Effectiveness of eHealth‐based cognitive behavioural therapy on depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Guided Intervention (MINDxYOU) for Reducing Stress and Promoting Mental Health Among Health Professionals: Results From a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The high levels of sustained stress that health professionals often experience are a significant risk factor for developing mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms, that not only affect their well-being but also have major social and organizational consequences. Different interventions, including those based on third-wave psychotherapy principles (ie, mindfulness, compassion, and acceptance), have proven to be effective in reducing stress in this population. Among them, those delivered on the web constitute a promising alternative with notable advantages in accessibility and flexibility, but some adherence inconveniences may limit their efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the MINDxYOU program, a web-based self-guided intervention based on third-wave psychotherapy principles, to reduce perceived stress and promote mental health in a sample of health professionals.

METHODS

In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, 357 health professionals from health centers in Aragon and Málaga, Spain, were recruited. They were divided into 6 clusters-3 per region-and randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 sequences, each starting with a control phase and then transitioning to the intervention phase (the MINDxYOU program) after 8, 16, or 24 weeks. This self-guided, web-based program, designed to be completed over 8 weeks, included weekly contact (via WhatsApp, call, or email) from the research team to promote adherence. Participants were assessed on the web every 8 weeks for 5 assessments. Perceived stress was the study's primary outcome, with additional measures of clinical factors (anxiety, depression, and somatization) and process variables (resilience, mindfulness, compassion, and acceptance).

RESULTS

The program was initiated by 229 participants, 112 (48.9%) of whom were completers (ie, completed at least 3 of the 4 modules). Perceived stress demonstrated a significant reduction both when considering the entire sample (β=-1.08, SE 0.51; P=.03) and the sample of completers (β=-1.84, SE 0.62; P=.003). The proportion of participants reflecting "low stress" increased after the treatment (n=90, 46.6% vs n=100, 28.8% at baseline). Intracluster analysis revealed that pre- versus postintervention moderate effects were present in 2 clusters (Cohen d=0.46 and 0.62), and these were maintained in subsequent assessments. The linear mixed-effects models also showed that depression, anxiety, and somatization, as well as resilience, self-compassion, and some mindfulness facets, experienced significant improvements (P<.05) when comparing the intervention and control phases.

CONCLUSIONS

The MINDxYOU program was effective in reducing perceived stress and promoting mental health, as well as increasing resilience, mindfulness facets, and self-compassion. These effects suggest that participants experienced a tangible improvement that could potentially enhance their well-being. Adherence to the intervention was moderate, while program use was notable compared to similar interventions. Finding ways to promote adherence to the intervention would contribute to increasing the effectiveness of this program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05436717; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05436717.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1186/s12912-022-01089-5.

Efficacy of Remote Psychological Interventions for Patients with Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders that are highly prevalent worldwide. Clinical trials have found that telehealth interventions result in increased accessibility and improved mental treatment effectiveness. However, a few comprehensive syntheses of evidence from randomized clinical trials that have been conducted to evaluate remote psychological vs face-to-face interventions for anxiety and depression are not conclusive. The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of remote psychological interventions for patients with anxiety and depression symptoms. Methods: Randomized clinical trials with the following criteria were included: participants aged ≥5 years, of both sexes, and who underwent psychological therapy to treat anxiety and or depression symptoms. They were randomized to receive the same psychological treatment remotely or face-to-face. Review studies, animal studies, pilot studies, and studies with patients diagnosed with chronic diseases were excluded. Searches were performed on March 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, and the standardized mean difference with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effect. Results: Six studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference when comparing remote or face-to-face treatment for depression (SMD of -0.10 [95% CI: -0.57 to 0.37; I2: 77%]) and anxiety (SMD of -0.06 [95% CI: -0.34 to 0.21; I2: 0%]) symptoms. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that remote psychotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to face-to-face care in mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety. It allows patients to select the best modality for their daily routines, promoting greater engagement and adherence to treatment.

Digital mental health interventions for the treatment of depression: A multiverse meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The varying sizes of effects in published meta-analyses on digital interventions for depression prompt questions about their efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic search in Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed identified 125 randomised controlled trials up to February 2023, comparing digital interventions for depression against inactive controls. The stability of results was evaluated with a multiverse meta-analysis, thousands of meta-analyses were conducted based on different combinations of analytical choices, like target populations, intervention characteristics, and study designs.

RESULTS

A total of 3638 meta-analyses were performed based on 125 randomised controlled trials and 263 effect sizes, with a total of 32,733 participants. The average effect size was Hedges' g = 0.43, remaining positive at both the 10th (g = 0.16) and 90th percentiles (g = 0.74). Most meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant benefit of digital interventions. Larger effects were observed in meta-analyses focusing on adults, low- and middle-income countries, guided interventions, comparing interventions with waitlist controls, and patients with major depressive or unipolar mood disorders. Smaller effects appeared when adjusting for publication bias and in assessments after 24 weeks.

LIMITATIONS

While multiverse meta-analysis aims to exhaustively investigate various analytical decisions, some subjectivity remains due to the necessity of making choices that affect the methodology. Additionally, the quality of the included primary studies was low.

CONCLUSIONS

The analytical decisions made during performing pairwise meta-analyses result in vibrations from small to medium effect sizes. Our study provides robust evidence for the effectiveness of digital interventions for depression while highlighting important factors associated with treatment outcomes.

Factors Associated With Digital Intervention Engagement and Adherence in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Digital interventions offer vital support for patients with cancer through education, behavior change, and monitoring. Despite their potential, patient adherence to and engagement with these self-help interventions is challenging. Factors like user characteristics, technology, and intervention design influence adherence and engagement. Existing reviews have gaps in exploring diverse factors associated with adherence in cancer care.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify factors influencing adherence to and engagement with digital interventions with self-help components in cancer care. It examined sociodemographic, psychosocial, health-related, and intervention-related factors that affect patients' adherence to and engagement with these digital health solutions.

METHODS

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to find studies published from January 2010 to September 2021. The studies included in this review focused on adult patients with cancer using digital interventions with self-help features. Data were extracted and synthesized using a standardized approach. Factors associated with adherence were synthesized according to their type-sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors, health-related factors, technology-related factors, and intervention-related factors.

RESULTS

Among 9386 studies initially screened, 61 (0.6%) were eligible for analysis. These studies covered diverse eHealth intervention types, cancer types, and outcome measures. Investigating the determinants of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions was the main objective for 43% (26/61) of the included studies. Adherence and engagement were gauged using varied measures, such as dropout rates, log-ins, and self-reported measures. Results regarding factors associated with adherence and engagement were inconsistent across studies. Most sociodemographic (eg, age) and health-related factors (eg, cancer stage) yielded mixed outcomes. However, comorbidity consistently predicted lower adherence and engagement. Results regarding psychosocial factors were more stable across studies. Specifically, higher social support was associated with lower adherence and engagement. Finally, intervention-related factors like intervention type or human support showed conflicting results. Adopting an intersectional perspective revealed that specificities vary according to intervention goals and the operationalization of adherence versus engagement, with women being more adherent and engaged than men in interventions targeting distress. When focusing on adherence rather than engagement, older patients were more adherent than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the complexity of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions in cancer care. While some factors, notably comorbidities and low social support, were consistently linked to adherence and engagement, others displayed mixed associations. The review underscores the need for standardizing measures, investigating specific intervention features, and enhancing study quality to optimize digital interventions for patients with cancer. Further research is crucial to better understand and improve adherence to digital health solutions in cancer care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021281028; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=281028.

An integrated approach to the treatment of Rheumatic diseases: the role of psychological interventions

Rheumatic diseases are chronic conditions that often result in significant physical and psychological challenges, reducing patients' quality of life and increasing the economic burden on healthcare systems. This study examines the vital role of psychological interventions in the comprehensive treatment of rheumatic diseases. The findings reveal a high prevalence of psycho-emotional disorders such as depression, anxiety, and stress among these patients, which can worsen disease progression and hinder treatment adherence. The review highlights the bidirectional relationship between the central nervous and immune systems, showing how psychological stress influences the pathophysiology of inflammatory diseases. Various psychological interventions are explored, including mind-body therapies, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based practices such as meditation, yoga, and tai chi. These approaches improve emotional well-being, help reduce pain, and enhance overall quality of life. The article emphasizes a holistic treatment model incorporating pharmacological care, physical rehabilitation, and psychological support. This integrated approach fosters more effective management of rheumatic diseases by addressing their complex nature and promoting better functional outcomes. The study advocates for the seamless incorporation of psychological support into routine clinical practice tailored to the biopsychosocial profile of each patient. Future research should focus on identifying the most effective psychological interventions for different patient groups to enhance the quality of life for individuals with rheumatic diseases.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Telehealth-Based Treatments for Depression in Adults: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of work-related disability, and accessing telehealth therapies can be a promising modality for workers with MDD. Barriers to accessing in-person mental healthcare, such as limited availability and accessibility in rural and remote communities, financial constraints, and stigma, have highlighted the need for alternative approaches like telehealth. This study investigated the efficacy of telehealth interventions including CBT for adults over 18 diagnosed with MDD.

METHODS

This rapid review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a transparent methodology. Out of the 2549 studies screened, 19 were incorporated into the rapid review, and of those, 10 were included in the subsequent meta-analyses. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers, with the disagreements reconciled through discussion. A reviewer extracted data from eligible articles. Descriptive statistics and narrative syntheses were used to describe outcomes. Two meta-analyses were conducted to investigate the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered by telehealth (tCBT). The first compared tCBT to in-person CBT (pCBT). The second meta-analysis compared tCBT to a control group that did not receive CBT or another telehealth-based treatment. Non-CBT interventions investigated within the non-CBT group included somatic rhythm therapy, problem-solving therapy, psychiatry, behavioral activation, and interpersonal psychotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, individuals with MDD who received tCBT showed significant improvement in depression symptoms. However, the efficacy of tCBT compared to non-telehealth control groups varied across studies. The first meta-analysis indicated the magnitudes of effect were similar for both interventions in reducing depression symptoms 0.023 (95% CI - 0.120 to 0.166); p = 1.00. In the second meta-analysis, the ratio of means comparing tCBT (0.51 ± 0.14 SD) to the control group (0.68 ± 0.12 SD) exhibited a statistically significant 25% reduction with regard to depression scores (one-sided p = 0.002), favouring tCBT to non-telehealth, non-CBT study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth-based CBT demonstrated positive effects on depression symptoms; it was generally superior when compared to control groups not receiving CBT and was on par with pCBT. The growing mental health burden in the community underscores the need for accessible telehealth services like tCBT. Effective policy formulation and implementation in national health agendas are essential to meet the increasing demand for mental health support.

Exploring experiences with an internet-delivered ACT intervention among individuals with a personal history of depression: A thematic analysis

This qualitative study explored the experiences of individuals testing a novel internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy program (iACT) for patients with mild and moderate depressive disorder. Twelve participants, consisting of one male and 11 females with a history of depression but not currently depressed were recruited. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted after 14 days of access to the iACT without therapist guidance. By using reflexive thematic analysis three key themes reflecting important aspects of the participants' experiences were created. 'Theme 1: I would have been too ill to benefit from the program' points to generally positive sentiments about the program among participants but raised concerns about treatment adherence during a depressive episode. 'Theme 2: It has the potential to fill gaps in healthcare services' highlighted the program's perceived role as a supplement to current health services rather than as a standalone intervention. 'Theme 3: It is not perfect for anyone' underscored the participants different views on how their personal needs would be met by this program and the lack of tailoring to individual preferences. These findings provide valuable insights for refining future internet-delivered intervention development targeting patients with depression or other mental health challenges.

Effectiveness of Behavioral and Pharmacologic Interventions for Depressive Symptoms After Spinal Cord Injury: Findings From a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions for depressive symptoms in adults living with spinal cord injury (SCI) and comorbid major depressive disorder or significant depressive symptoms to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Articles published since 2013 and available in Medline, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, or PsycINFO. Databases were searched in June 2022 and updated November 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria: age 18 years or older, traumatic SCI, and clinically significant depression (Population), mental health interventions including behavioral, pharmacologic, and complementary and alternative medicine (Intervention), inclusion of a control group (Comparator), with a primary outcome of depression symptom reduction (Outcome). Criteria were applied by multiple reviewers and disagreements were reconciled via unanimous decision among the entire research team. Eight articles of 2780 screened met the selection criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted independently by multiple reviewers. Two reviewers independently assigned a quality score using the guidelines described by Hawker and associates and independently evaluated the risk of bias of each article using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

All studies assessed depressive symptoms during participant recruitment, screening, and/or at a baseline assessment stage. Pharmacotherapy with venlafaxine XR and several behavioral interventions appear promising, including an online mindfulness course and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy. Remote interventions may be effective in reaching individuals who are unable to travel to in-person therapy sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides valuable information for clinicians who treat individuals with SCI and comorbid major depressive disorder or significant depressive symptoms. It highlights the importance of considering a variety of interventions and individualizing treatment to meet individuals' needs and preferences. Future research should aim to identify effective interventions for treating depressive symptoms in individuals with SCI and optimal delivery methods for these interventions.

Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for affective disorders, anxiety disorders and somatic conditions: An updated systematic umbrella review

Background

Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT), which can involve guidance from a clinician, continues to be a way to deliver psychological treatments. A previous umbrella review identified moderate-to-large effect sizes favouring ICBT compared to control conditions when treating major depression and anxiety disorders. Given the rapid developments in the field, an updated umbrella review of available meta-analyses can show other conditions and subpopulations for which ICBT is effective. The aim of the study was to provide an expanded overview of the efficacy of ICBT for a broader range of adult psychiatric and somatic conditions.

Methods

We conducted an updated search of the literature since the publication of the previous umbrella review back in 2019 and up until March 2024. Five different search engines were used (Medline (OVID), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library and CINAHL). The search was expanded to include additional psychiatric conditions (e.g., suicidal ideation) and somatic conditions (e.g., tinnitus and chronic pain).

Results

Of the 6509 identified articles, 39 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. In these meta-analyses 19 unique outcomes were represented. The most common outcome was symptoms of major depressive disorder, followed by symptoms of anxiety. Effect sizes for the comparisons against control conditions ranged between small (e.g., SMD = 0.10 for stress in employees) to large (e.g., SMD = 1.20 for depressive symptoms among older adults).

Conclusions

ICBT can generally reduce symptoms of a wide range of conditions including both psychiatric and somatic conditions, as well as other mental health problems. This updated review of available meta-analyses also indicated that ICBT has been successful in treating symptoms in different subpopulations such as older adults and students. However, some knowledge gaps remain, including the use of ICBT for psychotic disorders, and the quality of the available meta-analyses' points to a need for more stringent methodological procedures.

Corrigendum: Therapists' experiences with providing guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with mild and moderate depression: a thematic analysis

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236895.].

Therapists' experiences with providing guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with mild and moderate depression: a thematic analysis

Introduction

Guided internet-delivered therapy has shown promising results for patients with mild and moderate depressive disorder, but several challenges with the format have been reported. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate therapists' experiences providing guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with mild and moderate depression.

Material and methods

Twelve therapists were interviewed, and the interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results and conclusion

Three themes were created: (1) For the right person, at the right time. This theme is about therapists' experiences appointing patients to the program. It is challenging to predict which patients will benefit from it, and it is not the right option for all patients. (2) It is not like chatting on Facebook. The second theme was about the experiences with demands on clinics, therapists and patients that must be considered. The internet-delivered treatment should not be viewed as a simple treatment option, and the value of having contact with the patients during treatment was emphasized. (3) It is like a railroad, but without the switches. This theme was about the experiences with how the treatment content was conveyed to the patients, how the therapists expressed concerns with the usability of the program and the reported need for more possibilities in tailoring treatment for each patient.

Guided Internet-Delivered Treatment for Depression: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Studies on guided internet-delivered treatment have demonstrated promising results for patients with depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of this research area and identify potential gaps in the research.

METHODS

In this scoping review, web-based databases were used to identify research papers published between 2010 and 2022 where guided internet-delivered treatment was administered to participants with depressive disorders, a standardized rating scale of depressive symptoms was used as the primary outcome measure, and the treatment was compared with a control condition.

RESULTS

A total of 111 studies were included, and an overview of the studies was provided. Several gaps in the research were identified regarding the design of the studies, treatments delivered, participant representation, and treatment completion.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the research area, and several research gaps were identified. The use of other designs and active control conditions is recommended. Future studies should provide access to treatment manuals, and more replications should be conducted. Researchers should aim to include underrepresented populations and provide reports of comorbidities. Definitions of adequate dosage, reports of completion rates, and reasons for treatment dropout are recommended for future studies.