Prognostic factors in patients with endocrine tumours of the duodenopancreatic area

Current Management of Neuroendocrine Tumour Liver Metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to illustrate the current state of investigations and management of liver metastases in patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rising in incidence globally and have become the second most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in UK and USA. Frequently, patients have metastatic disease at time of presentation. The liver is the most common site of metastases for gastro-enteropancreatic NETs. Characterisation of liver metastases with imaging is important to ensure disease is not under-staged.

RECENT FINDINGS

Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are now becoming standard of care for imaging liver metastases. There is an increasing armamentarium of therapies available for management of NETs and loco-regional therapy for liver metastases. The data supporting surgical and loco-regional therapy is reviewed with focus on role of liver transplantation. It is important to use appropriate imaging and classification of NET liver metastases. It is key that decisions regarding approach to treatment is undertaken in a multidisciplinary team and that individualised approaches are considered for management of patients with metastatic NETs.

Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of lymphadenectomy for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) published between 1990 and 2021. Studies of functional PNET were excluded. Reported incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival analysis of either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) were required for inclusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 studies analyzing 24,608 PNET met the inclusion criteria. The reported LNM rate for NF-PNET ranged from 7 to 64 % (median 24.5%). Reported LNM rates ranged from 7 to 51% (median 11%) for NF-PNET< 2 cm in 14 studies and 29-47% (median 38%) in NF-PNET > 2 cm. In total, 19 studies (66%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on DFS. Additionally, 21 studies (60%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on OS. Two studies investigating the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) found LND had the greatest impact for large, high-grade tumors. The overall quality of available evidence was low as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature evaluating the impact of regional LNM and LND in PNET is confounded by heterogeneity in practice patterns and the retrospective nature of these cohort studies. Most studies suggest high rates of LNM in NF-PNET that negatively impact DFS and OS. Given the high rate of LNM in NF-PNET and its potential detrimental effect on DFS and OS, we recommend lymphadenectomy be completed for NF-PNET > 2 cm and strongly considered for NF-PNET < 2 cm.

Critical appraisal of the adequacy of surgical indications for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The lack of preoperative prognostic factors to accurately predict tumour aggressiveness in non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours may result in inappropriate management decisions. This study aimed to critically evaluate the adequacy of surgical treatment in patients with resectable non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and investigate preoperative features of surgical appropriateness.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent curative surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours at San Raffaele Hospital (2002-2022). The appropriateness of surgical treatment was categorized as appropriate, potential overtreatment and potential undertreatment based on histologic features of aggressiveness and disease relapse within 1 year from surgery (early relapse).

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were included. Among them, 230 (60%) received appropriate surgical treatment, whereas the remaining 154 (40%) underwent potentially inadequate treatment: 129 (34%) experienced potential overtreatment and 25 (6%) received potential undertreatment. The appropriateness of surgical treatment was significantly associated with radiological tumour size (P < 0.001), tumour site (P = 0.012), surgical technique (P < 0.001) and year of surgical resection (P < 0.001). Surgery performed before 2015 (OR 2.580, 95% c.i. 1.570 to 4.242; P < 0.001), radiological tumour diameter < 25.5 mm (OR 6.566, 95% c.i. 4.010 to 10.751; P < 0.001) and pancreatic body/tail localization (OR 1.908, 95% c.i. 1.119 to 3.253; P = 0.018) were identified as independent predictors of potential overtreatment. Radiological tumour size was the only independent determinant of potential undertreatment (OR 0.291, 95% c.i. 0.107 to 0.791; P = 0.016). Patients subjected to potential undertreatment exhibited significantly poorer disease-free survival (P < 0.001), overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Potential overtreatment occurs in nearly one-third of patients undergoing surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Tumour diameter emerges as the sole variable capable of predicting the risk of both potential surgical overtreatment and undertreatment.

Predictive Factors of Response to Streptozotocin in Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs) may exhibit a heterogeneous clinical course, ranging from indolent to progressive/metastatic behavior. In the latter scenario, streptozocin (STZ) is considered the cornerstone of systemic treatment; however, response to STZ-based chemotherapy may vary among individuals. In this narrative review, we aimed to identify the predictive factors of response to STZ in advanced Pan-NENs. We performed an extensive search in international online databases for published studies and ongoing clinical trials evaluating STZ in Pan-NENs. We found 11 pertinent studies evaluating 17 patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors. Age, CgA blood levels, tumor grade, Ki-67% index, anatomical location of the primary tumor, tumor stage, site of metastasis origin, liver tumor burden, extrahepatic spread, functional status, O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) status, line of therapy, and response to previous treatments were all statistically associated with radiological response and/or survival. The identified predictors may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions, in this way improving clinical outcomes in patients with advanced Pan-NENs.

A review of functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Exploring the molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer and can be divided into functional (30-40%) and nonfunctional subtypes. The different subtypes of functional PanNETs (F-PanNETs) have a variety of classical presentations that raise suspicion for an underlying PanNET. It is estimated that 90% of PanNETs are sporadic, and the PI3K-Akt-mTOR and ATRX/DAXX signaling pathways have been recognized as key genetic pathways implicated in the pathogenesis. The other 10% of PanNETs may occur in the context of familial cancer syndromes such as MEN1. Chromogranin A is the most useful biomarker currently; however, several studies have shown limitations with its use, especially its prognostic value. Synaptophysin is a novel biomarker which has shown promising preliminary results however its use clinically has yet to be established. Blood tests assessing hormone levels, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound remain at the core of establishing a diagnosis of F-PanNET. The treatment options for F-PanNETs include surgical methods such as enucleation, systemic therapies like chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies such as everolimus. The prognosis for F-PanNETs is more favorable than for nonfunctional PanNETs, however metastatic disease is associated with poor survival outcomes. Researchers should also focus their efforts on identifying novel pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of F-PanNETs in order to develop new targeted therapies that may reduce the need for surgical intervention and on the establishment of novel biomarkers that may reduce the need for invasive testing and allow for earlier detection of F-PanNETs.

Clinical features and prognosis of advanced intra- and extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas

Objective

We examined the clinical features and prognosis of advanced intra- and extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) to offer additional guidance for the clinical treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is a type of advanced intrapulmonary NEC (IPNECs).

Materials and Methods

The clinical data and survival of 123 patients with advanced IPNECs and extrapulmonary NECs (EPNECs) were obtained. We retrospectively examined the corresponding clinical diagnosis and treatment and investigated the significant factors influencing the survival prognosis of patients with NECs.

Results

There were 90 cases of IPNECs (including 81 cases of SCLC), and 33 cases of EPNECs. The median overall survival (OS) of IPNECs was significantly longer than that of the EPNECs in the gastrointestinal tract and in the other regions (P < 0.05). The median OS of patients with other IPNECs was longer than that of patients with SCLC (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, liver metastasis, number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy, and chest radiotherapy were risk factors influencing OS in patients with NECs (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The survival of IPNECs was significantly longer than that of EPNECs in the gastrointestinal tract and other regions. Nevertheless, patients with advanced NECs who were older and had liver metastases had a poorer prognosis. Multidisciplinary treatments including multicycle chemotherapy and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should function significantly in extending the survival of NECs.

Diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the detection of liver metastases in well-differentiated NETs

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of somatostatin receptor (SSR)-PET/CT to liver MRI as reference standard in the evaluation of hepatic involvement in neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

METHODS

An institutional database was screened for "SSR" imaging studies between 2006 and 2021. 1000 NET Patients (grade 1/2) with 2383 SSR-PET/CT studies and matching liver MRI in an interval of +3 months were identified. Medical reports of SSR-PET/CT and MRI were retrospectively evaluated regarding hepatic involvement and either confirmed by both or observed in MRI but not in SSR-PET/CT (false-negative) or in SSR-PET but not in MRI (false-positive).

RESULTS

Metastatic hepatic involvement was reported in 1650 (69.2%) of the total 2383 SSR-PET/CT imaging studies, whereas MRI detected hepatic involvement in 1685 (70.7%) cases. There were 51 (2.1%) false-negative and 16 (0.7%) false-positive cases. In case of discrepant reports, MRI and PET/CT were reviewed side by side for consensus reading. SSR-PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.0% (95%CI: 96.0%, 97.7%), a specificity of 97.7% (95%CI: 96.3%, 98.7%), a PPV of 99.0% (95%CI: 98.4%, 99.4%) and NPV of 93.0% (95%CI: 91.0, 94.8%) in identifying hepatic involvement. The most frequent reason for false-negative results was the small size of lesions with the majority < 0.6 cm.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high diagnostic accuracy of SSR-PET/CT in the detection of hepatic involvement in NET patients based on a patient-based analysis of metastatic hepatic involvement with a high sensitivity and specificity using liver MRI imaging as reference standard. However, one should be aware of possible pitfalls when a single imaging method is used in evaluating neuroendocrine liver metastases in patients.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosis: PET/MR Imaging

Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The initial workup of the primary tumor, including its characterization, local and distant staging, defines subsequent treatment decisions. Functional imaging using hybrid systems, such as PET combined with computed tomography, has become the gold standard. As NETs majorly arise from the gastrointestinal system and metastasize primarily to the liver, simultaneous PET and MR imaging with its high soft tissue contrast might be a valuable clinical one-stop-shop whole-body imaging tool. This review presents the current status and challenges of PET/MR imaging for diagnosis of NETs.

Preoperative assessment of microvessel density in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs)

BACKGROUND

Hypervascularization is a typical feature of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and it frequently allows their recognition at imaging studies. However, the density of microvessels in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors changes according to their biological behavior, and a low microvessel density is associated with higher disease aggressiveness. The primary aim was to investigate the relationship between microvessel density and aggressiveness of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The secondary aim was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in predicting tumor microvessel density.

METHODS

The patients who underwent surgery for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (n = 66) with an available preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (n = 39) and/or contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (n = 37) performed at San Raffaele Hospital (2016-2020) were included. The tumor vascularization was assessed by CD-34 staining, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Median microvessel density (165 microvessels/mm2) was chosen as the cutoff to define low microvessel density and high microvessel density.

RESULTS

The patients with a low microvessel density showed a significantly higher frequency of nodal metastases (P = .026), G2-G3 tumors (P = .022), and death domain-associated protein/α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked loss (P = .011) compared to patients with high microvessel density. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography tumor density in the arterial phase was significantly higher in patients with high microvessel density compared to those with low microvessel density (P = .016). The patients with a low microvessel density showed a significantly higher frequency of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound arterial hypoenhancement (P = .042) and late washout (P = .034). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography arterial hypoenhancement (P = .007) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound late washout (P = .048) independently predicted a low microvessel density in the patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A low microvessel density represents a marker of aggressiveness in the patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound are reliable and easily available tools for preoperative assessment of microvessel density.

Preoperative Prediction of G1 and G2/3 Grades in Patients With Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Multimodality Imaging

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop and validate a multimodality radiomics model for the preoperative prediction of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-pNET) grade (G).

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed 123 patients with surgically resected, pathologically confirmed NF-pNETs who underwent multidetector computed tomography and MRI scans between December 2012 and May 2020. Radiomic features were extracted from multidetector computed tomography and MRI. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy tests were used to select the features. The linear discriminative analysis (LDA) was used to construct the four models including a clinical model, MRI radiomics model, computed tomography radiomics model, and mixed radiomics model. The performance of the models was assessed using a training cohort (82 patients) and a validation cohort (41 patients), and decision curve analysis was applied for clinical use.

RESULTS

We successfully constructed 4 models to predict the tumor grade of NF- pNETs. Model 4 combined 6 features of T2-weighted imaging radiomics features and 1 arterial-phase computed tomography radiomics feature, and showed better discrimination in the training cohort (AUC = 0.92) and validation cohort (AUC = 0.85) relative to the other models. In the decision curves, if the threshold probability was 0.07-0.87, the use of the radiomics score to distinguish NF-pNET G1 and G2/3 offered more benefit than did the use of a "treat all patients" or a "treat none" scheme in the training cohort of the MRI radiomics model.

CONCLUSION

The LDA classifier combining multimodality images may be a valuable noninvasive tool for distinguishing NF-pNET grades and avoid unnecessary surgery.

Similar Outcomes in Minimally Invasive versus Open Management of Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Regional, Multi-Institutional Collaborative Analysis

In pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), the impact of minimally invasive (MI) versus open resection on outcomes remains poorly studied. We queried a multi-institutional pancreatic cancer registry for patients with resected non-metastatic PNET from 1996−2020. Recurrence-free (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and operative complications were evaluated. Two hundred and eighty-two patients were identified. Operations were open in 139 (49%) and MI in 143 (51%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 77 (27%, n = 23 MI), distal pancreatectomy in 184 (65%, n = 109 MI), enucleation in 13 (5%), and total pancreatectomy in eight (3%). Median follow-up was 50 months. Thirty-six recurrences and 13 deaths from recurrent disease yielded 5-year RFS and DSS of 85% and 95%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, grade 1 (HR 0.07, p < 0.001) and grade 2 (HR 0.20, p = 0.002) tumors were associated with improved RFS, while T3/T4 tumors were associated with worse RFS (OR 2.78, p = 0.04). MI resection was not associated with RFS (HR 0.53, p = 0.14). There was insufficient mortality to evaluate DSS with multivariable analysis. Of 159 patients with available NSQIP data, incisional surgical site infections (SSIs), organ space SSIs, Grade B/C pancreatic fistulas, reoperations, and need for percutaneous drainage did not differ by operative approach (all p > 0.2). Nodal harvest was similar for MI versus open distal pancreatectomies (p = 0.16) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (p = 0.28). Minimally invasive surgical management of PNETs is equivalent for oncologic and postoperative outcomes.

Progress in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a heterogeneous and orphan group of neoplasms that vary in their histology, clinical features, prognosis, and management. The treatment of PNETs is highly dependent on the stage at presentation, tumor grade and differentiation, presence of symptoms from hormonal overproduction or from local growth, tumor burden, and rate of progression. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved many novel treatments, which have altered decision making and positively impacted the care and prognosis of these patients. In this review, we focus on the significant progress made in the management of PNETs over the past decade, as well as the active areas of research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Target Heterogeneity in Oncology: The Best Predictor for Differential Response to Radioligand Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

In the era of precision medicine, novel targets have emerged on the surface of cancer cells, which have been exploited for the purpose of radioligand therapy. However, there have been variations in the way these receptors are expressed, especially in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors. This variable expression of receptors across the grades of cancers led to the concept of ‘target heterogeneity’, which has not just impacted therapeutic decisions but also their outcomes. Radiopharmaceuticals targeting receptors need to be used when there are specific indicators—either clinical, radiological, or at molecular level—warranting their use. In addition, response to these radioligands can be assessed using different techniques, whereby we can prognosticate further outcomes. We shall also discuss, in this review, the conventional as well as novel approaches of detecting heterogeneity in prostate cancers and neuroendocrine tumors.

Abstract

Tumor or target heterogeneity (TH) implies presence of variable cellular populations having different genomic characteristics within the same tumor, or in different tumor sites of the same patient. The challenge is to identify this heterogeneity, as it has emerged as the most common cause of ‘treatment resistance’, to current therapeutic agents. We have focused our discussion on ‘Prostate Cancer’ and ‘Neuroendocrine Tumors’, and looked at the established methods for demonstrating heterogeneity, each with its advantages and drawbacks. Also, the available theranostic radiotracers targeting PSMA and somatostatin receptors combined with targeted systemic agents, have been described. Lu-177 labeled PSMA and DOTATATE are the ‘standard of care’ radionuclide therapeutic tracers for management of progressive treatment-resistant prostate cancer and NET. These approved therapies have shown reasonable benefit in treatment outcome, with improvement in quality of life parameters. Various biomarkers and predictors of response to radionuclide therapies targeting TH which are currently available and those which can be explored have been elaborated in details. Imaging-based features using artificial intelligence (AI) need to be developed to further predict the presence of TH. Also, novel theranostic tools binding to newer targets on surface of cancer cell should be explored to overcome the treatment resistance to current treatment regimens.

High pre-operative fasting blood glucose levels predict a poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycaemia has been indicated as a pro-tumoural factor; however, the prognostic role of diabetes mellitus (DM) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs) remains ambiguous, partly due to the effects of anti-diabetic drugs. We hypothesise that the blood sugar level per se affects the outcome of panNETs, and thus, we investigated the prognostic significance of the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level in resected panNET patients with no pre-existing DM.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study comprising 201 patients with radically resected non-functional panNETs was conducted. A total of 164 patients without pre-existing DM were further studied. An FBG level greater than 5.6 mmol/L was defined as high (otherwise, normal). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses for survival were performed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

High FBG levels were significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS; p = 0.019) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; p = 0.011) in resected patients with panNET who had no pre-existing DM. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality and recurrence comparing patients with high and normal FBG levels were 12.19 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-128.78, p = 0.038) and 2.43 (95% CI = 1.03-5.72, p = 0.042), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A pre-operative FBG level greater than 5.6 mmol/L is associated with poor OS and RFS metastasis for patients with panNET who undergo radical surgical resection.

Understanding the Management and Treatment of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Clinician's Guide to a Complex Illness

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare neoplasms that arise in the neuroendocrine cells of the pancreas. Although their clinical presentations differ depending on cell type, most are indolent, whereas others cause noteworthy hormone-related symptoms. The increasing incidence of PanNETs, attributed to improved diagnostic modalities, demonstrates advances in current standard of care. However, given the heterogeneity of these tumors, treatment decisions can become complex and an individualized approach is often required. Surgical intervention has remained the mainstay for localized tumors, whereas systemic therapies remain viable options for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. Liver-directed therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial embolization have also become available adjunct therapies for patients with liver-predominant metastases. Despite the increase in the armamentarium of treatment options for patients with PanNETs, data regarding the ideal sequence of treatment, especially systemic treatments, are currently lacking. Ongoing clinical trials are aimed at addressing this knowledge gap in addition to developing the next generation of novel therapeutics.

Absolute Counts of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets Correlate with the Progression-Free Survival and Metastatic Status of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumour Patients

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs) are rare tumours of pancreas. Lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood are reported to reflect tumour prognosis and progression. The objective of the study is to investigate the hypotheses that the levels of peripheral lymphocytes may reflect tumour progression and may predict the prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study consisting of 73 patients diagnosed with panNETs was conducted. Kaplan-Meier methods and Log rank tests were used to compare the survival rates, and a Cox regression model was used to perform multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

panNET patients with distant metastasis were associated with lower peripheral total T cell (p = 0.039) and CD4+ T cell (p = 0.006) counts. Lower peripheral B cells (p = 0.007) and higher peripheral NK cell (p = 0.001) counts indicated worse progression-free survival (PFS) in Log rank tests. In multivariate analyses, low B cell count (hazard ratio (HR): 6.769, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.158 to 21.228, p = 0.001) and high NK cell count (HR: 3.715, 95% CI: 1.164 to 11.855, p = 0.027) were independent risk factors for progression. NK cells and B cells were also significantly associated with PFS following radical surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral total T cell and CD4+ T cell counts may reflect the distant metastasis status in panNET patients. The absolute count of peripheral B cells and NK cells may independently predict the progression of panNET patients, making them promising prognostic indicators and potential targets for treatment of panNETs.

Robustness of CT radiomic features against image discretization and interpolation in characterizing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE

To explore the variation of the discriminative power of CT radiomic features (RF) against image discretization/interpolation in characterizing pancreatic neuro-endocrine (PanNEN) neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine PanNEN patients with pre-surgical high contrast CT available were considered. Image interpolation and discretization parameters were intentionally changed, including pixel size (0.73-2.19 mm²), slice thickness (2-5 mm) and binning (32-128 grey levels) and their combination generated 27 parameter's set. The ability of 69 RF in discriminating post-surgically assessed tumor grade (>G1), positive nodes, metastases and vascular invasion was tested: AUC changes when changing the parameters were quantified for selected RF, significantly associated to each end-point. The analysis was repeated for the corresponding images with contrast medium and in a sub-group of 29/39 patients scanned on a single scanner.

RESULTS

The median tumor volume was 1.57 cm³ (16%-84% percentiles: 0.62-34.58 cm³). RF variability against discretization/interpolation parameters was large: only 21/69 RF showed %COV < 20%. Despite this variability, AUC changes were limited for all end-points: with typical AUC values around 0.75-0.85, AUC ranges for the 27 parameter's set were on average 0.062 (1SD:0.037) for all end-points with maximum %COV equal to 5.5% (mean:2.3%). Performances significantly improved when excluding the 5 mm thickness case and fixing the binning to 64 (mean AUC range: 0.036, 1SD:0.019). Using contrast images or limiting the population to single-scanner patients had limited impact on AUC variability.

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminative power of CT RF for panNEN is relatively invariant against image interpolation/discretization within a large range of voxel sizes and binning.

The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients: A population based analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) with different metastatic patterns.

METHODS

Data of pNETs cases were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. They were classified according to the different metastatic patterns. We utilized chi-square test to compare the clinical and metastasis characteristics among different groups. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing for survival comparisons. Adjusted HRs with 95% CIs was calculated using Cox regression model to estimate prognostic factors. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among the 3909 patients, liver is the most metastatic organ, and isolated brain metastasis is the least common. At the same time, many patients have had multiple metastases. We studied the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CCS) of the groups. OS: Non-organ metastasis: 5-year OS = 77.1%; Bone metastasis: median survival time (MST) = 56 m, 5-year OS = 42.7%; Liver metastasis: MST = 24 m, 5-year OS = 25.5%; Lung metastasis: MST = 14 m, 5-year OS = 33.7%; multiple metastases: MST = 7m, 5-year OS = 12.0%. CCS: Non-organ metastasis: 5-year OS = 84.2%; Bone metastasis: 5-year OS = 52.5%; Liver metastasis: MST = 27 m, 5-year OS = 28.6%; Lung metastasis: MST = 49 m, 5-year OS = 40.1%; multiple metastases: MST = 8 m, 5-year OS = 14.5%. In addition, the results showed that there were all statistical significances between the surgery and the no surgery group (all, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that brain metastasis, multiple metastases, age over 60 years, unmarried, grade III/IV, regional/distant and no surgery were independently associated with decreased OS and CCS.

CONCLUSIONS

pNETs patients without organ metastasis had the best survival outcomes, while multiple had the worst outcomes. There were no significant differences in bone metastasis, liver metastasis and lung metastasis. Surgery was still an option for patients with metastasis.

Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for pancreatic NET was updated to include a new category of well-differentiated high-grade (Ki 67 > 20%) pancreatic tumors (NET G3), distinct from high-grade poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). NET G3 are considered a molecularly, radiologically, and prognostically distinct entity compared to NEC and NET G1/G2. The optimal first-line management in NET G3 and sequencing therapies remains a challenge awaiting future trials taking into consideration the unique characteristics of this category. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence in the management of NET G3.

The Influence of Tumor Stage on the Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index and Mitotic Count in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Tumor cell proliferation rate determined by either Ki-67 index or mitotic count (MC) has shown to be a prognostic factor for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in general, and after its incorporation in the 2010 World Health Organization tumor grading system, it has become essentially mandatory in pathology reports for all gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, regardless of tumor location. Nevertheless, clinical significance for the Ki-67 index or MC has not been well demonstrated in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor (SINET), especially those without distant metastasis, the majority of which have very low proliferation rates. We assessed the clinical behavior of 130 SINETs in relation to stage, Ki-67 index, MC, and other pathologic features. Most SINETs (86%) were grade 1 and 14% were grade 2. There were no grade 3 tumors or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. On multivariate analysis, age, Ki-67 index >5%, MC >10/50 high-power field, stage IV, and liver metastases were associated with increased risk of death in all patients. When both stage and grade were considered, Ki-67 index >5% was associated with a nearly 4-fold increased risk of death in stage IV cases (n=60). In contrast, Ki-67 index did not show prognostic value for patients with stages I to III disease (n=70), although MC >1/50 high-power field was significantly associated with death on multivariable analysis. Our study confirms that liver metastasis and increased tumor cell proliferation rate are independent prognostic factors for SINETs, but shows that most SINETs have a very low proliferation rate, which limits its value for predicting tumor behavior. By combining staging and grading information, we demonstrate different roles and cutoff values of Ki-67 index and MC in SINET with different stages.

Tumor growth rate as a metric of progression, response, and prognosis in pancreatic and intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Lanreotide depot/autogel antitumor activity in intestinal/pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) was demonstrated in the phase-3 CLARINET study (NCT00353496), based on significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo.

Methods

During CLARINET, patients with metastatic intestinal/pancreatic NETs received lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 96 weeks. Imaging data (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors [RECIST] v1.0, centrally reviewed) were re-evaluated in this post hoc analysis of tumor growth rate (TGR) in NETs. TGR (%/month) was calculated from two imaging scans during relevant periods: pre-treatment (TGR₀); 12–24 weeks before randomization versus baseline; each treatment visit versus baseline (TGR_Tx-0); between consecutive treatment visits (TGR_Tx-Tx). To assess TGR as a measure of prognosis, PFS was compared for TGR₀ subgroups stratified by optimum TGR₀ cut-off; a multivariate analysis was conducted to identify prognostic factors for PFS.

Results

TGR₀ revealed tumors growing during pre-treatment (median [interquartile range] TGR₀: lanreotide 2.1%/month [0.2; 6.1]; placebo 2.7%/month [0.15; 6.8]), contrary to RECIST status. TGR was significantly reduced by 12 weeks with lanreotide versus placebo (difference in least-square mean TGR_0–12 of − 2.9 [− 5.1, − 0.8], p = 0.008), a difference that was maintained at most subsequent visits. TGR₀ > 4%/month had greater risk of progression/death than ≤4%/month (hazard ratio 4.1; [95% CI 2.5–6.5]; p < 0.001); multivariate analysis revealed lanreotide treatment, progression at baseline, TGR₀, hepatic tumor load, and primary tumor type were independently associated with PFS.

Conclusions

TGR provides valuable information on tumor activity and prognosis in patients with metastatic intestinal/pancreatic NETs, and identifies early lanreotide depot/autogel antitumor activity.

Trial registration

Retrospective registration, 18 July 2006; EudraCT: 2005–004904-35; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00353496.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5257-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) are a rare neoplasm with a bleak prognosis. Currently there are little prospective data available for optimal treatment. This review discusses the current available regimens and the future direction for the treatment of GEPNECs. Treatment plans for GEPNECs are often adapted from those devised for small cell lung cancer; however, differences in these malignancies exist, and GEPNECs require their own treatment paradigms. As such, current first-line treatment for GEPNECs is platinum-based chemotherapy with etoposide. Studies show that response rate and overall survival remain comparable between cisplatin and carboplatin versus etoposide and irinotecan; however, prognosis remains poor, and more efficacious therapy is needed to treat this malignancy. Additional first-line and second-line treatment options beyond platinum-based chemotherapy have also been investigated and may offer further treatment options, but again with suboptimal outcomes. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors may open the door for further research in its usefulness in GEPNECs. Additionally, the availability of checkpoint inhibitors lends promise to the treatment of GEPNECs. This review highlights the lack of large, prospective studies that focus on the treatment of GEPNECs. There is a need for randomized control trials to elucidate optimal treatment regimens specific to this malignancy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are limited data available for the treatment of poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) because of the rarity of this malignancy. Much of the treatment regimens used in practice today come from research in small cell lung cancer. Given the poor prognosis of GEPNECs, it is necessary to have treatment paradigms specific to this malignancy. The aim of this literature review is to summarize the available first- and second-line GEPNEC therapy, outline future treatments, and highlight the vast gap in the literature.

The impact of failure to achieve symptom control after resection of functional neuroendocrine tumors: An 8-institution study from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

The goals of resection of functional neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are two-fold: Oncological benefit and symptom control. The interaction between the two is not well understood.

METHODS

All patients with functional NETs of the pancreas, duodenum, and ampulla who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2016 were identified. Using Cox regression analysis, factors associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirty patients underwent curative-intent resection. Fifty-three percent were insulinomas, 35% gastrinomas, and 12% were other types. Twenty-one percent had a known genetic syndrome, 23% had lymph node (LN) positivity, 80% underwent an R0 resection, and 14% had no postoperative symptom improvement (SI). Factors associated with reduced RFS included noninsulinoma histology, the presence of a known genetic syndrome, LN positivity, R1 margin, and lack of SI. On multivariable analysis, only the failure to achieve SI following resection was associated with reduced RFS. Considering only those patients with an R0 resection, failure to achieve SI was associated with worse 3-year RFS compared with patients having SI (36% vs 80%; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve symptomatic improvement after resection of functional NETs is associated with worse RFS. These patients may benefit from short-interval surveillance imaging postoperatively to assess for earlier radiographical disease recurrence.

Treatment options for PNET liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare pancreatic neoplasms. About 40-80% of patients with PNET are metastatic at presentation, usually involving the liver (40-93%). Liver metastasis represents the most significant prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to present an up-to-date review of treatment options for patients with liver metastases from PNETs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify all pertinent studies published up to May 2018.

RESULTS

The literature search evaluated all the therapeutic options for patients with liver metastases of PNETs, including surgical treatment, loco-regional therapies, and pharmacological treatment. All the different treatment options showed particular indications in different presentations of liver metastases of PNET. Surgery remains the only potentially curative therapeutic option in patients with PNETs and resectable liver metastases, even if relapse rates are high. Efficacy of medical treatment has increased with advances in targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, and the introduction of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Several techniques for loco-regional control of metastases are available, including chemo- or radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with PNET metastases should be multidisciplinary and must be personalized according to the features of individual patients and tumors.

Open issues on G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms: back to the future

The recent recognition that grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can be divided into two different categories according to the histopathological differentiation, that is G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and G3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) has generated a lot of interest concerning not only the diagnosis, but also the differential management of such new group of NENs. However, several issues need to be fully clarified in order to put G3 NETs and G3 NECs in the right place. The aim of this review is to focus on those issues that are still undetermined starting from the current knowledge, evaluating the available evidence and the possible clinical implications.

Intrinsic Contact Between T and N Classifications in Resected Well-Moderately Differentiated Locoregional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The role of N classification is controversial in several prognostication systems proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). The widely accepted modified European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (mENETS) system suggests this contradiction may be related to T classification.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from 981 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2012; cohort 1) and 140 patients from the Pancreatic Cancer Institute of Fudan University (2006-2016; cohort 2). All patients had resected well- to moderately differentiated locoregional pNENs, whereby the mENETS system was adopted. Factors related to N1 classification and the association between N and T classifications were analyzed, and N classification prognosis based on T classification was assessed.

RESULTS

In cohorts 1 and 2, tumor size (2-4 cm: p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively; > 4 cm: p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively) and tumors extending beyond the pancreas (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively), which are factors for T classification, affected N1 classification. For tumors limited to the pancreas, the N1 classification was associated with tumor size (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively) and predicted poor disease-specific survival (DSS), while for tumors extending beyond the pancreas, the N1 classification did not affect patient outcomes. Findings obtained with data from the SEER database were reproducible with our institutional data.

CONCLUSIONS

N classification is associated with T classification, limiting the value of N1 classification for the pNENs tumor-node-metastasis system. A new risk model is necessary to predict patient outcomes and guide clinical practice for the prognosis of pNENs.

Vascularity and Tumor Size are Significant Predictors for Recurrence after Resection of a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to identify patients at high risk of recurrence after pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) using only the grading classification, especially the G2 category, which includes both benign and low- and high-grade malignant tumors.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with PNET who underwent pancreatectomy were enrolled in this study. We defined the computed tomography (CT) ratio as the CT value of the tumor divided by that of non-tumorous pancreatic parenchyma using the late arterial phase dynamic CT. The optimal cut-off values for CT ratio and tumor size were determined using p-values that were calculated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off values of CT ratio and tumor size for dividing patients into groups according to the greatest difference in disease-free survival (DFS) were 0.85 (p < 0.001) and 3.0 cm (p < 0.001), respectively. In analysis using Spearman's correlation coefficient, CT ratio (p = 0.007) and tumor size (p = 0.003) were individually associated with the Ki-67 proliferative index. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified that a CT ratio <0.85 (n = 10, p = 0.006) and tumor size ≥3.0 cm (n = 13, p = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors associated with DFS. All patients in the CT ratio ≥0.85 and tumor size <3.0 cm group (n = 23, including seven patients with G2 disease) did not develop recurrence after surgery. On the other hand, 5-year DFS in the CT ratio <0.85 and tumor size ≥3.0 cm group (n = 5, including three patients with G2 disease) was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

PNETs with a CT ratio <0.85 and tumor size ≥3.0 cm should be considered as having a high risk of recurrence after pancreatectomy.

The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications

The understanding of neuroendocrine neoplasms has evolved significantly since their initial descriptions in the 1800s to early 1900s. In the gastroenteropancreatic system, this group of malignant tumors is subdivided into well and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms based on morphologic, proliferative and biologic differences. However, it has become increasingly apparent that well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are not a homogeneous group. Attempting to better predict outcome of these tumors has been the motivation behind numerous proposed classification systems, the evolution of which culminated with the currently used system, the ENETS/WHO classification. Herein, we review the genesis of this classification system and some of its shortcomings. In addition, we discuss some of the most recent proposals that suggest modifications to the current system.

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement

: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms was reviewed and validated the crucial role of the proliferative rate. According to the WHO classification 2010, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of grade 1 or 2 in up to 84%, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in 6%-8%. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are of grade G. Recently, a proportion of neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified, calling for a new category, well-differentiated grade 3 NET (NET G-3). Studies that have reported the characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms have identified more well-differentiated NET G-3 than neuroendocrine carcinomas. The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. Treatment for NET G-3 is not standardized and is balanced between G-1/2 neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma treatments. In nonmetastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the European and American guidelines recommended a surgical resection for localized neuroendocrine neoplasm, irrespective of the tumor grading. In NET G-3, chemotherapy is the benchmark if the main treatment goal is reduction of the tumor mass, particularly if it would allow a secondary surgery. In the present work, we review the epidemiology and make recommendations for the management of NET G-3.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified and named well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3). The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. The prognosis is worse than that for NET G-2. In nonmetastatic NET G-3, surgery appeared to be the first option. The chemotherapy regimen in pancreatic NET G-3 should be in line with that implemented in NET G-1/2 when the Ki-67 index is below 55% and should be in line with that implemented for neuroendocrine carcinoma when Ki-67 is above 55%.

Emergency therapy for liver metastases from advanced VIPoma: surgery or transarterial chemoembolization?

VIPoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with a high potential to develop hepatic metastases and poor prognosis. The primitive tumor is nonsymptomatic and usually localized within the pancreas. Liver metastasis drives the prognosis and induces profuse watery diarrhea or renal failure. We herein present severe renal failure or diarrhea in two patients hospitalized in intensive care justifying emergency treatment of liver metastasis. The two patients experienced severe diarrhea due to a hypersecretion of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) from liver metastasis released into the blood circulation. Therapeutic management was discussed and liver transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed with chemotherapy-loaded embospheres, which cause necrosis of tumor lesions. TACE controlled the hormonal syndrome and made patients eligible for curative surgery. Tumor necrosis occurred and VIP levels collapsed. Surgery was performed in one of the two cases after TACE and the patient was considered in remission. Both patients were still alive after 3 years of follow up. Thus, TACE is feasible and appears to be an effective emergency treatment in patients with a VIP-hormonal syndrome due to liver metastases. Despite the biological disorder due to the hormonal secretion, an aggressive approach is warranted in VIP liver metastasis.

Predictive prognostic value of local and distant recurrence of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with reference to World Health Organization classifications (2004, 2010). Case series study

BACKGROUND

F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) have been claimed to be an important prognostic tool in different malignancies. However, its predictive prognostic value on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is still under investigation.

AIM

We study the prognostic impact of FDG-PET scan in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors.

METHODOLOGY

Between 2007 and 2012, 26 patients with no metastastatic histologically confirmed PNETs (mean age: 57 years) were examined with FDG-PET. We studied its captation in relation with the well established hystopathological prognostic markers assessed in the tumoral resected specimen according to the WHO 2004 and ENETS/WHO 2010 classification.

RESULTS

FDG-PET captation was positive in 17 cases (65.4%). The median follow-up period was 34.4 months and recurrences occurred in 4 cases (15.4%). We found a significant correlation between this captation and Ki 67 index (p = 0.032), mitotic index (p = 0.002), tumor grade (p = 0.017) and tumor size (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET provides a good prognostic value for PNETs. Present results must be further validated with larger sample studies.

Preoperative Identification of a Prognostic Factor for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

To find predictive factors among computed tomography (CT) findings to identify pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G2 of World Health Organization classification.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors underwent multiphase contrast enhanced CT (unenhanced, arterial, pancreatic, portal and equilibrium phase), and attenuation values and imaging findings were examined. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, and association between imaging findings and World Health Organization classification was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean CT attenuation value of NET G1 was significantly higher than that of NET G2 throughout the arterial, pancreatic, and portal phases. Receiver operating characteristic analysis according to tumor size revealed sensitivity: 83.3%, specificity: 92.0% and area under the curve (AUC): 0.853, whereas that of corrected true enhancement values in the pancreatic phase revealed sensitivity: 91.7%, specificity: 84.0% and AUC: 0.897, which showed the highest AUC. Specific CT findings, such as irregular tumor contour, vessel involvement, and cystic degeneration/necrosis, were significantly associated with NET G2, but not to the extent of CT attenuation value and tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

The CT enhancement in the pancreatic phase, and irregularity, vessel involvement, and cystic degeneration/necrosis were significant predictors of NET G2. These parameters might help in differentiating between NET G1 and G2, providing a basis for appropriate treatment.

Multiple and Secondary Hormone Secretion in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

CONTEXT

As a group, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) secrete many different peptide hormones, yet heretofore each NET patient is typically thought to produce at most one hormone that causes a distinct hormonal syndrome. A minority of patients have multiple hormones at diagnosis and may also develop secondary hormone secretion at a later stage.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency and to describe the impact of multiple and secondary hormone secretion in sporadic gasteroenteropancreatic NET patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients (n = 972) with gasteroenteropancreatic NET treated at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Patients with the secretion of multiple hormones at diagnosis and/or those developing secondary hormone secretion during the disease course were identified and studied in further detail.

RESULTS

In pancreatic NETs (PNETs), a total of 19 of 323 patients (6%) had secretion of multiple hormones at diagnosis, and 14 of 323 (4%) had secondary changes during the disease course. These phenomena occurred exclusively in patients with an advanced disease stage, and secondary hormones were detected in a close time span with progressive disease. Patients with secondary insulin hypersecretion had increased morbidity as well as reduced survival (P < .002). In contrast, multiple and secondary hormone secretion was rarely seen in NETs of the small intestine with 0 and 1 of 603 cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Diversity of PNET hormone secretion either at diagnosis or during the disease course occurred in a minority of patients (9.3%). These phenomena had a major impact on patient outcome both through increased morbidity and mortality. Our results support that patients with metastatic PNETs should be monitored for clinical symptoms of secondary hormone secretion during the disease course.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Despite an increase in the number of Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, long-term outcomes and prognostic factors, especially for those with advanced disease, remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 78 patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms treated at our hospital from January 1987 to March 2015. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Prognostic significance of several clinicopathological factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Median overall survivals of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 64) and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 14) were 83.7 and 9.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.08, P < 0.001). Although no significant differences were observed using a Ki-67 cut-off value of 2% (hazard ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-1.13, P = 0.0989), a Ki-67 cut-off of 10% was a significant predictor in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (hazard ratio: 9.95, 95% confidence interval, 3.01-32.97, P < 0.001). Treatment after the advent of targeted therapy (hazard ratio: 0.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.19, P < 0.001) and the presence of bone metastases (hazard ratio: 4.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.42-11.29, P = 0.013) were significant prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor evaluated by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis also revealed that a Ki-67 index ≥10% (hazard ratio: 38.8, 95% confidence interval: 8.42-226.62, P < 0.001), approval of targeted therapy (hazard ratio: 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.11, P < 0.001) and bone metastases (hazard ratio: 5.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-24.00, P = 0.039) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We elucidated the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Can pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour biopsy accurately determine pathological characteristics?

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the pathological characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is crucial for appropriate management. We compared preoperative pathological data with surgical specimens for accuracy.

METHODS

Surgical patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours who underwent preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the primary tumour or biopsy of liver metastasis were retrospectively included. Tumour differentiation and the Ki67 proliferation index on biopsies were compared with pancreatic specimens.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included. A preoperative biopsy of the primary tumour or of a liver metastasis was obtained in 48 and 9 patients respectively. Tumour differentiation was high in 98%, and poor in 2% on biopsy and high in 100% of surgical specimens. Ki67 index values were 0 (0-19) and 2 (0-15) on biopsy and surgical specimens (p=0.01). Correlation between preoperative and surgical findings was stronger for liver (r=0.62, p=0.001) than for pancreas (r=0.23, p=0.11). Correlation for pancreas varied according to the tumour pattern: solid (r=0.24, p=0.16), mixed (r=0.91, p=0.0036) or cystic (r=0.04, p=0.89). Tumour grade was different between pancreatic biopsies and surgical specimens, for grade 1 (63% vs 37%) and grade 2 (28% vs 72%), p=0.0007.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour grade assessment is accurate in biopsies of liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, while pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsies are less accurate.

Post-first-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma

There is no standard for second-line chemotherapy in poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (G3-NEC) patients. We analyzed the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy in this population. A single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive G3-NEC patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy after failure of a cisplatinum-based regimen between December 2003 and June 2012 was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and safety were assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and NCI.CTC v4 criteria. Twenty consecutive patients were included (seven males and 13 females; median age 55; range 23-87 years) with a performance status of 0-1 in 75% of them. Primary location was gastroenteropancreatic in 12, thoracic in four, other in two, and unknown in two patients. There were 12 (65%) large-cell and 7 (30%) small-cell G3-NEC tumors, and 1 (5%) unknown. All patients had distant metastases. Twelve (60%) patients received FOLFOX as second-line treatment and 8 (40%) as third-line treatment or later and the median number of administered cycles was 6 (range 3-14). The median follow-up was 19 months. Median PFS was 4.5 months. Among the 17 evaluable patients, five partial responses (29%), six stable diseases (35%), and six progressive diseases (35%) were observed. Median OS was 9.9 months. Main Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (35%), thrombopenia (20%), nausea/vomiting (10%), anemia (10%), and elevated liver transaminases (10%). Our results indicate that the FOLFOX regimen could be considered as a second-line option in poorly differentiated G3-NEC patients after cisplatinum-based first-line treatment but warrant further confirmation in future larger prospective studies.

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review

To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4–16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.

Radiofrequency ablation for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

To determine the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eight studies were included (N = 301). Twenty-six percent of RF ablation procedures were percutaneous (n = 156), with the remainder conducted at surgery. Forty-eight percent of patients had a concomitant liver resection. Fifty-four percent of patients presented with symptoms, with 92% reporting symptom improvement following RF ablation (alone or in combination with surgery). The median duration of symptom improvement was 14-27 months. However, recurrence was common (63%-87%). RF ablation can provide symptomatic relief in NET liver metastases alone or in combination with surgery.

Perspectives on surgical management of neuroendocrine liver metastases

Abstract: 

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) commonly metastasize to the liver. Different treatments are available for the management of metastatic NETs. Both primary tumor and metastases can significantly affect the patients’ quality of life and overall survival (OS). Surgical resection is the only chance for cure and should be considered for every patient. For operable patients, current evidence suggests that liver resection is a safe and effective treatment for neuroendocrine liver metastases. High rates of recurrence are reported following resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases. There is no evidence to support incomplete (R2) resection (debulking) surgery to improve OS or quality of life. When surgery is performed for NETs, other conservative adjuvant treatments should also be considered to prolong symptom-free, disease-free and OS.

Association of dose escalation of octreotide long-acting release on clinical symptoms and tumor markers and response among patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Patients with nonresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) experience symptoms of hormone hypersecretion including diarrhea, flushing, and bronchoconstriction, which can interfere with quality of life [Anthony and Vinik (2011) Pancreas, 40:987]. Treatment with a long-acting release formulation of octreotide, a somatostatin analog, can help to alleviate these symptoms. Although high doses of octreotide are often required for adequate symptom control, the relationship between octreotide dose escalation and symptom control in the NET context is not well quantified in the literature. A retrospective chart review was conducted of nonresectable metastatic NET patients who received a dose greater than 30 mg intramuscular octreotide long-acting formulation (O-LAR) at any time between January 2005 and December 2011 at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). The association between dose escalation of O-LAR, chromogranin A (CGA), 24-h urine 5-hydoxyindoacetate (5-HIAA), symptom control, and radiological progression was explored. Dose escalation of O-LAR was associated with improved symptom control in NET patients who were refractory to the standard dose levels. Reduction of serum CGA & 5-HIAA levels by at least 10% was observed in 31% and 23% respectively. Retrospective review of imaging did not document any reductions in tumor volume. Higher doses of O-LAR are associated with improved symptom control in NET patients. The variability in tumor marker levels in response to O-LAR dose escalation may indicate that tumor marker levels may not be an accurate assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Tumor-associated macrophages are a useful biomarker to predict recurrence after surgical resection of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

Patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) have poorer survival than those with functional PNETs. Our objective was to identify risk factors for recurrence after resection to better define surveillance parameters to improve long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for NF-PNET patients who underwent resection at the University of Michigan from 1995 to 2012. Immunohistochemical staining of tissues from patients with and without disease recurrence was performed for Ki-67 and the macrophage marker CD68, as tumor-associated macrophages are important for PNET development and progression. Clinicopathological factors and patient outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven NF-PNET patients underwent surgical resection. There was a recurrence rate of 14.4% (14/97). The median time to recurrence was 0.61 years, with 10 (71%) patients recurring within the first 2 years. Six of 7 patients (86%) monitored at 6-month surveillance intervals were diagnosed with recurrence on their first computed tomographic scan or during the intervening intervals. By Cox proportional hazards analysis, the most significant independent risk factors for recurrence were higher grade, stage, and intraoperative blood loss. High CD68 score and Ki-67 index correlated with recurrence risk, and Ki-67 index inversely correlated with time to recurrence. In patients who otherwise had few risk factors, a high CD68 score was a significant prognostic factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NF-PNETs, risk factors associated with recurrence were high EBL, grade, stage, CD68 score, and Ki-67 index. The CD68 score was an important prognostic factor in patients who otherwise had few clinicopathological risk factors; therefore, the CD68 score should be considered when planning surveillance strategies. We recommend that NF-PNET patients at high risk of recurrence undergo initial surveillance every 3 months for 2 years after surgery.

Nonsurgical Strategies in Patients With NET Liver Metastases: A Protocol of Four Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with hepatic metastases generally have a worse prognosis as compared with patients with nonmetastasized NETs. Due to tumor location and distant metastases, a surgical approach is often not possible and nonsurgical therapeutic strategies may apply.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of these systematic reviews is to evaluate the role of nonsurgical therapy options for patients with nonresectable liver metastases of NETs.

METHODS

An objective group of librarians will provide an electronic search strategy to examine the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) databases. There will be no restriction concerning language and publication date. The qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the systematic review will be conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective, and retrospective comparative cohort, and case-control studies. Case series will be collected in a separate database and only used for descriptive purposes.

RESULTS

This study is ongoing and presents a protocol of four systematic reviews to assess the role of nonsurgical treatment options in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

These systematic reviews, performed according to this protocol, will assess the value of noninvasive therapy options for patients with nonresectable liver metastases of NETs in combination with invasive techniques, such as percutaneous liver-directed techniques and local ablation techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42012002657; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2657 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlYi37O); CRD42012002658; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2658 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlfWSuD); CRD42012002659; www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2659 (Arichived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlmWAFM); and CRD42012002660; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2660 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDmnylzp).

Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs)

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic importance and preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in an effort to guide surgical decision making in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

BACKGROUND

PNETs are uncommon, and the natural history of the disease is not well described. As a result, there remains controversy regarding the optimal management of regional lymph nodes during resection of the primary tumor.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgery for locoregional PNET between 1994 and 2012 was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of nodal metastasis. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results were expressed as P values and odds ratio estimates, with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients were identified, of whom 50 (38%) patients had nodal metastasis. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was higher for larger tumors [> 1.5 cm (odds ratio [OR] = 4.7)], tumors of the head as compared with body-tail of the pancreas (OR = 2.8), tumors with Ki-67 greater than 20% (OR = 6.7), and tumors with lymph vascular invasion (OR = 3.6) (P < 0.05). Median disease-free survival was lower for patients with nodal metastases (4.5 vs 14.6 years, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis is predictive of poor outcomes in patients with PNETs. Preoperative variables are not able to reliably predict patients where the probability of lymph node involvement was less than 12%. These data support inclusion of regional lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PNET.

Clinical utility of indigenously formulated single-vial lyophilized HYNIC-TOC kit in evaluating Gastro-entero Pancreatic neuro endocrine tumours

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and utility of (99m)Tc HYNIC-TOC planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT in the diagnosis, staging and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GPNETs).

METHODS

22 patients (median age, 46 years) with histologically proven gastro- entero- pancreatic NETs underwent (99m)Tc HYNIC-TOC whole body scintigraphy and regional SPECT/CT as indicated. Scanning was performed after injection of 370-550 MBq (10-15 mCi) of (99m)Tc HYNIC-TOC intravenously. Images were evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians both qualitatively as well as semi quantitatively (tumor to background and tumor to normal liver ratios on SPECT -CT images). Results of SPECT/CT were compared with the results of conventional imaging. Histopathology results and follow-up somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with (99m)Tc HYNIC TOC or conventional imaging with biochemical markers were considered to be the reference standards.

RESULTS

(99m)Tc HYNIC TOC showed sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 85.7%, respectively, for primary tumor and 100% and 86% for metastases. It was better than conventional imaging modalities for the detection of both primary tumor (P<0.001) and metastases (P<0.0001). It changed the management strategy in 6 patients (31.8%) and supported management decisions in 8 patients (36.3%).

CONCLUSION

(99m)Tc HYNIC TOC SPECT/CT appears to be a highly sensitive and specific modality for the detection and staging of GPNETs. It is better than conventional imaging for the evaluation of GPNETs and can have a significant impact on patient management and planning further therapeutic options.

Transplantation and surgical strategies in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases: protocol of four systematic reviews

Background

Hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are considered a major prognostic factor associated with significantly reduced survival compared to patients without liver metastases. Several surgical and nonsurgical strategies are present to treat resectable and nonresectable liver metastases, some of which have the potential to cure liver mestatases.

Objective

The aims of the four systematic reviews presented in the paper are to determine the effectiveness of liver resection versus nonsurgical treatment of patients with NET liver metastases, to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment options on the tumor-free survival, to assess the role of liver transplantation in patients presenting with unresectable bilateral hepatic metastases, and to evaluate the role of primary tumor resection in presence of unresectable liver metastases.

Methods

Literature search was performed on Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). No language restrictions were applied. Randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies, and case-control studies will be used for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the systematic reviews. Case series will be only included in a separate database for descriptive purposes.

Results

This study is ongoing and presents a protocol system of four systematic reviews that will assist in determining the effectiveness of liver resection versus nonsurgical treatment of patients with NET liver metastases. This study is also assumed to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment options on the tumor-free survival, the role of liver transplantation, and the relevance of primary tumor resection in presence of unresectable liver metastasis.

Conclusions

The systematic reviews will show the current evidence based on the effectiveness of surgical strategies in patients with NET liver metastases and serve as basis for clinical practice guidelines.

Trial Registration

The systematic reviews have been prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: liver resection (CRD42012002652); http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002652 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LQUqMnqL,). neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies (CRD42012002656); http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002656 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LQVvEHuf). liver transplantation (CRD42012002655); http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002655 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LQW7WFo3,). resection of the locoregional primary NET (CRD42012002654); http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002654 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6LQWEIuGe).