Pharmacokinetics of fleroxacin after multiple oral dosing in patients receiving regular hemodialysis

β-Blocker Dialyzability in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of data available to describe drug dialyzability. Of the available information, most was obtained before implementation of modern hemodialysis membranes. Our study characterized dialyzability of the most commonly prescribed β-blockers in patients undergoing high-flux hemodialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Patients on hemodialysis (n=8) were recruited to an open label, pharmacokinetic, four-way crossover trial. Single doses of atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, and carvedilol were administered on separate days in random order to each patient. Plasma and dialysate drug concentrations were measured, and dialyzability was determined by the recovery clearance and arterial venous difference methods.

RESULTS

Using the recovery clearance method, the dialytic clearance values for atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, and carvedilol were 72, 87, 44, and 0.2 ml/min, respectively (P<0.001). Applying the arterial venous difference method, the dialytic clearance values of atenolol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, and carvedilol were 167, 114, 96, and 24 ml/min, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atenolol and metoprolol are extensively cleared by hemodialysis compared with the negligible dialytic clearance of carvedilol. Contrary to estimates of dialyzability on the basis of previous literature, our data indicate that bisoprolol is also dialyzable. This finding highlights the importance of conducting dialyzability studies to definitively characterize drug dialytic clearance.

Clearance of cardiovascular medications during hemodialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current understanding of hemodialysis-mediated clearance of commonly used cardiovascular medications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although cardiovascular drug dialyzability is poorly understood, many drug classes appear to include agents with substantially different degrees of dialyzability. Recent data suggest that more readily dialyzable beta-blockers associate with higher short-term mortality in patients initiating these drugs when on hemodialysis. Although this relationship was not observed in a later study with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors of varying dialyzability, studies of this kind are currently limited by pharmacokinetic data that are either incomplete or no longer applicable to modern hemodialysis procedures.

SUMMARY

There are substantial deficits in our understanding of cardiovascular medication dialyzability, which relates in large part to advances in the process of hemodialysis that have rendered older studies of dialyzability irrelevant. The importance of cardiovascular disease in patients receiving hemodialysis demands a better understanding of the effect hemodialysis exerts on cardiovascular drug pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in chronic kidney disease and patients requiring dialysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the progressive decline in renal function over time. Patients with end-stage renal disease require renal replacement therapy such as hemodialysis to support life. Hemodialysis patients require several medications to treat a variety of comorbid conditions. Polypharmacy accompanied by alterations in the pharmacokinetics of medications places hemodialysis patients at increased risk of drug accumulation and adverse events.

AREAS COVERED

We review alterations in the pharmacokinetics of drugs in hemodialysis patients. The major areas of pharmacokinetics, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, are covered and, where appropriate, differences between dialysis patients and non-dialysis CKD patients are compared. In addition, we review the importance of drug dialyzability and its potential impact on drug efficacy. Finally, we describe important clinical examples demonstrating nonrenal drug clearance is significantly altered in CKD.

EXPERT OPINION

Decreases in renal drug excretion experienced by hemodialysis patients have been known for years. Recent animal and human clinical pharmacokinetic studies have highlighted that nonrenal clearance of drugs is also substantially decreased in CKD. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies are required to determine the optimal dosage of drugs in CKD and hemodialysis patients in order to decrease the incidence of adverse medication events in these patient populations.

Fluorescence spectroscopic analysis on interaction of fleroxacin with pepsin

The interaction between fleroxacin (FLX) and pepsin was investigated by spectrofluorimetry. The effects of FLX on pepsin showed that the microenvironment of tryptophan residues and molecular conformation of pepsin were changed based on fluorescence quenching and synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy in combination with three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy. Static quenching was suggested and it was proved that the fluorescence quenching of pepsin by FLX was related to the formation of a new complex and a non-radiation energy transfer. The quenching constants KSV , binding constants K and binding sites n were calculated at different temperatures. The molecular interaction distance (r = 6.71) and energy transfer efficiency (E = 0.216) between pepsin and FLX were obtained according to the Forster mechanism of non-radiation energy transfer. Hydrophobic and electrostatic interaction played a major role in FLX-pepsin association. In addition, the hydrophobic interaction and binding free energy were further tested by molecular modeling study.

Increased cortisol metabolites and reduced activity of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal failure have symptoms assumed to be attributable to the accumulation of toxic endo- or xenobiotics. Most of these molecules, especially those with a molecular weight>300 D, have not been identified. In addition to excretion, the kidney is involved in some defined metabolic processes. In the cortical collecting duct, the enzyme 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11beta-HSD2) interconverts cortisol (F) and cortisone (E), and the metabolites of these glucocorticoids, tetrahydrocortisol (THF), 5alpha-tetrahydrocortisol (5alpha-THF) and tetrahydrocortisone (THE), are excreted in urine. We hypothesized that first, these metabolites accumulate and second, their concentration pattern changes in patients on hemodialysis.

METHODS

THF, 5alpha-THF, THE, F and E were measured in plasma of 63 patients on dialysis and in 34 healthy controls by gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In 11 patients, the metabolite clearance was determined during high flux hemodialysis by using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

RESULTS

Mean plasma concentrations of THF, 5alpha-THF and THE were more than five times higher and those of E lower in patients than in controls. The ratios of (THF + 5alpha-THF)/THE and F/E were increased in patients, indicating a reduced activity of 11beta-HSD2. Intradialytic clearances were between 120 and 300 mL/min and not sufficient to normalize the steroid concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Patients on hemodialysis exhibit pronounced increases in THF, 5alpha-THF and THE concentrations in plasma with insufficient removal during dialysis. Due to a reduced 11beta-HSD2 activity, an abnormal pattern of the concentrations of these cortisol and cortisone metabolites is observed. Since many signs and symptoms in uremic patients resemble those observed in subjects with glucocorticoid excess, the clinical relevance of the high concentrations of these glucocorticoid metabolites deserves further investigation.

Pharmacokinetics and haemodynamics of candesartan cilexetil in hypertensive patients on regular haemodialysis

AIMS

The pharmacokinetic profile of candesartan cilexetil might be altered in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). No data are available about the pharmacokinetics and haemodynamics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist candesartan cilexetil in ESRD patients on regular haemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

We performed a repeated dose study (8 mg candesartan cilexetil once daily) in eight male HD patients over a treatment period of 5 days with an additional observation period of 3 days.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analysis with nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) over the whole treatment period revealed a dependency of the volume of distribution on body weight and of the metabolic clearance on age and body weight in the studied population. No significant drug elimination by HD was observed. The estimated metabolic and intercompartmental clearances were 83 ml min-1 (CV 39%) and 9.9 ml min-1, respectively. The unexplained random variability of the final two compartment model was 30%. In one patient with adult polycystic kidney disease oral clearance decreased during the observation period, attributable to a significant increase in bioavailability. Maximum observed changes in blood pressure were -50/-27+/-14/8 mmHg on day 5 with haemodialysis therapy as compared with changes in blood pressure of -14/-12+/-14/8 mmHg on day 1 without haemodialysis treatment. The observed maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure correlated with the amount of ultrafiltration during the HD session on day 5 (r=0.70, P<0.05). In two patients, one of whom was binephrectomized, severe hypotensive episodes were observed during this HD session.

CONCLUSIONS

HD does not influence the elimination kinetics of candesartan. The observed inter- and intraindividual variability of oral clearance and the pronounced influence of HD-induced volume contraction on the haemodynamic effects of candesartan makes it mandatory to carefully monitor HD patients treated with candesartan cilexetil.

Urea kinetics and dialysis treatment time predict vancomycin elimination during high-flux hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis sessions with high-flux filters ask for a reconsideration of the kinetics of xenobiotics. The aim of this study was to analyze whether individual high-flux hemodialysis treatment parameters are of predictive value for dosing guidelines, with use of vancomycin as a model compound.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis were studied prospectively. After an intravenous infusion of 1000 mg or 500 mg vancomycin, respectively, six to eight blood samples were collected within a period of 5 to 9 days, including one hemodialysis session. Serum vancomycin concentrations were measured by HPLC. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) was used to fit a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model to the data of 20 patients; the data of the remaining six patients (group II) were used for a prospective evaluation of the model.

RESULTS

A linear relationship was found between vancomycin filter clearance (CLDV) and urea filter clearance (CLDBUN), derived from Kt/V (the product of urea clearance [K] and dialysis treatment time [t], standardized for the urea volume of distribution [V]). Mean (coefficient of variation) steady-state volume of distribution was 1.05 L/kg (22%), CLDV was 0.336.CLDBUN (13%), and residual interdialytic clearance was 2.25 ml/min (90%) in patients with creatinine clearance values (CLCR) below 2 ml/min and 2.25 ml/min + 0.59.CLCR (32%) in patients with CLCR values above 2 ml/min. The model predicted predialysis vancomycin concentrations before the first and the second postinfusion dialysis session in the six patients of group II, with a deviation of 1.8 +/- 1.0 mg/L and 0.8 +/- 0.5 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The described population pharmacokinetic model allows individualization of vancomycin dosing intervals in patients receiving hemodialysis, based on patient characteristics and urea kinetic modeling.