Differential involvement of intracellular domains of the rat NTS1 neurotensin receptor in coupling to G proteins: a molecular basis for agonist-directed trafficking of receptor stimulus

Neurotensin modulates ovarian vascular permeability via adherens junctions

Neurotensin (NTS) is a 13-amino acid peptide which is highly expressed in the mammalian ovary in response to the luteinizing hormone surge. Antibody neutralization of NTS in the ovulatory follicle of the cynomolgus macaque impairs ovulation and induces follicular vascular dysregulation, with excessive pooling of red blood cells in the follicle antrum. We hypothesize that NTS is an essential intrafollicular regulator of vascular permeability. In the present study, follicle injection of the NTS receptor antagonist SR142948 also resulted in vascular dysregulation. To measure vascular permeability changes in vitro, primary macaque ovarian microvascular endothelial cells (mOMECs) were enriched from follicle aspirates and studied in vitro. When treated with NTS, permeability of mOMECs decreased. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of mOMECs revealed high mRNA expression of the permeability-regulating adherens junction proteins N-cadherin (CDH2) and K-cadherin (CDH6). Immunofluorescent detection of CDH2 and CDH6 confirmed expression and localized these cadherins to the cell-cell boundaries, consistent with function as components of adherens junctions. mOMECs did not express detectable levels of the typical vascular endothelial cadherin, VE-cadherin (CDH5) as determined by RNA-Seq, qPCR, western blot, and immunofluorescence. Knockdown of CDH2 or CDH6 via siRNA abrogated the NTS effect on mOMEC permeability. Collectively, these data suggest that NTS plays an ovulation-critical role in vascular permeability maintenance, and that CDH2 and CDH6 are involved in the permeability modulating effect of NTS on the ovarian microvasculature. NTS can be added to a growing number of angiogenic regulators which are critical for successful ovulation.

The Neurotensinergic System: A Target for Cancer Treatment

BACKGROUND

The scientific interest regarding the involvement of peptides in cancer has increased in the last years. In tumor cells the overexpression of peptides and their receptors is known and new therapeutic targets for the treatment of cancer have been suggested. The overexpression of the neurotensinergic system has been associated with poor prognosis, tumor size, higher tumor aggressiveness, increased relapse risk and worse sensitivity to chemotherapy agents.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to update the findings regarding the involvement of the neurotensinergic system in cancer to suggest anticancer therapeutic strategies targeting this system. The neurotensin (NT) precursor, NT and its receptors (NTR) and the involvement of the neurotensinergic system in lung, breast, prostate, gastric, colon, liver and pancreatic cancers, glioblastoma, neuroendocrine tumors and B-cell leukemia will be mentioned and discussed as well as the signaling pathways mediated by NT. Some research lines to be developed in the future will be suggested such as: molecules regulating the expression of the NT precursor, influence of the diet in the development of tumors, molecules and signaling pathways activated by NT and antitumor therapeutic strategies targeting the neurotensinergic system.

CONCLUSION

NT, via the NTR, exerts oncogenic (tumor cell proliferation, invasion, migration, angiogenesis) and antiapoptotic effects, whereas NTR antagonists inhibit these effects. NTR expression can be used as a diagnostic tool/therapeutic target and the administration of NTR antagonists as antitumor drugs could be a therapeutic strategy to treat tumors overexpressing NTR.

The Role of Central Neurotensin in Regulating Feeding and Body Weight

The small peptide neurotensin (Nts) is implicated in myriad processes including analgesia, thermoregulation, reward, arousal, blood pressure, and modulation of feeding and body weight. Alterations in Nts have recently been described in individuals with obesity or eating disorders, suggesting that disrupted Nts signaling may contribute to body weight disturbance. Curiously, Nts mediates seemingly opposing regulation of body weight via different tissues. Peripherally acting Nts promotes fat absorption and weight gain, whereas central Nts signaling suppresses feeding and weight gain. Thus, because Nts is pleiotropic, a location-based approach must be used to understand its contributions to disordered body weight and whether the Nts system might be leveraged to improve metabolic health. Here we review the role of Nts signaling in the brain to understand the sites, receptors, and mechanisms by which Nts can promote behaviors that modify body weight. New techniques permitting site-specific modulation of Nts and Nts receptor-expressing cells suggest that, even in the brain, not all Nts circuitry exerts the same function. Intriguingly, there may be dedicated brain regions and circuits via which Nts specifically suppresses feeding behavior and weight gain vs other Nts-attributed physiology. Defining the central mechanisms by which Nts signaling modifies body weight may suggest strategies to correct disrupted energy balance, as needed to address overweight, obesity, and eating disorders.

Structure of signaling-competent neurotensin receptor 1 obtained by directed evolution in Escherichia coli

Crystallography has advanced our understanding of G protein-coupled receptors, but low expression levels and instability in solution have limited structural insights to very few selected members of this large protein family. Using neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) as a proof of principle, we show that two directed evolution technologies that we recently developed have the potential to overcome these problems. We purified three neurotensin-bound NTR1 variants from Escherichia coli and determined their X-ray structures at up to 2.75 Å resolution using vapor diffusion crystallization experiments. A crystallized construct was pharmacologically characterized and exhibited ligand-dependent signaling, internalization, and wild-type-like agonist and antagonist affinities. Our structures are fully consistent with all biochemically defined ligand-contacting residues, and they represent an inactive NTR1 state at the cytosolic side. They exhibit significant differences to a previously determined NTR1 structure (Protein Data Bank ID code 4GRV) in the ligand-binding pocket and by the presence of the amphipathic helix 8. A comparison of helix 8 stability determinants between NTR1 and other crystallized G protein-coupled receptors suggests that the occupancy of the canonical position of the amphipathic helix is reduced to various extents in many receptors, and we have elucidated the sequence determinants for a stable helix 8. Our analysis also provides a structural rationale for the long-known effects of C-terminal palmitoylation reactions on G protein-coupled receptor signaling, receptor maturation, and desensitization.

Suppression of Gq Function Using Intra-Pipette Delivery of shRNA during Extracellular Recording in the Ventral Tegmental Area

Selective suppression of protein function in the brain can be achieved using specific silencing RNAs administered in vivo. A viral delivery system is often employed to transfect neurons with small hairpin RNA (shRNA) directed against specific proteins, and intervals of several days are allowed between microinjection of the shRNA-containing virus into the brain and experiments to assess suppression of gene function. Here we report studies using extracellular recording of dopaminergic neurons of the ventral tegmental area (DA VTA neurons) recorded in brain slices in which lentivirus containing shRNA directed against Gq was included in the recording pipette, and suppression of Gq-related function was observed within the time frame of the recording. The action of neurotensin (NT) is associated with activation of Gq, and the firing rate of DA VTA neurons is increased by NT. With shRNA directed against Gq in the pipette, there was a significant reduction of NT excitation within 2 h. Likewise, time-dependent dopamine desensitization, which we have hypothesized to be Gq-dependent, was not observed when shRNA directed against Gq was present in the pipette and dopamine was tested 2 h after initiation of recording. As the time interval (2 h) is relatively short, we tested whether blockade of protein synthesis with cycloheximide delivered via the recording pipette would alter Gq-linked responses similarly. Both NT-induced excitation and dopamine desensitization were inhibited in the presence of cycloheximide. Inclusion of shRNA in the recording pipette may be an efficient and selective way to dampen responses linked to Gq, and, more generally, the use of lentiviral-packaged shRNA in the recording pipette is a means to produce selective inhibition of the function of specific proteins in experiments.

Differential expression of new splice variants of the neurotensin receptor 1 gene in human prostate cancer cell lines

Neurotensin is a neuroendocrine peptide acting as a trophic factor in a variety of cells in vivo but it can also function as an autocrine growth factor in human prostate cancer cells in vitro. In addition, the high-affinity G protein-coupled NT receptor (NTS1) is overexpressed in prostate cancer cell lines. Increasing evidence argues for a direct correlation between specific alternative splice variants and cancer. We detected four splice variants of the NTS1 receptor in human prostate cancer cell lines. These isoforms include one or more exons skipping as well as an alternative 5' splice donor site and are expressed in the late-stage androgen independent prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and DU145, but not in the early-stage androgen-sensitive LNCaP or in normal prostate tissue, which only express the normal transcript. This result shows new splice variants of NTS1 for the first time. The differential expression observed among prostate cancer cell lines and normal prostate tissue opens the interesting possibility of a new role of NT/NTS1 pathway in prostate cancer.

Targeting V1A-vasopressin receptors with [Arg6, D-Trp7,9, NmePhe8]-substance P (6-11) identifies a strategy to develop novel anti-cancer therapies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The anti-cancer agent [Arg(6), D-Trp(7,9), N(me)Phe(8)]-substance P (6-11) (SP-G) modulates gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) and arginine vasopressin signalling in small cell lung cancer cells leading to growth arrest and apoptosis. We have shown that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at GRP receptors. This work examines the hypothesis that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at the V(1A) vasopressin receptor.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The human V(1A) receptor was expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) activation and intracellular Ca(2+) were measured using activation state-specific antibodies and Fura-2-AM respectively. The effect of SP-G on tumourigenicity was assessed by colony assay.

KEY RESULTS

In V(1A) receptor expressing cells, SP-G caused a sustained activation of ERK via a stimulation of V(1A) receptor coupling to G(i). Inhibition of G(i) with Pertussis toxin attenuated the inhibition by SP-G of the growth of CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the V(1A) receptor. Chimeric V(1A) receptors containing the second or third intracellular loop of the V(2) receptor were capable of binding vasopressin and SP-G but had altered ability to activate phospholipase C (PLC) and ERK. The second intracellular loop of the V(1A) receptor was essential for vasopressin-stimulated PLC and ERK activation but not for SP-G-induced ERK activation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This work provides mechanistic insight, for biased agonists at V(1A) receptors and highlights a potential role for such agents as anti-cancer agents.

On the analysis of ligand-directed signaling at G protein-coupled receptors

The phenomenon of "ligand-directed signaling" is often considered to be inconsistent with the traditional receptor theory. In this review, I show how the mathematics of the receptor theory can be used to measure the observed affinity and relative efficacy of protean ligands at G protein-coupled receptors. The basis of this analysis rests on the assumption that the fraction of agonist bound in the form of the active receptor-G protein-guanine nucleotide complex is the biochemical equivalent of the pharmacological stimulus. Consequently, this stimulus function is analogous to the current response of a ligand-gated ion channel. Because guanosine triphosphate (GTP) greatly inhibits the formation of the active quaternary complex, even the most efficacious agonists probably only elicit partial receptor activation, and it seems likely that the ceiling of 100% receptor activation is not reached in the intact cell with high intracellular concentrations of GTP. Under these conditions, the maximum of the stimulus function is proportional to the ratio of microscopic affinity constants of the agonist for ground and active states. Ligand-directed signaling depends on the existence of different active states of the receptor with different selectivities for different G proteins or other effectors. This phenomenon can be characterized using classic pharmacological methods. Although not widely appreciated, it is possible to estimate the product of observed affinity and intrinsic efficacy expressed relative to that of another agonist (intrinsic relative activity) through the analysis of the concentration-response curves. No other information is required. This approach should be useful in quantifying agonist activity and in converting the two disparate parameters of potency and maximal response into a single parameter dependent only on the agonist-receptor-effector complex.

Functional selectivity of hallucinogenic phenethylamine and phenylisopropylamine derivatives at human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C receptors

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-substituted phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines are 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) (5-HT)(2A/2C) agonists. The former are partial to full agonists, whereas the latter are partial to weak agonists. However, most data come from studies analyzing phospholipase C (PLC)-mediated responses, although additional effectors [e.g., phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2))] are associated with these receptors. We compared two homologous series of phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines measuring both PLA(2) and PLC responses in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing human 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2C) receptors. In addition, we assayed both groups of compounds as head shake inducers in rats. At the 5-HT(2C) receptor, most compounds were partial agonists for both pathways. Relative efficacy of some phenylisopropylamines was higher for both responses compared with their phenethylamine counterparts, whereas for others, no differences were found. At the 5-HT(2A) receptor, most compounds behaved as partial agonists, but unlike findings at 5-HT(2C) receptors, all phenylisopropylamines were more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts. 2,5-Dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine activated only the PLC pathway at both receptor subtypes, 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine was selective for PLC at the 5-HT(2C) receptor, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-nitrophenethylamine was PLA(2)-specific at the 5-HT(2A) receptor. For both receptors, the rank order of efficacy of compounds differed depending upon which response was measured. The phenylisopropylamines were strong head shake inducers, whereas their phenethylamine congeners were not, in agreement with in vitro results and the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in the head shake response. Our results support the concept of functional selectivity and indicate that subtle changes in ligand structure can result in significant differences in the cellular signaling profile.

Interactions between neurotensin receptors and G proteins

Three neurotensin (NT) receptors have been cloned to date, two of which, NTS1 and NTS2, belong to the family of seven transmembrane domain receptors coupled to G proteins (GPCRs). NTS1 and NTS2 may activate multiple signal transduction pathways, involving several G proteins. However, whereas NT acts as an agonist towards all NTS1-mediated pathways, this peptide may exert either agonist or antagonist activities, depending on the NTS2-mediated pathway in question. Studies on these receptors reinforce the concept of independence between multiple signals potentially mediated through a single GPCR, generating a wide diversity of functional responses depending on the host cell and the ligand.

Neurotensin: role in psychiatric and neurological diseases

Neurotensin (NT), an endogenous brain-gut peptide, has a close anatomical and functional relationship with the mesocorticolimbic and neostriatal dopamine system. Dysregulation of NT neurotransmission in this system has been hypothesized to be involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Additionally, NT containing circuits have been demonstrated to mediate some of the mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs, as well as the rewarding and/or sensitizing properties of drugs of abuse. NT receptors have been suggested to be novel targets for the treatment of psychoses or drug addiction.

Functional domains of the subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1)

The subtype 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1) belongs to the family of G protein coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains and mediates most of the known effects of neurotensin. In the past years, mutagenesis studies have allowed to delineate functional regions of the receptor involved in agonist and antagonist binding, G protein coupling, sodium sensitivity of agonist binding, and agonist-induced receptor internalization. These data are reviewed and discussed in the present paper.

Multiple signaling states of G-protein-coupled receptors

Studies have been amassed in the past several years indicating that an agonist can conform a receptor into an activation state that is dependent upon an intrinsic property of the agonist usually based upon its chemical composition. Theoretically, each different agonist could impart its own unique activation state. Evidence for multiple signaling states for the G-protein-coupled receptors will be reviewed and is derived from many different pharmacological behaviors: efficacy, kinetics, protean agonism, differential desensitization and internalization, inverse agonism, and fusion chimeras. A recent extension of the ternary complex model is suggested by evidence that the different processes that govern deactivation, such as desensitization and internalization, is also regulated by conformers specific to the agonist. Rhodopsin may serve as a primer for the study of multiple activation states. Therapeutic implications that utilize multiple signaling states hold vast promise in the rationale design of drugs.

Chemically Distinct Ligands Promote Differential CB1Cannabinoid Receptor-Gi Protein Interactions

To understand how structurally distinct ligands regulate CB(1) receptor interactions with Gi1, Gi2, and Gi3, we quantified the Galphai and betagamma proteins that coimmunoprecipitate with the CB(1) receptor from a detergent extract of N18TG2 membranes in the presence of ligands. A mixture of A, R, G(GDP) (or G_), and ARG(GDP) (or ARG_) complexes was observed in the presence of aminoalkylindole (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN 55,212-2) for all three RGalphai complexes, cannabinoid desacetyllevonantradol for Galphai1 and Galphai2, and eicosanoid (R)-methanandamide for Galphai3. Desacetyllevonantradol maintained RGalphai3 complexes and (R)-methanandamide maintained RGalphai1 and RGalphai2 complexes even in the presence of a nonhydrolyzable GTP analog. The biaryl pyrazole antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride (SR141716) maintained all three RGalphai complexes. Gbeta proteins, and to a certain extent Ggamma2, exhibited the same association/dissociation pattern as the Galpha proteins. A GDP analog had no influence on any of these association/dissociation reactions and failed to promote sequestration of G proteins. These results can be explained by invoking the existence of an inverse agonist-supported inactive state in the ternary complex equilibrium model. WIN 55,212-2 behaves as an agonist for all three Gi subtypes; SR141716 behaves as an inverse agonist for all three Gi subtypes; desacetyllevonantradol behaves as an agonist for Gi1 and Gi2, and an inverse agonist at Gi3; and (R)-methanandamide behaves as an inverse agonist at Gi1 and Gi2, and an agonist at Gi3. These ligand-selective G protein responses imply that multiple conformations of the receptor could be evoked by ligands to regulate individual G proteins.

Coupling of the human A1 adenosine receptor to different heterotrimeric G proteins: evidence for agonist-specific G protein activation

The present study investigates the effect of varying ligand structure on the ability of agonists to activate guanine nucleotide-binding proteins of the Gi, Gs and Gq families via the A(1) adenosine receptor. In CHO cells expressing this receptor, inhibition or potentiation of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was used as an end point to measure the activation of Gi and, in Pertussis toxin (PTX)-treated cells, Gs, respectively. Stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation in PTX-treated cells was used as an index of Gq activation. CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine), NECA (5'-N-ethyl-carboxyamidoadenosine) and eight analogues of these ligands presented a range of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-activating profiles. Some ligands could only activate Gi (e.g. 2'deoxyCPA), some primarily Gi and Gs (and only weakly Gq) (e.g. 3'deoxyCPA), highlighting the importance of the ribose hydroxyls in agonist activation of multiple G proteins. CHA (N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine) activated Gi, Gs and Gq, but was more efficacious than CPA in activating Gs. The NECA analogues 5'-N-cyclopropyl-carboxamidoadenosine, 5'-N-cyclobutyl-carboxamidoadenosine and 5'-N-cyclopentyl-carboxamidoadenosine (CPeCA) also activated all three G proteins, although their ability to activate Gs and Gq (relative to CPA) was reduced with increasing substituent size, such that CPeCA produced only a small stimulation (at 100 microM) at Gq, but was a full agonist, relative to CPA, at Gi and Gs. This study suggests that the A(1) adenosine receptor can adopt agonist-specific conformations, arising from small changes in ligand structure, which lead to the differential activation of Gi, Gs and Gq.

Endogenous neurotensin facilitates visceral nociception and is required for stress-induced antinociception in mice and rats

Central neurotensin (NT) administration can both facilitate and inhibit somatic and visceral nociception, depending on the dose and administration site. NT microinjection in the rostroventral medulla facilitates nociception at low doses, while NT antagonist microinjection can markedly attenuate nociception, supporting the hypothesis that endogenous NT facilitates nociception. However, higher doses of NT produce a mu-opioid receptor-independent analgesia, similar to that resulting from various intense stressors. Furthermore, intense stress results in increased NT expression in several hypothalamic nuclei that have been implicated in stress-induced antinociception (SIAN); however, there is little direct evidence that endogenous NT is required for SIAN. We have investigated the role of endogenous NT in both basal visceral nociception and SIAN using both NT knockout mice and pharmacological approaches in rats. Visceral nociception was monitored by measuring visceromotor responses during colorectal distension both prior to and following water avoidance stress. Visceral nociception was significantly attenuated in both NT knockout mice and rats pre-treated with the NT antagonist SR 48692. Disruption of NT signaling also blocked SIAN, revealing a novel stress-induced hyperalgesic response that was significantly greater in female than in male rats. NT was also required for acetic acid-induced hyperalgesia. These results indicate that endogenous NT normally facilitates visceral pain responses, is required for irritant-induced hyperalgesia, and plays a critical role in SIAN.