Oral ribavirin treatment of influenza A and B

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antiviral activity of arctigenin, ribavirin, and ivermectin against viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus infection

Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) causes a severe and often lethal infection in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in Korea, resulting in mass mortality and substantial economic loss. As a potential prevention strategy for infectious viral diseases, this study aimed to evaluate the antiviral activity of three compounds (arctigenin [ARG], ribavirin [RBV], and ivermectin [IVM]) against VHSV infection in vitro and in vivo. In epithelioma papulosum cyprini cells, the expression of both VHSV glycoprotein (G) and nucleoprotein (N) genes were significantly suppressed by the three compounds in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05). Also, cell morphology and viability were maintained at the following concentrations: ARG 1.5 mg/L, RBV 2.5 mg/L, and IVM 10 mg/L. The fish that were treated with RBV (8.33 mg/kg) and IVM (0.25 mg/kg) before VHSV infection and those treated with IVM (0.25 mg/kg) after VHSV infection showed significant improvements in the survival rate, a reduction in the viral shedding rate, and downregulation of viral gene expression compared to those seen in fish with naïve VHSV infections. Furthermore, among the innate immune genes studied, persistent expression of Mx and upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-α gene expression in VHSV-infected fish treated with RBV and IVM revealed that these compounds might induce an immunostimulatory effect as one of their antiviral activities. Overall, this study supports the use of RBV and IVM as antiviral agents to control VHSV infections in olive flounder.

Antiviral Activity of Ribavirin against Tilapia tilapinevirus in Fish Cells

The outbreak of the novel Tilapia tilapinevirus or Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is having a severe economic impact on global tilapia aquaculture. Effective treatments and vaccines for TiLV are lacking. In this study, we demonstrated the antiviral activity of ribavirin against TiLV in E-11 cells. Our findings revealed that at concentrations above 100 μg/mL, ribavirin efficiently attenuates the cytopathic effect of the TiLV infection in fish cells. When administered in a dose-dependent manner, ribavirin significantly improved cell survival compared to the untreated control cells. Further investigation revealed that the cells exposed to ribavirin and TiLV had a lower viral load (p < 0.05) than the untreated cells. However, at concentrations above 1000 μg/mL, ribavirin led to cell toxicity. Taken together, our results demonstrate the efficacy of this antiviral drug against TiLV and could be a useful tool for future research on the pathogenesis and replication mechanism of TiLV as well as other piscine viruses.

Metabolic Modifications by Common Respiratory Viruses and Their Potential as New Antiviral Targets

Respiratory viruses are known to be the most frequent causative mediators of lung infections in humans, bearing significant impact on the host cell signaling machinery due to their host-dependency for efficient replication. Certain cellular functions are actively induced by respiratory viruses for their own benefit. This includes metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis (FAS) and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, among others, which are modified during viral infections. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of metabolic pathway modifications mediated by the acute respiratory viruses respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus (RV), influenza virus (IV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), coronavirus (CoV) and adenovirus (AdV), and highlight potential targets and compounds for therapeutic approaches.

Lassa Virus Treatment Options

Lassa fever causes an approximate 5000 to 10,000 deaths annually in West Africa and cases have been imported into Europe and the Americas, challenging public health. Although Lassa virus was first described over 5 decades ago in 1969, no treatments or vaccines have been approved to treat or prevent infection. In this review, we discuss current therapeutics in the development pipeline for the treatment of Lassa fever, focusing on those that have been evaluated in humans or animal models. Several treatments, including the antiviral favipiravir and a human monoclonal antibody cocktail, have shown efficacy in preclinical rodent and non-human primate animal models and have potential for use in clinical settings. Movement of the promising preclinical treatment options for Lassa fever into clinical trials is critical to continue addressing this neglected tropical disease.

In Vitro Combinations of Baloxavir Acid and Other Inhibitors against Seasonal Influenza A Viruses

Two antiviral classes, the neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) and polymerase inhibitors (baloxavir marboxil and favipiravir) can be used to prevent and treat influenza infections during seasonal epidemics and pandemics. However, prolonged treatment may lead to the emergence of drug resistance. Therapeutic combinations constitute an alternative to prevent resistance and reduce antiviral doses. Therefore, we evaluated in vitro combinations of baloxavir acid (BXA) and other approved drugs against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) subtypes. The determination of an effective concentration inhibiting virus cytopathic effects by 50% (EC50) for each drug and combination indexes (CIs) were based on cell viability. CompuSyn software was used to determine synergism, additivity or antagonism between drugs. Combinations of BXA and NAIs or favipiravir had synergistic effects on cell viability against the two influenza A subtypes. Those effects were confirmed using a physiological and predictive ex vivo reconstructed human airway epithelium model. On the other hand, the combination of BXA and ribavirin showed mixed results. Overall, BXA stands as a good candidate for combination with several existing drugs, notably oseltamivir and favipiravir, to improve in vitro antiviral activity. These results should be considered for further animal and clinical evaluations.

nucleoside analogues for the treatment of influenza: history and experience

Aim. In this study we retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of nucleoside analogues (Triazavirin© and ribavirin) with that of oseltamivir for treating moderate severe influenza in adults. Materials and methods. We have used data from 191 health records of patients with moderate severe PCR confirmed influenza A and B. Control group included 57 patients treated with oseltamivir, comparison groups – 53 and 81 patients, who received Triazavirin© and ribavirin accordingly. We compared infectious intoxication syndrome duration, fever duration, duration of acute rhinitis, acute pharyngitis, acute laryngitis, acute tracheitis, acute bronchitis, cough duration as well as pneumonia occurrence. Results. No statistically significant difference in the duration of developed syndromes in Triazavirin©-treated group and oseltamivir-treated group were observed. We have noticed that fever duration had been significantly longer in ribavirin group compared to control group (4,1±2,22 days vs. 3,1±1,94 days, p<0,05) as well as more frequent pneumonia occurrence (1,2% vs. 0,0%, p>0,05). Conclusion. New nucleoside analogue Triazavirin© showed good efficacy and safety profile in adult patients with influenza. This fact provides the opportunity to recommend it for treatment of influenza along with neuraminidase inhibitors.

Distinct Effects of T-705 (Favipiravir) and Ribavirin on Influenza Virus Replication and Viral RNA Synthesis

T-705 (favipiravir) is a new antiviral agent in advanced clinical development for influenza therapy. It is supposed to act as an alternative substrate for the viral polymerase, causing inhibition of viral RNA synthesis or virus mutagenesis. These mechanisms were also proposed for ribavirin, an established and broad antiviral drug that shares structural similarity with T-705. We here performed a comparative analysis of the effects of T-705 and ribavirin on influenza virus and host cell functions. Influenza virus-infected cell cultures were exposed to T-705 or ribavirin during single or serial virus passaging. The effects on viral RNA synthesis and infectious virus yield were determined and mutations appearing in the viral genome were detected by whole-genome virus sequencing. In addition, the cellular nucleotide pools as well as direct inhibition of the viral polymerase enzyme were quantified. We demonstrate that the anti-influenza virus effect of ribavirin is based on IMP dehydrogenase inhibition, which results in fast and profound GTP depletion and an imbalance in the nucleotide pools. In contrast, T-705 acts as a potent and GTP-competitive inhibitor of the viral polymerase. In infected cells, viral RNA synthesis is completely inhibited by T-705 or ribavirin at ≥50 μM, whereas exposure to lower drug concentrations induces formation of noninfectious particles and accumulation of random point mutations in the viral genome. This mutagenic effect is 2-fold higher for T-705 than for ribavirin. Hence, T-705 and ribavirin both act as purine pseudobases but profoundly differ with regard to the mechanism behind their antiviral and mutagenic effects on influenza virus.

Mutagenic Effects of Ribavirin on Hepatitis E Virus-Viral Extinction versus Selection of Fitness-Enhancing Mutations

Hepatitis E virus (HEV), an important agent of viral hepatitis worldwide, can cause severe courses of infection in pregnant women and immunosuppressed patients. To date, HEV infections can only be treated with ribavirin (RBV). Major drawbacks of this therapy are that RBV is not approved for administration to pregnant women and that the virus can acquire mutations, which render the intra-host population less sensitive or even resistant to RBV. One of the proposed modes of action of RBV is a direct mutagenic effect on viral genomes, inducing mismatches and subsequent nucleotide substitutions. These transition events can drive the already error-prone viral replication beyond an error threshold, causing viral population extinction. In contrast, the expanded heterogeneous viral population can facilitate selection of mutant viruses with enhanced replication fitness. Emergence of these mutant viruses can lead to therapeutic failure. Consequently, the onset of RBV treatment in chronically HEV-infected individuals can result in two divergent outcomes: viral extinction versus selection of fitness-enhanced viruses. Following an overview of RNA viruses treated with RBV in clinics and a summary of the different antiviral modes of action of this drug, we focus on the mutagenic effect of RBV on HEV intrahost populations, and how HEV is able to overcome lethal mutagenesis.

The Influenza Virus Polymerase Complex: An Update on Its Structure, Functions, and Significance for Antiviral Drug Design

Influenza viruses cause seasonal epidemics and pandemic outbreaks associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and a huge cost. Since resistance to the existing anti‐influenza drugs is rising, innovative inhibitors with a different mode of action are urgently needed. The influenza polymerase complex is widely recognized as a key drug target, given its critical role in virus replication and high degree of conservation among influenza A (of human or zoonotic origin) and B viruses. We here review the major progress that has been made in recent years in unravelling the structure and functions of this protein complex, enabling structure‐aided drug design toward the core regions of the PA endonuclease, PB1 polymerase, or cap‐binding PB2 subunit. Alternatively, inhibitors may target a protein–protein interaction site, a cellular factor involved in viral RNA synthesis, the viral RNA itself, or the nucleoprotein component of the viral ribonucleoprotein. The latest advances made for these diverse pharmacological targets have yielded agents in advanced (i.e., favipiravir and VX‐787) or early clinical testing, besides several experimental inhibitors in various stages of development, which are all covered here.

Cellular Metabolism and Anti-Influenza Activity of 1,3,4-Thiadiazol-2-Ylcyanamide (LY217896)

LY217896 (1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylcyanamide) is a 2-substituted thiadiazole that is an effective inhibitor of influenza A and B viruses in vitro and in the mouse infection model. The in vitro anti-influenza activity of LY217896 is reversed by a 10-fold excess amount of guanine or guanosine. LY217896 (1 or 10μg ml−1) effected a selective 60% decrease in the levels of intracellular pools of GTP in MDCK cells. The extent of cytotoxicity of LY217896 is positively correlated with the amount of LY217896 metabolite formed intracellularly. A cell line, derived from parental MDCK cells, was selected for resistance to 50 ng of LY217896 per ml. Unlike parental MDCK cells, the resistant cells were able to undergo log phase replication in LY217896 (25 g ml−1) and were unable to metabolize the compound. Furthermore, LY217896 had no antiviral activity against influenza A/Ann Arbor (IC50 >200μg ml−1) or vaccinia virus (IC50 = 13 μg ml−1) in resistant cells. In contrast, LY217896 inhibited influenza A/Ann Arbor (IC50 = 0.5 μg ml−1) or vaccinia virus (IC50 = 0.13 μg ml−1) in the parental MDCK cells. A thiadiazole, with a guanidinyl group in the 2 position, and ribavirin were active in both the parental cells and resistant cells. Nicotinamide (up to 240-fold excess) did not reverse the anti-influenza activity of LY217896 in vitro or in the mouse infection model. A 10-fold excess of nicotinamide reversed the cytotoxicity of 2-aminothiadiazole but not that of LY217896.

Antiviral combinations for severe influenza

Observational data suggest that the treatment of influenza infection with neuraminidase inhibitors decreases progression to more severe illness, especially when treatment is started soon after symptom onset. However, even early treatment might fail to prevent complications in some patients, particularly those infected with novel viruses such as the 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1, avian influenza A H5N1 virus subtype, or the avian influenza A H7N9 virus subtype. Furthermore, treatment with one antiviral drug might promote the development of antiviral resistance, especially in immunocompromised hosts and critically ill patients. An obvious strategy to optimise antiviral therapy is to combine drugs with different modes of action. Because host immune responses to infection might also contribute to illness pathogenesis, improved outcomes might be gained from the combination of antiviral therapy with drugs that modulate the immune response in an infected individual. We review available data from preclinical and clinical studies of combination antiviral therapy and of combined antiviral-immunomodulator therapy for influenza. Early-stage data draw attention to several promising antiviral combinations with therapeutic potential in severe infections, but there remains a need to substantiate clinical benefit. Combination therapies with favourable experimental data need to be tested in carefully designed aclinical trials to assess their efficacy.

Therapeutics against influenza

Despite 75 years of research into prevention and treatment of influenza, the viruses that cause this disease continue to rank as some of the most important pathogens afflicting humans today. Progress in development of therapeutics for influenza has been slow for much of that time, but has accelerated in pace over the last two decades. Two classes of antiviral medications are used in humans at present, but each has limitations in scope and effectiveness of use. New strategies involving these licensed agents, including alternate forms of delivery and combination therapy with other drugs, are currently being explored. In addition, several novel antiviral compounds are in various clinical phases of development. Together with strategies designed to target the virus itself, new approaches to interrupt host–pathogen interactions or modulate detrimental aspects of the immune response have been proposed. Therapy for influenza will likely undergo substantial changes in the decades to come, evolving with our knowledge of pathogenesis as new approaches become viable and are validated clinically.

Influenza virus resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors

In addition to immunization programs, antiviral agents can play a major role for the control of seasonal influenza epidemics and may also provide prophylactic and therapeutic benefits during an eventual pandemic. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and clinical indications of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) with an emphasis on the emergence of antiviral drug resistance. There are two approved NAIs compounds in US: inhaled zanamivir and oral oseltamivir, which have been commercially available since 1999-2000. In addition, two other NAIs, peramivir (an intravenous cyclopentane derivative) and laninamivir (a long-acting NAI administered by a single nasal inhalation) have been approved in certain countries and are under clinical evaluations in others. As for other antivirals, the development and dissemination of drug resistance is a significant threat to the clinical utility of NAIs. The emergence and worldwide spread of oseltamivir-resistant seasonal A(H1N1) viruses during the 2007-2009 seasons emphasize the need for continuous monitoring of antiviral drug susceptibilities. Further research priorities should include a better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to existing antivirals, the development of novel compounds which target viral or host proteins and the evaluation of combination therapies for improved treatment of severe influenza infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. This article forms part of a symposium in Antiviral Research on "Treatment of influenza: targeting the virus or the host."

Triple-combination antiviral drug for pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

A recent in vitro study showed that the three compounds of antiviral drugs with different mechanisms of action (amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir) could result in synergistic antiviral activity against influenza virus. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination antiviral therapy in patients with severe influenza illness. A total of 245 adult patients who were critically ill with confirmed pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (pH1N1) virus infection and were admitted to one of the intensive care units of 28 hospitals in Korea were reviewed. Patients who required ventilator support and received either triple-combination antiviral drug (TCAD) therapy or oseltamivir monotherapy were analyzed. A total of 127 patients were included in our analysis. Among them, 24 patients received TCAD therapy, and 103 patients received oseltamivir monotherapy. The 14-day mortality was 17% in the TCAD group and 35% in the oseltamivir group (P = 0.08), and the 90-day mortality was 46% in the TCAD group and 59% in the oseltamivir group (P = 0.23). None of the toxicities attributable to antiviral drugs occurred in either group of our study, including hemolytic anemia and hepatic toxicities related to the use of ribavirin. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the odds ratio for the association of TCAD with 90-day mortality was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 1.42; P = 0.24). Although this study was retrospective and did not provide virologic outcomes, our results suggest that the treatment outcome of the triple combination of amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir was comparable to that of oseltamivir monotherapy.

Influenza pharmacotherapy: present situation, strategies and hopes

INTRODUCTION

Influenza is a serious health threat for people of all ages. The causative virus is evolving continuously and the risk of an unexpected mutant, which cannot be controlled by seasonal vaccination, is real. New and more effective antiviral drugs are needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the antiviral drugs with confirmed efficacy in combating influenza, as well as newer compounds that are currently undergoing testing and will hopefully be marketed in the near future. A comprehensive, state-of-the-art picture of drug therapy for influenza is presented, including novel solutions and effective strategies for prescribing currently available antiviral drugs, with emphasis on the importance of updated local epidemiological data, clinical assessment and laboratory testing.

EXPERT OPINION

Current anti-influenza drug research is no longer tied solely to viral envelope protein targets like haemagglutinin and neuraminidase. New drugs act on the viral RNA polymerase complex, which is involved in transcription and replication of the viral genome, and can prevent the maturation, replication and dissemination of numerous viral subtypes. Combating this infection and reducing the duration of symptoms also has important socioeconomic implications related to health-care spending (including hospitalization for complications) and sick-leave pay for workers.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a statin/caffeine combination against H5N1, H3N2 and H1N1 virus infection in BALB/c mice

The development of novel antiviral drugs is necessary for the prevention and treatment of a potential avian influenza pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel statin/caffeine combination against H5N1, H3N2 and H1N1 virus infection in a murine model. In H5N1-, H3N2- and H1N1-infected BALB/c mice, 50mug statin/200mug caffeine effectively ameliorated lung damage and inhibited viral replication and was at least as effective as oseltamivir and ribavirin. The statin/caffeine combination also appeared to be more effective when administered preventatively rather than as treatment. These findings provide justification for further research into this novel antiviral formulation.

Seasonal influenza in adults and children--diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Guidelines for the treatment of persons with influenza virus infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The evidence-based guidelines encompass diagnostic issues, treatment and chemoprophylaxis with antiviral medications, and issues related to institutional outbreak management for seasonal (interpandemic) influenza. They are intended for use by physicians in all medical specialties with direct patient care, because influenza virus infection is common in communities during influenza season and may be encountered by practitioners caring for a wide variety of patients.

Antiviral therapy for respiratory tract infections

Viruses are important pathogens causing respiratory tract infections both in the community and health‐care facility settings. They are extremely common causes of morbidity in the competent hosts and some are associated with significant mortality in the compromised individuals. With wider application of molecular techniques, novel viruses are being described and old viruses are found to have new significance in different epidemiological and clinical settings. Some of these emerging pathogens may have the potential to cause pandemics or global spread of a severe disease, as exemplified by severe acute respiratory syndrome and avian influenza. Antiviral therapy of viral respiratory infections is often unnecessary in the competent hosts because most of them are self‐limiting and effective agents are not always available. In the immunocompromised individuals or for infections caused by highly pathogenic viruses, such as avian influenza viruses (AIV), antiviral treatment is highly desirable, despite the fact that many of the agents may not have undergone stringent clinical trials. In immunocompetent hosts, antiviral therapy can be stopped early because adaptive immune response can usually be mounted within 5–14 days. However, the duration of antiviral therapy in immunosuppressed hosts depends on clinical and radiological resolution, the degree and duration of immunosuppression, and therefore maintenance therapy is sometimes needed after the initial response. Immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis appear to be promising directions for future research. Appropriate and targeted immunomodulation may play an important adjunctive role in some of these infections by limiting the extent of end‐organ damage and multi‐organ failure in some fulminant infections.

Antiviral Resistance in Influenza Viruses: Clinical and Epidemiological Aspects

Two classes of anti-viral agents, the M2 ion channel inhibitors (amantadine, rimantadine) and neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir) are available for treatment and prevention of infl uenza in most countries of the world. The principle concerns about emergence of antiviral resistance in infl uenza viruses are loss of drug effi cacy, transmission of resistant variants, and possible increased virulence or transmissibility of resistant variants (1). Because seasonal infl uenza is usually an acute, self-limited illness in which viral clearance occurs rapidly due to innate and adaptive host immune responses, the emergence of drug-resistant variants would be anticipated to have modest effects on clinical recovery, except perhaps in immunocompromised or immunologically naïve hosts, such as young infants or during the appearance of a novel strain. In contrast to the limited impact of resistance emergence in the treated immunocompetent individual, the epidemiologic impact of resistance emergence and transmission could be considerable, including loss of both prophylactic and therapeutic activity for a particular drug, at the household, community, or perhaps global level. Infl uenza epidemiology in temperate climates is expected to provide some protection against widespread circulation of resistant variants, as viruses do not persist between epidemics but rather are re-introduced each season and new variants appear often (2, 3).

Current and future antiviral therapy of severe seasonal and avian influenza

The currently circulating H3N2 and H1N1 subtypes of influenza A virus cause a transient, febrile upper respiratory illness in most adults and children (“seasonal influenza”), but infants, the elderly, immunodeficient and chronically ill persons may develop life-threatening primary viral pneumonia or complications such as bacterial pneumonia. By contrast, avian influenza viruses such as the H5N1 virus that recently emerged in Southeast Asia can cause severe disease when transferred from domestic poultry to previously healthy people (“avian influenza”). Most H5N1 patients present with fever, cough and shortness of breath that progress rapidly to adult respiratory distress syndrome. In seasonal influenza, viral replication remains confined to the respiratory tract, but limited studies indicate that H5N1 infections are characterized by systemic viral dissemination, high cytokine levels and multiorgan failure. Gastrointestinal infection and encephalitis also occur. The licensed anti-influenza drugs (the M2 ion channel blockers, amantadine and rimantadine, and the neuraminidase inhibitors, oseltamivir and zanamivir) are beneficial for uncomplicated seasonal influenza, but appropriate dosing regimens for severe seasonal or H5N1 viral infections have not been defined. Treatment options may be limited by the rapid emergence of drug-resistant viruses. Ribavirin has also been used to a limited extent to treat influenza. This article reviews licensed drugs and treatments under development, including high-dose oseltamivir; parenterally administered neuraminidase inhibitors, peramivir and zanamivir; dimeric forms of zanamivir; the RNA polymerase inhibitor T-705; a ribavirin prodrug, viramidine; polyvalent and monoclonal antibodies; and combination therapies.

Anti-influenza virus agents: synthesis and mode of action

Annual epidemics of influenza virus infection are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality, and pandemics are much more devastating. Considerable knowledge of viral infectivity and replication has been acquired, but many details still have to be elucidated and the virus remains a challenging target for drug design and development. This review provides an overview of the antiviral drugs targeting the influenza viral replicative cycle. Included are a brief description of their chemical syntheses and biological activities. For other reviews, see References1-9.

The threat of avian influenza A (H5N1). Part III: antiviral therapy

Among emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases, influenza constitutes one of the major threats to mankind. In this review series epidemiologic, virologic and pathologic concerns raised by infections of humans with avian influenza virus A/H5N1 as well as treatment options are discussed. The third part discusses therapeutic options. Neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors are the most promising agents despite uncertainty about efficacy. Dosage increase, prolonged treatment or combination therapies may increase treatment efficacy and/or inhibit resistance formation. Immune system dysregulation contributes to H5N1 disease. Although current evidence does not support the use of anti-inflammatory drugs beneficial effects cannot be excluded at later disease stages.

Advanced Techniques in the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Pulmonary Diseases in Horses

Techniques for novel approaches to the diagnosis and management of equine pulmonary disease continue to be developed and used in clinical practice. Diagnostic techniques involving immunoassays and nucleic acid-based tests not only decrease the time in which results become available but increase the sensitivity and specificity of test results. These assays do not substitute for careful clinical evaluation but can shorten the time to a confirmed accurate diagnosis, and thus allow for early initiation of therapeutic strategies and prevention protocols. With further understanding of the molecular biology and immunology of equine pulmonary disease, diagnostic and management techniques should become further refined.

Adverse effects of ribavirin and outcome in severe acute respiratory syndrome: experience in two medical centers

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of ribavirin-induced anemia on the outcome of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Two medical centers in Taiwan.

PATIENTS

Forty-four patients with SARS who received ribavirin and 7 patients with SARS who did not receive ribavirin.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The mean peak C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels were higher in SARS patients who were receiving ribavirin therapy than in SARS patients who were not receiving ribavirin therapy. The mortality was also higher, but the difference was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, hemoglobin level was an independent prognostic correlate of hypoxemia or mortality (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.8; p = 0.03). The hemoglobin began decreasing in two thirds of SARS patients (32 of 44 patients; 73%) who were receiving ribavirin 3 days after therapy with the antiviral drug was started. Patients with a drop in hemoglobin level of > 2 g/dL had a significantly higher mortality rate than the other patients. Hypoxemia developed in one third of SARS patients (17 of 44 patients; 39%) who were receiving ribavirin, all of whom were anemic. Of the 17 hypoxemic patients, 11 (65%) had a drop in hemoglobin of > 2 g/dL, and 4 patients (24%) required a blood transfusion. The mean slope of the hemoglobin decrease was significantly steeper (p = 0.001) in hypoxemic patients with SARS who were receiving ribavirin than in the nonhypoxemic patients with SARS who were receiving ribavirin. Only one of seven SARS patients (14%) who was not receiving ribavirin became anemic, but this individual was not hypoxemic. Eventually, 5 of 17 hypoxemic and anemic SARS patients (29%) who were receiving ribavirin died. The combination of hypoxia with anemia was thus significantly associated with a higher mortality (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoxia combined with anemia increased the risk for death in SARS patients. Unless ribavirin can be shown to be effective against SARS-coronavirus, the risk of anemia posed by this drug argues against its use in SARS patients.

Anti-influenza drugs and neuraminidase inhibitors

Each year, influenza viruses are responsible for considerable illness, complications and mortality. An effective treatment will have a major impact on the severe personal and economic burden that this disease incurs. There are several points in the influenza life cycle that may be potentially inhibited. One critical point is the release of newly synthesized virions from the host cell surface. Viral neuraminidase (NA) cleaves the virus from host cell sialic acid residues allowing infection of other host cells. Rationally designed NA inhibitors that block the viral life cycle are now in the clinic and these molecules are effective and safe for the treatment of influenza. Compared with other anti-influenza agents the NA inhibitors are well tolerated, effective against all influenza types and there has been little evidence of the emergence of viral resistance. NA inhibitors provide an important new therapeutic weapon for the management of influenza infection.

Anti-influenza drugs and neuraminidase inhibitors

Each year, influenza viruses are responsible for considerable illness, complications and mortality. An effective treatment will have a major impact on the severe personal and economic burden that this disease incurs. There are several points in the influenza life cycle that may be potentially inhibited. One critical point is the release of newly synthesized virions from the host cell surface. Viral neuraminidase (NA) cleaves the virus from host cell sialic acid residues allowing infection of other host cells. Rationally designed NA inhibitors that block the viral life cycle are now in the clinic and these molecules are effective and safe for the treatment of influenza. Compared with other anti-influenza agents the NA inhibitors are well tolerated, effective against all influenza types and there has been little evidence of the emergence of viral resistance. NA inhibitors provide an important new therapeutic weapon for the management of influenza infection.

Recent progress in anti-influenza chemotherapy

Influenza virus infections in high risk individuals, such as infants, the elderly, and patients with cardiopulmonary disorders or immunocompromised states, cause severe manifestations which often result in fatalities. The emergence of a new antigen type of influenza A virus (H5N1) in Hong Kong during 1997 and 1998 threatened a possible pandemic of a new influenza infection. The investigation for anti-influenza chemotherapies has progressed in the last decade whereas clinical trials of new compounds have been limited to amantadine, rimantadine and ribavirin. Fusion inhibitors which directly inhibit conformational change of haemagglutinin (HA), protease inhibitors which inhibit cleavage of HA to HA1 and HA2, RNA transcription inhibitors which inhibit cap formation of mRNA and antisense oligonucleotides targeted at mRNA of PB2 (a part of viral RNA polymerase) have been reported, in their development phases. Recently, 2 neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, zanamivir and oseltamivir (GS 4104), were used in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with influenza. Both agents showed promising results. A polyoxometalate, PM-523, inhibits fusion between the virus envelope and cell membrane and inhibits the penetration of the virus into cells. This compound has shown potent anti-influenza activity and synergistic inhibitory activity in combination with ribavirin or zanamivir in vitro and in vivo. Resistant strains for zanamivir, oseltamivir or PM-523 have been isolated. The analysis of mutation points of these strains have contributed to the investigation of the antiviral mechanisms of action of these compounds and the mechanism of resistance of the mutants to these compounds.

Chemotherapy of respiratory viruses: prospects and challenges

Billions of people are infected with respiratory viruses annually. Infants and young children, the elderly, immunocompromised individuals and those debilitated by other diseases or nutritional deficiencies are most at risk for serious disease. There are few vaccines available for use against these viruses, and even where there are (influenza, measles and adenovirus), infections remain common. The continued prevalence of respiratory virus infections has lead to renewed efforts to find safe agents effective against the most medically important respiratory viruses: influenza, respiratory syncytial, parainfluenza, measles, rhino- and adenovirus. Copyright 1999 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Approaches and strategies for the treatment of influenza virus infections

Influenza A and B viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses. These viruses are responsible for severe morbidity and significant excess mortality each year. Infection with influenza viruses usually leads to respiratory involvement and can result in pneumonia and secondary bacterial infections. Vaccine approaches to the prophylaxis of influenza virus infections have been problematic owing to the ability of these viruses to undergo antigenic shift by exchanging genomic segments or by undergoing antigenic drift, consisting of point mutations in the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes as a result of an error-prone viral polymerase. Historically, antiviral approaches for the therapy of both influenza A and B viruses have been largely unsuccessful until the elucidation of the X-ray crystallographic structure of the viral NA, which has permitted structure-based drug design of inhibitors of this enzyme. In addition, recent advances in the elucidation of the structure and complex function of influenza HA have resulted in the discovery of a number of diverse compounds that target this viral protein. This review article will focus largely on newer antiviral agents including those that inhibit the influenza virus NA and HA. Other novel approaches that have entered clinical trials or been considered for their clinical utility will be mentioned.

Community respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer

Community respiratory viruses, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, adenoviruses, and picornaviruses, are an important cause of respiratory disease in the immunocompromised adult with cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that a minimum of 31% of adult bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients and 18% of adults with leukemia who are hospitalized with an acute respiratory illness have a community respiratory virus infection. The temporal occurrence of these infections in immunocompromised patients tends to mirror their occurrence in the community. The clinical illnesses range from self-limited upper respiratory illnesses to fatal pneumonias, depending on the type of virus and the type and degree of immunosuppression. The pneumonias may be viral, bacterial/fungal, or mixed. The highest frequency of progression to fatal viral pneumonia has been reported for RSV infections in recently transplanted BMT recipients and myelosuppressed patients with leukemia. Studies have suggested that early therapy for RSV pneumonia with a combination of aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin may be of benefit. Defining effective prophylactic and therapeutic strategies will be a challenge, given the diversity of viruses, the wide spectrum of immunocompromised patients with varying vulnerability to serious community respiratory virus disease, and the frequent presence of other opportunistic infections and medical problems. A combination of antiviral drugs and immunotherapy may need to be considered for their potential additive effect as well as to prevent the emergence of resistant virus, as occurs during monotherapy for influenza with amantadine or rimantadine. The optimal therapies need to be defined in controlled trials; however, it appears that a favorable response will hinge on the initiation of therapy at an early stage of the respiratory illness.

Influenza A pneumonitis following treatment of acute cardiac allograft rejection with murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3)

A 51-year-old man developed fever, cough, and dyspnea 5 days after completing murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) treatment for acute cardiac allograft rejection. Samples of BAL fluid grew influenza A virus. Progressive pulmonary infiltrates, respiratory compromise, and hypoxia developed, and the patient ultimately required 5 days of mechanical ventilation. Treatment with amantadine hydrochloride and ribavirin was prescribed, and the patient was discharged after 19 days. Influenza A virus has not been an important pathogen in cardiac transplant recipients. However, this is the first reported case of influenza A pneumonitis complicating anti-T lymphocyte therapy for cardiac allograft rejection. In comparison with our patient, two previously reported cases of influenza A infection in cardiac transplant patients have been less severe. The virulence of our patient's, life-threatening infection appears to be secondary to impairment of T lymphocyte-mediated immunity by OKT3. The role of therapeutic and even prophylactic amantadine therapy in this clinical setting has yet to be determined.

Antiviral agents

In recent years, the antiviral armamentarium has expanded considerably. Currently available agents are virustatic, inhibiting specific steps in the process of viral replication. No agent is active against nonreplicating or latent viruses. Acyclovir is useful in the treatment of genital herpes, herpes simplex encephalitis, mucocutaneous herpetic infection, varicella infection in the immunosuppressed host, and herpes zoster infection in the normal and the immunosuppressed host. It can also be used for prevention of herpesvirus infection in immunocompromised patients. Ganciclovir is indicated for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and is effective in the management of organ-specific cytomegalovirus infection in other immunocompromised patients. Chronic hepatitis C and condyloma acuminatum due to human papillomavirus respond to therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 500 cells/mm3 should be treated with zidovudine. Amantadine is useful in a therapeutic and prophylactic role in the management of influenza A virus infection. With the expanded use of and indications for antiviral therapy, clinically significant resistance to these agents has been encountered with increasing frequency.

Comparison of oral and aerosol ribavirin regimens in the high risk elderly

A comparison of different regiments of ribavirin (R), administered either orally or by aerosol, was performed in 16 elderly subjects (13 men, 3 women, mean age 63 +/- 8 years) considered to be in the "high-risk" category for complications from influenza as defined by the Centers for Disease Control. The subjects were divided into four groups. Group O-600 received 600 mg orally R every 8 hours for 48 hours followed by 200 mg every 8 hours for 72 hours for a total dose of 5.4 g (22.1 mmol). Group O-800 received 800 mg oral R every 8 hours for 24 hours followed by 400 mg every 12 hours for 96 hours for a total dose of 4.1 g (22.9 mMoles). Group A-40 received R (40 mg/ml) aerosolized through a small particle aerosol generator for 6 hours every 12 hours for 96 hours, yielding an average delivered dose of 6.2 g (25.4 mMoles) R. Group A-60 received aerosolized R (60 mg/mL) for 2 hours every 8 hours for 96 hours, yielding an average delivered dose of 4.6 g (18.8 mMoles) R. No hematologic or other laboratory abnormalities were associated with any of the regimens. Group O-800 and O-600 reached mean peak plasma R levels of 11.8 microM and 5.3 microM, respectively, after 18 hours of therapy. Subsequent administration of 20 mg R every 8 hours was sufficient to maintain a plasma R level greater than 7 microM. Among the aerosol groups, group A-40 approached steady state plasma R levels (8-10 microM) more quickly than group A-60.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)