1
|
Gupta R, Xie BE, Zhu M, Segal JB. Randomized Experiments to Reduce Overuse of Health Care: A Scoping Review. Med Care 2024; 62:263-269. [PMID: 38315879 PMCID: PMC10939761 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health care overuse is pervasive in countries with advanced health care delivery systems. We hypothesize that effective interventions to reduce low-value care that targets patients or clinicians are mediated by psychological and cognitive processes that change behaviors and that interventions targeting these processes are varied. Thus, we performed a scoping review of experimental studies of interventions, including the interventions' objectives and characteristics, to reduce low-value care that targeted psychological and cognitive processes. METHODS We systematically searched databases for experimental studies of interventions to change cognitive orientations and affective states in the setting of health care overuse. Outcomes included observed overuse or a stated intention to use services. We used existing frameworks for behavior change and mechanisms of change to categorize the interventions and the mediating processes. RESULTS Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studied the provision of information to patients or clinicians, with most providing cost information. Six studies used educational interventions, including the provision of feedback about individual practice. Studies rarely used counseling, behavioral nudges, persuasion, and rewards. Mechanisms for behavior change included gain in knowledge or confidence and motivation by social norms. CONCLUSIONS In this scoping review, we found few experiments testing interventions that directly target the psychological and cognitive processes of patients or clinicians to reduce low-value care. Most studies provided information to patients or clinicians without measuring or considering mediating factors toward behavior change. These findings highlight the need for process-driven experimental designs, including trials of behavioral nudges and persuasive language involving a trusting patient-clinician relationship, to identify effective interventions to reduce low-value care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Gupta
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Meng Zhu
- Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, MD
- Pamplin College of Business, Virgina Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Jodi B. Segal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zaluzec EK, Sempere LF. Systemic and Local Strategies for Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:248. [PMID: 38254741 PMCID: PMC10814018 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
One in eight women will develop breast cancer in the US. For women with moderate (15-20%) to average (12.5%) risk of breast cancer, there are few options available for risk reduction. For high-risk (>20%) women, such as BRCA mutation carriers, primary prevention strategies are limited to evidence-based surgical removal of breasts and/or ovaries and anti-estrogen treatment. Despite their effectiveness in risk reduction, not many high-risk individuals opt for surgical or hormonal interventions due to severe side effects and potentially life-changing outcomes as key deterrents. Thus, better communication about the benefits of existing strategies and the development of new strategies with minimal side effects are needed to offer women adequate risk-reducing interventions. We extensively review and discuss innovative investigational strategies for primary prevention. Most of these investigational strategies are at the pre-clinical stage, but some are already being evaluated in clinical trials and others are expected to lead to first-in-human clinical trials within 5 years. Likely, these strategies would be initially tested in high-risk individuals but may be applicable to lower-risk women, if shown to decrease risk at a similar rate to existing strategies, but with minimal side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K. Zaluzec
- Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Lorenzo F. Sempere
- Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA;
- Department of Radiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gram EG, Manso TFR, Heleno B, Siersma V, Á Rogvi J, Brodersen JB. The long-term psychosocial consequences of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast 2023; 70:41-48. [PMID: 37307773 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a risk factor for invasive breast cancer (IBC). The prognosis of DCIS is considerably better than for IBC, yet women do not distinguish between the threat. We aimed to compare the psychosocial consequences of screen-detected DCIS and IBC, and to examine this comparison over time. METHODS We surveyed a Danish mammography-screening cohort from 2004 to 2018. We assessed outcomes at six-time points: baseline, 1, 6, 18, 36 months, and 14 years after the screening. We measured psychosocial consequences with the Consequences Of Screening - Breast Cancer (COS-BC): a condition-specific questionnaire that is psychometrically validated and encompasses 14 psychosocial dimensions. We used weighted linear models with generalized estimating equations to compare responses between groups. We used a 1% level of significance. RESULTS 170 out of 1309 women were diagnosed with breast cancer (13.0%). 23 were diagnosed with DCIS (13.5%) and 147 with IBC (86.5%). From baseline to six months after diagnosis, there were no significant differences between women with DCIS and IBC. However, mean scores indicated that IBC generally was more affected than DCIS. After six months, we observed that women with DCIS and IBC might be affected differently in the long term; mean scores and mean differences showed that IBC were more affected on some scales, while DCIS were on others. CONCLUSION Overall, the DCIS and IBC experienced similar levels of psychosocial consequences. Women might benefit from renaming DCIS to exclude cancer nomenclature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Grundtvig Gram
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark.
| | - Túlia Filipa Roberto Manso
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Bruno Heleno
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; CHRC, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS, FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Volkert Siersma
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jessica Á Rogvi
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Brandt Brodersen
- Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark; Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Semsarian CR, Ma T, Nickel B, Barratt A, Varma M, Delahunt B, Millar J, Parker L, Glasziou P, Bell KJL. Low-risk prostate lesions: An evidence review to inform discussion on losing the "cancer" label. Prostate 2023; 83:498-515. [PMID: 36811453 PMCID: PMC10952636 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) mitigates harms from overtreatment of low-risk prostate lesions. Recalibration of diagnostic thresholds to redefine which prostate lesions are considered "cancer" and/or adopting alternative diagnostic labels could increase AS uptake and continuation. METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE to October 2021 for evidence on: (1) clinical outcomes of AS, (2) subclinical prostate cancer at autopsy, (3) reproducibility of histopathological diagnosis, and (4) diagnostic drift. Evidence is presented via narrative synthesis. RESULTS AS: one systematic review (13 studies) of men undergoing AS found that prostate cancer-specific mortality was 0%-6% at 15 years. There was eventual termination of AS and conversion to treatment in 45%-66% of men. Four additional cohort studies reported very low rates of metastasis (0%-2.1%) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (0%-0.1%) over follow-up to 15 years. Overall, AS was terminated without medical indication in 1%-9% of men. Subclinical reservoir: 1 systematic review (29 studies) estimated that the subclinical cancer prevalence was 5% at <30 years, and increased nonlinearly to 59% by >79 years. Four additional autopsy studies (mean age: 54-72 years) reported prevalences of 12%-43%. Reproducibility: 1 recent well-conducted study found high reproducibility for low-risk prostate cancer diagnosis, but this was more variable in 7 other studies. Diagnostic drift: 4 studies provided consistent evidence of diagnostic drift, with the most recent (published 2020) reporting that 66% of cases were upgraded and 3% were downgraded when using contemporary diagnostic criteria compared to original diagnoses (1985-1995). CONCLUSIONS Evidence collated may inform discussion of diagnostic changes for low-risk prostate lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin R. Semsarian
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Tara Ma
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Wellington School of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The AlfredMelbourneAustralia
| | - Lisa Parker
- Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsAustralia
| | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence‐Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and MedicineBond UniversityGold CoastAustralia
| | - Katy J. L. Bell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma T, Semsarian CR, Barratt A, Parker L, Pathmanathan N, Nickel B, Bell KJL. Should low-risk DCIS lose the cancer label? An evidence review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:415-433. [PMID: 37074481 PMCID: PMC10175360 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06934-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population mammographic screening for breast cancer has led to large increases in the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Active surveillance has been proposed as a management strategy for low-risk DCIS to mitigate against potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. However, clinicians and patients remain reluctant to choose active surveillance, even within a trial setting. Re-calibration of the diagnostic threshold for low-risk DCIS and/or use of a label that does not include the word 'cancer' might encourage the uptake of active surveillance and other conservative treatment options. We aimed to identify and collate relevant epidemiological evidence to inform further discussion on these ideas. METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases for low-risk DCIS studies in four categories: (1) natural history; (2) subclinical cancer found at autopsy; (3) diagnostic reproducibility (two or more pathologist interpretations at a single time point); and (4) diagnostic drift (two or more pathologist interpretations at different time points). Where we identified a pre-existing systematic review, the search was restricted to studies published after the inclusion period of the review. Two authors screened records, extracted data, and performed risk of bias assessment. We undertook a narrative synthesis of the included evidence within each category. RESULTS Natural History (n = 11): one systematic review and nine primary studies were included, but only five provided evidence on the prognosis of women with low-risk DCIS. These studies reported that women with low-risk DCIS had comparable outcomes whether or not they had surgery. The risk of invasive breast cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS ranged from 6.5% (7.5 years) to 10.8% (10 years). The risk of dying from breast cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS ranged from 1.2 to 2.2% (10 years). Subclinical cancer at autopsy (n = 1): one systematic review of 13 studies estimated the mean prevalence of subclinical in situ breast cancer to be 8.9%. Diagnostic reproducibility (n = 13): two systematic reviews and 11 primary studies found at most moderate agreement in differentiating low-grade DCIS from other diagnoses. Diagnostic drift: no studies found. CONCLUSION Epidemiological evidence supports consideration of relabelling and/or recalibrating diagnostic thresholds for low-risk DCIS. Such diagnostic changes would need agreement on the definition of low-risk DCIS and improved diagnostic reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Ma
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Caitlin R Semsarian
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Parker
- Sydney School of Pharmacy, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nirmala Pathmanathan
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barlet MH, Barks MC, Ubel PA, Davis JK, Pollak KI, Kaye EC, Weinfurt KP, Lemmon ME. Characterizing the Language Used to Discuss Death in Family Meetings for Critically Ill Infants. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2233722. [PMID: 36197666 PMCID: PMC9535532 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Communication during conversations about death is critical; however, little is known about the language clinicians and families use to discuss death. Objective To characterize (1) the way death is discussed in family meetings between parents of critically ill infants and the clinical team and (2) how discussion of death differs between clinicians and family members. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal qualitative study took place at a single academic hospital in the southeast US. Patients were enrolled from September 2018 to September 2020, and infants were followed up longitudinally throughout their hospitalization. Participants included families of infants with neurologic conditions who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit and had a planned family meeting to discuss neurologic prognosis or starting, not starting, or discontinuing life-sustaining treatment. Family meetings were recorded, transcribed, and deidentified before being screened for discussion of death. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the language used to reference death during family meetings between parents and clinicians. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze data. Results A total of 68 family meetings involving 36 parents of 24 infants were screened; 33 family meetings (49%) involving 20 parents (56%) and 13 infants (54%) included discussion of death. Most parents involved in discussion of death identified as the infant's mother (13 [65%]) and as Black (12 [60%]). Death was referenced 406 times throughout the family meetings (275 times by clinicians and 131 times by family members); the words die, death, dying, or stillborn were used 5% of the time by clinicians (13 of 275 references) and 15% of the time by family members (19 of 131 references). Four types of euphemisms used in place of die, death, dying, or stillborn were identified: (1) survival framing (eg, not live), (2) colloquialisms (eg, pass away), (3) medical jargon, including obscure technical terms (eg, code event) or talking around death with physiologic terms (eg, irrecoverable heart rate drop), and (4) pronouns without an antecedent (eg, it). The most common type of euphemism used by clinicians was medical jargon (118 of 275 references [43%]). The most common type of euphemism used by family members was colloquialism (44 of 131 references [34%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this qualitative study, the words die, death, dying, or stillborn were rarely used to refer to death in family meetings with clinicians. Families most often used colloquialisms to reference death, and clinicians most often used medical jargon. Future work should evaluate the effects of euphemisms on mutual understanding, shared decision-making, and clinician-family relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary C. Barks
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter A. Ubel
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - J. Kelly Davis
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Erica C. Kaye
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kevin P. Weinfurt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monica E. Lemmon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Keeffe M, Ferreira GE, Harris IA, Darlow B, Buchbinder R, Traeger AC, Zadro JR, Herbert RD, Thomas R, Belton J, Maher CG. Effect of diagnostic labelling on management intentions for non-specific low back pain: a randomised scenario-based experiment. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:1532-1545. [PMID: 35616226 PMCID: PMC9545091 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Diagnostic labels may influence treatment intentions. We examined the effect of labelling low back pain (LBP) on beliefs about imaging, surgery, second opinion, seriousness, recovery, work, and physical activities. Methods Six‐arm online randomized experiment with blinded participants with and without LBP. Participants received one of six labels: ‘disc bulge’,‘degeneration’,‘arthritis’,‘lumbar sprain’,‘non‐specific LBP’, ‘episode of back pain’. The primary outcome was the belief about the need for imaging. Results A total of 1375 participants (mean [SD] age, 41.7 years [18.4 years]; 748 women [54.4%]) were included. The need for imaging was rated lower with the labels ‘episode of back pain’ (4.2 [2.9]), ‘lumbar sprain’ (4.2 [2.9]) and ‘non‐specific LBP’ (4.4 [3.0]) compared to the labels ‘arthritis’ (6.0 [2.9]), ‘degeneration’ (5.7 [3.2]) and ‘disc bulge’ (5.7 [3.1]). The same labels led to higher recovery expectations and lower ratings of need for a second opinion, surgery and perceived seriousness compared to ‘disc bulge’,‘degeneration’ and ‘arthritis’. Differences were larger amongst participants with current LBP who had a history of seeking care. No differences were found in beliefs about physical activity and work between the six labels. Conclusions ‘Episode of back pain’,‘lumbar sprain’ and ‘non‐specific LBP’ reduced need for imaging, surgery and second opinion compared to ‘arthritis’,‘degeneration’ and ‘disc bulge’ amongst public and patients with LBP as well as reducing the perceived seriousness of LBP and enhancing recovery expectations. The impact of labels appears most relevant amongst those at risk of poor outcomes (participants with current LBP who had a history of seeking care).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary O'Keeffe
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia.,Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben Darlow
- Department of Primary Healthcare and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Joshua R Zadro
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Robert D Herbert
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rae Thomas
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joletta Belton
- Endless Possibilities Initiative, Fraser, Colorado, United States
| | - Chris G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zadro JR, Michaleff ZA, O'Keeffe M, Ferreira GE, Haas R, Harris IA, Buchbinder R, Maher CG. How do people perceive different labels for rotator cuff disease? A content analysis of data collected in a randomised controlled experiment. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052092. [PMID: 34952877 PMCID: PMC8710860 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Explore how people perceive different labels for rotator cuff disease in terms of words or feelings evoked by the label and treatments they feel are needed. SETTING We performed a content analysis of qualitative data collected in a six-arm, online randomised controlled experiment. PARTICIPANTS 1308 people with and without shoulder pain read a vignette describing a patient with rotator cuff disease and were randomised to one of six labels: subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, bursitis, rotator-cuff-related shoulder pain, shoulder sprain and episode of shoulder pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES Participants answered two questions (free-text response) about: (1) words or feelings evoked by the label; (2) what treatments they feel are needed. Two researchers iteratively developed coding frameworks to analyse responses.Results1308/1626 (80%) complete responses for each question were analysed. Psychological distress (21%), uncertainty (22%), serious condition (15%) and poor prognosis (9%) were most often expressed by those labelled with subacromial impingement syndrome. For those labelled with a rotator cuff tear, psychological distress (13%), serious condition (9%) and poor prognosis (8%) were relatively common, while minor issue was expressed least often compared with the other labels (5%). Treatment/investigation and surgery were common among those labelled with a rotator cuff tear (11% and 19%, respectively) and subacromial impingement syndrome (9% and 10%) compared with bursitis (7% and 5%). CONCLUSIONS Words or feelings evoked by certain labels for rotator cuff disease and perceived treatment needs may explain why some labels drive management preferences towards surgery and imaging more than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Zadro
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zoe A Michaleff
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Romi Haas
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chapman BM, Yang JC, Gonzalez JM, Havrilesky L, Reed SD, Hwang ES. Patient Preferences for Outcomes Following DCIS Management Strategies: A Discrete Choice Experiment. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e1639-e1648. [PMID: 33710917 PMCID: PMC9810136 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a nonobligate precursor of breast cancer, is often aggressively managed with multimodal therapy. However, there is limited research on patients' preferences for trade-offs among treatment-related outcomes such as breast appearance, side effects, and future cancer risk. We sought to investigate whether women consider treatment features aside from cancer risk when making treatment choices for ductal carcinoma in situ and if so, to what degree other features influence these decisions. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was administered to participants in a comprehensive cancer screening mammography clinic. The experimental design was used to generate constructed health profiles resulting from different management strategies. Health profiles were defined by breast appearance, severity of infection within the first year, chronic pain, hot flashes, and risk of developing or dying from breast cancer within 10 years. RESULTS One hundred ninety-four women without a personal history of breast cancer completed the choice task. Across 10 choice questions, 29% always selected the health profile with a lower risk of invasive breast cancer (ie, dominated on cancer risk), regardless of the effects of treatment. For nonrisk dominators, breast cancer risk remained the most important factor but was closely followed by chronic pain (24% [95% CI, 20 to 28]) and infection (22% [95% CI, 18 to 25]). Depending on treatment outcomes, the tolerable increase in breast cancer risk was as high as 3.4%. CONCLUSION Most women were willing to make some trade-offs between invasive cancer risk and treatment-related outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of shared decision-making weighing risks and benefits between patient and provider management of low-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Juan Marcos Gonzalez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Laura Havrilesky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Shelby D. Reed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC,E. Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH, Duke University and Duke Cancer Institute, Seeley Mudd Building 465, DUMC Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ma T, Semsarian CR, Barratt A, Parker L, Kumarasinghe MP, Bell KJL, Nickel B. Rethinking Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancers < 1cm (Papillary Microcarcinomas): An Evidence Review for Recalibrating Diagnostic Thresholds and/or Alternative Labels. Thyroid 2021; 31:1626-1638. [PMID: 34470465 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2021.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Recalibrating diagnostic thresholds or using alternative labels may mitigate overdiagnosis and overtreatment of papillary microcarcinoma (mPTC). We aimed at identifying and collating relevant epidemiological evidence on mPTC, to assess the case for recalibration and/or new labels. Methods: We searched EMBASE and PubMed databases from inception to December 2020 for natural history, autopsy, diagnostic drift, and diagnostic reproducibility studies. Where a relevant systematic review was pre-identified, only new articles were additionally included. Non-English articles were excluded. One author screened titles and abstracts. Two authors screened full text articles, performed quality assessments, and extracted data. We undertook narrative synthesis of included evidence (pooled estimates from systematic reviews and single estimates from primary studies). Results: One systematic review of patients undergoing active surveillance found that after 5 years of follow-up, 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI 4.4-6.4%]) of the mPTC lesions had increased in size by ≥3 mm, and 1.6% [CI 1.1-2.4%] of patients had lymph node metastases. Among 7 new primary studies (including 3 updates on 2 studies included in the systematic review), 1-5% of patients undergoing active surveillance had lymph node metastases after a median follow-up of 1-10 years. One systematic review found that subclinical thyroid cancer incidentally discovered at autopsy is relatively common, with a pooled prevalence of 11.2% [CI 6.7-16.1%] among studies that examined the whole thyroid. Four diagnostic drift studies evaluated the new classification of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). Three studies of cases previously diagnosed as papillary thyroid cancer found 1.3-2.3% were reclassified as NIFTP (reclassifications were from follicular variation of papillary thyroid cancer [FVPTC]). One study of 48 cases previously diagnosed as mPTC found that 23.5% were reclassified as NIFTP. Thirteen reproducibility studies of papillary thyroid lesions found substantial variation in the histopathological diagnosis of thyroid lesions, including FVPTC and NIFTP classifications (no study evaluated mPTC). Conclusions: This review supports consideration of recalibrating diagnostic thresholds and/or alternative labels for low-risk mPTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Ma
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caitlin R Semsarian
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Parker
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marian Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Farmer C, O'Connor DA, Lee H, McCaffery K, Maher C, Newell D, Cashin A, Byfield D, Jarvik J, Buchbinder R. Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e049938. [PMID: 34518265 PMCID: PMC8438839 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate (1) self-reported societal comprehension of common and usually non-serious terms found in lumbar spine imaging reports and (2) its relationship to perceived seriousness, likely persistence of low back pain (LBP), fear of movement, back beliefs and history and intensity of LBP. DESIGN Cross-sectional online survey of the general public. SETTING Five English-speaking countries: UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. PARTICIPANTS Adults (age >18 years) with or without a history of LBP recruited in April 2019 with quotas for country, age and gender. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported understanding of 14 terms (annular fissure, disc bulge, disc degeneration, disc extrusion, disc height loss, disc protrusion, disc signal loss, facet joint degeneration, high intensity zone, mild canal stenosis, Modic changes, nerve root contact, spondylolisthesis and spondylosis) commonly found in lumbar spine imaging reports. For each term, we also elicited worry about its seriousness, and whether its presence would indicate pain persistence and prompt fear of movement. RESULTS From 774 responses, we included 677 (87.5%) with complete and valid responses. 577 (85%) participants had a current or past history of LBP of whom 251 (44%) had received lumbar spine imaging. Self-reported understanding of all terms was poor. At best, 235 (35%) reported understanding the term 'disc degeneration', while only 71 (10.5%) reported understanding the term 'Modic changes'. For all terms, a moderate to large proportion of participants (range 59%-71%), considered they indicated a serious back problem, that pain might persist (range 52%-71%) and they would be fearful of movement (range 42%-57%). CONCLUSION Common and usually non-serious terms in lumbar spine imaging reports are poorly understood by the general population and may contribute to the burden of LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12619000545167.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Farmer
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Denise A O'Connor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hopin Lee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Rehabilitation Research in Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Maher
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Aidan Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Byfield
- University of South Wales Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, Treforest, UK
| | - Jeffrey Jarvik
- Departments of Radiology, Neurological Surgery and Health Services, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- UW Clinical Learning, Evidence And Research (CLEAR) Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diagnostic Labels for Rotator Cuff Disease Can Increase People's Perceived Need for Shoulder Surgery: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021; 51:401-411. [PMID: 33789444 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2021.10375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether different labels for rotator cuff disease influence people's perceived need for surgery. DESIGN Randomized controlled experiment. METHODS Participants with and without shoulder pain read a vignette describing a patient with rotator cuff disease and were randomized to 1 of 6 terms describing rotator cuff disease: subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, bursitis, rotator cuff-related shoulder pain, shoulder sprain, and episode of shoulder pain. Perceived need for shoulder surgery was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perceived need for imaging, an injection, a second opinion, and to see a specialist; perceived seriousness of the condition; recovery expectations; and perceived impact on work attendance. Using a Bonferroni correction (significance, P<.003), adjusted between-group mean differences and 99.67% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a 1-way analysis of covariance. RESULTS One thousand three hundred eight (80% of 1626) responses were analyzed. Participants' mean ± SD age was 40.3 ± 16.0 years, and 59% were women. Mean perceived need for surgery (0-10 scale) was low and slightly higher among those assigned to the rotator cuff tear label compared to the bursitis label (2.6 versus 2.1; adjusted mean difference, 0.7; 99.67% CI: 0.0, 1.4). Mean perceived need for imaging (0-10) was moderate and slightly higher among those assigned to the rotator cuff tear (4.7 versus 3.7; adjusted mean difference, 1.0; 99.67% CI: 0.2, 1.9) and subacromial impingement syndrome labels (4.7 versus 3.7; adjusted mean difference, 1.0; 99.7% CI: 0.1, 1.9) compared to the bursitis label. CONCLUSION There were small differences in the perceived need for surgery and imaging between some labels, which could be important at the population level. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(8):401-411. Epub 31 Mar 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.10375.
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith J, Ayre J, Jansen J, Cvejic E, McCaffery KJ, Doust J, Copp T. Impact of diagnostic labels and causal explanations for weight gain on diet intentions, cognitions and emotions: An experimental online study. Appetite 2021; 167:105612. [PMID: 34324910 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Disease labels and causal explanations for certain symptoms or conditions have been found to have both positive and negative outcomes. For example, a diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome could conceivably motivate a person to engage in weight management, which is the recommended first line treatment. Furthermore, doctors may feel more comfortable discussing weight when linked to a medical condition. However, such a diagnosis may elicit feelings of increased anxiety, perceived severity and reduced sense of control. Mixed findings are also evident for impacts of genetic explanations on psychosocial outcomes and behaviours. Using hypothetical scenarios presented in an online survey, participants were asked to imagine that they were visiting their general practitioner due to experiencing weight gain, irregular periods, and more pimples than usual. Participants were randomised to receive different diagnostic labels ('polycystic ovary syndrome', 'weight' or no label/description) and causal explanations (genetic or environmental) for their symptoms. Primary outcomes assessed included intention to eat a healthier diet and perceived personal control of weight (average score on scale 1-7 across 3 items). Secondary outcomes included weight stigma, blameworthiness, worry, perceived severity, self-esteem, belief diet will reduce risks and menu item choice. Participants were 545 females aged 18-45 years (mean = 33 years), living in Australia, recruited through a national online recruitment panel. The sample was overweight on average (BMI = 26.5). Participants reporting a PCOS diagnosis were excluded from analyses. We found no main effects of the label or explanation on intention to eat healthier or perceived personal control of weight. For secondary outcomes, those given the genetic explanation reported higher weight stigma (range 1-7; MD = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.011,0.522), greater worry (range 1-7; MD = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.037,0.496), lower self-esteem (range 10-40; MD = 1.26, 95%CI: 0.28 to 2.24) and perceived their weight as more severe (range 1-7; MD = 0.28; 95%CI: 0.05,0.52) than those given the environmental explanation, averaged over disease label given. These findings further highlight the deleterious effects of genetic explanations on psychosocial outcomes and reinforce the need for caution when communicating the aetiology of weight-related health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Smith
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 4006, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shih P, Nickel B, Degeling C, Thomas R, Brito JP, McLeod DSA, McCaffery K, Carter SM. Terminology Change for Small Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer As a Response to Overtreatment: Results from Three Australian Community Juries. Thyroid 2021; 31:1067-1075. [PMID: 33238815 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2020.0694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: The majority of small papillary thyroid cancers (sPTCs) are treated surgically, rather than by active surveillance. Patient and clinician preference for surgery may be partially driven by the use of cancer terminology. Some experts propose that changing terminology would better communicate the indolent nature of sPTCs and improve uptake of active surveillance. Others argue that terminology that includes "cancer" correctly reflects the biological nature of these tumors. The views of informed lay publics can provide value-based perspectives on complex issues and guide policy discussions. Methods: We recruited 40 people for three community juries, held in Sydney, Wodonga, and Cairns, Australia. Participants were of diverse backgrounds and ages, recruited through random digit dialing and a topic-blinded social media strategy. Juries were informed about thyroid cancer, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment, and heard arguments for and against terminology change before deliberation. The deliberative process in Jury 1 led to a refinement of jury charge, the updated version that was then used in Juries 2 and 3. Results: Jury 1 favored no terminology change, and Juries 2 and 3 were divided on the topic. Key reasons for opposing terminology change included a strong desire to retain terminology that aligns with the pathological definition of cancer, and to avoid even a minimal risk of harm that could arise if patients became complacent in follow-up. Key reasons to support terminology change included a desire to reduce psychological distress, stigma, and discrimination associated with a cancer diagnosis, and an argument that terminology change may be a more effective trigger for health system reform compared with other options. The juries unanimously recommended community education and health system reforms to reduce harms of overtreatment, and expressed an expectation that clinicians and researchers reach agreement on clinical guidelines to promote better uptake of active surveillance. Conclusions: The conceptual tension between a pathological and an outcome-based understanding of cancer was apparent in deliberation. This highlights an ongoing challenge for those advocating changing disease terminology. Regardless of action on terminology, jurors shared a strong expectation that practical changes would be made to respond to the harms of overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patti Shih
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, and Wiser Healthcare, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chris Degeling
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, and Wiser Healthcare, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Rae Thomas
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, and Wiser Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Donald S A McLeod
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stacy M Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, and Wiser Healthcare, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Muscat DM, Morris GM, Bell K, Cvejic E, Smith J, Jansen J, Thomas R, Bonner C, Doust J, McCaffery K. Benefits and Harms of Hypertension and High-Normal Labels: A Randomized Experiment. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2021; 14:e007160. [PMID: 33813855 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.007160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent US guidelines lowered the threshold for diagnosing hypertension while other international guidelines use alternative/no labels for the same group (blood pressure [BP], <140/90 mm Hg). We investigated potential benefits and harms of hypertension and high-normal BP labels, compared with control, among people at lower risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS We conducted a randomized experiment using a national sample of Australians (n=1318) 40 to 50 years of age recruited from an online panel. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 hypothetical scenarios where a general practitioner told them they had a BP reading of 135/85 mm Hg, using either hypertension/high-normal BP/control (general BP description) labels. Participants were then randomized to receive an additional absolute risk description or nothing. Primary outcomes were willingness to change diet and worry. Secondary outcomes included exercise/medication intentions, risk perceptions, and other psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS There was no difference in willingness to change diet across label groups (P=0.22). The hypertension label (mean difference [MD], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.41-1.06]; P<0.001) and high-normal BP label (MD, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.12-0.78]; P=0.008) had increased worry about cardiovascular disease risk compared with control. There was no evidence that either label increased willingness to exercise (P=0.80). However, the hypertension (MD, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.04-0.36]; P=0.014), but not high-normal label (MD, 0.06 [95% CI, -0.10 to 0.21]; P=0.49), increased willingness to accept BP-lowering medication compared with control. Psychosocial differences including lower control, higher risk perceptions, and more negative affect were found for the hypertension and high-normal labels compared with control. Providing absolute risk information decreased willingness to change diet (MD, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.41]; P=0.001) and increase exercise (MD, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.11-0.45]; P=0.001) in the hypertension group. CONCLUSIONS Neither hypertension nor high-normal labels motivated participants to change their diet or exercise more than control, but both labels had adverse psychosocial outcomes. Labeling people with systolic BP of 130 to 140 mm Hg, who are otherwise at low risk of cardiovascular disease, may cause harms that outweigh benefit. Registration: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618001700224.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina May Morris
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health (G.M.M., K.B., E.C.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katy Bell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health (G.M.M., K.B., E.C.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health (G.M.M., K.B., E.C.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenna Smith
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rae Thomas
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Queensland, Australia (R.T., J.D.)
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Queensland, Australia (R.T., J.D.)
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., E.C., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health (D.M.M., J.S., J.J., C.B., K.M.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240985. [PMID: 33104739 PMCID: PMC7588049 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined the effect of 'labels' versus 'descriptions' across four asymptomatic health conditions: pre-diabetes, pre-hypertension, mild hyperlipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A, on participants' intentions to pursue further tests. There were four secondary objectives: 1) assessing confidence and satisfaction in their intention to test further; 2) revealing psychological drivers affecting intentions; 3) exploring whether intentions, confidence and satisfaction differ by label vs. description and health condition; and 4) producing a perceptual map of illnesses by label condition. METHODS Practitioner validated health-related scenarios were used. Two variants of each condition were developed. Participants were recruited through Qualtrics from Australia, Ireland and Canada and randomly assigned two 'labelled' or two 'descriptive' scenarios. RESULTS There was no significant difference in intentions to test between label and description conditions (95% CI -0.76 to 0.33 points, p = 0.4). Confidence and satisfaction were both positively associated with intentions: regression coefficient (β) for confidence β = 0.58 points (95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, p < .001) and for satisfaction 0.67 points (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77, p < .001). Predisposition to seek healthcare (β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98), attributing illness to bad luck (β = -0.16 points; 95% CI -0.3 to -0.02), and concern about the health condition (β = 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.65) also significantly predicted intentions. CONCLUSIONS Unlike studies investigating symptomatic illnesses, the disease label effect on behavioural intentions was not supported suggesting that reducing demand for medical services for borderline cases cannot be achieved by labelling. The average intention to test score was higher in this sample than previous symptomatic health-related studies and there was a positive relationship between increased intentions and confidence/satisfaction in one's decision. Exploratory insights suggested perceptions of the four labelled asymptomatic illnesses all shifted toward greater levels of dread and concern compared to their respective description condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12618000392268.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of more medicalised labels can increase both concern about illness and the desire for more invasive treatment. This study analyses the media's coverage of an Analysis article in The BMJ which generated a large amount of high-profile international media coverage. It aims to understand how to better communicate messages about low-risk cancers and overdiagnosis to the public. DESIGN Content analysis of media coverage. SETTING Media was identified by Isentia Media Portal, searched in Google News and cross-checked in Factiva and Proquest databases from August 2018. METHODS Media headlines, full text and open access public comments responding to the coverage on the article proposing to 'rename low-risk conditions currently labelled as cancer' were analysed to determine the main themes. RESULTS 45 original media articles and their associated public comments (n=167) were identified and included in the analysis. Overall, headlines focused on cancer generally and there was little mention of 'low-risk', 'overdiagnosis' or 'overtreatment'. The full text generally presented a more balanced view of the evidence and were supportive of the proposal, however, public responses tended to be more negative towards the idea of renaming low-risk cancers and indicated confusion. Comments seemed to focus on the headlines rather than the full article. CONCLUSIONS This study offers a novel insight into media coverage of the complex and counterintuitive problem of overdiagnosis. Continued deliberation on how to communicate similar topics to the public through the mainstream media is needed. Future work in the area of low-risk cancer communication should consider the powerful impact of people's previous experience with a cancer diagnosis and the criticism about being paternalistic and concealing the truth from patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism & Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis. J Endod 2020; 46:483-489. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
19
|
Bromley HL, Mann GB, Petrie D, Nickson C, Rea D, Roberts TE. Valuing preferences for treating screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer 2019; 123:130-137. [PMID: 31689678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammographic screening reduces breast cancer mortality but may lead to the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk breast cancers. Conservative management may reduce the potential harm of overtreatment, yet little is known about the impact upon quality of life. OBJECTIVES To quantify women's preferences for managing low-risk screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), including the acceptability of active monitoring as an alternative treatment. METHODS Utilities (cardinal measures of quality of life) were elicited from 172 women using visual analogue scales (VASs), standard gambles, and the Euro-Qol-5D-5L questionnaire for seven health states describing treatments for low-risk DCIS. Sociodemographics and breast cancer history were examined as predictors of utility. RESULTS Both patients and non-patients valued active monitoring more favourably on average than conventional treatment. Utilities were lowest for DCIS treated with mastectomy (VAS: 0.454) or breast conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy (VAS: 0.575). The utility of active monitoring was comparable to BCS alone but was rated more favourably as progression risk was reduced from 40% to 10%. Disutility for active monitoring was likely driven by anxiety around progression, whereas conventional management impacted other dimensions of quality of life. The heterogeneity between individual preferences could not be explained by sociodemographic variables, suggesting that the factors influencing women's preferences are complex. CONCLUSIONS Active monitoring of low-risk DCIS is likely to be an acceptable alternative for reducing the impact of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in terms of quality of life. Further research is required to determine subgroups more likely to opt for conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Bromley
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, UK; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Dennis Petrie
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital of Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Tracy E Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nickel B, Howard K, Brito JP, Barratt A, Moynihan R, McCaffery K. Association of Preferences for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Treatment With Disease Terminology: A Discrete Choice Experiment. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 144:887-896. [PMID: 30140909 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Given recent evidence of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) and other low-risk cancers, strategies are needed to help patients consider less invasive treatment options. Objectives To determine which factors influence treatment preferences for patients with PTC, and the trade-offs in treatment factors people are willing to accept, and to understand how terminology influences preferences and benefit-harm trade-offs. Design, Setting, and Participants Preferences in PTC treatment were evaluated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) conducted as a web-based survey using an existing public online research panel. Participants were randomized to receive 1 of 2 frames of information based on the terminology used to describe the condition: "cancer" or "lesion." Participants chose between 3 treatment options for PTC (thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, and active surveillance). Analyses were conducted using a mixed logit model. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome variable was treatment preference; attributes of treatment options and sociodemographic characteristics were explanatory variables. Results The DCE was completed by 2054 participants (993 [48.3%] men and 1061 [51.7%] women; mean [SD] age, 46.0 [16.5] years) with no history of thyroid cancer. Participants preferred options with less frequent follow-up, lower out-of-pocket costs, lower chances of having voice and calcium level problems, and a lower risk of developing invasive thyroid cancer and of dying of thyroid cancer. When trading benefits against harms, participants were willing to accept a higher number of extra patients experiencing adverse effects to avoid a thyroid cancer death when the condition was described as a cancer compared with a lesion. Specifically, participants for whom the condition was described as a cancer were willing to accept more patients requiring lifelong medication (mean, 273; 95% CI, 207-339 vs mean, 98; 95% CI, 66-131), experiencing calcium problems (mean, 110; 95% CI, 77-144 vs mean, 56; 95% CI, 55-58), and fatigue (mean, 958; 95% CI, 691-1224 vs mean, 469; 95% CI, 375-564). For both the cancer and lesion terminology, health literacy consistently was associated with preferences for treatment options. Those with lower health literacy had a significantly lower preference for less invasive treatment options. Conclusions and Relevance This study makes an important contribution to understanding how attributes of treatment options, terminology, and patient characteristics, in particular health literacy, influence treatment decision making for PTC. As a result of increasing evidence of the indolent nature of PTC and other low-risk cancers, strategies to deal with potential overtreatment are critically needed. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000066381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- The University of Sydney, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- The University of Sydney, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- The University of Sydney, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- The University of Sydney, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nickel B, Barratt A, McGeechan K, Brito JP, Moynihan R, Howard K, McCaffery K. Effect of a Change in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Terminology on Anxiety Levels and Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Crossover Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 144:867-874. [PMID: 30335875 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance Given evidence of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs), strategies are needed to promote the consideration of less invasive treatment options for patients with low-risk PTC. Objective To determine the association of treatment preferences and anxiety levels for PTC with the terminology used to describe the condition. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized crossover study involved a community sample of 550 Australian men and women 18 years or older without a history of thyroid cancer. Between March 16, 2016, and July 26, 2016, participants accessed an online study that presented 3 hypothetical but clinically realistic scenarios, each of which described PTC as papillary thyroid cancer, papillary lesion, or abnormal cells. Participants were exposed to all 3 scenarios with the different terminologies, and participants were randomized by the order (first, second, or third) in which they viewed the terminologies. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2016, to May 15, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Treatment choice (total thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, or active surveillance), diagnosis anxiety, and treatment choice anxiety. Results Of the 550 participants who completed the online study and were included in the analysis, 279 (50.7%) were female and the mean (SD) age was 49.9 (15.2) years. A higher proportion of participants (108 [19.6%]) chose total thyroidectomy when papillary thyroid cancer was used to describe the condition compared with the percentage of participants who chose total thyroidectomy when papillary lesion (58 [10.5%]) or abnormal cells (60 [10.9%]) terminology was used. At first exposure, the papillary thyroid cancer terminology led 60 of 186 participants (32.3%) to choose surgery compared with 46 of 191 participants (24.1%) who chose surgery after being exposed to papillary lesion terminology first (risk ratio [RR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02) and 47 of 173 participants (27.2%) after being exposed to abnormal cells (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60-1.14) terminology first. After the first exposure, participants who viewed papillary thyroid cancer terminology reported significantly higher levels of anxiety (mean, 7.8 of 11 points) compared with those who viewed the papillary lesion (mean, 7.0 of 11 points; mean difference, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3) or abnormal cells (mean, 7.3 of 11 points; mean difference, -0.5; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.01). Overall, interest in active surveillance was high and higher levels of anxiety were reported by those who chose surgery, regardless of which terminology was viewed first (mean difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9). Conclusions and Relevance Changing the terminology of small PTCs may be one strategy to reduce patients' anxiety levels and help them consider less invasive management options. To curtail overdiagnosis and overtreatment in PTC, other strategies may include providing balanced information about the risks and advantages of alternative treatments. Trial Registration anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000271404.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nyhof BB, Wright FC, Look Hong NJ, Groot G, Helyer L, Meiers P, Quan ML, Baxter NN, Urquhart R, Warburton R, Gagliardi AR. Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women. Health Expect 2019; 23:106-114. [PMID: 31532871 PMCID: PMC6978860 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient‐centred care (PCC) improves health‐care experiences and outcomes. Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and clinicians have reported communication difficulties. Little prior research has studied how to improve communication and PCC for DCIS. Objective This study explored how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Design Canadian women treated for DCIS from five provinces participated in semi‐structured focus groups based on a 6‐domain cancer‐specific PCC framework to discuss communication about DCIS. Data were analysed using constant comparative technique. Setting and Participants Thirty‐five women aged 30 to 86 participated in five focus groups at five hospitals. Results Women said their clinicians used multiple approaches for fostering a healing relationship; however, most described an absence of desired information or behaviour to exchange information, respond to emotions, manage uncertainty, make decisions and enable self‐management. Most women were confused by terminology, offered little information about the risks of progression/recurrence, uninformed about treatment benefits and risks, frustrated with lack of engagement in decision making, given little information about follow‐up plans or self‐care advice, and received no acknowledgement or offer of emotional support. Discussion and Conclusions By comparing the accounts of women with DCIS to a PCC framework, we identified limitations and inconsistencies in women's lived experience of communication about DCIS, and approaches by which clinicians can more consistently achieve PCC for DCIS. Future research should develop and evaluate informational tools to support PCC for DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryanna B Nyhof
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Gary Groot
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Misconceptions and the Acceptance of Evidence-based Nonsurgical Interventions for Knee Osteoarthritis. A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:1975-1983. [PMID: 31192807 PMCID: PMC7000096 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to best practice guidelines for knee osteoarthritis (OA), findings from several different healthcare settings have identified that nonsurgical treatments are underused and TKA is overused. Empirical evidence and qualitative observations suggest that patients' willingness to accept nonsurgical interventions for knee OA is low. A qualitative investigation of why patients may feel that such interventions are of little value may be an important step toward increasing their use in the treatment of knee OA QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This qualitative study was embedded in a larger study investigating patient-related factors (beliefs/attitudes toward knee OA and its treatment) and health-system related factors (access, referral pathways) known to influence patients' decisions to seek medical care. In this paper we focus on the patient-related factors with the aim of exploring why patients may feel that nonsurgical interventions are of little value in the treatment of knee OA. METHODS A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in a single tertiary hospital in Australia. Patients with endstage knee OA on the waiting list for TKA were approached during their preadmission appointment and invited to participate in one-to-one interviews. As prescribed by the qualitative approach, data collection and data analysis were performed in parallel and recruitment continued until the authors agreed that the themes identified would not change through interviews with subsequent participants, at which point, recruitment stopped. Thirty-seven patients were approached and 27 participated. Participants were 48% female; mean age was 67 years. Participants' beliefs about knee OA and its treatment were identified in the interview transcripts. Beliefs were grouped into five belief dimensions: identity beliefs (what knee OA is), causal beliefs (what causes knee OA), consequence beliefs (what the consequences of knee OA are), timeline beliefs (how long knee OA lasts) and treatment beliefs (how knee OA can be controlled). RESULTS All participants believed that their knee OA was "bone on bone" (identity beliefs) and most (> 14 participants) believed it was caused by "wear and tear" (causal beliefs). Most (> 14 participants) believed that loading the knee could further damage their "vulnerable" joint (consequence beliefs) and all believed that their pain would deteriorate over time (timeline beliefs). Many (>20 participants) believed that physiotherapy and exercise interventions would increase pain and could not replace lost knee cartilage. They preferred experimental and surgical treatments which they believed would replace lost cartilage and cure their knee pain (treatment beliefs). CONCLUSIONS Common misconceptions about knee OA appear to influence patients' acceptance of nonsurgical, evidence-based treatments such as exercise and weight loss. Once the participants in this study had been "diagnosed" with "bone-on-bone" changes, many disregarded exercise-based interventions which they believed would damage their joint, in favor of alternative and experimental treatments, which they believed would regenerate lost knee cartilage. Future research involving larger, more representative samples are needed to understand how widespread these beliefs are and if/how they influence treatment decisions. In the meantime, clinicians seeking to encourage acceptance of nonsurgical interventions may consider exploring and targeting misconceptions that patients hold about the identity, causes, consequences, timeline, and treatment of knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
|
24
|
Blackwood J, Wright FC, Hong NJL, Gagliardi AR. Quality of DCIS information on the internet: a content analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:295-305. [PMID: 31214858 PMCID: PMC6661062 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05315-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) experience lingering confusion and anxiety, and may use the Internet for supplemental information. This study assessed the content and quality of DCIS information on the Internet. METHODS We searched Google for English-language, publicly available DCIS information tools published from 2010 to current by non-profit organizations. We summarized tool characteristics, DCIS labels, and information important to women with DCIS corresponding to domains of a patient-centred care (PCC) framework. Tool quality was appraised with the DISCERN instrument. RESULTS Of 39 tools included, most were plain language summaries published since 2016. Tools employed a median of 2.0 labels (range 1.0 to 5.0) for DCIS, most frequently non-invasive breast cancer (29, 74.4%), abnormal cells (14, 35.9%), pre-cancer (14, 35.9%), and early form of breast cancer (13, 33.3%). Tools addressed a median of 4.0 (range 2.0 to 5.0) PCC domains. Few tools contained content in the domains of fostering the relationship (30.8%), addressing emotions (41.0%), or follow-up (41.0%); 74.4% noted the risk of progression or recurrence but provided vague details. Tools were assessed as high (25.6%), moderate (48.7%), and low (25.6%) quality. CONCLUSIONS Few DCIS information tools available to women on the Internet meet quality criteria for consumer health information or address concerns of importance to women with DCIS. By identifying a range of poorly defined terms used to label DCIS, and specific content domains that were lacking, this study identified how existing tools could be improved, and identified higher-quality tools that clinicians can use when discussing DCIS with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayden Blackwood
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Frances C Wright
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Nicole J Look Hong
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shehata M, Grimm L, Ballantyne N, Lourenco A, Demello LR, Kilgore MR, Rahbar H. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Current Concepts in Biology, Imaging, and Treatment. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2019; 1:166-176. [PMID: 31538141 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a group of heterogeneous epithelial proliferations confined to the milk ducts that nearly always present in asymptomatic women on breast cancer screening. A stage 0, preinvasive breast cancer, increased detection of DCIS was initially hailed as a means to prevent invasive breast cancer through surgical treatment with adjuvant radiation and/or endocrine therapies. However, controversy in the medical community has emerged in the past two decades that a fraction of DCIS represents overdiagnosis, leading to unnecessary treatments and resulting morbidity. The imaging hallmarks of DCIS include linearly or segmentally distributed calcifications on mammography or nonmass enhancement on breast MRI. Imaging features have been shown to reflect the biological heterogeneity of DCIS lesions, with recent studies indicating MRI may identify a greater fraction of higher-grade lesions than mammography does. There is strong interest in the surgical, imaging, and oncology communities to better align DCIS management with biology, which has resulted in trials of active surveillance and therapy that is less aggressive. However, risk stratification of DCIS remains imperfect, which has limited the development of precision therapy approaches matched to DCIS aggressiveness. Accordingly, there are opportunities for breast imaging radiologists to assist the oncology community by leveraging advanced imaging techniques to identify appropriate patients for the less aggressive DCIS treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Shehata
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Lars Grimm
- Duke University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC
| | - Nancy Ballantyne
- Duke University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC
| | - Ana Lourenco
- Brown University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Providence, RI
| | - Linda R Demello
- Brown University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Providence, RI
| | - Mark R Kilgore
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Seattle, WA.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Berger-Höger B, Liethmann K, Mühlhauser I, Haastert B, Steckelberg A. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 93:141-152. [PMID: 30925280 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with breast cancer demand informed shared decision-making. Guidelines support these claims. OBJECTIVES To investigate whether an informed shared decision-making intervention for women with 'ductal carcinoma in situ' comprising an evidence-based decision aid with nurse-led decision coaching enhances the extent of the mutual shared decision-making behavior of patients and professionals regarding treatment options, and to analyze implementation barriers. DESIGN Cluster randomized controlled trial with accompanying process evaluation. SETTING Certified breast care centers in Germany. PARTICIPANTS Women with ductal carcinoma in situ and no previous history of breast cancer facing a primary treatment decision. METHODS Sixteen breast centers were randomized to intervention or standard care to recruit 192 patients (partially-blinded). All coaching sessions and physician consultations were videotaped to assess the primary outcome 'extent of patient involvement in shared decision-making' using the MAPPIN-Odyad observer instrument (scores 0 to 4). Secondary endpoints included the sub-measures of the MAPPIN-inventory (MAPPIN-Onurse, MAPPIN-Ophysician, MAPPIN-Opatient, MAPPIN-Qnurse, MAPPIN-Qpatient and MAPPIN-Qphysician), 'informed choice', 'decisional conflict' and 'duration of consultations'. Primary intention-to-treat analyses were on cluster level comparing means of cluster values using t-tests. An accompanying process evaluation was conducted comprising 1) analysis of all video recordings with focus on procedures and intervention fidelity and 2) field notes of researchers and feedback from professionals and patients assessed by questionnaires and interviews with focus on barriers and facilitators for implementation at different time points. RESULTS Due to protracted recruitment, the study was terminated after 14 centers had included 64 patients (intervention group 36, control group 28). Patient participation in informed shared decision-making was significantly higher in the intervention group (mean (SD) score 2.29 (0.56) vs. 0.42 (0.51) in the control group; difference 1.88 (95% CI 1.26-2.50, p < 0.0001). 47.7% women in the intervention group made informed choices, but none in the control group, difference 47.7% (95% CI 12.6-82.7%, p = 0.016). In the intervention group physician consultations lasted 12.8 (6.6) min. vs. 24.3 (6.3) min. in the control group. Physicians' attitudes, false incentives and structural barriers hindered implementation of informed shared decision-making. Nurses appreciated their new roles. CONCLUSIONS Informed shared decision-making is not yet implemented in German breast care centers. Nurse-led decision coaching grounded on evidence-based patient information enhances informed shared decision-making. Trial registration No. ISRCTN46305518.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Berger-Höger
- University of Hamburg, MIN-Faculty, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburger Str. 8, D-06112 Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Katrin Liethmann
- University of Hamburg, MIN-Faculty, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ingrid Mühlhauser
- University of Hamburg, MIN-Faculty, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Haastert
- mediStatistica Neuenrade, Lambertusweg 1b, D-58809 Neuenrade, Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- University of Hamburg, MIN-Faculty, Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburger Str. 8, D-06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nickel B, Semsarian C, Moynihan R, Barratt A, Jordan S, McLeod D, Brito JP, McCaffery K. Public perceptions of changing the terminology for low-risk thyroid cancer: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025820. [PMID: 30813118 PMCID: PMC6377531 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate public perceptions of overdiagnosis and overtreatment in low-risk thyroid cancer and explore opinions regarding the proposed strategy to change the terminology of low-risk cancers. DESIGN Qualitative study using focus groups that included a guided group discussion and presentation explaining thyroid cancer, overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and proposed communication strategies. Transcripts were analysed thematically. SETTING Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Forty-seven men and women of various ages from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds with no personal history of thyroid cancer. RESULTS Participants had low pre-existing general awareness of concepts of overdiagnosis and overtreatment and expressed concern regarding this new information in relation to thyroid cancer. Overall, participants understood why the strategy to change the terminology was being proposed and could see potential benefits including reducing the negative psychological impact and stigma associated with the term 'cancer'; however, many still had reservations about the strategy. The majority of the concerns were around their worry about the risk of further disease progression and that changing the terminology may create confusion and cause patients not to take the diagnosis and its associated managements seriously. Despite varied views towards the proposed strategy, there was a strong overarching desire for greater patient and public education around overdiagnosis and overtreatment in both thyroid cancer and cancer generally in order to complement any revised terminology and/or other mitigation strategies. CONCLUSIONS We found a strong and apparently widely held desire for more information surrounding the topic of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Careful consideration of how to inform both the public and current patients about the implications of a change in terminology, including changes to patients' follow-up or treatments, would be needed if such a change were to go ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caitlin Semsarian
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Jordan
- Cancer Causes and Care, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Donald McLeod
- Cancer Causes and Care, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rojas KE, Fortes TA, Borgen PI. Leveraging the variable natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to select optimal therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:307-313. [PMID: 30536119 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-05080-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma. The authors sought to discuss the evidence suggesting that not all DCIS will progress to invasive disease if left untreated. RESULTS Four lines of evidence align to suggest that not all of this in-situ disease progresses to invasive cancer: its prevalence on screening mammography, studies of missed diagnoses, incidental findings in autopsy specimens, and large retrospective reviews of those treated with excision alone. CONCLUSION A clearer understanding of the variable history of DCIS coupled with advances in genomic profiling of the disease holds the promise of reducing widespread over-treatment of this non-invasive cancer. Additionally, identification of higher risk of recurrence subsets may select patients for whom more aggressive treatment may be appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin E Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Brooklyn Breast Cancer Program of Maimonides Medical Center, 745 64th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11220, USA.
| | - Thais A Fortes
- Department of Surgery, Brooklyn Breast Cancer Program of Maimonides Medical Center, 745 64th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11220, USA
| | - Patrick I Borgen
- Department of Surgery, Brooklyn Breast Cancer Program of Maimonides Medical Center, 745 64th Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11220, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shaffer VA, Scherer LD. Too Much Medicine: Behavioral Science Insights on Overutilization, Overdiagnosis, and Overtreatment in Health Care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/2372732218786042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Overutilization—defined as the use of health care services for which the benefits do not outweigh the harms—has been identified as one of the leading contributors to the rising cost of health care in the United States. Although informational interventions designed to address overutilization have had a significant, but modest, impact on the rate of overutilization, they have not been sufficient to solve the problem. Also, various psychological mechanisms contribute to the desire for more medical tests and treatments. To effectively address overutilization, we need to better understand the psychological underpinnings of overuse in medicine. The article reviews recent findings from the behavioral science literature—including reliance on anecdotal evidence, test-related affect, the use of diagnostic labels, and medical maximizing tendencies—that lend insight into why patients sometimes seek, demand, or expect medical tests and treatments that are considered by experts to be low value.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chorley AJ, Hirst Y, Vrinten C, von Wagner C, Wardle J, Waller J. Public understanding of the purpose of cancer screening: A population-based survey. J Med Screen 2018; 25:64-69. [PMID: 28530514 PMCID: PMC5956561 DOI: 10.1177/0969141317699440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives In examining informed choice in cancer screening, we investigated public awareness that some screening programmes aim to prevent cancer, while others seek to detect cancer at an early stage. Methods A population-based survey of adults aged 50-70 in England (n = 1433), including data on demographic characteristics and screening experience. Participants were asked to select the main purpose of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening (both faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy). Results Across all four screening programmes, most people thought the main aim was to catch cancer early (71-78%). Only 18 and 14% knew that cervical screening and flexible sigmoidoscopy, respectively, are primarily preventive. Knowledge of the preventive aspect of these two programmes was low across the board, with few demographic patterns. By contrast, 78 and 73% of the sample were aware that breast screening and the faecal occult blood test, respectively, predominantly aim to detect cancer early. For these programmes, accurate knowledge was socially graded, lower in ethnic minority groups, and positively associated with previous participation in the programmes. Conclusions Our findings suggest that although awareness of the purpose of early detection screening is high, awareness that screening can prevent cancer is low across all demographic groups. Understanding the purpose of screening is a key aspect of informed choice but despite current communication strategies highlighting these differences, people do not seem to have a nuanced understanding of these differing aims. Our findings may be indicative of a broader public scepticism about the preventability of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Chorley
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Yasemin Hirst
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Vrinten
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | | | | | - Jo Waller
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Quinlan A, O’Brien KK, Galvin R, Hardy C, McDonnell R, Joyce D, McDowell RD, Aherne E, Keogh C, O’Sullivan K, Fahey T. Quantifying patient preferences for symptomatic breast clinic referral: a decision analysis study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e017286. [PMID: 29858402 PMCID: PMC5988058 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision analysis study that incorporates patient preferences and probability estimates to investigate the impact of women's preferences for referral or an alternative strategy of watchful waiting if faced with symptoms that could be due to breast cancer. SETTING Community-based study. PARTICIPANTS Asymptomatic women aged 30-60 years. INTERVENTIONS Participants were presented with 11 health scenarios that represent the possible consequences of symptomatic breast problems. Participants were asked the risk of death that they were willing to take in order to avoid the health scenario using the standard gamble utility method. This process was repeated for all 11 health scenarios. Formal decision analysis for the preferred individual decision was then estimated for each participant. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE The preferred diagnostic strategy was either watchful waiting or referral to a breast clinic. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine how each varied according to changes in the probabilities of the health scenarios. RESULTS A total of 35 participants completed the interviews, with a median age 41 years (IQR 35-47 years). The majority of the study sample was employed (n=32, 91.4%), with a third-level (university) education (n=32, 91.4%) and with knowledge of someone with breast cancer (n=30, 85.7%). When individual preferences were accounted for, 25 (71.4%) patients preferred watchful waiting to referral for triple assessment as their preferred initial diagnostic strategy. Sensitivity analysis shows that referral for triple assessment becomes the dominant strategy at the upper probability estimate (18%) of breast cancer in the community. CONCLUSIONS Watchful waiting is an acceptable strategy for most women who present to their general practitioner (GP) with breast symptoms. These findings suggest that current referral guidelines should take more explicit account of women's preferences in relation to their GPs initial management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling Quinlan
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kirsty K O’Brien
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rose Galvin
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Clinical Therapies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Colin Hardy
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronan McDonnell
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Doireann Joyce
- Department of Surgery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ronald D McDowell
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emma Aherne
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire Keogh
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Katriona O’Sullivan
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tom Fahey
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kim C, Liang L, Wright FC, Hong NJL, Groot G, Helyer L, Meiers P, Quan ML, Urquhart R, Warburton R, Gagliardi AR. Interventions are needed to support patient-provider decision-making for DCIS: a scoping review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 168:579-592. [PMID: 29273956 PMCID: PMC5842253 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4613-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic and treatment uncertainty make ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) complex to manage. The purpose of this study was to describe research that evaluated DCIS communication experiences, needs and interventions among DCIS patients or physicians. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2017. English language studies that evaluated patient or physician DCIS needs, experiences or behavioural interventions were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in duplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics and findings. RESULTS A total of 51 studies published from 1997 to 2016 were eligible for review, with a peak of 8 articles in year 2010. Women with DCIS lacked knowledge about the condition and its prognosis, although care partners were more informed, desired more information and experienced decisional conflict. Many chose mastectomy or prophylactic mastectomy, often based on physician's recommendation. Following treatment, women had anxiety and depression, often at levels similar to those with invasive breast cancer. Disparities were identified by education level, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and literacy. Physicians said that they had difficulty explaining DCIS and many referred to DCIS as cancer. Despite the challenges reported by patients and physicians, only two studies developed interventions designed to improve patient-physician discussion and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS As most women with DCIS undergo extensive treatment, and many experience treatment-related complications, the paucity of research on PE to improve and support informed decision-making for DCIS is profound. Research is needed to improve patient and provider discussions and decision-making for DCIS management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kim
- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Gary Groot
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nickel B, Brito JP, Moynihan R, Barratt A, Jordan S, McCaffery K. Patients' experiences of diagnosis and management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:242. [PMID: 29499654 PMCID: PMC5833084 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4152-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years management practices in relation to low-risk papillary microcarcinoma (PMC) have been evolving with increased awareness of the potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment of PMCs, and guidelines recommendations for non-surgical management options such as active surveillance. This study aimed to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ experiences of the communication of their PMC diagnosis, their treatment preferences and decision making. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 patients diagnosed pre-operatively with PMC < 1 year since their diagnosis and treatment. Interviews were conducted between September 2015 and July 2016 and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis method was used to analyse the data. Results The diagnosis and treatment experience of PMC patients varied widely. The majority of patients were asymptomatic, and their PMC was initially detected via an imaging test requested for a reason unrelated to a thyroid disorder or symptom. Clinicians generally described PMC to patients as being a “small” or “slow-growing” cancer, and there was little evidence that clinicians had discussions about the possibility of overdiagnosis or overtreatment. Overall, surgery was the only option discussed and offered to patients. Patients preference for treatment was largely based on eliminating the possibility of the cancer spreading (thyroidectomy) or not wanting to be on thyroid replacement medication for the rest of their life (hemi-thyroidectomy). Many patients reported emotional and physical side-effects associated with their diagnosis and treatment, however patients generally indicated that active surveillance is not something they would have been interested in if it was offered to them. Conclusions Evidence continues to emerge that many patients with PMCs may be overdiagnosed, and management guidelines are recommending more conservative management options for these patients. As a result, shared decision making around treatment options is vital so that patients are fully aware of the meaning of their diagnosis and their management options including active surveillance. Importantly, interventions to reduce unnecessary diagnoses of PMC are critically needed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4152-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, 4226, QLD, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan Jordan
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane City, QLD, 4006, Australia.,School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia. .,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192097. [PMID: 29401514 PMCID: PMC5798833 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Active surveillance (AS) represents a fundamental shift in managing select cancer patients that initiates treatment only upon disease progression to avoid overtreatment. Given uncertain outcomes, patient engagement could support decision-making about AS. Little is known about how to optimize patient engagement for AS decision-making. This scoping review aimed to characterize research on patient and provider communication about AS, and associated determinants and outcomes. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library were searched from 2006 to October 2016. English language studies that evaluated cancer patient or provider AS views, experiences or behavioural interventions were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in duplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics and findings. Results A total of 2,078 studies were identified, 1,587 were unique, and 1,243 were excluded based on titles/abstracts. Among 344 full-text articles, 73 studies were eligible: 2 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 4 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 6 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 61 prostate cancer. The most influential determinant of initiating AS was physician recommendation. Others included higher socioeconomic status, smaller tumor size, comorbid disease, older age, and preference to avoid adverse treatment effects. AS patients desired more information about AS and reassurance about future treatment options, involvement in decision-making and assessment of illness uncertainty and supportive care needs during follow-up. Only three studies of prostate cancer evaluated interventions to improve AS communication or experience. Conclusions This study revealed a paucity of research on AS communication for DCIS, RCC and CLL, but generated insight on how to optimize AS discussions in the context of routine care or clinical trials from research on AS for prostate cancer. Further research is needed on AS for patients with DCIS, RCC and CLL, and to evaluate interventions aimed at patients and/or providers to improve AS communication, experience and associated outcomes.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the noninvasive form of breast cancer (BC), comprises just over 20% of breast cancer cases diagnosed each year in the USA. Most patients are treated with local excision of the disease followed by whole breast radiation therapy. Total mastectomy is not an uncommon approach, and total mastectomy with a contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy has been on the rise in the past decade. In estrogen receptor-positive disease, patients are often offered endocrine ablative therapy with a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor as both treatment and prevention. Local regional treatment options have no impact upon ultimate overall survival. Long-term survival rates are higher in patients with DCIS than with any other form of the disease. Are these strikingly high success rates a testament to effective treatment strategies or is there a significant subset of DCIS that was unlikely to ever progress to invasive ductal carcinoma? DCIS was not seen in the US prior to the advent of screening mammography. When compared to other countries, the USA has the highest utilization of screening mammography and the incidence rate of DCIS. Other lines of evidence include autopsy series examining the breast tissue of women who died of other causes, missed-diagnosis series and current retrospective reviews of DCIS, all align in support of the concept of DCIS as indolent in the majority of cases [3-14]. The evidence suggests that both patient and physician misconceptions about DCIS have led to overdiagnosis and over-treatment of DCIS. Recently, a gene expression profiling tool (12 gene assay, Oncotype DCIS) has emerged that shows considerable promise in predicting class in DCIS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Breast Center, Maimonides Medical Center, Research Fellow, Oxford University, Oxford, England
| | - Rachel Wetstone
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Dana Greenstein
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Patrick Borgen
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kanbayashi C, Iwata H. Current approach and future perspective for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47:671-677. [PMID: 28486668 PMCID: PMC5896693 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. In ductal carcinoma in situ without micrometastasis, surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy significantly improve local control, however it has been reported that the selection of the surgical procedure and adjuvant therapy does not influence breast cancer death. On the other hand, owing to widespread mammography screening, the frequency of early breast cancer detection has increased. In early breast cancer, increased incidence of DCIS is remarkable. However, there is not enough reduction of advanced cancer to match it. Problems with overdiagnosis are now being discussed all over the world. It has been reported that surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not contribute to breast cancer-specific survival. However, it is currently impossible to reliably identify a population that does not progress to invasive cancer even without treatment. Recently, a non-surgery clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ was started. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ with less treatment intervention, without compromising the good prognosis obtained with the current treatment approach. This review presents an overview of the current treatment approaches, problems with overdiagnosis and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Copp T, McCaffery K, Azizi L, Doust J, Mol BWJ, Jansen J. Influence of the disease label 'polycystic ovary syndrome' on intention to have an ultrasound and psychosocial outcomes: a randomised online study in young women. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:876-884. [PMID: 28333180 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Study question Does the disease label 'polycystic ovary syndrome' (PCOS) have an impact on desire for medical testing and psychosocial outcomes? Summary answer When given the disease label PCOS in a hypothetical scenario, participants had higher intention to have an ultrasound, perceived the condition to be more severe and had lower self-esteem than those not given the disease label. What is known already Widening diagnostic criteria and improved imaging sensitivity have increased the number of reproductive-aged women diagnosed with PCOS from 4% to 8% to up to 21%. The uncertain clinical benefit of knowing this diagnosis needs to be weighed against the potential for poor psychological outcomes in women labelled with PCOS. Study design, size, duration This experimental online study randomised 181 young women to receive one of four hypothetical scenarios of a doctor's visit in a 2 (PCOS disease label versus no disease label) x 2 (information about unreliability of ultrasounds in clarifying diagnosis versus no information) design. Participants/materials, setting, methods Participants were university students (mean age: 19.4). After presenting the scenario, intention to have an ultrasound, negative affect, self-esteem, perceived severity of condition, credibility of the doctor and interest in a second opinion were measured. Participants were then presented with a second scenario, where the possibility of PCOS overdiagnosis was mentioned. Change in intention and perceived severity were then measured. Main results and the role of chance Participants given the PCOS label had significantly higher intention to have an ultrasound (mean = 6.62 versus mean = 5.76, P = 0.033, 95% CI(difference) = 0.069-1.599), perceived the condition to be more severe (17.17 versus 15.82, P = 0.019, 95% CI(difference) = 0.229-2.479) and had lower self-esteem (25.86 versus 27.56, P = 0.031, 95% CI(difference) = -3.187 to -0.157). After receiving overdiagnosis information, both intention and perceived severity decreased, regardless of condition (both P < 0.001). Limitations, reasons for caution This study used hypothetical scenarios; it is likely that for women facing a real diagnosis of PCOS, outcomes would be more affected than in the current study. The hypothetical design, however, allowed the symptoms and risks of PCOS to be held constant across conditions, the impact on intention and psychosocial outcomes directly attributable to the effect of the disease label. Wider implications of the findings These findings demonstrate the potential negative consequences of PCOS labelling. It is crucial we consider the impact of the label before diagnosing more women with PCOS when clinical benefit of this diagnosis is uncertain. Study funding/competing interest(s) This paper was written with support from a NHMRC grant awarded to the Screening and Test Evaluation Program. J.J. is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. K.M. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. The authors declare that no competing interests exist. Trial registration number ACTRN12617000111370. Trial registration date 20/01/2017. Date of first patient's enrolment 01/06/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lamiae Azizi
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Ben W J Mol
- Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nickel B, Barratt A, Copp T, Moynihan R, McCaffery K. Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014129. [PMID: 28698318 PMCID: PMC5541578 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Changing terminology for low-risk, screen-detected conditions has now been recommended by several expert groups in order to prevent overdiagnosis and reduce the associated harms of overtreatment. However, the effect of terminology on patients' preferences for management is not well understood. This review aims to synthesise existing studies on terminology and its impact on management decision making. DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Studies were included that compared two or more terminologies to describe the same condition and measured the effect on treatment or management preferences and/or choices. Studies were identified via database searches from inception to April 2017, and from reference lists. Two authors evaluated the eligibility of studies with verification from the study team, extracted and crosschecked data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. RESULTS Of the 1399 titles identified, seven studies, all of which included hypothetical scenarios, met the inclusion criteria. Six studies were quantitative and one was qualitative. Six of the studies were of high quality. Studies covered a diverse range of conditions: ductal carcinoma in situ (3), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (1), conjunctivitis (1), polycystic ovary syndrome (1) and a bony fracture (1). The terminologies compared in each study varied based on the condition assessed. Based on a narrative synthesis of the data, when a more medicalised or precise term was used to describe the condition, it generally resulted in a shift in preference towards more invasive managements, and/or higher ratings of anxiety and perceived severity of the condition. CONCLUSIONS Different terminology given for the same condition influenced management preferences and psychological outcomes in a consistent pattern in these studies. Changing the terminology may be one strategy to reduce patient preferences for aggressive management responses to low-risk conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO: CRD42016035643.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nickel B, Brito JP, Barratt A, Jordan S, Moynihan R, McCaffery K. Clinicians' Views on Management and Terminology for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Qualitative Study. Thyroid 2017; 27:661-671. [PMID: 28322617 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2016.0483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing acceptance that the increase in thyroid cancer incidence is in part a result of overdiagnosis of small low-risk papillary microcarcinomas (PMCs) with indolent clinical course. Although surgery is the cornerstone treatment for patients with PMCs, recent management guidelines are shifting toward inclusion of more conservative treatments such as active surveillance. There is little evidence on clinicians' experience in managing PMC patients and their attitudes toward treatment options, including their willingness to accept a nonsurgical option. The aim of this study was to understand how clinicians perceive a diagnosis of PMC, potential changes to terminology, and the treatment options available to patients. METHODS This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2015 and May 2016 with 22 clinicians (seven endocrinologists and 15 thyroid surgeons). Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded, and a framework method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Across a sample of clinicians who manage thyroid cancer patients, awareness of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of PMC was common. However, there was little acceptance of active surveillance to manage these patients. Clinicians did not feel comfortable recommending this management approach, as they were worried about the risk of metastases, did not feel that evidence to support this approach was strong enough, and also believed that patients currently have a high preference for surgery. The majority of clinicians did not believe that changing the terminology of this diagnosis was a viable strategy to reduce patients' anxiety and their perceived preference for more aggressive treatments. However, most clinicians felt that thyroid nodules <1 cm should not be biopsied, which could help minimize the risk of overdiagnosis of PMC. CONCLUSIONS This study, based on a non-representative sample of 22 clinicians, which remains an important limitation, provides revealing insight into clinicians' management preferences and decision making for small low-risk thyroid cancers at a time when management guidelines and practices are evolving. It suggests that clinicians may not be ready to accept nonsurgical options, or changes in terminology, until evidence to support these options and changes is stronger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Nickel
- 1 Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
- 2 Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Juan P Brito
- 3 Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Rochester, Mayo Clinic , Minnesota
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- 1 Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| | - Susan Jordan
- 4 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, Australia
- 5 School of Public Health, The University of Queensland , St. Lucia, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- 1 Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
- 6 Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University , Robina, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- 1 Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
- 2 Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Casasent AK, Edgerton M, Navin NE. Genome evolution in ductal carcinoma in situ: invasion of the clones. J Pathol 2016; 241:208-218. [PMID: 27861897 DOI: 10.1002/path.4840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most frequently diagnosed early-stage breast cancer. Only a subset of patients progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and this presents a formidable clinical challenge for determining which patients to treat aggressively and which patients to monitor without therapeutic intervention. Understanding the molecular and genomic basis of invasion has been difficult to study in DCIS cancers due to several technical obstacles, including low tumour cellularity, lack of fresh-frozen tissues, and intratumour heterogeneity. In this review, we discuss the role of intratumour heterogeneity in the progression of DCIS to IDC in the context of three evolutionary models: independent lineages, evolutionary bottlenecks, and multiclonal invasion. We examine the evidence in support of these models and their relevance to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with DCIS. We also discuss how emerging technologies, such as single-cell sequencing, STAR-FISH, and imaging mass spectrometry, are likely to provide new insights into the evolution of this enigmatic disease. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Casasent
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Edgerton
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|