Mechanisms of monoclonal antibody-mediated protection against virulent Semliki Forest virus

Insights into Antibody-Mediated Alphavirus Immunity and Vaccine Development Landscape

Alphaviruses are mosquito-borne pathogens distributed worldwide in tropical and temperate areas causing a wide range of symptoms ranging from inflammatory arthritis-like manifestations to the induction of encephalitis in humans. Historically, large outbreaks in susceptible populations have been recorded followed by the development of protective long-lasting antibody responses suggesting a potential advantageous role for a vaccine. Although the current understanding of alphavirus antibody-mediated immunity has been mainly gathered in natural and experimental settings of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection, little is known about the humoral responses triggered by other emerging alphaviruses. This knowledge is needed to improve serology-based diagnostic tests and the development of highly effective cross-protective vaccines. Here, we review the role of antibody-mediated immunity upon arthritogenic and neurotropic alphavirus infections, and the current research efforts for the development of vaccines as a tool to control future alphavirus outbreaks.

Viral mouse models used to study multiple sclerosis: past and present

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Although the etiology of MS is unknown, genetics and environmental factors, such as infections, play a role. Viral infections of mice have been used as model systems to study this demyelinating disease of humans. Three viruses that have long been studied in this capacity are Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus, mouse hepatitis virus, and Semliki Forest virus. This review describes the viruses themselves, the infection process, the disease caused by infection and its accompanying pathology, and the model systems and their usefulness in studying MS.

Nucleoprotein-specific nonneutralizing antibodies speed up LCMV elimination independently of complement and FcγR

CD8(+) T cells have an essential role in controlling lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection in mice. Here, we examined the contribution of humoral immunity, including nonneutralizing antibodies (Abs), in this infection induced by low virus inoculation doses. Mice with impaired humoral immunity readily terminated infection with the slowly replicating LCMV strain Armstrong but showed delayed virus elimination after inoculation with the faster replicating LCMV strain WE and failed to clear the rapidly replicating LCMV strain Docile, which is in contrast to the results obtained with wild-type mice. Thus, the requirement for adaptive humoral immunity to control the infection was dependent on the replication speed of the LCMV strains used. Ab transfers further showed that LCMV-specific IgG Abs isolated from LCMV immune serum accelerated virus elimination. These Abs were mainly directed against the viral nucleoprotein (NP) and completely lacked virus neutralizing activity. Moreover, mAbs specific for the LCMV NP were also able to decrease viral titers after transfer into infected hosts. Intriguingly, neither C3 nor Fcγ receptors were required for the antiviral activity of the transferred Abs. In conclusion, our study suggests that rapidly generated nonneutralizing Abs specific for the viral NP speed up virus elimination and thereby may counteract T-cell exhaustion.

Development of a highly protective combination monoclonal antibody therapy against Chikungunya virus

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-transmitted alphavirus that causes global epidemics of a debilitating polyarthritis in humans. As there is a pressing need for the development of therapeutic agents, we screened 230 new mouse anti-CHIKV monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) for their ability to inhibit infection of all three CHIKV genotypes. Four of 36 neutralizing MAbs (CHK-102, CHK-152, CHK-166, and CHK-263) provided complete protection against lethality as prophylaxis in highly susceptible immunocompromised mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (Ifnar^−/−) and mapped to distinct epitopes on the E1 and E2 structural proteins. CHK-152, the most protective MAb, was humanized, shown to block viral fusion, and require Fc effector function for optimal activity in vivo. In post-exposure therapeutic trials, administration of a single dose of a combination of two neutralizing MAbs (CHK-102+CHK-152 or CHK-166+CHK-152) limited the development of resistance and protected immunocompromised mice against disease when given 24 to 36 hours before CHIKV-induced death. Selected pairs of highly neutralizing MAbs may be a promising treatment option for CHIKV in humans.

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-transmitted alphavirus that causes outbreaks of polyarthritis in humans, and is currently a threat to spread to the United States due to the presence of its mosquito vector, Aedes albopictus. At present, there is no licensed human vaccine or therapeutic available to protect against CHIKV infection. The primary goal of this study was to develop an antibody-based therapeutic agent against CHIKV. To do this, we developed a panel of 230 new mouse anti-CHIKV MAbs and tested them for their ability to neutralize infection of different CHIKV strains in cell culture. We identified 36 MAbs with broad neutralizing activity, and then tested several of these for their ability to protect immunocompromised Ifnar^−/− mice against lethal CHIKV infection. In post-exposure therapeutic trials, administration of a single dose of a combination of two neutralizing MAbs limited the development of resistance and protected Ifnar^−/− mice against disease even when given just 24 to 36 hours before CHIKV-induced death. Analogous protection against CHIKV-induced arthritis was seen in a disease model in wild type mice. Our data suggest that pairs of highly neutralizing MAbs may be a therapeutic option against CHIKV infection.

Poorly neutralizing cross-reactive antibodies against the fusion loop of West Nile virus envelope protein protect in vivo via Fcgamma receptor and complement-dependent effector mechanisms

The human antibody response to flavivirus infection is dominantly directed against a cross-reactive epitope on the fusion loop of domain II (DII-FL) of the envelope (E) protein. Although antibodies against this epitope fail to recognize fully mature West Nile virus (WNV) virions and accordingly neutralize infection poorly in vitro, their functional properties in vivo remain less well understood. Here, we show that while passive transfer of poorly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAb) and polyclonal antibodies against the DII-FL epitope protect against lethal WNV infection in wild-type mice, they fail to protect mice lacking activating Fcγ receptors (FcγR) and the complement opsonin C1q. Consistent with this, an aglycosyl chimeric mouse-human DII-FL MAb (E28) variant that lacks the ability to engage FcγR and C1q also did not protect against WNV infection in wild-type mice. Using a series of immunodeficient mice and antibody depletions of individual immune cell populations, we demonstrate that the nonneutralizing DII-FL MAb E28 does not require T, B, or NK cells, inflammatory monocytes, or neutrophils for protection. Rather, E28 treatment decreased viral load in the serum early in the course of infection, which resulted in blunted dissemination to the brain, an effect that required phagocytic cells, C1q, and FcγRIII (CD16). Overall, these studies enhance our understanding of the functional significance of immunodominant, poorly neutralizing antibodies in the polyclonal human anti-flavivirus response and highlight the limitations of current in vitro surrogate markers of protection, such as cell-based neutralization assays, which cannot account for the beneficial effects conferred by these antibodies.

Persistent infection with ebola virus under conditions of partial immunity

Ebola hemorrhagic fever in humans is associated with high mortality; however, some infected hosts clear the virus and recover. The mechanisms by which this occurs and the correlates of protective immunity are not well defined. Using a mouse model, we determined the role of the immune system in clearance of and protection against Ebola virus. All CD8 T-cell-deficient mice succumbed to subcutaneous infection and had high viral antigen titers in tissues, whereas mice deficient in B cells or CD4 T cells cleared infection and survived, suggesting that CD8 T cells, independent of CD4 T cells and antibodies, are critical to protection against subcutaneous Ebola virus infection. B-cell-deficient mice that survived the primary subcutaneous infection (vaccinated mice) transiently depleted or not depleted of CD4 T cells also survived lethal intraperitoneal rechallenge for >/==" BORDER="0">25 days. However, all vaccinated B-cell-deficient mice depleted of CD8 T cells had high viral antigen titers in tissues following intraperitoneal rechallenge and died within 6 days, suggesting that memory CD8 T cells by themselves can protect mice from early death. Surprisingly, vaccinated B-cell-deficient mice, after initially clearing the infection, were found to have viral antigens in tissues later (day 120 to 150 post-intraperitoneal infection). Furthermore, following intraperitoneal rechallenge, vaccinated B-cell-deficient mice that were transiently depleted of CD4 T cells had high levels of viral antigen in tissues earlier (days 50 to 70) than vaccinated undepleted mice. This demonstrates that under certain immunodeficiency conditions, Ebola virus can persist and that loss of primed CD4 T cells accelerates the course of persistent infections. These data show that CD8 T cells play an important role in protection against acute disease, while both CD4 T cells and antibodies are required for long-term protection, and they provide evidence of persistent infection by Ebola virus suggesting that under certain conditions of immunodeficiency a host can harbor virus for prolonged periods, potentially acting as a reservoir.

Virus-neutralizing activity mediated by the Fab fragment of a hemagglutinin-specific antibody is sufficient for the resolution of influenza virus infection in SCID mice

Antibodies (Abs) contribute to the control of influenza virus infection in vivo by reducing progeny virus yield from infected cells (yield reduction [YR]) and by inhibiting progeny virus from spreading the infection to new host cells (virus neutralization [VN]). Previous studies showed that the infection could be resolved in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice by treatment with hemagglutinin (HA)-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that exhibit both VN and YR activities but not by MAbs that exhibited only YR activity. To determine whether virus clearance requires both activities, we measured the therapeutic activity of an HA-specific MAb (VN and YR) and its Fab fragment (VN) by intranasal (i.n.) administration to infected SCID mice. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Fab cleared the infection with i.n. 50% effective doses (ED(50)s) of 16 and 90 pmol, respectively. To resolve an established infection solely by VN activity, Fab must be present in the respiratory tract at an effective threshold concentration until all infected cells have died and production of virus has ceased. Because IgG and Fab had different half-lives in the respiratory tract (22 and 8 h, respectively) and assuming that both operated mainly or solely by VN, it could be estimated that clearance was achieved 24 h after Ab treatment when both reagents were present in the respiratory tract at approximately 10 pmol. This dose was approximately 200 times larger than the respiratory tract-associated Ab dose resulting from administration of the intraperitoneal ED(50) (270 pmol) of IgG. This indicated that our procedure of i.n. administration of Ab did not make optimal use of the Ab's therapeutic activity.

The antiviral activity of antibodies in vitro and in vivo

This chapter discusses in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities of antibody. Since experimentation is far easier in vitro , researchers have been sought to develop in vitro assays that are expected to predict activity in vivo . This could be important in both vaccine design and in passive antibody administration. The proposed mechanisms of in vitro neutralization range from those requiring binding of a single antibody molecule to virus to those requiring substantially complete antibody coating of virus. In vitro, antiviral activity can be separated into activity against virions and activity against infected cells. The activity against virions most often considered is neutralization that can be defined as the loss of infectivity, which ensues when antibody molecule(s) bind to a virus particle, and occurs without the involvement of any other agency. In vivo, it is conventional to distinguish phenomenologically between two types of antibody antiviral activity. One of them is the ability of antibody to protect against infection when it is present before or immediately following infection. Evidence for a number of viruses in vitro indicates that lower antibody concentrations are required to inhibit infection propagated by free virus than are required to inhibit infection propagated by cell-to-cell spread.

The biological relevance of virus neutralisation sites for virulence and vaccine protection in the guinea pig model of foot-and-mouth disease

Five neutralisation epitopes have been defined for the O1 Kaufbeuren strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) by neutralising murine monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). A mutant virus which is resistant to all these Mabs also resists neutralisation by bovine polyclonal sera, and this characteristic was exploited in the current study to investigate the biological relevance of neutralisation sites in FMDV virulence and vaccine protection. The five site neutralisation-resistant mutant was shown to be as pathogenic as wild-type virus in the guinea pig model of FMD. Guinea pigs were protected in cross-challenge studies from virulent wild-type and mutant viruses using either wild-type or mutant 146S antigen as inactivated whole virus vaccine. Furthermore, hyperimmune sera raised to either wild-type or mutant antigen offered passive protection against wild-type challenge, in spite of the serum raised against the mutant antigen having minimal neutralising activity in vitro. These results imply that virus neutralisation, at least as defined by the in vitro assay, may not play an essential role in the mechanism of immunity induced by whole inactivated FMDV vaccines.

A pulmonary influenza virus infection in SCID mice can be cured by treatment with hemagglutinin-specific antibodies that display very low virus-neutralizing activity in vitro

We have previously shown that a pulmonary influenza virus infection in SCID mice can be cured by treatment with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for the viral transmembrane protein hemagglutinin (HA) but not for matrix 2. Since both types of MAbs react with infected cells but only the former neutralizes the virus, it appeared that passive MAbs cured by neutralization of progeny virus rather than reaction with infected host cells. To prove this, we selected a set of four HA-specific MAbs, all of the immunoglobulin G2a isotype, which reacted well with native HA expressed on infected cells yet differed greatly (>10,000-fold) in virus neutralization (VN) activity in vitro, apparently because of differences in antibody avidity and accessibility of the respective determinants on the HA of mature virions. Since the VN activities of these MAbs in vitro were differentially enhanced by serum components, we determined their prophylactic activities in vivo and used them as measures of their actual VN activities in vivo. The comparison of therapeutic and prophylactic activities indicated that these MAbs cured the infection to a greater extent by VN activity (which was greatly enhanced in vivo) and to a lesser extent by reaction with infected host cells. Neither complement- nor NK cell-dependent mechanisms were involved in the MAb-mediated virus clearance.

Monovalent single-chain Fv fragments and bivalent miniantibodies bound to vesicular stomatitis virus protect against lethal infection

Several antibody-dependent mechanisms have been postulated to mediate neutralization of different animal viruses, including blocking of docking to receptors, induction of conformational changes in the virus coat, and Fc-dependent opsonization. We have studied the molecular requirements for antibody-mediated neutralization of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in vitro and protection against lethal disease in vivo with a single-chain Fv fragment (scFv) and the corresponding bivalent miniantibody (scFv-dHLX) generated from a VSV-neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Both monovalent scFv and bivalent scFv-dHLX miniantibodies were able to neutralize VSV in vitro and to protect interferon-alphabeta receptor-deficient (IFN-alphabeta R-/-) mice against lethal disease after intravenous injection of 50 plaque-forming units (pfu) VSV pre-incubated with the scFv reagents. Similarly, severe-combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice infected with immune complexes of 10(8) pfu VSV and bivalent scFv-dHLX were protected against lethal disease; however, mice infected with immune complexes of 10(8) pfu VSV and monovalent scFv were not. Although repeated scFv-dHLX treatment reduced virus quantities in the blood, neither SCID nor IFN-alphabeta R-/- mice were protected against lethal disease after passive immunization and subsequent VSV infection. This was due to the short half-life of 17 min of scFv-dHLX in the circulation. These data demonstrate that neutralization of VSV and protection against lethal disease do not require Fc-mediated mechanisms and that cross-linking is not crucial for protection against physiologically relevant virus doses in vivo.

The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution

The alphaviruses are a genus of 26 enveloped viruses that cause disease in humans and domestic animals. Mosquitoes or other hematophagous arthropods serve as vectors for these viruses. The complete sequences of the +/- 11.7-kb plus-strand RNA genomes of eight alphaviruses have been determined, and partial sequences are known for several others; this has made possible evolutionary comparisons between different alphaviruses as well as comparisons of this group of viruses with other animal and plant viruses. Full-length cDNA clones from which infectious RNA can be recovered have been constructed for four alphaviruses; these clones have facilitated many molecular genetic studies as well as the development of these viruses as expression vectors. From these and studies involving biochemical approaches, many details of the replication cycle of the alphaviruses are known. The interactions of the viruses with host cells and host organisms have been exclusively studied, and the molecular basis of virulence and recovery from viral infection have been addressed in a large number of recent papers. The structure of the viruses has been determined to about 2.5 nm, making them the best-characterized enveloped virus to date. Because of the wealth of data that has appeared, these viruses represent a well-characterized system that tell us much about the evolution of RNA viruses, their replication, and their interactions with their hosts. This review summarizes our current knowledge of this group of viruses.

The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution

The alphaviruses are a genus of 26 enveloped viruses that cause disease in humans and domestic animals. Mosquitoes or other hematophagous arthropods serve as vectors for these viruses. The complete sequences of the +/- 11.7-kb plus-strand RNA genomes of eight alphaviruses have been determined, and partial sequences are known for several others; this has made possible evolutionary comparisons between different alphaviruses as well as comparisons of this group of viruses with other animal and plant viruses. Full-length cDNA clones from which infectious RNA can be recovered have been constructed for four alphaviruses; these clones have facilitated many molecular genetic studies as well as the development of these viruses as expression vectors. From these and studies involving biochemical approaches, many details of the replication cycle of the alphaviruses are known. The interactions of the viruses with host cells and host organisms have been exclusively studied, and the molecular basis of virulence and recovery from viral infection have been addressed in a large number of recent papers. The structure of the viruses has been determined to about 2.5 nm, making them the best-characterized enveloped virus to date. Because of the wealth of data that has appeared, these viruses represent a well-characterized system that tell us much about the evolution of RNA viruses, their replication, and their interactions with their hosts. This review summarizes our current knowledge of this group of viruses.

Influence of epitope polarity and adjuvants on the immunogenicity and efficacy of a synthetic peptide vaccine against Semliki Forest virus

The antibody response to a previously defined B-cell epitope of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) was investigated in male BALB/c (H-2d) mice. The B-cell epitope, located at amino acid positions 240 to 255 of the E2 protein, was linked to an H-2d-restricted T-helper cell epitope of SFV located at positions 137 to 151 of the E2 protein. Colinearly synthesized peptides, of either T-B or B-T polarity, mixed with different adjuvants (the nonionic block copolymer L 180.5, a water-oil-water [W/O/W] emulsion of L 180.5, Montanide, and Q VAC) were used for immunization. Generally, after one booster immunization, high serum antibody titers were measured against either peptide. With Q VAC and W/O/W L 180.5 as adjuvants, the titers of SFV-reactive (nonneutralizing) antibodies were consistently much higher after immunization with the T-B peptide than with the B-T peptide, which was reflected in a higher vaccine efficacy. With these two adjuvants, the survival ratio in T-B peptide-immunized mice was 82%, compared with 8% in B-T peptide-immunized mice. Intermediate results were obtained with the adjuvant Montanide. L 180.5 alone was ineffective in this study. All immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotypes were induced with either adjuvant, but Q VAC was clearly the most effective in inducing IgG2a and IgG2b isotypes with the T-B peptide as the antigen. Subsequently, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) of IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 subclasses were prepared against the B-cell epitope. These nonneutralizing but SFV-reactive MAbs protected 40 to 80% of mice against a lethal challenge with SFV. Control mice all died. The availability of those antipeptide MAbs allowed competition binding assays with a previously characterized panel of E2-specific MAbs. Binding of enzyme-labeled antipeptide MAbs was very effectively inhibited by two strongly SFV-neutralizing mutually competitive MAbs, suggesting that the linear B-cell epitope (amino acids 240 to 255) is associated with a major neutralization site of SFV.

Protective anti-reovirus monoclonal antibodies and their effects on viral pathogenesis

We used a recently isolated and characterized panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for cross-reactive determinants on reovirus outer capsid proteins to define mechanisms of antibody-mediated protection in vivo. We studied the capacities of MAbs to protect against lethal infection with reoviruses which differ in site of primary replication, route of spread, and central nervous system tropism. We found the following. (i) MAbs specific for each of the viral outer capsid proteins (sigma 1, sigma 3, and mu 1) and the core spike protein (lambda 2) were protective under certain circumstances. (ii) In vitro properties of MAbs, including isotype, neutralization of viral infectivity, inhibition of virus-induced hemagglutination, and avidity of binding, were poorly predictive of the capacities of MAbs to protect in vivo. (iii) MAbs did not act at a single stage during pathogenesis to mediate protection; instead, protective MAbs were capable of altering a variety of stages in reovirus pathogenesis. (iv) MAbs protective against one reovirus also protected against other reoviruses that utilized different pathogenetic strategies, suggesting that the viral epitope bound by an antibody rather than the pathogenetic strategy employed by the virus is a critical determinant of antibody-mediated protection in vivo. (v) A prominent mechanism of protective MAb action is inhibition of viral spread through nerves from a site of primary replication (e.g., the intestine or muscle tissue) to the central nervous system.

Resistance of mice vaccinated with rabies virus internal structural proteins to lethal infection

Mice were vaccinated with recombinant vaccinia virus (rVac) expressing the glycoprotein (G), nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (NS) or matrix protein (M) of rabies virus and their resistance to peripheral lethal infection with street rabies virus was examined. Mice vaccinated with rVac-G or rVac-N developed strong antibody responses to the corresponding proteins and essentially all mice survived challenge infection. Mice vaccinated with rVac-NS or rVac-M developed only a slight antibody response, however, a significant protection (59%) was observed in the rVac-NS-vaccinated mice, whereas rVac-M-vaccinated mice were not protected. No anti-G antibodies were detected in the sera of mice which has been vaccinated with rVac-N or rVac-NS and survived challenge infection. Passive transfer of anti-N monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) recognizing an epitope located on amino acids 1-224 of the protein prior to challenge resulted in significant protection, although the protection was not complete even with a high amount of antibodies. In contrast, none of the mice given MAbs recognizing an epitope of amino acids 247-415 or F(ab')2 fragments from a protective MAb IgG were protected. Administration of anti-CD 8 MAb to rVac-N-vaccinated mice showed no significant effect on protection. Our observations suggest that a considerable part of the protection achieved by the vaccination with rVac-N can be ascribed to the intact anti-N antibodies recognizing an epitope located on amino acids 1-224 of the protein.

Pathogenesis of virus-induced demyelination

Demyelination is a component of several viral diseases of humans. The best known of these are subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). There are a number of naturally occurring virus infections of animals that involve demyelination and many of these serve as instructive models for human demyelinating diseases. In addition to the naturally occurring diseases, many viruses have been shown to be capable of producing demyelination in experimental situations. In discussing virus-associated demyelinating disease, the chapter reviews the architecture and functional organization of the CNS and considers what is known of the interaction of viruses with CNS cells. It also discusses the immunology of the CNS that differs in several important aspects from that of the rest of the body. Experimental models of viral-induced demyelination have also been considered. Viruses capable of producing demyelinating disease have no common taxonomic features; they include both DNA and RNA viruses, enveloped and nonenveloped viruses. The chapter attempts to summarize the important factors influencing viral demyelination, their common features, and possible mechanisms.

A vaccine against Semliki Forest virus consisting of a monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody cross-linked to a protein which contains virus-specific T-helper cell epitopes

A recombinantly expressed protein, consisting of cro-beta-galactosidase at the N-terminus and amino acid residues 115 to 151 of the E2 membrane of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) at the C-terminus containing two T-helper cell epitopes of SFV, was cross-linked with glutaraldehyde to a noninternal image monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody (ab2 alpha MAb) able to induce SFV-neutralizing anti-anti-idiotypic (ab3) antibodies in BALB/c mice. This vaccine, which might potentially induce SFV-specific T-helper cell memory, established in BALB/c mice a state of protective immunity against virulent SFV within 10 days of immunization. A steady rise in serum neutralization titre occurred from day 7 to day 28 after primary anti-idiotypic immunization, levelling off thereafter. In primarily immunized mice significant rises of serum neutralization titres, which could be indicative for an operational T-helper cell memory, were not observed after challenge on day 35 with virulent SFV. The results suggest that SFV is neutralized by ab3 antibodies shortly after challenge, preventing, thereby, virus multiplication to levels sufficient to provoke a measurable booster response.

Synthetic peptides of the E2 glycoprotein of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus. II. Antibody to the amino terminus protects animals by limiting viral replication

A peptide composed of the amino-terminal 25 amino acids of the E2 glycoprotein of the virulent Trinidad donkey (TRD) strain of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus was found to protect peptide-immunized mice from lethal TRD virus challenge (Hunt et al., 1990). Viral growth in peptide-immunized animals was found to be limited in comparison to that in nonimmunized controls. Although both treated and control groups of mice responded to virus challenge by producing neutralizing antibody, only immunized mice with preexisting antipeptide antibody survived. Polyclonal antipeptide sera as well as a monoclonal antipeptide antibody were able to passively protect naive mice from TRD virus challenge, despite the fact that these antibodies were nonneutralizing. Passive transfer of antipeptide antibody to immunosuppressed recipients was not protective, thus indicating that survival of TRD virus challenge required an in situ immune response as well as preexisting antipeptide antibody. Binding studies of both polyclonal and monoclonal antipeptide antibodies indicated that they recognize only epitopes present on virus-infected cells or denatured virus.

Identification of antigenically important domains in the glycoproteins of Sindbis virus by analysis of antibody escape variants

To study important epitopes on glycoprotein E2 of Sindbis virus, eight variants selected to be singly or multiply resistant to six neutralizing monoclonal antibodies reactive against E2, as well as four revertants which had regained sensitivity to neutralization, were sequenced throughout the E2 region. To study antigenic determinants in glycoprotein E1, four variants selected for resistance to a neutralizing monoclonal antibody reactive with E1 were sequenced throughout the E2 and E1 regions. All of the salient changes in E2 occurred within a relatively small region between amino acids 181 and 216, a domain that encompasses a glycosylation site at residue 196 and that is rich in charged amino acids. Almost all variants had a change in charge, suggesting that the charged nature of this domain is important for interaction with antibodies. Variants independently isolated for resistance to the same antibody were usually altered in the same amino acid, and reversion to sensitivity occurred at the sites of the original mutations, but did not always restore the parental amino acid. The characteristics of this region suggest that this domain is found on the surface of E2 and constitutes a prominent antigenic domain that interacts directly with neutralizing antibodies. Previous studies have shown that this domain is also important for penetration of cells and for virulence of the virus. Resistance to the single E1-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibody resulted from changes of Gly-132 of E1 to either Arg or Glu. Analogous to the findings with E2, these changes result in a change in charge and are found near a glycosylation site at residue 139. This domain of E1 may therefore be found near the 181 to 216 domain of E2 on the surface of the E1-E2 heterodimer; together, they could form a domain important in virus penetration and neutralization.

Studies on linear epitopes of Semliki Forest virus in protection studies against lethal challenge virus infection

Purified reduced and non-reduced glycoproteins E1 and E2 of Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) were used to investigate the protection potency to prevent clinical disease after lethal virus challenge. In parallel synthetic oligopeptides deduced from conserved regions of the nucleotide sequences coding for the glycoproteins E1 and E2 were included. It could be demonstrated that both reduced and non-reduced glycoprotein preparations induced protection against lethal virus challenge, whereas the oligopeptides did not. The role of linear epitopes in immunity and their potential use as synthetic vaccines against Alphaviruses are critically discussed.

Raccoon poxvirus recombinants expressing the rabies virus nucleoprotein protect mice against lethal rabies virus infection

Raccoon poxvirus (RCN) recombinants expressing the rabies virus internal structural nucleoprotein (RCN-N) protected A/WySnJ mice against a lethal challenge with street rabies virus (SRV). Maximum survival was achieved following vaccination by tail scratch and footpad (FP) SRV challenge. RCN-N-vaccinated mice inoculated in the FP with SRV were resistant to infection for at least 54 weeks postvaccination. Protection was also elicited by RCN recombinants expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein (RCN-G). Vaccination with RCN-G evoked rabies virus neutralizing antibody. Rabies virus neutralizing antibody was not detected in RCN-N-vaccinated mice prior to or following SRV infection. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays showed that sera from RCN-N-vaccinated mice which survived SRV infection did not contain antibody to SRV structural protein G, M, or NS. The mechanism(s) of N-induced resistance appears to correlate with the failure of peripherally inoculated SRV to enter the central nervous system (CNS). Support for this correlation with resistance was documented by the observations that SRV-inoculated RCN-N-vaccinated mice did not develop clinical signs of CNS rabies virus infection, infectious SRV was not detected in the spinal cord or brain following FP challenge, and all RCN-N-vaccinated mice died following direct intracranial infection of the CNS with SRV. These results suggest that factors other than anti-G neutralizing antibody are important in resistance to rabies virus and that the N protein should be considered for incorporation with the G protein in recombinant vaccines.

Topological mapping of antigenic sites on the Rift Valley fever virus envelope glycoproteins using monoclonal antibodies

A panel of 17 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the G1 and G2 envelope glycoproteins of Rift Valley fever (RVF) virus were used to analyze the topography and functional properties of the viral antigenic sites. Four heterogeneous antigenic regions which may be interlinked were identified on the G1 protein and four distinct domains on the G2 protein by competitive binding assays. Comparison of the biological activities and epitope specificities of the MAbs against G1 showed that the antigenic domains I, II, and IV were involved in virus neutralization and haemagglutination at different potencies. For both the G1 and G2 proteins, determinants mapping to domain G1 Ia and G2 Ia were associated with very strong neutralization independent of complement (C'), suggesting that they represent biologically important areas. Domain G2 II was involved in haemagglutination and weak C' dependent neutralization while the other two G2 regions had no haemagglutination function and neutralized to a low level only in the presence of C'. Epitopes Ia and IIb on G1 and Ia and IIa on G2 were also associated with protection of mice against virulent RVFV infection, indicating that both envelope glycoproteins play an important role in RVF viral infection and pathogenesis.

Blocking by anti-idiotypic antibodies of monoclonal antibody-mediated protection against lethal Semliki Forest virus in mice

Semliki Forest virus-(SEV) neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), produced after fusion of spleen cells from BALB/c mice and myeloma cell line P3-X63-AG8. 653 or SP2/0, were used for anti-idiotypic immunization of female BALB/c mice. Two intracutaneous immunizations (2 x 40 micrograms per animal), 3 weeks apart, with keyhole limpet haemocyanin-conjugated MoAbs mixed with the saponin Quil A were sufficient to induce high levels of anti-idiotypic antibodies in the circulation of these mice with the capacity to block specifically in vitro MoAb-mediated virus neutralization. Anti-idiotypic antibodies against SFV-neutralizing MoAbs, either passively transferred or actively acquired by immunization, are also able to abrogate (specifically) passive immunity, mediated by critical protective doses of MoAb, in mice against infection with a lethal strain of SFV. Furthermore we confirmed by intervention with anti-idiotypic serum in vivo that an SFV-neutralizing MoAb exerts its greatest protective effect during the first 2 days of infection.

Protection of mice against Sendai virus pneumonia by non-neutralizing anti-F monoclonal antibodies

Nine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to F protein of Sendai virus were obtained and characterized for their protective ability against Sendai virus infection in mice. None of the MAbs showed hemagglutination-inhibition (HI), hemolysis-inhibition (HLI), or neutralization (NT) activities in vitro when assayed by standard methods. Some of the MAbs, however, showed complement-requiring NT (C-NT) and complement-requiring hemolysis (C-HL) activities when assayed in the presence of complement. Passive immunization experiments revealed that the MAbs with higher C-NT and C-HL activities showed protective activity against Sendai virus pneumonia in mice, and that some MAbs with IgG1 isotype having neither C-NT nor C-HL activity also showed the protective activity. Digestion of the MAbs with pepsin which split immunoglobulin molecules into F(ab')2 and Fc fragments greatly suppressed the protective activity. These results suggest that not only complement-mediated immunological responses such as immune virolysis but also antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and/or immune phagocytosis, in which complement system is not necessarily involved, play an important role in the protection of mice from Sendai virus infection.

Passive protection of mice, goats, and monkeys against Japanese encephalitis with monoclonal antibodies

Six monoclonal antibodies (McAbs) against Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) were tested for passive protection in JEV-infected mice, goats, and rhesus monkeys. mG9 and nG2 had no protective effect; mG3 and 2D2 had some protective effect, but not sufficient to be of therapeutic significance; and 2H4 and 2F2 had excellent protective efficacy in mice even 120 hr after infection when most of the mice in the virus control group were sick. The mixture of 2H4, 2F2, mC3 (M-McAb), and their F(ab')2 fragments showed excellent protection in mice, goats, and monkeys and was safe. The protective effects of McAbs correlated with their neutralization titers, but cytotoxicity-mediated activities also played a role in protection.

Antibody protects against lethal infection with the neurally spreading reovirus type 3 (Dearing)

The mammalian reoviruses have provided a valuable model for studying the pathogenesis of viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS). We have used this model to study the effect of antibody on disease produced by the neurally spreading reovirus type 3 (Dearing) (T3). Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies protect mice from fatal infection with T3 after either footpad or intracerebral virus challenge. Protection occurs with monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral cell attachment protein sigma 1, and with polyclonal antisera without T3 sigma 1 binding activity. In vivo protection occurs with both neutralizing and nonneutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Antibody-mediated protection does not require serum complement and, under specific circumstances, can occur via Fc-independent mechanisms. Antibody can protect mice when transferred up to 5 days after intracerebral challenge and up to 7 days after footpad challenge, times when high titers of virus are present in the CNS. Thus, antibody mediated protection against this neurally spreading virus does not require neutralizing antibody or serum complement and occurs even in the face of established CNS infection.

In vitro mechanisms of monoclonal antibody neutralization of alphaviruses

We have previously identified at least eight epitopes on the E2 glycoprotein of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis (VEE) virus vaccine strain TC-83 by using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Several of these antibodies identified a critical neutralization (N) domain in competitive binding assays. Passive transfer of these MAbs protected animals from a lethal virus challenge. Using radioactive, purified virus as a marker, we have demonstrated that antibody-mediated virus N, preattachment, can be effected by one of three mechanisms. Interaction of antibody can block virus attachment to susceptible Vero or human embryonic lung cells. The MAbs that were most efficient at blocking attachment were those that defined epitopes spatially proximal to the E2c epitope. The E2c MAbs were, however, the most efficient antibodies for neutralizing virus postattachment. Other E2 MAbs were unable to efficiently block virus attachment to cells; however, resulting replication as monitored by plaque assay or intracellular viral RNA synthesis could not be detected. One novel MAb that defined the E2f epitope appeared to enhance virus attachment to Vero cells, but not BHK-21 or LLC-MK2 cells, by stabilizing virus-cell interaction. This antibody did, however, efficiently neutralize virus infectivity. Once virus had attached to cells, the ability of most MAbs to neutralize infectivity was diminished, except for E2c MAbs. On a molar basis antibody Fab fragments were less efficient than intact antibody at blocking virus attachment.

Discrimination of determinant specificity of two encephalomyocarditis virus neutralizing monoclonal antibodies by competition, mixed neutralization and anti-idiotypic antibodies

To investigate the epitope(s) on encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) involved in neutralization, two neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAs) (MA UM 21.1 and MA UM 21.2) were tested in a competition binding assay (CBA), a mixed neutralization test and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with specificity for the detection of idiotypes on MAs. With a CBA in cell culture, using EMCV infected L cell monolayers as binding antigen, strong homologous competition was observed between unlabelled MAs and horse radish peroxidase (HRPO-) labelled MAs but considerable heterologous competition did also occur, especially between the unlabelled MA UM 21.1 and HRPO-labelled MA UM 21.2. In the mixed neutralization test (50% plaque reduction) preincubation with slightly neutralizing or nonneutralizing doses of MA UM 21.2 had no diminishing effect on the neutralizing capacity of MA UM 21.1, the PRT50 value remains in all cases -10log titre of 5.8. Furthermore rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the idiotypes of MAs UM 21.1 and UM 21.2 did not cross react in the EIA. In conclusion both MAs recognize different viral determinants as indicated by the results obtained with a CBA, a mixed neutralization test and an EIA for detection of idiotypes on MAs.

Prophylaxis and therapy of virulent encephalomyocarditis virus infection in mice by monoclonal antibodies. Brief report

Two encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAs), recognizing different determinants on EMCV, were both able to protect mice prophylactically and therapeutically against a lethal dose of EMCV.

Protection of C58 mice from lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus-induced motor neuron disease by non-neutralizing antiviral antibodies without interference with virus replication

The paralytic poliomyelitis induced in old, immunosuppressed C58 mice by a primary infection with the lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) is prevented by the presence of anti-LDV antibodies in the virus inoculum or by passive transfer of LDV-free plasma from chronically LDV-infected mice one day before infection. Non-neutralizing antibodies were protective and specifically directed to the lowest molecular weight form of the envelope glycoprotein of LDV (VP-3), which seems to exist in virions in at least ten molecular forms ranging from 24 to 44 kDa. The antibodies did not prevent the productive infection of the subpopulation of macrophages that represents the primary permissive cell type in the mouse as evidenced by normal plasma LDV levels nor the spread of LDV to the central nervous system. Many non-neuronal cells containing LDV RNA were detected by in situ hybridization in the spinal cords of mice that had been infected with LDV in the presence of protective antibodies. However, no LDV RNA-positive neurons were detected, which are normally found coincidental with the development of paralytic symptoms in LDV-infected C58 mice. We propose that an early event after infection is critical for the infection of neurons and is inhibited by the presence of non-neutralizing antibodies to the LDV glycoprotein.

Protective effect of antibodies to two viral envelope glycoproteins on lethal infection with Newcastle disease virus

The protective effect of humoral immunity against lethal infection of chickens with Newcastle disease virus was studied. Chickens hatched from eggs laid by hens vaccinated with live attenuated Newcastle disease virus vaccine possessed antibody to various components of the virus, and were resistant to a challenge with a virulent strain of Newcastle disease virus which was 100 per cent fatal for the offspring of nonvaccinated hens. Passive administration of antiserum raised against whole virions provided susceptible chickens protection comparable to that seen in the birds with maternal antibody. When administered passively, both anti-HN serum with virus neutralizing activity, and anti-F serum with only marginal virus neutralizing activity significantly prolonged the survival of infected birds but failed to achieve the level of protection as afforded by the anti-whole NDV serum. The protection provided by the simultaneous presence of anti-HN and anti-F serum was significantly greater than that afforded by either alone and comparable to that of anti-whole NDV serum, indicating the complementary effect of anti-HN and anti-F antibodies not only in cell cultures as reported previously (19), but also in a natural host.

Protective effect of the F(ab')2 fragments of monoclonal antibodies to mouse hepatitis virus

The F(ab')2 fragments were prepared from three monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) reactive with either peplomer glycoprotein (E2) or nucleocapsid protein (NP) of a low-virulence mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), MHV-NuU. All the three MAbs could protect mice from challenge infection with virulent MHV-2, whereas only one of the anti-E2 MAbs was capable of neutralizing the virus in vitro. The F(ab')2 fragment of neutralizing anti-E2 MAb was shown to protect mice from challenge infection, but those of non-neutralizing anti-E2 and anti-NP MAbs were not protective.

The role of complement in monoclonal antibody-mediated protection against virulent Semliki Forest virus

Monoclonal antibodies (MAs), specific for either the E1 or E2 glycoproteins of Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and belonging to various immunoglobulin subclasses (IgM, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3), effected lysis of SFV-infected L cells in co-operation with guinea-pig complement. In this antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytolysis (ADCMC) test, IgG1 MAs were not effective although these antibodies recognize the viral antigens on the surface of SFV-infected L cells. The latter was shown with horseradish peroxidase (HRPO)-labelled MAs in a direct enzyme immunoassay. The binding reactivities of HRPO-labelled MAs to infected L cells at selected time-intervals after infection correlated well with the amount of cytolysis in a parallel ADCMC test. Cytolysis was dependent on the duration of incubation with antibodies: more cytolysis was measured after a 4-hr incubation period with MA, starting at 4 hr after infection, compared to a 1-hr incubation period starting after 7 hr of infection. However, in the latter case (1-hr period) the amount of cytolysis measured correlated better to neutralization and/or protection by MAs than after the extended period (4 hr) of incubation. Complement (C3) depletion by cobra venom factor treatment led to a higher mortality and viraemia of mice prophylactically injected with critically protective doses of either the neutralizing MA UM 8.4 (IgM) or the non-neutralizing MA UM 4.2 (IgG2a). The results suggest a co-operative role of MA with complement in mediating protection against SFV. Passive immunization by administration of low amounts (0.1 micrograms/mouse) of neutralizing MA UM 5.1 resulted in protection of normal mice against a lethal infection with SFV. Mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide were not protected by these doses. If the doses were increased however, these mice were protected both prophylactically and therapeutically. These results indicate that, using critical doses of MAs, an intact immune system ensures survival in normal mice after infection with virulent SFV.

Monoclonal antibody cure and prophylaxis of lethal Sindbis virus encephalitis in mice

Neuroadapted Sindbis virus (NSV) causes acute encephalitis and paralyzes and kills adult mice unless they are treated with primary immune serum after infection. To study the nature and specificity of curative antibodies, we gave mice 30 different monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against Sindbis virus (SV) 24 h after lethal intracerebral inoculation of NSV. By the time of MAb treatment, NSV replication in the brain had been well established (7.5 X 10(7) PFU/g). Seventeen MAbs directed against multiple biological domains on the NSV E1 and E2 envelope glycoproteins prevented paralysis and death. Anticapsid MAbs failed to protect. Altogether, 15 of 17 curative MAbs either neutralized NSV infectivity or lysed NSV-infected cells with complement, but neither ability was necessary or sufficient to guarantee recovery. All 5 protective anti-E2 MAbs neutralized NSV infectivity; 6 of 10 protective anti-E1 MAbs neutralized NSV; 4 did not. Plaque assay or immunohistochemical staining showed that neutralizing and nonneutralizing curative MAbs decreased NSV in the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord. Despite high neutralization titers, hyperimmune anti-SV and anti-NSV mouse sera prevented only 6 and 30% of deaths, respectively, while primary immune sera prevented 50 (SV) and 90% (NSV) of deaths. Secondary intravenous immunization with a live virus apparently diminished, obscured, or failed to boost a class of protective antibodies. When separate mouse groups were given these 30 MAbs 24 h before lethal intracerebral inoculation of NSV, a slightly different set of 17 neutralizing or nonneutralizing anti-E1 and anti-E2 antibodies protected. Two nonneutralizing MAbs and hyperimmune anti-SV serum, which had failed to promote recovery, prophylactically protected 100% of the mice. The antibody requirements or mechanisms of prophylaxis and recovery may differ.

Antigenic differences between virulent and avirulent strains of Semliki Forest viruses detected with monoclonal antibodies. Brief report

Eleven monoclonal antibodies (MAs) reacted strongly in an enzyme immunoassay with virulent Semliki Forest virus (SFV) replicating in L cell monolayers. Three MAs showed a considerably diminished reaction with an avirulent strain of SFV both in enzyme immunoassays and plaque reduction tests.