A Factor I-Like Activity Associated with Chikungunya Virus Contributes to Its Resistance to the Human Complement System

Elevated Complement Activation Fragments and C1q-Binding Circulating Immune Complexes in Varied Phases of Chikungunya Virus Infection

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a causative agent of a disease continuum, ranging from an acute transient chikungunya fever to chronic incapacitating viral arthralgia. The interaction between anti-CHIKV antibodies and the complement system has recently received attention. However, the contribution of complement activation in CHIKV-induced pathologies has not been fully elucidated. The present study was undertaken to delineate the possible contribution of complement activation in CHIKV-induced disease progression. In this study, using plasma specimens of chikungunya patients in the acute, chronic, and recovered phases of infection, we explicated the involvement of complement activation in CHIKV disease progression by ELISAs and Bio-Plex assays. Correlation analysis was carried out to demonstrate interrelation among C1q-binding IgG-containing circulating immune complexes (CIC-C1q), complement activation fragments (C3a, C5a, sC5b-9), and complement-modulated pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18, IL-6, and TNF-α). We detected elevated complement activation fragments, CIC-C1q, and complement-modulated cytokines in the varied patient groups compared with the healthy controls, indicating persistent activation of the complement system. Furthermore, we observed statistically significant correlations among CIC-C1q with complement activation fragments and C3a with complement modulatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18 during the CHIKV disease progression. Taken together, the current data provide insight into the plausible association between CICs, complement activation, subsequent complement modulatory cytokine expression, and CHIKV etiopathology.

How much (evil) intelligence can be encoded by 30 kb?

Genomes of most RNA viruses are rarely larger than the size of an average human gene (10-15 kb) and still code for a number of biologically active polypeptides that modify the immune system and metabolism of the host organism in an amazingly complex way. Prolonged coevolution developed tricks by which viruses can dodge many protective mechanisms of the host and lead to the formation of molecular mimicry patterns. Some viruses inhibit the interferon response, interfere with the membrane destroying effects of the activated complement cascade. They can replicate in cellular compartments formed by inner membranes of the cell hiding their characteristic features from diverse pattern recognition receptors. In many cases-and in this respect, the new coronavirus is a champion-they can exploit our own defensive mechanisms to cause serious harm, severe symptoms and frequently deadly disease.

Role of cytokines, chemokines, C3a, and mannose-binding lectin in the evolution of the chikungunya infection

The pathogenesis of the severity of chikungunya infection is not yet fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of the cytokines/chemokines and system of complement in the evolution of chikungunya infection.

METHODS

In both acute and chronic phases, we measured the serum levels of 12 cytokines/chemokines and two complement mediators: mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and C3a, in 83 patients with chikungunya infection and ten healthy controls.

RESULTS

During the acute phase, 75.9% of the patients developed musculoskeletal disorders, and in 37.7% of them, these disorders persisted until the chronic phase. In general, patients had higher levels of cytokines than healthy controls, with significant differences for IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MIP-1. Most cytokines exhibited a downward trend during the chronic phase. However, only IL-10, and MIP-1 levels were significantly lower in the chronic phase. Additionally, these levels never decreased to concentrations found in healthy controls. Moreover, MBL levels were significantly higher in the acute phase compared with the chronic phase. C3a levels were significantly higher in patients with musculoskeletal disorder compared with patients without it, in both acute-phase 118.2 (66.5-252.9), and chronic phase 68.5 (64.4-71.3), P < 0.001. Interestingly, C3a levels were significantly higher when patients had a severe disease version. Besides, in the acute phase, C3a levels were higher in patients that suffer arthritis as opposed to when they suffer arthralgia, 194.3 (69.5-282.2), and 70.9 (62.4-198.8), P = 0.013, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed an immunological response that persisted until the chronic phase and the role of the complement system in the severity of the disease.

Comparative Analysis of Serum Proteins Between Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes B and C Infection by DIA-Based Quantitative Proteomics

Purpose

In clinical practice, the clinicopathological profiles and outcomes of patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) are different between genotypes B and C. However, little is known about the potential mechanism and differences in specific biological pathways associated with the different genotype. This study aimed to compare the serum protein profile between patients infected with HBV genotype B and those infected with HBV genotype C.

Patients and Methods

A total of 54 serum samples from patients with chronic HBV genotype B infection and those with chronic HBV genotype C infection, and healthy controls were used for the proteomic analysis (n = 18 samples in per group). Serum proteomic profiles were analyzed using data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify differentially expressed proteins (up- or downregulation of at least 1.5-fold) between serum samples from HBV patients infected with HBV genotype B and those infected with genotype C.

Results

We identified 1010 proteins, 53 of which were differentially expressed between the serum samples of the healthy controls and those of HBV genotype B infected patients, and 59 that were differentially expressed between the samples of the healthy controls and those of HBV genotype C infected patients. Furthermore, our results indicated that two proteins identified as being differentially expressed (VWF and C8B) have potential as biomarkers for distinguishing genotype B infected HBV patients from those infected with genotype C.

Conclusion

The results of our DIA-based quantitative proteomic analysis revealed that HBV genotypes B and C are associated with different molecular profiles and may provide fundamental information for further detailed investigations of the molecular mechanism underlying these differences.

Virus-Encoded Complement Regulators: Current Status

Viruses require a host for replication and survival and hence are subjected to host immunological pressures. The complement system, a crucial first response of the host immune system, is effective in targeting viruses and virus-infected cells, and boosting the antiviral innate and acquired immune responses. Thus, the system imposes a strong selection pressure on viruses. Consequently, viruses have evolved multiple countermeasures against host complement. A major mechanism employed by viruses to subvert the complement system is encoding proteins that target complement. Since viruses have limited genome size, most of these proteins are multifunctional in nature. In this review, we provide up to date information on the structure and complement regulatory functions of various viral proteins.

In the Crosshairs: RNA Viruses OR Complement?

Complement, a part of the innate arm of the immune system, is integral to the frontline defense of the host against innumerable pathogens, which includes RNA viruses. Among the major groups of viruses, RNA viruses contribute significantly to the global mortality and morbidity index associated with viral infection. Despite multiple routes of entry adopted by these viruses, facing complement is inevitable. The initial interaction with complement and the nature of this interaction play an important role in determining host resistance versus susceptibility to the viral infection. Many RNA viruses are potent activators of complement, often resulting in virus neutralization. Yet, another facet of virus-induced activation is the exacerbation in pathogenesis contributing to the overall morbidity. The severity in disease and death associated with RNA virus infections shows a tip in the scale favoring viruses. Growing evidence suggest that like their DNA counterparts, RNA viruses have co-evolved to master ingenious strategies to remarkably restrict complement. Modulation of host genes involved in antiviral responses contributed prominently to the adoption of unique strategies to keep complement at bay, which included either down regulation of activation components (C3, C4) or up regulation of complement regulatory proteins. All this hints at a possible “hijacking” of the cross-talk mechanism of the host immune system. Enveloped RNA viruses have a selective advantage of not only modulating the host responses but also recruiting membrane-associated regulators of complement activation (RCAs). This review aims to highlight the significant progress in the understanding of RNA virus–complement interactions.

Viral Evasion of the Complement System and Its Importance for Vaccines and Therapeutics

The complement system is a key component of innate immunity which readily responds to invading microorganisms. Activation of the complement system typically occurs via three main pathways and can induce various antimicrobial effects, including: neutralization of pathogens, regulation of inflammatory responses, promotion of chemotaxis, and enhancement of the adaptive immune response. These can be vital host responses to protect against acute, chronic, and recurrent viral infections. Consequently, many viruses (including dengue virus, West Nile virus and Nipah virus) have evolved mechanisms for evasion or dysregulation of the complement system to enhance viral infectivity and even exacerbate disease symptoms. The complement system has multifaceted roles in both innate and adaptive immunity, with both intracellular and extracellular functions, that can be relevant to all stages of viral infection. A better understanding of this virus-host interplay and its contribution to pathogenesis has previously led to: the identification of genetic factors which influence viral infection and disease outcome, the development of novel antivirals, and the production of safer, more effective vaccines. This review will discuss the antiviral effects of the complement system against numerous viruses, the mechanisms employed by these viruses to then evade or manipulate this system, and how these interactions have informed vaccine/therapeutic development. Where relevant, conflicting findings and current research gaps are highlighted to aid future developments in virology and immunology, with potential applications to the current COVID-19 pandemic.