1
|
Le Flohic E, Vrijens B, Hiligsmann M. The impacts of undetected nonadherence in phase II, III and post-marketing clinical trials: An overview. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:1984-2003. [PMID: 38752447 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS This research aims to provide an overview of the consequences of undiagnosed nonadherence (noninitiation, suboptimal implementation, nonpersistence) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS This research was conducted by combining a literature review and qualitative semistructured interviews with key opinion leaders. Based on this groundwork, the consequences of undiagnosed nonadherence in RCTs were summarized and reported in a figure. This study focused on phases II, III and post-marketing in ambulatory settings across a variety of therapeutic areas and indications. RESULTS Various consequences of nonadherence in RCTs were investigated. In phase II, drug efficacy may be underestimated, variability in the outcomes may be high and a distorted picture of side effects could be reported, resulting in an uncertain impression of the investigational product's profile and complicating decision-making. The sponsor may need to increase the sample size of the upcoming phase III study to improve its power, representing additional costs, or even terminate the study. In phase III, similar phenomena may be observed, making demonstration of efficacy to the regulatory bodies more difficult. Lastly, after commercialization, a distortion in pharmacometrics may occur: the drug may underperform, prescriptions may be refilled less often than expected or extra expenses may be incurred by the payers. This can result in post-marketing dose reduction, new competitors coming into the market and, eventually, product withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS This research highlighted the many potential adverse consequences of undiagnosed nonadherence in RCTs, including additional costs. Collecting accurate data appeared to be crucial for decision-making throughout the drug development process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Le Flohic
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dauphine University, Paris, France
| | - Bernard Vrijens
- University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- AARDEX Group, Liège, Belgium
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGrady ME, Ignjatovic V, Jones S, Bruce A, Goldenberg NA, Rizzi M, Thornburg CD, Todd KE, Luchtman-Jones L. Evaluation, analysis, and reporting of medication adherence for clinical trials of anticoagulants in children: guidance from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost 2024; 22:2081-2092. [PMID: 38642706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
In response to growing recognition that nonadherence prevents children, adolescents, and young adults from achieving the therapeutic benefits of anticoagulant medication, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis convened a working party on medication adherence. The primary aim of this article was to synthesize recommendations from the larger adherence science literature to provide guidance regarding the classification, collection, and interpretation of anticoagulation adherence data. The secondary aim of this article was to evaluate the degree to which trials published from 2013 to 2023 adhered to these guidance recommendations. As less than half of all trials reported on adherence and none included all recommended elements, the proposed International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee guidance has the potential to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of pediatric anticoagulant research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan E McGrady
- Center for Adherence and Self-Management, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Patient and Family Wellness Center, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
| | - Vera Ignjatovic
- Haematology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophie Jones
- Haematology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Haematology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aisha Bruce
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Neil A Goldenberg
- Johns Hopkins All Children's Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA; Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Division of Hematology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mattia Rizzi
- Hematology/Oncology Unit, Division of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Courtney D Thornburg
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California, USA; Department of Pediatrics, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Kevin E Todd
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Lori Luchtman-Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Division of Hematology, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dasarathy S, Tu W, Bellar A, Welch N, Kettler C, Tang Q, Liangpunsakul S, Gawrieh S, Radaeva S, Mitchell M. Development and evaluation of objective trial performance metrics for multisite clinical studies: Experience from the AlcHep Network. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 138:107437. [PMID: 38215876 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment and retention are critical in clinical studies but there are limited objective metrics of trial performance. We tested if development of trial performance metrics will allow for objective evaluation of study quality. Performance metrics were developed using data from the observational cohort (OBS) and randomized clinical trial (RCT) arms of the prospective Alcoholic Hepatitis Network. METHODS Yield-rate (%YR; eligible/screened), recruitment index (RI; mean recruitment time/patient), completion index (CI; average number of days to complete the follow-up/patient), and protocol adherence index (AI; average number of deviations/subject recruited) were determined. RESULTS 2250 patients (1168 for OBS; 1082 for RCT) were screened across 8 sites. Recruitment in the RCT (57% target) was similar to that in the OBS (59% target). Of those screened, 743 (63.6%) subjects in the OBS and 147 (13.6%) subjects in the RCT were enrolled in the study. In OBS study, 253 (34.1%) subjects, and in the RCT, 68 (46.3%) subjects, completed the study or reached a censoring event. Across all sites (range), YR for OBS was 63.6% (41.3-98.3%) and for RCT was 13.6% (5.5-92.6%); RI for OBS was 1.66 (8.79-19.85) and for RCT was 4.05 (19.76-36.43); CI for OBS was 4.87 (22.6-118.3) and for RCT was 8.75 (27.27-161.5); and AR for OBS was 0.56 (0.08-1.04) and for RCT was 1.55 (0.39-3.21. Factors related to participants, research design, study team, and research sponsors contributed to lower performance metrics. CONCLUSIONS Objective measures of clinical trial performance allow for strategies to enhance study quality and development of site-specific improvement plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov NCT4072822 NCT03850899.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasan Dasarathy
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| | - Wanzhu Tu
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Annette Bellar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Nicole Welch
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology and Inflammation and Immunity, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Carla Kettler
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Qing Tang
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Suthat Liangpunsakul
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Samer Gawrieh
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Svetlana Radaeva
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Mack Mitchell
- Department of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kirkland AE, Tomko RL, Green R, Browning BD, Ferguson PL, Liu H, Miranda R, Gray KM, Squeglia LM. Pairwise comparisons of three medication adherence outcomes in adolescents who use alcohol. ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 47:2375-2385. [PMID: 38151786 PMCID: PMC10755249 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of medication adherence is important for understanding pharmacotherapy outcomes across all phases of adolescent substance use disorder (SUD) clinical trials. The objective of this study was to describe and assess the pairwise concordance between three commonly used non-biological medication adherence assessment methods in adolescents who use alcohol to inform the selection of medication adherence measures for use in future youth SUD trials. METHODS Participants (N = 32, 17-19-years-old) took N-acetylcysteine and placebo, in a randomized cross-over design, for 10 days each. Medication adherence was assessed (20 days total) via pill count, medication videos submitted twice daily, and the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS®). Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) assessed concordance and Bland-Altman plots are reported. Linear mixed-effects models with main effects of medication, treatment block (first medication, second medication), and sequence were also run. RESULTS Medication videos yielded the lowest (64%) and pill count yielded the highest (89%) adherence estimates. CCC values indicated poor correspondence, except between pill count and MEMS. The Bland-Altman plots showed good pairwise agreement between all methods. Linear mixed-effects models indicated a difference between the first and second cross-over medication, with adherence estimates being lower for the second medication, regardless of whether it was N-acetylcysteine or placebo. CONCLUSIONS The study yielded important and practical information. First, incorporating more than one method of adherence assessment may capture estimated floor and ceiling adherence in the absence of a biological marker. This is particularly relevant for remote or hybrid studies where bio-marker collection is challenging. Selection of the assessment methods will depend on study goals. Second, the continuation of medication adherence research can benefit each phase of clinical trials and inform rigorous pharmacotherapy evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna E. Kirkland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel L. Tomko
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - ReJoyce Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brittney D. Browning
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Pamela L. Ferguson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Helen Liu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Robert Miranda
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kevin M. Gray
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lindsay M. Squeglia
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lasala R, Santoleri F, Romagnoli A, Abrate P, Musicco F, Costantini A. Medication adherence reporting in pivotal clinical trials: overview of oral oncological drugs. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2023; 30:328-332. [PMID: 35058307 PMCID: PMC10647863 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess how and to what extent adherence to medication is reported in pivotal clinical trials of oral cancer drugs. METHODS All drugs authorised by the European Medicines Agency from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019 were considered for analysis. For each pivotal trial we extracted the journal of publication, phase of the study, posology, mention of adherence within the main text of the published article or additional material and the terms in which the adherence was reported. RESULTS Thirty drugs were included in the analysis from 56 clinical trials. Eleven articles (19.6%) contained a mention of medication adherence in the main document, 26 (46.4%) in the supplementary material and 19 (33.9%) did not contain any reference to adherence. Seven studies reported medication adherence between the results, expressed as number of patients discontinuing treatment for non-compliance and mean or median percentage. CONCLUSIONS Medication adherence in pivotal clinical trials of oral oncological drugs is poorly represented. There should be a greater level of reporting in the results and it should be included among the minimum set of recommendations in reporting health research.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hodson D, Mistry H, Yates J, Farrington P, Staniszewska A, Guzzetti S, Davies M, Aarons L, Ogungbenro K. Radiation in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Blockade and DNA Damage Response Inhibitors in Mice: Dosage Optimization in MC38 Syngeneic Tumors via Modelling and Simulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2023; 387:44-54. [PMID: 37348964 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.122.001572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials assessing the impact of radiotherapy (RT) in combination with DNA damage response pathway inhibitors (DDRis) and/or immune checkpoint blockade are currently ongoing. However, current methods for optimizing dosage and schedule are limited. A mathematical model was developed to capture the impacts of RT in combination with DDRi and/or anti-PD-L1 [immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)] on tumor immune interactions in the MC38 syngeneic tumor model. The model was fitted to datasets that assessed the impact of RT in combination with the DNA protein kinase inhibitor (DNAPKi) AZD7648. The model was further fitted to datasets from studies that were used to assess both RT/ICI combinations as well as RT/ICI combinations followed by concurrent administration of the poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was performed followed by internal validation with visual predictive checks (VPC). Simulations of alternative dosage regimens and scheduling were performed to identify optimal candidate dosage regimens of RT/DNAPKi and RT/PARPi/ICI. Model fits and VPCs confirmed a successful internal validation for both datasets and demonstrated very small differences in the median, lower, and upper percentile values of tumor diameters between RT/ICI and RT/PARPi/ICI, which indicated that the triple combination of RT/PARPi/ICI at the given dosage and schedule does not provide additional benefit compared with ICI in combination with RT. Simulation of alternative dosage regimens indicated that lowering the dosage of ICI to between 2 and 4 mg/kg could induce similar benefits to the full dosage regimen, which could be of translational benefit. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work provides a mixed-effects model framework to quantify the effects of combination radiotherapy/DNA damage response pathway inhibitors/immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical tumor models and identify optimal dosage regimens, which could be of translational benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hodson
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Hitesh Mistry
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - James Yates
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Paul Farrington
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Anna Staniszewska
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Sofia Guzzetti
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Michael Davies
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Leon Aarons
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| | - Kayode Ogungbenro
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (D.H., H.M., L.A., K.O.); DMPK (S.G., J.Y.) and Biosciences (P.F., A.S.), Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and DMPK, Research and Early Development, Neuroscience R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Chandra S, Peña MT, Lal L, Summers RL, Swint JM. Framework for Evaluating and Developing Sustainable Telehealth Programs. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:1421-1425. [PMID: 36716266 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency, telehealth programs vastly expanded with strong support from various federal and state agencies. However, the uncertainty regarding future reimbursement policies for telehealth services has resulted in concerns about long-term sustainability of innovative health service delivery models beyond the financial support. Given the limited literature on creating telehealth programs with long-term sustainability in consideration, we have developed a framework for gathering appropriate data during various stages of program implementation to evaluate clinical effectiveness and economic sustainability that is applicable across various settings, with additional attention to health equity. Recognizing the difficulty of sustaining telehealth programs solely through a fee-for-service payment model, we encourage all telehealth stakeholders, especially payers and policymakers, to consider cost-effectiveness of telehealth programs and support alternate payment models for ensuring long-term sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxi Zhang
- Department of Data Science, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandra
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
- Center for Telehealth, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Maria T Peña
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lincy Lal
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard L Summers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - John Michael Swint
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bui D, McWilliams LA, Wu L, Zhou H, Wong SJ, You M, Chow DSL, Singh R, Hu M. Pharmacokinetic Basis for Using Saliva Matrine Concentrations as a Clinical Compliance Monitoring in Antitumor B Chemoprevention Trials in Humans. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010089. [PMID: 36612086 PMCID: PMC9817974 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This study reports the first clinical evidence of significantly high secretion of matrine in a multi-component botanical (Antitumor B, ATB) into human saliva from the systemic circulation. This is of high clinical significance as matrine can be used as a monitoring tool during longitudinal clinical studies to overcome the key limitation of poor patient compliance often reported in cancer chemoprevention trials. Both matrine and dictamine were detected in the saliva and plasma samples but only matrine was quantifiable after the oral administration of ATB tablets (2400 mg) in 8 healthy volunteers. A significantly high saliva/plasma ratios for Cmax (6.5 ± 2.0) and AUC0-24 (4.8 ± 2.0) of matrine suggested an active secretion in saliva probably due to entero-salivary recycling as evident from the long half-lives (t1/2 plasma = 10.0 ± 2.8 h, t1/2 saliva = 13.4 ± 6.9 h). The correlation between saliva and plasma levels of matrine was established using a population compartmental pharmacokinetic co-model. Moreover, a species-relevant PBPK model was developed to adequately describe the pharmacokinetic profiles of matrine in mouse, rat, and human. In conclusion, matrine saliva concentrations can be used as an excellent marker compound for mechanistic studies of active secretion of drugs from plasma to saliva as well as monitor the patient's compliance to the treatment regimen in upcoming clinical trials of ATB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinh Bui
- College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | | | - Lei Wu
- College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | | | - Stuart J. Wong
- Department of Neoplastic Diseases, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Ming You
- Houston Methodist, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Diana S.-L. Chow
- College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Rashim Singh
- College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Correspondence: (R.S.); (M.H.)
| | - Ming Hu
- College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Correspondence: (R.S.); (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enhancement of motor skill acquisition by intermittent theta burst stimulation: a pilot study. Acta Neurol Belg 2022:10.1007/s13760-022-02155-0. [DOI: 10.1007/s13760-022-02155-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
10
|
Ebadi M, Tsien C, Bhanji RA, Dunichand-Hoedl AR, Rider E, Motamedrad M, Mazurak VC, Baracos V, Montano-Loza AJ. Myosteatosis in Cirrhosis: A Review of Diagnosis, Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Potential Interventions. Cells 2022; 11:cells11071216. [PMID: 35406780 PMCID: PMC8997850 DOI: 10.3390/cells11071216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Myosteatosis, or pathological excess fat accumulation in muscle, has been widely defined as a lower mean skeletal muscle radiodensity on computed tomography (CT). It is reported in more than half of patients with cirrhosis, and preliminary studies have shown a possible association with reduced survival and increased risk of portal hypertension complications. Despite the clinical implications in cirrhosis, a standardized definition for myosteatosis has not yet been established. Currently, little data exist on the mechanisms by which excess lipid accumulates within the muscle in individuals with cirrhosis. Hyperammonemia may play an important role in the pathophysiology of myosteatosis in this setting. Insulin resistance, impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, diminished lipid oxidation in muscle and age-related differentiation of muscle stem cells into adipocytes have been also been suggested as potential mechanisms contributing to myosteatosis. The metabolic consequence of ammonia-lowering treatments and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in reversing myosteatosis in cirrhosis remains uncertain. Factors including the population of interest, design and sample size, single/combined treatment, dosing and duration of treatment are important considerations for future trials aiming to prevent or treat myosteatosis in individuals with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ebadi
- Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (M.E.); (R.A.B.); (E.R.)
| | - Cynthia Tsien
- Ajmera Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada;
| | - Rahima A. Bhanji
- Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (M.E.); (R.A.B.); (E.R.)
| | - Abha R. Dunichand-Hoedl
- Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada; (A.R.D.-H.); (M.M.); (V.C.M.)
| | - Elora Rider
- Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (M.E.); (R.A.B.); (E.R.)
| | - Maryam Motamedrad
- Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada; (A.R.D.-H.); (M.M.); (V.C.M.)
| | - Vera C. Mazurak
- Division of Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada; (A.R.D.-H.); (M.M.); (V.C.M.)
| | - Vickie Baracos
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Aldo J. Montano-Loza
- Division of Gastroenterology & Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada; (M.E.); (R.A.B.); (E.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-780-248-1892
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Busby J, Matthews JG, Chaudhuri R, Pavord ID, Hardman TC, Arron JR, Bradding P, Brightling CE, Choy DF, Cowan DC, Djukanovic R, Hanratty CE, Harrison TW, Holweg CT, Howarth PH, Fowler SJ, Lordan JL, Mansur AH, Menzies-Gow A, Niven RM, Robinson DS, Walker SM, Woodcock A, Heaney LG. Factors affecting adherence with treatment advice in a clinical trial of patients with severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2021; 59:13993003.00768-2021. [PMID: 34561291 PMCID: PMC9202483 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00768-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Understanding why patients with severe asthma do not follow healthcare provider (HCP) advice to adjust treatment is critical to achieving personalised disease management. Methods We reviewed patient choice to follow HCP advice to adjust asthma treatment in a UK-based randomised, controlled, single-blind (study participant), multicentre, parallel group 48-week clinical study comparing biomarker-directed treatment adjustment with standard care in severe asthma. Results Of 1572 treatment advisories (291 participants), instructions were followed in 1377 cases (87.6%). Patients were more likely to follow advice to remain on treatment (96.7%) than to either reduce (70.3%) or increase (67.1%) their treatment, with 64% of patients following all treatment advice. Multivariate analysis associated belonging to an ethnic minority group (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.68–5.73) and prior study medication changes (two or more changes: OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.51–5.10) with failure to follow treatment advice. In contrast, emergency room attendance in the prior year (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.92) was associated with following treatment advice. The largest effect was seen with transition onto or off oral corticosteroids (OR 29.28, 95% CI 16.07–53.36) when compared with those requested to maintain treatment. Centre was also an important determinant regarding the likelihood of patients to follow treatment advice. Conclusions Belonging to an ethnic minority group and multiple prior treatment adjustments were associated with not following HCP treatment advice. Patients also responded differently to HCP advice across UK specialist centres. These findings have implications for the generalisability of models of care in severe asthma and require further focused studies. Belonging to a minority ethnic group, multiple prior medication changes, being treated at a specific clinical centre, introduction of systemic corticosteroids and increased asthma symptoms were associated with resistance to asthma treatment modificationhttps://bit.ly/3gYb66S
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Busby
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Rekha Chaudhuri
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Gartnavel General Hospital, and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ian D Pavord
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Bradding
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, Institute for Lung Health and Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Christopher E Brightling
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, Institute for Lung Health and Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - David F Choy
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Douglas C Cowan
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ratko Djukanovic
- School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine E Hanratty
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Tim W Harrison
- Nottingham Respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Peter H Howarth
- School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephen J Fowler
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - James L Lordan
- The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Adel H Mansur
- University of Birmingham and Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Robert M Niven
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Ashley Woodcock
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Martin-Cantero A, Reijnierse EM, Gill BMT, Maier AB. Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev 2021; 79:315-330. [PMID: 33031516 PMCID: PMC7876433 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aitana Martin-Cantero
- Department of Medicine and Aged Care, @AgeMelbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Esmee M Reijnierse
- Department of Medicine and Aged Care, @AgeMelbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin M T Gill
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrea B Maier
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, @AgeAmsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Probiotics as a treatment for prenatal maternal anxiety and depression: a double-blind randomized pilot trial. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3051. [PMID: 33542275 PMCID: PMC7862351 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81204-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Probiotic use may be an efficacious treatment option to effectively manage symptoms of prenatal maternal anxiety and depression. Our primary aim was to test feasibility and acceptability for a probiotic randomized controlled trial (RCT) in pregnant women with pre-existing symptoms. This double-blind pilot RCT included 40 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies and elevated depressive symptoms and/or anxiety. Once daily, participants orally consumed a probiotic (Ecologic Barrier) or a placebo, from 26 to 30 weeks gestation until delivery. A priori key progression criteria for primary outcomes were determined to decide whether or not a full RCT was feasible and acceptable. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, and maternal bonding to offspring. In 19 months, 1573 women were screened; following screening, 155 women (10%) were invited for participation, of whom 135 (87%) received study information, and 40 women (30%) were included. Four out of six a priori determined criteria for success on feasibility and acceptability were met. After 8 weeks of intervention, there was no significant difference between the probiotic and placebo groups for secondary outcomes. The pilot trial was feasible and acceptable, but hampered by recruitment method and study design. Secondary endpoints did not reveal differences between the groups for improving maternal mood.
Collapse
|
14
|
Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials. Pain Rep 2020; 6:e845. [PMID: 33511323 PMCID: PMC7837951 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a basis for understanding the emerging science of clinical trials and to provide a set of practical, evidence-based suggestions for designing and executing confirmatory clinical trials in a manner that minimizes measurement error. The most important step in creating a mindset of quality clinical research is to abandon the antiquated concept that clinical trials are a method for capturing data from clinical practice and shifting to a concept of the clinical trial as a measurement system, consisting of an interconnected set of processes, each of which must be in calibration for the trial to generate an accurate and reliable estimate of the efficacy (and safety) of a given treatment. The status quo of inaccurate, unreliable, and protracted clinical trials is unacceptable and unsustainable. This article gathers aspects of study design and conduct under a single broad umbrella of techniques available to improve the accuracy and reliability of confirmatory clinical trials across traditional domain boundaries.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hampson AJ, Schroeder JR, Ellefsen KN, Yammine L, Epstein DH, Preston KL, Huestis MA, Verrico CD. Subtherapeutic Acetazolamide Doses as a Noninvasive Method for Assessing Medication Adherence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 108:1203-1212. [PMID: 32496573 PMCID: PMC7669583 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Adherence monitoring is a vital component of clinical efficacy trials, as the regularity of medication consumption affects both efficacy and adverse effect profiles. Pill-counts do not confirm consumption, and invasive plasma assessments can only assist post hoc assessments. We previously reported on the pharmacokinetics of a potential adherence marker to noninvasively monitor dosage consumption during a trial without breaking a blind. We reported that consumption cessation of subtherapeutic 15 mg acetazolamide (ACZ) doses showed a predictable urinary excretion decay that was quantifiable for an extended period. The current study describes the clinical implementation of 15 mg ACZ doses as an adherence marker excipient in distinct cohorts taking ACZ for different "adherence" durations. We confirm that ACZ output did not change (accumulate) during 18-20 days of adherence, and developed and assessed urinary cutoffs as nonadherence indicators. We demonstrate that whereas an absolute concentration cutoff (989 ng/mL) lacked sensitivity, a creatinine normalized equivalent (1,376 ng/mg ACZ) was highly accurate at detecting nonadherence. We also demonstrate that during nonadherent phases of three trials, creatinine-normalized urinary ACZ elimination was reproducible within and across trials with low variability. Excretion was first order, with a decay half-life averaging ~ 2.0 days. Further, excretion remained quantifiable for 14 days, providing a long period during which the date of last consumption might be determined. We conclude that inclusion of 15 mg ACZ as a dosage form adherence marker excipient, provides a reliable and sensitive mechanism to confirm medication consumption and detect nonadherence during clinical efficacy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan J Hampson
- Division of Therapies and Medical Consequences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer R Schroeder
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kayla N Ellefsen
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Travis County Medical Examiner's Office, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Luba Yammine
- McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David H Epstein
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenzie L Preston
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marilyn A Huestis
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Institute on Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher D Verrico
- Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Research Service Line, Department of Veterans Affairs, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith SM, Fava M, Jensen MP, Mbowe OB, McDermott MP, Turk DC, Dworkin RH. John D. Loeser Award Lecture: Size does matter, but it isn't everything: the challenge of modest treatment effects in chronic pain clinical trials. Pain 2020; 161 Suppl 1:S3-S13. [PMID: 33090735 PMCID: PMC7434212 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M. Smith
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology and
- Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mark P. Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Omar B. Mbowe
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Michael P. McDermott
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Dennis C. Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Robert H. Dworkin
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eliasson L, Clifford S, Mulick A, Jackson C, Vrijens B. How the EMERGE guideline on medication adherence can improve the quality of clinical trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:687-697. [PMID: 32034923 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Medication adherence in drug trials is suboptimal, affecting the quality of these studies and adding significant costs. Nonadherence in this setting can lead to null findings, unduly large sample sizes and the need for dose modification after a drug has been approved. Despite these drawbacks, adherence behaviours are not consistently measured, analysed or reported appropriately in trial settings. The ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE) offers a solution by facilitating a sound protocol design that takes this crucial factor into account. This article summarises key evidence on traditional and newer measurements of adherence, discusses implementation in clinical trial settings and makes recommendations about the analysis and interpretation of adherence data. Given the potential benefits of this approach, the authors call on regulators and the pharmaceutical industry to endorse the EMERGE guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy Mulick
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Bernard Vrijens
- AARDEX Group, Seraing, Belgium.,Liège University, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhou B, Mitchell TC, Rusakevich AM, Brown DM, Wykoff CC. Noncompliance in Prospective Retina Clinical Trials: Analysis of Factors Predicting Loss to Follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 210:86-96. [PMID: 31647931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Noncompliance during prospective studies can bias results and limit conclusions. The current study retrospectively investigated the relationship between study subject characteristics and rates of noncompliance in interventional trials involving common causes of blindness. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials. METHODS Subjects were enrolled in investigator-initiated trials studying proliferative diabetic retinopathy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal venous occlusive disease. Records were reviewed for hypothesized risk factors of noncompliance and rates of noncompliance, which were defined as at least 1 missed visit or exiting the study early. Demographic information, systemic medical history, and ocular medical history, including visual acuity and central retinal thicknesses, were examined retrospectively using Student t test, Pearson χ2 test, and logistic regression. RESULTS Of 390 subjects included, 212 (54.4%) were compliant with all scheduled study visits and 178 (45.6%) met criteria for noncompliance, with 53 (13.6%) subjects exiting early. Regression models identified 17 variables that were significant in determining subject noncompliance. Among those, distance, comorbidities, diabetic status, concomitant medications, previous clinic visits, length of study, disease under study, and severe adverse events were highly significant risk factors of noncompliance. CONCLUSION The current research identified a substantial proportion of subjects who met the criteria for noncompliance within the trials analyzed. The factors identified in the current work are consistent with published clinical observations and the results of previous clinical trials. These results highlight the importance of considering study design and medical history when designing prospective clinical trials in an attempt to minimize data loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Zhou
- Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - David M Brown
- Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Charles C Wykoff
- Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dauphin-Ducharme P, Yang K, Arroyo-Currás N, Ploense KL, Zhang Y, Gerson J, Kurnik M, Kippin TE, Stojanovic MN, Plaxco KW. Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensors for Improved Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and High-Precision, Feedback-Controlled Drug Delivery. ACS Sens 2019; 4:2832-2837. [PMID: 31556293 PMCID: PMC6886665 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.9b01616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) sensing platform appears to be a convenient (rapid, single-step, and calibration-free) and modular approach to measure concentrations of specific molecules (irrespective of their chemical reactivity) directly in blood and even in situ in the living body. Given these attributes, the platform may thus provide significant opportunities to render therapeutic drug monitoring (the clinical practice in which dosing is adjusted in response to plasma drug measurements) as frequent and convenient as the measurement of blood sugar has become for diabetics. The ability to measure arbitrary molecules in the body in real time could even enable closed-loop feedback control over plasma drug levels in a manner analogous to the recently commercialized controlled blood sugar systems. As initial exploration of this, we describe here the selection of an aptamer against vancomycin, a narrow therapeutic window antibiotic for which therapeutic monitoring is a critical part of the standard of care, and its adaptation into an electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) sensor. Using this sensor, we then demonstrate: (i) rapid (seconds) and convenient (single-step and calibration-free) measurement of plasma vancomycin in finger-prick-scale samples of whole blood, (ii) high-precision measurement of subject-specific vancomycin pharmacokinetics (in a rat animal model), and (iii) high-precision, closed-loop feedback control over plasma levels of the drug (in a rat animal model). The ability to not only track (with continuous-glucose-monitor-like measurement frequency and convenience) but also actively control plasma drug levels provides an unprecedented route toward improving therapeutic drug monitoring and, more generally, the personalized, high-precision delivery of pharmacological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Dauphin-Ducharme
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Center for Bioengineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| | - Kyungae Yang
- Center for Innovative Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States
| | - Netzahualcóyotl Arroyo-Currás
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| | - Kyle L. Ploense
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Center for Bioengineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| | - Yameng Zhang
- Center for Innovative Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States
| | - Julian Gerson
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| | - Martin Kurnik
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Center for Bioengineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| | - Tod E. Kippin
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| | - Milan N. Stojanovic
- Center for Innovative Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States
| | - Kevin W. Plaxco
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
- Center for Bioengineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wolffsohn JS, Kollbaum PS, Berntsen DA, Atchison DA, Benavente A, Bradley A, Buckhurst H, Collins M, Fujikado T, Hiraoka T, Hirota M, Jones D, Logan NS, Lundström L, Torii H, Read SA, Naidoo K. IMI - Clinical Myopia Control Trials and Instrumentation Report. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019; 60:M132-M160. [PMID: 30817830 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-25955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence-basis based on existing myopia control trials along with the supporting academic literature were reviewed; this informed recommendations on the outcomes suggested from clinical trials aimed at slowing myopia progression to show the effectiveness of treatments and the impact on patients. These outcomes were classified as primary (refractive error and/or axial length), secondary (patient reported outcomes and treatment compliance), and exploratory (peripheral refraction, accommodative changes, ocular alignment, pupil size, outdoor activity/lighting levels, anterior and posterior segment imaging, and tissue biomechanics). The currently available instrumentation, which the literature has shown to best achieve the primary and secondary outcomes, was reviewed and critiqued. Issues relating to study design and patient selection were also identified. These findings and consensus from the International Myopia Institute members led to final recommendations to inform future instrumentation development and to guide clinical trial protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Wolffsohn
- Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Pete S Kollbaum
- Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
| | - David A Berntsen
- The Ocular Surface Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - David A Atchison
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
| | | | - Arthur Bradley
- Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
| | - Hetal Buckhurst
- School of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Collins
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
| | - Takashi Fujikado
- Department of Applied Visual Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masakazu Hirota
- Department of Applied Visual Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Debbie Jones
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicola S Logan
- Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hidemasa Torii
- Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Scott A Read
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
| | - Kovin Naidoo
- African Vision Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Probiotics in pregnancy: protocol of a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial for pregnant women with depression and anxiety (PIP pilot trial). Trials 2019; 20:440. [PMID: 31315657 PMCID: PMC6637581 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3389-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal prenatal depressive or anxiety symptoms are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. With prevalence rates of maternal prenatal depression and anxiety ranging between 10 and 20%, attempts to identify effective interventions to reduce symptoms are priority. There are indications that probiotics can reduce symptoms of maternal depression or anxiety. Probiotics ingested by the mother may thus offer a promising and accessible intervention to complement existing treatments. Methods The Probiotics in Pregnancy (PIP) pilot trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial. While one group orally consumes a probiotic mixture (Ecologic® Barrier; 2,5 × 109 colony forming units/g; 2 g; daily), the other group consumes a placebo, from between 26 and 30 weeks gestation until delivery. Subjects are randomly allocated (1:1) to the intervention or placebo group. Forty healthy pregnant women with symptoms of depression or anxiety and uncomplicated pregnancies at randomization will be included. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a probiotic trial to reduce symptoms of maternal depression or anxiety in pregnancy. The secondary aim is to exploratorily compare the potential effect of probiotics, compared to placebo, on depressive and/or anxiety symptoms, maternal stress (i.e. reported/hair cortisol), maternal vaginal and intestinal microbiota, and by possibly affecting maternal mood and microbiota, maternal bonding to offspring, infant microbiota and infant crying. Discussion Results of this pilot trial will help determine whether or not to proceed with a full trial after the pilot trial, and if so, whether revisions should be made to the study protocol and procedures before conducting a full randomized controlled trial. Additionally, they are expected to provide insights into whether changes in psychological, behavioral and biological parameters can be attributed to the probiotic intervention. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR6219. Registered on 28 February 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3389-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
22
|
Steinkamp JM, Goldblatt N, Borodovsky JT, LaVertu A, Kronish IM, Marsch LA, Schuman-Olivier Z. Technological Interventions for Medication Adherence in Adult Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6:e12493. [PMID: 30860493 PMCID: PMC6434404 DOI: 10.2196/12493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication adherence is critical to the effectiveness of psychopharmacologic therapy. Psychiatric disorders present special adherence considerations, notably an altered capacity for decision making and the increased street value of controlled substances. A wide range of interventions designed to improve adherence in mental health and substance use disorders have been studied; recently, many have incorporated information technology (eg, mobile phone apps, electronic pill dispensers, and telehealth). Many intervention components have been studied across different disorders. Furthermore, many interventions incorporate multiple components, making it difficult to evaluate the effect of individual components in isolation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic scoping review to develop a literature-driven, transdiagnostic taxonomic framework of technology-based medication adherence intervention and measurement components used in mental health and substance use disorders. METHODS This review was conducted based on a published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42018067902) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review guidelines. We searched 7 electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Engineering Village, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2000 to September 2018. Overall, 2 reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screens, full-text screens, and data extraction. We included all studies that evaluate populations or individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder and contain at least 1 technology-delivered component (eg, website, mobile phone app, biosensor, or algorithm) designed to improve medication adherence or the measurement thereof. Given the wide variety of studied interventions, populations, and outcomes, we did not conduct a risk of bias assessment or quantitative meta-analysis. We developed a taxonomic framework for intervention classification and applied it to multicomponent interventions across mental health disorders. RESULTS The initial search identified 21,749 results; after screening, 127 included studies remained (Cohen kappa: 0.8, 95% CI 0.72-0.87). Major intervention component categories include reminders, support messages, social support engagement, care team contact capabilities, data feedback, psychoeducation, adherence-based psychotherapy, remote care delivery, secure medication storage, and contingency management. Adherence measurement components include self-reports, remote direct visualization, fully automated computer vision algorithms, biosensors, smart pill bottles, ingestible sensors, pill counts, and utilization measures. Intervention modalities include short messaging service, mobile phone apps, websites, and interactive voice response. We provide graphical representations of intervention component categories and an element-wise breakdown of multicomponent interventions. CONCLUSIONS Many technology-based medication adherence and monitoring interventions have been studied across psychiatric disease contexts. Interventions that are useful in one psychiatric disorder may be useful in other disorders, and further research is necessary to elucidate the specific effects of individual intervention components. Our framework is directly developed from the substance use disorder and mental health treatment literature and allows for transdiagnostic comparisons and an organized conceptual mapping of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathaniel Goldblatt
- Outpatient Addiction Services, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Somerville, MA, United States
| | | | - Amy LaVertu
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ian M Kronish
- Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Zev Schuman-Olivier
- Outpatient Addiction Services, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Somerville, MA, United States.,Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schmidt WP, Lewis HE, Greenland K, Curtis V. Comparison of structured observation and pictorial 24 h recall of household activities to measure the prevalence of handwashing with soap in the community. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH 2019; 29:71-81. [PMID: 30146894 DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1511772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This study compared structured observation with a 24 h pictorial recall of household activities ('sticker diary') to measure the prevalence of handwashing with soap (HWWS) in the community. The study was done within a cluster-randomised trial evaluating a handwashing promotion programme in Bihar, India. HWWS at key occasions in mothers and school children was measured by structured observation in 299 households from 32 villages. Sticker diaries recalling common activities, including personal hygiene, were used to measure HWWS in 299 households from a further 20 villages. Sticker diary HWWS prevalence estimates were about 13% points higher than structured observation estimates, but the differences varied by the type of handwashing occasion. This study confirms structured observation as the method of choice for the study of handwashing behaviours. The sticker diary method may be useful in large-scale surveys. Sticker diaries may overestimate HWWS at important occasions, but probably less so than conventional questionnaire tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W P Schmidt
- a Department of Disease Control , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - H E Lewis
- a Department of Disease Control , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - K Greenland
- a Department of Disease Control , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - V Curtis
- a Department of Disease Control , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vonbank A, Drexel H, Agewall S, Lewis BS, Dopheide JF, Kjeldsen K, Ceconi C, Savarese G, Rosano G, Wassmann S, Niessner A, Schmidt TA, Saely CH, Baumgartner I, Tamargo J. Reasons for disparity in statin adherence rates between clinical trials and real-world observations: a review. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY 2019; 4:230-236. [PMID: 30099530 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
With statins, the reported rate of adverse events differs widely between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observations in clinical practice, the rates being 1-2% in RCTs vs. 10-20% in the so-called real world. One possible explanation is the claim that RCTs mostly use a run-in period with a statin. This would exclude intolerant patients from remaining in the trial and therefore favour a bias towards lower rates of intolerance. We here review data from RCTs with more than 1000 participants with and without a run-in period, which were included in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Two major conclusions arise: (i) the majority of RCTs did not have a test dose of a statin in the run-in phase. (ii) A test dose in the run-in phase was not associated with a significantly improved adherence rate within that trial when compared to trials without a test dose. Taken together, the RCTs of statins reviewed here do not suggest a bias towards an artificially higher adherence rate because of a run-in period with a test dose of the statin. Other possible explanations for the apparent disparity between RCTs and real-world observations are also included in this review albeit mostly not supported by scientific data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Vonbank
- Department of Medicine I, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.,Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.,Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
| | - Heinz Drexel
- Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.,Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein.,Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Division of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Agewall
- Department of Cardiology, Ullevål, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Søsterhjemmet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Basil S Lewis
- Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.,Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport School of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Joern F Dopheide
- Division of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Keld Kjeldsen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Claudio Ceconi
- Department of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- Department of Medical Sciences, Irccs San Raffaele Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Sven Wassmann
- Cardiology Pasing, Munich, Germany and University of the Saarland, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Alexander Niessner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Andersen Schmidt
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Holbaek Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph H Saely
- Department of Medicine I, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.,Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.,Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein.,Division of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Iris Baumgartner
- Division of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Juan Tamargo
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mallayasamy S, Chaturvedula A, Blaschke T, Fossler MJ. A Systematic Evaluation of Effect of Adherence Patterns on the Sample Size and Power of a Clinical Study. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY 2018; 7:818-828. [PMID: 30291680 PMCID: PMC6310871 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of adherence patterns on the sample size and power of a clinical trial. Simulations from a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model linked to an adherence model were used. Four types of drug characteristics, such as long (~35 hours) and short (~12 hours) half-life in combination with earlier or delayed time to reach steady-state PD end points were studied. Adherence patterns were simulated using Markov chains. Our results clearly demonstrate the significant impact of varying levels and patterns of nonadherence on the sample size and power of a study. For drugs with short half-lives the evidence to support efficacy could be diluted by various patterns of nonadherence that would make its efficacy indistinguishable from the response to placebo. Prospectively utilizing clinical trial simulations with thorough incorporation of various adherence patterns would provide valuable information when designing a trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ayyappa Chaturvedula
- UNTHSC, University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | | | - Michael J Fossler
- Clinical Operations and Quantitative Sciences, Trevena, Inc., Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wyant KJ, Yasuda E, Kotagal V. The 10-year Landscape of United States-Registered Parkinson Disease Clinical Trials: 2007-2016. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2018; 5:512-518. [PMID: 30515440 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We know little about how well the goals and results of clinical trials in Parkinson disease (PD) reflect the priorities of patients and the broader PD community. Objectives We conducted a review of registered trials on http://clincialtrials.gov from 2007 to 2016 to explore whether PD trials have moved closer to the therapeutic priority goals articulated by the PD community. Methods Using the search terms: Parkinson, interventional trials, phase "0-4," we categorized therapeutic PD studies from http://clinicaltrials.gov between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016. Seven hundred and sixty-six trials met the criteria for analysis. We explored temporal trends in the utilization of balance problems and falls; mood symptoms, including stress and anxiety; cognitive dysfunction, including dementia; and dyskinesias as primary outcomes. We analyzed trials where recruitment was listed as "completed" (n = 391) to explore publication rates. Results Balance problems and falls were listed as primary outcome measures in 125 studies (16.3%), cognitive measures in 48 (6.3%), mood features in 37 (4.8%), and dyskinesias in 30 (3.9%). Trials using balance problems and falls as a primary outcome increased in frequency per year between 2007 and 2016 (Z = -2.128, p = 0.033) unlike the proportion of trials evaluating cognitive dysfunction including dementia (Z = -0.380, p = 0.704), mood symptoms including stress and anxiety (Z = 0.345, p = 0.730), or dyskinesias (Z = 0.340, p = 0.734), which did not show temporal changes. 231 (59.1%) completed trials had results published in manuscript form as of 5/1/2017, leaving 40.9% of trials unpublished. Conclusions PD trials focusing on balance problems and falls are becoming more common. About 40% of completed PD trials are unpublished, reflecting suboptimal utilization of participant efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara J Wyant
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI
| | - Erika Yasuda
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI
| | - Vikas Kotagal
- Department of Neurology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI.,Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System (VAAAHS) & VAAAHS Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Ann Arbor Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ryan TP, Morrison RD, Sutherland JJ, Milne SB, Ryan KA, Daniels JS, Misra-Hebert A, Hicks JK, Vogan E, Teng K, Daly TM. Medication adherence, medical record accuracy, and medication exposure in real-world patients using comprehensive medication monitoring. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0185471. [PMID: 28957369 PMCID: PMC5619774 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Poor adherence to medication regimens and medical record inconsistencies result in incomplete knowledge of medication therapy in polypharmacy patients. By quantitatively identifying medications in the blood of patients and reconciling detected medications with the medical record, we have defined the severity of this knowledge gap and created a path toward optimizing medication therapy. Methods and findings We validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to detect and/or quantify 38 medications across a broad range of chronic diseases to obtain a comprehensive survey of patient adherence, medical record accuracy, and exposure variability in two patient populations. In a retrospectively tested 821-patient cohort representing U.S. adults, we found that 46% of medications assessed were detected in patients as prescribed in the medical record. Of the remaining medications, 23% were detected, but not listed in the medical record while 30% were prescribed to patients, but not detected in blood. To determine how often each detected medication fell within literature-derived reference ranges when taken as prescribed, we prospectively enrolled a cohort of 151 treatment-regimen adherent patients. In this cohort, we found that 53% of medications that were taken as prescribed, as determined using patient self-reporting, were not within the blood reference range. Of the medications not in range, 83% were below and 17% above the lower and upper range limits, respectively. Only 32% of out-of-range medications could be attributed to short oral half-lives, leaving extensive exposure variability to result from patient behavior, undefined drug interactions, genetics, and other characteristics that can affect medication exposure. Conclusions This is the first study to assess compliance, medical record accuracy, and exposure as determinants of real-world treatment and response. Variation in medication detection and exposure is greater than previously demonstrated, illustrating the scope of current therapy issues and opening avenues that warrant further investigation to optimize medication therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy P Ryan
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Ryan D Morrison
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey J Sutherland
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Stephen B Milne
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Kendall A Ryan
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - J Scott Daniels
- Sano Laboratories, Sano Informed Prescribing, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Anita Misra-Hebert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - J Kevin Hicks
- Medicines Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Eric Vogan
- Reporting and Analytics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Kathryn Teng
- Medicines Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Thomas M Daly
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Moser W, Schindler C, Keiser J. Efficacy of recommended drugs against soil transmitted helminths: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2017; 358:j4307. [PMID: 28947636 PMCID: PMC5611648 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate efficacies of anthelmintic drugs against soil transmitted helminths in terms of cure rates and egg reduction rates.Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Data Sources PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and the World Health Organization library database from 1960 until 31 December 2016.Study selection Randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of a single dose regimen of albendazole, mebendazole, levamisole, and pyrantel pamoate against Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) and Trichuris trichiura. The primary outcomes included cure rates analysed by network meta-analysis with mixed logistic regression models and egg reduction rates with mixed linear models.Results 55 and 46 randomised controlled trials were included in the analysis of cure rates and egg reduction rates, respectively. All drugs were highly efficacious against A lumbricoides Albendazole showed the highest efficacy against hookworm infections with a cure rate of 79.5% (95% confidence interval 71.5% to 85.6%) and an egg reduction rate of 89.6% (81.9% to 97.3%). All drugs had low efficacy against T trichiura, with mebendazole showing the highest cure rate of 42.1% (25.9% to 60.2%) and egg reduction rate of 66.0% (54.6% to 77.3%). Estimates for the years 1995 and 2015 showed significant reductions in efficacy of albendazole against T trichiura: by 2015 the egg reduction rates fell from 72.6% (53.7% to 91.5%) to 43.4% (23.5% to 63.3%; P=0.049) and the cure rates fell from 38.6% (26.2% to 52.7%) to 16.4 (7.7% to 31.3%; P=0.027).Conclusions All four currently recommended drugs show limitations in their efficacy profile. While only albendazole showed good efficacy against hookworm infection, all drugs had low efficacy against T trichiura The decrease in efficacy of albendazole against T trichiura over the past two decades is of concern. The findings indicate the need for strengthening efforts to develop new drug treatments, with a particular focus on drugs against T trichiura.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendelin Moser
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, PO Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Schindler
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, PO Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Keiser
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, PO Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Apollonio D, Glantz SA. Tobacco Industry Research on Nicotine Replacement Therapy: "If Anyone Is Going to Take Away Our Business It Should Be Us". Am J Public Health 2017; 107:1636-1642. [PMID: 28817320 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is recommended for tobacco cessation on the basis of pharmaceutical industry research showing its effectiveness when combined with counseling. The tobacco industry opposed NRT when it first appeared in the 1980s but by 2016 was marketing its own NRT products. We used internal tobacco industry documents dated 1960 through 2010 to identify the industry's perceptions of NRT. As early as the 1950s, tobacco companies developed nonsmoked nicotine replacements for cigarettes, but they stopped out of concern that marketing such products would trigger Food and Drug Administration regulation of cigarettes. In the 1990s, after pharmaceutical companies began selling prescription NRT, tobacco companies found that many smokers used NRT to supplement smoking rather than to quit. In 2009, once the Food and Drug Administration began regulating tobacco, tobacco companies restarted their plans to capture the nicotine market. Although the tobacco industry initially viewed NRT as a threat, it found that smokers often combined NRT with smoking rather than using it as a replacement and began marketing their own NRT products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorie Apollonio
- Dorie Apollonio is with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco. Stanton A. Glantz is with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Stanton A Glantz
- Dorie Apollonio is with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco. Stanton A. Glantz is with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thibaut A, O'Brien AT, Fregni F. Strategies for replacing non-invasive brain stimulation sessions: recommendations for designing neurostimulation clinical trials. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14:633-649. [PMID: 28681660 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1352470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the potential impact of missed visits on the outcomes of neuromodulation treatments, it is not clear how this issue has been addressed in clinical trials. Given this gap in the literature, we reviewed articles on non-invasive brain stimulation in participants with depression or chronic pain, and investigated how missed visits were handled. Areas covered: We performed a search on PUBMED/MEDLINE using the keywords: 'tDCS', 'transcranial direct current stimulation', 'transcranial magnetic stimulation', 'depression', and 'pain'. We included studies with a minimum of five participants who were diagnosed with depression or chronic pain, who underwent a minimum of five tDCS or TMS sessions. A total of 181 studies matched our inclusion criteria, 112 on depression and 69 on chronic pain. Of these, only fifteen (8%) articles reported or had a protocol addressing missed visits. This review demonstrates that, in most of the trials, there is no reported plan to handle missed visits. Expert commentary: Based on our findings and previous studies, we developed suggestions on how to handle missed visits in neuromodulation protocols. A maximum of 20% of missing sessions should be allowed before excluding a patient and these sessions should be replaced at the end of the stimulation period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore Thibaut
- a Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Anthony Terrence O'Brien
- a Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Felipe Fregni
- a Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Acri JB, Cross AJ, Skolnick P. From bench to bedside: mGluR2 positive allosteric modulators as medications to treat substance use disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:1347-1355. [PMID: 27995279 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4501-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper provides an overview of the role of type 2 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR2) in addiction and behaviors reflecting addictive processes. RESULTS AZD8529, an mGluR2 positive allosteric modulator (PAM), failed to separate from placebo in a phase II schizophrenia trial. The demonstration by Athina Markou's laboratory that AZD8529 attenuated both nicotine self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement was a key factor in the decision to move this compound into a smoking cessation study. CONCLUSION Here, we highlight Markou laboratory's contribution to this project, as well as several innovative features of the phase II clinical trial that has already completed enrollment with top line results expected in early 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane B Acri
- Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 4123, MSC 9551, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9551, USA.
| | - Alan J Cross
- AstraZeneca Neuroscience Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech Unit, 141 Portland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Phil Skolnick
- Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 4123, MSC 9551, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9551, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bain EE, Shafner L, Walling DP, Othman AA, Chuang-Stein C, Hinkle J, Hanina A. Use of a Novel Artificial Intelligence Platform on Mobile Devices to Assess Dosing Compliance in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial in Subjects With Schizophrenia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5:e18. [PMID: 28223265 PMCID: PMC5340925 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accurately monitoring and collecting drug adherence data can allow for better understanding and interpretation of the outcomes of clinical trials. Most clinical trials use a combination of pill counts and self-reported data to measure drug adherence, despite the drawbacks of relying on these types of indirect measures. It is assumed that doses are taken, but the exact timing of these events is often incomplete and imprecise. Objective The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the use of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) platform (AiCure) on mobile devices for measuring medication adherence, compared with modified directly observed therapy (mDOT) in a substudy of a Phase 2 trial of the α7 nicotinic receptor agonist (ABT-126) in subjects with schizophrenia. Methods AI platform generated adherence measures were compared with adherence inferred from drug concentration measurements. Results The mean cumulative pharmacokinetic adherence over 24 weeks was 89.7% (standard deviation [SD] 24.92) for subjects receiving ABT-126 who were monitored using the AI platform, compared with 71.9% (SD 39.81) for subjects receiving ABT-126 who were monitored by mDOT. The difference was 17.9% (95% CI -2 to 37.7; P=.08). Conclusions Using drug levels, this substudy demonstrates the potential of AI platforms to increase adherence, rapidly detect nonadherence, and predict future nonadherence. Subjects monitored using the AI platform demonstrated a percentage change in adherence of 25% over the mDOT group. Subjects were able to use the technology successfully for up to 6 months in an ambulatory setting with early termination rates that are comparable to subjects outside of the substudy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01655680 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01655680?term=NCT01655680
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - John Hinkle
- EarlyPhase Sciences, Inc., Cary, NC, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barker M, D'Angelo S, Ntani G, Lawrence W, Baird J, Jarman M, Vogel C, Inskip H, Cooper C, Harvey NC. The relationship between maternal self-efficacy, compliance and outcome in a trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:77-84. [PMID: 27549309 PMCID: PMC5404713 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3721-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In a randomised controlled trial of vitamin D during pregnancy, we demonstrated that women with lower self-efficacy were more likely to experience practical problems with taking the trial medication and that this was associated with lower compliance and achieved 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations. INTRODUCTION The relationship between self-efficacy (the belief that one can carry out a behaviour), compliance with study protocol and outcome was explored within a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. METHODS In the Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) trial, women with circulating plasma 25(OH)-vitamin D of 25-100 nmol/l in early pregnancy were randomised to either 1000 IU cholecalciferol/day or matched placebo from 14 weeks until delivery. Circulating 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations were assessed at 14 and 34 weeks' gestation. A sequential sub-sample completed Schwarzer's General Self-Efficacy Scale at 14 and 34 weeks and the Problematic Experiences of Therapy Scale at 34 weeks. Women were interviewed about their experiences of the trial and interview transcripts analysed thematically. RESULTS In 203 women, those with higher self-efficacy were less likely to experience practical problems taking the study medication (odds ratio (OR) 0.81 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.95), p = 0.01). Over half reported practical problems associated with poorer compliance with the protocol requiring women to take the medication daily. Compliance in women who experienced practical problems was 94 % compared with 98 % for those with no problems (p < 0.001). Poorer compliance was also associated with lower concentrations of 25(OH)-D in late pregnancy in the treatment group (β = 0.54 nmol/l (95 % CI 0.18-0.89), p = 0.003). Thematic analysis suggested common difficulties were remembering to take the medication every day and swallowing the large capsules. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that differences in self-efficacy influence trial outcomes. Such information may help clinicians anticipate responses to routine vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and identify those who may need more support to comply. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN82927713, registered 11/04/2008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Barker
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - S D'Angelo
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - G Ntani
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - W Lawrence
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J Baird
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - M Jarman
- Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - C Vogel
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - H Inskip
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Effects of vilazodone on sexual functioning in healthy adults: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 32:27-35. [PMID: 27643885 PMCID: PMC5131696 DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of vilazodone on sexual functioning in healthy, sexually active adults and assess the impact of medication nonadherence in this type of trial. Participants were randomized to vilazodone (20 or 40 mg/day), paroxetine (20 mg/day), or placebo for 5 weeks of double-blind treatment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to day 35 in Change in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) total score in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Post-hoc analyses were carried out in modified intent-to-treat (mITT) populations that excluded participants in the active-treatment groups with undetectable plasma drug concentrations at all visits (mITT-I) or at least one visit (mITT-II). In the ITT population (N=199), there were no statistically significant differences between any treatment groups for CSFQ total score change: placebo, -1.0; vilazodone 20 mg/day, -1.4; vilazodone 40 mg/day, -1.9; and paroxetine, -3.5. In mITT-I (N=197) and mITT-II (N=159), CSFQ total score change was not significantly different between vilazodone (either dose) versus placebo; the CSFQ total score decreased significantly (P<0.05) with paroxetine versus both placebo and vilazodone 20 mg/day, but not versus vilazodone 40 mg/day. Vilazodone exerted no significant effect on sexual functioning in healthy adults. Medication nonadherence can alter study results and may be an important consideration in trials with volunteer participants.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ramanujam VMS, Nayeem F, Anderson KE, Kuo YF, Chen NW, Ju H, Lu LJW. Riboflavin as an independent and accurate biomarker for adherence in a randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Biomarkers 2016; 22:508-516. [PMID: 27918196 DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2016.1269201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication adherence is critical for success of clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To assess oral riboflavin is an adherence marker. METHODS Riboflavin was incorporated into active treatment and placebo pills for a clinical trial lasting for 2 years. RESULTS The accuracy (area under the receiver operating curve) of urinary riboflavin was 0.91 as a binary classifier of adherence, and was similar or better than for two active study ingredients daidzein (0.92) and genistein (0.87) (all p < 0.0001). Decreased adherence over time was similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSION Riboflavin is an accurate and useful biomarker for study pill ingestion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V-M S Ramanujam
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Fatima Nayeem
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Karl E Anderson
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Nai-Wei Chen
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Hyunsu Ju
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| | - Lee-Jane W Lu
- a Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health , The University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
RATIONALE Accurate assessment of medication adherence is critical for determination of medication efficacy in clinical trials, but most current methods have significant limitations. This study tests a subtherapeutic (microdose) of acetazolamide as a medication ingestion marker because acetazolamide is rapidly absorbed and excreted without metabolism in urine and can be noninvasively sampled. METHODS In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, residential study, 10 volunteers received 15 mg oral acetazolamide for 4 consecutive days. Acetazolamide pharmacokinetics were assessed on day 3, and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with a model medication (30 mg oxycodone) were examined on day 4. The rate of acetazolamide elimination into urine was followed for several days after dosing cessation. RESULTS Erythrocyte sequestration (half-life = 50.2 ± 18.5 h, mean ± SD, n = 6), resulted in the acetazolamide microdose exhibiting a substantially longer plasma half-life (24.5 ± 5.6 hours, n = 10) than previously reported for therapeutic doses (3-6 hours). After cessation of dosing, the rate of urinary elimination decreased significantly (F3,23 = 247: P < 0.05, n = 6) in a predictable manner with low intersubject variability and a half-life of 16.1 ± 3.8 h (n = 10). For each of 4 consecutive mornings after dosing cessation, the rates of urinary acetazolamide elimination remained quantifiable.There was no overall effect of acetazolamide on the pharmacodynamics, Cmax, Tmax, or elimination half-life of the model medication tested. Acetazolamide may have modestly increased overall oxycodone exposure (20%, P < 0.05) compared with one of the 2 days when oxycodone was given alone, but there were no observed effects of acetazolamide on oxycodone pharmacodynamic responses. CONCLUSIONS Coformulation of a once-daily trial medication with an acetazolamide microdose may allow estimation of the last time of medication consumption for up to 96 hours postdose. Inclusion of acetazolamide may therefore provide an inexpensive new method to improve estimates of medication adherence in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview on drug targets and emerging pharmacological treatment options for chronic pain. RECENT FINDINGS Chronic pain poses an enormous socioeconomic burden for the more than 30% of people who suffer from it, costing over $600 billion per year in the USA. In recent years, there has been a surge in preclinical and clinical research endeavors to try to stem this epidemic. Preclinical studies have identified a wide array of potential targets, with some of the most promising translational research being performed on novel opioid receptors, cannabinoid receptors, selective ion channel blockers, cytokine inhibitors, nerve growth factor inhibitors, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, glial cell inhibitors, and bisphosphonates. SUMMARY There are many obstacles for the development of effective medications to treat chronic pain, including the inherent challenges in identifying pathophysiological mechanisms, the overlap and multiplicity of pain pathways, and off-target adverse effects stemming from the ubiquity of drug target receptor sites and the lack of highly selective receptor ligands. Despite these barriers, the number and diversity of potential therapies have continued to grow, to include disease-modifying and individualized drug treatments.
Collapse
|
38
|
Shiovitz TM, Bain EE, McCann DJ, Skolnick P, Laughren T, Hanina A, Burch D. Mitigating the Effects of Nonadherence in Clinical Trials. J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 56:1151-64. [PMID: 26634893 PMCID: PMC5066799 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Accounting for subject nonadherence and eliminating inappropriate subjects in clinical trials are critical elements of a successful study. Nonadherence can increase variance, lower study power, and reduce the magnitude of treatment effects. Inappropriate subjects (including those who do not have the illness under study, fail to report exclusionary conditions, falsely report medication adherence, or participate in concurrent trials) confound safety and efficacy signals. This paper, a product of the International Society for CNS Clinical Trial Methodology (ISCTM) Working Group on Nonadherence in Clinical Trials, explores and models nonadherence in clinical trials and puts forth specific recommendations to identify and mitigate its negative effects. These include statistical analyses of nonadherence data, novel protocol design, and the use of biomarkers, subject registries, and/or medication adherence technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Shiovitz
- California Neuroscience Research Medical Group, Sherman Oaks, CA, USA.,CTSdatabase, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
| | - Earle E Bain
- Global Pharmaceutical Research and Development, AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David J McCann
- Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences, NIDA, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Phil Skolnick
- Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences, NIDA, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas Laughren
- Director of Regulatory Affairs, Massachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trial Network and Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel Burch
- Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Wilmington, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Can shielded brackets reduce mucosa alteration and increase comfort perception in orthodontic patients in the first 3 days of treatment? A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148:956-66. [PMID: 26672701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 07/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Orthodontic patients can experience pain and discomfort on the oral mucosa from trauma caused by friction with the brackets and the wires. In this split-mouth design, single-blind randomized controlled trial, we aimed to investigate whether brackets with a self-snapping customized plastic shield would induce less mucosa alteration and discomfort than those without the shield. METHODS The overall sample comprised 42 patients (22 female, 20 male) from a government-funded orthodontic practice, with a mean age of 16.7 years. Eligibility criteria included, among others, no history of mouth ulcers or systemic diseases. Customized shields for the maxillary and mandibular brackets were fabricated and inserted on one side of the mouth. The null hypothesis was that bracket shielding would have no advantage. The primary outcomes were mucosal and discomfort assessments. As the secondary outcome, the numbers of spontaneous detachments of the shields were reported. Treatment allocation was mainly implemented using a random number table for selection of the intervention side. Only the raters in charge of assessing the oral mucosa were blinded to the side of the mouth where the shields had been placed. The mucosa was assessed by 3 calibrated raters at the following time points: immediately before bracket placement (baseline assessment, T0), 3 days after delivering the shields (direct assessment of intervention, T1), and 4 days after removal of the shields (indirect assessment of intervention, T2). The raters used a newly devised yardstick in which the higher the score, the more severe the alteration. Discomfort was assessed at T1 and T2 using a visual analog scale. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed at the 5% level of significance. RESULTS Of 60 patients, 42 were eligible, and 35 were randomly selected to have one side of the mouth receive the intervention. Two patients discontinued the intervention at T1, and 5 stopped at T2. Seven additional patients were recruited and completed all time points. Thus, 42 patients participated at T0, 40 at T1, and 35 at T2. Thirty-five patients participated at all time points. At T1, no statistically significant difference in terms of mucosa alteration was observed between the 2 sides (median of all differences [MD], 0.0; 95% CI, 0.0-1.0; P = 0.11). The same occurred at T2 (MD, 0.0; 95% CI, 0.0-0.0; P = 1.00). The comfort level was statistically higher at T1 on the shielded side (MD, 14.0; 95% CI, 1.0-36.0; P = 0.04), whereas no difference was observed at T2 (MD, 0.0; 95% CI, 0.0-1.0, P = 0.81). No serious harm was observed. CONCLUSIONS The customized bracket shields were effective in reducing discomfort during the first 3 days of orthodontic treatment despite no significant difference in terms of visible mucosa alteration. REGISTRATION This trial was not registered. PROTOCOL The protocol was not published before trial commencement. FUNDING Expenses for the fabrication of the shields were covered by the main author (L.P.B.P.). Orthodontic materials were from the Center for Dental Specialties in Cajazeiras, Brazil.
Collapse
|
40
|
Sharma H, Santra S, Dutta A. Triple reuptake inhibitors as potential next-generation antidepressants: a new hope? Future Med Chem 2015; 7:2385-406. [PMID: 26619226 PMCID: PMC4976848 DOI: 10.4155/fmc.15.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The current therapy for depression is less than ideal with remission rates of only 25-35% and a slow onset of action with other associated side effects. The persistence of anhedonia originating from depressed dopaminergic activity is one of the most treatment-resistant symptoms of depression. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that triple reuptake inhibitors (TRIs) with potency to block dopamine reuptake in addition to serotonin and norepinephrine transporters should produce higher efficacy. The current review comprehensively describes the development of TRIs and discusses the importance of evaluation of in vivo transporter occupancy of TRIs, which should correlate with efficacy in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horrick Sharma
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Soumava Santra
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Aloke Dutta
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Medication Nonadherence, "Professional Subjects," and Apparent Placebo Responders: Overlapping Challenges for Medications Development. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2015; 35:566-73. [PMID: 26244381 PMCID: PMC4553101 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000000372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Nonadherence is a major problem in clinical trials of new medications. To evaluate the extent of nonadherence, this study evaluated pharmacokinetic sampling from 1765 subjects receiving active therapy across 8 psychiatric trials conducted between 2001 and 2011. With nonadherence defined as greater than 50% of plasma samples below the limit of quantification for study drug, the percentage of nonadherent subjects ranged from 12.8% to 39.2%. There was a trend toward increased nonadherence in studies with greater numbers of subjects, but an association with nonadherence was not apparent for other study design parameters or subject characteristics. For 2 trials with multiple recruitment sites in geographical proximity, several subjects attempted to simultaneously enroll at separate site locations. The construct of "professional subjects," those who enroll in trials only for financial gain, is gaining attention, and we therefore modeled the impact of professional subjects on medication efficacy trials. The results indicate that enrollment of professional subjects who are destined to succeed (those who will appear to achieve treatment success regardless of study drug assignment) can substantially increase both the apparent placebo response rate and the sample size requirement for statistical power, while decreasing the observed effect size. The overlapping nature of nonadherence, professional subjects, and placebo response suggests that these issues should be considered and addressed together. Following this approach, we describe a novel clinical trial design to minimize the adverse effects of professional subjects on trial outcomes and discuss methods to monitor adherence.
Collapse
|
42
|
Fossler MJ. Patient adherence: clinical pharmacology's embarrassing relative. J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 55:365-7. [PMID: 25385704 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Fossler
- Clinical Pharmacology Modeling and Simulation, Quantitative Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hsu E, Murphy S, Chang D, Cohen SP. Expert opinion on emerging drugs: chronic low back pain. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2014; 20:103-27. [DOI: 10.1517/14728214.2015.993379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
44
|
Vrijens B, Urquhart J. Methods for Measuring, Enhancing, and Accounting for Medication Adherence in Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 95:617-26. [DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2014.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
45
|
Litten RZ, Falk D, Ryan M, Fertig J. Research opportunities for medications to treat alcohol dependence: addressing stakeholders' needs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 38:27-32. [PMID: 23889161 DOI: 10.1111/acer.12193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2013] [Accepted: 04/29/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
During the past decade, significant advances have been made in the development of medications to treat alcohol dependence. Four medications have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating alcohol dependence-naltrexone, injectable naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram-and several others show promise. The fact remains, however, that because of the heterogeneity of alcohol dependence, these medications will not work for all people, in all circumstances. Moreover, clinicians are not routinely prescribing these medications for alcohol treatment. This commentary poses a number of issues that must be addressed in order to advance the alcohol research field and to make medications a mainstream treatment for problematic drinking. These issues are framed from the perspective of the various stakeholders involved, including clinicians, patients, regulatory agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, and third-party payers. Addressing these issues will not only help to improve treatment but, as further described, will also open up many new research opportunities for alcohol investigators in the coming decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raye Z Litten
- NIAAA's Collaborative Investigator Group (NCIG), Division of Treatment and Recovery Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bergman J, Roof RA, Furman CA, Conroy JL, Mello NK, Sibley DR, Skolnick P. Modification of cocaine self-administration by buspirone (buspar®): potential involvement of D3 and D4 dopamine receptors. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 16:445-58. [PMID: 22827916 PMCID: PMC5100812 DOI: 10.1017/s1461145712000661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Converging lines of evidence indicate that elevations in synaptic dopamine levels play a pivotal role in the reinforcing effects of cocaine, which are associated with its abuse liability. This evidence has led to the exploration of dopamine receptor blockers as pharmacotherapy for cocaine addiction. While neither D1 nor D2 receptor antagonists have proven effective, medications acting at two other potential targets, D3 and D4 receptors, have yet to be explored for this indication in the clinic. Buspirone, a 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for the treatment of anxiety, has been reported to also bind with high affinity to D3 and D4 receptors. In view of this biochemical profile, the present research was conducted to examine both the functional effects of buspirone on these receptors and, in non-human primates, its ability to modify the reinforcing effects of i.v. cocaine in a behaviourally selective manner. Radioligand binding studies confirmed that buspirone binds with high affinity to recombinant human D3 and D4 receptors (∼98 and ∼29 nm respectively). Live cell functional assays also revealed that buspirone, and its metabolites, function as antagonists at both D3 and D4 receptors. In behavioural studies, doses of buspirone that had inconsistent effects on food-maintained responding (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg i.m.) produced a marked downward shift in the dose-effect function for cocaine-maintained behaviour, reflecting substantial decreases in self-administration of one or more unit doses of i.v. cocaine in each subject. These results support the further evaluation of buspirone as a candidate medication for the management of cocaine addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Bergman
- Harvard Medical School-McLean Hospital, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, Belmont, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Newman AH, Blaylock BL, Nader MA, Bergman J, Sibley DR, Skolnick P. Medication discovery for addiction: translating the dopamine D3 receptor hypothesis. Biochem Pharmacol 2012; 84:882-90. [PMID: 22781742 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Revised: 06/22/2012] [Accepted: 06/25/2012] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) has been investigated as a potential target for medication development to treat substance use disorders (SUDs) with a particular focus on cocaine and methamphetamine. Currently, there are no approved medications to treat cocaine and methamphetamine addiction and thus developing pharmacotherapeutics to complement existing behavioral strategies is a fundamental goal. Novel compounds with high affinity and D3R selectivity have been evaluated in numerous animal models of drug abuse and favorable outcomes in nonhuman primate models of self-administration and relapse have provided compelling evidence to advance these agents into the clinic. One approach is to repurpose drugs that share the D3R mechanism and already have clinical utility, and to this end buspirone has been identified as a viable candidate for clinical trials. A second, but substantially more resource intensive and risky approach involves the development of compounds that exclusively target D3R, such as GSK598809 and PG 619. Clinical investigation of these drugs or other novel D3R-selective agents will provide a better understanding of the role D3R plays in addiction and whether or not antagonists or partial agonists that are D3R selective are effective in achieving abstinence in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Hauck Newman
- Medicinal Chemistry Section, Molecular Targets and Medications Discovery Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Vocci
- Friends Research Institute, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|