The confusion continues: results from an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma survey on massive transfusion practices among United States trauma centers

Guidelines in trauma-related bleeding and coagulopathy: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and treatment of patients with severe traumatic bleeding and subsequent trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still inconsistent, although the implementation of standardized algorithms/treatment pathways was repeatedly linked to improved outcome. Various evidence-based guidelines for these patients now exist, three of which have recently been updated.

RECENT FINDINGS

A synopsis of the three recently updated guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of seriously bleeding trauma patients with TIC is presented: (i) AWMF S3 guideline 'Polytrauma/Seriously Injured Patient Treatment' under the auspices of the German Society for Trauma Surgery; (ii) guideline of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) on the management of perioperative bleeding; and (iii) European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy after trauma in its 6th edition (EU-Trauma).

SUMMARY

Treatment of trauma-related bleeding begins at the scene with local compression, use of tourniquets and pelvic binders and rapid transport to a certified trauma centre. After arrival at the hospital, measures to record, monitor and support coagulation function should be initiated immediately. Surgical bleeding control is carried out according to 'damage control' principles. Modern coagulation management includes individualized treatment based on target values derived from point-of-care viscoelastic test procedures.

Clinical decision support versus a paper-based protocol for massive transfusion: Impact on decision outcomes in a simulation study

BACKGROUND

Management of major hemorrhage frequently requires massive transfusion (MT) support, which should be delivered effectively and efficiently. We have previously developed a clinical decision support system (CDS) for MT using a multicenter multidisciplinary user-centered design study. Here we examine its impact when administering a MT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized simulation trial to compare a CDS for MT with a paper-based MT protocol for the management of simulated hemorrhage. A total of 44 specialist physicians, trainees (residents), and nurses were recruited across critical care to participate in two 20-min simulated bleeding scenarios. The primary outcome was the decision velocity (correct decisions per hour) and overall task completion. Secondary outcomes included cognitive workload and System Usability Scale (SUS).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in decision velocity for CDS-based management (mean 8.5 decisions per hour) compared to paper based (mean 6.9 decisions per hour; p .003, 95% CI 0.6-2.6). There was no significant difference in the overall task completion using CDS-based management (mean 13.3) compared to paper-based (mean 13.2; p .92, 95% CI -1.2-1.3). Cognitive workload was statistically significantly lower using the CDS compared to the paper protocol (mean 57.1 vs. mean 64.5, p .005, 95% CI 2.4-12.5). CDS usability was assessed as a SUS score of 82.5 (IQR 75-87.5).

DISCUSSION

Compared to paper-based management, CDS-based MT supports more time-efficient decision-making by users with limited CDS training and achieves similar overall task completion while reducing cognitive load. Clinical implementation will determine whether the benefits demonstrated translate to improved patient outcomes.

Assessment of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma

BACKGROUND

Accurately predicting which patients are most likely to benefit from massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation may help patients while saving blood products and limiting cost. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of modern machine learning (ML) methods to develop and validate a model that can accurately predict the need for massive blood transfusion (MBT).

METHODS

The institutional trauma registry was used to identify all trauma team activation cases between June 2015 and August 2019. We used an ML framework to explore multiple ML methods including logistic regression with forward and backward selection, logistic regression with lasso and ridge regularization, support vector machines (SVM), decision tree, random forest, naive Bayes, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and neural networks. Each model was then assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Model performance was compared to that of existing scores including the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) and the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT).

RESULTS

A total of 2438 patients were included in the study, with 4.9% receiving MBT. All models besides decision tree and SVM attained an area under the curve (AUC) of above 0.75 (range: 0.75-0.83). Most of the ML models have higher sensitivity (0.55-0.83) than the ABC and RABT score (0.36 and 0.55, respectively) while maintaining comparable specificity (0.75-0.81; ABC 0.80 and RABT 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Our ML models performed better than existing scores. Implementing an ML model in mobile computing devices or electronic health record has the potential to improve the usability.

Comprehensive analysis of coagulation factor delivery strategies in a cohort of trauma patients

PURPOSE

The 5^th edition of The European recommendations for the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma leaves room for various coagulation factor administration strategies. The present study examines these strategies reporting prevalence and timing of administration, quantity dispensed, and transfusion ratios in French trauma centers and their compliance with recommendations alongside associated mortality data.

METHODS

All adult patients, admitted directly to participating centers between 2011 and 2019, were extracted from a trauma registry. Two subpopulations were studied: severe hemorrhage (SH) and massive transfusion (MT) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 19,396 patients were included, among whom 8.4% (1630) experienced SH and 3% (579) received MT. Within the first 24 hours, 10% received fresh frozen plasma (FFP), rising to 93% and 99% in the subgroups of patients experiencing SH and MT respectively. Only, 8% received fibrinogen concentrate (FC), increasing to 75% and 92% in subgroups SH and MT respectively. Co-administration of FFP and FC became the dominant strategy with 68% of patients at 6 h and 72% at 24 h in SH subgroup. In unadjusted data, mortality was systematically lower in groups that complied with recommendations, a lower mortality than expected was mostly observed in contrast to non-compliant subgroups. The per-patient compliance to studied recommendations was 21% and 22% in SH and MT subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The main hemostatic strategy for major bleeding combined the administration of both FFP and FC, favoring an early additional supply of fibrinogen. Compliance with the recommendations was low in SH and MT subgroups.

Association between perioperative plasma transfusion and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing surgeries without massive transfusion: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

Background

An aggressive plasma transfusion is associated with a decreased mortality in traumatic patients requiring massive transfusion (MT). However, it is controversial whether non-traumatic or non-massively transfused patients can benefit from high doses of plasma.

Methods

We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from Hospital Quality Monitoring System, which collected anonymized inpatient medical records from 31 provinces in mainland China. We included the patients who had at least one record of surgical procedure and received red blood cell transfusion on the day of surgery from 2016 to 2018. We excluded those receiving MT or diagnosed with coagulopathy at admission. The exposure variable was the total volume of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfused, and the primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The relationship between them was assessed using multivariable logistic regression model adjusting 15 potential confounders.

Results

A total of 69319 patients were included, and 808 died among them. A 100-ml increase in FFP transfusion volume was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.06, p < 0.001) after controlling for the confounders. FFP transfusion volume was also associated with superficial surgical site infection, nosocomial infection, prolonged length of hospital stay, ventilation time, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The significant association between FFP transfusion volume and in-hospital mortality was extended to the subgroups of cardiac surgery, vascular surgery, and thoracic or abdominal surgery.

Conclusions

A higher volume of perioperative FFP transfusion was associated with an increased in-hospital mortality and inferior postoperative outcomes in surgical patients without MT.

It is time for TEG in pediatric trauma: unveiling meaningful alterations in children who undergo massive transfusion

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in pediatric trauma patients. In adults, goal-directed thrombelastography (TEG) has been shown to reduce mortality when used to guide massive transfusion (MT) resuscitation. There remains a paucity of data on the utility of TEG in directing resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients. We hypothesize that abnormalities on admission TEG will differ in pediatric trauma patients who undergo MT, compared to those who do not.

METHODS

Pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) who were highest level trauma activations at two trauma centers from 2015 to 2018 were analyzed. We included patients who had admission TEGs and excluded those who did not. Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received MT (> 40 cc/kg total blood product within 6 h of admission) and those who did not. We defined TEG abnormalities based on each institution's normative values and compared TEG abnormalities between the groups.

RESULTS

Of 117 children included, 39 had MT. MT patients had higher injury severity scores (30 vs. 23, p = 0.0004), lactates levels (7.0 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001), base deficit levels ( - 12.2 vs.  - 5.8, p < 0.001), and INR values (1.8 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001). MT patients had significantly shortened alpha-angles (35.9% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.023), maximum amplitude (MA) values (43.6% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.001), and significantly lower platelet counts (165 vs. 281, p < 0.001) compared to those who did not receive MT. There was no difference in the trends in R-time, LY30 (lysis or shutdown), or fibrinogen concentration between the groups. Logistic regression identified a decreased MA as a significant predictor for MT [OR 3.68 (CI 1.29-10.52)] CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric trauma patients who undergo MT are more likely to have lower alpha-angles and MA values, as well as lower platelet counts. These findings support the use of TEG to identify hemorrhaging pediatric trauma patients, who may benefit from cryoprecipitate and/or platelet transfusions. TEG provides real-time information on coagulation status, which may expedite the delivery of specific blood products during trauma resuscitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

LEVEL III: Type of study: Retrospective comparative study.

Blood shortages and changes to massive transfusion protocols: Survey of hospital practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in severe ongoing blood shortages across the US, despite employment of numerous blood-conservation measures. Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) are one resource-intensive practice that utilize significant amounts of blood products. Alterations to the composition of MTP parameters to conserve scarce biologic resources have hitherto not been examined during the pandemic.

Methods

An anonymous 18-question survey was administered to 115 hospitals with valid email contact information. Survey questions addressed whether institutions have altered their MTPs due to the COVID-19 pandemic and blood shortages, and if so, what adjustments they have made. Additional details concerning potential differences in the number and cycles of MTPs and blood product wastage during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the year prior were assessed.

Results

50 responses were received (43 % response rate). 10 % (5/50) of institutions altered their MTPs utilizing a variety of approaches in attempt to conserve blood during the COVID-19 pandemic. Four additional institutions intend to alter them if it becomes necessary. Following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, 24 % of institutions (12/50) reported an increase in monthly MTP activations, while 16 % (8/50) reported decreased activations compared to prior to the pandemic. 22 % (11/50) of institutions experienced increased blood wastage, whereas 16 % (8/50) reported decreased waste compared to pre-pandemic.

Discussion

The results of this survey highlight a variety of mechanisms by which institutions have attempted to conserve blood via altering MTPs. Whether an institution adjusted their MTP does not correlate with changes in blood product wastage compared to pre-pandemic.

How did we reform our out of control massive transfusion protocol program?

BACKGROUND

The massive transfusion protocol (MTP) is designed to quickly provide blood products at a fixed ratio for the exsanguinating patient. At our academic medical center, the frequency of MTP activation increased over 10-fold between 2008 and 2015, putting inordinate stress on our transfusion service.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Gathering a large number of relevant stakeholders, we performed a multidisciplinary root cause analysis (RCA) in response to the acute clinical need to reform our MTP.

RESULTS

Through the RCA, we identified four principal opportunities for improvement (OFI) associated with our MTP: education, stewardship, process improvement, and communication. Through the deployment of new approaches to each of these OFI, we reduced MTP activations, blood product waste, and transfusion service technologist stress.

CONCLUSION

The MTP is amenable to improvement, and, although time intensive, the RCA process yields significant favorable effects: improving communication with colleagues, reducing stress within the transfusion service, and improving resource utilization. Activation of the MTP at our institution is now more aligned with its primary purpose: rapidly providing large quantities of blood products to exsanguinating patients.

Viscoelastic monitoring in trauma resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury results in both physical and physiologic insult. Successful care of the trauma patient depends upon timely correction of both physical and biochemical injury. Trauma-induced coagulopathy is a derangement of hemostasis and thrombosis that develops rapidly and can be fatal if not corrected. Viscoelastic monitoring (VEM) assays have been developed to provide rapid, accurate, and relatively comprehensive depictions of an individual's coagulation profile. VEM are increasingly being integrated into trauma resuscitation guidelines to provide dynamic and individualized guidance to correct coagulopathy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the search terms viscoelastic, thromboelastography, thromboelastometry, TEG, ROTEM, trauma, injury, resuscitation, and coagulopathy using PubMed. Particular focus was directed to articles describing algorithms for management of traumatic coagulopathy based on VEM assay parameters.

RESULTS

Our search identified 16 papers with VEM-guided resuscitation strategies in adult patients based on TEG, 12 such protocols in adults based on ROTEM, 1 protocol for children based on TEG, and 2 protocols for children based on ROTEM.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents evidence to support VEM use to detect traumatic coagulopathy, discusses the role of VEM in trauma resuscitation, provides a summary of proposed treatment algorithms, and discusses pending questions in the field.

Getting hit by the bus around the world - a global perspective on goal directed treatment of massive hemorrhage in trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Major trauma remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide with traumatic brain injury and uncontrolled traumatic bleeding as the main determinants of fatal outcome. Interestingly, the therapeutic approach to trauma-associated bleeding and coagulopathy shows differences between geographic regions, that are reflected in different guidelines and protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes main principles in coagulation diagnostics and compares different strategies for treatment of massive hemorrhage after trauma in different regions of the world. How would a bleeding trauma patient be managed if they got hit by the bus in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Denmark, Australia, or in Japan?

SUMMARY

There are multiple coexistent treatment standards for trauma-induced coagulopathy in different countries and different trauma centers. Most of them initially follow a protocol-based approach and subsequently focus on predefined clinical and laboratory targets.

Trauma-induced coagulopathy

Uncontrolled haemorrhage is a major preventable cause of death in patients with traumatic injury. Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) describes abnormal coagulation processes that are attributable to trauma. In the early hours of TIC development, hypocoagulability is typically present, resulting in bleeding, whereas later TIC is characterized by a hypercoagulable state associated with venous thromboembolism and multiple organ failure. Several pathophysiological mechanisms underlie TIC; tissue injury and shock synergistically provoke endothelial, immune system, platelet and clotting activation, which are accentuated by the 'lethal triad' (coagulopathy, hypothermia and acidosis). Traumatic brain injury also has a distinct role in TIC. Haemostatic abnormalities include fibrinogen depletion, inadequate thrombin generation, impaired platelet function and dysregulated fibrinolysis. Laboratory diagnosis is based on coagulation abnormalities detected by conventional or viscoelastic haemostatic assays; however, it does not always match the clinical condition. Management priorities are stopping blood loss and reversing shock by restoring circulating blood volume, to prevent or reduce the risk of worsening TIC. Various blood products can be used in resuscitation; however, there is no international agreement on the optimal composition of transfusion components. Tranexamic acid is used in pre-hospital settings selectively in the USA and more widely in Europe and other locations. Survivors of TIC experience high rates of morbidity, which affects short-term and long-term quality of life and functional outcome.

The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy after Trauma: Summary of the 2019 Updated European Guideline

Non-controlled hemorrhage with accompanying trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) remains the most common cause of preventable death after multiple injury. Rapid identification followed by aggressive treatment is the key for improved outcomes. Treatment of trauma hemorrhage begins at the scene, with manual compression, the use of tourniquets and (non) commercial pelvic slings, and rapid transfer to an adequate trauma center. Upon hospital admission, coagulation monitoring and support are to be initiated immediately. Bleeding is controlled surgically following damage control principles. Modern coagulation management includes goal-oriented, individualized therapies, guided by point-of-care viscoelastic assays. Idarucizumab can be used as an antidote to the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, andexanet alpha as an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors. This review summarizes the key recommendations of the 2019 updated European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma. These evidence-based recommendations may form the backbone of algorithms adapted to local logistics and infrastructure.

Whole Blood, Fixed Ratio, or Goal-Directed Blood Component Therapy for the Initial Resuscitation of Severely Hemorrhaging Trauma Patients: A Narrative Review

This narrative review explores the pathophysiology, geographic variation, and historical developments underlying the selection of fixed ratio versus whole blood resuscitation for hemorrhaging trauma patients. We also detail a physiologically driven and goal-directed alternative to fixed ratio and whole blood, whereby viscoelastic testing guides the administration of blood components and factor concentrates to the severely bleeding trauma patient. The major studies of each resuscitation method are highlighted, and upcoming comparative trials are detailed.

Hemostatic defects in massive transfusion: an update and treatment recommendations

INTRODUCTION

Acute hemorrhage is a global healthcare issue, and remains the leading preventable cause of death in trauma. Acute severe hemorrhage can be related to traumatic, peripartum, gastrointestinal, and procedural causes. Hemostatic defects occur early in patients requiring massive transfusion. Early recognition and treatment of hemorrhage and hemostatic defects are required to save lives and to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses current evidence and trials aimed at identifying the optimal treatment for hemostatic defects in hemorrhage and massive transfusion. Literature search included PubMed and Embase.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with acute hemorrhage requiring massive transfusion commonly develop coagulopathy due to specific hemostatic defects, and accurate diagnosis and prompt correction are required for definitive hemorrhage control. Damage control resuscitation and massive transfusion protocols are optimal initial treatment strategies, followed by goal-directed individualized resuscitation using real-time coagulation monitoring. Distinct phenotypes exist in trauma-induced coagulopathy, including 'Bleeding' or 'Thrombotic' phenotypes, and hyperfibrinolysis vs. fibrinolysis shutdown. The trauma 'lethal triad' (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis) has been updated to the 'lethal diamond' (including hypocalcemia). A number of controversies in optimal management exist, including whole blood vs. component therapy, use of factor concentrates vs. blood products, optimal use of tranexamic acid, and prehospital plasma and tranexamic acid administration.

Liquid plasma: A solution to optimizing early and balanced plasma resuscitation in massive transfusion

BACKGROUND

Early and balanced resuscitation for traumatic hemorrhagic shock is associated with decreased mortality, making timely plasma administration imperative. However, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) thaw time can delay administration, and the shelf life of thawed FFP limits supply and may incur wastage. Liquid plasma (LP) offers an attractive alternative given immediate transfusion potential and extended shelf life. As such, we hypothesized that the use of LP in the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) would improve optimal plasma/red blood cell (RBC) ratios, initial plasma transfusion times, and clinical outcomes in the severely injured patient.

METHODS

Using Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from our level 1 trauma center, we evaluated MTP activations from 2016 to 2018. Type A LP use was instated April 2017. Before this, thawed FFP was solely used. Plasma/RBC ratios and initial plasma transfusion times were compared in MTP patients before and after LP implementation. Patient and injury characteristics were accounted for using linear regression analysis. Secondary outcomes of mortality, 28-day recovery, and complications were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included (pre-LP, 39; post-LP, 56). Time to initial plasma transfusion and plasma/RBC ratios at 4 and 24 hours were improved post-LP implementation with a coinciding reduction in RBC units transfused (p < 0.05). In a 28-day Cox proportional hazards regression LP implementation was associated with favorable recovery (hazard ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-6.24; p < 0.001) and reduction in acute kidney injury (hazard ratio, 0.092; 95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.77; p = 0.027). No post-LP patients with blood group type B or AB (n = 9) demonstrated evidence of hemolysis within 24 hours of type A LP transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Initial resuscitation with LP optimizes early plasma administration and improves adherence to transfusion ratio guidelines. Furthermore, LP offers a solution to inherent delays with FFP and is associated with improved clinical outcomes, particularly 28-day recovery and odds of acute kidney injury. Liquid plasma should be considered as an alternative to FFP in MTPs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Quality Improvement Project of a Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) to Reduce Wastage of Blood Components

Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) facilitate the organized delivery of blood components for traumatically injured patients. MTPs vary across institutions, and ratios of blood components can change during clinical management. As a result, significant amounts of components can be wasted. We completed a review of all MTP activations from 2015 to 2018, providing an in-depth analysis of waste in our single Level 1 trauma center. An interdepartmental group analyzed patterns of blood component wastage to guide three quality improvement initiatives. Specifically, we (1) completed a digital timeline for each MTP activation and termination, (2) improved communications between departments, and (3) provided yearly training for all personnel about MTP deployment. The analysis identified an association between delayed MTP deactivations and waste (RR = 1.48, CI 1.19–1.85, p = 0.0005). An overall improvement in waste was seen over the years, but this could not be attributed to increased closed-loop communication as determined by the proportion of non-stop activations (F(124,3) = 0.98, not significant). Delayed MTP deactivations are the primary determinant of blood component waste. Our proactive intervention on communications between groups was not sufficient in reducing the number of delayed deactivations. However, implementing a digital timeline and regular repetitive training yielded a significant reduction in wasted blood components.

Viscoelastic testing in liver transplantation

Despite the lack of large randomized clinical studies, viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been a critical armamentarium for hemostatic control in liver transplantation (LT) since the 1960s. Many transplant institutions have adopted VETs in their clinical practice. Several small-size randomized clinical trials on LT patients have suggested that VET-guided hemostatic treatment algorithms have led to decreased indications for and amounts of transfused blood products, especially fresh-frozen plasma, compared to standard laboratory-based hemostatic management. VETs have also been reported to offer insight into the diagnosis and prediction of LT patients' development of hypercoagulability-related morbidity and mortality. There is still a need for VET device-specific hemostatic algorithms in LT, and clinicians must take into account the tendency to underestimate the coagulation capacity of VETs in patients with end-stage liver disease where hemostasis is rebalanced.

Viscoelastic testing in combat resuscitation: Is it time for a new standard?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemorrhage and coagulopathy represent major sources of morbidity and mortality on the modern battlefield. Viscoelastic testing (VET) offers a potentially more personalized approach to resuscitation. We sought to evaluate outcomes of combat trauma patients who received VET-guided resuscitation compared with standard balanced blood product resuscitation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008 to 2016 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses of all adult patients initially presenting to NATO Role III facilities who required blood products were performed to identify factors associated with VET-guided resuscitation and mortality. A propensity score matched comparison of outcomes in patient cohorts treated at VET versus non-VET Role III facilities was performed.

RESULTS

There are 3,320 patients, predominately male (98%), median age ranges from 25 years to 29 years, Injury Severity Score of 18.8, with a penetrating injury (84%) were studied. Overall mortality was 9.7%. Five hundred ninety-four patients had VET during their initial resuscitation. After adjusting for confounders, VET during initial resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.63; p = 0.04). Propensity analysis confirmed this survival advantage with a 57% reduction in overall mortality (7.3% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.001) for all patients requiring blood products.

CONCLUSION

Viscoelastic testing offers the possibility of a product-specific resuscitation for critically injured patients requiring transfusion in combat settings. Routine VET may be superior to non-VET-guided resuscitation for combat trauma victims.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Effect of fibrinogen concentrate administration on early mortality in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Fibrinogen concentrate is widely used in traumatic hemorrhagic shock despite weak evidence in the literature. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours on 24-hour all-cause mortality in traumatic hemorrhagic shock using a causal inference approach.

METHODS

Observational study from a French multicenter prospective trauma registry was performed. Hemorrhagic shock was defined as transfusion of four or more red blood cell units within the first 6 hours after admission. The confounding variables for the outcome (24-hour all-cause mortality) and treatment allocation (fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours) were chosen by a Delphi method. The propensity score was specified with a data-adaptive algorithm and a doubly-robust approach with inverse proportionality of treatment weighting allowed to compute the average treatment effect. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 14,336 patients in the registry during the study period, 1,027 in hemorrhagic shock were analyzed (758 receiving fibrinogen concentrate within 6 hours and 269 not receiving fibrinogen concentrate). The average treatment effect, expressed as a risk difference, was -0.031 (95% confidence interval, -0.084 to 0.021). All sensitivity analysis confirmed the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours of a traumatic hemorrhagic shock did not decrease 24-hour all-cause mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Study of alteplase for respiratory failure in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/COVID-19: Study design of the phase IIa STARS trial

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a large surge of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prior phase I trials (non-COVID-19) demonstrated improvement in pulmonary function in patients ARDS using fibrinolytic therapy. A follow-up trial using the widely available tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) alteplase is now needed to assess optimal dosing and safety in this critically ill patient population.

Objective

To describe the design and rationale of a phase IIa trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of alteplase treatment for moderate/severe COVID-19-induced ARDS.

Patients/Methods

A rapidly adaptive, pragmatic, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase IIa clinical trial will be conducted with 3 groups: intravenous alteplase 50 mg, intravenous alteplase 100 mg, and control (standard-of-care). Inclusion criteria are known/suspected COVID-19 infection with PaO2/FiO2 ratio <150 mm Hg for > 4 hours despite maximal mechanical ventilation management. Alteplase will be delivered through an initial bolus of 50 mg or 100 mg followed by heparin infusion for systemic anticoagulation, with alteplase redosing if there is a >20% PaO2/FiO2 improvement not sustained by 24 hours.

Results

The primary outcome is improvement in PaO2/FiO2 at 48 hours after randomization. Other outcomes include ventilator- and intensive care unit-free days, successful extubation (no reintubation ≤3 days after initial extubation), and mortality. Fifty eligible patients will be enrolled in a rapidly adaptive, modified stepped-wedge design with 4 looks at the data.

Conclusion

Findings will provide timely information on the safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing of t-PA to treat moderate/severe COVID-19-induced ARDS, which can be rapidly adapted to a phase III trial (NCT04357730; FDA IND 149634).

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Traumatic Bleeding and Coagulopathy

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled bleeding with trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still the most common avoidable cause of death in multiple trauma. The aging of the population has led to an increasing number of bleeding trauma patients with pre-existing anticoagulation. Such patients are not treated uniformly, even in major trauma centers.

METHODS

This review is based on a selective search of the literature (Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Reviews) and summarizes current treatment recommendations, including those of the newly revised European trauma guidelines.

RESULTS

The treatment of traumatic hemorrhage begins at the site of the accident, with compression, tourniquets, pelvic binders, and rapid transport to a certified trauma center. The early use of tourniquets was shown to lessen the trans- fusion requirement (packed red blood cells: 2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 9.3 ± 0.6; p < 0.001; fresh frozen plasma concentrates: 1.4 ± 0.08 vs. 6.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001), while external pelvic stabilization was shown to reduce mortality (19.1% vs. 33.3%). Upon the patient's arrival in the hospital, steps are taken to measure, monitor, and support clotting function. Bleeding is controlled surgically according to the principles of damage control. Modern clotting management consists of goal-oriented, individualized therapy, including the use of point-of-care viscoelastic test procedures. Idarucizumab can be used as an antidote to the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, andexanet alpha as an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The evidence-based treatment of patients with hemorrhage from severe trauma, in accordance with the existing guidelines, can improve the clinical outcome. Corresponding algorithms, adapted to local logistics and infrastructure, must be developed and implemented.

Viscoelastic haemostatic assays and fibrinogen in paediatric acute traumatic coagulopathy: A comprehensive review

OBJECTIVE

Haemorrhage in paediatric trauma remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Over recent years there has been increasing attention to the role of fibrinogen in traumatic haemorrhage and the association of low fibrinogen levels with poor patient outcomes. In addition, there has been a move towards using viscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHAs) to rapidly assess coagulation status and guide clinicians in the replacement of coagulation factors, including fibrinogen. In the paediatric population, there has been limited uptake of these principles and a paucity of data to support a change in practice. This paper summarises the available evidence in the published literature through a systematic review, presented in narrative format.

RESULTS

There is limited high-quality prospective data on the use of VHA in the management of acute traumatic coagulopathy in the paediatric population. While the use of fibrinogen early in major haemorrhage is becoming standard practice, there are currently no randomised prospective studies comparing fibrinogen concentrate to cryoprecipitate.

CONCLUSIONS

The early identification of hypo-fibrinogenemia and acute traumatic coagulopathy in paediatric trauma using VHA testing and subsequent early fibrinogen replacement with a concentrated off the shelf product is an attractive treatment option. However, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence to support the use of fibrinogen concentrate over cryoprecipitate in the paediatric trauma population. Pilot studies currently under way will go some way to addressing this important knowledge gap, and facilitate the design of larger definitive multi-centre randomised trials.

Systematic reviews of scores and predictors to trigger activation of massive transfusion protocols

BACKGROUND

The use of massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) in the resuscitation of hemorrhaging trauma patients ensures rapid delivery of blood products to improve outcomes, where the decision to trigger MTPs early is important. Scores and tools to predict the need for MTP activation have been developed for use to aid with clinical judgment. We performed a systematic review to assess (1) the scores and tools available to predict MTP in trauma patients, (2) their clinical value and diagnostic accuracies, and (3) additional predictors of MTP.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to June 2017. All studies that utilized scores or predictors of MTP activation in adult (age, ≥18 years) trauma patients were included. Data collection for scores and tools included reported sensitivities and specificities and accuracy as defined by the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles were eligible for analysis, with 11 validated and four unvalidated scores and tools assessed. Of four scores using clinical assessment, laboratory values, and ultrasound assessment the modified Traumatic Bleeding Severity Score had the best performance. Of those scores, the Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage score is most well validated and has higher area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic than the Assessment of Blood Consumption and Prince of Wales scores. Without laboratory results, the Assessment of Blood Consumption score balances accuracy with ease of use. Without ultrasound use, the Vandromme and Schreiber scores have the highest accuracy and sensitivity respectively. The Shock Index uses clinical assessment only with fair performance. Other clinical variables, laboratory values, and use of point-of-care testing results were identified predictors of MTP activation.

CONCLUSION

The use of scores or tools to predict MTP need to be individualized to hospital resources and skill set to aid clinical judgment. Future studies for triggering nontrauma MTP activations are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, level III.

Fresh Frozen Plasma-to-Packed Red Blood Cell Ratio and Mortality in Traumatic Hemorrhage: Nationwide Analysis of 4,427 Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite the presence of highly reliable data, studies on packed red blood cells (pRBC):fresh frozen plasma (FFP) ratio suffer from limited sample size and the presence of survivor bias. We sought to study the association between FFP:pRBC and early mortality in the hemorrhaging trauma patient.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective nationwide cohort that included all TQIP participating hospitals (2013 to 2016). We included all trauma patients who were transfused ≥10 pRBCs and ≥1 FFP within 24 hours. We excluded transferred patients and those who died in the emergency department or had missing/inaccurate transfusion data. Patients were assigned to 7 FFP:pRBC cohorts (range 1:1 to 1:6, and 1:6+) only if the ratio was similar at 4 and 24 hours and, to avoid survival bias, were excluded otherwise. Multivariable analyses correcting for all available confounders (age, demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, Injury Severity Score [ISS] and mechanism, procedures performed) were derived to study the independent relationship between FFP:pRBC and 24-hour mortality.

RESULTS

Of 1,002,595 patients, 4,427 patients were included. Mean age was 41 years, 79% were males, 61% had blunt trauma, and median ISS was 29. Most patients were transfused in a 1:1, 1:2, or 1:3 ratio (31%, 41%, and 11%, respectively); mortality ranged between 28% for 1:1 and 62% for 1:4. In multivariable analyses, the odds of mortality independently and incrementally increased to 1.23 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.48) for a 1:2 ratio, 2.11 (95% CI 1.42 to 3.13) for 1:4, and as high as 4.11 (95% CI 2.31 to 7.31) for 1:5 (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A 1:1 FFP:pRBC ratio is associated with the lowest mortality in the hemorrhaging trauma patient, and mortality increases with decreasing ratios.

Comparison between thromboelastography and thromboelastometry

Two of the most commonly used viscoelastic hemostatic assays, thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thrombelastography (TEG), have proven to decrease allogenic blood transfusions with cost reduction and possibly decrease mortality and morbidity in cardiac, trauma, and other bleeding patients. This article compares the two devices to provide guidance on the selection and use of these monitoring systems. Their second-generation assays, TEG 6S and ROTEM Sigma, are also discussed.

The 10 commandments of exsanguinating pelvic fracture management

Background:

Unstable pelvic fractures are highly lethal injuries.

Objective:

The review aims to summarize the landmark management changes in the past two decades.

Methods:

Structured review based on pertinent published literatures on severe pelvic fracture was performed.

Results:

Ten key management points were identified.

Conclusion:

These 10 recommendations help diminish and prevent the mortality. (1) Before the ABCDE management, preparedness, protection, and decision are essential to optimize patient outcome and to conserve resources. (2) Do not rock the pelvis to check stability, avoid logrolling but prophylactic pelvic binder can be life-saving. (3) Computed tomography scanner can be the tunnel to death for hemodynamically unstable patients. (4) Correct application of pelvic binder at the greater trochanter level to achieve the most effective compression. (5) Choose the suitable binder (BEST does not exist, always look for BETTER) to facilitate body examination and therapeutic intervention. (6) Massive transfusion protocol is only a temporizing measure to sustain the circulation for life maintenance. (7) Damage control operation aims to promptly stop the bleeding to restore the physiology by combating the trauma lethal triad to be followed by definitive anatomical repair. (8) Protocol-driven teamwork management expedites the completion of the multi-phase therapy including external pelvic fixation, pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, and angio-embolization, preceded by laparotomy when indicated. (9) Resuscitation endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta can reduce the pelvic bleeding while awaiting hospital transfer or operation theater access. (10) Operation is the definitive therapy for trauma but prevention is the best treatment, comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.

A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique

BACKGROUND

A massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) enables rapid delivery of blood components in a patient who is exsanguinating pending definitive hemorrhage control, but there is variability in MHP implementation rates, content and compliance owing to challenges presented by infrequent activation, variable team performance and patient acuity. The goal of this project was to identify the key evidence-based principles and quality indicators required to develop a standardized regional MHP.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus technique was performed in the spring and summer of 2018. Panellists used survey links to independently review and rate (on a 7-point Likert scale) 43 statements and 8 quality indicators drafted by a steering committee composed of transfusion medicine specialists and technologists, and trauma physicians. External stakeholder input from all hospitals in Ontario was sought.

RESULTS

Three rounds were held with 36 experts from diverse clinical backgrounds. Consensus was reached for 42 statements and 8 quality indicators. Additional modifications from external stakeholders were incorporated to form the foundation for the proposed MHP.

INTERPRETATION

This MHP template will provide the basis for the design of an MHP toolkit, including specific recommendations for pediatric and obstetrical patients, and for hospitals with limited availability of blood components or means to achieve definitive hemorrhage control. We believe that harmonization of MHPs in our region will simplify training, increase uptake of evidence-based interventions, enhance communication, improve patient comfort and safety, and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

International assessment of massive transfusion protocol contents and indications for activation

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) provide blood products rapidly and in fixed amounts. MTPs are commonly used in trauma but may also be used in other clinical settings, although evidence to support fixed-ratio resuscitation in nontraumatic hemorrhage is lacking. The goals of this study were to describe the types and contents of available MTPs and the clinical indications for MTP activation.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to 353 transfusion medicine specialists to assess the types and contents of available MTPs. Survey participants were invited to provide the clinical indications for consecutive adult and pediatric MTP activations for at least 6 months during 2015 to 2017.

RESULTS

There were 125 completed surveys (35% response rate) including three from children's specialty hospitals. Most hospitals that treated adult patients (90/122, 74%) utilized only one MTP for all adult bleeding emergencies, while one hospital had no MTP. Of the 31 hospitals that provided more than one adult MTP, 20 provided MTPs specific for obstetric bleeding cases. Of these, 50% (10/20) included at least one pool of cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate in the first MTP round, compared with 14% (13/90) of the hospitals with one MTP (p = 0.0012). Fifty-seven hospitals provided the clinical indication for 4176 adult and 155 pediatric MTP activations. Although trauma was the single most common indication, the majority of adult (58%) and pediatric (65%) activations were for nontrauma indications.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of hospitals use a single MTP to manage massive hemorrhage. The majority of MTP activations were for nontrauma indications.

[Viscoelasticity-based treatment of bleeding injuries]

Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading preventable cause of death in patients with multiple injuries. Currently, trauma-induced coagulopathy is seen as an independent disease entity influencing survival. Severely bleeding trauma patients are often treated with classical blood products in predefined ratios (damage control resuscitation). Viscoelasticity-based and target-oriented approaches could possibly be given priority. Viscoelasticity-based diagnostics and therapy enable the qualitative investigation of whole blood and provide therapeutically usable information on initiation, dynamics and sustainability of thrombus formation. Due to the ease of handling and timely results this lends itself as a point-of-care procedure. This article presents the clinical issues with using viscoelastic procedures and current expert recommendations taking the literature into consideration.

Application of a recursive partitioning decision tree algorithm for the prediction of massive transfusion in civilian trauma: the MTPitt prediction tool

BACKGROUND

A supervised machine learning algorithm was used to generate decision trees for the prediction of massive transfusion at a Level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Trauma patients who received at least one unit of RBCs and/or low-titer group O whole blood between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, were included. Massive transfusion was defined as the transfusion of 10 or more units of RBCs and/or low-titer group O whole blood in the first 24 hours of admission. A recursive partitioning algorithm was used to generate two decision trees for prediction of massive transfusion using a training data set (n = 550): the first, MTPitt, was based on demographic and clinical parameters, and the second, MTPitt+Labs, also included laboratory data. Decision tree performance was compared with the Assessment of Blood Consumption score and the Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage score.

RESULTS

The incidence of massive transfusion in the validation data set (n = 199) was 7.5%. The MTPitt decision tree had a higher balanced accuracy (81.4%) and sensitivity (86.7%) compared to an Assessment of Blood Consumption Score of 2 or higher (77.9% and 66.7%, respectively) and a Trauma Associated Severe Hemorrhage score of 9 or higher (75.0% and 73.3%, respectively), although the 95% confidence intervals overlapped. Addition of laboratory data to the MTPitt decision tree (MTPitt+Labs) resulted in a higher specificity and balanced accuracy compared to MTPitt without an increase in sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTPitt decisions trees are highly sensitive tools for identifying patients who received a massive transfusion and do not require computational resources to be implemented in the trauma setting.

Current strategies for hemostatic control in acute trauma hemorrhage and trauma-induced coagulopathy

Introduction: Despite advances in the treatment of severely injured patients that have resulted in overall improved outcomes, uncontrolled hemorrhage still represents the most common cause of preventable death following major injury. While addressing both endo- and exogenous factors that lead to an acute trauma-induced coagulopathy, massive transfusion plays a key role in managing bleeding trauma patients. However, the best practice for hemostatic control including massive transfusion in these patients is still under debate. Areas covered: This review summarizes the current knowledge and clinical practice for hemostatic control including massive transfusion for bleeding trauma patients. The recent literature was reviewed and extended by current guidelines and their underlying evidence was incorporated. Expert commentary: Treatment strategies for bleeding trauma patients are still an area of emerging scientific and clinical interest as advances are likely to translate into improved outcomes including survival. To date, damage control resuscitation principles with ratio-based transfusion of packed red blood cells, plasma and platelets still dominate as "gold standard" of care but goal-directed strategies guided either by conventional coagulation tests or viscoelastic assays may demonstrate a better characterization of the underlying coagulopathy thereby allowing individualized and targeted therapies.

Prehospital Plasma during Air Medical Transport in Trauma Patients at Risk for Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

After a person has been injured, prehospital administration of plasma in addition to the initiation of standard resuscitation procedures in the prehospital environment may reduce the risk of downstream complications from hemorrhage and shock. Data from large clinical trials are lacking to show either the efficacy or the risks associated with plasma transfusion in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

To determine the efficacy and safety of prehospital administration of thawed plasma in injured patients who are at risk for hemorrhagic shock, we conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, cluster-randomized, phase 3 superiority trial that compared the administration of thawed plasma with standard-care resuscitation during air medical transport. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were evaluated: 230 patients received plasma (plasma group) and 271 received standard-care resuscitation (standard-care group). Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (23.2% vs. 33.0%; difference, -9.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -18.6 to -1.0%; P=0.03). A similar treatment effect was observed across nine prespecified subgroups (heterogeneity chi-square test, 12.21; P=0.79). Kaplan-Meier curves showed an early separation of the two treatment groups that began 3 hours after randomization and persisted until 30 days after randomization (log-rank chi-square test, 5.70; P=0.02). The median prothrombin-time ratio was lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (1.2 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.4] vs. 1.3 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.6], P<0.001) after the patients' arrival at the trauma center. No significant differences between the two groups were noted with respect to multiorgan failure, acute lung injury-acute respiratory distress syndrome, nosocomial infections, or allergic or transfusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In injured patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock, the prehospital administration of thawed plasma was safe and resulted in lower 30-day mortality and a lower median prothrombin-time ratio than standard-care resuscitation. (Funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; PAMPer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01818427 .).

The Role of Plasma Transfusion in Massive Bleeding: Protecting the Endothelial Glycocalyx?

Massive hemorrhage is a leading cause of death worldwide. During the last decade several retrospective and some prospective clinical studies have suggested a beneficial effect of early plasma-based resuscitation on survival in trauma patients. The underlying mechanisms are unknown but appear to involve the ability of plasma to preserve the endothelial glycocalyx. In this mini-review, we summarize current knowledge on glycocalyx structure and function, and present data describing the impact of hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation fluids on glycocalyx. Animal studies show that hemorrhagic shock leads to glycocalyx shedding, endothelial inflammatory changes, and vascular hyper-permeability. In these animal models, plasma administration preserves glycocalyx integrity and functions better than resuscitation with crystalloids or colloids. In addition, we briefly present data on the possible plasma components responsible for these effects. The endothelial glycocalyx is increasingly recognized as a critical component for the physiological vasculo-endothelial function, which is destroyed in hemorrhagic shock. Interventions for preserving an intact glycocalyx shall improve survival of trauma patients.

Damage Control Resuscitation

Damage control surgery is a combination of temporizing surgical interventions to arrest hemorrhage and control infectious source, with goal directed resuscitation to restore normal physiology. The convention of damage control surgery largely arose following the discovery of the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, with the goal of Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is to avoid the initiation of this "bloody vicious cycle" or to reverse its progression. While hypothermia and acidosis are generally corrected with resuscitation, coagulopathy remains a challenging aspect of DCS, and is exacerbated by excessive crystalloid administration. This chapter focuses on resuscitative principles in the four settings of trauma care: the prehospital setting, emergency department, operating room, and intensive care unit including historical perspectives, resuscitative methods, controversies, and future directions. Each setting provides unique challenges with specific goals of care.

A preoperative risk score for transfusion in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair to avoid type and cross

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative type and cross are often routinely ordered before elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but the cost of this practice is high, and transfusion is rare. We therefore aimed to stratify patients by their risk of transfusion to identify a cohort in whom a type and screen would be sufficient.

METHODS

We queried the targeted vascular module of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) for all elective EVARs from 2011 to 2015. We included only infrarenal aneurysms and excluded ruptured aneurysms and patients transfused within 72 hours preoperatively. Two-thirds of the cases were randomly assigned to a model derivation cohort and one third to a validation cohort. We created and subsequently validated a risk model for transfusion within the first 24 hours of surgery (including intraoperatively), using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, there were 4875 patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR, only 221 (4.5%) of whom received a transfusion within 24 hours of surgery. The frequency of transfusion during the study period declined monotonously from 6.5% in 2011 to 3.2% in 2015. The factors independently associated with transfusion were preoperative hematocrit <36% (odds ratio [OR], 3.4 [95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.4]; P < .001), aortic diameter (per centimeter increase: OR, 1.2 [1.03-1.4]; P = .02), preoperative dependent functional status (OR, 2.5 [1.1-5.5]; P = .03), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.7 [1.04-2.9]; P = .04). A risk prediction model based on these criteria produced a C statistic of 0.69 in the prediction cohort and 0.76 in the validation cohort and a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit of 0.62 and 0.14, respectively. A score of <3 of 9, corresponding to a <5% probability of transfusion, would avoid preoperative type and cross in 86% of patients. Of the 4203 patients (86%) with a hematocrit >36%, only 6 (0.1%) had a risk score of >3.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative transfusion for EVAR is becoming increasingly uncommon and is predicted well by a transfusion risk score or simply a hematocrit of <36%. Application of this risk score would avoid unnecessary type and cross in the majority of patients, leading to significant savings in both time and cost.

Resuscitation

Blast injuries can produce complex patterns of injury and can easily result in hemorrhagic shock. Adequate resuscitation of blast-injured patients is critical, as both under- and over-resuscitation can result in a number of fatal complications. Consideration must be given to the choice of resuscitative fluid, the volume of resuscitation, the timing of resuscitation relative to definitive surgical management, and the determination of endpoints at which resuscitation can be stopped. This chapter explores resuscitation of blast-injured patients, beginning in the prehospital phase with initial choice of fluid and continuing through definitive resuscitation at a higher echelon of care. Particular consideration is given to the effect of resuscitation on the unique physiologic derangements seen following blast injury. Drawing upon the enormous amount of literature on resuscitation from the recent coalition experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan, we advocate for the use of early hemostatic resuscitation with a high ratio of plasma, platelets, and packed red blood cells, with a transition to resuscitation guided by viscoelastic testing or coagulation status immediately following definitive control of hemorrhage.

Initiation and Termination of Massive Transfusion Protocols: Current Strategies and Future Prospects

The advent of massive transfusion protocols (MTP) has had a significant positive impact on hemorrhaging trauma patient morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, societal MTP guidelines and individual MTPs at academic institutions continue to circulate opposing recommendations on topics critical to MTPs. This narrative review discusses up-to-date information on 2 such topics, the initiation and termination of an MTP. The discussion for each begins with a review of the recommendations and supporting literature presented by MTP guidelines from 3 prominent societies, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Surgeons, and the task force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of the main components within those recommendations. Societal recommendations on MTP initiation in hemorrhaging trauma patients emphasize the use of retrospectively validated massive transfusion (MT) prediction score, specifically, the Assessment of Blood Consumption and Trauma-Associated Severe Hemorrhage scores. Validation studies have shown that both scoring systems perform similarly. Both scores reliably identify patients that will not require an MT, while simultaneously overpredicting MT requirements. However, each scoring system has its unique advantages and disadvantages, and this review discusses how specific aspects of each scoring system can affect widespread applicability and statistical performance. In addition, we discuss the often overlooked topic of initiating MT in nontrauma patients and the specific tools physicians have to guide the MT initiation decision in this unique setting. Despite the serious complications that can arise with transfusion of large volumes of blood products, there is considerably less research pertinent to the topic of MTP termination. Societal recommendations on MTP termination emphasize applying clinical reasoning to identify patients who have bleeding source control and are adequately resuscitated. This review, however, focuses primarily on the recommendations presented by the Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma's MTP guidelines that call for prompt termination of the algorithm-guided model of resuscitation and rapidly transitioning into a resuscitation model guided by laboratory test results. We also discuss the evidence in support of laboratory result-guided resuscitation and how recent literature on viscoelastic hemostatic assays, although limited, highlights the potential to achieve additional benefits from this method of resuscitation.

[Modern coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients : Point-of-care guided administration of coagulation factor concentrates and hemostatic agents]

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled bleeding with trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still the leading cause of preventable death following severe multiple injury. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are associated with improved outcome. Early individualized goal-directed therapy and the use of point-of-care technology may be superior to empiric and ratio-based therapies with conventional blood products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selective review of the literature considering current recommendations/expert opinion for coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients via individualized goal-directed therapy and the use of viscoelastic point-of-care (ROTEM®)-guided substitution of coagulation factor concentrates and hemostatic agents.

RESULTS

The administration of fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding trauma patients may be considered if ROTEM®-FIBTEM A10 < 10 mm (FIBTEM A5 < 9 mm; FIBTEM MCF < 12 mm) and EXTEM A10 < 45 mm (EXTEM A5 < 35 mm; EXTEM MCF < 55 mm); the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may be considered if signs of delayed coagulation initiation (ROTEM®-EXTEM CT > 80 s). At this stage, no concluding statement can be made for monitoring or treatment guidance with factor XIII by using point-of-care technology. Viscoelastic assays display high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of hyperfibrinolysis with subsequent administration of an antifibrinolytic.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized therapeutic concepts based upon viscoelastic point-of-care (ROTEM®) assays present an alternative to empiric and ratio-based therapies with conventional blood products in bleeding trauma patients and may be associated with reduced need for allogenic blood products and morbidity.

Should All Massively Transfused Patients Be Treated Equally? An Analysis of Massive Transfusion Ratios in the Nontrauma Setting

OBJECTIVES

Although balanced resuscitation has become integrated into massive transfusion practice, there is a paucity of evidence supporting the delivery of high ratios of plasma and platelet to RBCs in the nontrauma setting. This study investigated the administration of blood component ratios in the massively transfused nontrauma demographic.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective, observational cohort of massively bleeding patients.

SETTING

Surgical and critically ill patients at a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2015.

PATIENTS

Massively transfused nontrauma patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients receiving plasma, platelet, and RBC transfusions were categorized into high and low ratio groups and analyzed for differences in characteristics and clinical outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour mortality, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and ventilator-free days. Among 601 massively transfused nontrauma patients, cardiothoracic surgery and gastrointestinal or hepato-pancreatico-biliary bleeds were the most common indications for massive transfusion. Higher fresh frozen plasma ratios (> 1:2) were not associated with increased 30-day mortality. A high platelets-to-packed RBCs ratio (> 1:2) was associated with decreased 48-hour mortality (10.5% vs 19.3%; p = 0.032), but not 30-day mortality. Fresh frozen plasma-to-packed RBCs and platelets-to-packed RBCs ratios were not associated with 30-day mortality hazard ratios after controlling for baseline characteristics and disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of higher ratios of fresh frozen plasma-to-packed RBCs and platelets-to-packed RBCs described in trials of trauma patients were not observed in this analysis of a nontrauma, massively transfused population. These data suggest that greater than 1:2 ratio transfusion in the setting of massive hemorrhage may not be appropriate for all patients, and that further research to guide appropriate resuscitation strategies in nontrauma patients is warranted.

1: 1 Transfusion strategies are right for the wrong reasons

BACKGROUND

Early assessment of clot function identifies coagulopathies after injury. Abnormalities include a hypercoagulable state from excess thrombin generation, as well as an acquired coagulopathy. Efforts to address coagulopathy have resulted in earlier, aggressive use of plasma emphasizing 1:1 resuscitation. The purpose of this study was to describe coagulopathies in varying hemorrhagic profiles from a cohort of injured patients.

METHODS

All injured patients who received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first 24 hours of admission from September 2013 to May 2015 were eligible for inclusion. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling, using volume of transfusion over time, was used to identify specific hemorrhagic phenotypes. The thromboelastography profile of each subgroup was characterized and group features were compared.

RESULTS

Four hemorrhagic profiles were identified among 330 patients-minimal (MIN, group 1); patients with large PRBC requirements later in the hospital course (LH, group 2); massive PRBC usage (MH, group 3), and PRBC transfusion limited to shortly after injury (EH, group 4). All groups had an R-time shorter than the normal range (3.2-3.5, p = NS). Patients in group 3 had longer K-times (1.8 vs. 1.2-1.3, p < 0.05), significantly flatter α-angles (66.7 vs. 70.4-72.8, p < 0.05), and significantly weaker clot strength (MA 54.6 vs. 62.3-63.6, p < 0.05). Group 3 had greater physiologic derangements at admission and worse overall outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhagic profiles suggest a rapid onset of clot formation in all subgroups but significantly suppressed thrombin burst and diminished clot strength in the most injured. Patients are both hypercoagulable, with early and precipitous clot formation, and also have a demonstrable hypocoagulability. The exact cause of traumatic hypocoagulability is likely multifactorial. Goal-directed resuscitation, as early as institution of the massive transfusion protocol, may be more effective in resuscitating the most coagulopathic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level III.