1
|
Dolan DD, Cho MK, Lee SSJ. Spotlighting Structural Constraints on Decisions About Participation in Genomic and Precision Medicine. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2024; 15:87-92. [PMID: 38776221 PMCID: PMC11180498 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2355893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Deanne Dunbar Dolan
- Center for ELSI Resources and Analysis (CERA), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mildred K. Cho
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aleni C, Rinaldi C, Bettio V, Mazzucco E, Antona A, Meini C, Loria E, Bonvicini P, Cracas SV, Caristia S, Rimedio A, Faggiano F, Ferrante D, Capello D. Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13041. [PMID: 36293613 PMCID: PMC9603334 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Biobanks have established a critical role in biomedical research by collecting, preserving, organizing, and disseminating biospecimens and related health data, contributing to precision medicine development. Participation in biobanks is influenced by several factors, such as trust in institutions and scientists, knowledge about biobanking, and the consideration of benefit sharing. Understanding public attitudes, fears, and concerns toward biobanking is fundamental to designing targeted interventions to increase trust towards biobanks. The aim of our study was to investigate the level of knowledge and perception of biobanks in students and personnel of the University of Piemonte Orientale. An online questionnaire was designed and administered via e-mail. A total of 17,758 UPO personnel and students were invited to participate in the survey, and 1521 (9.3%) subjects completed the survey. The results showed that 65.0% of the participants were aware of the term "biobank" and knew what the activity of a biobank was, and 76.3% of subjects were willing to provide biospecimens to a research biobank, whereas 67.3% of the respondents were willing to contribute, in addition to biospecimens, their health and lifestyle data. Concerns were raised about the confidentiality of the information (25.6%) and the commercial use of the samples (25.0%). In conclusion, participants were aware of the role that biobanks play in research and were eager to participate for the sake of furthering scientific research. Still, several concerns need to be addressed regarding the confidentiality of the data along with the commercial use of the samples and associated data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Aleni
- Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Carmela Rinaldi
- “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
- UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Valentina Bettio
- UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Eleonora Mazzucco
- UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Annamaria Antona
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Cristina Meini
- Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Emiliano Loria
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonvicini
- Biobanks and Complex Data Management, University of Cote d’Azur, 06108 Nice, France
| | - Silvia Vittoria Cracas
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Silvia Caristia
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Antonio Rimedio
- Ethics Committee of the “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Faggiano
- Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Daniela Ferrante
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Daniela Capello
- UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nada D, Julien C, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Majewski J, Elbakry M, Elremaly W, Samuels ME, Moreau A. Identification of FAT3 as a new candidate gene for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:12298. [PMID: 35853984 PMCID: PMC9296578 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16620-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In an effort to identify rare alleles associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) whole-exome sequencing was performed on a discovery cohort of 73 unrelated patients and 70 age-and sex matched controls, all of French-Canadian ancestry. A collapsing gene burden test was performed to analyze rare protein-altering variants using case–control statistics. Since no single gene achieved statistical significance, targeted exon sequencing was performed for 24 genes with the smallest p values, in an independent replication cohort of unrelated severely affected females with AIS and sex-matched controls (N = 96 each). An excess of rare, potentially protein-altering variants was noted in one particular gene, FAT3, although it did not achieve statistical significance. Independently, we sequenced the exomes of all members of a rare multiplex family of three affected sisters and unaffected parents. All three sisters were compound heterozygous for two rare protein-altering variants in FAT3. The parents were single heterozygotes for each variant. The two variants in the family were also present in our discovery cohort. A second validation step was done, using another independent replication cohort of 258 unrelated AIS patients having reach their skeletal maturity and 143 healthy controls to genotype nine FAT3 gene variants, including the two variants previously identified in the multiplex family: p.L517S (rs139595720) and p.L4544F (rs187159256). Interestingly, two FAT3 variants, rs139595720 (genotype A/G) and rs80293525 (genotype C/T), were enriched in severe scoliosis cases (4.5% and 2.7% respectively) compared to milder cases (1.4% and 0.7%) and healthy controls (1.6% and 0.8%). Our results implicate FAT3 as a new candidate gene in the etiology of AIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Nada
- Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, (room 2.17.027), 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.,Pharmacology and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Cédric Julien
- Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, (room 2.17.027), 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.,Injury Repair Recovery Program, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Jacek Majewski
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mohamed Elbakry
- Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, (room 2.17.027), 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.,Biochemistry Division, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Wesam Elremaly
- Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, (room 2.17.027), 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark E Samuels
- Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alain Moreau
- Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Research Center, (room 2.17.027), 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roberts MC, Fohner AE, Landry L, Olstad DL, Smit AK, Turbitt E, Allen CG. Advancing precision public health using human genomics: examples from the field and future research opportunities. Genome Med 2021; 13:97. [PMID: 34074326 PMCID: PMC8168000 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00911-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision public health is a relatively new field that integrates components of precision medicine, such as human genomics research, with public health concepts to help improve population health. Despite interest in advancing precision public health initiatives using human genomics research, current and future opportunities in this emerging field remain largely undescribed. To that end, we provide examples of promising opportunities and current applications of genomics research within precision public health and outline future directions within five major domains of public health: biostatistics, environmental health, epidemiology, health policy and health services, and social and behavioral science. To further extend applications of genomics within precision public health research, three key cross-cutting challenges will need to be addressed: developing policies that implement precision public health initiatives at multiple levels, improving data integration and developing more rigorous methodologies, and incorporating initiatives that address health equity. Realizing the potential to better integrate human genomics within precision public health will require transdisciplinary efforts that leverage the strengths of both precision medicine and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C. Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Alison E. Fohner
- Department of Epidemiology and Institute of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Latrice Landry
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital &The Division of Population Sciences in Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215-5450 USA
| | - Dana Lee Olstad
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Amelia K. Smit
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, The University of Technology Sydney, 100 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2008 Australia
| | - Caitlin G. Allen
- Department of Behavioral Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Identification and Classification of Rare Variants in NPC1 and NPC2 in Quebec. Sci Rep 2021; 11:10344. [PMID: 33990640 PMCID: PMC8121778 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89630-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPC) is a treatable autosomal recessive neurodegenerative condition which leads to a variety of progressive manifestations. Despite most cases being diagnosed at a young age, disease prevalence may be underestimated, especially in adults, and interpretation of NPC1 and NPC2 variants can be difficult. This study aims to identify potential pathogenic variants in a large cohort of healthy individuals and classify their risk of pathogenicity to assist with future interpretation of variants. The CARTaGENE (CaG) cohort was used to identify possible variants of NPC1 and NPC2. Nine-hundred and eleven RNA samples and 198 exome sequencing were screened for genetic variants through a bio-informatic pipeline performing alignment and variant calling. The identified variants were analyzed using annotations for allelic frequency, pathogenicity and conservation scores. The ACMG guidelines were used to classify the variants. These were then compared to existing databases and previous studies of NPC prevalence, including the Tübingen NPC database. Thirty-two distinct variants were identified after running the samples in the RNA-sequencing pipeline, two of which were classified as pathogenic and 21 of which were not published previously. Furthermore, 46 variants were both identified in our population and with the Tübingen database, the majority of which were of uncertain significance. Ten additional variants were found in our exome-sequencing sample. This study of a sample from a population living in Quebec demonstrates a variety of rare variants, some of which were already described in the literature as well as some novel variants. Classifying these variants is arduous given the scarcity of available literature, even so in a population of healthy individuals. Yet using this data, we were able to identify two pathogenic variants within our population and several new variants not previously identified.
Collapse
|
6
|
Veerappan VR, Jindal RM. Community participation in global surgery. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e005044. [PMID: 33827792 PMCID: PMC8031061 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rahul M Jindal
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warrier P, Ho CWL, Bull S, Vaz M, Vaz M. Engaging publics in biobanking and genetic research governance - a literature review towards informing practice in India. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:5. [PMID: 38645686 PMCID: PMC11026954 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16558.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: There is growing interest in advancing biobanking and genetic research in many countries, including India. Concurrently, more importance is being placed on participatory approaches involving the public and other stakeholders in addressing ethical issues and policymaking as part of a broader governance approach. We analyse the tools, purposes, outcomes and limitations of engaging people towards biobanking and genetic research governance that have been undertaken worldwide, and explore their relevance to India. Methods: Papers to be reviewed were identified through a targeted literature search carried out using ProQuest and PubMed. Retrieved papers were analysed with the Rpackage for Qualitative Data Analysis using inductive coding and thematic analysis, guided by the Framework Method. Results: Empirical studies on public and community engagement in the context of biobanking and or genetic research show a predominance towards the end of the last decade, spanning 2007 to 2019. Numerous strategies-including public meetings, community durbars, focus group discussions, interviews, deliberations, citizen-expert panels and community advisory boards-have been used to facilitate communication, consultation and collaboration with people, at the level of general and specific publics. Engagement allowed researchers to understand how people's values, opinions and experiences related to the research process; and enabled participants to become partners within the conduct of research. Conclusions: Constructs such as 'co-production', 'engagement of knowledges', 'rules of engagement' and 'stewardship' emerge as significant mechanisms that can address the ethical challenges and the governance of biobanking and genetic research in India. Given the inherent diversity of the Indian population and its varying cultural values and beliefs, there is a need to invest time and research funds for engagement as a continuum of participatory activity, involving communication, consultation and collaboration in relation to biobanking and genetic research. Further research into these findings is required to explore their effective employment within India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasanna Warrier
- Health and Humanities, St John's Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560034, India
| | - Calvin Wai-Loon Ho
- Faculty of Law and Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Susan Bull
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Mario Vaz
- Health and Humanities, St John's Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560034, India
| | - Manjulika Vaz
- Health and Humanities, St John's Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560034, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mayeur C, van Hoof W. Citizens' conceptions of the genome: Related values and practical implications in a citizen forum on the use of genomic information. Health Expect 2021; 24:468-477. [PMID: 33453142 PMCID: PMC8077069 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of large data sets, including genomic data, coupled with rapid advances in personalized medicine where citizens increasingly face complex choices about the use of their genomic information implies that citizens are essential stakeholders in genomics. They should be engaged in the ethical, legal and societal issues to produce a framework that fosters trust and allows them to guide the technology based on their values. OBJECTIVE This article highlights that citizens' conceptions of the human genome inform about and make sense of their main values regarding the use of genomic information, which is critical for policymakers, experts and stakeholders to understand to maintain the public support in genomics. METHOD Through an inductive thematic approach, we reanalysed data collected for the Belgian citizen forum, which aimed to produce recommendations for the Ministry of Public Health and other stakeholders. RESULTS Citizens expressed four conceptions of the genome that determined which uses of genomic information they supported: the most intimate part of individuals; 'I am more than my genome'; the individual's property vs the common good; and uncertainty and fear. CONCLUSION Diversity in their conceptions reveals remaining conflicts of values among citizens, mainly regarding a conception of the genome as an individual property or a common good. However, despite differing conceptions, shared values emerged such as solidarity, privacy, no genetic discrimination and the right to an open future, where individual and common interests coexist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The panel of the citizen forum consisted of 32 citizens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Mayeur
- Department of Public Health and Monitoring, Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wannes van Hoof
- Department of Public Health and Monitoring, Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Warrier P, Ho CWL, Bull S, Vaz M, Vaz M. Engaging publics in biobanking and genetic research governance - a literature review towards informing practice in India. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16558.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is growing interest in advancing biobanking and genetic research in many countries, including India. Concurrently, more importance is being placed on participatory approaches involving the public and other stakeholders in addressing ethical issues and policymaking as part of a broader governance approach. We analyse the tools, purposes, outcomes and limitations of engaging people towards biobanking and genetic research governance that have been undertaken worldwide, and explore their relevance to India. Methods: Papers to be reviewed were identified through a targeted literature search carried out using ProQuest and PubMed. Retrieved papers were analysed with the R package for Qualitative Data Analysis using inductive coding and thematic analysis, guided by the Framework Method. Results: Empirical studies on public and community engagement in the context of biobanking and or genetic research show a predominance towards the end of the last decade, spanning 2007 to 2019. Numerous strategies—including public meetings, community durbars, focus group discussions, interviews, deliberations, citizen-expert panels and community advisory boards—have been used to facilitate communication, consultation and collaboration with people, at the level of general and specific publics. Engagement allowed researchers to understand how people’s values, opinions and experiences related to the research process; and enabled participants to become partners within the conduct of research. Conclusions: Constructs such as ‘co-production’, ‘engagement of knowledges’, ‘rules of engagement’ and ‘stewardship’ emerge as significant mechanisms that can address the ethical challenges and the governance of biobanking and genetic research in India. Given the inherent diversity of the Indian population and its varying cultural values and beliefs, there is a need to invest time and research funds for engagement as a continuum of participatory activity, involving communication, consultation and collaboration in relation to biobanking and genetic research. Further research into these findings is required to explore their effective employment within India
Collapse
|
10
|
Wagner KE, McCormick JB, Barns S, Carney M, Middleton FA, Hicks SD. Parent Perspectives Towards Genetic and Epigenetic Testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2020; 50:3114-3125. [PMID: 30903561 PMCID: PMC6755071 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-03990-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Examining community views on genetic/epigenetic research allows collaborative technology development. Parent perspectives toward genetic/epigenetic testing for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are not well-studied. Parents of children with ASD (n = 131), non-ASD developmental delay (n = 39), and typical development (n = 74) completed surveys assessing genetic/epigenetic knowledge, genetic/epigenetic concerns, motives for research participation, and attitudes/preferences toward ASD testing. Most parents (96%) were interested in saliva-based molecular testing for ASD. Some had concerns about privacy (14%) and insurance-status (10%). None (0%) doubted scientific evidence behind genetic/epigenetic testing. Most reported familiarity with genetics (88%), but few understood differences from epigenetics (19%). Child developmental status impacted insurance concerns (p = 0.01). There is broad parent interest in a genetic/epigenetic test for ASD. It will be crucial to carefully consider and address bioethical issues surrounding this sensitive topic while developing such technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla E Wagner
- Quadrant Biosciences Inc., Syracuse, USA.,Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive Mail Code H134, Hershey, USA
| | - Sarah Barns
- Quadrant Biosciences Inc., Syracuse, USA.,Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Molly Carney
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Mail Code HS83, Hershey, USA
| | - Frank A Middleton
- Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Steven D Hicks
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Mail Code HS83, Hershey, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luna Puerta L, Kendall W, Davies B, Day S, Ward H. The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review. Health Expect 2020; 23:759-788. [PMID: 32378306 PMCID: PMC7495079 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biobanks increasingly employ public involvement and engagement strategies, though few studies have explored their impact. This review aims to (a) investigate how the impact of public involvement in biobanks is reported and conceptualized by study authors; in order to (b) suggest how the research community might re-conceptualize the impact of public involvement in biobanks. METHODS A systematic literature search of three electronic databases and the INVOLVE Evidence Library in January 2019. Studies commenting on the impact of public involvement in a biobank were included, and a narrative review was conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Forty-one studies covering thirty-one biobanks were included, with varying degrees of public involvement. Impact was categorized according to where it was seen: 'the biobank', 'people involved' and 'the wider research community'. Most studies reported involvement in a 'functional' way, in relation to improved rates of participation in the biobank. Broader forms of impact were reported but were vaguely defined and measured. This review highlights a lack of clarity of purpose and varied researcher conceptualizations of involvement. We pose three areas for further research and consideration by biobank researchers and public involvement practitioners. CONCLUSIONS Functional approaches to public involvement in biobanking limit impact. This conceptualization of involvement emerges from an entrenched technical understanding that ignores its political nature, complicated by long-standing disagreement about the values of public involvement. This study urges a re-imagination of impact, re-conceptualized as a two-way learning process. More support will help researchers and members of the public to undergo such reflective exercises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Luna Puerta
- NIHR Imperial BRC Patient Experience Research CentreImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Family Medicine and Primary CareLee Kong Chian School of MedicineNanyang Technological University SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Will Kendall
- NIHR Imperial BRC Patient Experience Research CentreImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Department of SociologyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | - Bethan Davies
- NIHR Imperial BRC Patient Experience Research CentreImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sophie Day
- NIHR Imperial BRC Patient Experience Research CentreImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Helen Ward
- NIHR Imperial BRC Patient Experience Research CentreImperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:915-924. [PMID: 32086443 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Broad consent is increasingly recommended as an acceptable consent model for biobanking human samples and health data with a view to their future use in research. Empirical evidence on the practice of broad consent and its implementation in the hospital setting, however, is still very limited. We analyse and discuss results from a qualitative study of perceptions of a sample of patients and biobank recruiters regarding broad consent to participate in a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and health data. Our findings suggest that contextual and relational factors play an important role in the practice of broad consent, and illustrate that broad consent relies as much on intuition as on reasoning. Moreover, we show that seeking broad consent in the hospital affects patient-recruiter interaction and that "conditional" trust plays a significant role in broad-consent decision-making. In conclusion, we provide recommendations to improve patient autonomy in the context of hospital-based broad consent.
Collapse
|
13
|
Barg CJ, Miller FA, Hayeems RZ, Bombard Y, Cressman C, Painter-Main M. What's Involved with Wanting to Be Involved? Comparing Expectations for Public Engagement in Health Policy across Research and Care Contexts. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 13:40-56. [PMID: 29274226 PMCID: PMC5749523 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2017.25323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: We explored public preferences for involvement in health policy decisions, across the contexts of medical research and healthcare. Approach: We e-surveyed a sample of Canadians, categorizing respondents by preferences for decision control: (1) more authority; (2) more input; (3) status quo. Two generalized ordered logistic regressions assessed influences on preferences. Results: The participation rate was 94%; 1,102 completed responses met quality criteria. The dominant preference was for more input (average = 52.0%), followed by status quo (average = 24.9%) and more authority (average = 21.1%), though preferences for more control were higher in healthcare (57.2%) than medical research (46.8%). Preferences for greater control were associated with constructs related to reduced trust in healthcare systems. Conclusion: The public expects health policy to account for public views, but not base decisions primarily on these views. More involvement was expected in healthcare than medical research policy. As opportunities for public involvement in health research grow, we anticipate increased desired involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn J Barg
- Research Officer, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Fiona A Miller
- Professor, Chair in Health Management Strategies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Scientist-Track Investigator, Assistant Professor, Centre for Genetic Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Scientist, Assistant Professor, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Céline Cressman
- PhD Candidate, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Michael Painter-Main
- Research Assistant, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Olson JE, Ryu E, Lyke KJ, Bielinski SJ, Winkler EM, Hathcock MA, Bublitz JT, Takahashi PY, Cerhan JR. Acceptability of Electronic Visits for Return of Research Results in the Mayo Clinic Biobank. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018; 2:352-358. [PMID: 30560237 PMCID: PMC6257882 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To understand patient characteristics related to acceptability of returning individual research results via various modalities, focusing on electronic visits (e-visits). Patients and Methods Twelve hundred participants from the Mayo Clinic Biobank were selected using a stratified random sampling approach based on sex, age, and education level. Mailed surveys ascertained return of results preferences for 2 disease vignettes (cystic fibrosis and hereditary breast cancer) and a pharmacogenomics vignette. The study was conducted from October 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014. Results In all, 685 patients (57%) responded, and 60% reported liking e-visits, although the option of receiving results in an office visit was liked most frequently. Multivariable logistic models showed that the odds of liking the use of e-visits for returning results for cystic fibrosis and hereditary breast cancer were higher among those with higher education and better genetic knowledge and among those not living in proximity to the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota). Level of genetic knowledge was not considerably associated with accepting e-visits, whereas education level remained important. For all vignettes, those who are divorced were less likely to accept e-visits. Conclusion Researchers are faced with a difficult challenge of returning results with a method that is both acceptable to recipients and logistically feasible. This study implies that the use of e-visits may be a viable option for return of results to stratify the chasm between in-person genetic counseling and online portal receipt of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E. Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN
- Correspondence: Address to Janet E. Olson, PhD, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| | - Euijung Ryu
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN
| | - Kelly J. Lyke
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Matthew A. Hathcock
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN
| | - Joshua T. Bublitz
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN
| | - Paul Y. Takahashi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - James R. Cerhan
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alahmad G, Dierickx K. Ethics of Research Biobanks: Islamic Perspectives. Biopreserv Biobank 2018; 16:179-185. [DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ghiath Alahmad
- Bioethics Section, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A Replication Study for Association of LBX1 Locus With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in French-Canadian Population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:172-178. [PMID: 28604496 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A case-control association study. OBJECTIVES To investigate the relationship between LBX1 (lady bird homeobox1) polymorphisms and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in French-Canadian population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It is widely accepted that genetic factors contribute to AIS. Although the LBX1 locus is so far the most successfully replicated locus in different AIS cohorts, these associations were replicated mainly in Asian populations, with few studies in Caucasian populations of European descent. METHODS We recruited 1568 participants (667 AIS patients and 901 healthy controls) in the French-Canadian population. Genomic data were generated using the Illumina Human Omni 2.5M BeadChip. An additional 121 AIS cases and 51 controls were genotyped for specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction using standard procedures. BEAGLE 3 was used to impute the following markers: rs7893223, rs11190878, and rs678741 against the 1000-genomes European cohort phased genotypes given that they were absent in our genome wide association studies (GWAS) panel. Resulting genotypes were combined then used for single marker and haplotyped-based association. RESULTS Four markers showed association with AIS in our cohort at this locus; rs11190870 the most studied marker, rs7893223, rs594791, and rs11190878. When we restricted the analysis to severe cases only, four additional SNPs showed associations: rs11598177, rs1322331, rs670206, and rs678741. In addition, we analyzed the associations of the observed haplotypes and dihaplotypes formed by these SNPs. The haplotype TTAAGAAA and its homozygous dihaplotype showed the highest association with our severe group and was the highest risk haplotype. The haplotype CCGCAGGG was significantly more associated with the control group, and its homozygous or heterozygous dihaplotype was less frequent in the severe group compared with the control group, suggesting that CCGCAGGG may represent a protective haplotype. CONCLUSION We have replicated the association of the LBX1 locus with AIS in French-Canadian population, a novel European descent cohort, which is known for its unique genetic architecture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
17
|
Goodman D, Bowen D, Wenzel L, Tehrani P, Fernando F, Khacheryan A, Chowdhury F, Johnson CO, Edwards K. The research participant perspective related to the conduct of genomic cohort studies: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:119-129. [PMID: 29385589 PMCID: PMC6065547 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Observational genome-wide association studies require large sample sizes. Evaluating the interplay between genomic, environmental, and lifestyle factors can require even larger sample sizes. The All of Us Research Program will recruit 1 million participants to facilitate research on genomic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Integrating participant preferences into the research process is a new paradigm and a necessary component of the All of Us Research Program. The purpose of the study is to summarize quantitative studies of participant preferences related to participation in observational genomic research studies, starting with consent through return of results. Integrating this information into the conduct of genomic studies may benefit participants, and improve participant satisfaction, recruitment, and retention. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding participant views related to reconsent and broad consent, use of de-identified data, contribution of data to a biorepository, risk of identification, return of individual genetic results, and motivation for participation in genomic studies. Twenty-three articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study results found that most participants support broad consent; however, significant differences related to reconsent preferences have been shown by gender and age. Most participants support the return of individual genomic results and do not feel it is necessary to maintain a link to their de-identified data. Reasons given for joining research studies varied by population source. These findings, in addition to the knowledge that participants are more accepting of broad informed consent methods when the rationale is explained, can assist in developing guidelines for future observational genomic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Deborah Bowen
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lari Wenzel
- Department of Medicine, University of California,, CA, USA
| | - Paris Tehrani
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Francis Fernando
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Araksi Khacheryan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Farihah Chowdhury
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | - Karen Edwards
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Murtagh MJ, Minion JT, Turner A, Wilson RC, Blell M, Ochieng C, Murtagh B, Roberts S, Butters OW, Burton PR. The ECOUTER methodology for stakeholder engagement in translational research. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18:24. [PMID: 28376776 PMCID: PMC5379503 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0167-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because no single person or group holds knowledge about all aspects of research, mechanisms are needed to support knowledge exchange and engagement. Expertise in the research setting necessarily includes scientific and methodological expertise, but also expertise gained through the experience of participating in research and/or being a recipient of research outcomes (as a patient or member of the public). Engagement is, by its nature, reciprocal and relational: the process of engaging research participants, patients, citizens and others (the many 'publics' of engagement) brings them closer to the research but also brings the research closer to them. When translating research into practice, engaging the public and other stakeholders is explicitly intended to make the outcomes of translation relevant to its constituency of users. METHODS In practice, engagement faces numerous challenges and is often time-consuming, expensive and 'thorny' work. We explore the epistemic and ontological considerations and implications of four common critiques of engagement methodologies that contest: representativeness, communication and articulation, impacts and outcome, and democracy. The ECOUTER (Employing COnceptUal schema for policy and Translation Engagement in Research) methodology addresses problems of representation and epistemic foundationalism using a methodology that asks, "How could it be otherwise?" ECOUTER affords the possibility of engagement where spatial and temporal constraints are present, relying on saturation as a method of 'keeping open' the possible considerations that might emerge and including reflexive use of qualitative analytic methods. RESULTS This paper describes the ECOUTER process, focusing on one worked example and detailing lessons learned from four other pilots. ECOUTER uses mind-mapping techniques to 'open up' engagement, iteratively and organically. ECOUTER aims to balance the breadth, accessibility and user-determination of the scope of engagement. An ECOUTER exercise comprises four stages: (1) engagement and knowledge exchange; (2) analysis of mindmap contributions; (3) development of a conceptual schema (i.e. a map of concepts and their relationship); and (4) feedback, refinement and development of recommendations. CONCLUSION ECOUTER refuses fixed truths but also refuses a fixed nature. Its promise lies in its flexibility, adaptability and openness. ECOUTER will be formed and re-formed by the needs and creativity of those who use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine J. Murtagh
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences (PEALS), Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Joel T. Minion
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Turner
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca C. Wilson
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mwenza Blell
- Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cynthia Ochieng
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Barnaby Murtagh
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Urban Cow Productions, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Roberts
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Oliver W. Butters
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul R Burton
- Data2Knowledge (D2K) Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Building a Platform to Enable NCD Research to Address Population Health in Africa: CVD Working Group Discussion at the Sixth H3Africa Consortium Meeting in Zambia. Glob Heart 2017; 11:165-70. [PMID: 27102038 DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
20
|
Groth SW, Dozier A, Demment M, Li D, Fernandez ID, Chang J, Dye T. Participation in Genetic Research: Amazon's Mechanical Turk Workforce in the United States and India. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:325-335. [PMID: 27811475 DOI: 10.1159/000452094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic research has innumerable benefits. However, if people are unwilling to participate in genomic research, application of knowledge will be limited. This study examined the likelihood of respondents from a high- and a low- to middle-income country to participate in genetic research. METHODS Cross-sectional data were collected using Amazon's Mechanical Turk workforce to ascertain attitudes toward participation in genetic research. Registered country of residence was either the US (n = 505) or India (n = 505). Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess adjusted effects of demographic characteristics, health, social status, beliefs and concerns on 4 genetic research outcomes. RESULTS Participants from India who believed chance and powerful others influenced their health were more likely to participate in genetic research (OR = 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.1) and to agree with sharing of DNA data (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2). US participants were more likely to be concerned about protection of family history, which they indicated would affect participation (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.1-6.0). Commonalities for the likelihood of participation were beliefs that genetic research could help find new treatments (India OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.4; US OR = 4.7, 95% CI 2.0-11.2) and descendants would benefit (India OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.5; US OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-7.1). CONCLUSIONS Concurrence of beliefs on benefits and concerns about genetic research suggest they may be common across countries. Consideration of commonalities may be important to increase global participation in genetic research.
Collapse
|
21
|
Baik SH, Arevalo M, Gwede C, Meade CD, Jacobsen PB, Quinn GP, Wells KJ. Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016; 11:346-356. [PMID: 27646400 PMCID: PMC5478706 DOI: 10.1177/1556264616668973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study developed and validated the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS), a 10-item measure of global trust in biomedical research, in English and Spanish (BRTS-SP). In total, 85 English- and 85 Spanish-speaking participants completed the BRTS or BRTS-SP, as well as measures of biobanking attitudes, self-efficacy, receptivity, and intentions to donate blood or urine. Results indicated the BRTS and BRTS-SP showed adequate internal consistency in both English and Spanish. In addition, greater levels of trust in biomedical research were significantly associated with greater self-efficacy, receptivity, attitudes, and intentions to donate blood and urine in English-speaking participants, and self-efficacy and intention to donate urine in Spanish-speaking participants. These results support the use of the BRTS and BRTS-SP among English- and Spanish-speaking community members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon H. Baik
- San Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
- Moores UC San Diego Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mariana Arevalo
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clement Gwede
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kristen J. Wells
- San Diego State University/UC San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
- Moores UC San Diego Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
- San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lander J, Hainz T, Hirschberg I, Bossert S, Strech D. Do Public Involvement Activities in Biomedical Research and Innovation Recruit Representatively? A Systematic Qualitative Review. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:193-202. [PMID: 27027649 DOI: 10.1159/000444478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement activities (PIAs) may contribute to the governance of ethically challenging biomedical research and innovation by informing, consulting with and engaging the public in developments and decision-making processes. For PIAs to capture a population's preferences (e.g. on issues in whole genome sequencing, biobanks or genome editing), a central methodological requirement is to involve a sufficiently representative subgroup of the general public. While the existing literature focusses on theoretical and normative aspects of 'representation', this study assesses empirically how such considerations are implemented in practice. It evaluates how PIA reports describe representation objectives, the recruitment process and levels of representation achieved. METHODS PIA reports were included from a systematic literature search if they directly reported a PIA conducted in a relevant discipline such as genomics, biobanks, biotechnology or others. PIA reports were analyzed with thematic text analysis. The text analysis was guided by an assessment matrix based on PIA-specific guidelines and frameworks. RESULTS We included 46 relevant reports, most focusing on issues in genomics. 27 reports (59%) explicitly described representation objectives, though mostly without adjusting eligibility criteria and recruiting methods to the specific objective. 11 reports (24%) explicitly reported to have achieved the intended representation; the rest either reported failure or were silent on this issue. CONCLUSION Representation of study samples in PIAs in biomedical research and innovation is currently not reported systematically. Improved reporting on representation would not only improve the validity and value of PIAs, but could also contribute to PIA results being used more often in relevant policy and decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alahmad G, Hifnawy T, Abbasi B, Dierickx K. Attitudes toward medical and genetic confidentiality in the Saudi research biobank: An exploratory survey. Int J Med Inform 2015; 87:84-90. [PMID: 26806715 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Revised: 12/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Achieving a balance between giving access to information and respecting donors' confidentiality is a crucial issue for any biobank, with its large number of samples and associated information. Despite the existence of much empirical literature on confidentiality, there are too few surveys in the Middle East about the topic, particularly in the Saudi context. A survey was conducted of 200 respondents at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, among 5 groups of equal size, comprised of researchers, physicians, medical students, donors and laypersons, respectively. The majority of participants agreed that confidentiality is an important issue and that it is well protected in the Saudi biobank. All 5 groups showed different attitudes toward disclosing information to various third parties. They were in favor of allowing treating physicians, and to a certain extent family members, to have access to medical and genetic results from research. No significant differences were found between views on medical and genetic confidentiality. The majority of respondents agreed that confidentiality might be breached in cases with specific justified reasons. Even considering differences in religion, culture and other factors, the results of the study were consistent with those reported in the literature and research conducted in other countries. We therefore place emphasis on the importance of protecting and promoting patient/donor confidentiality and privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghiath Alahmad
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Center of Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tamer Hifnawy
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
| | - Badaruddin Abbasi
- Deanship of Scientific Research, Dammam Univerity, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research. Psychiatr Genet 2015; 25:127-30. [PMID: 25748091 DOI: 10.1097/ypg.0000000000000083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This study surveyed all adolescents who were enrolled in behavioral genomic research and provided DNA to a biobank, including 320 patients undergoing treatment for substance and conduct problems (SCPs) and 109 non-SCP controls. Participants selected from three options on the return of individual genomic results (RIR) and rated eight methods of re-contact. Most individuals with SCPs (77.8%) and non-SCP controls (72.5%) wanted RIR involving health or behavioral implications. The majority of individuals with SCPs (67.2%) and non-SCP controls (69.7%) indicated that phone re-contact was 'best', with e-mail (22.5% SCPs, 33.9% non-SCPs) and social networking websites (21.3% SCPs, 20.2% non-SCPs) being viable options. These results suggest a layered approach for RIR: phone calls, followed by e-mails and a secure message to a social networking account. Data from this special and vulnerable population, which includes youth involved in the criminal justice system and substantial minority participation, bring an essential and missing perspective to the discussion of RIR.
Collapse
|
25
|
Etchegary H, Green J, Parfrey P, Street C, Pullman D. Community engagement with genetics: public perceptions and expectations about genetics research. Health Expect 2015; 18:1413-25. [PMID: 23968492 PMCID: PMC5060853 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of molecular biology and genomics continues to expand rapidly, promising numerous opportunities for improving health. However, a key aspect of the success of genomic medicine is related to public understanding and acceptance. DESIGN Using community consultations and an online survey, we explored public attitudes and expectations about genomics research. RESULTS Thirty-three members of the general public in Newfoundland, Canada, took part in the community sessions, while 1024 Atlantic Canadians completed the online survey. Overall, many participants noted they lacked knowledge about genetics and associated research and took the opportunity to ask numerous questions throughout sessions. Participants were largely hopeful about genomics research in its capacity to improve health, not only for current residents, but also for future generations. However, they did not accept such research uncritically, and a variety of complex issues and questions arose during the community consultations and were reflected in survey responses. DISCUSSION With the proliferation of biobanks and the rapid pace of discoveries in genomics research, public support will be crucial to realize health improvements. If researchers can engage the public in regular, transparent dialogue, this two-way communication could allow greater understanding of the research process and the design of efficient and effective genetic health services, informed by the public that will use them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Green
- Department of GeneticsMemorial UniversitySt. John'sNLCanada
| | | | - Catherine Street
- Population Therapeutics Research GroupMemorial UniversitySt. John'sNLCanada
| | - Daryl Pullman
- Division of Community HealthMemorial UniversitySt. John'sNLCanada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Teare HJA, Morrison M, Whitley EA, Kaye J. Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants. Digit Health 2015; 1:2055207615605644. [PMID: 29942545 PMCID: PMC6001239 DOI: 10.1177/2055207615605644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Web 2.0 technologies have enabled new methods of engagement, moving from static mono-directional sources of information to interactive user-led experiences. Use of Web 2.0 technologies for engagement is gaining momentum within the health sector however this is still in its infancy in biobanking research. This paper reports on findings from focus groups with biobank participants to gauge their views on a Web 2.0 dynamic consent interface. The findings from this study suggest that participants would welcome more interactive engagement with biobanks, and the opportunity to hear more about how their data and samples are being used in research. We propose that by adopting Web 2.0 tools for dynamic consent, we can move towards an 'Engagement 2.0' model whereby research participants have the opportunity for more interactive engagement with medical research, setting up a two-way communication channel between participants and researchers, for the benefit of both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet JA Teare
- HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
- Harriet JA Teare, HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Summertown, Oxford OX2 7DD.
| | - Michael Morrison
- HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Edgar A Whitley
- Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
| | - Jane Kaye
- HeLEX Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tupasela A, Snell K, Cañada JA. Constructing populations in biobanking. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2015; 11:5. [PMID: 26194269 PMCID: PMC4508277 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-015-0024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
This article poses the question of whether biobanking practices and standards are giving rise to the construction of populations from which various biobanking initiatives increasingly draw on for legitimacy? We argue that although recent biobanking policies encourage various forms of engagement with publics to ensure legitimacy, different biobanks conceptualize their engagement strategies very differently. We suggest that biobanks undertake a broad range of different strategies with regard to engagement. We argue that these different approaches to engagement strategies are contributing to the construction of populations, whereby specific nationalities, communities, societies, patient groups and political systems become imbued or bio-objectified with particular characteristics, such as compliant, distant, positive, commercialized or authoritarian. This bio-objectification process is problematic in relation to policy aspirations ascribed to biobanking engagement since it gives rise to reified notions of different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaro Tupasela
- Department of Public Health, Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, Øster Farimagsgade 5, PO Box 2099, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Joly Y, Dalpé G, So D, Birko S. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0129893. [PMID: 26154134 PMCID: PMC4495996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Biobanks are important resources which enable large-scale genomic research with human samples and data, raising significant ethical concerns about how participants' information is managed and shared. Three previous studies of the Canadian public's opinion about these topics have been conducted. Building on those results, an online survey representing the first study of public perceptions about biobanking spanning all Canadian provinces was conducted. Specifically, this study examined qualitative views about biobank objectives, governance structure, control and ownership of samples and data, benefit sharing, consent practices and data sharing norms, as well as additional questions and ethical concerns expressed by the public. RESULTS Over half the respondents preferred to give a one-time general consent for the future sharing of their samples among researchers. Most expressed willingness for their data to be shared with the international scientific community rather than used by one or more Canadian institutions. Whereas more respondents indicated a preference for one-time general consent than any other model of consent, they constituted less than half of the total responses, revealing a lack of consensus among survey respondents regarding this question. Respondents identified biobank objectives, governance structure and accountability as the most important information to provide participants. Respondents' concerns about biobanking generally centred around the control and ownership of biological samples and data, especially with respect to potential misuse by insurers, the government and other third parties. Although almost half the respondents suggested that these should be managed by the researchers' institutions, results indicate that the public is interested in being well-informed about these projects and suggest the importance of increased involvement from participants. In conclusion, the study discusses the viability of several proposed models for informed consent, including e-governance, independent trustees and the use of exclusion clauses, in the context of these new findings about the views of the Canadian public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gratien Dalpé
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Derek So
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Stanislav Birko
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cohn EG, Husamudeen M, Larson EL, Williams JK. Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:491-502. [PMID: 25228357 PMCID: PMC4815899 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9768-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Achieving equitable minority representation in genomic biobanking is one of the most difficult challenges faced by researchers today. Capacity building--a framework for research that includes collaborations and on-going engagement--can be used to help researchers, clinicians and communities better understand the process, utility, and clinical application of genomic science. The purpose of this exploratory descriptive study was to examine factors that influence the decision to participate in genomic research, and identify essential components of capacity building with a community at risk of being under-represented in biobanks. Results of focus groups conducted in Central Harlem with 46 participants were analyzed by a collaborative team of community and academic investigators using content analysis and AtlisTi. Key themes identified were: (1) the potential contribution of biobanking to individual and community health, for example the effect of the environment on health, (2) the societal context of the science, such as DNA criminal databases and paternity testing, that may affect the decision to participate, and (3) the researchers' commitment to community health as an outcome of capacity building. These key factors can contribute to achieving equity in biobank participation, and guide genetic specialists in biobank planning and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Gross Cohn
- Columbia University, School of Nursing, 617 W. 168 Street Room 244, New York, NY, USA,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pullman D, Etchegary H. Clinical genetic research 3: Genetics ELSI (Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues) research. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1281:369-382. [PMID: 25694322 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
ELSI (Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues) is a widely used acronym in the bioethics literature that encompasses a broad range of research areas involved in examining the various impacts of science and technology on society. In Canada, GE3LS (Genetics, Ethical, Economic, Environmental, Legal, Social issues) is the term used to describe ELSI studies. It is intentionally more expansive in that GE3LS explicitly brings economic and environmental issues under its purview. ELSI/GE3LS research has become increasingly important in recent years as there has been a greater emphasis on "translational research" that moves genomics from the bench to the clinic. The purpose of this chapter is to outline a range of ELSI-related work that might be conducted as part of a large scale genetics or genomics research project, and to provide some practical insights on how a scientific research team might incorporate a strong and effective ELSI program within its broader research mandate. We begin by describing the historical context of ELSI research and the development of GE3LS research in the Canadian context. We then illustrate how some ELSI research might unfold by outlining a variety of research questions and the various methodologies that might be employed in addressing them in an area of ELSI research that is encompassed under the term "public engagement." We conclude with some practical pointers about how to build an effective ELSI/GE3LS team and focus within a broader scientific research program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Pullman
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lander J, Hainz T, Hirschberg I, Strech D. Current practice of public involvement activities in biomedical research and innovation: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One 2014; 9:e113274. [PMID: 25469705 PMCID: PMC4254603 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A recent report from the British Nuffield Council on Bioethics associated ‘emerging biotechnologies’ with a threefold challenge: 1) uncertainty about outcomes, 2) diverse public views on the values and implications attached to biotechnologies and 3) the possibility of creating radical changes regarding societal relations and practices. To address these challenges, leading international institutions stress the need for public involvement activities (PIAs). The objective of this study was to assess the state of PIA reports in the field of biomedical research. Methods PIA reports were identified via a systematic literature search. Thematic text analysis was employed for data extraction. Results After filtering, 35 public consultation and 11 public participation studies were included in this review. Analysis and synthesis of all 46 PIA studies resulted in 6 distinguishable PIA objectives and 37 corresponding PIA methods. Reports of outcome translation and PIA evaluation were found in 9 and 10 studies respectively (20% and 22%). The paper presents qualitative details. Discussion The state of PIAs on biomedical research and innovation is characterized by a broad range of methods and awkward variation in the wording of objectives. Better comparability of PIAs might improve the translation of PIA findings into further policy development. PIA-specific reporting guidelines would help in this regard. The modest level of translation efforts is another pointer to the “deliberation to policy gap”. The results of this review could inform the design of new PIAs and future efforts to improve PIA comparability and outcome translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lander
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias Hainz
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Irene Hirschberg
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Strech
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, CELLS-Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Science, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Street 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shabani M, Bezuidenhout L, Borry P. Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2014; 14:1053-65. [PMID: 25260013 DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.961917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
AIM Introducing data sharing practices into the genomic research arena has challenged the current mechanisms established to protect rights of individuals and triggered policy considerations. To inform such policy deliberations, soliciting public and research participants' attitudes with respect to genomic data sharing is a necessity. METHOD The main electronic databases were searched in order to retrieve empirical studies, investigating the attitudes of research participants and the public towards genomic data sharing through public databases. RESULTS In the 15 included studies, participants' attitudes towards genomic data sharing revealed the influence of a constellation of interrelated factors, including the personal perceptions of controllability and sensitivity of data, potential risks and benefits of data sharing at individual and social level and also governance level considerations. CONCLUSION This analysis indicates that future policy responses and recruitment practices should be attentive to a wide variety of concerns in order to promote both responsible and progressive research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Shabani
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 BOX 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Haldeman KM, Cadigan RJ, Davis A, Goldenberg A, Henderson GE, Lassiter D, Reavely E. Community engagement in US biobanking: multiplicity of meaning and method. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17:84-94. [PMID: 24556734 DOI: 10.1159/000357958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Accepted: 11/28/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Efforts to improve individual and population health increasingly rely on large-scale collections of human biological specimens and associated data. Such collections or 'biobanks' are hailed as valuable resources for facilitating translational biomedical research. However, biobanks also raise important ethical considerations, such as whether, how and why biobanks might engage with those who contributed specimens. This paper examines perceptions and practices of community engagement (CE) among individuals who operate 6 diverse biobanks in the US. METHODS Twenty-four people from a diverse group of 6 biobanks were interviewed in-person or via telephone from March to July 2011. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed for common themes. RESULTS Emergent themes include how biobank personnel understand 'community' and CE as it pertains to biobank operations, information regarding the diversity of practices of CE, and the reasons why biobanks conduct CE. CONCLUSION Despite recommendations from federal agencies to conduct CE, the interpretation of CE varies widely among biobank employees, ultimately affecting how CE is practiced and what goals are achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Haldeman
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Williamson L. Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2014; 14:4-16. [PMID: 24809598 PMCID: PMC4160284 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.900139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Patient and citizen participation is now regarded as central to the promotion of sustainable health and health care. Involvement efforts create and encounter many diverse ethical challenges that have the potential to enhance or undermine their success. This article examines different expressions of patient and citizen participation and the support health ethics offers. It is contended that despite its prominence and the link between patient empowerment and autonomy, traditional bioethics is insufficient to guide participation efforts. In addition, the turn to a "social paradigm" of ethics in examinations of biotechnologies and public health does not provide an account of values that is commensurable with the pervasive autonomy paradigm. This exacerbates rather than eases tensions for patients and citizens endeavoring to engage with health. Citizen and patient participation must have a significant influence on the way we do health ethics if its potential is to be fulfilled.
Collapse
|
35
|
Etchegary H, Green J, Dicks E, Pullman D, Street C, Parfrey P. Consulting the community: public expectations and attitudes about genetics research. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21:1338-43. [PMID: 23591403 PMCID: PMC3831079 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Revised: 03/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic discoveries and technologies promise numerous opportunities for improving health. Key to these potential health improvements, however, are health-care consumers' understanding and acceptance of these new developments. We identified community groups and invited them to a public information-consultation session in order to explore public awareness, perception and expectations about genetics and genomics research. One hundred and four members of seven community groups in Newfoundland, Canada took part in the community sessions. Content analysis of participant comments revealed they were largely hopeful about genetics research in its capacity to improve health; however, they did not accept such research uncritically. Complex issues arose during the community consultations, including the place of genetics in primary care, the value of genetics for personal health, and concerns about access to and uses of genetic information. Participants unequivocally endorsed the value of public engagement with these issues. The rapid pace of discoveries in genomics research offers exciting opportunities to improve population health. However, public support will be crucial to realize health improvements. Our findings suggest that regular, transparent dialog between researchers and the public could allow a greater understanding of the research process, as well as assist in the design of efficient and effective genetic health services, informed by the public that will use them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
- Eastern Health, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Jane Green
- Discipline of Genetics, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Dicks
- Clinical Epidemiology, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Daryl Pullman
- Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Catherine Street
- Population Therapeutics Research Group, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Patrick Parfrey
- Clinical Epidemiology, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nobile H, Vermeulen E, Thys K, Bergmann MM, Borry P. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2013; 13:35-47. [PMID: 23256702 DOI: 10.1586/erm.12.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Therapeutic misconception has been extensively studied and addressed within clinical trials. An equivalent in the genetic research context has been identified as diagnostic misconception. There is not much data on this phenomenon in population-based biobank studies. Since misconceptions may generate undue motives to enroll, the authors aimed at reviewing studies addressing the reasons to participate in biobank studies. The main databases were searched using relevant keywords. Studies were included if peer-reviewed, in English and describing the reasons to enroll was provided by actual and apparently healthy donors. Although the 13 studies retrieved were heterogeneous, a scheme summarizing the main aspects involved in the decision-making process was developed. Expectation of personal benefit through health-related information was found in eight studies. Three of them discussed whether this expectation could be considered a form of therapeutic misconception. The magnitude of this phenomenon is an important ethical concern and ought to be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Nobile
- German Institute of Human Nutrition, Nuthetal, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L, Kyne G, Hope F, Dawkins H, O'Leary P. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect 2013; 16:211-24. [PMID: 21645188 PMCID: PMC5060653 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00701.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public deliberation is recommended for obtaining citizen input to policy development when policies involve contested ethical dimensions, diverse perspectives on how to trade-off competing public interests and low public awareness of these perspectives. Several norms have been proposed for the design of deliberative methods. Evidence is scarce regarding whether such norms are achievable in practice. PURPOSE This paper refers to principles of deliberative democracy theory to describe a deliberative public forum on biobanking. Practical challenges and contextual facilitators of achieving deliberative ideals are discussed, along with factors that influenced use of the forum output in policy development. METHOD The forum ran for 4 days over two weekends in Perth, Western Australia. Key methodological features were socio-demographic stratification to randomly recruit a mini-public of citizens for discursive representation, provision of information inclusive of diverse perspectives and framed for difference, provision of a fair way for reasoning and collective decision making and adoption of processes to achieve publicity, accountability and independence from undue institutional influence. RESULTS Most design principles were achieved in practice, with the fundamental exception of representativeness. Factors influencing these outcomes, and the use of deliberated outputs to develop policy, included institutional characteristics, the design involvement of deliberative experts and quality of the outputs when compared to other consultation methods. CONCLUSIONS Public deliberations can achieve design ideals and influence (ethics-based) public health policy. The representation of 'hard to reach' citizens and their views needs further consideration, particularly as this relates to the procedural legitimacy of ethical analyses and the just inclusion of deliberative citizen advice within the broader policy-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caron Molster
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Department of Health, Perth, WA 6849, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Master Z, Claudio JO, Rachul C, Wang JCY, Minden MD, Caulfield T. Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking. BMC Med Genomics 2013; 6:8. [PMID: 23497701 PMCID: PMC3599691 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 02/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the perception of patients on research ethics issues related to biobanking is important to enrich ethical discourse and help inform policy. Methods We examined the views of leukemia patients undergoing treatment in clinics located in the Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. An initial written survey was provided to 100 patients (64.1% response rate) followed by a follow-up survey (62.5% response rate) covering the topics of informed consent, withdrawal, anonymity, incidental findings and the return of results, ownership, and trust. Results The majority (59.6%) preferred one-time consent, 30.3% desired a tiered consent approach that provides multiple options, and 10.1% preferred re-consent for future research. When asked different questions on re-consent, most (58%) reported that re-consent was a waste of time and money, but 51.7% indicated they would feel respected and involved if asked to re-consent. The majority of patients (62.2%) stated they had a right to withdraw their consent, but many changed their mind in the follow-up survey explaining that they should not have the right to withdraw consent. Nearly all of the patients (98%) desired being informed of incidental health findings and explained that the information was useful. Of these, 67.3% of patients preferred that researchers inform them and their doctors of the results. The majority of patients (62.2%) stated that the research institution owns the samples whereas 19.4% stated that the participants owned their samples. Patients had a great deal of trust in doctors, hospitals and government-funded university researchers, moderate levels of trust for provincial governments and industry-funded university researchers, and low levels of trust towards industry and insurance companies. Conclusions Many cancer patients surveyed preferred a one-time consent although others desired some form of control. The majority of participants wanted a continuing right to withdraw consent and nearly all wanted to be informed of incidental findings related to their health. Patients had a great deal of trust in their medical professionals and publically-funded researchers as opposed to profit-based industries and insurance companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubin Master
- Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, MC 153, Albany, NY 12208-3478, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lee CI, Bassett LW, Leng M, Maliski SL, Pezeshki BB, Wells CJ, Mangione CM, Naeim A. Patients' willingness to participate in a breast cancer biobank at screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 136:899-906. [PMID: 23129174 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2324-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2012] [Accepted: 10/26/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
To characterize patients' willingness to donate a biospecimen for future research as part of a breast cancer-related biobank involving a general screening population. We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of 4,217 women aged 21-89 years presenting to our facilities for screening mammogram between December 2010 and October 2011. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by our institutional review board. We collected data on patients' interest in and actual donation of a biospecimen, motivators and barriers to donating, demographic information, and personal breast cancer risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify patient-level characteristics associated with an increased likelihood to donate. Mean patient age was 57.8 years (SD 11.1 years). While 66.0 % (2,785/4,217) of patients were willing to donate blood or saliva during their visit, only 56.4 % (2,378/4,217) actually donated. Women with a college education (OR = 1.27, p = 0.003), older age (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), previous breast biopsy (OR = 1.23, p = 0.012), family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.23, p = 0.004), or a comorbidity (OR = 1.22, p = 0.014) were more likely to donate. Asian-American women were significantly less likely to donate (OR = 0.74, p = 0.005). The major reason for donating was to help all future patients (42.3 %) and the major reason for declining donation was privacy concerns (22.3 %). A large proportion of women participating in a breast cancer screening registry are willing to donate blood or saliva to a biobank. Among minority participants, Asian-American women are less likely to donate and further qualitative research is required to identify novel active recruitment strategies to insure their involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph I Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 825 Eastlake Avenue East, G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75:1604-11. [PMID: 22867865 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2011] [Revised: 06/19/2012] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively.
Collapse
|
41
|
Freeman BD, Kennedy CR, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Eastman A, Iverson E, Shehane E, Celious A, Barillas J, Clarridge B. Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012; 7:58-70. [PMID: 22378135 DOI: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Clinical studies conducted in intensive care units are associated with logistical and ethical challenges. Diseases investigated are precipitous and life-threatening, care is highly technological, and patients are often incapacitated and decision-making is provided by surrogates. These investigations increasingly involve collection of genetic data. The manner in which the exigencies of critical illness impact attitudes regarding genetic data collection is unstudied. Given interest in understanding stakeholder preferences as a foundation for the ethical conduct of research, filling this knowledge gap is timely. The conduct of opinion research in the critical care arena is novel. This brief report describes the development of parallel patient/surrogate decision-maker quantitative survey instruments for use in this environment. Future research employing this instrument or a variant of it with diverse populations promises to inform research practices in critical illness gene variation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley D Freeman
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Terry SF, Christensen KD, Metosky S, Rudofsky G, Deignan KP, Martinez H, Johnson-Moore P, Citrin T. Community engagement about genetic variation research. Popul Health Manag 2012; 15:78-89. [PMID: 21815821 PMCID: PMC3363293 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2011.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to describe the methods and effectiveness of the Public Engagement in Genetic Variation and Haplotype Mapping Issues (PEGV) Project, which engaged a community in policy discussion about genetic variation research. The project implemented a 6-stage community engagement model in New Rochelle, New York. First, researchers recruited community partners. Second, the project team created community oversight. Third, focus groups discussed concerns generated by genetic variation research. Fourth, community dialogue sessions addressed focus group findings and developed policy recommendations. Fifth, a conference was held to present these policy recommendations and to provide a forum for HapMap (haplotype mapping) researchers to dialogue directly with residents. Finally, findings were disseminated via presentations and papers to the participants and to the wider community beyond. The project generated a list of proposed guidelines for genetic variation research that addressed the concerns of New Rochelle residents. Project team members expressed satisfaction with the engagement model overall but expressed concerns about how well community groups were utilized and what segment of the community actually engaged in the project. The PEGV Project represents a model for researchers to engage the general public in policy development about genetic research. There are benefits of such a process beyond the desired genetic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon F Terry
- Genetic Alliance, 4301 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 404, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results. J Community Genet 2012; 3:275-83. [PMID: 22454259 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0091-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2011] [Accepted: 03/07/2012] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a deliberative engagement to assess attitudinal changes regarding biobank research, governance, and the return of results. We recruited African-Americans from two Southside Chicago health care facilities that serve communities of very different socioeconomic and educational backgrounds in order to examine similarities and differences within the African-American population. We used a mixed method, deliberative engagement process involving a convenience sample of parents recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) [n = 23] and a university-based practice (UBP) [n = 22]. Four coding categories illustrate similarities and differences between participants from the two different practices: (1) reasons for and against participation; (2) trust and mistrust; (3) return of research results; and (4) religion. Overall, there was strong interest in receiving results, which was a main motivator for participation. While participants from both health care facilities expressed distrust of research, UBP participants also expressed trust in the research enterprise. FQHC participants more frequently mentioned religion. Studies about participation in biobanks often focus on participants' race as the sole significant variable, while our work supports the importance of other demographic factors. Medical researchers must move beyond research analyses that consider the African-American population to be monolithic and value the diversity within it.
Collapse
|
44
|
McDonald JA, Weathers B, Barg FK, Troxel AB, Shea JA, Bowen D, Guerra CE, Halbert CH. Donation intentions for cancer genetics research among African Americans. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012; 16:252-8. [PMID: 22224593 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Scientific agencies rely on individuals to donate their DNA to support research on chronic conditions that disproportionately affect African Americans; however, donation is variable in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify sociodemographic characteristics, health care variables, and cultural values having significant independent associations with intentions to donate blood or saliva samples for cancer genetics research among African American adults. METHOD Cross-sectional survey of donation intentions. RESULTS The majority of respondents (73%) were willing to donate a biological sample for cancer genetics research. The results of the multivariate regression model found that respondents who received care at a facility other than a doctor's office (e.g., community center) were about five times more likely to be willing to donate a sample for cancer genetics research (odds ratio [OR]=5.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16-24.12, p=0.03); whereas, greater levels of religiosity (OR=0.09, 95% CI=0.01-0.75, p=0.02) and present temporal orientation (OR=0.23, 95% CI=0.06-0.79, p=0.02) were associated with a lower likelihood of donating a sample. CONCLUSION Efforts to enhance donation of biological samples for cancer genetics research may need to target diverse clinical sites for recruitment. Additionally, recruitment materials may need to address cultural values related to religiosity and present temporal orientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine A McDonald
- Center for Community-Based Research and Health Disparities, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Levitt M. Relating to participants: how close do biobanks and donors really want to be? HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2011; 19:220-30. [PMID: 21915714 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-011-0193-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Modern biobanks typically rely on the public to freely donate genetic data, undergo physical measurements and tests, allow access to medical records and give other personal information by questionnaire or interview. Given the demands on participants it is not surprising that there has been extensive public consultation even before biobanks in the UK and elsewhere began to recruit. This paper considers the different ways in which biobanks have attempted to engage and appeal to their publics and the reaction of potential and actual donors. Whilst those organising biobanks presumably want to be as close to their publics as they need to be in order to successfully recruit and sustain participation in sufficient numbers, the closer the relationship the more obligations and expectations there are on both sides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairi Levitt
- Department of Politics Philosophy and Religion, County South, Lancaster University, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pathmasiri S, Deschênes M, Joly Y, Mrejen T, Hemmings F, Knoppers BM. Intellectual property rights in publicly funded biobanks: much ado about nothing? Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:319-23. [PMID: 21478844 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Saminda Pathmasiri
- Public Population Project in Genomics (P3G) Consortium, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gottweis H, Chen H, Starkbaum J. Biobanks and the phantom public. Hum Genet 2011; 130:433-40. [PMID: 21773770 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1065-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2011] [Accepted: 07/05/2011] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This paper surveys the current state of knowledge about the relationship between different national publics and biobanks, how different publics perceive biobanks, and which issues are identified as important by various stakeholders. We discuss existing studies and emerging governance strategies dealing with the biobank-publics interface and argue that the search for phantom (biobank) public(s) is on, but still much needs to be done. We argue that the existing data originate in a relatively few regions, among them Northern Europe, the United Kingdom, and in certain U.S. states and are often based on survey research with small samples and short questionnaires. Combined usage of qualitative and quantitative methodology in studies is still rare though of great importance in order to investigate distributions of public opinion and also to be able to explain these patterns. Many important questions in the relationship between publics and biobanks are unexplored, or the existing data are inconsistent.
Collapse
|
48
|
Streicher SA, Sanderson SC, Jabs EW, Diefenbach M, Smirnoff M, Peter I, Horowitz CR, Brenner B, Richardson LD. Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study. J Community Genet 2011; 2:153-63. [PMID: 22109822 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0052-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2011] [Accepted: 05/26/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In order for DNA biobanks to be a valuable reservoir of genetic information, large numbers of participants from all racial and ethnic backgrounds need to be recruited. This study explored reasons for participating in a new biobank among primarily Hispanic and African American individuals, as well as their general attitudes towards genetic research, and their views on obtaining genetic tests. Focus groups were conducted with Mount Sinai Biobank participants recruited from predominantly lower income, minority communities. The topic guide included questions on The Mount Sinai Biobank, genetic research, and genetic testing. All focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The six focus groups comprised 43 participants: 39 females and four males, aged 27-76 years, with a median household income category of $20,000-$39,999. Twenty-one participants were Hispanic, 20 African American, one Asian, and one White. Participants' reasons for participating in the biobank included altruism, personal and family benefit, and general curiosity. Although there was evidence of conflation between genetic research and genetic testing, most participants held positive views of genetic research and expressed interest in receiving personal genetic test results. Participants wanted to learn more about genetic research and suggested various venues such as health fairs for disseminating information. Participation in biobanks by racial and ethnic minorities is apparently driven by altruism, and desire for personal or collective health benefits. Participants had generally positive attitudes, limited understanding of genetics and genetic research, and made useful suggestions regarding information dissemination mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha A Streicher
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1428 Madison Avenue, Box 1497, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wallace SE, Kent A. Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions? Hum Genet 2011; 130:393-401. [PMID: 21643981 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1021-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2011] [Accepted: 05/25/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Historically, large-scale longitudinal genomic research studies have not returned individual research results to their participants, as these studies are not intended to find clinically significant information for individuals, but to produce 'generalisable' knowledge for future research. However, this stance is now changing. Commentators now argue that there is an ethical imperative to return clinically significant results and individuals are now expressing a desire to have them. This shift reflects societal changes, such as the rise of social networking and an increased desire to participate in medical decision-making, as well as a greater awareness of genetic information and the increasing ability of clinicians to use this information in health care treatment. This paper will discuss the changes that have prompted genomic research studies to reconsider their position and presents examples of projects that are actively engaged in returning individual research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Wallace
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 212a Adrian Building, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
O'Daniel J, Haga SB. Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results. Public Health Genomics 2011; 14:346-55. [PMID: 21555865 DOI: 10.1159/000324933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2010] [Accepted: 02/04/2011] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The debate about returning research results has revealed different perspectives among researchers, participants and advisory groups with participants generally interested in obtaining their results. Given this preference, policies regarding return of individual research results may affect whether a potential subject chooses to participate in a study. Public attitudes, particularly those of African-Americans, toward this issue have been understudied. METHODS In 2008-2009, we convened 10 focus groups in Durham, N.C. to explore attitudes about returning research results and how different policies might influence their likelihood to participate in genetic/genomic studies. Transcripts were complimented by a short anonymous survey. Of 100 participants, 73% were female and 76% African-American with a median age of 40-49 years. RESULTS Although there was general interest in obtaining genetics research results, particularly individual results, discussants recognized many potential complexities. The option to obtain research results (individual or summary) was clearly valued and lack thereof was potentially a deterrent for genetic/genomic research enrollment. CONCLUSIONS Providing the option to learn research results may help strengthen relationships between investigators and participants and thereby serve as a positive influencing factor for minority communities. Consideration of the broader implications of returning research results is warranted. Engaging diverse publics is essential to gain a balance between the interests and burdens of participants and investigators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J O'Daniel
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|