1
|
Tobin EC, Dobbs E, Deslich S, Richmond BK. Race/Ethnicity and Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on the Timely Receipt of Appropriate Operative Treatment of Colon Cancer. Am Surg 2024; 90:1475-1480. [PMID: 38551594 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241241697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rates of appropriate surgical treatment of colon cancer are historically worse in traditionally marginalized populations. We sought to examine which social determinants of health may be associated with longer time to appropriate operative intervention. METHODS The National Cancer Databank was queried for this retrospective study. Adult patients (18 to 90 years of age) diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 with single or primary, stage III colon cancer were included. Patient demographic variables included age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic), comorbidity score, median household income, education status, rural/urban status, treatment facility type and location, and insurance status. Disease characteristics include stage (stage 3), primary site, surgical margins, tumor size, and number of nodes resected. Reported descriptive statistics include means and 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables and frequency and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 134,601 individuals diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer were included. Time to surgery in all cases had a mean of 26.4 ± 19.0 days. Multivariate analysis of time to surgery indicated that receiving surgery at a Community Cancer Program, Charlson-Deyo Score of 0, younger age, and non-Hispanic-White race/ethnicity are associated with decreased time to surgery (P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients who receive surgery at a Community Cancer Program, have fewer comorbidities, have lower household income, are younger, and receive surgery within 50 miles of their primary residence are more likely to have timely surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Tobin
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Erica Dobbs
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Stacie Deslich
- Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Bryan K Richmond
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University Charleston, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dobbs E, Tobin EC, Deslich S, Richmond BK. Race/Ethnicity and Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on Receiving Appropriate Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer. Am Surg 2024:31348241244646. [PMID: 38587435 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241244646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the heightened understanding and improved treatment for colorectal cancer in the United States, social determinants of health (SDH) play a significant role in the colorectal cancer outcomes. We sought to investigate the relationship between SDH and appropriate utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer. METHODS For this retrospective study, we utilized data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Descriptive statistics are reported, including means and 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables and frequency and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate hypothesis testing to identify categorical level factors associated with treatment used Wilcoxon rank sum or Kruskal-Wallis tests, with multivariate analyses performed using regression analysis. RESULTS Significant differences were as follows: Metro-non-Hispanic White patients received treatment less frequently (69.7%) when compared to Metro-non-Hispanic Black patients (73.4%) (P < .001). Increasing age was a negative predictor of likelihood to receive with those over 65 years old having an 83% decrease in likelihood to receive chemotherapy when compared to those under 65 (P < .001). Medicaid patients were 47% less likely and Medicare patients were 40% less likely to receive chemotherapy when compared to those with private insurance (P < .001). Rural patients were statistically more likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 1.42, 1.32-2.52, P < .001) as were urban patients, (OR 1.26, 1.20-1.31, P < .001) when compared to patients residing in metro areas. CONCLUSION Age, living in a Metro area, and government insurance status at diagnosis are negatively correlated with the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. Race was not associated with differences in receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Dobbs
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Edward C Tobin
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Staci Deslich
- CAMC Health Education and Research Institute, Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Bryan K Richmond
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University/Charleston Division, Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lorentsen MK, Sanoff HK. Social Determinants of Health and the Link to Colorectal Cancer Outcomes. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:453-464. [PMID: 38498252 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01191-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most deadly cancer in the United States, behind only lung cancer. Despite improvements in incidence due to screening and mortality in part due to better treatments, there are some groups that have not seen these promising changes. American Indian/Alaska Native and non-Hispanic Black individuals, certain geographic regions, and lower socioeconomic groups have all been shown to have worse CRC outcomes. A significant body of evidence has linked these disparities in outcomes to social determinants of health (SDH). SDH are defined by the WHO as "the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes." These factors include but are not limited to income, education, social support, neighborhood of residence, and access to healthcare. Individuals who are negatively impacted by SDH have been shown to have a higher incidence of CRC. These individuals are also less likely to receive adequate CRC screening, are less likely to receive appropriate treatment, and have increased CRC mortality. Interventions that target different SDH domains have been shown to lead to increased rates of CRC screening and receipt of appropriate treatment while simultaneously improving CRC mortality. The aim of this review is to highlight the connection between SDH and CRC outcomes while also exploring interventions that target SDH and thereby improve CRC outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Lorentsen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hinshaw TP, Fu Y, Irish WD, Parikh AA, Snyder RA. Racial Differences in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Molecular Profiling and Mutation Rates. J Surg Res 2024; 295:763-769. [PMID: 38150868 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, racial disparities persist. The primary aims of the study were to: evaluate differences in molecular testing rates over time by race; and measure the incidence of tumor mutations by race in patients with metastatic CRC. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed of all adult patients with stage IV CRC (2008-2018) identified within the cancer registry of a large regional health system. Demographic/clinical characteristics were collected through primary data abstraction of the electronic health record. Molecular profiling results were obtained directly from Caris Molecular Intelligence and electronic health record. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-three patients were included: 40.5% (n = 155) were Black and 59.5% (n = 228) were White. Significant increases were observed in microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS, and BRAF testing rates during the study period (P < 0.0001). The odds of testing over time increased more significantly in Black compared to White patients for MSI testing (White: odds ratio [OR] 1.26 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.41], Black: OR 1.69 [95% CI 1.41-2.02], P = 0.005) and BRAF testing (White: OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.26-1.62], Black: OR 1.89 [95% CI 1.51-2.36], P = 0.027). An increase in KRAS testing over time was observed for both cohorts and was independent of race (P = 0.58). Mutation rates did not differ by race: KRAS (Black 55.8% versus White 45.6%, P = 0.13) and BRAF (Black 4.8% versus White 10.0%, P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS Within a large regional health system, molecular testing rates in patients with metastatic CRC increased significantly following National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline changes for both Black and White patients. Black and White patients who underwent molecular testing had similar rates of MSI, KRAS, and BRAF mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler P Hinshaw
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Yuanyuan Fu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - William D Irish
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas Health San Antonio Mays Cancer Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siromoni B, Groman A, Parmar K, Mukherjee S, Vadehra D. Exploring Demographic Differences and Outcomes in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300671. [PMID: 38394477 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as CRC diagnosed before age 50 years, has increased significantly worldwide. The majority of EOCRCs do not appear to be driven by genetic factors and may be influenced by environmental factors. We hypothesized that sociodemographic disparities exist in EOCRC. The purpose was of the study was to examine the geographic disparities in patients with EOCRC. METHODS We retrospectively examined the SEER database from 1976 to 2016 to examine the geographic disparities in EOCRC. A total of 73,378 patients with EOCRC were included in the analysis. We performed univariate and multivariable analyses to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Sociodemographic factors, including the location of residence (metropolitan areas [MA] or rural areas [RA]), sex, race, insurance status, and marital status, were included in the statistical analysis. RESULTS The incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in RA versus MA during the study period. Multivariable analysis showed that patients living in RA had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; P < .01) and DSS (HR, 1.15; P < .001) compared with those living in MA. Similarly, non-Hispanic Black ethnicity and uninsured patients had significantly worse survival when compared with non-Hispanic White and insured patients, respectively. Married status showed better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION Patients with EOCRC living in RA have worse outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms behind such socioeconomic disparities is important so that future studies can reduce these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kanak Parmar
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Galadima H, Anson-Dwamena R, Johnson A, Bello G, Adunlin G, Blando J. Machine Learning as a Tool for Early Detection: A Focus on Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer across Socioeconomic Spectrums. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:540. [PMID: 38339293 PMCID: PMC10854986 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting late-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses against the backdrop of socio-economic and regional healthcare disparities. METHODS An innovative theoretical framework was developed to integrate individual- and census tract-level social determinants of health (SDOH) with sociodemographic factors. A comparative analysis of the ML models was conducted using key performance metrics such as AUC-ROC to evaluate their predictive accuracy. Spatio-temporal analysis was used to identify disparities in late-stage CRC diagnosis probabilities. RESULTS Gradient boosting emerged as the superior model, with the top predictors for late-stage CRC diagnosis being anatomic site, year of diagnosis, age, proximity to superfund sites, and primary payer. Spatio-temporal clusters highlighted geographic areas with a statistically significant high probability of late-stage diagnoses, emphasizing the need for targeted healthcare interventions. CONCLUSIONS This research underlines the potential of ML in enhancing the prognostic predictions in oncology, particularly in CRC. The gradient boosting model, with its robust performance, holds promise for deployment in healthcare systems to aid early detection and formulate localized cancer prevention strategies. The study's methodology demonstrates a significant step toward utilizing AI in public health to mitigate disparities and improve cancer care outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadiza Galadima
- School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; (R.A.-D.); (A.J.); (J.B.)
| | - Rexford Anson-Dwamena
- School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; (R.A.-D.); (A.J.); (J.B.)
| | - Ashley Johnson
- School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; (R.A.-D.); (A.J.); (J.B.)
| | - Ghalib Bello
- Department of Environmental Medicine & Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Georges Adunlin
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA;
| | - James Blando
- School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; (R.A.-D.); (A.J.); (J.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Katz ML, Shoben AB, Newell S, Hall C, Emerson B, Gray DM, Chakraborty S, Reiter PL. Video brochures in a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach program provide cancer screening information in a user-friendly format for rural Appalachian community members. J Rural Health 2024; 40:96-103. [PMID: 37296510 PMCID: PMC10709528 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults, yet many adults are not up-to-date with screening. One recommended CRC screening approach is the annual completion of a fecal immunochemical test (FIT). However, usually, fewer than half of mailed FIT tests are returned. METHODS To address barriers to FIT return, a video brochure was developed providing targeted CRC screening information and step-by-step FIT instructions as a component in a mailed FIT program. This pilot study occurred in 2021-2022 and partnered with a federally qualified health center in Appalachian Ohio to send a FIT to patients who were 50-64 years old, of average risk, and not up-to-date on CRC screening. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups that differed on materials sent with the FIT: usual care (manufacturer's instructions), a video brochure (video instructions, disposable gloves, disposable stool collection device), or an audio brochure (audio instructions, disposable gloves, disposable stool collection device). FINDINGS Overall, 16 of 94 patients (17%) returned the FIT, and return was higher among those sent the video brochure (28%) compared to the other 2 groups (OR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.02, 9.2; P = .046). Two patients had positive tests and were referred for colonoscopy. Patients sent the video brochure reported the content was important, relevant, and made them think about completing the FIT. CONCLUSIONS Using a video brochure to provide understandable information in a mailed FIT kit is a promising strategy to improve CRC screening outreach programs in rural regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira L. Katz
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Abigail B. Shoben
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Sabrina Newell
- Compass Community Health Center, Portsmouth, Ohio, United States
| | - Christina Hall
- Compass Community Health Center, Portsmouth, Ohio, United States
| | - Brent Emerson
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Darrell M. Gray
- Formerly in the Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University and currently the Chief Health Equity Officer at Elevance Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Subhankar Chakraborty
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Paul L. Reiter
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brenner AT, Waters AR, Wangen M, Rohweder C, Odebunmi O, Marciniak MW, Ferrari RM, Wheeler SB, Shah PD. Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:99-112. [PMID: 37072526 PMCID: PMC10113122 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT™) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service quality rating). METHODS We conducted a national online survey of non-institutionalized US adults through panels managed by Qualtrics, a survey research company. A total of 1,045 adults (response rate 62%) completed the survey between March and April 2021. Sampling quotas matched respondents to the 2010 US Census and oversampled rural residents. We assessed pharmacy use patterns by rurality and design preferences for learning about PharmFIT™; receiving a FIT kit from a pharmacy; and completing and returning the FIT kit. RESULTS Pharmacy use patterns varied, with some notable differences across rurality. Rural respondents used local, independently owned pharmacies more than non-rural respondents (20.4%, 6.3%, p < 0.001) and rated pharmacy service quality higher than non-rural respondents. Non-rural respondents preferred digital communication to learn about PharmFIT™ (36% vs 47%; p < 0.001) as well as digital FIT counseling (41% vs 49%; p = 0.02) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns: respondents who pick up prescriptions in-person preferred to get their FIT (OR 7.7; 5.3-11.2) and return it in-person at the pharmacy (OR 1.7; 1.1-2.4). CONCLUSION Pharmacies are highly accessible and could be useful for expanding access to CRC screening services. Local context and pharmacy use patterns should be considered in the design and implementation of PharmFIT™.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison T Brenner
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Austin R Waters
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Catherine Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Olufeyisayo Odebunmi
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Macary Weck Marciniak
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renée M Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Parth D Shah
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Colditz GA, Drake BF, Eberlein TJ. Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center: Cancer Prevention Perspective. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2023; 16:541-544. [PMID: 37779458 PMCID: PMC10543981 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
We summarize Siteman Cancer Center catchment that covers 82 counties in southern Illinois and eastern Missouri. We note both the high poverty and cancer rates in many rural counties. Siteman Community Outreach and Engagement has developed a number of strategies to move towards achieving health equity. These include NCI-funded research projects in rural clinics and outreach to improve access to cancer prevention services. To increase capacity for community-engaged research, we have developed and refined a Community Research Fellows Training Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham A. Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Bettina F. Drake
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Timothy J. Eberlein
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paskett ED, Kruse-Diehr AJ, Oliveri JM, Vanderpool RC, Gray DM, Pennell ML, Huang B, Young GS, Fickle D, Cromo M, Katz ML, Reiter PL, Rogers M, Gross DA, Fairchild V, Xu W, Carman A, Walunis JM, McAlearney AS, Huerta TR, Rahurkar S, Biederman E, Dignan M. Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:748-756. [PMID: 37202831 PMCID: PMC10538475 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Appalachian regions of Kentucky and Ohio are hotspots for colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in the USA. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality; however, screening uptake is needed, especially in these underserved geographic areas. Implementation science offers strategies to address this challenge. The aim of the current study was to conduct multi-site, transdisciplinary research to evaluate and improve CRC screening processes using implementation science strategies. The study consists of two phases (Planning and Implementation). In the Planning Phase, a multilevel assessment of 12 health centers (HC) (one HC from each of the 12 Appalachian counties) was conducted by interviewing key informants, creating community profiles, identifying HC and community champions, and performing HC data inventories. Two designated pilot HCs chose CRC evidence-based interventions to adapt and implement at each level (i.e., patient, provider, HC, and community) with evaluation relative to two matched control HCs. During the Implementation Phase, study staff will repeat the rollout process in HC and community settings in a randomized, staggered fashion in the remaining eight counties/HCs. Evaluation will include analyses of electronic health record data and provider and county surveys. Rural HCs have been reluctant to participate in research because of concerns about capacity; however, this project should demonstrate that research does not need to be burdensome and can adapt to local needs and HC abilities. If effective, this approach could be disseminated to HC and community partners throughout Appalachia to encourage the uptake of effective interventions to reduce the burden of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jill M Oliveri
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Robin C Vanderpool
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael L Pennell
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bin Huang
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Division of Biostatistics, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Facility, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Darla Fickle
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Melinda Rogers
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Community Impact Office, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David A Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Vickie Fairchild
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Wendy Xu
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Angela Carman
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jean M Walunis
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Erika Biederman
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Dignan
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferrari RM, Leeman J, Brenner AT, Correa SY, Malo TL, Moore AA, O'Leary MC, Randolph CM, Ratner S, Frerichs L, Farr D, Crockett SD, Wheeler SB, Lich KH, Beasley E, Hogsed M, Bland A, Richardson C, Newcomer M, Reuland DS. Implementation strategies in the Exploration and Preparation phases of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in community health centers. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:118. [PMID: 37730659 PMCID: PMC10512568 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adoption of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has lagged in community health center (CHC) populations in the USA. To address this implementation gap, we developed a multilevel intervention to improve screening in CHCs in our region. We used the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to guide this effort. Here, we describe the use of implementation strategies outlined in the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation in both the Exploration and Preparation phases of this project. During these two EPIS phases, we aimed to answer three primary questions: (1) What factors in the inner and outer contexts may support or hinder colorectal cancer screening in North Carolina CHCs?; (2) What evidence-based practices (EBPs) best fit the needs of North Carolina CHCs?; and (3) How can we best integrate the selected EBPs into North Carolina CHC systems? METHODS During the Exploration phase, we conducted local needs assessments, built a coalition, and conducted local consensus discussions. In the Preparation phase, we formed workgroups corresponding to the intervention's core functional components. Workgroups used cyclical small tests of change and process mapping to identify implementation barriers and facilitators and to adapt intervention components to fit inner and outer contexts. RESULTS Exploration activities yielded a coalition of stakeholders, including two rural CHCs, who identified barriers and facilitators and reached consensus on two EBPs: mailed FIT and navigation to colonoscopy. Stakeholders further agreed that the delivery of those two EBPs should be centralized to an outreach center. During Preparation, workgroups developed and refined protocols for the following centrally-delivered intervention components: a registry to identify and track eligible patients, a centralized system for mailing at-home stool tests, and a process to navigate patients to colonoscopy after an abnormal stool test. CONCLUSIONS This description may be useful both to implementation scientists, who can draw lessons from applied implementation studies such as this to refine their implementation strategy typologies and frameworks, as well as to implementation practitioners seeking exemplars for operationalizing strategies in early phases of implementation in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 North Medical Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Sara Y Correa
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Teri L Malo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Alexis A Moore
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Meghan C O'Leary
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Connor M Randolph
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Shana Ratner
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- UNC Institute for Healthcare Quality Improvement, CB #8005, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Leah Frerichs
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Deeonna Farr
- College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, 2307 Carol G. Belk Building, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA
| | - Seth D Crockett
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3161 SW Pavilion Loop, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Evan Beasley
- Blue Ridge Health, UNC Health, 2579 Chimney Rock Road, Hendersonville, NC, 28792, USA
| | - Michelle Hogsed
- Blue Ridge Health, 2759 Chimney Rock Road, Hendersonville, NC, 28792, USA
| | - Ashley Bland
- Blue Ridge Health, 2759 Chimney Rock Road, Hendersonville, NC, 28792, USA
| | - Claudia Richardson
- Ahoskie Comprehensive Care, Roanoke Chowan Community Health Center, 120 Health Center Drive, Ahoskie, NC, 27910, USA
| | - Mike Newcomer
- Digestive Health Partners, 191 Biltmore Avenue, Asheville, NC, 28801, USA
- Western Carolina Medical Society, 304 Summit Street, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA
| | - Daniel S Reuland
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tobin EC, Nolan N, Thompson S, Elmore M, Richmond BK. The Intersection of Race and Rurality and its Effect on Colorectal Cancer Survival. Am Surg 2023; 89:3163-3170. [PMID: 36890731 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231160833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcomes in colorectal cancer treatment are historically worse in Black people and residents of rural areas. Purported reasons include factors such as systemic racism, poverty, lack of access to care, and social determinants of health. We sought to determine whether outcomes worsened when race and rural residence intersected. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for individuals with stage II-III colorectal cancer (2004-2018). To examine the intersectionality of race/rurality on outcomes, race (Black/White) and rurality (based on county) were combined into a single variable. Main outcome of interest was 5-year survival. Cox hazard regression analysis was performed to determine variables independently associating with survival. Control variables included age at diagnosis, sex, race, Charlson-Deyo score, insurance status, stage, and facility type. RESULTS Of 463 948 patients, 5717 were Black-Rural, 50 742 were Black-Urban, 72 241 were White-Rural, and 33 5271 were White-Urban. Five-year mortality rate was 31.6%. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated race-rurality was associated with overall survival (P < .001), with White-Urban having the greatest mean survival length (47.9 months) and Black-Rural with the lowest (46.7 months). Multivariable analysis found that Black-Rural (1.26, 95% confidence interval [1.20-1.32]), Black-Urban (1.16, [1.16-1.18]), and White-Rural (HR: 1.05; (1.04-1.07) had increased mortality when compared to White-Urban individuals (P < .001). CONCLUSION Although White-Rural individuals fared worse than White-Urban, Black individuals fared worst of all, with the poorest outcomes observed in Black individuals in rural areas. This suggests that both Black race and rurality negatively affect survival, and act synergistically to further worsen outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Charles Tobin
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Nicholas Nolan
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Stephanie Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Michael Elmore
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Bryan Kelly Richmond
- Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Preston MA, Cadet D, Hunley R, Retnam R, Arezo S, Sheppard VB. Health Equity and Colorectal Cancer Awareness: a Community Health Educator Initiative. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:225-230. [PMID: 34677801 PMCID: PMC8532449 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-02102-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality persist in rural and underserved communities. Our Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) activities are grounded in a bi-directional Community-to-Bench model in which the National Outreach Network Community Health Educator (NON CHE) Screen to Save (S2S) initiative was implemented. In this study, we assessed the impact of the NON CHE S2S in rural and underserved communities. Descriptive and comparative analyses were used to examine the role of the NON CHE S2S on CRC knowledge and CRC screening intent. Data included demographics, current CRC knowledge, awareness, and future CRC health plans. A multivariate linear regression was fit to survey scores for CRC knowledge. The NON CHE S2S engaged 441 participants with 170 surveys completed. The difference in participants' CRC knowledge before and after the NON CHE S2S intervention had an overall mean of 0.92 with a standard deviation of 2.56. At baseline, White participants had significantly higher CRC knowledge scores, correctly answering 1.94 (p = 0.007) more questions on average than Black participants. After the NON CHE S2S intervention, this difference was not statistically significant. Greater than 95% of participants agreed that the NON CHE S2S sessions impacted their intent to get screened for CRC. Equity of access to health information and the health care system can be achieved with precision public health strategies. The COE bi-directional Community-to-Bench model facilitated community connections through the NON CHE and increased awareness of CRC risk reduction, screening, treatment, and research. The NON CHE combined with S2S is a powerful tool to engage communities with the greatest health care needs and positively impact an individual's intent to "get screened" for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Preston
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA.
| | - Debbie Cadet
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA
| | - Rachel Hunley
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA
| | - Reuben Retnam
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA
| | - Sarah Arezo
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Office of Health Equity & Disparities Research-Community Outreach & Engagement, Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980149, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lewis-Thames MW, Leahy N, Kruse-Diehr AJ, Ackermann N, Maki J, Davis KL, Drake BF. Adapting a Research and Community Capacity-Building Program to Address Rural Cancer Burden and Facilitate Partnership Development Between Rural Community Stakeholders and an Urban Comprehensive Cancer Center. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023:10.1007/s13187-022-02256-7. [PMID: 36595213 PMCID: PMC10315419 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02256-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
While rural-urban cancer disparities persist, the research building capacity between rural communities and high-quality cancer centers remains limited. Thus, we describe how a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center partnered with rural community stakeholders to adapt a cancer prevention-focused research and community capacity-building workshop. The workshop's goal was to strengthen community-academic partnerships and facilitate the development of sustainable well-resourced rural cancer-focused research. Researchers from the Siteman Cancer Center partnered with community leaders from rural counties in southern Illinois. We adapted the workshop from an existing evidence-based program. We analyzed changes in knowledge and research capacity and relevance to their community work. From February to May 2019, community partners guided all elements of the workshop development. Workshop participants were mostly White race (93%), had a college degree or beyond (75%), reported living in a rural community (93%), and represented an academic, faith-based, or healthcare institution (78%). Participants' mean knowledge scores of the presented content increased significantly after each session, from 9.3 to 9.9 for session 1 (p = 0.05) and 6.8 to 9.7 (p < 0.001) for session two. Through the workshop, participant scores also increased in research capacity skills, confidence, and their understanding of conducting research in the community. The workshop, co-curated and led by rural community leaders and researchers from Siteman Cancer Center, successfully increased knowledge of and interest in building cancer research capacity. Lessons from our work can inform the implementation of similar programs that address rural cancer health through research and community capacity building between rural community partners and urban cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marquita W Lewis-Thames
- Department of Medical Social Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Center for Community Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Nora Leahy
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Social Services, Vivent Health, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- Dept. of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 2195 Harrodsburg Rd, Suite 125, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA
| | - Nicole Ackermann
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Julia Maki
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Kia L Davis
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Bettina F Drake
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee KMN, Hunleth J, Rolf L, Maki J, Lewis-Thames M, Oestmann K, James AS. Distance and Transportation Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Community. J Prim Care Community Health 2023; 14:21501319221147126. [PMID: 36594346 PMCID: PMC9829879 DOI: 10.1177/21501319221147126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Rural residents in underserved areas face many barriers to health services, including colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but rural healthcare providers may assist patients navigating these challenges due to familiarity with local contexts. In 2017 to 2018, we interviewed clinical practitioners and staff (n = 40) at 13 primary care and gastroenterology locations across rural Southern Illinois. We used a semi-structured interview guide that addressed system, provider, and patient levels including domains related to barriers, facilitators, and needs for intervention. This article focuses on 3 main elements related to distance and transportation that emerged from inductive coding. First, providers described long distance travel for care as normalized but not necessarily preferable. Second, they identified and described distance-related challenges specific to CRC screening, and third, providers discussed strategies, mostly related to transportation, they use to navigate those challenges. Finally, they suggested a variety of broader solutions to reduce distance and transportation barriers to screening. Overall, distance to care remains a challenge to increasing CRC screening and contributes to disparities in rural communities. To increase early detection and reduce rural cancer disparities, efforts to increase screening and follow-up must address ways to help patients and providers navigate this distance within their local communities and contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine M. N. Lee
- Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA,Aimee S. James, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8100, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Jean Hunleth
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Liz Rolf
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Julia Maki
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Aimee S. James
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buchalter RB, Huml AM, Poggio ED, Schold JD. Geographic hot spots of kidney transplant candidates wait-listed post-dialysis. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14821. [PMID: 36102154 PMCID: PMC10078213 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preemptive wait-listing of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) candidates before maintenance dialysis increases the likelihood of transplantation and improves outcomes among transplant patients. Previous studies have identified substantial disparities in rates of preemptive listing, but a gap exists in examining geographic sources of disparities, particularly for sub-regional units. Identifying small area hot spots where delayed listing is particularly prevalent may more effectively inform both health policy and regionally appropriate interventions. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing 2010-2020 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data for all DDKT candidates to examine overall and race-stratified geospatial hot spots of post-dialysis wait-listing in U.S. zip code tabulation areas (ZCTA). Three geographic clustering methods were utilized to identify robust statistically significant hot spots of post-dialysis wait-listing. RESULTS Novel sub-regional hot spots were identified in the southeast, southwest, Appalachia, and California, with a majority existing in the southeast. Race-stratified results were more nuanced, but broadly reflected similar patterns. Comparing transplant candidates in hot spots to candidates in non-clusters indicated a strong association between residence in hot spots and high area deprivation (OR: 6.76, 95%CI: 6.52-7.02), indicating that improving access healthcare in these areas may be particularly beneficial. CONCLUSION Our study identified overall and race-stratified hot spots with low rates of preemptive wait list placement in the U.S., which may be useful for prospective healthcare policy and interventions via targeting of these narrowly defined geographical areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Blake Buchalter
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Anne M. Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Glickman Urological and Kidney InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Emilio D. Poggio
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Glickman Urological and Kidney InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kruse-Diehr AJ, Dignan M, Cromo M, Carman AL, Rogers M, Gross D, Russell S. Building Cancer Prevention and Control Research Capacity in Rural Appalachian Kentucky Primary Care Clinics During COVID-19: Development and Adaptation of a Multilevel Colorectal Cancer Screening Project. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:1407-1413. [PMID: 33599967 PMCID: PMC7890393 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01972-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study describes the development of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening multilevel intervention with four primary care clinics in rural Appalachian Kentucky. We also discuss barriers experienced by the clinics during COVID-19 and how clinic limitations and needs informed project modifications. Four primary care clinics were recruited, key informant interviews with clinic providers were conducted, electronic health record (EHR) capacity to collect data related to CRC screening and follow-up was assessed, and a series of meetings were held with clinic champions to discuss implementation of strategies to impact clinic CRC screening rates. Analysis of interviews revealed multilevel barriers to CRC screening. Patient-level barriers included fatalism, competing priorities, and financial and literacy concerns. The main provider- and clinic-level barriers were provider preference for colonoscopy over stool-based testing and EHR tracking concerns. Clinics selected strategies to address barriers, but the onset of COVID-19 necessitated modifications to these strategies. Due to COVID-19, changes in clinic staffing and workflow occurred, including provider furloughs, a state-mandated pause in elective procedures, and an increase in telehealth. Clinics adapted screening strategies to match changing needs, including shifting from paper to digital educational tools and using telehealth to increase annual wellness visits for screening promotion. While significant delays persist for scheduling colonoscopies, clinics were encouraged to promote stool-based tests as a primary screening modality for average-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 151 Washington Avenue, Bowman Hall 345, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
- Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | - Mark Dignan
- Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Angela L Carman
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 151 Washington Avenue, Bowman Hall 345, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | | | - David Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Sue Russell
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Murphy CC, Paskett ED, Pruitt SL. The Influence of Place and Geography on Outcomes Across the Cancer Continuum. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:369-371. [PMID: 35671802 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sandi L Pruitt
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rogers CR, Korous KM, Brooks E, De Vera MA, Tuuhetaufa F, Lucas T, Curtin K, Pesman C, Johnson W, Gallagher P, Moore JX. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Differences and Potential Geographic Determinants Among Men and Women in Utah. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-16. [PMID: 35522914 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_350241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
By 2030, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is expected to become the leading cancer-related cause of death for people age 20 to 49. To improve understanding of this phenomenon, we analyzed the geographic determinants of EOCRC in Utah by examining county-level incidence and mortality. We linked data from the Utah Population Database to the Utah Cancer Registry to identify residents (age 18-49) diagnosed with EOCRC between 2000 and 2020, and we used spatial empirical Bayes smoothing to determine county-level hotspots. We identified 1,867 EOCRC diagnoses (52.7% in male patients, 69.2% in non-Hispanic White patients). Ten counties (34%) were classified as hotspots, with high EOCRC incidence or mortality. Hotspot status was unrelated to incidence rates, but non-Hispanic ethnic-minority men (incidence rate ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.91), Hispanic White men and women (incidence rate ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.00-2.51), and Hispanic ethnic-minority men and women (incidence rate ratio, 4.59; 95% CI, 3.50-5.91) were more likely to be diagnosed with EOCRC. After adjustment for income and obesity, adults living in hotspots had a 31% higher hazard for death (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69). Survival was poorest for adults with a late-stage diagnosis living in hotspots (chi square (1) = 4.0; p = .045). Adults who were married or who had a life partner had a lower hazard for death than single adults (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92). The risk for EOCRC is elevated in 34% of Utah counties, warranting future research and interventions aimed at increasing screening and survival in the population age 18 to 49.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Rogers
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Kevin M Korous
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ellen Brooks
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Mary A De Vera
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fa Tuuhetaufa
- Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Todd Lucas
- Division of Public Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, MI
| | - Karen Curtin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Utah Population Database Shared Resource, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Wenora Johnson
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Justin X Moore
- Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention, Control, & Population Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lewis-Thames MW, Langston ME, Khan S, Han Y, Fuzzell L, Xu S, Moore JX. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Rural-Urban Trends in 5-Year Survival of Patients With Lung, Prostate, Breast, and Colorectal Cancers: 1975-2011 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2212246. [PMID: 35587350 PMCID: PMC9121191 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Considering reported rural-urban cancer incidence and mortality trends, rural-urban cancer survival trends are important for providing a comprehensive description of cancer burden. Furthermore, little is known about rural-urban differences in survival trends by racial and ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE To examine national rural-urban trends in 5-year cancer-specific survival probabilities for lung, prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers in a diverse sample of racial and ethnic groups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study used an epidemiologic assessment with 1975 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to analyze patients diagnosed no later than 2011. Patients were classified as living in rural and urban counties based on the 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The 5-year cancer-specific survival probability of urban and rural patients for each cancer type was estimated by fitting Cox proportional hazard regression models accounting for race, ethnicity, tumor characteristics, and other sociodemographic characteristics. A generalized linear regression model was used to estimate the mean estimated probability of survival for each stratum. Joinpoint regression analysis estimated periods of significant change in survival. RESULTS In this study, data from 3 659 417 patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 67 [58-76]; 1 918 609 [52.4%] male; 237 815 [6.5%] Hispanic patients; 396 790 [10.8%] Black patients; 2 825 037 [77.2%] White patients) were analyzed, including 888 338 patients with lung cancer (24.3%), 750 704 patients with colorectal cancer (20.5%), 987 826 patients with breast cancer (27.0%) breast, and 1 023 549 patients with prostate cancer (28.0%). There were 430 353 rural patients (11.8%). Overall, there was an equal representation of rural and urban men. Rural patients were likely to be non-Hispanic White individuals, have more cases of distant tumors, and be older. Rural and non-Hispanic Black patients for all cancer types often had shorter survival. From 1975 to 2016, the 5-year lung cancer survival rate was shorter for non-Hispanic Black rural patients in 1975 at 48%, while increasing to 57% for both non-Hispanic Black urban and rural patients in 2011, but still the shortest among all cancer types. In 1975, the longest survival rate was observed in urban Asian and Pacific Islander patients with breast cancer at 86%, and in 2011, the longest survival rate was observed in urban non-Hispanic White patients with XX cancer at 92%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Even after accounting for sociodemographic and tumor characteristics, these findings suggest that non-Hispanic Black patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to cancer burden, and resources are urgently needed to reverse decades-old survival trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marquita W. Lewis-Thames
- Department of Medical Social Science, Center for Community Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Marvin E. Langston
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Saira Khan
- Epidemiology Program, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Yunan Han
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Lindsay Fuzzell
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Shuai Xu
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Justin Xavier Moore
- Cancer Prevention, Control, and Population Health Program, Department of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
- Institute of Preventive and Public Health, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36:449-470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
22
|
Su LJ, Young SG, Collins J, Matich E, Hsu PC, Chiang TC. Geospatial Assessment of Pesticide Concentration in Ambient Air and Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Arkansas, 2013-2017. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063258. [PMID: 35328946 PMCID: PMC8951132 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to various agricultural pesticides has been linked to colorectal cancer (CRC), mostly among farmworkers and applicators. Given the potential pesticide drift in ambient air, residents near farmland may be exposed to carcinogenic pesticides even if they are not actively engaged in pesticide application. Pesticide air pollution at the county level was estimated using the 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment. CRC incidence data were acquired from the Arkansas Central Cancer Registry for 2013-2017. We ran ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models, finding significant spatial autocorrelation of residuals for most models. Using geographically weighted regression (GWR) we found age-adjusted CRC incidence rates vary in an increasing west-to-east gradient, with the highest rates in the Arkansas Delta region. A similar gradient was observed in the distribution of the population living below the poverty line and the population percentage of Black people. Significant associations between Trifluralin (crude model only), Carbon Tetrachloride, and Ethylene Dibromide with CRC incidence rates in OLS models only explained 5-7% of the variation and exhibited spatial autocorrelation of residuals. GWR models explained 24-32% (adjusted r2 9-16%) of CRC incidence rate variation, suggesting additional factors may contribute to the association between pesticides and CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihchyun Joseph Su
- Department of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Sean G. Young
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (E.M.); (P.-C.H.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Josephine Collins
- Department of Psychology, Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR 71998, USA;
| | - Eryn Matich
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (E.M.); (P.-C.H.)
| | - Ping-Ching Hsu
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; (E.M.); (P.-C.H.)
| | - Tung-Chin Chiang
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Al-hadlaq SM, Balto HA, Hassan WM, Marraiki NA, El-Ansary AK. Biomarkers of non-communicable chronic disease: an update on contemporary methods. PeerJ 2022; 10:e12977. [PMID: 35233297 PMCID: PMC8882335 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic diseases constitute a major global burden with significant impact on health systems, economies, and quality of life. Chronic diseases include a broad range of diseases that can be communicable or non-communicable. Chronic diseases are often associated with modifications of normal physiological levels of various analytes that are routinely measured in serum and other body fluids, as well as pathological findings, such as chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Identification of at-risk populations, early diagnosis, and prediction of prognosis play a major role in preventing or reducing the burden of chronic diseases. Biomarkers are tools that are used by health professionals to aid in the identification and management of chronic diseases. Biomarkers can be diagnostic, predictive, or prognostic. Several individual or grouped biomarkers have been used successfully in the diagnosis and prediction of certain chronic diseases, however, it is generally accepted that a more sophisticated approach to link and interpret various biomarkers involved in chronic disease is necessary to improve our current procedures. In order to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased coverage of the literature, first a primary frame of the manuscript (title, headings and subheadings) was drafted by the authors working on this paper. Second, based on the components drafted in the preliminary skeleton a comprehensive search of the literature was performed using the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. Multiple keywords related to the topic were used. Out of screened papers, only 190 papers, which are the most relevant, and recent articles were selected to cover the topic in relation to etiological mechanisms of different chronic diseases, the most recently used biomarkers of chronic diseases and finally the advances in the applications of multivariate biomarkers of chronic diseases as statistical and clinically applied tool for the early diagnosis of chronic diseases was discussed. Recently, multivariate biomarkers analysis approach has been employed with promising prospect. A brief discussion of the multivariate approach for the early diagnosis of the most common chronic diseases was highlighted in this review. The use of diagnostic algorithms might show the way for novel criteria and enhanced diagnostic effectiveness inpatients with one or numerous non-communicable chronic diseases. The search for new relevant biomarkers for the better diagnosis of patients with non-communicable chronic diseases according to the risk of progression, sickness, and fatality is ongoing. It is important to determine whether the newly identified biomarkers are purely associations or real biomarkers of underlying pathophysiological processes. Use of multivariate analysis could be of great importance in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solaiman M. Al-hadlaq
- Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hanan A. Balto
- Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Central Research Laboratory, Female Campus, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wail M. Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
| | - Najat A. Marraiki
- Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afaf K. El-Ansary
- Central Research Laboratory, Female Campus, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tossas KY, Reitzel S, Schifano K, Garrett C, Hurt K, Rosado M, Winn RA, Thomson MD. Project COALESCE-An Example of Academic Institutions as Conveners of Community-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Cancer Screening Access. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020957. [PMID: 35055776 PMCID: PMC8775556 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In Virginia, 56% of colorectal cancers (CRC) are diagnosed late, making it one of three enduring CRC mortality hotspots in the US. Cervical cancer (CCa) exhibits a similar pattern, with 48% late-stage diagnosis. Mortality for these cancers is worse for non-Latinx/e(nL)-Black people relative to nL-White people in Virginia, but preventable with equitable screening access and timely diagnostic follow-up. However, structural barriers, such as fractured referral systems and extended time between medical visits, remain. Because Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) care for a large proportion of racial and ethnic minorities, and underserved communities, regardless of ability to pay, they are ideal partners to tackle structural barriers to cancer screenings. We piloted a quality improvement initiative at five FQHCs in southcentral Virginia to identify and address structural, race-related barriers to CRC, as well as CCa screening and diagnostic follow-up using evidence-based approaches. Uniquely, FQHCs were paired with local community organizations in a didactic partnership, to elevate the community’s voice while together, increase support, acceptance, uptake, and intervention sustainability. We report on project development, and share preliminary data within the context of project goals, namely, to increase cancer screenings by 5–10%, improve knowledge and diagnostic follow-up processes, and build longitudinal partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Y. Tossas
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (S.R.); (M.D.T.)
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Savannah Reitzel
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (S.R.); (M.D.T.)
| | - Katelyn Schifano
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Charlotte Garrett
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Kathy Hurt
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Michelle Rosado
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Robert A. Winn
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Maria D. Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (S.R.); (M.D.T.)
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA; (K.S.); (C.G.); (K.H.); (M.R.); (R.A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hoseini B, Rahmatinejad Z, Goshayeshi L, Bergquist R, Golabpour A, Ghaffarzadegan K, Rahmatinejad F, Darrudi R, Eslami S. Colorectal Cancer in North-Eastern Iran: a retrospective, comparative study of early-onset and late-onset cases based on data from the Iranian hereditary colorectal cancer registry. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:48. [PMID: 34998373 PMCID: PMC8742430 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09132-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing among patients below 50 years of age. The reason for this is unclear, but could have to do with the fact that indicative variables, such as tumour location, gender preference and genetic preponderance have not been followed up in a consistent mann er. The current study was primarily conducted to improve the hereditary CRC screening programme by assessing the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of early-onset CRC compared to late-onset CRC in northeast Iran. METHODS This retrospective study, carried out over a three-year follow-up period (2014-2017), included 562 consecutive CRCs diagnosed in three Mashhad city hospital laboratories in north-eastern Iran. We applied comparative analysis of pathological and hereditary features together with information on the presence of mismatch repair (MMR) gene deficiency with respect to recovery versus mortality. Patients with mutations resulting in absence of the MMR gene MLH1 protein product and normal BRAF status were considered to be at high risk of Lynch syndrome (LS). Analyses using R studio software were performed on early-onset CRC (n = 222) and late-onset CRC (n = 340), corresponding to patients ≤50 years of age and patients > 50 years. RESULTS From an age-of-onset point of view, the distribution between the genders differed with females showing a higher proportion of early-onset CRC than men (56% vs. 44%), while the late-onset CRC disparity was less pronounced (48% vs. 52%). The mean age of all participants was 55.6 ± 14.8 years, with 40.3 ± 7.3 years for early-onset CRC and 65.1 ± 9.3 years for late-onset CRC. With respect to anatomical tumour location (distal, rectal and proximal), the frequencies were 61, 28 and 11%, respectively, but the variation did not reach statistical significance. However, there was a dramatic difference with regard to the history of CRC in second-degree relatives between two age categories, with much higher numbers of family-related CRCs in the early-onset group. Expression of the MLH1 and PMS2 genes were significantly different between recovered and deceased, while this finding was not observed with regard to the MSH6 and the MSH2 genes. Mortality was significantly higher in those at high risk of LS. CONCLUSION The variation of demographic, pathological and genetic characteristics between early-onset and late-onset CRC emphasizes the need for a well-defined algorithm to identify high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benyamin Hoseini
- Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Zahra Rahmatinejad
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Ladan Goshayeshi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Surgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Robert Bergquist
- Formerly UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Ingerod, SE-454 94, Brastad, Sweden
| | - Amin Golabpour
- School of Paramedical , Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Kamran Ghaffarzadegan
- Pathology Department, Education and Research Department, Razavi Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Rahmatinejad
- Department of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Reza Darrudi
- Department of Health Information Technology, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
| | - Saeid Eslami
- Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Danos D, Leonardi C, Wu XC. Geographic determinants of colorectal cancer in Louisiana. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:525-532. [PMID: 34994869 PMCID: PMC8904347 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01546-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Currently, rural residents in the United States (US) experience a greater cancer burden for tobacco-related cancers and cancers that can be prevented by screening. We aim to characterize geographic determinants of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in Louisiana due to rural residence and other known geographic risk factors, area socioeconomic status (SES), and cultural region (Acadian or French-speaking). Methods Primary colorectal cancer diagnosed among adults 30 years and older in 2008–2017 were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Population and social and economic data were obtained from US Census American Community Survey. Rural areas were defined using US Department of Agriculture 2010 rural–urban commuting area codes. Estimates of relative risk (RR) were obtained from multilevel binomial regression models of incidence. Results The study population was 16.1% rural, 18.4% low SES, and 17.9% Acadian. Risk of CRC was greater among rural white residents (RR Women: 1.09(1.02–1.16), RR Men: 1.11(1.04–1.18)). Low SES was associated with increased CRC for all demographic groups, with excess risk ranging from 8% in Black men (RR: 1.08(1.01–1.16)) to 16% in white men (RR: 1.16(1.08–1.24)). Increased risk in the Acadian region was greatest for Black men (RR: 1.21(1.10–1.33)) and women (RR: 1.21(1.09–1.33)). Rural–urban disparities in CRC were no longer significant after controlling for SES and Acadian region. Conclusion SES remains a significant determinant of CRC disparities in Louisiana and may contribute to observed rural–urban disparities in the state. While the intersectionality of CRC risk factors is complex, we have confirmed a robust regional disparity for the Acadian region of Louisiana. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-021-01546-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Danos
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Claudia Leonardi
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rogers CR, Brooks E, Curtin K, De Vera MA, Qeadan F, Rogers TN, Petersen E, Gallagher P, Pesmen C, Johnson W, Henley C, Hickman W, Newcomb E, Korous KM, Handley MA. Protocol for #iBeatCRC: a community-based intervention to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048959. [PMID: 34862279 PMCID: PMC8647393 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Th last two decades have seen a twofold increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence among individuals under the recommended screening age of 50 years. Although the origin of this early-onset CRC (EOCRC) spike remains unknown, prior studies have reported that EOCRC harbours a distinct molecular and clinical phenotype in younger individuals. The sharp increase in EOCRC incidence rates may be attributable to a complex interplay of factors, including race; lifestyle; and ecological, sociodemographic and geographical factors. However, more research that address psychosocial experiences and accounts for lifestyle-related behaviours before, during and after an EOCRC diagnosis are warranted. This study aims to develop and pilot test a theory-driven, community-based intervention to increase awareness of EOCRC, reduce its associated risk factors and improve early detection among adults aged 18-49 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel, we will use a multistage mixed-methods study design. We will pilot a sequential mixed-methods intervention study as follows: (1) First, we will analyse linked quantitative data from the Utah Cancer Registry and National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, linked to state-wide demographic and vital records in the Utah Population Database to identify EOCRC hotspots in Utah by examining the EOCRC incidence and survival variance explained by personal and county-level factors. (2) Next, we will conduct one-on-one interviews with 20 EOCRC survivors residing in EOCRC hotspots to ascertain psychosocial and lifestyle challenges that accompany an EOCRC diagnosis. (3) Finally, we will consider existing evidence-based approaches, our integrated results (quantitative +qualitative) and community action board input to design a community-based intervention to increase EOCRC awareness that can feasibly be delivered by means of outdoor mass media, and via social media. We will pilot the multicomponent media campaign with a quasiexperimental design among 17 EOCRC hotspot residents and 17 EOCRC 'coldspot' residents. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00138357). Signed informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to any data collection. Study results will be disseminated through CRC community blogs, targeted infographics, conference presentations at national and international professional conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Final intervention-specific data will be available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04715074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Rogers
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ellen Brooks
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Karen Curtin
- Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Mary A De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fares Qeadan
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tiana N Rogers
- Sorenson Impact Center, University of Utah Eccles School of Business, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ethan Petersen
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Curt Pesmen
- BoCo Media, Boulder, Colorado, USA
- Fight Colorectal Cancer, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin M Korous
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Margaret A Handley
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thatcher EJ, Camacho F, Anderson RT, Li L, Cohn WF, DeGuzman PB, Porter KJ, Zoellner JM. Spatial analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes and socioeconomic factors in Virginia. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1908. [PMID: 34674672 PMCID: PMC8529747 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11875-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) disparities vary by country and population group, but often have spatial features. This study of the United States state of Virginia assessed CRC outcomes, and identified demographic, socioeconomic and healthcare access contributors to CRC disparities. METHODS County- and city-level cross-sectional data for 2011-2015 CRC incidence, mortality, and mortality-incidence ratio (MIR) were analyzed for geographically determined clusters (hotspots and cold spots) and their correlates. Spatial regression examined predictors including proportion of African American (AA) residents, rural-urban status, socioeconomic (SES) index, CRC screening rate, and densities of primary care providers (PCP) and gastroenterologists. Stationarity, which assesses spatial equality, was examined with geographically weighted regression. RESULTS For incidence, one CRC hotspot and two cold spots were identified, including one large hotspot for MIR in southwest Virginia. In the spatial distribution of mortality, no clusters were found. Rurality and AA population were most associated with incidence. SES index, rurality, and PCP density were associated with spatial distribution of mortality. SES index and rurality were associated with MIR. Local coefficients indicated stronger associations of predictor variables in the southwestern region. CONCLUSIONS Rurality, low SES, and racial distribution were important predictors of CRC incidence, mortality, and MIR. Regions with concentrations of one or more factors of disparities face additional hurdles to improving CRC outcomes. A large cluster of high MIR in southwest Virginia region requires further investigation to improve early cancer detection and support survivorship. Spatial analysis can identify high-disparity populations and be used to inform targeted cancer control programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabian Camacho
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Roger T. Anderson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Li Li
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Wendy F. Cohn
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | | | - Kathleen J. Porter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Jamie M. Zoellner
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thomson MD, Williams AR, Sutton AL, Tossas KY, Garrett C, Sheppard VB. Engaging rural communities in cancer prevention and control research: Development and preliminary insights from a community-based research registry. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7726-7734. [PMID: 34647436 PMCID: PMC8559516 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To report on the development and preliminary findings of a community‐based cancer registry, including the community‐engaged approach to recruitment, participant profile, and distribution of cancer risk factors by race/ethnicity and geography. Methods Community outreach and engagement best practices were used to recruit a diverse convenience sample of Virginia residents (≥18 years) that oversampled residents living in rural areas, defined as Rural‐Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) 4–9 and African American (AA)/Black residents. Multiple survey administration methods included electronic (e‐survey) and in‐person survey by community‐based staff. Results At the time of this analysis, 595 participants are enrolled; 73% are rural, 46% are AA/Black. AA/Black participants reported similar education but lower income (p < 0.01) and health literacy (p < 0.01), lower alcohol use (p < 0.001), fewer sedentary behaviors (p = 0.01), but greater BMI (p < 0.05) compared to White participants. Rural residents reported significantly lower household income (p < 0.001) and greater use of Medicaid (p = 0.01) compared to urban participants. Biennial mammography was reported by 82% of women aged 45–74 years old and colonoscopy by 77% of participants ≥50 years old. Tobacco use was reported by 17%; no differences in cancer screening or tobacco use were identified by geography or by race. Conclusion and relevance Community engagement strategies successfully enrolled diverse residents within the cancer service area. AA/Black participants reported fewer cancer risk behaviors, similar educational attainment but lower income and health literacy compared to White respondents. Nuanced examinations of interactions among multilevel factors are needed to understand how individual, community, and institutional factors converge to maintain cancer disparities among AA/Black Virginians. Additional findings indicate a need for tobacco cessation, lung cancer screening, obesity treatment, and prevention initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria D Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | - Katherine Y Tossas
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Charlotte Garrett
- Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Office of Community Outreach and Engagement, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Malo TL, Correa SY, Moore AA, Ferrari RM, Leeman J, Brenner AT, Wheeler SB, Tan X, Reuland DS. Centralized colorectal cancer screening outreach and patient navigation for vulnerable populations in North Carolina: study protocol for the SCORE randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:113. [PMID: 34620250 PMCID: PMC8499575 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00194-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective in reducing CRC mortality, screening rates in vulnerable populations served by community health centers (CHCs) remain below national targets. CHCs in North Carolina are challenged to reach CRC screening targets as they tend to be under-resourced, have limited capacity to implement and sustain population health interventions, and typically operate independently from one another and from regional colonoscopy providers. The Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE) project is designed to address barriers to CRC screening in partnership with CHCs by implementing a multilevel intervention that includes centralized support infrastructure for mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to follow-up colonoscopy. This paper describes protocols for the SCORE implementation trial. METHODS We will conduct a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial that will assess effectiveness at increasing CRC screening and follow-up rates while also assessing implementation outcomes. The planned trial sample will include 4000 CHC patients who are at average CRC risk and due for screening. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either usual care or a multilevel intervention that includes mailed FIT outreach and patient navigation support to follow-up colonoscopy for those with abnormal FIT. The primary effectiveness outcome is completion of any CRC screening test at six months after randomization. We will also conduct a multilevel assessment of implementation outcomes and determinants. DISCUSSION This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of an intervention that provides centralized infrastructure for mailed FIT screening and patient navigation for CHCs that operate independently of other healthcare facilities. Findings from this research will enhance understanding of the effectiveness of a centralized approach and factors that determine successful implementation in vulnerable patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered on May 28, 2020, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04406714).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teri L. Malo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Sara Y. Correa
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Alexis A. Moore
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Renée M. Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 North Medical Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Alison T. Brenner
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Daniel S. Reuland
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5034 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Herbert C, Paro A, Diaz A, Pawlik TM. Association of Community Economic Distress and Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Rates Among US Counties. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:837-848. [PMID: 34585297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10849-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Not all Americans may benefit equally from current improvements in breast and colorectal cancer screening and mortality rates. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional retrospective review of county-level screening, incidence, and mortality rates for breast and colon cancer utilizing three publicly available data sources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and their association with the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), a measure of local economic prosperity across communities. RESULTS After controlling for other factors, DCI was associated with county-level screening, incidence, and death rates per 100,000 for breast and colorectal cancer. There was an absolute increase of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001) in the proportion of women aged 40 years or older who had a screening mammogram for every 10-point decrease in DCI, which in turn correlated with an increase in the age-adjusted incidence by 1.68 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.37-2.00, p < 0.001). While the age-adjusted death rate for breast cancer was highest in the most distressed communities, the overall incidence of age-adjusted death decreased by 0.28 per 100,000 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.19, p < 0.001) with every 10-point decrease in DCI. For colorectal cancer, every 10-point decrease in DCI was similarly associated with an absolute 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.69, p < 0.001) increase in the proportion of individuals who had screening endoscopy. Increased colorectal screening in low-DCI counties was associated with a lower age-adjusted incidence rate (-0.80 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.65) and age-adjusted death rate (-0.55 per 100,000; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.49) of colorectal cancer per every 10-point decrease in DCI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The association of county-level socioeconomic and healthcare factors with breast and colorectal cancer outcomes was notable, with level of community distress impacting cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Herbert
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, OH, USA.,Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alessandro Paro
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adrian Diaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. .,National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Done JZ, Fang SH. Young-onset colorectal cancer: A review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:856-866. [PMID: 34457191 PMCID: PMC8371519 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i8.856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the general decrease in overall incidence of colorectal cancer since the early 1990s, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients less than 50 years old has nearly doubled. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database (2011-2020) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011-2021) to identify studies (published in English) evaluating epidemiologic, clinical, hereditary, and molecular features; as well as evaluation, management, and prognosis of young-onset colorectal cancer patients. Our search yielded a total of 3401 articles, after applying our inclusion criteria. We fully reviewed 94 full-length studies. This systematic review demonstrates the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer and highlights the importance of being hypervigilant for the differential diagnosis colorectal cancer when evaluating a young adult who presents with gastrointestinal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Zhou Done
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Sandy H Fang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Changes in colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention among Ohio African American and Appalachian participants: The screen to save initiative. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:1149-1159. [PMID: 34165662 PMCID: PMC8417011 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01462-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
African Americans and Appalachians experience greater incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer due to factors, such as reduced prevalence of screening. An educational session (the Screen to Save Initiative) was conducted to increase intent to screen for colorectal cancer among African Americans and Appalachians in Ohio. Using a community-based approach, from April to September 2017, 85 eligible participants were recruited in Franklin County and Appalachia Ohio. Participants completed a knowledge assessment on colorectal cancer before and after participating in either an educational PowerPoint session or a guided tour through an Inflatable Colon. Logistic regression models were used to determine what factors were associated with changes in colorectal cancer knowledge and intent to screen for colorectal cancer. The majority (71.79%) of participants gained knowledge about colorectal cancer after the intervention. Multivariate results showed that race (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11–0.80 for African Americans versus White participants) and intervention type (OR = 5.97; 95% CI: 1.94–18.43 for PowerPoint versus Inflatable Colon) were associated with a change in knowledge. The association between education and intent to screen was marginally statistically significant (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.16–1.13 for college graduate versus not a college graduate). A change in colorectal cancer knowledge was not associated with intent to screen. Future educational interventions should be modified to increase intent to screen and screening for colorectal cancer. Further research with these modified interventions should aim to reduce disparities in CRC among underserved populations while listening to the voices of the communities.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kruse-Diehr AJ, Oliveri JM, Vanderpool RC, Katz ML, Reiter PL, Gray DM, Pennell ML, Young GS, Huang B, Fickle D, Cromo M, Rogers M, Gross D, Gibson A, Jellison J, Sarap MD, Bivens TA, McGuire TD, McAlearney AS, Huerta TR, Rahurkar S, Paskett ED, Dignan M. Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:51. [PMID: 34011410 PMCID: PMC8136225 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are lower in Appalachian regions of the United States than in non-Appalachian regions. Given the availability of various screening modalities, there is critical need for culturally relevant interventions addressing multiple socioecological levels to reduce the regional CRC burden. In this report, we describe the development and baseline findings from year 1 of "Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia," a 5-year, National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM-funded multilevel intervention (MLI) project to increase screening in Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio primary care clinics. METHODS Project development was theory-driven and included the establishment of both an external Scientific Advisory Board and a Community Advisory Board to provide guidance in conducting formative activities in two Appalachian counties: one in Kentucky and one in Ohio. Activities included identifying and describing the study communities and primary care clinics, selecting appropriate evidence-based interventions (EBIs), and conducting a pilot test of MLI strategies addressing patient, provider, clinic, and community needs. RESULTS Key informant interviews identified multiple barriers to CRC screening, including fear of screening, test results, and financial concerns (patient level); lack of time and competing priorities (provider level); lack of reminder or tracking systems and staff burden (clinic level); and cultural issues, societal norms, and transportation (community level). With this information, investigators then offered clinics a menu of EBIs and strategies to address barriers at each level. Clinics selected individually tailored MLIs, including improvement of patient education materials, provision of provider education (resulting in increased knowledge, p = .003), enhancement of electronic health record (EHR) systems and development of clinic screening protocols, and implementation of community CRC awareness events, all of which promoted stool-based screening (i.e., FIT or FIT-DNA). Variability among clinics, including differences in EHR systems, was the most salient barrier to EBI implementation, particularly in terms of tracking follow-up of positive screening results, whereas the development of clinic-wide screening protocols was found to promote fidelity to EBI components. CONCLUSIONS Lessons learned from year 1 included increased recognition of variability among the clinics and how they function, appreciation for clinic staff and provider workload, and development of strategies to utilize EHR systems. These findings necessitated a modification of study design for subsequent years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial NCT04427527 is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov and was registered on June 11, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | - Jill M Oliveri
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael L Pennell
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gregory S Young
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bin Huang
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Darla Fickle
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Melinda Rogers
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Ashley Gibson
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | | | | | - Tonia A Bivens
- Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. dba PrimaryPlus, Vanceburg, KY, USA
| | - Tracy D McGuire
- Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. dba PrimaryPlus, Vanceburg, KY, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Saurabh Rahurkar
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Dignan
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Eberth JM, Zahnd WE, Josey MJ, Schootman M, Hung P, Probst JC. Trends in spatial access to colonoscopy in South Carolina, 2000-2014. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2021; 37:100414. [PMID: 33980409 DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2021.100414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy use has increased since Medicare began covering screening for average-risk persons. Our objective was to describe changes in spatial access to colonoscopy in South Carolina (SC) between 2000 and 2014. METHODS Using data from the SC Ambulatory Surgery Database, we created annual ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) spatial accessibility scores. We assessed changes in accessibility, colonoscopy supply, and potential demand, overall and by metropolitan designation. Spatial clustering was also explored. RESULTS Spatial accessibility decreased across both small rural and metropolitan ZCTAs but was significantly higher in metropolitan areas during the first part of the study period . The proportion of persons with no access to colonoscopy within 30 min increased over time but was consistently higher in small rural areas. Clusters of low accessibility grew over time. CONCLUSIONS The supply of colonoscopy facilities decreased relative to the potential demand, and clusters of low access increased, indicating a contraction of services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Eberth
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, SC, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - Whitney E Zahnd
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Michele J Josey
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, SC, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Mario Schootman
- Department of Clinical Analytics, SSM Health, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Peiyin Hung
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Janice C Probst
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Galadima HI, Adunlin G, Hughes MS, Cropp CD, Lucero L, Akpinar-Elci M. Racial disparities and treatment trends among young-onset colorectal cancer patients: An analysis of a hospital cancer registry. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 72:101911. [PMID: 33662693 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing trend of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in individuals under the age of 50. The impact of age on the outcomes of CRC remains controversial. This study examined the characteristics and treatment trends of young-onset CRC by comparing patients < 50 years of age to those ≥50. METHODS Data were retrospectively obtained from one of the largest hospital systems in Virginia. The sample included patients diagnosed with CRC from 2008 to 2016. Bivariate analyses were used to describe patients' characteristics. Stratified and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between treatments and age groups in different stages at diagnosis. RESULTS Approximately 11.6 % (n = 522) of the cohort were younger than 50 years old at diagnosis with a mean age of 42.7 (SD = 5.9) years. Compared to their older counterpart (50 and older), young-onset patients were more likely to be African American (28.7 % (n = 150) vs. 23.7 % (n = 944)), to own private insurance (68.5 % (n = 313) vs. 27.6 % (n = 1032)), to have never used tobacco products (50.4 % (n = 237) vs. 43.8 % (n = 1616)), and to be late stage at diagnosis (68.6 % (n = 358) vs. 52.5 % (n = 2090)) (all p < 0.05). For early stage diagnosis, over 98 % of the young-onset treatments were surgery. For late stage diagnosis, the cancer treatment for young onset patients were a combination of surgery (89.4 %), radiation (82.5 %), and chemotherapy (86.3 %). The results of the analyses also demonstrated that patients with young-onset CRC have higher odds for surgery [OR = 1.76, 95 %CI (1.26, 2.47)], radiation [OR = 1.31, 95 %CI (1.17, 1.47)], and chemotherapy [OR = 3.34, 95 %CI (2.62, 4.25)]. CONCLUSIONS Findings confirmed late-stage prevalence among young-onset as well as significant demographic differences with patients' age ≥50. This study is one of few to explore the characteristics and assess treatment of young patients with CRC using U.S hospital data. Moreover, further studies need to clarify the effects of biological properties like genetic influences and environmental factors between races on cancer patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadiza I Galadima
- School of Community and Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.
| | - Georges Adunlin
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Marybeth S Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Cheryl D Cropp
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Luisa Lucero
- School of Community and Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Muge Akpinar-Elci
- Center for Global Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kruse-Diehr AJ, McDaniel JT, Lewis-Thames MW, James AS, Yahaya M. Racial Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the Mississippi Delta Region. Prev Chronic Dis 2021; 18:E14. [PMID: 33600304 PMCID: PMC7895478 DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Few studies have examined the effects of racial segregation on colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, and none has determined whether rurality moderates the effect of racial segregation on CRC mortality. We examined whether the effect of segregation on CRC mortality varied by rurality in the Mississippi Delta Region, an economically distressed and historically segregated region of the United States. Methods We used data from the US Census Bureau and the 1999–2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to estimate mixed linear regression models in which CRC mortality rates among Black and White residents in Delta Region counties (N = 252) were stratified by rurality and regressed on White–Black residential segregation indices and 4 socioeconomic control variables. Results Among Black residents, CRC mortality rates in urban counties were a function of a squared segregation term (b = 162.78, P = .01), indicating that the relationship between segregation and CRC mortality was U-shaped. Among White residents, main effects of annual household income (b = 29.01, P = .04) and educational attainment (b = 34.58, P = .03) were associated with CRC mortality rates in urban counties, whereas only annual household income (b = 19.44, P = .04) was associated with CRC mortality rates in rural counties. Racial segregation was not associated with CRC mortality rates among White residents. Conclusion Our county-level analysis suggests that health outcomes related to racial segregation vary by racial, contextual, and community factors. Segregated rural Black communities may feature stronger social bonds among residents than urban communities, thus increasing interpersonal support for cancer prevention and control. Future research should explore the effect of individual-level factors on colorectal cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- Department of Health, Behavior & Society, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky.,University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, 151 Washington Ave, Lexington, KY 40536.
| | - Justin T McDaniel
- School of Human Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
| | - Marquita W Lewis-Thames
- Department of Medical Social Science, Center for Community Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aimee S James
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis Missouri
| | - Musa Yahaya
- School of Human Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
The Intersection of Rural Residence and Minority Race/Ethnicity in Cancer Disparities in the United States. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18041384. [PMID: 33546168 PMCID: PMC7913122 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
One in every twenty-five persons in America is a racial/ethnic minority who lives in a rural area. Our objective was to summarize how racism and, subsequently, the social determinants of health disproportionately affect rural racial/ethnic minority populations, provide a review of the cancer disparities experienced by rural racial/ethnic minority groups, and recommend policy, research, and intervention approaches to reduce these disparities. We found that rural Black and American Indian/Alaska Native populations experience greater poverty and lack of access to care, which expose them to greater risk of developing cancer and experiencing poorer cancer outcomes in treatment and ultimately survival. There is a critical need for additional research to understand the disparities experienced by all rural racial/ethnic minority populations. We propose that policies aim to increase access to care and healthcare resources for these communities. Further, that observational and interventional research should more effectively address the intersections of rurality and race/ethnicity through reduced structural and interpersonal biases in cancer care, increased data access, more research on newer cancer screening and treatment modalities, and continued intervention and implementation research to understand how evidence-based practices can most effectively reduce disparities among these populations.
Collapse
|
39
|
Hinshaw T, Lea S, Arcury J, Parikh AA, Snyder RA. Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008-2016. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:271-278. [PMID: 33394205 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01381-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improvements in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, geographic disparities persist. Spatial mapping identified distinct "hotspots" of increased CRC mortality, including 11 rural counties in eastern North Carolina (ENC). The primary aims of this study were to measure CRC incidence and mortality by stage and determine if racial disparities exist within ENC. METHODS Data from 2008 to 2016 from the NC Central Cancer Registry were analyzed by stage, race, and region. Age-adjusted incidence and death rates (95% CI) were expressed per 100,000 persons within hotspot counties, all ENC counties, and Non-ENC counties. RESULTS CRC incidence [43.7 (95% CI 39.2-48.8) vs. 38.4 (95% CI 37.6-39.2)] and mortality rates [16.1 (95% CI 16.6-19.7) vs. 13.9 (95% CI 13.7-14.2)] were higher in the hotspot than non-ENC, respectively. Overall, localized, and regional CRC incidence rates were highest among African Americans (AA) residing in the hotspot compared to Whites or Non-ENC residents. Incidence rates of distant disease were higher among AA but did not differ by region. CRC mortality rates were highest among AA in the hotspot (AA 22.0 vs. Whites 15.8) compared to Non-ENC (AA 19.3 vs. Whites 13.0), although significant stage-stratified mortality differences were not observed. CONCLUSIONS Patients residing in the hotspot counties have higher age-adjusted incidence of overall, localized, regional, and distant CRC and mortality rates than patients in non-hotspot counties. Incidence and mortality rates remain highest among AA residing in the hotspot. IMPACT Increased CRC incidence and mortality rates were observed among all patients in the hotspot and were highest among AA, suggestive of ongoing racial and geographic disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Hinshaw
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Suzanne Lea
- Department of Public Health, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Justin Arcury
- North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA. .,Department of Public Health, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA. .,Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd, Surgical Oncology Suite 4S-24, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wong DL, Hendrick LE, Guerrero WM, Monroe JJ, Hinkle NM, Deneve JL, Dickson PV, Glazer ES, Shibata D. Adherence to neoadjuvant therapy guidelines for locally advanced rectal cancers in a region with sociodemographic disparities. Am J Surg 2020; 222:395-401. [PMID: 33279169 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We examined guideline adherence in a healthcare system serving a region with socioeconomic disparities and poor cancer outcomes. METHODS Retrospective analysis of factors associated with guideline adherence. RESULTS 63.1% of stage II/III LARC patients received NCR. Factors associated with adherence included white race (OR = 2.15, p = 0.024), private insurance (OR = 2.70, p = 0.005), employed status (OR = 2.30, p = 0.031), age at diagnosis (OR = 0.74, p = 0.032), appropriate local staging (OR = 9.17, p < 0.0001), and diagnosis later in the study period (OR per 1 year = 1.20, p = 0.006). By multivariate analysis, private insurance (OR = 2.51, p = 0.023), younger age (OR per 10 years = 0.72, p = 0.048) and appropriate local staging (OR = 6.67, p < 0.0001) were associated with adherence. CONCLUSION Guideline adherence for LARC in our system is low and is impacted by employment, race and insurance status. Standard of care compliance remains an important target for improvement efforts in this underserved region of the nation's Mid-South.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise L Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Leah E Hendrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Whitney M Guerrero
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Justin J Monroe
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Nathan M Hinkle
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Jeremiah L Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Paxton V Dickson
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Evan S Glazer
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Suite 300, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Spatial relationship between ambulatory surgery centers and colorectal cancer mortality within Pennsylvania, United States. Public Health 2020; 189:126-128. [PMID: 33221647 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial relationship between colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) density in Pennsylvania's 67 counties. STUDY DESIGN This was an ecological study. METHODS Age-adjusted CRC mortality rates were linked to ASC densities per 1,000 people. The data set was analyzed using global, local, and regional Moran's I, to test for randomness in CRC mortality and ASC density. RESULTS CRC mortality rates (median: 15.30 per 100,000 of the US 2000 standard million population) exhibited hot spots in rural Pennsylvania counties. ASC densities (median: 0.35 providers/km2 per 1,000 people) showed hot spots in urban southeastern Pennsylvania and cold spots in northern Pennsylvania. CONCLUSIONS CRC mortality rates tended to cluster in rural northern Pennsylvania counties; ASC density tended to cluster in urban southeastern counties, indicating a spatial disparity between needed and provided healthcare resources. There is a need for public health and health system changes to increase the availability of CRC services to rural communities.
Collapse
|
42
|
Doubeni CA, Selby K, Gupta S. Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes. Annu Rev Med 2020; 72:383-398. [PMID: 33208026 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-051619-035840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Preventable differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality across racial/ethnic, economic, geographic, and other groups can be eliminated by assuring equitable access and quality across the care continuum, but few interventions have been demonstrated to do so. Multicomponent strategies designed with a health equity framework may be effective. A health equity framework takes into account social determinants of health, multilevel influences (policy, community, delivery, and individual levels), screening processes, and community engagement. Effective strategies for increasing screening uptake include patient navigation and other interventions for structural barriers, reminders and clinical decision support, and data to continuously track metrics and guide targets for improvement. Community resource gaps should be addressed to assure high-quality services irrespective of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status. One model combinespopulation-based proactive outreach screening with screening delivery at in-person or virtual points of contact, as well as community engagement. Patient- and provider-based behavioral interventions may be considered for increasing screening demand and delivery. Providing a choice of screening tests is recommended for CRC screening, and access to colonoscopy is required for completion of the CRC screening process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chyke A Doubeni
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA; .,Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne 1011, Switzerland;
| | - Samir Gupta
- Section of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92103, USA; .,Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abualkhair WH, Zhou M, Ochoa CO, Lacayo L, Murphy C, Wu XC, Karlitz JJ. Geographic and intra-racial disparities in early-onset colorectal cancer in the SEER 18 registries of the United States. Cancer Med 2020; 9:9150-9159. [PMID: 33094553 PMCID: PMC7724480 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence rates (IRs) are increasing, geographic and intra‐racial IR disparities are not well defined. Methods 2000‐2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program CRC IR Analysis (170,434 cases) was performed from ages 30 to 60 in four US regions, 18 individual registries, metropolitan and nonmetropolitan locations and stratified by race. Analyses were conducted in 1‐year and 5‐year age increments. Results Wide US regional EOCRC IR variations exist: For example, age 45 IRs in the south are 26.8/100,000, 36.0% higher than the West, 19.7/100,000 (p < 0.0001). Disparities magnify between individual registries: EOCRC IRs in highest risk registries were 177‐348% (Alaska Natives), 75‐200% (Hawaii), 76‐128% (Louisiana), and 61‐125% (Kentucky) higher than lowest risk registries depending on age. EOCRC IRs are 18.2%‐25.6% higher in nonmetropolitan versus metropolitan settings. Wide geographic intra‐racial disparities exist. Within the White population, the greatest IR difference (78.8%) was between Kentucky (5.9/100,000) and Los Angeles (3.3/100,000) in 30‐ to 34‐year‐olds (p < .0001). Within the Black population, the greatest difference (136.2%) was between rural Georgia (30.7/100,000) and California excluding San Francisco‐Oakland/San Jose‐Monterey/Los Angeles (13/100,000) in 40‐ to 44‐year‐olds (p = 0003). Conclusion Marked geographic EOCRC disparities exist with disproportionately high IRs in Alaska Natives, Hawaii, and southern registries. Geographic intra‐racial disparities are present within White and Black populations. In Blacks, there are disproportionately high EOCRC IRs in rural Georgia. Although vigilance is required in all populations, attention must be paid to these higher risk populations. Potential interventions include assuring early investigation of symptoms, targeting modifiable risk factors and utilizing earlier age 45 screening options supported by some guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesal H Abualkhair
- Master of Science in Clinical Research, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Meijiao Zhou
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Leonel Lacayo
- Gastroenterologist, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Caitlin Murphy
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Public Health and Director of Louisiana Tumor Registry, Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Jordan J Karlitz
- Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Conn ME, Kennedy-Rea S, Subramanian S, Baus A, Hoover S, Cunningham C, Tangka FKL. Cost and Effectiveness of Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Federally Qualified Health Centers in West Virginia. Health Promot Pract 2020; 21:891-897. [PMID: 32990048 DOI: 10.1177/1524839920954164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the West Virginia Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in implementing patient reminders to increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates in nine federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Using process measures and cost data collected, the authors examined the differences in the intensity of the phone calls across FQHCs and compared them with the return rates achieved. They also reported the cost per kit successfully returned as a result of the intervention. Across all FQHCs, 5,041 FIT kits were ordered, and the initial return rate (without a reminder) was 41.1%. A total of 2,201 patients received reminder phone calls; on average, patients received 1.61 reminder calls each. The reminder interventions increased the average FIT kit return rate to 60.7%. The average total cost per FIT kit returned across all FQHCs was $60.18, and the average cost of only the reminders was $11.20 per FIT kit returned. FQHCs achieved an average increase of 19.6 percentage points in FIT kit return rates, and costs across clinics varied. Clinics with high-quality health information systems that enabled tracking of patients with minimal effort were able to implement lower cost reminder interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adam Baus
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hardin V, Tangka FKL, Wood T, Boisseau B, Hoover S, DeGroff A, Boehm J, Subramanian S. The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky. Health Promot Pract 2020; 21:905-909. [PMID: 32990049 DOI: 10.1177/1524839920954165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and cost of patient incentives, together with patient navigation and patient reminders, to increase fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit return rates and colorectal cancer screening uptake in one federally qualified health center (FQHC) in Appalachia. This FQHC is a designated homeless clinic, as 79.7% of its patient population are homeless. We collected process, outcome, and cost data from the FQHC for two time periods: usual care (September 2016-August 2017) and implementation (September 2017-September 2018). We reported the FIT kit return rate, the increase in return rate, and the additional number of individual screens. We also calculated the incremental cost per additional screen. The patient incentive program, with patient navigation and patient reminders, increased the number of FIT kits returned from the usual care period to the implementation period. The return rate increased by 25.9 percentage points (from 21.7% to 47.6%) with an additional 91 people screened at an incremental cost of $134.61 per screen. A patient incentive program, together with the assistance of patient navigators and supplemented with patient reminders, can help improve CRC screening uptake among vulnerable and homeless populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Teri Wood
- Kentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort, KY, USA
| | - Brian Boisseau
- Kentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort, KY, USA
| | | | - Amy DeGroff
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer Boehm
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang H, Zhang B, Li X, Zhou D, Li Y, Jia S, Qi S, Xu A, Zhao X, Wang J, Bai Z, Cao B, Li N, Dai M, Chen H, Huang J. Identification and Validation of Novel Serum Autoantibody Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1081. [PMID: 32793472 PMCID: PMC7387658 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) comprises a large proportion of malignant tumors, and early detection of CRC is critical for effective treatment and optimal prognosis. We aimed to discover and validate serum autoantibodies for early detection of CRC. Methods: Combined with CRC-associated autoantibodies discovered by serological proteome and multiplex analyses, 26 predefined autoantibodies were evaluated in 315 samples (130 CRCs, 75 advanced adenomas, and 110 healthy controls) by protein microarray analysis. Autoantibodies with potential detection value were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the biomarkers. Results: Four serum autoantibodies (ALDH1B1, UQCRC1, CTAG1, and CENPF) showed statistically different levels between patients with advanced neoplasm (CRC or advanced adenoma) and controls in microarray analysis, which were validated by ELISAs. Among the four biomarkers, the ALDH1B1 autoantibody showed the highest detection value with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.70 and 0.74 to detect CRC and advanced adenoma with sensitivities of 75.68 and 62.31% and specificities of 63.06 and 73.87%, respectively. By combining the four biomarkers, the performance was improved with an AUC of 0.79 to detect CRC and advanced adenomas. Conclusion: The ALDH1B1 autoantibody has a good potential for early detection of CRC and advanced adenoma, and measuring serum autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens may improve detection of early CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hejing Wang
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bei Zhang
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojin Li
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Donghu Zhou
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanmeng Li
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Siyu Jia
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Saiping Qi
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Anjian Xu
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaomu Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Bai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bangwei Cao
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongda Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Experimental Centre, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Goldshore MA, Mehta SJ, Fletcher W, Tzanis G, Doubeni CA, Paulson EC. An RCT of Fecal Immunochemical Test Colorectal Cancer Screening in Veterans Without Recent Primary Care. Am J Prev Med 2020; 59:41-48. [PMID: 32564804 PMCID: PMC7388415 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of screening can prevent death from colorectal cancer, yet people without regular healthcare visits may not realize the benefits of this preventive intervention. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a mailed screening invitation or mailed fecal immunochemical test in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake in veterans without recent primary care encounters. STUDY DESIGN Three-arm pragmatic randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Participants were screening-eligible veterans aged 50-75 years, without a recent primary care visit who accessed medical services at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017. All data were analyzed from March 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018. INTERVENTION Participants were randomized to (1) usual opportunistic screening during a healthcare visit (n=260), (2) mailed invitation to screen and reminder phone calls (n=261), or (3) mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach plus reminder calls (n=61). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome under investigation was the completion of colorectal cancer screening within 6 months after randomization. RESULTS Of 782 participants in the trial, 53.9% were aged 60-75 years and 59.7% were African American. The screening rate was higher in the mailed fecal immunochemical test group (26.1%) compared with usual care (5.8%) (rate difference=20.3%, 95% CI=14.3%, 26.3%; RR=4.52, 95% CI=2.7, 7.7) or screening invitation (7.7%) (rate difference=18.4%, 95% CI=12.2%, 24.6%; RR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1, 5.4). Screening completion rates were similar between invitation and usual care (rate difference=1.9%, 95% CI= -2.4%, 6.2%; RR=1.3, 95% CI=0.7, 2.5). CONCLUSIONS Mailed fecal immunochemical test screening promotes colorectal cancer screening participation among veterans without a recent primary care encounter. Despite the addition of reminder calls, an invitation letter was no more effective in screening participation than screening during outpatient appointments. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02584998.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Goldshore
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Shivan J Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Woodrow Fletcher
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - George Tzanis
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - E Carter Paulson
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Hoover S. Role of an Implementation Economics Analysis in Providing the Evidence Base for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening. Prev Chronic Dis 2020; 17:E46. [PMID: 32584756 PMCID: PMC7316416 DOI: 10.5888/pcd17.190407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objectives Since 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has funded organizations across the United States to promote screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) to detect early CRC or precancerous polyps that can be treated to avoid disease progression and death. The objective of this study was to describe how findings from economic evaluation approaches of a subset of these awardees and their implementation sites (n = 9) can drive decision making and improve program implementation and diffusion. Intervention Approach We described the framework for the implementation economics evaluation used since 2016 for the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) Learning Collaborative. Evaluation Methods We compared CRC interventions implemented across health systems, changes in screening uptake, and the incremental cost per person of implementing an intervention. We also analyzed data on how implementation costs changed over time for a CRC program that conducted interventions in a series of rounds. Results Implementation of the interventions, which included provider and patient reminders, provider assessment and feedback, and incentives, resulted in increases in screening uptake ranging from 4.9 to 26.7 percentage points. Across the health systems, the incremental cost per person screened ranged from $18.76 to $144.55. One awardee’s costs decreased because of a reduction in intervention development and start-up costs. Implications for Public Health Health systems, CRCCP awardees, and CDC can use these findings for quality improvement activities, incorporation of information into trainings and support activities, and future program design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujha Subramanian
- RTI International, 307 Waverley Oaks Rd, Ste 101, Waltham, MA 02452.
| | - Florence K L Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Johnson R, Bail JR, Behring M, Orlandella R, Williams V, Halilova KI, Hoenemeyer TW. Commentary: Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Two Underserved U.S. Populations: A Parallel Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:240. [PMID: 32195183 PMCID: PMC7066257 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Johnson
- Department of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jennifer R Bail
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Michael Behring
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Rachael Orlandella
- Graduate Biomedical Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Victoria Williams
- Department of Health Behavior, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Karina I Halilova
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Teri W Hoenemeyer
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Carethers JM, Doubeni CA. Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:354-367. [PMID: 31682851 PMCID: PMC6957741 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects people from low socioeconomic backgrounds and some racial minorities. Disparities in CRC incidence and outcomes might result from differences in exposure to risk factors such as unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle; limited access to risk-reducing behaviors such as chemoprevention, screening, and follow-up of abnormal test results; or lack of access to high-quality treatment resources. These factors operate at the individual, provider, health system, community, and policy levels to perpetuate CRC disparities. However, CRC disparities can be eliminated. Addressing the complex factors that contribute to development and progression of CRC with multicomponent, adaptive interventions, at multiple levels of the care continuum, can reduce gaps in mortality. These might be addressed with a combination of health care and community-based interventions and policy changes that promote healthy behaviors and ensure access to high-quality and effective measures for CRC prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Improving resources and coordinating efforts in communities where people of low socioeconomic status live and work would increase access to evidence-based interventions. Research is also needed to understand the role and potential mechanisms by which factors in diet, intestinal microbiome, and/or inflammation contribute to differences in colorectal carcinogenesis. Studies of large cohorts with diverse populations are needed to identify epidemiologic and molecular factors that contribute to CRC development in different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Carethers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Human Genetics and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|