The N- and L-Type Calcium Channel Blocker Cilnidipine Suppresses Renal Injury in Dahl Rats Fed a High-Sucrose Diet, an Experimental Model of Metabolic Syndrome

An in vivo and in vitro model on the protective effect of cilnidipine on contrast-induced nephropathy via regulation of apoptosis and CaMKⅡ/mPTP pathway

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an acute kidney injury (AKI) observed after the administration of contrast media. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been reported to exert a renal protective effect. This study aims to investigate the role of cilnidipine, a novel CCBs, on CIN by regulating the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase Ⅱ(CaMKⅡ)/mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) pathway. Here, iohexol, a representative contrast media, was used to establish CIN model. KN-93 (CaMKⅡ inhibitor) and atractyloside (mPTP opener) were administered in rats, and CaMKⅡ overexpression was used in Human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Markers of renal injury (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and urinary NAGL), hematoxylin-eosin stain, oxidative stress (ROS, superoxide dismutase [SOD], and malondialdehyde [MDA] levels), cell death (MTT and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling [TUNEL]), mitochondrial function (mPTP, mitochondrial membrane potential [MMP], and ATP) were assessed. Western blots were used to measure the expression levels of Bax/Bcl-2, caspase-3, CaMKⅡ/mPTP signaling pathways. Results showed that cilnidipine markedly improved kidney function, and alleviated tubular cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage induced by iohexol in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanism may be that cilnidipine relieved CaMKⅡ activation and mPTP opening induced by iohexol. All of these protective effects of cilnidipine were attenuated by CaMKⅡ overexpression and atractyloside (mPTP opener) pretreatment. Moreover, KN-93 (CaMKⅡ inhibitor) treatment showed a similar renal protective effect with cilnidipine, while the protective effect of cilnidipine on kidney in CIN rats was not further suppressed by KN-93 cotreatment. These in vitro and in vivo results point toward the fact that cilnidipine might be a novel therapeutic drug against contrast-induced nephrotoxicity in a CaMKⅡ-dependent manner.

N-type calcium channel and renal injury

Accumulating evidences indicated that voltage-gated calcium channels (VDCC), including L-, T-, N-, and P/Q-type, are present in kidney and contribute to renal injury during various chronic diseases trough different mechanisms. As a voltage-gated calcium channel, N-type calcium channel was firstly been founded predominately distributed on nerve endings which control neurotransmitter releases. Since sympathetic nerve is distributed along renal afferent and efferent arterioles, N-type calcium channel blockade on sympathetic nerve terminals would bring renal dynamic improvement by dilating both arterioles and reducing glomerular pressure. In addition, large body of scientific research indicated that neurotransmitters, such as norepinephrine, releases by activating N-type calcium channel can trigger inflammatory and fibrotic signaling pathways in kidney. Interestingly, we recently demonstrated that N-type calcium channel is also expressed on podocytes and may directly contribute to podocyte injury in denervated animal models. In this paper, we will summarize our current knowledge regarding renal N-type calcium channels, and discuss how they might contribute to the river that terminates in renal injury.

Calcium channel blocker in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is involved in a progressive deterioration in renal function over the years and is now a global public health problem. Currently, reducing the number of patients progressing to end-stage renal failure is urgently necessary. Hypertension and CKD interact with each other, and good control of blood pressure (BP) can improve CKD patients' prognosis. With the current global trend for more strict BP control, the importance of BP management and the need for medication to achieve this strict goal are increasing. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), which target voltage-dependent calcium channels, are frequently used in combination with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors for CKD patients because of their strong BP-lowering properties and relatively few adverse side effects. Calcium channels have several subtypes, including L, N, T, P/Q, and R, and three types of CCBs, L-type CCBs, L-/T-type CCBs, and L-/N-type CCBs, that are available. Nowadays, the new functions and effects of the CCBs are being elucidated.

CONCLUSION

We should use different types of CCBs properly depending on their pharmacological effects, such as the strength of antihypertensive effects and the organ protection effects, taking into account the pathophysiology of the patients. In this article, the role and the use of CCBs in CKD patients are reviewed.

Effects of the L/N-Type Ca2+ Channel Blocker Cilnidipine on the Cardiac Histological Remodelling and Inducibility of Atrial Fibrillation in High-Salt-Fed Rats

High salt intake has been shown to induce hypertrophy and fibrosis in the atria and ventricles, which could result in the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Whereas the development of AF is suggested to be prevented by renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, recent findings have indicated that this prevention is closely associated with their antihypertensive effects. In this study, we investigated whether the L/N-type Ca2+ channel blocker cilnidipine counteracts salt-induced atrial and ventricular remodelling and the inducibility of AF. Cilnidipine was orally administered to Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed with an 8% NaCl diet at 10 mg/kg for 5 weeks, and then electrophysiological evaluation and histological analyses were performed. The effects were compared with those of the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker amlodipine at 3 mg/kg. Following the intake of the 8% NaCl diet, the blood pressure (BP) increased, and fibrosis was induced in the atria and ventricles. Cilnidipine decreased BP, and the extent of the decrease in the cilnidipine group was similar to those in the amlodipine group. Cilnidipine produced a greater decrease in the fibrotic area in the atria and ventricles than amlodipine. The cilnidipine group shortened the AF duration from 7.43 ± 3.16 to 2.95 ± 1.73 s, which had been increased by NaCl intake. Plasma noradrenaline levels in the cilnidipine group were lower than those in the amlodipine group. Thus, the suppressive effects of cilnidipine on the salt-induced atrial and ventricular remodelling, fibrosis, and AF sustainability might be closely associated with its N-type Ca2+ channel-blocking actions.

Comparison of effects of L/N-type and L-type calcium channel blockers on post-infarct cardiac remodelling in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Hypertension and coronary events are becoming more prevalent in aging societies, and myocardial infarction usually occurs in calcium channel blocker (CCB)-treated hypertensive patients. We herein compared the effects of cilnidipine, an L/N-type CCB and amlodipine, an L-type CCB, on post-infarct left ventricular (LV) remodelling in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Male SHRs were subjected to 30 minutes of left coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion (MI group). The administration of cilnidipine (10 mg/kg/d; MI + Cil group) or amlodipine (10 mg/kg/d; MI + Aml group) was initiated one week before surgery and continued for five weeks. Both CCBs decreased blood pressure. Four weeks after surgery, cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, attenuated LV dilatation, fractional shortening impairments, end-diastolic pressure elevations, and tau elongation. In the non-infarct region, myocyte hypertrophy and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) mRNA levels were similarly attenuated by both CCBs. On the other hand, interstitial fibrosis, the mRNA expression of collagen type III and transforming growth factor (TGF) β and immunohistological TGF β protein expression in the non-infarct region were reduced more in the MI + Cil group than in the MI + Aml group. Additionally, elevated angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and interstitial noradrenaline concentrations in the non-infarct region were reduced by cilnidipine. These results suggest that cilnidipine reduced cardiac noradrenaline concentrations and inhibited the renin-angiotensin system, which attenuated post-infarct remodelling more than amlodipine in hypertensive rats.

Attenuation of renal fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction in mice lacking the N-type calcium channel

The N-type Ca²⁺ channel (Cav2.2) is distributed in sympathetic nerves that innervate the tubules, the vessels, and the juxtaglomerular granular cells of the kidney. However, the role of N-type Ca²⁺ channels in renal disease remains unknown. To address this issue, Cav2.2 knockout mice were utilized. Immunoreactive Cav2.2 was undetectable in normal kidneys of C57BL/6N mice, but it became positive in the interstitial S100-positive nerve fibers after unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). There were no significant differences in mean blood pressure, heart rate, and renal function between wild-type littermates and Cav2.2-knockout mice at baseline, as well as after UUO. Cav2.2 deficiency significantly reduced the EVG-positive fibrotic area, alpha-SMA expression, the production of type I collagen, and the hypoxic area in the obstructed kidneys. The expression of tyrosine hydroxylase, a marker for sympathetic neurons, was significantly increased in the obstructed kidneys of wild-type mice, but not in Cav2.2-knockout mice. These data suggest that increased Cav2.2 is implicated in renal nerve activation leading to the progression of renal fibrosis. Blockade of Cav2.2 might be a novel therapeutic approach for preventing renal fibrosis.

On the top of ARB N/L type Ca channel blocker leads to less elevation of aldosterone

The activation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is one of the unfavourable characteristics of calcium channel blocker (CCB). N type calcium channel is thought to be involved in renin gene transcription and adrenal aldosterone release. Accordingly, N/L type CCB has a possibility of less elevation of plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) among CCBs. In a monotherapy study, we had already demonstrated that N/L type CCB leads to less activation of the RAS compared with L type CCB. The objective of this study is to substantiate the hypothesis that at the condition of additive administration on the top of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), still N/L type CCB leads to less elevation of PAC compared with L type one. Subjects were 60 hypertensives administered with valsartan. As an open label study, amlodipine (L type) or cilnidipine (N/L type) were administered on the top of valsartan (ARB) in a cross-over manner. Results were as follows (valsartan+amlodipine compared with valsartan+cilnidipine): systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg): 132±10/76±10 compared with 131±10/77±9, P=0.95/0.48, plasma renin activity (PRA) (ng/ml·h): 2.41±2.67 compared with 2.00±1.50 P=0.20, PAC (pg/ml): 77.3±31.0 compared with 67.4±24.8, P<0.05, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (mg/gCr): 105.9±216.1 compared with 73.9±122.2, P<0.05. Thus, PAC at cilnidipine was significantly lower than those at amlodipine in spite of the comparable BP reductions. Besides, UAE was significantly lower at cilnidipine. In conclusion, on the top of the ARB, it is suggested that cilnidipine administration might lead to less elevation of PAC and reduction in UAE compared with amlodipine.

Ablation of the N-type calcium channel ameliorates diabetic nephropathy with improved glycemic control and reduced blood pressure

Pharmacological blockade of the N- and L-type calcium channel lessens renal injury in kidney disease patients. The significance of specific blockade of α1 subunit of N-type calcium channel, Ca_v2.2, in diabetic nephropathy, however, remains to be clarified. To examine functional roles, we mated Ca_v2.2^−/− mice with db/db (diabetic) mice on the C57BLKS background. Ca_v2.2 was localized in glomeruli including podocytes and in distal tubular cells. Diabetic Ca_v2.2^−/− mice significantly reduced urinary albumin excretion, glomerular hyperfiltration, blood glucose levels, histological deterioration and systolic blood pressure (SBP) with decreased urinary catecholamine compared to diabetic Ca_v2.2^+/+ mice. Interestingly, diabetic heterozygous Ca_v2.2^+/− mice also decreased albuminuria, although they exhibited comparable systolic blood pressure, sympathetic nerve activity and creatinine clearance to diabetic Ca_v2.2^+/+ mice. Consistently, diabetic mice with cilnidipine, an N-/L-type calcium channel blocker, showed a reduction in albuminuria and improvement of glomerular changes compared to diabetic mice with nitrendipine. In cultured podocytes, depolarization-dependent calcium responses were decreased by ω-conotoxin, a Ca_v2.2-specific inhibitor. Furthermore, reduction of nephrin by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in podocytes was abolished with ω-conotoxin, cilnidipine or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor. In conclusion, Ca_v2.2 inhibition exerts renoprotective effects against the progression of diabetic nephropathy, partly by protecting podocytes.

Comparison of the cardioprotective and renoprotective effects of the L/N-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, in adriamycin-treated spontaneously-hypertensive rats

Cilnidipine is an L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB). The effects of cilnidipine on N-type channels give it unique organ-protective properties via the suppression of hyperactivity in the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). In the present study, we compared the effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine (an L-type CCB) on cardiac and renal functions in spontaneously-hypertensive rats injected with adriamycin (ADR). After the weekly administration of ADR for 3 weeks, spontaneously-hypertensive rats were orally administered cilnidipine (20 mg/kg per day), amlodipine (3 mg/kg per day), or vehicle once daily for 4 weeks. A control group received saline rather than ADR, followed by vehicle for 4 weeks. Cilnidipine and amlodipine produced similar reductions in blood pressure after 4 weeks. Cilnidipine ameliorated ADR-induced heart and kidney damage, whereas amlodipine slightly improved cardiac echocardiographic parameters, but did not protect against ADR-induced renal damage. Cilnidipine (but not amlodipine) suppressed the reflex SNS and RAAS hyperactivity caused by their antihypertensive effects. Furthermore, cilnidipine and amlodipine treatment decreased the urinary levels of adrenocortical hormones. The protective effects of cilnidipine against ADR-induced renal and cardiac dysfunction might be associated with its blockade of N-type calcium channels, in addition to its pleiotropic actions, which include the inhibition of the RAAS.

The organ-protective effect of N-type Ca(2+) channel blockade

The six subtypes of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels (VDCCs) mediate a wide range of physiological responses. N-type VDCCs (NCCs) were originally identified as a high voltage-activated Ca(2+) channel selectively blocked by omega-conotoxin (ω-CTX)-GVIA. Predominantly localized in the nervous system, NCCs are key regulators of neurotransmitter release. Both pharmacological blockade with ω-CTX-GVIA and, more recently, mice lacking CNCNA1B, encoding the α1B subunit of NCC, have been used to assess the physiological and pathophysiological functions of NCCs, revealing in part their significant roles in sympathetic nerve activation and nociceptive transmission. The evidence now available indicates that NCCs are a potentially useful therapeutic target for the treatment of several pathological conditions. Efforts are therefore being made to develop effective NCC blockers, including both synthetic ω-CTX-GVIA derivatives and small-molecule inhibitors. Cilnidipine, for example, is a dihydropyridine L-type VDCC blocking agent that also possesses significant NCC blocking ability. As over-activation of the sympathetic nervous system appears to contribute to the pathological processes underlying cardiovascular, renal and metabolic diseases, NCC blockade could be a useful approach to treating these ailments. In this review article, we provide an overview of what is currently known about the physiological and pathophysiological activities of NCCs and the potentially beneficial effects of NCC blockade in several disease conditions, in particular cardiovascular diseases.

Effects of cilnidipine on sympathetic nerve activity and cardiorenal function in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: association with BNP and aldosterone levels

AIMS

Hypertension stimulates the sympathetic nervous system and this phenomenon is exacerbated by diabetes mellitus. We investigated the effects of cilnidipine, an N/L-type calcium channel blocker, on aspects of this system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

In 33 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a calcium channel blocker other than cilnidipine, we evaluated the influence of switching to cilnidipine on blood pressure, heart rate, catecholamine, plasma renin and aldosterone concentration, brain natriuretic peptide, urine liver-type fatty acid binding protein, and urinary albumin excretion ratio in the same patients by a cross-over design. Other biochemical parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Switching to cilnidipine did not change blood pressure but caused reduction in catecholamine concentrations in blood and urine and plasma aldosterone concentration, accompanied by significant reduction in brain natriuretic peptide, urine liver-type fatty acid binding protein, and albumin excretion ratio. These parameters other than brain natriuretic peptide were significantly increased after cilnidipine was changed to the original calcium channel blocker.

CONCLUSIONS

In 33 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared to other calcium channel blockers, cilnidipine suppressed sympathetic nerve activity and aldosterone, and significantly improved markers of cardiorenal disorders. Therefore, cilnidipine may be an important calcium channel blocker for use in combination with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors when dealing with hypertension complicated with diabetes mellitus.

Additive effects of cilnidipine, an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, and an angiotensin II receptor blocker on reducing cardiorenal damage in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cilnidipine (Cil), which is an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), has been known to provide renal protection by decreasing the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin–angiotensin system. In this study, we compared the effects of the combination of Cil and amlodipine (Aml), which is an L-type CCB, with an angiotensin (Ang) II receptor blocker on diabetic cardiorenal damage in spontaneously type 2 diabetic rats. Seventeen-week-old Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats were randomly assigned to receive Cil, Aml, valsartan (Val), Cil + Val, Aml + Val, or a vehicle (eight rats per group) for 22 weeks. Antihypertensive potencies were nearly equal among the CCB monotherapy groups and the combination therapy groups. The lowering of blood pressure by either treatment did not significantly affect the glycemic variables. However, exacerbations of renal and heart failure were significantly suppressed in rats administered Cil or Val, and additional suppression was observed in those administered Cil + Val. Although Val increased the renin–Ang system, Aml + Val treatment resulted in additional increases in these parameters, while Cil + Val did not show such effects. Furthermore, Cil increased the ratio of Ang-(1–7) to Ang-I, despite the fact that Val and Aml + Val decreased the Ang-(1–7) levels. These actions of Cil + Val might be due to their synergistic inhibitory effect on the activity of the SNS, and on aldosterone secretion through N-type calcium channel antagonism and Ang II receptor type 1 antagonism. Thus, Cil may inhibit the progression of cardiorenal disease in type 2 diabetes patients by acting as an N-type CCB and inhibiting the aldosterone secretion and SNS activation when these drugs were administered in combination with an Ang II receptor blocker.

Switching to an L/N-type calcium channel blocker shows renoprotective effects in patients with chronic kidney disease: the Kyoto Cilnidipine Study

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of cilnidipine, an L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Sixty patients with CKD and well-controlled hypertension being treated with a renin- angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor and an L-type CCB (L-CCB) were randomly assigned either to switch from the L-CCB to cilnidipine after a 4-week observation period or to continue with L-CCB treatment. Blood pressure, heart rate and renal function were monitored for 12 months. Data were available for analysis from 50 patients: 24 from the cilnidipine group and 26 from the L-CCB group.

RESULTS

Blood pressure was well controlled in both groups. After 12 months, proteinuria and heart rate were significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group, but proteinuria increased and heart rate remained unchanged in the L-CCB group. There was a significant positive correlation between the percentage changes in proteinuria and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilnidipine has antihypertensive effects equivalent to those of L-CCBs. In patients with CKD, proteinuria can be decreased by switching from an L-CCB to cilnidipine, thereby improving renal function.

Involvement of N-type Ca(2+) channels in the fibrotic process of the kidney in rats

N-type Ca(2+) channels are densely distributed in sympathetic nerves that innervate renal tubules. However, the role of N-type Ca(2+) channels in renal fibrosis remains unknown. To address this issue, we examined the difference between the effects of amlodipine (an L-type Ca(2+) channel blocker) and cilnidipine (a dual L/N-type Ca(2+) channel blocker) on fibrotic changes using a rat unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model. The expression of both L-type and N-type Ca(2+) channels was significantly upregulated in UUO kidneys compared with that in contralateral kidneys. There were no significant differences in mean blood pressure among the rats tested. Both amlodipine and cilnidipine significantly attenuated fibrotic changes in UUO kidneys. The antifibrotic effect of cilnidipine was more potent than that of amlodipine. Amlodipine as well as cilnidipine reduced type III collagen deposition, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression, and interstitial cell proliferation. In addition, cilnidipine significantly reduced deposition of type I collagen and macrophage infiltration in UUO kidneys. With the use of in vivo bromodeoxyuridine labeling, label-retaining cells (LRCs) were identified as a population of tubular cells that participate in epithelial-mesenchymal transition after UUO. Some LRCs migrated into the interstitium, expressed α-SMA and vimentin, and produced several extracellular matrixes in UUO kidneys. The number of interstitial LRCs was significantly decreased by cilnidipine but not amlodipine. These data suggest that N-type Ca(2+) channels contribute to multiple steps of renal fibrosis, and its blockade may thus be a useful therapeutic approach for prevention of renal fibrosis.

Comparison of the effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine on cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in Dahl salt-sensitive rats

OBJECTIVE

The L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB) cilnidipine suppresses sympathetic nerve activity and has a superior renoprotective effect compared with L-type CCBs such as amlodipine. The cardioprotective action of cilnidipine has remained largely uncharacterized, however. We have now investigated the effects of cilnidipine, in comparison with amlodipine, on cardiac pathophysiology in rats with salt-sensitive hypertension.

METHODS

Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed a high-salt diet from 6 weeks of age were treated with vehicle (LVH group), amlodipine (3 mg/kg per day), or cilnidipine (3 mg/kg per day) from 7 to 11 weeks.

RESULTS

The salt-induced increase in SBP apparent in LVH rats was attenuated to a similar extent by treatment with amlodipine or cilnidipine. The two drugs also similarly inhibited the development of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, cilnidipine attenuated the increase in relative wall thickness as well as ameliorated LV perivascular and interstitial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction to a greater extent than did amlodipine. In addition, cilnidipine treatment was associated with greater inhibition of cardiac oxidative stress, inflammation, and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) gene expression. The decrease in cardiac norepinephrine content apparent in LVH rats was similarly inhibited by both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilnidipine attenuated LV fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction as well as LV concentricity to a greater extent than did amlodipine in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. The superior cardioprotective action of cilnidipine is likely attributable, at least in part, to the greater antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects associated with inhibition of cardiac RAS gene expression observed with this drug.

L/N-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine reduces plasma aldosterone, albuminuria, and urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cilnidipine inhibits both L- and N-type calcium channels and has been shown to dilate efferent arterioles as effectively as afferent arterioles. We conducted an open-label, randomized trial to compare the effects of cilnidipine against those of amlodipine on blood pressure (BP), albuminuria, and plasma aldosterone concentration in hypertensive patients with mild- to moderate-stage chronic kidney disease. Patients with BP ≥130/80 mmHg, an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90-30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and albuminuria ≥30 mg/g, despite treatment with the maximum recommended dose of angiotensin II receptor blockers, were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients received either 10 mg/day cilnidipine (increased to 20 mg/day; n = 35) or 2.5 mg/day amlodipine (increased to 5 mg/day; n = 35). After 48 weeks of treatment, a significant and comparable reduction in systolic and diastolic BP was observed in both groups. The percent reduction in the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) in the cilnidipine group was significantly greater than in the amlodipine group. Although plasma renin activity did not differ between the two groups, the plasma aldosterone level was significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group. Cilnidipine therefore appears to reduce albuminuria, urinary L-FABP, and plasma aldosterone levels more than amlodipine, and these effects are independent of BP reduction.

N-type calcium channel inhibition with cilnidipine elicits glomerular podocyte protection independent of sympathetic nerve inhibition

We recently demonstrated that cilnidipine, an L/N-type calcium channel blocker, elicits protective effects against glomerular podocyte injury, in particular, in obese hypertensive rats that express the N-type calcium channel (N-CC). Since the N-CC is known to be expressed in sympathetic nerve endings, we evaluated the reno-protective effects of cilnidipine in innervated and denervated spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Male SHR were uninephrectomized and fed 4% high-salt diet (HS-UNX-SHR). Animals were divided into groups, as follows, and observed from 9 to 27 weeks of age: 1) vehicle (n = 14), 2) vehicle plus renal-denervation (n = 15), 3) cilnidipine (50 mg/kg per day, p.o.; n = 10), and 4) cilnidipine plus renal-denervation (n = 15). Renal denervation attenuated elevations in blood pressure, but failed to suppress urinary protein excretion and podocyte injury in HS-UNX-SHR. Cilnidipine in both innervated and denervated HS-UNX-SHR similarly induced significant antihypertensive effects, as well as suppressing the urinary protein excretion and podocyte injury, compared to vehicle-treated HS-UNX-SHR. These data indicate that renal nerves have a limited contribution to the cilnidipine-induced reno-protective effects in HS-UNX-SHR.

Amlodipine Reduces Inflammation despite Promoting Albuminuria in the Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rat

Amlodipine reduces blood pressure; however, its effect in the diabetic kidney irrespective of its blood pressure-lowering effects is unclear. This study examined the effects of amlodipine (0, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg; D_A0, D_A5, D_A10 and D_A20, respectively) for 12 weeks on renal functional and structural changes in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat, a nonhypertensive model of diabetes-associated hyperfiltration. Compared with nondiabetic rats, diabetes (D) was associated with increased urine albumin excretion (UAE, 12.6 ± 3.40 vs. 3.73 ± 1.14 mg/day), glomerular filtration rate (2.17 ± 0.09 vs. 1.64 ± 0.12 ml/min/g kidney weight), glomerulosclerosis (0.21 ± 0.03 vs. 0.05 ± 0.01 AU) and infiltration of inflammatory cells (18.5 ± 2.78 vs. 6.92 ± 0.70 cells/cm²), but did not affect mean arterial pressure (MAP, 110 ± 4.70 vs. 109 ± 5.33 mm Hg). While D_A20 abolished glomerular hyperfiltration (1.49 ± 0.05 ml/min/g kidney weight) and inflammatory cell abundance (6.0 ± 0.79 cells/cm²), it exacerbated UAE (43.5 ± 8.49 mg/day) and increased MAP (132 ± 3.76 mm Hg), but had no effect on renal pathology. These data suggest that amlodipine reduces renal inflammation and abolished glomerular hyperfiltration, but increases blood pressure and exacerbates albuminuria in the rat model of normotensive diabetic kidney disease. We conclude that amlodipine may have limited renoprotective effects in the face of hyperfiltration and absence of elevated blood pressure.

Renoprotective and antioxidant effects of cilnidipine in hypertensive patients

Cilnidipine, an L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), has been reported to have more beneficial effects on proteinuria progression in hypertensive patients than amlodipine, an L-type CCB. The N-type calcium channel blockade that inhibits renal sympathetic nerve activity might reduce glomerular hypertension by facilitating vasodilation of the efferent arterioles. However, the precise mechanism of the renoprotective effect of cilnidipine remains unknown. Because cilnidipine exerted significantly higher antioxidant activity than amlodipine in cultured human mesangial cells, we hypothesized that cilnidipine might exert a renoprotective effect by suppressing oxidative stress. A total of 35 hypertensive patients receiving a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were randomly assigned to a cilnidipine (n=18; 10 mg per day cilnidipine titrated to 20 mg per day) or amlodipine (n=17; 5 mg per day amlodipine titrated to 10 mg per day) group; the target blood pressure (BP) was set at 130/85 mmHg. After 6 months of treatment, systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly reduced in both of the groups, without any significant difference between the groups. The urinary albumin, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (OHdG) and liver-type fatty-acid-binding protein (L-FABP) to creatinine ratios significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group (P<0.05) compared with those in the amlodipine group. The reductions in urinary albumin, 8-OHdG and L-FABP were not correlated with the change in systolic BP. In conclusion, cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, ameliorated urinary albumin excretion and decreased urinary 8-OHdG and L-FABP in the hypertensive patients. Cilnidipine probably exerts a greater renoprotective effect through its antioxidative properties.

A crossover comparison of urinary albumin excretion as a new surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease among 4 types of calcium channel blockers

BACKGROUND

At the intervention for cardiovascular disease (CVD), albuminuria is a new pivotal target. Calcium channel blocker (CCB) is one of the most expected agents. Currently CCBs have been classified by delivery system, half-life and channel types. We tested anti-albuminuric effect among 4 types of CCBs.

METHODS

Subjects were 50 hypertensives (SBP/DBP 164.7±17.1/92.3±12.2mmHg, s-Cr 0.81±0.37mg/dl, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) 69.4 (33.5-142.6) mg/gCr). Four CCBs were administered in a crossover setting: nifedipine CR, a long biological half-life L type by controlled release; cilnidipine, an N/L type; efonidipine, a T/L type; and amlodipine, a long biological half-life L type.

RESULTS

Comparable BP reductions were obtained. UAE at endpoints ware as follows (mg/gCr, *P<0.01): nifedipine CR 30.8 (17.3-81.1),* cilnidipine 33.9 (18.0-67.7),* efonidipine 51.0 (21.2-129.8), amlodipine 40.6 (18.7-94.7). By all agents, significant augmentations were observed in PRA, angiotensin I and angiotensin II (AngII). AngII at cilnidipine was significantly lower than that at amlodipine. PAC at cilnidipine and efonidipine was significantly lower than that at amlodipine. Nifedipine CR significantly reduced ANP concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

It is revealed that only nifedipine CR and cilnidipine could reduce albuminuria statistically. Thus, it is suggested that the 2 CCBs might be favorable for organ protection in hypertensives.

Design and rationale of the study of assessment for kidney function by urinary microalbumin in randomized (SAKURA) trial

Recently, it has been demonstrated that L-/N-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine, but not L-type CCB, decreased urinary protein in renin-angiotensin system (RAS), inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with macroproteinuria. However, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine was weaker in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients with macroproteinuria. This may be due to the fact that diabetic neuropathy was also developed in patients with advanced diabetic nephropathy because L-/N-type CCB has been considered to exert its renoprotetive effects through sympatholytic action. If so, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine may be potent in patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy. To elucidate our hypothesis, we designed a multi-center, open-labeled, randomized trial to compare the antialbuminuric effect between cilnidipine and amlodipine in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive (blood pressure [BP]: 130-180/80-110 mmHg) patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine [Cr] ratio: 30-300 mg/g). The primary study endpoint is the change in the urinary albumin/Cr ratio after a 1-year treatment. Enrollment began in April 2008 and was completed in March 2010. A total of 367 patients were randomly allocated to receive cilnidipine or amlodipine. At baseline, study subjects had 63.3± 8.5 years of age, 145.9 ± 12.2/80.8 ± 10.0 mmHg of BP, 101.0 ± 111.6 mg/g of urinary albumin/Cr. The trial is expected to show whether cilnidipine can exert an antialbuminuric effect in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy.

Effects of an N-type calcium antagonist on angiotensin II-renin feedback

BACKGROUND

Interrupting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) has been found to induce RAS overactivation. In this study, we investigated the effect of 2 calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine (L-/N-type CCB) and amlodipine (L-type CCB), on the RAS activation induced by an ARB in a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR/Izm, 10 weeks of age).

METHODS

Rats intravenously catheterized for blood collection were randomly divided into groups that were administered the vehicle, the ARB valsartan or valsartan combined with one of the 2 CCBs. Their blood and kidneys were collected 270 min after administration.

RESULTS

Valsartan increased the plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) level in a dose-dependent manner. Cilnidipine suppressed the increase in plasma renin activity and plasma Ang II levels induced by valsartan, but amlodipine did not. Combined administration of cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, and valsartan significantly reduced the noradrenaline content in the renal cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the suppressive effect of cilnidipine on the valsartan-induced increase in RAS activity can be partly explained by its sympatholytic action mediated by N-type calcium channel blockade, and that combined administration of cilnidipine and valsartan might provide a synergistic therapeutic effect.

Comparison between the antiproteinuric effects of the calcium channel blockers benidipine and cilnidipine in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease

AIMS

Benidipine, an L-/T-type calcium channel blocker, dilates renal efferent and afferent arterioles and reduces glomerular pressure; therefore, it may exert renoprotective effects. We conducted an open-labeled randomized trial to compare the effects of benidipine with cilnidipine in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

The patients who were already being treated with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) received one of the following treatment regimens: benidipine at a dose of 2 mg/day that was increased up to a dose of 8 mg/day (benidipine group; n=118) or cilnidipine at a dose of 5 mg/day that was increased up to a dose of 20 mg/day (cilnidipine group; n=115).

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, we observed a significant and comparable reduction in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both groups. The urinary protein:creatinine ratio was significantly decreased in both groups after 3 months of treatment and thereafter; however, the difference between both groups was not significant after 12 months of treatment. Benidipine exerted an antiproteinuric effect to a greater extent than cilnidipine in patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The addition of benidipine as well as cilnidipine reduces urinary protein excretion in hypertensive patients with CKD who are already being administered ARBs.

L/N-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine ameliorates proteinuria and inhibits the renal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats

Cilnidipine, an N/L-type calcium channel blocker, has been reported to inhibit sympathetic nerve activity and has a greater renoprotective effect than L-type calcium channel blockers. To investigate the hypothesis that cilnidipine might ameliorate advanced hypertensive nephropathy and inhibit the renal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, cilnidipine (1 mg per kg per day) or amlodipine (1 mg per kg per day) was administered to uninephrectomized deoxycorticosterone (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rats (DOCA-salt) for 4 weeks by gavage. Although the blood pressure in the DOCA-salt group was higher than that of control, neither cilnidipine nor amlodipine had any effect on the increase in blood pressure in the DOCA-salt group. The DOCA (40 mg per kg per week, subcutaneously (s.c.)) and salt (1% NaCl in drinking water) treatment significantly aggravated the levels of urinary protein excretion and creatinine clearance and increased glomerulosclerosis and collagen deposition in the tubulointerstitial area of the kidney. These effects were attenuated by cilnidipine treatment. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that the renal expression of mRNA for collagen I/IV and transforming growth factor-β was enhanced in the DOCA-salt group and that the overexpression of these molecules was suppressed by cilnidipine. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase-derived superoxide production in the kidney and urinary norepinephrine excretion, which were enhanced in the DOCA-salt group, were suppressed by cilnidipine. Cilnidipine also decreased the activity and expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and the aldosterone concentration in the renal homogenate. Although neither cilnidipine nor amlodipine had any effect on the increased blood pressure in the DOCA-salt group, these renal changes were not induced by treatment with amlodipine. In conclusion, cilnidipine inhibited renal dysfunction, sympathetic nerve activity and renal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the DOCA-salt group.

T-type Ca channel blockade as a determinant of kidney protection

Voltage-dependent Ca channels are classified into several subtypes based on the isoform of their α1 subunits. Traditional Ca channels blockers (CCBs), including nifedipine and amlodipine, act predominantly on L-type Ca channels, whereas novel CCBs such as efonidipine, benidipine and azelnidipine inhibit both L-type and T-type Ca channels. Furthermore, cilnidipine blocks L-type and N-type Ca channels. These CCBs exert divergent actions on renal microvessels. L-type CCBs preferentially dilate afferent arterioles, whereas both L-/T-type and L-/N-type CCBs potently dilate afferent and efferent arterioles. The distinct actions of CCBs on the renal microcirculation are reflected by changes in glomerular capillary pressure and subsequent renal injury: L-type CCBs favor an increase in glomerular capillary pressure, whereas L-/T-type and L-/N-type CCBs alleviate glomerular hypertension. The renal protective action of L-/T-type CCBs is also mediated by non-hemodynamic mechanisms, i.e., inhibition of the inflammatory process and inhibition of Rho kinase and aldosterone secretion. Finally, a growing body of evidence indicates that T-type CCBs offer more beneficial action on proteinuria and renal survival rate than L-type CCBs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similarly, in CKD patients treated with renin-angiotensin blockers, add-on therapy with N-type CCBs is more potent in reducing proteinuria than that with L-type CCBs, although no difference is found in the subgroup with diabetic nephropathy. Thus, the strategy for hypertension treatment with CCBs has entered a new era: treatment selection depends not only on blood pressure control but also on the subtypes of CCBs.

The N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine suppresses renal injury in Dahl rats fed a high-salt diet

The aims of the present study were to compare the effects of cilnidipine [L-type/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB)] and amlodipine (L-type CCB) alone or in combination with the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), valsartan, on blood pressure (BP), kidney function in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats. DS rats fed a high-salt diet were divided into six groups; control (n = 13), two CCB (cilnidipine or amlodipine) groups at 1 mg/kg/day (n = 10), ARB (valsartan) at 10 mg/kg/day (n = 12), cilnidipine + valsartan (CV, n = 12), and amlodipine + valsartan (AV, n = 12). BPs were lower in the combination therapy groups than in those given either drug alone, but only CV inhibited the increase in urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and lowered the glomerular sclerosis score. In addition, AV elevated plasma renin activity and the angiotensin II concentration, and thus failed to inhibit increases in UAE and to lower glomerular sclerosis score. In conclusion, combination therapy with CCB and ARB decreases BP more effectively than either drug alone. When used in combination with valsartan, cilnidipine is more effective than amlodipine for preventing kidney injury.

Antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine in hypertensive Japanese treated with renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors - a multicenter, open, randomized trial using 24-hour urine collection

Sustained proteinuria is an important risk factor for not only renal but also cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have been shown to reduce proteinuria. Monotherapy with those drugs is often insufficient for optimal blood pressure (BP)-lowering and therefore, combined therapy is needed. Recent reports suggested that cilnidipine, a dual L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, has renoprotective effect by dilating both efferent and afferent arterioles. In this study, a multicenter, open, randomized trial was designed to compare the antiproteinuric effect between cilnidipine and amlodipine when coupled with RAS inhibitors in hypertensive patients with significant proteinuria. Proteinuria was evaluated by 24-h home urine collection for all patients. A total of 35 proteinuric (>0.1 g/day) patients with uncontrolled BP (>135/85 mmHg) were randomized to receive either cilnidipine (n = 18) or amlodipine (n = 17) after a 6-month treatment with RAS inhibitors and were followed for 48 weeks. At baseline, the cilnidipine group was older and had lower body mass index (BMI) compared to the amlodipine group. After 32 weeks of treatment, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was slightly, but significantly reduced, in the cilnidipine group, although systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean BP did not differ. The urinary protein did not differ at baseline (cilnidipine group 0.48 g/day, amlodipine group 0.52 g/day); however, it significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group (0.22 g/day) compared to the amlodipine group (0.50 g/day) after 48 weeks of treatment. Our findings suggest that cilnidipine is superior to amlodipine in preventing the progression of proteinuria in hypertensive patients even undergoing treatment with RAS inhibitors.

Effect of cilnidipine on normal to marginally elevated urine albumin-creatinine ratio in asymptomatic non-diabetic hypertensive patients: an exponential decay curve analysis

BACKGROUND

High-normal urinary albumin excretion has been reported to have clinical significance with respect to progression of proteinuria and hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

We analysed the effect of cilnidipine (10 mg/day) on morning systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) in 16 non-diabetic hypertensive patients with a normal to marginally elevated UACR (mean +/- SD 29.4 +/- 21.7; range 7.5-72.9 mg/g creatinine).

METHODS

Sequential home BP and UACR data were fitted to a simple exponential function as follows: where y is SBP (mmHg) or UACR (mg/g creatinine); alpha is the extent of the SBP (mmHg)- or UACR (mg/g creatinine)-lowering effect; beta (days) is the time-constant for SBP or UACR decrease; t is the number of days after the start of cilnidipine administration; and gamma is the finally stabilized SBP (mmHg) or UACR (mg/g creatinine).

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD morning SBP and UACR decreased by 20.4 +/- 11.4 mmHg and 15.2 +/- 13.1 mg/g creatinine, respectively, as determined by coefficient alpha. The mean +/- SD time-constant for UACR decrease was significantly longer than that for BP decrease (43.5 +/- 22.9 vs 15.4 +/- 7.1 days). UACR reduction correlated with pre-treatment UACR values (correlation coefficient [R] = 0.88, p < 0.01) but not with BP decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that cilnidipine reduced UACR in hypertensive patients with normal to marginally elevated UACR independent of its BP-lowering effect.

Cilnidipine suppresses podocyte injury and proteinuria in metabolic syndrome rats: possible involvement of N-type calcium channel in podocyte

OBJECTIVES

Clinical studies have indicated the beneficial effect of an L/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), cilnidipine, on the progression of proteinuria in hypertensive patients compared with an L-type CCB, amlodipine. In the present study, we examined the effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine on the renal injury in spontaneously hypertensive rat/ND mcr-cp (SHR/ND) and their underlying mechanism.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SHR/ND were treated with vehicle (nU10), cilnidipine [33 mg/kg per day, orally (p.o.); nU11] or amlodipine (20 mg/kg per day, p.o.; nU9) for 20 weeks. SHR/ND developed proteinuria in an age-dependent manner. Cilnidipine suppressed the proteinuria greater than amlodipine did. The immunohistochemical analysis showed that N-type calcium channel and Wilm's tumor factor, a marker of podocyte, were co-expressed. SHR/ND had significantly greater desmin staining, an indicator of podocyte injury, with lower podocin and nephrin expression in the glomeruli than Wistar-Kyoto rat or SHR. Cilnidipine significantly prevented the increase in desmin staining and restored the glomerular podocin and nephrin expression compared with amlodipine. Cilnidipine also prevented the increase in renal angiotensin II content, the expression and membrane translocation of NADPH oxidase subunits and dihydroethidium staining in SHR/ND. In contrast, amlodipine failed to change these renal parameters.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that cilnidipine suppressed the development of proteinuria greater than amlodipine possibly through inhibiting N-type calcium channel-dependent podocyte injury in SHR/ND.

The L/N-Type Calcium Channel Blocker, Cilnidipine, Reduces Heart Rate and Albuminuria in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

This study was designed to investigate whether the L/N-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, had a renoprotective effect compared with other calcium channel blockers. Twenty-five hypertensive patients with concomitant type 2 diabetes who had a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) of 10 − 300 mg albumin/g creatinine and who had been treated with oral calcium channel blockers other than cilnidipine for more than 3 months were included. Patients' medication was changed to cilnidipine 10 mg/day or 20 mg/day without a washout period. Blood pressure and renal function were measured before and at 3 months after the new treatment. Heart rate was also determined as a marker for sympathetic nervous activity. After substitution of cilnidipine, blood pressure did not change significantly, but heart rate decreased significantly from 73.9 ± 7.1 beats/min to 72.0 ± 8.4 beats/min, and the log-transformed urinary ACR decreased to 82.9 ± 49.4% of baseline values. The changes in urinary ACR and heart rate showed a significant positive correlation. Thus, there was a strong indication that cilnidipine may exert its renoprotective effect by inhibiting sympathetic nervous activity.

Influence of T-calcium channel blocker treatment on deterioration of renal function in chronic kidney disease

Some calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have renoprotective effects. Our aim was to compare the effects of different subclasses of CCBs on the deterioration of renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is a prospective, observational cohort study in a single center. The subjects were 107 nondiabetic CKD patients. The rate of deterioration of estimated glomerular filtration rate (DeltaeGFR) was calculated by [last visit eGFR - baseline eGFR/follow-up duration]. Multivariate analysis was performed using the change in urinary protein (DeltaUP) and DeltaeGFR during follow-up as response variables. CCB subclasses were L-type in 76 patients, T- and L-type in 28 patients, and nondihydropyridines in 6 patients. Multiregression analysis indicated that higher baseline proteinuria (UP) and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers were associated with the decrease of UP, while the use of L-type CCBs, prednisolone, and probucol was associated with the increase of UP. The use of T- and L-type CCBs, ACEIs and diuretics was associated with a good outcome in terms of DeltaeGFR, whereas chronic glomerulonephritis, polycystic kidney disease, and higher baseline eGFR and UP were associated with a poor outcome. It is suggested that the use of T- and L-type CCB among other subclasses may improve the outcome of patients with nondiabetic CKD in terms of renal function.

An overview of drug-induced acute kidney injury

The complex nature of critical illness often necessitates the use of multiple therapeutic agents, many of which may individually or in combination have the potential to cause renal injury. The use of nephrotoxic drugs has been implicated as a causative factor in up to 25% of all cases of severe acute renal failure in critically ill patients. Acute tubular necrosis is the most common form of renal injury from nephrotoxin exposure, although other types of renal failure may be seen. Given that this is a preventable cause of a potentially devastating complication, a comprehensive strategy should be used to avoid nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients including: accurate estimation of pre-existing renal function using serum creatinine-based glomerular filtration rates, avoidance of nephrotoxins if possible, ongoing monitoring of renal function, and immediate discontinuation of suspected nephrotoxins in the event of renal dysfunction.

Renal and vascular protective effects of cilnidipine in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Cilnidipine is a calcium channel blocker that blocks both L and N-type calcium channels. L/N-type calcium channel blockers exhibit sympatholytic action and a renal protective effect via dilation of afferent and efferent arterioles of the renal glomerulus, and afford more potent protection against hypertension-related organ damage than L-type calcium channel blockers. Few studies, however, have directly compared the organ protective effects of L-type calcium channel blocker monotherapy and L/N-type calcium channel blocker monotherapy. This study compares the effects on renal and vascular endothelial functions and arterial stiffness of monotherapy regimens of amlodipine, an L-type calcium antagonist, and cilnidipine, in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

Fifty patients with untreated essential hypertension were randomized to receive 5 mg of amlodipine (n = 25) or 10 mg of cilnidipine (n = 25) once daily in the morning for 24 weeks. The patients were evaluated before and after the therapy to assess changes in renal function, flow-mediated vasodilation (a parameter of vascular endothelial function), and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (a parameter of arterial stiffness).

RESULTS

Before treatment, the above parameters showed no significant differences between groups. After treatment, urinary albumin excretion was decreased significantly in the cilnidipine group compared with the amlodipine group, and the decrease of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was significantly larger in the cilnidipine group than in the amlodipine group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that cilnidipine is more effective than amlodipine at improving renal function and arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertension.

Ca2+ channel subtypes and pharmacology in the kidney

A large body of evidence has accrued indicating that voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel subtypes, including L-, T-, N-, and P/Q-type, are present within renal vascular and tubular tissues, and the blockade of these Ca(2+) channels produces diverse actions on renal microcirculation. Because nifedipine acts exclusively on L-type Ca(2+) channels, the observation that nifedipine predominantly dilates afferent arterioles implicates intrarenal heterogeneity in the distribution of L-type Ca(2+) channels and suggests that it potentially causes glomerular hypertension. In contrast, recently developed Ca(2+) channel blockers (CCBs), including mibefradil and efonidipine, exert blocking action on L-type and T-type Ca(2+) channels and elicit vasodilation of afferent and efferent arterioles, which suggests the presence of T-type Ca(2+) channels in both arterioles and the distinct impact on intraglomerular pressure. Recently, aldosterone has been established as an aggravating factor in kidney disease, and T-type Ca(2+) channels mediate aldosterone release as well as its effect on renal efferent arteriolar tone. Furthermore, T-type CCBs are reported to exert inhibitory action on inflammatory process and renin secretion. Similarly, N-type Ca(2+) channels are present in nerve terminals, and the inhibition of neurotransmitter release by N-type CCBs (eg, cilnidipine) elicits dilation of afferent and efferent arterioles and reduces glomerular pressure. Collectively, the kidney is endowed with a variety of Ca(2+) channel subtypes, and the inhibition of these channels by their specific CCBs leads to variable impact on renal microcirculation. Furthermore, multifaceted activity of CCBs on T- and N-type Ca(2+) channels may offer additive benefits through nonhemodynamic mechanisms in the progression of chronic kidney disease.

Effects of Benidipine in a Rat Model of Experimental Angina

To compare the antianginal effects of 1,4-dihydropyridine-type calcium-channel blockers, we evaluated the effects of benidipine, amlodipine, nifedipine, and efonidipine on vasopressin-induced myocardial ischemia in rats, an experimental model of angina. Intravenous administration of benidipine (3 microg/kg), amlodipine (1000 microg/kg), and nifedipine (100 microg/kg) suppressed the vasopressin-induced S-wave depression, an index of myocardial ischemia. Efonidipine (100 microg/kg, i.v.) tended to inhibit the S-wave depression. At the antianginal dose of each drug, amlodipine, nifedipine, and efonidipine decreased blood pressure significantly, whereas benidipine had little effect on blood pressure at a dose of 3 microg/kg. These results indicate that benidipine, unlike the other 1,4-dihydropyridine-type calcium-channel blockers examined in this study, inhibits vasopressin-induced coronary vasospasm with fewer undesirable effects such as hypotension in rats, suggesting that benidipine may be useful in the treatment of angina pectoris.