1
|
Gaspar B, Ramalho M, Guerra A. Seminal vesicles in focus: An illustrated overview. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2024:S0363-0188(24)00076-8. [PMID: 38692935 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Seminal vesicles play a crucial role in the male reproductive system, as they are responsible for secreting a fluid that forms most of the ejaculate. Seminal vesicles' pathology can present with non-specific symptoms, making imaging diagnosis essential for proper patient management. Various imaging modalities can be used to evaluate these glands, with MRI beneficial in illustrating the spectrum of seminal vesicle disease. Typical seminal vesicles appear as elongated fluid-containing structures, but congenital anomalies, inflammatory conditions, and neoplastic disorders can alter their appearance. Furthermore, differentiating mimics from actual pathology can be challenging but crucial for proper management. This article aims to provide an overview of the typical imaging appearance of the seminal vesicles and illustrate the principal imaging characteristics of conditions involving these structures. It will review the imaging characteristics of common and uncommon lesions involving the seminal vesicles by exploring congenital, infectious, and neoplastic in detail. As the seminal vesicles are often evaluated incidentally during prostate imaging, radiologists should be aware of the variability of normal findings and recognize the principal pathologies affecting these structures to ensure proper patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Gaspar
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
| | - Miguel Ramalho
- Department of Radiology, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Z, Zhou B, Liu W, Gan H, Chen R, Yang L, Zhou L, Liu X. Diagnostic efficacy and interobserver agreement among readers with variable experience of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting system with whole-mount histology after androgen deprivation therapy as a reference. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024; 14:3006-3017. [PMID: 38617164 PMCID: PMC11007506 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Background The Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system was recently proposed to assess the local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa), but its exact performance for the prostate after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy is difficult to determine. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of this system using whole-mount histology of the prostate after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as the standard of reference. Methods In total, 119 patients with PCa post-ADT underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) before prostatectomy. Three radiologists analyzed the MRI images independently, scoring imaging findings according to PI-RR. Spearman correlation was performed to assess the relationship between the percentage of sectors with residual cancer and PI-RR score. The diagnostic performance for detection of residual cancer was assessed on a per-sector basis. The chi-squared test was used to compare the cancer detection rate (CDR) among readers. Overall and pairwise interreader agreement in assigning PI-RR categories and residual cancer sectors with a score ≥3 or ≥4 were evaluated with the Cohen kappa coefficient. Results Histology revealed 209 sectors with residual cancer. The percentage of pathologically positive sectors increased with the increase in PI-RR score for all readers. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) at a cutoff of score 3 ranged from 74.2% to 83.7%, 86.4% to 92.7%, 51.3% to 64.3%, and 95.4% to 96.9%, respectively, and at a cutoff of score 4, they ranged from 47.4% to 56.5%, 97.9% to 98.6%, 82.5% to 85.3%, and 91.6% to 92.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the CDR of readers. In PI-RR categories and detection of residual cancer sectors, overall interreader agreement was moderate for all readers, but agreement was higher between the more experienced readers (moderate to substantial) than between the more and less experienced readers (fair to moderate). Conclusions MRI scoring with the PI-RR assessment provided accurate evaluation of PCa after ADT, but readers' experience influenced interreader agreement and cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhangzhe Chen
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Bingni Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hualei Gan
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruchuan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lirui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Liangping Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaohang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghezzo S, Mapelli P, Samanes Gajate AM, Palmisano A, Cucchiara V, Brembilla G, Bezzi C, Suardi N, Scifo P, Briganti A, De Cobelli F, Chiti A, Esposito A, Picchio M. Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI and [ 68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-center phase II clinical trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:907-918. [PMID: 37897615 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06483-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-M2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center phase II clinical trial from June 2020 to October 2022. Forty-four/60 completed all study examinations and were available at follow-up (median: 22.8 months, range: 6-31.5 months). Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed PET images and two radiologists interpreted MRI; images were then re-examined to produce an integrated PET/MRI report for both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 examinations. A composite reference standard including histological specimens, response to treatment, and conventional imaging gathered during follow-up was used to validate imaging findings. Detection rates, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were assessed. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity on a per-patient base and detection rate on a per-region base. Prostate bed, locoregional lymph nodes, non-skeletal distant metastases, and bone metastases were considered. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level after correction for multiple testing. RESULTS Patients' median age was 69.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61.8-75.1) and median PSA level at time of imaging was 0.53 ng/mL (IQR: 0.33-2.04). During follow-up, evidence of recurrence was observed in 31/44 patients. Combining MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET resulted in sensitivity = 100% and 93.5% and specificity of 69.2% and 69.2%, respectively. When considering the individual imaging modalities, [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET showed lower sensitivity compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI (61.3% vs 83.9% and 87.1%, p = 0.046 and 0.043, respectively), while specificity was comparable among the imaging modalities (100% vs 84.6% and 69.2%, p = 0.479 and 0.134, respectively). CONCLUSION This study brings further evidence on the utility of fully hybrid PET/MRI for disease characterization in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed high sensitivity, while the utility of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET in absence of a simultaneous whole-body/multiparametric MRI remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Ghezzo
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Largo Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Esposito
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pecoraro M, Dehghanpour A, Das JP, Woo S, Panebianco V. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Recurrence with MR Imaging and Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting Scoring System. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:135-159. [PMID: 37973239 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Detection of prostate cancer recurrence after whole-gland treatment with curative intent is critical to identify patients who may benefit from local salvage therapy. Among the different imaging modalities used in clinical practice, MR imaging is the most accurate in identifying local prostate cancer recurrence; indeed, it is an excellent technique for local recurrence detection superior to PET/CT, even at low PSA, but provides no information about extra-pelvic lymph nodes or bone metastasis. In 2021, a group of experts developed the Prostate Imaging for local Recurrence Reporting scoring system to standardize acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of prostate cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Pecoraro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Ailin Dehghanpour
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Jeeban Paul Das
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale Regina Elena 324, Rome 00161, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Awiwi MO, Gjoni M, Vikram R, Altinmakas E, Dogan H, Bathala TK, Naik S, Ravizzini G, Kandemirli SG, Elsayes KM, Salem UI. MRI and PSMA PET/CT of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230112. [PMID: 37999983 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer may recur several years after definitive treatment, such as prostatectomy or radiation therapy. A rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the first sign of disease recurrence, and this is termed biochemical recurrence. Patients with biochemical recurrence have worse survival outcomes. Radiologic localization of recurrent disease helps in directing patient management, which may vary from active surveillance to salvage radiation therapy, androgen-deprivation therapy, or other forms of systemic and local therapy. The likelihood of detecting the site of recurrence increases with higher serum PSA level. MRI provides optimal diagnostic performance for evaluation of the prostatectomy bed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET radiotracers currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration demonstrate physiologic urinary excretion, which can obscure recurrence at the vesicourethral junction. However, MRI and PSMA PET/CT have comparable diagnostic performance for evaluation of local recurrence after external-beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy. PSMA PET/CT outperforms MRI in identifying recurrence involving the lymph nodes and bones. Caveats for use of both PSMA PET/CT and MRI do exist and may cause false-positive or false-negative results. Hence, these techniques have complementary roles and should be interpreted in conjunction with each other, taking the patient history and results of any additional prior imaging studies into account. Novel PSMA agents at various stages of investigation are being developed, and preliminary data show promising results; these agents may revolutionize the landscape of prostate cancer recurrence imaging in the future. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Turkbey in this issue. The slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad O Awiwi
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Migena Gjoni
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Raghunandan Vikram
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Emre Altinmakas
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Hakan Dogan
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sagar Naik
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Gregory Ravizzini
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sedat Giray Kandemirli
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Usama I Salem
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guljaš S, Dupan Krivdić Z, Drežnjak Madunić M, Šambić Penc M, Pavlović O, Krajina V, Pavoković D, Šmit Takač P, Štefančić M, Salha T. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Study in the mpMRI of the Prostate-Unnecessary or Underutilised? A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3488. [PMID: 37998624 PMCID: PMC10670922 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to summarise recent scientific literature regarding the clinical use of DCE-MRI as a component of multiparametric resonance imaging of the prostate. This review presents the principles of DCE-MRI acquisition and analysis, the current role of DCE-MRI in clinical practice with special regard to its role in presently available categorisation systems, and an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of DCE-MRI described in the current literature. DCE-MRI is an important functional sequence that requires intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent and gives information regarding the vascularity and capillary permeability of the lesion. Although numerous studies have confirmed that DCE-MRI has great potential in the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer, its role is still inadequate in the PI-RADS categorisation. Moreover, there have been numerous scientific discussions about abandoning the intravenous application of gadolinium-based contrast as a routine part of MRI examination of the prostate. In this review, we summarised the recent literature on the advantages and disadvantages of DCE-MRI, focusing on an overview of currently available data on bpMRI and mpMRI, as well as on studies providing information on the potential better usability of DCE-MRI in improving the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI examinations of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silva Guljaš
- Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (S.G.); (Z.D.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
| | - Zdravka Dupan Krivdić
- Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (S.G.); (Z.D.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
| | - Maja Drežnjak Madunić
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Mirela Šambić Penc
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Oliver Pavlović
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Vinko Krajina
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Deni Pavoković
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Petra Šmit Takač
- Clinical Department of Surgery, Osijek University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Marin Štefančić
- Department of Radiology, National Memorial Hospital Vukovar, 32000 Vukovar, Croatia;
| | - Tamer Salha
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Teleradiology and Artificial Intelligence, Health Centre Osijek-Baranja County, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carpagnano FA, Eusebi L, Giannubilo W, Fenu F, Safi M, Bartelli F, Guglielmi G. Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Evaluation of Recurrence and Post-treatment Changes. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-022-00404-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This article reviews all the most common therapeutic strategies of prostate cancer, systemic or local, and all the following morpho-structural alterations, with the aim of helping the radiologist to recognize the signs of recurrence by using mp-MRI.
Recent Findings
According to the most recent evidences, prostate mp-MRI has now become a strong, non-invasive, and valid tool to evaluate all patient treated for prostatic carcinoma across the time, especially in the suspicion of biochemical recurrence.
Summary
The minimal signs of focal recurrence can put a strain on radiologists, especially if they are novice with multi-parametric prostate MRI. Familiarizing themselves with the outcomes of treatment, local or systemic, and its characteristics to MR imaging is indispensable to avoid diagnostic pitfalls and, subsequently, unnecessary reinterventions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandes MC, Yildirim O, Woo S, Vargas HA, Hricak H. The role of MRI in prostate cancer: current and future directions. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:503-521. [PMID: 35294642 PMCID: PMC9378354 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01006-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There has been an increasing role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of prostate cancer. MRI already plays an essential role in the detection and staging, with the introduction of functional MRI sequences. Recent advancements in radiomics and artificial intelligence are being tested to potentially improve detection, assessment of aggressiveness, and provide usefulness as a prognostic marker. MRI can improve pretreatment risk stratification and therefore selection of and follow-up of patients for active surveillance. MRI can also assist in guiding targeted biopsy, treatment planning and follow-up after treatment to assess local recurrence. MRI has gained importance in the evaluation of metastatic disease with emerging technology including whole-body MRI and integrated positron emission tomography/MRI, allowing for not only better detection but also quantification. The main goal of this article is to review the most recent advances on MRI in prostate cancer and provide insights into its potential clinical roles from the radiologist's perspective. In each of the sections, specific roles of MRI tailored to each clinical setting are discussed along with its strengths and weakness including already established material related to MRI and the introduction of recent advancements on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Clara Fernandes
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Onur Yildirim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shiradkar R, Ghose S, Mahran A, Li L, Hubbard I, Fu P, Tirumani SH, Ponsky L, Purysko A, Madabhushi A. Prostate Surface Distension and Tumor Texture Descriptors From Pre-Treatment MRI Are Associated With Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Findings. Front Oncol 2022; 12:841801. [PMID: 35669420 PMCID: PMC9163353 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.841801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To derive and evaluate the association of prostate shape distension descriptors from T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) with prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-radical prostatectomy (RP) independently and in conjunction with texture radiomics of PCa. Methods This retrospective study comprised 133 PCa patients from two institutions who underwent 3T-MRI prior to RP and were followed up with PSA measurements for ≥3 years. A 3D shape atlas-based approach was adopted to derive prostate shape distension descriptors from T2WI, and these descriptors were used to train a random forest classifier (CS) to predict BCR. Texture radiomics was derived within PCa regions of interest from T2WI and ADC maps, and another machine learning classifier (CR) was trained for BCR. An integrated classifier CS+R was then trained using predictions from CS and CR. These models were trained on D1 (N = 71, 27 BCR+) and evaluated on independent hold-out set D2 (N = 62, 12 BCR+). CS+R was compared against pre-RP, post-RP clinical variables, and extant nomograms for BCR-free survival (bFS) at 3 years. Results CS+R resulted in a higher AUC (0.75) compared to CR (0.70, p = 0.04) and CS (0.69, p = 0.01) on D2 in predicting BCR. On univariable analysis, CS+R achieved a higher hazard ratio (2.89, 95% CI 0.35–12.81, p < 0.01) compared to other pre-RP clinical variables for bFS. CS+R, pathologic Gleason grade, extraprostatic extension, and positive surgical margins were associated with bFS (p < 0.05). CS+R resulted in a higher C-index (0.76 ± 0.06) compared to CAPRA (0.69 ± 0.09, p < 0.01) and Decipher risk (0.59 ± 0.06, p < 0.01); however, it was comparable to post-RP CAPRA-S (0.75 ± 0.02, p = 0.07). Conclusions Radiomic shape descriptors quantifying prostate surface distension complement texture radiomics of prostate cancer on MRI and result in an improved association with biochemical recurrence post-radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Shiradkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Rakesh Shiradkar,
| | - Soumya Ghose
- GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States
| | - Amr Mahran
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Isaac Hubbard
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Pingfu Fu
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sree Harsha Tirumani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Lee Ponsky
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andrei Purysko
- Department of Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peters I, Derlin K, Peperhove MJ, Hensen B, Pertschy S, Wolters M, von Klot CAJ, Wacker F, Hellms S. First experiences and results after cryoablation of prostate cancer with histopathological evaluation and imaging-based follow-up. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1705-1716. [PMID: 35255716 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To share our experience after 28 cryoablation treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) with histopathology, clinical data and MRI as the follow-up methods. Methods: Clinical follow-up comprised prostate specific antigen (PSA)-measurements, PSA-density and quality-of-life-parameters. multi-parametric (mp)MRI pre- and post-cryoablation were retrospectively re-analyzed in 23 cases using Likert scores. Follow-up-histopathology was performed via MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided and/or systematic biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: 17 PCa (61%) were diagnosed within 12-month post-cryotherapy (infield and out-of-field disease). PSA levels and PSA density were not significantly different between patients with or without PCa recurrence. mpMRI can characterize the decrease in prostate volume and necrosis. Area under the curve for the detection of PCa was 81% (global Likert scores), 74-87% (T2), 78% (diffusion weighted imaging) and 57-78% (dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Youden-selected cutoff ≥3). Conclusion: Besides histopathological evaluation and control biopsy, MRI might have the potential to accurately detect PCa after cryotherapy. Clinical data and interdisciplinary communication are required for efficient monitoring after cryoablation treatments for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Peters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Katja Derlin
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Matti Joonas Peperhove
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Bennet Hensen
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Stefanie Pertschy
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Mathias Wolters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | | | - Frank Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Susanne Hellms
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yoon JG, Mohamed I, Smith DA, Tirumani SH, Paspulati RM, Mendiratta P, Ramaiya NH. The modern therapeutic & imaging landscape of metastatic prostate cancer: a primer for radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:781-800. [PMID: 34783876 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03348-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the United States and the most common cancer among men. Treatment paradigms for the management of advanced stages of prostate cancer have continued to evolve in recent years. These advancements in the therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer and diagnostic imaging modalities have fundamentally changed the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. In this review article we provide a primer for radiologists highlighting the most recent developments in treatment options and imaging techniques utilized in the modern oncologic management of metastatic prostate cancer. We will examine current therapy options and associated toxicities with an emphasis on relevant imaging findings commonly encountered by radiologists. We also summarize the role of modalities including CT, MRI, PET, bone scintigraphy, and PET in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G Yoon
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Inas Mohamed
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Daniel A Smith
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Sree H Tirumani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Raj M Paspulati
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Prateek Mendiratta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nikhil H Ramaiya
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evangelista L, Cassarino G, Lauro A, Morlacco A, Sepulcri M, Nguyen AAL, Ietto F, Cecchin D, Lacognata C, Zucchetta P. Comparison of MRI, PET, and 18F-choline PET/MRI in patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:4401-4409. [PMID: 34047801 PMCID: PMC8346454 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03131-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The aims of the study were (i) to examine the PCa detection rate of 18F-choline (FCH) PET/MRI and (ii) to assess the impact of PET/MRI findings in patients with PCa who develop OMD using PSA response as a biomarker. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 103 patients undergoing FCH PET/MRI for biochemical recurrence of PCa. The inclusion criteria were (1) previous radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT); (2) PSA levels available at the time of PET; (3) OMD, defined as a maximum of 5 lesions on PET/MRI; and (4) follow-up data available for at least 6 months after PET. All images were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and interpreted with the support of two radiologists. Results Seventy patients were eligible for the study: 52 patients had a positive FCH PET/MRI and 18 had a negative scan. The overall PCa detection rates for MRI, PET, and PET/MRI were 65.7%, 37.1%, and 74.3%, respectively. Thirty-five patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT), 16 received hormonal therapy (HT), 3 had a combined therapy (RT + HT), and 16 (23%) underwent PSA surveillance. At follow-up, PSA levels decreased in 51 patients (73%), most of whom had been treated with RT or RT + HT. Therapeutic management was guided by PET/MRI in 74% of patients, which performed better than MRI alone (68% of patients). Conclusion FCH PET/MRI has a higher detection rate than MRI or PET alone for PCa patients with OMD and PSA levels > 0.5 ng/mL, prompting a better choice of treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-021-03131-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Cassarino
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Lauro
- Radiology Unit, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Morlacco
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Urology University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiotherapy Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alex Ahn Li Nguyen
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Urology University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Ietto
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Diego Cecchin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Zucchetta
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Panebianco V, Villeirs G, Weinreb JC, Turkbey BI, Margolis DJ, Richenberg J, Schoots IG, Moore CM, Futterer J, Macura KJ, Oto A, Bittencourt LK, Haider MA, Salomon G, Tempany CM, Padhani AR, Barentsz JO. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR): International Consensus -based Guidelines on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:868-876. [PMID: 33582104 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imaging techniques are used to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) for salvage therapy and to exclude metastases that should be addressed with systemic therapy. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a reduction in the variability of acquisition, interpretation, and reporting is required to detect local PCa recurrence in men with biochemical relapse after local treatment with curative intent. OBJECTIVE To propose a standardised method for image acquisition and assessment of PCa local recurrence using MRI after radiation therapy (RP) and radical prostatectomy (RT). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) was formulated using the existing literature. An international panel of experts conducted a nonsystematic review of the literature. The PI-RR system was created via consensus through a combination of face-to-face and online discussions. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Similar to with PI-RADS, based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, the minimum acceptable MRI parameters for detection of recurrence after radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy are set. Also, a simplified and standardised terminology and content of the reports that use five assessment categories to summarise the suspicion of local recurrence (PI-RR) are designed. PI-RR scores of 1 and 2 are assigned to lesions with a very low and low likelihood of recurrence, respectively. PI-RR 3 is assigned if the presence of recurrence is uncertain. PI-RR 4 and 5 are assigned for a high and very high likelihood of recurrence, respectively. PI-RR is intended to be used in routine clinical practice and to facilitate data collection and outcome monitoring for research. CONCLUSIONS This paper provides a structured reporting system (PI-RR) for MRI evaluation of local recurrence of PCa after RT and RP. PATIENT SUMMARY A new method called PI-RR was developed to promote standardisation and reduce variations in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating local recurrence of prostate cancer and guiding therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jeffrey C Weinreb
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Baris I Turkbey
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Richenberg
- Department of Imaging, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurgen Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna J Macura
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Masoom A Haider
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham &Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nogueira L, Tracey AT, Alvim R, Reisz P, Scherz A, Coleman JA, Kim K. Developments in Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Urologic Malignancies. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25225417. [PMID: 33228126 PMCID: PMC7699359 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25225417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
With improved understanding of cancer biology and technical advancements in non-invasive management of urological malignancies, there is renewed interest in photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a means of focal cancer treatment. The application of PDT has also broadened as a result of development of better-tolerated and more effective photosensitizers. Vascular-targeted PDT (VTP) using padeliporfin, which is a water-soluble chlorophyll derivative, allows for tumor-specific cytotoxicity and has demonstrated efficacy in the management of urologic malignancies. Herein, we describe the evolution of photodynamic therapy in urologic oncology and the role of VTP in emerging treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Nogueira
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.N.); (A.T.T.); (R.A.); (P.R.); (J.A.C.)
| | - Andrew T. Tracey
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.N.); (A.T.T.); (R.A.); (P.R.); (J.A.C.)
| | - Ricardo Alvim
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.N.); (A.T.T.); (R.A.); (P.R.); (J.A.C.)
| | - Peter Reisz
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.N.); (A.T.T.); (R.A.); (P.R.); (J.A.C.)
| | - Avigdor Scherz
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel;
| | - Jonathan A. Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (L.N.); (A.T.T.); (R.A.); (P.R.); (J.A.C.)
| | - Kwanghee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-646-422-4432; Fax: +1-212-452-3323
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3882-3895. [PMID: 32447414 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02577-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
For clinically significant, locally confined prostate cancer, whole-gland radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are established effective treatment strategies that, however, come at a cost of significant morbidity related to urinary and sexual side effects. The concept of risk stratification paired with a better understanding of prognostic factors has led to the development of alternative management options including active surveillance and focal therapy for appropriately selected patients with localized disease. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one such minimally invasive, image-guided treatment option for prostate cancer. Due to the relative novelty of HIFU and the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer, many radiologists are not yet familiar with imaging findings related to HIFU, their temporal evolution as well as imaging appearance of recurrent disease after this type of focal therapy. HIFU induces sharply demarcated, localized coagulative necrosis of a tumor through thermal energy delivered via an endorectal or transurethral ultrasound transducer. In this pictorial review, we aim at providing relevant background information that will guide the reader through the general principles of HIFU in the prostate, as well as demonstrate the imaging appearance of expected post-HIFU changes versus recurrent tumor.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. A variety of treatment options is available for localized prostate cancer and may range from active surveillance to focal therapy or whole gland treatment, that is, surgery or radiotherapy. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels are an important tool to monitor treatment success after whole gland treatment, unfortunately prostate-specific antigen is unreliable after focal therapy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate is rapidly gaining field in the management of prostate cancer and may play a crucial role in the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. This article will focus on postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging after different forms of local therapy in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Dinis Fernandes C, Simões R, Ghobadi G, Heijmink SW, Schoots IG, de Jong J, Walraven I, van der Poel HG, van Houdt PJ, Smolic M, Pos FJ, van der Heide UA. Multiparametric MRI Tumor Probability Model for the Detection of Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy: Pathologic Validation and Comparison With Manual Tumor Delineations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:140-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
18
|
Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB, Villeirs G, Panebianco V, Stabile A, Emberton M, Moore CM. The Evolution of MRI of the Prostate: The Past, the Present, and the Future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:384-396. [PMID: 31039022 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to discuss the evolution of MRI in prostate cancer from the early 1980s to the current day, providing analysis of the key studies on this topic. CONCLUSION. The rapid diffusion of MRI technology has meant that residual variability remains between centers regarding the quality of acquisition and the quality and standardization of reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giganti
- 1 Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- 2 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Fl, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom
| | | | - Geert Villeirs
- 4 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- 5 Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- 2 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Fl, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom
- 6 Department of Urology, Division of Experiemental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mark Emberton
- 2 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Fl, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom
- 7 Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline M Moore
- 2 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Fl, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom
- 7 Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Feasibility and Initial Results: Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Recurrent Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2019; 202:413-421. [PMID: 30817240 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the feasibility and cancer detection rate of fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy vs standard template biopsy in the same patient with biochemical failure after nonsurgical therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 21 patients with a mean ± SD prostate specific antigen of 7.4 ± 6.8 ng/ml and biochemical failure after nonoperative prostate cancer treatment underwent fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (mean 364.1 ± 37.7 MBq) and planning transrectal prostate ultrasound with 3-dimensional image reconstruction. Focal prostatic activity on positron emission tomography was delineated and co-registered with planning ultrasound. During the subsequent biopsy session computer generated 12-core template biopsies were performed and then fluciclovine defined targets were revealed and biopsied. Histological analysis of template and targeted cores were completed. RESULTS Template biopsy was positive for malignancy in 6 of 21 patients (28.6%), including 10 of 124 regions and 11 of 246 cores, vs targeted biopsy in 10 of 21 (47.6%), including 17 of 50 regions and 40 of 125 cores. Five of 21 patients had positive findings on targeted biopsy only and 1 of 21 had positive findings on template biopsy only. An additional case was upgraded from Grade Group 2 to 3 on targeted biopsy. Extraprostatic disease was detected in 8 of 21 men (38.1%) with histological confirmation in all 3 who underwent lesion biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Fluciclovine positron emission tomography real-time ultrasound fusion guidance for biopsy is feasible in patients with biochemical failure after nonsurgical therapy for prostate cancer. It identifies more recurrent prostate cancer using fewer cores compared with template biopsy in the same patient. Further study is required to determine in what manner targeted biopsy may augment template biopsy of recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Update on Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent-Enhanced Imaging in the Genitourinary System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212:1223-1233. [PMID: 30973785 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced MRI applications in the genitourinary system. CONCLUSION. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is rare or nonexistent with standard dosing of group II GBCAs. Gadolinium retention, cost, and examination times are emerging considerations affecting GBCA use. GBCA is unnecessary to diagnose adrenal adenomas, simple cysts, and some Bosniak category II cysts; however, it is required to determine solid or septal renal mass enhancement. Biparametric prostate MRI requires high-quality and reproducible DWI; therefore, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI remains valuable in selected prostate MRI examinations.
Collapse
|
21
|
van der Poel H, Grivas N, van Leeuwen P, Heijmink S, Schoots I. The role of MRI for detection and staging of radio- and focal therapy-recurrent prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 37:1485-1490. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02677-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
22
|
Yuan Y, Qin W, Buyyounouski M, Ibragimov B, Hancock S, Han B, Xing L. Prostate cancer classification with multiparametric MRI transfer learning model. Med Phys 2019; 46:756-765. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yixuan Yuan
- Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Tong Hong Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford 94305USA
| | - Wenjian Qin
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen 518055People's Republic of China
| | - Mark Buyyounouski
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen 518055People's Republic of China
| | - Bulat Ibragimov
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford 94305USA
| | - Steve Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford 94305USA
| | - Bin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford 94305USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Stanford 94305USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barbosa FG, Queiroz MA, Nunes RF, Viana PCC, Marin JFG, Cerri GG, Buchpiguel CA. Revisiting Prostate Cancer Recurrence with PSMA PET: Atlas of Typical and Atypical Patterns of Spread. Radiographics 2019; 39:186-212. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe G. Barbosa
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - Marcelo A. Queiroz
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - Rafael F. Nunes
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - Publio C. C. Viana
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - José Flávio G. Marin
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - Giovanni G. Cerri
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| | - Carlos A. Buchpiguel
- From the Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, CEP 01308-060, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (M.A.Q., P.C.C.V., J.F.G.M., G.G.C., C.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dinis Fernandes C, van Houdt PJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Walraven I, Keesman R, Smolic M, Ghobadi G, van der Poel HG, Schoots IG, Pos FJ, van der Heide UA. Quantitative 3T multiparametric MRI of benign and malignant prostatic tissue in patients with and without local recurrent prostate cancer after external-beam radiation therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 50:269-278. [PMID: 30585368 PMCID: PMC6618021 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post‐radiotherapy locally recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients are candidates for focal salvage treatment. Multiparametric MRI (mp‐MRI) is attractive for tumor localization. However, radiotherapy‐induced tissue changes complicate image interpretation. To develop focal salvage strategies, accurate tumor localization and distinction from benign tissue is necessary. Purpose To quantitatively characterize radio‐recurrent tumor and benign radiation‐induced changes using mp‐MRI, and investigate which sequences optimize the distinction between tumor and benign surroundings. Study Type Prospective case–control. Subjects Thirty‐three patients with biochemical failure after external‐beam radiotherapy (cases), 35 patients without post‐radiotherapy recurrent disease (controls), and 13 patients with primary PCa (untreated). Field Strength/Sequences 3T; quantitative mp‐MRI: T2‐mapping, ADC, and Ktrans and kep maps. Assessment Quantitative image‐analysis of prostatic regions, within and between cases, controls, and untreated patients. Statistical Tests Within‐groups: nonparametric Friedman analysis of variance with post‐hoc Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests; between‐groups: Mann–Whitney tests. All with Bonferroni corrections. Generalized linear mixed modeling to ascertain the contribution of each map and location to tumor likelihood. Results Benign imaging values were comparable between cases and controls (P = 0.15 for ADC in the central gland up to 0.91 for kep in the peripheral zone), both with similarly high peri‐urethral Ktrans and kep values (min−1) (median [range]: Ktrans = 0.22 [0.14–0.43] and 0.22 [0.14–0.36], P = 0.60, kep = 0.43 [0.24–0.57] and 0.48 [0.32–0.67], P = 0.05). After radiotherapy, benign central gland values were significantly decreased for all maps (P ≤ 0.001) as well as T2, Ktrans, and kep of benign peripheral zone (all with P ≤ 0.002). All imaging maps distinguished recurrent tumor from benign peripheral zone, but only ADC, Ktrans, and kep were able to distinguish it from benign central gland. Recurrent tumor and peri‐urethral Ktrans values were not significantly different (P = 0.81), but kep values were (P < 0.001). Combining all quantitative maps and voxel location resulted in an optimal distinction between tumor and benign voxels. Data Conclusion Mp‐MRI can distinguish recurrent tumor from benign tissue. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:269–278.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milena Smolic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ghazaleh Ghobadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barbosa FDG, Queiroz MA, Nunes RF, Marin JFG, Buchpiguel CA, Cerri GG. Clinical perspectives of PSMA PET/MRI for prostate cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2018; 73:e586s. [PMID: 30281701 PMCID: PMC6142859 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e586s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer imaging has become an important diagnostic modality for tumor evaluation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied, and the results are robust and promising. The advent of the PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has added morphofunctional information from the standard of reference MRI to highly accurate molecular information from PET. Different PSMA ligands have been used for this purpose including 68gallium and 18fluorine-labeled PET probes, which have particular features including spatial resolution, imaging quality and tracer biodistribution. The use of PSMA PET imaging is well established for evaluating biochemical recurrence, even at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, but has also shown interesting applications for tumor detection, primary staging, assessment of therapeutic responses and treatment planning. This review will outline the potential role of PSMA PET/MRI for the clinical assessment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe de Galiza Barbosa
- Departamento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- *Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Marcelo Araújo Queiroz
- Departamento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | | | - José Flávio Gomes Marin
- Departamento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
- Departamento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Giovanni Guido Cerri
- Departamento de Radiologia, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hedgire S, Kilcoyne A, Tonyushkin A, Mao Y, Uyeda JW, Gervais DA, Harisinghani MG. Effect of androgen deprivation and radiation therapy on MRI fiber tractography in prostate cancer: can we assess treatment response on imaging? Br J Radiol 2018; 92:20170170. [PMID: 30209952 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate quantitative changes in Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Tractography in prostate cancer following androgen deprivation and radiation therapy. METHODS 22 patients with elevated PSA and biopsy proven prostate carcinoma who underwent MRI of the prostate at 1.5 T with an endorectal coil were included. Group A) was the study group (n = 11), participants who underwent androgen deprivation and/or radiation therapy and group B) were Gleason-matched control group (n = 11) participants who did not undergo such therapy. Diffusion weighted images were used to generate three-dimensional (3D) map of fiber tracts from DTI. 3D regions of interest (ROI) were drawn over the tumor and healthy prostatic parenchyma in both groups to record tract number and tract density. Tumor region and normal parenchymal tract densities within each group were compared. RESULTS Mean tract density in the tumor region and normal parenchyma was 2.3 and 3.3 in study group (tract numbers: 116.6 and 170.2 respectively) and 1.6 and 2.7 in the control group respectively (tract numbers: 252.5 and 346.3 respectively). The difference between these values was statistically significant for the control group (p = 0.0018) but not for the study group (p = 0.11). The difference between the tract numbers of tumor and normal parenchyma appears to narrow following therapy. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated utility in using tractography as a biomarker in prostate cancer patients post treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Quantitative DTI fiber tractography is a promising imaging biomarker to quantitatively assess treatment response in the setting of post-androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Hedgire
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexey Tonyushkin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Physics Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yun Mao
- Department of Radiology, The first affiliated hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jennifer W Uyeda
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Debra A Gervais
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mukesh G Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Riola-Parada C, Carreras-Delgado J, Pérez-Dueñas V, Garcerant-Tafur M, García-Cañamaque L. 18F-choline PET/MR in suspected recurrence of prostate cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
28
|
|
29
|
Won SY, Kim HS, Park SY. Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients. Ultrasonography 2018; 38:149-155. [PMID: 30153726 PMCID: PMC6443595 DOI: 10.14366/usg.18028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to externally validate the diagnostic usefulness of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)-guided biopsy for pelvic masses, and to analyze the diagnostic performance of these methods in oncologic patients. Methods A consecutive series of 30 patients who underwent TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy for pelvic masses was included. Tissue samples were obtained using an 18-gauge core biopsy needle under local anesthesia for lesions detected on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. We analyzed the rates of diagnostic biopsies upon pathologic examination and biopsy-related major complications requiring treatment. In diagnostic biopsy cases, the performance was also investigated for all patients and patients with underlying malignancy. Results The diagnostic biopsy rate was 93.3% (28 of 30) for all patients and 95.0% (19 of 20) for oncologic patients. No patients had major complications. In diagnostic biopsies, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy for identifying malignancy were 100% (17 of 17), 72.7% (8 of 11), 85.0% (17 of 20), 100% (8 of 8), and 89.3% (25 of 28) for all patients and 100% (14 of 14), 60.0% (3 of 5), 87.5% (14 of 16), 100% (3 of 3), and 89.5% (17 of 19) for oncologic patients, respectively. Conclusion This study externally validated the feasibility and safety of TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy. In addition, these techniques appear to enable accurate pathologic diagnoses of pelvic masses in oncologic patients to be made safely and relatively noninvasively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Yeon Won
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Yoon Park
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ward RD, Purysko AS. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Recurrence. Semin Roentgenol 2018; 53:234-246. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
31
|
Riola-Parada C, Carreras-Delgado JL, Pérez-Dueñas V, Garcerant-Tafur M, García-Cañamaque L. 18F-choline PET/MRI in suspected recurrence of prostate carcinoma. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018; 37:296-301. [PMID: 29793842 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the usefulness of simultaneous 18F-choline PET/MRI in the suspicion of prostate cancer recurrence and to relate 18F-choline PET/MRI detection rate with analytical and pathological variables. MATERIAL AND METHODS 27 patients with prostate cancer who received local therapy as primary treatment underwent a 18F-choline PET/MRI due to suspicion of recurrence (persistently rising serum PSA level). 18F-choline PET/MRI findings were validated by anatomopathological analysis, other imaging tests or by biochemical response to oncological treatment. RESULTS 18F-choline PET/MRI detected disease in 15 of 27 patients (detection rate 55.56%). 4 (15%) presented exclusively local recurrence, 5 (18%) lymph node metastases and 7 (26%) bone metastases. Mean PSA (PSAmed) at study time was 2.94ng/mL (range 0.18-10ng/mL). PSAmed in patients with positive PET/MRI was 3.70ng/mL (range 0.24-10ng/mL), higher than in patients with negative PET/MRI, PSAmed 1.97ng/mL (range 0.18-4.38ng/mL), although without statistically significant differences. Gleason score at diagnosis in patients with a positive study was 7.33 (range 6-9) and in patients with a negative study was 7 (range 6-9), without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION 18F-choline PET/MRI detection rate was considerable despite the relatively low PSA values in our sample. The influence of Gleason score and PSA level on 18F-choline PET/MRI detection rate was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Riola-Parada
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Móstoles, Madrid, España.
| | - J L Carreras-Delgado
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - V Pérez-Dueñas
- Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Móstoles, Madrid, España
| | - M Garcerant-Tafur
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Móstoles, Madrid, España
| | - L García-Cañamaque
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, Móstoles, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shiradkar R, Ghose S, Jambor I, Taimen P, Ettala O, Purysko AS, Madabhushi A. Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 48:1626-1636. [PMID: 29734484 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics or computer-extracted texture features derived from MRI have been shown to help quantitatively characterize prostate cancer (PCa). Radiomics have not been explored depth in the context of predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa. PURPOSE To identify a set of radiomic features derived from pretreatment biparametric MRI (bpMRI) that may be predictive of PCa BCR. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS In all, 120 PCa patients from two institutions, I1 and I2 , partitioned into training set D1 (N = 70) from I1 and independent validation set D2 (N = 50) from I2 . All patients were followed for ≥3 years. SEQUENCE 3T, T2 -weighted (T2 WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from diffusion-weighted sequences. ASSESSMENT PCa regions of interest (ROIs) on T2 WI were annotated by two experienced radiologists. Radiomic features from bpMRI (T2 WI and ADC maps) were extracted from the ROIs. A machine-learning classifier (CBCR ) was trained with the best discriminating set of radiomic features to predict BCR (pBCR ). STATISTICAL TESTS Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Differences in BCR-free survival at 3 years using pBCR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Gleason Score (GS), PSA, and PIRADS-v2. RESULTS Distribution statistics of co-occurrence of local anisotropic gradient orientation (CoLlAGe) and Haralick features from T2 WI and ADC were associated with BCR (P < 0.05) on D1 . CBCR predictions resulted in a mean AUC = 0.84 on D1 and AUC = 0.73 on D2 . A significant difference in BCR-free survival between the predicted classes (BCR + and BCR-) was observed (P = 0.02) on D2 compared to those obtained from GS (P = 0.8), PSA (P = 0.93) and PIRADS-v2 (P = 0.23). DATA CONCLUSION Radiomic features from pretreatment bpMRI can be predictive of PCa BCR after therapy and may help identify men who would benefit from adjuvant therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1626-1636.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Shiradkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Soumya Ghose
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Finland.,Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Section of Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Radiology Department, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lotte R, Lafourcade A, Mozer P, Conort P, Barret E, Comperat E, Ezziane M, de Guibert PHJ, Tavolaro S, Belin L, Boudghene F, Lucidarme O, Renard-Penna R. Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed? Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3760-3769. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5352-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
34
|
Pesapane F, Patella F, Fumarola EM, Zanchetta E, Floridi C, Carrafiello G, Standaert C. The prostate cancer focal therapy. Gland Surg 2018; 7:89-102. [PMID: 29770305 PMCID: PMC5938267 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Despite prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading form of non-cutaneous cancer in men, most patients with PCa die with disease rather than of the disease. Therefore, the risk of overtreatment should be considered by clinicians who have to distinguish between patients with high risk PCa (who would benefit from radical treatment) and patients who may be managed more conservatively, such as through active surveillance or emerging focal therapy (FT). The aim of FT is to eradicate clinically significant disease while protecting key genito-urinary structures and function from injury. While effectiveness studies comparing FT with conventional care options are still lacking, the rationale supporting FT relies on evidence-based advances such as the understanding of the index lesion's central role in the natural history of the PCa and the improvement of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection and risk stratification of PCa. In this literature review, we want to highlight the rationale for FT in PCa management and the current evidence on patient eligibility. Furthermore, we summarize the best imaging modalities to localize the target lesion, describe the current FT techniques in PCa, provide an update on their oncological outcomes and highlight trends for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pesapane
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Patella
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Fumarola
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Zanchetta
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Floridi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Department of Health Sciences, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chloë Standaert
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Patel P, Mathew MS, Trilisky I, Oto A. Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2018; 38:437-449. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pritesh Patel
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Melvy S. Mathew
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Igor Trilisky
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Aytekin Oto
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akin-Akintayo O, Tade F, Mittal P, Moreno C, Nieh PT, Rossi P, Patil D, Halkar R, Fei B, Master V, Jani AB, Kitajima H, Osunkoya AO, Ormenisan-Gherasim C, Goodman MM, Schuster DM. Prospective evaluation of fluciclovine ( 18F) PET-CT and MRI in detection of recurrent prostate cancer in non-prostatectomy patients. Eur J Radiol 2018; 102:1-8. [PMID: 29685521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Revised: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the disease detection rate, diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of fluciclovine (18F) PET-CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMR) in recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS Twenty-four patients with biochemical failure after non-prostatectomy definitive therapy, 16/24 of whom had undergone brachytherapy, underwent fluciclovine PET-CT and mpMR with interpretation by expert readers blinded to patient history, PSA and other imaging results. Reference standard was established via a multidisciplinary truth panel utilizing histology and clinical follow-up (22.9 ± 10.5 months) and emphasizing biochemical control. The truth panel was blinded to investigative imaging results. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement (kappa) for the prostate and extraprostatic regions were calculated for each of 2 readers for PET-CT (P1 and P2) and 2 different readers for mpMR (M1 and M2). RESULTS On a whole body basis, the detection rate for fluciclovine PET-CT was 94.7% (both readers), while it ranged from 31.6-36.8% for mpMR. Kappa for fluciclovine PET-CT was 0.90 in the prostate and 1.0 in the extraprostatic regions. For mpMR, kappa was 0.25 and 0.74, respectively. In the prostate, 22/24 patients met the reference standard with 13 malignant and 9 benign results. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 100.0%, 11.1% and 61.9%, respectively for both PET readers. For mpMR readers, values ranged from 15.4-38.5% for sensitivity, 55.6-77.8% for specificity and 50.0-55.6% for PPV. For extraprostatic disease determination, 18/24 patients met the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 87.5%, 90.0% and 87.5%, respectively, for fluciclovine PET-CT, while for mpMR, sensitivity ranged from 50 to 75%, specificity 70-80% and PPV 57-75%. CONCLUSION The disease detection rate for fluciclovine PET-CT in non-prostatectomy patients with biochemical failure was 94.7% versus 31.6-36.8% for mpMR. For extraprostatic disease detection, fluciclovine PET-CT had overall better diagnostic performance than mpMR. For the treated prostate, fluciclovine PET-CT had high sensitivity though low specificity for disease detection, while mpMR had higher specificity, though low sensitivity. Interobserver agreement was also higher with fluciclovine PET-CT compared with mpMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Funmilayo Tade
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Pardeep Mittal
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Courtney Moreno
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Peter T Nieh
- Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Peter Rossi
- Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Raghuveer Halkar
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Baowei Fei
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Viraj Master
- Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Hiroumi Kitajima
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Claudia Ormenisan-Gherasim
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mark M Goodman
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - David M Schuster
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Prostate multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) plays an important role in local evaluation after treatment of prostate cancer. After radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and focal therapy, mpMRI can be used to visualize normal post-treatment changes and to diagnose locally recurrent disease. An understanding of the various treatments and expected changes is essential for complete and accurate post-treatment mpMRI interpretation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Sandgren K, Westerlinck P, Jonsson JH, Blomqvist L, Thellenberg Karlsson C, Nyholm T, Dirix P. Imaging for the Detection of Locoregional Recurrences in Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy-A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 5:550-560. [PMID: 29133278 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Local and regional recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) can be treated using salvage radiotherapy (SRT). If the recurrence can be delineated on diagnostic imaging, this could allow for increasingly individualized SRT. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aimed at evaluating the evidence regarding the usefulness of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying local and regional recurrences, with the aim to further individualize the SRT treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic PubMed/Medline search was conducted in December 2015. Studies included were imaging studies of post-RP patients focusing on local and/or regional recurrence where sensitivity and specificity of MRI or PET were the primary end points. Only studies using biopsy, other histological analysis, and/or treatment follow-up as reference standard were included. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to score the study quality. Twenty-five articles were deemed of sufficient quality and included in the review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS [11C]Acetate had the highest pooled sensitivity (92%), while [11C]choline and [18F]choline had pooled sensitivities of 71% and 84%, respectively. The PET tracer with highest pooled specificity was [11C]choline (86%). Regarding MRI, MR spectroscopy combined with dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI showed the highest pooled sensitivity (89%). High pooled sensitivities were also seen using multiparametric MRI (84%), diffusion-weighted MRI combined with T2-weigthed (T2w) imaging (82%), and DCE MRI combined with T2w imaging (82%). These also showed high pooled specificities (85%, 89%, and 92%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Both MRI and PET have adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of prostate cancer recurrences post-RP. Multiparametric MRI, using diffusion-weighted and/or DCE imaging, and the choline-labeled tracers showed high pooled sensitivity and specificity, although their ranges were broad. PATIENT SUMMARY After reviewing imaging studies of recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy, we concluded that choline positron emission tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can be proposed as the current standard, with high sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philippe Westerlinck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | | | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tufve Nyholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Medical Radiation Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Focal Ablation of Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: Candidate Selection, Treatment Guidance, and Assessment of Outcome. Urol Clin North Am 2017; 44:575-585. [PMID: 29107274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer lesions smaller than 0.5 m3, or Gleason pattern 3, are likely clinically insignificant. Clinically significant disease is often limited to a single index lesion. Focal ablation targets this index lesion, maintains oncological control, and minimizes complications by preserving healthy prostate tissue. Template mapping biopsy or multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsies are used to identify appropriate index lesions. Multiple energy modalities have been tested, including high-intensity frequency ultrasound, cryoablation, laser ablation, photodynamic therapy, focal brachytherapy, radiofrequency ablation, irreversible electroporation. Outcome is assessed by biopsy of the target area, triggered by prostate-specific antigen measurements or MRI imaging, or performed per protocol at 12 months.
Collapse
|
40
|
Prostate cancer post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: CT vs MRI for vesico-urethral anastomosis target delineation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:113-117. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
41
|
Eiber M, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Maurer T, Schwaiger M, Holzapfel K, Beer AJ. Prospective head-to-head comparison of 11C-choline-PET/MR and 11C-choline-PET/CT for restaging of biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:2179-2188. [PMID: 28803358 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3797-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whole-body integrated 11C-choline PET/MR might provide advantages compared to 11C-choline PET/CT for restaging of prostate cancer (PC) due to the high soft-tissue contrast and the use of multiparametric MRI, especially for detection of local recurrence and bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-four patients with recurrent PC underwent a single-injection/dual-imaging protocol with contrast-enhanced PET/CT followed by fully diagnostic PET/MR. Imaging datasets were read separately by two reader teams (team 1 and 2) assessing the presence of local recurrence, lymph node and bone metastases in predefined regions using a five-point scale. Detection rates were calculated. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT vs. PET/MR was compared using ROC analysis. Inter-observer and inter-modality variability, radiation exposure, and mean imaging time were evaluated. Clinical follow-up, imaging, and/or histopathology served as standard of reference (SOR). RESULTS Seventy-five patients qualified for the final image analysis. A total of 188 regions were regarded as positive: local recurrence in 37 patients, 87 regions with lymph node metastases, and 64 regions with bone metastases. Mean detection rate between both readers teams for PET/MR was 84.7% compared to 77.3% for PET/CT (p > 0.05). Local recurrence was identified significantly more often in PET/MR compared to PET/CT by team 1. Lymph node and bone metastases were identified significantly more often in PET/CT compared to PET/MR by both teams. However, this difference was not present in the subgroup of patients with PSA values ≤2 ng/ml. Inter-modality and inter-observer agreement (K > 0.6) was moderate to substantial for nearly all categories. Mean reduction of radiation exposure for PET/MR compared to PET/CT was 79.7% (range, 72.6-86.2%). Mean imaging time for PET/CT was substantially lower (18.4 ± 0.7 min) compared to PET/MR (50.4 ± 7.9 min). CONCLUSIONS 11C-choline PET/MR is a robust imaging modality for restaging biochemical recurrent PC and interpretations between different readers are consistent. It provides a higher diagnostic value for detecting local recurrence compared to PET/CT with the advantage of substantial dose reduction. Drawbacks of PET/MR are a substantially longer imaging time and a slight inferiority in detecting bone and lymph node metastases in patients with PSA values >2 ng/ml. Thus, we suggest the use of 11C-choline PET/MR especially for patients with low (≤2 ng/ml) PSA values, whereas PET/CT is preferable in the subgroup with higher PSA values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Michael Souvatzoglou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Konstantin Holzapfel
- Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ambros J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Catalá V, Vilanova J, Gaya J, Algaba F, Martí T. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer: What's new? RADIOLOGIA 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
43
|
Resonancia magnética multiparamétrica y cáncer de próstata: ¿qué hay de nuevo? RADIOLOGIA 2017; 59:196-208. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2016.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
44
|
Starobinets O, Kurhanewicz J, Noworolski SM. Improved multiparametric MRI discrimination between low-risk prostate cancer and benign tissues in a small cohort of 5α-reductase inhibitor treated individuals as compared with an untreated cohort. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2017; 30:10.1002/nbm.3696. [PMID: 28164396 PMCID: PMC5522750 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) affect the discrimination between low-grade prostate cancer and benign tissues on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Twenty men with biopsy-proven Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer and 3 T mpMRI were studied. Ten patients (Tx) had been receiving 5-ARIs for at least a year at scan time. Ten untreated patients (Un) were matched to the treated cohort. For each subject two regions of interest representing cancerous and benign tissues were drawn within the peripheral zone of each prostate, MR measures evaluated, and cancer contrast versus benign (contrast = (MRTumor - MRHealthy )/MRHealthy ) calculated. Decreased cancer contrast was noted on T2 -weighted images: 0.4 (Un) versus 0.3 (Tx). However, for functional MR measures, a better separation of cancerous and benign tissues was observed in the treated group. Cancer contrast on high-b diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was 0.61 (Un) versus 0.99 (Tx). Logistic regression analysis yielded higher AUC (area under the curve) values for distinguishing cancerous from benign regions in treated subjects on high-b DWI (0.71 (Un), 0.94 (Tx)), maximal enhancement slope (0.95 (Un), 1 (Tx)), peak enhancement (0.84 (Un), 0.93 (Tx)), washout slope (0.78 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)), Ktrans (0.9 (Un), 1 (Tx)), and combined measures (0.86 (Un), 0.99 (Tx)). Coefficients of variation for MR measures were lower in benign and cancerous tissues in the treated group compared with the untreated group. This study's results suggest an increase in homogeneity of benign and malignant peripheral zone prostatic tissues with 5-ARI exposure, observed as reduced variability of MR measures after treatment. Cancer discrimination was lower with T2 -weighted imaging, but was higher with functional MR measures in a 5-ARI-treated cohort compared with controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Starobinets
- Graduate Group in Bioengineering, UCSF and UC Berkeley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF
| | - John Kurhanewicz
- Graduate Group in Bioengineering, UCSF and UC Berkeley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF
| | - Susan M Noworolski
- Graduate Group in Bioengineering, UCSF and UC Berkeley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
There is growing consensus that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an effective modality in the detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The emergence of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focal therapies, such as cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and laser ablation, have made the use of mpMRI even more important, as the normal anatomy is inevitably altered and the detection of recurrence is made more difficult. The aim of this article is to review the utility of mpMRI in detecting recurrent prostate cancer in patients following radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and focal therapy and to discuss expected post-treatment mpMRI findings, the varied appearance of recurrent tumors, and their mimics.
Collapse
|
46
|
García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Padhani AR, Oleaga L, Vilanova JC, Luna A, Cobas Gómez JC. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in oncology: the fingerprints of cancer? Diagn Interv Radiol 2017; 22:75-89. [PMID: 26712681 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2015.15009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Abnormal metabolism is a key tumor hallmark. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) allows measurement of metabolite concentration that can be utilized to characterize tumor metabolic changes. 1H-MRS measurements of specific metabolites have been implemented in the clinic. This article performs a systematic review of image acquisition and interpretation of 1H-MRS for cancer evaluation, evaluates its strengths and limitations, and correlates metabolite peaks at 1H-MRS with diagnostic and prognostic parameters of cancer in different tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto García-Figueiras
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Feng Z, Min X, Margolis DJA, Duan C, Chen Y, Sah VK, Chaudhary N, Li B, Ke Z, Zhang P, Wang L. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172127. [PMID: 28199367 PMCID: PMC5310778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0-4500 s/mm2) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3200, and 0-4500 s/mm2, grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, Dapp, and Kapp were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and Kapp in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than Kapp (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm2) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyan Feng
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiangde Min
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Daniel J. A. Margolis
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Caohui Duan
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuping Chen
- Centers for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Vivek Kumar Sah
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Nabin Chaudhary
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Basen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zan Ke
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Peipei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Oldan JD, Shah SN, Rose TL. Applications of PET/MR Imaging in Urogynecologic and Genitourinary Cancers. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2017; 25:335-350. [PMID: 28390533 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomograph (PET)-magnetic resonance (MR) is a new modality combining PET and MR. In gynecologic cancers it can be used for staging of cervical and endometrial cancer, planning of radiation therapy in cervical cancer, assessing response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, and detection of recurrence in most gynecologic cancers. It is being explored for prostate cancer and other genitourinary cancers, but is still in experimental stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Oldan
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chairman's Office, 2006 Old Clinic, CB# 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Shetal N Shah
- Abdominal Imaging Section and Nuclear Medicine Department, Imaging Institute and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Main Campus, Mail Code JB3, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Tracy Lynn Rose
- Hematology-Oncology, N.C. Cancer Hospital, 101 Manning Drive, Second Floor, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rosenkrantz AB, Khasgiwala A, Doshi AM, Ream JM, Taneja SS, Lepor H. Detection of prostate cancer local recurrence following radical prostatectomy: assessment using a continuously acquired radial golden-angle compressed sensing acquisition. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:290-297. [PMID: 27576605 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare image quality and diagnostic performance for detecting local recurrence (LR) of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) between standard dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a high spatiotemporal resolution, continuously acquired Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel acquisition employing compressed sensing reconstruction ("GRASP"). METHODS A search was conducted for prostate MRI examinations performed in patients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL after RP in whom follow-up evaluation allowed classification as positive (≥50% PSA reduction after pelvic radiation or positive biopsy) or negative (<50% PSA reduction after pelvic radiation; spontaneous PSA normalization) for LR, yielding 13 patients with standard DCE (11 LR+) and 12 with GRASP (10 LR+). Standard DCE had voxel size 3.0 × 1.9 × 1.9 mm and temporal resolution 5.5 s. GRASP had voxel size 1.0 × 1.1 × 1.1 cm and was retrospectively reconstructed at 2.3 s resolution. Two radiologists evaluated DCE sequences for image quality measures (1-5 scale) and the presence of LR. RESULTS GRASP achieved higher scores than standard DCE from both readers (p < 0.001-0.136) for anatomic clarity (R1: 4.4 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.67 R2: 4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.6), sharpness (3.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 0.7; 4.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5), confidence in interpretation (3.8 ± 0.8 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9; 3.8 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 1.2), and conspicuity of detected lesions (4.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 1.1; 4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 1.0). For detecting LR, GRASP also achieved higher sensitivity (70% vs. 36%; 80% vs. 45%), specificity (R1 and R2: 100% vs. 50%), and accuracy (75% vs. 38%; 83% vs. 46%) for both readers. CONCLUSION Although requiring larger studies, high spatiotemporal resolution GRASP achieved substantially better image quality and diagnostic performance than standard DCE for detecting LR in patients with elevated PSA after prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Rosenkrantz
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA.
| | - Anunita Khasgiwala
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA
| | - Ankur M Doshi
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA
| | - Justin M Ream
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urologic Oncology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA
| | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urologic Oncology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Avenue, Third Floor, New York, 10016, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McCammack KC, Raman SS, Margolis DJA. Imaging of local recurrence in prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2401-2415. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after therapy with curative intent currently depends primarily on biochemical serum analyses. When recurrence is suspected, further treatment decisions rely heavily on the confirmation of disease presence and determination of its extent. This is complicated by the fact that benign conditions can mimic biochemical recurrence, and serum studies do not reliably discriminate between local and distant recurrence. This review discusses the contemporary imaging paradigm for the evaluation of local PCa recurrence. The multidisciplinary implications for urologists, radiation oncologists and radiologists are examined. Emerging techniques and future directions of PCa imaging research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McCammack
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Daniel JA Margolis
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|