1
|
Mitrova K, Cerna K, Zdychyncova K, Pipek B, Svikova J, Minarikova P, Adamcova M, David J, Lukas M, Duricova D. Serological responses to vaccination in children exposed in utero to ustekinumab or vedolizumab: cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort. Eur J Pediatr 2024:10.1007/s00431-024-05683-4. [PMID: 39023645 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05683-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Evidence on serological responses to vaccination in children exposed to ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in utero is lacking. This multicentre prospective study aimed to assess the impact of prenatal exposure to UST or VDZ due to maternal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on serological responses to vaccination and other immunological parameters in exposed children. Children aged ≥ 1 year who were exposed in utero to UST or VDZ and completed at least 1-year of mandatory vaccination were included. We assessed the serological response to vaccination (non-live: tetanus, diphtheria, and Haemophilus influenzae B; live: mumps, rubella, and measles), whole blood count, and immunoglobulin levels. The control group comprised unexposed children born to mothers without IBD. A total of 23 children (median age, 25 months) exposed to UST (n = 13) or VDZ (n = 10) and 10 controls (median age, 37 months) were included. The serological response to vaccination was comparable between the UST and VDZ groups and controls, with an adequate serological response rate of ≥ 80%. Only children exposed to UST showed a slightly reduced serological response to mumps (67% vs. 86% in controls), whereas all children exposed to VDZ showed an adequate response. The majority of the exposed children had normal levels of individual immunoglobulin classes, similar to the controls. No severe pathology was observed in any of the children.Conclusion: Despite the limited sample size, our findings suggest that in utero exposure to VDZ or UST does not significantly impair the vaccine response or broader immunological parameters in exposed children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarina Mitrova
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE a.s., Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Pediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Karin Cerna
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE a.s., Prague, Czech Republic
- GENNET s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Barbora Pipek
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Hospital AGEL Vitkovice, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Svikova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jihlava Hospital, Jihlava, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Minarikova
- Department of Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Military Hospital, Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Jan David
- Department of Children and Adolescents, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Lukas
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE a.s., Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dana Duricova
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE a.s., Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Pharmacology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahuja D, Luo J, Qi Y, Syal G, Boland BS, Chang J, Ma C, Jairath V, Xu R, Singh S. Impact of Treatment Response on Risk of Serious Infections in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Secondary Analysis of the PYRAMID Registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:1286-1294.e4. [PMID: 38216022 PMCID: PMC11260264 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Traditional risk factors for serious infections with advanced therapies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have been assessed at baseline before starting therapy. We evaluated the impact of treatment response on the risk of serious infections in adalimumab-treated patients with CD through secondary analysis of the PYRAMID registry (NCT00524537). METHODS We included patients with CD who initiated adalimumab and classified them as treatment responders (achieved steroid-free clinical remission based on patient-reported outcomes) vs nonresponders (not in steroid-free clinical remission) at 6 months after treatment initiation (landmark). We compared the risk of serious infections between responders vs nonresponders between 6 and 36 months after treatment initiation through stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 1515 adalimumab-treated patients, 763 (50.4%) were classified as responders at 6 months (37 ± 13 y; 56% female; disease duration, 9.5 ± 8.5 y). Compared with nonresponders, responders were less likely to have moderate to severe symptoms (55.6% vs 33%), or require steroids (45.5% vs 17.3%) or opiates (6.6% vs 1.3%) at baseline, without any differences in disease location, perianal disease, and prior CD complications. During follow-up evaluation, using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, responders were 34% less likely to experience serious infections compared with nonresponders (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96). Risk of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal infections was lower in responders vs nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CD who respond to adalimumab have a lower risk of developing serious infections compared with nonresponders. These findings underscore that initiation of advanced therapy for CD may lower the risk of serious infections through effective disease control and avoidance of corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruv Ahuja
- Department of Medicine, Indira Gandhi Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jiyu Luo
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Yuchen Qi
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Gaurav Syal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Brigid S Boland
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - John Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Christopher Ma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronghui Xu
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Z, Alexander JL, Yee Eng K, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Constable L, Castro Seoane R, Bewshea C, Nice R, D’Mello A, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Boyton RJ, Hart AL, Lees CW, Goodhand JR, Kennedy NA, Pollock KM, Ahmad T, Powell N. Antibody Responses to Influenza Vaccination are Diminished in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Infliximab or Tofacitinib. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:560-569. [PMID: 37941436 PMCID: PMC11037107 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We sought to determine whether six commonly used immunosuppressive regimens were associated with lower antibody responses after seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. METHODS We conducted a prospective study including 213 IBD patients and 53 healthy controls: 165 who had received seasonal influenza vaccine and 101 who had not. IBD medications included infliximab, thiopurines, infliximab and thiopurine combination therapy, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib. The primary outcome was antibody responses against influenza/A H3N2 and A/H1N1, compared to controls, adjusting for age, prior vaccination, and interval between vaccination and sampling. RESULTS Lower antibody responses against influenza A/H3N2 were observed in patients on infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.20-0.60], p = 0.0002), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.46 [0.27-0.79], p = 0.0050), and tofacitinib (0.28 [0.14-0.57], p = 0.0005) compared to controls. Lower antibody responses against A/H1N1 were observed in patients on infliximab (0.29 [0.15-0.56], p = 0.0003), combination of infliximab and thiopurine therapy (0.34 [0.17-0.66], p = 0.0016), thiopurine monotherapy (0.46 [0.24-0.87], p = 0.017), and tofacitinib (0.23 [0.10-0.56], p = 0.0013). Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were not associated with reduced antibody responses against A/H3N2 or A/H1N1. Vaccination in the previous year was associated with higher antibody responses to A/H3N2. Vaccine-induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration weakly correlated with antibodies against H3N2 [r = 0.27; p = 0.0004] and H1N1 [r = 0.33; p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination in both the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 seasons was associated with significantly higher antibody responses to influenza/A than no vaccination or vaccination in 2021-2022 alone. Infliximab and tofacitinib are associated with lower binding antibody responses to influenza/A, similar to COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Kai Yee Eng
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D’Mello
- Division of Medicine & Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth R Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Unit [King’s Clinical Trials Unit], King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart’s Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George’s Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary J Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lung Division, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Marks Hospital and Academic Institute, Gastroenterology, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Katrina M Pollock
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Canales-Herrerias P, Uzzan M, Seki A, Czepielewski RS, Verstockt B, Livanos AE, Raso F, Dunn A, Dai D, Wang A, Al-taie Z, Martin J, Laurent T, Ko HM, Tokuyama M, Tankelevich M, Meringer H, Cossarini F, Jha D, Krek A, Paulsen JD, Taylor MD, Nakadar MZ, Wong J, Erlich EC, Mintz RL, Onufer EJ, Helmink BA, Sharma K, Rosenstein A, Ganjian D, Chung G, Dawson T, Juarez J, Yajnik V, Cerutti A, Faith JJ, Suarez-Farinas M, Argmann C, Petralia F, Randolph GJ, Polydorides AD, Reboldi A, Colombel JF, Mehandru S. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue attrition associates with response to anti-α4β7 therapy in ulcerative colitis. Sci Immunol 2024; 9:eadg7549. [PMID: 38640252 PMCID: PMC11140591 DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adg7549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a first-line treatment in ulcerative colitis (UC) that targets the α4β7- mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1) axis. To determine the mechanisms of action of VDZ, we examined five distinct cohorts of patients with UC. A decrease in naïve B and T cells in the intestines and gut-homing (β7+) plasmablasts in circulation of VDZ-treated patients suggested that VDZ targets gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Anti-α4β7 blockade in wild-type and photoconvertible (KikGR) mice confirmed a loss of GALT size and cellularity because of impaired cellular entry. In VDZ-treated patients with UC, treatment responders demonstrated reduced intestinal lymphoid aggregate size and follicle organization and a reduction of β7+IgG+ plasmablasts in circulation, as well as IgG+ plasma cells and FcγR-dependent signaling in the intestine. GALT targeting represents a previously unappreciated mechanism of action of α4β7-targeted therapies, with major implications for this therapeutic paradigm in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Canales-Herrerias
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mathieu Uzzan
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Paris Est Créteil University UPEC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Gastroenterology Department, Fédération Hospitalo–Universitaire TRUE (InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs), Créteil F-94010, France
| | - Akihiro Seki
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandra E. Livanos
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fiona Raso
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Alexandra Dunn
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Dai
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Wang
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zainab Al-taie
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerome Martin
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche Translationelle en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, Nantes, France
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Laboratoire d’immunologie, CIMNA, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Laurent
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche Translationelle en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, Nantes, France
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Laboratoire d’immunologie, CIMNA, Nantes, France
| | - Huaibin M. Ko
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Minami Tokuyama
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Tankelevich
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hadar Meringer
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesca Cossarini
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Divya Jha
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Azra Krek
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John D. Paulsen
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D. Taylor
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad Zuber Nakadar
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emma C. Erlich
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rachel L. Mintz
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Emily J. Onufer
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Beth A. Helmink
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Keshav Sharma
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam Rosenstein
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Ganjian
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Grace Chung
- Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Travis Dawson
- Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Andrea Cerutti
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Translational Clinical Research Program, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jeremiah J. Faith
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mayte Suarez-Farinas
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen Argmann
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesca Petralia
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gwendalyn J. Randolph
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexandros D. Polydorides
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Reboldi
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saurabh Mehandru
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caldera F, Rolak S, Farraye FA, Necela BM, Cogen D, Zona EE, Schell TL, Ramirez OR, Almasry M, Chun K, Hayney MS, Knutson KL. Higher and Sustained Cell-Mediated Immune Responses After 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024; 15:e00688. [PMID: 38349178 PMCID: PMC11042770 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies suggest that the generation of durable T-cell immunity following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination protects against severe disease. The aim of this study was to measure cell-mediated immune response (CMIR) 1-2 months and 6 months after a third dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. METHODS This prospective study (HumoRal and CellULar initial and Sustained immunogenicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]) evaluated CMIR at 28-65 days (t 1 ) after dose 2, 28-65 days (t 2 ) (n = 183) and 6 months (±45 days) (t 3 ) (n = 167) after a third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. A small cohort had blood sample available 28-65 days (t 4 ) (n = 55) after a fourth dose. Primary outcomes were CMIR at (t 2 ) and (t 3 ). Secondary outcomes included the effect of immunosuppressing IBD medications on CMIR and response at (t 4 ). RESULTS All patients had measurable CMIR at all time points. CMIR increased at t 2 compared with that at t 1 (median 1,467 responding cells per million (interquartile range [IQR] 410-5,971) vs 313 (94-960) P < 0.001). There was no significant waning in t 2 vs t 3 or significant boosting at t 4 . Those on anti-tumor necrosis factor monotherapy had a higher CMIR compared with those not on this therapy at t 2 (4,132 [IQR 1,136-8,795] vs 869 [IQR 343-3,221] P < 0.001) and t 3 (2,843 [IQR 596-6,459] vs 654 [IQR 143-2,067] P < 0.001). In univariable analysis, anti-tumor necrosis factor monotherapy was associated with a higher CMIR at t 2 ( P < 0.001) and t 3 ( P < 0.001) and confirmed in a multivariable model ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION A third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine boosts CMIR, and the response is sustained in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddy Caldera
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Stacey Rolak
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Francis A. Farraye
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Brian M. Necela
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Davitte Cogen
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Emily E. Zona
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Trevor L. Schell
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Oscar Ramirez Ramirez
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mazen Almasry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kelly Chun
- LabCorp, R&D and Specialty Medicine, Calabasas, CA, USA
| | - Mary S. Hayney
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Keith L. Knutson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prentice R, Flanagan E, Wright EK, Gibson PR, Rosella S, Rosella O, Begun J, An YK, Lawrance IC, Kamm MA, Sparrow M, Goldberg R, Prideaux L, Vogrin S, Kiburg KV, Ross AL, Burns M, Bell SJ. Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Levels in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Infants Exposed In Utero. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00252-0. [PMID: 38492905 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Vedolizumab and ustekinumab pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and the infant after in utero exposure remain incompletely defined. We aim to define the antenatal stability of ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels and the time at which infant drug levels become undetectable. METHODS This multicenter prospective observational cohort study recruited pregnant or preconception women with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Trough drug levels, clinical data, and biochemical data were documented preconception, during each trimester of pregnancy, and postpartum. Maternal and cord blood drug levels were measured at delivery and in infants until undetectable. Infant outcomes were assessed until 2 years of age. RESULTS A total of 102 participants (vedolizumab, n = 58) were included. The majority of mothers were, and remained, in clinical and biochemical remission. Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased over the course of pregnancy in association with increasing weight, rather than increasing gestation. Maternal ustekinumab levels remained stable. The median time to drug becoming undetectable in the infant was shorter for vedolizumab (11 wk; range, 5-19 wk; n = 32) than ustekinumab (14 wk; range, 9-36 wk; n = 17) and correlated positively with infant delivery level. Thirty-two of 41 (88%) and 17 of 30 (67%) vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age, respectively. Pregnancy and infant outcomes were favorable. Twenty infants with undetectable drug levels received the rotavirus vaccine, with no adverse reactions reported. CONCLUSIONS Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased, whereas ustekinumab levels remained stable over the course of pregnancy. Most vedolizumab- and approximately half of ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age. No concerning maternal or infant safety signals were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralley Prentice
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Centre of Inflammatory Disease, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Emma Flanagan
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily K Wright
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter R Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sam Rosella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ourania Rosella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jakob Begun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoon-Kyo An
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian C Lawrance
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael A Kamm
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Miles Sparrow
- Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rimma Goldberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Centre of Inflammatory Disease, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lani Prideaux
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Alyson L Ross
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Megan Burns
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sally J Bell
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Centre of Inflammatory Disease, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kelly AJ, Long A. Targeting T-cell integrins in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Clin Exp Immunol 2024; 215:15-26. [PMID: 37556361 PMCID: PMC10776250 DOI: 10.1093/cei/uxad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The recruitment of T cells to tissues and their retention there are essential processes in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The mechanisms regulating these processes have become better understood over the past three decades and are now recognized to involve temporally and spatially specific interactions between cell-adhesion molecules. These include integrins, which are heterodimeric molecules that mediate in-to-out and out-to-in signalling in T cells, other leukocytes, and most other cells of the body. Integrin signalling contributes to T-cell circulation through peripheral lymph nodes, immunological synapse stability and function, extravasation at the sites of inflammation, and T-cell retention at these sites. Greater understanding of the contribution of integrin signalling to the role of T cells in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases has focused much attention on the development of therapeutics that target T-cell integrins. This literature review describes the structure, activation, and function of integrins with respect to T cells, then discusses the use of integrin-targeting therapeutics in inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and psoriasis. Efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance are presented for currently approved therapeutics, therapeutics that have been withdrawn from the market, and novel therapeutics currently in clinical trials. This literature review will inform the reader of the current means of targeting T-cell integrins in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, as well as recent developments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan J Kelly
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin D08 NHY1, Ireland
| | - Aideen Long
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin D08 NHY1, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mehandru S, Colombel JF, Juarez J, Bugni J, Lindsay JO. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of anti-trafficking therapies and their clinical relevance in inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol 2023; 16:859-870. [PMID: 37574127 PMCID: PMC11141405 DOI: 10.1016/j.mucimm.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a combination of dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, and insufficient regulatory responses facilitate the development of chronic inflammation, which is driven by a complex interplay between the mucosal immune system and the environment and sustained by immune priming and ongoing cellular recruitment to the gut. The localization of immune cells is mediated by their expression of chemokine receptors and integrins, which bind to chemokines and adhesion molecules, respectively. In this article, we review the mechanisms of action of anti-trafficking therapies for IBD and consider clinical observations in the context of the different mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we discuss the evolution of molecular resistance to anti-cytokines, in which the composition of immune cells in the gut changes in response to treatment, and the potential implications of this for treatment sequencing. Lastly, we discuss the relevance of mechanism of action to combination therapy for IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Mehandru
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julius Juarez
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - James Bugni
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - James O Lindsay
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bamias G, Kitsou K, Rivera-Nieves J. The Underappreciated Role of Secretory IgA in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:1327-1341. [PMID: 36943800 PMCID: PMC10393212 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Eighty percent of antibody secreting cells (ASCs) are found in the intestine, where they produce grams of immunoglobulin (Ig) A daily. immunoglobulin A is actively transcytosed into the lumen, where it plays a critical role in modulating the gut microbiota. Although loss of immune tolerance to bacterial antigens is the likely trigger of the dysregulated immune response that characterizes inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), little effort has been placed on understanding the interface between B cells, IgA, and the microbiota during initiation or progression of disease. This may be in part due to the misleading fact that IgA-deficient humans are mostly asymptomatic, likely due to redundant role of secretory (S) IgM. Intestinal B cell recruitment is critically dependent on integrin α4β7-MAdCAM-1 interactions, yet antibodies that target α4β7 (ie, vedolizumab), MAdCAM-1 (ie, ontamalimab), or both β7 integrins (α4β7 and αE [CD103] β7; etrolizumab) are in clinical use or development as IBD therapeutics. The effect of such interventions on the biology of IgA is largely unknown, yet a single dose of vedolizumab lowers SIgA levels in stool and weakens the oral immunization response to cholera vaccine in healthy volunteers. Thus, it is critical to further understand the role of these integrins for the migration of ASC and other cellular subsets during homeostasis and IBD-associated inflammation and the mode of action of drugs that interfere with this traffic. We have recently identified a subset of mature ASC that employs integrin αEβ7 to dock with intestinal epithelial cells, predominantly in the pericryptal region of the terminal ileum. This role for the integrin had not been appreciated previously, nor the αEβ7-dependent mechanism of IgA transcytosis that it supports. Furthermore, we find that B cells more than T cells are critically dependent on α4β7-MAdCAM-1 interactions; thus MAdCAM-1 blockade and integrin-β7 deficiency counterintuitively hasten colitis in interleukin-10-deficient mice. In both cases, de novo recruitment of IgA ASC to the intestinal lamina propria is compromised, leading to bacterial overgrowth, dysbiosis, and lethal colitis. Thus, despite the safe and effective use of anti-integrin antibodies in patients with IBD, much remains to be learned about their various cell targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos Bamias
- GI Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantina Kitsou
- GI Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Jesús Rivera-Nieves
- Gastroenterology Section, San Diego VA Medical Center, La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Solitano V, Facciorusso A, Jess T, Ma C, Hassan C, Repici A, Jairath V, Armuzzi A, Singh S. Comparative Risk of Serious Infections With Biologic Agents and Oral Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:907-921.e2. [PMID: 35944832 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Safety is a key consideration when choosing advanced therapies (biologic agents and oral small-molecule inhibitors/modulators) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the risk of serious infections with advanced therapies in active comparator studies. METHODS Through a systematic search until February 28, 2022, we included 20 head-to-head studies comparing risk of serious infections with tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, and ozanimod in patients with IBD. We performed random-effects meta-analysis comparing different advanced therapies. RESULTS No significant difference was observed in the risk of serious infections between vedolizumab vs TNFα antagonists in all patients with IBD (17 cohorts: odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.04), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 37%); on subgroup analysis, vedolizumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections in patients with ulcerative colitis (11 cohorts: OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83; I2 = 0%), but not in Crohn's disease (CD) (9 cohorts: OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.35; I2 = 42%). Age, sex, prior biologic exposure, and use of biologic monotherapy did not influence this association. In patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections vs TNFα antagonists (3 cohorts: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.93; I2 = 16%) and vs vedolizumab (3 cohorts: OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93; I2 = 67%). Few studies compared other advanced therapies. CONCLUSIONS Vedolizumab may offer net benefit over TNFα antagonists in patients with ulcerative colitis, but not in CD. Ustekinumab may offer net benefit over TNFα antagonists and vedolizumab in patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Solitano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Tine Jess
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Christopher Ma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Chief Medical Officer, Global Medical Research and Development, Alimentiv, Inc, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Chief Medical Officer, Global Medical Research and Development, Alimentiv, Inc, London, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neurath L, D'Amico F, Danese S. Emerging drugs for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: review of phase II and III clinical trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:27-42. [PMID: 36876333 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2186399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current therapeutic options for patients with ulcerative colitis comprise monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), alpha4/beta7 integrin, and interleukin (IL)12/23 as well as small molecules such as tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ozanimod, and filgotinib. However, many patients fail to respond to these agents or have loss of response over time. Therefore, there is a large unmet clinical need for new therapeutic agents. AREAS COVERED Here, we review recent phase 2/3 studies in active ulcerative colitis and discuss preliminary data on the efficacy (clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission) and safety of novel drugs including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, IL23 blockers, integrin inhibitors, and S1P1R modulators. EXPERT OPINION We highlight the potential impact of these agents for the future therapeutic landscape of this disease with special emphasis on clinical impact, unmet needs, safety aspects, and advanced combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Neurath
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pavia G, Spagnuolo R, Quirino A, Marascio N, Giancotti A, Simeone S, Cosco C, Tino E, Carrabetta F, Di Gennaro G, Nobile C, Bianco A, Matera G, Doldo P. COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Shot Preserves T Cells Immune Response Based on Interferon-Gamma Release Assay in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Patients on Anti-TNFα Treatment. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030591. [PMID: 36992175 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune-modifying treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) impairs the humoral response. The role of T lymphocytes in this setting is still unclear. This study aims to assess if a booster shot (third dose) of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine enhanced the humoral response and elicited cellular immunity in IBD patients on different immuno-therapy regimens compared to healthy controls (HCs). Five months after a booster dose, serological and T-cell responses were assessed. The measurements were described using geometric means with 95% confidence intervals. The differences between study groups were assessed by Mann–Whitney tests. Seventy-seven subjects (n = 53 IBD patients and n = 24 HCs), who were fully vaccinated and not previously SARS-CoV-2 infected, were recruited. Regarding the IBD patients, 19 were affected by Crohn’s disease and 34 by ulcerative colitis. During the vaccination cycle, half of the patients (53%) were on stable treatment with aminosalicylates, and 32% were on biological therapy. No differences in antibody concentrations between IBD patients and HCs, nor T-cell responses, were found. Stratifying IBD patients based on the type of treatment (anti-TNFα agents vs. other treatment regimens), a decrease only in antibody titer (p = 0.008), but not in cellular response, was observed. Even after the COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, the TNFα inhibitors selectively decreased the humoral immune response compared to patients on other treatment regimens. The T-cell response was preserved in all study groups. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating T-cell immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in a routine diagnostic setting, particularly for immunocompromised cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Pavia
- Unit of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rocco Spagnuolo
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Angela Quirino
- Unit of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Nadia Marascio
- Unit of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Aida Giancotti
- Unit of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Silvio Simeone
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Cristina Cosco
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Elena Tino
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Federico Carrabetta
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Di Gennaro
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Carmelo Nobile
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Aida Bianco
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giovanni Matera
- Unit of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Patrizia Doldo
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro-"Mater Domini" Teaching Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Teich N, Stallmach A. COVID-19 und chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankungen. DIE GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023. [PMCID: PMC9969944 DOI: 10.1007/s11377-023-00679-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Die Pandemie durch die Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) beeinflusst weiter das Leben von Patient*innen mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen (CED). Umfangreiche Untersuchungen der letzten 3 Jahre ergaben, dass die allermeisten Infektionen durch „severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2“ (SARS-CoV-2) bei CED-Patient*innen blande verlaufen. In der Regel wird die Krankheitsaktivität der CED nicht negativ beeinflusst; bei einem Teil der Patient*innen können passager gastrointestinale Symptome auftreten. Häufig eingesetzte immunmodulierende Medikamente hatten mit Ausnahme systemischer Glukokortikoide keinen Einfluss auf den Schweregrad einer COVID-19-Erkrankung und die Gesamtletalität unterschied sich nicht von der übrigen Bevölkerung. Die Impfantwort ist jedoch substanzabhängig erniedrigt. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die wichtigsten Studien praxisrelevant zusammengefasst.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten Leipzig und Schkeuditz, Nordstr. 21, 04105 Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Woelfel S, Dütschler J, König M, Graf N, Oikonomou V, Krieger C, Truniger S, Franke A, Eckhold A, Forsch K, Wyss J, Krupka N, Albrich W, Frei N, Geissler N, Schaub P, Friedrich M, Misselwitz B, Korte W, Bürgi JJ, Brand S. Systemic and T cell-associated responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in gut inflammation (STAR SIGN study): effects of biologics on vaccination efficacy of the third dose of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:103-116. [PMID: 36307899 PMCID: PMC9874447 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience increased risk of vaccine-preventable diseases such as COVID-19. AIMS To assess humoral and cellular immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in immunosuppressed IBD patients and healthy controls. METHODS In this prospective, multicentre, case-control study, 139 IBD patients treated with biologics and 110 healthy controls were recruited. Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG concentrations were measured 2-16 weeks after receiving a third mRNA vaccine dose. The primary outcome was to determine if humoral immune responses towards booster vaccines differ in IBD patients under anti-TNF versus non-anti-TNF therapy and healthy controls. Secondary outcomes were antibody decline, impact of previous infection and SARS-CoV-2-targeted T cell responses. RESULTS Anti-TNF-treated IBD patients showed reduced anti-spike IgG concentrations (geometric mean 2357.4 BAU/ml [geometric SD 3.3]) when compared to non-anti-TNF-treated patients (5935.7 BAU/ml [3.9]; p < 0.0001) and healthy controls (5481.7 BAU/ml [2.4]; p < 0.0001), respectively. In multivariable modelling, prior infection (geometric mean ratio 2.00 [95% CI 1.34-2.90]) and vaccination with mRNA-1273 (1.53 [1.01-2.27]) increased antibody concentrations, while anti-TNF treatment (0.39 [0.28-0.54]) and prolonged time between vaccination and antibody measurement (0.72 [0.58-0.90]) decreased anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies. Antibody decline was comparable in IBD patients independent of anti-TNF treatment and antibody concentrations could not predict breakthrough infections. Cellular and humoral immune responses were uncoupled, and more anti-TNF-treated patients than healthy controls developed inadequate T cell responses (15/73 [20.5%] vs 2/100 [2.0%]; p = 0.00031). CONCLUSIONS Anti-TNF-treated IBD patients have impaired humoral and cellular immunogenicity following SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination. Fourth dose administration may be beneficial for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Woelfel
- Max von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineLudwig Maximilian University of MunichMunichGermany,Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Joel Dütschler
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland,Outpatient ClinicAmbulatory Services RorschachRorschachSwitzerland
| | - Marius König
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Nicole Graf
- Clinical Trials UnitCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Vasileios Oikonomou
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Claudia Krieger
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Samuel Truniger
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland,Outpatient ClinicAmbulatory Services RorschachRorschachSwitzerland
| | - Annett Franke
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland,Outpatient ClinicAmbulatory Services RorschachRorschachSwitzerland
| | - Annika Eckhold
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Kristina Forsch
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Jacqueline Wyss
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Niklas Krupka
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Werner Albrich
- Department of Infectious DiseasesCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Nicola Frei
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Nora Geissler
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | - Peter Schaub
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| | | | - Matthias Friedrich
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Stephan Brand
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyCantonal Hospital St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α have been the mainstay therapy for Crohn's (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) for decades. With growing need for highly effective therapy, various therapeutic targets have been introduced including anti-integrins, anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23, selective anti-IL23, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, and mRNA-124 splicing agent. AREAS COVERED The current state of available IBD therapies and those in development are reviewed, with recommendations made on positioning in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION Selecting and sequencing IBD therapies remains a clinical challenge. Disease phenotype, severity of symptoms, patient comorbidities, and prior drug exposure should be considered when considering therapy options. Anti-TNF remains a time-tested option that is effective in both UC and CD. The perception that newer biologics have slower onset of action is probably overestimated and providers should reconsider need for concurrent corticosteroid. JAK-inhibitors provide rapid symptom improvement in patients with moderate-severe UC. Due to safety concerns, it is recommended as a second-line therapy for UC. The goal for IBD treatment should be personalized, have rapid onset of action, induce durable clinical and endoscopic remission, and have excellent safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uni Wong
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stallmach A, Reuken PA, Grunert P, Teich N. [Inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: manifestations and management]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:1795-1801. [PMID: 35148564 DOI: 10.1055/a-1744-6697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is significantly affecting the lives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Those affected and their relatives have numerous questions about the risk of the disease, the course of a possible SARS-CoV-2 infection or the influence of CED-specific therapy on these. Many IBD patients also have additional questions about the safety and effectiveness of a vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest findings on COVID-19 and IBD, but also to discuss vaccine response (humoral/cellular), the influence of ongoing therapy on the vaccine response as well as the frequency of side effects and the importance of booster immunizations and to create an evidence-based basis for discussion with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitatsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Philipp A Reuken
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitatsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Philip Grunert
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitatsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Caldera F, Farraye FA, Necela BM, Cogen D, Saha S, Wald A, Daoud ND, Chun K, Grimes I, Lutz M, Van Helden SR, Swift MD, Virk A, Bharucha AE, Patel TC, Gores GJ, Chumsri S, Hayney MS, Knutson KL. Higher Cell-Mediated Immune Responses in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-TNF Therapy After COVID-19 Vaccination. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022:6697965. [PMID: 36103273 PMCID: PMC9494450 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive therapies may have a blunted response to certain vaccines, including the messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the cell-mediated immune response (CMIR), which is critical to host defense after COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response and CMIR after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD. METHODS This prospective study (HERCULES [HumoRal and CellULar initial and Sustained immunogenicity in patients with IBD] study) evaluated humoral immune response and CMIR after completion of 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 158 IBD patients and 20 healthy control (HC) subjects. The primary outcome was the CMIR to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD. The secondary outcomes were a comparison of (1) the CMIR in patients with IBD and HC subjects, (2) CMIR and humoral immune response in all participants, and (3) correlation between CMIR and humoral immune response. RESULTS The majority (89%) of patients with IBD developed a CMIR, which was not different vs HC subjects (94%) (P = .6667). There was no significant difference (P = .5488) in CMIR between immunocompetent (median 255 [interquartile range, 146-958] spike T cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and immunosuppressed patients (median 377 [interquartile range, 123-1440]). There was no correlation between humoral and cell-mediated immunity after vaccination (P = .5215). In univariable analysis, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy was associated with a higher CMIRs (P = .02) and confirmed in a multivariable model (P = .02). No other variables were associated with CMIR. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with IBD achieved CMIR to a COVID-19 vaccine. Future studies are needed evaluating sustained CMIR and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddy Caldera
- Address correspondence to: Freddy Caldera, DO, MS, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA ()
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Brian M Necela
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Davitte Cogen
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sumona Saha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Arnold Wald
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nader D Daoud
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly Chun
- R&D and Specialty Medicine, LabCorp, Calabasas, CA, USA
| | - Ian Grimes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Megan Lutz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sean R Van Helden
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Melanie D Swift
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Abinash Virk
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tushar C Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gregory J Gores
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Saranya Chumsri
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mary S Hayney
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Keith L Knutson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singh S, Iversen AT, Allin KH, Jess T. Comparative Outcomes and Safety of Vedolizumab vs Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists for Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2234200. [PMID: 36178685 PMCID: PMC9526086 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Observational comparative effectiveness studies can inform the positioning of biologic therapies for older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are underrepresented in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab vs tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for older patients with IBD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This active comparator, new-user design, comparative effectiveness study was conducted between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, among 754 older patients (aged ≥50 years) with IBD from the Danish National Patient Register. The mean follow-up after treatment initiation took place at 32 to 40 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to April 27, 2022. INTERVENTIONS Treatment with vedolizumab or TNF antagonists. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary effectiveness outcome was treatment failure, defined as the composite risk of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or a new corticosteroid prescription more than 6 weeks after initiation of treatment with biologic therapy. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were time to each individual component of the composite effectiveness outcome. The primary safety outcome was the risk of serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospitalization. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was conducted, accounting for patient-, disease-, and treatment-associated factors. RESULTS The study compared 377 older patients with IBD with incident use of vedolizumab (202 women [53.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.2 [8.3] years; 177 [46.9%] with Crohn disease) vs 377 patients with incident use of TNF antagonists (206 women [54.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.3 [8.1] years; 182 [48.3%] with Crohn disease). Overall, vedolizumab was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists (1-year risk, 45.4% vs 34.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69), including higher risk of IBD-related hospitalization (1-year risk, 27.8% vs 16.3%; adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15) and IBD-related major abdominal surgery (1-year risk, 21.3% vs 8.0%; adjusted HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.45-3.94). In subgroup analysis by IBD phenotype, among patients with Crohn disease, vedolizumab was associated with a 77% higher risk of treatment failure (adjusted HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.21-2.58), while no difference in risk of treatment failure was seen among patients with ulcerative colitis (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.75-1.43; P = .03 for interaction). There was no significant difference in the risk of serious infections, overall (1-year risk, 8.2% vs 8.7%; adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58-1.85) and by IBD phenotype. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this comparative effectiveness study of older patients with IBD, vedolizumab was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists, particularly among patients with Crohn disease, without offering a significant safety advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Aske T. Iversen
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristine H. Allin
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tine Jess
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Goetgebuer RL, Masclee GMC, van der Eijk AA, van der Woude CJ, de Man RA, de Vries AC. Hepatitis E infection with a benign course during vedolizumab treatment for Crohn's disease: A case report. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022; 46:101948. [PMID: 35659604 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We present a 49 year old female patient with Crohn's disease (CD) in remission on vedolizumab therapy who experienced a symptomatic, though benign, course of acute hepatitis E. Routine blood tests showed substantial elevation of liver enzymes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing confirmed hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. Vedolizumab therapy was paused, liver enzymes improved three weeks after infection and normalized after six months. The patient recovered completely from mild symptoms. This case shows that hepatitis E is a potential cause of acute hepatitis during vedolizumab therapy, and in this case the infection has run a benign course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Goetgebuer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - G M C Masclee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A A van der Eijk
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R A de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ferretti F, Monico MC, Cannatelli R, Carmagnola S, Lenti MV, Di Sabatino A, Conforti F, Pastorelli L, Caprioli F, Bezzio C, Saibeni S, Mazza S, Vecchi M, Maconi G, Ardizzone S. The impact of biologic therapies on extra-intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:933357. [PMID: 36004370 PMCID: PMC9393583 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.933357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high risk of developing extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs). We aimed to assess the cumulative incidence and clinical course of EIMs in patients treated with Vedolizumab (VDZ) and non-gut selective biologic drugs. Materials and methods In this multicenter observational study, we enrolled 1,182 patients with IBD under biologic treatment in tertiary care centers, collecting the rate of new-onset EIMs and the clinical course of new and pre-existing EIMs since the introduction of the ongoing biologic drug (259 VDZ vs. 923 non-gut selective agents, median time 3 vs. 4 years). Results Among 1,182 patients with IBD (median age of 46 years; 55% men) on biologics, the overall cumulative incidence of new onset EIMs was 4.1% (49/1,182), in particular 6.6% (17/259) on VDZ vs. 3.5% (32/923) on non-gut selective biologics (p = 0.02). Among 224 patients reporting new or pre-existing EIMs, those on VDZ showed a higher rate of clinical worsening compared with non-gut selective therapies (15.5 vs. 7.3%, p = 0.08). However, both showed a similar rate of modification of the therapeutic regimen. Female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 2.18], a longer course of ongoing biologic therapy (HR 1.18), ulcerative colitis (UC) (HR 1.83), and VDZ therapy (HR 1.85) were significant risk factors for developing new EIMs. Discussion Our study suggests that the type of biologic treatment might affect the risk of developing EIMs, with a slightly higher risk in patients on gut-selective therapies. However, a similar clinical course is observed in the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ferretti
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Francesca Ferretti,
| | - Maria Camilla Monico
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Carmagnola
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Vincenzo Lenti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Clinica Medica, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Clinica Medica, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Conforti
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Luca Pastorelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Flavio Caprioli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Rho Hospital, Rho, Italy
| | - Simone Saibeni
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Rho Hospital, Rho, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazza
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Levartovsky A, Ben-Horin S. Anti-TNF Therapy During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Friend or Foe? J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:517-518. [PMID: 34626174 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Asaf Levartovsky
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shomron Ben-Horin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kubas A, Malecka-Wojciesko E. COVID-19 Vaccination in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092676. [PMID: 35566802 PMCID: PMC9104993 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are believed to play a key role in the suppression of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines trials. Therefore, concerns regarding vaccination efficacy and safety among those patients were raised. Overall, vaccination is well tolerated in the IBD population, and different gastroenterological societies recommend vaccinating patients with IBD at the earliest opportunity to do so. Nevertheless, very little is known about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in special IBD populations such as pregnant and breastfeeding women or pediatric patients, and further research on this matter is crucial. The available data on vaccine efficacy are promising and show high seroconversion rates in IBD patients on different immune-modifying therapies. However, patients treated with high doses of systemic corticosteroids, infliximab or infliximab and immunomodulators may have a blunted response to the vaccination. The data on COVID-19 vaccination willingness among patients with IBD are conflicting. Nevertheless, vaccine effectiveness and safety are reported to be the most common reasons for hesitancy. This review examines the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines and describes vaccination willingness and the reasons for potential hesitancy among patients with IBD.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ayoub F, Odenwald M, Micic D, Dalal SR, Pekow J, Cohen RD, Rubin DT, Sakuraba A. Vedolizumab for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intest Res 2022; 20:240-250. [PMID: 35124951 PMCID: PMC9081994 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2021.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Perianal fistulas are a debilitating manifestation of Crohn's disease (CD). Despite the advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, the medical management of fistulizing CD continues to be challenged by unmet needs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of vedolizumab for the management of perianal fistulizing CD. METHODS A search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to June 2020 for studies reporting rates of perianal fistula healing in CD patients treated with vedolizumab. The primary outcome of interest was complete healing of perianal fistulas and the secondary outcome was partial healing. The pooled fistula healing rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random effects model. RESULTS A total of 74 studies were initially identified, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. A total of 198 patients with active perianal fistulas were included, 87% of whom had failed previous anti-TNF therapy. The pooled complete healing rate was 27.6% (95% CI, 18.9%-37.3%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=49.4%) and the pooled partial healing rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 23.2%-47.7%) with high heterogeneity (I2=67.1%). CONCLUSIONS In a meta-analysis of 4 studies that included 198 patients with perianal fistulizing CD, the majority of whom had failed previous anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab treatment led to healing of perianal fistulas in nearly one-third of the patients. The lack of high-quality data and significant study heterogeneity underscores the need for future prospective studies of fistula healing in patients receiving anti-integrin therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ayoub
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew Odenwald
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dejan Micic
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sushila R. Dalal
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel Pekow
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Russell D. Cohen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David T. Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Atsushi Sakuraba
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alexander JL, Kennedy NA, Ibraheim H, Anandabaskaran S, Saifuddin A, Castro Seoane R, Liu Z, Nice R, Bewshea C, D'Mello A, Constable L, Jones GR, Balarajah S, Fiorentino F, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Hicks LC, Williams HRT, Kent AJ, Linger R, Parkes M, Kok K, Patel KV, Teare JP, Altmann DM, Boyton RJ, Goodhand JR, Hart AL, Lees CW, Ahmad T, Powell N. COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:342-352. [PMID: 35123676 PMCID: PMC8813209 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00005-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects that therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are not yet fully known. Therefore, we sought to determine whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses were altered in patients with IBD on commonly used immunosuppressive drugs. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, case-control study (VIP), we recruited adults with IBD treated with one of six different immunosuppressive treatment regimens (thiopurines, infliximab, a thiopurine plus infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib) and healthy control participants from nine centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines (either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech], or mRNA1273 [Moderna]) 6-12 weeks apart (according to scheduling adopted in the UK). We measured antibody responses 53-92 days after a second vaccine dose using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations in participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, adjusted by age and vaccine type, and was analysed by use of multivariable linear regression models. This study is registered in the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN13495664, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between May 31 and Nov 24, 2021, we recruited 483 participants, including patients with IBD being treated with thiopurines (n=78), infliximab (n=63), a thiopurine plus infliximab (n=72), ustekinumab (n=57), vedolizumab (n=62), or tofacitinib (n=30), and 121 healthy controls. We included 370 participants without evidence of previous infection in our primary analysis. Geometric mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab (156·8 U/mL [geometric SD 5·7]; p<0·0001), infliximab plus thiopurine (111·1 U/mL [5·7]; p<0·0001), or tofacitinib (429·5 U/mL [3·1]; p=0·0012) compared with controls (1578·3 U/mL [3·7]). There were no significant differences in antibody concentrations between patients treated with thiopurine monotherapy (1019·8 U/mL [4·3]; p=0·74), ustekinumab (582·4 U/mL [4·6]; p=0·11), or vedolizumab (954·0 U/mL [4·1]; p=0·50) and healthy controls. In multivariable modelling, lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody concentrations were independently associated with infliximab (geometric mean ratio 0·12, 95% CI 0·08-0·17; p<0·0001) and tofacitinib (0·43, 0·23-0·81; p=0·0095), but not with ustekinumab (0·69, 0·41-1·19; p=0·18), thiopurines (0·89, 0·64-1·24; p=0·50), or vedolizumab (1·16, 0·74-1·83; p=0·51). mRNA vaccines (3·68, 2·80-4·84; p<0·0001; vs adenovirus vector vaccines) were independently associated with higher antibody concentrations and older age per decade (0·79, 0·72-0·87; p<0·0001) with lower antibody concentrations. INTERPRETATION For patients with IBD, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines varies according to immunosuppressive drug exposure, and is attenuated in recipients of infliximab, infliximab plus thiopurines, and tofacitinib. Scheduling of third primary, or booster, doses could be personalised on the basis of an individual's treatment, and patients taking anti-tumour necrosis factor and tofacitinib should be prioritised. FUNDING Pfizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Alexander
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sulak Anandabaskaran
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Aamir Saifuddin
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Rocio Castro Seoane
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Liu
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry-Exeter Clinical Laboratory International, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrea D'Mello
- Division of Medicine and Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura Constable
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth R Jones
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharmili Balarajah
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Hicks
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexandra J Kent
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Linger
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miles Parkes
- The NIHR Bioresource, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Klaartje Kok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamal V Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian P Teare
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Altmann
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary J Boyton
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nick Powell
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Garcillán B, Salavert M, Regueiro JR, Díaz-Castroverde S. Response to Vaccines in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:297. [PMID: 35214755 PMCID: PMC8877652 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, are at increased risk of infection. International guidelines recommend vaccination to limit this risk of infection, although live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated once immunosuppressive therapy has begun. Biologic therapies used to treat IMIDs target the immune system to stop chronic pathogenic process but may also attenuate the protective immune response to vaccines. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding vaccine responses in IMID patients receiving treatment with biologic therapies, with a focus on the interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors. B cell-depleting therapies, such as rituximab, strongly impair vaccines immunogenicity, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) fusion protein abatacept are also associated with attenuated antibody responses, which are further diminished in patients taking concomitant immunosuppressants. On the other hand, integrin, IL-6, IL-12/23, IL-17, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors do not appear to affect the immune response to several vaccines evaluated. Importantly, treatment with biologic therapies in IMID patients is not associated with an increased risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or developing severe disease. However, the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on IMID patients may be reduced compared with healthy individuals. The impact of biologic therapies on the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines seems to replicate what has been described for other vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appears to be safe and well tolerated in IMID patients. Attenuated but, in general, still protective responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the context of certain therapies warrant current recommendations for a third primary dose in IMID patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miguel Salavert
- Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, La Fe Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - José R. Regueiro
- Department of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ENT, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 12 de Octubre Health Research Institute (imas12), 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Immune response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1429 patients. Vaccine 2022; 40:2076-2086. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
27
|
Singh S, Heien HC, Herrin J, Dulai PS, Sangaralingham L, Shah ND, Sandborn WJ. Comparative Risk of Serious Infections With Tumor Necrosis Factor α Antagonists vs Vedolizumab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e74-e88. [PMID: 33640480 PMCID: PMC8384969 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of serious infections between patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-a (TNFa) antagonists vs. vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS Using an administrative claims database, we identified patients with IBD who were new-users of either TNFa antagonists or vedolizumab between 2014-2018 and had insurance coverage for at least 1y before and after treatment initiation. We compared the risk of serious infections (infections requiring hospitalization) between patients treated with vedolizumab or TNFa antagonists using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for baseline disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, comorbidities, and time-varying use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators and opiates. RESULTS We included 4881 patients treated with TNFa antagonists (age, 41 ± 15y, 60% with Crohn's disease [CD]) of whom 434 developed serious infections over 5786 person-year [PY] follow-up, and 1106 patients treated with vedolizumab (age, 44 ± 16y, 39% with CD) of whom 86 developed serious infections over 1040-PY follow-up. Vedolizumab was associated with 46% lower risk of serious infections as compared with TNFa antagonists in patients with ulcerative colitis (HR,0.54 [95% CI,0.35-0.83), but no significant differences were observed in patients with CD (HR,1.30 [0.80-2.11]). Vedolizumab was associated with lower risk of extra-intestinal serious infections in patients with UC, but higher risk of gastrointestinal serious infections in patients with CD. CONCLUSIONS In an observational study of patients with IBD, vedolizumab was associated with lower risk of serious infections as compared with TNFa antagonists, in patients with UC, but not in patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| | - Herbert C Heien
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeph Herrin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Parambir S Dulai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Lindsey Sangaralingham
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nilay D Shah
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vollenberg R, Tepasse PR, Kühn JE, Hennies M, Strauss M, Rennebaum F, Schomacher T, Boeckel G, Lorentzen E, Bokemeyer A, Nowacki TM. Humoral Immune Response in IBD Patients Three and Six Months after Vaccination with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2. Biomedicines 2022; 10:171. [PMID: 35052849 PMCID: PMC8774019 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronovirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vaccination is considered the core approach to containing the pandemic. There is currently insufficient evidence on the efficacy of these vaccines in immunosuppressed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the humoral response in immunosuppressed IBD patients after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. In this prospective study, IgG antibody levels (AB) against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (spike-protein) were quantitatively determined. For assessing the potential neutralizing capacity, a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization test (sVNT) was employed in IBD patients (n = 95) and healthy controls (n = 38). Sera were examined prior to the first/second vaccination and 3/6 months after second vaccination. Patients showed lower sVNT (%) and IgG-S (AU/mL) AB both before the second vaccination (sVNT p < 0.001; AB p < 0.001) and 3 (sVNT p = 0.002; AB p = 0.001) and 6 months (sVNT p = 0.062; AB p = 0.061) after the second vaccination. Although seroconversion rates (sVNT, IgG-S) did not differ between the two groups 3 months after second vaccination, a significant difference was seen 6 months after second vaccination (sVNT p = 0.045). Before and three months after the second vaccination, patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents showed significantly lower AB than healthy subjects. In conclusion, an early booster shot vaccination should be discussed for IBD patients on anti-TNF therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Vollenberg
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clincial Infectiology University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (F.R.); (T.S.); (T.M.N.)
| | - Phil-Robin Tepasse
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clincial Infectiology University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (F.R.); (T.S.); (T.M.N.)
| | - Joachim Ewald Kühn
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (J.E.K.); (M.H.); (E.L.)
| | - Marc Hennies
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (J.E.K.); (M.H.); (E.L.)
| | - Markus Strauss
- Department of Medicine C, Cardiology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Florian Rennebaum
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clincial Infectiology University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (F.R.); (T.S.); (T.M.N.)
| | - Tina Schomacher
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clincial Infectiology University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (F.R.); (T.S.); (T.M.N.)
| | - Göran Boeckel
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Eva Lorentzen
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (J.E.K.); (M.H.); (E.L.)
| | - Arne Bokemeyer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Tobias Max Nowacki
- Department of Medicine B for Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Clincial Infectiology University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (F.R.); (T.S.); (T.M.N.)
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Marienhospital Steinfurt, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee YJ, Kim SE, Park YE, Chang JY, Song HJ, Kim DH, Yang YJ, Kim BC, Lee JG, Yang HC, Choi M, Myung SJ. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: expert consensus statement by KASID. Intest Res 2022; 20:171-183. [PMID: 34974674 PMCID: PMC9081989 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2021.00098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus, is threatening global health worldwide with unprecedented contagiousness and severity. The best strategy to overcome COVID-19 is a vaccine. Various vaccines are currently being developed, and mass vaccination is in progress. Despite the very encouraging clinical trial results of these vaccines, there is insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of vaccines for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients facing various issues. After reviewing current evidence and international guidelines, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases developed an expert consensus statement on COVID-19 vaccination issues for Korean IBD patients. This expert consensus statement emphasizes that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination be strongly recommended for IBD patients, and it is safe for IBD patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ji Young Chang
- Department of Health Promotion Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Korea, Jeju, Korea
| | - Duk Hwan Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Hospital, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young Joo Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Gon Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Hee Chan Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tyler CJ, Guzman M, Lundborg LR, Yeasmin S, Zgajnar N, Jedlicka P, Bamias G, Rivera-Nieves J. Antibody secreting cells are critically dependent on integrin α4β7/MAdCAM-1 for intestinal recruitment and control of the microbiota during chronic colitis. Mucosal Immunol 2022; 15:109-119. [PMID: 34433904 PMCID: PMC8732264 DOI: 10.1038/s41385-021-00445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
T and B cells employ integrin α4β7 to migrate to intestine under homeostatic conditions. Whether those cells differentially rely on α4β7 for homing during inflammatory conditions has not been fully examined. This may have implications for our understanding of the mode of action of anti-integrin therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, we examined the role of α4β7 integrin during chronic colitis using IL-10-/- mice, β7-deficient IL-10-/-, IgA-deficient IL-10-/- mice, and antibody blockade of MAdCAM-1. We found that α4β7 was predominantly expressed by B cells. β7 deficiency and MAdCAM-1 blockade specifically depleted antibody secreting cells (ASC) (not T cells) from the colonic LP, leading to a fecal pan-immunoglobulin deficit, severe colitis, and alterations of microbiota composition. Colitis was not due to defective regulation, as dendritic cells (DC), regulatory T cells, retinaldehyde dehydrogenase (RALDH) expression, activity, and regulatory T/B-cell cytokines were all comparable between the strains/treatment. Finally, an IgA deficit closely recapitulated the clinical phenotype and altered microbiota composition of β7-deficient IL-10-/- mice. Thus, a luminal IgA deficit contributes to accelerated colitis in the β7-deficient state. Given the critical/nonredundant dependence of IgA ASC on α4β7:MAdCAM-1 for intestinal homing, B cells may represent unappreciated targets of anti-integrin therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. Tyler
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Mauricio Guzman
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Luke R. Lundborg
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Shaila Yeasmin
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Nadia Zgajnar
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Paul Jedlicka
- grid.241116.10000000107903411Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO USA
| | - Giorgos Bamias
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 0800GI Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jesús Rivera-Nieves
- San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA USA ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Aragão MC, Beraldo RF, Marcondes MB, de Barros JR, Herrerias GSP, Saad-Hossne R, Baima JP, Sassaki LY. Management of inflammatory bowel disease and serum level of infliximab in newborn exposed to anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy: Case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28274. [PMID: 34941109 PMCID: PMC8702279 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Heightened inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity during pregnancy is associated with higher rates of preterm birth, miscarriage, and low birth weight. Therefore, its adequate treatment is essential, considering the risk-benefit of medication use. Although previous literature has described the management of IBD during pregnancy, few studies have assessed the pharmacokinetics of IBD drugs in the newborn. In this case report, we describe the management of ulcerative colitis during pregnancy and discuss the benefits of checking serum levels of infliximab in newborns exposed to the medication during pregnancy. PATIENT CONCERN A 37-year-old patient with ulcerative colitis in clinical and endoscopic remission had been undergoing treated with infliximab since 2008. The patient became pregnant in 2018. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION Infliximab medication was discontinued at the 29th week of pregnancy. OUTCOMES The pregnancy was uneventful, and the levels of infliximab in the umbilical cord were >20 μg/dL. Live vaccinations were postponed until the baby was 6 months old, when a new serum drug level proved to be undetectable. LESSONS Our case suggests that the use of infliximab is safe in pregnancy, and drug discontinuation could be considered from the 24th week of pregnancy onward to reduce placental transfer to the newborn in patients at low risk of relapse. Vaccines with live attenuated organisms should be delayed for at least 6 months or until the serum level of the medication is undetectable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cecília de Aragão
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Fedatto Beraldo
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariana Barros Marcondes
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaqueline Ribeiro de Barros
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rogerio Saad-Hossne
- Department of Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Júlio Pinheiro Baima
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ligia Yukie Sassaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccines among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:healthcare10010006. [PMID: 35052170 PMCID: PMC8774988 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines has not been sufficiently evaluated in patients with IBD. We aimed to assess the acceptance and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccination and related factors among these patients. A retrospective cohort study using a self-reported questionnaire was performed among patients with IBD between 22 June 2021 and 30 August 2021. Of the 187 participants, 10.2% (n = 19) were hesitant to be vaccinated. Patients in the vaccine-hesitant group were younger (p = 0.009) and had a shorter disease duration (p = 0.020). Vedolizumab was prescribed more frequently (p = 0.024) and immunomodulators were less frequently used (p = 0.027) in this group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.00, p = 0.042) and the use of immunomodulators (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.66, p = 0.019) as independent significant factors for vaccine hesitancy. The COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate in patients with IBD in Japan was 10% in this study. The Japanese COVID-19 vaccination campaign appears to be successful. The risk of COVID-19 among patients with IBD requires adequate measures to ensure that vaccines are accepted by vaccine-hesitant patients. These findings may be helpful in achieving adequate vaccination rates.
Collapse
|
33
|
Shehab M, Alrashed F, Alfadhli A, Alotaibi K, Alsahli A, Mohammad H, Cherian P, Al-Khairi I, Alphonse Thanaraj T, Channanath A, Ali H, Abu-Farha M, Abubaker J, Al-Mulla F. Serological Response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Biologic Therapies. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:1471. [PMID: 34960217 PMCID: PMC8705736 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9121471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologic therapies is not well studied. The goal of this study was to measure the serological response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines in patients with IBD receiving different biologic therapies. Methods: We performed a multi-center prospective study between 1 August 2021 and 15 September 2021. We measured the seropositivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) and neutralizing antibody concentrations in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapies 4-10 weeks after their second dose or 3-6 weeks after their first dose of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 126 patients were enrolled (mean age, 31 years; 60% male; 71% Crohn's disease, 29% ulcerative colitis). Of these, 92 patients were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine (73%) and 34 patients with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (27%). In patients being treated with infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine were 44 out of 59 patients (74.5%) and 13 out of 16 patients (81.2%), respectively. In contrast, of those receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab, the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine were 100% and 92.8%, respectively. In patients receiving infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels after two-dose vaccination was 40 out of 59 patients (67.7%) and 14 out 16 patients (87.5%), respectively. On the other hand, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels were 12 out of 13 patients (92.3%) and 13 out of 14 patients (92.8%) in patients receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of patients with IBD who were on infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All patients on ustekinumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are both likely to be effective after two doses in patients with IBD on biologics. Larger follow-up studies are needed to evaluate if decay of antibodies occurs over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Shehab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital, Kuwait University, Aljabreyah 47060, Kuwait; (A.A.); (K.A.); (A.A.); (H.M.)
| | - Fatema Alrashed
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Health Sciences Center (HSC), Kuwait University, Jabriya 13110, Kuwait;
| | - Ahmad Alfadhli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital, Kuwait University, Aljabreyah 47060, Kuwait; (A.A.); (K.A.); (A.A.); (H.M.)
| | - Khazna Alotaibi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital, Kuwait University, Aljabreyah 47060, Kuwait; (A.A.); (K.A.); (A.A.); (H.M.)
| | - Abdullah Alsahli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital, Kuwait University, Aljabreyah 47060, Kuwait; (A.A.); (K.A.); (A.A.); (H.M.)
| | - Hussain Mohammad
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital, Kuwait University, Aljabreyah 47060, Kuwait; (A.A.); (K.A.); (A.A.); (H.M.)
| | - Preethi Cherian
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (P.C.); (I.A.-K.); (M.A.-F.); (J.A.)
| | - Irina Al-Khairi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (P.C.); (I.A.-K.); (M.A.-F.); (J.A.)
| | - Thangavel Alphonse Thanaraj
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (T.A.T.); (A.C.); (H.A.)
| | - Arshad Channanath
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (T.A.T.); (A.C.); (H.A.)
| | - Hamad Ali
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (T.A.T.); (A.C.); (H.A.)
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Health Sciences Center (HSC), Kuwait University, Jabriya 13110, Kuwait
| | - Mohamed Abu-Farha
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (P.C.); (I.A.-K.); (M.A.-F.); (J.A.)
| | - Jehad Abubaker
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (P.C.); (I.A.-K.); (M.A.-F.); (J.A.)
| | - Fahd Al-Mulla
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute (DDI), Dasman 15462, Kuwait; (T.A.T.); (A.C.); (H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Macaluso FS, Liguori G, Galli M. Vaccinations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1539-1545. [PMID: 34116972 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently requires administration of immunosuppressive therapies, which increases susceptibility to a number of infectious pathogens. However, many infections can be prevented by correct and appropriate utilization of vaccinations. While several guidelines have been published on vaccination schedules in patients with IBD, vaccination rates remain suboptimal and even lower than those in the general population. This is due to many factors including poor awareness of the importance of vaccines by gastroenterologists and general practitioners as well as potential prejudices of patients regarding the safety and benefits of vaccines. With the aim of increasing awareness about the key role of immunization in the management of patients with IBD, the present review examines the existing literature relating to the main vaccinations and their application in these patients. We also summarize current evidence in order to provide clinicians with an easy source of reference for the principal recommendations for prevention of infectious diseases in patients with IBD. In addition, the recommendations about traveling for IBD patients are briefly explored. Lastly, since it is important for gastroenterologists to be aware of recommendations on vaccination, we recommend implementing educational programs to ensure compliance with current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Salvatore Macaluso
- Department of Medicine, ''Villa Sofia-Cervello'' Hospital, Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD), Palermo, Italy.
| | | | - Massimo Galli
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, L Sacco" University of Milan, Via Giovan Battista Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Murthy SK, Kuenzig ME, Windsor JW, Ghia JE, Griffiths AM, Panaccione R, Seow CH, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Huang JG, Jones JL, Lee K, Kaplan GG, Mukhtar MS, Tandon P, Targownik LE, Gibson DL. Crohn's and Colitis Canada's 2021 Impact of COVID-19 and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: COVID-19 Vaccines-Biology, Current Evidence and Recommendations. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2021; 4:S54-S60. [PMID: 34755040 PMCID: PMC8570416 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has ushered a globally focused vaccine development program that produced multiple successful vaccines within a year. Four SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for use in Canada, using two different technologies, all of which have shown excellent efficacy in reducing the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 infection and 100% efficacy in preventing death from COVID-19. People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), like many others with immune-mediated chronic diseases, were excluded from the pivotal trials of these vaccines, leading to early hesitancy by regulatory bodies to endorse administering the vaccines to these groups. However, recent data has shown that the adverse event rate to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among people with IBD is similar to the general population. Early data has further shown that people with IBD are capable of mounting a robust immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, particularly following a second dose, whereas the response to the first dose is blunted in those receiving anti-TNF therapy or conventional immunosuppressants (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate). Based on these data and evidence from previous vaccine programs among people with IBD, multiple national and international expert panels have recommended that individuals with IBD receive complete vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay K Murthy
- The Ottawa Hospital IBD Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Ellen Kuenzig
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph W Windsor
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Eric Ghia
- Department of Immunology & Internal Medicine section of Gastroenterology, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba and University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Anne M Griffiths
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Alain Bitton
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| | - James Guoxian Huang
- SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Jones
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kate Lee
- Crohn's and Colitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mariam S Mukhtar
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Parul Tandon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura E Targownik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deanna L Gibson
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sutter M, Hruz P, Niess JH. High Serum Creatine Kinase Levels in Infliximab and Vedolizumab-Treated Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Inflamm Intest Dis 2021; 6:165-174. [PMID: 34722646 DOI: 10.1159/000518264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background TNF inhibitors are relatively safe drugs, but asymptomatic infliximab-induced high serum creatine kinase (CK) levels have been reported in >30% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Whether high serum CK levels are a specific effect of treatment with TNF inhibitors has not been studied in detail. CK levels were therefore compared between infliximab- and vedolizumab-treated IBD patients. Methods In this retrospective, monocentric study, 131 IBD cases (82 with Crohn's disease (CD), 49 with ulcerative colitis) of the Basel University Hospital IBD cohort treated either with infliximab or vedolizumab were included. Serum samples for measuring CK, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (FCal) levels were collected longitudinally and analyzed using mixed additive models. Results No significant differences in CK levels between infliximab and vedolizumab-treated patients were observed over time. Infliximab-treated males, however, showed significantly higher CK levels than females and former smokers treated with infliximab showed significantly lower CK levels than nonsmokers. No such differences were observed in vedolizumab-treated patients. LDH and CRP were not significantly different between infliximab- and vedolizumab-treated patients, while adjusted groups showed substantially higher LDH levels with increasing age and significantly lower LDH levels in patients with longer disease duration. Infliximab patients with CD showed significantly lower CRP. However, significantly higher FCal concentrations were noted in infliximab patients independent of diagnosis, gender, disease duration, smoking behavior, and age. Conclusion In our cohort, high serum CK levels are not an infliximab- or vedolizumab-specific effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Sutter
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Petr Hruz
- Clarunis - University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hendrik Niess
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clarunis - University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ardizzone S, Ferretti F, Monico MC, Carvalhas Gabrielli AM, Carmagnola S, Bezzio C, Saibeni S, Bosani M, Caprioli F, Mazza S, Casini V, Cortelezzi CC, Parravicini M, Cassinotti A, Cosimo P, Indriolo A, Di Sabatino A, Lenti MV, Pastorelli L, Conforti F, Ricci C, Sarzi‐Puttini P, Vecchi M, Maconi G. Lower incidence of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-gut selective biologic therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:3050-3055. [PMID: 34159648 PMCID: PMC8447454 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Since the outbreak of COVID-19, concerns have been raised as to whether inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients under biologic therapy may be more susceptible to the disease. This study aimed to determine the incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 in a large cohort of IBD patients on biologic therapy. METHODS This observational retrospective multicenter study collected data about COVID-19 in IBD patients on biologic therapy in Italy, between February and May 2020. The main end-points were (i) to assess both the cumulative incidence and clinical outcome of COVID-19, according to different biologic agents and (ii) to compare them with the general population and a cohort IBD patients undergoing non-biologic therapies. RESULTS Among 1816 IBD patients, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was 3.9 per 1000 (7/1816) with a 57% hospitalization rate and a 29% case-fatality rate. The class of biologic agents was the only risk factor of developing COVID-19 (P = 0.01). Non-gut selective agents were associated with a lower incidence of COVID-19 cases, related symptoms, and hospitalization (P < 0.05). Compared with the general population of Lombardy, an overall lower incidence of COVID-19 was observed (3.9 vs 8.5 per 1000, P = 0.03). Compared with 565 IBD patients on non-biologic therapies, a lower rate of COVID-19 symptoms was observed in our cohort (7.5% vs 18%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the general population, IBD patients on biologic therapy are not exposed to a higher risk of COVID-19. Non-gut selective agents are associated with a lower incidence of symptomatic disease, supporting the decision of maintaining the ongoing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Francesca Ferretti
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Maria Camilla Monico
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Anna Maria Carvalhas Gabrielli
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Stefania Carmagnola
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | | | - Simone Saibeni
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST RhodenseRho HospitalRhoItaly
| | | | - Flavio Caprioli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitIRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico FoundationMilanItaly,Department of Pathophysiology and TransplantationUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Stefano Mazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitIRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico FoundationMilanItaly
| | - Valentina Casini
- UOC Gastroenterology and Digestive EndoscopyASST Bergamo Est, SeriateBergamoItaly
| | | | - Marco Parravicini
- ASST Sette Laghi, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitCircolo Hospital and Macchi FoundationVareseItaly
| | - Andrea Cassinotti
- ASST Sette Laghi, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitCircolo Hospital and Macchi FoundationVareseItaly
| | - Paola Cosimo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitPapa Giovanni XXIII HospitalBergamoItaly
| | - Amedeo Indriolo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitPapa Giovanni XXIII HospitalBergamoItaly
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital FoundationUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Marco Vincenzo Lenti
- Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital FoundationUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Luca Pastorelli
- Gastroenterology UnitIRCCS Policlinico San Donato Research HospitalMilanItaly
| | - Francesco Conforti
- Gastroenterology UnitIRCCS Policlinico San Donato Research HospitalMilanItaly
| | - Chiara Ricci
- Gastroenterology UnitSpedali Civili Hospital, Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Piercarlo Sarzi‐Puttini
- Rheumatology UnitASST‐Fatebenefratelli L. Sacco University Hospital, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy UnitIRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico FoundationMilanItaly,Department of Pathophysiology and TransplantationUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli‐Sacco, L. Sacco University Hospital, Department of Biochemical and Clinical SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wyatt NJ, Speight RA, Stewart CJ, Kirby JA, Lamb CA. Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. BioDrugs 2021; 35:473-503. [PMID: 34613592 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00496-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In the last two decades, understanding of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) immunopathogenesis has expanded considerably. Histopathological examination of the intestinal mucosa in IBD demonstrates the presence of a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate. Research has focused on identifying mechanisms of immune cell trafficking to the gastrointestinal tract that may represent effective gut-selective targets for IBD therapy whilst avoiding systemic immunosuppression that may be associated with off-target adverse effects such as infection and malignancy. Integrins are cell surface receptors that can bind to cellular adhesion molecules to mediate both leukocyte homing and retention. In 2014, Vedolizumab (Entyvio®) was the first anti-integrin (anti-α4ß7 monoclonal antibody) treatment to be approved for use in IBD. Several other anti-integrin therapies are currently in advanced stages of development, including novel orally administered small-molecule drugs. Drugs targeting alternative trafficking mechanisms such as mucosal addressin cellular adhesion molecule-1 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors are also being evaluated. Here, we summarise key established and emerging therapies targeting leukocyte trafficking that may play an important role in realising the goal of stratified precision medicine in IBD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Wyatt
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - R Alexander Speight
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Christopher J Stewart
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - John A Kirby
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Christopher A Lamb
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lee YJ, Kim SE, Park YE, Chang JY, Song HJ, Kim DH, Yang YJ, Kim BC, Lee JG, Yang HC, Choi M, Myung SJ. [SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination for Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Consensus Statements by KASID]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 78:117-128. [PMID: 34446634 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2021.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus, is threatening global health worldwide with unprecedented contagiousness and severity. The best strategy to overcome COVID-19 is a vaccine. Various vaccines are currently being developed, and mass vaccination is in progress. Despite the very encouraging clinical trial results of these vaccines, there is insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of vaccines for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients facing various issues. After reviewing current evidence and international guidelines, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) developed an expert consensus statement on COVID-19 vaccination issues for Korean IBD patients. This expert consensus statement emphasizes that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination be strongly recommended for IBD patients, and it is safe for IBD patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ji Young Chang
- Department of Health Promotion Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Joo Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Duk Hwan Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Hospital, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young Joo Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Gon Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Hee Chan Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jones JL, Tse F, Carroll MW, deBruyn JC, McNeil SA, Pham-Huy A, Seow CH, Barrett LL, Bessissow T, Carman N, Melmed GY, Vanderkooi OG, Marshall JK, Benchimol EI. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2021; 4:e72-e91. [PMID: 34476339 PMCID: PMC8407486 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines. METHODS Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Jones
- Department of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie
University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center,
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health
Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew W Carroll
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition,
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer C deBruyn
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and
Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelly A McNeil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anne Pham-Huy
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Allergy, Department of
Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine and Community
Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa L Barrett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health
Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicholas Carman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology,
Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Eastern
Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical
Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Pediatrics,
Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta
Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary,
Alberta, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health
Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology and Public Health,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology,
Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO
Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada,
SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of
Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Child
Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, ICES,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jones JL, Tse F, Carroll MW, deBruyn JC, McNeil SA, Pham-Huy A, Seow CH, Barrett LL, Bessissow T, Carman N, Melmed GY, Vanderkooi OG, Marshall JK, Benchimol EI. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 2: Inactivated Vaccines. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:681-700. [PMID: 34334167 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations can be altered by immunosuppressive therapies, and perhaps by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on inactivated vaccines. METHODS Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative online platform, and voted on by a multidisciplinary group. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 15 of 20 questions. Recommendations address the following vaccines: Haemophilus influenzae type b, recombinant zoster, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, meningococcus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis, and human papillomavirus. Most of the recommendations for patients with IBD are congruent with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommendations for the general population, with the following exceptions. In patients with IBD, the panel suggested Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine for patients older than 5 years of age, recombinant zoster vaccine for adults younger than 50 year of age, and hepatitis B vaccine for adults without a risk factor. Consensus was not reached, and recommendations were not made for 5 statements, due largely to lack of evidence, including double-dose hepatitis B vaccine, timing of influenza immunization in patients on biologics, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines in adult patients without risk factors, and human papillomavirus vaccine in patients aged 27-45 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients with IBD may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Therefore, maintaining appropriate vaccination status in these patients is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, IBD is not a contraindication to the use of inactivated vaccines, but immunosuppressive therapy may reduce vaccine responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Jones
- Department of Medicine and Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew W Carroll
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer C deBruyn
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelly A McNeil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Anne Pham-Huy
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia H Seow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa L Barrett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicholas Carman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Otto G Vanderkooi
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Pediatrics, Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric I Benchimol
- Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Negahdaripour M, Shafiekhani M, Moezzi SMI, Amiri S, Rasekh S, Bagheri A, Mosaddeghi P, Vazin A. Administration of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients. Int Immunopharmacol 2021; 99:108021. [PMID: 34352567 PMCID: PMC8316069 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Since the beginning of vaccination programs against COVID-19 in different countries, several populations such as patients with specific immunological conditions have been considered as the priorities for immunization. In this regard, patients with autoimmune diseases or those receiving immunosuppressive agents and anti-cancer therapies, need special attention. However, no confirmed data is presently available regarding COVID-19 vaccines in these populations due to exclusion from the conducted clinical trials. Given the probable suppression or over-activation of the immune system in such patients, reaching a consensus for their vaccination is critical, besides gathering data and conducting trials, which could probably clarify this matter in the future. In this review, besides a brief on the available COVID-19 vaccines, considerations and available knowledge about administering similar vaccines in patients with cancer, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, solid organ transplantation, multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and rheumatologic and dermatologic autoimmune disorders are summarized to help in decision making. As discussed, live-attenuated viruses, which should be avoided in these groups, are not employed in the present COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, the main concern regarding efficacy could be met using a potent COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, the vaccination timing for maximum efficacy could be decided according to the patient’s condition, indicated medications, and the guides provided here. Post-vaccination monitoring is also advised to ensure an adequate immune response. Further studies in this area are urgently warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manica Negahdaripour
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Shafiekhani
- Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohammad Iman Moezzi
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sogand Amiri
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Shiva Rasekh
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ashkan Bagheri
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Pouria Mosaddeghi
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Afsaneh Vazin
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Axiaris G, Zampeli E, Michopoulos S, Bamias G. Management of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:3762-3779. [PMID: 34321842 PMCID: PMC8291024 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B remains a significant global clinical problem, despite the implementation of safe and effective vaccination programs. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) largely follows the regional epidemiologic status. Serological screening with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) and core (anti-HBc) proteins is a key element in the management of IBD patients and, ideally, should be performed at IBD diagnosis. Stratification of individual cases should be done according to the serologic profile and the IBD-specific treatment, with particular emphasis in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens. In patients who have not contracted HBV, vaccination is indicated to accomplish protective immunity. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients, however, is a challenging issue and several strategies for primary and revaccination have been proposed. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients with IBD should be considered in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, when immunosuppressive therapies are administered. HBV reactivation is preventable via the administration of prophylactic nucleot(s)ide analogues and should be the standard approach in HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients represent a non-homogeneous group and bear a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation. Biochemical, serological and molecular monitoring is currently the recommended approach for anti-HBc patients. Acute HBV infection is rarely reported in IBD patients. In the present review, we outline the problems associated with HBV infection in patients with IBD and present updated evidence for their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Axiaris
- Gastroenterology Department, "Alexandra" Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece
| | - Evanthia Zampeli
- Gastroenterology Department, "Alexandra" Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece
| | | | - Giorgos Bamias
- GI Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Athens 11526, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Prentice RE, Rentsch C, Al‐Ani AH, Zhang E, Johnson D, Halliday J, Bryant R, Begun J, Ward MG, Lewindon PJ, Connor SJ, Ghaly S, Christensen B. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. GASTROHEP 2021; 3:212-228. [PMID: 34539248 PMCID: PMC8441891 DOI: 10.1002/ygh2.473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has drastically impacted societies worldwide. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is expected to play a key role in the management of this pandemic. Inflammatory conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often require chronic immunosuppression, which can influence vaccination decisions. AIM This review article aims to describe the most commonly available SARS-CoV-2 vaccination vectors globally, assess the potential benefits and concerns of vaccination in the setting of immunosuppression and provide medical practitioners with guidance regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IBD. METHODS All published Phase 1/2 and/or Phase 3 and 4 studies of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations were reviewed. IBD international society position papers, safety registry data and media releases from pharmaceutical companies as well as administrative and medicines regulatory bodies were included. General vaccine evidence and recommendations in immunosuppressed patients were reviewed for context. Society position papers regarding special populations, including immunosuppressed, pregnant and breast-feeding individuals were also evaluated. Literature was critically analysed and summarised. RESULTS Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is supported in all adult, non-pregnant individuals with IBD without contraindication. There is the potential that vaccine efficacy may be reduced in those who are immunosuppressed; however, medical therapies should not be withheld in order to undertake vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe, but data specific to immunosuppressed patients remain limited. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is essential from both an individual patient and community perspective and should be encouraged in patients with IBD. Recommendations must be continually updated as real-world and trial-based evidence emerges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralley E. Prentice
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Clarissa Rentsch
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Aysha H. Al‐Ani
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Eva Zhang
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Douglas Johnson
- Departments of Infectious Diseases and General MedicineThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
- Department of MedicineRoyal Melbourne HospitalUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - John Halliday
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Robert Bryant
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Queen Elizabeth HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | - Jacob Begun
- Department of GastroenterologyMater HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Mark G. Ward
- Department of GastroenterologyAlfred HealthMelbourneVICAustralia
- Monash UniversityMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Peter J. Lewindon
- Department of GastroenterologyLady Cilento Children’s HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia
- Queensland Children’s Medical Research InstituteUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Susan J. Connor
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNSWAustralia
- South West Sydney Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Simon Ghaly
- Department of GastroenterologySt. Vincent’s Hospital SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- St. Vincent’s Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South Wales SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Britt Christensen
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVICAustralia
- University of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Righi E, Gallo T, Azzini AM, Mazzaferri F, Cordioli M, Merighi M, Tacconelli E. A Review of Vaccinations in Adult Patients with Secondary Immunodeficiency. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10:637-661. [PMID: 33687662 PMCID: PMC7941364 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00404-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccine-preventable diseases and their related complications are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with altered immunocompetence. Optimised immunisation in this patient population is challenging because of limited data from vaccine trials, suboptimal vaccine efficacy and safety concerns. Reliable efficacy data are lacking among patients with altered immunocompetence, and existing recommendations are mainly based on expert consensus and may vary geographically. Inactivated vaccines can be generally used without risks in this group, but their efficacy may be reduced, and immunisation schedules vary according to local guidelines, age, and type and stage of the underlying disease. Live vaccines, if indicated, should be administered with care because of the risk of vaccine-associated disease. We have reviewed the current evidence on vaccination principles and recommendations in adult patients with secondary immunodeficiencies, including asplenia, HIV infection, stem cell and solid organ transplant, haematological malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease and other chronic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elda Righi
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
- Infectious Diseases, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Tolinda Gallo
- Public Health Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Azzini
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Infectious Diseases, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Maddalena Cordioli
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Infectious Diseases, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Mara Merighi
- Infectious Diseases, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Infectious Diseases, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Robin J Dart
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas', First Floor College House, North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Mark A Samaan
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas', First Floor College House, North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Törüner M, Hakkı Kalkan İ, Akyüz F, Tezel A, Ferhat Çelik A. Turkish IBD Organization's Position Statement on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Recommendations During COVID-19 Pandemic. THE TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF TURKISH SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 32:488-492. [PMID: 34405814 PMCID: PMC8975298 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2021.280721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has resulted in high mortality and morbidity worldwide and is still a growing problem. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease for which a substantial number of patients are treated with immunosuppressive medications, either occasionally or long-term. Despite the accumulating evidence, there is still a lack of knowledge about the impact of COVID-19 on IBD patients, especially those who are under immunosuppressive treatment. Moreover, following the emergence of several COVID vaccines, there are concerns regarding vaccine effectiveness and possible side effects in such patients. In this context, we tried to briefly summarize the accumulating evidence and recommendations for the management of IBD in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Törüner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İsmail Hakkı Kalkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, TOBB University of Economics and Technology School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Filiz Akyüz
- Department of Gastroenterology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Tezel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Aykut Ferhat Çelik
- Department of Gastroenterology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Laube R, Paramsothy S, Leong RW. Review of pregnancy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211016242. [PMID: 34046084 PMCID: PMC8135214 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211016242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently affects women of childbearing age and can have implications in pregnancy. Most women with IBD have comparable fertility with women in the general population. Fertility is reduced in women with active disease or previous ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery and is temporarily reduced in men taking sulfasalazine. Women with IBD have an increased risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age infants and Cesarean section (CS) delivery, however, no increased risk of congenital abnormalities. These adverse outcomes are particularly prevalent for women with active IBD compared with those with quiescent disease. Conception should occur during disease remission to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes and reduce the risk of disease exacerbations during pregnancy. Pre-conception counseling is therefore pertinent to provide patient education, medication review for risk of teratogenicity and objective disease assessment. Most medications are safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with the exception of methotrexate, ciclosporin, allopurinol and tofacitinib. Delivery modality should be guided by obstetric factors in most cases; however, CS is recommended for women with active perianal disease and can be considered for women with inactive perianal disease or IPAA. In conclusion, most women with IBD have uncomplicated pregnancies. Active IBD is the predominant predictor of poor outcomes and disease exacerbations; therefore, maintenance of disease remission during and before pregnancy is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Laube
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sudarshan Paramsothy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rupert W. Leong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2137, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Safety of New Biologics (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) and Small Molecules (Tofacitinib) During Pregnancy: A Review. Drugs 2021; 80:1085-1100. [PMID: 32562207 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01346-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Two new biological drugs (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and one small molecule (tofacitinib) have been recently approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, we must be familiar with the safety of these "new" drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. In the present article, we critically review available data on the safety of new biologics (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with special focus on women with inflammatory bowel disease. Bibliographical searches (MEDLINE) up to April 2020 were performed. The timing and mechanisms of placental transfer of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are expected to be similar to anti-TNF agents. Animal studies show no evidence of adverse effects on pre- or post-natal development after administration of vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Just a few studies including patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab during pregnancy have been published, reporting uneventful pregnancies in most cases. The clinical programme of both drugs and post-marketing studies showed no new safety concerns. Due to the expected safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab during pregnancy, it may be recommended to plan the final pregnancy dose approximately 8 or 12 weeks, respectively, before the estimated date of delivery. Live vaccines should be avoided for up to a year in children exposed in utero to vedolizumab or ustekinumab unless drug elimination has been documented. Miniscule amounts of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are transferred to breast milk, so breastfeeding is probably safe. There is no evidence of adverse effect of vedolizumab or ustekinumab paternal exposure. Regarding tofacitinib, it is reasonable to assume that this molecule crosses the placenta from the beginning of pregnancy. In animal studies, tofacitinib was feticidal and teratogenic in rats and rabbits, although at exposures many times greater than the standard human dose. Reported outcomes of pregnancy cases identified from tofacitinib randomised controlled trials, post-approval and non-interventional studies, and spontaneous adverse-event reporting appear similar to those observed in the general population. Nevertheless, at present, the use of tofacitinib during pregnancy should be avoided. Although no human studies have reported outcomes of breastfeeding with small molecules such as tofacitinib, this drug is present in lactating rat milk so, at present, breastfeeding should be avoided. Pregnancy among patients with paternal exposure to tofacitinib appears to be safe. In summary, we can conclude that new biologic agents (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) should be used during pregnancy only if the benefits to the mother outweigh the risks to the mother and unborn child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
| | - María Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Siegel CA, Melmed GY, McGovern DPB, Rai V, Krammer F, Rubin DT, Abreu MT, Dubinsky MC. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: recommendations from an international consensus meeting. Gut 2021; 70:635-640. [PMID: 33472895 PMCID: PMC7818789 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-324000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Corey A Siegel
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- F Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dermot PB McGovern
- F Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victoria Rai
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA,Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Florian Krammer
- Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maria T Abreu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Crohn’s and Colitis Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|