1
|
Principi N, Bianchini S, Esposito S. Pertussis Epidemiology in Children: The Role of Maternal Immunization. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:1030. [PMID: 39340060 PMCID: PMC11436108 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12091030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2024] [Revised: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last twelve months, a significant global increase in pertussis cases has been observed, particularly among infants under three months of age. This age group is at the highest risk for severe disease, hospitalization, and death. Maternal immunization with the Tdap vaccine during pregnancy has been recommended to protect newborns by transferring maternal antibodies transplacentally. This review examines the current epidemiology of pertussis, the importance of preventing it in young children, and the effectiveness of maternal immunization. Despite the proven benefits of maternal vaccination, which has been found effective in pertussis prevention in up to 90% of cases, coverage remains suboptimal in many countries. Factors contributing to low vaccination rates include vaccine hesitancy due to low trust in health authority assessments, safety concerns, practical barriers to vaccine access, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted routine vaccination services. The recent increase in pertussis cases may also be influenced by the natural cyclic nature of the disease, increased Bordetella pertussis (Bp) activity in older children and adults, and the genetic divergence of circulating Bp strains from vaccine antigens. Given the high efficacy of maternal vaccination in preventing pertussis in infants, increasing coverage rates is crucial. Efforts to improve vaccine uptake should address barriers to access and vaccine hesitancy, ensuring consistent immune protection for the youngest and most vulnerable populations. Enhanced maternal vaccination could significantly reduce the incidence of whooping cough in infants, decreasing related hospitalizations and deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Bianchini
- Pediatric Unit, ASST Santi Carlo e Paolo, 20153 Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Weerdt L, Herzog SA, Van Damme P, Maertens K. Timing of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: Evidence and implementation - A systematic review. Vaccine 2024; 42:126152. [PMID: 39088988 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.07.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy has been introduced in an increasing number of countries to better protect infants against the disease in their first weeks of life. The optimal timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is however still under debate. METHODS We systematically reviewed published literature on safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy related to timing of vaccination. The search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science and yielded 1623 articles, thereof 777 duplicates. Screening resulted in the inclusion of 45 publications reporting on safety (n = 11), immunogenicity (n = 26) and/or effectiveness (n = 9). We also mapped pertussis recommendations in pregnancy by government institutions globally according to the recommended timing of vaccination. RESULTS Overall, the selected publications did not indicate increased safety concerns associated with timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. Immunogenicity studies often suggested optimal protection at birth after early third trimester vaccination. Few studies investigated qualitative antibody characteristics, and none investigated antibody titers in breastmilk or cellular-mediated immunity related to timing of vaccination. Effectiveness studies showed decreased vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. Worldwide, a general recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was found for 58 countries, with as many as 22 different recommended timings registered. CONCLUSION The timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy seems to impact immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness, with optimal immune responses at birth suggested following early third trimester vaccination and reduced vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination suggested compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. However, inconsistent and lacking data are reflected in the divergent national recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy worldwide. SUMMARY Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy aims to protect infants in their first weeks of life. Our review suggests that immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness are impacted by the timing of vaccination in pregnancy. National recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy vary widely worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise De Weerdt
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Sereina A Herzog
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Olson-Chen C, Swamy GK, Gonik B, Forsyth K, Heininger U, Hozbor D, von König CHW, Chitkara AJ, Top KA, Muloiwa R, van der Schyff M, Tan TQ. The current state of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world, with recommendations for improved care: Consensus statements from the Global Pertussis Initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165:860-869. [PMID: 38251722 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bernard Gonik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Forsyth
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Amar J Chitkara
- Department of Pediatrics, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Karina A Top
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rudzani Muloiwa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Malikah van der Schyff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Constantiaberg Mediclinic, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tina Q Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quincer EM, Cranmer LM, Kamidani S. Prenatal Maternal Immunization for Infant Protection: A Review of the Vaccines Recommended, Infant Immunity and Future Research Directions. Pathogens 2024; 13:200. [PMID: 38535543 PMCID: PMC10975994 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13030200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Prenatal maternal immunization is an effective tool to protect mothers and infants from poor health outcomes due to infectious diseases. We provide an overview of the rationale for the use of prenatal vaccines, discuss the immunologic environment of the maternal-fetal interface including the impact of maternal vaccines prenatally and subsequently on the infant's immune response, and review vaccines currently recommended in pregnancy and landscape for the future of maternal vaccination. This review aims to provide an understanding of the recent history and progress made in the field and highlight the importance of continued research and development into new vaccines for pregnant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M. Quincer
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Lisa M. Cranmer
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Satoshi Kamidani
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McCarron SA, Bradley DT, Hart ND. A scoping review of the reasons for and approaches to non-uptake of pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnant women in the United Kingdom and Ireland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:857. [PMID: 38087222 PMCID: PMC10717507 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06171-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis and influenza cause significant morbidity and mortality in pregnancy and the neonatal period. Maternal vaccination in pregnancy would reduce harm, but low vaccine uptake is a concern. This scoping review aimed to understand the reasons for, and approaches, to non-uptake of pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnant women in the UK and Ireland. METHODS The inclusion criteria of this scoping review consist of pregnant women who avail of pertussis and influenza vaccines in the UK and Ireland. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched in June 2021 and updated in October 2022. Searches were limited to English language reports published after 2011. We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance on scoping reviews. Data were extracted and charted. RESULTS Five themes emerged from the literature. Acceptability, as well as organisational and awareness issues, were overarching themes regarding reasons for and approaches to non-uptake of the vaccines respectively. Other themes included healthcare professional factors, information interpretation and pregnancy-related factors. CONCLUSIONS Women need clear, comprehensible information, ideally provided by their healthcare professionals, in a way that is meaningful and addresses their circumstances and risk perceptions. This research will serve as a base for future work that aims behaviour science interventions at the wider pregnant population as well as the target groups that have been identified in this review.
Collapse
|
6
|
Anderson EC, Blair PS, Finn A, Ingram J, Amirthalingam G, Cabral C. Maternal vaccination provision in NHS maternity trusts across England. Vaccine 2023; 41:7359-7368. [PMID: 37951792 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccinations for seasonal influenza and pertussis have been recommended for pregnant women in England since 2010 and 2012, respectively. Uptake rates are suboptimal with large regional variations. To improve uptake, from 2016 onwards maternity trusts were commissioned to offer pertussis (and other) vaccinations in addition to these being available in primary care. Since 2021, Covid-19 vaccination has also been recommended for pregnant women. Overall maternal vaccination rates are routinely available, but not the relative provision by maternity trusts. We aimed to describe the national picture of maternity trust provision of maternal vaccinations, including how the maternity trust vaccination programme has progressed. METHODS Cross-sectional survey plus comparisons with 2017-18 figures for maternity trust provision of pertussis vaccination, and with UKHSA data for total pertussis vaccination. RESULTS Twelve NHS commissioners participated (from 13/06/22 to 31/03/23) providing data for 120 (of a total 124) maternity trusts across England. All 120 (100%) trusts were commissioned to deliver influenza, and 107 (89%) to deliver pertussis vaccinations, though not all actually administered the vaccines; 29% offered Covid-19 vaccinations. For 2021-22 we found a mean of 25% (range 0-81.3%) women were vaccinated for pertussis (a large increase compared with previous estimates for 2017-18); and 11% (range 0-74.2%) for influenza, via their maternity trust. Commissioners reported a negative impact of the pandemic on routine vaccination provision. There was indication of efficiency by vaccinating women attending for other appointments. There are diverse mechanisms for reporting pertussis and influenza vaccinations administered at maternity trusts back to primary care, which may be inefficient for maternity staff workload and accuracy of data transfer (especially for pertussis). CONCLUSION A high proportion of maternity trusts provide both pertussis and influenza vaccinations, despite a negative impact of the pandemic. Reasons for large between-trust variation in vaccination rates should be explored to improve uptake and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Anderson
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Third Floor, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter S Blair
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Third Floor, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
| | - Adam Finn
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Third Floor, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Third Floor, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- UK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR, United Kingdom.
| | - Christie Cabral
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pehlivan T, Dinleyici EC, Kara A, Kurugöl Z, Tezer H, Aksakal NB, Biri A, Azap A. The Present and Future Aspects of Life-Long Pertussis Prevention: Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives for Türkiye. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:2495-2512. [PMID: 37815753 PMCID: PMC10651609 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, remains one of the most widespread, contagious, and vaccine-preventable diseases. It results in notable morbidity and mortality as well as severe medical, social, and economic burden. Despite high global vaccine coverage, pertussis continues to be a significant epidemiologic problem, with outbreak episodes every few years just as in the pre-vaccination era. In Türkiye, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the current burden of pertussis in different age and risk groups, leading to underdiagnosis and underreporting of the disease, especially in adults who are often not considered at risk. Available data from Türkiye also reveal inadequate levels of protective antibodies in preterm newborns, emphasizing the need for additional preventive measures. Authors stated that improving physician awareness of pertussis symptoms in patients with prolonged cough, increasing access to routine pertussis tests, and conducting surveillance studies would aid in accurate diagnosis and reporting in Türkiye. As the Turkish Ministry of Health Antenatal Care Management Guide suggests routine second and third pregnancy check-up visits at weeks 18-24 and 28-32 correspondingly, this period can be considered the ideal vaccination time for Türkiye. Introducing a booster dose of Tdap at around 10 years of age or during national military service would reduce transmission and protect susceptible individuals. Identifying individuals at high risk of severe pertussis and prioritizing them for a booster dose is also crucial in Türkiye. Enhancing surveillance systems, increasing healthcare professionals' awareness through training, and organizing catch-up visits for missed vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic are mentioned as additional strategies to improve pertussis prevention in Türkiye. This review focuses on the global and regional burden of pertussis and obstacles to effective prevention and evaluates existing strategies to achieve lifelong pertussis prevention. Literature and current strategies were also discussed from a Turkish national standpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Pehlivan
- Public Health, Remedium Consulting Group, Izmir, Türkiye.
| | - Ener Cagri Dinleyici
- Department of Pediatrics, Eskisehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye
| | - Ateş Kara
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Zafer Kurugöl
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Hasan Tezer
- Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Nur Baran Aksakal
- Department of Public Health, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Aydan Biri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Koru Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Alpay Azap
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clark LR, Johnson DR. Safety and Clinical Benefits of Adacel ® and Adacel ®-Polio Vaccination in Pregnancy: A Structured Literature Review. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:1955-2003. [PMID: 37653123 PMCID: PMC10505126 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00847-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination in pregnancy using a tetanus toxoid, reduced dose diphtheria toxoid, and reduced dose acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is important for prevention of severe pertussis disease in young infants. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to search for original research studies evaluating the vaccine effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of Adacel®/Adacel-Polio® used during pregnancy to prevent pertussis disease in young infants. Medical databases used included EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Chemical Abstracts, with search terms related to pregnancy, vaccines/immunization, safety, pertussis, effectiveness/efficacy, and immune response; other potentially eligible reports were included where applicable. Search results were restricted to literature published from 1 January 1995 to 26 July 2021. A total of 2021 articles and 4 other reports were identified for primary review. A total of 49 publications qualified for inclusion after primary and secondary reviews. Effectiveness studies of Adacel or Adacel-Polio given in pregnancy consistently showed high levels of protection from pertussis disease in the newborn (vaccine effectiveness: 91-93%). In immunogenicity studies, the response in pregnant women was consistent with that of non-pregnant women. Infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio in pregnancy had higher anti-pertussis antibody levels at birth and at 2 months of age compared to infants born to women vaccinated with comparator vaccines, placebo, or those not vaccinated during pregnancy. There was evidence of a slightly decreased response to primary pertussis vaccination in infants of mothers vaccinated with Adacel or Adacel-Polio, but this was not thought to be clinically significant. In safety studies, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination was well tolerated by pregnant woman and not associated with pregnancy, postpartum, or neonatal complications. In conclusion, Adacel or Adacel-Polio vaccination in pregnancy is highly effective in protecting young infants from pertussis disease, with a favorable safety profile for both pregnant women and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana R Clark
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA.
| | - David R Johnson
- Global Medical, Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, 18370, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Puthanakit T, Chokephaibulkit K, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Bhat N, Tang Y, Anugulruengkitt S, Chayachinda C, Anuwutnavin S, Lapphra K, Rungmaitree S, Tawan M, Andi-Lolo I, Holt R, Fortuna L, Kerdsomboon C, Yuwaree V, Mansouri S, Thai PH, Innis BL. A phase 2 randomized controlled dose-ranging trial of recombinant pertussis booster vaccines containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin in pregnant women. Vaccine 2023; 41:4541-4553. [PMID: 37330371 PMCID: PMC10267846 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite a decrease in infections caused by Bordetella pertussis due to COVID-19 pandemic, booster vaccination of pregnant women is still recommended to protect newborns. Highly immunogenic vaccines containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin (PTgen) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) may generate comparable anti-PT antibody concentrations, even at lower doses, to chemically inactivated acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdapchem) shown effective for maternal immunization. METHODS This phase 2 randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted in healthy Thai pregnant women randomly assigned to receive one dose of low-dose recombinant pertussis-only vaccine containing 1 µg PTgen and 1 µg FHA (ap1gen), or tetanus, reduced-dose diphtheria combined with ap1gen (Tdap1gen), or combined with 2 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (Tdap2gen), or with 5 µg PTgen and 5 µg FHA (TdaP5gen, Boostagen®) or comparator containing 8 µg of chemically inactivated pertussis toxoid, 8 µg FHA, and 2.5 µg pertactin (Boostrix™, Tdap8chem). Blood was collected at Day 0 and Day 28 post-vaccination. The non-inferiority of the study vaccines was assessed based on anti-PT IgG antibody levels on Day 28 pooled with results from a similarly structured previous trial in non-pregnant women. RESULTS 400 healthy pregnant women received one dose of vaccine. Combined with data from 250 non-pregnant women, all study vaccines containing PTgen were non-inferior to comparator vaccine (Tdap8chem). Both ap1gen and TdaP5gen vaccines could be considered to have superior immunogenicity to Tdap8chem. Local and systemic solicited reactions were similar among all vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine formulations containing PTgen were safe and immunogenic in pregnant women. The ap1gen vaccine, with the lowest cost and reactogenicity, may be suitable for use in pregnant women when diphtheria and tetanus toxoids are not needed. This study is registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (www. CLINICALTRIALS in.th), number TCTR20180725004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanyawee Puthanakit
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit
- Siriraj Institute of Clinical Research (SICRES) Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Niranjan Bhat
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Yuxiao Tang
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Suvaporn Anugulruengkitt
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Chenchit Chayachinda
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Sanitra Anuwutnavin
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Keswadee Lapphra
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Supattra Rungmaitree
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Monta Tawan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Indah Andi-Lolo
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Renee Holt
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| | - Librada Fortuna
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand.
| | - Chawanee Kerdsomboon
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Vilasinee Yuwaree
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Souad Mansouri
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Pham Hong Thai
- BioNet-Asia Co., Ltd., 19 Soi Udomsuk 37, Sukhumvit 103 Road, Bangjak, Prakanong, Bangkok 10260, Thailand
| | - Bruce L Innis
- PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martin Aispuro P, Bottero D, Zurita ME, Gaillard ME, Hozbor DF. Impact of maternal whole-cell or acellular pertussis primary immunization on neonatal immune response. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1192119. [PMID: 37435078 PMCID: PMC10330814 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1192119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
With the introduction of pertussis immunization for pregnant women in many countries, there has been renewed interest in the impact of whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP) versus acellular vaccine (aP) on disease control, particularly regarding the best approach for priming. To gather evidence on this topic, we analyzed the impact of aP or wP priming on aP vaccination during pregnancy (aPpreg) in mice. Two-mother vaccination schemes were employed (wP-wP-aPpreg and aP-aP-aPpreg), and the immune response in the mothers and their offspring, as well as the protection of the offspring against Bordetella pertussis challenge, were assessed. Pertussis toxin (PTx)-specific IgG responses were detected in mothers after both the second and third doses, with higher titers after the third dose, regardless of the vaccination schedule. However, a significant reduction in PTx-IgG levels was observed after 22 weeks post aPpreg immunization in mothers with the aP-aP-aPpreg scheme but not in the wP-wP-aPpreg immunized mothers. The aP-aP-aPpreg schedule triggered a murine antibody response mainly to a Th2-profile, while wP-wP-aPpreg induced a Th1/Th2 mixed profile. Both immunization schemes administered to the mothers protected the offspring against pertussis, but the wP-wP-aPpreg vaccination conferred offspring protection in all pregnancies at least up to 20 weeks after receiving the aPpreg-dose. In contrast, the immunity induced by aP-aP-aPpreg began to decline in births that occurred 18 weeks after receiving the aPpreg dose. For the aP-aP-aPpreg scheme, pups born from gestations furthest from aPpreg (+22 weeks) had lower PTx-specific IgG levels than those born closer to the application of the dose during pregnancy. In contrast, for pups born to wP-wP-aPpreg vaccinated mothers, the PTx-specific IgG levels were maintained over time, even for those born at the longest time studied (+22 weeks). It is noteworthy that only the pups born from mothers with aP-aP-aPpreg and receiving a neonatal dose of either aP or wP were more susceptible to B. pertussis infection than mice with only maternal immunity, suggesting interference with the induced immunity (p<0.05). However, it should be noted that mice with maternal immunity, whether vaccinated or not with neonatal doses, are better protected against colonization with B. pertussis than mice without maternal immunity but vaccinated with aP or wP.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ciapponi A, Berrueta M, P K Parker E, Bardach A, Mazzoni A, Anderson SA, Argento FJ, Ballivian J, Bok K, Comandé D, Goucher E, Kampmann B, Munoz FM, Rodriguez Cairoli F, Santa María V, Stergachis AS, Voss G, Xiong X, Zamora N, Zaraa S, Buekens PM. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2023; 41:3688-3700. [PMID: 37012114 PMCID: PMC10040368 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of COVID-19 vaccines safety during pregnancy is urgently needed. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, including their components and technological platforms used in other vaccines during pregnancy and animal studies to complement direct evidence. We searched literature databases from its inception to September 2021 without language restriction, COVID-19 vaccine websites, and reference lists of other systematic reviews and the included studies. Pairs of reviewers independently selected, data extracted, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. (PROSPERO CRD42021234185). RESULTS We retrieved 8,837 records from the literature search; 71 studies were included, involving 17,719,495 pregnant persons and 389 pregnant animals. Most studies (94%) were conducted in high-income countries, were cohort studies (51%), and 15% were classified as high risk of bias. We identified nine COVID-19 vaccine studies, seven involving 309,164 pregnant persons, mostly exposed to mRNA vaccines. Among non-COVID-19 vaccines, the most frequent exposures were AS03 and aluminum-based adjuvants. A meta-analysis of studies that adjusted for potential confounders showed no association with adverse outcomes, regardless of the vaccine or the trimester of vaccination. Neither the reported rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes nor reactogenicity exceeded expected background rates, which was the case for ASO3- or aluminum-adjuvanted non-COVID-19 vaccines in the proportion meta-analyses of uncontrolled studies/arms. The only exception was postpartum hemorrhage after COVID-19 vaccination (10.40%; 95% CI: 6.49-15.10%), reported by two studies; however, the comparison with non-exposed pregnant persons, available for one study, found non-statistically significant differences (adjusted OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.56-2.12). Animal studies showed consistent results with studies in pregnant persons. CONCLUSION We found no safety concerns for currently administered COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Additional experimental and real-world evidence could enhance vaccination coverage. Robust safety data for non-mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Ciapponi
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Edward P K Parker
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Agustina Mazzoni
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Steven A Anderson
- US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
| | - Fernando J Argento
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Jamile Ballivian
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Karin Bok
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Daniel Comandé
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Erin Goucher
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
| | - Beate Kampmann
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Vaccines & Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, the Gambia; Charité Centre for Global Health, Universitätsmedizin Charité Berlin, Germany.
| | - Flor M Munoz
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Federico Rodriguez Cairoli
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Victoria Santa María
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Andy S Stergachis
- School of Pharmacy and School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, BOX 357631, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Gerald Voss
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Xu Xiong
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Natalia Zamora
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Sabra Zaraa
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Pierre M Buekens
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Immink MM, van Zoonen K, Jager NM, Pluijmaekers AJM, de Melker HE, van der Maas NAT, Bekker MN. Maternal vaccination against pertussis as part of the national immunization program: a qualitative evaluation among obstetric care providers one year after the implementation in December 2019. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:311. [PMID: 36998072 PMCID: PMC10062680 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09274-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization of pregnant women with a tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is an effective and safe way to protect infants from pertussis before their primary vaccinations. Vaccine uptake among pregnant women is influenced by their care providers' attitudes toward maternal vaccination. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the maternal Tdap vaccination under the National Immunization Program of the Netherlands from the perspective of obstetric care providers. METHODS In this qualitative and explorative study, we conducted in-depth interviews by telephone with obstetric care providers who were selected from a pool of respondents (convenience sampling) to a questionnaire in a previous study. The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide that covered three aspects of the implementation strategy: providers' overall experience with the implementation of maternal Tdap vaccination in the Netherlands; implementation logistics and counseling, and pregnant women referrals to municipal Youth Healthcare Centers. The interviews were recorded, pseudonymized and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed according to the Thematic Analysis approach by two researchers independently in two phases of iterative coding, categorizing, reviewing and redefining until ultimately, emergent themes regarding maternal Tdap vaccination implementation were identified. RESULTS Interviews with 11 midwives and 5 OB-GYN physicians yielded 5 major themes regarding the Tdap vaccination implementation strategy: challenges throughout the implementation process, views on maternal Tdap vaccination, general versus tailored counseling, provider responsibilities in vaccine promotion, and impact of materials for information delivery. Participants indicated that to improve provider attitudes toward Tdap vaccination, its implementation requires clear and transparent information about what is entailed, i.e., what is expected from obstetric care providers, how they can obtain information, and when their actions must be initiated. Participants demanded involvement throughout the implementation planning process. They preferred tailored communication with pregnant women over a generalized approach. CONCLUSION This study emphasized the importance of involving all relevant healthcare professionals in planning the implementation of maternal Tdap vaccination. Possible barriers perceived by these professionals should be taken into account in order to improve their attitudes toward vaccination, thus to increase uptake among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands.
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Kim van Zoonen
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Nina M Jager
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Anne J M Pluijmaekers
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven, 3720 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maertens K, Orije MRP, Huoi C, Boisnard F, Lyabis O. Immunogenicity of a liquid hexavalent DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine after primary and booster vaccination of term and preterm infants born to women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy. Vaccine 2023; 41:795-804. [PMID: 36528443 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination during pregnancy with tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (aP) (Tdap) antigens is important for early protection of newborn infants against pertussis, particularly for preterm infants. This study evaluated the effect of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on the immunogenicity of a diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), aP, inactivated poliovirus (IPV), hepatitis B (HB), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP ∼ T) vaccine in term and preterm populations. METHODS A prospective, observational study (NCT02511327) recruited women and their infants based on delivery (term or preterm) and vaccination status (vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine [Boostrix™, GlaxoSmithKline] during pregnancy or not vaccinated in the last 5 years). All infants received licensed DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T (Hexyon™, Sanofi) (8, 12, 16 week primary series and booster at 13 months of age [preterm infants] or 15 months of age [term infants]). Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays. Data were pooled into term (N = 127) and preterm infants (N = 105), and infants of women who received a Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (N = 199) or not (N = 33). RESULTS Before primary vaccination, antibody levels were higher for term than preterm infants for anti-D, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP, and similar for anti-HBs and anti-T. At this time, infants of Tdap-vaccinated women had higher anti-D, anti-T, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP antibody levels than infants of Tdap-unvaccinated women; anti-HBs and anti-polio antibody levels were similar in both groups. Post-primary, pre-booster, and post-booster, there were only small differences in seroprotection rates (anti-D, anti-T, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-HBs, anti-PRP) and seroconversion rates (anti-PT, anti-FHA), except for anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥ 0.15 µg/mL post-primary vaccination (higher for term [98.31 % and 90.91 %, respectively] versus preterm infants [89.80 % and 79.41 %, respectively]). CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T vaccine for primary and booster vaccination in term and preterm born infants and in infants born to Tdap-vaccinated or Tdap-unvaccinated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - M R P Orije
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Basov AA, Zhernov YV, Kashutina MI, Kashkovskaya NN, Kombarova SY, Enilenis II, Severova LP, Fadeeva IA, Vysochanskaya SO, Belova EV, Shashina EA, Makarova VV, Shcherbakov DV, Skopin AY, Mitrokhin OV. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis immunity among healthcare professionals and pregnant women in the Moscow region, Russian federation: A preliminary cross-sectional study. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1043707. [PMID: 36896403 PMCID: PMC9989173 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1043707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite more than 50 years of primary immunization against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus in Russia, complicated illnesses, including fatal ones, still occur. The goal of this preliminary cross-sectional study is to see how well pregnant women and healthcare workers are protected against diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus. The required sample size (pregnant women and healthcare professionals, as well as pregnant women of two age categories) for this preliminary cross-sectional study was calculated using a confidence value of 0.95 and a probability of 0.05. The required number of participants in each group calculated sample size must be at least 59 people. In the Moscow region (Solnechnogorsk city, Russia), a cross-sectional study of pregnant patients and healthcare professionals interacting with children regularly as part of their job from numerous medical organizations was conducted in the year 2021 (n = 655). Antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis toxoids and microorganisms were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The STATISTICA and IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 were used to process the study results statistically. Descriptive statistics methods, the Mann-Whitney U-test, discriminant analysis with the stepwise selection and analysis of ROC-curves were applied. IgG against diphtheria was found in 99.5% of pregnant women, tetanus in 91.5%, and pertussis in only 36.5%. According to the results of the discriminant analysis, the value of IgG to pertussis is linked to the value of IgA to pertussis and the gestational periods. Immunity to diphtheria was discovered in 99.1% of medical personnel, tetanus in 96.9%, and pertussis in 43.9%, no significant variations with age. When comparing the levels of immunity of pregnant women and healthcare professionals, it was shown that healthcare workers have greater levels of immunity against diphtheria and tetanus. The novel contribution of this study is that it will reveal the proportion of those vulnerable to pertussis, diphtheria, and tetanus among health workers and pregnant women in all age groups under the current national immunization program in Russia. Considering the data obtained from the preliminary cross-sectional study, we believe that it is necessary to conduct a full-scale study on a larger sample and, based on that, make certain changes to the national immunization program in Russia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem A Basov
- Diphtheria and Pertussis Surveillance Laboratory, G.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia.,Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Yury V Zhernov
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Center of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.,Center for Medical Anthropology, N.N. Miklukho-Maclay Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria I Kashutina
- Department of Diagnostics and Treatment of Diseases of the Breast and Reproductive System No 2, Women's Health Clinic - Mammological Center, Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Healthcare Promotion, National Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Therapy, Clinical Pharmacology and Emergency Medicine, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia N Kashkovskaya
- Diphtheria and Pertussis Surveillance Laboratory, G.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Yu Kombarova
- Diphtheria and Pertussis Surveillance Laboratory, G.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Inga I Enilenis
- M.I. Perelman Department of Phthisiopulmonology and Thoracic Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Lyudmila P Severova
- M.I. Perelman Department of Phthisiopulmonology and Thoracic Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Inna A Fadeeva
- Department of English Language, Institute of World Economy, Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sonya O Vysochanskaya
- Diphtheria and Pertussis Surveillance Laboratory, G.N. Gabrichevsky Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, Russia.,Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena V Belova
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina A Shashina
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Valentina V Makarova
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis V Shcherbakov
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Yu Skopin
- Department of Scientific Support for Laboratory Research of Products and Environment Objects, F.F. Erisman Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene of Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, Moscow Region, Mytishchi, Russia
| | - Oleg V Mitrokhin
- Department of General Hygiene, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gebeyehu NA, Asmare Adela G, Dagnaw Tegegne K, Birhan Assfaw B. Vaccination dropout among children in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2145821. [PMID: 36459433 PMCID: PMC9762788 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2145821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization is cost-effective preventive strategy for child morbidity and mortality. PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Science Direct, and online institutional repository homes were searched. Data were extracted by Microsoft excel. Begg's rank test, and Egger's regression test was done. A pooled prevalence, Sub-group analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were conducted. A total of 12 articles were included in this study. The pooled prevalence of vaccination dropout was 26.06% (95% CI: 11.59, 30.53), I2 =91.2%. In sub-group analysis, Nigeria had the highest prevalence of immunization dropouts (33.59%). It was 18.01% and 29.25%, respectively, for published and unpublished research. Community-based studies and institutional-based studies also yield a prevalence of dropout 39.04% and 13.73% respectively. Dropout rate was 22.66% for sample sizes under 500 and 18.01% for sample sizes beyond 500. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of vaccination dropout was high. Community education about vaccinations importance should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia,CONTACT Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolaita Sodo University, 02, My street, Sodo 138, Ethiopia
| | - Getachew Asmare Adela
- Department of Reproductive Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Kirubel Dagnaw Tegegne
- Department of Comprehensive Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Belete Birhan Assfaw
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Szwejser-Zawislak E, Wilk MM, Piszczek P, Krawczyk J, Wilczyńska D, Hozbor D. Evaluation of Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines in the Context of Long-Term Herd Immunity. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 11:vaccines11010001. [PMID: 36679846 PMCID: PMC9863224 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
After the pertussis vaccine had been introduced in the 1940s and was shown to be very successful in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease, the possibility of improving both vaccine composition and vaccination schedules has become the subject of continuous interest. As a result, we are witnessing a considerable heterogeneity in pertussis vaccination policies, which remains beyond universal consensus. Many pertussis-related deaths still occur in low- and middle-income countries; however, these deaths are attributable to gaps in vaccination coverage and limited access to healthcare in these countries, rather than to the poor efficacy of the first generation of pertussis vaccine consisting in inactivated and detoxified whole cell pathogen (wP). In many, particularly high-income countries, a switch was made in the 1990s to the use of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, to reduce the rate of post-vaccination adverse events and thereby achieve a higher percentage of children vaccinated. However the epidemiological data collected over the past few decades, even in those high-income countries, show an increase in pertussis prevalence and morbidity rates, triggering a wide-ranging debate on the causes of pertussis resurgence and the effectiveness of current pertussis prevention strategies, as well as on the efficacy of available pertussis vaccines and immunization schedules. The current article presents a systematic review of scientific reports on the evaluation of the use of whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines, in the context of long-term immunity and vaccines efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Szwejser-Zawislak
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Mieszko M. Wilk
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Piszczek
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Justyna Krawczyk
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Daria Wilczyńska
- Institute of Biotechnology of Serums and Vaccines Biomed, Al. Sosnowa 8, 30-224 Krakow, Poland
| | - Daniela Hozbor
- VacSal Laboratory, Institute of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, National University of La Plata (UNLP), National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), La Plata 1900, Argentina
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vaccination in Pregnancy against Pertussis: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10121990. [PMID: 36560400 PMCID: PMC9786323 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10121990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants are at high risk for severe morbidity and mortality from pertussis disease during early infancy. Vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy has emerged as the ideal strategy to protect infants during these early, vulnerable, first months of life. On 30 November and 1 December 2021, the Global Pertussis Initiative held a meeting that aimed to discuss and review the most up-to-date scientific literature supporting vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy and outstanding scientific questions. Herein, we review the current and historically published literature and summarize the findings as consensus statements on vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy on behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative.
Collapse
|
18
|
López García-Franco A, Baeyens Fernández JA, Iglesias Piñeiro MJ, Alonso Coello P, Ruiz Cabello C, Pereira Iglesias A, Landa Goñi J. [Preventive activities in women. PAPPS update 2022]. Aten Primaria 2022; 54 Suppl 1:102471. [PMID: 36435585 PMCID: PMC9705224 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In the 2022 PAPPS update we present those specific preventive activities for women's health, except those related to cancer prevention (which are included in another document) and those aspects related to differential gender morbidity, a cross-cutting aspect for all working groups. Contraception is an essential preventive activity, considering basic the right to decide both the number of children and the time to have them. We must inform about the possible contraceptive methods, guaranteeing the monitoring of their safety, efficacy and effectiveness (tables are included on changing from one method to another to preserve contraceptive protection). We must inform about emergency contraception and propose it in the event of unprotected intercourse. All this will be done through opportunistic screening without requiring screening for thrombophilia or dyslipidemia, but for arterial hypertension. Pregnancy is an important life experience and the family doctor should not remain oblivious. We must be competent both in the preconception consultation (recommending the intake of folic acid, avoiding exposure to occupational and environmental risks, screening for certain pathologies and assessing the intake of drugs not indicated during pregnancy) and in the monitoring of pregnancy. Whether or not we monitor the pregnancy, we must not disregard its control, taking advantage of this period to promote healthy lifestyles and participating in the intercurrent processes that may occur. Menopause in general and osteoporosis in particular exemplify the strategy of medicalization of vital processes that has been followed from different instances and organizations. In our update we address the prevention and treatment of symptoms secondary to estrogen deprivation. We also propose the prevention of osteoporosis, including carrying out densitometry based on the risk of fracture in the next 10 years, and therefore densitometric screening is not recommended in women under 60 years of age. In risk assessment we recommend the use of the frax tool or better, the calibration of the risk of hip fracture with prevalence data from our setting. We linked the indication for treatment with the Z-Score (bone mineral density compared with women of the same age), as it is a condition associated with aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pablo Alonso Coello
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (CIBERESP-IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, España
| | - Cristina Ruiz Cabello
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Consultorio Castilléjar, zona básica de Benamaurel, Granada, España
| | - Ana Pereira Iglesias
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Dr. Mendiguchía Carriche, Leganés, Madrid, España
| | - Jacinta Landa Goñi
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Emisora, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cairns A, Hogan J, Mackillop L. Vaccinations in pregnancy. OBSTETRICS, GYNAECOLOGY & REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE 2022; 32:163-171. [PMID: 35702629 PMCID: PMC9181831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Vaccinations are a cost-effective means of preventing disease. They may be recommended primarily for maternal benefit or for prevention of intrauterine fetal or early neonatal infection. Data from the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems relating to the COVID-19 pandemic showed that for all countries studied (the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Italy), at least 80% of pregnant women admitted to critical care were unvaccinated. In the UK this figure was 98%. The MBRRACE-UK 2014 report, covering 2009–2012 during the H1N1 epidemic, demonstrated that one in eleven maternal mortalities were directly from influenza virus: more than half could have been prevented by the flu vaccine in pregnancy. Research is ongoing to develop additional vaccines for infections that cause detrimental effects to pregnant women and their infants. Theoretical concerns regarding adverse effects to the fetus and lack of efficacy have, in general, not been confirmed by clinical evidence. Nevertheless, live attenuated vaccines remain contraindicated due to risk of fetal infection. As with any clinical decision, advice on antenatal vaccination should be based on the balance of risks and benefits to mother and fetus. This article aims to guide such decisions by discussing the issues surrounding commonly used vaccines and presenting current UK guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Cairns
- , Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant Obstetric Physician, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK. Conflicts of interest: LM is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is a part-time employee and shareholder of Sensyne Health plc
| | - Jennifer Hogan
- , Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant Obstetric Physician, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK. Conflicts of interest: LM is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is a part-time employee and shareholder of Sensyne Health plc
| | - Lucy Mackillop
- , Subspecialty Trainee in Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Conflicts of interest: none declared
- , Consultant Obstetric Physician, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK. Conflicts of interest: LM is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is a part-time employee and shareholder of Sensyne Health plc
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hattabi H, Bouchez C, Dubos F, Martinot A, Faure K, Dessein R, Bartolo S, Subtil D. [Should French pregnant women be vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy?]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2022; 50:486-493. [PMID: 35483610 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Many countries with a high perinatal level have started a policy of vaccination of pregnant women against pertussis. To date, France has not chosen this policy. The objective was to review knowledge on pertussis mortality in infants. Compare the strategies available to protect the infant before his first vaccination, scheduled for two months of age. We proceeded to a litterature analysis, from January 1998 to 2021. Search by the following keywords used ; "Whooping cough, vaccination, pregnancy, strategy, cocooning", on the scientific basis of "Pubmed", as well as French and foreign vaccination recommendations. Currently 90% of whooping cough deaths are concerning infants under six months of age and this mortality represents 2% of mortality in the first year of life. Vaccination at birth is not effective. The cocooning strategy, which consists of vaccinating those around the child, is expensive and difficult to implement. A systematic vaccination policy for pregnant women is effective and reasonably expensive when compared to the cocooning strategy. In England, it was recently accompanied by a 78% reduction in confirmed cases of pertussis in infants under six months of age. In conclusion, compared to cocooning strategy, pertussis vaccination of pregnant women appears more effective and cost-effective, and this with each pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Hattabi
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle femme mère nouveau-né, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - C Bouchez
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle femme mère nouveau-né, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France
| | - F Dubos
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle enfant, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, EA 2694, METRICS, Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales. CHU Lille, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France
| | - A Martinot
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle enfant, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, EA 2694, METRICS, Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales. CHU Lille, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France
| | - K Faure
- University Lille, CHU Lille, service de maladies infectieuses, rue Michel Polonowski, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, EA7366, recherche translationnelle relation hôte-pathogènes, faculté de médecine pôle recherche, 59045 Lille, France
| | - R Dessein
- University Lille, EA7366, recherche translationnelle relation hôte-pathogènes, faculté de médecine pôle recherche, 59045 Lille, France
| | - S Bartolo
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle femme mère nouveau-né, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, EA 2694, METRICS, Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales. CHU Lille, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France
| | - D Subtil
- University Lille, CHU Lille, pôle femme mère nouveau-né, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, EA 2694, METRICS, Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales. CHU Lille, hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Flu and pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Geneva during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicentric, prospective, survey-based study. Vaccine 2022; 40:3455-3460. [PMID: 35534311 PMCID: PMC9076028 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
22
|
González-López JJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Álvarez García FJ, Campins M, Garcés-Sánchez M, Gil-Prieto R, Grande-Tejada AM. Epidemiology, prevention and control of pertussis in Spain: New vaccination strategies for lifelong protection. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 40:195-203. [PMID: 35473991 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Pertussis is a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable respiratory tract infection, with high morbidity and mortality and a particularly severe effect on newborns and infants under 2 months. The first pertussis vaccines were introduced in the 1940s. Since 1980, however, the incidence of cases has risen despite the extensive vaccination programmes and antibiotic adjuvant treatments available. Transition from the use of whole-cell vaccines to acellular vaccines and the antigenic modifications of Bordetella pertussis have contributed, among other factors, to a reduction in vaccine-acquired immunity and reemergence of the disease. Today, there are still unmet needs not covered by conventional prevention measures and existing antibiotic treatments. This review aims to update the available data, and to discuss which vaccine strategies might contribute to better disease control and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José González-López
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Francisco José Álvarez García
- Pediatrics, Centro de Salud de Llanera, Asturias, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Gil-Prieto
- Department of Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pointon L, Howe AS, Hobbs M, Paynter J, Gauld N, Turner N, Willing E. Evidence of suboptimal maternal vaccination coverage in pregnant New Zealand women and increasing inequity over time: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Vaccine 2022; 40:2150-2160. [PMID: 35248420 PMCID: PMC9352189 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Adequate maternal vaccination coverage is critical for the prevention and control of infectious disease outbreaks such as pertussis, influenza, and more recently COVID-19. To guide efforts to increase vaccination coverage this study examined the extent of vaccination coverage in pregnant New Zealand women over time by area-level deprivation and ethnicity. Methods A retrospective cohort study was used consisting of all pregnant women who delivered between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, using administrative health datasets. Outcomes were defined as receipt of influenza or pertussis vaccination in any one of the relevant data sources (National Immunisation Register, Proclaims, or Pharmaceutical collection) during their eligible pregnancy. Ethnicity was prioritised as Māori (NZ indigenous), Pacific, Asian, and Other or NZ European and deprivation was defined using New Zealand Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). Results Between 2013 and 2018, Asian women had the highest maternal vaccination coverage (36%) for pertussis, while Māori and Pacific women had the lowest, 13% and 15% respectively. Coverage of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in low deprivation Māori women was 24% and 28% in Pacific women. This is in comparison to 30% and 25% in high deprivation Asian and European/Other women, respectively. Similar trends were seen for influenza. Conclusion Between 2013 and 2018 maternal vaccination coverage increased for pertussis and influenza. Despite this coverage remains suboptimal, and existing ethnic and deprivation inequities increased. There is an urgent need to focus on equity, to engage and support ethic communities by creating genuinely accessible, culturally appropriate health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Pointon
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anna S Howe
- School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Matthew Hobbs
- School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand; GeoHealth Laboratory, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Janine Paynter
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Natalie Gauld
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nikki Turner
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Esther Willing
- Kōhatu - Centre for Hauora Māori, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ralph KM, Dorey RB, Rowe R, Jones CE. Improving uptake of vaccines in pregnancy: A service evaluation of an antenatal vaccination clinic at a tertiary hospital in the UK. Midwifery 2021; 105:103222. [PMID: 34965498 PMCID: PMC8639287 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background Vaccination against pertussis and seasonal influenza is recommended for all pregnant women in the UK. More recently COVID-19 vaccination has also been offered to women in pregnancy. Objectives To evaluate the uptake of vaccines in pregnant women within a midwife-led immunisation clinic and to assess factors influencing pregnant women's decisions about accepting vaccination. Methods Uptake of vaccines amongst pregnant women referred to a single UK centre for antenatal care between 01/01/19 and 02/10/19 was assessed. Interviews with 20 pregnant women explored views of antenatal vaccination and experiences of the vaccination service. Findings Amongst 4420 women, uptake was 90.6% for pertussis and 78.8% for influenza vaccines. Factors influencing vaccine-related decision-making amongst 20 interviewed women were: healthcare professional recommendation, perceived susceptibility and risk of infection, and previous experience of vaccination and vaccine-preventable disease. Conclusions and Implications for Practice Uptake of pertussis and influenza vaccines within a secondary care immunisation service was higher than the national or regional average. The model of vaccine delivery was associated with high levels of satisfaction. This model of vaccine delivery could be implemented elsewhere to increase vaccine uptake, and should be considered for delivery of COVID-19 vaccines in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Mi Ralph
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert B Dorey
- NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Rebecca Rowe
- Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Christine E Jones
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Switzer C, Tikhonov I, Khromava A, Pool V, Lévesque LE. Safety and use of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis-5 (Tdap5) vaccine during pregnancy: findings from 11 years of reporting to a pregnancy registry. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:5325-5333. [PMID: 34965196 PMCID: PMC8903913 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1915038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The "Adacel (Tdap5) Pregnancy Registry" was used to identify 1182 women who received the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis [5 components] (Tdap5) vaccine during pregnancy from 2005 to 2016. To evaluate the safety and use of prenatal Tdap5, we calculated the rate of maternal, obstetrical, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following Tdap5 pregnancy exposure and assessed vaccine uptake by year and trimester of exposure. The most commonly reported maternal adverse events included injection site reactions (2.6%; 95% Confidence Interval 1.8%, 3.7%), nervous system events (1.3%; 0.8%, 2.1%) and musculoskeletal events (1.1%; 0.6%, 1.9%). The most commonly reported complications of pregnancy were hypertension/preeclampsia (5.5%; 3.3%, 8.9%) and gestational diabetes (2.5%; 1.1%, 5.3%), while those for labor and delivery were premature labor (2.9%; 1.4%, 5.7%) and premature membrane rupture (1.5%; 0.4%, 3.8%). These rates were similar to, or lower than those reported for the general population of pregnant women. Among pregnancies with known birth outcomes (N = 275), 90.4% (86.2%, 93.4%) resulted in a live birth, 5.9% (3.6%, 9.5%) in spontaneous abortion, 3.0% (1.4%, 5.8%) in stillbirth, and 0.7% (0.0%, 2.8%) in ectopic pregnancies. Most newborns had normal APGAR scores and birth weights (98.1% and 93.0%, respectively), and only two reported a congenital anomaly (0.7%; 0.0%, 2.8%). An influx of reports in 2012 with third trimester Tdap5 exposure coincided with the 2012 updated Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations. This analysis did not identify any safety concerns across the continuum of maternal, obstetrical, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in women who received Tdap5 vaccination during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Switzer
- Global Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilia Tikhonov
- Global Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alena Khromava
- Epidemiology and Benefit-Risk, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vitali Pool
- Medical Affairs, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA
| | - Linda E. Lévesque
- Epidemiology and Benefit-Risk, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nooney J, Thor S, de Vries C, Clements J, Sahin L, Hua W, Everett D, Zaccaria C, Ball R, Saint‐Raymond A, Yao L, Raine J, Kweder S. Assuring Access to Safe Medicines in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 110:941-945. [PMID: 33615448 PMCID: PMC8518426 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Scientists and regulators in Europe and the United States continue to seek methods and strategies to improve knowledge on rational use of medicines for pregnant and breastfeeding populations, an important subset of women's health. Regulatory agencies have made strides toward improvement, but much more is needed. Recognizing the importance of international collaboration, we have begun to consider how to address these important public health issues more globally. The health of the child begins with the health of the mother.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Nooney
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyLondonUK
| | - Shannon Thor
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | | | - John Clements
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyLondonUK
| | - Leyla Sahin
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | - Wei Hua
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | | | | | - Robert Ball
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | | | - Lynne Yao
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| | - June Raine
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyLondonUK
| | - Sandra Kweder
- US Food and Drug AdministrationSilver SpringMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rice TF, Diavatopoulos DA, Guo Y, Donaldson B, Bouqueau M, Bosanquet A, Barnett S, Holder B, Kampmann B. Modification of innate immune responses to Bordetella pertussis in babies from pertussis vaccinated pregnancies. EBioMedicine 2021; 72:103612. [PMID: 34649076 PMCID: PMC8517834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis, inactivated polio (Tdap-IPV) vaccines administered during pregnancy protect young infants from Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) infection. Whilst the impact of maternal Tdap-IPV vaccination on infants' humoral response to subsequent pertussis immunisation has been investigated, little is known about any impact on innate responses. METHODS We investigated the immune response to B. pertussis in mothers and infants from Tdap-IPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnancies, utilising a whole blood assay and flow cytometric phenotyping of neonatal natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes and dendritic cells. Blood was collected from mother and umbilical cord at birth, and from infants at seven weeks (one week pre-primary pertussis immunisation) and five months of age (one month post-primary pertussis immunisation). 21 mothers and 67 infants were studied. FINDINGS Vaccinated women had elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine responses to B. pertussis. At birth, babies of vaccinated women had elevated IL-2 and IL-12 responses, elevated classical monocyte proportions, and reduced monocyte and NK cell cytokine responses. The elevated IL-2 response persisted to seven weeks-of-age, when lower IL-10 and IL-13 responses were also seen. One-month post-primary pertussis vaccination, infants from vaccinated pregnancies still had lower IL-10 responses to B. pertussis, as well as lower IL-4. INTERPRETATION This study suggests that pertussis vaccination during pregnancy impacts infant cellular immune responses, potentially contributing to the modification of antibody responses already reported following primary immunisation against B. pertussis. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and IMmunising PRegnant women and INfants neTwork (funded by the GCRF Networks in Vaccines R&D).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Rice
- Department of Metabolism, Development and Reproduction (MDR), Lecturer in Maternal and Fetal Health, Imperial College London, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology (IRDB), Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0HS, UK; Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Dimitri A Diavatopoulos
- Section Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Yanping Guo
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, UK
| | - Beverly Donaldson
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Marielle Bouqueau
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Anna Bosanquet
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Sara Barnett
- Department of Metabolism, Development and Reproduction (MDR), Lecturer in Maternal and Fetal Health, Imperial College London, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology (IRDB), Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Beth Holder
- Department of Metabolism, Development and Reproduction (MDR), Lecturer in Maternal and Fetal Health, Imperial College London, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology (IRDB), Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0HS, UK; Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK; Vaccines and Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Gambia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Immink MM, Bekker MN, de Melker HE, Rots NY, Sanders EAM, van der Maas NAT. Study protocol of the PIMPI-project, a cohort study on acceptance, tolerability and immunogenicity of second trimester maternal pertussis immunization in relation to term and preterm infants. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:897. [PMID: 34479491 PMCID: PMC8414744 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06559-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal immunization confers passive immunity to the fetus by transplacental antibody transfer. Infants may be better protected against pertussis if the mother received a diphtheriae, tetanus and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination in the second trimester of pregnancy compared to the third trimester. This study evaluates IgG antibody concentrations in term and preterm infants at birth and 2 months after birth after maternal Tdap-vaccination between 200 and 240 w of gestation vs third trimester Tdap-vaccination. Further aims are assessing the determinants that underlie acceptance of second trimester maternal Tdap-vaccination as well as the tolerability of vaccination. Methods This prospective cohort study consists of two parts. In the acceptance part, pregnant women complete a questionnaire on determinants that underlie acceptance of a second trimester Tdap-vaccination, which is offered subsequently between 200 and 240 w of gestation. Vaccinated women complete an additional questionnaire on vaccination tolerability. Vaccinated women may also participate in the immunogenicity part, in which blood is drawn from mother at delivery and from infant at birth and 2 months after birth. Women are also eligible for the immunogenicity part if they received a Tdap-vaccination between 200 and 240 w of gestation via the national immunization program and get hospitalized for an imminent preterm delivery. Blood sampling continues until 60 term and 60 preterm mother-infant-pairs have been included. Pertussis-specific IgG antibody concentrations are determined in serum using a fluorescent bead-based multiplex immunoassay. For term infants, non-inferiority in IgG antibody concentrations against pertussis toxin (anti-PT) will be assessed referred to a historical control group in which mothers were Tdap-vaccinated between 300 and 320 w of gestation. For preterm infants, non-inferiority of anti-PT IgG concentrations is referred to as 85% of infants having ≥ 20 international units/mL at 2 months after birth. Discussion This study investigates acceptance, tolerability and immunogenicity regarding maternal Tdap-immunization between 200 and 240 w of gestation. Its results provide insight into the effects of second trimester Tdap-vaccination on IgG antibody concentrations in term and preterm infants before primary infant vaccinations. Results on acceptance and tolerability guide antenatal care providers in communication with pregnant women and maintain the safety of second trimester Tdap-vaccination. Trial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register, 2018-002976-41, retrospectively registered 24 July 2019, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2018-002976-41. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06559-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke Y Rots
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anderson E, Brigden A, Davies A, Shepherd E, Ingram J. Maternal vaccines during the Covid-19 pandemic:A qualitative interview study with UK pregnant women. Midwifery 2021; 100:103062. [PMID: 34198208 PMCID: PMC8192261 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is suboptimal uptake of recommended maternal vaccines (pertussis and influenza) during pregnancy in the UK. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare services, and potentially vaccine coverage, and brought the need for new vaccines to be tested and rolled out. OBJECTIVES To explore: i) the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on pregnant women's access to, and attitudes towards, routine maternal vaccines and; ii) women's attitudes towards testing Covid-19 vaccines on pregnant women and their personal willingness to take part in such a trial. DESIGN Qualitative interview study with pregnant women in the Bristol and surrounding area (UK). METHODS Semi-structured telephone/videoconference interviews were conducted (following a topic guide), transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-one pregnant women (selected for demographic range) were interviewed in April/May 2020. Participants felt the pandemic had elevated the importance of routine maternal vaccines, though women were concerned about safety management around appointment attendance. Women were wary of receiving a new Covid-19 vaccine, with most perceiving it as riskier than Covid-19 itself. CONCLUSIONS It is important to maximise the safety and efficiency of maternity appointments to encourage uptake of routine maternal vaccines, and to communicate this well. For pregnant women to gain a new vaccine or participate in a vaccine trial, they need to be convinced that the risk posed by the virus is greater than any risk of receiving a new vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Anderson
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU.
| | - Amberly Brigden
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU
| | - Anna Davies
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU
| | - Emily Shepherd
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU
| | - Jenny Ingram
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mott K, Huybrechts KF, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Hernández-Díaz S. Tetanus, Diphtheria, Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy and Risk of Pertussis in the Newborn in Publicly and Privately Insured Mother-infant Pairs in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40:681-687. [PMID: 33657597 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, pertussis circulation persists and primarily infects infants and children, despite routine vaccinations. To minimize infant morbidity and mortality from the disease before the first DTaP dose, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends maternal Tdap vaccination in weeks 27-36 of pregnancy. METHODS Cohorts of mother-infant pairs in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) (2010-2014) and IBM MarketScan (2011-2015) databases were analyzed to estimate the effectiveness of prenatal Tdap vaccination compared with no vaccination to prevent infant pertussis in the first 6 months. Hazard ratios were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for potential confounders via inverse probability weights. The impact of preterm delivery on the risk of pertussis was analyzed. Results from the 2 databases were pooled. RESULTS In MarketScan, women received Tdap vaccination before delivery in 114,067 (25.6%) of 445,638 pregnancies and in MAX, 33,286 (4.8%) of 695,262 pregnancies. Among pregnancies with preterm delivery, only 21.2% and 3.8% in MarketScan and MAX had been vaccinated. The risk of pertussis in unvaccinated term infants was 3.5 (MarketScan) and 17 (MAX) per 10,000; and in preterm infants, it was 8.4 (MarketScan) and 19.8 (MAX) per 10,000. The pooled hazard ratio for Tdap vaccination any time before delivery versus no vaccination was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.00]. The hazard ratio was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.36) for preterm and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.48-1.29) for term infants vaccinated before 37 weeks. The incidence of pertussis was higher and the protective hazard ratio stronger during pertussis outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS Prenatal Tdap vaccination reduces the risk of pertussis infections in the infants' first 6 months by 36%. Vaccination soon after 27 weeks of pregnancy, before when deliveries began, ensures vaccination includes those born preterm, who are at highest risk for pertussis and benefit particularly from this vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Mott
- From the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Krista F Huybrechts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert J Glynn
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen Mogun
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sonia Hernández-Díaz
- From the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
González-López JJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Álvarez García FJ, Campins M, Garcés-Sánchez M, Gil-Prieto R, Grande-Tejada AM. Epidemiology, prevention and control of pertussis in Spain: New vaccination strategies for lifelong protection. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2021:S0213-005X(21)00185-3. [PMID: 34154858 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Pertussis is a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable respiratory tract infection, with high morbidity and mortality and a particularly severe effect on newborns and infants under 2 months. The first pertussis vaccines were introduced in the 1940s. Since 1980, however, the incidence of cases has risen despite the extensive vaccination programmes and antibiotic adjuvant treatments available. Transition from the use of whole-cell vaccines to acellular vaccines and the antigenic modifications of Bordetella pertussis have contributed, among other factors, to a reduction in vaccine-acquired immunity and reemergence of the disease. Today, there are still unmet needs not covered by conventional prevention measures and existing antibiotic treatments. This review aims to update the available data, and to discuss which vaccine strategies might contribute to better disease control and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José González-López
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Francisco José Álvarez García
- Pediatrics, Centro de Salud de Llanera, Asturias, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ruth Gil-Prieto
- Department of Medicine and Public Health, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Calvert A, Karampatsas K, Andrews N, England A, Hallis B, Jones CE, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Snape MD, Heath PT. Optimising the Timing of whooping cough Immunisation in MUMs: a randomised controlled trial investigating the timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy (OpTIMUM): a protocol paper. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16767.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pertussis is a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by the bacteria Bordetella pertussis. A resurgence of pertussis, even in countries with good vaccine coverage, has led to an increase in infant deaths. In response to this, many countries have introduced pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. This strategy is effective at preventing infant disease, but there remains uncertainty about what gestational timing is best to ensure maximal protection of the infant. These uncertainties are the rationale for this randomised controlled trial and a sub-study investigating pertussis-specific antibody in breastmilk. Protocol: We will recruit 354 pregnant women and will randomise them to receive their pertussis vaccination in one of three gestational age windows: ≤23+6, 24-27+6 and 28-31+6 weeks of gestation. Vaccination will be with Boostrix-IPV® and participants will be asked to complete a symptom diary for seven days following vaccination. Blood sampling will be performed prior to vaccination, two weeks following vaccination and at the time of delivery. A cord blood sample will be collected at delivery and a blood sample collected from the infant 4-10 weeks after completion of the primary immunisations. Individuals participating in the breastmilk sub-study will provide a sample of colostrum within 48 hours of delivery and samples of breastmilk at two weeks and around five-six months. Blood samples will be analysed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques for pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin and pertactin. A subset of serum samples will also be analysed using a functional assay. Colostrum and breastmilk samples will be analysed using functional assays. Discussion: Although pertussis vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective in pregnancy there remains debate about the optimal timing for the administration during pregnancy. This study will investigate antibody responses in serum and breastmilk when vaccination is performed in three different time periods. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03908164 (09/04/2019)
Collapse
|
33
|
Jones CE, Calvert A, Southern J, Matheson M, Andrews N, Khalil A, Cuthbertson H, Hallis B, England A, Heath PT, Miller E. A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants. BMC Med 2021; 19:138. [PMID: 34098951 PMCID: PMC8186138 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02005-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccines containing three or five pertussis antigens are recommended in pregnancy in many countries, but no studies have compared the effect on infants' antigen-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations. The aim of this study was to compare anti-pertussis IgG responses following primary immunization in infants of mothers vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV (low dose diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, acellular pertussis [five antigens] and inactivated polio) or TdaP3-IPV in pregnancy (three pertussis antigens). METHODS This multi-centre phase IV randomized clinical trial was conducted in a tertiary referral centre and primary care sites in England. Women were randomized to receive TdaP5-IPV (n = 77) or TdaP3-IPV (n = 77) at 28-32 gestational weeks. A non-randomized control group of 44 women who had not received a pertussis-containing vaccine in pregnancy and their 47 infants were enrolled post-partum. RESULTS Following infant primary immunization, there was no difference in the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-pertussis toxin, filamentous haemagglutinin or pertactin IgG between infants born to women vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV (n = 67) or TdaP3-IPV (n = 63). However, the GMC of anti-pertussis toxin IgG was lower in infants born to TdaP5-IPV- and TdaP3-IPV-vaccinated mothers compared to infants born to unvaccinated mothers (n = 45) (geometric mean ratio 0.71 [0.56-0.90] and 0.78 [0.61-0.98], respectively); by 13 months of age, this difference was no longer observed. CONCLUSION Blunting of anti-pertussis toxin IgG response following primary immunization occurs in infants born to women vaccinated with TdaP5-IPV and TdaP3-IPV, with no difference between maternal vaccines. The blunting effect had resolved by 13 months of age. These results may be helpful for countries considering which pertussis-containing vaccine to recommend for use in pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02145624 , registered 23 May 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Elizabeth Jones
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK. .,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Room LF102, F Level, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Anna Calvert
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jo Southern
- Immunisation and Countermeasures, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Mary Matheson
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah Cuthbertson
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Anna England
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton, Salisbury, UK
| | - Paul T Heath
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Miller
- Immunisation and Countermeasures, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Esteghamati A, Sayyahfar S, Alimohamadi Y, Salahi S, Faramarzi M. Is it time to administer acellular pertussis vaccine to childbearing age/pregnant women in all areas using whole-cell pertussis vaccination schedule? Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2021; 9:25151355211015842. [PMID: 34104864 PMCID: PMC8161843 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211015842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine administration is still advocated for children under 7 years of age in Iran. However, there is no recommendation for the administration of a dose of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine to childbearing age/pregnant women in the Iranian vaccination program and it has increased the risk of infection through waning immunity during women’s childbearing age life. The study aimed to assess the levels of anti-Bordetella pertussis antibodies in childbearing age women of different ages in Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total number of 360 childbearing age women divided into six age groups, with 5-year intervals from 15 to 45 years old, in 2018–2019. Then, the levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against B. pertussis were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 16.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 30.01 ± 8.35 years (range 14–45 years). All the cases were IgM negative, but two IgA-positive individuals (in the age groups of 14–19 and 30–34 years) were reported. Overall, 239 (66.4%) cases were IgG positive. The mean age of IgG-positive cases was 30.37 ± 8.37 years. The IgG-positive cases were mostly in the age groups of 30–34 and 35–39 years [43 (71.1%)]. The odds of IgG positivity were 1.97. The highest odds of IgG positivity were seen in 30–34 and 35–39 years groups (2.52) and the lowest odds were seen in the 20–24 and 25–29 years groups (1.60). Using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test, the increasing trend of IgG changes in different age groups was not statistically significant (Tπ=5.78, p = 0.09). Conclusion: The infants of women of childbearing age might be prone to pertussis in countries using the wP vaccination schedule. It is suggested to administer a dose of Tdap to women before or during pregnancy to increase the immunity of their infants against this disease during early infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdoulreza Esteghamati
- Research Center of Pediatric Infectious diseases, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shirin Sayyahfar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Ali Asghar Children Hospital, Vahid Dastgerdi Street, Shariati Street, Tehran 1919816766, Iran
| | - Yousef Alimohamadi
- Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sarvenaz Salahi
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmood Faramarzi
- Research Center of Pediatric Infectious diseases, Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Berbers G, van Gageldonk P, Kassteele JVD, Wiedermann U, Desombere I, Dalby T, Toubiana J, Tsiodras S, Ferencz IP, Mullan K, Griskevicius A, Kolupajeva T, Vestrheim DF, Palminha P, Popovici O, Wehlin L, Kastrin T, Maďarová L, Campbell H, Ködmön C, Bacci S, Barkoff AM, He Q. Circulation of pertussis and poor protection against diphtheria among middle-aged adults in 18 European countries. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2871. [PMID: 34001895 PMCID: PMC8128873 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23114-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Reported incidence of pertussis in the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA) varies and may not reflect the real situation, while vaccine-induced protection against diphtheria and tetanus seems sufficient. We aimed to determine the seroprevalence of DTP antibodies in EU/EEA countries within the age groups of 40-49 and 50-59 years. Eighteen countries collected around 500 samples between 2015 and 2018 (N = 10,302) which were analysed for IgG-DTP specific antibodies. The proportion of sera with pertussis toxin antibody levels ≥100 IU/mL, indicative of recent exposure to pertussis was comparable for 13/18 countries, ranging between 2.7-5.8%. For diphtheria the proportion of sera lacking the protective level (<0.1 IU/mL) varied between 22.8-82.0%. For tetanus the protection was sufficient. Here, we report that the seroprevalence of pertussis in these age groups indicates circulation of B. pertussis across EU/EEA while the lack of vaccine-induced seroprotection against diphtheria is of concern and deserves further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Berbers
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Pieter van Gageldonk
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jan van de Kassteele
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Tine Dalby
- Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lena Wehlin
- Public Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tamara Kastrin
- Slovenia National Laboratory of Health, Environment and Food, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lucia Maďarová
- Regional Authority of Public Health, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
| | | | - Csaba Ködmön
- European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sabrina Bacci
- European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Qiushui He
- University of Turku, Turku, Finland. .,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peppa M, Minassian C, Mangtani P, Thomas SL. The identification and validity of congenital malformation diagnoses in UK electronic health records: A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2021; 30:875-898. [PMID: 33881794 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the methods used to identify and validate congenital malformation diagnoses recorded in UK electronic health records, and the results of validation studies. METHODS Medline and Embase were searched for publications between 1987 and 2019 that involved identifying congenital malformations from UK electronic health records using diagnostic codes. The methods and code-lists used to identify congenital malformations, and the methods and results of validations, were examined. RESULTS We retrieved 54 eligible studies; 36 identified congenital malformations from primary care data and 18 from secondary care data alone or in combination with birth and/or death records. Identification in secondary care data relied on codes from the 'Q' chapter for congenital malformations in ICD-10. In contrast, studies using primary care data frequently used additional codes outside of the 'P' chapter for congenital malformation diagnoses in Read, although the exact codes used were not always clear. Eight studies validated diagnoses identified in primary care data. The positive predictive value was highest (80%-100%) for congenital malformations overall, major malformations, and heart defects although the validity of the reference standard used was often uncertain. It was lowest for neural tube defects (71%) and developmental hip dysplasia (56%). CONCLUSIONS Studies identifying congenital malformations from primary care data provided limited details about the methods used. The few validation studies were limited to diagnoses recorded in primary care. Further assessments of all measures of validity in both data sources and of other malformation subgroups are needed, using robust reference standards and adhering to reporting guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Peppa
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Caroline Minassian
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Punam Mangtani
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sara L Thomas
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chander S, Gonzalez-Casanova I, Chaves SS, Otieno NA, Widdowson MA, Verani J, Frew P, Wilson A, Omer SB, Malik F. Antenatal care providers' attitudes and beliefs towards maternal vaccination in Kenya. Gates Open Res 2021; 4:19. [PMID: 34136751 PMCID: PMC8181780 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13091.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Maternal immunization is known to be one of the best strategies to protect both mothers and their infants from infectious diseases. Studies have shown that healthcare providers play a critical role in implementation of maternal immunization. However, little is known about providers' attitudes and beliefs towards vaccination that can influence their vaccine recommendations, specifically in low to middle income countries (LMIC). Methods: A self-administrated knowledge, attitude and behavior (KAB) survey was provided to 150 antenatal care providers across four different regions (Nairobi, Mombasa, Marsabit, and Siaya counties) of Kenya. The research staff visited the 150 clinics and hospitals and distributed a quantitative KAB survey. Results: Nearly all of the antenatal care providers (99%) recommended tetanus maternal vaccination. Similarly, 99% of the providers agreed that they would agree to provide additional vaccinations for pregnant women and reported that they always advise their patients to get vaccinated. Between 80 and 90% of the providers reported that religious beliefs, ethnicity, cultural background and political leaders do not affect their attitude or beliefs towards recommending vaccines. Conclusions: Considering the positive responses of healthcare providers towards vaccine acceptance and recommendation, these results highlight an opportunity to work in partnership with these providers to improve coverage of maternal vaccination and to introduce additional vaccines (such as influenza). In order to achieve this, logistical barriers that have affected the coverage of the currently recommended vaccines, should be addressed as part of this partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subhash Chander
- Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | | | - Sandra S Chaves
- Influenza Program, Kenya Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nancy A Otieno
- Center for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Marc-Alain Widdowson
- Division of Global Health Protection, Kenya Center for Disease Control, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jennifer Verani
- Division of Global Health Protection, Kenya Center for Disease Control, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Paula Frew
- Population Health & Health Equity Initiative, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Andrew Wilson
- Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Saad B Omer
- Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Fauzia Malik
- Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sebghati M, Khalil A. Uptake of vaccination in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 76:53-65. [PMID: 33965331 PMCID: PMC8021457 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Maternal immunisation is a public health strategy that aims to provide protection against certain infections to both mother and her foetus or newborn child. Vaccination of pregnant women induces vaccine-specific antibodies that lead to the subsequent transfer of these antibodies across the placenta or through breastfeeding to the offspring. At present, vaccinations in pregnancy are limited to pertussis, tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and the seasonal Influenza vaccine. Recently, some countries have incorporated routine antenatal vaccinations in their national immunisation programmes. Future vaccines targeted at pregnant women such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and Group B streptococcus (GBS) are under development. The recently approved Covid-19 vaccines have no safety data for use in pregnancy at present, but have been considered in the UK in extremely vulnerable pregnant women or pregnant frontline health and social care workers. In this article, we review the evidence supporting maternal immunisation and discuss the uptake of vaccines in pregnant women, challenges of recording the data on vaccine coverage, and consider reasons behind the present levels of uptake and strategies for future improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercede Sebghati
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals, Blackshaw Road, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals, Blackshaw Road, London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fakhraei R, Crowcroft N, Bolotin S, Sucha E, Hawken S, Wilson K, Gaudet L, Amirthalingam G, Biringer A, Cook J, Dubey V, Halperin SA, Jamieson F, Kwong JC, Sadarangani M, Walker MC, Laverty M, Fell DB. Obstetric and perinatal health outcomes after pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E349. [PMID: 33849984 PMCID: PMC8084546 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In February 2018, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended maternal vaccination with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy to prevent severe pertussis infection in young infants. This study assessed the relation between maternal Tdap vaccination and obstetric and perinatal outcomes in Ontario. METHODS We performed a population-based cohort study of all births from April 2012 to March 2017 using multiple linked health administrative databases. We used Cox regression with a time-dependent exposure variable to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for preterm birth (< 37 wk), very preterm birth (< 32 wk) and stillbirth. We assessed remaining outcomes (gestational hypertension, chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, severe postpartum hemorrhage, being small for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit stay > 24 h, composite neonatal morbidity) using log-binomial regression to generate adjusted risk ratios (RRs). We adjusted estimates for potential confounding using propensity score weighting. RESULTS Of 615 213 infants (live births and stillbirths), 11 519 were exposed to Tdap vaccination in utero. There was no increased risk for preterm birth (adjusted HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.06), very preterm birth (adjusted HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.41), stillbirth (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.82-1.60) or being small for gestational age (adjusted RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.02). The risks of a neonatal intensive care unit stay exceeding 24 hours (adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.88) and neonatal morbidity (adjusted RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.87) were decreased. There was no association with chorioamnionitis (adjusted RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.99-1.39), postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.13) or severe postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.55-1.13), but we observed a reduced risk of gestational hypertension (adjusted RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96). INTERPRETATION Our results complement evidence that maternal Tdap vaccination is not associated with adverse outcomes in mothers or infants. Ongoing evaluation in Canada is needed as maternal Tdap vaccination coverage increases in coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Fakhraei
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Natasha Crowcroft
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Shelly Bolotin
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ewa Sucha
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Steven Hawken
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Laura Gaudet
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Anne Biringer
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jocelynn Cook
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Vinita Dubey
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Frances Jamieson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mark C Walker
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Meghan Laverty
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Deshayne B Fell
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute (Fakhraei, Sucha, Fell); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Fakhraei, Hawken, Wilson, Walker), Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Central (Crowcroft, Hawken, Kwong, Fell); University of Toronto (Crowcroft, Bolotin, Biringer, Dubey, Jamieson, Kwong); Public Health Ontario (Bolotin, Jamieson, Kwong), Toronto, Ont.; ICES uOttawa (Sucha); University of Ottawa (Hawken, Cook, Walker, Laverty, Fell); Bruyère Research Institute (Wilson), Ottawa, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Gaudet); Queen's University (Gaudet), Kingston, Ont.; Public Health England (Amirthalingam), London, UK; Mount Sinai Hospital (Biringer), Toronto, Ont.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (Cook), Ottawa, Ont.; Toronto Public Health (Dubey), Toronto, Ont.; Canadian Centre for Vaccinology (Halperin), Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics (Sadarangani), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Andersen AR, Kolmos SK, Flanagan KL, Benn CS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy on the risk of chorioamnionitis, non-pertussis infectious diseases and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Vaccine 2021; 40:1572-1582. [PMID: 33642162 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several countries have introduced maternal immunisation with pertussis vaccine to provide protection against pertussis in early infancy. There is increasing interest in non-specific effects of vaccines including that non-live vaccines may enhance susceptibility to non-targeted infections in females. Some studies have shown increased risk of chorioamnionitis among women receiving pertussis vaccine during pregnancy. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of maternal pertussis immunisation on the risk of chorioamnionitis, as well as the secondary outcomes of non-pertussis infections in women, non-pertussis infections in infants, spontaneous abortion or stillbirth, maternal death and infant death. METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published until January 14, 2021. We screened articles for eligibility and extracted data using Covidence. Quality was assessed using Cochrane RoB tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were imported into RevMan for pooling and conduction of a meta-analysis stratified by study type. Outcomes are presented as risk ratios. RESULTS We identified 13 observational studies and six randomized controlled trials eligible for inclusion. We pooled data on chorioamnionitis from six observational studies and found maternal pertussis vaccine (mostly compared with other maternal immunizations with non-live vaccines) to be associated with an increased risk among the pertussis vaccinated women, RR = 1.27 [CI 95%: 1.14-1.42]. We found no difference in the analysis of our secondary outcomes of non-pertussis infections, spontaneous abortion or stillbirth and death. CONCLUSION We found an increased risk of chorioamnionitis among women who received pertussis vaccine in pregnancy. The large number of women receiving pertussis vaccine during pregnancy, as well as the growing evidence of non-live vaccines causing increased susceptibility to infections, indicates a need for further randomised trials to assess potential adverse effects of maternal immunisation with pertussis-containing vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Andersen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - S K Kolmos
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - K L Flanagan
- Tasmanian Vaccine Trial Centre, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - C S Benn
- OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Institute of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Danish Institute of Advanced Science, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Impact of maternal diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination on pertussis booster immune responses in toddlers: Follow-up of a randomized trial. Vaccine 2021; 39:1598-1608. [PMID: 33612341 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplacentally transferred antibodies induced by maternal pertussis vaccination interfere with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination. We evaluated whether this interference remains in toddlers after booster vaccination. METHODS In a prior phase IV, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT02377349), pregnant women in Australia, Canada and Europe received intramuscular tetanus-reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) at 270/7-366/7 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum. Their infants were primed (study NCT02422264) and boosted (at 11-18 months; current study NCT02853929) with diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Immunogenicity before and after booster vaccination, and reactogenicity and safety of the booster were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS 263 (Tdap group) and 277 (control group) toddlers received a DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster. Pre-booster vaccination, observed geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the three pertussis antigens and diphtheria were 1.4-1.5-fold higher in controls than in the Tdap group. No differences were observed for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens. One month post-booster vaccination, booster response rates for pertussis antigens were ≥ 92.1% and seroprotection rates for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were ≥ 99.2% in both groups (primary objective). Higher post-booster GMCs were observed in controls versus the Tdap group for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (1.2-fold), anti-pertussis toxoid (1.5-fold) and anti-diphtheria (1.4-fold). GMCs for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for three toddlers (controls, not vaccination-related). One death occurred pre-booster (Tdap group, not vaccination-related). CONCLUSIONS As a consequence of interference of maternal pertussis antibodies with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination, pertussis antibody concentrations were still lower in toddlers from Tdap-vaccinated mothers before DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster vaccination. After the booster, antibody concentrations were lower for filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid but not for pertactin. The clinical significance of this interference requires further evaluation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02853929.
Collapse
|
42
|
Evaluating the Association of Stillbirths After Maternal Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 136:1086-1094. [PMID: 33156197 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended influenza and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccinations in pregnancy are associated with increased risk of stillbirth. METHODS We performed a case-control study in the Vaccine Safety Datalink that was matched 1:4 on site, month, and year of last menstrual period, comparing the odds of vaccination in pregnancies that ended in stillbirth (defined as fetal loss at or after 20 weeks of gestation) compared with those that ended in live birth from January 1, 2012, to September 30, 2015. We included patients with singleton pregnancies that ended in stillbirth or live birth who had at least one prenatal care visit, pregnancy dating information, and continuous health plan enrollment for the duration of pregnancy. Medical records for all stillbirths were reviewed. We were statistically powered to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 1.37 when evaluating the association between influenza or Tdap vaccination and stillbirth. We also examined stillbirth rates in pregnant patients aged 14-49 years in the Vaccine Safety Datalink between 2007 and 2015. RESULTS In our matched analysis of 795 confirmed stillbirths in the case group and 3,180 live births in the control group, there was no significant association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and stillbirth (343/795 [43.1%] stillbirths in the case group vs 1,407/3,180 [44.3%] live births in the control group, OR 0.94, adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.14, P=.54) and no significant association between Tdap vaccination during pregnancy and stillbirth (184/795 [23.1%] stillbirths in the case group vs 746/3,180 [23.5%] live births in the control group, OR 0.97, aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.28, P=.91). From 2007 to 2015, the stillbirth rate in the Vaccine Safety Datalink was 5.2 per 1,000 live births and stillbirths. CONCLUSION No association was found between vaccination during pregnancy and the odds of stillbirth. These findings support the safety of ACIP recommendations for vaccination during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sadarangani M, Kollmann T, Bjornson G, Heath P, Clarke E, Marchant A, Levy O, Leuridan E, Ulloa-Gutierrez R, Cutland CL, Kampmann B, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Dinleyici E, van Damme P, Munoz FM. The Fifth International Neonatal and Maternal Immunization Symposium (INMIS 2019): Securing Protection for the Next Generation. mSphere 2021; 6:e00862-20. [PMID: 33504658 PMCID: PMC7885317 DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00862-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite significant progress in reaching some milestones of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, neonatal and early infant morbidity and mortality remain high, and maternal health remains suboptimal in many countries. Novel and improved preventative strategies with the potential to benefit pregnant women and their infants are needed, with maternal and neonatal immunization representing effective approaches. Experts from immunology, vaccinology, infectious diseases, clinicians, industry, public health, and vaccine-related social sciences convened at the 5th International Neonatal and Maternal Immunization Symposium (INMIS) in Vancouver, Canada, from 15 to 17 September 2019. We critically evaluated the lessons learned from recent clinical studies, presented cutting-edge scientific progress in maternal and neonatal immunology and vaccine development, and discussed maternal and neonatal immunization in the broader context of infectious disease epidemiology and public health. Focusing on practical aspects of research and implementation, we also discussed the safety, awareness, and perception of maternal immunization as an existing strategy to address the need to improve maternal and neonatal health worldwide. The symposium provided a comprehensive scientific and practical primer as well as an update for all those with an interest in maternal and neonatal infection, immunity, and vaccination. The summary presented here provides an update of the current status of progress in maternal and neonatal immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tobias Kollmann
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, University of Western Perth, Perth, Australia
| | - Gordean Bjornson
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Heath
- St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ed Clarke
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRCG at LSHTM), Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Arnaud Marchant
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Ofer Levy
- Precision Vaccines Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Rolando Ulloa-Gutierrez
- Hospital Nacional de Niños Dr. Carlos Sáenz Herrera, Centro de Ciencias Médicas C.C.S.S., San José, Costa Rica
| | - Clare L Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (ALIVE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRCG at LSHTM), Banjul, The Gambia
- The Vaccine Centre, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana
- Division of Infectious Disease in Gynecology and Obstetrics (InDiGO), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ener Dinleyici
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Pierre van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Skirrow H, Holder B, Meinel A, Narh E, Donaldson B, Bosanquet A, Barnett S, Kampmann B. Evaluation of a midwife-led, hospital based vaccination service for pregnant women. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:237-246. [PMID: 32873132 PMCID: PMC7872094 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1770515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Vaccines against whooping cough (pertussis) and seasonal-influenza are recommended for pregnant women in England. Uptake however varies regionally and by ethnicity. Pregnant women are traditionally vaccinated in primary care, though some hospitals now offer vaccines through antenatal clinics. This mixed-methods evaluation describes the demographic characteristics of women seen in a hospital midwife-led antenatal vaccine clinic and explores vaccine decision making. Methods: Descriptive statistics of women seen in a London hospital's midwife-led vaccine clinic were generated from electronic routine maternity records, including data on ethnicity, parity, age and deprivation indices. Reasons for vaccine decline given by women to midwives were categorized by themes. Qualitative interviews of women seen in the clinic were also undertaken. Results: Between 1st April 2017 and 31st March 2018 the vaccine clinic saw 1501 pregnant women. Of these, 83% received pertussis vaccine and (during flu season) 51% received influenza vaccine, from the clinic. Fewer Black Afro-Caribbean women seen by the clinic were vaccinated, compared to other ethnicities with only 68% receiving pertussis and 34% flu vaccines respectively (p < .05). Among all women delivering at the hospital over the year, 42%, (1334/3147) were vaccinated by the clinic. Qualitative interviews found that reassurance from healthcare professionals, particularly midwives, was the most important factor influencing maternal vaccine decisions. Conclusions: Midwife-led hospital clinics can offer an effective alternative to primary care provision for vaccines in pregnancy. Consistent with previous work, vaccine uptake varied by ethnicity. Midwives play a key role in the provision of vaccine services and influence women's vaccine decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Skirrow
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London
| | - Beth Holder
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London
| | | | - Evelyn Narh
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
| | - Beverly Donaldson
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
| | - Anna Bosanquet
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
| | - Sara Barnett
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
| | - Beate Kampmann
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London
- The Vaccine Centre, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, MRC Unit the Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Immink MM, Koole S, Bekker MN, Groenendaal F, Kemmeren JM, de Melker HE, van der Maas NAT. Background incidence rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Netherlands: Data of 2006-2018. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:274-280. [PMID: 33259996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternal vaccination is an effective and safe intervention to protect newborns against infectious diseases shortly after birth. We assessed background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes before the implementation of a maternal pertussis immunisation programme in the Netherlands, to put into perspective the safety concerns about such outcomes following immunisation. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cross-sectional study, annual numbers of pregnancy outcomes derived from the Dutch Perinatal Registry were used to calculate incidence rates per 10,000 in the 2006-2018 period. Births of ≥500 g birth weight and ≥24 + 0 w gestational age were included. Trends with moving-average-lines over the past 3 years were plotted, with 95 % confidence interval. RESULTS From 2006 through 2018, yearly numbers of pregnancies ranged between 158,868-175,710. Numbers of newborns ranged between 161,307-178,874, of whom 160,838-178,177 were live-born. Most outcomes were stable over time. Between 2006-2011, occurrence of labour induction increased by 68 %, and postpartum hemorrhage increased by 25 %. Both stabilised from 2011 onwards. Perinatal mortality up to day 7 or 28 postpartum decreased by 38 % and 37 %, respectively. Occurrence of low Apgar score among preterm infants born before 37 + 0 w gestational age and among term infants increased by 19 % and 27 %, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study on background incidences showed notable increases over time in occurrence of labour induction, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score, while showing a considerable decrease in overall perinatal mortality. These findings should be considered when interpreting data on adverse events occurring since the maternal pertussis immunisation programme was implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne Koole
- The Dutch Perinatal Registry, Perined, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanet M Kemmeren
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Liu C, Yang L, Cheng Y, Xu H, Xu F. Risk factors associated with death in infants <120 days old with severe pertussis: a case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:852. [PMID: 33198647 PMCID: PMC7668018 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05535-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Pertussis is a serious infectious disease in young infants, and severe cases frequently cause death. Our study explored risk factors for death from severe pertussis. Method A case-control study of infants with severe pertussis admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2019, was conducted. Pertussis was confirmed by clinical features and laboratory examinations. Severe pertussis was defined as patients with pertussis resulting in PICU admission or death. To understand the risk factors for death, we compared fatal and nonfatal cases of severe pertussis in infants aged < 120 days by collecting clinical and laboratory data. Results The participants included 63 infants < 120 days of age with severe pertussis. Fifteen fatal cases were confirmed and compared with 44 nonfatal severe pertussis cases, Four patients with termination of treatment were excluded. In the univariate analysis, the risk factors associated with death included apnoea (P = 0.001), leukocytosis (white blood cell (WBC) count≥30 × 109/L (P = 0.001) or ≥ 50 × 109/L (P = 0)), highest lymphocyte count (P = 0), pulmonary hypertension (P = 0.001), and length of PICU stay (P = 0.003). The multivariate analysis revealed that apnoea (OR 23.722, 95%CI 2.796–201.26, P = 0.004), leukocytosis (OR 63.708, 95%CI 3.574–1135.674, P = 0.005) and pulmonary hypertension (OR 26.109, 95%CI 1.800–378.809, P = 0.017) were significantly associated with death. Conclusion Leukocytosis and pulmonary hypertension exhibited the greatest associations with death in infants with severe pertussis admitted to the PICU. Vaccination is still the most effective protection method against pertussis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Liu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China
| | - Lin Yang
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Department of Emergency, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China
| | - Yuwei Cheng
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Department of Emergency, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China
| | - Hongmei Xu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China.,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China
| | - Feng Xu
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, 400014, China. .,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, 400014, China. .,Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
López García-Franco A, Baeyens Fernández JA, Bailón Muñoz E, Iglesias Piñeiro MJ, Ortega Del Moral A, Coello PA, Ruiz Cabello C, Landa Goñi J, Arribas Mir L. [Preventive activities in women's care]. Aten Primaria 2020; 52 Suppl 2:125-148. [PMID: 33388112 PMCID: PMC7801221 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A review is presented of the scientific evidence on preventive activities in women's care in relation to pregnancy follow-up, preventive activities in the planning and follow-up of contraceptive methods, preventive activities in menopause, and the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emilia Bailón Muñoz
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Universitario de Albaycín, Granada, España
| | | | | | - Pablo Alonso Coello
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (CIBERESP-IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, España
| | - Cristina Ruiz Cabello
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Consultorio Castilléjar, zona básica de Benamaurel, Granada, España
| | - Jacinta Landa Goñi
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Emisora, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, España
| | - Lorenzo Arribas Mir
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Universitario La Chana, Granada, España
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mackin DW, Walker SP. The historical aspects of vaccination in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 76:13-22. [PMID: 33168428 PMCID: PMC7550856 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
As we live through the history-making pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is timely to consider the lessons that history has taught us about vaccine-preventable disease in pregnancy. Vaccinations have earned an established place in pregnancy care to prevent communicable disease in the mother, fetus and newborn. The improvements in maternal and perinatal outcome have been achieved through the evolution and application of new knowledge in many areas. These include recognition of the unique pathogenic consequences of diseases in pregnancy; improved understanding of the maternal immune system and its interplay with the fetus; optimizing safe vaccine development; ensuring pregnant women are included in appropriately designed trials of efficacy, and public health engagement to optimize uptake. As the world eagerly awaits an effective vaccine for COVID 19, these lessons of history help signpost the way, to ensure the potential of vaccinations to reduce morbidity for pregnant women and their newborns is fully realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David William Mackin
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Level 3, 163 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.
| | - Susan P Walker
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Level 3, 163 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 163 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Howe AS, Pointon L, Gauld N, Paynter J, Willing E, Turner N. Pertussis and influenza immunisation coverage of pregnant women in New Zealand. Vaccine 2020; 38:6766-6776. [PMID: 32868133 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunisation is an important public health policy and measuring coverage is imperative to identify gaps and monitor trends. New Zealand (NZ), like many countries, does not routinely publish coverage of immunisations given during pregnancy. Therefore, this study examined pregnancy immunisation coverage of all pregnant NZ women between 2013 and 2018, and what factors affected uptake. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who delivered between 2013 and 2018 was undertaken using administrative datasets. Maternity and immunisation data were linked to determine coverage of pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnancy. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate the odds of receiving a vaccination during pregnancy. RESULTS From 2013 to 2018 data were available for 323,622 pregnant women, of whom 21.7% received maternal influenza immunisations and 25.7% maternal pertussis immunisations. Coverage for both vaccines increased over time, pertussis increased from 10.2% to 43.6% and influenza from 11.2% to 30.8%. The odds of being vaccinated, with either vaccine, during pregnancy increased with increasing age and decreasing deprivation. Compared to NZ European or Other women, Māori and Pacific women had lower odds of receiving a maternal pertussis (OR:0.55, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.57; OR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62, respectively) and influenza (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.71; OR:0.90, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.94, respectively) immunisations during pregnancy. Women were also more likely to be vaccinated against pertussis if they received antenatal care from a General Practitioner or Obstetrician compared to a Midwife. A similar pattern was seen for influenza vaccination. CONCLUSION Gaps in maternal coverage for pertussis and influenza exist and work is needed to reduce immunisation inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Howe
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Leah Pointon
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Natalie Gauld
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Janine Paynter
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Esther Willing
- Kōhatu - Centre for Hauora Māori, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand.
| | - Nikki Turner
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kinetics of maternal pertussis-specific antibodies in infants of mothers vaccinated with tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) during pregnancy. Vaccine 2020; 38:5955-5961. [PMID: 32709433 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kinetics of Tdap-induced maternally-derived antibodies in infants are poorly understood. Pre-Tdap era data suggest that maternal pertussis antibodies in infants have a half-life of approximately 5-6 weeks. METHODS 34 mother-infant pairs had blood collected before maternal Tdap vaccination, 4 weeks later, at delivery (maternal and cord), and at infant ages 3 and 6 weeks from June 2014-March 2015. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) to pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), fimbrial proteins (FIM) and pertactin (PRN) was quantified by multiplex luminex assay (IU/ml). Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) with 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) and half-life of pertussis antibodies were calculated. RESULTS Tdap was administered to 34 women (mean age 31.1 years) at mean gestation 30.7 weeks (28-32.7). Mean neonatal gestation was 39.1 weeks (36-41.1) and mean birthweight was 3379 g (2580-4584). Four weeks post-Tdap vaccination, maternal pertussis-specific IgG GMCs increased ≥4-fold in 59%, 41%, 29% and 44% of women for PT, FHA, FIM and PRN, respectively, and then waned. The transplacental transport ratio of pertussis antibodies was 1.35 for PT, 1.41 for FHA, 1.31 for FIM and 1.36 for PRN. Between birth and age 6 weeks, infant serum GMC for PT-specific IgG decreased from 55.1 IU/mL (38.6-78.6) to 21.1 IU/ml (14.7-30.2), and the proportion of infants with PT levels ≥10 IU/ml fell from 97% to 67%. Half-life of pertussis-specific IgG in infants in days was 29.4 (95% CI 27.3-31.7) for PT, 29.8 (95% CI 27.7-32.2) for FHA, 31.2 (95% CI 28.9-33.7) for PRN, and 35.8 (95% CI 30.1-44.3) for FIM. CONCLUSION The half-life of pertussis-specific antibodies in infants induced by maternal Tdap vaccination (29-36 days) is shorter than previously reported. Understanding how the durability of passively-acquired antibodies impacts infant susceptibility to pertussis and response to primary vaccination is critical to refine prevention strategies.
Collapse
|