1
|
Babu N, Freeman BC. Establishing Order Through Disorder by the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone. J Mol Biol 2024; 436:168460. [PMID: 38301804 PMCID: PMC11211062 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
The Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) molecular chaperone is a key driver of protein homeostasis (proteostasis) under physiologically normal and stress conditions. In eukaryotes, Hsp90 is essential and is one of the most abundant proteins in a cell where the chaperone shuttles between the cytoplasm and nucleus to fold, stabilize, and regulate client proteins and protein complexes. Numerous high-throughput screens have mapped the Hsp90 interactome, building a vast network comprising ∼25% of the proteome in budding yeast. How Hsp90 is able to associate with this diverse and large cadre of targets is critical to comprehending how the proteostatic process works. Here, we review recent progress on our understanding of the molecular underpinnings driving Hsp90-client interactions from both the perspective of the targets and Hsp90. In addition to considering the available Hsp90-client structures, we also assessed recently identified Hsp90-client peptide complexes to build a model that justifies how Hsp90 might recognize a wide spectrum of target proteins. In brief, Hsp90 either directly recognizes a site within an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) of a client protein to transiently regulate that client or it associates with an unstructured polypeptide section created by the concerted efforts of multiple chaperones and cochaperones to stably associate with a client. Overall, Hsp90 exploits a common recognition property (i.e., IDR) within diverse clients to support chaperone-actionthereby enabling its central role in proteostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neethu Babu
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Brian C Freeman
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sirois CL, Guo Y, Li M, Wolkoff NE, Korabelnikov T, Sandoval S, Lee J, Shen M, Contractor A, Sousa AMM, Bhattacharyya A, Zhao X. CGG repeats in the human FMR1 gene regulate mRNA localization and cellular stress in developing neurons. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114330. [PMID: 38865241 PMCID: PMC11240841 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The human genome has many short tandem repeats, yet the normal functions of these repeats are unclear. The 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene contains polymorphic CGG repeats, the length of which has differing effects on FMR1 expression and human health, including the neurodevelopmental disorder fragile X syndrome. We deleted the CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene (0CGG) in human stem cells and examined the effects on differentiated neurons. 0CGG neurons have altered subcellular localization of FMR1 mRNA and protein, and differential expression of cellular stress proteins compared with neurons with normal repeats (31CGG). In addition, 0CGG neurons have altered responses to glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activation, including FMR1 mRNA localization, GR chaperone HSP90α expression, GR localization, and cellular stress protein levels. Therefore, the CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene are important for the homeostatic responses of neurons to stress signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa L Sirois
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Yu Guo
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Meng Li
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Natalie E Wolkoff
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Tomer Korabelnikov
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Soraya Sandoval
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Jiyoun Lee
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Minjie Shen
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Amaya Contractor
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Andre M M Sousa
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Anita Bhattacharyya
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Xinyu Zhao
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kinyamu HK, Bennett BD, Ward JM, Archer TK. Proteasome Inhibition Reprograms Chromatin Landscape in Breast Cancer. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2024; 4:1082-1099. [PMID: 38625038 PMCID: PMC11019832 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the major protein degradation machinery in cells. Cancer cells use the proteasome to modulate gene expression networks that promote tumor growth. Proteasome inhibitors have emerged as effective cancer therapeutics, but how they work mechanistically remains unclear. Here, using integrative genomic analysis, we discovered unexpected reprogramming of the chromatin landscape and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription initiation in breast cancer cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. The cells acquired dynamic changes in chromatin accessibility at specific genomic loci termed differentially open chromatin regions (DOCR). DOCRs with decreased accessibility were promoter proximal and exhibited unique chromatin architecture associated with divergent RNAPII transcription. Conversely, DOCRs with increased accessibility were primarily distal to transcription start sites and enriched in oncogenic superenhancers predominantly accessible in non-basal breast tumor subtypes. These findings describe the mechanisms by which the proteasome modulates the expression of gene networks intrinsic to breast cancer biology. SIGNIFICANCE Our study provides a strong basis for understanding the mechanisms by which proteasome inhibitors exert anticancer effects. We find open chromatin regions that change during proteasome inhibition, are typically accessible in non-basal breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Karimi Kinyamu
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Section, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian D. Bennett
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Integrative Bioinformatics Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James M. Ward
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Integrative Bioinformatics Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Trevor K. Archer
- Chromatin and Gene Expression Section, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iyer-Bierhoff A, Wieczorek M, Peter SM, Ward D, Bens M, Vettorazzi S, Guehrs KH, Tuckermann JP, Heinzel T. Acetylation-induced proteasomal degradation of the activated glucocorticoid receptor limits hormonal signaling. iScience 2024; 27:108943. [PMID: 38333702 PMCID: PMC10850750 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoid (GC) signaling is essential for mounting a stress response, however, chronic stress or prolonged GC therapy downregulates the GC receptor (GR), leading to GC resistance. Regulatory mechanisms that refine this equilibrium are not well understood. Here, we identify seven lysine acetylation sites in the amino terminal domain of GR, with lysine 154 (Lys154) in the AF-1 region being the dominant acetyl-acceptor. GR-Lys154 acetylation is mediated by p300/CBP in the nucleus in an agonist-dependent manner and correlates with transcriptional activity. Deacetylation by NAD+-dependent SIRT1 facilitates dynamic regulation of this mark. Notably, agonist-binding to both wild-type GR and an acetylation-deficient mutant elicits similar short-term target gene expression. In contrast, upon extended treatment, the polyubiquitination of the acetylation-deficient GR mutant is impaired resulting in higher protein stability, increased chromatin association and prolonged transactivation. Taken together, reversible acetylation fine-tunes duration of the GC response by regulating proteasomal degradation of activated GR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aishwarya Iyer-Bierhoff
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Centre for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Martin Wieczorek
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Centre for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Sina Marielle Peter
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Centre for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Dima Ward
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Centre for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Martin Bens
- Core Facility Next Generation Sequencing, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstrasse 11, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Sabine Vettorazzi
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Guehrs
- Core Facility Proteomics, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Beutenbergstrasse 11, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Jan P. Tuckermann
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 8/1, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Thorsten Heinzel
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Centre for Molecular Biomedicine (CMB), Friedrich Schiller University, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lumahan LEV, Arif M, Whitener AE, Yi P. Regulating Androgen Receptor Function in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Diversity of Post-Translational Modifications. Cells 2024; 13:191. [PMID: 38275816 PMCID: PMC10814774 DOI: 10.3390/cells13020191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity significantly influences prostate cancer (PCa) progression. In addition to ligand stimulation, AR transcriptional activity is also influenced by a variety of post-translational modifications (PTMs). A number of oncogenes and tumor suppressors have been observed leveraging PTMs to influence AR activity. Subjectively targeting these post-translational modifiers based on their impact on PCa cell proliferation is a rapidly developing area of research. This review elucidates the modifiers, contextualizes the effects of these PTMs on AR activity, and connects these cellular interactions to the progression of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance Edward V. Lumahan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Mazia Arif
- Center for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77205, USA
| | - Amy E. Whitener
- Center for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77205, USA
| | - Ping Yi
- Center for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kinyamu HK, Bennett BD, Ward JM, Archer T. Proteasome inhibition reprograms chromatin landscape in breast cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.13.562284. [PMID: 37904968 PMCID: PMC10614768 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the major protein degradation machinery in cells. Cancer cells use the proteasome to modulate gene expression networks that promote tumor growth. Proteasome inhibitors have emerged as effective cancer therapeutics, but how they work mechanistically remains unclear. Here, using integrative genomic analysis, we discovered unexpected reprogramming of the chromatin landscape and RNAPII transcription initiation in breast cancer cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. The cells acquired dynamic changes in chromatin accessibility at specific genomic loci termed Differentially Open Chromatin Regions (DOCRs). DOCRs with decreased accessibility were promoter proximal and exhibited unique chromatin architecture associated with divergent RNAPII transcription. Conversely, DOCRs with increased accessibility were primarily distal to transcription start sites and enriched in oncogenic super enhancers predominantly accessible in non-basal breast tumor subtypes. These findings describe the mechanisms by which the proteasome modulates the expression of gene networks intrinsic to breast cancer biology. Highlights Proteasome inhibition uncovers de novo Differential Open Chromatin Regions (DOCRs) in breast cancer cells. Proteasome inhibitor sensitive promoters exhibit a distinctive chromatin architecture with discrete transcription initiation patterns.Proteasome inhibition reprograms accessibility of super enhancers.Proteasome inhibitor sensitive super enhancers distinguish basal from non-basal breast cancer subtypes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Cells must tightly regulate their gene expression programs and yet rapidly respond to acute biochemical and biophysical cues within their environment. This information is transmitted to the nucleus through various signaling cascades, culminating in the activation or repression of target genes. Transcription factors (TFs) are key mediators of these signals, binding to specific regulatory elements within chromatin. While live-cell imaging has conclusively proven that TF-chromatin interactions are highly dynamic, how such transient interactions can have long-term impacts on developmental trajectories and disease progression is still largely unclear. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the dynamic nature of TF functions, starting with a historical overview of early live-cell experiments. We highlight key factors that govern TF dynamics and how TF dynamics, in turn, affect downstream transcriptional bursting. Finally, we conclude with open challenges and emerging technologies that will further our understanding of transcriptional regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaustubh Wagh
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; , ,
- Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA;
| | - Diana A Stavreva
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; , ,
| | - Arpita Upadhyaya
- Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA;
- Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hörberg J, Reymer A. Decoding the dual recognition mechanism of the glucocorticoid receptor for DNA and RNA: sequence versus shape. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16125. [PMID: 37752333 PMCID: PMC10522765 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43244-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) regulate eukaryotic transcription through selective DNA-binding, can also specifically interact with RNA, which may present another layer of transcriptional control. The mechanisms of the TFs-DNA recognition are often well-characterised, while the details of TFs-RNA complexation are less understood. Here we investigate the dual recognition mechanism of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which interacts with similar affinities with consensus DNA and diverse RNA hairpin motifs but discriminates against uniform dsRNA. Using atomic molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that the GR binding to nucleic acids requires a wide and shallow groove pocket. The protein effectively moulds its binding site within DNA major groove, which enables base-specific interactions. Contrary, the GR binding has little effect on the grooves geometry of RNA systems, most notably in uniform dsRNA. Instead, a hairpin motif in RNA yields a wide and shallow major groove pocket, allowing the protein to anchor itself through nonspecific electrostatic contacts with RNA backbone. Addition of a bulge increases RNA hairpin flexibility, which leads to a greater number of GR-RNA contacts and, thus, higher affinity. Thus, the combination of structural motifs defines the GR-RNA selective binding: a recognition mechanism, which may be shared by other zinc finger TFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Hörberg
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Anna Reymer
- Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Borin C, Pieters T, Serafin V, Ntziachristos P. Emerging Epigenetic and Posttranslational Mechanisms Controlling Resistance to Glucocorticoids in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e916. [PMID: 37359189 PMCID: PMC10289758 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids are extensively used for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia as they pressure cancer cells to undergo apoptosis. Nevertheless, glucocorticoid partners, modifications, and mechanisms of action are hitherto poorly characterized. This hampers our understanding of therapy resistance, frequently occurring in leukemia despite the current therapeutic combinations using glucocorticoids in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In this review, we initially cover the traditional view of glucocorticoid resistance and ways of targeting this resistance. We discuss recent progress in our understanding of chromatin and posttranslational properties of the glucocorticoid receptor that might be proven beneficial in our efforts to understand and target therapy resistance. We discuss emerging roles of pathways and proteins such as the lymphocyte-specific kinase that antagonizes glucocorticoid receptor activation and nuclear translocation. In addition, we provide an overview of ongoing therapeutic approaches that sensitize cells to glucocorticoids including small molecule inhibitors and proteolysis-targeting chimeras.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Borin
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University and University Hospital, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Belgium
| | - Tim Pieters
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University and University Hospital, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Belgium
| | - Valentina Serafin
- Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology, Oncology and Immunology Section, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Panagiotis Ntziachristos
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University and University Hospital, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lammer NC, Ashraf HM, Ugay DA, Spencer SL, Allen MA, Batey RT, Wuttke DS. RNA binding by the glucocorticoid receptor attenuates dexamethasone-induced gene activation. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9385. [PMID: 37296231 PMCID: PMC10251336 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35549-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates a suite of genes through direct binding of GR to specific DNA promoter elements. GR also interacts with RNA, but the function of this RNA-binding activity remains elusive. Current models speculate that RNA could repress the transcriptional activity of GR. To investigate the function of the GR-RNA interaction on GR's transcriptional activity, we generated cells that stably express a mutant of GR with reduced RNA binding affinity and treated the cells with the GR agonist dexamethasone. Changes in the dexamethasone-driven transcriptome were quantified using 4-thiouridine labeling of RNAs followed by high-throughput sequencing. We find that while many genes are unaffected, GR-RNA binding is repressive for specific subsets of genes in both dexamethasone-dependent and independent contexts. Genes that are dexamethasone-dependent are activated directly by chromatin-bound GR, suggesting a competition-based repression mechanism in which increasing local concentrations of RNA may compete with DNA for binding to GR at sites of transcription. Unexpectedly, genes that are dexamethasone-independent instead display a localization to specific chromosomal regions, which points to changes in chromatin accessibility or architecture. These results show that RNA binding plays a fundamental role in regulating GR function and highlights potential functions for transcription factor-RNA interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nickolaus C Lammer
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Humza M Ashraf
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Daniella A Ugay
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Sabrina L Spencer
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Mary A Allen
- BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Robert T Batey
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
| | - Deborah S Wuttke
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
“Structure”-function relationships in eukaryotic transcription factors: The role of intrinsically disordered regions in gene regulation. Mol Cell 2022; 82:3970-3984. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
12
|
Belity T, Horowitz M, Hoffman JR, Epstein Y, Bruchim Y, Todder D, Cohen H. Heat-Stress Preconditioning Attenuates Behavioral Responses to Psychological Stress: The Role of HSP-70 in Modulating Stress Responses. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23084129. [PMID: 35456946 PMCID: PMC9031159 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Exposure to high ambient temperature is a stressor that influences both biological and behavioral functions and has been previously shown to have an extensive impact on brain structure and function. Physiological, cellular and behavioral responses to heat-stress (HS) (40-41 °C, 2 h) were evaluated in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. The effect of HS exposure before predator-scent stress (PSS) exposure (i.e., HS preconditioning) was examined. Finally, a possible mechanism of HS-preconditioning to PSS was investigated. Immunohistochemical analyses of chosen cellular markers were performed in the hippocampus and in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Plasma corticosterone levels were evaluated, and the behavioral assessment included the elevated plus-maze (EPM) and the acoustic startle response (ASR) paradigms. Endogenous levels of heat shock protein (HSP)-70 were manipulated using an amino acid (L-glutamine) and a pharmacological agent (Doxazosin). A single exposure to an acute HS resulted in decreased body mass (BM), increased body temperature and increased corticosterone levels. Additionally, extensive cellular, but not behavioral changes were noted. HS-preconditioning provided behavioral resiliency to anxiety-like behavior associated with PSS, possibly through the induction of HSP-70. Targeting of HSP-70 is an attractive strategy for stress-related psychopathology treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Belity
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel;
| | - Michal Horowitz
- Laboratory of Environmental Physiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel; (M.H.); (Y.B.)
| | - Jay R. Hoffman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel;
| | - Yoram Epstein
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv and the Heller Institute of Medical Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel;
| | - Yaron Bruchim
- Laboratory of Environmental Physiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel; (M.H.); (Y.B.)
- Intensive Care, Veterinary Emergency and Specialist Center, Youth Village Ben Shemen, Ben-Shemen 7311200, Israel
| | - Doron Todder
- Beer-Sheva Mental Health Center, Ministry of Health, Anxiety and Stress Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8461144, Israel;
| | - Hagit Cohen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel;
- Beer-Sheva Mental Health Center, Ministry of Health, Anxiety and Stress Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8461144, Israel;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +972-8-6401743
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
DNA-induced spatial entrapment of general transcription machinery can stabilize gene expression in a nondividing cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:2116091119. [PMID: 35074915 PMCID: PMC8795562 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2116091119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
How differentiated cells such as muscle or nerve maintain their gene expression for prolonged times is currently elusive. Here, using Xenopus oocyte, we have shown that the stability of gene expression in nondividing cells may arise due to the local entrapment of transcriptional machinery to specific gene transcription start sites. We found that within the same nucleus active versus inactive versions of the same gene are spatially segregated through liquid–liquid phase separation. We further observe that silent genes are associated with RNA-Pol-II phosphorylated on Ser5 but fails to attract RNA-Pol-II elongation factors. We propose that liquid–liquid phase separation mediated entrapment of limiting transcriptional machinery factors maintain stable expression of some genes in nondividing cells. An important characteristic of cell differentiation is its stability. Only rarely do cells or their stem cell progenitors change their differentiation pathway. If they do, it is often accompanied by a malfunction such as cancer. A mechanistic understanding of the stability of differentiated states would allow better prospects of alleviating the malfunctioning. However, such complete information is yet elusive. Earlier experiments performed in Xenopus oocytes to address this question suggest that a cell may maintain its gene expression by prolonged binding of cell type–specific transcription factors. Here, using DNA competition experiments, we show that the stability of gene expression in a nondividing cell could be caused by the local entrapment of part of the general transcription machinery in transcriptionally active regions. Strikingly, we found that transcriptionally active and silent forms of the same DNA template can stably coexist within the same nucleus. Both DNA templates are associated with the gene-specific transcription factor Ascl1, the core factor TBP2, and the polymerase II (Pol-II) ser5 C-terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylated form, while Pol-II ser2 CTD phosphorylation is restricted to the transcriptionally dominant template. We discover that the active and silent DNA forms are physically separated in the oocyte nucleus through partition into liquid–liquid phase-separated condensates. Altogether, our study proposes a mechanism of transcriptional regulation involving a spatial entrapment of general transcription machinery components to stabilize the active form of a gene in a nondividing cell.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kowalczyk W, Waliszczak G, Jach R, Dulińska-Litewka J. Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer: Understanding of Molecular Function as a Basis for Effective Therapy Development. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4779. [PMID: 34638264 PMCID: PMC8507808 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the most important health problems worldwide. The family of steroid receptors (SRs), which comprise estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), androgen (AR), glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid (MR) receptors, along with a receptor for a secosteroid-vitamin D, play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease. They function predominantly as nuclear receptors to regulate gene expression, however, their full spectrum of action reaches far beyond this basic mechanism. SRs are involved in a vast variety of interactions with other proteins, including extensive crosstalk with each other. How they affect the biology of a breast cell depends on such factors as post-translational modifications, expression of coregulators, or which SR isoform is predominantly synthesized in a given cellular context. Although ER has been successfully utilized as a breast cancer therapy target for years, research on therapeutic application of other SRs is still ongoing. Designing effective hormone therapies requires thorough understanding of the molecular function of the SRs. Over the past decades, huge amount of data was obtained in multiple studies exploring this field, therefore in this review we attempt to summarize the current knowledge in a comprehensive way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Kowalczyk
- Chair of Medical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7 Kopernika St., 31-034 Kraków, Poland; (W.K.); (G.W.)
| | - Grzegorz Waliszczak
- Chair of Medical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7 Kopernika St., 31-034 Kraków, Poland; (W.K.); (G.W.)
| | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 23 Kopernika St., 31-501 Kraków, Poland;
| | - Joanna Dulińska-Litewka
- Chair of Medical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7 Kopernika St., 31-034 Kraków, Poland; (W.K.); (G.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vettorazzi S, Nalbantoglu D, Gebhardt JCM, Tuckermann J. A guide to changing paradigms of glucocorticoid receptor function-a model system for genome regulation and physiology. FEBS J 2021; 289:5718-5743. [PMID: 34213830 DOI: 10.1111/febs.16100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a bona fide ligand-regulated transcription factor. Cloned in the 80s, the GR has become one of the best-studied and clinically most relevant members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Cooperative activity of GR with other transcription factors and a plethora of coregulators contribute to the tissue- and context-specific response toward the endogenous and pharmacological glucocorticoids (GCs). Furthermore, nontranscriptional activities in the cytoplasm are emerging as an additional function of GR. Over the past 40 years, the concepts of GR mechanisms of action had been constantly changing. Different methodologies in the pregenomic and genomic era of molecular biological research and recent cutting-edge technology in single-cell and single-molecule analysis are steadily evolving the views, how the GR in particular and transcriptional regulation in general act in physiological and pathological processes. In addition to the development of technologies for GR analysis, the use of model organisms provides insights how the GR in vivo executes GC action in tissue homeostasis, inflammation, and energy metabolism. The model organisms, namely the mouse, but also rats, zebrafish, and recently fruit flies carrying mutations of the GR became a major driving force to analyze the molecular function of GR in disease models. This guide provides an overview of the exciting research and paradigm shifts in the GR field from past to present with a focus on GR transcription factor networks, GR DNA-binding and single-cell analysis, and model systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vettorazzi
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Germany
| | - Denis Nalbantoglu
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Germany
| | | | - Jan Tuckermann
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weems JC, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Weaver KJ, Miller BD, Delventhal KM, Conaway JW, Conaway RC. A role for the Cockayne Syndrome B (CSB)-Elongin ubiquitin ligase complex in signal-dependent RNA polymerase II transcription. J Biol Chem 2021; 297:100862. [PMID: 34116057 PMCID: PMC8294581 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Elongin complex was originally identified as an RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) elongation factor and subsequently as the substrate recognition component of a Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase. More recent evidence indicates that the Elongin ubiquitin ligase assembles with the Cockayne syndrome B helicase (CSB) in response to DNA damage and can target stalled polymerases for ubiquitylation and removal from the genome. In this report, we present evidence that the CSB-Elongin ubiquitin ligase pathway has roles beyond the DNA damage response in the activation of RNAPII-mediated transcription. We observed that assembly of the CSB-Elongin ubiquitin ligase is induced not just by DNA damage, but also by a variety of signals that activate RNAPII-mediated transcription, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, amino acid starvation, retinoic acid, glucocorticoids, and doxycycline treatment of cells carrying several copies of a doxycycline-inducible reporter. Using glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-regulated genes as a model, we showed that glucocorticoid-induced transcription is accompanied by rapid recruitment of CSB and the Elongin ubiquitin ligase to target genes in a step that depends upon the presence of transcribing RNAPII on those genes. Consistent with the idea that the CSB-Elongin pathway plays a direct role in GR-regulated transcription, mouse cells lacking the Elongin subunit Elongin A exhibit delays in both RNAPII accumulation on and dismissal from target genes following glucocorticoid addition and withdrawal, respectively. Taken together, our findings bring to light a new role for the CSB-Elongin pathway in RNAPII-mediated transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juston C Weems
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Jay R Unruh
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Kyle J Weaver
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Brandon D Miller
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Kym M Delventhal
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Joan W Conaway
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
| | - Ronald C Conaway
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gadasheva Y, Nolze A, Grossmann C. Posttranslational Modifications of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Cardiovascular Aging. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:667990. [PMID: 34124152 PMCID: PMC8193679 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.667990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
During aging, the cardiovascular system is especially prone to a decline in function and to life-expectancy limiting diseases. Cardiovascular aging is associated with increased arterial stiffness and vasoconstriction as well as left ventricular hypertrophy and reduced diastolic function. Pathological changes include endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, fibrosis, hypertrophy, inflammation, and changes in micromilieu with increased production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system is an important mediator of electrolyte and blood pressure homeostasis and a key contributor to pathological remodeling processes of the cardiovascular system. Its effects are partially conveyed by the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor, whose activity increases during aging and cardiovascular diseases without correlating changes of its ligand aldosterone. There is growing evidence that the MR can be enzymatically and non-enzymatically modified and that these modifications contribute to ligand-independent modulation of MR activity. Modifications reported so far include phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation and changes induced by nitrosative and oxidative stress. This review focuses on the different posttranslational modifications of the MR, their impact on MR function and degradation and the possible implications for cardiovascular aging and diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yekatarina Gadasheva
- Julius-Bernstein-Institute of Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Alexander Nolze
- Julius-Bernstein-Institute of Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Claudia Grossmann
- Julius-Bernstein-Institute of Physiology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paakinaho V, Lempiäinen JK, Sigismondo G, Niskanen EA, Malinen M, Jääskeläinen T, Varjosalo M, Krijgsveld J, Palvimo J. SUMOylation regulates the protein network and chromatin accessibility at glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:1951-1971. [PMID: 33524141 PMCID: PMC7913686 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is an essential transcription factor (TF), controlling metabolism, development and immune responses. SUMOylation regulates chromatin occupancy and target gene expression of GR in a locus-selective manner, but the mechanism of regulation has remained elusive. Here, we identify the protein network around chromatin-bound GR by using selective isolation of chromatin-associated proteins and show that the network is affected by receptor SUMOylation, with several nuclear receptor coregulators and chromatin modifiers preferring interaction with SUMOylation-deficient GR and proteins implicated in transcriptional repression preferring interaction with SUMOylation-competent GR. This difference is reflected in our chromatin binding, chromatin accessibility and gene expression data, showing that the SUMOylation-deficient GR is more potent in binding and opening chromatin at glucocorticoid-regulated enhancers and inducing expression of target loci. Blockage of SUMOylation by a SUMO-activating enzyme inhibitor (ML-792) phenocopied to a large extent the consequences of GR SUMOylation deficiency on chromatin binding and target gene expression. Our results thus show that SUMOylation modulates the specificity of GR by regulating its chromatin protein network and accessibility at GR-bound enhancers. We speculate that many other SUMOylated TFs utilize a similar regulatory mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ville Paakinaho
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | - Einari A Niskanen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Marjo Malinen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Tiina Jääskeläinen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Markku Varjosalo
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jeroen Krijgsveld
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jorma J Palvimo
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Phasing the intranuclear organization of steroid hormone receptors. Biochem J 2021; 478:443-461. [DOI: 10.1042/bcj20200883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Steroid receptors (SRs) encompass a family of transcription factors that regulate the expression of thousands of genes upon binding to steroid hormones and include the glucocorticoid, androgen, progesterone, estrogen and mineralocorticoid receptors. SRs control key physiological and pathological processes, thus becoming relevant drug targets. As with many other nuclear proteins, hormone-activated SRs concentrate in multiple discrete foci within the cell nucleus. Even though these foci were first observed ∼25 years ago, their exact structure and function remained elusive. In the last years, new imaging methodologies and theoretical frameworks improved our understanding of the intranuclear organization. These studies led to a new paradigm stating that many membraneless nuclear compartments, including transcription-related foci, form through a liquid–liquid phase separation process. These exciting ideas impacted the SR field by raising the hypothesis of SR foci as liquid condensates involved in transcriptional regulation. In this work, we review the current knowledge about SR foci formation under the light of the condensate model, analyzing how these structures may impact SR function. These new ideas, combined with state-of-the-art techniques, may shed light on the biophysical mechanisms governing the formation of SR foci and the biological function of these structures in normal physiology and disease.
Collapse
|
20
|
Signaling Mechanism of Transcriptional Bursting: A Technical Resolution-Independent Study. BIOLOGY 2020; 9:biology9100339. [PMID: 33086528 PMCID: PMC7603168 DOI: 10.3390/biology9100339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Simple Summary Following changing cellular signals, various genes adjust their activities and initiate transcripts with the right rates. The precision of such a transcriptional response has a fundamental role in the survival and development of lives. Quite unexpectedly, gene transcription has been uncovered to occur in sporadic bursts, rather than in a continuous manner. This has raised a provoking issue of how the bursting transmits regulatory signals, and it remains controversial whether the burst size, frequency, or both, take the role of signal transmission. Here, this study showed that only the burst frequency was subject to modulation by activators that carry the regulatory signals. A higher activator concentration led to a larger frequency, whereas the size remains unchanged. When very high, the burst cluster emerged, which may be mistaken as a large burst. This work thus supports the conclusion that transcription regulation is in a “digital” way. Abstract Gene transcription has been uncovered to occur in sporadic bursts. However, due to technical difficulties in differentiating individual transcription initiation events, it remains debated as to whether the burst size, frequency, or both are subject to modulation by transcriptional activators. Here, to bypass technical constraints, we addressed this issue by introducing two independent theoretical methods including analytical research based on the classic two-model and information entropy research based on the architecture of transcription apparatus. Both methods connect the signaling mechanism of transcriptional bursting to the characteristics of transcriptional uncertainty (i.e., the differences in transcriptional levels of the same genes that are equally activated). By comparing the theoretical predictions with abundant experimental data collected from published papers, the results exclusively support frequency modulation. To further validate this conclusion, we showed that the data that appeared to support size modulation essentially supported frequency modulation taking into account the existence of burst clusters. This work provides a unified scheme that reconciles the debate on burst signaling.
Collapse
|
21
|
de Jonge WJ, Brok M, Lijnzaad P, Kemmeren P, Holstege FCP. Genome-wide off-rates reveal how DNA binding dynamics shape transcription factor function. Mol Syst Biol 2020; 16:e9885. [PMID: 33280256 PMCID: PMC7586999 DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein-DNA interactions are dynamic, and these dynamics are an important aspect of chromatin-associated processes such as transcription or replication. Due to a lack of methods to study on- and off-rates across entire genomes, protein-DNA interaction dynamics have not been studied extensively. Here, we determine in vivo off-rates for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin organizing factor Abf1, at 191 sites simultaneously across the yeast genome. Average Abf1 residence times span a wide range, varying between 4.2 and 33 min. Sites with different off-rates are associated with different functional characteristics. This includes their transcriptional dependency on Abf1, nucleosome positioning and the size of the nucleosome-free region, as well as the ability to roadblock RNA polymerase II for termination. The results show how off-rates contribute to transcription factor function and that DIVORSEQ (Determining In Vivo Off-Rates by SEQuencing) is a meaningful way of investigating protein-DNA binding dynamics genome-wide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim J de Jonge
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Mariël Brok
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Philip Lijnzaad
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Patrick Kemmeren
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric OncologyUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Long-term association of a transcription factor with its chromatin binding site can stabilize gene expression and cell fate commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:15075-15084. [PMID: 32532919 PMCID: PMC7334453 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000467117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Some kinds of transcription factor proteins are very important in initiating and guiding cell fate differentiation. Overexpression of these factors can force many other kinds of cells to become muscle or nerve. Examples are MyoD for muscle and Ascl1 for nerve. It is not known how long such a factor must remain bound to its binding site for it to have its function; this could be seconds, minutes, hours, or days. We have developed a procedure to determine the required residence time for the Ascl1 nerve factor to have its function. This factor remains closely associated with its chromatin binding site for hours or days. This may be a general characteristic of such factors in nondividing (adult) cells. Some lineage-determining transcription factors are overwhelmingly important in directing embryonic cells to a particular differentiation pathway, such as Ascl1 for nerve. They also have an exceptionally strong ability to force cells to change from an unrelated pathway to one preferred by their action. Transcription factors are believed to have a very short residence time of only a few seconds on their specific DNA or chromatin-binding sites. We have developed a procedure in which DNA containing one copy of the binding site for the neural-inducing factor Ascl1 is injected directly into a Xenopus oocyte nucleus which has been preloaded with a limiting amount of the Ascl1 transcription factor protein. This is followed by a further injection of DNA as a competitor, either in a plasmid or in chromosomal DNA, containing the same binding site but with a different reporter. Importantly, expression of the reporter provides a measure of the function of the transcription factor in addition to its residence time. The same long residence time and resistance to competition are seen with the estrogen receptor and its DNA response elements. We find that in this nondividing oocyte, the nerve-inducing factor Ascl1 can remain bound to a specific chromatin site for hours or days and thereby help to stabilize gene expression. This stability of transcription factor binding to chromatin is a necessary part of its action because removal of this factor causes discontinuation of its effect on gene expression. Stable transcription factor binding may be a characteristic of nondividing cells.
Collapse
|
23
|
Azpeitia E, Wagner A. Short Residence Times of DNA-Bound Transcription Factors Can Reduce Gene Expression Noise and Increase the Transmission of Information in a Gene Regulation System. Front Mol Biosci 2020; 7:67. [PMID: 32411721 PMCID: PMC7198700 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene expression noise is not just ubiquitous but also variable, and we still do not understand some of the most elementary factors that affect it. Among them is the residence time of a transcription factor (TF) on DNA, the mean time that a DNA-bound TF remains bound. Here, we use a stochastic model of transcriptional regulation to study how residence time affects the gene expression noise that arises when a TF induces gene expression. We find that the effect of residence time on gene expression noise depends on the TF’s concentration and its affinity to DNA, which determine the level of induction of the gene. At high levels of induction, residence time has no effect on gene expression noise. However, as the level of induction decreases, short residence times reduce gene expression noise. The reason is that fast on-off TF binding dynamics prevent long periods where proteins are predominantly synthesized or degraded, which can cause excessive fluctuations in gene expression. As a consequence, short residence times can help a gene regulation system acquire information about the cellular environment it operates in. Our predictions are consistent with the observation that experimentally measured residence times are usually modest and lie between seconds to minutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Azpeitia
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Centro de Ciencias Matemáticas, UNAM, Morelia, Mexico
| | - Andreas Wagner
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Parsonnet NV, Lammer NC, Holmes ZE, Batey RT, Wuttke DS. The glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding domain recognizes RNA hairpin structures with high affinity. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:8180-8192. [PMID: 31147715 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binds the noncoding RNA Gas5 via its DNA-binding domain (DBD) with functional implications in pro-apoptosis signaling. Here, we report a comprehensive in vitro binding study where we have determined that GR-DBD is a robust structure-specific RNA-binding domain. GR-DBD binds to a diverse range of RNA hairpin motifs, both synthetic and biologically derived, with apparent mid-nanomolar affinity while discriminating against uniform dsRNA. As opposed to dimeric recognition of dsDNA, GR-DBD binds to RNA as a monomer and confers high affinity primarily through electrostatic contacts. GR-DBD adopts a discrete RNA-bound state, as assessed by NMR, distinct from both free and DNA-bound. NMR and alanine mutagenesis suggest a heightened involvement of the C-terminal α-helix of the GR-DBD in RNA-binding. RNA competes for binding with dsDNA and occurs in a similar affinity range as dimer binding to the canonical DNA element. Given the prevalence of RNA hairpins within the transcriptome, our findings strongly suggest that many RNAs have potential to impact GR biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas V Parsonnet
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309-0596, USA
| | - Nickolaus C Lammer
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309-0596, USA
| | - Zachariah E Holmes
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309-0596, USA
| | - Robert T Batey
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309-0596, USA
| | - Deborah S Wuttke
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309-0596, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gvozdenov Z, Bendix LD, Kolhe J, Freeman BC. The Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone Regulates the Transcription Factor Network Controlling Chromatin Accessibility. J Mol Biol 2019; 431:4993-5003. [PMID: 31628945 PMCID: PMC6983977 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Genomic events including gene regulation and chromatin status are controlled by transcription factors. Here we report that the Hsp90 molecular chaperone broadly regulates the transcription factor protein family. Our studies identified a biphasic use of Hsp90 in which early inactivation (15 min) of the chaperone triggered a wide reduction of DNA binding events along the genome with concurrent changes to chromatin structure. Long-term loss (6 h) of Hsp90 resulted in a decline of a divergent yet overlaying pool of transcription factors that produced a distinct chromatin pattern. Although both phases involve protein folding, the early point correlated with Hsp90 acting in a late folding step that is critical for DNA binding function, whereas prolonged Hsp90 inactivation led to a significant decrease in the steady-state transcription factor protein levels. Intriguingly, despite the broad chaperone impact on a variety of transcription factors, the operational influence of Hsp90 was at the level of chromatin with only a mild effect on gene regulation. Thus, Hsp90 selectively governs the transcription factor process overseeing local chromatin structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zlata Gvozdenov
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Lindsey D Bendix
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Janhavi Kolhe
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Brian C Freeman
- University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stavreva DA, Garcia DA, Fettweis G, Gudla PR, Zaki GF, Soni V, McGowan A, Williams G, Huynh A, Palangat M, Schiltz RL, Johnson TA, Presman DM, Ferguson ML, Pegoraro G, Upadhyaya A, Hager GL. Transcriptional Bursting and Co-bursting Regulation by Steroid Hormone Release Pattern and Transcription Factor Mobility. Mol Cell 2019; 75:1161-1177.e11. [PMID: 31421980 PMCID: PMC6754282 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Genes are transcribed in a discontinuous pattern referred to as RNA bursting, but the mechanisms regulating this process are unclear. Although many physiological signals, including glucocorticoid hormones, are pulsatile, the effects of transient stimulation on bursting are unknown. Here we characterize RNA synthesis from single-copy glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-regulated transcription sites (TSs) under pulsed (ultradian) and constant hormone stimulation. In contrast to constant stimulation, pulsed stimulation induces restricted bursting centered around the hormonal pulse. Moreover, we demonstrate that transcription factor (TF) nuclear mobility determines burst duration, whereas its bound fraction determines burst frequency. Using 3D tracking of TSs, we directly correlate TF binding and RNA synthesis at a specific promoter. Finally, we uncover a striking co-bursting pattern between TSs located at proximal and distal positions in the nucleus. Together, our data reveal a dynamic interplay between TF mobility and RNA bursting that is responsive to stimuli strength, type, modality, and duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Stavreva
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA.
| | - David A Garcia
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA; Department of Physics and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Gregory Fettweis
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Prabhakar R Gudla
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - George F Zaki
- High Performance Computing Group, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Vikas Soni
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Andrew McGowan
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Geneva Williams
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Anh Huynh
- Department of Physics and Graduate Program in Biomolecular Science, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Murali Palangat
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - R Louis Schiltz
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Thomas A Johnson
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Diego M Presman
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Matthew L Ferguson
- Department of Physics and Graduate Program in Biomolecular Science, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Gianluca Pegoraro
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Arpita Upadhyaya
- Department of Physics and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Keizer VIP, Coppola S, Houtsmuller AB, Geverts B, van Royen ME, Schmidt T, Schaaf MJM. Repetitive switching between DNA binding modes enables target finding by the glucocorticoid receptor. J Cell Sci 2019; 132:jcs.217455. [DOI: 10.1242/jcs.217455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription factor mobility is a determining factor in the regulation of gene expression. Here, we have studied the intranuclear dynamics of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and single-molecule microscopy. First we have described the dynamic states in which the GR occurs. Subsequently we have analyzed the transitions between these states using a continuous time Markov chain model, and functionally investigated these states by making specific mutations in the DNA-binding domain. This analysis revealed that the GR diffuses freely through the nucleus, and once it leaves this free diffusion state it most often enters a repetitive switching mode. In this mode it alternates between slow diffusion as a result of brief nonspecific DNA binding events, and a state of stable binding to specific DNA target sites. This repetitive switching mechanism results in a compact searching strategy which facilitates finding DNA target sites by the GR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefano Coppola
- Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan B. Houtsmuller
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Geverts
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin E. van Royen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Optical Imaging Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mehta GD, Ball DA, Eriksson PR, Chereji RV, Clark DJ, McNally JG, Karpova TS. Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Linked Cycles of RSC Chromatin Remodeling and Ace1p Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast. Mol Cell 2018; 72:875-887.e9. [PMID: 30318444 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
It is unknown how the dynamic binding of transcription factors (TFs) is molecularly linked to chromatin remodeling and transcription. Using single-molecule tracking (SMT), we show that the chromatin remodeler RSC speeds up the search process of the TF Ace1p for its response elements (REs) at the CUP1 promoter. We quantified smFISH mRNA data using a gene bursting model and demonstrated that RSC regulates transcription bursts of CUP1 only by modulating TF occupancy but does not affect initiation and elongation rates. We show by SMT that RSC binds to activated promoters transiently, and based on MNase-seq data, that RSC does not affect the nucleosomal occupancy at CUP1. Therefore, transient binding of Ace1p and rapid bursts of transcription at CUP1 may be dependent on short repetitive cycles of nucleosome mobilization. This type of regulation reduces the transcriptional noise and ensures a homogeneous response of the cell population to heavy metal stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunjan D Mehta
- CCR/LRBGE Optical Microscopy Core, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - David A Ball
- CCR/LRBGE Optical Microscopy Core, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Peter R Eriksson
- Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Razvan V Chereji
- Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - David J Clark
- Division of Developmental Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - James G McNally
- Institute for Soft Matter and Functional Materials, Helmholtz Center Berlin, Berlin 12489, Germany
| | - Tatiana S Karpova
- CCR/LRBGE Optical Microscopy Core, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Swinstead EE, Paakinaho V, Hager GL. Chromatin reprogramming in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2018; 25:R385-R404. [PMID: 29692347 PMCID: PMC6029727 DOI: 10.1530/erc-18-0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Reprogramming of the chromatin landscape is a critical component to the transcriptional response in breast cancer. Effects of sex hormones such as estrogens and progesterone have been well described to have a critical impact on breast cancer proliferation. However, the complex network of the chromatin landscape, enhancer regions and mode of function of steroid receptors (SRs) and other transcription factors (TFs), is an intricate web of signaling and functional processes that is still largely misunderstood at the mechanistic level. In this review, we describe what is currently known about the dynamic interplay between TFs with chromatin and the reprogramming of enhancer elements. Emphasis has been placed on characterizing the different modes of action of TFs in regulating enhancer activity, specifically, how different SRs target enhancer regions to reprogram chromatin in breast cancer cells. In addition, we discuss current techniques employed to study enhancer function at a genome-wide level. Further, we have noted recent advances in live cell imaging technology. These single-cell approaches enable the coupling of population-based assays with real-time studies to address many unsolved questions about SRs and chromatin dynamics in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Swinstead
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene ExpressionNational Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ville Paakinaho
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene ExpressionNational Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Institute of BiomedicineUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene ExpressionNational Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Live-cell single-molecule dynamics of PcG proteins imposed by the DIPG H3.3K27M mutation. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2080. [PMID: 29802243 PMCID: PMC5970213 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04455-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 80% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) harbor a point mutation in histone H3.3 where lysine 27 is substituted with methionine (H3.3K27M); however, how the mutation affects kinetics and function of PcG proteins remains elusive. We demonstrate that H3.3K27M prolongs the residence time and search time of Ezh2, but has no effect on its fraction bound to chromatin. In contrast, H3.3K27M has no effect on the residence time of Cbx7, but prolongs its search time and decreases its fraction bound to chromatin. We show that increasing expression of Cbx7 inhibits the proliferation of DIPG cells and prolongs its residence time. Our results highlight that the residence time of PcG proteins directly correlates with their functions and the search time of PcG proteins is critical for regulating their genomic occupancy. Together, our data provide mechanisms in which the cancer-causing histone mutation alters the binding and search dynamics of epigenetic complexes. Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas exhibit a characteristic mutation of lysine 27 to methionine (K27M) in genes encoding histone H3.3. Here the authors show that the H3.3K27M mutation imposes a specific pattern of H3.3K27 methylation by altering the target search dynamics of PcG proteins.
Collapse
|
31
|
Fries GR, Gassen NC, Rein T. The FKBP51 Glucocorticoid Receptor Co-Chaperone: Regulation, Function, and Implications in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18122614. [PMID: 29206196 PMCID: PMC5751217 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Among the chaperones and co-chaperones regulating the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), FK506 binding protein (FKBP) 51 is the most intensely investigated across different disciplines. This review provides an update on the role of the different co-chaperones of Hsp70 and Hsp90 in the regulation of GR function. The development leading to the focus on FKBP51 is outlined. Further, a survey of the vast literature on the mechanism and function of FKBP51 is provided. This includes its structure and biochemical function, its regulation on different levels—transcription, post-transcription, and post-translation—and its function in signaling pathways. The evidence portraying FKBP51 as a scaffolding protein organizing protein complexes rather than a chaperone contributing to the folding of individual proteins is collated. Finally, FKBP51’s involvement in physiology and disease is outlined, and the promising efforts in developing drugs targeting FKBP51 are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel R Fries
- Translational Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
| | - Nils C Gassen
- Department of Translational Science in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
| | - Theo Rein
- Department of Translational Science in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clauß K, Popp AP, Schulze L, Hettich J, Reisser M, Escoter Torres L, Uhlenhaut NH, Gebhardt JCM. DNA residence time is a regulatory factor of transcription repression. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:11121-11130. [PMID: 28977492 PMCID: PMC5737411 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription comprises a highly regulated sequence of intrinsically stochastic processes, resulting in bursts of transcription intermitted by quiescence. In transcription activation or repression, a transcription factor binds dynamically to DNA, with a residence time unique to each factor. Whether the DNA residence time is important in the transcription process is unclear. Here, we designed a series of transcription repressors differing in their DNA residence time by utilizing the modular DNA binding domain of transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) and varying the number of nucleotide-recognizing repeat domains. We characterized the DNA residence times of our repressors in living cells using single molecule tracking. The residence times depended non-linearly on the number of repeat domains and differed by more than a factor of six. The factors provoked a residence time-dependent decrease in transcript level of the glucocorticoid receptor-activated gene SGK1. Down regulation of transcription was due to a lower burst frequency in the presence of long binding repressors and is in accordance with a model of competitive inhibition of endogenous activator binding. Our single molecule experiments reveal transcription factor DNA residence time as a regulatory factor controlling transcription repression and establish TALE-DNA binding domains as tools for the temporal dissection of transcription regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Clauß
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Achim P Popp
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Lena Schulze
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Johannes Hettich
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Matthias Reisser
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Laura Escoter Torres
- Helmholtz Diabetes Center (HMGU) and German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), IDO, Parkring 13, 85748 Garching, Munich, Germany
| | - N Henriette Uhlenhaut
- Helmholtz Diabetes Center (HMGU) and German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), IDO, Parkring 13, 85748 Garching, Munich, Germany
| | - J Christof M Gebhardt
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mikuni S, Yamamoto J, Horio T, Kinjo M. Negative Correlation between the Diffusion Coefficient and Transcriptional Activity of the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18091855. [PMID: 28841150 PMCID: PMC5618504 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18091855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a transcription factor, which interacts with DNA and other cofactors to regulate gene transcription. Binding to other partners in the cell nucleus alters the diffusion properties of GR. Raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS) was applied to quantitatively characterize the diffusion properties of EGFP labeled human GR (EGFP-hGR) and its mutants in the cell nucleus. RICS is an image correlation technique that evaluates the spatial distribution of the diffusion coefficient as a diffusion map. Interestingly, we observed that the averaged diffusion coefficient of EGFP-hGR strongly and negatively correlated with its transcriptional activities in comparison to that of EGFP-hGR wild type and mutants with various transcriptional activities. This result suggests that the decreasing of the diffusion coefficient of hGR was reflected in the high-affinity binding to DNA. Moreover, the hyper-phosphorylation of hGR can enhance the transcriptional activity by reduction of the interaction between the hGR and the nuclear corepressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Mikuni
- Laboratory of Molecular Cell Dynamics, Faculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 0010021, Japan.
| | - Johtaro Yamamoto
- Laboratory of Molecular Cell Dynamics, Faculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 0010021, Japan.
| | - Takashi Horio
- Laboratory of Molecular Cell Dynamics, Faculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 0010021, Japan.
| | - Masataka Kinjo
- Laboratory of Molecular Cell Dynamics, Faculty of Advanced Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 0010021, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Loffreda A, Jacchetti E, Antunes S, Rainone P, Daniele T, Morisaki T, Bianchi ME, Tacchetti C, Mazza D. Live-cell p53 single-molecule binding is modulated by C-terminal acetylation and correlates with transcriptional activity. Nat Commun 2017; 8:313. [PMID: 28827596 PMCID: PMC5567047 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00398-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Live-cell microscopy has highlighted that transcription factors bind transiently to chromatin but it is not clear if the duration of these binding interactions can be modulated in response to an activation stimulus, and if such modulation can be controlled by post-translational modifications of the transcription factor. We address this question for the tumor suppressor p53 by combining live-cell single-molecule microscopy and single cell in situ measurements of transcription and we show that p53-binding kinetics are modulated following genotoxic stress. The modulation of p53 residence times on chromatin requires C-terminal acetylation—a classical mark for transcriptionally active p53—and correlates with the induction of transcription of target genes such as CDKN1a. We propose a model in which the modification state of the transcription factor determines the coupling between transcription factor abundance and transcriptional activity by tuning the transcription factor residence time on target sites. Both transcription binding kinetics and post-translational modifications of transcription factors are thought to play a role in the modulation of transcription. Here the authors use single-molecule tracking to directly demonstrate that p53 acetylation modulates promoter residence time and transcriptional activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Loffreda
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy.,Fondazione CEN, European Center for Nanomedicine, Milano, 20133, Italy
| | - Emanuela Jacchetti
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy.,Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica "G.Natta". Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano, 20133, Italy
| | - Sofia Antunes
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy
| | - Paolo Rainone
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy.,Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Researches Council, Segrate, 20090, (MI), Italy
| | - Tiziana Daniele
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy
| | - Tatsuya Morisaki
- Fluorescence Imaging Group, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Marco E Bianchi
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Chromatin Dynamics Unit, Milano, 20132, Italy.,Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, 20132, Italy
| | - Carlo Tacchetti
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy. .,Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, 20132, Italy.
| | - Davide Mazza
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale, Milano, 20132, Italy. .,Fondazione CEN, European Center for Nanomedicine, Milano, 20133, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Myc Regulates Chromatin Decompaction and Nuclear Architecture during B Cell Activation. Mol Cell 2017; 67:566-578.e10. [PMID: 28803781 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
50 years ago, Vincent Allfrey and colleagues discovered that lymphocyte activation triggers massive acetylation of chromatin. However, the molecular mechanisms driving epigenetic accessibility are still unknown. We here show that stimulated lymphocytes decondense chromatin by three differentially regulated steps. First, chromatin is repositioned away from the nuclear periphery in response to global acetylation. Second, histone nanodomain clusters decompact into mononucleosome fibers through a mechanism that requires Myc and continual energy input. Single-molecule imaging shows that this step lowers transcription factor residence time and non-specific collisions during sampling for DNA targets. Third, chromatin interactions shift from long range to predominantly short range, and CTCF-mediated loops and contact domains double in numbers. This architectural change facilitates cognate promoter-enhancer contacts and also requires Myc and continual ATP production. Our results thus define the nature and transcriptional impact of chromatin decondensation and reveal an unexpected role for Myc in the establishment of nuclear topology in mammalian cells.
Collapse
|
36
|
Defective glucocorticoid receptor signaling and keratinocyte-autonomous defects contribute to skin phenotype of mouse embryos lacking the Hsp90 co-chaperone p23. PLoS One 2017. [PMID: 28650975 PMCID: PMC5484504 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
p23 is a small acidic protein with intrinsic molecular chaperone activity. It is best known as a co-chaperone of the major cytosolic molecular chaperone Hsp90. p23 binds the N-terminus of Hsp90 and stabilizes the ATP-bound and N-terminally closed Hsp90 dimer. It is in this configuration that many Hsp90 clients are most stably bound. Considering the important role of p23 in the Hsp90 cycle, it came as a surprise that it is not absolutely essential for viability in the budding yeast or for mouse development. Mice without p23 develop quite normally until birth and then all die perinatally because of immature lungs. The only other apparent phenotype of late stage embryos and newborns is a skin defect, which we have further characterized here. We found that skin differentiation is impaired, and that both apoptosis and cell proliferation are augmented in the absence of p23; the consequences are a severe thinning of the stratum corneum and reduced numbers of hair follicles. The altered differentiation, spontaneous apoptosis and proliferation are all mimicked by isolated primary keratinocytes indicating that they do require p23 functions in a cell-autonomous fashion. Since the phenotype of p23-null embryos is strikingly similar to that of embryos lacking the glucocorticoid receptor, a paradigmatic Hsp90-p23 client protein, we investigated glucocorticoid signaling. We discovered that it is impaired in vivo and for some aspects in isolated keratinocytes. Our results suggest that part of the phenotype of p23-null embryos can be explained by an impact on this particular Hsp90 client, but do not exclude that p23 by itself or in association with Hsp90 affects skin development and homeostasis through yet other pathways.
Collapse
|
37
|
Paakinaho V, Presman DM, Ball DA, Johnson TA, Schiltz RL, Levitt P, Mazza D, Morisaki T, Karpova TS, Hager GL. Single-molecule analysis of steroid receptor and cofactor action in living cells. Nat Commun 2017. [PMID: 28635963 PMCID: PMC5482060 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Population-based assays have been employed extensively to investigate the interactions of transcription factors (TFs) with chromatin and are often interpreted in terms of static and sequential binding. However, fluorescence microscopy techniques reveal a more dynamic binding behaviour of TFs in live cells. Here we analyse the strengths and limitations of in vivo single-molecule tracking and performed a comprehensive analysis on the intranuclear dwell times of four steroid receptors and a number of known cofactors. While the absolute residence times estimates can depend on imaging acquisition parameters due to sampling bias, our results indicate that only a small proportion of factors are specifically bound to chromatin at any given time. Interestingly, the glucocorticoid receptor and its cofactors affect each other’s dwell times in an asymmetric manner. Overall, our data indicate transient rather than stable TF-cofactors chromatin interactions at response elements at the single-molecule level. Transcription factors (TFs) are thought to regulate gene expression by stably binding to target DNA elements. Here, the authors use single-molecule tracking to analyse the dynamic behaviour of steroid receptors TFs and show that most specific interactions with chromatin are transient and dynamic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ville Paakinaho
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Diego M Presman
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - David A Ball
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Thomas A Johnson
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - R Louis Schiltz
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Peter Levitt
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Davide Mazza
- Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Centro di Imaging Sperimentale e Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy
| | - Tatsuya Morisaki
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Tatiana S Karpova
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, 41 Library Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Weikum ER, Knuesel MT, Ortlund EA, Yamamoto KR. Glucocorticoid receptor control of transcription: precision and plasticity via allostery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017; 18:159-174. [PMID: 28053348 PMCID: PMC6257982 DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2016.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 338] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a constitutively expressed transcriptional regulatory factor (TRF) that controls many distinct gene networks, each uniquely determined by particular cellular and physiological contexts. The precision of GR-mediated responses seems to depend on combinatorial, context-specific assembly of GR-nucleated transcription regulatory complexes at genomic response elements. In turn, evidence suggests that context-driven plasticity is conferred by the integration of multiple signals, each serving as an allosteric effector of GR conformation, a key determinant of regulatory complex composition and activity. This structural and mechanistic perspective on GR regulatory specificity is likely to extend to other eukaryotic TRFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Weikum
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - Matthew T Knuesel
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Eric A Ortlund
- Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - Keith R Yamamoto
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yao J. Imaging Transcriptional Regulation of Eukaryotic mRNA Genes: Advances and Outlook. J Mol Biol 2017; 429:14-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
40
|
Abstract
Glucocorticoid hormones (GC) regulate essential physiological functions including energy homeostasis, embryonic and postembryonic development, and the stress response. From the biomedical perspective, GC have garnered a tremendous amount of attention as highly potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive medications indispensable in the clinic. GC signal through the GC receptor (GR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor whose structure, DNA binding, and the molecular partners that it employs to regulate transcription have been under intense investigation for decades. In particular, next-generation sequencing-based approaches have revolutionized the field by introducing a unified platform for a simultaneous genome-wide analysis of cellular activities at the level of RNA production, binding of transcription factors to DNA and RNA, and chromatin landscape and topology. Here we describe fundamental concepts of GC/GR function as established through traditional molecular and in vivo approaches and focus on the novel insights of GC biology that have emerged over the last 10 years from the rapidly expanding arsenal of system-wide genomic methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Sacta
- Hospital for Special Surgery, The David Rosensweig Genomics Center, New York, NY 10021; .,Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering MD/PhD program, New York, NY 10021
| | - Yurii Chinenov
- Hospital for Special Surgery, The David Rosensweig Genomics Center, New York, NY 10021;
| | - Inez Rogatsky
- Hospital for Special Surgery, The David Rosensweig Genomics Center, New York, NY 10021; .,Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering MD/PhD program, New York, NY 10021
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Smirnova OV. Competitive Agonists and Antagonists of Steroid Nuclear Receptors: Evolution of the Concept or Its Reversal. BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) 2016; 80:1227-34. [PMID: 26567566 DOI: 10.1134/s000629791510003x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The mechanisms displaying pure and mixed steroid agonist/antagonist activity as well as principles underlying in vivo action of selective steroid receptor modulators dependent on tissue or cell type including interaction with various types of nuclear receptors are analyzed in this work. Mechanisms of in vitro action for mixed agonist/antagonist steroids are discussed depending on: specific features of their interaction with receptor hormone-binding pocket; steroid-dependent allosteric modulation of interaction between hormone-receptor complex and hormone response DNA elements; features of interacting hormone-receptor complex with protein transcriptional coregulators; level and tissue-specific composition of transcriptional coregulators. A novel understanding regarding context-selective modulators replacing the concept of steroid agonists and antagonists is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O V Smirnova
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Biological Faculty, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tesikova M, Dezitter X, Nenseth HZ, Klokk TI, Mueller F, Hager GL, Saatcioglu F. Divergent Binding and Transactivation by Two Related Steroid Receptors at the Same Response Element. J Biol Chem 2016; 291:11899-910. [PMID: 27056330 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.684480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription factor (TF) recruitment to chromatin is central to activation of transcription. TF-chromatin interactions are highly dynamic, which are evaluated by recovery half time (t1/2) in seconds, determined by fluorescence recovery experiments in living cells, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis, measured in minutes. These two states are related: the larger the t1/2, the longer the ChIP occupancy resulting in increased transcription. Here we present data showing that this relationship does not always hold. We found that histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) significantly increased t1/2 of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused androgen receptor (AR) on a tandem array of positive hormone response elements (HREs) in chromatin. This resulted in increased ChIP signal of GFP-AR. Unexpectedly, however, transcription was inhibited. In contrast, the GFP-fused glucocorticoid receptor (GR), acting through the same HREs, displayed a profile consistent with current models. We provide evidence that these differences are mediated, at least in part, by HDACs. Our results provide insight into TF action in living cells and show that very closely related TFs may trigger significantly divergent outcomes at the same REs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Tesikova
- From the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Xavier Dezitter
- From the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hatice Z Nenseth
- From the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Tove I Klokk
- From the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Florian Mueller
- Computational Imaging and Modeling Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and
| | - Fahri Saatcioglu
- From the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Division of Cancer and Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Chromatin regulatory processes, like all biological reactions, are dynamic and stochastic in nature but can give rise to stable and inheritable changes in gene expression patterns. A molecular understanding of those processes is key for fundamental biological insight into gene regulation, epigenetic inheritance, lineage determination, and therapeutic intervention in the case of disease. In recent years, great progress has been made in identifying important molecular players involved in key chromatin regulatory pathways. Conversely, we are only beginning to understand the dynamic interplay between protein effectors, transcription factors, and the chromatin substrate itself. Single-molecule approaches employing both highly defined chromatin substrates in vitro, as well as direct observation of complex regulatory processes in vivo, open new avenues for a molecular view of chromatin regulation. This review highlights recent applications of single-molecule methods and related techniques to investigate fundamental chromatin regulatory processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Fierz
- Laboratory
of Biophysical
Chemistry of Macromolecules, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Völker-Albert MC, Pusch MC, Fedisch A, Schilcher P, Schmidt A, Imhof A. A Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of In Vitro Assembled Chromatin. Mol Cell Proteomics 2016; 15:945-59. [PMID: 26811354 PMCID: PMC4813712 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m115.053553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The structure of chromatin is critical for many aspects of cellular physiology and is considered to be the primary medium to store epigenetic information. It is defined by the histone molecules that constitute the nucleosome, the positioning of the nucleosomes along the DNA and the non-histone proteins that associate with it. These factors help to establish and maintain a largely DNA sequence-independent but surprisingly stable structure. Chromatin is extensively disassembled and reassembled during DNA replication, repair, recombination or transcription in order to allow the necessary factors to gain access to their substrate. Despite such constant interference with chromatin structure, the epigenetic information is generally well maintained. Surprisingly, the mechanisms that coordinate chromatin assembly and ensure proper assembly are not particularly well understood. Here, we use label free quantitative mass spectrometry to describe the kinetics of in vitro assembled chromatin supported by an embryo extract prepared from preblastoderm Drosophila melanogaster embryos. The use of a data independent acquisition method for proteome wide quantitation allows a time resolved comparison of in vitro chromatin assembly. A comparison of our in vitro data with proteomic studies of replicative chromatin assembly in vivo reveals an extensive overlap showing that the in vitro system can be used for investigating the kinetics of chromatin assembly in a proteome-wide manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Carl Völker-Albert
- From the ‡BioMedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Sciences Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Miriam Caroline Pusch
- From the ‡BioMedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Sciences Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Andreas Fedisch
- From the ‡BioMedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Sciences Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Pierre Schilcher
- §Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analyis Unit), Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Andreas Schmidt
- §Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analyis Unit), Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Axel Imhof
- From the ‡BioMedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Sciences Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; §Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analyis Unit), Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Groβhaderner Straβe 9, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stavreva DA, Hager GL. Chromatin structure and gene regulation: a dynamic view of enhancer function. Nucleus 2016; 6:442-8. [PMID: 26765055 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2015.1107689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized chromatin organization is now recognized as an important determinant of cell identity and developmental pathways. Recent studies have demonstrated that these epigenetic states are unexpectedly dynamic and malleable. In this Extra view we will highlight the transient nature of stimulus-induced enhancer accessibility and its importance for transcription regulation. Using glucocorticoid receptor (GR) as a model system we will discuss spatiotemporal relationships between receptor/chromatin interactions, lifetimes of the DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHSs), long-range interactions, and gene regulation. We propose that differential temporal activation and utilization of distal regulatory elements plays a role in directing divergent stimulus-induced transcriptional programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Stavreva
- a Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health ; Bethesda , MD USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- a Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health ; Bethesda , MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Mammals have at least 210 histologically diverse cell types (Alberts, Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science, New York, 2008) and the number would be even higher if functional differences are taken into account. The genome in each of these cell types is differentially programmed to express the specific set of genes needed to fulfill the phenotypical requirements of the cell. Furthermore, in each of these cell types, the gene program can be differentially modulated by exposure to external signals such as hormones or nutrients. The basis for the distinct gene programs relies on cell type-selective activation of transcriptional enhancers, which in turn are particularly sensitive to modulation. Until recently we had only fragmented insight into the regulation of a few of these enhancers; however, the recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have enabled the development of a large number of technologies that can be used to obtain genome-wide insight into how genomes are reprogrammed during development and in response to specific external signals. By applying such technologies, we have begun to reveal the cross-talk between metabolism and the genome, i.e., how genomes are reprogrammed in response to metabolites, and how the regulation of metabolic networks is coordinated at the genomic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rauch
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Susanne Mandrup
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Geng Y, Zhao Y, Schuster LC, Feng B, Lynn DA, Austin KM, Stoklosa JD, Morrison JD. A Chemical Biology Study of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Unveils HSPA8 as a Key Regulator of Pluripotency. Stem Cell Reports 2015; 5:1143-1154. [PMID: 26549849 PMCID: PMC4682066 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Revised: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemical biology methods such as high-throughput screening (HTS) and affinity-based target identification can be used to probe biological systems on a biomacromolecule level, providing valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of those systems. Here, by establishing a human embryonal carcinoma cell-based HTS platform, we screened 171,077 small molecules for regulators of pluripotency and identified a small molecule, Displurigen, that potently disrupts hESC pluripotency by targeting heat shock 70-kDa protein 8 (HSPA8), the constitutively expressed member of the 70-kDa heat shock protein family, as elucidated using affinity-based target identification techniques and confirmed by loss-of-function and gain-of-function assays. We demonstrated that HSPA8 maintains pluripotency by binding to the master pluripotency regulator OCT4 and facilitating its DNA-binding activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijie Geng
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
| | - Yongfeng Zhao
- Stem Cell Center, Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | - Lisa Corinna Schuster
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Bradley Feng
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Dana A Lynn
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Katherine M Austin
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Jason Daniel Stoklosa
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Joseph D Morrison
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Helzer KT, Hooper C, Miyamoto S, Alarid ET. Ubiquitylation of nuclear receptors: new linkages and therapeutic implications. J Mol Endocrinol 2015; 54:R151-67. [PMID: 25943391 PMCID: PMC4457637 DOI: 10.1530/jme-14-0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily is a group of transcriptional regulators that control multiple aspects of both physiology and pathology and are broadly recognized as viable therapeutic targets. While receptor-modulating drugs have been successful in many cases, the discovery of new drug targets is still an active area of research, because resistance to NR-targeting therapies remains a significant clinical challenge. Many successful targeted therapies have harnessed the control of receptor activity by targeting events within the NR signaling pathway. In this review, we explore the role of NR ubiquitylation and discuss how the expanding roles of ubiquitin could be leveraged to identify additional entry points to control receptor function for future therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle T Helzer
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Christopher Hooper
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Shigeki Miyamoto
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Elaine T Alarid
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer ResearchDepartment of Oncology, 6151 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Koster M, Snel B, Timmers H. Genesis of Chromatin and Transcription Dynamics in the Origin of Species. Cell 2015; 161:724-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
50
|
Chow CC, Finn KK, Storchan GB, Lu X, Sheng X, Simons SS. Kinetically-defined component actions in gene repression. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1004122. [PMID: 25816223 PMCID: PMC4376387 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene repression by transcription factors, and glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in particular, is a critical, but poorly understood, physiological response. Among the many unresolved questions is the difference between GR regulated induction and repression, and whether transcription cofactor action is the same in both. Because activity classifications based on changes in gene product level are mechanistically uninformative, we present a theory for gene repression in which the mechanisms of factor action are defined kinetically and are consistent for both gene repression and induction. The theory is generally applicable and amenable to predictions if the dose-response curve for gene repression is non-cooperative with a unit Hill coefficient, which is observed for GR-regulated repression of AP1LUC reporter induction by phorbol myristate acetate. The theory predicts the mechanism of GR and cofactors, and where they act with respect to each other, based on how each cofactor alters the plots of various kinetic parameters vs. cofactor. We show that the kinetically-defined mechanism of action of each of four factors (reporter gene, p160 coactivator TIF2, and two pharmaceuticals [NU6027 and phenanthroline]) is the same in GR-regulated repression and induction. What differs is the position of GR action. This insight should simplify clinical efforts to differentially modulate factor actions in gene induction vs. gene repression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carson C. Chow
- Mathematical Biology Section, NIDDK/LBM, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail: (CCC); (SSS)
| | - Kelsey K. Finn
- Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LERB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Geoffery B. Storchan
- Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LERB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Xinping Lu
- Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LERB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Xiaoyan Sheng
- Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LERB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - S. Stoney Simons
- Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LERB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail: (CCC); (SSS)
| |
Collapse
|