1
|
Harmon S, Kocum CG, Ranum RM, Hermann G, Farias ST, Kiselica AM. The mobile everyday cognition scale (mECog): development and pilot testing. Clin Neuropsychol 2024:1-20. [PMID: 39060986 DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2383333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is an important part of the aging process and may be a sign of neurodegenerative disease. Current measures of SCD are subject to the limits of retrospective recall of symptoms over a long span of time, which might be addressed by using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. However, there are no currently available measures of SCD validated for use in EMA. Thus, our goal was to develop and pilot test the mobile Everyday Cognition Scale (mECog). Method: 31 community-dwelling older adults completed in lab measures of cognition and mental health symptoms, followed by daily mECog ratings on a smart phone for 28 days. Results: Most participants completed at least 75% of mECog assessments (n = 27, 87%), and the average number of assessments completed was 22. Further, respondents rated the mobile assessment platform and measures as easy to use and non-interfering with daily life. Test-retest reliability of mECog scores was very strong (RKRN = .99), and within-person reliability was moderate (RCN = .41). mECog scores demonstrated strong positive associations with scores from the original ECog (ρ = .62-69, p < .001) and short form ECog (ρ = .63-.69, p < .001) and non-significant associations with demographics (ρ = -0.25-.04, p = .21-.94) and mental health symptoms (ρ = -0.06-.34, p = .08-.99). mECog scores also exhibited small-to-moderate negative correlations with objective cognitive test scores, though these relationships did not reach statistical significance (ρ = -0.32 to -0.22, p = .10-.27). Conclusions: Results suggest that mobile assessment of SCD via the mECog is feasible and acceptable. Further, mECog scores demonstrated good psychometric properties, including evidence of strong reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawyer Harmon
- Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Courtney G Kocum
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Rylea M Ranum
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Greta Hermann
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | - Andrew M Kiselica
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKay NS, Millar PR, Nicosia J, Aschenbrenner AJ, Gordon BA, Benzinger TLS, Cruchaga CC, Schindler SE, Morris JC, Hassenstab J. Pick a PACC: Comparing domain-specific and general cognitive composites in Alzheimer disease research. Neuropsychology 2024; 38:443-464. [PMID: 38602816 PMCID: PMC11176005 DOI: 10.1037/neu0000949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to illustrate how complex cognitive data can be used to create domain-specific and general cognitive composites relevant to Alzheimer disease research. METHOD Using equipercentile equating, we combined data from the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center that spanned multiple iterations of the Uniform Data Set. Exploratory factor analyses revealed four domain-specific composites representing episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, and attention/processing speed. The previously defined preclinical Alzheimer disease cognitive composite (PACC) and a novel alternative, the Knight-PACC, were also computed alongside a global composite comprising all available tests. These three composites allowed us to compare the usefulness of domain and general composites in the context of predicting common Alzheimer disease biomarkers. RESULTS General composites slightly outperformed domain-specific metrics in predicting imaging-derived amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration burden. Power analyses revealed that the global, Knight-PACC, and attention and processing speed composites would require the smallest sample sizes to detect cognitive change in a clinical trial, while the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-PACC required two to three times as many participants. CONCLUSIONS Analyses of cognition with the Knight-PACC and our domain-specific composites offer researchers flexibility by providing validated outcome assessments that can equate across test versions to answer a wide range of questions regarding cognitive decline in normal aging and neurodegenerative disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
3
|
Blömeke L, Rehn F, Kraemer‐Schulien V, Kutzsche J, Pils M, Bujnicki T, Lewczuk P, Kornhuber J, Freiesleben SD, Schneider L, Preis L, Priller J, Spruth EJ, Altenstein S, Lohse A, Schneider A, Fliessbach K, Wiltfang J, Hansen N, Rostamzadeh A, Düzel E, Glanz W, Incesoy EI, Butryn M, Buerger K, Janowitz D, Ewers M, Perneczky R, Rauchmann B, Teipel S, Kilimann I, Goerss D, Laske C, Munk MH, Sanzenbacher C, Spottke A, Roy‐Kluth N, Heneka MT, Brosseron F, Wagner M, Wolfsgruber S, Kleineidam L, Stark M, Schmid M, Jessen F, Bannach O, Willbold D, Peters O. Aβ oligomers peak in early stages of Alzheimer's disease preceding tau pathology. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2024; 16:e12589. [PMID: 38666085 PMCID: PMC11044868 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Soluble amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomers have been suggested as initiating Aβ related neuropathologic change in Alzheimer's disease (AD) but their quantitative distribution and chronological sequence within the AD continuum remain unclear. METHODS A total of 526 participants in early clinical stages of AD and controls from a longitudinal cohort were neurobiologically classified for amyloid and tau pathology applying the AT(N) system. Aβ and tau oligomers in the quantified cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured using surface-based fluorescence intensity distribution analysis (sFIDA) technology. RESULTS Across groups, highest Aβ oligomer levels were found in A+ with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Aβ oligomers were significantly higher in A+T- compared to A-T- and A+T+. APOE ε4 allele carriers showed significantly higher Aβ oligomer levels. No differences in tau oligomers were detected. DISCUSSION The accumulation of Aβ oligomers in the CSF peaks early within the AD continuum, preceding tau pathology. Disease-modifying treatments targeting Aβ oligomers might have the highest therapeutic effect in these disease stages. Highlights Using surface-based fluorescence intensity distribution analysis (sFIDA) technology, we quantified Aβ oligomers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of the DZNE-Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia (DELCODE) cohortAβ oligomers were significantly elevated in mild cognitive impairment (MCI)Amyloid-positive subjects in the subjective cognitive decline (SCD) group increased compared to the amyloid-negative control groupInterestingly, levels of Aβ oligomers decrease at advanced stages of the disease (A+T+), which might be explained by altered clearing mechanisms.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sannemann L, Bartels C, Brosseron F, Buerger K, Fliessbach K, Freiesleben SD, Frommann I, Glanz W, Heneka MT, Janowitz D, Kilimann I, Kleineidam L, Lammerding D, Laske C, Munk MHJ, Perneczky R, Peters O, Priller J, Rauchmann BS, Rostamzadeh A, Roy-Kluth N, Schild AK, Schneider A, Schneider LS, Spottke A, Spruth EJ, Teipel S, Wagner M, Wiltfang J, Wolfsgruber S, Duezel E, Jessen F. Symptomatic Clusters Related to Amyloid Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 100:193-205. [PMID: 38848176 DOI: 10.3233/jad-231335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
Background The NIA-AA Research Framework on Alzheimer's disease (AD) proposes a transitional stage (stage 2) characterized by subtle cognitive decline, subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild neurobehavioral symptoms (NPS). Objective To identify participant clusters based on stage 2 features and assess their association with amyloid positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Methods We included baseline data of N = 338 cognitively unimpaired participants from the DELCODE cohort with data on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for AD. Classification into the AD continuum (i.e., amyloid positivity, A+) was based on Aβ42/40 status. Neuropsychological test data were used to assess subtle objective cognitive dysfunction (OBJ), the subjective cognitive decline interview (SCD-I) was used to detect SCD, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) was used to assess NPS. A two-step cluster analysis was carried out and differences in AD biomarkers between clusters were analyzed. Results We identified three distinct participant clusters based on presented symptoms. The highest rate of A+ participants (47.6%) was found in a cluster characterized by both OBJ and SCD. A cluster of participants that presented with SCD and NPS (A+:26.6%) and a cluster of participants with overall few symptoms (A+:19.7%) showed amyloid positivity in a range that was not higher than the expected A+ rate for the age group. Across the full sample, participants with a combination of SCD and OBJ in the memory domain showed a lower Aβ42/ptau181 ratio compared to those with neither SCD nor OBJ. Conclusions The cluster characterized by participants with OBJ and concomitant SCD was enriched for amyloid pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Sannemann
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Bartels
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Katharina Buerger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research - ISD, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Silka Dawn Freiesleben
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingo Frommann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Wenzel Glanz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael T Heneka
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine - LCSB, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Daniel Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research - ISD, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingo Kilimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Luca Kleineidam
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Dominik Lammerding
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Laske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Dementia Research, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias H J Munk
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology - SyNergy, Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit - AGE, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver Peters
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josef Priller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- University of Edinburgh and UK DRI, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience - SITraN, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Ayda Rostamzadeh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nina Roy-Kluth
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ann-Katrin Schild
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Luisa-Sophie Schneider
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin-Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Eike Jakob Spruth
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Michael Wagner
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Signaling Group, Institute of Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Steffen Wolfsgruber
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Emrah Duezel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research - IKND, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases - DZNE, Bonn, Germany
- Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases - CECAD, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hammers DB, Pentchev JV, Kim HJ, Spencer RJ, Apostolova LG. The relationship between learning slopes and Alzheimer's Disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants with and without subjective memory concerns. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2023; 45:727-743. [PMID: 37676258 PMCID: PMC10916703 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2254444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Learning slopes represent serial acquisition of information during list-learning tasks. Although several calculations for learning slopes exist, the Learning Ratio (LR) has recently demonstrated the highest sensitivity toward changes in cognition and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. However, investigation of learning slopes in cognitively unimpaired individuals with subjective memory concerns (SMC) has been limited. The current study examines the association of learning slopes to SMC, and the role of SMC in the relationship between learning slopes and AD biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired individuals. METHOD Data from 950 cognitively unimpaired participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (aged 55 to 89) were used to calculate learning slope metrics. Learning slopes among those with and without SMC were compared with demographic correction, and the relationships of learning slopes with AD biomarkers of bilateral hippocampal volume and β-amyloid pathology were determined. RESULTS Learning slopes were consistently predictive of hippocampal atrophy and β-amyloid deposition. Results were heightened for LR relative to the other learning slopes. Additionally, interaction analyses revealed different associations between learning slopes and hippocampal volume as a function of SMC status. CONCLUSIONS Learning slopes appear to be sensitive to SMC and AD biomarkers, with SMC status influencing the relationship in cognitively unimpaired participants. These findings advance our knowledge of SMC, and suggest that LR - in particular - can be an important tool for the detection of AD pathology in both SMC and in AD clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin B. Hammers
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202
| | - Julian V. Pentchev
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202
| | - Hee Jin Kim
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Robert J. Spencer
- Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor MI, USA, 48105
- Michigan Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychology Section, Ann Arbor MI, USA, 48105
| | - Liana G. Apostolova
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Neuroimaging, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 46202
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaser AN, Kaplan DM, Goette W, Kiselica AM. The impact of conventional versus robust norming on cognitive characterization and clinical classification of MCI and dementia. J Neuropsychol 2023; 17:108-124. [PMID: 36124357 PMCID: PMC10006397 DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We examined the impact of conventional versus robust normative approaches on cognitive characterization and clinical classification of MCI versus dementia. The sample included participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set. Separate demographically adjusted z-scores for cognitive tests were derived from conventional (n = 4273) and robust (n = 602) normative groups. To assess the impact of deriving scores from a conventional versus robust normative group on cognitive characterization, we examined likelihood of having a low score on each neuropsychological test. Next, we created receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the ability of normed scores derived from each normative group to differentiate between MCI (n = 3570) and dementia (n = 1564). We examined the impact of choice of normative group on classification accuracy by comparing sensitivity and specificity values and areas under the curves (AUC). Compared with using a conventional normative group, using a robust normative group resulted in a higher likelihood of low cognitive scores for individuals classified with MCI and dementia. Comparison of the classification accuracy for distinguishing MCI from dementia did not suggest a statistically significant advantage for either normative approach (Z = -0.29, p = .77; AUC = 0.86 for conventional and AUC = 0.86 for robust). In summary, these results indicate that using a robust normative group increases the likelihood of characterizing cognitive performance as low. However, there is not a clear advantage of using a robust over a conventional normative group when differentiating between MCI and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa N. Kaser
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - David M. Kaplan
- Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - William Goette
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew M. Kiselica
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Dyk K, Ahn J, Zhou X, Zhai W, Ahles TA, Bethea TN, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Dilawari AA, Graham D, Jacobsen PB, Jim H, McDonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Rentscher KE, Saykin AJ, Small BJ, Mandelblatt JS, Root JC. Associating persistent self-reported cognitive decline with neurocognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors using machine learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1132-1140. [PMID: 36030173 PMCID: PMC10016202 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n = 435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n = 441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. RESULTS The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60-89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n = 60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC = 0.736) and survivors without decline (n = 147; AUC = 0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. DISCUSSION Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Asma A Dilawari
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States of America
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Heather Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Sunita K Patel
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Brent J Small
- University of South Florida, Health Outcome and Behavior Program and Biostatistics Resource Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - James C Root
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pinus halepensis Essential Oil Ameliorates Aβ1-42-Induced Brain Injury by Diminishing Anxiety, Oxidative Stress, and Neuroinflammation in Rats. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092300. [PMID: 36140401 PMCID: PMC9496595 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The Pinus L. genus comprises around 250 species, being popular worldwide for their medicinal and aromatic properties. The present study aimed to evaluate the P. halepensis Mill. essential oil (PNO) in an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) environment as an anxiolytic and antidepressant agent. The AD-like symptoms were induced in Wistar male rats by intracerebroventricular administration of amyloid beta1-42 (Aβ1-42), and PNO (1% and 3%) was delivered to Aβ1-42 pre-treated rats via inhalation route for 21 consecutive days, 30 min before behavioral assessments. The obtained results indicate PNO’s potential to relieve anxious–depressive features and to restore redox imbalance in the rats exhibiting AD-like neuropsychiatric impairments. Moreover, PNO presented beneficial effects against neuroinflammation and neuroapoptosis in the Aβ1-42 rat AD model.
Collapse
|
9
|
Novotný JS, Gonzalez‐Rivas JP, Medina‐Inojosa JR, Lopez‐Jimenez F, Geda YE, Stokin GB. Investigating cognition in midlife. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2021; 7:e12234. [PMID: 35005209 PMCID: PMC8719351 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
We here posit that measurements of midlife cognition can be instructive in understanding cognitive disorders. Even though molecular events signal possible onset of cognitive disorders decades prior to their clinical diagnoses, cognition and its possible early changes in midlife remain poorly understood. We characterize midlife cognition in a cognitively healthy population-based sample using the Cogstate Brief Battery and test for associations with cardiovascular, adiposity-related, lifestyle-associated, and psychosocial variables. Learning and working memory showed significant variability and vulnerability to psychosocial influences in midlife. Furthermore, midlife aging significantly and progressively increased prevalence of suboptimal cognitive performance. Our findings suggest that physiological changes in cognition, measured with simple tests suitable for use in everyday clinical setting, may signal already in midlife the first clinical manifestations of the presymptomatic biologically defined cognitive disorders. This pilot study calls for longitudinal studies investigating midlife cognition to identify clinical correlates of biologically defined cognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan S. Novotný
- Translational Aging and Neuroscience Program, Centre for Translational Medicine, International Clinical Research CentreSt. Anne's University HospitalBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Juan P. Gonzalez‐Rivas
- Kardiovize Study, International Clinical Research CentreSt. Anne's University HospitalBrnoCzech Republic
- Department of Global Health and PopulationHarvard TH Chan School of Public HealthHarvard UniversityBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jose R. Medina‐Inojosa
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Francisco Lopez‐Jimenez
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Yonas E. Geda
- Division of Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders ProgramDepartment of NeurologyBarrow Neurological InstitutePhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Gorazd B. Stokin
- Translational Aging and Neuroscience Program, Centre for Translational Medicine, International Clinical Research CentreSt. Anne's University HospitalBrnoCzech Republic
- Translational Aging and Neuroscience ProgramMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
- Division of NeurologyUniversity Medical CentreLjubljanaSlovenia
| |
Collapse
|