1
|
Koyun AH, Wendiggensen P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock AK. Effects of Catecholaminergic and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Response Inhibition. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 27:pyae023. [PMID: 38742426 PMCID: PMC11184454 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The principle of gain control determines the efficiency of neuronal processing and can be enhanced with pharmacological or brain stimulation methods. It is a key factor for cognitive control, but the degree of how much gain control may be enhanced underlies a physical limit. METHODS To investigate whether methylphenidate (MPH) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) share common underlying mechanisms and cognitive effects, we administered MPH and anodal tDCS (atDCS) over the right inferior frontal gyrus both separately and combined, while healthy adult participants (n = 104) performed a response selection and inhibition task. The recorded EEG data were analyzed with a focus on theta band activity, and source estimation analyses were conducted. RESULTS The behavioral data show that MPH and atDCS revealed interactive effects on the ability to inhibit responses. Both MPH and atDCS modulated task-related theta oscillations in the supplementary motor area when applied separately, making a common underlying mechanism likely. When both stimulation methods were combined, there was no doubling of effects in the supplementary motor area but a shift to inferior frontal areas in the cortical network responsible for theta-driven processing. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that both MPH and atDCS likely share a common underlying neuronal mechanism, and interestingly, they demonstrate interactive effects when combined, which are most likely due to the physical limitations of gain control increases. The current study provides critical groundwork for future combined applications of MPH and non-invasive brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Helin Koyun
- University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Paul Wendiggensen
- University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Veit Roessner
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Beste
- University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Stock
- University Neuropsychology Center, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farahani F, Khadka N, Parra LC, Bikson M, Vöröslakos M. Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:561-571. [PMID: 38631548 PMCID: PMC466978 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function. OBJECTIVE To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow. METHODS Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents). RESULTS Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25-0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2-18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive. CONCLUSION In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forouzan Farahani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lucas C Parra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mihály Vöröslakos
- Neuroscience Institute and Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tamura R, Dezawa S, Kato J, Nakata M, Kunori N, Takashima I. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves motor function in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced Parkinsonism. Behav Brain Res 2024; 460:114815. [PMID: 38122905 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is increasingly being used for Parkinson's disease (PD); however, the evaluation of its clinical impact remains complex owing to the heterogeneity of patients and treatments. Therefore, we used a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-induced PD rat model to investigate whether anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) alleviates PD motor deficits. Before tDCS treatment, unilateral PD rats preferentially used the forelimb ipsilateral to the lesion in the exploratory cylinder test and showed reduced locomotor activity in the open field test. In addition, PD-related clumsy forelimb movements during treadmill walking were detected using deep learning-based video analysis (DeepLabCut). When the 5-day tDCS treatment began, the forelimb-use asymmetry was ameliorated gradually, and locomotor activity increased to pre-lesion levels. tDCS treatment also normalized unnatural forelimb movement during walking and restored a balanced gait. However, these therapeutic effects were rapidly lost or gradually disappeared when the tDCS treatment was terminated. Histological analysis at the end of the experiment revealed that the animals had moderately advanced PD, with 40-50% of dopamine neurons and fibers preserved on the injured side compared with those on the intact side. Although it remains a challenge to elucidate the neural mechanisms of the transient improvement in motor function induced by tDCS, the results of this study provide evidence that tDCS of the M1 produces positive behavioral outcomes in PD animals and provides the basis for further clinical research examining the application of tDCS in patients with PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Tamura
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shinnosuke Dezawa
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Junpei Kato
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Mariko Nakata
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan; Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroendocrinology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Nobuo Kunori
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takashima
- Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan; Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan; Department of Informatics and Electronics, Daiichi Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vasu SO, Kaphzan H. Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Synaptic Facilitation via Distinct Presynaptic Calcium Channels. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16866. [PMID: 38069188 PMCID: PMC10706473 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a subthreshold neurostimulation technique known for ameliorating neuropsychiatric conditions. The principal mechanism of tDCS is the differential polarization of subcellular neuronal compartments, particularly the axon terminals that are sensitive to external electrical fields. Yet, the underlying mechanism of tDCS is not fully clear. Here, we hypothesized that direct current stimulation (DCS)-induced modulation of presynaptic calcium channel conductance alters axon terminal dynamics with regard to synaptic vesicle release. To examine the involvement of calcium-channel subtypes in tDCS, we recorded spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) from cortical layer-V pyramidal neurons under DCS while selectively inhibiting distinct subtypes of voltage-dependent calcium channels. Blocking P/Q or N-type calcium channels occluded the effects of DCS on sEPSCs, demonstrating their critical role in the process of DCS-induced modulation of spontaneous vesicle release. However, inhibiting T-type calcium channels did not occlude DCS-induced modulation of sEPSCs, suggesting that despite being active in the subthreshold range, T-type calcium channels are not involved in the axonal effects of DCS. DCS modulates synaptic facilitation by regulating calcium channels in axon terminals, primarily via controlling P/Q and N-type calcium channels, while T-type calcium channels are not involved in this mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanoch Kaphzan
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farahani F, Khadka N, Parra LC, Bikson M, Vöröslakos M. Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.24.568618. [PMID: 38045400 PMCID: PMC10690262 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.24.568618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function. We used Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels in an in-vivo rat model of TES to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents). We demonstrate that electric fields below 0.5 V/m acutely modulate firing rate in 5% of neurons recorded in the hippocampus. At these intensities, average firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 7 % per V/m. For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for cathodal stimulation and diminished for anodal stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive. Our results indicate that responses to TES at clinically relevant intensities are driven by a fraction of high-responder excitatory neurons, with polarity-specific effects. We conclude that transcranial electric stimulation is an effective neuromodulator at clinically realistic intensities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forouzan Farahani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niranjan Khadka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lucas C. Parra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mihály Vöröslakos
- Neuroscience Institute and Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khadka N, Poon C, Cancel LM, Tarbell JM, Bikson M. Multi-scale multi-physics model of brain interstitial water flux by transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:10.1088/1741-2552/ace4f4. [PMID: 37413982 PMCID: PMC10996349 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ace4f4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates sustained electric fields in the brain, that may be amplified when crossing capillary walls (across blood-brain barrier, BBB). Electric fields across the BBB may generate fluid flow by electroosmosis. We consider that tDCS may thus enhance interstitial fluid flow.Approach. We developed a modeling pipeline novel in both (1) spanning the mm (head),μm (capillary network), and then nm (down to BBB tight junction (TJ)) scales; and (2) coupling electric current flow to fluid current flow across these scales. Electroosmotic coupling was parametrized based on prior measures of fluid flow across isolated BBB layers. Electric field amplification across the BBB in a realistic capillary network was converted to volumetric fluid exchange.Main results. The ultrastructure of the BBB results in peak electric fields (per mA of applied current) of 32-63Vm-1across capillary wall and >1150Vm-1in TJs (contrasted with 0.3Vm-1in parenchyma). Based on an electroosmotic coupling of 1.0 × 10-9- 5.6 × 10-10m3s-1m2perVm-1, peak water fluxes across the BBB are 2.44 × 10-10- 6.94 × 10-10m3s-1m2, with a peak 1.5 × 10-4- 5.6 × 10-4m3min-1m3interstitial water exchange (per mA).Significance. Using this pipeline, the fluid exchange rate per each brain voxel can be predicted for any tDCS dose (electrode montage, current) or anatomy. Under experimentally constrained tissue properties, we predicted tDCS produces a fluid exchange rate comparable to endogenous flow, so doubling fluid exchange with further local flow rate hot spots ('jets'). The validation and implication of such tDCS brain 'flushing' is important to establish.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cynthia Poon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, United States of America
| | - Limary M Cancel
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, United States of America
| | - John M Tarbell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, United States of America
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A microfluidic perspective on conventional in vitro transcranial direct current stimulation methods. J Neurosci Methods 2023; 385:109761. [PMID: 36470469 PMCID: PMC9884911 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation method to treat neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, its underlying neural mechanisms warrant further investigation. Indeed, dose-response interrelations are poorly understood. Placing explanted brain tissue, mostly from mice or rats, into a uniform direct current electric field (dcEF) is a well-established in vitro system to elucidate the neural mechanism of tDCS. Nevertheless, we will show that generating a defined, uniform, and constant dcEF throughout a brain slice is challenging. This article critically reviews the methods used to generate and calibrate a uniform dcEF. We use finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the widely used parallel electrode configuration and show that it may not reliably generate uniform dcEF within a brain slice inside an open interface or submerged chamber. Moreover, equivalent circuit analysis and measurements inside a testing chamber suggest that calibrating the dcEF intensity with two recording electrodes can inaccurately capture the true EF magnitude in the targeted tissue when specific criteria are not met. Finally, we outline why microfluidic chambers are an effective and calibration-free approach of generating spatiotemporally uniform dcEF for DCS in vitro studies, facilitating accurate and fine-scale dcEF adjustments. We are convinced that improving the precision and addressing the limitations of current experimental platforms will substantially improve the reproducibility of in vitro experimental results. A better mechanistic understanding of dose-response relations will ultimately facilitate more effective non-invasive stimulation therapies in patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Simula S, Daoud M, Ruffini G, Biagi MC, Bénar CG, Benquet P, Wendling F, Bartolomei F. Transcranial current stimulation in epilepsy: A systematic review of the fundamental and clinical aspects. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:909421. [PMID: 36090277 PMCID: PMC9453675 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.909421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Transcranial electrical current stimulation (tES or tCS, as it is sometimes referred to) has been proposed as non-invasive therapy for pharmacoresistant epilepsy. This technique, which includes direct current (tDCS) and alternating current (tACS) stimulation involves the application of weak currents across the cortex to change cortical excitability. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of tES, its specific effects on epileptic brain activity are poorly understood. We sought to summarize the clinical and fundamental effects underlying the application of tES in epilepsy. Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A database search was performed in PUBMED, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL for articles corresponding to the keywords “epilepsy AND (transcranial current stimulation OR transcranial electrical stimulation)”. Results A total of 56 studies were included in this review. Through these records, we show that tDCS and tACS epileptic patients are safe and clinically relevant techniques for epilepsy. Recent articles reported changes of functional connectivity in epileptic patients after tDCS. We argue that tDCS may act by affecting brain networks, rather than simply modifying local activity in the targeted area. To explain the mechanisms of tES, various cellular effects have been identified. Among them, reduced cell loss, mossy fiber sprouting, and hippocampal BDNF protein levels. Brain modeling and human studies highlight the influence of individual brain anatomy and physiology on the electric field distribution. Computational models may optimize the stimulation parameters and bring new therapeutic perspectives. Conclusion Both tDCS and tACS are promising techniques for epilepsy patients. Although the clinical effects of tDCS have been repeatedly assessed, only one clinical trial has involved a consistent number of epileptic patients and little knowledge is present about the clinical outcome of tACS. To fill this gap, multicenter studies on tES in epileptic patients are needed involving novel methods such as personalized stimulation protocols based on computational modeling. Furthermore, there is a need for more in vivo studies replicating the tES parameters applied in patients. Finally, there is a lack of clinical studies investigating changes in intracranial epileptiform discharges during tES application, which could clarify the nature of tES-related local and network dynamics in epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Simula
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Int Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | - Maëva Daoud
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Int Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabrice Bartolomei
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Int Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
- APHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Marseille, France
- *Correspondence: Fabrice Bartolomei
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vasu SO, Kaphzan H. Calcium channels control tDCS-induced spontaneous vesicle release from axon terminals. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:270-282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
10
|
Direct Current Stimulation in Cell Culture Systems and Brain Slices-New Approaches for Mechanistic Evaluation of Neuronal Plasticity and Neuromodulation: State of the Art. Cells 2021; 10:cells10123583. [PMID: 34944091 PMCID: PMC8700319 DOI: 10.3390/cells10123583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive direct current stimulation (DCS) of the human brain induces neuronal plasticity and alters plasticity-related cognition and behavior. Numerous basic animal research studies focusing on molecular and cellular targets of DCS have been published. In vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro models enhanced knowledge about mechanistic foundations of DCS effects. Our review identified 451 papers using a PRISMA-based search strategy. Only a minority of these papers used cell culture or brain slice experiments with DCS paradigms comparable to those applied in humans. Most of the studies were performed in brain slices (9 papers), whereas cell culture experiments (2 papers) were only rarely conducted. These ex vivo and in vitro approaches underline the importance of cell and electric field orientation, cell morphology, cell location within populations, stimulation duration (acute, prolonged, chronic), and molecular changes, such as Ca2+-dependent intracellular signaling pathways, for the effects of DC stimulation. The reviewed studies help to clarify and confirm basic mechanisms of this intervention. However, the potential of in vitro studies has not been fully exploited and a more systematic combination of rodent models, ex vivo, and cellular approaches might provide a better insight into the neurophysiological changes caused by tDCS.
Collapse
|
11
|
Transcranial direct current stimulation of cerebellum alters spiking precision in cerebellar cortex: A modeling study of cellular responses. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009609. [PMID: 34882680 PMCID: PMC8691604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the cerebellum has rapidly raised interest but the effects of tDCS on cerebellar neurons remain unclear. Assessing the cellular response to tDCS is challenging because of the uneven, highly stratified cytoarchitecture of the cerebellum, within which cellular morphologies, physiological properties, and function vary largely across several types of neurons. In this study, we combine MRI-based segmentation of the cerebellum and a finite element model of the tDCS-induced electric field (EF) inside the cerebellum to determine the field imposed on the cerebellar neurons throughout the region. We then pair the EF with multicompartment models of the Purkinje cell (PC), deep cerebellar neuron (DCN), and granule cell (GrC) and quantify the acute response of these neurons under various orientations, physiological conditions, and sequences of presynaptic stimuli. We show that cerebellar tDCS significantly modulates the postsynaptic spiking precision of the PC, which is expressed as a change in the spike count and timing in response to presynaptic stimuli. tDCS has modest effects, instead, on the PC tonic firing at rest and on the postsynaptic activity of DCN and GrC. In Purkinje cells, anodal tDCS shortens the repolarization phase following complex spikes (-14.7 ± 6.5% of baseline value, mean ± S.D.; max: -22.7%) and promotes burstiness with longer bursts compared to resting conditions. Cathodal tDCS, instead, promotes irregular spiking by enhancing somatic excitability and significantly prolongs the repolarization after complex spikes compared to baseline (+37.0 ± 28.9%, mean ± S.D.; max: +84.3%). tDCS-induced changes to the repolarization phase and firing pattern exceed 10% of the baseline values in Purkinje cells covering up to 20% of the cerebellar cortex, with the effects being distributed along the EF direction and concentrated in the area under the electrode over the cerebellum. Altogether, the acute effects of tDCS on cerebellum mainly focus on Purkinje cells and modulate the precision of the response to synaptic stimuli, thus having the largest impact when the cerebellar cortex is active. Since the spatiotemporal precision of the PC spiking is critical to learning and coordination, our results suggest cerebellar tDCS as a viable therapeutic option for disorders involving cerebellar hyperactivity such as ataxia. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the cerebellum is gaining momentum as a neuromodulation tool for the treatment of neurological diseases like movement disorders. Nonetheless, the response of cells in the cerebellum to tDCS is unclear and hardly generalizes from our understanding of tDCS of the cerebral cortex. We use computational models to investigate the response of several types of cerebellar neurons to the electric field induced by tDCS and show that, differently from the cerebral cortex, tDCS has significant acute effects on the cerebellar cortex. These effects (i) primarily alter the way Purkinje cells encode synaptic stimuli from the molecular layer and (ii) can help hyperactive cells regain postsynaptic spiking precision. Since the spatiotemporal precision of the Purkinje cell spiking is critical to learning and coordination, the study shows how tDCS can operate at the cellular level to treat movement disorders like tremor and ataxia.
Collapse
|
12
|
Faucher CR, Doherty RA, Philip NS, Harle ASM, Cole JJE, van ’t Wout-Frank M. Is there a neuroscience-based, mechanistic rationale for transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder? Behav Neurosci 2021; 135:702-713. [PMID: 34338547 PMCID: PMC8648962 DOI: 10.1037/bne0000487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
It is well-known that there is considerable variation in the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for psychiatric disorders, and a continued need to improve the real-world effectiveness of these treatments. In the last 20+ years the examination of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for psychiatric treatment has increased dramatically. However, in order to test these techniques for effective therapeutic use, it is critical to understand (a) (what are) the key neural circuits to engage for specific disorders or clusters of symptoms, and (b) (how) can these circuits be reached effectively using neurostimulation? Here we focus on the research toward the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). tDCS is a portable and inexpensive technique that lends itself well to be combined with, and thus potentially augment, exposure-based treatment for PTSD. In this review, we discuss the behavioral model of threat and safety learning and memory as it relates to PTSD, the underlying neurobiology of PTSD, as well as the current understandings of tDCS action, including its limitations and opportunities. Through this lens, we summarize the research on the application of tDCS to modulated threat and safety learning and memory to date, and propose new directions for its future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. R. Faucher
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Brown Medical School, Providence
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence
- COBRE Center for Neuromodulation, Butler Hospital, Providence
| | - R. A. Doherty
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Brown Medical School, Providence
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence
- COBRE Center for Neuromodulation, Butler Hospital, Providence
| | - N. S. Philip
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Brown Medical School, Providence
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence
- COBRE Center for Neuromodulation, Butler Hospital, Providence
| | - A. S. M Harle
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Brown Medical School, Providence
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence
- COBRE Center for Neuromodulation, Butler Hospital, Providence
| | - J. J. E. Cole
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Brown Medical School, Providence
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence
- COBRE Center for Neuromodulation, Butler Hospital, Providence
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jankowska E, Hammar I. The plasticity of nerve fibers: the prolonged effects of polarization of afferent fibers. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:1568-1591. [PMID: 34525323 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00718.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The review surveys various aspects of the plasticity of nerve fibers, in particular the prolonged increase in their excitability evoked by polarization, focusing on a long-lasting increase in the excitability of myelinated afferent fibers traversing the dorsal columns of the spinal cord. We review the evidence that increased axonal excitability 1) follows epidurally applied direct current (DC) as well as relatively short (5 or 10 ms) current pulses and synaptically evoked intrinsic field potentials; 2) critically depends on the polarization of branching regions of afferent fibers at the sites where they bifurcate and give off axon collaterals entering the spinal gray matter in conjunction with actions of extrasynaptic GABAA membrane receptors; and 3) shares the feature of being activity-independent with the short-lasting effects of polarization of peripheral nerve fibers. A comparison between the polarization evoked sustained increase in the excitability of dorsal column fibers and spinal motoneurons (plateau potentials) indicates the possibility that they are mediated by partly similar membrane channels (including noninactivating type L Cav++ 1.3 but not Na+ channels) and partly different mechanisms. We finally consider under which conditions transspinally applied DC (tsDCS) might reproduce the effects of epidural polarization on dorsal column fibers and the possible advantages of increased excitability of afferent fibers for the rehabilitation of motor and sensory functions after spinal cord injuries.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This review supplements previous reviews of properties of nerve fibers by surveying recent experimental evidence for their long-term plasticity. It also extends recent descriptions of spinal effects of DC by reviewing effects of polarization of afferent nerve fibers within the dorsal columns, the mechanisms most likely underlying the long-lasting increase in their excitability and possible clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elzbieta Jankowska
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingela Hammar
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vasu SO, Kaphzan H. The role of sodium channels in direct current stimulation-axonal perspective. Cell Rep 2021; 37:109832. [PMID: 34644580 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial neurostimulation methods are utilized as therapies for various neuropsychiatric disorders. Primarily, they entail the delivery of weak subthreshold currents across the brain, which modulate neuronal excitability. However, it is still a puzzle how such weak electrical fields actuate their effects. Previous studies showed that axons are the most sensitive subcellular compartment for direct current stimulation, and maximal polarization is achieved at their terminals. Nonetheless, polarization of axon terminals according to models was predicted to be weak, and the mechanism for substantial axon terminals polarization was obscure. Here, we show that a weak subthreshold electrical field modifies the conductance of voltage-dependent sodium channels in axon terminals, subsequently amplifying their membrane polarization. Moreover, we show that this amplification has substantial effects on synaptic functioning. Finally, we employ analytical modeling to explain how sodium currents modifications enhance axon terminal polarization. These findings relate to the mechanistic aspects of any neurostimulation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreerag Othayoth Vasu
- Laboratory for Neurobiology of Psychiatric Disorders, Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Avenue, Mt. Carmel, 3498838 Haifa, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kaphzan
- Laboratory for Neurobiology of Psychiatric Disorders, Sagol Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Avenue, Mt. Carmel, 3498838 Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rasmussen ID, Boayue NM, Mittner M, Bystad M, Grnli OK, Vangberg TR, Csifcsák G, Aslaksen PM. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Delayed Memory in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study Using Computational Modeling to Optimize Electrode Position. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:753-769. [PMID: 34366347 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal stimulation parameters when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve memory performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are lacking. In healthy individuals, inter-individual differences in brain anatomy significantly influence current distribution during tDCS, an effect that might be aggravated by variations in cortical atrophy in AD patients. OBJECTIVE To measure the effect of individualized HD-tDCS in AD patients. METHODS Nineteen AD patients were randomly assigned to receive active or sham high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS). Computational modeling of the HD-tDCS-induced electric field in each patient's brain was analyzed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The chosen montage provided the highest net anodal electric field in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). An accelerated HD-tDCS design was conducted (2 mA for 3×20 min) on two separate days. Pre- and post-intervention cognitive tests and T1 and T2-weighted MRI and diffusion tensor imaging data at baseline were analyzed. RESULTS Different montages were optimal for individual patients. The active HD-tDCS group improved significantly in delayed memory and MMSE performance compared to the sham group. Five participants in the active group had higher scores on delayed memory post HD-tDCS, four remained stable and one declined. The active HD-tDCS group had a significant positive correlation between fractional anisotropy in the anterior thalamic radiation and delayed memory score. CONCLUSION HD-tDCS significantly improved delayed memory in AD. Our study can be regarded as a proof-of-concept attempt to increase tDCS efficacy. The present findings should be confirmed in larger samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Daae Rasmussen
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | - Nya Mehnwolo Boayue
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Matthias Mittner
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Martin Bystad
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | - Ole K Grnli
- Department of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | - Torgil Riise Vangberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University hospital of North Norway, Norway.,PET Center, University hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Gábor Csifcsák
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Per M Aslaksen
- Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adelhöfer N, Stock AK, Beste C. Anodal tDCS modulates specific processing codes during conflict monitoring associated with superior and middle frontal cortices. Brain Struct Funct 2021; 226:1335-1351. [PMID: 33656578 PMCID: PMC8036188 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02245-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Conflict monitoring processes are central for cognitive control. Neurophysiological correlates of conflict monitoring (i.e. the N2 ERP) likely represent a mixture of different cognitive processes. Based on theoretical considerations, we hypothesized that effects of anodal tDCS (atDCS) in superior frontal areas affect specific subprocesses in neurophysiological activity during conflict monitoring. To investigate this, young healthy adults performed a Simon task while EEG was recorded. atDCS and sham tDCS were applied in a single-blind, cross-over study design. Using temporal signal decomposition in combination with source localization analyses, we demonstrated that atDCS effects on cognitive control are very specific: the detrimental effect of atDCS on response speed was largest in case of response conflicts. This however only showed in aspects of the decomposed N2 component, reflecting stimulus-response translation processes. In contrast to this, stimulus-related aspects of the N2 as well as purely response-related processes were not modulated by atDCS. EEG source localization analyses revealed that the effect was likely driven by activity modulations in the superior frontal areas, including the supplementary motor cortex (BA6), as well as middle frontal (BA9) and medial frontal areas (BA32). atDCS did not modulate effects of proprioceptive information on hand position, even though this aspect is known to be processed within the same brain areas. Physiological effects of atDCS likely modulate specific aspects of information processing during cognitive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Adelhöfer
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Stock
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Beste
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Farahani F, Kronberg G, FallahRad M, Oviedo HV, Parra LC. Effects of direct current stimulation on synaptic plasticity in a single neuron. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:588-597. [PMID: 33766677 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (DCS) has lasting effects that may be explained by a boost in synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP). We hypothesized that this boost is the result of a modulation of somatic spiking in the postsynaptic neuron, as opposed to indirect network effects. To test this directly we record somatic spiking in a postsynaptic neuron during LTP induction with concurrent DCS. METHODS We performed rodent in-vitro patch-clamp recordings at the soma of individual CA1 pyramidal neurons. LTP was induced with theta-burst stimulation (TBS) applied concurrently with DCS. To test the causal role of somatic polarization, we manipulated polarization via current injections. We also used a computational multi-compartment neuron model that captures the effect of electric fields on membrane polarization and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. RESULTS TBS-induced LTP was enhanced when paired with anodal DCS as well as depolarizing current injections. In both cases, somatic spiking during the TBS was increased, suggesting that evoked somatic activity is the primary factor affecting LTP modulation. However, the boost of LTP with DCS was less than expected given the increase in spiking activity alone. In some cells, we also observed DCS-induced spiking, suggesting DCS also modulates LTP via induced network activity. The computational model reproduces these results and suggests that they are driven by both direct changes in postsynaptic spiking and indirect changes due to network activity. CONCLUSION DCS enhances synaptic plasticity by increasing postsynaptic somatic spiking, but we also find that an increase in network activity may boost but also limit this enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forouzan Farahani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Greg Kronberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohamad FallahRad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hysell V Oviedo
- Biology Department, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lucas C Parra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chan MMY, Yau SSY, Han YMY. The neurobiology of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in promoting brain plasticity: A systematic review and meta-analyses of human and rodent studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 125:392-416. [PMID: 33662444 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The neurobiological mechanisms underlying prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain elusive. Randomized, sham-controlled trials in humans and rodents applying in vivo prefrontal tDCS were included to explore whether prefrontal tDCS modulates resting-state and event-related functional connectivity, neural oscillation and synaptic plasticity. Fifty studies were included in the systematic review and 32 in the meta-analyses. Neuroimaging meta-analysis indicated anodal prefrontal tDCS significantly enhanced bilateral median cingulate activity [familywise error (FWE)-corrected p < .005]; meta-regression revealed a positive relationship between changes in median cingulate activity after tDCS and current density (FWE-corrected p < .005) as well as electric current strength (FWE-corrected p < .05). Meta-analyses of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography data revealed nonsignificant changes (ps > .1) in both resting-state and event-related oscillatory power across all frequency bands. Applying anodal tDCS over the rodent hippocampus/prefrontal cortex enhanced long-term potentiation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the stimulated brain regions (ps <.005). Evidence supporting prefrontal tDCS administration is preliminary; more methodologically consistent studies evaluating its effects on cognitive function that include brain activity measurements are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melody M Y Chan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sonata S Y Yau
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yvonne M Y Han
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O'Leary GH, Jenkins DD, Coker-Bolt P, George MS, Kautz S, Bikson M, Gillick BT, Badran BW. From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2021; 264:287-322. [PMID: 34167660 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Stroke is a major problem worldwide that impacts over 100 million adults and children annually. Rehabilitation therapy is the current standard of care to restore functional impairments post-stroke, however its effects are limited and many patients suffer persisting functional impairments and life-long disability. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as a potential rehabilitation treatment option in both adults and children with brain injury. In the last decade, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) have been investigated to improve motor recovery in adults post-stroke. These promising adult findings using NIBS, however, have yet to be widely translated to the area of pediatrics. The limited studies exploring NIBS in children have demonstrated safety, feasibility, and utility of stimulation-augmented rehabilitation. This chapter will describe the mechanism of NIBS therapy (cortical excitability, neuroplasticity) that underlies its use in stroke and motor function and how TMS, tDCS, and taVNS are applied in adult stroke treatment paradigms. We will then discuss the current state of NIBS in early pediatric brain injury and will provide insight regarding practical considerations and future applications of NIBS in pediatrics to make this promising treatment option a viable therapy in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia H O'Leary
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Dorothea D Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Patricia Coker-Bolt
- Division of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Steve Kautz
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States; Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bernadette T Gillick
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields. eNeuro 2020; 7:ENEURO.0368-20.2020. [PMID: 33328248 PMCID: PMC7773889 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0368-20.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the cellular mechanisms of kilohertz (kHz) electrical stimulation is of broad interest in neuromodulation including forms of transcranial electrical stimulation, interferential stimulation, and high-rate spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Yet, the well-established low-pass filtering by neuronal membranes suggests minimal neuronal polarization in respond to charge-balanced kHz stimulation. The hippocampal brain slice model is among the most studied systems in neuroscience and exhaustively characterized in screening the effects of electrical stimulation. High-frequency electric fields of varied amplitudes (1–150 V/m), waveforms (sinusoidal, symmetrical pule, asymmetrical pulse) and frequencies (1 and10 kHz) were tested. Changes in single or paired-pulse field EPSPs (fEPSP) in CA1 were measured in response to radial-directed and tangential-directed electric fields, with brief (30 s) or long (30 min) application times. The effects of kHz stimulation on ongoing endogenous network activity were tested in carbachol-induced γ oscillation of CA3a and CA3c. Across 23 conditions evaluated, no significant changes in fEPSP were resolved, while responses were detected for within-slice control direct current (DC) fields; 1-kHz sinusoidal and pulse stimulation (≥60 V/m), but not 10 kHz, induced changes in oscillating neuronal network. We thus report no responses to low-amplitude 1-kHz or any 10-kHz fields, suggesting that any brain sensitivity to these fields is via yet to be-determined mechanism(s) of action which were not identified in our experimental preparation.
Collapse
|
21
|
Garcia S, Hampstead BM. HD-tDCS as a neurorehabilitation technique for a case of post-anoxic leukoencephalopathy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 32:946-966. [PMID: 33208043 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1845749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Post-anoxic leukoencephalopathy is a rare event that causes global demyelination secondary to anoxic injury. Given the nature and extent of the damage, cognitive and functional deficits are typically chronic even after standard therapies. Here, we describe a novel treatment approach that used high definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-tDCS) with a 62-year-old male who was 5 years post-anoxic leukoencephalopathy secondary to an accidental drug overdose. HD-tDCS was administered over the left lateral prefrontal cortex across 29 daily sessions at 2 mA (20 min/session) in order to address dysexecutive behaviors. Results demonstrated improved delayed memory and trends for improved visuospatial and semantic fluency performance as well as improved insight and daily functioning, all of which returned to baseline by the end of a 10 week no-contact follow up period. Resting state fMRI connectivity results mirrored these changes by showing increased dorsal attention and cingulo-opercular but reduced ventral attention network connectivity after session 29, all of which returned to baseline at follow-up. These findings suggest HD-tDCS may benefit functioning even following serious and pervasive anoxic injury. Findings also suggest the need for continued HD-tDCS for maintenance purposes, though future work is needed to identify optimal dose-response information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Garcia
- Psychology Department, Stetson University, DeLand, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin M Hampstead
- Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Esmaeilpour Z, Kronberg G, Reato D, Parra LC, Bikson M. Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations. Brain Stimul 2020; 14:55-65. [PMID: 33186778 PMCID: PMC9382891 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Temporal interference (TI) stimulation of the brain generates amplitude-modulated electric fields oscillating in the kHz range with the goal of non-invasive targeted deep brain stimulation. Yet, the current intensities required in human (sensitivity) to modulate deep brain activity and if superficial brain region are spared (selectivity) at these intensities remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We developed an experimentally constrained theory for TI sensitivity to kHz electric field given the attenuation by membrane low-pass filtering property, and for TI selectivity to deep structures given the distribution of modulated and unmodulated electric fields in brain. METHODS The electric field threshold to modulate carbachol-induced gamma oscillations in rat hippocampal slices was determined for unmodulated 0.05-2 kHz sine waveforms, and 5 Hz amplitude-modulated waveforms with 0.1-2 kHz carrier frequencies. The neuronal effects are replicated with a computational network model to explore the underlying mechanisms, and then coupled to a validated current-flow model of the human head. RESULTS Amplitude-modulated electric fields are stronger in deep brain regions, while unmodulated electric fields are maximal at the cortical regions. Both experiment and model confirmed the hypothesis that spatial selectivity of temporal interference stimulation depends on the phasic modulation of neural oscillations only in deep brain regions. Adaptation mechanism (e.g. GABAb) enhanced sensitivity to amplitude modulated waveform in contrast to unmodulated kHz and produced selectivity in modulating gamma oscillation (i.e. Higher gamma modulation in amplitude modulated vs unmodulated kHz stimulation). Selection of carrier frequency strongly affected sensitivity to amplitude modulation stimulation. Amplitude modulated stimulation with 100 Hz carrier frequency required ∼5 V/m (corresponding to ∼13 mA at the scalp surface), whereas, 1 kHz carrier frequency ∼60 V/m (∼160 mA) and 2 kHz carrier frequency ∼80 V/m (∼220 mA) to significantly modulate gamma oscillation. Sensitivity is increased (scalp current required decreased) for theoretical neuronal membranes with faster time constants. CONCLUSION The TI sensitivity (current required at the scalp) depends on the neuronal membrane time-constant (e.g. axons) approaching the kHz carrier frequency. TI selectivity is governed by network adaption (e.g. GABAb) that is faster than the amplitude-modulation frequency. Thus, we show neuronal and network oscillations time-constants determine the scalp current required and the selectivity achievable with TI in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Greg Kronberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Davide Reato
- Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Neuroscience Program, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lucas C Parra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nissim NR, Moberg PJ, Hamilton RH. Efficacy of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS or TMS) Paired with Language Therapy in the Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia: An Exploratory Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci 2020; 10:E597. [PMID: 32872344 PMCID: PMC7563447 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10090597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), paired with behavioral language therapy, have demonstrated the capacity to enhance language abilities in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a debilitating degenerative neurological syndrome that leads to declines in communication abilities. The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically evaluate the efficacy of tDCS and TMS in improving language outcomes in PPA, explore the magnitude of effects between stimulation modalities, and examine potential moderators that may influence treatment effects. Standard mean differences for change in performance from baseline to post-stimulation on language-related tasks were evaluated. Six tDCS studies and two repetitive TMS studies met inclusion criteria and provided 22 effects in the analysis. Random effect models revealed a significant, heterogeneous, and moderate effect size for tDCS and TMS in the enhancement of language outcomes. Findings demonstrate that naming ability significantly improves due to brain stimulation, an effect found to be largely driven by tDCS. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to determine long-term effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on language abilities, further delineate the efficacy of tDCS and TMS, and identify optimal parameters to enable the greatest gains for persons with PPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole R. Nissim
- Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA
| | - Paul J. Moberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roy H. Hamilton
- Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cocco S, Rinaudo M, Fusco S, Longo V, Gironi K, Renna P, Aceto G, Mastrodonato A, Li Puma DD, Podda MV, Grassi C. Plasma BDNF Levels Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Allow Prediction of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Deficits in 3×Tg-AD Mice. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:541. [PMID: 32719795 PMCID: PMC7349675 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) supposedly increases the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. However, presently available diagnostic procedures are either invasive or require complex and expensive technologies, which cannot be applied at a larger scale to screen populations at risk of AD. We were looking for a biomarker allowing to unveil a dysfunction of molecular mechanisms, which underly synaptic plasticity and memory, before the AD phenotype is manifested and investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in 3×Tg-AD mice, an experimental model of AD which does not exhibit any long-term potentiation (LTP) and memory deficits at the age of 3 months (3×Tg-AD-3M). Our results demonstrated that tDCS differentially affected 3×Tg-AD-3M and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice. While tDCS increased LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses and memory in WT mice, it failed to elicit these effects in 3×Tg-AD-3M mice. Remarkably, 3×Tg-AD-3M mice did not show the tDCS-dependent increases in pCREBSer133 and pCaMKIIThr286, which were found in WT mice. Of relevance, tDCS induced a significant increase of plasma BDNF levels in WT mice, which was not found in 3×Tg-AD-3M mice. Collectively, our results showed that plasticity mechanisms are resistant to tDCS effects in the pre-AD stage. In particular, the lack of BDNF responsiveness to tDCS in 3×Tg-AD-3M mice suggests that combining tDCS with dosages of plasma BDNF levels may provide an easy-to-detect and low-cost biomarker of covert impairment of synaptic plasticity mechanisms underlying memory, which could be clinically applicable. Testing proposed here might be useful to identify AD in its preclinical stage, allowing timely and, hopefully, more effective disease-modifying interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cocco
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Rinaudo
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Fusco
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Longo
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Gironi
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Renna
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Aceto
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Domenica Donatella Li Puma
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Podda
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Grassi
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Steadman CJ, Grill WM. Spinal cord stimulation for the restoration of bladder function after spinal cord injury. Healthc Technol Lett 2020; 7:87-92. [PMID: 32754343 PMCID: PMC7353924 DOI: 10.1049/htl.2020.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in the inability to empty the bladder voluntarily, and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) negatively impact both the health and quality of life of persons with SCI. Current approaches to treat bladder dysfunction in persons with SCI, including self-catheterisation and anticholinergic medications, are inadequate, and novel approaches are required to restore continence with increased bladder capacity, as well as to provide predictable and efficient on-demand voiding. Improvements in bladder function following SCI have been documented using a number of different modalities of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in both persons with SCI and animal models, including SCS alone or SCS with concomitant activity-based training. Improvements include increased volitional voiding, voided volumes, bladder capacity, and quality of life, as well as decreases in NDO and DSD. Further, SCS is a well-developed therapy for chronic pain, and existing Food And Drug Administration (FDA)-approved devices provide a clear pathway to sustainable commercial availability and impact. However, the effective stimulation parameters and the appropriate timing and location of stimulation for SCS-mediated restoration of bladder function require further study, and studies are needed to determine underlying mechanisms of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey J Steadman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boroda E, Sponheim SR, Fiecas M, Lim KO. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits stimulus-specific enhancement of cortical plasticity. Neuroimage 2020; 211:116598. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
27
|
Adair D, Truong D, Esmaeilpour Z, Gebodh N, Borges H, Ho L, Bremner JD, Badran BW, Napadow V, Clark VP, Bikson M. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:717-750. [PMID: 32289703 PMCID: PMC7196013 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The cranial nerves are the pathways through which environmental information (sensation) is directly communicated to the brain, leading to perception, and giving rise to higher cognition. Because cranial nerves determine and modulate brain function, invasive and non-invasive cranial nerve electrical stimulation methods have applications in the clinical, behavioral, and cognitive domains. Among other neuromodulation approaches such as peripheral, transcranial and deep brain stimulation, cranial nerve stimulation is unique in allowing axon pathway-specific engagement of brain circuits, including thalamo-cortical networks. In this review we amalgamate relevant knowledge of 1) cranial nerve anatomy and biophysics; 2) evidence of the modulatory effects of cranial nerves on cognition; 3) clinical and behavioral outcomes of cranial nerve stimulation; and 4) biomarkers of nerve target engagement including physiology, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and behavioral metrics. Existing non-invasive stimulation methods cannot feasibly activate the axons of only individual cranial nerves. Even with invasive stimulation methods, selective targeting of one nerve fiber type requires nuance since each nerve is composed of functionally distinct axon-types that differentially branch and can anastomose onto other nerves. None-the-less, precisely controlling stimulation parameters can aid in affecting distinct sets of axons, thus supporting specific actions on cognition and behavior. To this end, a rubric for reproducible dose-response stimulation parameters is defined here. Given that afferent cranial nerve axons project directly to the brain, targeting structures (e.g. thalamus, cortex) that are critical nodes in higher order brain networks, potent effects on cognition are plausible. We propose an intervention design framework based on driving cranial nerve pathways in targeted brain circuits, which are in turn linked to specific higher cognitive processes. State-of-the-art current flow models that are used to explain and design cranial-nerve-activating stimulation technology require multi-scale detail that includes: gross anatomy; skull foramina and superficial tissue layers; and precise nerve morphology. Detailed simulations also predict that some non-invasive electrical or magnetic stimulation approaches that do not intend to modulate cranial nerves per se, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), may also modulate activity of specific cranial nerves. Much prior cranial nerve stimulation work was conceptually limited to the production of sensory perception, with individual titration of intensity based on the level of perception and tolerability. However, disregarding sensory emulation allows consideration of temporal stimulation patterns (axon recruitment) that modulate the tone of cortical networks independent of sensory cortices, without necessarily titrating perception. For example, leveraging the role of the thalamus as a gatekeeper for information to the cerebral cortex, preventing or enhancing the passage of specific information depending on the behavioral state. We show that properly parameterized computational models at multiple scales are needed to rationally optimize neuromodulation that target sets of cranial nerves, determining which and how specific brain circuitries are modulated, which can in turn influence cognition in a designed manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin Adair
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Truong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Nigel Gebodh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen Borges
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Libby Ho
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Douglas Bremner
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA
| | - Bashar W Badran
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Vitaly Napadow
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, MGH, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vincent P Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Dept. Psychology, MSC03-2220, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; The Mind Research Network of the Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Denoyer Y, Merlet I, Wendling F, Benquet P. Modelling acute and lasting effects of tDCS on epileptic activity. J Comput Neurosci 2020; 48:161-176. [DOI: 10.1007/s10827-020-00745-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
29
|
Colzato L, Beste C. A literature review on the neurophysiological underpinnings and cognitive effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: challenges and future directions. J Neurophysiol 2020; 123:1739-1755. [PMID: 32208895 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00057.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain stimulation approaches are important to gain causal mechanistic insights into the relevance of functional brain regions and/or neurophysiological systems for human cognitive functions. In recent years, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has attracted considerable popularity. It is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique based on the stimulation of the vagus nerve. The stimulation of this nerve activates subcortical nuclei, such as the locus coeruleus and the nucleus of the solitary tract, and from there, the activation propagates to the cortex. Since tVNS is a novel stimulation technique, this literature review outlines a brief historical background of tVNS, before detailing underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of action, stimulation parameters, cognitive effects of tVNS on healthy humans, and, lastly, current challenges and future directions of tVNS research in cognitive functions. Although more research is needed, we conclude that tVNS, by increasing norepineprine (NE) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, affects NE- and GABA-related cognitive performance. The review provides detailed background information how to use tVNS as a neuromodulatory tool in cognitive neuroscience and outlines important future leads of research on tVNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenza Colzato
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.,Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Christian Beste
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Neymotin SA, Daniels DS, Caldwell B, McDougal RA, Carnevale NT, Jas M, Moore CI, Hines ML, Hämäläinen M, Jones SR. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data. eLife 2020; 9:e51214. [PMID: 31967544 PMCID: PMC7018509 DOI: 10.7554/elife.51214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Magneto- and electro-encephalography (MEG/EEG) non-invasively record human brain activity with millisecond resolution providing reliable markers of healthy and disease states. Relating these macroscopic signals to underlying cellular- and circuit-level generators is a limitation that constrains using MEG/EEG to reveal novel principles of information processing or to translate findings into new therapies for neuropathology. To address this problem, we built Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN, https://hnn.brown.edu) software. HNN has a graphical user interface designed to help researchers and clinicians interpret the neural origins of MEG/EEG. HNN's core is a neocortical circuit model that accounts for biophysical origins of electrical currents generating MEG/EEG. Data can be directly compared to simulated signals and parameters easily manipulated to develop/test hypotheses on a signal's origin. Tutorials teach users to simulate commonly measured signals, including event related potentials and brain rhythms. HNN's ability to associate signals across scales makes it a unique tool for translational neuroscience research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Neymotin
- Department Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and NeuromodulationNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchOrangeburgUnited States
| | - Dylan S Daniels
- Department Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Blake Caldwell
- Department Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Robert A McDougal
- Department NeuroscienceYale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
- Department of BiostatisticsYale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | | | - Mainak Jas
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingMassachusetts General HospitalCharlestownUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Christopher I Moore
- Department Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Michael L Hines
- Department NeuroscienceYale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Matti Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingMassachusetts General HospitalCharlestownUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Stephanie R Jones
- Department Neuroscience, Carney Institute for Brain SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Center for Neurorestoration and NeurotechnologyProvidence VAMCProvidenceUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barbati SA, Cocco S, Longo V, Spinelli M, Gironi K, Mattera A, Paciello F, Colussi C, Podda MV, Grassi C. Enhancing Plasticity Mechanisms in the Mouse Motor Cortex by Anodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: The Contribution of Nitric Oxide Signaling. Cereb Cortex 2019; 30:2972-2985. [PMID: 31821409 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Consistent body of evidence shows that transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) facilitates motor learning and promotes recovery after stroke. However, the knowledge of molecular mechanisms behind tDCS effects needs to be deepened for a more rational use of this technique in clinical settings. Here we characterized the effects of anodal tDCS of M1, focusing on its impact on glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity. Mice subjected to tDCS displayed increased long-term potentiation (LTP) and enhanced basal synaptic transmission at layer II/III horizontal connections. They performed better than sham-stimulated mice in the single-pellet reaching task and exhibited increased forelimb strength. Dendritic spine density of layer II/III pyramidal neurons was also increased by tDCS. At molecular level, tDCS enhanced: 1) BDNF expression, 2) phosphorylation of CREB, CaMKII, and GluA1, and 3) S-nitrosylation of GluA1 and HDAC2. Blockade of nitric oxide synthesis by L-NAME prevented the tDCS-induced enhancement of GluA1 phosphorylation at Ser831 and BDNF levels, as well as of miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequency, LTP and reaching performance. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that anodal tDCS engages plasticity mechanisms in the M1 and highlight a role for nitric oxide (NO) as a novel mediator of tDCS effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Cocco
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Valentina Longo
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Matteo Spinelli
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Katia Gironi
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Andrea Mattera
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Fabiola Paciello
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Claudia Colussi
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy.,Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica "Antonio Ruberti" (IASI) - CNR, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Podda
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Claudio Grassi
- Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy.,Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Adelhöfer N, Gohil K, Passow S, Beste C, Li SC. Lateral prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation augments resolution of auditory perceptual-attentional conflicts. Neuroimage 2019; 199:217-227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|
33
|
Evaluation of acute anodal direct current stimulation-induced effects on somatosensory-evoked responses in the rat. Brain Res 2019; 1720:146318. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
34
|
Antonenko D, Thielscher A, Saturnino GB, Aydin S, Ittermann B, Grittner U, Flöel A. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1159-1168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
35
|
Simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS at the motor cortex boosts inhibitory aftereffects. J Neurosci Methods 2019; 324:108308. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
36
|
Lefaucheur JP, Wendling F. Mechanisms of action of tDCS: A brief and practical overview. Neurophysiol Clin 2019; 49:269-275. [PMID: 31350060 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Unité de neurophysiologie clinique, EA4391, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Paris-Est Créteil University,, 94000 Créteil, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adelhöfer N, Mückschel M, Teufert B, Ziemssen T, Beste C. Anodal tDCS affects neuromodulatory effects of the norepinephrine system on superior frontal theta activity during response inhibition. Brain Struct Funct 2019; 224:1291-1300. [PMID: 30701308 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-01839-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Medial and superior frontal theta oscillations are important for response inhibition. The norepinephrine (NE) system has been shown to modulate these oscillations possibly via gain control mechanisms, which depend on the modulation of neuron membrane potentials. Because the latter are also modulated by tDCS, the interrelation of tDCS and NE effects on superior frontal theta band activity needs investigation. We test the hypothesis that anodal tDCS affects modulatory effects of the NE system on theta band activity during inhibitory control in superior frontal regions. Using EEG beamforming, theta band activity in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) was integrated (correlated) with the pupil diameter data as an indirect index of NE activity. In a within-subject design, healthy participants completed a response inhibition task in two sessions in which they received 2 mA anodal tDCS over the vertex, or sham stimulation. There were no behavioral effects of anodal tDCS. Yet, tDCS affected correlations between SFG theta band activity time course and the pupil diameter time course. Correlations were evident after sham stimulation (r = .701; p < .004), but absent after anodal tDCS. The observed power of this dissociation was above 95%. The data suggest that anodal tDCS may eliminate neuromodulatory effects, likely of the NE system, on theta band activity during response inhibition in a structure of the response inhibition network. The NE system and tDCS seem to target similar mechanisms important for cognitive control in the prefrontal cortex. The results provide a hint why tDCS often fails to induce overt behavioral effects and shows that neurobiological systems, which may exert similar effects as tDCS on neural processes should closely be monitored in tDCS experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Adelhöfer
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Moritz Mückschel
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, MS Centre Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Benjamin Teufert
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, MS Centre Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Beste
- Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yi G, Wei X, Wang J, Deng B, Che Y. Modulations of dendritic Ca 2+ spike with weak electric fields in layer 5 pyramidal cells. Neural Netw 2018; 110:8-18. [PMID: 30471543 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Weak electric fields (EFs) modulate input/output function of pyramidal cells. Dendritic Ca2+ spike is an important cellular mechanism for coupling synaptic inputs from different cortical layers, which plays a critical role in neuronal computation. This study aims to understand the effects of weak EFs on Ca2+ spikes initiated in the distal dendrites. We use a computational model to simulate dendritic Ca2+ spikes and backpropagating action potentials (APs) in layer 5 pyramidal cells. We apply uniform EFs (less than 20 mV/mm) to the model and examine how they affect the threshold for activation of Ca2+ spikes. We show that the effects of weak field on synaptically evoked Ca2+ spikes depend on the timing of synaptic inputs. When distal inputs coincide with the onset of EFs within a time window of several milliseconds, field-induced depolarization facilitates the initiation of Ca2+ spikes, while field-induced hyperpolarization suppresses dendritic APs. Sustained field-induced depolarization leads to the inactivation of Ca2+ channels and increases the threshold of Ca2+ spike. Sustained field-induced hyperpolarization de-inactivates Ca2+ channels and reduces the threshold of Ca2+ spike. By altering the threshold of backpropagation activated Ca2+ firing, field-induced depolarization increases the degree of coupling between inputs of the soma and distal dendrites, while field-induced hyperpolarization results in a decrease of coupling. The modulatory effects of weak EF are governed by the field direction with respect to the cell. Our study explains a fundamental link between field-induced polarization, dendritic Ca2+ spike, and somato-dendritic coupling. The findings are crucial to interpret how weak EFs achieve specific modulation of cellular activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guosheng Yi
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Xile Wei
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
| | - Jiang Wang
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Bin Deng
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
| | - Yanqiu Che
- School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sliva DD, Black CJ, Bowary P, Agrawal U, Santoyo JF, Philip NS, Greenberg BD, Moore CI, Jones SR. A Prospective Study of the Impact of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on EEG Correlates of Somatosensory Perception. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2117. [PMID: 30515114 PMCID: PMC6255923 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The (8-12 Hz) neocortical alpha rhythm is associated with shifts in attention across sensory systems, and is thought to represent a sensory gating mechanism for the inhibitory control of cortical processing. The present preliminary study sought to explore whether alpha frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) could modulate endogenous alpha power in the somatosensory system, and whether the hypothesized modulation would causally impact perception of tactile stimuli at perceptual threshold. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) with simultaneous brief and intermittent tACS applied over primary somatosensory cortex at individuals' endogenous alpha frequency during a tactile detection task (n = 12 for EEG, n = 20 for behavior). EEG-measured pre-stimulus alpha power was higher on non-perceived than perceived trials, and analogous perceptual correlates emerged in early components of the tactile evoked response. Further, baseline normalized tactile detection performance was significantly lower during alpha than sham tACS, but the effect did not last into the post-tACS time period. Pre- to post-tACS changes in alpha power were linearly dependent upon baseline state, such that alpha power tended to increase when pre-tACS alpha power was low, and decrease when it was high. However, these observations were comparable in both groups, and not associated with evidence of tACS-induced alpha power modulation. Nevertheless, the tactile stimulus evoked response potential (ERP) revealed a potentially lasting impact of alpha tACS on circuit dynamics. The post-tACS ERP was marked by the emergence of a prominent peak ∼70 ms post-stimulus, which was not discernible post-sham, or in either pre-stimulation condition. Computational neural modeling designed to simulate macroscale EEG signals supported the hypothesis that the emergence of this peak could reflect synaptic plasticity mechanisms induced by tACS. The primary lesson learned in this study, which commanded a small sample size, was that while our experimental paradigm provided some evidence of an influence of tACS on behavior and circuit dynamics, it was not sufficient to induce observable causal effects of tACS on EEG-measured alpha oscillations. We discuss limitations and suggest improvements that may help further delineate a causal influence of tACS on cortical dynamics and perception in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle D. Sliva
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Christopher J. Black
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Paul Bowary
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Uday Agrawal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Juan F. Santoyo
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Noah S. Philip
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Benjamin D. Greenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | | | - Stephanie R. Jones
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dumel G, Bourassa ME, Charlebois-Plante C, Desjardins M, Doyon J, Saint-Amour D, De Beaumont L. Motor Learning Improvement Remains 3 Months After a Multisession Anodal tDCS Intervention in an Aging Population. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10:335. [PMID: 30405402 PMCID: PMC6207687 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthy aging is associated with decline of motor function that can generate serious consequences on the quality of life and safety. Our studies aim to explore the 3-month effects of a 5-day multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) protocol applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) during motor sequence learning in elderly. The present sham-controlled aging study investigated whether tDCS-induced motor improvements previously observed 1 day after the intervention persist beyond 3 months. A total of 37 cognitively-intact aging participants performed five consecutive daily 20-min sessions of the serial-reaction time task (SRTT) concomitant with either anodal (n = 18) or sham (n = 19) tDCS over M1. All participants performed the Purdue Pegboard Test and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of cortical excitability were collected before, 1 day after and 3 months after the intervention. The last follow-up session also included the execution of the trained SRTT. The main findings are the demonstration of durable effects of a 5-day anodal tDCS intervention at the trained skill, while the active intervention did not differ from the sham intervention at both the untrained task and on measures of M1-disinhibition. Thus, the current article revealed for the first time the durability of functional effects of a-tDCS combined with motor training after only 5 days of intervention in an aging population. This finding provides evidence that the latter treatment alternative is effective in achieving our primary motor rehabilitation goal, that is to allow durable motor training effects in an aging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Dumel
- Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Bourassa
- Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Martine Desjardins
- Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Julien Doyon
- Unité de Neuroimagerie Fonctionnelle, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Dave Saint-Amour
- Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Louis De Beaumont
- Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Physiological effects of low-magnitude electric fields on brain activity: advances from in vitro, in vivo and in silico models. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018; 8:38-44. [PMID: 31106284 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
While electrical stimulation of brain tissue has been thoroughly investigated over the last decades, ongoing questions remain regarding the neurophysiological effects of low-level electric fields (on the order of 1 V/m) on brain activity. Electric fields at such levels are, for example, induced by transcranial direct/alternating current stimulation (tDCS/tACS). Action potentials can be indeed elicited when applied (supra-threshold) electric fields are in the 10-100 V/m range, while lower (subthreshold) electric fields result in more limited and subtler membrane polarization effects. In this review, we address the question of the mechanisms underlying the immediate effects (also referred to as acute, concurrent or short-term) and the lasting effects (also referred to as long-term or aftereffects) of low-level electric fields on brain tissue. We review recent evidence at the in vitro and in vivo (animal and human) level, and also present mechanistic insights gained from in silico models, which are still few but have received increased attention over the recent past years. We highlight the convergent evidence towards potential mechanisms, and also discuss discrepancies between in vitro studies and human tDCS/tACS studies that require further investigation to bridge the gap between the single-cell and large-scale network level. Possible novel avenues of research are discussed.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) devices apply direct current through electrodes on the scalp with the intention to modulate brain function for experimental or clinical purposes. All tDCS devices include a current controlled stimulator, electrodes that include a disposable electrolyte, and headgear to position the electrodes on the scalp. Transcranial direct current stimulation dose can be defined by the size and position of electrodes and the duration and intensity of current applied across electrodes. Electrode design and preparation are important for reproducibility and tolerability. High-definition tDCS uses smaller electrodes that can be arranged in arrays to optimize brain current flow. When intended to be used at home, tDCS devices require specific device design considerations. Computational models of current flow have been validated and support optimization and hypothesis testing. Consensus on the safety and tolerability of tDCS is protocol specific, but medical-grade tDCS devices minimize risk.
Collapse
|
43
|
Aspart F, Remme MWH, Obermayer K. Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006124. [PMID: 29727454 PMCID: PMC5955601 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The rise of transcranial current stimulation (tCS) techniques have sparked an increasing interest in the effects of weak extracellular electric fields on neural activity. These fields modulate ongoing neural activity through polarization of the neuronal membrane. While the somatic polarization has been investigated experimentally, the frequency-dependent polarization of the dendritic trees in the presence of alternating (AC) fields has received little attention yet. Using a biophysically detailed model with experimentally constrained active conductances, we analyze the subthreshold response of cortical pyramidal cells to weak AC fields, as induced during tCS. We observe a strong frequency resonance around 10-20 Hz in the apical dendrites sensitivity to polarize in response to electric fields but not in the basal dendrites nor the soma. To disentangle the relative roles of the cell morphology and active and passive membrane properties in this resonance, we perform a thorough analysis using simplified models, e.g. a passive pyramidal neuron model, simple passive cables and reconstructed cell model with simplified ion channels. We attribute the origin of the resonance in the apical dendrites to (i) a locally increased sensitivity due to the morphology and to (ii) the high density of h-type channels. Our systematic study provides an improved understanding of the subthreshold response of cortical cells to weak electric fields and, importantly, allows for an improved design of tCS stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Aspart
- Department of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail: (FA); (MWHR); (KO)
| | - Michiel W. H. Remme
- Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail: (FA); (MWHR); (KO)
| | - Klaus Obermayer
- Department of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail: (FA); (MWHR); (KO)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kaczmarek D, Jankowska E. DC-Evoked Modulation of Excitability of Myelinated Nerve Fibers and Their Terminal Branches; Differences in Sustained Effects of DC. Neuroscience 2018; 374:236-249. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
45
|
Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci 2018; 21:174-187. [PMID: 29311747 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 523] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In the past three decades, our understanding of brain-behavior relationships has been significantly shaped by research using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. These methods allow non-invasive and safe modulation of neural processes in the healthy brain, enabling researchers to directly study how experimentally altered neural activity causally affects behavior. This unique property of NIBS methods has, on the one hand, led to groundbreaking findings on the brain basis of various aspects of behavior and has raised interest in possible clinical and practical applications of these methods. On the other hand, it has also triggered increasingly critical debates about the properties and possible limitations of these methods. In this review, we discuss these issues, clarify the challenges associated with the use of currently available NIBS techniques for basic research and practical applications, and provide recommendations for studies using NIBS techniques to establish brain-behavior relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Polanía
- Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christian C Ruff
- Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Esmaeilpour Z, Marangolo P, Hampstead BM, Bestmann S, Galletta E, Knotkova H, Bikson M. Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes. Brain Stimul 2017; 11:310-321. [PMID: 29258808 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated to modulate neuronal function by applying a fixed low-intensity direct current to scalp. OBJECTIVES We critically discuss evidence for a monotonic response in effect size with increasing current intensity, with a specific focus on a question if increasing applied current enhance the efficacy of tDCS. METHODS We analyzed tDCS intensity does-response from different perspectives including biophysical modeling, animal modeling, human neurophysiology, neuroimaging and behavioral/clinical measures. Further, we discuss approaches to design dose-response trials. RESULTS Physical models predict electric field in the brain increases with applied tDCS intensity. Data from animal studies are lacking since a range of relevant low-intensities is rarely tested. Results from imaging studies are ambiguous while human neurophysiology, including using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a probe, suggests a complex state-dependent non-monotonic dose response. The diffusivity of brain current flow produced by conventional tDCS montages complicates this analysis, with relatively few studies on focal High Definition (HD)-tDCS. In behavioral and clinical trials, only a limited range of intensities (1-2 mA), and typically just one intensity, are conventionally tested; moreover, outcomes are subject brain-state dependent. Measurements and models of current flow show that for the same applied current, substantial differences in brain current occur across individuals. Trials are thus subject to inter-individual differences that complicate consideration of population-level dose response. CONCLUSION The presence or absence of simple dose response does not impact how efficacious a given tDCS dose is for a given indication. Understanding dose-response in human applications of tDCS is needed for protocol optimization including individualized dose to reduce outcome variability, which requires intelligent design of dose-response studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Esmaeilpour
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA; Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Paola Marangolo
- Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, University Federico II, Naples and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome Italy
| | - Benjamin M Hampstead
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - Elisabeth Galletta
- Rusk Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, USA
| | - Helena Knotkova
- MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, NY, USA; Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA
| |
Collapse
|