1
|
Hong JS, Kim A, Layrisse Landaeta V, Patrón R, Foglia C, Saldinger P, Chu DI, Chao SY. Uncommon Sociodemographic Factors Are Associated With Racial Disparities in Length of Stay Following Oncologic Elective Colectomy. J Surg Res 2024; 300:287-297. [PMID: 38833755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although outcome disparities by race have been identified in colorectal cancer, these patterns are challenging to explain using variables that are commonly available in databases. In a single institution serving a diverse community, length of stay (LOS) varies by race following elective oncologic colectomy. We investigated previously unexplored variables that may explain the relationship between race and LOS following elective resection of colorectal neoplasms. METHODS Retrospective, single institution cohort study from January 2015 to December 2020 for adult patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resections. Baseline demographic variables and intraoperative factors were analyzed for changes in LOS following elective colorectal resection. Additional retrospective chart review was carried out to determine household member composition and distance from home to hospital. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine which variables should be included in multivariable analyses. All analyses were conducted using SAS Academic. RESULTS Most patients (n = 383) were Asian (40%), Black (12%), or Hispanic (26%). Race and LOS were associated with age (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001 for race and LOS, respectively), American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001), enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001), household members (P = 0.009 and P = 0.002), and discharge disposition (P = 0.049 and P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, household members (P = 0.021) independently remained associated with LOS after controlling for race (P = 0.008) and discharge disposition (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Household member composition varies with LOS, suggesting that level of support at home may influence decisions regarding discharge disposition, which lead to differences in LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie S Hong
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York.
| | - Angelina Kim
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York
| | | | - Roger Patrón
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Foglia
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Pierre Saldinger
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Daniel I Chu
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Steven Y Chao
- Department of Surgery, NewYork Presbyterian - Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hussaini SMQ, Fan Q, Barrow LCJ, Yabroff KR, Pollack CE, Nogueira LM. Association of Historical Housing Discrimination and Colon Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:678-687. [PMID: 38320228 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the 1930s, the federally sponsored Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition in its assessment of areas worthy of receiving loans. Neighborhoods with large proportions of Black residents were mapped in red (ie, redlining) and flagged as hazardous for mortgage financing. Redlining created a platform for systemic disinvestment in these neighborhoods, leading to barriers in access to resources that persist today. We investigated the association between residing in areas with different HOLC ratings and receipt of quality cancer care and outcomes among individuals diagnosed with colon cancer-a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment. METHODS Individuals who resided in zip code tabulation areas in 196 cities with HOLC rating and were diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database and assigned a HOLC grade (A, best; B, still desirable; C, definitely declining; and D, hazardous and mapped in red). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated association of area-level HOLC grade and late stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method evaluated differences in time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models investigated differences in overall survival (OS). RESULTS There were 149,917 patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer with a median age of 68 years. Compared with people living in HOLC A areas, people living in HOLC D areas were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12]). In addition, people living in HOLC B, C, and D areas had 8%, 16%, and 24% higher odds of not receiving guideline-concordant care, including lower receipt of surgery, evaluation of ≥12 lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. People residing in HOLC B, C, or D areas also experienced delays in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. People residing in HOLC C (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.13]) and D (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.18]) areas had worse OS, including 13% and 20% excess risk of death for individuals diagnosed with early- and 6% and 8% for late-stage disease for HOLC C and D, respectively. CONCLUSION Historical housing discrimination is associated with worse contemporary access to colon cancer care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Qasim Hussaini
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Qinjin Fan
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Lauren C J Barrow
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Craig E Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| | - Leticia M Nogueira
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robertson DJ, Rex DK, Ciani O, Drummond MF. Colonoscopy vs the Fecal Immunochemical Test: Which is Best? Gastroenterology 2024; 166:758-771. [PMID: 38342196 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Although there is no debate around the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in reducing disease burden, there remains a question regarding the most effective and cost-effective screening modality. Current United States guidelines present a panel of options that include the 2 most commonly used modalities, colonoscopy and stool testing with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Large-scale comparative effectiveness trials comparing colonoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer outcomes are underway, but results are not yet available. This review will separately state the "best case" for FIT and colonoscopy as the screening tool of first choice. In addition, the review will examine these modalities from a health economics perspective to provide the reader further context about the relative advantages of these commonly used tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas J Robertson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
White M, Israilevich R, Lam S, McCarthy M, Mico V, Chipkin B, Abrams E, Moore K, Kastenberg D. Timely Completion of Direct Access Colonoscopy Is Noninferior to Office Scheduled for Screening and Surveillance. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00287. [PMID: 38630852 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000002000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
GOALS We aimed to evaluate whether direct access colonoscopy (DAC) is noninferior to office-scheduled colonoscopy (OSC) for achieving successful colonoscopy. BACKGROUND DAC may improve access to colonoscopy. We developed an algorithm assessing eligibility, risk for inadequate preparation, and need for nursing/navigator assistance. STUDY This was a retrospective, single-center study of DAC and OSC patients from June 5, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Patients were 45 to 75 years old with an indication of screening or surveillance. A successful colonoscopy met 3 criteria: complete colonoscopy (cecum, anastomosis, or ileum), adequate preparation (Boston Score ≥2/segment), and performed <90 days from initial patient contact. Unsuccessful colonoscopy did not meet ≥1 criteria. Secondary end points included days to successful colonoscopy, preparation quality, polyp detection, and 10-year recall rate. Noninferiority against risk ratio value of 0.85 was tested using 1-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS A total of 1823 DAC and 828 OSC patients were eligible. DAC patients were younger, with a greater proportion of black patients and screening indications. For the outcome of successful colonoscopy, DAC was noninferior to OSC (DAC vs. OSC: 62.7% vs. 57.1%, RR 1.16, 95% LCL 1.09, P=0.001). For DAC, days to colonoscopy were fewer, and likelihood of 10-year recall after negative screening greater. Boston Score and polyp detection were similar for groups. Black patients were less likely to achieve successful colonoscopy; otherwise, groups were similar. For unsuccessful colonoscopies, proportionally more DAC patients canceled or no-showed while more OSC patients scheduled >90 days. DAC remained noninferior to OSC at 180 days. CONCLUSIONS DAC was noninferior to OSC for achieving successful colonoscopy, comparing similarly in quality and efficiency outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary White
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Rachel Israilevich
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sophia Lam
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York City, NY
| | - Michael McCarthy
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vasil Mico
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston
| | - Benjamin Chipkin
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Eric Abrams
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA
| | - Kelly Moore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Kastenberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rawl SM, Perkins SM, Tong Y, Katz ML, Carter-Bawa L, Imperiale TF, Schwartz PH, Fatima H, Krier C, Tharp K, Shedd-Steele R, Magnarella M, Malloy C, Haunert L, Gebregziabher N, Paskett ED, Champion V. Patient Navigation Plus Tailored Digital Video Disc Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Low-Income and Minority Patients Who Did Not Attend a Scheduled Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial. Ann Behav Med 2024; 58:314-327. [PMID: 38470961 PMCID: PMC11008590 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 50% of people scheduled for screening colonoscopy do not complete this test and no studies have focused on minority and low-income populations. Interventions are needed to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening knowledge, reduce barriers, and provide alternative screening options. Patient navigation (PN) and tailored interventions increase CRC screening uptake, however there is limited information comparing their effectiveness or the effect of combining them. PURPOSE Compare the effectiveness of two interventions to increase CRC screening among minority and low-income individuals who did not attend their screening colonoscopy appointment-a mailed tailored digital video disc (DVD) alone versus the mailed DVD plus telephone-based PN compared to usual care. METHODS Patients (n = 371) aged 45-75 years at average risk for CRC who did not attend a screening colonoscopy appointment were enrolled and were randomized to: (i) a mailed tailored DVD; (ii) the mailed DVD plus phone-based PN; or (iii) usual care. CRC screening outcomes were from electronic medical records at 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to study intervention effects. RESULTS Participants randomized to tailored DVD plus PN were four times more likely to complete CRC screening compared to usual care and almost two and a half times more likely than those who were sent the DVD alone. CONCLUSIONS Combining telephone-based PN with a mailed, tailored DVD increased CRC screening among low-income and minority patients who did not attend their screening colonoscopy appointments and has potential for wide dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Rawl
- Center for Research and Scholarship, School of Nursing, Indiana University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan M Perkins
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yan Tong
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mira L Katz
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Heath, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH, USA
- Cancer Control Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lisa Carter-Bawa
- Community Outreach and Engagement, Center for Discovery & Innovation, Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas F Imperiale
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Peter H Schwartz
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Hala Fatima
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Connie Krier
- Center for Research and Scholarship, School of Nursing, Indiana University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kevin Tharp
- Indiana University Center for Survey Research, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Rivienne Shedd-Steele
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Caeli Malloy
- Center for Research and Scholarship, School of Nursing, Indiana University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Laura Haunert
- School of Health and Human Sciences, Physician Assistant Program, Indiana University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Netsanet Gebregziabher
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Cancer Control Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Victoria Champion
- Center for Research and Scholarship, School of Nursing, Indiana University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Telles VM, Rodriguez S, Torres M, Schneider J, Haughton J, Maldonado M, Arredondo E. Barriers and facilitators to implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening in health centers: a qualitative study of key informant perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:404. [PMID: 38553723 PMCID: PMC10981354 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10749-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a major cause of death in the U.S. despite the availability of effective screening tools. U.S. Latinos have lower rates of CRC screening and higher rates of death due to colorectal disease compared to non-Hispanic whites. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) serve medically underserved populations, including many Latino patients. Given the low CRC screening rates, identifying culturally sensitive and cost-effective methods of promoting screening is a priority for many FQHCs. METHODS We interviewed FQHC leaders and providers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of a multilevel, multicomponent (ML-MC) CRC screening intervention (i.e., promotor navigation and group-based education) in FQHCs. A rapid qualitative analysis approach was used to identify themes organized according to the following CFIR constructs: intervention characteristics, outer and inner settings, and characteristics of the individual. RESULTS We completed interviews with 13 healthcare professionals in leadership positions at six FQHCs. The participating FQHCs perceived the ML-MC screening CRC program as feasible and expressed interest in implementing the program at their sites. Facilitators included financial incentives for increasing screening rates, the need for patient education programming, and involving promotores to support the work of clinical teams. Barriers included concerns about available resources to implement new programs, lack of federal reimbursement for health education, competing priorities of other health concerns, and the need for more resources for confirmatory screening and treatment following a positive screen. CONCLUSIONS FQHCs provide essential primary care to millions of underserved patients in the U.S. and have the ability and motivation to provide screenings for colorectal cancer. Partnering with an academic institution to deliver a group-based, promotor-led CRC screening intervention for patients not up to date with screening could help increase screening rates. By identifying the specific barriers and facilitators to implementing CRC intervention, findings suggest that group-based, promotor-led interventions are a promising approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M Telles
- Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health at San Diego State University, University of California, San Diego, USA.
| | - S Rodriguez
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, USA
| | - M Torres
- Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health at San Diego State University, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - J Schneider
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, USA
| | - J Haughton
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - M Maldonado
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, USA
| | - E Arredondo
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, USA
- Psychology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoon PS, Navarro S, Barzi A, Ochoa-Dominguez CY, Arizpe A, Farias AJ. Racial and ethnic disparities in self-reported general and mental health status among colorectal cancer survivors: impact of sociodemographic factors and implications for mortality-a SEER-CAHPS study. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:793-804. [PMID: 38153617 PMCID: PMC10894139 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03566-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes are recognized as strong predictors of cancer prognosis. This study examines racial and ethnic differences in self-reported general health status (GHS) and mental health status (MHS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiaries between 1998 and 2011 with non-distant CRC who underwent curative resection and completed a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey within 6-36 months of CRC diagnosis. Analysis included a stepwise logistic regression to examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and fair or poor health status, and a proportional hazards model to determine the mortality risk associated with fair or poor health status. RESULTS Of 1867 patients, Non-Hispanic Black (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.28) and Hispanic (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.11) patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor GHS compared to Non-Hispanic White patients, also Hispanic patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor MHS (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.01). These relationships persisted after adjusting for clinical factors but were attenuated after subsequently adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Compared to those reporting good to excellent health status, patients reporting fair or poor GHS or MHS had an increased mortality risk (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.76 and OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.34-1.99, respectively). CONCLUSION Racial and ethnic differences in GHS and MHS reported after CRC diagnosis are mainly driven by sociodemographic factors and reflect a higher risk of mortality. Identifying unmet biopsychosocial needs is necessary to promote equitable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Yoon
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Navarro
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Afsaneh Barzi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Carol Y Ochoa-Dominguez
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Angel Arizpe
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Albert J Farias
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- The Gehr Family Center for Health System Science, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, 2001 N. Soto St., Suite 318B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang Q, Zhu S, Grady SC, Wang A, Hutchings H, Cox J, Popoff A, Okereke I. Spatial and spatio-temporal clusters of lung cancer incidence by stage of disease in Michigan, United States 1985-2018. GEOSPATIAL HEALTH 2024; 19. [PMID: 38357855 DOI: 10.4081/gh.2024.1219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death in Michigan. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. There is a need to detect clusters of lung cancer incidence over time, to generate new hypotheses about causation and identify high-risk areas for screening and treatment. The Michigan Cancer Surveillance database of individual lung cancer cases, 1985 to 2018 was used for this study. Spatial and spatiotemporal clusters of lung cancer and level of disease (localized, regional and distant) were detected using discrete Poisson spatial scan statistics at the zip code level over the study time period. The approach detected cancer clusters in cities such as Battle Creek, Sterling Heights and St. Clair County that occurred prior to year 2000 but not afterwards. In the northern area of the lower peninsula and the upper peninsula clusters of late-stage lung cancer emerged after year 2000. In Otter Lake Township and southwest Detroit, late-stage lung cancer clusters persisted. Public and patient education about lung cancer screening programs must remain a health priority in order to optimize lung cancer surveillance. Interventions should also involve programs such as telemedicine to reduce advanced stage disease in remote areas. In cities such as Detroit, residents often live near industry that emits air pollutants. Future research should therefore, continue to focus on the geography of lung cancer to uncover place-based risks and in response, the need for screening and health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiong Zhang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - Shangrui Zhu
- Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Sue C Grady
- Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
| | - Anqi Wang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
| | | | - Jessica Cox
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
| | - Andrew Popoff
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - Ikenna Okereke
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sakowitz S, Bakhtiyar SS, Verma A, Ebrahimian S, Vadlakonda A, Mabeza RM, Lee H, Benharash P. Association of time to resection with survival in patients with colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:614-623. [PMID: 38012438 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10548-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colon cancer (CC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, for which colectomy represents the standard of care. Yet, the impact of delayed resection on survival outcomes remains controversial. We assessed the association between time to surgery and 10-year survival in a national cohort of CC patients. METHODS This retrospective cohort study identified all adults who underwent colectomy for Stage I-III CC in the 2004-2020 National Cancer Database. Those who required neoadjuvant therapy or emergent resection < 7 days from diagnosis were excluded. Patients were classified into Early (< 25 days) and Delayed (≥ 25 days) cohorts after an adjusted analysis of the relationship between time to surgery and 10-year survival. Survival at 1-, 5-, and 10-years was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for age, sex, race, income quartile, insurance coverage, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, disease stage, location of tumor, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as hospital type, location, and case volume. RESULTS Of 165,991 patients, 84,665 (51%) were classified as Early and 81,326 (49%) Delayed. Following risk adjustment, Delayed resection was associated with similar 1-year [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.04, P = 0.72], but inferior 5- (HR 1.24, CI 1.22-1.26; P < 0.001) and 10-year survival (HR 1.22, CI 1.20-1.23; P < 0.001). Black race [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.36, CI 1.31-1.41; P < 0.001], Medicaid insurance coverage (AOR 1.34, CI 1.26-1.42; P < 0.001), and care at high-volume hospitals (AOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.08-1.17; P < 0.001) were linked with greater likelihood of Delayed resection. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CC who underwent resection ≥ 25 days following diagnosis demonstrated similar 1-year, but inferior 5- and 10-year survival, compared to those who underwent surgery within 25 days. Socioeconomic factors, including race and Medicaid insurance, were linked with greater odds of delayed resection. Efforts to balance appropriate preoperative evaluation with expedited resection are needed to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Sakowitz
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Arjun Verma
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shayan Ebrahimian
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amulya Vadlakonda
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Russyan Mark Mabeza
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- UCLA Division of Cardiac Surgery, 64-249 Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Luque JS, Kiros GE, Vargas M, Jackson DR, Matthew OO, Austin TD, Tawk R, Ali AA, Harris CM, Wallace K, Gwede CK. Association of Preventive Care Attitudes and Beliefs with Colorectal Cancer Screening History among African American Patients of Community Health Centers. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:1816-1824. [PMID: 37442915 PMCID: PMC10787027 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02337-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer-related death among African Americans in the United States. However, when detected early, CRC is treatable and survival rates are high. CRC health disparities for African Americans compared with other groups may be due in part to lower screening adherence and later stage diagnosis. The objective of this research phase was to test predictors of ever having received CRC screening (i.e., self-report of lifetime receipt of CRC screening) using survey measures in the domains of healthcare communication, trust in doctors, CRC perceived susceptibility, CRC worry, negative cancer beliefs, CRC screening self-efficacy, and cultural constructs for CRC screening in a sample of African American community health center patients. The study recruited 115 African American patients between the ages of 45 to 64 years old from community health centers in north Florida to complete the baseline survey. Our results show significant differences in CRC screening history by age, marital status, level of mistrust of healthcare providers, and level of empowerment toward cancer screening. To increase CRC screening in this population, the study findings suggest development of intervention programs that focus on priority populations of younger, unmarried African Americans, especially given the current trend of early onset CRC. Moreover, survival rates are lower for unmarried and younger African Americans relative to older and married individuals. Such interventions should also aim to increase trust in healthcare providers and increase empowerment for CRC screening decision making to increase screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Luque
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA.
| | - Gebre-Egziabher Kiros
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Matthew Vargas
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Deloria R Jackson
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Olayemi O Matthew
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Tifini D Austin
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Rima Tawk
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Askal A Ali
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Cynthia M Harris
- College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Florida A&M University, 1515 South Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA
| | - Kristin Wallace
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 86 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mandelblatt J, Meza R, Trentham-Dietz A, Heckman-Stoddard B, Feuer E. Using simulation modeling to guide policy to reduce disparities and achieve equity in cancer outcomes: state of the science and a road map for the future. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:159-166. [PMID: 37947330 PMCID: PMC11009490 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brandy Heckman-Stoddard
- Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Research Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eric Feuer
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chapman C, Jayasekera J, Dash C, Sheppard V, Mandelblatt J. A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:255-264. [PMID: 37947339 PMCID: PMC10846912 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, population simulation modeling has evolved as an effective public health tool for surveillance of cancer trends and estimation of the impact of screening and treatment strategies on incidence and mortality, including documentation of persistent cancer inequities. The goal of this research was to provide a framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models to identify leverage points in the cancer control continuum to accelerate achievement of equity in cancer care for minoritized populations. In our framework, systemic racism is conceptualized as the root cause of inequity and an upstream influence acting on subsequent downstream events, which ultimately exert physiological effects on cancer incidence and mortality and competing comorbidities. To date, most simulation models investigating racial inequity have used individual-level race variables. Individual-level race is a proxy for exposure to systemic racism, not a biological construct. However, single-level race variables are suboptimal proxies for the multilevel systems, policies, and practices that perpetuate inequity. We recommend that future models designed to capture relationships between systemic racism and cancer outcomes replace or extend single-level race variables with multilevel measures that capture structural, interpersonal, and internalized racism. Models should investigate actionable levers, such as changes in health care, education, and economic structures and policies to increase equity and reductions in health-care-based interpersonal racism. This integrated approach could support novel research approaches, make explicit the effects of different structures and policies, highlight data gaps in interactions between model components mirroring how factors act in the real world, inform how we collect data to model cancer equity, and generate results that could inform policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety in the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and the Houston VA, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jinani Jayasekera
- Health Equity and Decision Sciences Research Laboratory, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chiranjeev Dash
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vanessa Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy and Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Departments of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Luo Z, Dong X, Wang C, Cao W, Zheng Y, Wu Z, Xu Y, Zhao L, Wang F, Li J, Ren J, Shi J, Chen W, Li N. Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e48150. [PMID: 37906212 PMCID: PMC10646673 DOI: 10.2196/48150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening adherence is important in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Disparity in CRC screening adherence was observed in populations of different socioeconomic status (SES), but the direction and strength of the association remained unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review all the observational studies that have analyzed the association between SES and adherence to organized CRC screening based on fecal occult blood tests. METHODS We systematically reviewed the studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science and reference lists of relevant reviews from the inception of the database up until June 7, 2023. Individual SES, neighborhood SES, and small-area SES were included, while any SES aggregated by geographic areas larger than neighbors were excluded. Studies assessing SES with any index or score combining indicators of income, education, deprivation, poverty, occupation, employment, marital status, cohabitation, and others were included. A random effect model meta-analysis was carried out for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and relative risks for adherence related to SES. RESULTS Overall, 10 studies, with a total of 3,542,379 participants and an overall adherence rate of 64.9%, were included. Compared with low SES, high SES was associated with higher adherence (unadjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.42-2.10; adjusted OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). In the subgroup of nonindividual-level SES, the adjusted association was significant (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.26-1.95). However, the adjusted association was insignificant in the subgroup of individual-level SES (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.98-2.17). As for subgroups of the year of print, not only was the unadjusted association significantly stronger in the subgroup of early studies (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.59-2.44) than in the subgroup of late studies (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.56), but also the adjusted one was significantly stronger in the early group (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.43-2.42) than in the late group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39), which was consistent and robust. Despite being statistically insignificant, the strength of the association seemed lower in studies that did not adjust for race and ethnicity (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.43) than the overall estimate (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.82). CONCLUSIONS The higher-SES population had higher adherence to fecal occult blood test-based organized CRC screening. Neighborhood SES, or small-area SES, was more competent than individual SES to be used to assess the association between SES and adherence. The disparity in adherence between the high SES and the low SES narrowed along with the development of interventions and the improvement of organized programs. Race and ethnicity were probably important confounding factors for the association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilin Luo
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesi Dong
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chenran Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Cao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yadi Zheng
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongjie Xu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Zhao
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jibin Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Key Laboratory for National Cancer Big Data Analysis and Implement, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sakowitz S, Bakhtiyar SS, Mallick S, Khoraminejad B, Olmedo M, Croman M, Benharash P, Lee H. Decreasing rates of colectomy for benign neoplasms: A nationwide analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293389. [PMID: 37878628 PMCID: PMC10599571 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in endoscopic techniques for management of benign colonic neoplasms, a rise in rates of surgical treatment has been reported. We used a nationally representative cohort to characterize temporal trends, patient characteristics, and outcomes associated with colectomy for colonic neoplasms. METHODS All patients undergoing elective partial colectomy for benign or malignant colonic neoplasms were identified using the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Those presenting with inflammatory bowel disease, or experiencing intestinal perforation were excluded. Patients with benign neoplasms were classified as the Benign cohort (others: Malignant). Trends, characteristics, and outcomes were assessed between groups. RESULTS Of 569,280 colectomy procedures included for analysis, 153,435 (27.0%) were performed for benign lesions. The proportion of Benign operations decreased from 28.6% in 2012 to 23.7% in 2019 (P for trend<0.001). While overall national incidence of colectomy for benign neoplasms decreased from 2012 to 2019 (IRD -1.19, 95%CI -1.20- -1.19), Black patients demonstrated an incremental increase (IRD +0.04, 95%CI +0.02-0.06). On average, Benign was younger (66 [57-72] vs 68 years [58-77], P<0.001), and demonstrated a lower Elixhauser comorbidity index (2 [1-3] vs 3 [2-4], P<0.001), relative to Malignancy. Following adjustment, Benign demonstrated lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.61, 95%CI 0.50-0.74; P<0.001), stoma creation (AOR 0.46, 95%CI 0.43-0.50; P<0.001), and infectious complications (AOR 0.68, 95%CI 0.63-0.73; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present national study identifies a decrease in colectomy for benign polyps from 2012-2019. Future investigations should identify patients who would most benefit from surgical resection and address persistent inequities in access to screening and treatment for colonic neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Sakowitz
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Saad Mallick
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Baran Khoraminejad
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Manuel Olmedo
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Millicent Croman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Agunwamba AA, Zhu X, Sauver JS, Thompson G, Helmueller L, Finney Rutten LJ. Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102353. [PMID: 37576848 PMCID: PMC10415795 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amenah A. Agunwamba
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jenny St. Sauver
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anyane‐Yeboa A, Aubertine M, Parker A, Sylvester K, Levell C, Bell E, Emmons KM, May FP. Use of a mixed-methods approach to develop a guidebook with messaging to encourage colorectal cancer screening among Black individuals 45 and older. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19047-19056. [PMID: 37602823 PMCID: PMC10557828 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and disproportionately impacts Black individuals. Here, we describe the mixed-methods approach used to develop a tailored message guidebook to promote CRC screening among Black individuals in the setting of recently updated screening guidelines. METHODS This mixed-methods study included 10 in-depth qualitative interviews and 490 surveys in a nationally representative sample of unscreened Black individuals age ≥ 45. Messages were developed based on American Cancer Society (ACS) and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable (NCCRT) research findings, tested among Black individuals using MaxDiff analytic methods, and reviewed by a multi-sector expert advisory committee of NCCRT members. RESULTS The most frequently reported screening barrier in all age groups was self-reported procrastination (40.0% in age 45-49, 42.8% for age 50-54, 34.2% for age ≥ 55). Reasons for procrastination varied by age and included financial concerns, COVID-19 concerns, and fear of the test and bowel preparation. Additional screening barriers included lack of symptoms, provider recommendation, and family history of CRC. Most individuals age 45-49 preferred to receive screening information from a healthcare provider (57.5%); however, only 20% reported that a provider had initiated a screening conversation. CONCLUSIONS We identified age-specific barriers to CRC screening and tailored messaging to motivate participation among unscreened Black people age ≥ 45. Findings informed the development of the NCCRT and ACS guidebook for organizations and institutions aiming to increase CRC screening participation in Black individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kaitlin Sylvester
- American Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableKennesawGeorgiaUSA
| | - Caleb Levell
- American Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableKennesawGeorgiaUSA
| | - Emily Bell
- American Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableKennesawGeorgiaUSA
| | - Karen M. Emmons
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Folasade P. May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Masters RK, Tilstra AM, Simon DH, Coleman-Minahan K. Differences in Determinants: Racialized Obstetric Care and Increases in U.S. State Labor Induction Rates. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 2023; 64:174-191. [PMID: 37098856 PMCID: PMC10848243 DOI: 10.1177/00221465231165284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Induction of labor (IOL) rates in the United States have nearly tripled since 1990. We examine official U.S. birth records to document increases in states' IOL rates among pregnancies to Black, Latina, and White women. We test if the increases are associated with changes in demographic characteristics and risk factors among states' racial-ethnic childbearing populations. Among pregnancies to White women, increases in state IOL rates are strongly associated with changes in risk factors among White childbearing populations. However, the rising IOL rates among pregnancies to Black and Latina women are not due to changing factors in their own populations but are instead driven by changing factors among states' White childbearing populations. The results suggest systemic racism may be shaping U.S. obstetric care whereby care is not "centered at the margins" but is instead responsive to characteristics in states' White populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan K. Masters
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Population Center, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Andrea M. Tilstra
- University of Colorado Population Center, Boulder, CO, USA
- Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel H. Simon
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Population Center, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Kate Coleman-Minahan
- University of Colorado Population Center, Boulder, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yeh JH, Tseng CH, Wang WL, Chen CI, Liu YP, Lee YC, Wang JY, Lin YC. Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms and Colorectal Cancers in People Aged 40-49 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15113006. [PMID: 37296969 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. Many guidelines recommend initiating screening at 45 years. This study investigated the detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasm (ACRN) by using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in individuals aged 40-49 years. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 2022. The primary outcomes were the detection rates and positive predictive values of FITs for ACRN and CRC in people aged 40-49 (younger age group) and ≥50 years (average risk group). RESULTS Ten studies with 664,159 FITs were included. The FIT positivity rate was 4.9% and 7.3% for the younger age and average risk groups, respectively. Younger individuals with positive FIT results had significantly higher risks of ACRN (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-3.73) or CRC (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.59-5.13) than did individuals in the average-risk group, regardless of FIT results. Individuals aged 45-49 years with positive FIT results had a similar risk of ACRN (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49-1.29) to that of people aged 50-59 years with positive FIT results, although significant heterogeneity was observed. The positive predictive values of the FIT were 10-28.1% for ACRN and 2.7-6.8% for CRC in the younger age group. CONCLUSION The detection rate of ACRN and CRC based on FITs in individuals aged 40-49 years is acceptable, and the yield of ACRN might be similar between individuals aged 45-49 and 50-59 years. Further prospective cohort and cost-effective analysis are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA DaChang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Technology, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hao Tseng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Lun Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
| | - Chih-I Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Peng Liu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
- Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung 900, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ching Lin
- Department of Family Medicine, E-DA DaChang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Finn CB, Sharpe JE, Tong JK, Kaufman EJ, Wachtel H, Aarons CB, Weissman GE, Kelz RR. Development of a Machine Learning Model to Identify Colorectal Cancer Stage in Medicare Claims. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300003. [PMID: 37257142 PMCID: PMC10530805 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Staging information is essential for colorectal cancer research. Medicare claims are an important source of population-level data but currently lack oncologic stage. We aimed to develop a claims-based model to identify stage at diagnosis in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS We included patients age 66 years or older with colorectal cancer in the SEER-Medicare registry. Using patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2016, we developed models (multinomial logistic regression, elastic net regression, and random forest) to classify patients into stage I-II, III, or IV on the basis of demographics, diagnoses, and treatment utilization identified in Medicare claims. Models developed in a training cohort (2014-2016) were applied to a testing cohort (2017), and performance was evaluated using cancer stage listed in the SEER registry as the reference standard. RESULTS The cohort of patients with 30,543 colorectal cancer included 14,935 (48.9%) patients with stage I-II, 9,203 (30.1%) with stage III, and 6,405 (21%) with stage IV disease. A claims-based model using elastic net regression had a scaled Brier score (SBS) of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.46). Performance was strongest for classifying stage IV (SBS, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.64; sensitivity, 93%; 95% CI, 91 to 94) followed by stage I-II (SBS, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.47; sensitivity, 86%; 95% CI, 85 to 76) and stage III (SBS, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.33; sensitivity, 62%; 95% CI, 61 to 64). CONCLUSION Machine learning models effectively classified colorectal cancer stage using Medicare claims. These models extend the ability of claims-based research to risk-adjust and stratify by stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B. Finn
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James E. Sharpe
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jason K. Tong
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elinore J. Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather Wachtel
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cary B. Aarons
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gary E. Weissman
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Deng Z, Jones MR, Wang MC, Wolff AC, Visvanathan K. Racial and ethnic disparities in mortality among breast cancer survivors after a second malignancy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:279-287. [PMID: 36529890 PMCID: PMC9996210 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic differences in survival after a first cancer are well established but have not been examined after a second primary cancer (SPC) despite the increasing incidence among survivors. METHODS We examined 39 029 female breast cancer survivors who developed an SPC between 2000 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for competing risks data was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality after SPCs comparing Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian, and Non-Hispanic Black survivors with Non-Hispanic White survivors. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments of the first and second cancer. Analyses were stratified by SPC type. RESULTS During 17 years of follow-up, there were 15 117 deaths after SPCs. The risk of cancer death was 12% higher among Non-Hispanic Black survivors (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) and 8% higher among Hispanic survivors (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16) compared with Non-Hispanic White survivors. In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations were observed among Non-Hispanic Black survivors with a second breast or uterine cancer and among Hispanic survivors with a second breast cancer. Non-Hispanic Black survivors also experienced a 44% higher risk of cardiovascular disease death after SPC diagnosis than Non-Hispanic White survivors (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.74). CONCLUSIONS Higher cancer mortality among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic survivors and higher cardiovascular mortality among Non-Hispanic Black survivors exist among women who survive a first breast cancer to develop an SPC. Studies focused on identifying the contributors to these disparities are needed to enable implementation of effective mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengyi Deng
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Miranda R Jones
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mei-Cheng Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Department of Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang CW, Mclean I R, Cheng YW, Kim S, Terdiman J, Kathpalia P, Beck KR. Racial Disparities in Endoscopy Cancellations During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:729-735. [PMID: 35732970 PMCID: PMC9216287 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07575-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery including elective endoscopy. We aimed to determine the prevalence of endoscopy cancellations in the COVID-19 era and identify patient characteristics associated with cancellation due to the pandemic. METHODS Medical charts were reviewed for adults who cancelled an outpatient endoscopic procedure from 5/2020 to 8/2020. The association of patient characteristics with cancellation of endoscopy due to COVID-19 was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS There were 652 endoscopy cancelations with 211 (32%) due to COVID-19, 384 (59%) due to non-COVID reasons, and 57 (9%) undetermined. Among COVID-19 related cancellations, 75 (36%) were COVID-19 testing logistics related, 121 (57%) were COVID-19 fear related, and 15 (7%) were other. On adjusted analysis, the odds of cancellation due to COVID-19 was significantly higher for black patients (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.07-3.88, p = 0.03), while patients undergoing EGD (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99, p = 0.05) or advanced endoscopy (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.49, p = 0.001) had lower odds of cancellation. The odds of cancelling due to COVID-19 testing logistics was significantly higher among black patients (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.03-9.46, p = 0.05) and patients with Medi-Cal insurance (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.21-6.89, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Black race is associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 related cancellation. Specifically, black patients and those with Medi-Cal are at increased risk of cancellation related to logistics of obtaining pre-endoscopy COVID-19 testing. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to endoscopy may be further amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie W. Wang
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Richard Mclean I
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Yao-Wen Cheng
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Stephanie Kim
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Jonathan Terdiman
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Priya Kathpalia
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Kendall R. Beck
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Berrian J, Liu Y, Ezenwajiaku N, Moreno‐Aspitia A, Holton SJ, Toriola AT, Colditz GA, Housten AJ, Hall L, Fiala MA, Ademuyiwa FO. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis according to race. Cancer Med 2023; 12:7381-7388. [PMID: 36404491 PMCID: PMC10067026 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated racial disparities in late-stage presentation of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. METHODS We conducted a registry-based retrospective study of patients with newly reported diagnoses of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers between March 2019-June 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and March 2020-June 2020 (early-COVID-19). We compared the volume of new diagnoses and stage at presentation according to race between both periods. RESULTS During the study period, a total of 3528 patients had newly diagnosed cancer; 3304 of which had known disease stages and were included in the formal analyses. 467 (14.1%) were Blacks, and 2743 were (83%) Whites. 1216 (36.8%) had breast, 415 (12.6%) had colorectal, 827 (25%) had lung, and 846 (25.6%) had prostate cancers, respectively. The pre-COVID-19 period included 2120 (64.2%), and the early-COVID-19 period included 1184 (35.8%), representing a proportional 44.2% decline in the volume of new cases of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers, p < 0.0001. Pre-COVID-19, 16.8% were diagnosed with metastatic disease, versus 20.4% early-COVID-19, representing a proportional increase of 21.4% in the numbers of new cases with metastatic disease, p = 0.01. There was a non-significant proportional decline of 1.9% in Black patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers early-COVID-19 (p = 0.71) and a non-significant proportional increase of 7% in Black patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (p = 0.71). Difference-in-difference analyses showed no statistically significant differences in metastatic presentation comparing Black to White patients. CONCLUSION While we identified substantial reductions in the volume of new cancer diagnoses and increases in metastatic presentations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact was similar for White and Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ying Liu
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lannis Hall
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Mark A. Fiala
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Larkey L, Szalacha LA, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Menon U. Recruitment Challenges of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Dissemination Study. Nurs Res 2023; 72:E8-E15. [PMID: 36287144 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dissemination strategies to reach underserved and minority populations to promote screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) are key to reducing disparities. We conducted a study to examine a tailored messaging approach to navigate individuals from communities (i.e., lower income, less access to care, and underscreened) to clinics to receive CRC screening. We encountered several political, demographic, and secular trend issues that required reconsideration and redesign of implementation strategies. OBJECTIVES Through study implementation from 2012 to 2017, changes in medical reimbursement and immigration policies-at the state level and later at the national level-affected healthcare delivery systems that had initially committed to supporting the study and our recruitment methods. Although our selected zip codes and sites had previously yielded high rates of CRC screening nonadherence, within a few years, these sites showed substantially higher screening adherence rates-yielding limited numbers of eligible participants. In addition, state immigration policy trends created mistrust and fear, leading to lower participation rates than anticipated. This report documents and provides valuable insights on how we and the community network developed creative strategies to overcome these challenges. METHODS New relationships with community partners were extended to tap advisory board input to meet the challenges. Criteria for clinic participation widened from originally selected Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to various nonprofit, hybrid, and privately insured reimbursement types. Recruitment site options were creatively redefined to reach community participants where they live, work, and receive services. RESULTS Strategies that engage community members in identifying alternative healthcare delivery structures and that link recruitment efforts to community-based service organizations were found to be critical to recapturing community trust in the face of unfavorable political environments. Widening the type of clinic partners from FQHCs to stand-alone nonprofits and private clinics and identifying unusual types of recruitment sites provided alternative solutions for successful study implementation. DISCUSSION In prevention-based studies that face unplanned system and political barriers to recruitment, embedding the study in the community may aid in reestablishing trust levels to improve engagement and recruitment of clinic partners and eligible participants.
Collapse
|
24
|
Motamedi H, Ari MM, Shahlaei M, Moradi S, Farhadikia P, Alvandi A, Abiri R. Designing multi-epitope vaccine against important colorectal cancer (CRC) associated pathogens based on immunoinformatics approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2023; 24:65. [PMID: 36829112 PMCID: PMC9951438 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05197-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It seems that several members of intestinal gut microbiota like Streptococcus bovis, Bacteroides fragilis, Helicobacter pylori, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius may be considered as the causative agents of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). The present study used bioinformatics and immunoinformatics approaches to design a potential epitope-based multi-epitope vaccine to prevent CRC with optimal population coverage. METHODS In this study, ten amino acid sequences of CRC-related pathogens were retrieved from the NCBI database. Three ABCpred, BCPREDS and LBtope online servers were considered for B cells prediction and the IEDB server for T cells (CD4+ and CD8+) prediction. Then, validation, allergenicity, toxicity and physicochemical analysis of all sequences were performed using web servers. A total of three linkers, AAY, GPGPG, and KK were used to bind CTL, HTL and BCL epitopes, respectively. In addition, the final construct was subjected to disulfide engineering, molecular docking, immune simulation and codon adaptation to design an effective vaccine production strategy. RESULTS A total of 19 sequences of different lengths for linear B-cell epitopes, 19 and 18 sequences were considered as epitopes of CD4+ T and CD8+ cells, respectively. The predicted epitopes were joined by appropriate linkers because they play an important role in producing an extended conformation and protein folding. The final multi-epitope construct and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) were evaluated by molecular docking, which revealed stable and strong binding interactions. Immunity simulation of the vaccine showed significantly high levels of immunoglobulins, helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells and INF-γ. CONCLUSION Finally, the results showed that the designed multi-epitope vaccine could serve as an excellent prophylactic candidate against CRC-associated pathogens, but in vitro and animal studies are needed to justify our findings for its use as a possible preventive measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Motamedi
- grid.412112.50000 0001 2012 5829Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran ,grid.412112.50000 0001 2012 5829Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Marzie Mahdizade Ari
- grid.411746.10000 0004 4911 7066Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,grid.411746.10000 0004 4911 7066Microbial Biotechnology Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Shahlaei
- grid.412112.50000 0001 2012 5829Nano Drug Delivery Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Sajad Moradi
- grid.412112.50000 0001 2012 5829Nano Drug Delivery Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Parisa Farhadikia
- grid.412112.50000 0001 2012 5829Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Amirhoushang Alvandi
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. .,Medical Technology Research Center, Health Technology Institute,, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| | - Ramin Abiri
- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. .,Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute,, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Complex effects of racism and discrimination on African Americans' health and well-being: Navigating the status quo. Soc Sci Med 2023; 316:115421. [PMID: 36270847 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Most research on the effects of racism and discrimination on the health and well-being of African Americans utilize a deficit perspective, one that homogeneously paints African Americans as disadvantaged victims. Such approaches do little to highlight the variability in the effects of racism and discrimination on relevant outcomes, and the resources that African Americans have drawn upon to navigate an environment characterized by varying levels of racialized hostility. The goal of this special issue is to inspire more refined conceptualizations of how African Americans navigate an often-hostile status quo in service of their health and well-being. The articles in this special issue examine within-race heterogeneity in African Americans' responses to varying manifestations of racism and discrimination, as well as subsequent heterogeneity in the effects of racism and discrimination on African Americans' health and well-being at the individual level. The commentaries and articles address the goals of this special issue in three broad categories of health outcomes: biological/physiological, mind and brain, and health behavior. These contributions demonstrate several critical themes that can guide future work to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the heterogeneity in the effects of racism and discrimination on health and well-being among African Americans.
Collapse
|
26
|
Manning M, Lucas T, Purrington K, Thompson H, Albrecht TL, Penner L. Moderators of the effects of perceived racism and discrimination on cancer-related health behaviors among two samples of African Americans. Soc Sci Med 2023; 316:114982. [PMID: 35484000 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assumptions regarding within-race variation in the associations between measures of discrimination racism and health-related behaviors among African Americans have been largely unexplored. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of two studies to examine support for a model which describes several theoretical moderators of the effects of discrimination and racism on health behaviors. The first study examined the effects of group-based behavioral information and racial identity on the association between perceived racism and requests for at home colorectal cancer screening tests among a sample of 205 geographically diverse African Americans who participated in an online experiment from 2019 to 2020. RESULTS Group-based behavioral information attenuated the association between perceived racism and requests for at-home screening kit. In the absence of group-based behavioral information, perceived racism was positively associated with screening kit requests for African Americans with weaker racial identity and negatively associated with requests for African Americans with stronger racial identity. The second study examined the influence of personal and group-based perceived discrimination, and behavior-relevant affective information related to a breast cancer risk notification, on 89 Michigan dwelling African American women's self-reported physician communication from 2015 to 2016. Results showed that perceived group-based discrimination was positively associated with physician communication in the absence of negative affective information, and perceived personal discrimination was negatively associated with physician communication as positive affective information increased. CONCLUSIONS Together, these results support our theoretical model highlighting variation in the effects of discrimination and racism on health behaviors among African Americans, and indicates group-relevant behavioral information, racial identity, behavior relevant affective information, and target of discrimination as moderators of the effect. Implications for conceptualizing the effects of racism and discrimination and for examining racially targeted interventions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Manning
- Department of Psychology, Oakland University, USA
| | - Todd Lucas
- Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, USA
| | | | - Hayley Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Louis Penner
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cobb S, Ekwegh T, Adinkrah E, Ameli H, Dillard A, Kibe LW, Bazargan M. Examining colorectal cancer screening uptake and health provider recommendations among underserved middle aged and older African Americans. Health Promot Perspect 2022; 12:399-409. [PMID: 36852204 PMCID: PMC9958235 DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2022.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to determine whether underserved middle-aged and older African Americans are receiving a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) and if recommended by their provider. Additionally, we examined correlates of both provider recommendation and uptake of CRC screening. Methods: Seven hundred forty African American individuals, aged 55 and older, participated in this local community cross-sectional survey. We used a multivariate technique of logistic regression. Results: One out of three participants reported that they never received a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for CRC screening. More than 31% indicted that their providers never suggested CRC testing. However, participants who indicated that their providers recommended sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy were almost 49 times (odds ratio [OR]: 48.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.5-81.2) more likely to obtain it compared to their counterparts who were not advised to have these procedures. Our data suggest that African American men were significantly less likely than women to receive recommendations from their providers (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.91). Furthermore, controlling for other variables, the following factors: 1) living arrangement (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.02-2.04), 2) health maintenance organization (HMO) membership (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.28-2.67), 3) number of providers (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32), 4) satisfaction with access to and quality of care (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.51), 5) depressive symptoms (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98), and 6) gastrointestinal conditions (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.16-2.58) were associated with obtaining a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy test. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the absence of a provider recommendation is the primary barrier preventing underserved older African Americans from obtaining CRC screening. In addition, our data revealed significant association between obtaining CRC screening and some of the predisposing characteristics of participants, satisfaction with access to and quality of care, and physical and mental health. These findings are consistent with this notion that disparities in health care for African Americans can be traced back to four primary factors: patients, healthcare providers, the healthcare system, and society as a whole, and emphasize the need for establishing theory-driven, culturally-sensitive, and cost-effective CRC screening interventions that recognize and address the constraints to cancer screening experienced by this segment of population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Cobb
- Mervyn M. Dymally School of Nursing, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), CA, USA
| | - Tavonia Ekwegh
- Mervyn M. Dymally School of Nursing, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), CA, USA
| | - Edward Adinkrah
- Department of Public Health, College of Science & Health, CDU, CA, USA
| | | | - Attallah Dillard
- Mervyn M. Dymally School of Nursing, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), CA, USA
| | - Lucy W. Kibe
- Physician Assistant Program, College of Science & Health, CDU, CA, USA
| | - Mohsen Bazargan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, CDU, CA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Adegboyega A, Wiggins A, Obielodan O, Dignan M, Schoenberg N. Beliefs associated with cancer screening behaviors among African Americans and Sub-Saharan African immigrant adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2219. [PMID: 36447190 PMCID: PMC9710024 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14591-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beliefs influence cancer screening. However, there are conflicting findings about how belief influence cancer screening among Black adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between beliefs (religiosity, fatalism, temporal orientation, and acculturation) and cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening behaviors among African Americans and sub-Saharan African immigrants. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 73 African American and 59 English speaking Sub-Saharan immigrant adults recruited from Lexington and surrounding cities in Kentucky. Data collected included sociodemographic variables, cancer screening behaviors, and several instruments that characterize beliefs, including religiosity, fatalism, temporal orientation, and acculturation. RESULTS Participants' mean age was 43.73 years (SD = 14.0), 83% were females, and 45% self-identified as sub-Saharan immigrants. Based on eligibility for each screening modality, 64% reported having ever had a Pap test, 82% reported ever having mammogram, and 71% reported ever having a colonoscopy. Higher education (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.43-4.80) and being insured (OR = 4.09, 95% CI = 1.10 - 15.18) were associated with increased odds of cervical cancer screening (pap test), while cancer fatalism (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07 - 0.88) was associated with decreased odds. Increased age (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06 - 2.32) and reduced present orientation (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22 - 0.80) were associated with receipt of a mammogram. Nativity was the only factor associated with colonoscopy screening. Compared to African Americans, sub-Saharan African immigrants were 90% less likely to have had a colonoscopy (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.66). CONCLUSION This study contributes to the existing literature by confirming that beliefs are important in cancer screening behaviors among African American and sub-Saharan African immigrants. These findings should inform the development of cancer control and prevention programs for Black adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION US National Library of Science identifier NCT04927494. Registered June 16, 2021, www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Adegboyega
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438University of Kentucky College of Nursing, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232 USA
| | - A.T. Wiggins
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438University of Kentucky College of Nursing, 751 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0232 USA
| | - O. Obielodan
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, USA
| | - M. Dignan
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY USA
| | - N. Schoenberg
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438Center for Health Equity Transformation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, 468 Healthy Kentucky Research Building, Lexington, KY 40536 USA ,grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Evaluation of Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy Utilization for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Georgia, USA. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8955-8966. [PMID: 36421356 PMCID: PMC9689714 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer, and the second most common cancer-related cause of death in the United States (USA). Timely screening reduces both CRC incidence and mortality. Understanding population behaviors and factors that influence CRC screening is important for directing interventions targeted at reducing CRC rates. The 1997-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data were analyzed for trends in colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy utilization for CRC screening among adults in Georgia, USA. Overall, in Georgia, there has been an increase in the prevalence of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy utilization from 48.1% in 1997 to 71.2% in 2018 (AAPC = 2.30, p < 0.001). Compared nationally, this increase was less pronounced (from 41.0% in 1997 to 73.7% in 2018 (AAPC = 2.90, p < 0.001) overall for USA). Logistic regression analysis of the 2018 BRFSS data, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, shows that sex (female vs. male [aOR = 1.20, C.I. = 1.05, 1.38]); marital status (couple vs. single [aOR = 1.20, C.I. = 1.04, 1.39]); healthcare coverage (yes vs. no [aOR = 3.86, C.I. = 3.05, 4.88]); age (60-69 years [aOR = 2.38, C.I. = 2.02, 2.80], 70-79 [aOR = 2.88, C.I. = 2.38, 3.48] vs. 50-59 years); education (high school [aOR = 1.32, C.I. = 1.05, 1.65], some post high school [aOR= 1.63, C.I. = 1.29, 2.06], college graduate [aOR = 2.08, C.I. = 1.64, 2.63] vs. less than high school); and income ($25,000-$49,999 [aOR = 1.24, C.I. = 1.01, 1.51], $50,000+ [aOR = 1.56, C.I. = 1.27, 1.91] vs. <$25,000) were all significantly associated with colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy utilization. In Georgia, a significant increase over time in colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy utilization for CRC screening was observed pertaining to the associated sociodemographic factors. The findings from this study may help guide tailored programs for promoting screening among underserved populations.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pankratz VS, Kanda D, Edwardson N, English K, Adsul P, Li Y, Parasher G, Mishra SI. Colorectal Cancer Survival Trends in the United States From 1992 to 2018 Differ Among Persons From Five Racial and Ethnic Groups According to Stage at Diagnosis: A SEER-Based Study. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221136440. [PMID: 36264283 PMCID: PMC9597478 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221136440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Survival following colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved in the US since 1975, but there is limited information on stage-specific survival trends among racial and ethnic subgroups. Objectives The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare trends in 1- and 5-year CRC cause-specific survival in the United States by both stage and race/ethnicity. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals diagnosed with CRC using the 1992-2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated and compared time trends in 1- and 5-year survival for CRC stage by race/ethnicity. Results Data from 399 220 individuals diagnosed with CRC were available. There were significant differences in stage-specific 1-year survival trends by race and ethnicity. Differences were most notable for distant stage CRC: survival probabilities increased most consistently for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) and Black (NHB) persons, but their trend lines were lower than those of Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (API) and White (NHW) persons, whose initially greater gains appear to be slowing. Although the data do not support significant racial/ethnic differences in 5-year CRC survival trends by stage, AIAN and NHB persons have the lowest average survival probabilities for multiple CRC stages, and no racial/ethnic group has 5-year survival probabilities above 20% for distant-stage CRC. Conclusion Although there has been an overall improvement in adjusted CRC-specific survival probabilities since 1992, AIAN and NHB persons continue to experience worse prognosis than those of other races/ethnicities. This highlights the importance of reinvigorating efforts to understand the causes of mortality in CRC, including those which may differ according to an individual’s race or ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vernon S. Pankratz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA,University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA,Vernon S. Pankratz, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, MSC 07 4025, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
| | - Deborah Kanda
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Nicholas Edwardson
- School of Public Administration, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kevin English
- Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Albuquerque Area Indian Health Board, Inc., Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA,University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Yiting Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Gulshan Parasher
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Shiraz I. Mishra
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA,Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu PH, Sanford NN, Liang PS, Singal AG, Murphy CC. Persistent Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Tell-Tale Sign for Implementing New Guidelines in Younger Adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1701-1709. [PMID: 35765830 PMCID: PMC9444917 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In May 2021, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force began recommending initiating colorectal cancer screening at age 45 (vs. 50) years. METHODS We estimated prevalence of colorectal cancer screening (by colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography, or stool-based tests) in adults ages 50 to 75 years using data from the National Health Interview Survey in 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2013, 2015, and 2018. For each survey year, we estimated prevalence by age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, family income, and health insurance. We also compared increases in prevalence of screening from 2000 to 2018 in 5-year age groups (50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70-75 years). RESULTS Overall, prevalence of colorectal cancer screening increased from 36.7% in 2000 to 66.1% in 2018. Screening prevalence in 2018 was lowest for age 50 to 54 years (47.6%), Hispanics (56.5%), Asians (57.1%), and participants with less than a high school degree (53.6%), from low-income families (56.6%), or without insurance (39.7%). Increases in prevalence over time differed by five-year age group. For example, prevalence increased from 28.2% in 2000 to 47.6% in 2018 (+19.4%; 95% CI, 13.1-25.6) for age 50 to 54 years but from 46.4% to 78.0% (+31.6%; 95% CI, 25.4%-37.7%) for age 70 to 75 years. This pattern was consistent across race/ethnicity, educational attainment, family income, and health insurance. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening remains low in adults ages 50 to 54 years. IMPACT As new guidelines are implemented, care must be taken to ensure screening benefits are realized equally by all population groups, particularly newly eligible adults ages 45 to 49 years. See related commentary by Brawley, p. 1671.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Hong Liu
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nina N. Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Peter S. Liang
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, VA New York Harbor Health Care System, New York, NY
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Caitlin C. Murphy
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reif de Paula T, Haas EM, Keller DS. Colorectal cancer in the 45-to-50 age group in the United States: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6629-6637. [PMID: 34888710 PMCID: PMC9402772 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08929-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid increasing awareness of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), guidelines in the United States (US) recently lowered the recommended routine CRC screening age from 50 to 45 in average-risk individuals. There are little data on the number of patients in this age group diagnosed with CRC prior to these changes. Our objective was to audit the historic CRC case trends and impact of CRC in the 45-to-50-year-old category prior to new screening recommendations. METHODS Colorectal adenocarcinoma cases in 45-to-50-year-old patients were queried from the NCDB (2004-2017). Cases were stratified by sex, race, and site. The disability-adjusted lost years (DALY) and lost earnings were estimated. The average annual percentage changes (AAPC) of CRC incidence were estimated using jointpoint analysis. The main outcome measures were DALY and lost earnings. Secondary outcome measures were the 2004-2017 AAPC and the cumulative incidence of potential CRC cases in the 45-to-50 cohort through 2030 without guideline changes. RESULTS 67,442 CRC patients in the 45-to-50 demographic were identified. The CRC burden resulted 899,905 DALY and $17 billion in lost earnings. The 2004-2017 AAPC was 1.6%, with an estimated 13-year increase of 25%. There were sex-, race-, and anatomic site-specific discrepancies with estimated 13-year increases of 30% for males, 110% for American Indian/ Alaska Natives/ Asian American/ Pacific Islander races, and 31% for rectal cancer by 2030. CONCLUSION CRC has been steadily increasing in the 45-to-50 age group, with tremendous disability and cost ensuing. There is great potential benefit from lowering the recommended routine CRC screening age to 45. Targeted intervention could ensure the most vulnerable segments benefit from the new guidelines, in both reducing the incidence and improving survivorship in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thais Reif de Paula
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
- Houston Colon PLLC, Houston, TX USA
| | - Eric M. Haas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
- Houston Colon PLLC, Houston, TX USA
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX USA
| | - Deborah S. Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2335 Stockton Blvd. NAOB 6322, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Uche-Anya E, Anyane-Yeboa A, Berzin TM, Ghassemi M, May FP. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: how to advance clinical practice while ensuring health equity. Gut 2022; 71:1909-1915. [PMID: 35688612 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems are increasingly used in medicine to improve clinical decision-making and healthcare delivery. In gastroenterology and hepatology, studies have explored a myriad of opportunities for AI/ML applications which are already making the transition to bedside. Despite these advances, there is a risk that biases and health inequities can be introduced or exacerbated by these technologies. If unrecognised, these technologies could generate or worsen systematic racial, ethnic and sex disparities when deployed on a large scale. There are several mechanisms through which AI/ML could contribute to health inequities in gastroenterology and hepatology, including diagnosis of oesophageal cancer, management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), liver transplantation, colorectal cancer screening and many others. This review adapts a framework for ethical AI/ML development and application to gastroenterology and hepatology such that clinical practice is advanced while minimising bias and optimising health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Uche-Anya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marzyeh Ghassemi
- Institute for Medical and Evaluative Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Early detection of colorectal neoplasia significantly reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), and numerous screening options exist. Guidelines for CRC screening from US and international professional societies provide menus of options based on strength of evidence. Despite availability of screening and its proven impact, 40% of guideline-eligible patients are not screened as recommended in the United States. Adherence to or uptake of CRC screening is especially poor among underserved populations, including those with low income and African American and Hispanic populations. Consideration of screening options must not only take into account test performance, but issues of resources and individual versus population benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Bresalier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Unit 1466, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dey P, Ray Chaudhuri S. Cancer-Associated Microbiota: From Mechanisms of Disease Causation to Microbiota-Centric Anti-Cancer Approaches. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:757. [PMID: 35625485 PMCID: PMC9138768 DOI: 10.3390/biology11050757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori infection is the only well-established bacterial cause of cancer. However, due to the integral role of tissue-resident commensals in maintaining tissue-specific immunometabolic homeostasis, accumulated evidence suggests that an imbalance of tissue-resident microbiota that are otherwise considered as commensals, can also promote various types of cancers. Therefore, the present review discusses compelling evidence linking tissue-resident microbiota (especially gut bacteria) with cancer initiation and progression. Experimental evidence supporting the cancer-causing role of gut commensal through the modulation of host-specific processes (e.g., bile acid metabolism, hormonal effects) or by direct DNA damage and toxicity has been discussed. The opportunistic role of commensal through pathoadaptive mutation and overcoming colonization resistance is discussed, and how chronic inflammation triggered by microbiota could be an intermediate in cancer-causing infections has been discussed. Finally, we discuss microbiota-centric strategies, including fecal microbiota transplantation, proven to be beneficial in preventing and treating cancers. Collectively, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the role of tissue-resident microbiota, their cancer-promoting potentials, and how beneficial bacteria can be used against cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyankar Dey
- Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, India
| | - Saumya Ray Chaudhuri
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh 160036, India;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Giaquinto AN, Miller KD, Tossas KY, Winn RA, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:202-229. [PMID: 35143040 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
African American/Black individuals have a disproportionate cancer burden, including the highest mortality and the lowest survival of any racial/ethnic group for most cancers. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society estimates the number of new cancer cases and deaths for Black people in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence (herein through 2018), mortality (through 2019), survival, screening, and risk factors using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2022, there will be approximately 224,080 new cancer cases and 73,680 cancer deaths among Black people in the United States. During the most recent 5-year period, Black men had a 6% higher incidence rate but 19% higher mortality than White men overall, including an approximately 2-fold higher risk of death from myeloma, stomach cancer, and prostate cancer. The overall cancer mortality disparity is narrowing between Black and White men because of a steeper drop in Black men for lung and prostate cancers. However, the decline in prostate cancer mortality in Black men slowed from 5% annually during 2010 through 2014 to 1.3% during 2015 through 2019, likely reflecting the 5% annual increase in advanced-stage diagnoses since 2012. Black women have an 8% lower incidence rate than White women but a 12% higher mortality; further, mortality rates are 2-fold higher for endometrial cancer and 41% higher for breast cancer despite similar or lower incidence rates. The wide breast cancer disparity reflects both later stage diagnosis (57% localized stage vs 67% in White women) and lower 5-year survival overall (82% vs 92%, respectively) and for every stage of disease (eg, 20% vs 30%, respectively, for distant stage). Breast cancer surpassed lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer death among Black women in 2019. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce stark cancer inequalities in the Black community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela N Giaquinto
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kimberly D Miller
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Katherine Y Tossas
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Robert A Winn
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Coronado GD, Leo MC, Ramsey K, Coury J, Petrik AF, Patzel M, Kenzie ES, Thompson JH, Brodt E, Mummadi R, Elder N, Davis MM. Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:42. [PMID: 35418107 PMCID: PMC9006522 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening reduces incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet US screening rates are low, particularly among Medicaid enrollees in rural communities. We describe a two-phase project, SMARTER CRC, designed to achieve the National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM objectives by reducing the burden of CRC on the US population. Specifically, SMARTER CRC aims to test the implementation, effectiveness, and maintenance of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program to improve rates of CRC screening, follow-up colonoscopy, and referral to care in clinics serving rural Medicaid enrollees. Methods Phase I activities in SMARTER CRC include a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program involving three Medicaid health plans and 30 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho; the implementation of the program is supported by training and practice facilitation. Participating clinic units were randomized 1:1 into the intervention or usual care. The intervention combines (1) mailed fecal testing outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and (2) patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test result. We will evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention and track adaptations to the intervention and to implementation strategies, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Our primary effectiveness outcome is receipt of any CRC screening within 6 months of enrollee identification. Our primary implementation outcome is health plan- and clinic-level rates of program delivery, by component (mailed FIT and patient navigation). Trial results will inform phase II activities to scale up the program through partnerships with health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations that serve rural primary care clinics; scale-up will include webinars, train-the-trainer workshops, and collaborative learning activities. Discussion This study will test the implementation, effectiveness, and scale-up of a multi-component mailed fecal testing and patient navigation program to improve CRC screening rates in rural Medicaid enrollees. Our findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI’s Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP #: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katrina Ramsey
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Biostatistics and Design Program, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: CB669, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Mary Patzel
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jamie H Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Erik Brodt
- OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Raj Mummadi
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Nancy Elder
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cooks EJ, Duke KA, Neil JM, Vilaro MJ, Wilson-Howard D, Modave F, George TJ, Odedina FT, Lok BC, Carek P, Laber EB, Davidian M, Krieger JL. Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e48. [PMID: 35619640 PMCID: PMC9108377 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) can be addressed through increased adherence to screening guidelines. In real-life encounters, patients may be more willing to follow screening recommendations delivered by a race concordant clinician. The growth of telehealth to deliver care provides an opportunity to explore whether these effects translate to a virtual setting. The primary purpose of this pilot study is to explore the relationships between virtual clinician (VC) characteristics and CRC screening intentions after engagement with a telehealth intervention leveraging technology to deliver tailored CRC prevention messaging. Methods Using a posttest-only design with three factors (VC race-matching, VC gender, intervention type), participants (N = 2267) were randomised to one of eight intervention treatments. Participants self-reported perceptions and behavioral intentions. Results The benefits of matching participants with a racially similar VC trended positive but did not reach statistical significance. Specifically, race-matching positively influenced screening intentions for Black participants but not for Whites (b = 0.29, p = 0.10). Importantly, perceptions of credibility, attractiveness, and message relevance significantly influenced screening intentions and the relationship with race-matching. Conclusions To reduce racial CRC screening disparities, investments are needed to identify patient-focused interventions to address structural barriers to screening. This study suggests that telehealth interventions that match Black patients with a Black VC can enhance perceptions of credibility and message relevance, which may then improve screening intentions. Future research is needed to examine how to increase VC credibility and attractiveness, as well as message relevance without race-matching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Cooks
- STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kyle A. Duke
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Jordan M. Neil
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Melissa J. Vilaro
- STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Francois Modave
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas J. George
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Folakemi T. Odedina
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin C. Lok
- Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter Carek
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eric B. Laber
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marie Davidian
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Janice L. Krieger
- STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Outcomes. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:415-428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
40
|
Poulson MR, Geary A, Annesi C, Dechert T, Kenzik K, Hall J. The Impact of Income and Social Mobility on Colorectal Cancer Outcomes and Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study. Ann Surg 2022; 275:546-550. [PMID: 34954755 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of income mobility on racial disparities in colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND There are well-documented disparities in colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes between Black and White patients. Socioeconomic status, insurance, and other patient-level factors have been shown important, but little has been done to show the discriminatory factors that lead to these outcomes. METHODS Data were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Results database for Black and White patients with colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2015. County level measures of Black (BIM) and White income mobility (WIM) were obtained from the Opportunity Atlas as a measure of intergenerational poverty and social mobility. Regression models were created to assess the relative risk of advanced stage at diagnosis (Stage IV), surgery for localized disease (Stage I/II), and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS There was no significant association of BIM or WIM on advanced stage at diagnosis in Black or White patients. An increase of $10,000 of BIM was associated with a 9% decrease in hazards of death for both Black (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.86,0.95) and White (0.91, 95%CI 0.90,0.93) patients, while the same increase in WIM was associated with no significant difference in hazards among Black patients (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.97,1.02). There were no predicted racial differences in hazards of death at high levels of BIM. CONCLUSIONS Increased Black income mobility significantly improves survival for both Black and White patients. Interventions aimed at increasing economic and social mobility could significantly decrease mortality in both Black and White patients while alleviating disparities in outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Poulson
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Alaina Geary
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | | - Tracey Dechert
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly Kenzik
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jason Hall
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Health care disparities are defined as health differences between groups that are avoidable, unnecessary, and unjust. Racial disparities in colorectal cancer mortality, particularly for Black patients, are well-described. Disparities in preventative measures, early detection, effective treatment, and posttreatment services contribute to these differences. Underlying these issues are patient, provider, health care system, and policy-level factors that lead to these disparities. Multilevel interventions designed to address each level of care can provide an effective means to mitigate these disparities.
Collapse
|
42
|
Yu KX, Yuan WJ, Huang CH, Xiao L, Xiao RS, Zeng PW, Chen L, Chen ZH. Socioeconomic deprivation and survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:829-838. [PMID: 35261805 PMCID: PMC8899994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Socioeconomic deprivation has been linked to detrimental healthcare outcomes. We sought to examine whether patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas experience worse survival outcomes and how it interacts with other factors. In this population-based study, patients with CRC diagnosed between 2007 to 2015 in the SEER program were reviewed. Socioeconomic deprivation was measured using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) linked to patients' residence addresses. The effect of ADI on cancer-specific survival and overall survival was evaluated using survival analysis. The Inverse Probability of Weighted (IPW) method and multiple regression was performed to account for the confounding bias. Subgroup analyses were used to test interactions. Multiple mediation analysis was used to estimate the mediating effects. Overall, 266,620 eligible patients were included in further analyses. Compared with low ADI patients, high ADI patients had more unfavorable characteristics and worse cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% CI 1.12-1.16, P<.001) and overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.12, P<0.001). The results were similar after accounting for confounding factors using the IPW and multiple regression methods. Subgroup analyses revealed the relative robustness of ADI as a prognostic factor. They detected significant interactions between ADI and other covariates on cancer survival, such as age, race, insurance status, disease stage, and receipt of treatment. Multiple mediation analyses identified several factors mediating survival disparities, including anticancer therapy, insurance status, race, marital status, and age. This study suggested that high ADI CRC patients were associated with more unfavorable characteristics at presentation and lower cancer and noncancer survival after treatment than their low ADI counterparts. Multiple factors interacted and mediated these survival disparities associated with the ADI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Xun Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Wei-Jie Yuan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Chang-Hao Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Lei Xiao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Run-Sha Xiao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Peng-Wei Zeng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Zi-Hua Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The Hunan Provincial Key Lab of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Tumor, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
- Department of The International Joint Research Center of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Technology Equipment & Standardization, Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangsha 410008, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Azin A, Guidolin K, Chadi SA, Quereshy FA. Racial disparities in colon cancer survival: A propensity score matched analysis in the United States. Surgery 2022; 171:873-881. [PMID: 35078631 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black patients are disproportionally impacted by colorectal cancer, both with respect to incidence and mortality. Studies accounting for patient- and community-level factors that contribute to such disparities are lacking. Our objective is to determine if Black compared to White race is associated with worse survival in colon cancer, while accounting for socioeconomic and clinical factors. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of Black or White patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry between 2008 and 2016. Multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity-score matching was performed. RESULTS A total of 100,083 patients were identified, 15,155 Black patients and 84,928 White patients. Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range: 15-67). Black patients were more likely to lack health insurance and reside in counties with low household income, high unemployment, and lower high school completion rates. Black race was associated with poorer unadjusted 5-year cancer-specific survival (79.4% vs 82.4%, P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, Black race was associated with greater 5-year cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.25, P < .001) and overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.16, P < .001). Mortality was higher for Black patients across stages: stage I (hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.09), stage II (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.07), stage III (1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.04). Propensity-score matching identified 27,640 patients; Black race was associated with worse 5-year overall survival (67.5% vs 70.2%, P = .003) and cancer-specific survival (79.4% vs 82.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This US population-based analysis confirms poorer overall survival and cancer-specific survival in Black patients undergoing surgery for nonmetastatic colon cancer despite accounting for trans-sectoral factors that have been implicated in structural racism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Azin
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. http://www.twitter.com/AAzinMD
| | - Keegan Guidolin
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. http://www.twitter.com/KeeganGuidolin
| | - Sami A Chadi
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Colorectal Cancer Program, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. http://www.twitter.com/Schadi_CRS
| | - Fayez A Quereshy
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Colorectal Cancer Program, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abar B, Park CS, Dalawari P, Klausner H, Ogedegbe C, Valassis S, Koneswaran H, Adler D, Bradley K. Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening. EMERGENCY CANCER CARE 2022; 1:12. [PMID: 36312902 PMCID: PMC9589631 DOI: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients’ adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent. Methods RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant’s adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings. Results A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beau Abar
- grid.412750.50000 0004 1936 9166University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 655c, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
| | - Chanjun Syd Park
- grid.412750.50000 0004 1936 9166University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 655c, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
| | - Preeti Dalawari
- grid.262962.b0000 0004 1936 9342Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA
| | - Howard Klausner
- grid.254444.70000 0001 1456 7807Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Chinwe Ogedegbe
- grid.239835.60000 0004 0407 6328Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | - Steven Valassis
- grid.416971.c0000 0004 0435 9598St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT USA
| | - Haran Koneswaran
- grid.416971.c0000 0004 0435 9598St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT USA
| | - David Adler
- grid.412750.50000 0004 1936 9166University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 655c, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
| | - Keith Bradley
- The National Alliance of Research Associates Programs, Bridgeport, CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sharma AE, Lyson H, Cherian R, Somsouk M, Schillinger D, Sarkar U. A Root Cause Analysis of Barriers to Timely Colonoscopy in California Safety-Net Health Systems. J Patient Saf 2022; 18:e163-e171. [PMID: 32467445 PMCID: PMC7688501 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Safety-net health care systems, serving vulnerable populations, see longer delays to timely colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT), which may contribute to existing disparities. We sought to identify root causes of colonoscopy delay after positive FOBT result in the primary care safety net. METHODS We conducted a multisite root cause analysis of cases of delayed colonoscopy, identifying cases where there was a delay of greater than 6 months in completing or scheduling a follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FOBT. We identified cases across 5 California health systems serving low-income, vulnerable populations. We developed a semistructured interview guide based on precedent work. We conducted telephone individual interviews with primary care providers (PCPs) and patients. We then performed qualitative content analysis of the interviews, using an integrated inductive-deductive analytic approach, to identify themes related to recurrent root causes of colonoscopy delay. RESULTS We identified 12 unique cases, comprising 5 patient and 11 PCP interviews. Eight patients completed colonoscopy; median time to colonoscopy was 11.0 months (interquartile range, 6.3 months). Three patients had advanced adenomatous findings. Primary care providers highlighted system-level root causes, including inability to track referrals between primary care and gastroenterology, lack of protocols to follow up with patients, lack of electronic medical record interoperability, and lack of time or staffing resources, compelling tremendous additional effort by staff. In contrast, patients' highlighted individual-level root causes included comorbidities, social needs, and misunderstanding the importance of the FOBT. There was a little overlap between PCP and patient-elicited root causes. CONCLUSIONS Current protocols do not accommodate communication between primary care and gastroenterology. Interventions to address specific barriers identified include improved interoperability between PCP and gastroenterology scheduling systems, protocols to follow-up on incomplete colonoscopies, accommodation for support and transport needs, and patient-friendly education. Interviewing both patients and PCPs leads to richer analysis of the root causes leading to delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Lyson
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF SOM
| | - Roy Cherian
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF SOM
| | | | - Dean Schillinger
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF SOM
| | - Urmimala Sarkar
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF SOM
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rogers CR, Figueroa R, Brooks E, Petersen EM, Kennedy CD, Gray II DM, Sapienza M, Hung M. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening intent and uptake among adult Non-Hispanic Black men. Am J Cancer Res 2021; 11:6200-6213. [PMID: 35018252 PMCID: PMC8727804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-Hispanic (NH) Black men in the United States have the lowest five-year colorectal cancer (CRC) survival rate across all racial/ethnic and sex subgroups and are less likely than their NH White counterparts to complete CRC screening. We hypothesized that greater masculinity barriers to medical care (MBMC) would be negatively associated with CRC screening uptake. Employing a survey design, we examined the MBMC scale and other psychosocial factors influencing CRC screening intent and uptake in a sample of 319 NH Black men aged 45 to 75 years residing in Minnesota, Ohio, and Utah. A series of ordinary least squares and logistic regression models were run with intention and uptake as the outcome variable while controlling for various demographic characteristics. Independent variables in all models included average score on the MBMC; CRC screening knowledge, beliefs and values; and barriers to and social support for CRC screening. Social support, marital status, and age were positively associated with CRC screening intention. Increased CRC screening knowledge and older age were associated with a greater likelihood of completing a stool-based screening test for CRC. Fewer masculinity-related and CRC screening barriers were associated with a greater likelihood of undergoing a sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Contrary to our primary hypothesis, lesser MBMC-related perceptions were associated with increased CRC screening uptake among NH Black men. Our findings inform future CRC promotion programs and emphasize the need for multilevel interventions tailored toward this marginalized population to reduce disparities in screening and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Rogers
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake, UT 84108, USA
| | - Roger Figueroa
- Cornell University, College of Human Ecology, Division of Nutritional Sciences244 Garden Avenue, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Ellen Brooks
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake, UT 84108, USA
| | - Ethan M Petersen
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake, UT 84108, USA
| | - Carson D Kennedy
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine375 Chipeta Way, Suite A, Salt Lake, UT 84108, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray II
- The Ohio State University, College of Medicine1590 N High St. Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
| | - Michael Sapienza
- Colorectal Cancer Alliance1025 Vermont Ave. NW, Suite 1066, Washington, DC 20005, USA
| | - Man Hung
- College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences10894 South River Front Pkwy, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Haverkamp D, Melkonian SC, Jim MA. Growing Disparity in the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer among Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native Populations-United States, 2013-2017. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1799-1806. [PMID: 34341050 PMCID: PMC8590617 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations have experienced regional variation and disparities in colorectal cancer incidence rates. METHODS We examined colorectal cancer incidence (2013-2017) and colorectal cancer incidence trends (1999-2017) among AI/AN persons. Incidence data were linked to Indian Health Service enrollment records, and analyses were restricted to Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Areas. Incidence rates of colorectal cancer among AI/AN and White persons were analyzed in six geographic regions; Hispanic persons were excluded. Incidence trends were analyzed using linear modeling. RESULTS During 2013-2017, colorectal cancer incidence was 41% higher among AI/AN than among White persons. AI/AN incidence rates per 100,000 varied regionally from 34.4 in the East to 96.1 in Alaska. Compared with White persons, AI/AN persons had higher colorectal cancer incidence rates among all age strata and were more likely to have late-stage diagnoses. Incidence rate trends indicated significant increases among both AI/AN and White persons ages <50 years and among AI/AN persons ages 50-64 years. The colorectal cancer incidence rate trend increased among AI/AN persons in the Southwest. CONCLUSIONS The disparity of colorectal cancer incidence rates between AI/AN and White persons has widened since 2005-2009. AI/AN populations have higher colorectal cancer incidence compared with White populations, especially in the Alaska region. IMPACT Our finding of increased colorectal cancer incidence disparities suggests that enhanced screening efforts and culturally appropriate clinical and public health interventions are needed among AI/AN persons overall, and especially in regions and age groups in which colorectal cancer rates are increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald Haverkamp
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
| | - Stephanie C Melkonian
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Melissa A Jim
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the impact of racial residential segregation on Black-White disparities in colorectal cancer diagnosis, surgical resection, and cancer-specific survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA There are clear Black-White disparities in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment with equally disparate explanations for these findings, including genetics, socioeconomic factors, and health behaviors. METHODS Data on Black and White patients with colorectal cancer were obtained from SEER between 2005 and 2015. The exposure of interest was the index of dissimilarity (IoD), a validated measure of segregation derived from 2010 Census data. Outcomes included advanced stage at diagnosis (AJCC stage IV), resection of localized disease (AJCC stage I-II), and cancer-specific survival. We used Poisson regression with robust error variance for the outcomes of interest and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess cancer-specific 5-year survival. RESULTS Black patients had a 41% increased risk of presenting at advanced stage per IoD [risk ratio (RR) 1.41, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.18, 1.69] and White patients saw a 17% increase (RR 1.17, 95%CI 1.04, 1.31). Black patients were 5% less likely to undergo surgical resection (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.90, 0.99), whereas Whites were 5% more likely (RR 1.05, 95%CI 1.03, 1.07). Black patients had 43% increased hazards of cancer-specific mortality with increasing IoD (hazard ratio (HR) 1.43, 95%CI 1.17, 1.74). CONCLUSIONS Black patients with colorectal cancer living in more segregated counties are significantly more likely to present at advanced stage and have worse cancer-specific survival. Enduring structural racism in the form of residential segregation has strong impacts on the colorectal cancer outcomes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Salehi O, Vega EA, Lathan C, James D, Kozyreva O, Alarcon SV, Kutlu OC, Herrick B, Conrad C. Race, Age, Gender, and Insurance Status: A Comparative Analysis of Access to and Quality of Gastrointestinal Cancer Care. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:2152-2162. [PMID: 34027580 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05038-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomics, demographics, and insurance status play roles in healthcare access. Considering the limited resources available, understanding the relative impact of disparities helps prioritize programs designed to overcome them. This study evaluates gastrointestinal cancer care disparity by comparing the impact of different patient factors across oncologic care metrices. METHODS A multi-institutional prospectively maintained cancer database was reviewed retrospectively for gastrointestinal cancers (esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colorectal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary) from 2007 to 2017 to assess quality of care provided. Quality of care was defined by clinical course following national guidelines for the respective cancer. This included surgical intervention, chemotherapy, palliative care, and minimal delay to treatment/diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors associated with quality of care. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank test. RESULTS One thousand seventy-two patients were identified. Survival improved in patients with private insurance compared to government-funded options [median overall survival (mOS) 57.8 vs. 21.2 months; P < .001]. Private insurance also correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis [stages I-II = 50.9% vs. 37.5%, stages III-IV = 37.7% vs. 49.1%, P < .001], increased chemotherapy use [44.2% vs. 37.1%, P < .001], and more surgical intervention [62.4% vs. 48.8%, P < .001]. Outcomes were inferior for Black Americans, including trend towards lower rate of surgical treatment [42% vs. 54%, P = .058] and worse survival in private insurance carriers [mOS 7.8 vs. 57.8 months, P = .021] and those with early stage disease [mOS 39.2 vs. 81.5 months, P = .045] compared to White counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Insurance status has the strongest impact on the quality of gastrointestinal oncologic care with negative synergistic negative effect of race for Black Americans. While governmental programs aim to improve equality of care, there remains significant disparity compared to private insurance. Moreover, private insurance doesn't correct disparity for Black Americans, suggesting the need to address racial imbalances in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Christopher Lathan
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daria James
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvia V Alarcon
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Beth Herrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, & University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Self-reported reasons for colonoscopy among adults aged 45-49 versus 50 years and older from 2010-2018. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 74:101984. [PMID: 34293640 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In May of 2018, the American Cancer Society lowered the age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years and in October 2020, United States Preventive Services Task Force published draft guidelines also lowering age of screening initiation to 45 years. Evaluating guideline adherence is needed; however, the majority of prior research on cancer screening do not distinguish whether colonoscopy was performed for true screening purposes or for post-symptomatic diagnosis. METHODS Using data from the National Health Interview Survey between 2010 to mid-2018, we assessed response to the question "What was the MAIN reason you had [last] colonoscopy?" stratified by age (45-49 versus 50+ years). Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios of receiving last colonoscopy for screening controlling for relevant demographic characteristics. To estimate the cost burden of colonoscopy, the proportion of respondents reporting paying out of pocket for their last colonoscopy was assessed. RESULTS Among 29,074 participants who had undergone a colonoscopy, 44.4 % of those aged 45-50 reported routine procedure as the reason for their most recent colonoscopy, as compared to 82.4 % in the 50+ age group (p < 0.001). Characteristics associated with undergoing colonoscopy as a routine procedure included Black race and male sex for both age cohorts (p < 0.01 for all). Notably, almost half (46.9 %) of participants younger than 50 years paid part of or the full cost of their colonoscopy, as compared to 30.7 % over the age of 50 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The majority of adults aged 45-49 self-report that last colonoscopy was not performed for screening, which is unsurprising given guidelines for screening for individuals under 50. As guidelines change, continued surveillance of colonoscopy patterns across age cohorts is needed, and studies should also incorporate reasons for testing.
Collapse
|