Plasma catecholamine levels after fluoxetine treatment in depressive patients

Giant Pheochromocytoma Diagnosis Confounded by Amphetamine Use

Objective

Diagnosis of giant pheochromocytoma is difficult; patients often lack the classic triad and presence of gross biochemical positivity. At times, presence of sympathetic stimulant drugs can further complicate the clinical picture. Here, we present a case of giant "functional" pheochromocytoma with a history of amphetamine use. Case Description. 37-year-old female presented with a 1-day history of abdominal pain. CT abdomen identified a 12.5 cm heterogeneously enhancing left adrenal mass. Plasma/urine catecholamine and metanephrine levels were markedly elevated with evidence of elevated serum/urine cortisol. However, the patient's subsequent urine toxicology was found to be positive for amphetamines, which she later admitted to using, 1 week prior to admission. Repeat biochemical workup after 1 week drug washout period showed improvement in both catecholamine and cortisol levels. Given the high degree of suspicion for PCC, an open laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed with histology confirming SDHB gene mutation positive giant pheochromocytoma. Discussion. Diagnosis of PCC in a patient with a history of amphetamine abuse remains an enigma, to which addition of it being a giant PCC that are rare and typically silent further confounds the clinical picture as seen in this case.

Conclusion

PCC could be termed a "chameleon" tumor given its varied clinical presentations and lack of standardized biochemical and radiological data (giant, pheochromocytoma, and amphetamine).

Plasma Neurotrophic Factor Levels are not Associated with the Severity of Depression: Prospective Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Depression is one of the most common mental illnesses. Impaired neurogenesis is observed in depression. Biomarkers of impaired neurogenesis in depression can act as a useful objective and diagnostic and prognostic tool to determine the severity of depression.

AIM

To study the concentration of biochemical indicators in the blood that may be involved in the pathogenesis of depression and their intercorrelations, and to determine any associations between the concentrations of biochemical indicators and severity of depressive symptoms.

METHODS

We determined the plasma concentrations of serotonin, dopamine, and neurotrophic factors involved in neurogenesis (BDNF, CDNF and neuropeptide Y) using enzyme immunoassay and mass spectrometry in depressed patients (n=22) and healthy controls (n=16) matched by socio-demographic parameters. All participants were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to enter the study. The standard cut-offs for the CES-D and GAD-7 scales were used to confirm the presence or absence of depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

The concentrations of serotonin, dopamine, BDNF, CDNF, and neuropeptide Y in plasma did not differ between the groups and was not found to be associated with the scores on the scales. Positive correlations were found between the concentration of neuropeptide Y and serotonin, BDNF, and CDNF in blood plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma concentrations of biomarkers related to the pathophysiology of depression did not correlate with the severity of its symptoms.

Fluoxetine-induced Systemic Hypertension in a 12-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is an efficacious medication in social anxiety disorder with a generally well-tolerated adverse effect profile. However, infrequent side effects may occur during treatment. Here, we report a case of systemic hypertension in a 12-year-old female patient with social anxiety disorder receiving fluoxetine treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of fluoxetine-induced systemic hypertension in children and adolescences.

Propranolol Reverses Impaired Fracture Healing Response Observed With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Treatment

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants worldwide and recent data show significant impairment of fracture healing after treatment with the SSRI fluoxetine in mice. Here, we provide evidence that the negative effects of SSRIs can be overcome by administration of the beta-blocker propranolol at the time of fracture. First, in vitro experiments established that propranolol does not affect osteogenic differentiation. We then used a murine model of intramembranous ossification to study the potential rescue effect of propranolol on SSRI-induced impaired fracture healing. Micro-CT analysis revealed that fluoxetine treatment resulted in a smaller bony regenerate and that this decrease in bone formation can be overcome by co-treatment with propranolol. We then tested this in a clinically relevant model of endochondral ossification. Fluoxetine-treated mice with a femur fracture were treated with propranolol initiated at the time of fracture, and a battery of analyses demonstrated a reversal of the detrimental effect of fluoxetine on fracture healing in response to propranolol treatment. These experiments show for the first time to our knowledge that the negative effects of SSRIs on fracture healing can be overcome by co-treatment with a beta-blocker. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The Effects of Tryptophan Enhancement and Depletion on Plasma Catecholamine Levels in Healthy Individuals

OBJECTIVE

Central nervous system (CNS) serotonin (5-HT) exerts both excitatory and inhibitory effects on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in animals. In this study, we examine the effects of tryptophan enhancement and depletion on plasma catecholamine levels in humans.

METHODS

The total sample consisted of 164 healthy men and women who were tested for 2 days. Seventy-nine participants were randomized to a tryptophan enhancement condition and 85 to a tryptophan depletion condition. Both protocols consisted of a "sham day," followed by an "active day." Blood samples for assessment of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels were collected before and after tryptophan enhancement/depletion. Data were analyzed using general linear models. Separate analyses were conducted for each study arm and for each measure.

RESULTS

In the depletion condition, both epinephrine (F(5,330) = 2.69, p = .021) and norepinephrine (F(5,335) = 2.79, p = .018) showed small increases on active versus "sham" depletion days. There were also significant day by time interactions for epinephrine (F(3,171) = 39.32, p < .0001) and norepinephrine (F(3,195) = 31.09, p < .0001) levels in the enhancement arm. Tryptophan infusion resulted in a marked increase in epinephrine (Premean = 23.92 (12.23) versus Postmean = 81.57 (62.36)) and decrease in norepinephrine (Premean = 257.2 (106.11) versus Postmean = 177.04 (87.15)), whereas levels of both catecholamines were stable on the "sham day."

CONCLUSIONS

CNS 5-HT exerts both inhibitory and excitatory effects on SNS activity in humans, potentially due to stimulation of CNS 5-HT receptors that have shown to have inhibitory (5-HT1A) and excitatory (5-HT1A and/or 5-HT2) SNS effects in animal models.

Serotonin-reuptake inhibitors act centrally to cause bone loss in mice by counteracting a local anti-resorptive effect

The use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been associated with an increased risk of bone fracture, raising concerns about their increasingly broader usage. This deleterious effect is poorly understood, and thus strategies to avoid this side effect remain elusive. We show here that fluoxetine (Flx), one of the most-prescribed SSRIs, acts on bone remodeling through two distinct mechanisms. Peripherally, Flx has anti-resorptive properties, directly impairing osteoclast differentiation and function through a serotonin-reuptake-independent mechanism that is dependent on intracellular Ca2+ levels and the transcription factor Nfatc1. With time, however, Flx also triggers a brain-serotonin-dependent rise in sympathetic output that increases bone resorption sufficiently to counteract its local anti-resorptive effect, thus leading to a net effect of impaired bone formation and bone loss. Accordingly, neutralizing this second mode of action through co-treatment with the β-blocker propranolol, while leaving the peripheral effect intact, prevents Flx-induced bone loss in mice. Hence, this study identifies a dual mode of action of SSRIs on bone remodeling and suggests a therapeutic strategy to block the deleterious effect on bone homeostasis from their chronic use.

Serotonin and histamine mediate gastroprotective effect of fluoxetine against experimentally-induced ulcers in rats

Research in the treatment of gastric ulcer has involved the investigation of new alternatives, such as anti-depressant drugs. The present study was designed to investigate the gastroprotective effects of fluoxetine against indomethacin and alcohol induced gastric ulcers in rats and the potential mechanisms of that effect. Fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) was administered IP for 14 days. For comparative purposes, other rats were treated with ranitidine (30 mg/kg). Thereafter, after 24 h of fasting, INDO (100 mg/kg) or absolute alcohol (5 ml/kg) was administered to all rats (saline was administered to naïve controls) and rats in each group were sacrificed 5 h (for INDO rats) or 1 h (for alcohol rats) later. Macroscopic examination revealed that both fluoxetine and ranitidine decreased ulcer scores in variable ratios, which was supported by microscopic histopathological examination. Biochemical analysis of fluoxetine- or ranitidine-pre-treated host tissues demonstrated reductions in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels and concomitant increases in gastric pH, nitric oxide (NO) and reduced glutathione (GSH) contents. Fluoxetine, more than ranitidine, also resulted in serotonin and histamine levels nearest to control values. Moreover, immuno-histochemical analysis showed that fluoxetine markedly enhanced expression of cyclo-oxygenases COX-1 and COX-2 in both models; in comparison, ranitidine did not affect COX-1 expression in either ulcer model but caused moderate increases in COX-2 expression in INDO-induced hosts and high expression in alcohol-induced hosts. The results here indicated fluoxetine exhibited better gastroprotective effects than ranitidine and this could be due to anti-secretory, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-histaminic effects of the drug, as well as a stabilization of gastric serotonin levels.

Differential regulation of catecholamine synthesis and transport in rat adrenal medulla by fluoxetine treatment

We have recently shown that chronic fluoxetine treatment acted significantly increasing plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations both in control and chronically stressed adult male rats. However, possible effects of fluoxetine on catecholamine synthesis and re-uptake in adrenal medulla have been largely unknown. In the present study the effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting enzyme in catecholamine synthesis, as well as a norepinephrine transporter and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 gene expressions in adrenal medulla of animals exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for 4 weeks, were investigated. Gene expression analyses were performed using a real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Chronically stressed animals had increased tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA levels and decreased expression of both transporters. Fluoxetine increased tyrosine hydroxylase and decreased norepinephrine transporter gene expression in both unstressed and CUMS rats. These findings suggest that chronic fluoxetine treatment increased plasma catecholamine levels by affecting opposing changes in catecholamine synthesis and uptake.

Fluoxetine: juvenile pharmacokinetics in a nonhuman primate model

RATIONALE

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine is the only psychopharmacological agent approved for use in children. While short-term studies of side effects have been performed, long-term consequences for brain development are not known. Such studies can be performed in appropriate animal models if doses modeling therapeutic use in children are known.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to identify a daily dose of fluoxetine in juvenile monkeys which would result in serum fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations in the therapeutic range for children.

METHODS

Juvenile (2.5-year-old rhesus monkeys, n = 6) received single administration of doses of 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg day fluoxetine on a background of chronic dosing at an intermediate level to provide steady-state conditions to model therapeutic administration. Using nonlinear modeling, standard pharmacokinetic parameters were derived. Cerebrospinal fluid monoamine neurotransmitters were assayed to confirm the pharmacological effects.

RESULTS

Dose-dependent area under the curve (AUC) and C max values were seen, while T max and absorption/elimination half-lives were minimally influenced by dose. A dosage of 2 mg/kg day given over a 14-week period led to steady-state serum concentrations of active agent (fluoxetine + norfluoxetine) similar to those recorded from drug monitoring studies in children. Cisternal cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of serotonin increased significantly over the 14-week period, while concentrations of the serotonin metabolite (5-HIAA) were lower but not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of 2 mg/kg day fluoxetine in juvenile rhesus monkeys provides an internal dose similar to therapeutic use in children and will help establish a valuable animal model for understanding fluoxetine's therapeutic and potential adverse effects in children.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of methylphenidate and MDMA administered alone or in combination

Methylphenidate and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') are widely misused psychoactive drugs. Methylphenidate increases brain dopamine and norepinephrine levels by blocking the presynaptic reuptake transporters. MDMA releases serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine through the same transporters. Pharmacodynamic interactions of methylphenidate and MDMA are likely. This study compared the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of methylphenidate and MDMA administered alone or in combination in healthy subjects using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Methylphenidate did not enhance the psychotropic effects of MDMA, although it produced psychostimulant effects on its own. The haemodynamic and adverse effects of co-administration of methylphenidate and MDMA were significantly higher compared with MDMA or methylphenidate alone. Methylphenidate did not change the pharmacokinetics of MDMA and vice versa. Methylphenidate and MDMA shared some subjective amphetamine-type effects; however, 125 mg of MDMA increased positive mood more than 60 mg of methylphenidate, and methylphenidate enhanced activity and concentration more than MDMA. Methylphenidate and MDMA differentially altered facial emotion recognition. Methylphenidate enhanced the recognition of sad and fearful faces, whereas MDMA reduced the recognition of negative emotions. Additionally, the present study found acute pharmacodynamic tolerance to MDMA but not methylphenidate. In conclusion, the combined use of methylphenidate and MDMA does not produce more psychoactive effects compared with either drug alone, but potentially enhances cardiovascular and adverse effects. The findings may be of clinical importance for assessing the risks of combined psychostimulant misuse. Trial registration identification number: NCT01465685 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01465685).

Neuromodulation by soy diets or equol: anti-depressive & anti-obesity-like influences, age- & hormone-dependent effects

BACKGROUND

Soy-derived isoflavones potentially protect against obesity and depression. In five different studies we examined the influence of soy-containing diets or equol injections on depression, serotonin levels, body weight gain (BW) and white adipose tissue (WAT) deposition in female Long-Evans rats at various stages of life [rats were intact, ovariectomized or experienced natural ovarian failure (NOF)].

RESULTS

In general, animals fed a soy-rich diet (Phyto-600) and/or administered equol (@ 5 mg/kg/day) displayed significant decreases in BW and WAT compared to a low-soy diet. When equol was injected alone (5 mg/kg/day), experiments 1, 4, and 5 demonstrated that body weight was significantly decreased. Equol has body weight control effects in females that are dependent on ovarian status and/or age of diet initiation. Experiments 1-4 all displayed no significant differences in depressive-related behavior as measured by the Prosolt forced swim test (PFST) when soy-rich (Phyto-600) or low-soy diets (Phyto-low) or equol treatments (5 mg/kg/day) were tested in female rats at various ages or hormonal status. Results of all the experiments are not presented here due to space limitations, but data from experiment 5 are presented. From conception female rats were exposed to either: a) a soy-rich (Phyto-600) or b) low-soy diet (Phyto-low). After 290 days all rats experienced NOF. At 330 days-old the animals were examined in the Porsolt forced swim test (PFST). One month later a second PFST was performed [after Phyto-low fed animals were injected with equol (5 mg/kg/day) for one week prior to the second PFST]. At the first PFST, serotonin and mobility levels were significantly decreased in the Phyto-low fed animals compared to animals that consumed the Phyto-600 diet. After equol injections at the second PFST, mobility and serotonin levels significantly increased in aged NOF rats fed the Phyto-low diet (to levels comparable to Phyto-600 fed animals).

CONCLUSIONS

Consumption of dietary isoflavones or equol exposure in rats has body weight controlling effects and equol specifically may have antidepressant potential dependent upon diet initiation and/or dosage of treatments. The current study demonstrates that equol is able to decrease body weight, abdominal WAT, and depressive-related behavior. While other factors and mechanisms may play a role, in part, the present results provide a greater understanding of how isoflavonoid molecules modulate the brain's influence on behavior.

Effects of repeated maprotiline and fluoxetine treatment on gene expression of catecholamine synthesizing enzymes in adrenal medulla of unstressed and stressed rats

1 Repeated maprotiline (a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor) and fluoxetine (a serotonin reuptake inhibitor) treatment on gene expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes were examined in adrenal medulla of unstressed control and chronic unpredictable mild stressed rats. 2 Maprotiline did not change gene expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes in control and stressed rats. 3 Fluoxetine increased gene expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DBH), but did not phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase in both unstressed and chronic unpredictable mild stressed animals. 4 In conclusion, we have demonstrated that repeated administration of fluoxetine enhanced gene transcription of TH and DBH and subsequently stimulates noradrenaline synthesis in adrenal medulla of control and stressed rats.

Effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine on counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Previous work has demonstrated that chronic administration of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine augments counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in healthy humans. However, virtually no information exists regarding the effects of fluoxetine on integrated physiological counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, the specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6-week use of the SSRI fluoxetine would amplify autonomic nervous system (ANS) counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen type 1 diabetic patients (14 men/4 women aged 19-48 years with BMI 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2) and A1C 7.0 +/- 0.4%) participated in randomized, double-blind 2-h hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1))-hypoglycemic clamp studies before and after 6 weeks of fluoxetine administration (n = 8) or identical placebo (n = 10). Glucose kinetics was determined by 3-tritiated glucose. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was determined by microneurography.

RESULTS

Hypoglycemia (2.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) and insulinemia (646 +/- 52 pmol/l) were similar during all clamp studies. ANS, neuroendocrine, and metabolic counterregulatory responses remained unchanged in the placebo group. However, fluoxetine administration significantly (P < 0.05) increased key ANS (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and MSNA), metabolic (endogenous glucose production and lipolysis), and cardiovascular (systolic blood pressure) counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that 6-week administration of the SSRI fluoxetine can amplify ANS and metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms during moderate hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. These data also suggest that the use of fluoxetine may be useful in increasing epinephrine responses during hypoglycemia in clinical practice.

Effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, on counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in healthy individuals

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglycemia commonly occurs in intensively-treated diabetic patients. Repeated hypoglycemia blunts counterregulatory responses, thereby increasing the risk for further hypoglycemic events. Currently, physiologic approaches to augment counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia have not been established. Therefore, the specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6 weeks' administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine would amplify autonomic nervous system (ANS) and neuroendocrine counterregulatory mechanisms during hypoglycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 20 healthy (10 male and 10 female) subjects participated in an initial single-step hyperinsulinemic (9 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1))-hypoglycemic (means +/- SE 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) clamp study and were then randomized to receive 6 weeks' administration of fluoxetine (n = 14) or identical placebo (n = 6) in a double-blind fashion. After 6 weeks, subjects returned for a second hypoglycemic clamp. Glucose kinetics were determined by three-tritiated glucose, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured by microneurography.

RESULTS

Despite identical hypoglycemia (2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l) and insulinemia during all clamp studies, key ANS (epinephrine, norepinephrine, and MSNA but not symptoms), neuroendocrine (cortisol), and metabolic (endogenous glucose production, glycogenolysis, and lipolysis) responses were increased (P < 0.01) following fluoxetine.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 6 weeks' administration of the SSRI fluoxetine can amplify a wide spectrum of ANS and metabolic counterregulatory responses during hypoglycemia in healthy individuals. These data further suggest that serotonergic transmission may be an important mechanism in modulating sympathetic nervous system drive during hypoglycemia in healthy individuals.

Effects of fluoxetine on hippocampal-dependent and hippocampal-independent learning tasks

It is generally assumed that fluoxetine does not produce cognitive impairments, based on observations that fluoxetine-treated animals do not show impairment in learning the spatial water-maze task. As fluoxetine has different effects on different brain regions and as learning is not a unitary phenomenon, it may be the case that fluoxetine has different effects on different types of learning and memory paradigms. In this study, 15 male Sprague-Dawley rats were given chronic injections of either fluoxetine or saline and received training in two hippocampal-independent tasks in addition to a spatial water-maze task. The two hippocampal-independent tasks were a short-delay appetitive Pavlovian-conditioning task and an object-recognition task. The results showed that the fluoxetine-injected rats did not show any impairment relative to the saline controls in either the acquisition or the retention phases of the water-maze task, but were significantly impaired in both of the hippocampal-independent tasks. Fluoxetine-injected rats spent significantly less time exploring the novel object in the object-recognition task and took longer to learn the association between the conditional stimulus and the appetitive unconditional stimulus in the appetitive Pavlovian-conditioning task.

Altered brain activation pattern associated with drug-induced attenuation of enhanced depression-like behavior in rats bred for high anxiety

BACKGROUND

The enhanced depression-like behavior in the forced swim test displayed by rats selectively bred for high anxiety-related behavior (HAB) as compared with their low anxiety counterparts (LAB) is abolished by chronic paroxetine treatment. The aim of the present study was to identify neuronal substrates underlying this treatment response in HABs.

METHODS

The HAB rats received paroxetine (10 mg/kg/day) for 24 days via drinking water, and drug-induced modulation of neuronal activation patterns in response to forced swimming was mapped with the expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos as marker.

RESULTS

Chronic paroxetine treatment reduced the immobility scores during forced swimming, confirming the previously observed antidepressant-like effect in these animals, and attenuated the forced swim-induced c-Fos response in a restricted set (11 of 70) of brain areas. These included limbic areas such as the prelimbic cortex, parts of the amygdala, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, dorsal hippocampus, dorsal lateral septum as well as hypothalamic and hindbrain areas (dorsolateral periaqueductal gray [PAG], locus coeruleus). Untreated LAB rats, which displayed low depression-like behavior comparable to that of treated HABs, also showed low swim stress-induced c-Fos response in most of these same areas, further supporting an association of attenuated neuronal excitability in the identified areas with attenuated depression-like behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that modulation of neuronal activation in a restricted set of defined, mainly limbic as well as selected hypothalamic and hindbrain areas by paroxetine treatment is associated with the reduction of enhanced depression-like behavior in a psychopathological animal model.

Region-specific transcriptional changes following the three antidepressant treatments electro convulsive therapy, sleep deprivation and fluoxetine

The significant proportion of depressed patients that are resistant to monoaminergic drug therapy and the slow onset of therapeutic effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are two major reasons for the sustained search for new antidepressants. In an attempt to identify common underlying mechanisms for fast- and slow-acting antidepressant modalities, we have examined the transcriptional changes in seven different brain regions of the rat brain induced by three clinically effective antidepressant treatments: electro convulsive therapy (ECT), sleep deprivation (SD), and fluoxetine (FLX), the most commonly used slow-onset antidepressant. Each of these antidepressant treatments was applied with the same regimen known to have clinical efficacy: 2 days of ECT (four sessions per day), 24 h of SD, and 14 days of daily treatment of FLX, respectively. Transcriptional changes were evaluated on RNA extracted from seven different brain regions using the Affymetrix rat genome microarray 230 2.0. The gene chip data were validated using in situ hybridization or autoradiography for selected genes. The major findings of the study are: 1. The transcriptional changes induced by SD, ECT and SSRI display a regionally specific distribution distinct to each treatment. 2. The fast-onset, short-lived antidepressant treatments ECT and SD evoked transcriptional changes primarily in the catecholaminergic system, whereas the slow-onset antidepressant FLX treatment evoked transcriptional changes in the serotonergic system. 3. ECT and SD affect in a similar manner the same brain regions, primarily the locus coeruleus, whereas the effects of FLX were primarily in the dorsal raphe and hypothalamus, suggesting that both different regions and pathways account for fast onset but short lasting effects as compared to slow-onset but long-lasting effects. However, the similarity between effects of ECT and SD is somewhat confounded by the fact that the two treatments appear to regulate a number of transcripts in an opposite manner. 4. Multiple transcripts (e.g. brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (Sgk1)), whose level was reported to be affected by antidepressants or behavioral manipulations, were also found to be regulated by the treatments used in the present study. Several novel findings of transcriptional regulation upon one, two or all three treatments were made, for the latter we highlight homer, erg2, HSP27, the proto oncogene ret, sulfotransferase family 1A (Sult1a1), glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD3), the orphan receptor G protein-coupled receptor 88 (GPR88) and a large number of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). 5. Transcripts encoding proteins involved in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus were strongly affected by ECT and SD, but not by FLX. The novel transcripts, concomitantly regulated by several antidepressant treatments, may represent novel targets for fast onset, long-duration antidepressants.