Fosfomycin synergy in vitro with amoxicillin, daptomycin, and linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from renal transplant patients with infected urinary stents

In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Fosfomycin against Escherichia coli Isolates from Canine Urinary Tract Infection

Fosfomycin is a bactericidal drug recommended as an alternative treatment for canine bacterial cystitis, particularly in cases involving multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections when no other options are available. In this study, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of fosfomycin were determined against 79 clinical E. coli isolates using the agar dilution method. The susceptibility rate of E. coli to fosfomycin was 86.06%, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 4 mg/L and 96 mg/L, respectively. MPC50 and MPC90 values were 64 mg/L and 192 mg/L. Using pharmacokinetic (PK) data from dogs given a single 80 mg/kg oral dose of fosfomycin, the area under the curve per MIC50 (AUC0-24/MIC50) was 85.79 with time above MIC50 (T > MIC50) exceeding 50%. In urine, the AUC0-24/MIC50 was 10,694.78, and the AUC0-24/MPC90 was 222.81, with T > MPC90 extending beyond 24 h. Therefore, fosfomycin exhibited significant antibacterial activity against canine uropathogenic E. coli, including MDR strains, at concentrations below the susceptible MIC breakpoint. However, the high MPC values, especially the MPC90, indicate the critical importance of performing susceptibility testing for fosfomycin and maintaining ongoing resistance monitoring.

Synergistic properties of linezolid against Enterococcus spp. isolates: a systematic review from in vitro studies

PURPOSE

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with limited therapeutic options. Combination of at least two antimicrobials is a possible strategy to obtain rapid and sustained bactericidal effects and overcome the emergence of resistance. We revised the literature on linezolid synergistic properties from in vitro studies to assess its activity in combination with molecules belonging to other antibiotic classes against Enterococcus spp.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from three peer-reviewed databases including papers evaluating linezolid synergistic properties in vitro against Enterococcus spp. isolates.

RESULTS

We included 206 Enterococcus spp. isolates (92 E. faecalis, 90 E. faecium, 2 E. gallinarum, 3 E. casseliflavus, 19 Enterococcus spp.) from 24 studies. When an isolate was tested with different combinations, each combination was considered independently for further analysis. The most frequent interaction was indifferent effect (247/343, 72% of total interactions). The highest synergism rates were observed when linezolid was tested in combination with rifampin (10/49, 20.4% of interactions) and fosfomycin (16/84, 19.0%, of interactions). Antagonistic effect accounted for 7/343 (2.0%) of total interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our study reported overall limited synergistic in vitro properties of linezolid with other antibiotics when tested against Enterococcus spp. The clinical choice of linezolid in combination with other antibiotics should be guided by reasoned empiric therapy in the suspicion of a polymicrobial infection or targeted therapy on microbiological results, rather than on an intended synergistic effect of the linezolid-based combination.

Fosfomycin Enhances the Inhibition Ability of Linezolid Against Biofilms of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in vitro

Purpose

We explored the inhibition ability of linezolid/fosfomycin combination against biofilms of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and tried to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of VREfm biofilm-associated infections.

Methods

Four clinical isolates of VREfm (No.2, No.4, No.5, and No.6) were used for this study, which were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The checkerboard method was used to assess the synergistic effect of linezolid and fosfomycin. The inhibition ability of biofilm biomass was evaluated by crystal violet staining, and the metabolic activity was tested by an Alamar blue cell viability assay. Changes in biofilm formation-related genes of the strains after incubating with drugs were investigated via the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Results

The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) showed that linezolid combined with fosfomycin had a synergistic effect on all four VREfm isolates. Compared with linezolid monotherapy, linezolid combined with fosfomycin led to a significant decrease in biofilm biomass and metabolic activity, especially in the mature biofilm. The results of RT-qPCR showed linezolid combined with fosfomycin inhibition biofilm formation through the inhibition of cylA, ebpA, and gelE transcription in VREfm in the initial and mature stages. To the mature biofilm, the combination also reduced the expression of asa1, atlA, and esp.

Conclusion

The combination of linezolid and fosfomycin represented stronger inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of VREfm than linezolid alone.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

Rediscovering the value of fosfomycin trometamol in the era of antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and expert opinion

The worldwide prevalence of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (uUTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli is increasing. To address this emergency, international guidelines recommend reducing administration of fluoroquinolones, in the context of growing resistance and the long-lasting and potentially disabling side effects of these drugs. The favoured drug to replace fluoroquinolones is fosfomycin trometamol (FT), a well-known derivate of phosphonic acid with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recently reduced the susceptibility breakpoint for E. coli from 32 mg/L to 8 mg/L regarding FT used for uUTIs. This might lead to increased appropriate use of oral fosfomycin target therapy against E. coli and other microorganisms, and may be associated with a high likelihood of success. For species such as Klebsiella spp, particularly MDR strains, the absence of clinical breakpoints might lead to reduced use of oral fosfomycin, particularly if minimum inhibitory concentration is not available. To address this issue, this review presents an overview of the preclinical evidence on the activity of FT, and a systematic review of the clinical activity of FT in uUTIs in women, and in the prevention of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. The findings indicate that the safety and microbiological and clinical effectiveness of a single oral dose of FT are similar to that for comparator regimens with longer treatment schedules in women with uUTI, and FT can be considered a viable alternative to fluoroquinolones for antimicrobial prophylaxis in prostate biopsy. These observations and a broad clinical experience support the empirical use of FT for treating uUTI and indicate that FT is a promising candidate to effectively counteract antibiotic-resistant uUTIs throughout Europe.

Nitrofurantoin: properties and potential in treatment of urinary tract infection: a narrative review

Nitrofurantoin (NF), a wide-spectrum antibiotic accessible since 1953, is utilized widely to treat urinary tract infections as it usually stays active against drug-resistant uropathogen. The use of Nitrofurantoin has increased exponentially since new guidelines have repositioned it as first-line therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI). To, although fluoroquinolones are usually used to re-evaluate the first- and second-line therapies for treating uncomplicated UTI, their level of utilization is thought to be inappropriately excessive and will eventually have a detrimental impact; thus, we hypothesize that NF might be the best choice for this condition, because of its low frequency of utilization and its high susceptibility in common UTI pathogens. It can be concluded from this review that NF can be considered as the most effective drug in the treatment of acute urinary infection, but due to the long-term side effects of this drug, especially in elderly patients, it is essential to introduce some criteria for prescribing NF in cases of chronic UTI.

Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.

The Combination of Daptomycin with Fosfomycin is More Effective than Daptomycin Alone in Reducing Mortality of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

High-dose daptomycin-based combinations are recommended for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). Preclinical data have shown a synergistic effect of daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations against VRE. However, clinical studies comparing daptomycin monotherapy with daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations are unavailable.

METHODS

An observational study of VRE-BSI was performed between 2010-2021 on patients receiving daptomycin monotherapy (≥ 8 mg/kg) or daptomycin combined with intravenous fosfomycin. Patients treated with concomitant β-lactam combinations were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) analyses.

RESULTS

Among 224 patients, 176 received daptomycin monotherapy, and 48 received fosfomycin combinations. The median daptomycin and fosfomycin doses were 9.8 mg/kg and 12 g/day, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 77.3% and 47.9% in the daptomycin monotherapy and fosfomycin combination groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis predicted lower mortality with fosfomycin combination treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.73; P = 0.005). AIPW demonstrated a 17.8% reduced mortality with fosfomycin combinations (95% CI, - 30.6- - 4.9%; P = 0.007). The survival benefit was significant, especially among patients with a lower Pitt bacteremia score or fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 64 mg/l. Fosfomycin combination resulted in higher hypernatremia (10.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.04) and hypokalemia (33.3% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.009) compared to daptomycin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high-dose daptomycin with fosfomycin improved the survival rate of patients with VRE-BSI compared to daptomycin alone. The benefit of the combination was most pronounced for VRE with fosfomycin MIC ≤ 64 mg/l and for patients with a low Pitt bacteremia score.

Daptomycin synergistic properties from in vitro and in vivo studies: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Daptomycin is a bactericidal lipopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of systemic infections (i.e. skin and soft tissue infections, bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis) caused by Gram-positive cocci. It is often prescribed in association with a partner drug to increase its bactericidal effect and to prevent the emergence of resistant strains during treatment; however, its synergistic properties are still under evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to offer clinicians an updated overview of daptomycin synergistic properties from in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, we reported all in vitro and in vivo data evaluating daptomycin in combination with other antibiotic agents, subdivided by antibiotic classes, and a summary graph presenting the most favourable combinations at a glance.

RESULTS

A total of 92 studies and 1087 isolates (723 Staphylococcus aureus, 68 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 179 Enterococcus faecium, 105 Enterococcus faecalis, 12 Enterococcus durans) were included. Synergism accounted for 30.9% of total interactions, while indifferent effect was the most frequently observed interaction (41.9%). Antagonistic effect accounted for 0.7% of total interactions. The highest synergistic rates against S. aureus were observed with daptomycin in combination with fosfomycin (55.6%). For S. epidermidis and Enterococcus spp., the most effective combinations were daptomycin plus ceftobiprole (50%) and daptomycin plus fosfomycin (63.6%) or rifampicin (62.8%), respectively.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

We believe this systematic review could be useful for the future updates of guidelines on systemic infections where daptomycin plays a key role.

Human serum induces daptomycin tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis and viridans group streptococci

Daptomycin is a membrane-targeting lipopeptide antibiotic used in the treatment of infective endocarditis caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and viridans group streptococci. Despite demonstrating excellent in vitro activity and a low prevalence of resistant isolates, treatment failure is a significant concern, particularly for enterococcal infection. We have shown recently that human serum triggers daptomycin tolerance in S. aureus, but it was not clear if a similar phenotype occurred in other major infective endocarditis pathogens. We found that Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus gordonii or Streptococcus mutans grown under standard laboratory conditions were efficiently killed by daptomycin, whereas bacteria pre-incubated in human serum survived exposure to the antibiotic, with >99 % cells remaining viable. Incubation of enterococci or streptococci in serum led to peptidoglycan accumulation, as shown by increased incorporation of the fluorescent d-amino acid analogue HADA. Inhibition of peptidoglycan accumulation using the antibiotic fosfomycin resulted in a >tenfold reduction in serum-induced daptomycin tolerance, demonstrating the important contribution of the cell wall to the phenotype. We also identified a small contribution to daptomycin tolerance in E. faecalis from cardiolipin synthases, although this may reflect the inherent increased susceptibility of cardiolipin-deficient mutants. In summary, serum-induced daptomycin tolerance is a consistent phenomenon between Gram-positive infective endocarditis pathogens, but it may be mitigated using currently available antibiotic combination therapy.

Evolution of Enterococcus faecium in Response to a Combination of Daptomycin and Fosfomycin Reveals Distinct and Diverse Adaptive Strategies

Infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) are an important public health threat. VREfm isolates have become increasingly resistant to the front-line antibiotic daptomycin (DAP). As such, the use of DAP combination therapies with other antibiotics like fosfomycin (FOS) has received increased attention. Antibiotic combinations could extend the efficacy of currently available antibiotics and potentially delay the onset of further resistance. We investigated the potential for E. faecium HOU503, a clinical VREfm isolate that is DAP and FOS susceptible, to develop resistance to a DAP-FOS combination. Of particular interest was whether the genetic drivers for DAP-FOS resistance might be epistatic and, thus, potentially decrease the efficacy of a combinatorial approach in either inhibiting VREfm or in delaying the onset of resistance. We show that resistance to DAP-FOS could be achieved by independent mutations to proteins responsible for cell wall synthesis for FOS and in altering membrane dynamics for DAP. However, we did not observe genetic drivers that exhibited substantial cross-drug epistasis that could undermine the DAP-FOS combination. Of interest was that FOS resistance in HOU503 was largely mediated by changes in phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) flux as a result of mutations in pyruvate kinase (pyk). Increasing PEP flux could be a readily accessible mechanism for FOS resistance in many pathogens. Importantly, we show that HOU503 was able to develop DAP resistance through a variety of biochemical mechanisms and was able to employ different adaptive strategies. Finally, we showed that the addition of FOS can prolong the efficacy of DAP and slow down DAP resistance in vitro.

Removal of peptidoglycan and inhibition of active cellular processes leads to daptomycin tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic used in the clinic for treatment of severe enterococcal infections. Recent reports indicate that daptomycin targets active cellular processes, specifically, peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Within, we examined the efficacy of daptomycin against Enterococcus faecalis under a range of environmental growth conditions including inhibitors that target active cellular processes. Daptomycin was far less effective against cells in late stationary phase compared to cells in exponential phase, and this was independent of cellular ATP levels. Further, the addition of either the de novo protein synthesis inhibitor chloramphenicol or the fatty acid biosynthesis inhibitor cerulenin induced survival against daptomycin far better than controls. Alterations in metabolites associated with peptidoglycan synthesis correlated with protection against daptomycin. This was further supported as removal of peptidoglycan induced physiological daptomycin tolerance, a synergistic relation between daptomycin and fosfomycin, an inhibitor of the fist committed step peptidoglycan synthesis, was observed, as well as an additive effect when daptomycin was combined with ampicillin, which targets crosslinking of peptidoglycan strands. Removal of the peptidoglycan of Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis also resulted in significant protection against daptomycin in comparison to whole cells with intact cell walls. Based on these observations, we conclude that bacterial growth phase and metabolic activity, as well as the presence/absence of peptidoglycan are major contributors to the efficacy of daptomycin.

Optimal empiric treatment for KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in critically ill patients with normal or decreased renal function using Monte Carlo simulation

BACKGROUND

Limited clinical studies describe the pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin (FOS), tigecycline (TGC) and colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) in combination against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp). Population pharmacokinetic models were used in our study. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of each agent alone and in combination against KPC-Kp in patients with normal or decreased renal function.

RESULTS

The simulated regimen of FOS 6 g q8h reached ≥90% PTA against a MIC of 64 mg/L in patients with normal renal function. For patients with renal impairment, FOS 4 g q8h could provide sufficient antimicrobial coverage against a MIC of 128 mg/L. And increasing the daily dose could result to the cut-off value to 256 mg/L in decreased renal function. For TGC, conventional dosing regimens failed to reach 90% PTA against a MIC of 2 mg/L. Higher loading and daily doses (TGC 200/400 mg loading doses followed by 100 mg q12h/200 mg q24h) were needed. For CMS, none achieved 90% PTA against a MIC of 2 mg/L in normal renal function. Against KPC-Kp, the regimens of 200/400 mg loading dose followed by 100 q12h /200 mg q24h achieved > 80% CFRs regardless of renal function, followed by CMS 9 million IU loading dose followed by 4.5/3 million IU q12h in combination with FOS 8 g q8h (CFR 75-91%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a loading dose and high daily dose of TGC and CMS in combination with FOS can provide sufficient antimicrobial coverage against critically ill patients infected with KPC-Kp.

Pharmacokinetics of culture-directed antibiotics for the treatment of peritonitis in automated peritoneal dialysis: A systematic narrative review

The objectives of this study were to provide a summary of the pharmacokinetic data of some intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotics that could be used for both empirical and culture-directed therapy, as per the ISPD recommendations, and examine factors to consider when using IP antibiotics for the management of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)-associated peritonitis. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles published between 1998 and 2020 was conducted. To be eligible, articles had to describe the use of antibiotics via the IP route in adult patients ≥18 years old on APD in the context of pharmacokinetic studies or case reports/series. Articles describing the use of IP antibiotics that had been recently reviewed (cefazolin, vancomycin, gentamicin and ceftazidime) or administered for non-APD-associated peritonitis were excluded. A total of 1119 articles were identified, of which 983 abstracts were screened. Seventy-three full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Eight records were included in the final study. Three reports had pharmacokinetic data in patients on APD without peritonitis. Each of cefepime 15 mg/kg IP, meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP given in single doses achieved drug plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for treating the susceptible organisms. The remaining five records were case series or reports in patients on APD with peritonitis. While pharmacokinetic data support intermittent cefepime 15 mg/kg IP daily, only meropenem 0.5 g IP and fosfomycin 4 g IP are likely to be effective if given in APD exchanges with dwell times of 15 h. Higher doses may be required in APD with shorter dwell times. Information on therapeutic efficacy was derived from case reports/series in individual patients and without therapeutic drug monitoring. Until more pharmacokinetic data are available on these antibiotics, it would be prudent to shift patients who develop peritonitis on APD to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, where pharmacokinetic information is more readily available.

Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance and gene mutations in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Background

Fosfomycin exhibits excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Increasing fosfomycin resistance among clinical MRSA isolates was reported previously, but little is known about the relative abundance of Fosfomycin resistance genes in MRSA isolates circulating in Taiwan.

Methods

All MRSA isolates, collected in 2002 and 2012 by the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program, were used in this study. Susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents, including fosfomycin, was determined by broth microdilution. Genetic determinants of fosfomycin resistance, including fosB carriage and murA, glpT and uhpT mutations, were investigated using PCR and sequencing of amplicons. Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing was also performed to determine the genetic relatedness of MRSA isolates.

Results

A total of 969 MRSA strains, 495 in the year 2002 and 474 in the year 2012, were analyzed. The overall in vitro susceptibility was 8.2% to erythromycin, 18.0% to clindamycin, 29.0% to tetracycline, 44.6% to ciprofloxacin, 57.5% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 86.9% to rifampicin, 92.9% to fosfomycin and 100% to linezolid and vancomycin. A significant increase in the fosfomycin resistance rate was observed from 3.4% in 2002 to 11.0% in 2012. Of 68 fosfomycin-resistant MRSA isolates, several genetic backgrounds probably contributing to fosfomycin resistance were identified. Twelve isolates harbored the fosB gene, and various mutations in murA, uhpT, and glpT genes were noted in 11, 59, and 66 isolates, respectively. The most prevalent gene mutations were found in the combination of uhpT and glpT genes (58 isolates). The vast majority of the fosfomycin-resistant MRSA isolates belonged to spa type t002.

Conclusions

An increased fosfomycin resistance rate of MRSA isolates was observed in our present study, mostly due to mutations in the glpT and uhpT genes. Clonal spread probably contributed to the increased fosfomycin resistance.

Fosfomycin as Partner Drug for Systemic Infection Management. A Systematic Review of Its Synergistic Properties from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Fosfomycin is being increasingly prescribed for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In patients with systemic involvement, intravenous fosfomycin is usually administered as a partner drug, as part of an antibiotic regimen. Hence, the knowledge of fosfomycin pharmacodynamic interactions (synergistic, additive, indifferent and antagonistic effect) is fundamental for a proper clinical management of severe bacterial infections. We performed a systematic review to point out fosfomycin’s synergistic properties, when administered with other antibiotics, in order to help clinicians to maximize drug efficacy optimizing its use in clinical practice. Interactions were more frequently additive or indifferent (65.4%). Synergism accounted for 33.7% of total interactions, while antagonism occurred sporadically (0.9%). Clinically significant synergistic interactions were mostly distributed in combination with penicillins (51%), carbapenems (43%), chloramphenicol (39%) and cephalosporins (33%) in Enterobactaerales; with linezolid (74%), tetracyclines (72%) and daptomycin (56%) in Staphylococcus aureus; with chloramphenicol (53%), aminoglycosides (43%) and cephalosporins (36%) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa; with daptomycin (97%) in Enterococcus spp. and with sulbactam (75%) and penicillins (60%) and in Acinetobacter spp. fosfomycin-based antibiotic associations benefit from increase in the bactericidal effect and prevention of antimicrobial resistances. Taken together, the presence of synergistic interactions and the nearly total absence of antagonisms, make fosfomycin a good partner drug in clinical practice.

Potential of fosfomycin in treating multidrug-resistant infections in children

In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, there are limited treatment options available to treat multidrug-resistant organisms in paediatric patients. Fosfomycin is an antibiotic defined as 'critically important' by The World Health Organization due to its potential efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria and is increasingly cited in the international literature as a promising antimicrobial for combating sepsis in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. With broad-spectrum cover that includes both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and both parenteral and oral formulations available, fosfomycin provides a promising treatment option for paediatric patients. This review summarises fosfomycin's spectrum of activity, published efficacy in paediatric patients, safety considerations and pharmacokinetic data, as well as identifying current clinical trials delineating pharmacokinetic parameters and safety parameters in neonatal sepsis which will provide further information regarding the use of fosfomycin in neonatal and paediatric infections. Limitations regarding the current standards for fosfomycin susceptibility definitions, variations in dosing regimens and the potential mechanisms for resistance are also discussed.

Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model

There are limited treatment options for enterococcal urinary tract infections, especially vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Oral fosfomycin is a potential option, although limited data are available guiding dosing and susceptibility. We undertook pharmacodynamic profiling of fosfomycin against E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates using a dynamic in vitro bladder infection model. Eighty-four isolates underwent fosfomycin agar dilution susceptibility testing (E. faecalis MIC_50/90 32/64 μg/ml; E. faecium MIC_50/90 64/128 μg/ml). Sixteen isolates (including E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecium ATCC 35667) were chosen to reflect the MIC range and tested in the bladder infection model with synthetic human urine (SHU). Under drug-free conditions, E. faecium demonstrated greater growth restriction in SHU compared to E. faecalis (E. faecium maximal growth 5.8 ± 0.6 log₁₀ CFU/ml; E. faecalis 8.0 ± 1.0 log₁₀ CFU/ml). Isolates were exposed to high and low fosfomycin urinary concentrations after a single dose, and after two doses given over two days with low urinary concentration exposure. Simulated concentrations closely matched the target (bias 2.3%). E. faecalis isolates required greater fosfomycin exposure for 3 log₁₀ kill from the starting inoculum compared with E. faecium The ƒAUC_0-72/MIC and ƒ%T > MIC_0-72 for E. faecalis were 672 and 70%, compared to 216 and 51% for E. faecium, respectively. There was no rise in fosfomycin MIC postexposure. Two doses of fosfomycin with low urinary concentrations resulted in equivalent growth inhibition to a single dose with high urinary concentrations. With this urinary exposure, fosfomycin was effective in promoting suppression of regrowth (>3 log₁₀ kill) in the majority of isolates.

In vitro efficacy of vancomycin combined with fosfomycin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci strains

Objective:

Enterococci have been isolated frequently worldwide and have difficulties in the treatment. Combination antibiotherapies have a distinct advantage over monotherapies in terms of their synergistic effect. In the study, it was aimed to investigate in vitro activity of vancomycin combined with fosfomycin against VRE strains.

Methods:

A total of 30 VRE strains were included in the study. Bacterial identifications of the strains were undertaken using conventional routine methods. The resistance to agents tested was investigated by using the broth microdilution method. Glucose-6-phosphate (25 mcg/mL) for fosfomycin were used in all experiments. The activity of antibiotics in combination was assessed using a broth microcheckerboard. The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was interpreted as follows: synergism, FICI ≤0.5. Additionally, two strains in 30 VRE were studied to determine the time-kill curves to verify the synergistic results. For each strain, antibiotics were studied alone and in combination at the minimum inhibitory concentration (1xMIC) values.

Results:

Susceptibility rate to fosfomycin was found at 26.6 % (8/30). The MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀ and MIC interval values of antimicrobials were 512, 512, and 512 - 1024 mcg/mL for vancomycin, and 128, 160, and 64 - 224 mcg/mL for fosfomycin, respectively. The rate of synergism was found as 100 % by both checkerboard and time-kill methods.

Conclusion:

The result shows that the combination of vancomycin with fosfomycin could be an alternative in the treatment of infections caused by VRE.

In vitro synergy with fosfomycin plus doxycyclin against linezolid and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

OBJECTIVE

Linezolid and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (LRVREF) is globally emerging as a urinary nosocomial pathogen. A decrease in the amount of successful treatment options has created a necessity for the development of novel antimicrobial therapies. Combination therapy may provide an effective alternative for treatment. Fosfomycin and doxycyclin are currently used individually for the treatment of urinary tract infections. Fosfomycin has recently seen increased use because of its persistent activity against a large spectrum of multidrug-resistant organisms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of fosfomycin plus doxycyclin against LRVREF isolates.

METHODS

MICs for fosfomycin and doxycyclin were determined for 24 unique clinical LRVREF isolates (4%, fosfomycin-susceptible; 92%, doxycyclin-susceptible). In vitro synergy testing with the combination of fosfomycin and doxycyclin was performed using an Etest method and time-kill assay.

RESULTS

The combination of fosfomycin and doxycyclin demonstrated synergy with the Etest method in 11/24 (46%) isolates and in 10/24 (42%) isolates by the time-kill assay. Results from the Etest method and time-kill assay were in agreement for 7/24 (29.2%) of isolates. No antagonism was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of fosfomycin and doxycyclin should be evaluated further with additional LRVREF isolates. In vivo studies should also be performed before use in clinical situations.

Enterococcal periprosthetic joint infection: clinical and microbiological findings from an 8-year retrospective cohort study

Background

Treatment of enterococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is challenging due to non-standardized management strategies and lack of biofilm-active antibiotics. The optimal surgical and antimicrobial therapy are unknown. Therefore, we evaluated characteristics and outcome of enterococcal PJI.

Methods

Consecutive patients with enterococcal PJI from two specialized orthopedic institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Both institutions are following the same diagnostic and treatment concepts. The probability of relapse-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared by log-rank test. Treatment success was defined by absence of relapse or persistence of PJI due to enterococci or death related to enterococcal PJI. Clinical success was defined by the infection-free status, no subsequent surgical intervention for persistent or perioperative infection after re-implantation and no PJI-related death within 3 months.

Results

Included were 75 enterococcal PJI episodes, involving 41 hip, 30 knee, 2 elbow and 2 shoulder prostheses. PJI occurred postoperatively in 61 episodes (81%), hematogenously in 13 (17%) and by contiguous spread in one. E. faecalis grew in 64 episodes, E. faecium in 10 and E. casseliflavus in one episode(s). Additional microorganism(s) were isolated in 38 patients (51%). Enterococci were susceptible to vancomycin in 73 of 75 isolates (97%), to daptomycin in all 75 isolates, and to fosfomycin in 21 of 22 isolates (96%). The outcome data was available for 66 patients (88%). The treatment success after 3 years was 83.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 76.1–96.7%) and the clinical success was 67.5% (95% CI; 57.3–80.8%). In 11 patients (17%), a new PJI episode caused by a different pathogen occurred. All failures occurred within 3 years after surgery.

Conclusion

About half of enterococcal PJI were polymicrobial infections. The treatment success was high (84%). All treatment failures occurred within the first 3 years after revision surgery. Interestingly, 17% of patients experienced a new PJI caused by another pathogen at a later stage.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered with the public clinical trial identification NCT0253022 at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov on 15 July 2015.

Pharmacodynamics Of Linezolid-Plus-Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Susceptible And -Resistant Enterococci In Vitro And In Vivo Of A Galleria mellonella Larval Infection Model

Objectives

To explore the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of linezolid/fosfomycin combination against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci (VSE and VRE), and provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of VRE.

Methods

The checkerboard method and time-kill curve study were used to evaluate the efficacy of linezolid combined with fosfomycin against VSE and VRE. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to observe the cell morphology of bacteria treated with each drug alone or in combination, which further elucidate the mechanism of action of antibiotic combination therapy. The Galleria mellonella infection model was constructed to demonstrate the in vivo efficacy of linezolid plus fosfomycin for VSE and VRE infection.

Results

The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of all strains suggested that linezolid showed synergy or additivity in combination with fosfomycin against five of the six strains. Time-kill experiments demonstrated that the combination of linezolid-fosfomycin at 1×MIC or 2×MIC led to higher degree of bacterial killing without regrowth for all isolates tested than each monotherapy. TEM images showed that the combination treatment damaged the bacterial cell morphology more obviously than each drug alone. In the Galleria mellonella infection model, the enhanced survival rate of the combination treatment compared with linezolid monotherapy (P<0.05) was revealed.

Conclusion

Our data manifested that the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin was a potential therapeutic regimen for VRE infection. The combination displayed excellent bacterial killing and inhibited amplification of fosfomycin-resistant subpopulations.

An in vitro experimental study of the effect of fosfomycin in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin or meropenem on biofilm formation by multidrug-resistant urinary isolates of Escherichia coli

Background. This study was conducted to understand the effect of fosfomycin in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin or meropenem on biofilm formation by multidrug-resistant urinary isolates of Escherichia coli.Methods. Fifty urinary tract multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates that were known biofilm producers were studied. The MIC was determined using the agar dilution method for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem and fosfomycin. The fractional inhibitory concentration was determined for the combination of antibiotics followed by a time-kill assay. A tissue culture plate method was used to study the effect of the combination of antibiotics on biofilm formation.Results. The MICs of the isolates tested ranged from 0.25 to 32 µg ml^-1 for fosfomycin, 1 to 1024 µg ml^-1 for ciprofloxacin, 4 to 1024 µg ml^-1 for amikacin, and 0.25 to 512 µg ml^-1 for meropenem. The combination of fosfomycin with meropenem showed 68 % synergy, fosfomycin with amikacin 58 % synergy and fosfomycin with ciprofloxacin 6 % synergy. The combination also reduced the MIC of each antibiotic and none showed an antagonistic effect. Biofilm inhibition was best observed with the combination of fosfomycin with meropenem.Conclusion. The combination of fosfomycin with amikacin and fosfomycin with meropenem yielded a high percentage of synergy alongside an increased capacity to reduce biofilm formation when compared to combination with ciprofloxacin against multidrug-resistant E. coli. Fosfomycin in combination with other classes of antimicrobial agents has potential beneficial effects.

Parenteral Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections: The Rise of the Epoxide

Fosfomycin was initially discovered in 1969 but has recently gained renewed interest for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, particularly in the United States. Its unique mechanism of action, bactericidal activity, broad spectrum of activity, and relatively safe and tolerable adverse effect profile make it a great addition to the dwindling antibiotic armamentarium. Fosfomycin contains a three-membered epoxide ring with a direct carbon to phosphorous bond that bypasses the intermediate oxygen bond commonly present in other organophosphorous compounds; this structure makes the agent unique from other antibiotics. Despite nearly 50 years of parenteral fosfomycin use in Europe, fosfomycin has retained stable activity against most pathogens. Furthermore, fosfomycin demonstrated in vitro synergy in combination with other cell wall-active antibiotics (e.g., β-lactams, daptomycin). These combinations may offer respite for severe infections due to MDR gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The intravenous (IV) formulation is currently under review in the United States, and apropos, this review collates more contemporary evidence (i.e., studies published between 2000 and early 2019) in anticipation of this development. The approval of IV fosfomycin provides another option for consideration in the management of MDR infections. Its unique structure will give rise to a promising epoxide epoch in the battle against MDR bacteria.

When One Drug Is Not Enough: Context, Methodology, and Future Prospects in Antibacterial Synergy Testing

Antibacterial combinations have long been used to accomplish a variety of therapeutic goals, including prevention of resistance and enhanced antimicrobial activity. In vitro synergy testing methods, including the checkerboard array, the time-kill study, diffusion assays, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, are used commonly in the research setting, but are not routinely performed in the clinical microbiology laboratory because of test complexity and uncertainty about their predictive value for patient outcomes. Optimized synergy testing techniques and better data on the relationship between in vitro results and clinical outcomes are needed to guide the rational use of antimicrobial combinations in the multidrug resistance era.

New evidence on the use of fosfomycin for bacteremia and infectious endocarditis

There is growing concern regarding the increased resistance rates of numerous pathogens and the limited availability of new antibiotics against these pathogens. In this context, fosfomycin is of considerable interest due to its activity against a wide spectrum of these microorganisms. We will review the encouraging data on this issue regarding the use of fosfomycin in treating Gram-negative bacterial infections. We will also cover fosfomycin's role against 2 of the main causal agents of bacteremia and endocarditis worldwide (nosocomial and community-acquired): enterococci, whose growing resistance to glycopeptides and aminoglycosides represents a serious threat, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, whose infection, despite efforts, continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality and a high risk of complications. Thanks also to its considerable synergistic capacity with various antibiotics, fosfomycin is a tool for extending the therapeutic arsenal against these types of infections.

The potential of fosfomycin for multi-drug resistant sepsis: an analysis of in vitro activity against invasive paediatric Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of increasing global concern, threatening to undermine recent progress in reducing child and neonatal mortality. Repurposing older antimicrobials is a prominent strategy to combat multidrug-resistant sepsis. A potential agent is fosfomycin, however, there is scarce data regarding its in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics in the paediatric population.

METHODOLOGY

We analysed a contemporary, systematically collected archive of community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) paediatric Gram-negative bacteraemia isolates for their susceptibility to fosfomcyin. MICs were determined using agar serial dilution methods and validated by disk diffusion testing where breakpoints are available. Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing was also conducted for current empirical therapies (ampicillin, gentamicin, ceftriaxone) and amikacin (proposed in the literature as a new combination empirical therapeutic option).

RESULTS

Fosfomycin was highly active against invasive Gram-negative isolates, including 90  % (202/224) of Enterobacteriaceae and 96  % (22/23) of Pseudomonas spp. Fosfomycin showed high sensitivity against both CA isolates (94 %, 142/151) and HA isolates (81 %, 78/96; P =0.0015). CA isolates were significantly more likely to be susceptible to fosfomycin than the current first-line empirical therapy (96  % vs 59  %, P <0.0001). Extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) production was detected in 34  % (85/247) of isolates with no significant difference in fosfomycin susceptibility between ESBL-positive or -negative isolates [73/85 (86  %) vs 147/162 (91  %) respectively, P =0.245]. All isolates were susceptible to a fosfomycin-amikacin combination.

CONCLUSION

Gram-negative paediatric bacteraemia isolates are highly susceptible to fosfomycin, which could be combined with aminoglycosides as a new, carbapenem-sparing regimen to achieve excellent coverage to treat antimicrobial-resistant neonatal and paediatric sepsis.

In vitro activities of daptomycin combined with fosfomycin or rifampin on planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore daptomycin combined with fosfomycin or rifampin against the planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis.

METHODOLOGY

Four linezolid-resistant and four linezolid-sensitive isolates of E. faecalis which formed biofilms were collected for this study. Biofilm biomasses were detected by crystal violet staining and the adherent cells in the mature biofilms were quantified by c.f.u. determination.

RESULTS

Daptomycin alone, or combined with fosfomycin or rifampin (4×MIC) demonstrated bactericidal activities on the planktonic cells, and daptomycin combined with fosfomycin killed more planktonic cells (at least 1-log10 c.f.u. ml^-1) than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone. Daptomycin alone (16×MIC) showed anti-biofilm activities against the mature biofilms and bactericidal activities on the adherent cells, while daptomycin combined with fosfomycin (16×MIC) demonstrated significantly more anti-biofilm activities than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone and effectively killed the adherent cells in the mature biofilms. The high concentration of daptomycin (512 mg l^-1 ) combined with fosfomycin indicated more bactericidal activities on the adherent cells and more anti-biofilm activities against the mature biofilms than daptomycin 64 mg l^-1 (16×MIC) combined with fosfomycin. The addition of rifampin increased the anti-biofilm and bactericidal activities of daptomycin against the mature biofilms and the adherent cells of two isolates, however, which was not observed in other isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin combined with fosfomycin demonstrated better effect on the planktonic and adherent linezolid-resistant isolates of E. faecalis than daptomycin or fosfomycin alone. The role of rifampin in the treatment of E. faecalis isolates is discrepant and needs more studies.

Fosfomycin: mechanisms and the increasing prevalence of resistance

There are challenges regarding increased global rates of microbial resistance and the emergence of new mechanisms that result in microorganisms becoming resistant to antimicrobial drugs. Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotic effective against Gram-negative and certain Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococci, that interfere with cell wall synthesis. During the last 40 years, fosfomycin has been evaluated in a wide range of applications and fields. Although numerous studies have been done in this area, there remains limited information regarding the prevalence of resistance. Therefore, in this review, we focus on the available data concerning the mechanisms and increasing resistance regarding fosfomycin.

Activity of fosfomycin when tested against US contemporary bacterial isolates

Fosfomycin and comparators were susceptibility tested against over 2200 contemporary clinical isolates from US medical centers. Fosfomycin was active against Enterobacterales (MIC_50/90, 4/16 μg/mL), including multidrug-resistant isolates. Potent activity was exhibited against gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus (MIC_50/90, 4/8 μg/mL). Fosfomycin may provide a promising alternative option for treatment of infections where resistant bacteria may occur.

Clinical efficacy of fosfomycin combinations against a variety of gram-positive cocci

INTRODUCTION

Over recent years we have witnessed an increase in the resistance of microorganisms to the available antimicrobials and a decrease in the number of new antimicrobials. Fosfomycin is a safe and cheap broad-spectrum antibiotic which has shown very promising results in combination therapy, mainly against gram-negative microorganisms. Little is known, however, about its clinical efficacy against gram-positive microorganisms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with severe gram-positive infections who received fosfomycin as part of their treatment from 2011 to 2017. We also performed in vitro time-kill assays to study the behaviour of fosfomycin with different antimicrobials against two strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and two strains of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were treated with different fosfomycin combinations. Among them, 61 (81%) were successfully treated. Daptomycin plus fosfomycin was the most effective combination. Overall, the treatment with fosfomycin was safe, and side effects were minor. There was only one major side effect that resolved after discontinuation of therapy. Time-kill studies demonstrated increased activity of fosfomycin combinations, with daptomycin-fosfomycin being the most active combination against both MRSA and MSSA strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that antimicrobial combinations including fosfomycin are an alternative and effective approach for gram-positive infections.

Combatting resistant enterococcal infections: a pharmacotherapy review

INTRODUCTION

The role of enterococci in infectious diseases has evolved from a gut and urinary commensal to a major pathogen of concern. Few options exist for resistant enterococci, and appropriate use of the available agents is crucial.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors discuss antibiotics with clinically useful activity against Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. The article specifically discusses: antibiotics active against enterococci and their mechanism of resistance, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles, in vitro combinations, and clinical studies which focus on urinary tract, intra-abdominal, central nervous system, and bloodstream infections due to enterococci.

EXPERT OPINION

Aminopenicillins are preferred over all other agents when enterococci are susceptible and patients can tolerate them. Daptomycin and linezolid have demonstrated clinical efficacy against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Synergistic combinations are often warranted in complex infections of high inoculum and biofilms while monotherapies are generally appropriate for uncomplicated infections. Although active against resistant enterococci, the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of tigecycline and quinupristin/dalfopristin can problematical for severe infections. For cystitis, amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin are ideal. Recently, approved agents such as tedizolid and oritavancin have good in vitro activity against VRE but clinical studies against other resistant enterococci are lacking.

Analysis of the spectrum and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens in outpatients at a tertiary hospital

The objective of this study was to analyse the distribution and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial uropathogens isolated from outpatients at Henan Provincial People's Hospital. A total of 1419 samples from 823 newly diagnosed and 596 recurrent UTI outpatients culture positive. Escherichia coli was the most common uropathogen. Compared with the recurrent group, the newly diagnosed group had a higher isolation rate of E. coli and Enterobacter cloacae but a lower isolation rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Except for P. aeruginosa, the resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to most antibiotics was less than 30%. All Enterococcus and Staphylococcus spp. were sensitive to linezolid, vancomycin and teicoplanin. Both Gram-negative and -positive bacteria exhibited high susceptibility to fosfomycin. Uropathogens isolated from recurrent outpatients had higher resistance rates than did those isolated from newly diagnosed outpatients. Our study indicated that fosfomycin might be an excellent treatment option for outpatients with UTIs.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infection in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient: an overview of epidemiology, management, and prevention

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) is now one of the leading causes of nosocomial infections in the United States. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk of VRE colonization and infection. VRE has emerged as a major cause of bacteremia in this population, raising important clinical questions regarding the role and impact of VRE colonization and infection in HSCT outcomes as well as the optimal means of prevention and treatment. We review here the published literature and scientific advances addressing these thorny issues and provide a rational framework for their approach.

In vitro activity of linezolid alone and combined with other antibiotics against clinical enterococcal isolates

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance has led to research on finding new antimicrobial agents or identifying drug combinations with synergistic effects. Enterococcal infections, particularly those associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VREs), are therapeutic problems. Linezolid (LZD), an oxazolidinone antibiotic, shows good activity against Gram-positive bacteria including enterococci. To avoid the emergence of linezolid-resistant subpopulations and achieve enhanced activity or bactericidal effect, the use of combined therapy has been considered.

METHODS

The in vitro activity of LZD in combination with five different antibiotics was evaluated using a microdilution checkerboard method and time-kill study against 12 clinical enterococcus isolates.

RESULTS

With the checkerboard method, LZD plus doxycycline (DX) had the highest frequency among all synergistic combinations. This combination and the one of LZD plus ceftriaxone (CRO) were the most frequent effective combinations against VREs. Time-kill studies using selected synergistic combinations-LZD + DX and LZD + CRO-showed an indifferent interaction. One tested combination of LZD + rifampicin showed antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonistic interactions in combinations containing LZD are rare. LZD + DX and LZD + CRO may be beneficial in the treatment of VREs. However, more time-kill studies as well as in vivo experiments are required.

Identification of Novel Conjugative Plasmids with Multiple Copies of fosB that Confer High-Level Fosfomycin Resistance to Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

To further characterize the fosB-carrying plasmids of 19 vancomycin-resistant enterococci, the complete sequences of the fosB- and vanA-containing plasmids of Enterococcus faecium (pEMA120) and E. avium (pEA19081) were obtained by single-molecule, real-time sequencing. We found that these two plasmids are essentially identical (99.99% nucleotide sequence identity), which proved the possibility of interspecies transmission. Comparative analysis of the plasmids revealed that the backbone of pEMA120 is 99% similar to a conjugative fosB-negative E. faecium plasmid, pZB18. There is a traE disrupted in the transfer region of pEMA120, in comparison to pZB18 with an intact traE. The difference of their transfer frequencies between pEMA120 and pZB18 suggests this interruption of traE might affect conjugative transfer. Two copies of the fosB gene linked to a tnpA gene, forming an ISL3-like transposon, were found at separate locations within pEMA120, which had not been reported previously. These two fosB-carrying transposons were confirmed to form circular intermediates by inverse PCR. The hybridization of plasmid DNA digested by BsaI, having restriction site within the fosB sequence, demonstrated that the presence of multiple copies of fosB per plasmid is common. The total copy number of the fosB gene as revealed by qRT-PCR did not correlate with fosfomycin MICs or growth rates at sub-MICs of fosfomycin in different transconjugants. From susceptibility tests, the fosB gene, regardless of the copy number, conferred high fosfomycin MICs that ranged from 16384 to 65536 μg/ml. This first complete nucleotide sequence of a plasmid carrying two copies of fosB in VRE suggests that the fosB gene can transfer to multiple loci of plasmids by the ISL3 family transposase TnpA, possibly in the form of circular intermediates, leading to the dissemination of high fosfomycin resistance in VRE.

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Therapeutic Challenges in the 21st Century

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci are serious health threats due in part to their ability to persist in rugged environments and their propensity to acquire antibiotic resistance determinants. Enterococci have now established a home in our hospitals and possess mechanisms to defeat most currently available antimicrobials. This article reviews the history of the struggle with this pathogen, what is known about the traits associated with its rise in the modern medical environment, and the current understanding of therapeutic approaches in severe infections caused by these microorganisms. As the 21st century progresses, vancomycin-resistant enterococci continue to pose a daunting clinical challenge.

Fosfomycin tromethamine for the Treatment of Cystitis in Abdominal Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Renal Dysfunction

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) after abdominal solid organ transplantation (SOT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Fosfomycin tromethamine (FOS), a uroselective antibiotic, is FDA approved for uncomplicated UTIs in women and is used off-label for complicated UTIs and prostatitis in men. Literature supporting the use of FOS in the SOT population is limited, and efficacy is questioned in the setting of renal dysfunction. Objective: To evaluate the success of FOS for the treatment of cystitis in SOT patients with renal dysfunction. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study using medical records. SOT recipients receiving at least 1 dose of FOS for treatment of cystitis between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2015, were included. Treatment outcomes were analyzed with respect to renal function. Results: A total of 76 courses of FOS were identified in 64 patients. The renal dysfunction arm (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 40 mL/min) included 33 patients with 39 FOS courses; the normal renal function arm (CrCl ≥ 40 mL/min) included 31 patients with 37 FOS courses. Mean CrCl was 23.3 ± 9.7 mL/min for the renal-dysfunction group and 65 ± 29.3 mL/min for the normal renal function group ( P < 0.01). No significant difference in treatment success was noted between CrCl <40 mL/min and CrCl ≥40 mL/min (31 [80%] vs 34 [92%], P = 0.12) in a unilateral analysis. After adjusting for confounders in a multivariable analysis, there was no difference in the risk of failure between CrCl <40 mL/min and CrCl ≥40 mL/min groups ( P = 0.70). Conclusion: FOS appears to be successful for the treatment of cystitis in SOT recipients in the setting of renal dysfunction.

Role of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Infections: Review of the Current Evidence

Enterococcus species are the second most common cause of nosocomial infections in the United States and are particularly concerning in critically ill patients with preexisting comorbid conditions. Rising resistance to antimicrobials that were historically used as front-line agents for treatment of enterococcal infections, such as ampicillin, vancomycin, and aminoglycosides, further complicates the treatment of these infections. Of particular concern are Enterococcus faecium strains that are associated with the highest rate of vancomycin resistance. The introduction of antimicrobial agents with specific activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) faecium including daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and tigecycline did not completely resolve this clinical dilemma. In this review, the mechanisms of action and resistance to currently available anti-VRE antimicrobial agents including newer agents such as oritavancin and dalbavancin will be presented. In addition, novel combination therapies including β-lactams and fosfomycin, and the promising results from in vitro, animal studies, and clinical experience in the treatment of VRE faecium will be discussed.

Cefazolin and Ertapenem, a Synergistic Combination Used To Clear Persistent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Ertapenem and cefazolin were used in combination to successfully clear refractory methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. In addition, recent work has demonstrated activity of combination therapy with beta-lactams from different classes against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The ertapenem-plus-cefazolin combination was evaluated for synergy in vitro and in vivo in a murine skin infection model using an index MSSA bloodstream isolate from a patient in whom persistent bacteremia was cleared with this combination and against a cadre of well-described research strains and clinical strains of MSSA and MRSA. Against the index MSSA bloodstream isolate, ertapenem and cefazolin showed synergy using both checkerboard (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] index = 0.375) and time-kill assays. Using a disk diffusion ertapenem potentiation assay, the MSSA isolate showed a cefazolin disk zone increased from 34 to 40 mm. In vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling at clinically relevant drug concentrations demonstrated bactericidal activity (>3 log₁₀-CFU/ml reduction) of the combination but bacteriostatic activity of ether drug alone at 48 h. A disk diffusion potentiation assay showed that ertapenem increased the cefazolin zone of inhibition by >3 mm for 34/35 (97%) MSSA and 10/15 (67%) MRSA strains. A murine skin infection model of MSSA showed enhanced activity of cefazolin plus ertapenem compared to monotherapy with these agents. After successful use in clearance of MSSA bacteremia, the combination of ertapenem and cefazolin showed synergy against MSSA in vitro and in vivo. This combination may warrant consideration for future clinical study in MSSA bacteremia.

Fosfomycin

The treatment of bacterial infections suffers from two major problems: spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens and lack of development of new antibiotics active against such MDR and XDR bacteria. As a result, physicians have turned to older antibiotics, such as polymyxins, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides. Lately, due to development of resistance to these agents, fosfomycin has gained attention, as it has remained active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative MDR and XDR bacteria. New data of higher quality have become available, and several issues were clarified further. In this review, we summarize the available fosfomycin data regarding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, the in vitro activity against susceptible and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, mechanisms of resistance and development of resistance during treatment, synergy and antagonism with other antibiotics, clinical effectiveness, and adverse events. Issues that need to be studied further are also discussed.

Fosfomycin Enhances the Activity of Daptomycin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model

Daptomycin (DAP) is being used more frequently to treat infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE). DAP tends to be less active against enterococci than staphylococci and may require high doses or combination therapy to be bactericidal. Fosfomycin (FOF) has activity against VRE and has demonstrated synergistic bactericidal activity with DAP in vitro The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of DAP alone and in combination with FOF against VRE in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. The activity of DAP at 8 and 12 mg/kg of body weight/day (DAP 8 and DAP 12, respectively) and FOF of 40 mg/kg intravenously every 8 h, alone and in combination, were evaluated against 2 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains (8019 and 5938) and 2 vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strains (V583 and R7302) in an in vitro PK/PD model over 72 h. Cell surface charge in the presence and absence of FOF was evaluated by zeta potential analysis. Daptomycin-boron-dipyrromethene (bodipy) binding was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. The addition of FOF to DAP 8 and DAP 12 resulted in significantly increased killing over DAP alone at 72 h for 8019, V583, and R7302 (P < 0.05). Therapeutic enhancement was observed with DAP 12 plus FOF against 8019, V583, and R7302. Cell surface charge became more negative after exposure to FOF by ∼2 to 8mV in all 4 strains. Daptomycin-bodipy binding increased by 2.6 times in the presence of fosfomycin (P < 0.0001). The combination of DAP plus FOF may provide improved killing against VRE (including DAP-resistant strains) through modulation of cell surface charge. Further studies to clarify the role of intravenous FOF are warranted.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci with reduced daptomycin susceptibility in Singapore: prevalence and associated factors

Prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and use of daptomycin are increasing in Asia. To determine the prevalence of daptomycin non-susceptible enterococci (DNSE) and understand factors associated with reduced daptomycin susceptibility in VRE, we conducted a case-control study in a 1600-bed adult tertiary hospital in Singapore. All VRE isolates from inpatients in 2012 were tested for daptomycin susceptibility. Patients with VRE isolates of daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ⩾3 µg/ml were classified as daptomycin-reduced susceptible VRE (DRS-VRE) and those with daptomycin MIC 4 µg/ml (DNSE). About half (135, 55%) had reduced susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC 3-4 µg/ml). None in the DS-VRE group had prior exposure to daptomycin. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidity, hospitalization duration, surgical history, indwelling device use, and duration of antibiotic exposure in the prior 3 months, >1 movement between wards [odds ratio (OR) 0·35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·16-0·74, P = 0·006] and minocycline resistance (OR 0·45, 95% CI 0·25-0·84, P = 0·011) were independently associated with DRS-VRE. Our study suggests that daptomycin exposure, >1 movement between wards, and resistance to minocycline, were associated with reduced daptomycin susceptibility in VRE.