The outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection in inpatient liver transplant population

The impact of Clostridioides difficile infection on outcomes among kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients, particularly those who are immunosuppressed. We aim to assess the outcomes of CDI among kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 was used to identify patients with KT and stratify based on the presence of CDI. Data were collected regarding demographics and comorbidities. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, transplant rejection, transplant failure, length of stay, and total hospitalization charges. The relationships between variables of interest and outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 557,635 KT recipients were included. CDI prevalence was 2.4%. The majority of patients in the CDI group were age >65 (43.6%), female (51%), White (55.3%), and had Medicare insurance (74.9%). On multivariate regression analysis, CDI was associated with increased odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 2.06, p < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (aOR 2.47, p < 0.001), and mortality (aOR 1.90, p < 0.001). CDI was also associated with longer length of stay (9.35 days vs 5.42 days, p < 0.001) and higher total hospitalization charges ($110,063 vs $100,006, p < 0.001). There was no difference in transplant rejection, complication, failure, or infection among KT recipients with CDI and those without.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that CDI was associated with worse outcomes and higher costs. KT patients should be monitored closely for signs of CDI in order to initiate appropriate management.

Epidemiology and Management of Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients

Background: Improvements in liver transplant (LT) outcomes are attributed to advances in surgical techniques, use of potent immunosuppressants, and rigorous pre-LT testing. Despite these improvements, post-LT infections remain the most common complication in this population. Bacteria constitute the most common infectious agents, while fungal and viral infections are also frequently encountered. Multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections develop because of polymicrobial overuse and prolonged hospital stays. Immediate post-LT infections are commonly caused by viruses. Conclusions: Appropriate vaccination, screening of both donor and recipients before LT and antiviral prophylaxis in high-risk individuals are recommended. Antimicrobial drug resistance is common in high-risk LT and associated with poor outcomes; epidemiology and management of these cases is discussed. Additionally, we also discuss the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and monkeypox in the LT population.

Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Although antimicrobial stewardship programs have excelled over the past decade, uptake and application of these programs to special populations such as solid organ transplant recipients have lagged. Here, we review the value of antimicrobial stewardship for transplant centers and highlight data supporting interventions that are ripe for adoption. In addition, we review the design of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, targets for both syndromic and system-based interventions.

COVID-19 and Clostridioides difficile Coinfection Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients in the United States: An Insight from National Inpatient Database

The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing compared to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels. The COVID-19 infection and CDI relationship can be affected by gut dysbiosis and poor antibiotic stewardship. As the COVID-19 pandemic transitions into an endemic stage, it has become increasingly important to further characterize how concurrent infection with both conditions can impact patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2020 NIS Healthcare Cost Utilization Project (HCUP) database with a total of 1,659,040 patients, with 10,710 (0.6%) of those patients with concurrent CDI. We found that patients with concurrent COVID-19 and CDI had worse outcomes compared to patients without CDI including higher in-hospital mortality (23% vs. 13.4%, aOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.12-1.5, p = 0.01), rates of in-hospital complications such as ileus (2.7% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001), septic shock (21.0% vs. 7.2%, aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.1-2.6, p < 0.001), length of stay (15.1 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) and overall cost of hospitalization (USD 196,012 vs. USD 91,162, p < 0.001). Patients with concurrent COVID-19 and CDI had increased morbidity and mortality, and added significant preventable burden on the healthcare system. Optimizing hand hygiene and antibiotic stewardship during in-hospital admissions can help to reduce worse outcomes in this population, and more efforts should be directly made to reduce CDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection.

Short Course of Antibiotic Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacilli Bacteremia in Patients with Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less Is Possible

Data about short courses of antibiotic therapy for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia in immunosuppressed patients are limited. This is a prospective observational study performed on adult patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who developed GNB bacteremia and received appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT), had a clinical response within 7 days and survived 48 h after the end of therapy. They received antibiotic therapy in the range of 7-15 days and were divided into short course, with a median of 7 days (SC), or long course, with a median of 14 days (LC). Seventy-four patients were included (SC: 36 and LC: 38). No differences were observed in baseline characteristics or in the presence of neutropenia: 58.3% vs. 60.5% (p = 0.84). Clinical presentation and microbiological characteristics were similar in SC and LC, respectively: clinical source of bacteremia 72.2% vs. 76.3% (p = 0.68); shock 2.8% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.35) and multidrug-resistant GNB 27.8% vs. 21.1% (p = 0.50). Overall, mortality was 2.8% vs. 7.9% (p = 0.61), and bacteremia relapse was 2.8% vs. 0 (p = 0.30). The length of hospitalization since bacteremia was 7 days (interquartile range (IQR), 6-15) for SC and 12 days (IQR, 7-19) (p = 0.021) for LC. In the case of patients with cancer or HSCT and GNB bacteremia who receive appropriate EAT with clinical response, 7 days of antibiotic therapy might be adequate.

Shorter antibiotic courses in the immunocompromised: the impossible dream?

BACKGROUND

A growing number of studies have demonstrated similar outcomes with shorter courses of antibiotics for bacterial infections. Immunocompromised patients are frequently excluded from these studies despite anticipated benefits associated with shortening antibiotic courses (including lower risks of antibiotic toxicity, Clostridioides difficile infection, drug-resistant pathogens, and microbiome alterations).

OBJECTIVES

To critically review the literature that assesses shorter antibiotic courses in immunocompromised patients, specifically among solid organ transplant recipients and neutropenic fever (NF) syndromes among patients on antineoplastic chemotherapy and undergoing haematopoietic cell transplant.

SOURCES

References were identified through searches of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and clinical guidelines documents.

CONTENT

Among organ transplant recipients, the majority of studies assessing outcomes associated with shorter antibiotic courses have been retrospective but have demonstrated similar rates of clinically relevant endpoints. Patients with high- and low-risk NF have been well-studied, including enrolment in randomized studies, albeit with heterogeneous patient populations and outcomes assessed. Clinical improvement-guided adoption of shorter courses has been associated with fewer antibiotic days and similar rates of fever recurrence and mortality.

IMPLICATIONS

Similar to studies demonstrating efficacy in immunocompetent patients, shorter antibiotic courses should be considered for immunocompromised hosts with presumed bacterial infections. Organ recipients and patients with NF syndromes should be prioritized for study in randomized controlled clinical trials assessing shorter course therapy.

An analysis of the outcomes of Clostridioides difficile occurring in intestinal transplant recipients requiring hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Organ transplantation is a known risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). There is limited published data on the impact of CDI in the intestinal transplant population.

METHODS

We utilized the National Readmission Database (2010-2017) to study the outcomes of CDI in patients having a history of intestinal transplantation. Association of CDI with readmission and hospital resource utilization was computed in multivariable models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

During 2010-2017, 8442 hospitalizations with the history of intestinal transplantation had indexed hospital admissions. Of these, 320 (3.8%) had CDI. CDI hospitalization in intestine transplant patients was associated with higher median cost $54 430 (IQR: 27 231, 109 980) as compared to patients who did not have CDI $48 888 (IQR: 22 578, 112 777), (β: 71 814 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 676-142 953, p = .048). The median length of stay was also longer for patients with CDI 7 (IQR: 4, 13) days as compared to 5 (IQR: 3, 11) days in non-CDI (β: 5.51 95% CI: 0.73-10.29, p = .02). The mortality rate, intestinal transplant complications, presence of malnutrition, acute kidney injury, ICU admissions, and sepsis were similar in both groups. CDI was the top cause of 30-day readmission in the intestinal transplant recipients with CDI during the index admission; the number of 30-day readmissions also increased from 2010 to 2017.

CONCLUSION

CDI hospitalization in post-intestine transplant patients occurs commonly and is associated with a longer length of stay and higher costs during hospitalization. The CDI was the most common cause of readmission after the index admission of CDI in these patients.

Comparative analysis and trends in liver transplant hospitalizations with Clostridium difficile infections: A 10-year national cross-sectional study

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in the United States. We aimed to determine comparative trends in inpatient outcomes of liver transplant (LT) patients based on CDI during hospitalizations.

METHODS

The national inpatient sample database was used to conduct the present retrospective study regarding CDI among the LT hospitalizations from 2009 to 2019. Primary outcomes included 10-year comparative trends of the length of stay (LOS) and mean inpatient charges (MIC). Secondary outcomes included comparative mortality and LT rejection trends.

RESULTS

There was a 14.05% decrease in CDI in LT hospitalizations over the study period (p = .05). The trend in LOS did not significantly vary (p = .9). MIC increased significantly over the last decade in LT hospitalizations with CDI (p < .001). LT hospitalizations of autoimmune etiology compared against non-autoimmune did not increase association with CDI, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.26, p = .87). CDI was associated with increased mortality in LT hospitalizations, aOR 1.84 (95% CI 1.52-2.24, p < .001). In-hospital mortality for LT hospitalizations with CDI decreased by 7.75% over the study period (p = .3). CDI increased transplant rejections, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.08-1.65, p < .001). There was a declining trend in transplant rejection for LT hospitalization with CDI from 5% to 3% over the study period (p = .0048).

CONCLUSION

CDI prevalence does not increase based on autoimmune LT etiology. It increases mortality in LT hospitalizations; however, trend for mortality and transplant rejections has been declining over the last decade.

Fibrinolysis resistance after liver transplant as a predictor of early infection

BACKGROUND

Infection is a leading cause of morbidity in liver transplant (LT). Considering that the fibrinolytic system is altered in sepsis, we investigated the relationship between fibrinolysis resistance (FR) and post-transplant infection.

METHODS

Fibrinolysis was quantified using thrombelastography (TEG) with the addition of tPA to quantify FR. FR was defined as LY30 = 0% and stratified as transient if present on POD1 or POD5 (tFR), persistent (pFR) if present on both, or no FR (nFR) if absent.

RESULTS

180 LT recipients were prospectively enrolled. 52 (29%) recipients developed infection. 72 had tFR; 37 had pFR; and 71 had nFR. Recipients with pFR had significantly greater incidence of infections (51% vs. 26% tFR vs. 20% nFR, p = 0.002). pFR was independently associated with increased odds of post-transplant infection (adjusted OR 3.39, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent fibrinolysis resistance is associated with increased risk of post-transplant infection.