In vitro effects of neuropeptide Y at the vascular neuroeffector junction

Neuropeptide Y as a risk factor for cardiorenal disease and cognitive dysfunction in CKD: translational opportunities and challenges

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino-acid peptide member of a family also including peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide, which are all ligands to Gi/Go coupled receptors. NPY regulates several fundamental biologic functions including appetite/satiety, sex and reproduction, learning and memory, cardiovascular and renal function and immune functions. The mesenteric circulation is a major source of NPY in the blood in man and this peptide is considered a key regulator of gut–brain cross talk. A progressive increase in circulating NPY accompanies the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) toward kidney failure and NPY robustly predicts cardiovascular events in this population. Furthermore, NPY is suspected as a possible player in accelerated cognitive function decline and dementia in patients with CKD and in dialysis patients. In theory, interfering with the NPY system has relevant potential for the treatment of diverse diseases from cardiovascular and renal diseases to diseases of the central nervous system. Pharmaceutical formulations for effective drug delivery and cost, as well as the complexity of diseases potentially addressable by NPY/NPY antagonists, have been a problem until now. This in part explains the slow progress of knowledge about the NPY system in the clinical arena. There is now renewed research interest in the NPY system in psychopharmacology and in pharmacology in general and new studies and a new breed of clinical trials may eventually bring the expected benefits in human health with drugs interfering with this system.

Simultaneous analysis of vascular norepinephrine and ATP release using an integrated microfluidic system

BACKGROUND

Sympathetic nerves are known to release three neurotransmitters: norepinephrine, ATP, and neuropeptide Y that play a role in controlling vascular tone. This paper focuses on the co-release of norepinephrine and ATP from the mesenteric arterial sympathetic nerves of the rat.

NEW METHOD

In this paper, a quantification technique is described that allows simultaneous detection of norepinephrine and ATP in a near-real-time fashion from the isolated perfused mesenteric arterial bed of the rat. Simultaneous detection is enabled with 3-D printing technology, which is shown to help integrate the perfusate with different detection methods (norepinephrine by microchip-based amperometery and ATP by on-line chemiluminescence).

RESULTS

Stimulated levels relative to basal levels of norepinephrine and ATP were found to be 363nM and 125nM, respectively (n=6). The limit of detection for norepinephrine is 80nM using microchip-based amperometric detection. The LOD for on-line ATP detection using chemiluminescence is 35nM.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

In previous studies, the co-transmitters have been separated and detected with HPLC techniques. With HPLC, the samples from biological preparations have to be derivatized for ATP detection and require collection time before analysis. Thus real-time measurements are not made and the delay in analysis by HPLC can cause degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the method described in the paper can be used to successfully detect norepinephrine and ATP simultaneously and in a near-real-time fashion.

Neuronal and non-neuronal modulation of sympathetic neurovascular transmission

Noradrenaline, neuropeptide Y and adenosine triphosphate are co-stored in, and co-released from, sympathetic nerves. Each transmitter modulates its own release as well as the release of one another; thus, anything affecting the release of one of these transmitters has consequences for all. Neurotransmission at the sympathetic neurovascular junction is also modulated by non-sympathetic mediators such as angiotensin II, serotonin, histamine, endothelin and prostaglandins through the activation of specific pre-junctional receptors. In addition, nitric oxide (NO) has been identified as a modulator of sympathetic neuronal activity, both as a physiological antagonist against the vasoconstrictor actions of the sympathetic neurotransmitters, and also by directly affecting transmitter release. Here, we review the modulation of sympathetic neurovascular transmission by neuronal and non-neuronal mediators with an emphasis on the actions of NO. The consequences for co-transmission are also discussed, particularly in light of hypertensive states where NO availability is diminished.

Splanchnic and systemic vasodilation: the experimental models

Experimental models are a sine qua non condition for unraveling the specific components and mechanisms contributing to vascular dysfunction and arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension. Moreover, a careful selection of the type of animal model, vascular bed, and methodology is crucial for any investigation of this issue. In this review, some critical aspects related to experimental models in portal hypertension and the techniques applied are highlighted. In addition, a detailed summary of the mechanisms of arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension is presented. First, humoral and endothelial vasodilators, predominantly nitric oxide but also carbon monoxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and others are discussed. Second, time course and potential stimuli triggering and/or perpetuating splanchnic vasodilation are delineated. Finally, a brief general overview of vascular smooth muscle signaling sets the stage for a discussion on cotransmission, receptor desensitization, and the observed impairment in vasoconstrictor-induced smooth muscle contraction in the splanchnic and systemic circulation during portal hypertension.

Neuropeptide Y Induced Attenuation of Catecholamine Synthesis in the Rat Mesenteric Arterial Bed

The effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on the basal and nerve stimulation-induced increase in norepinephrine synthesis was studied in the isolated and perfused mesenteric arterial bed of the rat. Tyrosine hydroxylation, the rate-limiting step in catecholamine (CA) biosynthesis, was assessed by measuring the accumulation of DOPA in the perfusate/superfusate overflow after perfusion of the mesenteric arterial bed with the decarboxylase inhibitor m-hydroxybenzyl hydralazine (NSD-1015). Treatment with NDS-1015 resulted in a time-dependent increase in DOPA production and nerve stimulation (8 Hz, supramaximal voltage, 2 ms duration) increased DOPA production even further. NPY 1 to 100 nM was observed to produce a concentration-dependent attenuation in both the basal and nerve stimulation-induced increase in DOPA formation. To come to an understanding of the NPY receptor subtype mediating the inhibition of CA synthesis, the rank order of potency of a series of NPY analogs with varying selectivity for NPY receptor subtypes including intestinal polypeptide (PYY), PYY 13-36, Leu36 Pro34 NPY, human pancreatic polypeptide (h-PP), and rat pancreatic polypeptide (r-PP) were determined. In addition, the effect of various selective NPY antagonists on the inhibitory effect of NPY was also examined. These included the Y1 antagonist BIB03304, the Y2 antagonist BIIE0246, and the Y5 antagonist CGP71683. The IC50's for NPY, PYY, PYY13-36, Leu31 Pro34 NPY, and hPP in inhibiting CA synthesis were 5, 7, 15, 30, and 33 nM respectively. rPP failed to inhibit CA synthesis. All 3 of the NPY antagonists produced attenuation of the NPY-induced inhibition of CA synthesis, but it took a combination of all 3 to completely block the effect of a maximal inhibitory concentration of NPY. These results demonstrate that NPY inhibits CA synthesis in the perfused mesenteric arterial bed and can do so by activation of a variety of receptors including the Y1, Y2, and Y5.

Effects of ACE inhibitor and beta-adrenergic blocker on plasma NPY and NPY receptors in aortic vascular smooth muscle cells from SHR and WKY rats

To investigate the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, peridopril, and the beta-adrenergic blocker, metoprolol, on plasma neuropeptide Y (NPY), and NPY receptors in aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), both strains of rats were fed with different doses of the drugs (peridopril or metoprolol) for 7 days to get the optimal dosages. After that, 18 male SHR and 18 male age-matched WKY rats were divided into three groups: control, peridopril (2mg/kg/day) and metoprolol (2mg/kg/day). After two months of treatment, VSMCs were isolated from the media layer of the aortic wall. Results showed that the SHRs had higher plasma concentrations and binding sites/affinity for NPY as compared to WKY rats. Peridopril dose-dependently decreased plasma NPY concentrations in WKY rats, and the absolute changes of plasma NPY were greater in SHRs than in WKY rats. Metoprolol showed none of these changes. Metoprolol decreased while peridopril increased NPY binding sites/affinity in SHRs. This indicated that lowered plasma NPY concentration and decreased NPY receptor in VSMCs, might play some roles in the anti-hypertensive mechanisms mediated by ACE inhibitor and beta-adrenergic blockers.

Heterogeneous control of blood flow amongst different vascular beds

The control and maintenance of vascular tone is due to a balance between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator pathways. Vasomotor responses to neural, metabolic and physical factors vary between vessels in different vascular beds, as well as along the same bed, particularly as vessels become smaller. These differences result from variation in the composition of neurotransmitters released by perivascular nerves, variation in the array and activation of receptor subtypes expressed in different vascular beds and variation in the signal transduction pathways activated in either the vascular smooth muscle or endothelial cells. As the study of vasomotor responses often requires pre-existing tone, some of the reported heterogeneity in the relative contributions of different vasodilator mechanisms may be compounded by different experimental conditions. Biochemical variations, such as the expression of ion channels, connexin subtypes and other important components of second messenger cascades, have been documented in the smooth muscle and endothelial cells in different parts of the body. Anatomical variations, in the presence and prevalence of gap junctions between smooth muscle cells, between endothelial cells and at myoendothelial gap junctions, between the two cell layers, have also been described. These factors will contribute further to the heterogeneity in local and conducted responses.

Central bombesin inhibits food intake and the orexigenic effect of neuropeptide Y in the neonatal chick

It is well known that central injection of bombesin (BN) suppresses feeding in mammalian and avian species, but the anorexigenic effect of central BN are still open with special reference to the chick. The dose response (0, 0.1 and 0.5 microg) of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of BN was examined in Experiment 1. ICV injection of BN inhibited food intake in a dose-dependent manner. Experiment 2 was done to determine whether BN interacts with the orexigenic effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the neonatal chick. Central administration of NPY (2.5 microg) greatly enhanced food intake, but co-injection of BN (0.5 microg) suppressed food intake. The dose response of NPY (2.5 microg) co-injected with three levels of BN (0, 0.1 and 0.5 microg) was examined in Experiment 3. ICV injection of BN attenuated the hyperphagia by NPY in a dose-related fashion. It is suggested that central BN may interact with NPY for the regulation of feeding in the neonatal chick.

Neuropeptide Y receptors involved in calcium channel regulation in PC12 cells

Our laboratory has previously used NGF-differentiated PC12 cells as a sympathetic neuronal model to investigate the effects of NPY on catecholamine synthesis and release. We have additionally used these cells to demonstrate the NPY-induced inhibition of Ca2+ channels which was suggested by those studies. In the present work, multiple NPY, PYY, and PP analogs are utilized to further define the receptor subtypes involved in this Ca2+ channel modulation. We find that in PC12 cells NPY and PP modulate Ca2+ channels through Y1, Y2, Y3, and Y4 receptors. In addition, we show that these receptors are differentially coupled to N, L, and non-N, non-L Ca2+ channel subtypes. The results of the present study in combination with our previous investigations demonstrate an intriguing and complex role for NPY and PP in the modulation of sympathetic neurotransmission.

Bioassays for NPY receptors: old and new

Classical pharmacology performed on isolated organ preparations is an essential tool for receptor characterization and classification. Basic pharmacological parameters (e.g. ED50, ID50, pD2, pA2 as measures of apparent affinities) obtained by relating the agent concentration with the biological effect are the final results of the various steps required for drug action and necessarily reflect the complex mechanisms of cell function. Results obtained with bioassays are therefore a useful and essential part in the assessment of endogenous systems, in the present case, the NPY family of peptides and their receptors. An attempt has been made, in the present review, to present a choice of isolated organs that may provide a starting point towards the construction of a solid classical pharmacology of receptors for NPY and congeners. Some of these organs appear to be 'monoreceptor systems' (e.g. the rabbit saphenous vein) whose response is contributed by a single receptor type, others (e.g. the rat colon) are 'multiple receptor systems' and their pharmacology is much too complex and requires the use of a variety of compounds from the naturally occuring peptides, to some selective agonists and when available, specific and selective antagonists. Such compounds have been utilised by us and other workers to detect specific biological responses to NPY and congeners in peripheral tissues: such responses have been quantified, carefully analysed in pharmacological terms and characterized as biological effects mediated by Y1 (the rabbit saphenous vein), Y2 (dog saphenous vein, rat vas deferens, rat colon), Y4 (rat colon) and Y5 (rabbit ileum) receptors. Compared to findings obtained with binding assays and molecular biology experiments, the results of the bioassays show very interesting similarities. Much remains however to be done in view of providing the classical pharmacological bases that are needed in the field of NPY.

Neuropeptide Y inhibition of calcium channels in PC-12 pheochromocytoma cells

We previously demonstrated, using rat PC-12 pheochromocytoma cells differentiated to a sympathetic neuronal phenotype with nerve growth factor (NGF), that neuropeptide Y (NPY) inhibits catecholamine synthesis as well as release. Inquiry into the mechanisms of these inhibitions implicated distinct pathways involving reduction of Ca2+ influx through voltage-activated Ca2+ channels. In the present investigation the effects of NPY on whole cell Ba2+ currents were examined to obtain direct evidence supporting the mechanisms suggested by those studies. NPY was found to inhibit the voltage-activated Ba2+ current in NGF-differentiated PC-12 cells in a reversible fashion with an EC50 of 13 nM. This inhibition was pertussis toxin sensitive and resulted from NPY modulation of L- and N-type Ca2+ channels. The inhibition of L-type channels was not seen with < 1 nM free intracellular Ca2+ or when protein kinase C (PKC) was inhibited by chelerythrine or PKC-(19-31). Furthermore, the effect of NPY on L-type channels was mimicked by the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. These studies demonstrate that, in addition to inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels, in NGF-differentiated PC-12 cells NPY inhibits L-type Ca2+ channels via an intracellular Ca(2+)- and PKC-dependent pathway.

Neuropeptides, Via Specific Receptors, Regulate T Cell Adhesion to Fibronectin

The ability of T cells to adhere to and interact with components of the blood vessel walls and the extracellular matrix is essential for their extravasation and migration into inflamed sites. We have found that the β1 integrin-mediated adhesion of resting human T cells to fibronectin, a major glycoprotein component of the extracellular matrix, is induced by physiologic concentrations of three neuropeptides: calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP), neuropeptide Y, and somatostatin; each acts via its own specific receptor on the T cell membrane. In contrast, substance P (SP), which coexists with CGRP in the majority of peripheral endings of sensory nerves, including those innervating the lymphoid organs, blocks T cell adhesion to fibronectin when induced by CGRP, neuropeptide Y, somatostatin, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, and PMA. Inhibition of T cell adhesion was obtained both by the intact SP peptide and by its 1–4 N-terminal and its 4–11, 5–11, and 6–11 C-terminal fragments, used at similar nanomolar concentrations. The inhibitory effects of the parent SP peptide and its fragments were abrogated by an SP NK-1 receptor antagonist, suggesting they all act through the same SP NK-1 receptor. These findings suggest that neuropeptides, by activating their specific T cell-expressed receptors, can provide the T cells with both positive (proadhesive) and negative (antiadhesive) signals and thereby regulate their function. Thus, neuropeptides may influence diverse physiologic processes involving integrins, including leukocyte-mediated migration and inflammation.

Direct evidence for the role of neuropeptide Y in sympathetic nerve stimulation-induced vasoconstriction

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a vasoconstrictor peptide and a cotransmitter with norepinephrine (NE) in sympathetic nerve terminals and is thought to be involved in sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS)-induced vasoconstriction. Using BIBP-3226, a Y1 receptor selective antagonist, we examined this hypothesis in the isolated and perfused mesenteric vascular bed. SNS produced a frequency-dependent increase in perfusion pressure and concomitant overflow of NPY immunoreactivity in the perfusate. [Leu31,Pro34]NPY potentiated NE-induced and ATP-induced vasoconstriction, indicating the presence and biological action of Y1 receptors in this vascular bed. The potentiation effect of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY of the increase in perfusion pressure by NE, ATP, or SNS was prevented by BIBP-3226. In addition, SNS-induced vasoconstriction at both high and low frequencies was significantly attenuated by BIBP-3226 at a concentration that completely blocked the [Leu31,Pro34]NPY-induced potentiation of the NE- or ATP-induced vasoconstrictor effect. These results suggest that approximately 30% of vasoconstriction produced by SNS depends on NPY in the mesenteric vascular bed.

Y-receptor subtypes--how many more?

The Y-receptors belong to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and mediate a wide variety of physiological effects, such as regulation of blood pressure, anxiety, memory retention, hormone release and food intake. Since the first human Y-receptor was cloned in 1992, the search for additional subtypes has been an area of intense study. Recently four new NPY-receptor subtypes have been isolated, revealing surprisingly limited sequence identity with values as low as 30%. Several reports indicate further heterogeneity of this receptor family, for example a peripheral Y2 receptor. However, since many studies have been carried out with different peptide analogs and radioligands in different species, there is substantial confusion regarding the pharmacological profile of the receptors. This may have led to an exaggeration of the potential number of discrete receptors.

Neuropeptide Y family of hormones: receptor subtypes and antagonists

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is the most abundant peptide present in the mammalian central and peripheral nervous system. NPY exhibits a variety of potent central and peripheral effects including those on feeding, memory, blood pressure, cardiac contractility and intestinal secretions. Classical pharmacological studies have shown that NPY effects are mediated by four different receptor subtypes, Y-1, Y-1-like, Y-2, and Y-3. However, the existence of numerous atypical activities provide strong evidence for the occurrence of additional NPY receptor subtypes. Pharmacological studies have further been facilitated by the recent cloning and expression of Y-1, Y-2, Y-4 (PP-1) and Y-5 receptors. Moreover, the cloned Y-5 receptor has been suggested to be the long awaited Y-1-like receptor involved in feeding. Structure-activity studies have laid a good foundation towards the development of receptor selective compounds, and to date potent Y-1 selective peptide and nonpeptide antagonists have been developed. The need to clone numerous receptor subtypes and to develop receptor selective compounds for physiological and perhaps clinical use is expected to keep NPY research active for many years to come.

Neuropeptide Y receptors from calf brain: effect of crude Conus venom preparations on [3H]NPY binding

NPY receptors are identified in calf frontal cortex and hippocampus membrane preparations by binding of N-[propionyl-3H] neuropeptide Y. Saturation and competition binding data with PYY, NPY-(18-36) and NPY itself fit with a single class of sites: for the radioligand KD = 1.4 +/- 0.5 nM, Bmax = 434 +/- 180 fmol/mg protein in frontal cortex, KD = 0.7 +/- 0.2 nM, Bmax = 267 +/- 50 fmol/mg protein in hippocampus. Competition curves of the Y1-subtype selective agonist [Leu31, Pro34]NPY are biphasic in both membrane preparations: high affinity sites (i.e. Y1-subtype) amount to 80% in frontal cortex and 23% in hippocampus. The remaining sites are of the Y2-subtype. Out of 23 Conus venom preparations, 17 inhibit the binding of [3H]NPY in both membrane preparations, but only two of them (from Conus aulicus and C. pennaceus) do so with high potency (IC50 < 5 micrograms protein/ml). Only one venom preparation (from C. mercator) had weak discriminatory properties (IC50Y2/IC50Y1 = 6). Venom from C. anemone increased the [3H]NPY binding 5-fold and with an IC50 of 15-18 micrograms protein/ml. This binding occurred to the venom itself and was unrelated to the NPY receptors since it was equally potent when displaced by [Leu31, Pro34]NPY, NPY-(18-36), PYY and NPY.

Subconstrictor doses of neuropeptide Y potentiate alpha 1-adrenergic venoconstriction in vivo

The 36-amino acid human neuropeptide Y is a vasoactive compound released after stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. In addition to its direct and long-lasting vasopressor effects, it may potentiate the constrictor action of catecholamines and other vasoconstrictors at doses that do not per se exert vascular effects. Using the hand vein compliance technique, we have previously shown that neuropeptide Y also constricts superficial hand veins and that its effects may last for several hours. In this study, we investigated the local effect of neuropeptide Y on alpha 1-adrenergic venoconstriction in nine healthy volunteers at dose rates that did not affect venous compliance. On separate days, cumulative dose-response curves to phenylephrine alone and with coadministration of 1 or 30 pmol neuropeptide Y per minute were constructed, and the responses were fitted to a four-parameter logistic equation. Neuropeptide Y dose dependently shifted the phenylephrine curves toward lower dose rates without affecting maximal effects. ED50 values for phenylephrine alone and with 1 or 30 pmol/min neuropeptide Y were 4.0, 4.9 (P = NS versus control), and 1.2 (P < .005) nmol/min, respectively. Comparison with neuropeptide Y dose-response curves revealed that the interaction was synergistic. These are the first data in humans to show that small dose rates of neuropeptide Y may potentiate alpha-adrenergic effects in vivo. Because this interaction occurs at estimated local concentrations nearly achieved in humans, these studies suggest that neuropeptide Y might modulate the filling of this capacitance system in vivo.

Localization and characterization of neuropeptide Y/peptide YY receptors in the brain of the smooth dogfish (Mustelis canis)

Multiple receptor subtypes specific for the neuropeptide Y (NPY)/peptide Y (PYY) family of peptides exist in mammals, but little is known about the distribution of this receptor family in other vertebrates. Saturable binding sites for 125I-labeled porcine PYY were localized in frozen sections of the brain of the smooth dogfish (Mustelis canis) by radioligand binding and autoradiography. Saturable 125I-porcine PYY binding sites were distributed widely in the cerebral hemispheres, optic lobes, hypothalamus, cerebellum and hindbrain. Binding was saturable, specific for PYY and related peptides, and of high affinity (Kd = 2.53 nM). The specificity of the binding site was analyzed by performing competitive inhibition experiments with nonradioactive PYY, NPY, and [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY and NPY13-36, synthetic peptide analogs specific for the mammalian Y1 and Y2 receptor subtypes, respectively. Saturable 125I-porcine PYY binding sites in all regions of the dogfish brain closely resembled the mammalian Y1 NPY receptor subtype in specificity for these substances. There was no evidence for expression of multiple receptor subtypes. We conclude that a single receptor specific for the NPY/PYY family of peptides is widely expressed in the smooth dogfish brain and that this receptor closely resembles the mammalian Y1 receptor subtype, suggesting that the Y1 receptor is the ancestral receptor in this family.

Neuropeptide Y is a vasoconstrictor and adrenergic modulator in the hamster microcirculation by acting on neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors

The microvascular effects of neuropeptide Y, and two analogs with preferential affinity for different neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes, were assessed by intravital microscopy on the hamster cheek pouch. The interaction of neuropeptide Y and its analogs with noradrenaline was also studied. Superfusion with 0.1-300 nM neuropeptide Y caused a concentration-dependent reduction in microvascular conductance that was paralleled by reductions in arteriolar and venular diameters. These effects of neuropeptide Y were equipotent with noradrenaline, but slower to develop and longer-lasting than that of noradrenaline. Neuropeptide Y did not affect permeability to macromolecules, as measured by extravasation of fluorescent dextran. The neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu31,Pro34]neuropeptide Y, mimicked neuropeptide Y with similar potency but shorter duration, while neuropeptide Y-(13-36), a neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor agonist, was at least 10-fold less potent than neuropeptide Y to induce a delayed and prolonged reduction in microvascular conductance. The joint superfusion of 1 nM neuropeptide Y plus 0.1 mu M noradrenaline did not cause synergism, nor even summation of effects, but reduced the contractile effect of noradrenaline. No synergism was observed after a 10 min priming with 1 nM neuropeptide Y, followed by its joint application with 0.1 mu M noradrenaline, but a significant vasodilation and hyperemia ensued upon stopping noradrenaline application. Priming with 1 nM [Leu31,Pro34]neuropeptide Y prolonged noradrenaline vasoconstriction without evidence of hyperemia. In contrast, priming with 1 nM neuropeptide Y-(13-36) significantly antagonized noradrenaline vasoconstriction. These findings indicate that both neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes are present in arterioles and venules of the hamster, and suggest that their activation with neuropeptide Y induces a rapid (Y1 receptor subtype activation) and a delayed (Y2 receptor subtype activation) vasocontractile response. The interaction with noradrenaline is complex, without evidence for synergism, but neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor activation seems to antagonize noradrenaline and/or to facilitate auto-regulatory vasodilation after the catecholamine-induced vasoconstriction.

Neuropeptide Y inhibits depolarization-stimulated catecholamine synthesis in rat pheochromocytoma cells

In PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells differentiated with nerve growth factor (NGF), neuropeptide Y inhibited depolarization-stimulated catecholamine synthesis as determined by in situ measurement of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) production in the presence of the decarboxylase inhibitor m-hydroxybenzylhydrazine (NSD-1015). The inhibition by neuropeptide Y was concentration-dependent and was prevented by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, suggesting the involvement of a GTP-binding protein of the Gi or Go subtype. The neuropeptide Y analog [Leu31,Pro34]neuropeptide Y also caused inhibition of DOPA production, but was less potent than neuropeptide Y itself, while peptide YY and neuropeptide Y-(13-36) had no significant effect. This pattern is most consistent with the involvement of the neuropeptide Y Y3 receptor subtype. In PC12 cells differentiated with dexamethasone, neuropeptide Y also caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of DOPA production, while peptide YY was again without effect. Neuropeptide Y had no effect on DOPA production in undifferentiated PC12 cells. These results indicate that neuropeptide Y can modulate catecholamine synthesis in addition to its modulatory effects on catecholamine release.

Neuropeptide Y in rat detrusor and its effect on nerve-mediated and acetylcholine-evoked contractions

1. Immunohistochemical and isolated organ bath techniques were used to detect the presence of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the rat urinary bladder and to determine its effect on tone, spontaneous activity and contractile responses of the detrusor muscle to electrical field stimulation, acetylcholine and alpha,beta-methylene ATP (alpha,beta-MeATP). 2. A very rich presence of NPY-immunoreactive nerve fibres was found mainly within the bundles of detrusor muscle cells. Chronic treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine did not affect the density of NPY-positive nerve fibres. 3. NPY (> 1 nM) enhanced the force and frequency of spontaneous contractions and generated a rise in the resting tone of the detrusor. These effects of NPY on the tone and the spontaneous activity remained unaffected by atropine (3 microM), indomethacin (10 microM) and aspirin (100 microM) but were abolished by Ca(2+)-withdrawal from the bathing medium. 4. The enhancing effects of NPY on the spontaneous contractions and the resting tone were not prevented by the induction of purinoceptor desensitization. 5. NPY (1-250 nM) potentiated electrical field stimulation (EFS, 1-64 Hz, 0.1 ms pulses duration, 10s train duration)-evoked, tetrodotoxin (0.5 microM)-sensitive contractions. The atropine (3 microM)-resistant component of EFS-evoked contractions was also potentiated by NPY. By contrast, the nifedipine (1 microM)-resistant but atropine-sensitive component of EFS-evoked contraction was inhibited by NPY. 6. NPY (250 nM) did not affect acetylcholine-evoked contractions, but potentiated alpha,beta-MeATP-evoked contractions. 7. It is concluded that NPY-innervation of rat urinary bladder is largely confined to the detrusor muscle and is abundant and mainly non-adrenergic. It is further concluded that the enhancing effect of NPY on detrusor spontaneous activity and tone is caused by Ca2+ influx through nifedipine-sensitive Ca2+ channels and is not mediated through acetylcholine or cyclo-oxygenase-sensitive eicosanoids or ATP.8. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that intrinsic NPY in the rat detrusor innervation contributes to the motor transmission in two ways: by promoting non-cholinergic motor transmission and by inhibiting prejunctionally the cholinergic transmission.

The renal nerves in the newborn rat

Immunocytochemical methods were used to investigate the distribution of afferent [calcitonin gene-related peptide-(CGRP) immunoreactive and substance P-immunoreactive] nerves and efferent (neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive and dopamine beta-hydroxylase-immunoreactive) nerves in the kidneys of rats within the 1st day of life. The newborn rat kidney possesses an afferent and efferent innervation. Both afferent and efferent nerves reach the kidney in the same bundles. The afferent sensory fibers predominate overwhelmingly in the renal pelvis and ureter while the efferent fibers clearly predominate in the vasculature. The corticomedullary connective tissue contains both types of innervation with a more prominent afferent innervation (CGRP immunoreactive). Only afferent arterioles of perihilar nephrons were innervated by efferent sympathetic fibers. The distribution and extent of afferent and efferent innervation is consistent with the renal nerves playing a significant role in the transition from fetal to newborn life. The close proximity between afferent and efferent fibers suggests a possible interaction between the two systems.

Multiple neuropeptide Y receptors are involved in cardiovascular regulation. Peripheral and central mechanisms

1. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) occurs in both the central and peripheral nervous system. In the periphery, NPY coexists with noradrenaline (NA) in perivascular sympathetic fibers. 2. NPY has a vasopressor effect, reflecting direct vasoconstriction of blood vessels and potentiation of the NA-evoked response. NPY also suppresses the release of NA from sympathetic fibers. 3. The post- and pre-junctional NPY receptors are referred to as Y1 and Y2, respectively. They recognize not only NPY but also the homologous gut hormone peptide YY (PYY). 4. The Y1 and Y2 receptors have been characterized in numerous test systems using analogs of NPY/PYY. Already the deletion of the first N-terminal amino acid (NPY 2-36) results in a marked loss of potency at the Y1 receptor. The Y2 receptor is much less dependent upon an intact N-terminus, and a wide range of C-terminal NPY fragments retain quite high potency. 5. Recently, yet another NPY receptor, Y3, that is distinct from Y1 and Y2 in that it recognizes PYY poorly, has been demonstrated in the brainstem and in the periphery. 6. Further attempts to characterize the various receptor types have relied on truncated and substituted analogs of NPY/PYY. Although such studies suggest the existence of at least three types of NPY receptors, the lack of antagonists has represented a problem. 7. Since NPY may regulate cardiovascular functions via peripheral and central receptors its physiological and possibly pathophysiological significance has attracted much attention. 8. The responsiveness to NPY seems to be altered in animal models of hypertension and elevated plasma levels of NPY have been found in patients under various conditions of stress and in primary hypertension. A number of studies have suggested that NPY may be a pathogenetic factor behind primary hypertension. 9. Antagonists for the various NPY receptors would be useful for an analysis of which effects of these peptides are physiologically relevant. It is tempting to predict that both agonists and antagonists of the NPY receptors could be useful as drugs, for instance, in the treatment of primary hypertension.

An immunohistochemical study of neuropeptide Y positive sites in the developing human hippocampal formation

Neuropeptide Y (NPY)-positive sites were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in the hippocampal formation of human fetuses aged from 15 to 41 weeks of gestation. Immunopositive cells and fibers were identified in the hippocampus as early as 15 weeks of gestation. These cells were localized in the polymorphic and pyramidal layers and their numbers increased with the age of the fetuses. NPY-positive cells were observed to be closely apposed to blood vessels and some NPY fibers, present mainly in the polymorphic layer, would infiltrate the alveus.

Unmasking the vasoconstrictor response to neuropeptide Y and its interaction with vasodilating agents in vitro

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a powerful vasoconstrictor in vivo but is usually much less active on isolated blood vessels. The contractile effect of NPY was examined in the isolated rat femoral artery exposed to various degrees of vasoconstriction. The effects of NPY on the relaxation induced by vasodilator agents was also studied. NPY (< or = 1 microM) had no contractile effect. In vessels pretreated with a low concentration of phenylephrine (0.3-1.0 microM), NPY evoked a concentration-dependent contraction, which was similar in intact and in endothelium-deprived vessels. Other vessels were contracted with phenylephrine (3-10 microM) and relaxed with histamine (0.1 mM). Subsequent addition of NPY elicited a contraction which was much greater than that observed in vessels pretreated with phenylephrine only. The Y1 receptor agonist, [Pro34]NPY, but not the Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, evoked a concentration-dependent contraction in phenylephrine-pretreated vessels. Acetylcholine (ACh) induced endothelium-dependent relaxation in vessels contracted with phenylephrine. NPY (0.1 microM) induced a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve and a lower maximum relaxation in response to ACh. NPY was without effect on the dilatation evoked by nitroprusside, histamine or forskolin. In conclusion, under appropriate vasoconstrictor and vasodilator influence, NPY can act at Y1 receptors to evoke vasoconstriction in the femoral artery via endothelium-independent mechanisms. In addition, NPY seems to attenuate the endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by ACh. These actions of NPY may contribute to explain the strong vascular effects of the peptide in vivo.

Neuropeptide Y 16-36 inhibits mucociliary activity but does not affect blood flow in the rabbit maxillary sinus in vivo

Recent investigations have shown neuropeptide Y (NPY) to be present in the rabbit maxillary sinus, and NPY is known to be released upon sympathetic nerve stimulation. To study, in vivo, the effect on mucociliary activity and blood flow, NPY 1-36 and some of its analogues were injected intra-arterially. The effects of the Y1/Y2 agonist NPY 1-36 was compared with the ones of the Y2 agonist NPY 16-36, the Y1-agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and the Y1/Y2 agonist peptide YY. Mucociliary response was recorded photoelectrically and expressed as a percentage of the basal mucociliary activity immediately prior to challenge. The effect on blood flow was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry and expressed as a percentage of the mean blood flow during the 60 s preceding challenge. NPY 1-36 and NPY 16-36 both reduced mucociliary activity dose-dependently at equimolar dosages (0.024-1.2 nmol/kg). The greatest effect was seen after the highest dosage tested. NPY 1-36 reduced mucociliary activity by 14.6 +/- 1.8%, and NPY 16-36 by 13.2 +/- 1.4%. At the highest dosage tested the Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY did not significantly reduce mucociliary activity, whereas PYY reduced mucociliary activity by 15.0 +/- 1.8%. Injections of NPY 16-36 had no effect on blood flow whereas NPY 1-36, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and PYY all reduced blood flow dose-dependently. Maximal decrease was seen at the highest dosage tested and was 47.1 +/- 5.4%, 70.4 +/- 7.4% and 58.2 +/- 8.4%, respectively. These findings suggest the mucociliary effects to be mediated via Y2 receptors whereas blood flow is regulated via Y1 receptors.

Analysis of neuropeptide Y-induced feeding: dissociation of Y1 and Y2 receptor effects on natural meal patterns

To differentiate NPY receptor subtypes, Y1 and Y2, in terms of their impact on feeding behavior, the intact molecule NPY(1-36) and the 3 fragments, NPY(2-36), the Y1 agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, and the Y2 agonist NPY(13-36), were injected (100 pmol/0.3 microliters) into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of freely feeding rats. A computer-automated data acquisition system was employed in these experiments to permit a detailed analysis of feeding over the 12-h nocturnal cycle, in animals maintained on pure macronutrient diets. The results demonstrate that: 1) NPY(1-36) potentiates feeding behavior, primarily carbohydrate ingestion, by increasing the size and duration of the first meal after injection, rather than by affecting meal number of feeding rate, suggesting that NPY acts through mechanisms of satiety. The potentiation of carbohydrate intake occurs in association with a suppression of protein intake, which is strongest during the second meal after injection and which further increases the proportion of carbohydrate in the diet. No changes in fat ingestion are seen. 2) NPY(2-36), with the N-terminal tyrosine residue deleted, is equally potent to NPY(1-36) in potentiating carbohydrate intake and increasing meal size; however, it is less selective than NPY(1-36), producing an additional, smaller increase in consumption of protein. 3) The stimulatory effect of these peptides on carbohydrate intake and meal size is similarly observed, with somewhat reduced potency, after PVN injection of the selective Y1 agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY which, like NPY(1-36), also reduces protein intake. 4) The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY(13-36), causes a decrease in the ingestion of carbohydrate, a smaller decline in protein intake, and a reduction in meal size. It is proposed that hypothalamic Y1 receptors mediate the stimulatory effect of NPY on carbohydrate intake and meal size, while Y2 receptors have the opposite effect of suppressing carbohydrate intake, possibly by altering presynaptic release of monoamines known to influence nutrient ingestion.