1
|
Ouranos K, Avila DV, Mylona EK, Vassilopoulos A, Vassilopoulos S, Shehadeh F, Mylonakis E. Cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with janus kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0306548. [PMID: 39083492 PMCID: PMC11290652 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive immunosuppressive medications have a heightened risk of infection. The goal of our study was to calculate the pooled cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with RA treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried for randomized controlled trials comparing patients with RA treated with JAKi (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, or filgotinib), defined as the treatment group, compared with control subjects, defined as participants receiving placebo or treatment regimen that was similar to that of participants in the treatment group, with the exception of JAKi. The primary study endpoint was the relative risk (RR) of any-grade and severe infection. The secondary endpoints were RR and cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections, herpes zoster, and pneumonia. The Stata v17 software was used for all data analysis. Results showed that treatment with baricitinib was associated with an increased risk of any-grade (RR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.19-1.52) and opportunistic (RR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.22-5.94) infection, whereas treatment with filgotinib (RR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.05-1.39), peficitinib (RR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.05-1.86) and upadacitinib (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.09-1.56) was associated with increased risk of any-grade infection only. Analysis based on type of infection showed a pooled cumulative incidence of 32.44% for any-grade infections, 2.02% for severe infections, 1.74% for opportunistic infections, 1.56% for herpes zoster, and 0.49% for pneumonia in patients treated with any JAKi during the follow-up period. Treatment with specific JAKi in patients with RA is associated with an increased risk of any-grade and opportunistic infections but not severe infection. Close clinical monitoring of patients with RA treated with JAKi is required to establish the long-term infection risk profile of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Ouranos
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Diana V. Avila
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Evangelia K. Mylona
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Athanasios Vassilopoulos
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Stephanos Vassilopoulos
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Fadi Shehadeh
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Mylonakis
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kiełbowski K, Plewa P, Bratborska AW, Bakinowska E, Pawlik A. JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Immunomodulatory Properties and Clinical Efficacy. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:8327. [PMID: 39125897 PMCID: PMC11311960 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a highly prevalent autoimmune disorder. The pathogenesis of the disease is complex and involves various cellular populations, including fibroblast-like synoviocytes, macrophages, and T cells, among others. Identification of signalling pathways and molecules that actively contribute to the development of the disease is crucial to understanding the mechanisms involved in the chronic inflammatory environment present in affected joints. Recent studies have demonstrated that the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway regulates the behaviour of immune cells and contributes to the progression of RA. Several JAK inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgocitinib, have been developed, and their efficacy and safety in patients with RA have been comprehensively investigated in a number of clinical trials. Consequently, JAK inhibitors have been approved and registered as a treatment for patients with RA. In this review, we discuss the involvement of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis of RA and summarise the potential beneficial effects of JAK inhibitors in cells implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease. Moreover, we present the most important phase 3 clinical trials that evaluated the use of these agents in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajetan Kiełbowski
- Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (K.K.); (E.B.)
| | - Paulina Plewa
- Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland;
| | | | - Estera Bakinowska
- Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (K.K.); (E.B.)
| | - Andrzej Pawlik
- Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (K.K.); (E.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Srivastava SK, Watkins TR, Nguyen QD, Sharma S, Scales DK, Dacey MS, Shah RE, Chu DS, Grewal DS, Faia LJ, Suhler EB, Genovese MC, Guo Y, Barchuk WT, Besuyen R, Dick AD, Rosenbaum JT. Filgotinib in Active Noninfectious Uveitis: The HUMBOLDT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2024:2820954. [PMID: 39023880 PMCID: PMC11258638 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Importance Noninfectious uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment with an unmet need for additional treatment options. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib, a Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) preferential inhibitor, for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Design, Setting, and Participants The HUMBOLDT trial was a double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2, randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2017 to April 2021 at 26 centers in 7 countries. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis despite at least 2 weeks of treatment with oral prednisone (10-60 mg per day). Interventions Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive filgotinib, 200 mg, or placebo orally once daily for up to 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of participants experiencing treatment failure by week 24. Treatment failure was a composite end point represented by assessment of the presence of chorioretinal and/or retinal vascular lesions, best-corrected visual acuity, and anterior chamber cell and vitreous haze grades. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug or placebo. Results Between July 26, 2017, and April 22, 2021, 116 participants were screened, and 74 (mean [SD] age, 46 [16] years; 43 female [59.7%] of 72 participants, as 2 participants did not receive treatment doses) were randomly assigned to receive filgotinib (n = 38) or placebo (n = 36). Despite early termination of the trial for business reasons ahead of meeting enrollment targets, a significantly reduced proportion of participants who received filgotinib experienced treatment failure by week 24 vs placebo (12 of 32 participants [37.5%] vs 23 of 34 participants [67.6%]; difference vs placebo -30.1%; 95% CI, -56.2% to -4.1%; P = .006). Business reasons were unrelated to efficacy or safety. Adverse events were reported in 30 of 37 participants (81.1%) who received filgotinib and in 24 of 35 participants (68.6%) who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in 5 of 37 participants (13.5%) in the filgotinib group and in 2 of 35 participants (5.7%) in the placebo group. No deaths were reported during the trial. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial show that filgotinib lowered the risk of treatment failure in participants with active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis vs placebo. Although the HUMBOLDT trial provided evidence supporting the efficacy of filgotinib in patients with active noninfectious uveitis, the premature termination of the trial prevented collection of additional safety or efficacy information of this JAK1 preferential inhibitor. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03207815.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sumit Sharma
- Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Rajiv E. Shah
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David S. Chu
- Metropolitan Eye Research and Surgery Institute, Palisades Park, New Jersey
| | - Dilraj S. Grewal
- Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lisa J. Faia
- Associated Retinal Consultants PC, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Eric B. Suhler
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland
| | | | - Ying Guo
- Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, California
| | | | | | - Andrew D. Dick
- Bristol Medical School and School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute of Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taylor PC, Downie B, Han L, Hawtin R, Hertz A, Moots RJ, Takeuchi T. Patients with High Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Exhibit Better Response to Filgotinib as Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2024:10.1007/s40744-024-00695-w. [PMID: 38985247 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00695-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations. METHODS Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models. RESULTS Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200 mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12 weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population. CONCLUSION The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Bryan Downie
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 94404, USA
| | - Ling Han
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 94404, USA
| | | | - Angie Hertz
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 94404, USA
| | - Robert J Moots
- Department of Rheumatology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dreo B, Muralikrishnan AS, Husic R, Lackner A, Brügmann T, Haudum P, Bosch P, Thiel J, Fessler J, Stradner M. JAK/STAT signaling in rheumatoid arthritis leukocytes is uncoupled from serum cytokines in a subset of patients. Clin Immunol 2024; 264:110238. [PMID: 38729230 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.110238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease involving pro-inflammatory cytokines that can be therapeutically targeted by antibodies or kinase inhibitors. Nevertheless, these drugs fail in a subset of patients independent of the abundance of the targeted cytokines. We aim to explore the cellular basis of this phenomenon by analyzing the relation of cytokine abundance and activation of downstream signaling pathways in RA. METHODS The study included 62 RA patients and 9 healthy controls (HC). Phosphorylation of STAT 1-6 in various immune cell subsets was determined ex vivo using a novel robust flow cytometry-based protocol. Serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17 A, interferon gamma, and TNFα in the same samples were measured using highly sensitive single molecule array (SIMOA). RESULTS We found an increase in circulating cytokines in RA patients, while STAT activity was lower in RA patients compared to HC. Based on STAT activity we determined three endotypes in active RA patients (cDAI>10, n = 28): 1) those with active STAT5a/b signaling in T cells (n = 7/28), 2) those with a low STAT activity in all assessed cell types (n = 14/28), and 3) those with active STAT1 and STAT3 signaling mainly in myeloid cells (n = 7/28). Integrating intracellular STAT activation and cytokine analysis revealed diminished JAK/STAT signaling in a subset of patients (n = 8/20) despite elevated serum cytokine concentrations. CONCLUSION Diminished JAK/STAT signaling in active RA may partly explain unresponsiveness to therapy targeting cytokine signaling. Analysis of JAK/STAT phosphorylation may identify patients at risk for non-response to these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Dreo
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | | | - Rusmir Husic
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Angelika Lackner
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Theresa Brügmann
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Patrizia Haudum
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Philipp Bosch
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Jens Thiel
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Johannes Fessler
- Division of Immunology, Otto Loewi Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
| | - Martin Stradner
- Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qu B, Zhao F, Song Y, Zhao J, Yao Y, Chen Y, Liao R, Fu L. The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305621. [PMID: 38905267 PMCID: PMC11192398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of patients with RA. METHODS The databases CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, and PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), all from the time of database creation to April 2024. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (using Review Manager-5.3 software) were independently performed by at least two authors. The network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.1.3 software. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022370444. RESULTS Thirty-three RCTs included 15,961 patients The experimental groups involved six JAK inhibitors (filgotinib, tofacitinib, decernotinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and peficitinib) and 12 interventions (different doses of the six JAK inhibitors), and the control group involved adalimumab (ADA) and placebo. Compared with placebo, all JAK inhibitors showed a significant increase in efficacy measures (ACR20/50/70). Compared with ADA, only tofacitinib, low-dose decernotinib, and high-dose peficitinib showed a significant increase in ACR20/50/70. Decernotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking of ACR20/50/70. In terms of safety indicators, only those differences between low-dose filgotinib and high-dose upadacitinib, low-dose tofacitinib and high-dose upadacitinib were statistically significant. Low-dose filgotinib ranked first in the SUCRA ranking with adverse events as safety indicators. Only the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib ranked higher among different SUCRA rankings. CONCLUSION Six JAK inhibitors have better efficacy than placebo. The superior efficacy of decernotinib and safety of low-dose filgotinib can be found in the SUCRA. However, there are no significant differences in safety between the different JAK inhibitors. Head-to-head trials, directly comparing one against each other, are required to provide more certain evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingjia Qu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Feng Zhao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ying Song
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Junyi Zhao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yuxin Yao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yulan Chen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ruobing Liao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lingyu Fu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Medical Record Management Center, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ernst D, Krüger K, Witte T. [Head-to-head trials in rheumatoid arthritis]. Z Rheumatol 2024:10.1007/s00393-024-01517-8. [PMID: 38831141 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-024-01517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head-to-head studies are important to select the optimal treatment in terms of efficacy and side effect profiles when several drugs are available. AIM OF THE WORK This article describes all studies comparing the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in head-to-head studies or in which a DMARD was at least included in an active comparison arm. RESULTS A total of 23 studies comparing DMARDs were identified. These included comparisons of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors with methotrexate and with adalimumab as well as the oral surveillance study. DISCUSSION There are already an exceptionally large number of head-to-head studies in RA, both for comparisons of efficacy and safety of DMARDs. Nevertheless, more such comparative studies are needed, for example to clarify whether adverse events of tofacitinib observed in the oral surveillance study are specific to the JAK 1/JAK 3 inhibitor or are a class effect of all JAK inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Ernst
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Krüger
- Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, München, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Witte
- Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Watanabe K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Fujitani Y, Faes M, Oortwijn A, Lindsay JO, Rogler G, Hibi T. Impact of Concomitant Thiopurine on the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase 2b/3 SELECTION Study. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:801-811. [PMID: 38019901 PMCID: PMC11147794 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS SELECTION is the first study to assess the impact of concomitant thiopurine and other immunomodulator [IM] use on the efficacy and safety of a Janus kinase inhibitor, filgotinib, in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS Data from the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study were used for this post hoc analysis. Patients were randomised [2:2:1] to two induction studies [biologic-naive, biologic-experienced] to filgotinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo. At Week 10, patients receiving filgotinib were re-randomised [2:1] to continue filgotinib or to switch to placebo until Week 58 [maintenance]. Outcomes were compared between subgroups with and without concomitant IM use. RESULTS At Week 10, similar proportions of patients in the +IM and -IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] response [biologic-naive: 65.8% vs 66.9%; biologic-experienced: 61.3% vs 50.5%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 26.0% vs 26.2%; biologic-experienced: 11.3% vs 11.5%]. At Week 58, similar proportion of patients in the +IM and -IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved MCS response [biologic-naive: 74.2% vs 75.0%; biologic-experienced: 45.5% vs 61.4%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 51.6% vs 47.4%; biologic-experienced: 22.7% vs 24.3%]. The probability of protocol-specified disease worsening during the maintenance study in patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg did not differ between +IM and -IM groups [p = 0.6700]. No differences were observed in the incidences of adverse events between +IM and -IM groups in the induction/maintenance studies. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety profiles of filgotinib treatment in SELECTION did not differ with or without concomitant IM use. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT02914522.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Watanabe
- Department of Internal Medicine for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHRU-Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
- Inserm, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - James O Lindsay
- Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Toshifumi Hibi
- Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sen R, Riofrio M, Singh JA. A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:687-714. [PMID: 38695151 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2348575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events. AREAS COVERED In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies. EXPERT OPINION DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rouhin Sen
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Medicine/Rheumatology Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Riofrio
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Medicine/Rheumatology Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UAB School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van de Laar CJ, Oude Voshaar MAH, Ten Klooster P, Tedjo DI, Bos R, Jansen T, Willemze A, Versteeg GA, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, Kroot EJ, van de Laar M. PERFECTRA: a pragmatic, multicentre, real-life study comparing treat-to-target strategies with baricitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after failure on csDMARDs. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004291. [PMID: 38816210 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of a strategy administering baricitinib versus one using TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) failure in a real-life treat-to-target (T2T) setting. METHODS Patients with biological and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) naïve RA with disease duration ≤5 years without contraindications to b/tsDMARD were randomised to either TNFi or baricitinib when csDMARD failed to achieve disease control in a T2T setting. Changes in clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 12-week intervals for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority, with testing for superiority if non-inferiority is demonstrated, of baricitinib strategy in the number of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included 28-joint count Disease Activity Score with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6, changes in PROMs and radiographic progression. RESULTS A total of 199 patients (TNFi, n=102; baricitinib, n=97) were studied. Both study groups were similar. Baricitinib was both non-inferior and superior in achieving ACR50 response at week 12 (42% vs 20%). Moreover, 75% of baricitinib patients achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 at week 12 compared with 46% of TNFi patients. On secondary outcomes throughout the duration of the study, the baricitinib strategy demonstrated comparable or better outcomes than TNFi strategy. Although not powered for safety, no unexpected safety signals were seen in this relatively small group of patients. CONCLUSION Up to present, in a T2T setting, patients with RA failing csDMARDs have two main strategies to consider, Janus Kinases inhibitor versus bDMARDs (in clinical practice, predominantly TNFi). The PERFECTRA study suggested that starting with baricitinib was superior over TNFi in achieving response at 12 weeks and resulted in improved outcomes across all studied clinical measures and PROMs throughout the study duration in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine J van de Laar
- Transparency in Healthcare BV, Hengelo, Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Department of Medical Cell BioPhysics & TechMed Center, University of Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
| | - Peter Ten Klooster
- Transparency in Healthcare bv @ University of Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands
- Department of Technology, Human and Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
| | - Danyta I Tedjo
- Transparency in Healthcare bv @ University of Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands
| | - Reinhard Bos
- Rheumatology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Fryslân, Netherlands
| | - Tim Jansen
- Rheumatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands
| | - A Willemze
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Grada A Versteeg
- Rheumatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Overijssel, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mart van de Laar
- Transparency in Healthcare bv @ University of Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands
- Department of Technology, Human and Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nakayama Y, Onishi A, Yamamoto W, Yoshikawa A, Shiba H, Yoshida N, Son Y, Shirasugi I, Maeda T, Katsushima M, Hashimoto M, Etani Y, Itami T, Nozaki Y, Onizawa H, Fujii T, Murakami K, Murata K, Tanaka M, Matsuda S, Morinobu A. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and renal impairment: the ANSWER cohort study. Clin Exp Med 2024; 24:97. [PMID: 38727756 PMCID: PMC11087367 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01360-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Data on the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with renal impairment are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to biological (b) DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and renal impairment. We used a multi-centre observational registry of patients with RA in Japan (the ANSWER cohort). We assessed the drug retention rates of b/targeted synthetic DMARDs with different modes of action (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulins fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), and JAKis) in patients with RA stratified by pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model This study included 3775 patients, who were classified into three groups (the normal group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 2893 patients; CKDa group (eGFR 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 551; and CKDb group (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2): 331). In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to adverse events (AE) was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AE were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKi. In contrast, drug retention rates due to inefficacy were similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in all groups. In the Cox-proportional model, in the CKDb group, TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKis (TNFi: hazard ratio = 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14-0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15-0.89)). JAKis showed the lowest drug retention due to AE in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Physicians should pay more attention to renal function when using JAKis than when using bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Nakayama
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Akira Onishi
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Wataru Yamamoto
- Department of Health Information Management, Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ayaka Yoshikawa
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiba
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naofumi Yoshida
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yonsu Son
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Iku Shirasugi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshihisa Maeda
- Rheumatic Disease Center, Orthopaedic Surgery, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Kato, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masao Katsushima
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motomu Hashimoto
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuki Etani
- Department of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsu Itami
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Nozaki
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideo Onizawa
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Fujii
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kosaku Murakami
- Center for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Murata
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masao Tanaka
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shuichi Matsuda
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akio Morinobu
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoisnard L, Meyer A, Dray-Spira R, Weill A, Zureik M, Sbidian E. Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Exposed to Janus Kinase Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024. [PMID: 38699822 DOI: 10.1002/art.42862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real-world population of patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow-up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and proton-pump inhibitors were time-varying variables. RESULTS The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow-up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease. CONCLUSION In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Hoisnard
- Henri Mondor Hospital, INSERM, and Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France
| | - Antoine Meyer
- French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France, and Bicêtre University Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Rosemary Dray-Spira
- French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Alain Weill
- French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Mahmoud Zureik
- French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Emilie Sbidian
- Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, INSERM, Créteil, France, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schultz O, Fiehn C, Kneitz C, Picker N, Kromer D, Zignani M, De Leonardis F, Orzechowski HD, Gurrath M, Krüger K. Real-world experience with filgotinib for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany : A retrospective chart review. Z Rheumatol 2024:10.1007/s00393-024-01506-x. [PMID: 38689038 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-024-01506-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data for filgotinib, a Janus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor, are limited in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES To explore real-world filgotinib use in patients with RA in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective chart review included patients aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed moderate to severe RA who initiated filgotinib before December 1, 2021, with ≥ 6 months of medical records available prior to filgotinib initiation or after initial diagnosis. Patient characteristics, prior treatments, reasons for initiating/discontinuing filgotinib, disease activity, dose adjustments and concomitant treatments were recorded. RESULTS In total, 301 patients from 20 German rheumatology outpatient units were included. One-third were aged ≥ 65 years and almost half had ≥ 1 cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. Most patients initiated filgotinib as monotherapy (83.7%; 12.7% of whom with glucocorticoids) and at the 200 mg dose (84.7%); higher proportions of those initiating the 100 versus 200 mg dose were aged ≥ 65 years and had renal impairment or ≥ 1 CV risk factor. Oral administration (78.4%), fast onset of action (66.8%) and administration as monotherapy (65.4%) were the most common reasons for initiating filgotinib. At 12 months, 41 (18.4%) patients had discontinued filgotinib, most commonly due to lack of effectiveness. After 6‑months of follow-up, 36.8% of patients had achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission and 45.6% had achieved CDAI low disease activity. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice in Germany, reasons for initiating filgotinib in patients with RA were related to dosing flexibility and general JAK inhibitor attributes. Filgotinib was used predominantly as monotherapy and was effective and generally well tolerated; however, longer-term data in larger, prospective cohorts are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Schultz
- ACURA Kliniken Baden-Baden/Rheumazentrum, Rotenbachtalstraße 5, 76530, Baden-Baden, Germany.
| | - Christoph Fiehn
- Praxis for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center Baden-Baden, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | | | - Nils Picker
- Ingress-Health HWM GmbH-A Cytel Company, Wismar, Germany
| | - Daniel Kromer
- Ingress-Health HWM GmbH-A Cytel Company, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Klaus Krüger
- Rheumatologisches Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cai W, Tong R, Sun Y, Yao Y, Zhang J. Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1387585. [PMID: 38725657 PMCID: PMC11080655 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1387585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The European League of Rheumatology(EULAR)guidelines recommend Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are insensitive or under-responsive to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). But there was no recommendation for which one was preferred in five currently approved JAK inhibitors. The objective of this network meta-analysis study was to evaluate the efficacy of five JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy or combined with csDMARD in the treatment of active RA were searched in database of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, up to December 2023. The control group included placebo or csDMARD. Outcome indicators included American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70 and the percentage of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP))<2.6 at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The statistical analysis was performed by Stata14 and RevMan5.4. Data processing, network evidence plots, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking, league plots and funnel plots were generated. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) as effect sizes to analyze the statistics. Results This study included thirty-six RCTs with 16,713 patients. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.74 and 3.08), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 2.02 and 7.47), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 2.68 and 18.13), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.70 and 7.09) at 12 weeks. Upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than csDMARD or placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.16 and 1.86), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 1.69 and 2.84), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 1.50 and 4.47), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.28 and 7.56) at 24 weeks. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4 mg + csDMARD showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. The safety analysis results such as serious infection, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) showed no statistical difference. Conclusion This NMA study indicated that all JAK inhibitors performed better than placebo. Based on the results of this study, upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4 mg + csDMARD were recommended treatment options with relatively good efficacy and safety. However, attention should be paid to monitoring the occurrence of adverse events in high-risk RA patients with medication. Combination therapy with csDMARD might be more suitable for the maintenance of long-term efficacy. However, in clinical practice, it is still necessary to select the appropriate therapeutic regimen based on the actual clinical situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenting Cai
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Rui Tong
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yue Sun
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yao Yao
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jinping Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Balogh L, Oláh K, Sánta S, Majerhoffer N, Németh T. Novel and potential future therapeutic options in systemic autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1249500. [PMID: 38558805 PMCID: PMC10978744 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1249500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune inflammation is caused by the loss of tolerance to specific self-antigens and can result in organ-specific or systemic disorders. Systemic autoimmune diseases affect a significant portion of the population with an increasing rate of incidence, which means that is essential to have effective therapies to control these chronic disorders. Unfortunately, several patients with systemic autoimmune diseases do not respond at all or just partially respond to available conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and targeted therapies. However, during the past few years, some new medications have been approved and can be used in real-life clinical settings. Meanwhile, several new candidates appeared and can offer promising novel treatment options in the future. Here, we summarize the newly available medications and the most encouraging drug candidates in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's disease, systemic sclerosis, systemic vasculitis, and autoimmune myositis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Balogh
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- MTA-SE “Lendület” Translational Rheumatology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Katalin Oláh
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- MTA-SE “Lendület” Translational Rheumatology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Soma Sánta
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- MTA-SE “Lendület” Translational Rheumatology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nóra Majerhoffer
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- MTA-SE “Lendület” Translational Rheumatology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Németh
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- MTA-SE “Lendület” Translational Rheumatology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taylor PC, Kavanaugh A, Nash P, Pope J, Pongratz G, Fautrel B, Alten R, Hasegawa K, Rao S, de Vries D, Stiers PJ, Watson C, Westhovens R. Impact of filgotinib on pain control in the phase 3 FINCH studies. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003839. [PMID: 38479751 PMCID: PMC10936501 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis of the FINCH 1-3 (NCT02889796, NCT02873936 and NCT02886728) studies assessed specific effects of filgotinib on pain control and their relationship with other aspects of efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Assessments included: residual pain responses of ≤10 and ≤20 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS); the proportion of patients who achieved VAS pain responses in addition to remission or low disease activity by Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria. RESULTS Across studies, filgotinib reduced pain from week 2, with responses sustained throughout the studies. In FINCH 1, at week 24, 35.8%, 25.0%, 24.6% and 11.6% of patients in the filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab and placebo arms (each plus methotrexate) achieved VAS pain ≤20 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission; 26.3%, 17.9%, 17.2% and 7.6% achieved VAS pain ≤10 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission. A similar pattern was seen for CDAI remission. Time during which VAS pain was ≤10 or ≤20 mm was longest with filgotinib 200 mg and comparable between adalimumab and filgotinib 100 mg. Similar findings were reported for filgotinib in FINCH 2 and 3. CONCLUSION In all RA populations studied, pain improvements occurred from week 2 and were sustained over time. In FINCH 1, filgotinib 100 mg provided similar pain amelioration to adalimumab, whereas filgotinib 200 mg resulted in greater pain improvement and higher proportion of patients with residual pain ≤10 or ≤20 mm and meeting DAS28-CRP remission criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Arthur Kavanaugh
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Peter Nash
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet Pope
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Georg Pongratz
- Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, APHP - Sorbonne University, GH Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Pierre Louis Institut of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM UMRS 1136, Paris, France
| | - Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Schlosspark Klinik, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ken Hasegawa
- Global Medical Affairs Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Shangbang Rao
- Biostatistics, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Dick de Vries
- Research and Development, Clinical Research, Galapagos BV, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Watson
- Medical Affairs, Galapagos Biotech Ltd, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang X, He X, Liu J, Zhang H, Wan H, Luo J, Yang J. Immune pathogenesis of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: from etiology toward therapeutic approaches. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1295759. [PMID: 38529282 PMCID: PMC10961981 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1295759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a noncancerous, chronic inflammatory disorder of breast with unknown causes, posing significant challenges to the quality of life due to its high refractoriness and local aggressiveness. The typical symptoms of this disease involve skin redness, a firm and tender breast mass and mastalgia; others may include swelling, fistula, abscess (often without fever), nipple retraction, and peau d'orange appearance. IGM often mimics breast abscesses or malignancies, particularly inflammatory breast cancer, and is characterized by absent standardized treatment options, inconsistent patient response and unknown mechanism. Definite diagnosis of this disease relies on core needle biopsy and histopathological examination. The prevailing etiological theory suggests that IGM is an autoimmune disease, as some patients respond well to steroid treatment. Additionally, the presence of concurrent erythema nodosum or other autoimmune conditions supports the autoimmune nature of the disease. Based on current knowledge, this review aims to elucidate the autoimmune-favored features of IGM and explore its potential etiologies. Furthermore, we discuss the immune-mediated pathogenesis of IGM using existing research and propose immunotherapeutic strategies for managing this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Wang
- Breast Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiujing He
- Clinical Research Center for Breast, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Tumor Targeted and Immune Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Junzhi Liu
- West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Hangyu Wan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Luo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiqiao Yang
- Breast Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Clinical Research Center for Breast, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skouvaklidou E, Deligeorgakis D, Skalkou A, Skepastianos V, Tsafis K, Papadimitriou E, Pagkopoulou E, Avgerou P, Mytilinaiou MG, Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou M, Kougkas N, Adamichou C. Focus on Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Trial-Based Review. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2024; 35:1-9. [PMID: 38756936 PMCID: PMC11094443 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.281123.fof] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Janus kinases (JAK)/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) pathway is involved in pathophysiologic cascade of a notable number of rheumatic diseases. The development of JAK inhibitors has expanded treatment choices in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a sustained class-effect efficacy. Filgotinib is a novel selective inhibitor of JAK1 isoform licensed for use in RA and ulcerative colitis. In this review we aim to present an analysis of filgotinib's efficacy and drug-specific safety warnings. Patients with RA with or without concomitant conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) (naïve or experienced) and those who have failed biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) were examined in randomised clinical trials. Filgotinib was also tested against placebo, methotrexate, or adalimumab. Long-term extension trials provide insights for up to four years of continuous filgotinib administration. Beneficial effects are depicted in both disease activity parameters and quality of life indexes in moderate or severe RA with a longitudinal efficacy. In head-to-head comparison with adalimumab, filgotinib 200 mg was non-inferior. Adverse effects alerts are marked by the elevated risk of infectious adverse effects with the exception of herpes zoster infection, which has a low incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elpida Skouvaklidou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Deligeorgakis
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasia Skalkou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasileios Skepastianos
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Tsafis
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Evdokia Papadimitriou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Pagkopoulou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paraskevi Avgerou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria G Mytilinaiou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Nikolaos Kougkas
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christina Adamichou
- Department of Rheumatology, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Curtis JR, Emery P, Downie B, Zhong Y, Liu J, Han L, Hawtin RE, Burmester GR. Filgotinib Demonstrates Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Independent of Smoking Status: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials and Claims-Based Analysis. Rheumatol Ther 2024; 11:177-189. [PMID: 38057656 PMCID: PMC10796882 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00619-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess cigarette smoking's effects on efficacy of the preferential Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor filgotinib and drug persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Efficacy in non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers from phase 3 filgotinib trials was analyzed, including patients with inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or who were MTX-naïve. Proportions achieving Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) ≤ 3.2 were compared using logistic regression. Retrospective claims-based switching data were reviewed. RESULTS Week 12 (W12) DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 was achieved by 50, 61, and 62% of MTX-IR non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers taking filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) + MTX vs. 23, 16, and 32% taking placebo + MTX (p < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.001) and 50, 34, and 33% taking adalimumab + MTX (p = 0.97, 0.013, and 0.006 vs. FIL200 + MTX). W12 DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 was achieved by 46, 48, and 32% of bDMARD-IR non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers taking FIL200 + conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) vs. 16, 23, and 5% taking placebo + csDMARD (p < 0.001, 0.077, and 0.051); 57, 58, and 59% of respective MTX-naïve smoking groups achieved W12 DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 with FIL200 + MTX vs. 28, 37, and 18% with MTX (p < 0.001, 0.026, and < 0.001). Claims data showed former/current smokers were likelier than non-smokers to switch from adalimumab to other biologics or JAK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS Greater proportions of MTX-IR current/former smokers responded to FIL200 + MTX vs. adalimumab + MTX. In non-smoking MTX-IR, bDMARD-IR, and MTX-naïve patients with RA, FIL200 + MTX demonstrated increased response vs. controls. Current/former smokers were likelier to discontinue adalimumab vs. non-smokers in real-world clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Faculty Office Tower, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th St S #834, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, LTHT, and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Yan Zhong
- Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | - Ling Han
- Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | - Gerd Rüdiger Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Szekanecz Z, Buch MH, Charles-Schoeman C, Galloway J, Karpouzas GA, Kristensen LE, Ytterberg SR, Hamar A, Fleischmann R. Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: update for the practising clinician. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2024; 20:101-115. [PMID: 38216757 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-01062-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD. In the ORAL Surveillance trial, which enrolled patients >50 years of age with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, tofacitinib was statistically inferior to TNF inhibitors for the occurrence of MACEs and malignancy. Further post hoc analysis of the data revealed that an age of ≥65 years, a high baseline cardiovascular risk, a history of smoking, sustained inflammation, disease activity and suboptimal treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities all increase the risk of these outcomes. The guidance issued by regulatory agencies should be carefully considered to ensure appropriate and safe treatment of patients with RA without undertreatment of patients who might benefit from JAK inhibitor, as well as biologic, treatment. As always, the risks associated with the use of these agents, treatment goals, costs and patient preferences should be discussed with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Szekanecz
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Christina Charles-Schoeman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Harbour-University of California Los Angeles Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Galloway
- Department of Inflammation Biology and Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - George A Karpouzas
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Harbour-University of California Los Angeles Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lars Erik Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Attila Hamar
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Roy Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bonelli M, Kerschbaumer A, Kastrati K, Ghoreschi K, Gadina M, Heinz LX, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, O'Shea J, Laurence A. Selectivity, efficacy and safety of JAKinibs: new evidence for a still evolving story. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83:139-160. [PMID: 37923366 PMCID: PMC10850682 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-223850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Fundamental insight gained over the last decades led to the discovery of cytokines as pivotal drivers of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis/psoriasis arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, atopic dermatitis and spondylarthritis. A deeper understanding of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects of various cytokines has prompted new cytokine-targeting therapies, which revolutionised the treatment options in the last years for patients with inflammatory disorders. Disease-associated immune responses typically involve a complex interplay of multiple cytokines. Therefore, blockade of one single cytokine does not necessarily lead to a persistent remission in all patients with inflammatory disorders and fostered new therapeutic strategies targeting intracellular pathways shared by multiple cytokines. By inhibiting JAK-STAT signalling pathways common to families of cytokines, JAK-inhibitors (JAKinibs) have created a new paradigm for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Multiple agents have been approved for various disorders and more are being investigated for several new indications. Second-generation selective JAKinibs have been devised with the aim to achieve an increased selectivity and a possible reduced risk of side effects. In the current review, we will summarise the current body of evidence of pan versus selective JAKinibs and the most recent insights on new side effects and indications, including COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bonelli
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kastriot Kastrati
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Massimo Gadina
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Leonhard X Heinz
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John O'Shea
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Arian Laurence
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Haematology, University College Hospital, UCLH Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martinez-Molina C, Gich I, Diaz-Torné C, Park HS, Feliu A, Vidal S, Corominas H. Patient-related factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of Janus Kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:172. [PMID: 38168532 PMCID: PMC10761698 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50379-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
In real-world scenarios, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are often offered to "difficult-to-treat" rheumatoid arthritis patients, quite different from those included in randomized controlled trials. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-related factors on the effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in real-world clinical practice. This observational retrospective study involved rheumatoid arthritis patients who received treatment with either tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib. At 12 months of treatment, reasons for and rates of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation were examined. Treatment retentions were analyzed through Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patient-related factors that could influence treatment retention were evaluated for the discontinuation reasons of lack of effectiveness and adverse events. At 12 months of treatment, discontinuation rates for 189 JAK inhibitor treatments were: lack of effectiveness (24.3%), adverse events (20.6%), and other reasons (3.7%). The remaining 51.4% represents the treatment continuation rate. No patient-related factors evaluated had an influence on treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness. Ae significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (p = 0.030). In terms of age, at 12 month of treatment, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were: < 65 years, 14.4% vs. 65 years or older, 26.3% (p = 0.019). Rheumatoid arthritis patients aged 65 years or older showed an increased risk of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Factors not related to treatment discontinuation were: sex, rheumatoid arthritis disease duration, rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, seropositivity for rheumatoid factor, seropositivity for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides, number of prior biologic treatments, number of prior JAK inhibitor treatments, concomitant use of glucocorticoids, and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Martinez-Molina
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignasi Gich
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cesar Diaz-Torné
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Rheumatology and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 89 Sant Quinti Street, 5th Floor, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hye S Park
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Rheumatology and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 89 Sant Quinti Street, 5th Floor, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Feliu
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Vidal
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
- Group of Immunology-Inflammatory Diseases, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hèctor Corominas
- Department of Rheumatology and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Atsumi T, Combe BG, Aletaha D, Kaise T, Rajendran V. Prevention of Radiographic Progression in Higher-Risk Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Filgotinib in Phase III Studies: Narrative Review of Post Hoc Analyses. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1399-1415. [PMID: 37668865 PMCID: PMC10654325 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00590-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Filgotinib is an oral preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that demonstrated significant reductions in radiographic progression, with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile, vs placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR; FINCH 1) and vs MTX in MTX-naïve patients with RA (FINCH 3). International treatment guidelines identify multiple poor prognostic factors (PPFs) associated with worse disease outcomes among patients with RA. However, questions remain both about the clinical utility of considering PPFs and about which PPFs should drive treatment decisions. Additionally, the role of radiographic findings in clinical practice continues to be discussed and to evolve. This review examines radiographic results from post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials of filgotinib that examined subgroups with 4 PPFs or with baseline estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP). In MTX groups, there were trends toward greater progression among patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP, suggesting these subgroups may comprise a higher-risk population. Results show general consistency for the efficacy of filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX vs placebo plus MTX/MTX monotherapy on radiographic assessments, including change from baseline in modified total Sharp score and proportions without radiographic progression, even among MTX-IR or MTX-naïve patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP who may be at higher risk of bone damage. Multivariate analysis identified multiple factors associated with baseline e-RRP status. This summary of the current understanding of benefits associated with filgotinib on radiographic progression and the relevance of baseline factors to these benefits may help inform treatment decisions for patients facing high risk of radiographic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahata-nishi, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan.
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Balsa A, Wassenberg S, Tanaka Y, Tournadre A, Orzechowski HD, Rajendran V, Lendl U, Stiers PJ, Watson C, Caporali R, Galloway J, Verschueren P. Effect of Filgotinib on Body Mass Index (BMI) and Effect of Baseline BMI on the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1555-1574. [PMID: 37747626 PMCID: PMC10654312 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00599-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) filgotinib clinical trial program assessed the effect of filgotinib on body mass index (BMI) in patients with RA and the impact of BMI on the efficacy and safety of filgotinib. METHODS FINCH 1-3 were randomized, double-blind, active- or placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of filgotinib 100 and 200 mg in patients with RA (N = 3452). BMI assessments included the mean change from baseline in BMI and the proportion of patients whose BMI increased by incremental thresholds. Efficacy measures included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and low disease activity/remission according to Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein. The exposure-adjusted incident rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) was assessed by baseline BMI, using integrated data from the FINCH 1-4 and the phase 2 DARWIN 1-3 studies (total filgotinib exposure = 8085 patient-years). RESULTS Mean change from baseline in BMI over time was similar across treatment arms. In most patients, BMI increased by ≤ 1 or 2 kg/m2 at both weeks 12 and 24, regardless of treatment group or baseline BMI; few patients had increases of ≥ 4 kg/m2. For most efficacy measures, filgotinib 200 mg was more efficacious than filgotinib 100 mg or active comparators or placebo across BMI subgroups. For the higher filgotinib dose, the EAIR of serious treatment-emergent AEs, venous thrombotic and embolic events, and major adverse cardiovascular events increased with increasing BMI. CONCLUSIONS Filgotinib did not lead to substantial changes in BMI, and BMI did not appear to affect the efficacy of filgotinib. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT03025308, NCT01888874, NCT01894516, NCT02065700.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Balsa
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Anne Tournadre
- Rheumatology Service, Clermont Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | | - Udo Lendl
- Medical Affairs, Galapagos Biopharma Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Chris Watson
- Medical Affairs, Galapagos Biotech Ltd, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, The University of Milan and ASST G. Pini-CTO Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - James Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Westhovens R, Verschueren P. Lessons from negative phase 3 trials in rheumatoid arthritis anno 2023. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1503-1505. [PMID: 37903542 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- René Westhovens
- University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven Belgium, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boers M. Viewpoint: Glucocorticoids in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: points to (re)consider. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3534-3537. [PMID: 37338537 PMCID: PMC10629782 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (prednisone) are essential in the treatment of RA and other autoimmune diseases. They are widely used, but treatment guidelines advise against. This viewpoint article explains why and suggests a way forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cohen S, Reddy V. Janus kinase inhibitors: efficacy and safety. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2023; 35:429-434. [PMID: 37682051 DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since 2012 and are indicated for patients with active disease despite csDMARD therapy. Efficacy and safety, as demonstrated in the clinical trials, was similar to biologics. A recent post marketing trial suggested safety concerns with the JAKi, which will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS A post marketing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated open-label randomized clinical trial of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) compared with adalimumab and etanercept was conducted in RA patients on background methotrexate who were at a high risk for cardiovascular disease. This was a noninferiority study evaluating the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and malignancy with the therapies. Noninferiority for both doses of tofacitinib was not achieved with a numerical increase in MACEs and malignancy with tofacitinib compared to the TNF inhibitors. A dose-dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk with tofacitinib was observed. The findings from this study resulted in the FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) restriction of use for all Jaki to RA patients who had failed TNF inhibitors. SUMMARY JAK inhibitors are effective treatments for RA. Issues have been raised regarding safety in patients with an increase in cardiovascular risk and VTE risk resulting in the need for risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley Cohen
- Medical Director, Metroplex Clinical Research Center
- UT Southwestern Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanaka Y, Genovese MC, Matsushima H. Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2499-2516. [PMID: 37822545 PMCID: PMC10563783 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s417677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Filgotinib is an orally administered, preferential Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The short-term safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with filgotinib from Phase 2b/3 clinical trials (DARWIN 1 and 2; FINCH 1, 2, and 3) are described in patients who inadequately responded to methotrexate (MTX) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or who were naïve to MTX. This article reviews the safety and efficacy from the long-term extension (LTE) trials, DARWIN 3 (N=739) and FINCH 4 (N=2731), and PROs across the filgotinib development program in RA. Overall, in the DARWIN clinical trials (conducted from 2013-2023), patients received their LTE treatment for ≤8 years, while in the FINCH trials (ongoing from 2016-2025), patients received filgotinib treatment for ≤6 years in the LTE. The longer-term safety profile and consistent, sustained efficacy (American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Disease Activity Scale in 28 joints with C-reactive protein response rates) of filgotinib were largely similar to those observed in the shorter-term parent trials ≤52 weeks. PRO results from the parent trials showed improvements in patients' quality of life with filgotinib treatment, which compared to or exceeded improvements seen with placebo and active comparators (adalimumab, MTX). Filgotinib has a higher specificity for JAK1 compared with other therapeutic treatments, leading to reduced inhibition of JAK2/3-dependent pathways, potentially providing a distinct safety profile. Filgotinib is approved in Europe and Japan for treatment of people with moderate-to-severe RA, though it has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, due to concerns around the benefit/risk profile of the filgotinib 200-mg dosage and the potential impact on semen parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Mark C Genovese
- Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tanaka Y, Taylor PC, Elboudwarej E, Hertz A, Shao X, Malkov VA, Matsushima H, Emoto K, Downie B, Takeuchi T. Filgotinib Modulates Inflammation-Associated Peripheral Blood Protein Biomarkers in Adults with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Methotrexate. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1335-1348. [PMID: 37490202 PMCID: PMC10468462 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00583-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our aim was to evaluate protein biomarker changes related to the administration of filgotinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1 preferential inhibitor, in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate response to methotrexate. METHODS Plasma and serum samples were collected from patients enrolled in FINCH 1 (NCT02889796), a Phase 3 trial. Patients with stable backgrounds of methotrexate were randomly assigned once-daily oral filgotinib 200 or 100 mg, subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks (W), or placebo. Up to 35 biomarkers were analyzed at baseline, W4, and W12 with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence assays. RESULTS At baseline, four distinct biomarker clusters were identified. The strongest intragroup correlations were in bone-cartilage resorption/inflammation and JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling activity. At baseline, significant positive correlations were identified for cytokines with patient-reported pain and with patient measures of fatigue. Filgotinib reduced levels of cytokines associated with inflammation and cell migration as early as W4 and through W12. Compared to adalimumab, filgotinib induced significant reductions in bone-related turnover biomarkers, N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen and C-telopeptide 1, as well as biomarkers associated with baseline disease activity. No baseline predictors of therapeutic response to filgotinib were identified. CONCLUSIONS Filgotinib reduced peripheral protein biomarkers associated with JAK/STAT signaling, inflammatory signaling, immune cell migration, and bone resorption as soon as W4 in FINCH 1. Effects were dose-dependent and consistent with the clinical efficacy of filgotinib observed in FINCH 1. The changes in peripheral biomarkers associated with filgotinib treatment in methotrexate-experienced patients are consistent with changes observed in both methotrexate-naïve and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-experienced RA populations. These data demonstrate dose-dependent effects of preferential JAK1 inhibition by filgotinib on peripheral blood protein biomarkers in methotrexate-experienced patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02889796.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1, Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan.
| | - Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nakase H. Understanding the efficacy of individual Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of ulcerative colitis for future positioning in inflammatory bowel disease treatment. Immunol Med 2023; 46:121-130. [PMID: 37036140 DOI: 10.1080/25785826.2023.2195522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have gradually elucidated the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease; thus, the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway are strongly involved in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Generally, Janus kinase inhibitors are being used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other immunological diseases, with the therapeutic promising effects. Currently, in Japan, three Janus kinase inhibitors, namely tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, are available for the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Therefore, evaluating the efficacy and safety of each JAK inhibitor is essential for determining the role of JAK inhibitors in future therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Nakase
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shah RJ, Banerjee S, Raychaudhuri S, Raychaudhuri SP. JAK-STAT inhibitors in Immune mediated diseases: An Overview. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2023; 89:691-699. [PMID: 37609730 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_1152_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
For any biological response, transmission of extracellular signals to the nucleus is required for DNA transcription and gene expression. In that respect, cytokines/chemokines are well-known inflammatory agents which play a critical role in signalling pathways by activating the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signalling proteins (Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription) which are a group of intracellular kinase molecules. Cytokines are a category of small proteins (∼5-25 kDa) that play a major role in cell signalling and are major drivers of an autoimmune response. Here we will discuss the role of Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription kinase cascades in the inflammatory-proliferative cascades of autoimmune disease and about the recent progress in the development of oral synthetic Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and their therapeutic efficacies in dermatologic and systemic autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors is now well established in the treatment of array of autoimmune and inflammatory disease: spondylarthritis with a special focus on psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and its dermatologic manifestations (psoriasis) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), atopic dermatitis (AD), alopecia areata (AA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition to the first-generation Janus kinase inhibitors several new-generation Janus kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated. It is expected that these Janus kinase inhibitors likely have higher potency and less adverse effects as compared to their predecessors. Here we have discussed: (1) the functional significance of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription kinase cascades in the inflammatory-proliferative processes of autoimmune diseases and its cellular/molecular mechanisms and (2) progress in the development of oral synthetic Janus kinase inhibitors and their therapeutic efficacies in several systemic and cutaneous autoimmune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchi Jayesh Shah
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, USA
| | - Sneha Banerjee
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Sacramento Medical Center, Northern California Health Care, California, CA, USA
| | - Smriti Raychaudhuri
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Sacramento Medical Center, Northern California Health Care, California, CA, USA
| | - Siba P Raychaudhuri
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reinisch W, Hellstrom W, Dolhain RJEM, Sikka S, Westhovens R, Mehta R, Ritter T, Seidler U, Golovchenko O, Simanenkov V, Garmish O, Jeka S, Moravcová R, Rajendran V, Le Brun FO, Arterburn S, Watkins TR, Besuyen R, Vanderschueren D. Effects of filgotinib on semen parameters and sex hormones in male patients with inflammatory diseases: results from the phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled MANTA and MANTA-RAy studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:1049-1058. [PMID: 37137672 PMCID: PMC10359529 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The phase 2 MANTA and MANTA-RAy studies aimed to determine if the oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib affects semen parameters and sex hormones in men with inflammatory diseases. METHODS MANTA (NCT03201445) and MANTA-RAy (NCT03926195) included men (21-65 years) with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis), respectively. Eligible participants had semen parameters in the normal range per the WHO definition. In each study, participants were randomised 1:1 to receive once-daily, double-blind filgotinib 200 mg or placebo for 13 weeks for pooled analysis of the primary endpoint (proportion of participants with a ≥50% decrease from baseline in sperm concentration at week 13). Participants who met the primary endpoint were monitored over an additional 52 weeks for 'reversibility'. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 13 in: sperm concentration, total motility, normal morphology, total count and ejaculate volume. Sex hormones (luteinising hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, inhibin B and total testosterone) and reversibility were exploratory endpoints. RESULTS Across both studies, 631 patients were screened, and 248 were randomised to filgotinib 200 mg or placebo. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar within indications between treatment groups. Numerically similar proportions of filgotinib-treated versus placebo-treated patients met the primary endpoint (8/120 (6.7%) vs 10/120 (8.3%)), Δ-1.7% (95% CI -9.3% to 5.8%)). There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline to week 13 in semen parameters or sex hormones, or patterns of reversibility between treatment groups. Filgotinib was well tolerated, with no new safety events. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that once daily filgotinib 200 mg for 13 weeks has no measurable impact on semen parameters or sex hormones in men with active IBD or inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Reinisch
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wayne Hellstrom
- Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Radboud J E M Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suresh Sikka
- Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - René Westhovens
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Ursula Seidler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleksandr Golovchenko
- Medical Clinical Investigational Center of Medical Center Health Clinic LLC, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | - Vladimir Simanenkov
- State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "City Hospital #26", Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Olena Garmish
- National Scientific Center M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Sławomir Jeka
- Clinic of Rheumatology and Systemic Connective Tissue Disorders, J. Biziel University Hospital No. 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Radka Moravcová
- Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Rheumatology Institute, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dirk Vanderschueren
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Xue C, Yao Q, Gu X, Shi Q, Yuan X, Chu Q, Bao Z, Lu J, Li L. Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:204. [PMID: 37208335 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction that enables cells to communicate with the exterior environment. Various cytokines, interferons, growth factors, and other specific molecules activate JAK-STAT signaling to drive a series of physiological and pathological processes, including proliferation, metabolism, immune response, inflammation, and malignancy. Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling and related genetic mutations are strongly associated with immune activation and cancer progression. Insights into the structures and functions of the JAK-STAT pathway have led to the development and approval of diverse drugs for the clinical treatment of diseases. Currently, drugs have been developed to mainly target the JAK-STAT pathway and are commonly divided into three subtypes: cytokine or receptor antibodies, JAK inhibitors, and STAT inhibitors. And novel agents also continue to be developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. The effectiveness and safety of each kind of drug also warrant further scientific trials before put into being clinical applications. Here, we review the current understanding of the fundamental composition and function of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. We also discuss advancements in the understanding of JAK-STAT-related pathogenic mechanisms; targeted JAK-STAT therapies for various diseases, especially immune disorders, and cancers; newly developed JAK inhibitors; and current challenges and directions in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Xue
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qinfan Yao
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xinyu Gu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qingmiao Shi
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xin Yuan
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qingfei Chu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhengyi Bao
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Juan Lu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Lanjuan Li
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Langbour C, Rene J, Goupille P, Carvajal Alegria G. Efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Inflamm Res 2023; 72:1121-1132. [PMID: 37087519 DOI: 10.1007/s00011-023-01717-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) is a new therapeutic class in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Four molecules are approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe. Recently, questions have raised about adverse events. In this context, a synthesis of the efficacy data of JAKis in RA is of use. METHOD We performed a literature review based on published articles about efficacy of JAKis in RA, including clinical trials, registries, retrospective and prospective cohorts as well as database analysis. RESULTS Based on the phase III clinical trials, JAKis are effective in comparison to placebo, methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Based on registries, cohorts and post hoc analysis of phase III clinical trials, several parameters might modulate the efficacy of JAKis: the serological status, a short duration of the disease or the presence of poor prognostic factors. Preliminary data suggest that early ultrasonographic evaluation might help to predict the medium-term progression. CONCLUSION Some clinical, biological and imaging parameters seem to influence the response to JAKis and should be evaluated in larger studies. In addition to factors that might influence the efficacy of JAKis, the safety profile and risk factors should be considered before initiating JAKis in a patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Langbour
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU de Tours, Bd Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - Jessica Rene
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU de Tours, Bd Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France
- Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Philippe Goupille
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU de Tours, Bd Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France
- Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Guillermo Carvajal Alegria
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU de Tours, Bd Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France.
- Université de Tours, Tours, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shimizu T, Kawashiri SY, Morimoto S, Kawazoe Y, Kuroda S, Kawasaki R, Ito Y, Kiya R, Sato S, Yamamoto H, Kawakami A. Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority clinical trial. Trials 2023; 24:161. [PMID: 36869356 PMCID: PMC9985291 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07176-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. METHODS This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. DISCUSSION The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments-clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021. CLINICALTRIALS gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshimasa Shimizu
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.,Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shin-Ya Kawashiri
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. .,Department of Community Medicine, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
| | - Shimpei Morimoto
- Innovation Platform & Office for Precision Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yurika Kawazoe
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shohei Kuroda
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Rina Kawasaki
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yasuko Ito
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Rieko Kiya
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shuntaro Sato
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yamamoto
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kawakami
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.,Innovation Platform & Office for Precision Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yari S, Kikuta J, Shigyo H, Miyamoto Y, Okuzaki D, Furusawa Y, Minoshima M, Kikuchi K, Ishii M. JAK inhibition ameliorates bone destruction by simultaneously targeting mature osteoclasts and their precursors. Inflamm Regen 2023; 43:18. [PMID: 36869390 PMCID: PMC9983229 DOI: 10.1186/s41232-023-00268-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by chronic inflammation and resultant cartilage/bone destruction because of aberrantly activated osteoclasts. Recently, novel treatments with several Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been shown to successfully ameliorate arthritis-related inflammation and bone erosion, although their mechanisms of action for limiting bone destruction remain unclear. Here, we examined the effects of a JAK inhibitor on mature osteoclasts and their precursors by intravital multiphoton imaging. METHODS Inflammatory bone destruction was induced by local injection of lipopolysaccharides into transgenic mice carrying reporters for mature osteoclasts or their precursors. Mice were treated with the JAK inhibitor, ABT-317, which selectively inhibits the activation of JAK1, and then subjected to intravital imaging with multiphoton microscopy. We also used RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of the JAK inhibitor on osteoclasts. RESULTS The JAK inhibitor, ABT-317, suppressed bone resorption by blocking the function of mature osteoclasts and by targeting the migratory behaviors of osteoclast precursors to the bone surface. Further exhaustive RNA-Seq analysis demonstrated that Ccr1 expression on osteoclast precursors was suppressed in the JAK inhibitor-treated mice; the CCR1 antagonist, J-113863, altered the migratory behaviors of osteoclast precursors, which led to the inhibition of bone destruction under inflammatory conditions. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to determine the pharmacological actions by which a JAK inhibitor blocks bone destruction under inflammatory conditions; this inhibition is beneficial because of its dual effects on both mature osteoclasts and immature osteoclast precursors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Yari
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan ,grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Junichi Kikuta
- Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. .,WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. .,Laboratory of Bioimaging and Drug Discovery, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Hotaka Shigyo
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan
| | - Yu Miyamoto
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan ,grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Okuzaki
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan ,grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Genome Information Research Center, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Masafumi Minoshima
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kikuchi
- grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan ,grid.136593.b0000 0004 0373 3971Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine and Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. .,WPI-Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. .,Laboratory of Bioimaging and Drug Discovery, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nielsen OH, Boye TL, Gubatan J, Chakravarti D, Jaquith JB, LaCasse EC. Selective JAK1 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 245:108402. [PMID: 37004800 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, also known as jakinibs, are third-generation oral small molecules that have expanded the therapeutic options for the management of chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, has spearheaded the new JAK class for IBD treatment. Unfortunately, serious adverse effects, including cardiovascular complications such as pulmonary embolism and venous thromboembolism or even death from any cause, have been reported for tofacitinib. However, it is anticipated that next-generation selective JAK inhibitors may limit the development of serious adverse events, leading to a safer treatment course with these novel targeted therapies. Nevertheless, although this drug class was recently introduced, following the launch of second-generation biologics in the late 1990s, it is breaking new ground and has been shown to efficiently modulate complex cytokine-driven inflammation in both preclinical models and human studies. Herein, we review the clinical opportunities for targeting JAK1 signaling in the pathophysiology of IBD, the biology and chemistry underpinning these target-selective compounds, and their mechanisms of actions. We also discuss the potential for these inhibitors in efforts to balance their benefits and harms.
Collapse
|
38
|
Combe B, Besuyen R, Gómez-Centeno A, Matsubara T, Sancho Jimenez JJ, Yin Z, Buch MH. Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:35-51. [PMID: 36205910 PMCID: PMC9931958 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00494-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often do not recruit enough patients from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds to identify any potential differences in treatment outcome across such groups. To overcome this limitation, using data from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA across geographic regions. METHODS This was a post hoc, exploratory analysis of data from male and female patients with RA meeting the 2010 RA criteria as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. Data were analyzed from phase 2 (DARWIN 1-2) and phase 3 (FINCH 1-3) clinical trials, as well as two long-term extension studies (DARWIN 3, FINCH 4), of filgotinib. Efficacy endpoints included ACR 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein [DAS28(CRP)], Clinical Disease Activity Index scores, Boolean remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety data were presented as exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years of exposure of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS Compared with placebo, at week 12 a greater proportion of patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) achieved ACR20 (p < 0.01), with similar outcomes in most regions. Overall, the reduction in HAQ-DI with FIL200 or FIL100 was greater than with placebo (p < 0.05) at week 12. Compared with placebo, at week 24 the proportions of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 were greater for both doses of FIL, as seen in most regions (p < 0.01). Safety outcomes did not indicate regional or ethnic differences in the safety profile of filgotinib. CONCLUSION Filgotinib efficacy and safety in patients with RA were generally consistent across geographic regions. CLINICALTRIALS GOV TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728; NCT03025308; NCT01888874; NCT01894516; NCT02065700.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhaoyu Yin
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Maya H Buch
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, AV Hill, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Combe BG, Tanaka Y, Buch MH, Nash P, Burmester GR, Kivitz AJ, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Xia K, Emoto K, Kano S, Hendrikx TK, Landewé RBM, Aletaha D. Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Patients with High Risk of Poor Prognosis Who Showed Inadequate Response to MTX: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FINCH 1 Study. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:53-70. [PMID: 36209441 PMCID: PMC9931960 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00498-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This exploratory analysis of FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) examined filgotinib (FIL) efficacy and safety in a subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; MTX-IR) who had four poor prognostic factors (PPFs). METHODS Patients with MTX-IR received placebo up to week (W)24 or FIL200 mg, FIL100 mg, or adalimumab up to W52; all received MTX. Efficacy and safety data were stratified by four PPFs versus fewer than four PPFs: seropositivity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 6 mg/L, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with CRP > 5.1, and erosions on X-rays. RESULTS At baseline, 687/1755 patients had four PPFs. At W12, whether with four PPFs or fewer than four PPFs, response rates on all American College of Rheumatology (ACR) measures were significantly greater with FIL200 and FIL100 versus placebo. At W52, FIL200 ACR20/50/70 response rates remained at least numerically higher versus adalimumab in both subgroups. At W52, FIL200 reduced modified total Sharp score (mTSS) change versus adalimumab in patients with four or fewer than four PPFs. CONCLUSIONS In high-risk (four PPFs) patients with MTX-IR RA, FIL200 and FIL100 showed similar reductions in disease activity versus placebo at W12 as in patients with fewer than four PPFs. mTSS in patients receiving FIL200 changed little from W24 to W52, while that in patients receiving FIL100 progressed comparably to patients who received adalimumab. Tolerability was comparable across treatment arms and subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard G Combe
- Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
- Rheumatology Department, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Maya H Buch
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Nash
- Griffith University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Alan J Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Center (amC) and Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Han L, Emoto K, Kano S, Rajendran V, Takeuchi T. Benefit of Filgotinib, a JAK1 Preferential Inhibitor, in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Previous Rapid Radiographic Progression: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Trials. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:161-185. [PMID: 36327094 PMCID: PMC9931963 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00503-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a post hoc analysis of efficacy and safety of filgotinib stratified by estimated radiographic progression rate before baseline (BL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; FINCH 1; NCT02889796) or were naïve to it (FINCH 3; NCT02886728). METHODS Radiographic progression rate was BL-Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) divided by RA duration (BL mTSS/year); estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP) was BL change in mTSS/year ≥ 5; and estimated nonrapid radiographic progression (e-NRRP) was BL mTSS/year < 5. Efficacy and safety were compared between subgroups. All p-values are nominal. RESULTS In FINCH 1 and FINCH 3, 558/1755 (31.8%) and 787/1249 (63.0%) patients, respectively, had BL e-RRP. BL characteristics were generally similar between subgroups within each trial. At week (W) 24, in FINCH 1, proportions achieving a Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis with C-reactive protein < 2.6 were significantly greater with filgotinib 200 (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) versus placebo among e-RRP and e-NRRP subgroups. In each study, proportions of FIL-treated patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤ 2.8 and Simple Disease Activity Index ≤ 3.3 were similar between subgroups. In FINCH 3, disease activity measures were at least numerically improved among patients receiving FIL versus MTX monotherapy. At W24, mTSS changes from BL (CFB) were greater among patients with e-RRP in FINCH 1 and FINCH 3 versus e-NRRP (0.81 versus 0.19, p = 0.001; 0.67 versus 0.25, p = 0.31, respectively). At W52, in FINCH 1, mTSS CFBs were smaller among e-RRP patients treated with FIL200 (0.40; p < 0.001) and FIL100 (0.77; p = 0.024) versus adalimumab (ADA; 1.46). In FINCH 3 at W52, mTSS CFBs were significantly smaller with FIL200 versus MTX among e-RRP patients. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were comparable between subgroups and across treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS Patients with previous e-RRP who received standard care tended to progress radiographically. FIL200 demonstrated persistent, consistent benefit for disease activity control among e-RRP and e-NRRP subgroups, and AE profiles were similar between subgroups. Although filgotinib efficacy was somewhat reduced among patients with e-RRP, filgotinib treatment slowed radiographic progression in both subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02889796, NCT02886728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahata-Nishi, Kitakyushu, 807-8555, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Ling Han
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Westhovens R. Filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023; 19:135-144. [PMID: 36396615 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2149495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) remains a challenge for rheumatologists and patients despite implementation of intensive treat-to-target strategies in shared decision with patients and an increasing availability of drugs. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are a new generation of oral targeted drugs. Filgotinib preferentially inhibits JAK1 and is the latest JAKi to be approved for use in RA. AREAS COVERED This narrative review focuses on drug characteristics, efficacy, and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA, summarizing available literature. Trial data are detailed, put into perspective for practice and discussed in regulatory perspective. EXPERT OPINION Preclinical studies demonstrate preferential inhibition of JAK1 and a promising pharmacokinetic profile with few drug-drug interactions. Increase in hemoglobin in line with preferential inhibition of JAK1 over JAK2 is seen in early-phase clinical trials. A phase III program demonstrates efficacy in several disease stages, numerically higher with 200 mg versus 100 mg daily. In the overall RA population such dose-related effect is not observed for safety except for herpes zoster and increases in lipids and creatine phosphokinase. This reassuring safety profile is to be confirmed in future practice. It also needs to be unraveled if JAK1 preferential inhibition plays a key role in this safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rene Westhovens
- Emeritus Professor KU Leuven, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ishiguro N, Tanaka Y, Matsubara T, Atsumi T, Amano K, Sugiyama E, Yamaoka K, Winthrop K, Kivitz A, Burmester GR, Gottenberg JE, Genovese MC, Matzkies F, Guo Y, Jiang D, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Kondo A, Besuyen R, Takeuchi T. Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in patients from Japan over a median of 1.5 years. Mod Rheumatol 2023; 33:64-72. [PMID: 35365828 DOI: 10.1093/mr/roac020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Data from three Phase 3 trials (NCT02889796, NCT02873936, and NCT02886728) and a long-term extension (NCT03025308) through September 2019 were integrated; patients received ≥1 dose of FIL 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily, or placebo (PBO). We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years FIL exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest. RESULTS Among 3691 total patients and 6080.7 PYE, 229 Japanese patients received FIL for 311.4 PYE (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years). During the 12-week PBO-controlled period, serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to study drug disruption were comparable between FIL and PBO. Serious infection rates were 1.9%, 0%, and 2% for FIL200, FIL100, and PBO during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.8 and 2.1/100PYE. No herpes zoster (HZ) or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.0 and 2.1/100PYE (HZ) and 0.6 and 0/100PYE (MACE). CONCLUSION Long-term FIL treatment (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years exposure) was well tolerated at 100- and 200-mg doses in Japanese patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Matsubara
- Department of Orthopedics, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Katō, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Amano
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan
| | - Eiji Sugiyama
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Yamaoka
- Department of Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kevin Winthrop
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ying Guo
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope JE, Takeuchi T, Hyrich KL, Winthrop KL, Aletaha D, Stamm TA, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM. Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:95-106. [PMID: 36368906 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022. RESULTS Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission. CONCLUSION The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Christopher John Edwards
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven and Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Savia de Souza
- Patient Research Partner Network, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janet E Pope
- Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sepriano A, Kerschbaumer A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope J, Takeuchi T, Hyrich K, Winthrop KL, Aletaha D, Stamm T, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:107-118. [PMID: 36376026 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic(s) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention in RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments yet without, or limited, registry data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used. RESULTS Fifty-nine observational studies addressed the safety of DMARDs. Two studies (unclear risk of bias (RoB)) showed an increased risk of serious infections with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Herpes zoster infections occurred more with JAKi than csDMARDs (adjusted HR (aHR): 3.66) and bDMARDs (aHR: 1.9-2.3) (four studies, two low RoB). The risk of malignancies was similar across bDMARDs (five studies) and with tofacitinib compared with bDMARDs (one study, low RoB). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar with bDMARDs and tofacitinib (two studies, one low RoB). Thirty studies reported safety from RCTs, with one, designed to evaluate safety, showing that malignancies (HR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.04 to 2.09)) and MACE (HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)) occurred numerically more frequently with tofacitinib (5 mg and 10 mg doses combined) than with TNFi in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg than with TNFi. CONCLUSION The safety profile of bDMARDs was further demonstrated. Whether the difference in incidence of malignancies, MACE and VTE between tofacitinib and TNFi applies to other JAKi needs further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Sepriano
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal .,Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.,2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, ASS G. Pini, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.,Department of Rheumatology, ASST PINI-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Christopher J Edwards
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.,Engineering Research Centre, Lueven, Belgium
| | - Savia de Souza
- Patient Research Partner Network, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janet Pope
- Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Western Ontario Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.,Saitama Medical University, Iruma-gun, Japan
| | - Kimme Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.,Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Ludwig Boltzmann, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Studenic P, Aletaha D, de Wit M, Stamm TA, Alasti F, Lacaille D, Smolen JS, Felson DT. American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023; 75:15-22. [PMID: 36274193 PMCID: PMC10092655 DOI: 10.1002/art.42347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean- and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria. METHODS We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean- and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression. RESULTS Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Studenic
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Maarten de Wit
- EULAR Community of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE)ZürichSwitzerland
| | - Tanja A. Stamm
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent SystemsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Farideh Alasti
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Diane Lacaille
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineUniversity of British Columbia and Arthritis Research CanadaVancouverCanada
| | - Josef S. Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - David T. Felson
- Section of RheumatologyBoston University School of MedicineBostonMassachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rheumatoid arthritis: advances in treatment strategies. Mol Cell Biochem 2023; 478:69-88. [PMID: 35725992 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-022-04492-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterised by severe joint and bone damage due to heightened autoimmune response at the articular sites. Worldwide annual incidence and prevalence rate of RA is 3 cases per 10,000 population and 1%, respectively. Several genetic and environmental (microbiota, smoking, infectious agents) factors contribute to its pathogenesis. Although convention treatment strategies, predominantly Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and Glucocorticoids (GC), are unchanged as the primary line of treatment; novel strategies consisting of biological DMARDs, are being developed and explored. Personalized approaches using biologicals targetspecific pathways associated with disease progression. However, considering the economic burden and side-effects associated with these, there is an unmet need on strategies for early stratification of the inadequate responders with cDMARDs. As RA is a complex disease with a variable remission rate, it is important not only to evaluate the current status of drugs in clinical practice but also those with the potential of personalised therapeutics. Here, we provide comprehensive data on the treatment strategies in RA, including studies exploring various combination strategies in clinical trials. Our systematic analysis of current literature found that conventional DMARDs along with glucocorticoid may be best suited for early RA cases and a combination of conventional and targeted DMARDs could be effective for treating seronegative patients with moderate to high RA activity. Clinical trials with insufficient responders to Methotrexate suggest that adding biologicals may help in such cases. However, certain adverse events associated with the current therapy advocate exploring novel therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy, mesenchymal stem cell therapy in future.
Collapse
|
47
|
Studenic P, Aletaha D, de Wit M, Stamm TA, Alasti F, Lacaille D, Smolen JS, Felson DT. American College of Rheumatology/EULAR remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:74-80. [PMID: 36280238 PMCID: PMC9811102 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean-based and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the two sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria. METHODS We used data from four randomised trials comparing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared with the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analysed agreement between the Boolean-based and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score≤0.5) and radiographic non-progression. RESULTS Data from 2048 trial participants, 1101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared with Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes. CONCLUSION Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies, more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardising predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Studenic
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maarten de Wit
- EULAR community of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farideh Alasti
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diane Lacaille
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David T Felson
- Section of Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Buttgereit F, Kvien TK. Controversies in rheumatology: maintenance therapy with low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:35-41. [PMID: 35713511 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the beginning of the use of glucocorticoids in clinical medicine, the risk-benefit ratio of these still very important drugs has been debated. There is no doubt that they produce many desirable therapeutic effects quickly and reliably. However, their potential to cause adverse effects, especially with prolonged use in high doses, limits their applicability. We discuss the arguments against and in favour of maintenance therapy with low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with RA, and present recent studies, assessments and conclusions on this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Neutrophils in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatic Diseases. RHEUMATOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2022; 3:120-127. [PMID: 36788971 PMCID: PMC9895873 DOI: 10.2478/rir-2022-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), are a group of auto-inflammatory disorders associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. One unifying feature of these diseases is the presence of abnormal neutrophils exhibiting dysregulated neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, degranulation, and pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion. Moreover, the release of autoantigens associated with NETs promotes the generation of autoantibodies and a breakdown of self-tolerance, thereby perpetuating inflammation and tissue injury in these patients. In recent years, targeted therapies directed at neutrophilic effector functions have shown promising results in the management of rheumatic diseases. In this review, we will highlight the emerging roles of neutrophils in the onset and progression of rheumatic diseases, and further discuss current and future therapeutic approaches targeting the pathogenic functions of neutrophils, which can modulate inflammation and hence improve patients' survival and quality of life.
Collapse
|
50
|
Yan MK, Wang C, Wolfe R, Mar VJ, Wluka AE. Association Between Low-Dose Methotrexate Exposure and Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:1157-1166. [PMID: 36044236 PMCID: PMC9434483 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Methotrexate is widely used for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis. Studies suggest that methotrexate may be associated with an increased risk of melanoma. Objective To determine whether methotrexate exposure is associated with an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to May 12, 2022, for eligible studies. Study Selection Case-control studies, cohort studies, or randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they examined the odds or risk of cutaneous melanoma in individuals exposed to low-dose methotrexate in comparison with individuals unexposed. No language limitations were applied. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics and outcome data. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. To assess study quality, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for RCTs, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist was used for cohort and case-control studies. Odds ratio from case-control studies and relative risk or hazard ratio from cohort studies or RCTs were pooled, and a random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures Prespecified outcome was the odds ratio, hazard ratio, or risk ratio of cutaneous melanoma comparing low-dose methotrexate exposure with nonexposure. Results Seventeen studies (8 RCTs, 5 cohort studies, 4 case-control studies) were eligible for inclusion, and of these, 12 studies with 16 642 cases of melanoma were pooled in the primary analysis. Indications for methotrexate included rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease and were unknown in 5 studies. Compared with unexposed individuals, study participants with methotrexate exposure had a small increased risk of melanoma (pooled relative risk, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22), but this did not persist in a sensitivity analysis excluding the largest study (pooled relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.24). Subgroup analyses according to comparator group (comparing methotrexate exposure with either immunomodulator alone vs immunomodulator and methotrexate) or the indication for methotrexate being rheumatoid arthritis provided similar risk estimates. Using geographical population melanoma incidence rates, a number needed to harm of 18 630 was calculated in Australia, and 41 425 in North America. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, low-dose methotrexate exposure was associated with an increased melanoma risk, but the absolute risk increase could be considered negligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel K. Yan
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Charlie Wang
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria J. Mar
- Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita E. Wluka
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|