Are energy and protein requirements met in hospital?

Access to a pre-sleep protein snack increases daily energy and protein intake in surgical hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND & AIM

In hospitalized patients, daily protein intake remains far below WHO requirements for healthy adults (0.8 g·kg-1·d-1) as well as ESPEN guidelines for patients (1.2-1.5 g·kg-1·d-1). Providing access to a pre-sleep protein dense snack between dinner and going to bed may serve as a great opportunity to increase daily energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. However, it remains to be assessed whether protein provision prior to sleep effectively increases protein intake, or may reduce food intake throughout the remainder of the day(s). The present study evaluated the impact of giving access to a pre-sleep snack on daily energy and protein intake in patients throughout their hospitalization.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the surgical wards of the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ were randomly allocated to usual care (n = 51) or given access to a pre-sleep snack (n = 50). The pre-sleep snack consisted of 103 g cheese cubes (30 g protein) provided between 7:30 and 9:30 PM, prior to sleep. All food provided and all food consumed was weighed and recorded throughout (2-7 days) hospitalization. Daily energy and protein intake and distribution were calculated. Data were analyzed by independent T-Tests with P < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Daily energy intake was higher in the pre-sleep group (1353 ± 424 kcal d-1) when compared to the usual care group (1190 ± 402 kcal·d-1; P = 0.049). Providing patients access to a pre-sleep snack resulted in a 17% (11 ± 9 g) higher daily protein intake (0.81 ± 0.29 g·kg-1·d-1) when compared to the usual care group (0.69 ± 0.28 g·kg-1·d-1; P = 0.045). Protein intake at breakfast, lunch, and dinner did not differ between the pre-sleep and usual care groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Providing access to a pre-sleep protein snack, in the form of protein dense food items such as cheese, represents an effective dietary strategy to increase daily energy and protein intake in hospitalized patients. Patients consuming pre-sleep protein snacks do not compensate by lowering energy or protein intake throughout the remainder of the days. Pre-sleep protein dense food provision should be implemented in hospital food logistics to improve the nutritional intake of patients.

TRIAL REGISTER NO

NL8507 (https://trialsearch.who.int/).

Individualised nutritional treatment increases the positive effects of a novel á la carte hospital food service concept: Results of a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

One-third of hospitalised patients are at nutritional risk, and limited choice regarding meals and meal times, and inadequate nutritional support may contribute to inadequate nutritional intake during hospitalisation. The aim was to test the effect of a novel á la carte hospital food service concept as a stand-alone intervention and combined with individualised nutritional treatment.

METHODS

Medical inpatients at nutritional risk were recruited for this three-arm quasi-experimental study. The control group received meals from the traditional bulk trolley food service system. Intervention group 1 (IG1) received meals from a novel á la carte food service concept with an electronic ordering system, whereas intervention group 2 (IG2) in addition to this received individualised nutritional treatment by a clinical dietitian. Nutritional intake and length of stay was measured, and patient satisfaction was assessed with purpose-designed questionnaires.

RESULTS

206 patients were included: 67 in the control group, 68 in IG1, and 71 in IG2. The proportion of participants reaching ≥75 % of both their energy and protein requirement was higher in IG1 compared to the control group (34 % vs. 12 %, p = 0.002) and higher in IG2 compared to IG1 (53 % vs. 34 %, p = 0.035). Length of stay was shorter in IG2 compared to the control group (6.0 vs. 8.7 days, p = 0.005). It was important to participants to be able to choose when and what to eat, and this preference was met to a larger extent in the intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

The novel á la carte concept increases energy and protein intake in hospitalised patients, and the positive effects are increased, when the concept is used in combination with individualised nutritional treatment.

Management of disease-related malnutrition: a real-world experience with a novel concentrated high-protein energy-dense oral nutritional supplement

OBJECTIVE

Despite the availability of a wide range of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) offerings, individuals with malnutrition are still struggling to meet their nutritional targets. A new concentrated and high-protein energy-dense ONS (≥2.1 kcal/mL;32 g protein/200 mL) with high-quality protein (60% whey protein) has emerged as a pivotal formula to reach the patient's energy-protein requirements, enhance compliance, and maximize stimulation of muscle protein synthesis, key factors driving better nutritional, functional, and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to provide our clinical experience using this new nutritionally concentrated ONS as a therapeutic strategy for patients with DRM.

METHODS

Three clinical cases have been examined using new assessment procedures and a new form of nutritional therapy, and their impact on the nutritional and functional outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe DRM.

RESULTS

A tailored individualized nutritional interventions improved anthropometric, biochemical, and functional outcomes (Case 1,2, and 3) assessed using hand grip strength, bioimpedance and muscle ultrasound, and as well as good gastrointestinal tolerance (Case 1) and compliance to the ONS in patients with DRM (Case 1,2,3).

CONCLUSION

The use of this novel high-protein energy-dense formula with high-quality protein source (≥2.1 kcal/mL; 32 g protein/200 mL; 60% whey protein) overcome common practical challenges in the medical nutrition therapy of patients with DRM, either because these patients require a highly concentrated formulation to meet nutritional requirements due to loss of appetite, lack of interest in food, and high caloric-protein needs due to disease, and a large quantity and quality of protein to optimize muscle recovery due to sarcopenia, common in patients with moderate-severe malnutrition.

Dietary assessment methods for measurement of oral intake in acute care and critically ill hospitalised patients: a scoping review

Quantification of oral intake within the hospital setting is required to guide nutrition care. Multiple dietary assessment methods are available, yet details regarding their application in the acute care setting are scarce. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, describes dietary assessment methods used to measure oral intake in acute and critical care hospital patients. The search was run across four databases to identify primary research conducted in adult acute or critical care settings from 1st of January 2000-15th March 2023 which quantified oral diet with any dietary assessment method. In total, 155 articles were included, predominantly from the acute care setting (n = 153, 99%). Studies were mainly single-centre (n = 138, 88%) and of observational design (n = 135, 87%). Estimated plate waste (n = 59, 38%) and food records (n = 43, 28%) were the most frequent assessment methods with energy and protein the main nutrients quantified (n = 81, 52%). Validation was completed in 23 (15%) studies, with the majority of these using a reference method reliant on estimation (n = 17, 74%). A quarter of studies (n = 39) quantified completion (either as complete versus incomplete or degree of completeness) and four studies (2.5%) explored factors influencing completion. Findings indicate a lack of high-quality evidence to guide selection and application of existing dietary assessment methods to quantify oral intake with a particular absence of evidence in the critical care setting. Further validation of existing tools and identification of factors influencing completion is needed to guide the optimal approach to quantification of oral intake in both research and clinical contexts.

Strategies to Reduce the Rate of Plate Waste in Hospitalized Patients: A Scoping Review

There is evidence that hospital waste is indisputably high, and various strategies have been used to reduce the hospital's rate of plate waste. This study aimed to map the currently implemented strategies in lowering the rate of plate waste in hospitals and categorize the different types of strategies used as interventions, as well as determine their impact based on specific parameters. The scoping review method included a search of three databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-SCR). The duplicate articles (n = 80) were removed. A total of 441 articles remained for the title and abstract screening. After 400 were excluded, 41 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Thirty-two full articles were eliminated due to a lack of focus on plate waste evaluation. Finally, nine accepted studies were grouped into five categories: menu modification, room service implementation, menu presentation, meal-serving system, and dietary monitoring tool. In conclusion, results showed that the majority of the studies implemented either of the five strategies to reduce plate waste; however, the cook-freeze system and staff training for both kitchen and ward staff were not yet part of any intervention strategy. The potential of this method should be explored in future interventions.

Using an interactive nutrition technology platform to predict malnutrition risk

AIMS

The Nutrition Dashboard is an interactive nutrition technology platform that displays food provision and intake data used to categorise the nutrition risk of hospitalised individuals. This study aimed to investigate the Nutrition Dashboard's ability to identify malnutrition compared to a validated malnutrition screening tool.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study at a 99-bed hospital was conducted using medical record and food intake data presented via the Nutrition Dashboard. Inter-Rater Reliability of food intake estimation between hospital catering staff and a dietitian reported good agreement across 912 food items (κ = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.72, p < 0.001). Default nutritional adequacy thresholds of 4500kJ and 50g protein were applied for Nutrition Dashboard categorisation of supply and intake. Generalised estimating equation regression models explored the association between the Nutrition Dashboard risk categories and the Malnutrition Screening Tool, with and without controlling for patient demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Analyses from 216 individuals (1783 hospital-stay days) found those in the highest risk Nutrition Dashboard Category were 1.93 times more likely to have a Malnutrition Screening Tool score indicating risk compared to the lowest Nutrition Dashboard Category (unadjusted odds ratio 1.93, 95% CI, 1.17-3.19, p<0.01). When patient weight was added to the model, lower weight became the only significant predictor of MST≥2 (p<0.01) CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a role for nutrition intake technology in malnutrition screening. Further adaptions that address the complexities of applying this technology could improve the use of the Nutrition Dashboard to support identification of malnutrition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a "COVID Hospital": A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus

Aim

The aim of the present study was to modify the hospital menu to increase energy and protein provision in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

After the conversion of our hospital to a COVID-19 hospital, eggs, and comfort foods such as vanilla pudding were added to the menu to boost energy and protein intake of patients. All meals of the standard menu of the hospital, i.e., breakfast, lunch, and dinner were recorded for 14 consecutive days during two periods: pre-COVID-19 and after being converted to a "COVID hospital." The menus were analyzed with the use of the USDA database.

Results

The total content of energy (1,873 ± 87 vs. 2,489 ± 137 Kcal), protein (97 ± 11 vs. 126.4 ± 18.7 g), fat (55 ± 9 vs. 74.1 ± 12.8 g), and carbohydrate (241.0 ± 16.0 vs. 323.0 ± 16.0 g) of the provided menus was increased in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID period. The leucine provision was also increased (4.8 ± 1.08 vs. 7.2 ± 1.3 g). Changes in protein and leucine were greater for breakfast (10 vs. 21 g protein and 0.8 vs. 1.7 g of leucine). The menu during COVID-29 provided more vitamin C (69.5 vs. 109.4 mg), thiamine (1.5 vs. 1.6 mg), riboflavin (2.1 vs. 2.6 mg), niacin (20.6 vs. 27.2 mg), pantothenic Acid (5.7 vs. 7.9 mg), vitamin B6 (2 vs. 2.6 mg), folate (274 vs. 334 μg), B 12 (4.8 vs. 6.2 μg), choline (296 vs. 458 mg) as well as vitamins A (8,564 vs. 21,258 IU), D (3.9 vs. 4.7 μg), and K (59.3-111.5 μg). As far as micronutrients are concerned, the provisions of calcium (972 vs. 1375 mg), iron (10.2-12.8 mg), magnesium (236 vs. 294 mg), phosphorus (1,325 vs. 1,807 mg), copper (1.0 vs. 1.3 mg), manganese (2.1 vs. 2.4 mg) and selenium (148 vs. 183 μg) were increased during the COVID-19 period.

Conclusion

Simple menu changes and addition of comfort foods can substantially boost the nutrient content of a hospital diet, which in concert with provision of oral nutritional supplements could have an impact on patients' nutritional status.

Eat what you want and when you want. Effect of a free choice menu on the energy and protein intake of geriatric medical patients

BACKGROUND

Geriatric medical patients are often at nutritional risk when admitted to hospital. More flexible meal service concepts may prove successful in improving nutritional intake.

AIM

To evaluate whether the Free Choice Menu (FCM), a new room service resembling meal service concept, improves energy and protein intake in a population of geriatric medical patients compared with the traditional concept of serving meals from a trolley with a fixed menu (trolley).

METHODS

Data were collected consecutive in a geriatric ward at Slagelse Hospital (Denmark) before (autumn 2018; n = 98) and after (autumn 2020; n = 52) implementing the Free Choice Menu. Weighed dietary intake was recorded for three full days for each patient.

RESULTS

Energy and protein intake did not differ significantly when comparing the two meal service concepts (trolley: 6124 kJ; 52.6 g and FCM: 5923 kJ; 47.1 g) over three days. The FCM concept showed however a significantly higher energy and protein intake for the dinner (relative to the other meals), whereas a higher percentage of protein and energy intake was covered by oral nutritional supplements in the trolley concept. The majority of the participants met the recommendations for energy intake, while only a minority met the recommendations for protein intake. Plate waste was significantly lower (p = 0.0005) at the lunch meal for the FCM concept (15.6%) compared with the trolley concept (26.1%).

CONCLUSION

When implementing a FCM, energy and protein intake was maintained and patients received more energy and protein from the dinner and less from oral nutritional supplements. However, the introduction of a free choice of meals concept did not in itself ensure nutritional intake in geriatric medical patients.

ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition

In hospitals through Europe and worldwide, the practices regarding hospital diets are very heterogeneous. Hospital diets are rarely prescribed by physicians, and sometimes the choices of diets are based on arbitrary reasons. Often prescriptions are made independently from the evaluation of nutritional status, and without taking into account the nutritional status. Therapeutic diets (low salt, gluten-free, texture and consistency modified, …) are associated with decreased energy delivery (i.e. underfeeding) and increased risk of malnutrition. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) proposes here evidence-based recommendations regarding the organization of food catering, the prescriptions and indications of diets, as well as monitoring of food intake at hospital, rehabilitation center, and nursing home, all of these by taking into account the patient perspectives. We propose a systematic approach to adapt the hospital food to the nutritional status and potential food allergy or intolerances. Particular conditions such as patients with dysphagia, older patients, gastrointestinal diseases, abdominal surgery, diabetes, and obesity, are discussed to guide the practitioner toward the best evidence based therapy. The terminology of the different useful diets is defined. The general objectives are to increase the awareness of physicians, dietitians, nurses, kitchen managers, and stakeholders towards the pivotal role of hospital food in hospital care, to contribute to patient safety within nutritional care, to improve coverage of nutritional needs by hospital food, and reduce the risk of malnutrition and its related complications.

Hospital Food Service Strategies to Improve Food Intakes among Inpatients: A Systematic Review

This review aims to identify hospital food service strategies to improve food consumption among hospitalized patients. A systematic search that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria was manually conducted through Web of Science and Scopus by an author, and the ambiguities were clarified by two senior authors. The quality assessment was separately conducted by two authors, and the ambiguities were clarified with all the involved authors. Qualitative synthesis was used to analyze and summarized the findings. A total of 2432 articles were identified by searching the databases, and 36 studies were included. The majority of the studies applied menu modifications and meal composition interventions (n = 12, 33.3%), or included the implementation of the new food service system (n = 8, 22.2%), protected mealtimes, mealtime assistance and environmental intervention (n = 7, 19.4%), and attractive meal presentation (n = 3, 8.3%). Previous studies that used multidisciplinary approaches reported a significant improvement in food intake, nutritional status, patient satisfaction and quality of life (n = 6, 16.7%). In conclusion, it is suggested that healthcare institutions consider applying one or more of the listed intervention strategies to enhance their foodservice operation in the future.

Safety and impact of peripheral parenteral nutrition on nutrient delivery in patients with nutrition risk: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients and strategies to improve energy and protein intake have a positive impact on outcome. Despite early evidence suggesting the usefulness of peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN), its adoption has been hampered by concerns regarding safety and efficacy. This study addresses this issue.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was performed in medical and surgical inpatients in who were screened for nutrition risk and assessed using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Data captured included nutrition status, energy and protein requirements, intravenous access, indications for PPN, use of supplemental micronutrients, and disposition of patients on PPN.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were recruited from two centers over 8 months. The average age was 61.5 years, the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.21 (±3.09), 52% were male, and 48% were admitted to medicine, whereas 52% were admitted to surgery. Thirty-three percent of patients were SGA C, 44% were SGA B, and 19% were SGA A. Twenty-seven percent of patients had cancer. The average length of hospital stay was 22 days. The main indications for PPN were gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (72%) and postsurgical status (16%). PPN provided an average of 1296 kcal (±191) and 46 g of protein (±7). Intravenous access complications in patients receiving PPN did not occur in excess of expected. Almost 40% of patients required transition to central PN.

CONCLUSIONS

PPN is a safe, effective way to deliver supplemental protein, energy, and micronutrients to malnourished patients and supports transition to other modes of nutrition care.

Trends and Novel Research in Hospital Nutrition Care: A Narrative Review of Leading Clinical Nutrition Journals

Hospital malnutrition is a longstanding problem that continues to be underrecognized and undertreated. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize novel, solution-focused, recent research or commentary to update providers on the prevention of iatrogenic malnutrition as well as the detection and treatment of hospital malnutrition. A narrative review was completed using the top 11 clinically relevant nutrition journals. Of the 13,850 articles and editorials published in these journals between 2013 and 2019, 511 were related to hospital malnutrition. A duplicate review was used to select (n = 108) and extract key findings from articles and editorials. Key criteria for selection were population of interest (adult hospital patients, no specific diagnostic group), solution-focused, and novel perspectives. Articles were categorized (6 classified in >1 category) as Screening and Assessment (n = 17), Standard (n = 25), Advanced (n = 12) and Specialized Nutrition Care (n = 8), Transitions (n = 15), Multicomponent (n = 21), Education and Empowerment (n = 9), Economic Impact (n = 3), and Guidelines (n = 4) for summarizing. Research advances in screening implementation, standard nutrition care, transitions, and multicomponent interventions provide new strategies to consider for malnutrition prevention (iatrogenic), detection, and care. However, several areas requiring further research were identified. Specifically, larger and more rigorous studies that examine health outcomes and economic analyses are urgently needed.

During Hospitalization, Older Patients at Risk for Malnutrition Consume <0.65 Grams of Protein per Kilogram Body Weight per Day

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is prevalent in hospitalized patients. To support muscle maintenance in older and chronically ill patients, a protein intake of 1.2-1.5 g/kg/d has been recommended during hospitalization. We assessed daily protein intake levels and distribution in older patients at risk for malnutrition during hospitalization.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, we measured actual food and food supplement consumption in patients (n = 102; age, 68 ± 14 years; hospital stay, 14 [8-28] days) at risk of malnutrition during hospitalization. Food provided by hospital meals, ONS, and snacks and the actual amount of food (not) consumed were weighed and recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

Hospital meals provided 1.03 [0.77-1.26] protein, whereas actual protein consumption was only 0.65 [0.37-0.93] g/kg/d. Protein intake at breakfast, lunch, and dinner was 10 [6-15], 9 [5-14], and 13 [9-18] g, respectively. The use of ONS (n = 62) resulted in greater energy (1.26 [0.40-1.79] MJ/d, 300 [100-430] kcal/d) and protein intake levels (11 [4-16] g/d), without changing the macronutrient composition of the diet.

CONCLUSION

Despite protein provision of ∼1.0 g/kg/d, protein intake remains well below these values (∼0.65 g/kg/d), as 30%-40% of the provided food and supplements is not consumed. Provision of ONS may increase energy and protein intake but does not change the macronutrient composition of the diet. Current nutrition strategies to achieve the recommended daily protein intake in older patients during their hospitalization are not as effective as generally assumed.

Improved meals service and reduced food waste and costs in medical institutions resulting from employment of a food service dietitian - a case study

BACKGROUND

A recurring problem in medical institutions is patients not always receiving food meeting their nutritional and medical needs. A proposed contributing factor is non- inclusion of dietitians in food service staff. Recently, positions for food service dietitians in hospitals were created. For the newly defined role of "Food Service Dietitian", comprehensive training courses were developed (70 dietitians participated).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the addition of the role of a "Food Service Dietitian" in medical institutions on suitability of foods served, food costs and food waste.

METHODS

A three years (2014-2017) national case study to examine the new role's impact was carried out, in 18 hospitals, nine of which employ a food service dietitian (intervention), and 9 without (control). The number of nutritional analyses of menus was checked, as was the extent of kitchen staff training, and how often night meals were served for all patients. Data were gathered regarding food costs and waste with respect to food distributed to staff and patients. Food costs savings and waste reduction were calculated, based on reduction in provision of unnecessary meals, at a cost of 18 NIS per day per meal.

RESULTS

Kitchen staff training was carried out in all intervention institutions, and not in the controls. In most controls, nutritional analyses were not performed, whereas in the intervention hospitals, full analyses were performed and tailoring of menus to specific department requirements improved significantly. In most intervention hospitals, late night snacks were provided, this not being so in the controls. Total food cost savings of $229,569 per annum was seen in the six intervention hospitals, attributable to 4 factors: 1.Meals not delivered to fasting patients, or those receiving parenteral/enteral nutrition- cost savings of 328,500 NIS ($93,857)2.Better tailoring and monitoring of food delivered to the wards and staff (bread, cheese, milk etc)- annual cost savings of 235,000 NIS ($67,142) in the hospitals with a food service dietitian.3.Checking expiry dates of medical foods, and improved communication between the wards, the kitchen and the food distribution centers, has lessened food waste with savings of 5% from the medical food budget per annum of 40,000 NIS ($11,428).4.As a result of dietitian-performed nutritional analyses, tailoring of food provided according to the patient's medical and nutrition needs was improved. In one hospital, after re-evaluation of serve sizes in high protein diets, sizes were reduced while retaining adequacy, with immediate cost savings of 200,000 NIS ($57,142) per annum.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the new role of Food Service Dietitian led to cost savings and significant improvements in adherence to the nutritional care plan.

Improving the nutritional intake of hospital patients: how far have we come? A re-audit

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition affects up to 33.6% of hospitalised patients, with consequences that are detrimental for both patients and healthcare providers. In 2015, an audit demonstrated inadequate nutritional provision and consumption by hospitalised patients, comprising a major risk factor for malnutrition. This re-audit evaluates whether patients are meeting recommended energy and protein standards and estimated individual requirements, subsequent to food service improvements since 2015.

METHODS

Patients (n = 111) were included from a South West hospital, and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool scores (MUST) categorised patients as 'nutritionally well' (MUST 0) or 'nutritionally vulnerable' (MUST ≥ 1). Individual energy and protein requirements were estimated using weight-based equations. Nutritional intakes were assessed via 24-h dietary recall and compared against the British Dietetic Association's Nutrition and Hydration Digest standards, as well as estimated individual requirements.

RESULTS

In total, the Digest standards for energy and protein were met by 35% and 63% of patients respectively, which is an increase of 19% and 36% since 2015. 'Nutritionally well' patients were more likely to meet nutrient standards for protein (62%) than estimated individual requirements (30%) (P ≤ 0.001). 'Nutritionally vulnerable' patients were more likely to meet estimated individual requirements for energy (60%) than the Digest standards (30%) (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients meeting the Digest standards has increased considerably following numerous food service changes. Nutritional training for housekeepers, energy/protein-dense snacks and drinks, and fortified dietary items may further increase nutritional intakes. Additionally, as a result of discrepancies between the Digest standards and individual estimated requirements, more research is required to identify the most appropriate auditing standards that reflect best practice.

Oral nutrition support interventions for patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition: a survey of clinical practice amongst UK dietitians

BACKGROUND

Guidance on choosing oral nutritional support strategies varies and the evidence for different approaches is discordant. The present study aimed to examine opinion and practice in the use of oral nutritional support amongst UK dietitians and to assess the factors that influence these clinical decisions.

METHODS

The study comprised a cross-sectional, anonymous, national survey of UK dietitians.

RESULTS

There were 207 completed responses (3% response rate). More dietitians reported using combined approaches (COMB) [n = 129 (62%)] over food-based (FB) strategies [n = 70 (34%)] or oral nutritional supplements (ONS) alone [n = 8 (4%)] (N = 207, P < 0.001). Intervention choice was associated with clinical setting and clinical speciality; community dietitians reported more frequent use of FB or ONS alone [n = 48 (59%)] versus COMB [n = 34 (41%)] compared to acute dietitians [COMB: n = 83 (78%) COMB versus FB or ONS alone: n = 24 (22%)] (N = 207, P < 0.0001). Specialist nutrition support dietitians reported more frequent use of FB or ONS alone [n = 22 (54%)] versus COMB [n = 19 (46%)] compared to nonspecialists [FB or ONS alone: n = 17 (45%) versus COMB: n = 21 (55%)] and other specialist dietitians [FB or ONS: n = 39 (30%) alone versus COMB: n = 89 (70%)] (P = 0.017). The greatest influences on choice were ease of implementation [n = 192 (93%)], departmental protocols [n = 184 (89%)], professional management pathways [n = 179 (87%)] and published research [n = 165 (80%)]. Patient circumstances [n = 117 (57%) and n = 99 (48%)] and ease of implementation [n = 35 (17%) and n = 48 (24%)] were reported as most influential in the first and second case scenarios, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for further research on approaches to the dietetic management of adult malnutrition.