Control of muscle tone in the human colon

Effects of opium tincture on gastrointestinal function and motility in healthy volunteers: A magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND

Opioids inhibit motility and secretion of the gut and have been used for antidiarrheal treatment for centuries. However, the underlying mechanisms of opium tincture are not evident.

AIM

To investigate the effects of opium tincture on gastrointestinal motility, intestinal volumes, and water content of different gut segments assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 9 days of treatment with 30 drops of opium tincture per day. MRI was performed on day 1 (before treatment) and day 9 (during treatment). Measurements included assessments of gastric volume, gastric emptying, gastric motility, small bowel volume, small bowel water content, small bowel motility, colon volume, colon water content, and whole gut transit.

KEY RESULTS

Opium tincture delayed gastric emptying by a mean difference of 5.6 min [95% CI: 1.8-9.4], p = 0.004, and increased postprandial gastric meal volume (17-21%, p = 0.02). Small bowel endpoints did not change. Opium tincture delayed whole gut transit time (p = 0.027) and increased ascending colon volume by 59 mL [95% CI: 15-103], p = 0.004, and transverse colon volume by 48 mL [95% CI: 4-92], p = 0.027. T1-relaxation time of the descending colon chyme was decreased during opium treatment, indicating dryer feces (difference: -173 ms [95% CI: -336 -11], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES

Opium tincture induced changes in the stomach and colon in healthy volunteers. An improved understanding of how opioids affect gut functions may lead to a better understanding and optimized management of diarrhea.

The Clinical Utility of Antroduodenal Manometry in the Evaluation of Children with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Antroduodenal manometry (ADM) measures antral and small bowel motility and is clinically used to evaluate upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms. We aimed to evaluate its utility in guiding treatment, predicting response, and association with clinical findings.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 200 children undergoing ADM. ADM interpretation and parameters were compared to outcomes (response to first therapy after ADM and overall response), predominant symptom (group A, abdominal distention and/or vomiting and group B, abdominal pain and/or nausea), etiology (idiopathic or with known comorbidity), and ADM indication [suspected chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) or unexplained UGI symptoms].

RESULTS

We found an association between a normal intestinal phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) and idiopathic etiology, group B symptoms and unexplained UGI symptoms. No variable was associated with initial successful response. However, normal small bowel phase III of the MMC and idiopathic etiology were associated with overall successful response to treatment (including feeding tolerance and weaning of parenteral nutrition). No antral ADM parameter was associated with outcomes or other comparisons. The time to overall successful treatment response was significantly shorter in patients with a normal ADM and presence of a normal phase III of the MMC.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the phase III of the MMC was the single ADM parameter predictive of overall treatment response, also associated to group B symptoms and idiopathic etiology. Our findings suggest that small bowel ADM parameters are more useful to predict outcomes and ADM should be performed primarily in patients presenting with abdominal distention and/or vomiting and those being evaluated for CIPO.

Novel sensory trigger for gastrocolonic response

BACKGROUND

Gastrocolonic response (GCR) is a physiologic increase in motor activity of the colon following meal ingestion. The presence of GCR, in colonic manometry (CM) studies, is used as a marker of normal colonic motor activity. Our aim was to investigate whether GCR could be induced by sensory stimulation (visual or olfactory) prior to food ingestion, and to describe the characteristics of patients with this response.

METHODS

We prospectively marked time of meal presence and initiation on CM tracings of patients with idiopathic constipation. We reviewed electronic medical records and normal CM studies. Presence of sensory GCR was defined as an increase by at least 25% of the baseline motility index (MI) after exposure to meal, prior to food ingestion. Manometry characteristics of patients with a sensory GCR response were compared to those without.

KEY RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients, (47% females, median age 9 years) met the inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (52.8%) patients had a positive sensory GCR. This cohort had a higher proportion of postprandial GCR (93.6% vs. 76.2%, p-value = 0.02) and lower fasting MI (2.08 mm Hg vs. 3.54 mm Hg, p < 0.01). Thirteen (14.6%) patients who had no postprandial GCR had higher baseline MI (median of 3.69 vs. 2.46 mm Hg, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Visualizing or smelling food resulted in a significant increase in baseline MI in more than 50% of patients. Our findings propose a novel, alternate pathway that can induce GCR. This central sensory pathway may have clinical relevance in the diagnosis and management of patients with colonic dysmotility.

Gastrocolonic Response

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The gastrocolonic response (GCR), is a physiologic increase in motor activity of the colon, which usually occurs within minutes following meal ingestion. Over the years several triggers that provoke GCR were recognized including gastric dilation, caloric intake, and fat component of the meal. The response is mediated by the vagal nerve and neurohumoral mechanisms, and it can be modified by several pharmacological factors. Assessment of GCR is part of high-resolution colonic manometry studies, performed in patients with suspected colonic dysmotility. This review highlights the physiologic basis of GCR as well as its clinical and diagnostic features and implementation in variable pathological conditions and clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

GCR has a role in patients with constipation, diabetes, dumping syndrome, bowel hyper and hypomotility and irritable bowel syndrome. Novel sensory triggers for GCR were recently recognized. GCR is a physiological response which is evaluated during colonic manometry studies. Abnormal GCR is a marker of an underlying pathology, which can provide a potential target for treatment.

The Macro- and Micro-Mechanics of the Colon and Rectum I: Experimental Evidence

Many lower gastrointestinal diseases are associated with altered mechanical movement and deformation of the large intestine, i.e., the colon and rectum. The leading reason for patients' visits to gastrointestinal clinics is visceral pain, which is reliably evoked by mechanical distension rather than non-mechanical stimuli such as inflammation or heating. The macroscopic biomechanics of the large intestine were characterized by mechanical tests and the microscopic by imaging the load-bearing constituents, i.e., intestinal collagen and muscle fibers. Regions with high mechanical stresses in the large intestine (submucosa and muscularis propria) coincide with locations of submucosal and myenteric neural plexuses, indicating a functional interaction between intestinal structural biomechanics and enteric neurons. In this review, we systematically summarized experimental evidence on the macro- and micro-scale biomechanics of the colon and rectum in both health and disease. We reviewed the heterogeneous mechanical properties of the colon and rectum and surveyed the imaging methods applied to characterize collagen fibers in the intestinal wall. We also discussed the presence of extrinsic and intrinsic neural tissues within different layers of the colon and rectum. This review provides a foundation for further advancements in intestinal biomechanics by synergistically studying the interplay between tissue biomechanics and enteric neurons.

First translational consensus on terminology and definitions of colonic motility in animals and humans studied by manometric and other techniques

Alterations in colonic motility are implicated in the pathophysiology of bowel disorders, but high-resolution manometry of human colonic motor function has revealed that our knowledge of normal motor patterns is limited. Furthermore, various terminologies and definitions have been used to describe colonic motor patterns in children, adults and animals. An example is the distinction between the high-amplitude propagating contractions in humans and giant contractions in animals. Harmonized terminology and definitions are required that are applicable to the study of colonic motility performed by basic scientists and clinicians, as well as adult and paediatric gastroenterologists. As clinical studies increasingly require adequate animal models to develop and test new therapies, there is a need for rational use of terminology to describe those motor patterns that are equivalent between animals and humans. This Consensus Statement provides the first harmonized interpretation of commonly used terminology to describe colonic motor function and delineates possible similarities between motor patterns observed in animal models and humans in vitro (ex vivo) and in vivo. The consolidated terminology can be an impetus for new research that will considerably improve our understanding of colonic motor function and will facilitate the development and testing of new therapies for colonic motility disorders.

Transcriptomics analysis reveals new insights in E171-induced molecular alterations in a mouse model of colon cancer

Titanium dioxide as a food additive (E171) has been demonstrated to facilitate growth of chemically induced colorectal tumours in vivo and induce transcriptomic changes suggestive of an immune system impairment and cancer development. The present study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms behind the tumour stimulatory effects of E171 in combination with azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) and compare these results to a recent study performed under the same conditions with E171 only. BALB/c mice underwent exposure to 5 mg/kg_bw/day of E171 by gavage for 2, 7, 14, and 21 days. Whole genome mRNA microarray analyses on the distal colon were performed. The results show that E171 induced a downregulation of genes involved in the innate and adaptive immune system, suggesting impairment of this system. In addition, over time, signalling genes involved in colorectal cancer and other types of cancers were modulated. In relation to cancer development, effects potentially associated with oxidative stress were observed through modulation of genes related to antioxidant production. E171 affected genes involved in biotransformation of xenobiotics which can form reactive intermediates resulting in toxicological effects. These transcriptomics data reflect the early biological responses induced by E171 which precede tumour formation in an AOM/DSS mouse model.

Effects of naloxegol on whole gut transit in opioid-naïve healthy subjects receiving codeine: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Nausea, vomiting, and constipation (OIC) are common adverse effects of acute or chronic opioid use. Naloxegol (25 mg) is an approved peripherally active mu-opiate opioid receptor antagonist.

AIM

To compare the effects on pan-gut transit of treatment with codeine, naloxegol, or combination in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group study in 72 healthy opioid-naïve adults, randomized to: codeine (30 mg q.i.d.), naloxegol (25 mg daily), codeine and naloxegol, or matching placebo. During 3 days of treatment, we measured gastric emptying (GE) T1/2 , colonic filling at 6 hours (CF6), colonic geometric center at 24 and 48 hours, and ascending colon emptying (ACE) T1/2 .

KEY RESULTS

Participants were 59.7% women, median BMI 25.0 kg/m2 , and median age 33.8 years. Codeine significantly retarded GE T1/2, CF6, overall colonic transit, and ACE T1/2 . There was significant difference (P = .026) in GE T1/2 between codeine (144.0 min [IQR 110.5-238.6]) and naloxegol (95.5 min [89.1-135.4]). There was a significant overall group difference in CF6 (P = .023), with significant difference (P = .019) between codeine (11.0% [0.0-45.0]) and naloxegol (51% [18.8-76.2]). However, no significant differences were found between codeine-treated participants concomitantly receiving placebo or naloxegol.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Short-term administration of naloxegol (25 mg) in healthy, opioid-naïve volunteers does not reverse the retardation of gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit induced by acute administration of codeine. Further studies with naloxegol at higher dose are warranted to assess the ability to reverse the retardation of transit caused by acute administration of codeine in opioid-naïve subjects.

Lack of an Effect of Gastric Capsaicin on the Rectal Component of the Gastrocolonic Response

Luminal capsaicin induces local and distant reflexes in the upper gastrointestinal tract and stimulates lower gastrointestinal symptoms in susceptible persons. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gastric capsaicin on rectal motor function and sensation.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers participated twice, at least 1 week apart, in this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Participants swallowed a gastric tube for capsaicin or saline infusion. A barostat tube was placed in the rectum to measure rectal tone before and during gastric capsaicin (40 µg/ml, 2.5 ml/min) or placebo infusion and to conduct distension experiments before and after gastric infusions. Gastric infusions were terminated after 60 min or when epigastric discomfort occurred. Differences in rectal tone, compliance, and sensitivity between gastric placebo and gastric capsaicin were determined.

RESULTS

On both study days, basal rectal volumes, compliance, and sensitivity parameters were comparable (NS) before gastric infusions. Gastric capsaicin infusion induced epigastric discomfort that necessitated termination of infusion after 29.6 ± 12.3 min (saline: 54.7 ± 8.9 min; p < 0.01). Rectal tone, aggregate perception scores, and rectal compliance did not differ between placebo and capsaicin trials (p > 0.05). Rectal tone increased significantly only when capsaicin induced epigastric discomfort (p < 0.05). The reproducibility of the barostat trial was acceptable with significant correlations of volumes, pressures (< 0.05; r ² from 0.41 to 0.55), rectal compliance (p < 0.01; r ² = 0.44), and aggregate perception scores (p values all < 0.05; r ² from 0.44 to 0.0.65) between the two barostat trials.

CONCLUSION

Gastric perfusion with capsaicin does not directly influence rectal physiology through a reflex arc.

Resection of the large bowel suppresses hunger and food intake and modulates gastrointestinal fermentation

OBJECTIVE

To assess appetite and gut hormone levels in patients following partial (PR) or total resection (TR) of the large bowel.

METHODS

A comparative cross sectional study was carried out with healthy controls (n = 99) and patients who had undergone PR (n = 64) or TR (n = 12) of the large bowel. Participants consumed a standard (720 kcal) breakfast meal at 0830 (t = 0) h followed by lactulose (15 g) and a buffet lunch (t = 210 min). Participants rated the subjective feelings of hunger at t = -30, 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Breath hydrogen (BH) concentrations were also evaluated. In a matched subset (11 controls, 11 PR and 9 TR patients) PYY and GLP-1 concentrations were measured following breakfast. The primary outcome measure was appetite, as measured using visual analogue scales and the buffet lunch. The secondary outcome was BH concentrations following a test meal.

RESULTS

PR and TR participants had lower hunger and energy intake at the buffet lunch meal compared to controls. PR subjects had higher BH concentrations compared to controls and TR subjects. BH levels correlated with circulating GLP-1 levels at specific time points.

CONCLUSIONS

PR or TR of the large bowel reduced feelings of hunger and energy intake, and PR increased gastrointestinal fermentation.

Rectal motility in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence: a study with impedance planimetry

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with fecal incontinence have poor anal sphincter function. In patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence no structural abnormality can be identified. The aim of the present study was to compare rectal motility patterns in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and in healthy controls.

METHODS

Rectal impedance planimetry provides simultaneous measurement of rectal pressure, anal pressure, and rectal cross-sectional area at 5 levels. This allows highly detailed description of rectoanal motility. In 12 female patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence (mean age, 64.5) and 12 healthy controls (mean age, 47; 12 females) rectal phasic activity and tone were studied at a distension pressure 10 cm H2O above basic rectal pressure for one hour during fast and one hour after the meal.

RESULTS

The median rectal cross-sectional area during fast was 3178 mm2 (range, 1905-4095) in patients with fecal incontinence and 2907 mm2 (range, 1832-4195) in the control group (P = .42). The postprandial decrease in rectal cross-sectional area was significantly more pronounced in patients (median postprandial reduction 462 mm2 (range, 3124 reduction to 7 increase)) than in the control group (median postprandial change 33 mm2 (range, 844 reduction to 974 increase)) (P = .007). The number of anal sampling reflexes during fast was reduced in patients (P = .03) and rectal wall tension during anal sampling reflexes also tended to be lower (P = .07). No differences in other phasic rectal motility patterns were found.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic fecal incontinence is associated with enhanced postprandial increase in rectal tone and a reduced frequency of anal sampling reflexes.

Current and novel therapeutic options for irritable bowel syndrome management

Irritable bowel syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal disorder affecting up to 3-15% of the general population in western countries. It is characterised by unexplained abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating in association with altered bowel habits. The pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome is multifactorial involving disturbances of the brain-gut axis. The pathophysiology provides the rationale for pharmacotherapy: abnormal gastrointestinal motor functions, visceral hypersensitivity, psychosocial factors, autonomic dysfunction, and mucosal immune activation. Understanding the mechanisms, and their mediators or modulators including neurotransmitters and receptors have led to several therapeutic approaches including agents acting on the serotonin receptor or serotonin transporter system, antidepressants, novel selective anticholinergics, alpha-adrenergic agonists, opioid agents, cholecystokinin-antagonists, neurokinin-antagonists, somatostatin receptor agonists, corticotropin releasing factor antagonists, chloride channel activators, guanylate cyclase-c agonists, melatonin, atypical benzodiazepines, antibiotics, immune modulators and probiotics. The mechanisms and current evidence regarding efficacy of these agents are reviewed.

Challenges to the therapeutic pipeline for irritable bowel syndrome: end points and regulatory hurdles

Recent advances in our understanding of basic neuroenteric mechanisms and the role of effectors and transmitters in the brain-gut axis have provided opportunities to develop new therapeutic agents for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Furthermore, human pharmacodynamic studies utilizing transit, colonic, or rectal sensitivity and brain imaging have been useful in determining therapeutic efficacy (particularly for drugs that act on motor function). This review provides an overview of medications that have not yet been approved for treatment of patients with IBS yet have shown promise in phase IIB trials. These include drugs that act on the serotonin receptor and transporter system: antidepressants, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, opioids, cholecystokinin antagonists, neurokinin-antagonists, chloride channel activators, guanylate cyclase C agonists, atypical benzodiazepines, probiotics, and antibiotics. The changing landscape in the regulatory approval process has impacted the development of IBS drugs. Guidance documents from regulatory agencies in Europe and the United States have focused on patients' reported outcomes and associated quality of life. After a decade of experience with different end points that have generated some data on psychometric validation and unprecedented information about responsiveness of the binary or global end points to drug therapy, it is necessary to pursue further validation studies before or during pivotal phase IIB or III trials. The hope of providing relief to patients should galvanize all parties to achieve these goals.

Effect of bisacodyl on postoperative bowel motility in elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus is a common condition after abdominal surgery. Many prokinetic drugs have been evaluated including osmotic laxatives. The data on colon-stimulating laxatives are scarce. This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial investigates the effect of the colon-stimulating laxative bisacodyl on postoperative ileus in elective colorectal resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2004 and February 2007, 200 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either bisacodyl or placebo. Primary endpoint was time to gastrointestinal recovery (mean time to first flatus passed, first defecation, and first solid food tolerated; GI-3). Secondary endpoints were incidence and duration of nasogastric tube reinsertion, incidence of vomiting, length of hospital stay, and visual analogue scores for pain, cramps, and nausea.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed, and 31 patients discontinued the study. Groups were comparable in baseline demographics. Time to GI-3 was significantly shorter in the bisacodyl group (3.0 versus 3.7 days, P = 0.007). Of the single parameters defining GI-3, there was a 1-day difference in time to defecation in favor to the bisacodyl group (3.0 versus 4.0 days, P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference in time to first flatus or tolerance of solid food was seen. No significant difference in the secondary endpoints was seen. Morbidity and mortality did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Bisacodyl accelerated gastrointestinal recovery and might be considered as part of multimodal recovery programs after colorectal surgery.

Lipid-induced colonic hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome: the role of bowel habit, sex, and psychologic factors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Duodenal lipid infusion increases colonic hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Whether this is affected by bowel habit, psychologic factors, or sex is unknown.

METHODS

We included 61 patients with IBS (50 women, 11 men), 25 with diarrhea-predominant IBS, 17 with constipation-predominant IBS, 19 with alternating-type IBS, and 20 healthy controls (15 women, 5 men). A colonic distension trial was performed with a barostat before and after a 1-hour duodenal lipid infusion (3 kcal/min). Colonic thresholds, colonic tone, and the viscerosomatic referral pattern were assessed and compared between groups. Patients also completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale.

RESULTS

The reduction in colonic pressure thresholds after vs before duodenal lipids was greater in patients than in controls for discomfort (P = .006) and pain (P < .0001). An increased viscerosomatic referral area for pain and discomfort during colonic distensions after vs before duodenal lipids was observed in patients but not in controls. The response was similar in IBS subgroups based on the predominant bowel habit, in patients with vs without anxiety and/or depression, and in women and men with IBS. The colonic tone response during lipid infusion was similar in IBS patients and controls, and in the different IBS subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

IBS patients show increased colonic sensitivity and altered viscerosomatic referral pattern after duodenal lipids. This response is largely unaffected by the predominant bowel habit, psychologic factors, or sex, but seems to be related to IBS per se.

Irritable bowel syndrome: recent and novel therapeutic approaches

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder affecting up to 3-15% of the general population in Western countries. It is characterised by unexplained abdominal pain, discomfort and bloating in association with altered bowel habits. The pathophysiology of IBS is considered to be multifactorial, involving disturbances of the brain-gut-axis: IBS has been associated with abnormal gastrointestinal motor functions, visceral hypersensitivity, psychosocial factors, autonomic dysfunction and mucosal inflammation. Traditional IBS therapy is mainly symptom oriented and often unsatisfactory. Hence, there is a need for new treatment strategies. Increasing knowledge of brain-gut physiology, mechanisms, and neurotransmitters and receptors involved in gastrointestinal motor and sensory function have led to the development of several new therapeutic approaches. This article provides a systematic overview of recently approved or novel medications that show promise for the treatment of IBS; classification is based on the physiological systems targeted by the medication. The article includes agents acting on the serotonin receptor or serotonin transporter system, novel selective anticholinergics, alpha-adrenergic agonists, opioid agents, cholecystokinin antagonists, neurokinin antagonists, somatostatin receptor agonists, neurotrophin-3, corticotropin releasing factor antagonists, chloride channel activators, guanylate cyclase-c agonists, melatonin and atypical benzodiazepines. Finally, the role of probiotics and antibacterials in the treatment of IBS is summarised.

Meal induced rectosigmoid tone modification: a low caloric meal accurately separates functional and organic gastrointestinal disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is based on arbitrary criteria due to the lack of an accurate diagnostic test. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether rectosigmoid tone modification after a meal represents an accurate diagnostic approach.

METHODS

In a secondary care setting, 32 constipation predominant and 24 diarrhoea predominant IBS patients, 10 functional diarrhoea and 10 functional constipation patients, 29 organic gastrointestinal disease patients, and 10 healthy volunteers underwent a rectal barostat test to measure fasting and postprandial rectosigmoid tone. Rectosigmoid response was assessed following three meals containing different amounts of calories: 200 kcal, 400 kcal and 1000 kcal.

RESULTS

After 200 kcal, healthy volunteers and patients with organic diseases showed a reduction in rectosigmoid volume of at least 28% of fasting volume, indicating a meal induced increase in muscle tone. In contrast, patients with diarrhoea predominant IBS showed dilation of the rectosigmoid colon, indicative of reduced tone, and patients with constipation predominant IBS showed a mild volume reduction or no modification. Functional diarrhoea and constipation patients showed rectosigmoid tone modification resembling that of the corresponding IBS subtype. A 400 kcal meal normalised rectosigmoid tone in more than half of the constipation predominant IBS patients but none of the diarrhoea predominant IBS patients. In contrast, a 1000 kcal meal normalised tone response in all IBS patients. Sensitivity of the test was 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 96%, and negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSION

A postprandial reduction in rectosigmoid tone of at least 28% of fasting value after a low caloric meal accurately separates organic and functional gastrointestinal disease patients. This parameter may therefore be used in the positive diagnosis of IBS.

Normal aspects of colorectal motility and abnormalities in slow transit constipation

Human colonic motility is a relatively difficult topic to investigate. However, the refinement of manometric techniques in recent years enabled us to study both the proximal and distal segments of the viscus. The present paper reviews our knowledge about normal aspects of colorectal motility in man and the abnormalities found in slow transit constipation (STC), one of the most frequent and difficult to treat subtypes of constipation. An internet-based search strategy of the Medline and Science Citation Index was performed using the keywords colon, colonic, colorectal, constipation, slow transit, motility, rectal, rectum in various combinations with the Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Only articles related to human studies were used, and manual cross-referencing was also performed. Most of colonic motor activity is represented by single nonpropagated contractions, rarely organized in bursts; this activity is maximal during the day, especially after waking and following meals. In addition, a specialized propagated activity with propulsive features is detectable, represented by high- and low-amplitude propagated contractions. In the severe form of constipation represented by the slow transit type, the above motor activity is completely deranged. In fact, both basal segmental activity (especially in response to meals) and propagated activity (especially that of high amplitude) are usually decreased, and this may represent a physiologic marker of this disorder. Human colonic motor activity is quite a complex issue, still only partly understood and investigated, due to anatomic and physiological difficulties. In recent years, however, some more data have been obtained, even in proximal segments. These data have helped in elucidating, although only in part, some pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic constipation, and especially of the STC subtype.

Alvimopan, a selective peripherally acting mu-opioid antagonist

Alvimopan is a novel, peripherally acting mu-opioid antagonist that is being developed for the management of acute postoperative ileus and for the reversal of the delayed gastrointestinal and colonic transit that result in symptoms such as constipation, nausea and motility disorders in patients treated with opiate analgesics. There is a clinical need for effective medications for the treatment of postoperative ileus and opiate-induced constipation and other motility disorders. This review addresses the basic and applied pharmacology and current evidence for the use of the medication, alvimopan, in clinical gastroenterology.

Postoperative colonic motility increases after early food intake in patients undergoing colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Stimulation of colonic motility by the gastrocolonic response may help to reduce inhibition of gastrointestinal motility after colorectal surgery. We aimed to investigate whether postoperative colonic motility is increased after early food intake.

METHODS

Nineteen patients undergoing colorectal surgery and 7 healthy volunteers were investigated. Colonic motility was recorded with a combined manometry/barostat system, and the effect of a standard 500-kcal meal was evaluated once in healthy volunteers and in 15 patients on the first and second postoperative day. Four patients remained unfed, serving as controls.

RESULTS

In patients, the colonic motility index increased from 12 +/- 5 at baseline to 65 +/- 24 mm Hg after the meal on postoperative day 1 (mean +/- SEM; P < .01), while barostat bag volumes decreased, indicating a rise in colonic tone. On day 2, the motility index was 62 +/- 17 mm Hg at baseline and did not change after the meal. In unfed controls, no change was observed during colonic motility recordings on both postoperative days. In healthy volunteers, the colonic motility index increased from 98 +/- 52 at baseline to 151 +/- 58 mm Hg postprandially (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

As in healthy volunteers, there is a potential to stimulate colonic motility by early food intake in postoperative patients. This may help to improve prolonged colonic motility disorders after colorectal surgery.

Treatment with hypnotherapy reduces the sensory and motor component of the gastrocolonic response in irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Postprandial symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome are common and relate to an exaggerated motor and sensory component of the gastrocolonic response. We investigated whether this response can be affected by hypnotherapy.

METHODS

We included 28 patients with irritable bowel syndrome refractory to other treatments. They were randomized to receive gut-directed hypnotherapy 1 hour per week for 12 weeks (N = 14) or were provided with supportive therapy (control group; N = 14). Before randomization and after 3 months, all patients underwent a colonic distension trial before and after a 1-hour duodenal lipid infusion. Colonic sensory thresholds and tonic and phasic motor activity were assessed.

RESULTS

Before randomization, reduced thresholds after vs. before lipid infusion were seen in both groups for all studied sensations. At 3 months, the colonic sensitivity before duodenal lipids did not differ between groups. Controls reduced their thresholds after duodenal lipids for gas (22 +/- 1.7 mm Hg vs. 16 +/- 1.6 mm Hg, p <.01), discomfort (29 +/- 2.9 mm Hg vs. 22 +/- 2.6 mm Hg, p <.01), and pain (33 +/- 2.7 mm Hg vs. 26 +/- 3.3 mm Hg, p <.01), whereas the hypnotherapy group reduced their thresholds after lipids only for pain (35 +/- 4.0 mm Hg vs. 29 +/- 4.7 mm Hg, p <.01). The colonic balloon volumes and tone response at randomization were similar in both groups. At 3 months, baseline balloon volumes were lower in the hypnotherapy group than in controls (83 +/- 14 ml vs. 141 +/- 15 ml, p <.01). In the control group, reduced balloon volumes during lipid infusion were seen (141 +/- 15 ml vs. 111 +/- 19 ml, p <.05), but not after hypnotherapy (83 +/- 14 ml vs. 80 +/- 16 ml, p >.20).

CONCLUSION

Hypnotherapy reduces the sensory and motor component of the gastrocolonic response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. These effects may be involved in the clinical efficacy of hypnotherapy in IBS.

Manometric techniques for the evaluation of colonic motor activity: current status

Colonic motility disorders are common conditions. However, our understanding of normal, and, consequently, pathological motor function of the colon remains limited, mainly due to the relative inaccessibility of this organ for study. Investigation of colonic motility may encompass one or more of the four separate components (myoelectric activity, phasic and tonic contractile activity and movement of intraluminal content) using electrophysiological, manometric or transit studies. Although transit studies provide the best 'functional' appreciation of colonic motor activity, and are the only techniques used in contemporary clinical practice, manometric methods are becoming increasingly popular, as they allow a direct study of colonic contractile activity over prolonged periods. To date, the majority of studies have been limited to the pelvic colon by a retrograde (per rectal) approach; however, recent technological advances have facilitated 'pan-colonic' investigation. This review concentrates on manometry of the human colon proximal to the sigmoid, and includes evaluation of both phasic and tonic motor activity, by utilization of perfused-tube and solid-state manometric catheters, and also the electronic barostat. Methodological techniques, experimental protocols and the analysis and interpretation of recorded data are critically explored, and a contemporary classification of colonic contractile activities is presented.

Neuronal locus and cellular signaling for stimulation of ileal giant migrating and phasic contractions

We investigated the neuronal locus, the role of PKC activation, and utilization of extracellular Ca(2+) and intracellular Ca(2+) release in smooth muscle cells for the generation of giant migrating contractions (GMCs) and rhythmic phasic contractions (RPCs) in intact normal and inflamed canine ileum. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), administered close intra-arterially, stimulated GMCs at higher doses and RPCs at smaller doses. These effects were blocked by prior close intra-arterial infusions of CGRP(8-37), atropine, hexamethonium, and TTX but not by tachykinin, serotonin, and histaminergic receptor subtype antagonists. Both types of contractions were blocked by verapamil in normal and inflamed ileums. Dantrolene and ruthenium red blocked only the RPCs in normal ileum but blocked both GMCs and RPCs in the inflamed ileum. PKC inhibition by chelerythrine blocked GMCs only in inflamed ileum but blocked RPCs in both normal and inflamed ileums. The inhibition of phospholipase C by neomycin blocked both RPCs and GMCs in normal and inflamed ileums. In conclusion, acetylcholine is the common neurotransmitter for the stimulation of both GMCs and RPCs, but the signaling cascades for their stimulation are partially divergent, and they differ also in the normal and inflamed states.

Effect of extrinsic denervation on muscarinic neurotransmission in the canine ileocolonic region

To explore the hypothesis that denervation hypersensitivity increases ileocolonic motor activity after extrinsic denervation, we compared muscarinic neurotransmission in canine ileocolonic loops that were isolated and either extrinsically innervated or extrinsically denervated. We recorded ileal, ileocolonic sphincter (ICS) and colonic pressures, and colonic tone, compliance and relaxation during ileal distention. Muscarinic effects were probed by neostigmine, and minimally effective doses of muscarinic receptor antagonists. Denervation augmented ileal, ICS and colonic contractile activity; colonic high-amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs) were also augmented; colonic relaxation during ileal distention was abolished. Neostigmine induced HAPCs in both loop preparations. Pirenzipine (M1 antagonist) reduced ileal contractile activity in all loops and reduced colonic relaxation during ileal distention in innervated loops. Pirenzipine also reduced colonic tone and colonic HAPCs, more in denervated loops. Darifenacin (M3 antagonist) reduced ileocolonic contractile activity and tone more than did AF-DX 116 (M2 antagonist) in all loops. Cholinergic receptor subtypes modulate different facets of ileocolonic motor activity in the canine ileocolonic region. Increased sensitivity at M1 muscarinic receptors may partly account for the effects of extrinsic denervation.

Influence of gender, parity, and caloric load on gastrorectal response in healthy subjects: a barostat study

The gastrocolonic response consists of a prompt increase in colonic tone after a meal. With a barostat and a high compliant air-filled bag, it is possible to measure rectal tone by recording changes in volume at a constant intrabag pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the gastrorectal response in males and females as well as the effect of different caloric loads on the gastrorectal response. In 33 volunteers a barostat procedure during basal conditions and after a 600-kcal meal was performed. In 26 volunteers the procedure was repeated with a 1000-kcal meal. A meal response was defined as a decrease in volume of more than 10%. Phasic volume events (PVE) were defined as a 10% decrease in volume of 15-60 sec duration. After a 600-kcal meal, the decrease in volume after 1 hr was 28 +/- 7% (mean +/- SEM, P < 0.001). A meal response was found in 64% of the subjects. Parous females had a diminished meal response compared with nulliparous females (2 +/- 5% and 48 +/- 11%, P < 0.001). After the 600-kcal meal, PVEs increased from 3 to 10/hr (P = 0.001). In the 26 subjects, volume decrease was 40 +/- 9% after the 1000-kcal meal and 20 +/- 7% after the 600-kcal meal (P = 0.28). In the high-calorie meal, 18 subjects (69%) had a response versus 14 (54%) in the low-calorie meal (NS). Enhancing the caloric load of the meal did not increase the amounts of PVEs. In conclusion, a gastrorectal response occurs in 64% of the healthy subjects after a 600-kcal meal. The gastrorectal response can be measured to a similar extent in men and nulliparous women; however, the response is significantly impaired in parous women. This is possibly due to neurogenic damage during childbirth. Increasing the caloric load did not increase the gastrorectal response. Therefore, to study gastrorectal meal response with the barostat, a meal of 600-kcal is sufficient and a correction for parity should be made when results are compared.

Neostigmine increases postoperative colonic motility in patients undergoing colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal motility is frequently impaired after abdominal surgery. We investigated the effects of neostigmine on colonic motility in patients after colorectal surgery and in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Colonic motility was recorded by a manometry/barostat system in 12 patients after left colonic or rectal resection during baseline and after the intravenous administration of increasing doses of neostigmine on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. In addition, colonic motility was recorded in 7 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Neostigmine increased the colonic motility index. This increase was from 135 +/- 28 mm Hg/min at baseline to 574 +/- 219 mm Hg/min after administration of 5 microg/kg neostigmine on day 3 after surgery (mean +/- SEM, P <.05). In healthy volunteers, neostigmine at a dose of 5 microg/kg increased the colonic motility index from 184 +/- 73 to 446 +/- 114 mm Hg/min (P <.05). Barostat bag volumes decreased dose-dependently after neostigmine administration in patients as well as in volunteers, indicating an increase in colonic tone.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic motility and tone increased after neostigmine administration at a dose of 5 microg/kg in postoperative patients and in healthy volunteers. Neostigmine can be used to stimulate colonic motility after colorectal surgery and has a similar effect postoperatively as in healthy volunteers.

Irritable bowel syndrome patients show altered sensitivity to exogenous opioids

Alterations in activation of pain modulation systems may play a role in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, little is known about the effects of exogenous opioids on the perceptual and autonomic responses to aversive visceral stimulation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the mu opioid-preferring analgesic fentanyl (FEN), given intravenously, on perceptual and autonomic responses to rectal distension. Ten IBS patients and ten normal subjects received, on separate days, either high dose (HD) fentanyl (112 microg bolus followed by 0.04 microg/kg per min infusion), low dose (LD) fentanyl (56 microg bolus followed by 0.02 microg/kg per min) or normal saline (SAL) (50 cc bolus followed by 45 cc/h infusion). Perception thresholds for discomfort and pain during rectal distension were assessed using a tracking paradigm. Intensity and unpleasantness ratings of the distensions, and cardiac autonomic parameters were assessed during randomly delivered rectal stimuli. Effects of FEN on rectal compliance and tone as well as mental status were also assessed. IBS patients had lower perceptual thresholds for discomfort and pain under control conditions. FEN dose-dependently increased the perception thresholds in both healthy control subjects and in IBS patients with a greater relative efficacy in IBS patients than in normal subjects. IBS patients used significantly higher unpleasantness ratings of rectal stimuli compared to healthy controls, but showed no difference in the sensory intensity rating of the stimulus. FEN decreased both intensity and unpleasantness ratings for IBS and normals. FEN lowered cardiosympathetic tone in normal subjects but had no effect on IBS patients. FEN had no effect on rectal tone or compliance. FEN dose-dependently attenuates the perception of phasic rectal distension and affects unpleasantness ratings during random fixed rectal distension, with a greater relative efficacy for this antinociceptive effect in IBS patients. These findings support the hypothesis that IBS patients may have an altered central release of endogenous opioids in response to visceral stimulation.

Postoperative colonic motility and tone in patients after colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

Colonic motility is crucial for the resolution of postoperative ileus. However, few data are available on postoperative colonic motility and no data on postoperative colonic tone. We aimed to characterize postoperative colonic tone and motility in patients.

METHODS

Nineteen patients were investigated with combined barostat and manometry recordings after left colonic surgery. During surgery a combined recording catheter was placed in the colon with two barostat bags and four manometry channels cephalad to the anastomosis. Recordings were performed twice daily from Day 1 to Day 3 after surgery.

RESULTS

Manometry showed an increasing colonic motility index, which was a mean (+/- standard error of the mean) of 37 +/- 5 mmHg/minute on Day 1, 87 +/- 19 mmHg/minute on Day 2, and 102 +/- 13 mmHg/minute on Day 3 (P < 0.05 for Day 1 vs. Day 2 and Day 2 vs. Day 3). Low barostat bag volumes indicating a high colonic tone were observed on Day 1 after surgery and increased subsequently (barostat bag I was 19 +/- 4, 32 +/- 6, and 32 +/- 6 ml; barostat bag II was 13 +/- 1, 19 +/- 3, and 22 +/- 5 ml on Days 1, 2, and 3, respectively; for both barostat bags P < 0.05 for Day 1 vs. Day 2 but not Day 2 vs. Day 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic motility increased during the postoperative course. The low barostat bag volumes indicated a high colonic tone postoperatively which would correspond to a contracted rather than to a distended colon. High colonic tone postoperatively may be relevant for pharmacologic treatment of postoperative ileus.

Effect of atropine and sincalide on the intestinal uptake of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose

PURPOSE

Variable diffuse intestinal uptake of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is commonly seen in patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Diffuse high uptake can obscure a lesion, whereas occasional high focal uptake can mimic a lesion. The cause of intestinal FDG uptake and the parameters that influence the level of uptake are unknown.

METHODS

We hypothesized that intestinal FDG uptake may result from smooth muscle peristalsis. We tested our hypothesis by comparing FDG uptake at baseline and after administration of two drugs (atropine and sincalide) that are known to affect intestinal motility. We performed FDG PET scans in random order in five healthy male volunteers without medication, after intramuscular administration of atropine, and after intravenous administration of sincalide.

RESULTS

Qualitative comparison of the images before and after both medications did not show any significant difference in the level of intestinal FDG uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that intestinal FDG uptake is probably not caused by peristalsis. Mucosal uptake may be an alternative explanation.

The role of the barostat in human research and clinical practice

BACKGROUND

The barostat is a recently developed device used to study the physiology and pathophysiology of the motor and sensory functions of the gastrointestinal tract. It can monitor volume changes while maintaining a set constant pressure and deliver controlled distensions of gastrointestinal organs. Simultaneously, motility and visceral perception may be assessed. The barostat has contributed to the understanding of physiological processes in the gastrointestinal tract with regard to regulation of tone, compliance, enteric reflexes, sensation and processing of signals to and from the gut. In addition, the barostat has been used to study various gastrointestinal disorders. In functional bowel disorders, objective abnormalities in visceral sensitivity and enteric reflexes have been demonstrated. Numerous other diseases, gastrointestinal in origin as well as systemic diseases affecting the gut, have been studied. In the near future, the barostat may become a clinically useful tool for the objective diagnosis of motor and sensitivity disorders of the gut and for monitoring the effectiveness of therapy.

Colonic motility in man: features in normal subjects and in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation

The human colon is still a relatively unknown viscus, especially concerning its motor activity. However, in recent years, techniques have been perfected that allow a better understanding of colonic motility, especially through prolonged recording periods. In this way, it has been demonstrated that the viscus contracts according to a circadian trend, is responsive to physiological stimuli (meals, sleep), and features high amplitude, propulsive contractions that are part of the complex dynamic of the defecatory process. These physiological properties and their alterations in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation are reviewed in this article.

AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques

This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee. Following external review, the paper was approved by the committee on May 17, 1998.

Review article: colonic sensorimotor physiology in health, and its alteration in constipation and diarrhoeal disorders

AIM

To review the physiology of colonic motility and sensation in healthy humans and the pathophysiological changes associated with constipation and diarrhoea.

SOURCE

Medline Search from 1965 using the index terms: human, colonic motility, sensation, pharmacology, neurohormonal control, gastrointestinal transit, constipation, diarrhoea and combinations of these.

RESULTS

In health, the ascending and transverse regions of colon function as reservoirs to accommodate ileal chyme and the descending colon acts as a conduit; the neuromuscular functions and transmitters control colonic motility and sensation and play pivotal roles in disorders associated with constipation and/or diarrhoea. Disorders of proximal colonic transit contribute to symptoms in idiopathic constipation, diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and carcinoid diarrhoea. Colonic function in patients presenting with constipation is best assessed clinically by colonic transit time using radiopaque markers ingested orally. Measurements of colonic contractility are less useful clinically but they can help identify motor abnormalities including colonic inertia; in some patients with irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal pain, urgency and diarrhoea are temporally associated with high amplitude contractions, which originate in the proximal colon and traverse the distal conduit at very high propagation velocities. Visceral hypersensitivity contributes to the urgency and tenesmus in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Colonic motility and sensation can be reduced by anticholinergic agents, somatostatin analogues and 5HT3 antagonists.

CONCLUSION

Physiological and pharmacological studies of the human colon have provided new insights into the pathophysiology of colonic disorders, and offer possibilities of novel therapeutic approaches for constipation or diarrhoea associated with colonic motor or sensory dysfunction.

Pouchitis

Pouchitis is a major long-term complication of the continent ileostomy as well as the ileoanal pouch anastomosis. When diagnosed on the basis of clinical, endoscopic and histologic features, this syndrome has been demonstrated almost exclusively in patients with ulcerative colitis. The clinical course, the endoscopic findings and the histologic abnormalities resemble those of ulcerative colitis. The association with extra-intestinal manifestations further supports the hypothesis that pouchitis represents ulcerative colitis in the small bowel. All ileal reservoirs show bacterial overgrowth, especially of anaerobes. As a response to this altered intraluminal environment chronic inflammation and incomplete colonic metaplasia occur. The efficiency of metronidazole does suggest that bacteriological factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of pouchitis.

Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK

An international working team of 13 investigators met on two occasions to develop guidelines for standardizing the procedures used to test gastrointestinal muscle tone and sensory thresholds using a barostat. General recommendations were: (1) Use a thin-walled plastic bag that is infinitely compliant until its capacity is reached. Maximum diameter of the bag should be much greater than the maximum diameter of the viscus. (2) The pump should be able to inflate the bag at up to 40 ml/sec. (3) Pressure should be monitored inside the bag, not in the pump or inflation line. (4) Subjects should be positioned so that the bag is close to the uppermost surface of the body. (5) For rectal tests, bowel cleansing should be limited to a tap water enema to minimize rectal irritation. Oral colonic lavage is recommended for studies of the proximal colon, and magnesium citrate enemas for the descending colon and sigmoid. (6) If sedation is required for colonic probe placement, allow at least one hour for drug washout and clearance of insufflated air. Ten to 20 min of adaptation before testing is adequate if no air or drugs were used. (7) The volumes reported must be corrected for the compressibility of gas and the compliance of the pump, which is greater for bellows pumps than for piston pumps. (8) Subjects should be tested in the fasted state. For evaluation of muscle tone: (9) The volume of the bag should be monitored for at least 15 min. For evaluation of sensory thresholds; (10) It is recommended that phasic distensions be > or = 60 sec long and that they be separated by > or = 60 sec. (11) Sensory thresholds should be reported as bag pressure rather than (or in addition to) bag volume because pressure is less vulnerable to measurement error. (12) Tests for sensory threshold should minimize psychological influences on perception by making the amount of each distension unpredictable to the subject. (13) Pain or other sensations should be reported on a graduated scale; not "yes-no." The working team recommends verbal descriptor scales, containing approximately seven steps, or visual analog scales in which subjects place a mark on a straight line marked "none" on one end and "maximum" on the other end. (14) It is recommended that subjects should be asked to rate the unpleasantness of distensions separately from their intensity.

Effect of cholecystokinin octapeptide and atropine on human colonic motility, tone, and transit

The role of cholecystokinin (CCK) in postprandial control of colonic motility is controversial. To test the hypothesis that CCK stimulates colonic tone, motility, and transit we measured these colonic functions in 16 healthy subjects using intraluminal manometry, barostatic balloon measurements, and radioscintigraphy. This was a randomized-order, double-blind, sequential study design in each subject of saline and either atropine (0.01 mg/kg stat and 0.01 mg/kg/hr by infusion) or CCK-octapeptide (OP, 30 ng/kg stat and 60 ng/kg/hr by infusion). Atropine was used as control to demonstrate responsiveness of selected parameters of colonic motility. Atropine significantly reduced whole colon (change from fasting = 52 +/- 11%) and left colon (change from fasting 61 +/- 8%) phasic pressure activity and transverse colon tone (change from fasting 159 +/- 40%); CCK-OP had no significant effects on phasic contractility, tone or transit. Thus, a CCK-OP infusion that maximally stimulates pancreatic exocrine secretion and gallbladder contraction has no effect on motor function or transit in prepared colon of healthy subjects.

Methods for assessing the effects of drugs on gastrointestinal function in patients and healthy volunteers

The gastrointestinal tract is a complex organ with many functions. Many diseases affect the way in which the gastrointestinal tract performs these functions. The pharmaceutical industry and academia are putting great effort into the development of treatments for these diseases. As a consequence, there is increasing pressure on the clinical pharmacologist and gastroenterologist to develop methods to measure the effects of drugs on the gastrointestinal tract. This article reviews the methods currently available to assess gastrointestinal function; in particular it focuses on motility and sensitivity.

Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract

As the function of the gastrointestinal tract is to a large degree mechanical, it has become increasingly popular to acquire distensibility data in motility research based on various parameters. Hence it is important to know on which geometrical and mechanical assumptions the various parameters are based. Currently, compliance and tone derived from pressure-volume curves are by far the most often used parameters. However, pressure-volume relations obtained in tubular organs must be carefully interpreted as they provide no direct measure of luminal cross-sectional area and other variables useful in plane stress and strain analysis. Thus, erroneous conclusions concerning tissue distensibility may be deduced. Other parameters, such as wall tension, stress and strain, give more useful information about mechanical behaviour. Distensibility data procure significance in fluid mechanics and in the study of tone, peristaltic reflexes, and mechanoreceptor kinematics. Such data are needed for the determination of the interaction between stimulus, electrical responses in neurons and the mechanical behaviour of the gut. Furthermore, from a clinical perspective, investigation of visco-elastic properties is important because GI diseases are associated with growth and remodelling. For example, prestenotic dilatation, increased collagen synthesis, dysmotility and altered distensibility are common features of obstructive diseases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the physiological and clinical importance of acquiring biomechanical data, distensibility parameters and interpretation of these results and their associated errors. We will also discuss some aspects of the relationship between morphology, growth and biomechanics. Finally, we will outline a number of techniques to study the mechanical properties of the GI tract.

Methods for studying intestinal sensitivity and compliance: in vitro studies of balloons and a barostat

The aim of this study was to compare in vitro various methods for recording intestinal sensitivity and compliance. Relationships between volume and pressure were determined in segments of penrose tubing and pig gut ("artificial intestine') using pressure increments of 2 mmHg (0-24 mmHg). We tested two direct methods of distension of the entire segments (by syringe inflation and the Mayo barostat); we also used three different balloon devices for indirect distension (a 10 cm polyethylene barostat bag, a 10 cm latex condom balloon and a 6 cm latex condom balloon). Maximal distending diameters of the recording systems were measured by injecting from 0 to 160 mL of air. The elastic properties of the balloons were also tested by distensions in air and in rigid tubes. All recording systems accurately detected a lesser compliance of the penrose drain as compared to pig gut. In absolute terms, only the compliance measured with a polyethylene barostat bag distended with a syringe was not different from the compliance of the segment as measured directly. The bellows of our barostat and the latex balloons had significant intrinsic compliances which interfered with the recorded pressure-volume curves. On the other hand, highly compliant plastic bags recorded most faithfully the compliance of artificial gut and that of non-compliant rigid tubes. For comparable volumes of distension, external diameters were larger with the 6 cm latex balloon than with the 10 cm latex balloon or the 10 cm polyethylene barostat balloon. A polyethylene bag distended with a non-compliant air injector (syringe) reflected most accurately the pressure-volume relationships of tubular structures. The different maximal diameters assumed by the three distending devices may explain, in part, why lower volumes of distension are required to elicit symptoms with smaller distending balloons in vivo.

Colonic motility in health and disease

Being the final pathway for chyme and digestive residues, the colorectum influences bowel function critically. The most important and relevant symptoms of colonic dysfunction are diarrhea, constipation, urgency, and pain. Despite the effects of many investigators, over several decades, the motor physiology of the human colon is still relatively obscure. Most is known about patterns of colonic transit. In practice, measurements of transit are the best characterized and most widely available tests of colonic motor function. Colonic hypersensitivity, implying an abnormality of afferent signaling, is assuming greater importance in the pathophysiology of conditions as common as IBS and inflammatory bowel disease.

Correlates of regular laxative use by frail elderly persons

PURPOSE

To examine the demographic, clinical, and pharmacological correlates of regular laxative use in elderly persons residing in a long-term care setting.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using retrospective record review undertaken in an academically affiliated long-term care facility in the United States. All individuals residing in the institution for at least 1 month (n = 694) were characterized regarding use of laxatives. Regular laxative use was defined as more than 30 doses of laxatives, stool softeners, or enemas taken over the most recent 1-month period.

RESULTS

Residents with regular laxative use (n = 349) were compared with those who received no laxatives (n = 227). Factors significantly associated with regular laxative use at the P < 0.05 significance level were simultaneously included in a multiple logistic regression model. Factors associated with regular laxative use were immobility, Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus, and use of iron supplements, calcium channel blockers, and antidepressants with moderate to strong anticholinergic properties.

CONCLUSION

Regular laxative use is often associated with neurologic dysfunction that directly or indirectly affects the gut, or medications known to depress colonic motility. Identification of potentially modifiable correlates of regular laxative use in older individuals may suggest management strategies to avoid or reduce laxative, stool softener, and enema requirements, improve constipation symptoms, and enhance quality of life for the frail elderly population.

Does routine intravenous glucagon administration facilitate colonoscopy? A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies on the routine use of glucagon in colonoscopy have produced conflicting results.

METHODS

Two separate studies were performed. In one study (Study 1), 80 consecutive patients were randomized after cecal intubation to receive 1 mg glucagon (n = 41) or placebo (n = 39), intravenously, in double-blind fashion. In a second study (Study 2) 90 sedated patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive 1 mg glucagon (n = 46) or placebo (n = 44), intravenously, just before colonoscope insertion. In each study, colonoscope insertion and withdrawal time, therapeutic intervention time, the presence and severity of colonic spasm, colonoscopy yield, and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean withdrawal time in Study 1 was similar in those receiving glucagon (6.85 min) and in those receiving placebo (6.92 min). Mean insertion time in Study 2 (5.07 min) was identical between groups. Spasm scores and colonoscopy yield did not differ between glucagon and placebo in either study. There was a trend toward more side effects (nausea and vomiting) with glucagon in Study 1. Glucagon did not facilitate insertion or withdrawal in the subset of patients with diverticulosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of intravenous glucagon in a dosage of 1 mg does not facilitate colonoscopy by experienced examiners.

Differences in colonic tone and phasic response to a meal in the transverse and sigmoid human colon

It is not yet clear whether the regional differences in the physical properties of the colon influence its motor responses. Tonic and phasic colonic motility and compliance of the transverse and sigmoid colon were therefore assessed using a combined barostat-manometry assembly in 22 healthy subjects. Measured colonic compliance was corrected by subtraction of the compliance of the closed barostat system. The mean (SEM) preprandial colonic volumes in the transverse and sigmoid colon were similar (150 (12) and 128 (13) ml, p = NS), corresponding to calculated mean (SEM) colonic diameters of 4.3 cm and 4.0 cm respectively. The mean increase in colonic tone postprandially was significantly greater in the transverse (24.1% (3.5)) than in the sigmoid colon (13.1% (3.0), p < 0.01). The mean increase in phasic contractility was significantly greater, however, in the sigmoid than in the transverse colon (1270 (210) and 425 (60) mm Hg/90 min respectively, p < 0.01). Compliance was greater in the transverse than sigmoid colon (7.6 (0.44) and 4.1 (0.15) ml/mm Hg, p < 0.001). The fasting volume of the colon was significantly correlated with the magnitude of the tonic response to the meal in the transverse and sigmoid colon (p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, there are quantitatively different but qualitatively similar phasic and tonic responses to the meal in the two colonic regions. Differences in the viscoelastic and luminal dimensions may partly account for these differences in tonic responses.

Ascending colon response to feeding: evidence for a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 mechanism

BACKGROUND

The role of serotonergic type-3 receptors in proximal human colon is unclear. Our aims were to assess the postprandial volume and emptying of the ascending colon and to explore the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5HT3) mechanisms.

METHODS

In healthy subjects with unprepared colons we evaluated in a randomized trial the effects of the 5HT3 antagonist ondansetron (n = 5) or placebo (n = 5) on ascending colon volume and emptying, using a scintigraphic method.

RESULTS

Base-line ascending colon volumes were similar and were unaltered by ondansetron. After a 1000-kcal liquid meal the placebo group showed a variable change in volume (P = NS versus base line) during the first 25 min (median, -4%; range, -13% to 135%). Increases in volume during this period coincided with ileal emptying of chyme. During a second phase (30-105 min) there was a significant decrease of ascending colon volume (P = 0.02) relative to the early postprandial volume, but the volume was not significantly different from base line. This second phase was associated with transfer of chyme towards the transverse colon. In the ondansetron group there was an initial modest increase in volume (median, 5%; range, -15% to 14%; P = NS versus base line), and the second phase of contraction was inhibited.

CONCLUSIONS

The ascending colon response to a meal in health is characterized by a variable initial change in volume, accommodating ileal chyme in some individuals, and a more consistent reduction in volume from 30 to 105 min postprandially. The latter response is inhibited by ondansetron, suggesting partial control of postprandial colonic motor function by 5HT3 mechanisms.

Visceral perception in irritable bowel syndrome. Rectal and gastric responses to distension and serotonin type 3 antagonism

We wished to determine if visceral perception in the rectum and stomach is altered in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and to evaluate the effects on visceral sensation of 5-HT3 receptor blockade. Twelve community patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and 10 healthy controls were studied in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Using two barostats, the stomach and rectum were distended, with pressure increments of 4 mm Hg, from 10 to 26 mm Hg; visceral perception was measured on an ordinal scale of 0-10. Personality traits were measured using standard psychological methods, and somatic pain was evaluated by immersion of the nondominant hand in cold water. The effect of 5-HT3 antagonism was tested with a single intravenous dose of ondansetron at 0.15 mg/kg. Gastric perception was higher in irritable bowel syndrome, but rectal distension was perceived similarly in irritable bowel syndrome and controls. Pain tolerance to cold water was also similar in irritable bowel syndrome and controls. Ondansetron induced rectal relaxation and increased rectal compliance but did not significantly alter gastric compliance or visceral perception. Psychological test scores were similar in patients and controls. We conclude that in this group of psychologically normal patients with irritable bowel syndrome, who were not chronic health-care seekers, visceral perception was normal. Ondansetron did not alter gut perception in health or in irritable bowel syndrome.

Hyperglycemia inhibits mechanoreceptor-mediated gastrocolonic responses and colonic peristaltic reflexes in healthy humans

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The effects of hyperglycemia on colonic motor function are unknown. Therefore, colonic neuromuscular function was tested in normal volunteers as a model for constipation in diabetes.

METHODS

Extended (gastrocolonic response) and local (peristaltic reflex) neural responses and colonic muscle contractility were tested under control, hyperglycemic clamp, and euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions with placement of barostat-regulated balloons in the descending colon to measure changes in tone as differences in balloon volume.

RESULTS

Hyperglycemic clamping to 274 +/- 3 mg/dL blunted increases in colon tone evoked by gastric distention (gastrocolonic response) (100-300 mL) but did not affect gastric tone. Three descending colonic balloons in series assessed the peristaltic reflex. Inflation of the middle stimulus balloon increased proximal tone, an increase that was blunted by hyperglycemia, but produced distal relaxation followed by increases in tone that were unaffected by hyperglycemia. Euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamping had no effect on the gastrocolonic response or peristaltic reflex. Tonic increases evoked by bethanechol (5 mg administered subcutaneously) were unaffected by hyperglycemic clamping.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycemia blunts mechanoreceptor-mediated gastrocolonic responses and ascending contractions but not descending components of the peristaltic reflex in humans, effects not caused by hyperinsulinemia or direct muscle actions. These inhibitory effects on long and short neural reflexes that modulate colonic motility may contribute to constipation in diabetes.