Suboptimal Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in the United States

ESRRG-controlled downregulation of KCNN1 in primary sensory neurons is required for neuropathic pain

Peripheral nerve injury-induced neuronal hyperactivity in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) participates in neuropathic pain. The calcium-activated potassium channel subfamily N member 1 (KCNN1) mediates action potential afterhyperpolarization (AHP) and gates neuronal excitability. However, the specific contribution of DRG KCNN1 to neuropathic pain is not yet clear. We report that chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the unilateral sciatic nerve or unilateral ligation of the fourth lumbar nerve produced the downregulation of Kcnn1 mRNA and KCNN1 protein in the injured DRG. This downregulation was partially attributed to a decrease in DRG estrogen-related receptor gamma (ESRRG), a transcription factor, which led to reduced binding to the Kcnn1 promoter. Rescuing this downregulation prevented CCI-induced decreases in total potassium voltage currents and AHP currents, reduced excitability in the injured DRG neurons, and alleviated CCI-induced development and maintenance of nociceptive hypersensitivities, without affecting locomotor function and acute pain. Mimicking the CCI-induced DRG KCNN1 downregulation resulted in augmented responses to mechanical, heat, and cold stimuli in naive mice. Our findings indicate that ESRRG-controlled downregulation of DRG KCNN1 is likely essential for the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Thus, KCNN1 may serve as a potential target for managing this disorder.

Spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic neuropathy: An overview

Up to 25% of people with diabetes develop painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The standard of care pharmacotherapies for PDN have limited efficacy with a considerable side effect profile. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a form of electrical neurostimulation that modulates neural function via electrodes implanted into the spinal epidural space. While low frequency SCS has been shown to be potentially effective for treating pain associated with neuropathies, it masks pain perception by inducing paresthesia. Compared to low frequency SCS, high frequency (10 kHz) SCS delivers paresthesia-free therapy. As was shown in a randomized controlled trial, SENZA-PDN (NCT03228420), 10 kHz SCS is safe and effective for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. 10 kHz SCS offered a comprehensive treatment that improved pain levels, sleep, quality of life, and neurological function. These improvements correlated with a high degree of patient satisfaction. 10 kHz SCS provides a safe, durable and effective treatment for PDN with the unique potential to improve neurological function. In patients for whom durable, effective treatments have been limited thus far, the findings of the SENZA-PDN study are encouraging.

Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Treatments for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes. The lifetime prevalence of DPN is thought to be >50%, and 15%-25% of patients with diabetes experience neuropathic pain, referred to as "painful DPN." Appropriate treatment of painful DPN is important because this pain contributes to a poor quality of life by causing sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression. The basic principle for the management of painful DPN is to control hyperglycemia and other modifiable risk factors, but these may be insufficient for preventing or improving DPN. Because there is no promising diseasemodifying medication for DPN, the pain itself needs to be managed when treating painful DPN. Drugs for neuropathic pain, such as gabapentinoids, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, alpha-lipoic acid, sodium channel blockers, and topical capsaicin, are used for the management of painful DPN. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved pregabalin, duloxetine, tapentadol, and the 8% capsaicin patch as drugs for the treatment of painful DPN. Recently, spinal cord stimulation using electrical stimulation is approved by the FDA for the treatment for painful DPN. This review describes the currently available pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for painful DPN.

Sensory neuron-specific long noncoding RNA in small non-peptidergic dorsal root ganglion neurons selectively impairs nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity

AIMS

Nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity is one of major clinical symptoms in neuropathic pain patients. Understanding molecular mechanisms underlying this symptom is crucial for developing effective therapies. The present study was to investigate whether sensory neuron-specific long noncoding RNA (SS-lncRNA) predominantly expressed in small non-peptidergic dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons repaired nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SS-lncRNA downregulation in the mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member D (Mrgprd)-expressed DRG neurons was rescued and mimicked by crossbreeding MrgprdCreERT2/+ lines with Rosa26SS-lncRNA knock-in mice and SS-lncRNAfl/fl mice, respectively, followed by tamoxifen injection.

KEY FINDINGS

Rescuing SS-lncRNA downregulation in the Mrgprd-expressed DRG neurons significantly reversed the spinal nerve ligation (SNL)-induced reduction of the calcium-activated potassium channel subfamily N member 1 (KCNN1) in these DRG neurons and alleviated the SNL-induced mechanical hypersensitivity, without affecting the SNL-induced heat and cold nociceptive hypersensitivities, on the ipsilateral side. Conversely, mimicking SS-lncRNA downregulation in the Mrgprd-expressed DRG neurons reduced basal KCNN1 expression in these DRG neurons and produced the enhanced response to mechanical stimulation, but not thermal and cold stimuli, on bilateral sides. Mechanistically, SS-lncRNA downregulation caused a reduction in its binding to lysine-specific demethylase 6B (KDM6B) and consequent recruitment of less KDM6B to Kcnn1 promoter and an increase of H3K27me3 enrichment in this promoter in injured DRG.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings suggest that SS-lncRNA downregulation in small non-peptidergic sensory neurons is required specifically for nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity likely through silencing KCNN1 expression caused by KDM6B-gated increase of H3K27me3 enrichment in Kcnn1 promoter in these neurons.

Pregabalin alters reproductive performance in male mice and causes congenital anomalies in offspring

CONTEXT

Pregabalin is an anticonvulsant drug with analgesic activity for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

AIMS

To valuate the toxicity of pregabalin in reproductive parameters, spermatogenesis, and teratogenicity in the offspring of mice.

METHODS

Twenty male mice were randomly distributed into two groups: PGB group and group C (n =10 per group). The animals in the PGB group received, via gavage, 200mg/kg of pregabalin diluted in distilled water daily, for a period of 45days. Group C received distilled water under the same experimental design.

KEY RESULTS

In the paternal parameters of the PGB group, there was a significant increase in the size of the testicles, morphological alterations in the spermatozoa, a decrease in the Johnsen score, an increase in the Leydig cells, and a decrease in the serum level of testosterone. In the intrauterine development parameters of females mated with males from the PGB group, a significant decrease in placental weight, weight and length of fetuses, and fetal viability rate was observed. There was a significant increase in the number of resorptions and post-implantation losses. The significant anomalies observed in the offspring were alteration in the size of the kidneys, absent metacarpals and phalanges, alteration in the sternum, and supernumerary thoracic vertebrae.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that pregabalin had toxic effects on the reproductive function of male mice and teratogenic potential.

IMPLICATIONS

The findings of this study may provide new hypotheses, taking into account the risk-benefit ratio for male reproduction and offspring health.

Health care resource utilization and costs in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy treated with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation therapy

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, a common comorbidity of diabetes, is a neurodegenerative disorder that targets sensory, autonomic, and motor nerves frequently associated with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). PDN carries an economic burden as the result of reduced work and productivity. A recent multicenter randomized controlled trial, SENZA-PDN (NCT03228420), assessed the impact of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on pain relief. The effects of high-frequency SCS on health care resource utilization and medical costs are not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS on health care resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in patients with PDN using data from the SENZA-PDN trial. METHODS: Participants with PDN were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either 10 kHz SCS plus conventional medical management (CMM) (SCS treatment group) or CMM alone (CMM treatment group). Patient outcomes and HRU up to the 6-month follow-up are reported here. Costs (2020 USD) for each service was estimated based on publicly available Medicare fee schedules, Medicare claims data, and literature. HRU metrics of inpatient and outpatient contacts and costs are reported as means and SDs. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to compare SCS and CMM treatment groups at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6-month follow up, the SCS arm experienced approximately half the mean rate of hospitalizations per patient compared with the CMM treatment group (0.08 vs 0.15; P = 0.066). The CMM treatment group's total health care costs per patient were approximately 51% higher compared with the SCS treatment group (equivalent to mean annual cost per patient of $9,532 vs $6,300). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the SENZA-PDN trial indicates that the addition of 10 kHz SCS therapy results in lower rates of hospitalization and consequently lower health care costs among patients with PDN compared with those receiving conventional management alone.

Long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: 24-Month results of a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treating refractory painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

METHODS

The SENZA-PDN study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compared conventional medical management (CMM) alone with 10 kHz SCS plus CMM (10 kHz SCS+CMM) in 216 patients with refractory PDN. After 6 months, participants with insufficient pain relief could cross over to the other treatment. In total, 142 patients with a 10 kHz SCS system were followed for 24 months, including 84 initial 10 kHz SCS+CMM recipients and 58 crossovers from CMM alone. Assessments included pain intensity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), sleep, and neurological function. Investigators assessed neurological function via sensory, reflex, and motor tests. They identified a clinically meaningful improvement relative to the baseline assessment if there was a significant persistent improvement in neurological function that impacted the participant's well-being and was attributable to a neurological finding.

RESULTS

At 24 months, 10 kHz SCS reduced pain by a mean of 79.9% compared to baseline, with 90.1% of participants experiencing ≥50% pain relief. Participants had significantly improved HRQoL and sleep, and 65.7% demonstrated clinically meaningful neurological improvement. Five (3.2%) SCS systems were explanted due to infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 24 months, 10 kHz SCS provided durable pain relief and significant improvements in HRQoL and sleep. Furthermore, the majority of participants demonstrated neurological improvement. These long-term data support 10 kHz SCS as a safe and highly effective therapy for PDN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClincalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03228420.

l-Methylfolate in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

One of the most frequently occurring complications of diabetes mellitus is peripheral neuropathy. Despite the painful symptoms associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), the current treatment landscape focuses on managing symptoms without addressing the underlying causes of DPN. This narrative review describes the mechanistic effects and clinical trial data supporting the use of l-methylfolate calcium (LMF), the bioactive form of folate, which is available in the United States as a prescription medical food that also contains other B vitamins for the dietary management of DPN.

METHODS

Preclinical and clinical trial data evaluating the impact of LMF on DPN was identified using PubMed searches for articles published between 2010 and 2023. Search terms included: folate, l-methylfolate, diabetes, neuropathy, and neuropathic pain. Additionally, a literature search was conducted to identify studies related to LMF, genetic polymorphisms, and DPN pathophysiology.

RESULTS

Several studies show that the C677T variant of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene is linked to greater risk of DPN than other MTHFR variants due to its inhibitory effects on several folic acid metabolic pathways. One double-blind, randomized controlled trial, five open-label studies, and one retrospective study found that LMF has a significant beneficial effect on DPN that extends beyond symptomatic relief to include modulating the underlying pathophysiology that leads to the progression and symptoms of DPN. LMF also significantly improves patient quality of life, with minimal adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Preclinical and clinical studies have found that LMF can be used to treat the underlying causes of DPN and provide long-lasting symptomatic relief.

Fast-Acting Sub-perception Spinal Cord Stimulation for a Case of Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy. Just an Antalgic Treatment or Even a Therapy?

Introduction

Painful diabetic polyneuropathy (P-DPN) occurs in 20% - 30% of diabetic patients. Currently, therapeutic strategies include lifestyle modifications, good glycemic control, and neuropathic pain drugs. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be successful in patients who have not responded to other treatments. The American Diabetes Association strongly recommends early screening and diagnosis for this condition through clinical tests and nerve conduction study (NCS). In recent years, high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) with the analysis of cross-sectional area (CSA) has shown an increasingly important role in detecting changes in the nervous structures, blood vessels, echo, and mobility of the nerve. Cross-sectional area is frequently enlarged in these patients, even those with normal NCS. We aimed to use SCS with fast-acting sub-perception therapy (FAST) modality to treat P-DPN. We also evaluated the CSA of the involved nerves before and after treatment.

Case Presentation

A 58-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital in 2020 (Civitavecchia, Italy). She suffered from P-DPN for 3 years and did not respond to conventional medical treatments. Preoperative electromyography (EMG) was negative for radiculopathy, while electroneurography (ENG) showed a reduction in sensory conduction velocity (SCV) in the sural nerve (SN) bilaterally. Clinical tests on perceived pain and quality of life showed high severity. The report was confirmed by HRUS with enlargement of the CSA of the posterior tibial nerve (PTN), external popliteal nerve (EPN), and SN. The patient was successfully subjected to all-in-one SCS implantation in the FAST modality. She obtained immediate pain relief that remained unaltered at the 3-month follow-up. The patient completely discontinued drug therapy. One month after implantation, ENG highlighted an increased SN SCV, and the HRUS of PTN EPN and SN showed a significant reduction in CSA in all 3 nerves involved.

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in improving the clinical outcome of P-DPN, but there is still no gold standard therapy. Spinal cord stimulation in the new FAST modality was effective in this clinical case. The pain relief was supported by a significant reduction in the CSA of the studied nerves observed on HRUS 1 month after SCS implantation. The results and the improvement of a pathological nervous pattern, albeit with a short follow-up of only 3 months, could suggest not only a symptomatic but perhaps also a therapeutic role of SCS in P-DPN.

Effect of intrathecal NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides on neuropathic pain caused by nerve trauma, chemotherapy, or diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Blocking increased expression of nerve injury-specific long non-coding RNA (NIS-lncRNA) in injured dorsal root ganglia (DRG) through DRG microinjection of NIS-lncRNA small hairpin interfering RNA or generation of NIS-lncRNA knockdown mice mitigates neuropathic pain. However, these strategies are impractical in the clinic. This study employed a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antisense oligonucleotides strategy to examine the effect of NIS-lncRNA ASOs on neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Effects of intrathecal injection of NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides on day 7 or 14 after chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve, fourth lumbar (L4) spinal nerve ligation, or intraperitoneal injection of paclitaxel or streptozotocin on the expression of DRG NIS-lncRNA and C-C chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2, an NIS-lncRNA downstream target) and nociceptive hypersensitivity were examined. We also assessed whether NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides produced cellular toxicity.

RESULTS

Intrathecal NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides attenuated CCI-induced mechanical allodynia, heat hyperalgesia, cold hyperalgesia, and ongoing nociceptive responses, without changing basal or acute nociceptive responses and locomotor function. Intrathecal NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides also blocked CCI-induced increases in NIS-lncRNA and CCL2 in the ipsilateral L3 and L4 DRG and hyperactivities of neurones and astrocytes in the ipsilateral L3 and L4 spinal cord dorsal horn. Similar results were found in antisense oligonucleotides-treated mice after spinal nerve ligation or intraperitoneal injection of paclitaxel or streptozotocin. Normal morphologic structure and no cell loss were observed in the DRG and spinal cord of antisense oligonucleotides-treated mice.

CONCLUSION

These findings further validate the role of NIS-lncRNA in trauma-, chemotherapy-, or diabetes-induced neuropathic pain and demonstrate potential clinical application of NIS-lncRNA antisense oligonucleotides for neuropathic pain management.

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments

INTRODUCTION

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus, is challenging to treat. Efficacy and tolerability of the topical lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and well-established first-line oral medications (OM) were compared in refractory PDPN patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a subgroup analysis of a non-interventional, retrospective 24-week cohort study using anonymized routine medical care data from the German Pain eRegistry. Propensity score matching provided 732 datasets per treatment group. Primary effectiveness endpoint was the absolute change in average 24-hour Pain Intensity Index (0-100 mm) from baseline after 4, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment and over the entire treatment period.

RESULTS

The majority of this multimorbid and polymedicated study population of patients with PDPN had suffered pain for more than a year and presented with a high pain burden despite a median of seven previous analgesic medications. LMP treatment resulted in significant reductions in pain intensity and improvements in daily functioning already after 4 treatment weeks. Effectiveness was maintained over the treatment period even when concomitant analgesics were reduced or discontinued and quality of life improved. Mean change in the primary effectiveness parameter over the 24-week treatment period was -30.2 mm (SE 0.38) and -17.0 mm (SE 0.51) in the LMP and OM groups, respectively. Improvements in all effectiveness parameters were significantly greater under LMP than under OM treatment (p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients under LMP than OM experienced drug-related adverse events (DRAEs; 9.6% vs 61.6%, p<0.001) and discontinued treatment due to DRAEs (4.4% vs 35.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LMP was effective and well tolerated in routine clinical care of patients with PDPN. The more favorable benefit/risk profile and greater reduction in intake of concomitant analgesics compared with OM suggest LMP as a useful treatment option for PDPN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUPAS 32826.

Indirect Comparison of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) versus Traditional Low-Frequency SCS for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used to treat painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). At the time of a recent meta-analysis in this field, data were only available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). However, outcomes from high-frequency 10 kHz SCS treatment are now available. Our study aimed to systematically review the contemporary evidence for SCS in patients with lower limb pain due to PDN and include an indirect comparison of the high- and low-frequency modalities. We searched the PubMed/CENTRAL databases up to 18 August 2022, for peer-reviewed RCTs of SCS that enrolled PDN patients with lower limb pain symptoms. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Using SCS treatment arm data from the RCTs, we indirectly compared the absolute treatment effect of 10 kHz SCS and LF-SCS. Results are presented in tables and forest plots. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Three RCTs met our eligibility criteria, including the recent 10 kHz SCS RCT (N = 216, 90 implanted) and 2 others that examined LF-SCS (N = 36, 17 implanted; N = 60, 37 implanted). Our analysis of 6-month data found clinically meaningful pain relief with each SCS modality. However, significantly greater pain reduction was identified for 10 kHz SCS over LF-SCS: average pain reduction in the 10 kHz SCS cohort was 73.7% compared with 47.5% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p < 0.0001). In the permanent implant subset, the 50% pain reduction responder rate was 83.3% in the 10 kHz SCS cohort versus 63.0% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p = 0.0072). The overall risk of bias of each included RCT was deemed high, mainly due to the absence of patient blinding. Our analysis indicates that paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS can provide superior pain relief and responder rate over LF-SCS for managing PDN patients refractory to conventional medical management.

High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: 12-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To evaluate high-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) treatment in refractory painful diabetic neuropathy.

Patients and Methods

A prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between Aug 28, 2017 and March 16, 2021, comparing conventional medical management (CMM) with 10-kHz SCS+CMM. The participants had hemoglobin A1c level of less than or equal to 10% and pain greater than or equal to 5 of 10 cm on visual analog scale, with painful diabetic neuropathy symptoms 12 months or more refractory to gabapentinoids and at least 1 other analgesic class. Assessments included measures of pain, neurologic function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 12 months with optional crossover at 6 months.

Results

The participants were randomized 1:1 to CMM (n=103) or 10-kHz SCS+CMM (n=113). At 6 months, 77 of 95 (81%) CMM group participants opted for crossover, whereas none of the 10-kHz SCS group participants did so. At 12 months, the mean pain relief from baseline among participants implanted with 10-kHz SCS was 74.3% (95% CI, 70.1-78.5), and 121 of 142 (85%) participants were treatment responders (≥50% pain relief). Treatment with 10-kHz SCS improved HRQoL, including a mean improvement in the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire index score of 0.136 (95% CI, 0.104-0.169). The participants also reported significantly less pain interference with sleep, mood, and daily activities. At 12 months, 131 of 142 (92%) participants were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the 10-kHz SCS treatment.

Conclusion

The 10-kHz SCS treatment resulted in substantial pain relief and improvement in overall HRQoL 2.5- to 4.5-fold higher than the minimal clinically important difference. The outcomes were durable over 12 months and support 10-kHz SCS treatment in patients with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy.

Trial registration

clincaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228420.

An overview of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Diagnosis and treatment advancements

Diabetes mellitus remains a public health problem, affecting 422 million people worldwide. Currently, there is no consensus around treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a step-wise manner. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, neuromodulation has become a promising alternative. Over the past decade, significant clinical trials have paved the way for prompt inclusion of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation within the painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment algorithm. This article aims to provide an updated evidence-based approach for the management of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Low-Intensity 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduces Behavioral and Neural Hypersensitivity in a Rat Model of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

A large-scale database study for the prescription status of a new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, in Japan

BACKGROUND

A new voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel α₂δ ligand, mirogabalin, was first approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan in 2019. This is the first report on the prescription status of mirogabalin using a large-scale prescription database.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The authors analyzed the prescription data of 12,924 patients prescribed mirogabalin between 1 June and 31 August 2020. The endpoints were the number of patients prescribed, prescription days, prescription doses, dose changes, co-prescription patterns, medication possession ratio (MPR), and treatment discontinuation rates (TDRs).

RESULTS

Mirogabalin was newly prescribed to 7,914 patients in the 3-month study period. Most patients were prescribed mirogabalin at about 10 mg/day during the study period, and 30.9% of patients were prescribed ≥ 20 mg/day on Day 90 after the first prescription. The most frequently prescribed concomitant drug was celecoxib. The MPR (80 to 110%) was 86.2%, indicating good treatment adherence. The cumulative TDRs during ≤ 7 Days, Days 31-60, and 61-90 were 14.0%, 70.0%, and 77.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirogabalin was prescribed to a considerable number of patients. These results may be useful for optimizing mirogabalin use for patients with peripheral neuropathic pain in daily clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000042592.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common disease that results in significant pain and disability. Treatment options have traditionally consisted of conservative measures including topical and oral medication management as well as transcutaneous electrical stimulation units. These treatments demonstrate various degrees of efficacy, and many times initial treatments are discontinued, indicating low levels of satisfaction or poor tolerability. Spinal cord stimulation has been proposed as an alternative therapy for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this procedure. A literature search identified 14 prospective studies. Based on our analysis of the available evidence, there is moderate-quality evidence for the safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for painful diabetic neuropathy. However, further high-quality research, including a large-scale randomized controlled trial is warranted.

A review of a new voltage-gated Ca2+ channel α2δ ligand, mirogabalin, for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain

INTRODUCTION

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a chronic and refractory condition in many patients, and its treatment is a challenge for physicians. A new voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel α₂δ ligand, mirogabalin, has a high specific binding affinity for the α₂δ subunit, with a slower dissociation rate for α₂δ-1 than α₂δ-2 compared to that of pregabalin. Mirogabalin was shown to be effective in NeP animal models, with a margin of safety between central nervous system side effects and the analgesic effect of the dose. It exerted a favorable analgesic effect, was well tolerated in patients with peripheral NeP (P-NeP), and was first approved in Japan in 2019 and subsequently in Korea and Taiwan in 2020.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacological characteristics, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for NeP based on the results of non-clinical and clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there are several first-line therapies for NeP, insufficient efficacy and adverse drug reactions of NeP drugs often cause patient dissatisfaction. Mirogabalin was effective and well tolerated with a step-wise dose increase in clinical studies on P-NeP patients. Thus, mirogabalin is expected to be a useful treatment option for patients with P-NeP.

A Cross-Sectional Web Survey of Satisfaction with Treatment for Pain in Participants with Suspected Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Both Feet

Introduction

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), is underdiagnosed in people with diabetes. To date, no studies have determined the relationship between diagnosis of DPN and satisfaction with treatment for pain. Additionally, the factors that influence satisfaction with treatment for pain remain unknown. This questionnaire study was conducted to understand satisfaction with treatment for pain among participants with diabetes who experienced bilateral pain or numbness in their feet.

Methods

This cross-sectional, observational, web-based questionnaire study for participants with diabetes and suspected DPNP was conducted in Japan. Potential respondents were registered in the INTAGE Disease Panel or the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. The primary endpoint was the number and percentage of participants who were satisfied with their DPNP treatment. Secondary endpoints included participant opinions regarding treatment-related efficacy, side effects, and economic burden, and factors affecting satisfaction with treatment.

Results

The questionnaire was accessed by 7565 potential participants; 777 met the eligibility criteria (final analysis set). Satisfaction with treatment for bilateral foot pain was low (satisfied, 27.9%; neither satisfied nor unsatisfied, 42.2%; unsatisfied, 23.4%; very unsatisfied, 6.4%). Participants were somewhat more satisfied with treatment side effects than with treatment efficacy and economic burden. Satisfaction with treatment mainly differed by improvement in actions in daily life, improvement in quality of life, and communication with doctors. The diagnostic testing rate for DPN was low, and diagnosis was more common in participants who complained of symptoms of pain and numbness (any visit) versus those who did not.

Conclusion

Participants with diabetes who experience bilateral foot pain or numbness reported a low level of satisfaction with treatment for pain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01810-x.

People with diabetes may develop diabetic polyneuropathy and experience diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, which is often felt as pain or numbness below the knee. This study aimed to learn whether participants with diabetes who had pain or numbness in both feet were satisfied with the pain treatment they received. Factors affecting satisfaction with treatment were also evaluated. Potential participants with diabetes identified from two commercial databases (INTAGE Disease Panel or Rakuten Insight Disease Panel) of patients with various diseases living in Japan were asked to respond to our web survey. Besides satisfaction with treatment for pain, participants were asked about how well their treatment was working, treatment side effects, how treatment affected them financially, and what factors affected their satisfaction with treatment. The main finding was that only 27.9% of participants were satisfied with their treatment for foot pain and numbness. Generally, participants were more satisfied with treatment side effects than they were with how well the treatment worked, and how treatment affected them financially. Participants were more satisfied if they had an improved ability to perform everyday activities or experienced an improvement in quality of life with treatment. Participants were also more satisfied if they communicated well with their physician. The rate of diagnostic tests was low; however, participants were more likely to receive a diagnostic test when they complained of pain or numbness than when they did not. On the basis of these findings, we think improvements in the treatment of foot pain or numbness in those with diabetes are needed.

Incidence of antiepileptic drug therapy and factors associated with their prescribing in outpatients with diabetic polyneuropathy

AIMS

The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the incidence of, and factors associated with the antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in the five years following the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy in patients followed in Germany.

METHODS

The study included patients aged 18-80 years with an initial diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy in 1238 general and diabetologist practices in Germany between January 2008 and December 2017 (index date). The main outcome of the study was the incidence of the AED therapy in the five years following the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy. Adjusted Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between study covariates and the incidence of the AED therapy.

RESULTS

The present study included 48,324 patients (mean [standard deviation] age 65.8 [10.6] years, 55.6% male). Within five years of the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy, 16.4% of patients were prescribed at least one AED. The three most frequent drugs were pregabalin, gabapentin, and carbamazepine. Female sex (HR = 1.22), private health insurance coverage (HR = 1.22), follow-up in a general practice (HR = 1.85), HbA1c ≥10% (HR = 1.36), previous referral to a neurological practice (HR = 1.47), previous hospital admission (HR = 1.51) and depression (HR = 1.15) were positively associated with the incidence of the AED therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of the AED therapy was low in patients recently diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy in Germany. More research is warranted to understand the infrequent use of AEDs in diabetic polyneuropathy patients from this country.

Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Will 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation improve pain relief for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy refractory to medical management?

Findings

In this randomized clinical trial including 216 patients, there was a significant benefit of 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation, with 79% of treatment responders whose underlying neurological deficits did not worsen compared with 5% of controls treated with conventional medical management.

Meaning

Patients with painful diabetic neuropathy with inadequate pain relief despite best available medical treatments should be considered for 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation.

Importance

Many patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy experience chronic pain and inadequate relief despite best available medical treatments.

Objective

To determine whether 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves outcomes for patients with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

Design, Setting, and Participants

The prospective, multicenter, open-label SENZA-PDN randomized clinical trial compared conventional medical management (CMM) with 10-kHz SCS plus CMM. Participants with PDN for 1 year or more refractory to gabapentinoids and at least 1 other analgesic class, lower limb pain intensity of 5 cm or more on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS), body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 45 or less, hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) of 10% or less, daily morphine equivalents of 120 mg or less, and medically appropriate for the procedure were recruited from clinic patient populations and digital advertising. Participants were enrolled from multiple sites across the US, including academic centers and community pain clinics, between August 2017 and August 2019 with 6-month follow-up and optional crossover at 6 months. Screening 430 patients resulted in 214 who were excluded or declined participation and 216 who were randomized. At 6-month follow-up, 187 patients were evaluated.

Interventions

Implanted medical device delivering 10-kHz SCS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified primary end point was percentage of participants with 50% pain relief or more on VAS without worsening of baseline neurological deficits at 3 months. Secondary end points were tested hierarchically, as prespecified in the analysis plan. Measures included pain VAS, neurological examination, health-related quality of life (EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire), and HbA_1c over 6 months.

Results

Of 216 randomized patients, 136 (63.0%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.8 (10.7) years. Additionally, the median (interquartile range) duration of diabetes and peripheral neuropathy were 10.9 (6.3-16.4) years and 5.6 (3.0-10.1) years, respectively. The primary end point assessed in the intention-to-treat population was met by 5 of 94 patients in the CMM group (5%) and 75 of 95 patients in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (79%; difference, 73.6%; 95% CI, 64.2-83.0; P < .001). Infections requiring device explant occurred in 2 patients in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (2%). For the CMM group, the mean pain VAS score was 7.0 cm (95% CI, 6.7-7.3) at baseline and 6.9 cm (95% CI, 6.5-7.3) at 6 months. For the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group, the mean pain VAS score was 7.6 cm (95% CI, 7.3-7.9) at baseline and 1.7 cm (95% CI, 1.3-2.1) at 6 months. Investigators observed neurological examination improvements for 3 of 92 patients in the CMM group (3%) and 52 of 84 in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (62%) at 6 months (difference, 58.6%; 95% CI, 47.6-69.6; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Substantial pain relief and improved health-related quality of life sustained over 6 months demonstrates 10-kHz SCS can safely and effectively treat patients with refractory PDN.

Trial Registration

ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228420

Safety and Efficacy of Mirogabalin for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Pooled Analysis of Two Pivotal Phase III Studies

PURPOSE

Mirogabalin besylate has been approved in several countries to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. This pooled analysis, using data from the two pivotal Phase III studies in Asian patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and post-herpetic neuralgia, aimed to provide clinicians with more detailed and precise information relating to mirogabalin's safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 14-week treatment studies of mirogabalin conducted at ∼350 study sites (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand). Eligible patients in both studies were randomized in a 2:1:1:1 ratio, stratified according to a baseline average daily pain score (ADPS) of <6 or ≥6, to placebo, mirogabalin 15-mg once daily (QD), mirogabalin 10-mg twice daily (BID), or mirogabalin 15-mg BID treatment groups. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events identified from the adverse events collected throughout both studies. The primary efficacy end point of both studies was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 14.

FINDINGS

In total, 1587 patients (824 with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain; 763 with post-herpetic neuralgia) who received at least 1 dose of study drug were analyzed (633 received placebo, 954 treated with mirogabalin). Treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence (3.8%, 10.8%, 14.5%, and 19.1%) and dizziness (2.7%, 5.7%, 9.1%, and 13.1%) in patients receiving placebo, mirogabalin 15 mg QD, mirogabalin 10 mg BID, and mirogabalin 15 mg BID, respectively. In patients treated with mirogabalin 15 mg QD, 2 (0.6%) of 316 patients discontinued due to somnolence. In the mirogabalin 10-mg BID group, somnolence, edema, and peripheral edema each resulted in 3 (0.9%) of 318 patient discontinuations. In the mirogabalin 15-mg BID group, 6 (1.9%) of 320 patients discontinued due to dizziness and 3 (0.9%) due to somnolence. At week 14, mirogabalin 10 mg BID and 15 mg BID statistically significantly improved ADPS versus placebo, with least squares mean changes (95% CI) of -0.31 (-0.55, -0.08) and -0.63 (-0.86, -0.40). Post hoc analysis showed a statistically significant difference 2 days after administration in the mirogabalin 10-mg and 15-mg BID groups compared with placebo. Female sex, age ≥65 years, and baseline weight <60 kg may influence the safety of mirogabalin, particularly regarding the incidence of somnolence and dizziness, but had no notable impact on efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02318706 and NCT02318719.

IMPLICATIONS

This pooled analysis showed that mirogabalin was efficacious and well-tolerated by Asian patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin treatment in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

AIM

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

METHODS

We searched four databases from inception to 1st July 2020. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effectiveness and safety of mirogabalin in patients with DPNP. We evaluated the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We pooled dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios and continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, both under the random- or fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Three RCTs matched our inclusion criteria with a total of 1732 patients with DPNP: 1057, 534 and 141 patients received mirogabalin, placebo and pregabalin, respectively. The quality of included RCTs was marked as moderate-to-high. Mirogabalin treatment was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the average daily pain score (ADPS) compared with placebo over 7 weeks. Compared with pregabalin, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more decrease in ADPS only after 3, 4 and 5 weeks. The proportion of patients with ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in the ADPS was significantly higher in the mirogabalin vs placebo and pregabalin groups. Compared with placebo, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more adverse events of dizziness, increased weight, peripheral oedema and somnolence. The safety profile was comparable between mirogabalin and pregabalin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that in patients with DPNP, mirogabalin treatment was superior to placebo and pregabalin in decreasing the ADPS over time. Besides, mirogabalin was largely safe and associated with some adverse events that could be managed conservatively.

Joint effect of diabetes and opiate use on all-cause and cause-specific mortality: the Golestan cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many diabetic individuals use prescription and non-prescription opioids and opiates. We aimed to investigate the joint effect of diabetes and opiate use on all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

METHODS

Golestan Cohort study is a prospective population-based study in Iran. A total of 50 045 people-aged 40-75, 28 811 women, 8487 opiate users, 3548 diabetic patients-were followed during a median of 11.1 years, with over 99% success follow-up. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (HRs, 95% CIs), and preventable death attributable to each risk factor, were calculated.

RESULTS

After 533 309 person-years, 7060 deaths occurred: 4178 (10.8%) of non-diabetic non-opiate users, 757 (25.3%) diabetic non-users, 1906 (24.0%) non-diabetic opiate users and 219 (39.8%) diabetic opiate users. Compared with non-diabetic non-users, HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality were 2.17 (2.00-2.35) in diabetic non-opiate users, 1.63 (1.53-1.74) in non-diabetic opiate users and 2.76 (2.40-3.17) in diabetic opiate users. Among those who both had diabetes and used opiates, 63.8% (95% CI: 58.3%-68.5%) of all deaths were attributable to these risk factors, compared with 53.9% (95% CI: 50%-57.4%) in people who only had diabetes and 38.7% (95% CI: 34.6%-42.5%) in non-diabetic opiate users. Diabetes was more strongly associated with cardiovascular than cancer mortality. The risk of early mortality in known cases of diabetes did not depend on whether they started opiate use before or after their diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using opiates is detrimental to the health of diabetic patients. Public awareness about the health effects of opiates, and improvement of diabetes care especially among individuals with or at risk of opiate use, are necessary.

Trends in Pain Medication Initiation Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, 2014-2018

This cohort study assesses trends in the rates of initiation of pain medication among patients with newly diagnosed diabetic peripheral neuropathy and the types of pain medication prescribed from 2014 to 2018.

Therapeutic Effect of Mirogabalin on Peripheral Neuropathic Pain due to Lumbar Spine Disease

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mirogabalin in treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain due to lumbar spine disease.

Overview of Literature

Mirogabalin is a novel selective ligand for the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated Ca channels.

Methods

Between April and December 2019, we used mirogabalin to treat 60 consecutive patients (mean age, 67.6 years) with leg symptoms due to lumbar disease. The treatment outcome after 8 weeks of mirogabalin therapy was evaluated by comparing the preand post-administration Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg symptoms and sleep disturbance, the NRS and Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain (LBP), and the quality of life (QOL) score (based on EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale).

Results

Mirogabalin treatment was stopped at less than eight weeks in eight patients. The remaining 52 patients for evaluation were divided as group 1 (17 patients who presented with leg symptoms that lasted for less than 3 months) and group 2 (35 patients with leg symptoms that lasted longer than 3 months). The leg symptoms and LBP in both groups significantly improved at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and sleep disturbance and QOL were improved at 8 weeks as well. Compared to group 2, the pretreatment leg symptoms and QOL were significantly worse in group 1, and their improvement after 8 weeks of mirogabalin treatment was significantly better (p<0.05). Of the 60 original patients, 17 suffered adverse effects, which were mild in 16 patients and required treatment cessation due to excessive weight gain in one patient.

Conclusions

We have validated the effect of mirogabalin on neuropathic pain due to lumbar spine disease, which has effectively addressed the associated leg symptoms, LBP, and sleep disturbance.

Polyneuropathy is inadequately treated despite increasing symptom intensity in individuals with and without diabetes (PROTECT follow-up study)

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Despite its major clinical impact, distal symmetric polyneuropathy remains frequently undiagnosed and undertreated in clinical practice. We previously reported in the PROTECT Study that 70% of type 2 diabetes patients with distal symmetric polyneuropathy were unaware of having the latter condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present follow up after 2.5 ± 0.7 years, 122 and 85 participants with and without type 2 diabetes, respectively, completed questionnaires to obtain information about the further course of disease and its management.

RESULTS

At follow up, 49 and 48% of the respondents with type 2 diabetes and without diabetes, respectively, reported that the intensity of paresthesia or numbness in the feet increased, whereas for burning and pain in the feet the corresponding percentages were 56 and 61%. However, 33 and 40% of the respondents with type 2 diabetes and without diabetes, respectively, reporting neuropathic symptoms at follow up did not receive any pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy of neuropathic symptoms at follow up among participants with type 2 diabetes and without diabetes included mainly World Health Organization Step 1 analgesics (17% each; excluding acetylsalicylic acid), pregabalin/gabapentin (20 and 12%), vitamin B complex (13 and 22%), benfotiamine (13 and 2%), opioids (7 and 12%), antidepressants (4 and 5%) and α-lipoic acid (4 and 2%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings point to insufficient care, inadequate treatment adherence or limited efficacy of treatments in patients with polyneuropathy, suggesting that effective measures should be implemented to correct these healthcare deficits.

10-kHz spinal cord stimulation treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy: results from post-hoc analysis of the SENZA-PPN study

Aim: Previous studies of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation demonstrated its safety and efficacy for treatment of neuropathic pain of the trunk and/or limbs. This study analyzed data from a subset of subjects with painful diabetic neuropathy enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of peripheral polyneuropathy with various etiologies. Materials & methods: Of the eight subjects that had permanent devices, seven attended the 12-month follow-up assessment. Results & conclusion: At 12 months, 6/7 subjects were treatment responders (≥50% pain relief) and had pain remission (visual analog scale ≤ 3.0 cm). Worsening of neurologic deficits was not reported in any subject. Instead, 5/7 subjects showed improvements in sensory testing and/or reflexes. These results support further investigation of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation as a safe and effective treatment for intractable painful diabetic neuropathy.

Mirogabalin in Japanese Patients with Renal Impairment and Pain Associated with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: A Phase III, Open-Label, 14-Week Study

Purpose

Mirogabalin was recently approved in Japan for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain, based on data from clinical trials in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), common clinical conditions which cause intense distress for patients. We characterized the safety and tolerability of mirogabalin in Japanese patients with renal impairment.

Patients and Methods

This multicenter, open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02607280) enrolled renally impaired individuals aged ≥20 years diagnosed with DPNP or PHN, and with an average daily pain score (ADPS) of ≥4 over the 7 days prior to treatment initiation. Mirogabalin dosage was titrated for 2 weeks, followed by a fixed dose for 12 weeks according to degree of renal impairment: 7.5 mg twice daily for moderate impairment and 7.5 mg once daily for severe impairment. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of mirogabalin, evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary efficacy endpoints included change in ADPS from baseline to Week 14.

Results

Overall, 35 patients were enrolled (30 with moderate and 5 with severe renal impairment). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity; the most commonly reported were nasopharyngitis (22.9%) and somnolence (11.4%). Only 4 patients (11.4%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Mirogabalin significantly decreased ADPS from baseline in patients with renal impairment; least squares mean change from baseline at Week 14 was −1.9 (95% confidence interval: −2.8, −1.0).

Conclusion

Mirogabalin was well tolerated and significantly reduced pain levels when used to treat DPNP/PHN at a fixed dose of 7.5 mg once or twice daily in patients with renal impairment.

Results of Mirogabalin Treatment for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Asian Subjects: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Study

INTRODUCTION

Almost one-quarter of Asian patients with diabetes experience diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), which may be associated with moderate or severe levels of pain, insomnia, mood disorders, and worsened quality of life. Current treatments are generally ineffective and may be poorly tolerated. We evaluated mirogabalin as a treatment for DPNP in Asian subjects.

METHODS

This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Subjects (n = 450) with DPNP were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to treatment with 5, 10, or 15 mg twice-daily (BID) mirogabalin, 150 mg BID pregabalin, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 7; secondary endpoints included responder rates, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), average daily sleep-interference score (ADSIS), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

A greater improvement was noted for each mirogabalin treatment group for change from baseline in ADPS at week 7 compared with both placebo and with pregabalin, although these improvements were not statistically significant. The percentage of 30, 50, and 75% responders and subjects with PGIC improvements was greater in each mirogabalin group versus placebo. Mirogabalin 15 mg BID significantly improved the SF-MPQ sensory (p = 0.0313) and visual analog scale scores (p = 0.0093), and ADSIS (p = 0.0002), versus placebo. Treatment was generally well tolerated; the most frequently reported TEAEs in the mirogabalin groups were somnolence (14.7%) and dizziness (11.0%), and most AEs were mild or moderate even at the highest dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In Asian subjects with DPNP, mirogabalin (5, 10, and 15 mg BID) was well tolerated. Although no significant differences were observed in the primary endpoint, there was a tendency toward improvement of pain with mirogabalin treatment, and this trend was also observed in the secondary endpoints.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01504412.

Evaluation of Treatment Patterns and Direct Costs Associated with the Management of Neuropathic Pain

Background

Neuropathic pain has a prevalence of 2-17% in the general population. Diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic pain are not fully described in different populations. The aim was to determine the treatment patterns and direct costs of care associated with the management of neuropathic pain from the onset of the first symptom to up to two years after diagnosis.

Methods

From a drug-claim database, a cohort of randomly selected outpatients diagnosed with neuropathic pain was obtained from an insurer in Colombia and followed up for two years after diagnosis. The clinical records were reviewed individually to identify the study variables, including the time needed to make the diagnosis, the medical and paraclinical resources used, the pharmacological therapy for pain management, and the direct costs associated with care.

Results

We identified 624 patients in 49 cities, with a mean age of 50.3 ± 14.1 years, of which 324 were men (51.9%). An average of 90 days passed from the initial consultation until the diagnosis of neuropathic pain, the most frequent being lumbosacral radiculopathy (57.9%). 34.5% of the cohort had at least one diagnostic imaging procedure, and 16% had an electromyography. On average, they were treated by a general practitioner twice. 91.7% received initial treatment with tramadol, carbamazepine, amitriptyline, imipramine, or pregabalin, and 60.4% received combined therapy. The mean cost of care for two years for each patient was US$246.3.

Conclusions

Patients with neuropathic pain in Colombia are being diagnosed late, are using therapeutic agents not recommended as first-line treatment by clinical practice guidelines, and are being treated for short periods of time.

Clinical Response to Real-Time Patient-Reported Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms

INTRODUCTION

To assess clinician response to real-time patient-reported data about diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) symptoms, we analyzed DPN diagnosis and treatment patterns after administration of a 4-question symptom questionnaire in a large vertically integrated health care system.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study to analyze data from 160,852 patients screened for DPN symptoms from April 2012 to March 2014. Electronic medical record data were used to study changes in DPN diagnosis, treatment initiation, and treatment intensification. We used logistic regression to study the association of patient characteristics with the odds of clinical response.

RESULTS

Of patients queried, 50,684 (31.5%) reported symptoms. Patients reporting DPN symptoms experienced a greater increase in new DPN diagnoses (16 percentage points; p < 0.0001) and medication use (4 percentage points; p < 0.0001) compared with those denying symptoms. Among patients reporting symptoms, women and nonwhite patients were less likely to receive a DPN diagnosis, whereas older patients were more likely to receive a DPN diagnosis. Overall, patients who were older, were Asian (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.77), and had lower socioeconomic status (hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.99) were less likely to be treated. However, these racial and socioeconomic differences were not statistically significant for patients with preexisting DPN diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Patients' real-time reports of DPN symptoms were associated with increased clinical activity. Patient- and clinician-level factors associated with the likelihood of receiving a DPN diagnosis need further study because a formal diagnosis may be associated with more equitable treatment.

Evidence for Dietary Agmatine Sulfate Effectiveness in Neuropathies Associated with Painful Small Fiber Neuropathy. A Pilot Open-Label Consecutive Case Series Study

Peripheral neuropathies associated with painful small fiber neuropathy (SFN) are complex conditions, resistant to treatment with conventional medications. Previous clinical studies strongly support the use of dietary agmatine as a safe and effective treatment for neuropathic pain. Based on this evidence, we conducted an open-label consecutive case series study to evaluate the effectiveness of agmatine in neuropathies associated with painful SFN (Study Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, System Identifier: NCT01524666). Participants diagnosed with painful SFN and autonomic dysfunctions were treated with 2.67 g/day agmatine sulfate (AgmaSet^® capsules containing G-Agmatine^® brand of agmatine sulfate) for a period of 2 months. Before the beginning (baseline) and at the end of the treatment period, participants answered the established 12-item neuropathic pain questionnaire specifically developed to distinguish symptoms associated with neuropathy and to quantify their severity. Secondary outcomes included other treatment options and a safety assessment. Twelve patients were recruited, and 11 patients—8 diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy, two with idiopathic neuropathy and one with inflammatory neuropathy—completed the study. All patients showed improvement in neuropathic pain to a varied extent. The average decrease in pain intensity was 26.0 rating points, corresponding to a 46.4% reduction in overall pain (p < 0.00001). The results suggest that dietary agmatine sulfate has a significant effect in reducing neuropathic pain intensity associated with painful SFN resistant to treatment with conventional neuropathic pain medications. Larger randomized placebo-controlled studies are expected to establish agmatine sulfate as a preferred treatment.

High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SENZA-PDN)

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), a debilitating and progressive chronic pain condition that significantly impacts quality of life, is one of the common complications seen with long-standing diabetes mellitus. Neither pharmacological treatments nor low-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has provided significant and long-term pain relief for patients with PDN. This study aims to document the value of 10-kHz SCS in addition to conventional medical management (CMM) compared with CMM alone in patients with refractory PDN.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SENZA-PDN), 216 subjects with PDN will be assigned 1:1 to receive 10-kHz SCS combined with CMM or CMM alone after appropriate institutional review board approvals and followed for 24 months. Key inclusion criteria include (1) symptoms of PDN for at least 12 months, (2) average pain intensity of at least 5 cm-on a 0- to 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS)-in the lower limbs, and (3) an appropriate candidate for SCS. Key exclusion criteria include (1) large or gangrenous ulcers or (2) average pain intensity of at least 3 cm on VAS in the upper limbs or both. Along with pain VAS, neurological assessments, health-related quality of life, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction will be captured. The primary endpoint comparing responder rates (≥50% pain relief) and safety rates between the treatment groups will be assessed at 3 months. Several secondary endpoints will also be reported on.

DISCUSSION

Enrollment commenced in 2017 and was completed in 2019. This study will help to determine whether 10-kHz SCS improves clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life and is a cost-effective treatment for PDN that is refractory to CMM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03228420 (registered 24 July 2017).

Genome-wide differential expression profiling of lncRNAs and mRNAs associated with early diabetic cardiomyopathy

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is one of the main causes of heart failure and death in patients with diabetes. There are no effective approaches to preventing its development in the clinic. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) are increasingly recognized as important molecular players in cardiovascular disease. Herein we investigated the profiling of cardiac lncRNA and mRNA expression in type 2 diabetic db/db mice with and without early diabetic cardiomyopathy. We found that db/db mice developed cardiac hypertrophy with normal cardiac function at 6 weeks of age but with a decreased diastolic function at 20 weeks of age. LncRNA and mRNA transcripts were remarkably different in 20-week-old db/db mouse hearts compared with both nondiabetic and diabetic controls. Overall 1479 lncRNA transcripts and 1109 mRNA transcripts were aberrantly expressed in 6- and 20-week-old db/db hearts compared with nondiabetic controls. The lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network analysis revealed that 5 deregulated lncRNAs having maximum connections with differentially expressed mRNAs were BC038927, G730013B05Rik, 2700054A10Rik, AK089884, and Daw1. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that these 5 lncRNAs are closely associated with membrane depolarization, action potential conduction, contraction of cardiac myocytes, and actin filament-based movement of cardiac cells. This study profiles differently expressed lncRNAs in type 2 mice with and without early diabetic cardiomyopathy and identifies BC038927, G730013B05Rik, 2700054A10Rik, AK089884, and Daw1 as the core lncRNA with high significance in diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Mirogabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study in Asian patients

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, a novel, potent, selective ligand of the α2 δ subunit of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During this double-blind, multisite, placebo-controlled phase III study, Asian patients aged ≥20 years with type 1 or 2 diabetes and DPNP were randomized 2:1:1:1 to a placebo, mirogabalin 15, 20 or 30 mg/day for up to 14 weeks, with a 1- to 2-week titration (NCT02318706). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14, defined as a weekly average of daily pain (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain, for the past 24 h).

RESULTS

Of 834 randomized patients, 330, 164, 165 and 165 received placebo, mirogabalin 15, 20 or 30 mg/day, respectively, and were included in analyses (modified intention-to-treat population, n = 824); 755 (90.5%) completed the study. At week 14, the least squares mean average daily pain score change from baseline was -1.31, -1.34, -1.47 and -1.81, respectively, showing statistical significance for mirogabalin 30 mg/day versus placebo (P = 0.0027). The treatment-emergent adverse events observed were mostly mild-to-moderate in all mirogabalin doses, and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, somnolence, dizziness, peripheral edema and weight increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirogabalin relieved DPNP in a dose-dependent manner; mirogabalin 30 mg/day showed statistically significant pain relief (vs placebo) in Asian DPNP patients. All doses of mirogabalin tested were well tolerated.

Automated symptom and treatment side effect monitoring for improved quality of life among adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster, randomized, controlled trial

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of automated symptom and side effect monitoring on quality of life among individuals with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (July 2014 to July 2016) within a large healthcare system. We randomized 1834 primary care physicians and prospectively recruited from their lists 1270 individuals with neuropathy who were newly prescribed medications for their symptoms. Intervention participants received automated telephone-based symptom and side effect monitoring with physician feedback over 6 months. The control group received usual care plus three non-interactive diabetes educational calls. Our primary outcomes were quality of life (EQ-5D) and select symptoms (e.g. pain) measured 4-8 weeks after starting medication and again 8 months after baseline. Process outcomes included receiving a clinically effective dose and communication between individuals with neuropathy and their primary care provider over 12 months. Interviewers collecting outcome data were blinded to intervention assignment.

RESULTS

Some 1252 participants completed the baseline measures [mean age (sd): 67 (11.7), 53% female, 57% white, 8% Asian, 13% black, 20% Hispanic]. In total, 1179 participants (93%) completed follow-up (619 control, 560 intervention). Quality of life scores (intervention: 0.658 ± 0.094; control: 0.653 ± 0.092) and symptom severity were similar at baseline. The intervention had no effect on primary [EQ-5D: -0.002 (95% CI -0.01, 0.01), P = 0.623; pain: 0.295 (-0.75, 1.34), P = 0.579; sleep disruption: 0.342 (-0.18, 0.86), P = 0.196; lower extremity functioning: -0.079 (-1.27, 1.11), P = 0.896; depression: -0.462 (-1.24, 0.32); P = 0.247] or process outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated telephone monitoring and feedback alone were not effective at improving quality of life or symptoms for people with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02056431).

An Assessment of Clinically Important Differences on the Worst Pain Severity Item of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Objectives

Using patient global impression of change (PGIC) as an anchor, an approximately 30% reduction on an 11-point numeric pain intensity rating scale (PI-NRS) is considered a clinically important difference (CID) in pain. Our objective was to define the CID for another pain measure, the worst pain severity (WPS) item of the modified Brief Pain Inventory (m-BPI).

Methods

In this post hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, 452 randomized patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were followed over 5 weeks, with m-BPI data collected weekly and PGIC at treatment conclusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (via logistic regression) were used to determine the changes in the m-BPI-WPS score that best predicted ordinal clinical improvement thresholds (i.e., "minimally improved" or better) on the PGIC.

Results

Similar to the PI-NRS, a change of -3 (raw) or -33.3% from the baseline on the m-BPI-WPS optimized prediction for the "much improved" or better PGIC threshold and represents a CID. There was a high correspondence between observed and predicted PGIC categories at each PGIC threshold (ROC AUCs were 0.78-0.82).

Conclusions

Worst pain on the m-BPI may be used to assess clinically important improvements in DPNP studies. Findings require validation in larger studies.

Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

Over the past 2 decades, the use of intravenous ketamine infusions as a treatment for chronic pain has increased dramatically, with wide variation in patient selection, dosing, and monitoring. This has led to a chorus of calls from various sources for the development of consensus guidelines.

METHODS

In November 2016, the charge for developing consensus guidelines was approved by the boards of directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and, shortly thereafter, the American Academy of Pain Medicine. In late 2017, the completed document was sent to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committees on Pain Medicine and Standards and Practice Parameters, after which additional modifications were made. Panel members were selected by the committee chair and both boards of directors based on their expertise in evaluating clinical trials, past research experience, and clinical experience in developing protocols and treating patients with ketamine. Questions were developed and refined by the committee, and the groups responsible for addressing each question consisted of modules composed of 3 to 5 panel members in addition to the committee chair. Once a preliminary consensus was achieved, sections were sent to the entire panel, and further revisions were made. In addition to consensus guidelines, a comprehensive narrative review was performed, which formed part of the basis for guidelines.

RESULTS

Guidelines were prepared for the following areas: indications; contraindications; whether there was evidence for a dose-response relationship, or a minimum or therapeutic dose range; whether oral ketamine or another N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist was a reasonable treatment option as a follow-up to infusions; preinfusion testing requirements; settings and personnel necessary to administer and monitor treatment; the use of preemptive and rescue medications to address adverse effects; and what constitutes a positive treatment response. The group was able to reach consensus on all questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the use of ketamine for chronic pain, but the level of evidence varies by condition and dose range. Most studies evaluating the efficacy of ketamine were small and uncontrolled and were either unblinded or ineffectively blinded. Adverse effects were few and the rate of serious adverse effects was similar to placebo in most studies, with higher dosages and more frequent infusions associated with greater risks. Larger studies, evaluating a wider variety of conditions, are needed to better quantify efficacy, improve patient selection, refine the therapeutic dose range, determine the effectiveness of nonintravenous ketamine alternatives, and develop a greater understanding of the long-term risks of repeated treatments.

Neuropathic pain is not adequately treated in the older general population: Results from the KORA F4 survey

PURPOSE

We evaluated the pharmacological treatment of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) among older subjects from the general population.

METHODS

The study included subjects aged 61 to 82 years from the KORA F4 survey (2006-2008). DSPN was defined as the presence of bilaterally impaired foot-vibration perception and/or bilaterally impaired foot-pressure sensation. Pain intensity was assessed with the painDETECT questionnaire.

RESULTS

From the included 1076 older persons, 172 (16%) persons reported pain in the lower extremities and DSPN was present in 150 (14%) subjects. Forty-eight people with pain in the lower extremities reported DSPN. Only 38% of the subjects with DSPN reporting an average pain level of ≥4 during the past 4 weeks received medical treatment, predominantly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs 20% and opioids 12%). The medication of choice for neuropathic pain, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids was relatively being underused. However, opioids and neuropathy preparations were prescribed preferably for subjects with painful DSPN.

CONCLUSIONS

In the older general population, only a small proportion of subjects with painful DSPN receive analgesic pharmacotherapy. Although not recommended by guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain, NSAIDs were the most frequently used class of analgesic drugs.

Overcoming barriers to diabetic polyneuropathy management in primary care

Diabetic polyneuropathy is a highly prevalent and costly complication of diabetes that is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated in primary care settings. In this article, we discuss challenges in the management of diabetic polyneuropathy symptoms, including diagnostic complexity, the limited efficacy and high side effect rates associated with available treatments and the time constrained primary care visit. We call for the development of novel patient-centric, system-level strategies that engage patients between physician visits in order to facilitate timely communication of symptoms and treatment response and to promote patient-centered care.

Living With Chronic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify the relative importance of positive (facilitators) and negative (barriers) contributors to living with chronic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Mixed-methods: (1) Qualitative (n=35): individual, semistructured, open-ended interviews identifying facilitator/barrier themes; (2) Quantitative (n=491): converting the most common themes into statements and quantifying agreement with these in an online survey to determine relative importance, underlying dimensions, and their associations with perceived difficulty in dealing with pain.

SETTING

University-based research setting and general community.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteers (N=526) with SCI experiencing moderate to severe chronic pain.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Interview guides, facilitator/barrier statements, and pain inventories.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analyses reduced agreement ratings into 4 facilitators (information regarding pain and treatments, resilience, coping, medication use) and 5 barriers (poor health care communication, pain impact and limitations, poor communication about pain, difficult nature of pain, treatment concerns). Greater "pain impact and limitations," "difficult nature of pain," "poor communication from provider," lower "resilience," greater "medication use," and younger age predicted greater difficulty in dealing with pain (r=.75; F=69.02; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed multiple facilitators and barriers to living with chronic pain after SCI. The principal barrier, "poor health care communication," indicated that consumers do not receive adequate information from their health care providers regarding pain. "Information regarding pain and treatments" had greater agreement scores and factor loadings than all other facilitators, indicating that most participants view provider-patient communication and educational efforts regarding pain and pain management as priorities and critical needs. Further initiatives in these areas are important for improving pain management post-SCI.

Real-life efficacy of pregabalin for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain in daily clinical practice in Denmark: the NEP-TUNE study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide evidence regarding the real-life efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP) in Denmark.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, noninterventional study, pregabalin (Lyrica(®)) was prescribed following usual clinical practice. Compared with baseline, the primary study end points after 3 months of observation were changes in 1) the average level of pain during the past week, 2) the worst level of pain during the past week, and 3) the least level of pain during the past week. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to perform paired analyses, and a multivariate regression analysis investigated factors driving change in pain.

RESULTS

A total of 86 of the 128 patients included were regarded as efficacy evaluable (those completing 3 months of pregabalin treatment). Patients (59 years) were long-time sufferers of peripheral NeP, and 38% of them had comorbidities. The majority had previously been treated with tricyclic antidepressants or gabapentin. The average dose of pregabalin was 81.5 mg/d at baseline and 240 mg/d after 3 months. A clinically and statistically significant improvement of 2.2 points in the average level of pain intensity was found after 3 months. The higher the pain intensity at baseline, the higher was the reduction of the pain score. Positive results were also found for pain-related sleep interference, patients' global impression of change, quality of life, and work and productivity impairment. Twenty-one patients reported 28 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study indicates that for some patients (two-thirds), addition of pregabalin for peripheral NeP helps to reduce their pain intensity significantly.

Alleviation of pain in painful diabetic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a disabling pain condition. Its pathomechanism remains unknown, but a sensitization and neuronal hyperexcitabilty have been suggested. Only symptomatic pharmacological pain management treatment is currently available.

AREAS COVERED

The origin of PDN is enigmatic, and the evidence-based therapeutic guidelines therefore consist only of antidepressants and antiepileptics as first-line recommended drugs. This article relates to a MEDLINE/PubMed systematic search (2005-2015).

EXPERT OPINION

The results of the meta-analysis from the aspect of the efficacy of amitriptyline, duloxetine, venlafaxine, gabapentin and pregabalin are favorable, but the placebo response rate is relatively high in patients with neuropathic pain. For personalization of the medication of PDN patients, the optimum dosing, the genotyping of the metabolizing enzymes and optimum biomarkers are needed. As concerns the future perspectives, specific sodium channel subtype inhibitors acting on peripheral nociceptive neurons or modified T-type voltage-gated calcium channel blockers may be promising targets for pharmaceutical innovations. Another attractive strategy for the treatment is based on the effects of monoclonal antibodies against nerve growth factor, sodium channels, specific receptor and cytokines. Botulinum toxin A, capsaicin patch and spinal cord stimulation therapies are the nearest future therapeutic options for the treatment of PDN patients.

Pregabalin prescriptions in the United Kingdom: a drug utilisation study of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database

AIM

In Europe, pregabalin is approved for treatment of neuropathic pain, general anxiety disorder (GAD) and as adjunctive therapy for epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to assess utilisation of pregabalin in the UK, including patients with a recorded history of substance abuse, from a large general practice database.

METHODS

This observational drug utilisation study (DUS) analysed pregabalin prescription data from the UK Health Improvement Network primary care database between September 2004 and July 2009. Patient demographics, diagnoses (by READ codes) and pregabalin dosing data were collected. Diagnosis codes were used as proxy for approved indication for pregabalin.

RESULT

A cohort of 18,951 patients was prescribed pregabalin; dosing information was available for 13,480 (71.1%). Median age of patients was 58 years, and majority were female (60.1%). Median (interquartile range) prescribed average daily dose (ADD) of pregabalin for all patients was 150.0 (162.5) mg/day; this was highest in patients with epilepsy (191.9 mg/day), followed by neuropathic pain (158.0 mg/day) and GAD (150.0 mg/day). Only 1.0% (136/13,480) of patients were prescribed an ADD of pregabalin over the maximum approved dose of 600 mg/day. Of these, 18.4% (25/136) of patients had a history of substance abuse compared with 14.0% (1884/13,480) in the full population.

CONCLUSION

Data from this DUS indicated that the majority of pregabalin prescribing in the UK was consistent with product labelling. The proportion of patients with prescribed ADD > 600 mg/day was small and with a similar proportion with a history of substance abuse as in the full population.