Effects of Changes in Number of Medications and Drug Burden Index Exposure on Transitions Between Frailty States and Death: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project Cohort Study

Associations among frailty conditions and pain indicators: Data from 22 356 European older adults

AIM

Recent studies supported the presence of a relationship between pain and frailty, but more research is needed to highlight the pain-frailty association. The study aimed to investigate the prevalence and the influence of different pain indicators on frailty while controlling for age, sex and country.

METHODS

This observational study used data from the sixth wave of the SHARE survey. A sample of 22 356 community-dwelling individuals aged >60 years from six European countries (Spain, Estonia, France, Greece, Czech Republic and Sweden) was analyzed. The pain was measured through assessment of medication used for joint pain or other types of pain, pain location, polypharmacy and pain level. Frailty was assessed with the modified Fried Frailty phenotype.

RESULTS

Pain indicators, especially widespread pain and pain severity, were significantly associated with prefrailty (odds ratio 3.30, 95% CI 2.40, 4.55; and odds ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.51, 0.72) and frailty status (odds ratio 4.69, 95% CI 3.31, 6.67; and odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.30, 0.44). Advancing age and female sex consistently correlated with increased prefrailty (odds ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.05, 1.07; and odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.22, 1.53) and frailty risk (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 1.10, 1.12; and odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.48, 1.96). Country-specific differences emerged, with Spaniards showing higher odds ratios of prefrailty and frailty compared with Swedish, French and Czech individuals, whereas Greeks showed elevated odds ratios compared with Spaniards. The factors associated jointly explained 27.5% of the variance in frailty categories.

CONCLUSION

Significant associations were identified, particularly with widespread pain and pain severity, highlighting their impact on frailty. Country-specific variations in frailty prevalence were observed, alongside consistent associations with advancing age and female sex. These findings provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between pain and frailty, offering the potential for targeted interventions in older adults' care through tailored pain management strategies. Geriatr Gerontol Int ••; ••: ••-••. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

The Australian Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (AusTAPER) hospital study: effect of a collaborative medication review on the number of current regular medicines for older hospital inpatients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Potentially harmful polypharmacy is a growing public health concern. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (AusTAPER) framework.

METHODS

We recruited patients at metropolitan hospitals for a randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up. The intervention included a comprehensive medicines history, multidisciplinary meeting and medicines review prior to discharge, with engagement with the participants' general practitioner extending after discharge. The primary outcome was the change in the number of regular medicines used at 12 months from baseline. A cost consequence was performed to estimate costs per participant during the study period.

RESULTS

There were 98 participants enrolled in the study. The number of regular medicines was significantly reduced from baseline in both groups (-1.7 ± 4.3, t = 2.38, P = 0.02 in the control group vs -2.7 ± 3.6, t = 4.48, P = 0.0001 in the intervention group), although there was no statistical difference detected between the two groups (1.0 (SE 0.9), t = 1.03, P = 0.31). The intervention was estimated to cost AU$644.17 and was associated with cost savings of AU$552.53 per participant in sustained reduced medicines cost. Health outcomes and healthcare costs were similar in both groups.

DISCUSSION

Medicines were significantly reduced in both groups, with a trend to a larger reduction in medicines at 12 months in the intervention group. The intervention cost was approximately offset by sustained reduced medicines cost, although these results should be regarded cautiously because of the absence of significance in the differences in outcomes between groups.

Treatment of chronic kidney disease in older populations

As the world population ages, an expected increase in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among older individuals will pose a considerable challenge for health care systems in terms of resource allocation for disease management. Treatment strategies for older patients with CKD should ideally align with those applied to the general population, focusing on minimizing cardiovascular events and reducing the risk of progression to kidney failure. Emerging therapies, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, hold promise for the effective management of CKD in older individuals. In addition, non-pharmacological interventions such as nutritional and exercise therapies have a crucial role. These interventions enhance the effects of pharmacotherapy and, importantly, contribute to the maintenance of cognitive function and overall quality of life. Various factors beyond age and cognitive function must be taken into account when considering kidney replacement therapy for patients with kidney failure. Importantly, all treatment options, including dialysis, transplantation and conservative management approaches, should be tailored to the individual through patient-centred decision-making. The dynamic integration of digital technologies into medical practice has the potential to transform the management of CKD in the aging population.

Effect modification of polypharmacy on incident frailty by chronic kidney disease in older adults

BACKGROUND

Frailty and polypharmacy are common conditions in older adults, especially in those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we analyzed the association of polypharmacy and incident frailty and the effect modification by CKD in very old adults.

METHODS

In non-frail individuals within the Berlin Initiative (cohort) Study, polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications) was assessed according to multiple definitions based on the number of regular and on demand prescription and over the counter drugs, as well as vitamins and supplements. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and/or an albumin-creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g. Incident frailty was assessed at follow-up using Fried criteria. Logistic regression was applied to assess (1) the association of different polypharmacy definitions with incident frailty and (2) effect modification by CKD.

RESULTS

In this cohort study, out of 757 non-frail participants (mean age 82.9 years, 52% female, 74% CKD), 298 (39%) participants reported polypharmacy. Over the observation period of 2.1 years, 105 became frail. Individuals with polypharmacy had 1.96 adjusted odds (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-3.19) of becoming frail compared to participants without polypharmacy. The effect of polypharmacy on incident frailty was modified by CKD on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction: 1.56; 95% CI 0.01-3.12).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates an association of polypharmacy and incident frailty and suggests strong evidence for an effect modification of CKD on polypharmacy and incident frailty. Revision of prescriptions could be a target strategy to prevent frailty occurrence, especially in older adults with CKD.

The association between anticholinergic/sedative burden and physical frailty in people aging with HIV

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the strength of the association between anticholinergic/sedative burden and concurrent physical frailty in people aging with HIV.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional analysis examined baseline data from 824 adults with a mean age of 53 enrolled in the Positive Brain Health Now study.

METHODS

Anticholinergic medications were identified using four methods: Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) Scale, Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), and the anticholinergic list of the Anticholinergic and Sedative Burden Catalog (ACSBC). Sedatives were identified using the Sedative Load Model (SLM) and the sedative list of the ACSBC. Physical frailty was assessed using a modified Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) based on self-report items. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, lifestyle considerations, HIV-related variables, comorbidities, and co-medication use, were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Anticholinergic burden demonstrated associations with frailty across various methods: total anticholinergic burden (OR range: 1.22-1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) range: 1.03-1.66), sedative burden (OR range: 1.18-1.24; 95% CI range: 1.02-1.45), high anticholinergic burden (OR range: 2.12-2.74; 95% CI range: 1.03-6.19), and high sedative burden (OR range: 1.94-2.18; 95% CI: 1.01-4.34).

CONCLUSION

The anticholinergic and sedative burdens may represent modifiable risk factors for frailty in people aging with HIV. Future studies should evaluate the effects of reducing anticholinergic and sedative burdens on frailty outcomes and explore the prognostic value of diverse scoring methods.

Moving towards the detection of frailty with biomarkers: A population health study

Aging adults experience increased health vulnerability and compromised abilities to cope with stressors, which are the clinical manifestations of frailty. Frailty is complex, and efforts to identify biomarkers to detect frailty and pre-frailty in the clinical setting are rarely reproduced across cohorts. We developed a predictive model incorporating biological and clinical frailty measures to identify robust biomarkers across data sets. Data were from two large cohorts of older adults: "Invecchiare in Chianti (Aging in Chianti, InCHIANTI Study") (n = 1453) from two small towns in Tuscany, Italy, and replicated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) (n = 6508) from four U.S. communities. A complex systems approach to biomarker selection with a tree-boosting machine learning (ML) technique for supervised learning analysis was used to examine biomarker population differences across both datasets. Our approach compared predictors with robust, pre-frail, and frail participants and examined the ability to detect frailty status by race. Unique biomarker features identified in the InCHIANTI study allowed us to predict frailty with a model accuracy of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.80). Replication models in ARIC maintained a model accuracy of 0.64 (95% CI 0.66-0.72). Frail and pre-frail Black participant models maintained a lower model accuracy. The predictive panel of biomarkers identified in this study may improve the ability to detect frailty as a complex aging syndrome in the clinical setting. We propose several concrete next steps to keep research moving toward detecting frailty with biomarker-based detection methods.

Association of the Drug Burden Index (DBI) exposure with outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Drug Burden Index (DBI) measures an individual's total exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications. This systematic review aimed to investigate the association of the DBI with clinical and prescribing outcomes in observational pharmaco-epidemiological studies, and the effect of DBI exposure on functional outcomes in pre-clinical models.

METHODS

A systematic search of nine electronic databases, citation indexes and gray literature was performed (April 1, 2007-December 31, 2022). Studies that reported primary data on the association of the DBI with clinical or prescribing outcomes conducted in any setting in humans aged ≥18 years or animals were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools and the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Of 2382 studies screened, 70 met the inclusion criteria (65 in humans, five in animals). In humans, outcomes reported included function (n = 56), cognition (n = 20), falls (n = 14), frailty (n = 7), mortality (n = 9), quality of life (n = 8), hospitalization (n = 7), length of stay (n = 5), readmission (n = 1), other clinical outcomes (n = 15) and prescribing outcomes (n = 2). A higher DBI was significantly associated with increased falls (11/14, 71%), poorer function (31/56, 55%), and cognition (11/20, 55%) related outcomes. Narrative synthesis was used due to significant heterogeneity in the study population, setting, study type, definition of DBI, and outcome measures. Results could not be pooled due to heterogeneity. In animals, outcomes reported included function (n = 18), frailty (n = 2), and mortality (n = 1). In pre-clinical studies, a higher DBI caused poorer function and frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher DBI may be associated with an increased risk of falls and decreased function and cognition. Higher DBI was inconsistently associated with increased mortality, length of stay, frailty, hospitalization or reduced quality of life. Human observational findings with respect to functional outcomes are supported by preclinical interventional studies. The DBI may be used as a tool to identify older adults at higher risk of harm.

The Prognostic Utility of Anticholinergic Burden Scales: An Integrative Review and Gap Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic drugs are commonly prescribed, especially to older adults. Anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) have been used to evaluate the cumulative effects of multiple anticholinergics. However, studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the association between anticholinergic burden assessed with ABS and adverse clinical outcomes such as cognitive impairment, functional decline, and frailty. This review aims to identify gaps in research on the development, validation, and evaluation of ABS, and provide recommendations for future studies.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, CENTRAL) was conducted for relevant studies published from inception until 25 May 2023. Two reviewers screened for eligibility and assessed the quality of studies using different tools based on the study design and stage of the review framework. Research evidence was evaluated, and gaps were identified and grouped into evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps, using evidence tables to summarize data.

RESULTS

Several evidence, knowledge, and methodological gaps in existing development, validation, and evaluation studies of ABS were identified. There is no universally accepted scale, and there is a need to define a clinically relevant threshold for measuring total anticholinergic burden. The current evidence has limitations, underrepresenting low- and middle-income countries, younger individuals, and populations with cognitive disabilities. The impact of anticholinergic burden on frailty is also understudied. Existing evaluation studies provide limited evidence on the benefit of reducing anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes or the safety of anticholinergic deprescribing. There is also uncertainty regarding optimal reduction, clinically significant anticholinergic burden thresholds, and cost effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research recommendations to bridge knowledge gaps include developing a risk assessment framework, refining ABS scales, establishing a standardized consensus scale, and creating a longitudinal measure of cumulative anticholinergic risk. Strategies to minimize bias, consider frailty, and promote multidisciplinary and multinational collaborations are also necessary to improve patient outcomes.

Number of medications and polypharmacy are associated with frailty in older adults: results from the Midlife in the United States study

Objectives

The current study aimed to examine the association between the number of medications, polypharmacy, and frailty in community-dwelling older adults. In addition, the cutoff score for the number of medications related with frailty in this sample was determined.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data of 328 individual aged between 65 and 85 years from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 2): Biomarker Project, 2004-2009, a multisite longitudinal study, for 328 individuals aged between 65 and 85 years. All the participants were categorized into two groups based on the number of medications used: no polypharmacy (n = 206) and polypharmacy (n = 122). The polypharmacy was defined as having 5 or more medication per day. Frailty status was measured using a modified form of Fried frailty phenotype through the presences of the following indicators include low physical activity; exhaustion; weight loss; slow gait speed and muscle weakness. Participants were categorized into three different groups based on total score: 0 as robust, 1 to 2 as prefrail, 3 or more as frail. The relationship between no. of medications, polypharmacy, and frailty was examined using a multinomial logistic regression model. The model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and no. of chronic conditions. Receiver operator characteristics and area under the curve were used to determine the cutoff number of medications.

Results

Number of medications, and polypharmacy were associated with being frail (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.12, 1.50], p = 0.001), (RRR: 4.77; 95% CI [1.69, 13.4], p = 0.003), respectively. Number of medications with cutoff 6 medication or more was associated with being in frail category with sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 73%.

Conclusion

Polypharmacy was shown to be significantly related to frailty. A cutoff score of 6 or more medications distinguished frail from non-frail. Addressing polypharmacy in the older population might ameliorate the impact of physical frailty.

Identification of Prescribing Patterns in Hemodialysis Outpatients Taking Multiple Medications

We investigated the relationship between multidrug administration and the characteristics, pathophysiology, and drug class in outpatients with hemodialysis. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Saitama Medical University Hospital in October 2018. Multidrug administration was defined as receiving either more than six drugs or more than the median number of drugs. The drugs used were represented by their anatomical classification codes in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry Classification System (ATC classification). A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify clusters at risk of receiving multiple medications. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to select ATC classifications prone to being involved in multidrug administration. As of October 2018, 98 outpatients with hemodialysis were enrolled in the study. In the LCA, when diabetes was the main primary disease, oral hypoglycemic agents available to dialysis patients were limited, but the number of drugs administered was large. Old age, poor nourishment, a long history of dialysis, and chronic nephritis were associated with multidrug administration among nondiabetic patients. In the second level of the ATC classification, the drugs frequently used were coded A02 (drugs for acid-related disorders), A07 (antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents), B01 (antithrombotic agents), and N05 (psycholeptics). The prescribing patterns for either diabetic patients or nondiabetic elderly patients were identified in outpatients with hemodialysis taking multiple medications, and drugs for acid-related disorders, antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents, antithrombotic agents, and psycholeptics are frequently used in those patients.

Risk factors predictive of adverse drug events and drug-related falls in aged care residents: secondary analysis from the ReMInDAR trial

BACKGROUND

Residents of aged-care facilities have high rates of adverse drug events. This study aimed to identify risk factors for adverse drug events in aged-care residents.

METHOD

This was a secondary study using data from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Data from 224 residents for whom there was 6 months of baseline information were analysed. We assessed the risk of adverse drug events and falls (post hoc) in the subsequent 6 months. Adverse events were identified via a key word search of the resident care record and adjudicated by a multidisciplinary panel using a modified version of the Naranjo criteria. Covariates identified through univariable logistic regression, including age, sex, medicines, physical activity, cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), previous adverse events and health service use were included in multivariable models.

RESULTS

Overall, 224 residents were included, with a mean age of 86 years; 70% were female. 107 (48%) residents had an adverse drug event during the 6-month follow-up. Falls and bleeding were experienced by 73 (33%) and 28 (13%) residents, respectively. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.10), weight (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002-1.04), previous fall (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.34-4.98) and sedative or hypnotic medicine use (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.52-2.60) were associated with increased risk of adverse drug events. Increased cognition (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95) was protective. Risk factors for falls were previous fall (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.68-6.35) and sedative or hypnotic medicines (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.14-8.16). Increased cognition (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.95) was protective.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest residents with a previous fall, reduced cognition, and prescription of sedative or hypnotic medicines were at higher risk of adverse drug events and should be considered for proactive prevention.

Predictors of Maintained Transitions Between Robustness and Prefrailty in Community-Dwelling Older Spaniards

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore predictors of sustained transitions (those that are maintained for an extra follow-up) between robustness and prefrailty in both directions.

DESIGN

Longitudinal population-based cohort.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling Spaniards 65 years or older from the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing.

METHODS

The Fried's frailty phenotype was measured over 3 waves (2006-2009, 2011-2013, and 2014-2017). Multiple logistic regressions compared individuals following the pattern robust-prefrail-prefrail with those who remained robust across waves, and those following the pattern prefrail-robust-robust with those who remained prefrail, for sociodemographic, clinical, life-habits, dependency for activities of daily living, upper and lower extremities' strength variables. The Fried's items of those who remained prefrail and those who became robust were compared.

RESULTS

Mean age was 72.3 years (95% CI: 71.8-72.8) and 57.9% (52.7%-63.0%) were women. After multivariate adjustment, predictors (apart from age) of the sustained transition robustness-prefrailty were as follows: number of drugs taken (odds ratio: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.14-1.65), not declaring the amount of alcohol consumed (8.32; 1.78-38.88), and grip strength (0.92 per kg; 0.86-0.99). Predictors of the sustained transition prefrailty-robustness were as follows: drinking alcohol (0.2; 0.05-0.83), uricemia (0.67; 0.49-0.93), number of chair stands in 30 seconds (1.14; 1.01-1.28), and grip strength (1.12; 1.05-1.2). Low grip strength was associated with a lower probability of regaining robustness.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Prediction of sustained transitions between the first stages of frailty development can be achieved with a reduced number of variables and noting whether the Fried's item leading to a diagnosis of prefrailty is low grip strength. Our results suggest the need to intensify interventions on deprescription, quitting alcohol, and strengthening of upper and lower limbs.

The identification and prediction of frailty based on Bayesian network analysis in a community-dwelling older population

Background

We have witnessed frailty, which characterized by a decline in physiological reserves, become a major public health issue in older adults. Understanding the influential factors associated with frailty may help prevent or if possible reverse frailty. The present study aimed to investigate factors associated with frailty status and frailty transition in a community-dwelling older population.

Methods

A prospective cohort study on community-dwelling subjects aged ≥ 60 years was conducted, which was registered beforehand (ChiCTR 2,000,032,949). Participants who had completed two visits during 2020–2021 were included. Frailty status was evaluated using the Fried frailty phenotype. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied for variable selection. Bayesian network analysis with the max-min hill-climbing (MMHC) algorithm was used to identify factors related to frailty status and frailty transition.

Results

Of 1,981 subjects at baseline, 1,040 (52.5%) and 165 (8.33%) were classified as prefrailty and frailty. After one year, improved, stable, and worsening frailty status was observed in 460 (35.6%), 526 (40.7%), and 306 (23.7%) subjects, respectively. Based on the variables screened by LASSO regression, the Bayesian network structure suggested that age, nutritional status, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), balance capacity, and social support were directly related to frailty status. The probability of developing frailty is 14.4% in an individual aged ≥ 71 years, which increases to 20.2% and 53.2% if the individual has balance impairment alone, or combined with IADL disability and malnutrition. At a longitudinal level, ADL/IADL decline was a direct predictor of worsening in frailty state, which further increased the risk of hospitalization. Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels were related to malnutrition, and further had impacts on ADL/IADL decline, and ultimately led to the worsening of the frailty state. Knowing the status of any one or more of these factors can be used to infer the risk of frailty based on conditional probabilities.

Conclusion

Older age, malnutrition, IADL disability, and balance impairment are important factors for identifying frailty. Malnutrition and ADL/IADL decline further predict worsening of the frailty state.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03520-7.

A novel set of volatile urinary biomarkers for late-life major depressive and anxiety disorders upon the progression of frailty: a pilot study

Mood and anxiety disorders are frequent in the elderly and increase the risk of frailty. This study aimed to identify novel biomarkers of major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety in the elderly. We examined 639 participants in the community-dwelling Otassha Study (518 individuals considered healthy control, 77 with depression, anxiety, etc.), mean age 75 years, 58.4% of female. After exclusion criteria, we analyzed VOCs from 18 individuals (9 healthy control, 9 of MDD/agoraphobia case). Urinary volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were profiled using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Six urinary VOCs differed in the absolute area of the base peak between participants with MDD and/or agoraphobia and controls. High area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were found for phenethyl isothiocyanate (AUC: 0.86, p = 0.009), hexanoic acid (AUC: 0.85, p = 0.012), texanol (AUC: 0.99, p = 0.0005), and texanol isomer (AUC: 0.89, p = 0.005). The combined indices of dimethyl sulfone, phenethyl isothiocyanate, and hexanoic acid, and texanol and texanol isomer showed AUCs of 0.91 (p = 0.003) and 0.99 (p = 0.0005) and correlated with the GRID-HAMD and the Kihon Checklist (CL score), respectively. These VOCs may be valuable biomarkers for evaluating MDD and/or agoraphobia in the elderly.

Safety of Mexidol® (ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate) in adult patients of different age groups

To reduce the risk of developing adverse events (AEs) and increase the adherence of elderly patients to treatment, it is recommended to limit maximally the total number of prescribed drugs (DR), using one drug for the treatment of two or more pathologies if possible. The drugs that meet the criteria for use in elderly patients and / or patients with comorbidity include the original Russian drug Mexidol® (ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate), which has a multimodal mechanism of action and has multiple pharmacological effects. In order to study the safety of Mexidol in comparison with placebo in different age groups of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia, a post hoc analysis of the international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MEMO study with an adaptive design was carried out, which assessed the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with Mexidol®, a solution for intravenous and intramuscular injection, 50 mg/ml (NPK PHARMASOFT, Russia) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 film-coated tablets, 250 mg (NPK PHARMASOFT, Russia) in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia. The study involved 318 patients aged from 40 to 90 years.

Comparable safety and tolerability of Mexidol was demonstrated in middle-aged and elderly people with chronic cerebral ischemia, including patients over 75 years of age. 

Does polypharmacy shape dependency transitions in the very old? Findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study

BACKGROUND

helping older people to maintain their independence, and identifying risk factors that compromise this, is of high importance. Polypharmacy is common in the very old (aged ≥ 85) but whether it can shape transitions in dependency in this fastest growing subpopulation is unclear.

METHODS

using Newcastle 85+ Study data and multi-state modelling, we investigated the association between each additional medication prescribed and the progression of and recovery from dependency states, over 10 years (age 85-95). Participants were defined as either free from care (independent), requiring care less often than daily (low dependency), or requiring care at regular intervals each day or 24 hourly (medium/high dependency).

RESULTS

each additional medication prescribed was associated with a 10% decreased chance of recovery from low dependence to independence (hazard ratio (HR): 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.99).

DISCUSSION

when a relatively able person visits the GP or clinical pharmacist, careful consideration should be given to whether the potential benefits from adding a new medication outweigh the risk to reduced recovery of independence.

The cross-sectional association of frailty with chronic past and current use of benzodiazepine drugs

BACKGROUND

Frailty, a clinical syndrome characterized by vulnerability to stressors resulting from multisystemic loss of physiological reserve. The use of benzodiazepines in older adults has been associated with confusion, sedation, and cognitive impairment, which in turn may lead to frailty.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the cross-sectional association between frailty and chronic past or current use of benzodiazepine drugs among older US Veterans.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling older Veterans who had determinations of frailty. Benzodiazepine prescription data were obtained via EHR. A 31-item VA Frailty Index (VA-FI) was generated at the time of the assessment. We categorized Veterans into robust (FI ≤ 0.10), pre-frail (FI 0.10-0.21), and Frail (FI ≥ 0.21). After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, we calculated ORs and 95% CIs using a binomial logistic regression (BLR) model to assess the cross-sectional association between benzodiazepine use and frailty.

RESULTS

Population sample consisted of 17,423 Veterans, mean age 75.53 (SD = 8.03) years, 70.80% Caucasian, 97.34% male, 14,545 (83.50%) patients were non-users of benzodiazepine drugs, 2408 (13.80%) had a past use, and 470 (2.70%) were current users. In BLR, individuals with past (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.30-2.74, p < .001) or current (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.96-2.83, p < .001) use showed a higher association with frailty as compared to individuals who were non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of benzodiazepine was cross-sectionally associated with frailty in older Veterans. These results suggest that screening for frailty in patients with past or current exposure to benzodiazepine medications may be necessary for proper management.

Factors associated with the identification of drug therapy problems among older patients in Primary Health Care

Objective

To determine the frequency of drug therapy problems among older adults in Primary Health Care, and to analyze the factors associated with their identification in the initial patient assessment, carried out by pharmacists offering medication therapy management services.

Methods

A cross-sectional study conducted with data from 758 older adults followed up in medication therapy management services in Primary Health Care in the cities of Belo Horizonte, Betim, and Lagoa Santa (MG, Brazil). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with identification of four or more drug therapy problems in the initial clinical assessment.

Results

A total of 1,683 drug therapy problems were identified, 73.6% of older patients had at least one problem. The most frequent problems were nonadherence (23.0%) and the need for additional drug therapy (18.0%). Polypharmacy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and aged 75 years or older remained positively and statistically associated with identification of four or more drug therapy problems (p<0.05).

Conclusion

There is a high frequency of problems related to medication use among older users of Primary Health Care, and the medication therapy management services should be prioritized to the older patients, who present with polypharmacy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and age ≥ 75 years, since they are more likely to have more drug therapy problems.

Inappropriate prescribing: hazards and solutions

With population ageing, the number of older people is growing, which results in increasing number of people with multimorbidity and related polypharmacy. Polypharmacy in its turn leads to drug-related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate prescribing (IP) in older people. In this commentary, susceptibility of older people to DRPs due to changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, plurality of prescribing physicians, inadequate consideration of patients' characteristics, polypharmacy and its consequences such as prescribing cascades, drug interactions and potentially IP have been discussed respectively. Consecutively, identifying DRPs and optimizing of IP, including drug reconciliation, application of criteria for identifying and preventing IP, implementation of computer-based prescribing systems, and comprehensive geriatric assessment and management have been elaborated as well. One of the main challenges regarding appropriate and tailored prescribing in older people is to evaluate whether the expected benefits of pharmacotherapy are bigger than the risks in a population with multimorbidity, decreased tolerance to vulnerability and limited life expectancy. Comprehensive geriatric assessment enables informed prescribing decisions in the context of such variables. A challenge for future research is how to integrate important clinical information obtained by existing methods into a comprehensive and wide-reaching approach targeting all potential factors involved in causing DRPs. Good prescribing in late life accommodates the needs of older patients with multimorbidity. Individualized, interactive, multidisciplinary, and multifaceted approach to geriatric pharmacotherapy should be promoted and encouraged. How to optimize pharmacological prescription in complex older patients is a major legacy of geriatrics to contemporary medicine/medical practice.

Preclinical frailty assessments: Phenotype and frailty index identify frailty in different mice and are variably affected by chronic medications

Use of different objective frailty assessment tools may improve understanding of the biology of frailty and allow evaluation of effects of interventions on frailty. Polypharmacy is associated with increased risk of frailty in epidemiologic studies, regardless of frailty definition, but the pathophysiology of the association is not well understood. This study aims to (1) assess and compare the prevalence of frailty from middle to old age following control, chronic polypharmacy or monotherapy treatment, when measured using the clinical frailty index assessment and the mouse frailty phenotype tools; and (2) to evaluate and compare the effects of chronic polypharmacy regimens with zero, low and high Drug Burden Index (DBI) and monotherapies from middle to old age on the rate of deficit accumulation on the frailty index, mean number of phenotype criteria, odds of being frail assessed by the frailty index or phenotype, and the time to onset of frailty assessed by the frailty index or phenotype. In a longitudinal study, middle-aged (12 months) male C57BL/6J(B6) mice were administered non medicated control feed and water, or therapeutic doses of different polypharmacy combinations or monotherapies in feed and/or water. Frailty assessments were performed at 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months. There was limited overlap between animals identified as frail using different frailty assessments. Polypharmacy has measurable and different effects on each frailty assessment. Long-term chronic administration of some polypharmacy and monotherapy therapeutic drug regimens increased the number of frailty deficits (clinical frailty index: low DBI polypharmacy (15 and 21 months), high DBI polypharmacy (15-21 months), oxycodone (15-18 months), oxybutynin (15-18 months), citalopram (15-21 months) and metoprolol monotherapy (15 months) and modified frailty phenotype assessment (over the whole duration of treatment, low DBI polypharmacy (adjusted Risk Ratio(aRR) = 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.72), high DBI polypharmacy (aRR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.36-2.60), oxybutynin (aRR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.16) and citalopram monotherapy (aRR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.41-2.74), p < 0.05) . The odds of developing frailty measured with the clinical frailty index increased with high DBI polypharmacy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.13; 95% CI 1.01-9.66) and when measured with the frailty phenotype assessment increased with low DBI polypharmacy (aOR = 4.38, 95% CI 1.40-13.74), high DBI polypharmacy (aOR = 3.43; 95% CI 1.12-10.50) and citalopram monotherapy (aOR = 4.63; 95% CI 1.39-15.54)). No treatment affected time to frailty using either frailty assessment. Analysis of the number of deficits on the frailty index or number of positive criteria on the frailty phenotype allows analysis of rate of change and provides greater sensitivity, while the odds of being frail analysis provided a clinically relevant indicator of whether mice had greater chance of reaching a cut-off for becoming frail with medication exposure than without. Our results are consistent with clinical studies, demonstrating that certain polypharmacy regimens induce frailty, with different relationships observed when using different frailty assessments and analyses.

Association of Polypharmacy with Kidney Disease Progression in Adults with CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is common in patients with CKD and reportedly associated with adverse outcomes. However, its effect on kidney outcomes among patients with CKD has not been adequately elucidated. Hence, this investigation was aimed at exploring the association between polypharmacy and kidney failure requiring KRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

We retrospectively examined 1117 participants (median age, 66 years; 56% male; median eGFR, 48 ml/min per 1.73 m²) enrolled in the Fukushima CKD Cohort Study to investigate the association between the number of prescribed medications and adverse outcomes such as kidney failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were defined as the regular use of 5-9 and ≥10 medications per day, respectively.

RESULTS

The median number of medications was eight; the prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was each 38%. During the observation period (median, 4.8 years), 120 developed kidney failure, 153 developed cardiovascular events, and 109 died. Compared with the use of fewer than five medications, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were 2.28 (1.00 to 5.21) and 2.83 (1.21 to 6.66) for kidney failure, 1.60 (0.85 to 3.04) and 3.02 (1.59 to 5.74) for cardiovascular events, and 1.25 (0.62 to 2.53) and 2.80 (1.41 to 5.54) for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a high number of medications was associated with a high risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD under nephrology care.

Change in Medication-Associated Fall Risk Among Older Adults After Admission for Fall-Related Trauma

BACKGROUND

As the population ages, it is predicted that approximately 40% of all patients who experience fall-related trauma will be 65 years of age and older. Most injuries in older adults are caused by falls that are the result of multiple contributing factors including home hazards, comorbidities, frailty, and medications. A variety of medications have been associated with falls, specifically those with sedating and anticholinergic effects. The drug burden index can be used to quantify sedating and anticholinergic drug burden, with higher scores being associated with reduced psychomotor function.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the medication-associated fall risk on admission and discharge for older patients admitted to a trauma nurse practitioner service.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of patients managed by trauma nurse practitioners at a Level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Patients were included if they were at least 65 years of age, the primary diagnosis for the admission was fall-related trauma, and length of stay was at least 7 days.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were included in the study. The drug burden index was significantly higher at discharge than admission (M = 1.4, SD = 0.9 vs. M = 1.9, SD = 0.9) as was the total number of medications (M = 11.0, SD = 5.2 vs. M = 15.1, SD = 5.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Medication-related fall risk was increased during admission due to fall-related trauma. Patients were discharged with a higher sedating and anticholinergic burden than on admission, which increases risk for future falls.

Deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing deprescribing of anticholinergic and sedative drugs in a cohort of frail older people living in the community

BACKGROUND

Targeted deprescribing of anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people may improve their health outcomes. This trial will determine if pharmacist-led reviews lead to general practitioners deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people living in the community.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The standard protocol items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist was used to develop and report the protocol. The trial will involve older adults stratified by frailty (low, medium, and high). This will be a pragmatic two-arm randomized controlled trial to test general practitioner uptake of pharmacist recommendations to deprescribe anticholinergic and sedative medications that are causing adverse side effects in patients.

STUDY POPULATION

Community-dwelling frail adults, 65 years or older, living in the Canterbury region of New Zealand, seeking publicly funded home support services or admission to aged residential care and taking at least one anticholinergic or sedative medication regularly.

INTERVENTION

New Zealand registered pharmacists using peer-reviewed deprescribing guidelines will visit participants at home in the community, review their medications, and recommend anticholinergic and sedative medications that could be deprescribed to the participant's general practitioner. The total use of anticholinergic and sedative medications will be quantified using the Drug Burden Index (DBI).

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome will be the change in total DBI between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include entry into aged residential care, prolonged hospitalization, and death.

DATA COLLECTION POINTS

Data will be collected at the time of interRAI assessments (T0), at the time of the baseline review (T1), at 6 months following the baseline review (T2), and at the end of the study period, or end of study participation for participants admitted into aged residential care, or who died (T3).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human, Disability and Ethics Committee: ethical number (17CEN265).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ACTRN12618000729224 . Registered on May 2, 2018, with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

A delicate balance: Psychotropic polypharmacy and anti-cholinergic use are correlated with fall incidence in Australian inpatients with dementia

BACKGROUND

Persons with dementia commonly experience a range of behavioural and psychological symptoms, including agitation, aggression, perceptual disturbances, and depression. While psychotropic medications are regularly prescribed to mitigate these symptoms, these agents also carry a broad adverse effect profile. This study aimed to characterize psychotropic medication use in patients with dementia, as well as identify prescribing factors associated with falls in this cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected longitudinal demographic and medication data from all patients admitted to a neuro-cognitive unit at an Australian metropolitan hospital over a 2-year period. Psychotropic polypharmacy and psychotropic agent use per patient-fortnight were investigated for their association with inpatient falls.

RESULTS

All patients (n = 147) were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication, with 96% receiving anti-psychotic medications and 90% receiving benzodiazepines. Patient fall rate was significantly associated with anticholinergic drug use (Incidence rate ratio: 2.2; P < .001), as well as concomitant use of ≥5 daily psychotropic agents (Incidence rate ratio: 3.1; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dementia are routinely prescribed a wide variety of psychotropic medications. Use of anticholinergic drugs and psychotropic polypharmacy are correlated with fall incidence in persons with dementia.

The cross-sectional association of frailty with past and current exposure to strong anticholinergic drugs

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic drugs may contribute to frailty by impairing cognitive and physical functions. Strong anticholinergic drugs in particular may have adverse effects among older adults.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the association between frailty and the use of strong anticholinergic drugs among older US Veterans.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling Veterans 65 years and older who had determinations of frailty status. Prescription data for patients using strong anticholinergic medications (never/past/current) was obtained via electronic health records. A 31-item VA Frailty Index (VA-FI) was generated at the time of the assessment. We dichotomized the groups into non-frail (FI =  < 0.21) and frail (FI ≥ 0.21) patients. We used binomial logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Frailty was the dependent variable and use of strong anticholinergic drugs was the independent variable. Multivariate adjustment was conducted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, and BMI.

RESULTS

Population sample consisted of 17,084 Veterans who were 71.05% Caucasian, 97.34% male, and with a mean age 75.60 (SD = 8.04) years. Among the population, 9940 (58.18%) patients had no previous use of strong anticholinergic drugs, whereas 5182 (30.33%) had past exposure and 1962 (11.49%) had current exposure. In binomial logistic regression, individuals with past (OR 3.27, 95% CI 3.03-3.54, p < 0.0005) or current (OR 4.78, 95% CI 4.30-5.31, p < 0.0005) exposure showed a higher association with frailty as compared to individuals who were never exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Past and current use of strong anticholinergic drugs were associated with frailty in older Veterans. These results suggest that screening for frailty in patients with past or current exposure to strong anticholinergic medications may be necessary for proper management.

Identifying and Managing Malnutrition, Frailty and Sarcopenia in the Community: A Narrative Review

Malnutrition, frailty and sarcopenia are becoming increasingly prevalent among community-dwelling older adults; yet are often unidentified and untreated in community settings. There is an urgent need for community-based healthcare professionals (HCPs) from all disciplines, including medicine, nursing and allied health, to be aware of, and to be able to recognise and appropriately manage these conditions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of malnutrition, frailty and sarcopenia in the community, including their definitions, prevalence, impacts and causes/risk factors; and guidance on how these conditions may be identified and managed by HCPs in the community. A detailed description of the care process, including screening and referral, assessment and diagnosis, intervention, and monitoring and evaluation, relevant to the community context, is also provided. Further research exploring the barriers/enablers to delivering high-quality nutrition care to older community-dwelling adults who are malnourished, frail or sarcopenic is recommended, to inform the development of specific guidance for HCPs in identifying and managing these conditions in the community.

Associations Between Anticholinergic Medication Exposure and Adverse Health Outcomes in Older People with Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

There are robust associations between use of anticholinergic medicines and adverse effects in older people. However, the nature of these associations for older people living with frailty is yet to be established.

Objectives

The aims were to identify and investigate associations between anticholinergics and adverse outcomes in older people living with frailty and to investigate whether exposure is associated with greater risks according to frailty status.

Methods

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and PsycINFO were searched to 1 August 2019. Observational studies reporting associations between anticholinergics and outcomes in older adults (average age ≥ 65 years) that reported frailty using validated measures were included. Primary outcomes were physical impairment, cognitive dysfunction, and change in frailty status. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was undertaken where appropriate.

Results

Thirteen studies (21,516 participants) were included (ten community, one residential aged-care facility and two hospital studies). Observed associations included reduced ability for chair standing, slower gait speeds, poorer physical performance, increased risk of falls and mortality. Conflicting results were reported for grip strength, timed up and go test, cognition and activities of daily living. No associations were observed for transitions between frailty states, psychological wellbeing or benzodiazepine-related adverse reactions. There was no clear evidence of differences in risks according to frailty status.

Conclusions

Anticholinergics are associated with adverse outcomes in older people living with frailty; however, the literature has significant methodological limitations. There is insufficient evidence to suggest greater risks based on frailty, and there is an urgent need to evaluate this further in well-designed studies stratifying by frailty.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00256-5.

Polypharmacy and Frailty among Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Both polypharmacy and frailty are highly prevalent among the patients on hemodialysis and associated with adverse outcomes; however, little is known about the association between them.

METHODS

We examined 337 patients enrolled in the ACTIVE/ADIPOSE dialysis cohort study between 2009 and 2011. The number of prescribed medications and frailty were assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Frailty was defined based upon the Fried's frailty phenotype. We used logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to model the association of the number of medications and frailty at baseline and over time. A competing-risk regression analysis was also used to assess the association between the number of medications and incidence of frailty.

RESULTS

The mean number of medications was 10 ± 5, and 94 patients (28%) were frail at baseline. Patients taking >11 medications showed higher odds for frailty than the patients taking fewer than 8 medications (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.26). During the 2-year of follow-up, 87 patients developed frailty among those who were nonfrail at baseline. Compared with the patients taking fewer than 8 medications, the incidence of frailty was approximately 2-fold in those taking >11 medications (sub-distribution hazard ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.32-3.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a higher number of medications was associated with frailty and the incidence of frailty among hemodialysis patients. Minimizing polypharmacy may reduce the incidence and prevalence of frailty among dialysis patients.

The impact of long-term exposure to anticholinergics among people with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review protocol

Background: Older adults with intellectual disability often take multiple medicines with anticholinergic activity and sedative properties to manage multi-morbidity; the use of medication with anticholinergic activity has been found to be associated with various cognitive and physical impairments. However, there are limited studies that have examined the long-term impact of anticholinergic use among older adults. Therefore, this protocol is designed to conduct a scoping review to examine the available data on the long-term impact of anticholinergic use in older adults with intellectual disability. Aim and objectives:  The aim of this scoping review is to a) map and b) examine the existing research literature to answer the research question: What is the impact on cognitive and physical outcomes of long-term exposure to medications with anticholinergic activity among older adults with intellectual disabilities? Methods and analysis: This scoping review will follow the methodology framework of Arksey and O’Malley and its developed version by Levac. The framework consists of a six-stage process to be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines. The search strategy will include the following electronic data bases: Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL Complete and PsycINFO. The search will include terms related to ‘Anticholinergic burden’, ‘Intellectual disability’, ‘Adverse drug reaction’ and ‘long-term impact’ with Boolean operator ‘and’. The scoping review will include studies with at least 3 months exposure to anticholinergics. The collected data will be mapped as a tabular presentation of the various physical and cognitive adverse effects associated with long-term use of anticholinergics in this group of population.

Anticholinergic/Sedative Drug Burden and Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults at Risk of Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND

Anticholinergic/sedative drug use, measured by the Drug Burden Index (DBI), has been linked to cognitive impairment in older adults. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may be among the first symptoms patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) experience. We examined whether DBI values are associated with SCD in older adults at risk of AD. We hypothesized that increased DBI would be associated with greater SCD at older ages.

METHOD

Two-hundred-six community-dwelling, English-speaking adults (age = 65 ± 9 years) at risk of AD (42% apolipoprotein ε4 carriers; 78% with AD family history) were administered a single question to ascertain SCD: "Do you feel like your memory is becoming worse?" Response options were "No"; "Yes, but this does not worry me"; and "Yes, this worries me." DBI values were derived from self-reported medication regimens using older adult dosing recommendations. Adjusting for relevant covariates (comorbidities and polypharmacy), we examined independent effects of age and DBI on SCD, as well as the moderating effect of age on the DBI-SCD association at mean ± 1 SD of age.

RESULTS

Both SCD and anticholinergic/sedative drug burden were prevalent. Greater drug burden was predictive of SCD severity, but age alone was not. A significant DBI*Age interaction emerged with greater drug burden corresponding to more severe SCD among individuals age 65 and older.

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic/sedative drug exposure was associated with greater SCD in adults 65 and older at risk for AD. Longitudinal research is needed to understand if this relationship is a pre-clinical marker of neurodegenerative disease and predictive of future cognitive decline.

Effect of number of medications and use of potentially inappropriate medications on frailty among early-stage older outpatients

Background

Frailty is an urgent concern among an aging population worldwide. However, the relationship between frailty and number and types of medications has not been studied in detail among early-stage older patients, and it is unclear what prescriptions may have a role in preventing frailty. This study aimed to clarify the effects of number of medications and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) on frailty among early-stage older outpatients in Japan.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was undertaken. Frailty scores and medications of outpatients aged 65–74 years who regularly visited community pharmacies were investigated. Frailty scores were classified as 0 (non-frailty), 1–2 (pre-frailty), and ≥ 3 (frailty). The association between frailty and number of medications was analyzed by age and compared between PIM use and non-use groups. The proportion of patients who used PIMs was also analyzed by frailty score.

Results

Of 923 older outpatients, 49 (5.3%) and 318 (34.5%) patients had frailty and pre-frailty scores, respectively. The numbers of medications among patients with pre-frailty and frailty were significantly higher than among those with non-frailty (p <  0.001 for both). A similar increase was shown for PIM use groups aged 69–71 and 72–74 years, but not for the PIM use group aged 65–68 years and all groups without PIM use. An increasing linear trend was observed for the relationship between the proportion of patients who used any PIM, as well as some subcategories of PIMs (such as NSAIDs, benzodiazepines, loop diuretics and antithrombotic drugs) and frailty score.

Conclusions

Unnecessary medication use among early-stage older outpatients, especially patients aged ≥69 years who use PIMs and many medications, seems to be associated with frailty, but further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-021-00195-x.

Anticholinergic Drug Induced Cognitive and Physical Impairment: Results from the InCHIANTI Study

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between anticholinergic drug burden (ACB) cognitive impairment, physical frailty, and cognitive frailty, and to determine if ACB is predictive of these phenotypes when modeled with biological and genomic biomarkers.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, a total of 1,453 adults aged 20-102 years were used to examine ACB as a predictor for cognitive impairment, physical frailty, and cognitive frailty. Anticholinergic burden is examined as a predictor for all phenotypes in a cross-sectional analysis using logistic, ordinal regression models, and Extreme Gradient Boosting for population predictive modeling.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between ACB and cognitive decline (p = .02), frailty (p < .001), and cognitive frailty (p < .001). The odds of cognitive impairment increased by 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.37, p < .001), odds of being frail increased by 1.33 (95% CI = 1.18-1.50, p < .001), and odds of having cognitive frailty increased by 1.36 (95% CI = 1.21-1.54, p < .001). Population modeling results indicated ACB score as one of the stronger predictors for cognitive impairment, physical frailty, and cognitive frailty with area under the curves ranging from 0.81 to 0.88.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticholinergic medications are a potentially modifiable risk factor for the prevention of cognitive and physical decline. Identification of reversible causes for cognitive and physical impairment is critical for the aging population. These findings encourage new research that may lead to effective interventions for deprescribing programs for the prevention of cognitive and physical decline in older adults.

Frailty, and not medicines with anticholinergic or sedative effects, predicts adverse outcomes in octogenarians admitted for myocardial infarction: Population-level study

OBJECTIVE

To determine independent associations between the use of medicines with anticholinergic or sedative effects and frailty with outcomes of length of stay (LOS), coronary artery procedure performed and 30-day deaths in octogenarians admitted for a myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

We quantified patient exposure to medicines with anticholinergic or sedative effects using the drug burden index (DBI) and frailty using the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS). We used multivariable regression methods to determine the association between DBI and HFRS with outcomes of LOS, coronary artery procedures performed and 30-day deaths.

RESULTS

HFRS and not DBI score was significantly associated with receipt of coronary artery procedures (odds ratio [OR] 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.62 for high- versus low-risk groups) and 30-day deaths (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-2.24 for high- versus low-risk groups).

CONCLUSION

Frailty risk is a more important predictor of outcomes than DBI score for octogenarians with an MI.

Natural Regression of Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Frailty is a dynamic process with potential transitions over time. However, there is limited understanding of the patterns of frailty improvement. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the natural rate of frailty regression among community-dwelling older adults aged at least 60 years.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Systematic searches for studies reporting frailty improvement were performed in 5 databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL plus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) from inception until January 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies from 26 countries were included. Among a baseline population of more than 50,000 individuals, the pooled prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty was 50.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.8-53.3) and 12.8% (95% CI 9.1-17.0), respectively. During a median follow-up of 3.0 (range 1-10.0) years, 23.3% of surviving pre-frail individuals regressed to a robust state and 35.2% of surviving frail individuals reversed to a pre-frail or robust state. The pooled remission rates among people with pre-frailty and frailty were 80.4 (95% CI 61.7-104.6) and 135.3 (95% CI 98.1-186.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Frailty and pre-frailty improvement rates varied by sex, diagnostic criteria, study region, and follow-up duration. The remission rates were significantly reduced when accounting for progressions to death. The heterogeneity of included studies was high which reflected considerable differences in methodological approach.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Although frailty is highly prevalent in older people, natural remission is possible and common. Improved understanding of the factors that confer increased likelihood of frailty regression may support the design of interventions to reduce the burden of frailty.

Factors associated with frailty transition at different follow-up intervals: A scoping review

Frailty is a dynamic process. Identifying the factors associated with frailty transition may increase the opportunities for success in interventions for frailty. This scoping review, following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, aimed to identify the factors associated with frailty transition and the rate of frailty transition among community-dwelling older people. A literature search was conducted. Among the included studies, 5, 13, and 3 involved follow-up intervals of 2-3 years (short term), 4-6 years (intermediate term), and >6 years (long term), respectively. Reportedly, life course characteristics, diseases, and psychological factors were related to frailty transitions at all follow-up intervals. Physical factors were related to frailty transition at both short and intermediate follow-up intervals, while social factors were related to frailty transition at intermediate follow-up intervals. The rate of improvement in frailty seemed to decrease, and that of worsening seemed to increase when the follow-up intervals lengthened.

Disability in people with epilepsy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore the prevalence and predictors of limitations causing disability in patients treated for seizures or epilepsy compared with patients without epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We included all participants ≥20 years old for 2013-2018. We classified patients as having epilepsy if they reported taking at least one prescription medication to treat seizures or epilepsy. Physical, mental, and social limitations were determined from interview questions. We report the prevalence of any limitation and total number of limitations for participants without vs. with epilepsy using serial negative binomial regressions and severity of individual limitations according to epilepsy status.

RESULTS

We included 17,057 participants, of whom 148 (0.8%) had epilepsy. Overall, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-86%) with epilepsy vs. 38% (95% CI: 36%-39%) without epilepsy reported at least 1 limitation (p < 0.01). The mean number of limitations was 7.5 (95% CI: 6.2-8.8) for those with epilepsy vs. 2.4 (95% CI: 2.3-2.6) for those without epilepsy (p < 0.01). Epilepsy was associated with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 3.1 (95% CI: 2.6-3.7) in an unadjusted negative binomial regression. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, this association was no longer significant (IRR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.9-1.7). Limitations cited by 40-50% of participants with epilepsy included stooping/kneeling/crouching, standing for long periods of time, and pushing/pulling objects. Limitation severity was consistently higher in patients with epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with epilepsy had 3.1 times as many physical, mental, or social limitations compared with those without epilepsy, and disability severity was consistently higher. This effect was attenuated after considering baseline variables such as smoking and depression severity. Our work implies the importance of structured mental health screening and self-management programs targeting mood, weight, and lifestyle as potential leverage points towards alleviating epilepsy-related disability.

Geriatric management of older patients with multimorbidity

Older patients tend to have multimorbidity represented by multiple chronic diseases or geriatric conditions due to aging changes of organs, which require a variety of medical management. Currently, there are no sufficient disease treatment guidelines for older people with multimorbidity, therefore physicians have difficulty managing multimorbidity, such as which diseases should be treated intensively or to what extent the conditions should be improved. Furthermore, there are other points to be considered when initiating the treatment of diseases. For example, physicians must assess physical function. Some people have no difficulty with ambulation, but some are bedridden and have difficulty getting up on their own. As there are differences in disease severity, comorbid conditions and life expectancy, there should be differences in deciding treatment and prescribing drugs. It may be necessary to change the option for treatment depending on cognitive function, the living environment and the care environment, using comprehensive geriatric assessments. In addition, when treating multimorbidity, patients tend to have polypharmacy, which is a risk for adverse drug events. Because of this, it is necessary to consider dose reduction and drug discontinuation in patients with polypharmacy. Because of the global increase in older patients with multimorbidity, developing an essential method for managing multimorbidity is an urgent issue. More research and practices are necessary to achieve high-quality care in patients with multimorbidity. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 1105-1111.

Factors Associated With Improving or Worsening the State of Frailty: A Secondary Data Analysis of a 5-Year Longitudinal Study

PURPOSE

This study aims to examine the frailty transition patterns of older adults recruited from both community and residential care settings within a 5-year period, and to identify the physical and psychosocial factors associated with the transitions.

DESIGN

This study is a secondary data analysis of a longitudinal study for tracking the change of health status of older adults 60 years of age or older. Participants who had undergone at least two assessments during 2013-2017 were selected for analysis. Guided by the Gobben's Frailty Model, biopsychosocial predictors were comprehensively identified from the literature, and their relationship to frailty state transition was explored.

METHODS

We compared the baseline characteristics of participants at the frail, pre-frail, and robust states (categorized using the Fried Frailty Index). A generalized estimating equation was used to identify factors associated with an improvement or a deterioration in frailty. The probability of transitions between frailty states was calculated.

FINDINGS

Among the 306 participants, 19% (n = 59) improved and 30% (n = 92) declined in frailty within the project period. Sleep difficulties (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-2.90; p = .027), better cognitive status (OR = 0.80-0.84; 95% CI: 0.66-0.98 and 0.73-2.73; p = .031 and .018), good nutritional status (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.91; p = .005), slow mobility (OR = 1.03-1.13; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05 and 1.03-1.25; p = .047 and .014), hearing impairment (OR = 2.83; 95% CI: 1.00-8.01; p = .05), better quality of health-physical domain (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99; p = .006), and better functional ability (OR = 0.85-0.97; 95% CI: 0.79-0.92 and 0.96-0.99; p < .001 and p = .003) were significant associated factors in the worsening group. More physical activity (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.01 and 1.01-1.02; p = .026 and p < .001), hearing impairment (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.86; p = .028), and slow mobility (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00; p = .037) were significant associated factors in the improvement group.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is a crucial global public health issue. This study provides evidence for nurses to holistically consider the associated factors and to design effective interventions to combat frailty in our ageing society.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Frailty is a transient state that can be reversed. Professional nurses working in both community and residential care settings should be able to identify older adults at risk and improve their health conditions appropriately.

Using the Drug Burden Index to identify older adults at highest risk for medication-related falls

BACKGROUND

The Drug Burden Index (DBI) was developed to assess patient exposure to medications associated with an increased risk of falling. The objective of this study was to examine the association between the DBI and medication-related fall risk.

METHODS

The study used a retrospective cohort design, with a 1-year observation period. Participants (n = 1562) were identified from 31 community pharmacies. We examined the association between DBI scores and four outcomes. Our primary outcome, which was limited to participants who received a medication review, indexed whether the review resulted in at least one medication-related recommendation (e.g., discontinue medication) being communicated to the participant's health care provider. Secondary outcomes indexed whether participants in the full sample: (1) screened positive for fall risk, (2) reported 1+ falls in the past year, and (3) reported 1+ injurious falls in the past year. All outcome variables were dichotomous (yes/no).

RESULTS

Among those who received a medication review (n = 387), the percentage of patients receiving at least one medication-related recommendation ranged from 10.2% among those with DBI scores of 0 compared to 60.2% among those with DBI scores ≥1.0 (Chi-square (4)=42.4, p < 0.0001). Among those screened for fall risk (n = 1058), DBI scores were higher among those who screened positive compared to those who did not (Means = 0.98 (SD = 1.00) versus 0.59 (SD = 0.74), respectively, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the DBI is a useful tool that could be used to improve future research and practice by focusing limited resources on those individuals at greatest risk of medication-related falls.

Reducing medicine-induced deterioration and adverse reactions (ReMInDAR) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in residential aged-care facilities assessing frailty as the primary outcome

INTRODUCTION

Many medicines have adverse effects which are difficult to detect and frequently go unrecognised. Pharmacist monitoring of changes in signs and symptoms of these adverse effects, which we describe as medicine-induced deterioration, may reduce the risk of developing frailty. The aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of a 12-month pharmacist service compared with usual care in reducing medicine-induced deterioration, frailty and adverse reactions in older people living in aged-care facilities in Australia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The reducing medicine-induced deterioration and adverse reactions trial is a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from 39 facilities in South Australia and Tasmania. Residents will be included if they are using four or more medicines at the time of recruitment, or taking more than one medicine with anticholinergic or sedative properties. The intervention group will receive a pharmacist assessment which occurs every 8 weeks. The pharmacists will liaise with the participants' general practitioners when medicine-induced deterioration is evident or adverse events are considered serious. The primary outcome is a reduction in medicine-induced deterioration from baseline to 6 and 12 months, as measured by change in frailty index. The secondary outcomes are changes in cognition scores, 24-hour movement behaviour, grip strength, weight, percentage robust, pre-frail and frail classification, rate of adverse medicine events, health-related quality of life and health resource use. The statistical analysis will use mixed-models adjusted for baseline to account for repeated outcome measures. A health economic evaluation will be conducted following trial completion using data collected during the trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approvals have been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of University of South Australia (ID:0000036440) and University of Tasmania (ID:H0017022). A copy of the final report will be provided to the Australian Government Department of Health.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry ACTRN12618000766213.

Impact of STEADI-Rx: A Community Pharmacy-Based Fall Prevention Intervention

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of a community pharmacy-based fall prevention intervention (STEADI-Rx) on the risk of falling and use of medications associated with an increased risk of falling.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A total of 65 community pharmacies in North Carolina (NC).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (age ≥65 years) using either four or more chronic medications or one or more medications associated with an increased risk of falling (n = 10,565).

INTERVENTION

Pharmacy staff screened patients for fall risk using questions from the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) algorithm. Patients who screened positive were eligible to receive a pharmacist-conducted medication review, with recommendations sent to patients' healthcare providers following the review.

MEASUREMENTS

At intervention pharmacies, pharmacy staff used standardized forms to record participant responses to screening questions and information concerning the medication reviews. For participants with continuous Medicare Part D/NC Medicaid coverage (n = 3,212), the Drug Burden Index (DBI) was used to assess exposure to high-risk medications, and insurance claims records for emergency department visits and hospitalizations were used to assess falls.

RESULTS

Among intervention group participants (n = 4,719), 73% (n = 3,437) were screened for fall risk. Among those who screened positive (n = 1,901), 72% (n = 1,373) received a medication review; and 27% (n = 521) had at least one medication-related recommendation communicated to their healthcare provider(s) following the review. A total of 716 specific medication recommendations were made. DBI scores decreased from the pre- to postintervention period in both the control and the intervention group. However, the amount of change over time did not differ between these two groups (P = .66). Risk of falling did not change between the pre- to postintervention period or differ between groups (P = .58).

CONCLUSION

We successfully implemented STEADI-Rx in the community pharmacy setting. However, we found no differences in fall risk or the use of medications associated with increased risk of falling between the intervention and control groups. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1778-1786, 2020.

[Effects of polypharmacy and anticholinergic/sedative drugs on the physical/cognitive/mental related outcomes of community-dwelling elderly people: The Kawasaki Wellbeing Project]

AIM

To assess the burdens of polypharmacy and the drug burden index in community-dwelling elder people.

METHODS

The survey was conducted on 396 participants who participated in The Kawasaki Wellbeing Project from March to December 2017. We investigated the associations between the drug burden and the physical/cognitive/mental outcomes. The drug burden was determined by calculating the number of medications and the drug burden index (DBI) based on the use of anticholinergic and sedative drugs. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted for the outcome measures ADL, IADL, MMSE, J-CHS, and EQ5D5L after adjusting for the sex, age, number of diseases, education level, smoking history, and alcohol history.

RESULTS

A total of 389 subjects were analyzed, the mean age of the population was 86 years old, and 187 people (48%) were male. Polypharmacy was reported in 243 people (62%), and DBI exposure was reported for 142 people (36.5%). We found that this population was physically healthy, with a median ADL of 100, and had high quality of life, with a median EQ5D5L of 0.895. Polypharmacy was found to be related to the J-CHS (β: 0.04) and EQ5D5L (-0.01). The DBI was also related to the EQ5D5L (-0.04).

CONCLUSION

These results showed that even though this population was healthier than the general Japanese elderly population, the drug burden of polypharmacy and high dosages of anticholinergic/sedative drugs exerted significant negative effects on frailty and the quality of life. Additional research should be conducted to investigate the long-term effects of polypharmacy and anticholinergic/sedative drugs on elderly people.

Medication exposure and frailty in older community-dwelling patients: a cross-sectional study

Objective To investigate the association between the medication exposure, measured by the polypharmacy/excessive polypharmacy and the anticholinergic and/or sedative drug exposure, on frailty status among French older community-dwelling patients. Setting day-care unit in France (Lyon), with retrospective data from July, 2017 to March, 2018. Method This monocentric cross-sectional study included community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and over and admitted at the day-care unit for a geriatric evaluation. Frailty was assessed according to the frailty phenotype, described by Fried et al. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and 10 or more drugs, respectively. The cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure was measured using the drug burden index (DBI). The DBI score was presented in 4 differentiated scores: a null score (DBI = 0), a combined score (anticholinergic and sedative score), an anticholinergic score, and a sedative score. The association between medication and frailty was assessed by logistic regression models controlled for multiple potential confounders. Main outcome measure Association between medication exposure (polypharmacy, anticholinergic and sedative exposure) and frailty. Results In this study, 403 patients were included: 44.7% were frail and 40.7% were pre-frail. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy affected 44.7% and 17.1% of the population respectively. The mean DBI was 0.33 ± 0.43, with 16.4% of patients with only sedative exposure, 9.7% with only anticholinergic exposure and 33.0% with both exposures. After adjustment, polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.18 (1.03-4.22) and 2.72 (1.01-7.37) respectively. The cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs (combined score) was significantly associated to an increased risk for frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.54 (1.47-8.57). Conclusion The study showed that polypharmacy and cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure are associated with frailty. Further research should address the potential benefit of collaborative medication review for preventing medication-associated frailty.

Medication burden and frailty in older adults with intellectual disability: An observational cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Recently, efforts have been made to quantify frailty among older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Medication exposure is associated with frailty among older adults without ID. However, there is little research on this association among older adults with ID. The aim of this study was to examine specifically in people with ID the association between frailty and medication exposure, including anticholinergic and sedative medication exposure.

METHODS

Data were drawn from Wave 2 (2013/2014) of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA), a nationally representative study of older adults with ID in Ireland. A modified version of Fried's frailty phenotype was constructed. Drug burden measures were polypharmacy, Drug Burden Index (DBI), Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) and Sedative Load Model. Multinomial logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and identify associations between frailty and drug burden.

RESULTS

This study included 570 participants with ID. Excessive polypharmacy (use of ≥10 medications) was significantly associated with being pre-frail (P = .017; OR = 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-5.50) and frail (P < .001; OR 7.13; 95% CI 2.81-18.12), but DBI, ACB or Sedative Load score were not significantly associated with frailty status (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to examine frailty and its association with medication use including anticholinergic and sedative medication burden among older adults with ID. Further research is required to investigate frailty as measured by other frailty models in relation to medication burden in older adults with ID.