Metformin, heart failure, and lactic acidosis: is metformin absolutely contraindicated?

Clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic heart failure treated with metformin: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore outcomes of metformin (Met) as an antihyperglycemic agent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) combined with chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

This article employed a meta-analysis approach to systematically search several databases. Stata 15.1 software was employed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis encompassed 15 randomized controlled trials, involving 20,595 patients with T2DM and CHF. The results revealed that in comparison to the non-Met group, the Met group exhibited a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.60-0.87) and a notably lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.52, 95%CI:0.29-0.92). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of hospitalization due to heart failure (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.70-1.04). Furthermore, the Met group demonstrated significant improvements in NT-proBNP levels compared to the non-Met group (WMD = -132.91, 95%CI: -173.03, -92.79). Regarding the enhancement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Dimension levels, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In individuals with T2DM and CHF, the use of Met is linked to a decreased likelihood of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular-related mortality. Furthermore, it can enhance cardiac function in CHF patients without elevating the risk of hospitalization due to heart failure, establishing its safety and potential benefits.

Current findings on the antitumor effects of metformin on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Review)

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an intractable type of cancer that requires novel therapeutic modalities, since the therapeutic outcomes are often inadequate, even in response to multidisciplinary treatment. The antitumor effect of metformin, an antidiabetic drug, has been reported in esophageal cancer; however, its effects are diverse. Since various multidisciplinary therapies are used in ESCC, the antitumor effect of metformin is expected to be synergistic in some treatment strategies. The present review summarizes the antitumor effects of metformin and discusses its use in combination with existing therapies. The present study reviewed relevant studies where the molecular targets of metformin (AMPK and inflammatory system signals) were described, followed by the classification and organization of its antitumor effects, and subsequently summarized the current research on its antitumor effects, especially in ESCC. A number of studies have reported that metformin prevents the development of ESCC and exerts its antitumor effects through various pathways. In addition, metformin has been shown to inhibit tumor growth, induce apoptosis, inhibit cancer cell invasion, migration and angiogenesis into the tumor, and decrease tumor malignancy, such as metastasis. Furthermore, it may modulate host tumor immunity in a tumor-suppressive manner and is expected to improve prognosis following treatment for ESCC. Notably, metformin may be beneficial in combination with chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, and radiation. By contrast, it has been shown to potentially induce resistance to 5-fluorouracil. Finally, the effects of metformin in combination with other therapies are discussed in the present study, and perspectives on the potential benefits of metformin for future ESCC treatment are presented. In conclusion, the present review may be useful in improving the understanding of the wide range of antitumor effects of metformin. Although some concerning points remain, using metformin in ESCC treatment could be promising. Notably, more knowledge needs to be accumulated regarding the effects of metformin on ESCC.

Exploring the link between metformin use and adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

The risk of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder in diabetic patients taking metformin has not been evaluated. We aimed for evaluating the relative risk of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder in diabetic patients taking metformin at the level of the whole country population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a national health insurance database in Taiwan from 2000 to2015. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, to categorise the medical condition for study group and comparison group. We used Cox proportional hazard regression analyses to determined adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder between study and comparison group after adjusting for sex, age, and comorbidities.Among 30,412 diabetic patients using metformin, 3020 patients were diagnosis with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder during follow up. Of the 121,648 patients without the use of metformin, 11,375 patients developed adhesive capsulitis of shoulder. Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder risk was elevated in patients taking metformin than in non-metformin group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.179, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.022 to 1.268; p = 0.039). Risk of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder among the diabetic patients taking metformin was higher than those did not taking metformin.

Synergistic In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Triton X-100 and Metformin against Enterococcus faecalis in Normal and High-Glucose Conditions

The prevention and treatment of oral diseases is more difficult in diabetic patients with poorly controlled blood glucose levels. This study aims to explore an effective, low-cytotoxicity medication for root canal treatment in diabetic patients. The antibacterial effect of the combination of Triton X-100 (TX-100) and metformin (Met) on Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration required to kill 99% bacteria (MBC₉₉) and by conducting dynamic time-killing assays. While the antibiofilm activity was measured by crystal violet (CV) assay, field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and colony-forming unit (CFU) counting assays. The expression of relative genes was evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and the cytotoxicity of the new combination on MC3T3-E1 cell was also tested. Results showed that the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of Met could be significantly enhanced by very low concentrations of TX-100 in both normal and high-glucose conditions, with a much lower cytotoxicity than 2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Thus, the TX-100 + Met combination may be developed as a promising and effective root canal disinfectant for patients with diabetes.

Heart failure in type 2 diabetes: current perspectives on screening, diagnosis and management

Type 2 diabetes is one of the most relevant risk factors for heart failure, the prevalence of which is increasing worldwide. The aim of the review is to highlight the current perspectives of the pathophysiology of heart failure as it pertains to type 2 diabetes. This review summarizes the proposed mechanistic bases, explaining the myocardial damage induced by diabetes-related stressors and other risk factors, i.e., cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes. We highlight the complex pathology of individuals with type 2 diabetes, including the relationship with chronic kidney disease, metabolic alterations, and heart failure. We also discuss the current criteria used for heart failure diagnosis and the gold standard screening tools for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Currently approved pharmacological therapies with primary use in type 2 diabetes and heart failure, and the treatment-guiding role of NT-proBNP are also presented. Finally, the influence of the presence of type 2 diabetes as well as heart failure on COVID-19 severity is briefly discussed.

Which drug is best for a patient with type 2 diabetes and heart failure?

ABSTRACT

Heart failure is twice as common in men with type 2 diabetes than those without it and is almost five times greater in women with diabetes. Ideally, effective treatment for one condition also will help with the other; certainly, clinicians should not prescribe a medication that will potentially worsen one of the conditions, if avoiding it is at all possible. This article reviews the effects of diabetes medications on heart failure outcomes.

The effects of antidiabetic agents on heart failure

In the Netherlands, approximately 250,000 people are living with heart failure. About one-third of them have comorbid diabetes mellitus type 2. Until recently, the effects of antidiabetic agents on heart failure were largely unknown. This changed after an observed increased risk of heart failure and ischaemic heart disease associated with thiazolidinediones that prompted the requirement for cardiovascular outcome trials for new glucose-lowering drugs. In the past decade, three new classes of antidiabetic agents have become available (i.e. dipeptidyl peptidase‑4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide‑1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter‑2 (SGLT2) inhibitors). Although the first two classes demonstrated no beneficial effects on heart failure compared to placebo in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly and consistently lowered the risk of incident and worsening heart failure. Two recent trials indicated that these favourable effects were also present in non-diabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, resulting in significantly lower risks of hospitalisation for heart failure and presumably also cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to be benefit on top of recommended heart failure therapy including sacubitril/valsartan and may also prove beneficial for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In this review, we discuss the effects of antidiabetic agents on heart failure.

Protective effect of sitagliptin and whole-body γ-irradiation in diabetes-induced cardiac injury

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications; this study aimed to investigate effect of sitagliptin (SITA) alone or combined with γ-irradiation on diabetes-associated cardiac injury. Rats were treated with SITA (100 mg/kg per day; p.o.) for 2 weeks followed by a single dose of whole-body γ-irradiation (3 Gy). Solitary administration of SITA or combined treatment with γ-irradiation succeeded to ameliorate the increase in serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, creatine kinase-MB, and malondialdehyde, coupled by increased insulin and reduced glutathione levels. Their cardioprotective potential was confirmed through attenuating the apoptotic signaling by mitigating Bcl-2-associated X protein, caspase-3, and apoptosis-inducing factor expression, while augmenting the anti-apoptotic factors, B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and heat shock protein 70 (HSP-70) in left ventricular tissue homogenates. These findings were supported histopathologically. In conclusion, treatment with SITA alone or combined with γ-irradiation may prove beneficial in diabetes-accompanied cardiac insult. This could be due to the crosstalk between the antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and restoration of body's defense capacities.

Metformin turns 62 in pharmacotherapy: Emergence of non-glycaemic effects and potential novel therapeutic applications

Metformin is the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic medication. Direct/indirect activation of Adenosine Monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and non-AMPK pathways, amongst others, are deemed to explain the molecular mechanisms of action of metformin. Metformin is an established insulin receptor sensitising antihyperglycemic agent, is highly affordable, and has superior safety and efficacy profiles. Emerging experimental and clinical evidence suggests that metformin has pleiotropic non-glycemic effects. Metformin appears to have weight stabilising, renoprotective, neuroprotective, cardio-vascular protective, and antineoplastic effects and mitigates polycystic ovarian syndrome. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of metformin seem to qualify it as an adjunct therapy in treating infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, and the current novel Covid-19 infections. So far, metformin is the only prescription medicine relevant to the emerging field of senotherapeutics. Non-glycemic effects of metformin favourable to its repurposing in therapeutic use are hereby discussed.

Should metformin remain the first-line therapy for treatment of type 2 diabetes?

Metformin is a biguanide that is used as first-line treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is effective as monotherapy and in combination with other glucose-lowering medications. It is generally well-tolerated with minimal side effects and is affordable. Although the safety and efficacy of metformin have been well-established, there is discussion regarding whether metformin should continue to be the first choice for therapy as other anti-hyperglycemic medications exhibit additional advantages in certain populations. Despite a long-standing history of metformin use, there are limited cardiovascular outcomes data for metformin. Furthermore, the available studies fail to provide strong evidence due to either small sample size or short duration. Recent data from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor cardiovascular and renal outcomes trials demonstrated additional protection from diabetes complications for some high-risk patients, which has impacted the guidelines for diabetes management. Post-hoc analyses comparing hazard ratios for participants taking metformin at baseline versus not taking metformin are inconclusive for these two groups. There are no data to suggest that metformin should not be initiated soon after the diagnosis of diabetes. Furthermore, the initiation of newer glycemic-lowering medications with cardiovascular benefits should be considered in high-risk patients regardless of glycemic control or target HbA1c. However, cost remains a major factor in determining appropriate treatment.

Where Does Metformin Stand in Modern Day Management of Type 2 Diabetes?

Metformin is the most commonly used glucose-lowering therapy (GLT) worldwide and remains the first-line therapy for newly diagnosed individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in management algorithms and guidelines after the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed cardiovascular mortality benefits in the overweight population using metformin. However, the improved Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) realised in some of the recent large cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) using sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have challenged metformin's position as a first-line agent in the management of T2D. Many experts now advocate revising the existing treatment algorithms to target atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and improving glycaemic control as a secondary aim. In this review article, we will revisit the major cardiovascular outcome data for metformin and include a critique of the UKPDS data. We then review additional factors that might be pertinent to metformin's status as a first-line agent and finally answer key questions when considering metformin's role in the modern-day management of T2D.

Association Between Preoperative Metformin Exposure and Postoperative Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Importance

Adults with comorbidity have less physiological reserve and an increased rate of postoperative mortality and readmission after the stress of a major surgical intervention.

Objective

To assess postoperative mortality and readmission among individuals with diabetes with or without preoperative prescriptions for metformin.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study obtained data from the electronic health record of a multicenter, single health care system in Pennsylvania. Included were adults with diabetes who underwent a major operation with hospital admission from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2016, at 15 community and academic hospitals within the system. Individuals without a clinical indication for metformin therapy were excluded. Follow-up continued until December 18, 2018.

Exposures

Preoperative metformin exposure was defined as 1 or more prescriptions for metformin in the 180 days before the surgical procedure.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause postoperative mortality, hospital readmission within 90 days of discharge, and preoperative inflammation measured by the neutrophil to leukocyte ratio were compared between those with and without preoperative prescriptions for metformin. The corresponding absolute risk reduction (ARR) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI were calculated in a propensity score-matched cohort.

Results

Among the 10 088 individuals with diabetes who underwent a major surgical intervention, 5962 (59%) had preoperative metformin prescriptions. A total of 5460 patients were propensity score-matched, among whom the mean (SD) age was 67.7 (12.2) years, and 2866 (53%) were women. In the propensity score-matched cohort, preoperative metformin prescriptions were associated with a reduced hazard for 90-day mortality (adjusted HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.95]; ARR, 1.28% [95% CI, 0.26-2.31]) and hazard of readmission, with mortality as a competing risk at both 30 days (ARR, 2.09% [95% CI, 0.35-3.82]; sub-HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]) and 90 days (ARR, 2.78% [95% CI, 0.62-4.95]; sub-HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.97]). Preoperative inflammation was reduced in those with metformin prescriptions compared with those without (mean neutrophil to leukocyte ratio, 4.5 [95% CI, 4.3-4.6] vs 5.0 [95% CI, 4.8-5.3]; P < .001). E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found an association between metformin prescriptions provided to individuals with type 2 diabetes before a major surgical procedure and reduced risk-adjusted mortality and readmission after the operation. This association warrants further investigation.

Therapeutic approaches to diabetic cardiomyopathy: Targeting the antioxidant pathway

The global epidemic of cardiovascular disease continues unabated and remains the leading cause of death both in the US and worldwide. We hereby summarize the available therapies for diabetes and cardiovascular disease in diabetics. Clearly, the current approaches to diabetic heart disease often target the manifestations and certain mediators but not the specific pathways leading to myocardial injury, remodeling and dysfunction. Better understanding of the molecular events determining the evolution of diabetic cardiomyopathy will provide insight into the development of specific and targeted therapies. Recent studies largely increased our understanding of the role of enhanced inflammatory response, ROS production, as well as the contribution of Cyp-P450-epoxygenase-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), Heme Oxygenase (HO)-1 and 20-HETE in pathophysiology and therapy of cardiovascular disease. PGC-1α increases production of the HO-1 which has a major role in protecting the heart against oxidative stress, microcirculation and mitochondrial dysfunction. This review describes the potential drugs and their downstream targets, PGC-1α and HO-1, as major loci for developing therapeutic approaches beside diet and lifestyle modification for the treatment and prevention of heart disease associated with obesity and diabetes.

Metformin as Potential Therapy for High-Grade Glioma

Metformin (MET), 1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride, is a biguanide drug used as the first-line medication in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The recent years have brought many observations showing metformin in its new role. The drug, commonly used in the therapy of diabetes, may also find application in the therapy of a vast variety of tumors. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in colon, breast, prostate, pancreatic cancer, leukemia, melanoma, lung and endometrial carcinoma, as well as in gliomas. This is especially important in light of the poor options offered to patients in the case of high-grade gliomas, which include glioblastoma (GBM). A thorough understanding of the mechanism of action of metformin can make it possible to discover new drugs that could be used in neoplasm therapy.

Metformin use and cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study

Background

The use of metformin after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with reduced mortality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, it is not known if it is acutely cardioprotective in patients taking metformin at the time of AMI. We compared patient outcomes according to metformin status at the time of admission for fatal and non-fatal AMI in a large cohort of patients in England.

Methods

This study used linked data from primary care, hospital admissions and death registry from 4.7 million inhabitants in England, as part of the CALIBER resource. The primary endpoint was a composite of acute myocardial infarction requiring hospitalisation, stroke and cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoints were heart failure (HF) hospitalisation and all-cause mortality.

Results

4,030 patients with T2DM and incident AMI recorded between January 1998 and October 2010 were included. At AMI admission, 63.9% of patients were receiving metformin and 36.1% another oral hypoglycaemic drug. Median follow-up was 343 (IQR: 1–1436) days. Adjusted analyses showed an increased hazard of the composite endpoint in metformin users compared to non-users (HR 1.09 [1.01–1.19]), but not of the secondary endpoints. The higher risk of the composite endpoint in metformin users was only observed in people taking metformin at AMI admission, whereas metformin use post-AMI was associated with a reduction in risk of all-cause mortality (0.76 [0.62–0.93], P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that metformin use at the time of first AMI is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death in patients with T2DM, while its use post-AMI might be beneficial. Further investigation in well-designed randomised controlled trials is indicated, especially in view of emerging evidence of cardioprotection from sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Induction of Apoptosis by a Combination of 2-Deoxyglucose and Metformin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting Cancer Cell Metabolism

BACKGROUND

Both mitochondrial dysfunction and aerobic glycolysis are signs of growing aggressive cancer. If altered metabolism of cancer cell is intended, using the glycolysis inhibitor (2-deoxyglucose (2DG)) would be a viable therapeutic method. The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), as a metabolic sensor, could be activated with metformin and it can also launch a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint and might inhibit cancer cell growth.

METHODS

After treatment with 5 mM metformin and/or 500 µM 2DG, the TE1, TE8, and TE11 cellular viability and apoptosis were assessed by MTT, TUNEL, and ELISA methods. The changes in p53 and Bcl-2 genes expression levels were examined using real-time PCR method. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test using the SPSS 17.0 software.

RESULTS

Metformin and 2DG, alone and in combination, induced apoptosis in the cell lines. Real-time PCR revealed that metformin induced apoptosis in TE8 and TE11 cells by activating p53, down-regulating Bcl-2 expression. The induced apoptosis by 2DG raised by metformin and the combination modulated the expression of Bcl-2 protein in all cell lines and it was more effective in TE11 cell line.

CONCLUSION

Metformin induced apoptosis in ESCC by down-regulating Bcl-2 expression, and up-regulating p53 and induced apoptosis increased by 2-deoxy-d-glucose. Thus, the combination therapy is an effective therapeutic strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

AMPK is associated with the beneficial effects of antidiabetic agents on cardiovascular diseases

Diabetics have higher morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease (CVD). A variety of antidiabetic agents are available for clinical choice. Cardiovascular (CV) safety assessment of these agents is crucial in addition to hypoglycemic effect before clinical prescription. Adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important cell energy sensor, which plays an important role in regulating myocardial energy metabolism, reducing ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, improving heart failure (HF) and ventricular remodeling, ameliorating vascular endothelial dysfunction, antichronic inflammation, anti-apoptosis, and regulating autophagy. In this review, we summarized the effects of antidiabetic agents to CVD according to basic and clinical research evidence and put emphasis on whether these agents can play roles in CV system through AMPK-dependent signaling pathways. Metformin has displayed definite CV benefits related to AMPK. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors also demonstrate sufficient clinical evidence for CV protection, but the mechanisms need further exploration. Glucagon-likepeptide1 analogs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors and thiazolidinediones also show some AMPK-dependent CV benefits. Sulfonylureas and meglitinides may be unfavorable to CV system. AMPK is becoming a promising target for the treatment of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and CVD. But there are still some questions to be answered.

Assessing the incidence of acidosis in patients receiving metformin with and without risk factors for lactic acidosis

BACKGROUND

Despite strong recommendations to use metformin as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), its use has been suboptimal, likely due to concerns of lactic acidosis. This study compared the association of acidosis in patients with T2DM prescribed metformin with those prescribed other antihyperglycemic medications or no medications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed T2DM utilizing an administrative database, which includes medical and prescription claims. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of T2DM, had continuous health plan enrollment 3 months prior to study enrollment and during the study period, and were at least 18 years of age. Mutually exclusive exposure groups were metformin only, other antihyperglycemic medications, and no medication. Acidosis cases were stratified by exposure group and risk factors for lactic acidosis (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatic dysfunction, alcohol abuse, heart failure, renal insufficiency, age of 80 years or older, and a history of acidosis). Degree of renal insufficiency was not available. Associations between exposure and acidosis were estimated, and risk factors evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 132,780 patients met inclusion criteria: 24,936 (20%) metformin only group, 15,059 (11%) other antihyperglycemic medication group, and 92,785 (70%) no medication group. Acidosis was observed in 1.45 per 10,000 patient months (0.78 metformin, 1.59 other antihyperglycemic medication, 1.51 no medication). The unadjusted relative risk of acidosis was 0.5 for patients prescribed metformin only compared with the other exposure groups (95% confidence interval = 0.2-1.2). There was no significant difference in risk of acidosis between exposure groups, irrespective of risk factors for lactic acidosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of acidosis was similar with metformin only compared with those prescribed other antihyperglycemic medications or no medication. These results support expanded use of metformin for T2DM. Additional studies are needed to understand the impact of risk factor severity on risk of lactic acidosis.

Cardioprotection by Metformin: Beneficial Effects Beyond Glucose Reduction

Metformin is a biguanide that is widely used as an insulin-sparing agent to treat diabetes. When compared with the general population, diabetics are twice as likely to die from fatal myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure (CHF). There has been a significant concern regarding the use of metformin in patients with CHF because of their higher tendency to develop lactic acidosis. However, large epidemiological trials have reported better cardiovascular prognosis with metformin compared to other glucose-lowering agents among diabetics. Additionally, metformin has reduced the risk of reinfarction and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and CHF, respectively. The protection against cardiovascular diseases appears to be independent of the anti-hyperglycemic effects of metformin. These effects are mediated through an increase in 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation and by increased phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in cardiomyocytes with an increased production of nitric oxide (NO). Metformin preconditions the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury and may improve myocardial remodeling after an ischemic insult. The preponderance of evidence currently suggests that metformin is safe in patients with CHF, prompting the Food and Drug Administration to remove CHF as a contraindication from the package insert of all generic metformin preparations. In this narrative, along with a limited meta-analysis of available studies, we have reviewed the pleiotropic (non-glucose-lowering) effects of metformin that potentially contribute to its cardioprotective properties. Additionally, we have reviewed issues surrounding the safety of metformin in patients with cardiac diseases.

Patient-factors associated with metformin steady-state levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus with therapeutic dosage

AIMS

This prospective study aimed to analyze metformin steady-state concentration in repeated constant dosage and the influencing patient-factors as well as to correlate them with glycemic control.

METHODS

The validated HPLC-UV method was used to examine metformin steady-state concentration, while FBG and glycated albumin were used as the parameters of glycemic control during metformin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 82 type-2 diabetes patients were involved with 32.1% of them having metformin Cssmin and 84.1% having Cssmax of metformin within the recommended therapeutic range. One patient had metformin Css that exceeded minimum toxic concentration despite his normal renal function and administered therapeutic dosage of metformin. Higher Cssmax was found in patients with metformin monotherapy, while patients with longer duration of metformin use had significantly higher Cssmin.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with initial hyperglycemia and eGFR, metformin Cssmin became the only parameter that influenced FBG level (P < 0.05). Duration of previous metformin use should be considered in the strategy of optimizing metformin dosage. The type-2 diabetes patients with obesity are more suggested to take shorter interval of metformin administration (or possibly with sustained-release formulation) to keep Cssmin within the therapeutic range.

Cardiac applications of hyperpolarised magnetic resonance

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death world-wide. It is increasingly recognised that cardiac pathologies show, or may even be caused by, changes in metabolism, leading to impaired cardiac energetics. The heart turns over 15 times its own weight in ATP every day and thus relies heavily on the availability of substrates and on efficient oxidation to generate this ATP. A number of old and emerging drugs that target different aspects of metabolism are showing promising results with regard to improved cardiac outcomes in patients. A non-invasive imaging technique that could assess the role of different aspects of metabolism in heart disease, as well as measure changes in cardiac energetics due to treatment, would be valuable in the routine clinical care of cardiac patients. Hyperpolarised magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging have revolutionised metabolic imaging, allowing real-time metabolic flux assessment in vivo for the first time. In this review we summarise metabolism in the healthy and diseased heart, give an introduction to the hyperpolarisation technique, 'dynamic nuclear polarisation' (DNP), and review the preclinical studies that have thus far explored healthy cardiac metabolism and different models of human heart disease. We furthermore show what advances have been made to translate this technique into the clinic, what technical challenges still remain and what unmet clinical needs and unexplored metabolic substrates still need to be assessed by researchers in this exciting and fast-moving field.

Is the management of diabetes different in dialysis patients?

Diabetes is highly and increasingly prevalent in the dialysis population and negatively impacts both quality and quantity of life. Nevertheless, the best approach to these patients is still debatable. The question of whether the management of diabetes should be different in dialysis patients does not have a clear yes or no answer but is divided into too many sub-issues that should be carefully considered. In this review, lifestyle, cardiovascular risk, and hyperglycemia management are explored, emphasizing the possible pros and cons of a similar approach to diabetes in dialysis patients compared to the general population.

Metformin Use in Practice: Compliance With Guidelines for Patients With Diabetes and Preserved Renal Function

IN BRIEF Several contraindications limit the use of metformin, most notably the risk of lactic acidosis. This article reports on an examination of a population of patients with diabetes with preserved renal function to evaluate provider compliance with guidelines on metformin use and to identify factors that contributed when practice diverged from recommendations. It found that metformin was withheld from approximately one-third of these patients because of 1) an existent contraindication to metformin, 2) patient behavior or preference, or 3) provider preference or bias based on patient or personal factors. Although providers generally follow current recommendations for the use of metformin, deviations from guidelines in practice are common.

Changes in metformin use in chronic kidney disease

Metformin is one of the oldest and most widely prescribed antidiabetic medicines worldwide. It is the only such medicine that has shown a reduction of cardiovascular mortality in diabetes mellitus type 2. Since many diabetic patients have chronic kidney disease, its use is often curtailed by practitioners due to fear of lactic acidosis and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings that, until recently, had been in place for decades. Current guidelines, though somewhat vague regarding dosages, clearly pave the way for spreading the use of metformin in patients with lower glomerular filtration rates. These guidelines also suggest moving away from just looking at serum creatinine to create a cut-off. Metformin’s costs are lower, and in many underdeveloped countries this is the only medicine available for poor patients. More widespread use of metformin will further help with health care costs, as well as obesity. It will simplify the use of diabetes mellitus type 2 management with lower incidences of hypoglycemia. With all the mounting evidence, the FDA is finally requiring labeling changes regarding recommendations, to allow the use of metformin in patients with much reduced kidney function.

Postburn Hypermetabolism: Past, Present, and Future

Hypermetabolism is the ubiquitous response to a severe burn injury, which was first described in the nineteenth century. Despite identification of important components of this complex response, hypermetabolism is still not well understood in its entirety. This article describes this incredibly fascinating response and the understanding we have gained over the past 100 years. Additionally, this article describes novel insights and delineates treatment options to modulate postburn hypermetabolism with the goal to improve outcomes of burn patients.

Assessment of Metformin-Induced Changes in Cardiac and Hepatic Redox State Using Hyperpolarized[1-13C]Pyruvate

Metformin improves cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes, but its exact mechanisms of action remain controversial. We used hyperpolarized [1-¹³C]pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine the effects of metformin treatment on heart and liver pyruvate metabolism in rats in vivo. Both oral treatment for 4 weeks and a single intravenous metformin infusion significantly increased the cardiac [1-¹³C]lactate:[1-¹³C]pyruvate ratio but had no effect on the [1-¹³C]bicarbonate + ¹³CO₂:[1-¹³C]pyruvate ratio, an index of pyruvate dehydrogenase flux. These changes were paralleled by a significant increase in the heart and liver cytosolic redox state, estimated from the [lactate]:[pyruvate] ratio but not the whole-cell [NAD⁺]/[NADH] ratio. Hyperpolarized MRI localized the increase in cardiac lactate to the left ventricular myocardium, implying a direct myocardial effect, though metformin had no effect on systolic or diastolic cardiac function. These findings demonstrate the ability of hyperpolarized pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy to detect metformin-induced changes in cytosolic redox biology, suggest that metformin has a previously unrecognized effect on cardiac redox state, and help to refine the design of impending hyperpolarized magnetic resonance studies in humans.

Heart Failure: a Major Cardiovascular Complication of Diabetes Mellitus

Heart failure (HF) is a major cardiovascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The greatest risk factor for HF is age, and data indicate that 6 to 10 % of individuals over the age of 65 years suffer from HF. Patients with DM have a 2.5-fold increased risk for developing HF than individuals without DM. The 25 to 40 % of patients with HF who have DM have worse outcome (death from cardiovascular disease or hospitalization for worsening HF) than patients without DM. Hyperglycemia is a risk factor for the development of HF with an increase in incidence of HF rising from 10 % at hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.0 to 9.0 % to 71 % at a HbA1c > 10 %. Patients with DM and HF are equally distributed between those with low ejection fractions and those with normal ejection fractions. The HF treatment regimens for patients with HF and DM (blockade of angiotensin II synthesis or action, cardioselective β-adrenergic blockade, mineralocorticoid receptor blockade, and diuretics) are the same as for HF patients without DM, though the benefit on clinical outcomes is not as great. The new angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors appear to provide increase outcome benefits in both HF patients with or without DM. Glycemic control impacts the clinical outcomes in patients with HF and DM in a U-shaped relationship with poorer survival at low and high mean HbA1c levels. The optimal chronic glycemic control occurs at an HbA1c of 7.5 to 8.0 % for patients with DM who have symptoms of HF.

Epidemiology of lactic acidosis in type 2 diabetes patients with metformin in Japan

PURPOSE

To estimate the incidence of lactic acidosis (LA) and role of metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with anti-diabetes drugs.

METHODS

This retrospective propensity score matched cohort study was conducted using the Japanese Medical Data Vision claims database. T2DM patients aged 18 or above who received diabetes drugs during January 2010 through August 2014 were identified. Cases of LA were identified based on reimbursement codes and confirmed by lactic acid test and subsequent treatment by hemodialysis or intravenous sodium bicarbonate. Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the incidence and assess if metformin use was associated with increased risk of LA.

RESULTS

Thirty cases of LA were identified among 283 491 treated T2DM patients with 504 169 patient-years of follow-up. Crude incidence of LA was 5.95 per 100 000 patient-years. T2DM patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were seven-fold more likely to develop LA than those without CKD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 7.33, 95%CI, 3.17-16.96). Use of metformin was not associated with risk of LA in the study population (aHR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.33-2.55), and in the propensity score matched cohort (aHR, 0.90, 95%CI, 0.26-3.11). Similar findings were observed among diabetes patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and CKD. The age-sex adjusted incidence rates in metformin users and non-users were 5.80 and 5.78 per 100 000 person-years, respectively (Incidence rate ratio, 1.00, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that use of metformin was not associated with increased risk of LA in diabetic patients including those with CKD or CLD. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Pharmacology and therapeutic implications of current drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global epidemic that poses a major challenge to health-care systems. Improving metabolic control to approach normal glycaemia (where practical) greatly benefits long-term prognoses and justifies early, effective, sustained and safety-conscious intervention. Improvements in the understanding of the complex pathogenesis of T2DM have underpinned the development of glucose-lowering therapies with complementary mechanisms of action, which have expanded treatment options and facilitated individualized management strategies. Over the past decade, several new classes of glucose-lowering agents have been licensed, including glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. These agents can be used individually or in combination with well-established treatments such as biguanides, sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Although novel agents have potential advantages including low risk of hypoglycaemia and help with weight control, long-term safety has yet to be established. In this Review, we assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profiles, including cardiovascular safety, of currently available therapies for management of hyperglycaemia in patients with T2DM within the context of disease pathogenesis and natural history. In addition, we briefly describe treatment algorithms for patients with T2DM and lessons from present therapies to inform the development of future therapies.

Should Restrictions Be Relaxed for Metformin Use in Chronic Kidney Disease? No, We Should Never Again Compromise Safety!

Metformin is and has been considered as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes for over a quarter of a century. Like other biguanides, metformin can cause a lactic acidosis that is exceptionally rare but fatal. The likelihood of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is substantially higher in patients with kidney impairment and also among those with seemingly normal kidney function who are at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Hence, regulatory agencies in many industrialized nations have maintained strict renal restrictions surrounding metformin. However, there have been millions of people exposed to metformin for many years, many of them with serum creatinine values at or close to 1.5 mg/dL with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) much below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who have not developed lactic acidosis. Thus, there clearly remains controversy in this area, and there has been heightened pressure to remove the renal restrictions of metformin. To provide a discussion on the pros and cons of relaxing the renal restrictions for metformin use, we provide a Point-Counterpoint. In the point narrative below, Drs. Kalantar-Zadeh and Kovesdy provide their argument that although there is little evidence of the potential benefits of metformin in kidney disease, just considering the sheer numbers of metformin users and the high fatality rate of its associated lactic acidosis, the most appropriate practice is to avoid metformin use in people with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or in those who are at high risk of AKI irrespective of underlying eGFR. In the following counterpoint narrative, Drs. Bakris and Molitch argue that the data from a very large analysis demonstrate clearly that serum creatinine should be supplanted with eGFR as the criteria for metformin use and that the incidence of lactic acidosis is only elevated in those with a reduced eGFR who become dehydrated for various reasons or in those exposed to some toxin resulting in AKI. Otherwise the data clearly support the use of metformin under normal circumstances down to eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)-William T. CefaluEditor in Chief, Diabetes Care.

Prevalence and Predictors of Metformin Prescribing in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

Metformin is the first-line oral type 2 diabetes treatment. Despite an abundance of evidence, metformin is routinely underused. This study evaluated the rates of metformin use in an appropriate outpatient type 2 diabetes population and identified predictors of metformin use.

METHODS

A national cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Office visits involving patients aged 18-79 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were included, and visits involving patients with a diagnosis of chronic renal failure or heart failure were excluded. The primary outcome was metformin-prescribing rate. Multivariate logistic regression identified variables associated with metformin prescribing.

RESULTS

A total of 2348 patient visits were eligible for inclusion, representing 88,671,714 office visits nationally. Metformin was continued or initiated in 40.6% of these visits. The strongest independent predictors of metformin prescribing were insulin use (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.47), presence of four or more chronic conditions (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34-0.98), patients with Medicare insurance (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.83), visit with a surgical specialist (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.61) or a medical specialist (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38-0.92), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.28-3.22).

CONCLUSION

Metformin-prescribing rates are low, particularly in patients receiving insulin, with Medicare insurance, seen by medical or surgical specialists, or with four or more chronic conditions. The observed low rates of metformin use represent an important opportunity to improve the quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Alogliptin + metformin combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow worldwide, with appropriate glycemic management being a cornerstone of treatment to minimize the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. While metformin is widely utilized as a first-line agent for patients without a contraindication to therapy, treatment guidelines recommend a variety of options for second-line dual therapy with patient-specific choices depending on assessment of hypoglycemia risk, weight effects, tolerability, cost and other considerations. Incretin-based therapies, inclusive of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, have become a widely utilized group of medications due to their potentially advantageous effects, such as a low risk of hypoglycemia and overall favorable tolerability profile. Accordingly, fixed-dose combination products containing metformin in combination with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor have been developed by several manufacturers. This article summarizes the current evidence for the safety and efficacy of alogliptin and metformin used in combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Adverse event notifications implicating metformin with lactic acidosis in Australia

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the reported lactic acidosis cases associated with metformin from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and estimate the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) in Australia.

METHOD

All "lactic acidosis" cases associated with metformin and reported to the TGA between January 1971 and October 2014 were included. Data extracted included patient demographics, medical history and co-existing conditions, metformin dosage and relevant pathology results.

RESULT

A total of 152 cases of suspected MALA were included in this study. For 20 patients the outcome was unknown. There were 23 patients (n=132, 17.4%) reported as deceased. Plasma lactate levels were higher in non-survivors (p=0.02). Thirty-five patients (n=132, 26.5%) were reported to have at least one pre-existing contraindication to the use of metformin; this proportion was not different between patients who died or survived. Renal impairment was the most common contraindication. Approximately 75% of patients were reported to have at least one clinical condition which might cause acidosis. Metformin dosage, plasma lactate and serum creatinine were not correlated. Based on the cases reported to the TGA, the incidence of MALA in Australia was estimated to be 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5-3.1) cases per 100,000 patient-years between 1997 and 2011.

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing clinical conditions, such as renal impairment, and acute illnesses associated with lactic acidosis were frequently reported in the cases of MALA. The estimated incidence of MALA was lower than in most previous studies in other countries, probably due to the nature of spontaneous reports to the TGA.

Nutrition and anabolic pharmacotherapies in the care of burn patients

Thermal injury is a devastating injury that results in a number of pathological alterations in almost every system in the body. Hypermetabolism, muscle wasting, depressed immunity, and impaired wound healing are all clinical features of burns. Failure to address each of these specific pathological alterations can lead to increased mortality. Nutrition supplementation has been recommended as a therapeutic tool to help attenuate the hypermetabolism and devastating catabolism evident following burn. Despite the wide consensus on the need of nutrition supplementation in burn patients, controversy exists with regard to the type and amount of nutrition recommended. Nutrition alone is also not enough in these patients to halt and reverse some of the damage done by the catabolic pathways activated following severe burn injury. This has led to the use of anabolic pharmacologic agents in conjunction with nutrition to help improve patient outcome following burn injury. In this review, we examine the relevant literature on nutrition after burn injury and its contribution to the attenuation of the postburn hypermetabolic response, impaired wound healing, and suppressed immunological responses. We also review the commonly used anabolic agents clinically in the care of burn patients. Finally, we provide nutrition and pharmacological recommendations gained from prospective trials, retrospective analyses, and expert opinions based on our practice at the Ross Tilley Burn Center in Toronto, Canada.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor improves cardiac function by attenuating adverse cardiac remodelling in rats with chronic myocardial infarction

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Although cardioprotective effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have been demonstrated, their cardiac effects in chronic myocardial infarction (MI) are unclear. We determined the effects of a DPP-4 inhibitor on cardiac function and remodelling in rats with chronic MI. What is the main finding and its importance? We demonstrated, for the first time, that DPP-4 inhibitor, but not metformin, exerted similar efficacy in improving cardiac function and attenuating cardiac fibrosis compared with enalapril in rats with chronic MI. These findings reveal benefits additional to the glycaemic control by the DPP-4 inhibitor in chronic MI, and it might become the new drug of choice for MI in patients with diabetes mellitus. Adverse cardiac remodelling after myocardial infarction (MI) leads to progressive heart failure. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are new antidiabetic drugs that exert cardioprotection. However, their role in cardiac function and remodelling in chronic MI is unclear. We hypothesized that the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin reduces adverse cardiac remodelling and improves cardiac function in rats with chronic MI. These effects were also compared with enalapril and metformin. Male Wistar rats (n = 36) with chronic MI induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery were divided into six groups to receive vehicle, vildagliptin (3 mg kg(-1)  day(-1) ), metformin (30 mg kg(-1)  day(-1) ), enalapril (10 mg kg(-1)  day(-1) ), combined metformin and enalapril or combined vildagliptin and enalapril for 8 weeks. At the end of the study, plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), heart rate variability (HRV), left ventricular (LV) function, pathological and biochemical studies of cardiac remodelling were investigated. Our study demonstrated that rats with chronic MI had increased oxidative stress levels, depressed HRV, adverse cardiac remodelling, indicated by cardiac fibrosis, and LV dysfunction. Treatment with vildagliptin or enalapril significantly decreased oxidative stress, attenuated cardiac fibrosis and improved HRV and LV function. We conclude that vildagliptin exerts similar cardioprotective effects to enalapril in attenuating oxidative stress and cardiac fibrosis and improving cardiac function in rats with chronic MI. Metformin does not provide these benefits in this model. Moreover, addition of either metformin or vildagliptin to enalapril does not provide additional benefit in attenuating cardiac remodelling or improving LV function compared with enalapril alone.

Metformin utilisation in Australian community and aged care settings

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to: (i) evaluate the potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP; defined as the use of metformin in the presence of contraindications and/or use in excessive dosage based on the renal function) of metformin in people receiving medication reviews in Australia and (ii) identify the predictors for PIP of metformin.

METHOD

Retrospective study of patients taking metformin through a large medication review database, containing records between January 2010 and June 2012. Data, including demographics, medical conditions, medications and relevant pathology results, were extracted for analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect risk factors for PIP of metformin.

RESULTS

Medication reviews pertaining to 6386 patients who received Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs, n=5327) or Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMRs, n=1059) were included in this study. Overall, there were 12.9% (n=685) of patients in the HMR group and 17.4% (n=184) of patients in the RMMR group who had PIP of metformin. Multivariate logistic regression showed age, gender and type of medication review service as the significant (p<0.05) independent risk factors for PIP of metformin.

CONCLUSION

Metformin was often used in patients with contraindications, or in higher than recommended dosages in patients with renal impairment. Given the recent debate in the literature about the role of metformin in the presence of contraindications, a detailed prospective study in patients with contraindications and its association with lactic acidosis is warranted to establish the way in which metformin is to be used in these patients.

Novel therapeutics for type 2 diabetes: insulin resistance

Insulin resistance (IR) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. Hence improving IR is a major target of treatment in patients with T2D. Obesity and lack of exercise are major causes of IR. However, recent evidence implicates sleep disorders and disorders of the circadian rhythm in the pathogenesis of IR. Weight loss and lifestyle changes are the cornerstone and most effective treatments of IR, but adherence and patient's acceptability are poor. Bariatric surgery results in significant and sustainable long-term weight loss associated with beneficial impact on IR and glucose metabolism, making this an attractive treatment option for patients with T2D. Currently available pharmacological options targeting IR (such as metformin and thiazolidinediones) do not maintain glycaemic measures within targets long term and can be associated with significant side effects. Over the last two decades, many pharmacological agents targeting different aspects of the insulin signalling pathway were developed to improve IR, but only a minority reached clinical trials. Such treatments need to be specific and reversible as many of the components of the insulin signalling pathway are involved in other cellular functions such as apoptosis. Recent evidence highlighted the role of circadian rhythm and sleep-related disorders in the pathogenesis of IR. In this article, we review the latest developments in the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions targeting IR including bariatric surgery. We will also review the role of circadian rhythm and sleep-related disorders in the development and treatment of IR.

Pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes: oral medications

OBJECTIVE

To review the oral and injectable pharmacologic treatment options for type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed electronic database for studies published in English between 1993 and September 2014. Search terms included diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, and the individual name for each antidiabetic medication reviewed. In addition, manual searches were performed for cross-references from publications. Package inserts, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site, Institute for Safe Medication Practices Web site, American Diabetes Association Web site and scientific session poster presentations, and individual drug company Web pages were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

This review focused on information elucidated over the past 10 years to assist prescribers in choosing optimal therapy based on individual patient characteristics. Studies leading to the approval of or raising safety concerns for the antidiabetic medications reviewed in this article were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In the past 10 years, there have been 4 novel oral antidiabetic medication classes and 9 new injectable agents and insulin products approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as well as new information regarding the safety and use of several older antidiabetic medication classes. The distinctions were reviewed for each individual agent, and a comparison was completed if there was more than one agent in a particular therapeutic class. Using current information available, select investigational agents in phase III trials or those with a pending new drug application were highlighted.

CONCLUSION

There are now 9 distinct oral pharmacologic classes and a variety of insulin and noninsulin injectable medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. When considering options for alternative or additional treatment, prescribers must weigh the benefits and risks using individual patient characteristics.

Achieving glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a critical comparison of current options

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in the elderly. Because of the unique characteristics of elderly people with T2DM, therapeutic strategy and focus should be tailored to suit this population. This article reviews the guidelines and studies related to older people with T2DM worldwide. A few important themes are generalized: 1) the functional and cognitive status is critical for older people with T2DM considering their life expectancy compared to younger counterparts; 2) both severe hypoglycemia and persistent hyperglycemia are deleterious to older adults with T2DM, and both conditions should be avoided when determining therapeutic goals; 3) recently developed guidelines emphasize the avoidance of hypoglycemic episodes in older people, even in the absence of symptoms. In addition, we raise the concern of glycemic variability, and discuss the rationale for the selection of current options in managing this patient population.

Incretin therapies in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment

Renal impairment (RI) is common among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and these patients also experience an age-related decline in renal function. At the same time, treatment options are more limited and treatment is more complex, particularly in patients with moderate or severe RI due to contraindications, need for dose adjustment and/or regular monitoring, and side effects, such as fluid retention and hypoglycemia, which are a more serious concern in this patient population. Incretin therapies, consisting of the injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and the oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are a promising new class of antihyperglycemic drugs. In the overall population, they improve glycemic control in a glucose-dependent manner and are not likely to cause hypoglycemia, representing a clear advantage in at-risk populations. Data regarding use of these agents in renally impaired patients have started to emerge, and the objective of this article is to provide an overview of the currently available data and the potential role of these novel agents in the management of patients with T2DM and RI. Data for the GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with moderate or severe RI are still limited, with no trials dedicated to these populations currently published. In addition, their potential to cause gastrointestinal side effects may limit use in patients with RI due to the risk of dehydration and hypovolemia. The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with moderate or severe RI is therefore, at present, underlying caution and/or restrictions. On the other hand, data from specific trials in patients with moderate or severe RI are now becoming available for most of the DPP-4 inhibitors. These studies demonstrate good efficacy and tolerability of the DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with moderate or severe RI, thus opening a place for these therapies in the treatment of populations with T2DM and RI. Several of the DPP-4 inhibitors are already approved for use in patients with moderate or severe RI, including for those with end-stage renal disease. While discussing the advantages related to their common mechanism of action, this article also describes differences among the DPP-4 inhibitors (eg, related to their pharmacokinetic properties and the available clinical data). In conclusion, while initial data for these new therapies are promising, further experience is needed to fully assess the risk-benefit balance and clinical positioning of these agents in RI populations.

Metformin in chronic kidney disease: time for a rethink

Metformin has traditionally been regarded as contraindicated in chronic kidney disease (CKD), though guidelines in recent years have been relaxed to permit therapy if the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is > 30 mL/min. The main problem is the perceived risk of lactic acidosis (LA). Epidemiological evidence suggests that this fear is disproportionate. Lactic acidosis is a rare complication to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with an incidence of 6/100,000 patient-years. The risk is not increased in metformin-treated patients. Metformin possesses a number of clinical effects independent of glucose reduction, including weight loss, which are beneficial to patients. The risk of death and cardiovascular disease is reduced by about a third in non-CKD patients. Since metformin intoxication undoubtedly causes LA, and metformin is renally excreted, inappropriate dosage of metformin will increase the risk of LA. It is suggested that introduction of metformin therapy to more advanced stages of CKD may bring therapeutic benefits that outweigh the possible risks.

Personalized medicine: risk prediction, targeted therapies and mobile health technology

Personalized medicine is increasingly being employed across many areas of clinical practice, as genes associated with specific diseases are discovered and targeted therapies are developed. Mobile apps are also beginning to be used in medicine with the aim of providing a personalized approach to disease management. In some areas of medicine, patient-tailored risk prediction and treatment are applied routinely in the clinic, whereas in other fields, more work is required to translate scientific advances into individualized treatment. In this forum article, we asked specialists in oncology, neurology, endocrinology and mobile health technology to discuss where we are in terms of personalized medicine, and address their visions for the future and the challenges that remain in their respective fields.

The older patient with diabetes: a practical approach

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is very prevalent among persons aged 60-80 years old. This population is expected to increase in number and is characterized by the presence of comorbidities, long standing diabetes, frailty, high rate of cognitive impairment and limited life expectancy. These characteristics have a significant impact on diabetes and treatment among the elderly, much as diabetes predisposes to these conditions. In this article we will describe mechanisms that may lead to insulin resistance and diabetes among the elderly and also how these conditions contribute to the development of frailty and cognitive impairment. Hypoglycemia and it's consequences are important considerations when planning the treatment of diabetes. Treatment options in light of new goals and the danger of hypoglycemia will be detailed.

Unleash metformin: reconsideration of the contraindication in patients with renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the expanded use of metformin in renal impairment.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database via PubMed, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health were searched in August 2013 and included studies from 1950 onward.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The search included comparative trials, observational cohort studies, and meta-analyses using the terms diabetes mellitus, metformin, renal insufficiency, and acidosis, lactic.

DATA SYNTHESIS

One randomized controlled trial, 1 meta-analysis, 1 case-control, and 3 prospective-cohort studies, representing about 150 000 patients, revealed that metformin is safe in patients with stable mild-moderate renal impairment. The incidence of lactic acidosis is low and similar to sulfonylureas. In addition, reduced risks of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, or any acidosis/serious infection were seen with metformin use in mild-to-moderate renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Data over the past decade refute the historical contraindication in patients with renal impairment and suggest that the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is low in stable mild-to-moderate renal impairment and similar to the risk with other type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) medications with no renal impairment restrictions. Because of its unique impact on microvascular and macrovascular complications, it is advantageous to utilize metformin as the cornerstone in DM2 treatment for as long as possible, including in those patients with mild to moderate stages of renal impairment with no additional contraindications. A dosage reduction is recommended if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is between 30 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and discontinuation if eGFR is <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2).