Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: outcome and prognostic factors

Mitochondrial DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is associated with the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a single cohort study

BACKGROUND

Extracellular mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is released from damaged cells and increases in the serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients. While increased levels of serum mtDNA have been reported to be linked to disease progression and the future development of acute exacerbation (AE) of IPF (AE-IPF), the clinical significance of mtDNA in BALF (BALF-mtDNA) remains unclear. We investigated the relationships between BALF-mtDNA levels and other clinical variables and prognosis in IPF.

METHODS

Extracellular mtDNA levels in BALF samples collected from IPF patients were determined using droplet-digital PCR. Levels of extracellular nucleolar DNA in BALF (BALF-nucDNA) were also determined as a marker for simple cell collapse. Patient characteristics and survival information were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

mtDNA levels in serum and BALF did not correlate with each other. In 27 patients with paired BALF samples obtained in a stable state and at the time of AE diagnosis, BALF-mtDNA levels were significantly increased at the time of AE. Elevated BALF-mtDNA levels were associated with inflammation or disordered pulmonary function in a stable state (n = 90), while being associated with age and BALF-neutrophils at the time of AE (n = 38). BALF-mtDNA ≥ 4234.3 copies/µL in a stable state (median survival time (MST): 42.4 vs. 79.6 months, p < 0.001) and ≥ 11,194.3 copies/µL at the time of AE (MST: 2.6 vs. 20.0 months, p = 0.03) were associated with shorter survival after BALF collection, even after adjusting for other known prognostic factors. On the other hand, BALF-nucDNA showed different trends in correlation with other clinical variables and did not show any significant association with survival time.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated BALF-mtDNA was associated with a poor prognosis in both IPF and AE-IPF. Of note, at the time of AE, it sharply distinguished survivors from non-survivors. Given the trends shown by analyses for BALF-nucDNA, the elevation of BALF-mtDNA might not simply reflect the impact of cell collapse. Further studies are required to explore the underlying mechanisms and clinical applications of BALF-mtDNA in IPF.

Interstitial lung disease: a review of classification, etiology, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) refer to a heterogeneous and complex group of conditions characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, or both, in the interstitium of the lungs. This results in impaired gas exchange, leading to a worsening of respiratory symptoms and a decline in lung function. While the etiology of some ILDs is unclear, most cases can be traced back to factors such as genetic predispositions, environmental exposures (including allergens, toxins, and air pollution), underlying autoimmune diseases, or the use of certain medications. There has been an increase in research and evidence aimed at identifying etiology, understanding epidemiology, improving clinical diagnosis, and developing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in the field of interstitial lung diseases.

Association of the lung immune prognostic index with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), a simple index calculated from the blood lactate dehydrogenase level and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is thought to be associated with host immune status. However, the utility of LIPI in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unknown.

METHODS

In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, an association between LIPI and the survival of patients with IIPs was evaluated.

RESULTS

Exploratory and validation cohorts consisting of 460 and 414 patients with IIPs, respectively, were included (159 and 159 patients had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], and 301 and 255 had non-IPF, respectively). In the exploratory cohort, patients with IPF and a low LIPI had significantly better survival than those with a high LIPI (median of 5.6 years vs. 3.9 years, p = 0.016). The predictive ability of LIPI for the survival of patients with IPF was validated in the validation cohort (median of 8.5 years vs. 4.4 years, p = 0.003). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, LIPI was selected as an independent predictive factor for the survival of IPF patients. There was no significant association between LIPI and survival of non-IPF patients in the exploratory and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The LIPI was a predictive factor for the survival of patients with IPF and could aid the management of IPF.

COVID-19 and interstitial lung diseases: A multifaceted look at the relationship between the two diseases

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although it has been a fatal disease for many patients, the development of treatment strategies and vaccines have progressed over the past 3 years, and our society has become able to accept COVID-19 as a manageable common disease. However, as COVID-19 sometimes causes pneumonia, post-COVID pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF), and worsening of preexisting interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), it is still a concern for pulmonary physicians. In this review, we have selected several topics regarding the relationships between ILDs and COVID-19. The pathogenesis of COVID-19-induced ILD is currently assumed based mainly on the evidence of other ILDs and has not been well elucidated specifically in the context of COVID-19. We have summarized what has been clarified to date and constructed a coherent story about the establishment and progress of the disease. We have also reviewed clinical information regarding ILDs newly induced or worsened by COVID-19 or anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Inflammatory and profibrotic responses induced by COVID-19 or vaccines have been thought to be a risk for de novo induction or worsening of ILDs, and this has been supported by the evidence obtained through clinical experience over the past 3 years. Although COVID-19 has become a mild disease in most cases, it is still worth looking back on the above-reviewed information to broaden our perspectives regarding the relationship between viral infection and ILD. As a representative etiology for severe viral pneumonia, further studies in this area are expected.

Combination of computed tomography imaging pattern and severity of respiratory failure as factors associated with prognosis for acute exacerbation of idiopathic chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of idiopathic chronic fibrotic interstitial pneumonitis (CFIP) in patients with acute exacerbation (AE) is variable. We examined whether the imaging pattern on thoracic computed tomography (CT) or the severity of respiratory failure with AE-CFIP is associated with short-term prognosis.

METHODS

Patients admitted to two university hospitals were retrospectively analyzed and divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The distribution of newly appearing parenchymal abnormalities on thoracic CT was classified into peripheral, multifocal, and diffuse patterns. Respiratory failure was defined as severe if a fraction of inspired oxygen ≥ 0.5 was required to maintain percutaneous oxygen saturation ≥ 90% on admission. Factors associated with 90 day-mortality were analyzed using univariate and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

In 59 patients with AE-CFIP of the derivation cohort, diffuse pattern on CT was associated with higher mortality within 90 days (43%) than peripheral/multifocal pattern (17%, p = 0.03). Additionally, compared with non-severe failure, severe respiratory failure was associated with higher mortality (47% vs. 21%, p = 0.06). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that a combination of diffuse pattern on CT and severe respiratory failure was associated with the poorest prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.51 [interquartile range 1.26-9.80], p = 0.016) in the derivation cohort, which was confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 31, HR 4.30 [interquartile range 1.51-12.2], p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The combination of imaging pattern on thoracic CT and severity of respiratory failure was associated with the prognosis of idiopathic AE-CFIP.

Interstitial Lung Disease: A Focused Review for the Emergency Clinician

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of restrictive pulmonary diseases associated with diffuse interstitial and parenchymal inflammation. Patients can present to the emergency department with severe exacerbation.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides emergency clinicians with the most recent evidence concerning acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD).

DISCUSSION

AE-ILD can present as acute respiratory distress in a patient with a pre-existing ILD diagnosis or as a de novo presentation of ILD, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A variety of underlying triggers may result in AE-ILD. Emergency clinicians must first assess for extraneous causes of respiratory decompensation prior to diagnosing AE-ILD. For a de novo presentation of ILD, emergency physicians should also assess for possible reversible causes. AE-ILD is managed with systemic steroids, immunosuppressants, intravenous antibiotics, supplemental oxygen, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cases. Given the high mortality rates in the absence of lung transplantation, early referral to transplant centers is essential to increase chances of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency clinician knowledge of AE-ILD can improve the evaluation and management of these patients.

Pathological Roles of Pulmonary Cells in Acute Lung Injury: Lessons from Clinical Practice

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are relatively rare and sometimes become life threatening. In particular, rapidly progressive ILD, which frequently presents as acute lung injury (ALI) on lung histopathology, shows poor prognosis if proper and immediate treatments are not initiated. These devastating conditions include acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF), clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM), epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)-induced lung injury, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this review, clinical information, physical findings, laboratory examinations, and findings on lung high-resolution computed tomography and lung histopathology are presented, focusing on majorly damaged cells in each disease. Furthermore, treatments that should be immediately initiated in clinical practice for each disease are illustrated to save patients with these diseases.

Assessment of diagnostic utility of serum hemeoxygenase-1 measurement for acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonias

The present study aimed to evaluate whether serum heme oxygenase (HO)-1 could be a reliable blood biomarker for diagnosing acute exacerbations (AEs) of both idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and secondary interstitial pneumonia (SIP). Serum HO-1 levels of newly diagnosed patients with IP were measured, and the relationships between serum HO-1 and other serum biomarkers and high-resolution CT scores, were evaluated. Blood samples were collected from 90 patients with IIP, including 32 having an AE, and 32 with SIP, including 9 having an AE. The patients having an AE had significantly higher HO-1 levels than those not having an AE (35.2 ng/mL vs. 16.4 ng/mL; p < 0.001). On receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for serum HO-1 ability to detect an AE, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.87 in patients with IIPs and 0.86 in those with SIPs. Also, in patients with both IIPs and SIPs, the combination of the serum HO-1 level and the GGO score showed favorable AUCs (IIPs: 0.92, SIPs: 0.83), though HO-1-not-including model (combination of LDH and GGO) also showed acceptable AUCs. Serum HO-1 could be a clinically useful biomarker for the accurate diagnosis of patients with AEs.

Changes in blood Krebs von den Lungen-6 predict the mortality of patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease

Acute exacerbation (AE) significantly affects the prognosis of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study aimed to investigate the best prognostic biomarker for patients with AE-ILD. Clinical data obtained during hospitalization were retrospectively analyzed for 96 patients with AE-ILD at three tertiary hospitals. The mean age of all subjects was 70.1 years; the percentage of males was 66.7%. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis accounted for 60.4% of the cases. During follow-up (median: 88 days), in-hospital mortality was 24%. Non-survivors had higher lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, lower ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspiratory oxygen (P/F ratio), and higher relative change in Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels over 1 week after hospitalization than survivors. In multivariable analysis adjusted by age, the 1-week change in KL-6-along with baseline P/F ratio and CRP levels-was an independent prognostic factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.094, P = 0.025). Patients with remarkable increase in KL-6 (≥ 10%) showed significantly worse survival (in-hospital mortality: 63.2 vs. 6.1%) than those without. In addition to baseline CRP and P/F ratio, the relative changes in KL-6 over 1 week after hospitalization might be useful for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with AE-ILD.

Acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: mortality and its prediction model

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), like those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), might develop an unexpected acute exacerbation (AE)—a rapidly progressing and deadly respiratory decline. Although AE incidence and risk factors in RA-ILD patients are known, their post-AE clinical course remains unknown owing to the rarity of AE-RA-ILD. This multicentre retrospective study evaluated post-AE mortality and prognostic variables in AE-RA-ILD patients and created a mortality prediction model for AE-RA-ILD.

Methods

This research comprised 58 patients with AE-RA-ILD and 96 with AE-IPF (a control disease). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic variables. A prediction model was created with recursive partitioning (decision tree).

Results

The post-AE 90-day mortality rate in the overall AE-RA-ILD group was 48.3%; percent predicted forced vital capacity within 12 months before AE onset (baseline %FVC) and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio at AE onset (P/F at AE) were independent predictors of mortality. Post-AE 90-day mortality rates were 40.6% and 43.8%, respectively, in AE-RA-ILD and AE-IPF patients propensity score-matched for age, sex, baseline %FVC and P/F at AE (P = 1.0000). In AE-RA-ILD patients, C-indices of baseline %FVC and P/F at AE to predict post-AE 90-day mortality were 0.604 and 0.623, respectively. A decision tree model based on these prognostic factors classified AE-RA-ILD patients into mild, moderate and severe groups (post-AE 90-day mortality rates: 20.8%, 64.0% and 88.9%, respectively; P = 0.0002); the C-index improved to 0.775.

Conclusions

Post-AE mortality was high in AE-RA-ILD patients similar to AE-IPF patients. The discovered prognostic factors and our mortality prediction model may aid in the management of AE-RA-ILD patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-01978-y.

Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatic disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with rheumatic diseases, such as connective-tissue diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic vasculitis. Some patients with ILD secondary to rheumatic disease (RD-ILD) experience acute exacerbations, with sudden ILD progression and high mortality during or immediately after the exacerbation, and a very low 1-year survival rate. In the ILD subtype idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), an acute exacerbation is defined as acute worsening or development of dyspnoea associated with new bilateral ground-glass opacities and/or consolidations at high-resolution CT, superimposed on a background pattern consistent with fibrosing ILD. However, acute exacerbation in RD-ILD (AE-RD-ILD) currently has no specific definition. The aetiology and pathogenesis of AE-RD-ILD remain unclear, but distinct triggers might include infection, mechanical stress, microaspiration and DMARD treatment. At this time, no effective evidence-based therapeutic strategies for AE-RD-ILD are available. In clinical practice, AE-RD-ILD is often empirically treated with high-dose systemic steroids and antibiotics, with or without immunosuppressive drugs. In this Review, we summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, management and prognosis of AE-RD-ILD, enabling the similarities and differences with acute exacerbation in IPF to be critically assessed.

Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in the intensive care unit

Acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) represent an acute, frequent and often highly morbid event in the disease course of ILD patients. Admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) is very common and the need for mechanical ventilation arises early. While non-invasive ventilation has shown promise in staving off intubation in selected patients, it is unclear whether mechanical ventilation can alter the exacerbation course unless it is a bridge to lung transplantation. Risk stratification using clinical and radiographic findings, and early palliative care involvement, are important in ICU care. In this review, we discuss many of the pathophysiological aspects of AE-ILD and raise the hypothesis that ventilation strategies used in acute respiratory distress syndrome might be implemented in AE-ILD. We present possible decision-making and management algorithms that can be used by the intensivist when caring for these patients.

Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Acute exacerbation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Although the real nature of it is still not clear and there is no proven effective therapy, progress has been made since the consensus definition and diagnostic criteria were proposed. The trial results of several new innovative therapies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have suggested a potential for benefit in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, leading to double blind randomized clinical trials in this area. This article reviews the present knowledge on acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, focusing on the triggering factors and treatment.

The Extent of Honeycombing on Computed Tomography Cannot Predict the Treatment Outcome of Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Interstitial Lung Disease

Background

The purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify whether the presence of honeycombing on computed tomography (CT) can affect the prognosis of patients with acute exacerbations (AEs) of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

Methods

Clinical parameters including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS), blood biomarkers, and 3-month mortality were retrospectively compared between the CT honeycombing present and absent groups at the diagnosis of AEs of ILDs.

Results

Ninety-five patients who were on corticosteroid pulse therapy were assessed. Though log-rank tests showed that Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the high and low ground-glass opacity (GGO) score groups differed significantly in 3-month mortality in patients with AEs of idiopathic ILDs (P = 0.007) and overall patients (P = 0.045), there was no significant difference between the CT honeycombing present and absent groups in patients with AEs of idiopathic ILDs (P = 0.472) and AEs of secondary ILDs (P = 0.905), as well as of overall patients (P = 0.600). In addition, whereas CCIS (OR, 1.436; 95% CI, 1.156–1.842; P < 0.001) was a significant predictor of 3-month mortality in the CT honeycombing absent group, serum LDH (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.002–1.007; P = 0.001) was a significant predictor in the CT honeycombing present group.

Conclusions

The clinical features of patients with or without honeycombing may differ due to the difference in prognostic factors, but these groups were found to have similar prognoses 3 months after AE onset, and clinicopathological examinations according to these groups are essential.

Utility of illness severity scores to predict mortality in patients hospitalized with respiratory deterioration of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

In the context of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), respiratory-related admissions to hospital are associated with a high morbidity and short-term mortality with significant burden on secondary care services. It has yet to be determined how to accurately identify patients at risk of acute respiratory deterioration (ARD) or the prognosticating factors.

AIM

We sought to define the characteristics of hospitalized ARD-IPF patients in a real-world cohort and investigate factors associated with worse outcomes. Specifically, we wished to determine the association between baseline CURB-65 and NEWS-2 and mortality in IPF, given illness severity scores have not previously been validated in this cohort.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.

RESULTS

Of 172 first hospitalizations for ARD, 27 admissions (15.7%) were due to an acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF), 28 (16.3%) secondary to cardiac failure/fluid overload and 17 due to pneumonia (9.9%). Other admissions related to lower respiratory tract infection, extra-parenchymal causes and those without a specific trigger. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable for all underlying aetiologies of ARD-IPF. Treatment pathways did not differ significantly between AE-IPF and other causes of ARD-IPF. Short-term mortality was high, with ∼22% patients dying within 30 days. Illness severity scores (NEWS-2 and CURB-65) were independent predictors of mortality in multivariable logistic regression modelling.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest significant mortality related to hospitalization with ARD-IPF of any underlying cause. Our data support the use of CURB-65 and NEWS-2 scores as illness severity scores that can provide a simple tool to help future prognostication in IPF. Research should be aimed at refining the management of these episodes, to try to reduce mortality, where possible, or to facilitate palliative care for those with adverse prognostic characteristics.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Diffuse Lung Disease

Diffuse lung disease, frequently referred to as interstitial lung disease, encompasses numerous disorders affecting the lung parenchyma. The potential etiologies of diffuse lung disease are broad with several hundred established clinical syndromes and pathologies currently identified. Imaging plays a critical role in diagnosis and follow-up of many of these diseases, although multidisciplinary discussion is the current standard for diagnosis of several DLDs. This document aims to establish guidelines for evaluation of diffuse lung diseases for 1) initial imaging of suspected diffuse lung disease, 2) initial imaging of suspected acute exacerbation or acute deterioration in cases of confirmed diffuse lung disease, and 3) clinically indicated routine follow-up of confirmed diffuse lung disease without acute deterioration. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Management of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Specialised and Non-specialised ILD Centres Around the World

Background: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a severe complication associated with a high mortality. However, evidence and guidance on management is sparse. The aim of this international survey was to assess differences in prevention, diagnostic and treatment strategies for AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres worldwide.

Material and Methods: Pulmonologists working in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres were invited to participate in a survey designed by an international expert panel. Responses were evaluated in respect to the physicians' institutions.

Results: Three hundred and two (65%) of the respondents worked in a specialised ILD centre, 134 (29%) in a non-specialised pulmonology centre. Similarities were frequent with regards to diagnostic methods including radiology and screening for infection, treatment with corticosteroids, use of high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation in critical ill patients and palliative strategies. However, differences were significant in terms of the use of KL-6 and pathogen testing in urine, treatments with cyclosporine and recombinant thrombomodulin, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critical ill patients as well as antacid medication and anaesthesia measures as preventive methods.

Conclusion: Despite the absence of recommendations, approaches to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of AE-IPF are comparable in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres, yet certain differences in the managements of AE-IPF exist. Clinical trials and guidelines are needed to improve patient care and prognosis in AE-IPF.

Cyclophosphamide added to glucocorticoids in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (EXAFIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) plus uromitexan as haemorrhagic cystitis prophylaxis (200 mg/m²) at the time of cyclophosphamide administration and then again, 4 h later, or placebo at days 0, 15, 30, and 60. Random assignment was stratified according to the severity of IPF and was block-balanced with variable block sizes of four or six patients. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with active infection, with active cancer, or who were registered on the lung transplant waiting list were excluded. All patients received standardised high-dose glucocorticoids. The investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality, analysed by a χ² test adhering to an intention-to-treat principle. The trial is now complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460588.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients.

FUNDING

Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals.

Differences between Acute Exacerbations of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Other Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a wide group of pulmonary parenchymal disorders. These patients may experience acute respiratory deteriorations of their respiratory condition, termed "acute exacerbation" (AE). The incidence of AE-ILD seems to be lower than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but prognosis and prognostic factors are largely unrecognized. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 158 consecutive adult patients hospitalized for AE-ILD in two Italian university hospitals from 2009 to 2016. Patients included in the analysis were divided into two groups: non-IPF (62%) and IPF (38%). Among ILDs included in the non-IPF group, the most frequent diagnoses were non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (42%) and connective tissue disease (CTD)-ILD (20%). Mortality during hospitalization was significantly different between the two groups: 19% in the non-IPF group and 43% in the IPF group. AEs of ILDs are difficult-to-predict events and are burdened by relevant mortality. Increased inflammatory markers, such as neutrophilia on the differential blood cell count (HR 1.02 (CI 1.01-1.04)), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (HR 1.85 (CI 1.17-2.92)), and the diagnosis of IPF (HR 2.31 (CI 1.55-3.46)), resulted in negative prognostic factors in our analysis. Otherwise, lymphocytosis on the differential count seemed to act as a protective prognostic factor (OR 0.938 (CI 0.884-0.995)). Further prospective, large-scale, real-world data are needed to support and confirm the impact of our findings.

[Exacerbation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis]

Acute exacerbations (AE) are a life-threatening complication in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In-hospital mortality is high and the overall prognosis poor. The underlying causes of AE-IPF still remain unclear and there are no focused guidelines for its management. In most cases high-dose steroids combined with an antibiotic therapy are applied. Preventive and palliative measures are very important. Intensive research is necessary to improve management of AE-IPF.

Feasibility and Outcomes of a Standardized Management Protocol for Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite the high mortality of acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD), there is minimal evidence to guide management decisions. We aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a standardized management protocol for AE-ILD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with AE-ILD admitted to hospital between January 2015 and August 2019. Patients were managed with a standardized protocol including chest computed tomography (CT) at diagnosis, pulse corticosteroid treatment, and a follow-up CT 7 days after corticosteroid pulse. The association between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) versus non-IPF diagnosis and transplant-free survival within 1-year of AE-ILD was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis. Associations with CT chest improvement 7 days after corticosteroid pulse were secondarily assessed.

RESULTS

89 patients with AE-ILD were identified. 1-year transplant-free and overall survival were 20.2 and 51.7%, respectively. Protocol adherence to pulse corticosteroids was high (95.5%). A diagnosis of IPF was associated with higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year versus a non-IPF diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 95% CI 1.19-4.17, p = 0.012]. There were no significant associations with 7-day CT improvement; however, CT improvement was associated with higher transplant-free survival (p = 0.02) and a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (χ² = 7.06, p = 0.01) on unadjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

IPF is associated with a higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year as compared to a non-IPF diagnosis in patients with AE-ILD managed using a standardized protocol. Improvement on CT chest 7 days after corticosteroid pulse is associated with better survival.

Body mass index and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an interstitial lung disease characterised by chronic fibrosis, and acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF) is the leading cause of death in patients with IPF. Data on the association between the body mass index (BMI) and prognosis of AE-IPF are lacking. This study was performed to evaluate the association between BMI and in-hospital mortality in patients who developed AE-IPF using a national inpatient database.

Methods

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively collected data of inpatients with AE-IPF from 1 July, 2010 to 31 March, 2018. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between all-cause in-hospital mortality and BMI, categorised as underweight (<18.5 kg·m⁻²), low-normal weight (18.5–22.9 kg·m⁻²), high-normal weight (23.0–24.9 kg·m⁻²), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg·m⁻²) and obese (≥30.0 kg·m⁻²).

Results

In total, 14 783 patients were eligible for this study. The in-hospital mortality rate was 59.0%, 55.0%, 53.8%, 54.8% and 46.0% in the underweight, low-normal weight, high-normal weight, overweight and obese groups, respectively. Underweight patients had a significantly higher mortality rate (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10–1.42) and obese patients had a significantly lower mortality rate (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54–0.94) than low-normal weight patients.

Conclusion

Among patients with AE-IPF, the underweight group had higher mortality and the obese group had lower mortality.

Among patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, underweight patients have higher mortality and obese patients lower mortalityhttps://bit.ly/3eoVMOR

Prognostic classification in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

Acute exacerbation (AE) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major prognostic determinant. However, evidence for its prognostic strength is mainly based on the results of small cohort studies with statistical limitations. This retrospective study, which included 108 patients with a first episode of AE-IPF, aimed to identify prognostic factors and to develop prognostic classification models. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a lower percent-predicted forced vital capacity within 12 months before AE onset (baseline %FVC) and a lower PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio at AE onset were independent mortality predictors. If the value of each predictor was lower than the cutoff determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis, 1 point was assigned. Classification of patients into mild, moderate, and severe groups based on total score showed post-AE 90-day cumulative survival rates of 83.3%, 66.2%, and 22.2%, respectively (model 1: C-index 0.702). Moreover, a decision tree-based model was created with the recursive partitioning method using baseline %FVC and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio at AE onset from among multivariable; accordingly, patients were classified into 3 groups with post-AE 90-day cumulative survival rates of 84.1%, 64.3%, and 24.0%, respectively (model 2: C-index 0.735). These models can guide clinicians in determining therapeutic strategies and help design future studies on AE-IPF.

Characteristics and evaluation of acute exacerbations in chronic interstitial lung diseases

Acute exacerbations of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) occur in both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as well as non-IPF ILDs. An expert consensus definition has allowed for more frequent reporting of IPF exacerbations. The same is lacking for non-IPF ILD exacerbations. The incidence of non-IPF ILD exacerbations is likely less than in IPF, but the two entities share similar risk factors, such as increased frequency as physiologic derangements advance. The radiologic and histopathologic spectrum of acute ILD exacerbations extends from organizing pneumonia (OP) to the more treatment-refractory diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern. Indeed, responsiveness to various therapies may depend on the relative components of these entities, favoring OP over DAD. There are no proven therapies for acute ILD exacerbations. Corticosteroids are a mainstay in any regimen although clear evidence of benefit does not exist. A variety of immunosuppressant agents have purported success in historical cohort studies - cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus most commonly. Only one randomized controlled trial has been published, studying recombinant thrombomodulin for IPF exacerbation, but the primary outcome of survivor proportion at 90 days was not met. Other novel therapies for ILD exacerbations are still under investigation. The short and long-term prognosis of acute exacerbations of ILD is poor, especially in patients with IPF. Transplant referral should be considered early for both IPF as well as fibrosing non-IPF ILDs, given the unpredictability of the exacerbation event.

Initial therapeutic dose of corticosteroid for an acute exacerbation of IPF is associated with subsequent early recurrence of another exacerbation

Some patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergo recurrent acute exacerbations (AEs). This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for recurrent AEs of IPF (AE-IPF). Consecutive patients with IPF admitted for their first AE-IPF between January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively recruited. Of 63 patients admitted for an AE-IPF and discharged alive, 9 (14.3%) developed a recurrence of AE within 1 year. The mean time to recurrence was 233 ± 103 days. Total doses (mg/month and mg/kg/month) of corticosteroids administered over day 1 to 30 after the AE were significantly higher in patients without recurrences of AE-IPF (5185 ± 2414 mg/month, 93.5 ± 44.0 mg/kg/month) than the doses in patients with recurrences (3133 ± 1990 mg/month, 57.2 ± 37.7 mg/kg/month) (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). However, no differences were observed between the total doses of corticosteroids administered over days 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, and 151 to 180 after the AE. Furthermore, differences between the administration rates of immunosuppressive and antifibrotic treatments administered to the 2 patient groups were not significant. An increased total dose of corticosteroid administered over day 1 to 30 after an AE-IPF was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent recurrence of AE-IPF within 1 year after the first AE.

Practical Imaging Interpretation in Patients Suspected of Having Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Official Recommendations from the Radiology Working Group of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation

Imaging serves a key role in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Accurate pattern classification at thin-section chest CT is a key step in multidisciplinary discussions, guiding the need for surgical lung biopsy and determining available pharmacologic therapies. The recent approval of new treatments for fibrosing lung disease has made it more critical than ever for radiologists to facilitate accurate and early diagnosis of IPF. This document was developed by the Radiology Working Group of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation with the goal of providing a practical guide for radiologists. In this review, the critical imaging patterns of IPF, pitfalls in imaging classifications, confounding imaging findings with other fibrotic lung diseases, and reporting standards for cases of lung fibrosis will be discussed.

Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

See also the commentary by White and Galvin in this issue.

Clinical course and prognosis in survivors of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are at risk of acute exacerbations (AEs) that manifest as respiratory distress. However, the clinical course after AEs of IPF (AE-IPFs) has not been well described. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the clinical course and prognosis in survivors of AE-IPFs.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with IPF who presented to our institution with their first AE-IPFs between January 2008 and December 2019 were included in this study. Data were retrospectively collected, and the clinical course, survival, and cause of death were further analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 67 (69.1%) were discharged alive, with a median survival time after discharge of 1081 days. AE recurrence and pneumonia were the most common causes of death, each accounting for 22.2% of cases among survivors of AE-IPFs. AEs were the most frequent during the first 3 years after discharge, whereas pneumonia was more common thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of AE-IPFs have a relatively favorable long-term prognosis. Among the survivors of first AE-IPFs, AE recurrence and pneumonia were the most common causes of death after discharge. Therefore, preventing AE recurrence and lung infections is crucial for prolonging survival in survivors of AE-IPFs.

The role of interleukin-6 as a prognostic biomarker for predicting acute exacerbation in interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic, parenchymal lung diseases with a variable clinical course and a poor prognosis. Within various clinical courses, acute exacerbation (AE) is a devastating condition with significant morbidity and high mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to predict AE and prognosis in patients with ILD.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients who were diagnosed with ILD from 2016 to 2019 at the Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea, were included and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 20 months. The mean age was 68.1 years and 65.1% of the patients were men with 60.2% of patients being ever-smokers. Among ILDs, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was the most common disease (68.7%), followed by connective tissue disease-associated ILD (14.5%), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (9.6%), and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (6.0%). The serum levels of IL-6 were measured at diagnosis with ILD and sequentially at follow-up visits. During the follow-ups, 15 (18.1%) patients experienced an acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD and among them, four (26.7%) patients died. In the multivariable analysis, high levels of IL-6 (OR 1.014, 95% CI: 1.001-1.027, p = 0.036) along with lower baseline saturations of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) were independent risk factors for AE. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.815 (p < 0.001) and the optimal cut-off value of serum IL-6 to predict AE was 25.20 pg/mL with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 80.6%. In the multivariable Cox analysis, a high level of serum IL-6 (HR 1.007, 95% CI: 1.001-1.014, p = 0.018) was only an independent risk factor for mortality in ILD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, a high level of serum IL-6 is a useful biomarker to predict AE and poor prognosis in patients with ILD.

Pulmonary fibrosis and COVID-19: the potential role for antifibrotic therapy

In December, 2019, reports emerged from Wuhan, China, of a severe acute respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). By the end of April, 2020, over 3 million people had been confirmed infected, with over 1 million in the USA alone, and over 215 000 deaths. The symptoms associated with COVID-19 are diverse, ranging from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The major risk factors for severe COVID-19 are shared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), namely increasing age, male sex, and comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. However, the role of antifibrotic therapy in patients with IPF who contract SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the scientific rationale for their continuation or cessation, is poorly defined. Furthermore, several licensed and potential antifibrotic compounds have been assessed in models of acute lung injury and viral pneumonia. Data from previous coronavirus infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome, as well as emerging data from the COVID-19 pandemic, suggest there could be substantial fibrotic consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antifibrotic therapies that are available or in development could have value in preventing severe COVID-19 in patients with IPF, have the potential to treat severe COVID-19 in patients without IPF, and might have a role in preventing fibrosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Incidence and impact of extra-pulmonary organ failures on hospital mortality in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

To evaluate hospital mortality and associated risk factors for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AEIPF). Emphases were put on incidence and impact of extra-pulmonary organ failures. Patients diagnosed with AEIPF from July 2014 to September 2018 were enrolled. Clinical data were collected. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and simplified acute physiological score II (SAPS II) were calculated. Extra-pulmonary organ failures were diagnosed upon criteria of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). Forty-five patients with AEIPF were included. Eighteen patients (40.0%) developed extra-pulmonary organ failures, and 25 patients (55.6%) died during hospitalization. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.001), SAPS II (p = 0.004), SOFA (p = 0.001) were higher, whereas arterial oxygen pressure (PaO₂)/ fractional inspired oxygen (FiO₂) (p = 0.001) was lower in non-survivors than survivors. More non-survivors developed extra-pulmonary organ failures than survivors (p = 0.002). After adjustment, elevated serum CRP (OR 1.038, p = 0.049) and extra-pulmonary organ failure (OR 13.126, p = 0.016) were independent predictors of hospital mortality in AEIPF. AEIPF had high hospital mortality and occurrence of extra-pulmonary organ failure was common. Elevated serum CRP and extra-pulmonary organ failure had predictive values for mortality.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify prognostic factors of acute exacerbation (AE) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched from 2002 through 1 March 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

The review included primary studies addressing the association between the outcomes such as all-cause mortality of AE of IPF and its potential prognostic factors, which were designated as any clinical information related to the outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers extracted relevant data independently and assessed risk of bias. Univariate results were pooled using a random-effect model if at least three studies were available. Prognostic factors were determined based on significant and consistent results on both univariate and multivariate analyses in the majority of studies.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 6763 articles retrieved, 37 were eligible and 31 potential prognostic factors for all-cause mortality were selected. Each study was subject to certain methodological shortcomings. The following five factors were statistically significant by a meta-analysis of univariate results, which was confirmed by multivariate analysis, that is, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (HR 1.10, 1.01 to 1.19), partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio (ORs 0.99 in two studies and HRs 0.31 and 0.99 in two studies, respectively), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HRs 1.002, 1.003, 1.01 and 1.02), white blood cell (WBC) count (OR 1.38, 1.04 to 1.83) and oxygen therapy before AE (HRs 3.68, 1.05 to 12.9 and 2.34, 1.04 to 5.28) (multivariate analysis, 95% CI).

CONCLUSIONS

APACHE II score, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, LDH, WBC count and oxygen therapy before AE were deemed as prognostic factors of AE of IPF. Although there are some methodological limitations in this study, these findings are reliable due to consistent results by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018106172.

Prognosis of patients with acute exacerbation of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Previous analyses of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) cohorts have provided conflicting data on the survival of patients with CPFE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical prognosis of acute exacerbations (AE) of CPFE.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had been treated at the Shinshu University Hospital (Matsumoto, Japan) between 2003 and 2017. We identified 21 patients with AE of CPFE and 41 patients with AE of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and estimated their prognoses using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Treatment content and respiratory management were not significantly different between the two groups before and after exacerbation. At the time of AE, the median serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level was significantly lower in the CPFE group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 966 U/μL; white blood cell count: 8810 /μL) than that in the IPF group (Krebs von den Lungen-6: 2130 U/μL, p < 0.001; white blood cells: 10809/μL, p = 0.0096). The baseline Gender-Age-Physiology scores were not significantly different between the two groups (CPFE, 4.5 points; IPF, 4.7 points; p = 0.58). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the survival time after AE for patients with CPFE was longer than that for patients with IPF (p < 0.001, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival prognoses after AE were significantly better for patients with CPFE than that for those with IPF. Our findings may improve the medical treatment and respiratory management of patients with AE-CPFE.

Prognosis and causes of death of patients with acute exacerbation of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, causes of death and factors impacting on the prognosis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) with a history of acute exacerbation (AE) of IPF or FILD.

METHODS

Retrospective data of hospital treatment periods caused by AE-IPF and AE-FILD were collected from medical records. Clinical features and survival data of IPF and non-IPF cases were evaluated and compared. The underlying and immediate causes of death were gathered from death certificates.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. IPF (n=79/62%), rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD; n=17/14%) and asbestosis (n=11/8.6%) were the most common FILD subgroups in the study. The median survival after hospitalisation in AE-IPF was 2.6 months compared with 21 months in other AE-FILDs (p<0.001). The survival difference was not explained by age, gender or pulmonary function test results at the time of hospitalisation. Patients with non-specific interstitial pneumonia and RA-ILD had the most favourable prognosis. ILD was the most common underlying cause of death in both patients with IPF and with other FILD accounting for 87% and 78% of deaths, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected a significantly longer survival in AE of patients with non-IPF compared with that of AE-IPFs. The prognosis of patients was affected by the underlying lung disease since pulmonary fibrosis was the underlying cause of death in the majority of all patients with FILD having experienced an AE.

Regulatory T Cells Limit Pneumococcus-Induced Exacerbation of Lung Fibrosis in Mice

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can experience life-threatening episodes of acute worsening of their disease, termed acute exacerbation of IPF, which may be caused by bacterial and/or viral infections. The potential for regulatory T cells (Tregs) to limit disease progression in bacterially triggered fibrosis exacerbation has not been explored so far. In the current study, we show that the number of Tregs was significantly increased in mice with established AdTGF-β1-induced lung fibrosis and further increased in mice with pneumococcal infection-induced lung fibrosis exacerbation. Diphtheria toxin-induced depletion of Tregs significantly worsened infection-induced fibrosis exacerbation as determined by increased lung collagen deposition, lung histology, and elevated pulmonary Th1/Th2 cytokine levels. Conversely, IL-2 complex-induced Treg expansion in wild-type mice with established lung fibrosis completely inhibited pneumococcal infection-induced fibrosis exacerbation as efficaciously as antibiotic treatment while preserving lung antibacterial immunity in mice. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the efficacy of Tregs as "silencers," suppressing infection-induced exacerbation of lung fibrosis in mice, and their expansion may offer a novel adjunctive treatment to limit acute exacerbations in patients with IPF.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: usual interstitial pneumonitis vs. possible usual interstitial pneumonitis pattern

Background:

The prognosis of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is very poor with a high mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features and survival of patients with AE-IPF with usual pulmonary fibrosis (UIP) and possible UIP (P-UIP) pattern on chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

Methods:

This retrospective study included 107 patients with AE-IPF admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The subjects were divided into UIP (n = 86) and P-UIP group (n = 21) based on chest HRCT. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ² test. Log-rank test was used for the survival analysis. Cox proportional models evaluated the risk factors for AE occurrence and survival.

Results:

The male, older patients, previous N-acetylcysteine use, elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts, and microbiology infection were more common in the UIP group than the P-UIP group (χ² = 13.567, P < 0.001; z = −2.936, P = 0.003; χ² = 5.901, P = 0.015; t = 2.048, P = 0.043; χ² = 10.297, P = 0.036, respectively). The percentage of AE with UIP pattern in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) was significantly higher than P-UIP pattern (χ² = 40.011, P < 0.001). Smoking was the risk factor for AE within 6 months after IPF diagnosis in the UIP group. The cumulative proportion survival of 30-days was significantly higher in the UIP group compared with the P-UIP group (χ² = 5.489, P = 0.019) despite of the similar overall survival in the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated WBC count, partial pressure of oxygen in artery (PaO₂)/fractional concentration of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), and computed tomography (CT) score were the independent predictors for survival in the UIP group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.070, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.027–1.114, P = 0.001; HR: 0.992, 95% CI: 0.986–0.997, P = 0.002; and HR: 1.649, 95% CI: 1.253–2.171, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions:

AE occurrence of UIP patients in IIP was significantly more than P-UIP cases. The short-term survival was better in the UIP group despite of the similar overall survival in the two groups. WBC count, PaO₂/FiO₂, and CT score were the independent predictors for survival in UIP subjects.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: who to treat, how to treat

Purpose of Review

Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are the most frequent cause of death among patients with IPF. Here, we review the revised definition and diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF and discuss management strategies including mechanistically targeted investigational therapies for this complex syndrome.

Recent Findings

Novel therapies targeting various pathways including inflammation, autoimmunity and coagulation cascade involved in AE-IPF have recently been reported. Although most of these reports are small and uncontrolled, they have provided evidence to design larger randomized, controlled, multicenter studies to improve outcomes among patients with AE-IPF.

Summary

AE-IPF has a dismal prognosis and current treatment consists mainly of supportive care and symptom palliation. There is a lack of consensus on current therapies for AE-IPF, including corticosteroids, but current randomized control studies for newer therapeutic strategies may hold promise.

Acute exacerbations of fibrosing interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases: a population-based study

Background

Acute exacerbation (AE) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). AEs also occur in other forms of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD). The clinical features and prognosis of AE patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) associated-ILD has not been fully described.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 177 patients with either IPF or a characterized CTD-ILD admitted to Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital with an AE from January 2010 to December 2016.

Results

The study cohort included 107 subjects with AE-IPF and 70 cases with AE-CTD-ILD. Female gender, prior use of corticosteroid and immunosupressants, lower serum albumin, higher D-dimer level, TLC% pred, survival, and treatment with immunosupressants and caspofungin were more common in the CTD-ILD group (all p<0.05). The incidences of AE-CTD-ILD and AE-IPF were similar in our single center (p = 0.526). TLC% pred was the risk factor for AE after ILD diagnosis for 1 year in CTD patients (p = 0.018). Log-rank tests showed patients with CTD-ILD had a significantly lower mortality rate compared with IPF patients after AEs (p = 0.029). No significant difference in survival was noted among CTD subgroups (p = 0.353). The survival was negatively correlated with WBC count, LDH and CT score, (p = 0.006, p = 0.013 and p = 0.035, respectively), and positively correlated with PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (p<0.001) in the CTD-ILD group. WBC count and PO₂/FiO₂ ratio were the independent predictors for survival in AE-CTD-ILD after adjusting for other clinical variates in Cox regression Models (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics of patients with AE-CTD-ILD differed from those with AE-IPF, while AE incidences were similar between the two groups. Subjects with AE-CTD-fILD tended to have a better prognosis, and WBC count and PO₂/FiO₂ ratio were the independent survival predictors for these patients.

Imaging Review of the Lung Parenchymal Complications in Patients with IPF

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, pulmonary-limited, interstitial lung disease with a poor prognosis. This condition is characterized by different clinical scenarios, ranging from the most typical slow and progressive deterioration of symptoms to a rapid and abrupt decline of lung function. Rapid worsening of clinical course is due to superimposed complications and comorbidities that can develop in IPF patients, with a higher incidence rate compared to the general population. These conditions may require a different management of the patient and a therapy adjustment, and thus it is fundamental to recognize them. High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) is sensitive, but not specific, in detecting these complications, and can evaluate the presence of radiological variations when previous examinations are available; it recognizes ground glass opacities or consolidation that can be related to a large spectrum of comorbidities, such as infection, lung cancer, or acute exacerbation. To reach the final diagnosis, a multidisciplinary discussion is required, particularly when the clinical context is related to imaging findings.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in small cell lung cancer as a predictive factor for poor clinical outcome and risk of its exacerbation

Objective

Lung cancer frequently co-exists with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which can be subdivided into idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and IIP other than IPF (other IIP). Although chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with IIP may result in the exacerbation of IIP, these patients commonly receive chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of chemotherapy in SCLC patients with IIP.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 122 patients with SCLC who received chemotherapy. Patients with secondary interstitial lung disease (ILD) of known etiology were excluded. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: SCLC with and without IIP. The former group was subdivided into those with IPF and other IIP.

Results

Of the 47 (39.2%) SCLC patients with IIP, 20 had IPF and 27 had other IIP. The frequency of chemotherapy-induced ILD development or IIP exacerbation was higher in patients with IPF (40.0%) than in those with other IIP (3.7%) and non-IIP (1.4%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ILD development or IIP exacerbation was independently associated with IPF (P = 0.007). Time to treatment failure (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.001) were different among the groups., Cox proportional hazard model revealed that IPF was independently associated with time to treatment failure (P = 0,017) and overall survival (P = 0.006). Other IIP had no impact on time to treatment failure or overall survival. Development of ILD or exacerbation of IIP independently reduced time to treatment failure and overall survival.

Conclusions

Comorbid IPF can be an independent, negative prognostic indicator and at high risk of ILD development or IIP exacerbation in SCLC patients. Early diagnosis and intervention for chemotherapy-induced IIP exacerbation will be beneficial for SCLC patients with IPF, who need close monitoring for its onset.

Postoperative acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia in pulmonary and non-pulmonary surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia (AE-IP) is a serious complication of pulmonary surgery in patients with IP. However, little is known about AE-IP after non-pulmonary surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of AE-IP after non-pulmonary surgery and identify its risk factors.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one patients with IP who underwent pulmonary surgery and 291 who underwent non-pulmonary surgery were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

AE-IP developed in 5 (3.3%) of the 151 patients in the pulmonary surgery group and 4 (1.4%) of the 291 in the non-pulmonary surgery group; the difference was not statistically significant. A logistic regression model showed that serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was a predictor of AE-IP in the non-pulmonary surgery group (odds ratio 1.187, 95% confidence interval 1.073-1.344, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare the frequency of AE-IP after pulmonary surgery with that after non-pulmonary surgery performed under the same conditions. The results suggest that the frequency of AE-IP after non-pulmonary surgery is similar to that after pulmonary surgery. A high preoperative C-reactive protein level is a potential risk factor for AE-IP after non-pulmonary surgery.

Diagnosing complications and co-morbidities of fibrotic interstitial lung disease

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that include more than 200 entities, mostly associated with high mortality. In recent years, the progress regarding the understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases led to the approval of specific treatments. In ILDs, the presence of comorbidities has a significant impact on the quality of life and the survival of patients and, therefore, their diagnosis and treatment has a pivotal role in management and could improve overall outcome. Areas covered: We discuss key diagnostic issues with regard to the most frequent comorbidities in ILDs. Treatment options are also discussed as the decision to investigate more definitively in order to identify specific comorbidities (including lung cancer, pulmonary hypertension, GE reflux, and obstructive sleep apnoea) is critically dependent upon whether comorbidity-specific treatments are likely to be helpful in individual patients, judged on a case by case basis. Expert opinion: The extent to which clinicians proactively pursue the identification of comorbidities depends on realistic treatment goals in individual patients.

Chinese Herbal Medicines Compared with N-Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major global health problem. The prevalence of the disease appears to be increasing. There is no curative therapy for IPF except lung transplantation. Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) are showing promise for treatment of IPF. However, their effectiveness and safety are still unclear and deserve further investigation. The aim of this systematic review is to access the efficacy and safety of CHMs in treating IPF.

METHODS

The protocol of this review is registered at PROSPERO. We searched seven main databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on CHMs for IPF from their inception to June 4, 2018. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All trials included were analyzed according to the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook. Review Manager 5.3, R-3.5.2 software, and Grade pro GDT web solution were used for data synthesis and analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized clinical trials enrolling 733 patients were included. All trials included had clear outcome indicators. The methodological quality of included trials was generally "poor." Few trials reported methods of randomization. One trial on Xuefu-zhuyu capsule assessed rate of acute exacerbation and mortality after treatment for 72 weeks and found no statistically significant difference between two groups. This meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in QOL of IPF patients when CHMs was applied or combined with conventional medicine treatment. 6MWT was significantly improved in IPF patients after using CHMs or combined with conventional medicine treatment. CHMs treatment also had a certain improvement in TLC and DLCO, but the effect on FVC was not significant. Besides, CHMs failed to provide benefits in terms of PaO2. The reported adverse events were not obvious and severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Some CHMs seem effective and safe as alternative remedies for patients with IPF, suggesting that further study of CHMs in the treatment of IPF is warranted. Although this systematic review suggests that CHMs may have positive effect on quality of life, 6-minute walk test distance, and lung function (TLC, DLOC%) and seem to be relatively safe during the course of treatment, the results must be treated with great caution because of the methodological flaws of the included trials. Long-term and high-quality trials are needed in the future to provide clear evidence for the use of CHMs.

Prognostic factors for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a form of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with unknown disease aetiology. Acute exacerbation (AE) of IPF is an accelerated disease progression beyond its expected course. A 30-day mortality of AE of IPF is 40%. While death may occur, there is much variation in the clinical progression of this condition. Previous attempts have been made to investigate various possible prognostic factors for AE of IPF; however, they have yet to be confirmed. The aim of this systematic review is to clarify these prognostic factors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this review, AE of IPF is the condition of interest, which has been defined according to previously established diagnostic criteria. The primary outcomes of interest include short-term all-cause mortality and pulmonary-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes of interest include long-term mortality and hospital separation for the disease. Primary studies investigating prognostic factors for AE of IPF are eligible for inclusion in this review. All study types are permitted except case reports. Two reviewers will search electronic databases, such as Medline and EMBASE, from 2002 to the 1 April 2019 and extract data independently. Risk of bias in individual studies will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Meta-analysis will be conducted for univariate data if at least three studies report the effect of a specific prognostic factor using similar statistical methods. Multivariate results will be reported qualitatively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be considered with the aim of generalising findings to the clinical settings and drawing more robust conclusions. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method will be applied to evaluate the quality of evidence for each prognostic factor.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be required. Results will be reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018106172.

Therapeutic Role of Recombinant Human Soluble Thrombomodulin for Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is an acute respiratory worsening of unidentifiable cause that sometimes develops during the clinical course of IPF. Although the incidence of AE-IPF is not high, prognosis is poor. The pathogenesis of AE-IPF is not well understood; however, evidence suggests that coagulation abnormalities and inflammation are involved. Thrombomodulin is a transmembranous glycoprotein found on the cell surface of vascular endothelial cells. Thrombomodulin combines with thrombin, regulates coagulation/fibrinolysis balance, and has a pivotal role in suppressing excess inflammation through its inhibition of high-mobility group box 1 protein and the complement system. Thus, thrombomodulin might be effective in the treatment of AE-IPF, and we and other groups found that recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin improved survival in patients with AE-IPF. This review summarizes the existing evidence and considers the therapeutic role of thrombomodulin in AE-IPF.

Study protocol: exploring the efficacy of cyclophosphamide added to corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center phase III trial (EXAFIP)

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease, with a median survival of 2–3 years and variable natural history, characterized by gradual and progressive deterioration. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a severe complication, associated with poor survival and a mortality > 50%. To date, no treatment has proven effective in AE-IPF, with cyclophosphamide (CYC) the only therapy suggested to be effective on survival, primarily based on retrospective series. Considering the high fatality rates of AE-IPF, evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive agents in a randomized controlled trial proves crucial, as the results could significantly impact treatment and prognosis of AE-IPF.

Methods

The EXAFIP study is a French national multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Its primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on early survival in patients treated with corticosteroids. We hypothesize that adding CYC to high-dose corticosteroids would reduce 3-month mortality in AE-IPF patients. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality rate at Month 3; secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of CYC compared to placebo on overall survival at Months 6 and 12, respiratory disease-specific mortality, respiratory morbidity, and chest high-resolution computed tomography features, and to determine prognostic factors in AE-IPF and compare the safety of the two treatment arms during 6 months’ follow-up.

Discussion

There is an urgent unmet clinical need for effective AE-IPF treatment. The EXAFIP study is the first large Phase III placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CYC added to corticosteroids in treating AE-IPF. The results of this study could significantly impact treatment strategy and prognosis of AE-IPF.

Trial registration

Clinical trials, NCT02460588; Date: June 2, 2015, prospectively; Issue date: 14/11/2017; Protocole Amendment Number: 03.