Inoculum effect on the efficacies of amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in an experimental murine sepsis model

Purine and pyrimidine synthesis differently affect the strength of the inoculum effect for aminoglycoside and β-lactam antibiotics

The inoculum effect has been observed for nearly all antibiotics and bacterial species. However, explanations accounting for its occurrence and strength are lacking. We previously found that growth productivity, which captures the relationship between [ATP] and growth, can account for the strength of the inoculum effect for bactericidal antibiotics. However, the molecular pathway(s) underlying this relationship, and therefore determining the inoculum effect, remain undiscovered. We show that nucleotide synthesis can determine the relationship between [ATP] and growth, and thus the strength of inoculum effect in an antibiotic class-dependent manner. Specifically, and separate from activity through the tricarboxylic acid cycle, we find that transcriptional activity of genes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis can predict the strength of the inoculum effect for β-lactam and aminoglycosides antibiotics, respectively. Our work highlights the antibiotic class-specific effect of purine and pyrimidine synthesis on the severity of the inoculum effect and paves the way for intervention strategies to reduce the inoculum effect in the clinic.

Inoculum effect of CTX-M-15, OXA-48, and KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae on meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy

The inoculum effect, characterized by diminished antibacterial activity at high bacterial inocula, is studied in the context of beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. The inhibition of ESBL + OXA-48 and KPC enzymes, in combination with ceftazidime, demonstrates encouraging results. In this study, 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested with different inocula (1-5 × 105 and 1-5 × 107 cfu/ml) using broth microdilution methods. The inoculum effect was observed in meropenem against OXA-48 + CTX-M-15- and KPC-2-producing isolates but not with ceftazidime/avibactam. Notably, meropenem exhibited inoculum effect against carbapenemase-producing strains, whereas ceftazidime-avibactam remained effective. We conclude that ceftazidime-avibactam is recommended for high-inoculum infections.

Pharmacodynamics of Doripenem Alone and in Combination with Relebactam in an In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Dynamic Model: Emergence of Resistance of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and the Inoculum Effect

The emergence of bacteria resistant to beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations is insufficiently studied, wherein the role of the inoculum effect (IE) in decreased efficacy is unclear. To address these issues, 5-day treatments with doripenem and doripenem/relebactam combination at different ratios of the agents were simulated in a hollow-fiber dynamic model against carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae at standard and high inocula. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of doripenem alone and in the presence of relebactam at two inocula were determined. Combination MICs were tested using traditional (fixed relebactam concentration) and pharmacokinetic-based approach (fixed doripenem-to-relebactam concentration ratio equal to the therapeutic 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio). In all experiments, resistant subpopulations were noted, but combined simulations reduced their numbers. With doripenem, the IE was apparent for both K. pneumoniae isolates in combined treatments for one strain. The pharmacokinetic-based approach to combination MIC estimation compared to traditional showed stronger correlation between DOSE/MIC and emergence of resistance. These results support (1) the constraint of relebactam combined with doripenem against the emergence of resistance and IE; (2) the applicability of a pharmacokinetic-based approach to estimate carbapenem MICs in the presence of an inhibitor to predict the IE and to describe the patterns of resistance occurrence.

Re-evaluation of FDA-approved antibiotics with increased diagnostic accuracy for assessment of antimicrobial resistance

Accurate assessment of antibiotic susceptibility is critical for treatment of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) infections. Here, we examine whether antimicrobial susceptibility testing in media more physiologically representative of in vivo conditions improves prediction of clinical outcome relative to standard bacteriologic medium. This analysis reveals that ∼15% of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained in physiologic media predicted a change in susceptibility that crossed a clinical breakpoint used to categorize patient isolates as susceptible or resistant. The activities of antibiotics having discrepant results in different media were evaluated in murine sepsis models. Testing in cell culture medium improves the accuracy by which MIC assays predict in vivo efficacy. This analysis identifies several antibiotics for treatment of AMR infections that standard testing failed to identify and those that are ineffective despite indicated use by standard testing. Methods with increased diagnostic accuracy mitigate the AMR crisis via utilizing existing agents and optimizing drug discovery.

Meropenem MICs at Standard and High Inocula and Mutant Prevention Concentration Inter-Relations: Comparative Study with Non-Carbapenemase-Producing and OXA-48-, KPC- and NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is conventionally used to define in vitro levels of susceptibility or resistance of a specific bacterial strain to an antibiotic and to predict its clinical efficacy. Along with MIC, other measures of bacteria resistance exist: the MIC determined at high bacterial inocula (MIC_HI) that allow the estimation of the occurrence of inoculum effect (IE) and the mutant prevention concentration, MPC. Together, MIC, MIC_HI and MPC represent the bacterial "resistance profile". In this paper, we provide a comprehensive analysis of such profiles of K. pneumoniae strains that differ by meropenem susceptibility, ability to produce carbapenemases and specific carbapenemase types. In addition, we have analyzed inter-relations between the MIC, MIC_HI and MPC for each tested K. pneumoniae strain. Low IE probability was detected with carbapenemase-non-producing K. pneumoniae, and high IE probability was detected with those that were carbapenemase-producing. MICs did not correlate with the MPCs; significant correlation was observed between the MIC_HIs and the MPCs, indicating that these bacteria/antibiotic characteristics display similar resistance properties of a given bacterial strain. To determine the possible resistance-related risk due to a given K. pneumoniae strain, we propose determining the MIC_HI. This can more or less predict the MPC value of the particular strain.

The threat of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative respiratory infections: another pandemic

Antibiotic resistance is recognised as a global threat to human health by national healthcare agencies, governments and medical societies, as well as the World Health Organization. Increasing resistance to available antimicrobial agents is of concern for bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic pathogens. One of the greatest concerns is the continuing escalation of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative bacteria resulting in the endemic presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extremely drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens. This concern is heightened by the identification of such MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria in water and food sources, as colonisers of the intestine and other locations in both hospitalised patients and individuals in the community, and as agents of all types of infections. Pneumonia and other types of respiratory infections are among the most common infections caused by MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria and are associated with high rates of mortality. Future concerns are already heightened due to emergence of resistance to all existing antimicrobial agents developed in the past decade to treat MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria and a scarcity of novel agents in the developmental pipeline. This clinical scenario increases the likelihood of a future pandemic caused by MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Evaluation of the inoculum effect of new antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales

OBJECTIVES

New antibiotics have been developed to treat multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. We evaluated the impact of the inoculum size on minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of recently commercialized antibiotics.

METHODS

We focused on 40 clinical carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and evaluated the impact of the inoculum size on the MICs to cefiderocol and to new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam) at usual and high inocula (105 and 107 CFU/mL, respectively).

RESULTS

At usual inoculum, 15% were resistant to cefiderocol (n = 6), 30% to meropenem-vaborbactam (n = 12), 42.5% to ceftazidime-avibactam (n = 17), 55% to imipenem-relebactam (n = 22), and 90% to ceftolozane-tazobactam (n = 36). At higher inoculum, a switch from susceptible to resistant category was observed for 88% (n = 30/34; CI, 71.6-96.2), 75% (n = 3/4; CI, 21.9-98.7), 72% (n = 13/18; CI, 46.4-89.3), 50% (n = 14/28; CI, 31.1-68.9), and 8.7% (n = 2/23; CI, 1.5-29.5) isolates regarding cefiderocol, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam were the most efficient against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales at usual inoculum. When increasing inoculum to 107 CFU/mL, all of the molecules were impacted, particularly cefiderocol and imipenem-relebactam, while others, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, remain mildly affected. Our in vitro results deserved to be confirmed in vivo.

New antimicrobial treatment options for severe Gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will provide rationale for the development of new antibiotics to treat severe or multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections. It will also provide an overview of recently approved and pipeline antibiotics for severe/MDR Gram-negative infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

MDR Gram-negative infections are recognized as critical threats by global and national organizations and carry a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Increasing antibiotic resistance amongst Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii , extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , with difficult-to-treat-resistance has made both empiric and definitive treatment of these infections increasingly problematic. In recent years, several antibiotics have been approved for treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections and ongoing clinical trials are poised to provide additional options to clinicians' armamentarium. These agents include various β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, eravacycline, plazomicin and cefiderocol.

SUMMARY

Severe/MDR Gram-negative infections continue to be important infections due to their impact on patient outcomes, especially in critically ill and immunocompromised hosts. The availability of new antibiotics offers an opportunity to improve empiric and definitive treatment of these infections.

Comparison of the Treatment Outcome of Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Carbapenems for Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Areas with Low Frequency of Coproduction of OXA-1: a Preliminary Analysis

Although piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) was shown to be less effective than carbapenems in treating bacteremia due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL)-producing organisms in a randomized controlled trial, the fact that many of the causative organisms co-produced inhibitor-resistant OXA-1 along with ESBLs may have influenced the results. In this study, we compared the therapeutic effectiveness of TZP and carbapenem in treating ESBL-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia in areas with low frequency of OXA-1 co-production. Forty patients, 14 in the TZP treatment group and 26 in the carbapenem treatment group, were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient background between the two groups. Urinary tract infection or cholangitis was the source of bacteremia in 26 patients (65%), and the Pitt bacteremia score was zero or one in 35 patients (87.5%). Only four (11.4%) of the 35 causative isolates available for microbiological analysis harbored bla_OXA-1, and only three (8.6%) were non-susceptible to TZP. Seventeen (48.6%) isolates carried bla_CTX-M-27, none of which carried other β-lactamase genes. No significant difference in the frequency of treatment failure on day 14 of bacteremia was documented between the TZP and carbapenem treatment groups in both the crude analysis and the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis. This study demonstrates that TZP may be a treatment option for non-severe cases of ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia in areas with low frequency of OXA-1 co-production. IMPORTANCE Although carbapenems are considered the drug of choice for severe infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL)-producing organisms, other therapeutic options are being explored to avoid increasing the selective pressure for carbapenem-resistant organisms. In this study, it was suggested that piperacillin-tazobactam may be as effective as carbapenems for the treatment of mild bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in areas where OXA-1 co-production by ESBL-producing E. coli is rare. The genetic background of each regional epidemic clone differs even among multidrug-resistant bacteria classified under the same name (e.g., ESBL-producing organisms), resulting in possible differences in the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Exploration of treatment options for multidrug-resistant organisms according to local epidemiology is worthwhile from the perspective of antimicrobial stewardship.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model

BACKGROUND

Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

METHODS

E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days.

RESULTS

Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing versus non-producing Escherichia coli in a hollow-fibre infection model

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is a global public health concern. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens against ESBL-producing versus non-producing E. coli. E. coli clinical isolates were obtained from Bangladesh. Broth microdilution and WGS were performed on the 5 studied isolates. Three piperacillin/tazobactam susceptible ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam regimens (4.5 g, every 6 h and 4.5 g, every 8 h, as 30 min infusion) in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. The extent of bacterial killing was ∼4-5 log₁₀ CFU/mL against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli with piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h regimens over the first 8 h. Bacterial killing was similar between two of three ESBL-producing (CTAP#168, CTAP169) and two non-ESBL-producing (CTAP#179, CTAP#180) E. coli over the experiment. ESBL-producing CTAP#173 E. coli was poorly killed (∼1 log) compared to two non-ESBL-producing E. coli over 168 h. WGS revealed, ESBL-producing E. coli isolates co-harboured multiple antibiotic resistance genes such as bla_CTX-M-15, bla_EC, bla_OXA-1, bla_TEM-1, aac(6')-Ib-cr5. Overall, piperacillin/tazobactam, every 6 h and every 8 h dosing regimens attained >3 log bacterial kill against all ESBL-producing or non-ESBL-producing E. coli within 24 h, maintained and prevented emergence of resistance over the end of experiment. To conclude, piperacillin/tazobactam standard regimens resulted in similar bacterial killing and prevented emergence of resistance against bla_CTX-M-15 type ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

In Vitro Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam at Different Inoculum Sizes of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Blood Isolates

β-lactam–avibactam combinations have been proposed as carbapenem-sparing therapies, but little data exist on their in vitro activities in infections with high bacterial inocula. We investigated the in vitro efficacies and the inoculum effects of ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Enterobacterales blood isolates. A total of 228 non-repetitive extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates were prospectively collected in a tertiary center. In vitro susceptibilities to ceftazidime, aztreonam, meropenem, ceftazidime–avibactam, and aztreonam–avibactam were evaluated by broth microdilution method using standard and high inocula. An inoculum effect was defined as an eightfold or greater increase in MIC when tested with the high inoculum. Of the 228 isolates, 99% were susceptible to ceftazidime–avibactam and 99% had low aztreonam–avibactam MICs (≤8 mg/L). Ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam exhibited good in vitro activities; MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ values were 0.5/2 mg/L, 0.125/0.5 mg/L, and ≤0.03/0.25 mg/L, respectively, and aztreonam–avibactam was more active than ceftazidime–avibactam. The frequencies of the inoculum effect with ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam were lower than with meropenem (14% vs. 38%, p < 0.001 and 30% vs. 38%, p = 0.03, respectively). The β-lactam-avibactam combinations could be useful as carbapenem-sparing strategies, and aztreonam–avibactam has the better in vitro activity but is more subject to the inoculum effect than ceftazidime–avibactam.

Comparison of therapy with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems for bacteraemia of nonurinary source caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae has become a public health concern. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with nonurinary source bacteraemia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-producing EK) receiving β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) versus carbapenem treatment and assess the risk factors of mortality with these two drugs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of adult hospitalised patients with ESBL-producing EK bloodstream infection (BSI) from nonurinary source at our centre over a 4-year period. One hundred and eighty patients who received BLICs or carbapenems were included in the analysis. The outcome variables were 14-day treatment failure and 30-day mortality. For more reliable results, propensity score analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs and analyse their risk factors for 30-day mortality.

Results

Out of 180 patients, 114 received BLICs, and 66 received carbapenem therapy. Compared to carbapenem-treated patients, those treated with BLICs were older and had higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, but they had shorter stay in the hospital. Additionally, their Pitt bacteraemia score, SOFA score, rate of leukaemia, and immune compromise were lower. After propensity score matching (PSM), the baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups were balanced. BLICs were associated with a higher 14-day treatment failure rate (20.6%, 13/63) than carbapenems (16.3%, 7/43), although the difference was not significant in either univariate analysis (P = 0.429) or multivariate analysis (P = 0.122). And the 30-day mortality rate in BTG (11.1%, 7/63) and CTG (11.6%, 5/43) did not significantly differ (univariate analysis, P = 0.926; multivariate analysis, P = 0.420). In the multivariate analysis, after PSM, leukaemia was the only independent predictor of mortality in both BTG and CTG.

Conclusions

Our study showed that BLICs had higher 14-day treatment failure rate compared with carbapenems, although there were no statistically significant differences because of the small number of patients, therefore, further evaluation of the efficacy of BLICs is needed.

Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.

Single-dose amikacin plus 7 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate to treat acute cystitis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Treatment options for urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms are limited other than carbapenem. Accordingly, clinicians should investigate alternative antimicrobial options for limited infection. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of single-dose amikacin and a 7-day oral regimen of amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute cystitis caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-dose amikacin and 7-day oral amoxicillin/clavulanate regimen was given to all patients with acute cystitis or recurrent cystitis between May 2016 and October 2018. We conducted a retrospective cohort study assessing the efficacy of this regimen for the treatment of UTI due to ESBL-producing organisms. Both clinical and laboratory efficacy were assessed a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days after the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were enrolled in this study. E. coli and K. pneumoniae were isolated in 44 patients (93.6%) and 3 patients (6.4%), respectively. Of the 47 enrolled, 39 patients (83.0%) showed sterile culture results on follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (78.7%) showed improvement of symptoms. Of 8 patients who showed bacterial persistence, 4 patients showed ESBL-producing E. coli, whereas 4 patients showed non-ESBL E. coli on follow-up cultures. During follow-up, 12 patients experienced the recurrence of acute cystitis with a median recurrence period of 2.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of amoxicillin/clavulanate and amikacin may be an alternative to carbapenem treatment in patients with acute cystitis caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics

The phenomenon of attenuated antibacterial activity at inocula above those utilized for susceptibility testing is referred to as the inoculum effect. Although the inoculum effect has been reported for several decades, it is currently debatable whether the inoculum effect is clinically significant. The aim of the present review was to consolidate currently available evidence to summarize which β-lactam drug classes demonstrate an inoculum effect against specific bacterial pathogens. Review of the literature showed that the majority of studies that evaluated the inoculum effect of β-lactams were in vitro investigations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus. Across all five pathogens, cephalosporins consistently displayed observable inoculum effects in vitro, whereas carbapenems were less susceptible to an inoculum effect. A handful of animal studies were available that validated that the in vitro inoculum effect translates into attenuated pharmacodynamics of β-lactams in vivo. Only a few clinical investigations were available and suggested that an in vitro inoculum effect of cefazolin against MSSA may correspond to an increased likeliness of adverse clinical outcomes in patients receiving cefazolin for bacteraemia. The presence of β-lactamase enzymes was the primary mechanism responsible for an inoculum effect, but the observation of an inoculum effect in multiple pathogens lacking β-lactamase enzymes indicates that there are likely multiple mechanisms that may result in an inoculum effect. Further clinical studies are needed to better define whether interventions made in the clinic in response to organisms displaying an in vitro inoculum effect will optimize clinical outcomes.

Optimizing therapy of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are usually regarded as the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of serious ESBL infections. However, because of the alarming emergence or carbapenem resistance, interest in effective alternatives has emerged. The present review summarizes the findings published on the antibiotics currently available for treatment of patients with an ESBL-E bloodstream infection (BSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

Meropenem and imipenem are the drugs recommended for treatment of ESBL BSIs in critically ill patients, and in infections with high bacterial loads or elevated β-lactam minimum inhibitory concentrations. Ertapenem should be reserved for patients with less severe presentations, and should be used at high doses. In milder presentations or BSIs from low-risk sources, other carbapenem-sparing alternatives could be considered: cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, and particularly a β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combination (particularly piperacillin/tazobactam). Optimized dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended (high doses and extended infusion). There are few data on the use of the promising newly available drugs (e.g. ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin), and it seems reasonable to reserve them as last-resort drugs.

SUMMARY

Carbapenems should be used in patients with serious infections; alternatives could be used individually, particularly for definitive treatment of patients with milder presentations.

Effective Oral Combination Treatment for Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli

Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is increasing worldwide. The drugs of choice for treatment of ESBLs are parenteral carbapenems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a new combination of oral cephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanate in treatment of ESBL-EC. Methods: A total of 150 ESBL-EC samples were collected over 1 year from two referral centers. Synergistic studies of cephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanate were performed in vitro using disk approximation and disk replacement methods. Combination treatment was assessed in vivo on 20 ESBL-EC urinary tract infection (UTI) patients. Results: ESBL-EC isolates were confirmed in 150 patients with a mean age of 46.67 years, 75.2% of them being women. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolates indicated high resistance rate to oral antibiotics. The frequency of positive synergy and mean distance of synergy between cephalosporins and amoxicillin/clavulanate was significantly higher with cefotaxime and cefixime compared with cefpodoxime, cefdinir, and ceftazidime using disk approximation and disk replacement methods (p < 0.05). Addition of amoxicillin/clavulanate enhanced the susceptibility rate with cefixime from 8.6% to 86.3%, significantly higher than with other cephalosporins (p < 0.0005). Cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate synergy was not affected by age, gender, hospital, department, sample type, or bacterial load. Eighteen of 20 ESBL-EC-positive UTI patients had a positive in vitro synergy test and complete clinical and microbiological resolution after completion of cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate oral treatment course. Conclusions: Cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanate combination therapy could be an effective oral outpatient treatment option for ESBL-EC. In vitro synergistic testing is simple and predictive of successful treatment.

Current options for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different groups of patients

BACKGROUND

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are a frequent cause of invasive infections worldwide. Carbapenems are nowadays the most used drugs to treat these infections. However, due to the increasing rates of resistance to these antimicrobials, carbapenem-sparing alternatives are being investigated.

OBJECTIVES AND SOURCES

The aim of this narrative literature review is to summarize the published information on the currently available antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL-E infections, providing specific information on three subgroups of patients: Group 1, patients with severe infections or infections from high-risk sources or in severely immunocompromised patients; Group 2, patients with non-severe infections from intermediate-risk source; and Group 3, patients with non-severe urinary tract infection.

CONTENT AND IMPLICATIONS

For patients in Group 1, the current data would support the use of carbapenems. For milder infections, however, particularly urinary tract infections, other non-carbapenem antibiotics can be considered in selected cases, including beta-lactam/beta-lactam inhibitor combinations, cephamycins, temocillin and aminoglycosides. While specific studies should be performed in these situations, individualized decisions may be taken in order to avoid overuse of carbapenems.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.

Inoculum effect of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus against broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics

Scarce information concerning the inoculum effect (InE) of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) against broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics is available. We investigated the InE of MSSA against ceftriaxone, cefepime, meropenem, ampicillin/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam. The bacteraemic MSSA isolates were collected at ten Korean general hospitals from Sep 2013 to Mar 2015. The InE was defined if MICs of antibiotics at high inoculum (HI, ~5 × 10⁷ CFU/ml) increased beyond the susceptible range compared to those at standard inoculum (SI, ~5 × 10⁵ CFU/ml). All isolates were sequenced for blaZ gene typing. Among 302 MSSA isolates, 254 (84.1%) were positive for blaZ; types A, B, C and D were 13.6%, 26.8%, 43.4% and 0.3%, respectively. Mean HI MICs of all tested antibiotics were significantly increased and increases in HI MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam (HI, 48.14 ± 4.08 vs. SI, 2.04 ± 0.08 mg/L, p < 0.001) and ampicillin/sulbactam (HI, 24.15 ± 1.27 vs. SI, 2.79 ± 0.11 mg/L, p < 0.001) were most prominent. No MSSA isolates exhibited meropenem InE, and few isolates exhibited cefepime (0.3%) and ceftriaxone (2.3%) InE, whereas 43.0% and 65.9% of MSSA isolates exhibited piperacillin/tazobactam and ampicillin/sulbactam InE, respectively. About 93% of type C blaZ versus 45% of non-type C exhibited ampicillin/sulbactam InE (p < 0.001) and 88% of type C blaZ versus 9% of non-type C exhibited piperacillin/tazobactam InE (p < 0.001). A large proportion of MSSA clinical isolates, especially those positive for type C blaZ, showed marked ampicillin/sulbactam InE and piperacillin/tazobactam.

The Inoculum Effect in the Era of Multidrug Resistance: Minor Differences in Inoculum Have Dramatic Effect on MIC Determination

The observed MIC may depend on the number of bacteria initially inoculated into the assay. This phenomenon is termed the inoculum effect (IE) and is often most pronounced for β-lactams in strains expressing β-lactamase enzymes. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-recommended inoculum is 5 × 10⁵ CFU ml^-1 with an acceptable range of 2 × 10⁵ to 8 × 10⁵ CFU ml^-1 IE testing is typically performed using an inoculum 100-fold greater than the CLSI-recommended inoculum. Therefore, it remains unknown whether the IE influences MICs during testing performed according to CLSI guidelines. Here, we utilized inkjet printing technology to test the IE on cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam. First, we determined that the inkjet dispense volume correlated well with the number of bacteria delivered to microwells in 2-fold (R² = 0.99) or 1.1-fold (R² = 0.98) serial dilutions. We then quantified the IE by dispensing orthogonal titrations of bacterial cells and antibiotics. For cefepime-resistant and susceptible dose-dependent strains, a 2-fold increase in inoculum resulted in a 1.6 log₂-fold increase in MIC. For carbapenemase-producing strains, each 2-fold reduction in inoculum resulted in a 1.26 log₂-fold reduction in meropenem MIC. At the lower end of the CLSI-allowable inoculum range, minor error rates of 34.8% were observed for meropenem when testing a resistant-strain set. Ceftazidime-avibactam was not subject to an appreciable IE. Our results suggest that IE is sufficiently pronounced for meropenem and cefepime in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens to affect categorical interpretations during standard laboratory testing.

In Vivo Efficacy of Plazomicin Alone or in Combination with Meropenem or Tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Exhibiting Various Resistance Mechanisms in an Immunocompetent Murine Septicemia Model

Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside with potent in vitro activity against multidrug- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of plazomicin exposure, alone and in combination with meropenem or tigecycline, against Enterobacteriaceae in the immunocompetent murine septicemia model. ICR mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with bacterial suspensions. Eight Enterobacteriaceae isolates with wide ranges of plazomicin, meropenem, and tigecycline MICs were utilized. Treatment mice were administered plazomicin, meropenem, or tigecycline human-equivalent doses alone or in combinations of plazomicin-meropenem and plazomicin-tigecycline. Treatments were initiated at 1 h postinfection and continued for 24 h. Efficacy was assessed by determination of mouse survival through 96 h. Compared with the survival of the controls, plazomicin monotherapy produced a significant improvement in survival for all mice infected with the isolates (P < 0.05) and resulted in overall survival rates of 86% (n = 50) and 53.3% (n = 30) for mice infected with isolates with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 and ≥8 mg/liter, respectively (P < 0.05). The survival of the meropenem and tigecycline groups correlated well with susceptibilities of their respective isolates, with incremental increases in survival being observed at lower MIC values. For mice infected with isolate Klebsiella pneumoniae 561 (plazomicin, meropenem, and tigecycline MICs, 8, >32, and 2 mg/liter, respectively), combination therapies showed a significant reduction in mortality compared with that achieved with any monotherapy (P < 0.05). Plazomicin monotherapy resulted in improved survival in the immunocompetent murine septicemia model, notably, for mice infected with isolates with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 mg/liter. As evidenced by our current data, coadministration of meropenem or tigecycline could potentially lead to a further improvement in survival. These data support a role for plazomicin in the management of septicemia due to Enterobacteriaceae with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 mg/liter, including carbapenem-resistant isolates.

Point-Counterpoint: Piperacillin-Tazobactam Should Be Used To Treat Infections with Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-Positive Organisms

INTRODUCTIONBeta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antimicrobials (BLBLIs) are among the most controversial classes of antibiotic agents available for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria (ESBL-GNR). Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most frequently utilized antibiotic agents for empirical Gram-negative bacterial coverage and remains active against a large proportion of ESBL-GNR strains. Furthermore, good antimicrobial stewardship practices encourage the use of carbapenem-sparing treatment regimens for infections due to ESBL-GNR. As rapid diagnostics are increasingly used in the clinical microbiology laboratory and have the capability of detecting CTX-M type or other ESBL resistance mechanisms, this issue continues to be pertinent. Some data imply reduced efficacy of PTZ against ESBLs. Several factors may affect a clinician's choice to use BLBLIs, including the isolate's MIC, the site and severity of infection, and the type of resistance mechanism. These factors are explored in this review of the pros and cons of BLBLI treatment of invasive infections due to ESBL-producing bacteria, as well as how laboratories should report results for BLBLIs for these organisms as they relate to antimicrobial stewardship. In this Point-Counterpoint, Audrey Schuetz provides the pro point of view and Sergio Reyes and Pranita Tamma provide the con, counterpoint view.

Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Therapy of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDR-E) is challenging, and some of the few active drugs are not available in many countries. For extended-spectrum β-lactamase and AmpC producers, carbapenems are the drugs of choice, but alternatives are needed because the rate of carbapenem resistance is rising. Potential active drugs include classic and newer β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephamycins, temocillin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and, rarely, fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. These drugs might be considered in some specific situations. AmpC producers are resistant to cephamycins, but cefepime is an option. In the case of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), only some "second-line" drugs, such as polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin, may be active; double carbapenems can also be considered in specific situations. Combination therapy is associated with better outcomes for high-risk patients, such as those in septic shock or with pneumonia. Ceftazidime-avibactam was recently approved and is active against KPC and OXA-48 producers; the available experience is scarce but promising, although development of resistance is a concern. New drugs active against some CPE isolates are in different stages of development, including meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, cefiderocol, eravacycline, and aztreonam-avibactam. Overall, therapy of MDR-E infection must be individualized according to the susceptibility profile, type, and severity of infection and the features of the patient.

Management of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: current evidence and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

The spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae has become a major public health threat worldwide. Area covered: A thorough systematic literature review describing the current evidence and future prospects of therapeutic options for infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Expert commentary: The methods of detecting ESBLs have been evolving. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing lowered the MIC breakpoints of cephalosporins against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in 2010. Phenotypic testing for ESBLs is no longer recommended. Instead, the selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents largely depends on the report of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). To date, therapeutic options for these multidrug-resistant organisms remain limited. The clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime on in vitro-susceptible ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae remains a concern. Many studies found an in vitro-in vivo discordance based on current breakpoints. Carbapenems are the most reliable antibiotics for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. However, their overuse has led to a serious problem of increasing drug resistance. Recently, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam have been approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The introduction of these new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations offers new carbapenem-sparing options for the treatment of ESBL infections.

Escherichia coli: an old friend with new tidings

Escherichia coli is one of the most-studied microorganisms worldwide but its characteristics are continually changing. Extraintestinal E. coli infections, such as urinary tract infections and neonatal sepsis, represent a huge public health problem. They are caused mainly by specialized extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strains that can innocuously colonize human hosts but can also cause disease upon entering a normally sterile body site. The virulence capability of such strains is determined by a combination of distinctive accessory traits, called virulence factors, in conjunction with their distinctive phylogenetic background. It is conceivable that by developing interventions against the most successful ExPEC lineages or their key virulence/colonization factors the associated burden of disease and health care costs could foreseeably be reduced in the future. On the other hand, one important problem worldwide is the increase of antimicrobial resistance shown by bacteria. As underscored in the last WHO global report, within a wide range of infectious agents including E. coli, antimicrobial resistance has reached an extremely worrisome situation that ‘threatens the achievements of modern medicine’. In the present review, an update of the knowledge about the pathogenicity, antimicrobial resistance and clinical aspects of this ‘old friend’ was presented.

The impact of inoculum size on the activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against multidrug resistant organisms

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the in vitro activity of cefoperazone alone and different cefoperazone-sulbactam ratios against different inoculum sizes of multidrug resistant organisms.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefoperazone, cefoperazone-sulbactam at fixed ratio of 1:1 and 2:1 against a normal inoculum size of 5 × 10⁵ CFU/ml and a high inoculum size of 5 × 10⁷ CFU/ml were measured.

RESULTS

Each 33 isolates of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a total of 122 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were collected. After the addition of sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio, most MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values decreased. Cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio had a higher susceptibility rate against ESBL-producing E. coli, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii than cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 2:1 ratio (all P < 0.05). For ESBL-producing E. coli, the susceptibility rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam at ratios of (1:1) and (2:1) decreased from 97.0 to 87.9% and 90.9 to 60.6%, for normal to high inoculum, respectively. For ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, both susceptibility rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam at ratios of (1:1) and (2:1) decreased from 75.8%, and 63.6% at normal inoculum to 51.5% and 42.4% at high inoculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio has greater in vitro activity against most multidrug resistant organisms than cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 2:1 ratio. Such combinations were not influenced by the inoculum size of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae and could be a therapeutic option for treating severe infections.

Unmet needs in the management of intra-abdominal infections

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal infections remain a leading cause of death, morbidity and resource use in surgical wards and intensive care units. The growing complexity of their management has led to new paradigms and unresolved issues in anti-infective therapy described in the current review. Areas covered: We analyzed the literature, recent guidelines, and expert opinions published over the last decade. Expert commentary: Prospective randomized trials are difficult to perform and observational studies or database analyses should be encouraged. Epidemiologic and microbiologic reports should be promoted, especially in developing/resource-limited countries and in specific subpopulations such as children, older people and patients with underlying diseases. The diagnostic process, including imaging procedures, could be improved. The value of biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring and discontinuation of therapy should be clarified and improved. New microbiologic techniques are needed to speed up the diagnostic process and to improve the adequacy of anti-infective therapy. Very little progress has been made in the detection of clinical failures. Many aspects of anti-infective management, both for bacteria and fungi, remain unresolved, such as the high inoculum, the type of microorganisms to be treated, the timing of therapy, the value of de-escalation, drug monitoring and duration of therapy. New antibiotics are expected.

Use of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors for Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase Infections: Defining the Right Patient Population

In a multicenter, multinational observational study that included neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing species, Gudiol et al. (Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:e00164-17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00164-17) demonstrated that β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors are effective treatment options. A review of this work, however, reminds us that some lingering questions remain for specific high-risk subgroups.

Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance: Influencing Factors

Rational use of antibiotic is the key approach to improve the antibiotic performance and tackling of the antimicrobial resistance. The efficacy of antimicrobials are influenced by many factors: (1) bacterial status (susceptibility and resistance, tolerance, persistence, biofilm) and inoculum size; (2) antimicrobial concentrations [mutant selection window (MSW) and sub-inhibitory concentration]; (3) host factors (serum effect and impact on gut micro-biota). Additional understandings regarding the linkage between antimicrobial usages, bacterial status and host response offers us new insights and encourage the struggle for the designing of antimicrobial treatment regimens that reaching better clinical outcome and minimizing the emergence of resistance at the same time.

Updates in the Management of Cephalosporin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Resistance to cephalosporins is now common among Gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, posing a major threat to public health. As resistance to the traditional drugs of choice for these infections, carbapenems, has also become increasingly common, interest in cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam as carbapenem-sparing alternatives has increased. Additionally, the availability of the novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam has added to the antimicrobial armamentarium available to treat these multidrug-resistant infections. Here, we review the recent literature on the use of carbapenem-sparing alternatives and highlight the potential utility of novel antimicrobials.

A Multinational, Preregistered Cohort Study of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

The spread of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is leading to increased carbapenem consumption. Alternatives to carbapenems need to be investigated. We investigated whether β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations are as effective as carbapenems in the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to ESBL-E. A multinational, retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with monomicrobial BSI due to ESBL-E were studied; specific criteria were applied for inclusion of patients in the empirical-therapy (ET) cohort (ETC; 365 patients), targeted-therapy (TT) cohort (TTC; 601 patients), and global cohort (GC; 627 patients). The main outcome variables were cure/improvement rate at day 14 and all-cause 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis, propensity scores (PS), and sensitivity analyses were used to control for confounding. The cure/improvement rates with BLBLIs and carbapenems were 80.0% and 78.9% in the ETC and 90.2% and 85.5% in the TTC, respectively. The 30-day mortality rates were 17.6% and 20% in the ETC and 9.8% and 13.9% in the TTC, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) values for cure/improvement rate with ET with BLBLIs were 1.37 (0.69 to 2.76); for TT, they were 1.61 (0.58 to 4.86). Regarding 30-day mortality, the adjusted OR (95% CI) values were 0.55 (0.25 to 1.18) for ET and 0.59 (0.19 to 1.71) for TT. The results were consistent in all subgroups studied, in a stratified analysis according to quartiles of PS, in PS-matched cases, and in the GC. BLBLIs, if active in vitro, appear to be as effective as carbapenems for ET and TT of BSI due to ESLB-E regardless of the source and specific species. These data may help to avoid the overuse of carbapenems. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01764490.).

Activity of temocillin in a lethal murine model of infection of intra-abdominal origin due to KPC-producing Escherichia coli

OBJECTIVES

Temocillin is a 6-α-methoxy derivative of ticarcillin that shows in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC). Our objective was to assess in vivo temocillin activity against KPC-producing Escherichia coli.

METHODS

Isogenic derivatives of the WT E. coli CFT073 producing KPC-2, KPC-3 or OXA-48 were constructed. An experimental murine model of intra-abdominal infection with sepsis was used. Mice were treated subcutaneously with temocillin 200 mg/kg every 2 h for 24 h, reproducing the duration of time that the free serum concentration of temocillin exceeded the MIC in humans with a regimen of 2 g every 12 h or 2 g every 8 h. Blood, peritoneal fluid (PF) and spleen were collected; 24 h survival and sterility rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Temocillin MICs were 8, 16, 32, and 256 mg/L for the susceptible strain and KPC-2-, KPC-3-, and OXA-48-producing strains, respectively. In mice treated with temocillin, significant bacterial reduction was obtained in PF, blood, and spleen for the susceptible strain and KPC-2- and KPC-3-producing strains (P < 0.001) but not for the OXA-48-producing strain. Sterility rates in PF were 53%, 10%, 0% and 0% (P < 0.001) and sterility rates in blood were 77%, 40%, 3% and 0% (P < 0.001), while survival rates were 97%, 97%, 57%, 0% (P < 0.001) for mice infected with the susceptible strain and KPC-2-, KPC-3- and OXA-48-producing strains, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a lethal-infection model with bacteraemia from intra-abdominal origin, temocillin retained significant activity in PF, blood and spleen and prevented death in mice by effectively working against KPC-producing E. coli with temocillin MICs ≤16 mg/L.

A statistical approach for determination of disk diffusion-based cutoff values for systematic characterization of wild-type and non-wild-type bacterial populations in antimicrobial susceptibility testing

In this study, we introduce a new approach for determination of epidemiologic cutoffs (ECOFFs) and resistant-population cutoffs (RCOFFs) based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. As an example, the method was applied for determination of ECOFFs for seven different beta-lactam antibiotics and wild-type populations of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae. In addition, RCOFFs were determined for bacterial populations with defined resistance mechanisms ("resistotypes"), i.e., extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive E. coli, ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae, and ESBL-positive E. cloacae; AmpC cephalosporinase-positive E. coli and AmpC-positive K. pneumoniae; and broad-spectrum beta-lactamase (BSBL)-positive E. coli. RCOFFs and ECOFFs are instrumental for a systematic characterization of associations between resistotypes and wild-type populations.

The Resistant-Population Cutoff (RCOFF): a New Concept for Improved Characterization of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Non-Wild-Type Bacterial Populations

This study aimed to determine resistant-population cutoffs (RCOFFs) to allow for improved characterization of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in bacterial populations. RCOFFs can complement epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF)-based settings of clinical breakpoints (CBPs) by systematically describing the correlation between non-wild-type and wild-type populations. We illustrate this concept by describing three paradigmatic examples of wild-type and non-wild-type Escherichia coli populations from our clinical strain database of disk diffusion diameters. The statistical determination of RCOFFs and ECOFFs and their standardized applications in antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) facilitates the assignment of isolates to wild-type or non-wild-type populations. This should improve the correlation of in vitro AST data and distinct antibiotic resistance mechanisms with clinical outcome facilitating the setting and validation of CBPs.

β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: time for a reappraisal in the era of few antibiotic options?

The spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes in Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp is a major challenge to modern medical practice. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for serious infections caused by ESBL producers; however, carbapenem resistance has increased globally. ESBL producers might be susceptible to β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combination antibiotics such piperacillin-tazobactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate. These drugs are frequently avoided in serious infections caused by ESBL producers because of the inoculum effect in-vitro (especially for piperacillin-tazobactam), animal data suggesting inferior efficacy when compared with carbapenems, concerns about pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug target attainment with standard doses, and poor outcomes shown in some observational studies. Prospective cohort data and a meta-analysis suggest that BLBLIs are non-inferior to carbapenems in the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by ESBL producers. We examine why BLBLIs are perceived as inferior in the treatment of infection with ESBL producers, and discuss data that suggest these concerns might not be strongly supported by clinical evidence.

β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

Objective: To review the available evidence regarding the utility of the currently available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) as well as the emerging body of data for the novel agents in the pipeline. Data Sources: A MEDLINE literature search (1960-August 2014) was performed using the search terms β-lactamase, β-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam, avibactam, NXL104, MK-7655, and RPX7009. Current studies focusing on new agents were obtained from clinicaltrials.gov. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations and meeting abstracts. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language studies pertaining to BLICs were evaluated. Data Synthesis: Historical clinical and in vitro data focusing on the characteristics of the conventional BLICs are reviewed. Avibactam, relebactam (formerly MK-7655), and RPX7009 are new β-lactamase inhibitors that are being studied in combination with β-lactams. Clinical and in vitro data that provide support for their use for multidrug-resistant organisms are reviewed. β-Lactam antibiotics are a mainstay for the treatment of many infections. The addition of β-lactamase inhibitors enhances their activity against organisms that produce β-lactamases; however, organisms that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases are proliferating. The BLICs (amoxicillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam) lack activity against some of these enzymes, presenting a critical need for new antibiotics. Conclusions: The historical BLICs are useful for many infections; however, evolving resistance limits their use. The new BLICs (combinations with avibactam, relebactam, and RPX7009) may be valuable options for patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms.

In vitro and in vivo activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem at different inoculum sizes of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The inoculum effect is a laboratory phenomenon in which the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antibiotic is increased when a large number of organisms are exposed. Due to the emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kpn) infections, the inoculum effect of ESBL-Kpn on β-lactams was studied in vitro and in vivo using an experimental model of pneumonia. The in vitro inoculum effect of 45 clinical ESBL-Kpn isolates on β-lactams was evaluated at standard (10(5) CFU/mL) and high (10(7) CFU/mL) organism concentrations. The MIC50 of piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime and cefepime was increased eight-fold or more and that of meropenem was increased two-fold. The in vivo inoculum effect was evaluated in an ESBL-Kpn pneumonia mouse model treated with bacteriostatic effect-adjusted doses of piperacillin-tazobactam (1000 mg/kg four times daily, %T>MIC; 32.60%) or meropenem (100 mg/kg twice daily, %T>MIC; 28.65%) at low/standard (10(4) CFU/mouse) and high (10(6) CFU/mouse) inocula. In mice administered a low inoculum, no mice died after treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem, whereas all the control mice died. In contrast, in the high inoculum model, all mice in the piperacillin-tazobactam-treated group died, whereas all meropenem-treated mice survived and had a decreased bacterial load in the lungs and no invasion into the blood. In conclusion, meropenem was more resistant to the inoculum effect of ESBL-Kpn than piperacillin-tazobactam both in vitro and in vivo. In the management of severe pneumonia caused by ESBL-Kpn, carbapenems may be the drugs of choice to achieve a successful outcome.