Angiopoietin-2-Dependent Spatial Vascular Destabilization Promotes T-cell Exclusion and Limits Immunotherapy in Melanoma

Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab for Untreated Melanoma Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy enhances PD-1 inhibitor activity in preclinical models and has been used to treat perilesional cerebral edema and radiation necrosis.

METHODS

We conducted a two-institution phase II trial of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab in patients with untreated melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02681549). Patients were anti-PD-(L)-1-naïve, and had ≥one asymptomatic, nonhemorrhagic 5-20 mm MBM, not requiring immediate local therapy or steroids.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received four doses of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab every 3 weeks followed by up to 2 years of pembrolizumab. The brain metastasis response rate (primary end point) was 54.1% (95% CI, 36.9 to 70.5). The extracranial response rate was 56.3% (95% CI, 37.7 to 73.6). Median intracranial progression-free survival was 2.2 years (95% CI, 0.41 to not reached [NR]). Median overall survival (OS) was 4.3 years (95% CI, 1.6 to NR). Four-year OS rate was 51.6%. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event rates from bevacizumab and pembrolizumab were 10.8% and 18.9%, respectively. Higher pretreatment vessel density in metastatic tumors and smaller on-therapy increases in circulating angiopoietin-2 were associated with response.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab with bevacizumab was well tolerated and demonstrated substantial activity in patients with untreated MBM with promising OS, justifying further evaluation of this regimen.

Crosstalk between GLTSCR1-deficient endothelial cells and tumour cells promotes colorectal cancer development by activating the Notch pathway

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) typically reside in perivascular niches, but whether endothelial cells of blood vessels influence the stemness of cancer cells remains poorly understood. This study revealed that endothelial cell-specific GLTSCR1 deletion promotes colorectal cancer (CRC) tumorigenesis and metastasis by increasing cancer cell stemness. Mechanistically, knocking down GLTSCR1 induces the transformation of endothelial cells into tip cells by regulating the expression of Neuropilin-1 (NRP1), thereby increasing the direct contact and interaction between endothelial cells and tumour cells. In addition, GLTSCR1 inhibits JAG1 transcription by competing with acetylated p65(Lys-310) to bind to the BRD4 interaction site. Therefore, GLTSCR1 deficiency increases JAG1 expression in endothelial cells. Subsequently, increased JAG1 levels on tip cell membranes bind to Notch on CRC cell membranes, activating the Notch signalling pathway in tumour cells and increasing CRC cell stemness. Taken together, our findings highlight the roles of endothelial cells in CRC development.

Harnessing the tumor microenvironment: targeted cancer therapies through modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is integral to cancer progression, impacting metastasis and treatment response. It consists of diverse cell types, extracellular matrix components, and signaling molecules that interact to promote tumor growth and therapeutic resistance. Elucidating the intricate interactions between cancer cells and the TME is crucial in understanding cancer progression and therapeutic challenges. A critical process induced by TME signaling is the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), wherein epithelial cells acquire mesenchymal traits, which enhance their motility and invasiveness and promote metastasis and cancer progression. By targeting various components of the TME, novel investigational strategies aim to disrupt the TME's contribution to the EMT, thereby improving treatment efficacy, addressing therapeutic resistance, and offering a nuanced approach to cancer therapy. This review scrutinizes the key players in the TME and the TME's contribution to the EMT, emphasizing avenues to therapeutically disrupt the interactions between the various TME components. Moreover, the article discusses the TME's implications for resistance mechanisms and highlights the current therapeutic strategies toward TME modulation along with potential caveats.

Peritumoral Venous Vessels: Autobahn and Portal for T Cells to Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Melanoma brain metastasis is associated with high morbidity and mortality and remains a major clinical challenge. Despite recent successes with combination immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of affected patients, the mechanistic underpinnings of T-cell entry and response to these drugs in brain metastasis are poorly understood. Using real-time intravital microscopy, Messmer and colleagues identified peritumoral venous vessels (PVV) as critical sites for T-cell entry into brain metastases, a process accelerated by immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 on PVVs was found to be important for T-cell recruitment in preclinical models and associated with increased T-cell infiltration in human brain metastatic lesions. This study highlights PVVs as key vascular entry points for T cells into brain metastases, laying the foundation for enhancing the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies.

Identification of Angiogenesis-Related Gene Signatures and Prediction of Potential Therapeutic Targets in Ulcerative Colitis Using Integrated Bioinformatics

Objective

This study aims to clarify angiogenesis mechanisms in ulcerative colitis and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Methods

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to obtain expression profiles and clinical data for UC and healthy colon tissues. Angiogenesis-related gene sets were acquired from GeneCards. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified UC-associated hub genes. The CIBERSORT algorithm assessed immune cell infiltration. Analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were performed to determine biological mechanisms. External datasets were utilized to validate and characterize the angiogenesis-related genes in relation to biological agents. Additionally, an ulcerative colitis mouse model was constructed to verify the key genes' expression using real-time quantitative PCR. To predict potential therapeutic agents, we used the DGIdb database. Molecular docking modeled small molecule binding conformations to key gene targets.

Results

This study identified 1,247 DEGs enriched in inflammatory/immune pathways from UC and healthy colon samples. WGCNA indicated the black and light cyan modules were most relevant. Intersecting these with 89 angiogenesis genes revealed 5 UC-associated hub genes (pdgfrb, vegfc, angpt2, tnc, hgf). Validation via ROC analysis, differential expression, and a mouse model confirmed upregulation, supporting their potential as UC diagnostic biomarkers. Bioinformatics approaches like protein-protein interaction, enrichment analysis, and GSEA revealed involvement in PDGFR and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. CIBERSORT analysis of immune cell infiltration showed positive correlations between the key genes and various immune cells, especially neutrophils, highlighting angiogenesis-inflammation interplay in UC. A ceRNA network was constructed. Drug prediction and molecular docking revealed potential UC therapies like sunitinib and imatinib targeting angiogenesis.

Conclusion

This study identified and validated five angiogenesis-related genes (pdgfrb, vegfc, angpt2, tnc, hgf) that may serve as diagnostic biomarkers and drug targets for UC.

Targeting the tumour vasculature: from vessel destruction to promotion

As angiogenesis was recognized as a core hallmark of cancer growth and survival, several strategies have been implemented to target the tumour vasculature. Yet to date, attempts have rarely been so diverse, ranging from vessel growth inhibition and destruction to vessel normalization, reprogramming and vessel growth promotion. Some of these strategies, combined with standard of care, have translated into improved cancer therapies, but their successes are constrained to certain cancer types. This Review provides an overview of these vascular targeting approaches and puts them into context based on our subsequent improved understanding of the tumour vasculature as an integral part of the tumour microenvironment with which it is functionally interlinked. This new knowledge has already led to dual targeting of the vascular and immune cell compartments and sets the scene for future investigations of possible alternative approaches that consider the vascular link with other tumour microenvironment components for improved cancer therapy.

Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials

Antiangiogenic agents, generally antibodies or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors that target the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, are currently among the few combination partners clinically proven to improve the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This benefit has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials across different cancer types, some with practice-changing results; however, numerous phase III trials have also had negative results. The rationale for using antiangiogenic drugs as partners for ICIs relies primarily on blocking the multiple immunosuppressive effects of VEGF and inducing several different vascular-modulating effects that can stimulate immunity, such as vascular normalization leading to increased intratumoural blood perfusion and flow, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic effects of endothelial cells on T cells, among others. Conversely, VEGF blockade can also cause changes that suppress antitumour immunity, such as increased tumour hypoxia, and reduced intratumoural ingress of co-administered ICIs. As a result, the net clinical benefits from antiangiogenic-ICI combinations will be determined by the balance between the opposing effects of VEGF signalling and its inhibition on the antitumour immune response. In this Perspective, we summarize the results from the currently completed phase III trials evaluating antiangiogenic agent-ICI combinations. We also discuss strategies to improve the efficacy of these combinations, focusing on aspects that include the deleterious functions of VEGF-VEGFR inhibition on antitumour immunity, vessel co-option as a driver of non-angiogenic tumour growth, clinical trial design, or the rationale for drug selection, dosing and scheduling.

Milestones in tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting

Research into the mechanisms and manifestations of solid tumor vascularization was launched more than 50 years ago with the proposition and experimental demonstrations that angiogenesis is instrumental for tumor growth and was, therefore, a promising therapeutic target. The biological knowledge and therapeutic insights forthcoming have been remarkable, punctuated by new concepts, many of which were not foreseen in the early decades. This article presents a perspective on tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting but does not portray a historical timeline. Rather, we highlight eight conceptual milestones, integrating initial discoveries and recent progress and posing open questions for the future.

Status of alternative angiogenic pathways in glioblastoma resected under and after bevacizumab treatment

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) acquires resistance to bevacizumab (Bev) treatment. Bev affects angiogenic factors other than vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which are poorly understood. We investigated changes in angiogenic factors under and after Bev therapy, including angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1), angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2), placental growth factor (PLGF), fibroblast growth factor 2, and ephrin A2 (EphA2). Fifty-four GBM tissues, including 28 specimens from 14 cases as paired specimens from the same patient obtained in three settings: initial tumor resection (naïve Bev), tumors resected following Bev therapy (effective Bev), and recurrent tumors after Bev therapy (refractory Bev). Immunohistochemistry assessed their expressions in tumor vessels and its correlation with recurrent MRI patterns. PLGF expression was higher in the effective Bev group than in the naïve Bev group (p = 0.024) and remained high in the refractory Bev group. ANGPT2 and EphA2 expressions were higher in the refractory Bev group than in the naïve Bev group (p = 0.047 and 0.028, respectively). PLGF expression was higher in the refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group for paired specimens (p = 0.036). PLGF was more abundant in T2 diffuse/circumscribe patterns (p = 0.046). This is the first study to evaluate angiogenic factors other than VEGF during effective and refractory Bev therapy in patient-derived specimens.

Quantitative multiplex immunohistochemistry reveals inter-patient lymphovascular and immune heterogeneity in primary cutaneous melanoma

Introduction

Quantitative, multiplexed imaging is revealing complex spatial relationships between phenotypically diverse tumor infiltrating leukocyte populations and their prognostic implications. The underlying mechanisms and tissue structures that determine leukocyte distribution within and around tumor nests, however, remain poorly understood. While presumed players in metastatic dissemination, new preclinical data demonstrates that blood and lymphatic vessels (lymphovasculature) also dictate leukocyte trafficking within tumor microenvironments and thereby impact anti-tumor immunity. Here we interrogate these relationships in primary human cutaneous melanoma.

Methods

We established a quantitative, multiplexed imaging platform to simultaneously detect immune infiltrates and tumor-associated vessels in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded patient samples. We performed a discovery, retrospective analysis of 28 treatment-naïve, primary cutaneous melanomas.

Results

Here we find that the lymphvasculature and immune infiltrate is heterogenous across patients in treatment naïve, primary melanoma. We categorized five lymphovascular subtypes that differ by functionality and morphology and mapped their localization in and around primary tumors. Interestingly, the localization of specific vessel subtypes, but not overall vessel density, significantly associated with the presence of lymphoid aggregates, regional progression, and intratumoral T cell infiltrates.

Discussion

We describe a quantitative platform to enable simultaneous lymphovascular and immune infiltrate analysis and map their spatial relationships in primary melanoma. Our data indicate that tumor-associated vessels exist in different states and that their localization may determine potential for metastasis or immune infiltration. This platform will support future efforts to map tumor-associated lymphovascular evolution across stage, assess its prognostic value, and stratify patients for adjuvant therapy.

Disturbed endothelial cell signaling in tumor progression and therapy resistance

Growth of new blood vessels is considered requisite to cancer progression. Recent findings revealed that in addition to inducing angiogenesis, tumor-derived factors alter endothelial cell gene transcription within the tumor mass but also systemically throughout the body. This subsequently contributes to immunosuppression, altered metabolism, therapy resistance and metastasis. Clinical studies demonstrated that targeting the endothelium can increase the success rate of immunotherapy. Single-cell technologies revealed remarkable organ-specific endothelial heterogeneity that becomes altered by the presence of a tumor. In metastases, endothelial transcription differs remarkably between newly formed and co-opted vessels which may provide a basis for developing new therapies to target endothelial cells and overcome therapy resistance more effectively. This review addresses how cancers impact the endothelium to facilitate tumor progression.

Toward the clinical development of synthetic immunity to cancer

Synthetic biology (synbio) tools, such as chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), have been designed to target, activate, and improve immune cell responses to tumors. These therapies have demonstrated an ability to cure patients with blood cancers. However, there are significant challenges to designing, testing, and efficiently translating these complex cell therapies for patients who do not respond or have immune refractory solid tumors. The rapid progress of synbio tools for cell therapy, particularly for cancer immunotherapy, is encouraging but our development process should be tailored to increase translational success. Particularly, next-generation cell therapies should be rooted in basic immunology, tested in more predictive preclinical models, engineered for potency with the right balance of safety, educated by clinical findings, and multi-faceted to combat a range of suppressive mechanisms. Here, we lay out five principles for engineering future cell therapies to increase the probability of clinical impact, and in the context of these principles, we provide an overview of the current state of synbio cell therapy design for cancer. Although these principles are anchored in engineering immune cells for cancer therapy, we posit that they can help guide translational synbio research for broad impact in other disease indications with high unmet need.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus nivolumab as organ-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a phase 2 trial

Cystectomy is a standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but it is life-altering. We initiated a phase 2 study in which patients with MIBC received four cycles of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab followed by clinical restaging. Patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) could proceed without cystectomy. The co-primary objectives were to assess the cCR rate and the positive predictive value of cCR for a composite outcome: 2-year metastasis-free survival in patients forgoing immediate cystectomy or Collapse

Key Words

• phase ii trials
• translational research
• bladder cancer
• cancer immunotherapy
• chemotherapy

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Cisplatin/therapeutic use
• Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use
• Disease-Free Survival
• Gemcitabine
• Muscles
• Neoadjuvant Therapy
• Neoplasm Invasiveness
• Nivolumab/therapeutic use
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
• Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein

Collapse

Grants

• U24 CA224319 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 DK124165 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U24 CA224285 NCI NIH HHS
• T32 CA078207 NCI NIH HHS
• S10 OD030463 NIH HHS
• P30 CA196521 NCI NIH HHS
• S10 OD026880 NIH HHS
• U24 CA224316 NCI NIH HHS
• U24 CA224331 NCI NIH HHS
• R01 CA249175 NCI NIH HHS
• V Foundation for Cancer Research (V Foundation)
• Bristol-Myers Squibb (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company)
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)/Partnership for Accelerating Cancer Therapies (PACT)

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Matthew D Galsky Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Siamak Daneshmand Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sudeh Izadmehr Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova Department of Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Kevin G Chan Department of Urology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
Sara Lewis Department of Radiology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Bassam El Achkar Department of Radiology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Tanya B Dorff Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
Jeremy Paul Cetnar Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Brock O Neil Department of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Anishka D'Souza Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ronac Mamtani Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Christos Kyriakopoulos Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Tomi Jun Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA Formerly with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Mahalya Gogerly-Moragoda Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Rachel Brody Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Department of Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Hui Xie Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Kai Nie Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Geoffrey Kelly Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Amir Horowitz Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Yayoi Kinoshita Department of Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Ethan Ellis Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Yohei Nose Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Giorgio Ioannou Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Rafael Cabal Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Diane M Del Valle Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
G Kenneth Haines Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Li Wang Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Gene Dx, Stamford, CT, USA
Kent W Mouw Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Robert M Samstein Department of Radiation Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Reza Mehrazin Department of Urology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Nina Bhardwaj Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Menggang Yu Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Qianqian Zhao Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
Seunghee Kim-Schulze Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Robert Sebra Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Jun Zhu Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Gene Dx, Stamford, CT, USA
Sacha Gnjatic Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Human Immune Monitoring Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
John Sfakianos Department of Urology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Sumanta K Pal Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA

Collapse

Tumor Angiocrine Signaling: Novel Targeting Opportunity in Cancer

The vascular endothelium supplies nutrients and oxygen to different body organs and supports the progression of diseases such as cancer through angiogenesis. Pathological angiogenesis remains a challenge as most patients develop resistance to the approved anti-angiogenic therapies. Therefore, a better understanding of endothelium signaling will support the development of more effective treatments. Over the past two decades, the emerging consensus suggests that the role of endothelial cells in tumor development has gone beyond angiogenesis. Instead, endothelial cells are now considered active participants in the tumor microenvironment, secreting angiocrine factors such as cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines, which instruct their proximate microenvironments. The function of angiocrine signaling is being uncovered in different fields, such as tissue homeostasis, early development, organogenesis, organ regeneration post-injury, and tumorigenesis. In this review, we elucidate the intricate role of angiocrine signaling in cancer progression, including distant metastasis, tumor dormancy, pre-metastatic niche formation, immune evasion, and therapy resistance.

The role of angiogenic growth factors in the immune microenvironment of glioma

Angiogenic growth factors (AGFs) are a class of secreted cytokines related to angiogenesis that mainly include vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and angiopoietins (ANGs). Accumulating evidence indicates that the role of AGFs is not only limited to tumor angiogenesis but also participating in tumor progression by other mechanisms that go beyond their angiogenic role. AGFs were shown to be upregulated in the glioma microenvironment characterized by extensive angiogenesis and high immunosuppression. AGFs produced by tumor and stromal cells can exert an immunomodulatory role in the glioma microenvironment by interacting with immune cells. This review aims to sum up the interactions among AGFs, immune cells and cancer cells with a particular emphasis on glioma and tries to provide new perspectives for understanding the glioma immune microenvironment and in-depth explorations for anti-glioma therapy.