Evaluation of unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin and fondaparinux for pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis in critically ill patients with cancer

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) in the Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) Era

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon complication of heparin therapy with significant risk for severe morbidity and mortality. We investigated the role and outcome of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of HIT.

METHODS

After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a retrospective review was performed identifying all patients with positive HIT serotonin-release assays between 2020 and 2022 at two hospitals. The demographic and clinical variables were collected as follows: initial anticoagulant, dosing and indication, interval before onset of HIT, thrombotic complications, platelet nadir and recovery, direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) and DOAC usage, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

15 patients were included in the study. 8 underwent a vascular procedure, 3 had cardiac surgery, 1 patient had both and was included in both groups, and 5 patients had either noncardiac, nonvascular surgery, or no surgery. 14 patients received unfractionated heparin (93% with therapeutic dosing), and 1 received prophylactic enoxaparin prior to diagnosis of HIT. The average time to diagnosis of HIT was 10.77 days after initial anticoagulation. In-hospital mortality was 27%, related to Covid-19 infection (3/4) and intracranial hemorrhage (1/4). 40% developed thrombosis (67% venous, 33% arterial) after the diagnosis of HIT. 8/11 survivors were discharged on a DOAC. With DOAC therapy, platelet counts rebounded to an average of 265K ( ± 104.6 K) within an average of 2.3 days and 364K ( ± 273.9 K) within 30 days after initiation of a DOAC. No recurrent thrombosis occurred after DOAC administration and only one patient had persistent thrombocytopenia within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and thrombosis (arterial and venous) are common complications in patients diagnosed with HIT. In patients who survive to discharge, DOACs are the most common discharge antithrombotic agent, with low rates of recurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia.

Acute pulmonary embolism in cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit: Impact of anticoagulant treatment on 90-day mortality and risk factors, results of a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening situation in cancer patients. In this situation, anticoagulant therapy is complex to administer due to the risk of bleeding. Only few studies have been conducted when these patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between anticoagulation strategies as well as other factors with 90-day mortality in patients with cancer and PE admitted to ICU. Major bleeding was also evaluated according to the type of anticoagulation.

METHODS

Retrospective study carried out in 4 ICUs in France over a 12-year period (2009-2021). All patients with cancer and PE were included. An overlap propensity score weighting analysis was performed in the subgroup of patients treated with either unfractionated heparins (UFH) alone or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) alone on 90-day mortality and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 218 consecutive cancer patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE were included. The 90-day mortality rate was 42 % for the global cohort. After propensity score analysis in the subgroup of patients treated with either "UFH alone" (n = 80) or "LMWH alone" (n = 71), the 90-day mortality was similar in patients treated with UFH alone (42.6 %) vs LMWH alone (39.9 %): OR = 1.124, CI 95 % [0.571-2.214], p = 0.750. There was a significant increased toward major bleeding rates in the "UFH alone" group (25.5 %) as compared to "LMWH alone" group (11.5 %), p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

In 218 patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE, the 90-day mortality rate was 42 %. Treatment with UFH alone was associated with a mortality comparable to treatment with LMWH alone but it appeared to be more prone to major bleeding.

The Role of Injectables in the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer. CAT can manifest itself as venous thromboembolism (VTE), in the form of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or arterial thromboembolism. The pathophysiology of CAT is complex and depends on cancer-, patient-, treatment- and biomarkers-related factors. Treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is complex and includes three major classes of anticoagulant agents: heparin and its derivatives, e.g., low molecular weight heparins, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and vitamin K inhibitors. Given the tremendous heterogeneity of clinical situations in patients with cancer and the challenges of CAT, there is no single universal treatment option for patients suffering from or at risk of CAT. Initial studies suggested that patients seemed to prefer an anticoagulant that would not interfere with their cancer treatment, suggesting the primacy of cancer over VTE, and favoring efficacy and safety over convenience of route of administration. Recent studies show that when the efficacy and safety aspects are similar, patients prefer the oral route of administration. Despite this, injectables are a valid option for many patients with cancer.

Pharmacological and clinical application of heparin progress: An essential drug for modern medicine

Heparin is the earliest and most widely used anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug that is still used in a variety of clinical indications. Since it was discovered in 1916, after more than a century of repeated exploration, heparin has not been replaced by other drugs, but a great progress has been made in its basic research and clinical application. Besides anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects, heparin also has antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and other pharmacological activities. It is widely used clinically in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, lung diseases, kidney diseases, cancer, etc., as the first anticoagulant medicine in COVID-19 exerts anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects. At the same time, however, it also leads to a lot of adverse reactions, such as bleeding, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminase, allergic reactions, and others. This article comprehensively reviews the modern research progress of heparin compounds; discusses the structure, preparation, and adverse reactions of heparin; emphasizes the pharmacological activity and clinical application of heparin; reveals the possible mechanism of the therapeutic effect of heparin in related clinical applications; provides evidence support for the clinical application of heparin; and hints on the significance of exploring the wider application fields of heparin.

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of intrahepatic bile ducts complicated by chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombosis: A case report

RATIONALE

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPNB) is a relatively rare tumor that is clinically characterized by digestive symptoms. The concurrent occurrence of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with thrombosis is an extremely rare combination, reported in patients with IPNB. The clinical features of chronic DIC include microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and hypofibrinogenemia. Here, we report the case of a mucin-producing IPNB patient with hematological abnormalities.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 58-year-old male patient suffered from abdominal distension for more than 2 months with obstructive jaundice appearance. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed a neoplasm in the right hepatic lobe. Multiple intravascular fillings were found in the inferior vena cava, pulmonary artery, and right atrium. Anemia and hypofibrinogenemia were discovered through routine laboratory tests. The count of platelets began to decline 25 days after admission, while 1 month after hospitalization, the patient developed abdominal pain, fever, and shock.

DIAGNOSIS

Pathological examination demonstrated IPNB with a part of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Cardiac and inferior vena cava emboli were diagnosed as thrombi without neoplastic cells. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for Vimentin (mesenchyme), CK7, CK19, MUC-1, MUC-5AC, MUC-6, S-100p (focal), Ki-67 (12%), and negative for Inhibin-α, ER, CK20, CEA, and MUC-2. Additionally, immunohistochemistry indicated that IPNB was a mucus-secretion gastric type. The laboratory tests confirmed the presence of chronic DIC.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was given anticoagulant therapy before hepatectomy and right atrium thrombectomy was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass.

OUTCOMES

After anticoagulant therapy, the levels of hemoglobin, platelet, and fibrinogen of the patient returned to normal. Hepatectomy and thrombus removal was successfully performed. Then, the patient was discharged 12 days after the operation. After 12 months of follow-up, the patient recovered well without any hematologic abnormalities and no signs of tumor recurrence were observed.

LESSONS

IPNB may cause hematological complications, which can be easily misdiagnosed. It is essential to pay particular attention to the hematological abnormalities of patients with IPNB. Early detection and differential diagnosis of chronic DIC and thrombosis are necessary. We note that anticoagulant therapy coupled with surgery is an effective strategy to treat these complications.

Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication of acute endomyocardial injury and chronic ventricular wall hypokinesis, resulting in increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Observational studies support the general safety and efficacy of warfarin for this indication. Limited data exists regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LV thrombus. This retrospective cohort study sought to compare the incidence of thromboembolic events, bleeding rates, and blood product administration in patients receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. A total of 949 patients met inclusion, 180 (19%) received a DOAC and 769 (81%) warfarin. For the primary endpoint of new onset thromboembolic stroke, no difference existed between treatments (DOAC: 7.8% vs warfarin: 11.7%, p = 0.13). When compared to warfarin, no difference existed in the composite of thromboembolic events (33% vs 30.6%, p = 0.53, respectively) or in GUSTO bleeding (10.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.40, respectively). More patients on warfarin received blood products compared to those taking a DOAC (25.8% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001).DOACs may be an alternative to warfarin for the treatment of LV thrombus based on a retrospective assessment of thromboembolic events and GUSTO bleeding events within 90 days of diagnosis of LV thrombus. However, further prospective studies are warranted.

Coagulopathy, Venous Thromboembolism, and Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has led to a worldwide pandemic, and patients with the infection are referred to as having COVID‐19. Although COVID‐19 is commonly considered a respiratory disease, there is clearly a thrombotic potential that was not expected. The pathophysiology of the disease and subsequent coagulopathy produce an inflammatory, hypercoagulable, and hypofibrinolytic state. Several observational studies have demonstrated surprisingly high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in both general ward and intensive care patients with COVID‐19. Many of these observational studies demonstrate high rates of VTE despite patients being on standard, or even higher intensity, pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Fibrinolytic therapy has also been used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Unfortunately, high quality randomized controlled trials are lacking. A literature search was performed to provide the most up‐to‐date information on the pathophysiology, coagulopathy, risk of VTE, and prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID‐19. These topics are reviewed in detail, along with practical issues of anticoagulant selection and duration. Although many international organizations have produced guidelines or consensus statements, they do not all cover the same issues regarding anticoagulant therapy for patients with COVID‐19, and they do not all agree. These statements and the most recent literature are combined into a list of clinical considerations that clinicians can use for the prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with COVID‐19.

Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractioned heparin for anticoagulation during perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A single center experience in 102 lung transplant patients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is gaining importance in the perioperative management of lung transplant patients. To date, the ideal substance for anticoagulation of ECMO patients is still a matter of debate. In this study, we describe our experience with the use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in comparison with unfractioned heparin (UFH) in lung transplant patients undergoing perioperative ECMO support. We retrospectively analyzed data from all lung transplant patients who underwent perioperative ECMO support at our institution between 2013 and 2017. Bleeding events served as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters consisted of thromboembolic events. 102 patients were included in this study, of which 22 (21.6%) received UFH for anticoagulation, and 80 (78.4%) received LMWH. There was no difference between the two groups in regard to serious bleeding events (22.7% in the UFH group vs 12.5% in the LMWH group, P = .31). However, the proportion of patients experiencing thromboembolic events was significantly higher in the UFH group than in the LMWH group (50% vs 20%, P = .01). After adjusting for baseline differences between the two groups, we still observed a difference with respect to thromboembolic events. These data remain to be validated in future prospective, randomized trials.

Impact of Macrolide Antibiotics on Hospital Readmissions and Other Clinically Important Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a macrolide-based antibiotic treatment strategy reduces in-hospital mortality, decreases hospital readmissions, or improves other clinically important outcomes compared with a non-macrolide antibiotic treatment strategy in critically ill patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

DESIGN

Propensity score-matched pharmacoepidemiologic cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

Premier's Perspective Hospital Database.

PATIENTS

A total of 28,700 adults aged 40 years or older who were admitted to one of 566 United States intensive care units and had the primary diagnosis of AECOPD between January 2010 and December 2014 and received antibiotic treatment within 2 days of hospital admission were included. Patients were divided into macrolide (11,602 patients [40%]) or non-macrolide (17,098 patients [60%]) antibiotic treatment groups. Propensity score analysis successfully matched 8660 patients in each treatment group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the matched cohort, the macrolide treatment group was not associated with decreased hospital mortality after day 2 (3.0% vs 3.3%, p=0.28), intensive care unit length of stay (2 days vs 2 days, p=0.12), hospital length of stay (6 days vs 6 days, p=0.86), or length of assisted ventilation (3 days vs 3 days, p=0.71), compared with the non-macrolide treatment group. However, a macrolide-based antibiotic regimen was associated with an overall reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions (7.3% vs 8.8%, p<0.01), increased time to next all-cause (159 vs 130 days, p<0.01) or AECOPD (200 vs 175 days, p=0.03) readmission, and decreased hospital costs ($32,730 vs $34,021, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that inclusion of a macrolide antibiotic in the treatment regimen may have both acute and sustained benefits in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with an AECOPD, including reductions in hospital readmissions and improvements in time to next readmission.