1
|
Guida A, Mosillo C, Mammone G, Caserta C, Sirgiovanni G, Conteduca V, Bracarda S. The 5-WS of targeting DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways in prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 128:102766. [PMID: 38763054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways alterations, a growing area of interest in oncology, are detected in about 20% of patient with prostate cancer and are associated with improved sensitivity to poly(ADP ribose) polymerases (PARP) inhibitors. In May 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two PARP inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) for prostate cancer treatment. Moreover, germline aberrations in DDR pathways genes have also been related to familial or hereditary prostate cancer, requiring tailored health-care programs. These emerging scenarios are rapidly changing diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches in prostate cancer management. The aim of this review is to highlight the five W-points of DDR pathways in prostate cancer: why targeting DDR pathways in prostate cancer; what we should test for genomic profiling in prostate cancer; "where" testing genetic assessment in prostate cancer (germline or somatic, solid or liquid biopsy); when genetic testing is appropriate in prostate cancer; who could get benefit from PARP inhibitors; how improve patients outcome with combinations strategies.
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerke MB, Jansen CS, Bilen MA. Circulating Tumor DNA in Genitourinary Cancers: Detection, Prognostics, and Therapeutic Implications. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2280. [PMID: 38927984 PMCID: PMC11201475 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
CtDNA is emerging as a non-invasive clinical detection method for several cancers, including genitourinary (GU) cancers such as prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). CtDNA assays have shown promise in early detection of GU cancers, providing prognostic information, assessing real-time treatment response, and detecting residual disease and relapse. The ease of obtaining a "liquid biopsy" from blood or urine in GU cancers enhances its potential to be used as a biomarker. Interrogating these "liquid biopsies" for ctDNA can then be used to detect common cancer mutations, novel genomic alterations, or epigenetic modifications. CtDNA has undergone investigation in numerous clinical trials, which could address clinical needs in GU cancers, for instance, earlier detection in RCC, therapeutic response prediction in castration-resistant prostate cancer, and monitoring for recurrence in bladder cancers. The utilization of liquid biopsy for ctDNA analysis provides a promising method of advancing precision medicine within the field of GU cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo B. Gerke
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (M.B.G.); (C.S.J.)
| | - Caroline S. Jansen
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (M.B.G.); (C.S.J.)
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Mehmet A. Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Urabe F, Sumiyoshi T, Tashiro K, Goto T, Kimura T, Kobayashi T. Prostate cancer and liquid biopsies: Clinical applications and challenges. Int J Urol 2024; 31:617-626. [PMID: 38551314 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Liquid biopsy has emerged as a valuable and minimally invasive tool for real-time detection of clinically actionable abnormalities across various cancer types. Its applicability is particularly compelling in the realm of prostate cancer, where novel therapeutic agents, including those targeting DNA repair systems, are under development. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in effectively screening for prostate cancer, enhancing risk stratification, and determining optimal approaches for treating advanced disease. Consequently, there is a pressing need for improved biomarkers to aid clinicians in decision-making within these contexts. Cell-free DNA and extracellular vesicle analysis have demonstrated promise in diagnosis, prognostication, assessment of treatment responses, and identification of emerging mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, obstacles must be addressed before liquid biopsies can be integrated into routine clinical practice. These challenges encompass preanalytical considerations such as sample collection and storage, methods of extracellular vesicle isolation and enrichment, and the need for enhanced interpretation of generated sequencing data. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current clinical opportunities in managing prostate cancer through blood-based liquid biopsy, highlighting the progress made, and acknowledging the challenges that remain. Additionally, we discuss the next steps required for the effective implementation of liquid biopsies in guiding personalized treatment strategies for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Goto
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schostak M, Bradbury A, Briganti A, Gonzalez D, Gomella L, Mateo J, Penault-Llorca F, Stenzinger A, Wyatt AW, Bjartell A. Practical Guidance on Establishing a Molecular Testing Pathway for Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes in Clinical Practice for Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:344-354. [PMID: 37714762 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer is a molecularly heterogeneous disease that is amenable to diagnostic testing to identify patients potentially eligible for personalised treatments inform familial risk and provide relevant information about potential prognosis. Several guidelines support the integration of genomic testing in a shared decision-making framework so that both health care professionals (HCPs) and patients are involved in determining the best treatment approach. OBJECTIVE To review current guidelines on molecular diagnostic testing for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, with the aim of providing practical considerations for effective guideline implementation and establishment of an appropriate pathway for molecular diagnostic testing. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We undertook a nonsystematic narrative review of the literature using PubMed to identify current guidelines and recommendations on molecular diagnostic testing for BRCA and/or homologous recombination repair gene alterations (HRRm) in patients with prostate cancer. In addition, selected articles that included BRCA/HRRm testing in clinical trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and real-world evidence were also evaluated. Websites for relevant societies were reviewed for molecular diagnostic guidelines not published on PubMed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our review of guidelines published by several international societies that include molecular testing in prostate cancer identified variations in molecular testing approaches. The review of testing approaches used in clinical trials and real-world settings also highlighted several aspects that require improvement. Therefore, we compiled practical guidance for establishing an appropriate BRCA/HRR mutation testing pathway. CONCLUSIONS While there are several challenges to molecular testing and interpretation of test results that require enhancement, a multidisciplinary team approach will empower HCPs and their institutions to improve on or initiate their own molecular testing pathways. This in turn will lead to improvements in management strategies for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, for whom better treatment outcomes is a significant unmet need. PATIENT SUMMARY Establishing a molecular testing pathway in clinical practice for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer will lead to fairer and more equal access to personalised treatments. This should lead to better outcomes, particularly for patients whose disease has spread to other areas of the body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schostak
- Department of Urology, Urooncology, Robot-assisted and Focal Treatment, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Angela Bradbury
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - David Gonzalez
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Leonard Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baboudjian M, Peyrottes A, Dariane C, Fromont G, Denis JA, Fiard G, Kassab D, Ladoire S, Lehmann-Che J, Ploussard G, Rouprêt M, Barthélémy P, Roubaud G, Lamy PJ. Circulating Biomarkers Predictive of Treatment Response in Patients with Hormone-sensitive or Castration-resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00132-9. [PMID: 38824003 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) harbors genomic alterations that may predict targeted therapy efficacy. These alterations can be identified not only in tissue but also directly in biologic fluids (ie, liquid biopsies), mainly blood. Liquid biopsies may represent a safer and less invasive alternative for monitoring patients treated for mPCa. Current research focuses on the description and validation of novel predictive biomarkers to improve precision medicine in mPCa. Our aim was to systematically review the current evidence on liquid biopsy biomarkers for predicting treatment response in mPCa. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, Web of Science, and evidence-based websites for publications on circulating biomarkers in mPCa between March 2013 and February 2024 for review. Endpoints were: prediction of overall survival, biochemical or radiographic progression-free survival after treatment (chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPIs], immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors [PARPIs]). For each biomarker, the level of evidence (LOE) for clinical validity was attributed: LOE IA and IB, high level of evidence; LOE IIB and IIC, intermediate level; and LOE IIIC and LOE IV-VD, weak level. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The predictive value of each biomarker for the response to several therapies was evaluated in both metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In patients with mCRPC, BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations predicted response to ARPIs (LOE IB) and PARPIs (LOE IIB), while AR-V7 transcripts or AR-V7 protein levels in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted response to ARPIs and taxanes (LOE IB). CTC quantification predicted response to cabazitaxel, abiraterone, and radium-223 (LOE IIB), while TP53 alterations predicted response to 177Lu prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand treatment (LOE IIB). AR copy number in circulating tumor DNA before the first treatment line and before subsequent lines predicted response to docetaxel, cabazitaxel, and ARPIs (LOE IIB). In mHSPC, DNA damage in lymphocytes was predictive of the response to radium-223 (LOE IIB). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS BRCA1/2, ATM, and AR alterations detected in liquid biopsies may help clinicians in management of patients with mPCa. The other circulating biomarkers did not reach the LOE required for routine clinical use and should be validated in prospective independent studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed studies assessing the value of biomarkers in blood or urine for management of metastatic prostate cancer. The evidence indicates that some biomarkers could help in selecting patients eligible for specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Arthur Peyrottes
- Service d'Urologie et de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, European Hospital Georges-Pompidou, University Paris Cité, Paris, France; UMR-S1151, CNRS UMR-S8253 Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fromont
- INSERM UMR1069, Nutrition Croissance et Cancer, University of Tours, Tours, France; Department of Pathology, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Jérôme Alexandre Denis
- INSERM UMR_S938, CRSA, Biologie et Thérapeutiques du Cancer, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Biochimie Endocrinienne et Oncologique, Oncobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, University of Grenoble Alpes CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, France; INSERM U1231, Dijon, France
| | - Jacqueline Lehmann-Che
- INSERM U976, Immunologie Humaine, Pathophysiologie, Immunothérapie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; UF Oncologie Moléculaire, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Lamy
- Biopathologie et Génétique des Cancers, Institut Médical d'Analyse Génomique, Imagenome, Inovie, Montpellier, France; Unité de Recherche Clinique, Clinique Beausoleil, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Slootbeek PHJ, Tolmeijer SH, Mehra N, Schalken JA. Therapeutic biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: does the state matter? Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2024; 61:178-204. [PMID: 37882463 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2023.2266482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has been fundamentally transformed by our greater understanding of its complex biological mechanisms and its entrance into the era of precision oncology. A broad aim is to use the extreme heterogeneity of mCRPC by matching already approved or new targeted therapies to the correct tumor genotype. To achieve this, tumor DNA must be obtained, sequenced, and correctly interpreted, with individual aberrations explored for their druggability, taking into account the hierarchy of driving molecular pathways. Although tumor tissue sequencing is the gold standard, tumor tissue can be challenging to obtain, and a biopsy from one metastatic site or primary tumor may not provide an accurate representation of the current genetic underpinning. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might catalyze precision oncology in mCRPC, as it enables real-time observation of genomic changes in tumors and allows for monitoring of treatment response and identification of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, ctDNA can be used to identify mutations that may not be detected in solitary metastatic lesions and can provide a more in-depth understanding of inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Finally, ctDNA abundance can serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRPC.The androgen receptor (AR)-axis is a well-established therapeutical target for prostate cancer, and through ctDNA sequencing, insights have been obtained in (temporal) resistance mechanisms that develop through castration resistance. New third-generation AR-axis inhibitors are being developed to overcome some of these resistance mechanisms. The druggability of defects in the DNA damage repair machinery has impacted the treatment landscape of mCRPC in recent years. For patients with deleterious gene aberrations in genes linked to homologous recombination, particularly BRCA1 or BRCA2, PARP inhibitors have shown efficacy compared to the standard of care armamentarium, but platinum-based chemotherapy may be equally effective. A hierarchy exists in genes associated with homologous recombination, where, besides the canonical genes in this pathway, not every other gene aberration predicts the same likelihood of response. Moreover, evidence is emerging on cross-resistance between therapies such as PARP inhibitors, platinum-based chemotherapy and even radioligand therapy that target this genotype. Mismatch repair-deficient patients can experience a beneficial response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Activation of other cellular signaling pathways such as PI3K, cell cycle, and MAPK have shown limited success with monotherapy, but there is potential in co-targeting these pathways with combination therapy, either already witnessed or anticipated. This review outlines precision medicine in mCRPC, zooming in on the role of ctDNA, to identify genomic biomarkers that may be used to tailor molecularly targeted therapies. The most common druggable pathways and outcomes of therapies matched to these pathways are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter H J Slootbeek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Sofie H Tolmeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherland
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Department of Experimental Urology, Research Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McKay RR, Morgans AK, Shore ND, Dunshee C, Devgan G, Agarwal N. First-line combination treatment with PARP and androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors in HRR-deficient mCRPC: Applying clinical study findings to clinical practice in the United States. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 126:102726. [PMID: 38613872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains incurable and develops from biochemically recurrent PC treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) following definitive therapy for localized PC, or from metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC). In the mCSPC setting, treatment intensification of ADT plus androgen receptor (AR)-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), with or without chemotherapy, improves outcomes vs ADT alone. Despite multiple phase 3 trials demonstrating a survival benefit of treatment intensification in PC, there remains high use of ADT monotherapy in real-world clinical practice. Prior studies indicate that co-inhibition of AR and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) may result in enhanced benefit in treating tumors regardless of alterations in DNA damage response genes involved either directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Three recent phase 3 studies evaluated the combination of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) with an ARSI as first-line treatment for mCRPC: TALAPRO-2, talazoparib plus enzalutamide; PROpel, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP); and MAGNITUDE, niraparib plus AAP. Results from these studies have led to the recent approval in the United States of talazoparib plus enzalutamide for the treatment of mCRPC with any HRR alteration, and of both olaparib and niraparib indicated in combination with AAP for the treatment of mCRPC with BRCA alterations. SUMMARY Here, we review the newly approved PARPi plus ARSI treatments within the context of the mCRPC treatment landscape, provide an overview of practical considerations for the combinations in clinical practice, highlight the importance of HRR testing, and discuss the benefits of treatment intensification for patients with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Dana 09-930, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, 823 82nd Parkway, Suite B, Myrtle Beach, SC 29572, USA.
| | - Curtis Dunshee
- Urology Specialists, 2260 W. Orange Grove Road, Tucson, AZ 85741, USA.
| | - Geeta Devgan
- Pfizer Inc., 66 Hudson Blvd East, New York, NY 10001, USA.
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (NCI-CCC), University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Suite 5726, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Messina C, Giunta EF, Signori A, Rebuzzi SE, Banna GL, Maniam A, Buti S, Cattrini C, Fornarini G, Bauckneht M, Greystoke A, Plummer R, Oing C, Rescigno P. Combining PARP Inhibitors and Androgen Receptor Signalling Inhibitors in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Quantitative Synthesis and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:179-188. [PMID: 37574390 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are established treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency after androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSI) failure. New PARPi + ARSI combinations have been tested in all comers, although their clinical relevance in HRR-proficient tumours remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To quantitatively synthesise evidence from randomised trials assessing the efficacy and safety of PARPi + ARSI combinations for first-line treatment of mCRPC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases up to February 28, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PARPi + ARSI versus placebo + ARSI for first-line treatment of mCRPC were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction and assessed the risk of bias, while a third reviewer evaluated the eligibility criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, three phase 3 RCTs were included in the systematic review: PROPEL, MAGNITUDE, and TALAPRO-2. A total of 2601 patients with mCRPC were enrolled. Two of these trials (PROPEL and TALAPRO-2) assessed the radiographic progression-free survival benefit of PARPi + ARSI for first-line treatment of mCRPC, independent of HRR status. The pooled hazard ratio was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.72). The pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.98), indicating a 16% reduction in the risk of death among patients who received the combination. CONCLUSIONS Results from this meta-analysis support the use of ARSI + PARPi combinations in biomarker-unselected mCRPC. However, such combinations might be less clinically relevant in HRR-proficient cancers, especially considering the change in treatment landscape for mCRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at outcomes from trials testing combinations of two classes of drugs (PARP inhibitors and ARSI) in advanced prostate cancer. We found that these combinations seem to work regardless of gene mutations identified as biomarkers of response to PARP inhibitors when used on their own.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alessio Signori
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara Elena Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Luigi Banna
- Department of Oncology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; Faculty of Science and Health, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Akash Maniam
- Department of Oncology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Carlo Cattrini
- SCDU Oncologia, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alastair Greystoke
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth Plummer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Centre HaTriCS4, University Cancer Centre Hamburg, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mandel P, Hoeh B, Humke C, Doering C, Wenzel M, Cano Garcia C, Fuhr N, Koll F, Fassl A, Tilki D, Steuber T, Faull I, Jeroch J, Ebner S, Schmitt C, Reis H, Köllermann J, Kokkaliaris KD, Demes MC, Chun FKH, Wild PJ. Feasibility of Next-generation Sequencing of Liquid Biopsy (Circulating Tumor DNA) Samples and Tumor Tissue from Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer in a Real-world Clinical Setting in Germany. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00043-9. [PMID: 38493067 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE With European Medicines Agency approval of PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and ongoing trials in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, detection of genetic alterations in BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair genes has gained an important role. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility and comparability of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of liquid biopsy (LB; circulating tumor DNA) and tumor tissue (TT) samples in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS The study cohort consisted of 50 patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) who had TT NGS performed for BRCA1/2 alterations and consent for additional LB NGS. The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for TT NGS. The Guardant360 83-gene assay (Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used for LB NGS, including all types of somatic alterations, microsatellite instability, and blood tumor mutational burden. We calculated BRCA1/2 alteration rates and the negative percentage agreement (NPA) and positive percentage agreement (PPA) between TT and LB results. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS TT NGS was successful in 44/50 patients (88%), with pathogenic BRCA1/2 alterations detected in four (9%). LB NGS was successful in all 50 patients (100%), with BRCA1/2 alterations detected in ten (20%). In a subgroup analysis for the 44 patients with successful TT NGS, NPA was 85% and PPA was 50%. The median time between TT sample collection and blood sampling for NGS was 132 wk (IQR 94-186). The limited sample size and differences in the time of NGS assessment are limitations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS LB NGS resulted in a higher detection rate for BRCA1/2 alterations in comparison to conventional TT NGS (20% vs 9%). Ideally, BRCA1/2 testing should be based on both approaches to identify all patients with mPC eligible for PARP inhibitor therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study shows that genetic tests for both tumor tissue and blood samples results in higher rates of detection of BRCA1/2 gene alterations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Clara Humke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Claudia Doering
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Fuhr
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Florestan Koll
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Anne Fassl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jan Jeroch
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Silvana Ebner
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christina Schmitt
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Henning Reis
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Frankfurt/Mainz Partner Site, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Melanie C Demes
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter J Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cimadamore A, Franzese C, Di Loreto C, Blanca A, Lopez-Beltran A, Crestani A, Giannarini G, Tan PH, Carneiro BA, El-Deiry WS, Montironi R, Cheng L. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in urological tumours. Pathology 2024; 56:228-238. [PMID: 38199927 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Advancements in cutting-edge molecular profiling techniques, such as next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analytic tools, have allowed researchers to examine tumour biology in detail and stratify patients based on factors linked with clinical outcome and response to therapy. This manuscript highlights the most relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers in kidney, bladder, prostate and testicular cancers with recognised impact in clinical practice. In bladder and prostate cancer, new genetic acquisitions concerning the biology of tumours have modified the therapeutic scenario and led to the approval of target directed therapies, increasing the quality of patient care. Thus, it has become of paramount importance to choose adequate molecular tests, i.e., FGFR screening for urothelial cancer and BRCA1-2 alterations for prostate cancer, to guide the treatment plan for patients. While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers are currently used in routine clinical practice for renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancers, the field is quickly expanding. In kidney tumours, gene expression signatures might be the key to identify patients who will respond better to immunotherapy or anti-angiogenic drugs. In testicular germ cell tumours, the use of microRNA has outperformed conventional serum biomarkers in the diagnosis of primary tumours, prediction of chemoresistance, follow-up monitoring, and relapse prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Cimadamore
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), Udine University, Udine, Italy.
| | - Carmine Franzese
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Carla Di Loreto
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), Udine University, Udine, Italy
| | - Ana Blanca
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Reina Sofia, UCO, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Crestani
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Benedito A Carneiro
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Wafik S El-Deiry
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Longoria O, Beije N, de Bono JS. PARP inhibitors for prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:25-35. [PMID: 37783649 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in DNA damage response genes. This has also led to widespread use of genomic testing in all patients with mCRPC. The current review will give an overview of (1) the current understanding of the interplay between DNA damage response and PARP enzymes; (2) the clinical landscape of PARP inhibitors, including the combination of PARP inhibitors with other agents such as androgen-receptor signaling agents; (3) biomarkers related to PARP inhibitor response and resistance; and (4) considerations for interpreting genomic testing results and treating patients with PARP inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ossian Longoria
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Beije
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Giunta EF, Malapelle U, Russo A, De Giorgi U. Blood-based liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104241. [PMID: 38122919 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is characterized by several genetic alterations which could impact prognosis and therapeutic decisions in the advanced disease. Tissue biopsy is still considered the gold standard approach for molecular characterization in prostate cancer, but it has several limitations, including the possibility of insufficient/inadequate tumor tissue to be analyzed. Blood-based liquid biopsy is a non-invasive method to investigate tumor cell derivatives in the bloodstream, being a valid alternative to tissue biopsy for molecular characterization but also for predictive and/or prognostic purposes. In this review, we analyze the most relevant evidence in this field, focusing on clinically relevant targets such as HRD genetic alterations and also focusing on the differences between tissue and liquid biopsy in light of the data from the latest clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Francesco Giunta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) 'Dino Amadori', Meldola, FC, Italy.
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) 'Dino Amadori', Meldola, FC, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang R, Xu Q, Guo H, Yang G, Zhang J, Wang H, Xu T, Guo C, Yuan J, He Y, Zhang X, Fu H, Xu G, Zhao B, Xie J, Zhao T, Huang L, Zhang J, Peng B, Yao X, Yang B. Concordance and Clinical Significance of Genomic Alterations in Progressive Tumor Tissue and Matched Circulating Tumor DNA in Aggressive-variant Prostate Cancer. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:2221-2232. [PMID: 37877742 PMCID: PMC10624154 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive approach to reveal the genomic alterations of cancer; however, its comparison with sequencing of tumor tissue has not been well documented in real-world patients with aggressive-variant prostate cancer (AVPC). Concordance of genomic alterations was assessed between progressive tumor tissue and matched ctDNA by next-generation sequencing for 63 patients with AVPC. Associations of genomic alterations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. A total of 161 somatic mutations (SMs) and 84 copy-number variants (CNVs) were detected in tumors, of which 97 were also found in ctDNA, giving concordance of 39.6% (97/245) across all SMs and CNVs, 49.7% for SMs only and 20.2% for CNVs only. Across all patients with AVPC, chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer median PFS (6 vs. 0.75 months, P = 0.001) and OS (11 vs. 8 months, P < 0.001) than next-generation hormonal therapy (NHT). Among types of chemotherapy, additional platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer median PFS and OS than docetaxel only in patients with TP53, RB1, or PTEN alterations, and in those with ctDNA% ≥ 13.5%. The concordance analysis first provides evidence for combining the sequencing of ctDNA and tumor tissue in real-world patients with AVPC. Chemotherapy is associated with significantly better survival than NHT, and the benefit of additional platinum-based chemotherapy may depend on the presence of alterations in TP53, RB1, or PTEN and on a sufficiently high proportion of ctDNA in patients with AVPC. SIGNIFICANCE AVPC is a highly malignant and heterogeneous disease. Sequencing of ctDNA is a minimally invasive approach to reveal genomic alterations. On the basis of the current real-world study, we found ctDNA does not fully recapitulate the landscape of genomic alterations from progressive tumor tissue in AVPC. We also revealed AVPC can benefit from chemotherapy, especially platinum-based regimens. TP53/RB1/PTEN alterations in ctDNA or tumor tissue could be biomarkers for platinum-based chemotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiliang Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Qiufan Xu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Hanxu Guo
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Guanjie Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Tianyuan Xu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Changcheng Guo
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Yanyan He
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Hongliang Fu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Guang Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Binghui Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Jun Xie
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Tingting Zhao
- Research Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Longfei Huang
- Research Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Jiansheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Bo Peng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Bin Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Urologic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Iannantuono GM, Chandran E, Floudas CS, Choo-Wosoba H, Butera G, Roselli M, Gulley JL, Karzai F. Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102623. [PMID: 37716332 PMCID: PMC10591840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a standard-of-care (SoC) treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several clinical trials have shown the potential of combining PARPi with other anticancer agents. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARPi in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched on March 22nd, 2023, for phase 2 or 3 clinical trials. Efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], PSA decline >50% [PSA50], and objective response rate [ORR]) and safety outcomes were assessed in the included studies. RESULTS Seventeen clinical trials (PARPi monotherapy [n = 7], PARPi + androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors [ARSI] [n = 6], and PARPi + immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI] [n = 4]) were included in the quantitative analyses. PARPi monotherapy improved radiographic PFS and OS over SoC in mCRPC patients with alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes but not in those with alterations in the ATM gene. Higher rates of PSA50 and ORR were reported in participants treated with PARPi + ARSI than in single-agent PARPi or PARPi + ICI. Although the rate of high-grade adverse events was similar across all groups, treatment discontinuation was higher in patients treated with PARPi-based combinations than PARPi monotherapy. CONCLUSION The efficacy of PARPi is not uniform across mCRPC patients with alterations in DNA damage repair genes, and optimal patient selection remains a clinical challenge. No unexpected safety signals for this class of agents emerged from this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Maria Iannantuono
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States; Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Elias Chandran
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Charalampos S Floudas
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Gisela Butera
- Division of Library Services, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mario Roselli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - James L Gulley
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Fatima Karzai
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cimadamore A, Rescigno P, Conteduca V, Caliò A, Allegritti M, Calò V, Montagnani I, Lucianò R, Patruno M, Bracarda S. SIUrO best practice recommendations to optimize BRCA 1/2 gene testing from DNA extracted from bone biopsy in mCRPC patients (BRCA Optimal Bone Biopsy Procedure: BOP). Virchows Arch 2023; 483:579-589. [PMID: 37794204 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03660-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
The main guidelines and recommendations for the implementation of the BRCA1/2 somatic test do not focus on the clinical application of predictive testing on bone metastases, a frequent condition in metastatic prostate cancer, by analyzing the critical issues encountered by laboratory practice. Our goal is to produce a document (protocol) deriving from a multidisciplinary team approach to obtain high quality nucleic acids from biopsy of bone metastases. This document aims to compose an operational check-list of three phases: the pre-analytical phase concerns tumor cellularity, tissue processing, sample preservation (blood/FFPE), fixation and staining, but above all the decalcification process, the most critical phase because of its key role in allowing the extraction of somatic DNA with a good yield and high quality. The analytical phase involves the preparation of the libraries that can be analyzed in various NGS genetic sequencing platforms and with various bioinformatics software for the interpretation of sequence variants. Finally, the post-analytical phase that allows to report the variants of the BRCA1/2 genes in a clear and usable way to the clinician who will use these data to manage cancer therapy with PARP Inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Cimadamore
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Via Palladio 8, 33100, Udine, Italy.
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Vincenza Conteduca
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - Policlinico Riuniti, University of Foggia, 71122, Foggia, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Allegritti
- Interventional radiology Unit, Azienda ospedaliera Santa Maria Terni, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Valentina Calò
- Central Laboratory of Advanced Diagnosis and Biomedical Research, (CLADIBIOR) Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Hospital, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ilaria Montagnani
- Pathology Unit, USL Toscana Centro - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Empoli, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Margherita Patruno
- Center for Study of Heredo-Familial Tumors - IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II,", Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fettke H, Dai C, Kwan EM, Zheng T, Du P, Ng N, Bukczynska P, Docanto M, Kostos L, Foroughi S, Brown S, Graham LJK, Mahon K, Horvath LG, Jia S, Kohli M, Azad AA. BRCA-deficient metastatic prostate cancer has an adverse prognosis and distinct genomic phenotype. EBioMedicine 2023; 95:104738. [PMID: 37549632 PMCID: PMC10412463 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) genes are common in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Understanding how these genomic events impact prognosis and/or treatment response is vital for optimising clinical outcomes. METHODS Targeted sequencing was performed on 407 plasma samples from 375 men with mCRPC. Using the CLIA-certified PredicineCARE™ cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assay, pathogenic alterations in 152 key genes (including 27 DDR-related genes) were assessed, as was the presence and mechanisms of biallelic loss in BRCA2. FINDINGS At least one DDR alteration was present in 34.5% (129/375) of patients (including monoallelic alterations). The most frequently altered DDR genes were BRCA2 (19%), ATM (13%), FANCA (5%), CHEK2 (5%) and BRCA1 (3%). Patients with BRCA alterations, especially BRCA2, had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard ratio (HR) 3.3 [95% CI 1.9-6.0]; Cox regression p < 0.001), overall survival (HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.5]; Cox regression p = 0.02) and PSA response rates to androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors (32% vs 60%, chi-square p = 0.02). BRCA-deficient tumours were also enriched for alterations within multiple genes including in the AR and PI3K pathways. Zygosity of BRCA2 alterations had no discernible impact on clinical outcomes, with similarly poor PFS for monoallelic vs biallelic loss (median 3.9 months vs 3.4 months vs copy neutral 9.8 months). INTERPRETATION These data emphasise that the BRCA genes, in particular BRCA2, are key prognostic biomarkers in mCRPC. The clinical utility of BRCA2 as a marker of poor outcomes may, at least in cfDNA assays, be independent of the zygosity state detected. Enrichment of actionable genomic alterations in cfDNA from BRCA-deficient mCRPC may support rational co-targeting strategies in future clinical trials. FUNDING Several funding sources have supported this study. A full list is provided in the Acknowledgments. No funding was received from Predicine, Inc. during the conduct of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Fettke
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Chao Dai
- Predicine Inc., Hayward, CA, USA
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Pan Du
- Predicine Inc., Hayward, CA, USA
| | - Nicole Ng
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Maria Docanto
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Kostos
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Siavash Foroughi
- Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Personalized Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen Brown
- Medical Oncology, Ballarat Base Hospital, Ballarat, Australia
| | | | - Kate Mahon
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | | | - Manish Kohli
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Arun A Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT The advent of high-throughput technologies has enabled the analysis of minute amounts of tumor-derived material purified from body fluids, termed "liquid biopsies." Prostate cancer (PCa) management, like in many other cancer types, has benefited from liquid biopsies at several stages of the disease. Although initially describing circulating tumor cells in blood, the term "liquid biopsy" has come to more prominently include cell-free, circulating tumor DNA, as well as RNA, proteins, and other molecules. They provide tumor molecular information representing the entire, often-heterogeneous disease, relatively noninvasively and longitudinally. Blood has been the main liquid biopsy specimen in PCa, and urine has also proven beneficial. Technological advances have allowed clinical implementation of some liquid biopsies in PCa, in disease monitoring and precision oncology. This narrative review introduces the main types of blood-based PCa liquid biopsies focusing on advances in the past 5 years. Clinical adoption of liquid biopsies to detect and monitor the evolving PCa tumor biology promises to deepen our understanding of the disease and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andi K. Cani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Simpa S. Salami
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Domrazek K, Pawłowski K, Jurka P. Usefulness of BRCA and ctDNA as Prostate Cancer Biomarkers: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3452. [PMID: 37444562 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer represents the most common male urologic neoplasia. Tissue biopsies are the gold standard in oncology for diagnosing prostate cancer. We conducted a study to find the most reliable and noninvasive diagnostic tool. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of two biomarkers which we believe are the most interesting: BRCA (BRCA1 and 2) and ctDNA. Our systematic research yielded 248 articles. Forty-five duplicates were first excluded and, upon further examination, a further 203 articles were excluded on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, leaving 25 articles. A statistical analysis of the obtained data has been performed. With a collective calculation, BRCA1 was expressed in 2.74% of all cases from 24,212 patients examined and BRCA2 in 1.96% of cases from 20,480 patients. In a total calculation using ctDNA, it was observed that 89% of cases from 1198 patients exhibited high expression of circulating tumor DNA. To date, no ideal PCa biomarker has been found. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 work well for breast and ovarian cancers, they do not seem to be reliable for prostate cancer. ctDNA seems to be a much better biomarker; however, there are few studies in this area. Further studies need to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Domrazek
- Department of Small Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karol Pawłowski
- Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Jurka
- Department of Small Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Inoue T, Sekito S, Kageyama T, Sugino Y, Sasaki T. Roles of the PARP Inhibitor in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Mutated Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Direct Functions and Modification of the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092662. [PMID: 37174127 PMCID: PMC10177034 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer cells frequently exhibit defects in DNA damage repair (DDR), leading to genomic instability. Mutations in DDR genes or epigenetic alterations leading to the downregulation of DDR genes can result in increased dependency on other DDR pathways. Therefore, DDR pathways could be a treatment target for various cancers. In fact, polyadenosine diphosphatase ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib (Lynparza®), have shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy against BRCA1/2-mutant cancers through synthetic lethality. Recent genomic analytical advancements have revealed that BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants are the most frequent mutations among DDR genes in prostate cancer. Currently, the PROfound randomized controlled trial is investigating the efficacy of a PARP inhibitor, olaparib (Lynparza®), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The efficacy of the drug is promising, especially in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants, even if they are in the advanced stage of the disease. However, olaparib (Lynparza®) is not effective in all BRCA1/2 mutant prostate cancer patients and inactivation of DDR genes elicits genomic instability, leading to alterations in multiple genes, which eventually leads to drug resistance. In this review, we summarize PARP inhibitors' basic and clinical mechanisms of action against prostate cancer cells and discuss their effects on the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Sho Sekito
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takumi Kageyama
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sugino
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vandekerkhove G. BRCA Reversion Mutations in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2023; 83:210-211. [PMID: 36273936 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Detection of BRCA1, and BRCA2 Alterations in Matched Tumor Tissue and Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Patients with Prostate Cancer in a Real-World Setting. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123170. [PMID: 36551924 PMCID: PMC9776086 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA1 and/or 2 mutations. Identifying patients with prostate cancer harboring these mutations may be challenging. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides an avenue for an easier detection of these mutations. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the concordance of BRCA mutations in the tumor tissue and cfDNA in patients with metastatic prostate cancer in the real-world setting. METHODS Somatic genomic profiling results were obtained from a clinical cohort of patients at our institution who had at least two samples tested. One of the samples needed to be from either primary or metastatic tissue. Concordance was adjusted to not include mutation types that the cfDNA platforms were not designed to detect. RESULTS The presence or absence of mutations in the BRCA gene was assessed in a total of 589 samples, including 327 cfDNA samples, from 260 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The median time between the first test and any subsequent test was 22.8 (0.0-232) months. BRCA mutation was present in the patient's original prostate tissue in 23 samples (3.9%) of patients. The adjusted concordance between prostate tumor tissue and cfDNA was 97.9% [95% CI, 95.3-99.1%]. The adjusted concordance between metastatic samples and cfDNA was 93.5% [95% CI, 86.4-97.3%]. Of the patients who had a BRCA mutation detected in their prostate tissue, there was a 70% probability of detecting a BRCA mutation in the patient's cfDNA as well. For patients who did not have a detectable BRCA mutation in their primary prostate tissue, the probability of detecting a subsequent one later in the disease course was less than 0.9%. CONCLUSION There is a high level of concordance between tissue and blood for BRCA mutations. Testing cfDNA can provide reliable information on BRCA mutational status and is a viable alternative to solid tissue sequencing when unavailable. The development of a new BRCA mutation later in the disease course is a rare event.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kwan EM, Wyatt AW, Chi KN. Towards clinical implementation of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: Opportunities for integration and pitfalls to interpretation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1054497. [PMID: 36439451 PMCID: PMC9685669 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents short fragments of tumor-derived DNA released into the bloodstream primarily from cancer cells undergoing apoptosis. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), characterizing genomic alterations in ctDNA identifies mutations, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements with predictive and prognostic biomarker utility. These associations with clinical outcomes have resulted in ctDNA increasingly incorporated into routine clinical care. In this review, we summarize current and emerging applications for ctDNA analysis in metastatic prostate cancer, including outcome prediction, treatment selection, and characterization of treatment resistance. We also discuss potential pitfalls with interpreting ctDNA findings, namely false negatives arising from low tumor content and optimal assay design, including correction for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and germline variants. Understanding the influence of these limitations on interpretation of ctDNA results is necessary to overcome barriers to clinical implementation. Nevertheless, as assay availability and technology continue to improve, recognizing both opportunities and shortcomings of ctDNA analysis will retain relevance with informing the implementation of precision-oncology initiatives for metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond M. Kwan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexander W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim N. Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|