1
|
Sun Y, Saulsberry L, Liao C, Hedeker D, Huo D. Geographic and Physician-Level Variation in the Use of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer in the U.S.: A Cross-Classified Multilevel Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101487. [PMID: 38725638 PMCID: PMC11078635 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to assess geographic and physician-level variation for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use for early-stage breast cancer patients in the United States. We further evaluated the association between HF-WBI use and demographic factors after accounting for these variations. Methods and Materials We performed a retrospective study of early-stage breast cancer patients using private employer-sponsored insurance claims from 2008 to 2017. Patients were clustered according to geographic level and by radiation oncologist. Bayesian cross-classified multilevel logistic models were used to examine the geographic heterogeneity and variation of radiation oncologists simultaneously. Intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and median odds ratios (MOR) were calculated to quantify the variation at different levels. We also used the cross-classified model to identify patient demographic factors associated with receiving HF-WBI. Results The study included 79,747 women (74.0%) who received conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI) and 27,999 women (26.0%) who underwent HF-WBI. HF-WBI adoption increased significantly across time (2008-2017). The variation in HF-WBI utilization was attributed mostly to physician-level variability (MOR = 2.59). The variability of HF-WBI utilization across core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) (MOR = 1.55) was found to be the strongest among all geographic classifications. After accounting for variability in both CBSAs and radiation oncologists, age, receiving chemotherapy, and several community-level factors, including distance from home to facility, community education level, and racial composition, were found to be associated with HF-WBI utilization. Conclusion This study demonstrated geographic and physician-level heterogeneity in the use of HF-WBI among early-stage breast cancer patients. HF-WBI utilization was also found to be associated with patient and community-level characteristics. Given observed physician-level variability, intervention through continuing medical education could help doctors to better understand the advantages of HF-WBI and promote the adoption of HF-WBI in the U.S. Influence of physician-level characteristics on HF-WBI utilization merits further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijia Sun
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Loren Saulsberry
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Chuanhong Liao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Donald Hedeker
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pfob A, Cai L, Schneeweiss A, Rauch G, Thomas B, Schaefgen B, Kuemmel S, Reimer T, Hahn M, Thill M, Blohmer JU, Hackmann J, Malter W, Bekes I, Friedrichs K, Wojcinski S, Joos S, Paepke S, Degenhardt T, Rom J, Rody A, van Mackelenbergh M, Banys-Paluchowski M, Große R, Reinisch M, Karsten MM, Sidey-Gibbons C, Wallwiener M, Golatta M, Heil J. Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment to Identify Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Disease for Extended Neoadjuvant Treatment: A New Concept. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:957-965. [PMID: 37947974 PMCID: PMC10761434 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14551-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) have a worse prognosis compared with those achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR). Earlier identification of these patients might allow timely, extended neoadjuvant treatment strategies. We explored the feasibility of a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) after NAST to identify patients with residual disease (ypT+ or ypN+) prior to surgery. METHODS We used data from a multicenter trial, collected at 21 study sites (NCT02948764). The trial included women with cT1-3, cN0/+ breast cancer undergoing routine post-neoadjuvant imaging (ultrasound, MRI, mammography) and VAB prior to surgery. We compared the findings of VAB and routine imaging with the histopathologic evaluation of the surgical specimen. RESULTS Of 398 patients, 34 patients with missing ypN status and 127 patients with luminal tumors were excluded. Among the remaining 237 patients, tumor cells in the VAB indicated a surgical non-pCR in all patients (73/73, positive predictive value [PPV] 100%), whereas PPV of routine imaging after NAST was 56.0% (75/134). Sensitivity of the VAB was 72.3% (73/101), and 74.3% for sensitivity of imaging (75/101). CONCLUSION Residual cancer found in a VAB specimen after NAST always corresponds to non-pCR. Residual cancer assumed on routine imaging after NAST corresponds to actual residual cancer in about half of patients. Response assessment by VAB is not safe for the exclusion of residual cancer. Response assessment by biopsies after NAST may allow studying the new concept of extended neoadjuvant treatment for patients with residual disease in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Pfob
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Lie Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Geraldine Rauch
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Thomas
- Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS), University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaefgen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology/Breast Unit, Agaplesion Markus Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - John Hackmann
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, Marienhospital, Witten, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Breast Cancer Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Inga Bekes
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Kay Friedrichs
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, Jerusalem Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wojcinski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte GmbH, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sylvie Joos
- Radiologische Allianz Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Paepke
- Frauenklinik, Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum des Klinikums rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joachim Rom
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, Klinikum Frankfurt-Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Regina Große
- Department of Gynecology/Breast Unit, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Maria Margarete Karsten
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chris Sidey-Gibbons
- MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Breast Unit, Klinikum Sankt Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Breast Unit, Klinikum Sankt Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pelzer F, Tröger W, Reif M, Schönberg S, Martin DD, Müller C, Utz-Billing I, Kühn T, Baumgartner S, Kiechle M, Paepke D. Fatigue and quality of life during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:124-134. [PMID: 37966690 PMCID: PMC10764505 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few measurements of fatigue and quality of life have been performed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer. This study evaluates fatigue and quality of life experienced by early breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their association with different clinical parameters. METHODS Fifty-four stage I-III patients' responses to the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) were analyzed by a linear covariance pattern model. Chemotherapy regimen, age, baseline fatigue level, body-mass-index and cancer stage were added to the model to estimate their impact on both outcomes. RESULTS All fatigue dimensions worsened in clinically relevant levels. Physical fatigue worsened the most, mental fatigue the least. For quality of life, physical and functional well-being worsened the most. Only emotional well-being improved during chemotherapy. Physical well-being worsened more during standard than during dose-dense chemotherapy, and more during anthracycline than during taxane cycles. Age, body-mass-index and cancer stage had no impact. The higher the fatigue levels at baseline, the less they worsened during chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Further actions to reduce fatigue and improve quality of life during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer are needed. Focus should be laid on the physical dimension. Future research should also investigate the impact of different chemotherapy sequences and densities on fatigue and quality of life. STUDY REGISTRATION The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register in May 2019 (DRKS00016761).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Pelzer
- Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
- Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
| | | | - Marcus Reif
- Gesellschaft Für Klinische Forschung e.V., Berlin, Germany
| | | | - David D Martin
- Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Tübingen University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Müller
- Brandenburgisches Brustzentum, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
- Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Germany
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephan Baumgartner
- Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Society for Cancer Research, Arlesheim, Switzerland
- Gesellschaft Für Klinische Forschung e.V., Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Paepke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Spital Zollikerberg, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu Y, Liu C, Sun M, He X, Wang W, Lu Q. Experiences of breast cancer survivors with exercise rehabilitation: qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:565. [PMID: 37682356 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08029-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to synthesize and evaluate the available qualitative literature on posttreatment participation in exercise rehabilitation among breast cancer survivors. METHODS This systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) meta-aggregation approach guided by ENTREQ, graded according to the ConQual approach, and evaluated using the JBI Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI). We searched qualitative or mixed methods studies related to the experiences of exercise rehabilitation among breast cancer survivors conducted until April 13, 2023, in nine English and Chinese databases. The selected studies were reviewed independently, and the data were collaboratively synthesized into core themes. RESULTS A total of 24 studies were included, and 88 findings resulted in five synthesis findings: (a) benefits of participating in exercise rehabilitation, (b) facilitators of participation in exercise rehabilitation, (c) obstacle factors for participating in exercise rehabilitation, (d) evaluation of the exercise program, and (e) recommendations. CONCLUSION Breast cancer survivors need exercise to recover physically and mentally and to transition from cancer treatment to a normal life. The factors affecting exercise participation in breast cancer survivors are complex. Breast cancer survivors require timely and continuous effective exercise intervention forms, including online, offline, instrumental, and emotional support from others, especially healthcare providers and family members. Moreover, multidisciplinary collaboration is required to develop more effective and convenient exercise interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanjuan Lu
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, #342 Yuhua Road, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Chunlei Liu
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, #342 Yuhua Road, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China.
| | - Mengying Sun
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, #342 Yuhua Road, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xiaoge He
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, #342 Yuhua Road, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Wei Wang
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, #342 Yuhua Road, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qian Lu
- Division of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, #38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuemmel S, Heil J, Bruzas S, Breit E, Schindowski D, Harrach H, Chiari O, Hellerhoff K, Bensmann E, Hanf V, Graßhoff ST, Deuschle P, Belke K, Polata S, Paepke S, Warm M, Meiler J, Schindlbeck C, Ruhwedel W, Beckmann U, Groh U, Dall P, Blohmer JU, Traut A, Reinisch M. Safety of Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:807-815. [PMID: 37285140 PMCID: PMC10248815 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Importance The increasing use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has led to substantial pathological complete response rates in patients with initially node-positive, early breast cancer, thereby questioning the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is feasible for axillary staging; however, data on oncological safety are scarce. Objective To assess 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent TAD alone or TAD with ALND. Design, Setting, and Participants The SenTa study is a prospective registry study and was conducted between January 2017 and October 2018. The registry includes 50 study centers in Germany. Patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer underwent clipping of the most suspicious lymph node (LN) before NST. After NST, the marked LNs and sentinel LNs were excised (TAD) followed by ALND according to the clinician's choice. Patients who did not undergo TAD were excluded. Data analysis was performed in April 2022 after 43 months of follow-up. Exposure TAD alone vs TAD with ALND. Main Outcomes and Measures Three-year clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results Of 199 female patients, the median (IQR) age was 52 (45-60) years. A total of 182 patients (91.5%) had 1 to 3 suspicious LNs; 119 received TAD alone and 80 received TAD with ALND. Unadjusted invasive disease-free survival was 82.4% (95% CI, 71.5-89.4) in the TAD with ALND group and 91.2% (95% CI, 84.2-95.1) in the TAD alone group (P = .04); axillary recurrence rates were 1.4% (95% CI, 0-54.8) and 1.8% (95% CI, 0-36.4), respectively (P = .56). Adjusted multivariate Cox regression indicated that TAD alone was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.34-2.05; P = .69) or death (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.31-3.70; P = .91). Similar results were obtained for 152 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer after NST (invasive disease-free survival: HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.27-5.87; P = .77; overall survival: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.15-3.83; P = .74). Conclusions and Relevance These results suggest that TAD alone in patients with mostly good clinical response to NST and at least 3 TAD LNs may confer survival outcomes and recurrence rates similar to TAD with ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherko Kuemmel
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology With Breast Center Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simona Bruzas
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Breit
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Hakima Harrach
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Ouafaa Chiari
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Hanf
- Breast Unit Klinikum Fürth, Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Fürth, Germany
| | | | - Petra Deuschle
- Breast Unit, Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift Neustadt/Weinstraße, Neustadt, Germany
| | - Kerstin Belke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Robert-Koch-Krankenhaus Apolda, Apolda, Germany
| | - Silke Polata
- Klinik für Innere Medizin/Onkologisches Zentrum, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Paepke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Brustzentrum Holweide, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Wencke Ruhwedel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany
| | - Ulrike Beckmann
- Brustzentrum der Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg, Georgsmarienhütte, Germany
| | - Ulrich Groh
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Senologie, Hochwaldkrankenhaus Bad Nauheim, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Brustzentrum und Gynäkologisches Krebszentrum, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology With Breast Center Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology With Breast Center Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muradali D, Fletcher GG, Cordeiro E, Fienberg S, George R, Kulkarni S, Seely JM, Shaheen R, Eisen A. Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6255-6270. [PMID: 37504323 PMCID: PMC10378361 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography and/or ultrasound is inconsistent. METHODS After conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing preoperative breast MRI versus no MRI, we reconvened to prepare a clinical practice guideline on this topic. RESULTS Based on the evidence that MRI improved recurrence, decreased the rates of reoperations (re-excisions or conversion mastectomy), and increased detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer, we recommend that preoperative breast MRI should be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients diagnosed with breast cancer for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. Based on stronger evidence, preoperative breast MRI is recommended in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. For both recommendations, the decision to proceed with MRI would be conditional on shared decision-making between care providers and the patient, taking into account the benefits and risks of MRI as well as patient preferences. Based on the opinion of the Working Group, preoperative breast MRI is also recommended in the following more specific situations: (a) to aid in surgical planning of breast conserving surgery in patients with suspected or known multicentric or multifocal disease; (b) to identify additional lesions in patients with dense breasts; (c) to determine the presence of pectoralis major muscle/chest wall invasion in patients with posteriorly located tumours or when invasion of the pectoralis major muscle or chest wall is suspected; (d) to aid in surgical planning for skin/nipple-sparing mastectomies, autologous reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, and breast conserving surgery with suspected nipple/areolar involvement; and (e) in patients with familial/hereditary breast cancer but who have not had recent breast MRI as part of screening or diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Muradali
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Glenn G Fletcher
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Erin Cordeiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | | | - Ralph George
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Supriya Kulkarni
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Jean M Seely
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Rola Shaheen
- Department of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Diagnostic Imaging, Peterborough Regional Health Centre, Peterborough, ON K9J 7C6, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Somi MH, Dolatkhah R, Asvadi Kermani I, Sepahi S, Youzbashi N, Nezamdoust M, Abedi-Ardekani B. Providing Suggested Rules for Multiple Primary Cancer Recording, Coding and Registering in Population-based Cancer Registry. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2023; 24:1905-1916. [PMID: 37378918 PMCID: PMC10505895 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2023.24.6.1905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple primary cancers (MPC) present many coding difficulties, while a distinction should be made between new cases and those with metastasis and/or extension and recurrence of the primary ones. We aimed to reflect on the experiences and results of data quality control of the East Azerbaijan/Iran Population-Based Cancer Registry and present our suggested rules for reporting, recording and registering multiple primary cancer. METHODS Comparability, validity, timeliness, and completeness of data assessment were performed. As a result, we created a consulting team including expert oncologists, pathologists, and gastroenterologists to discuss for multiple primary tumors recording, identifying, coding and registering. RESULTS In case of confirmed Blood malignancies with definite BMB results, Brain and/or Bone involvements are always metastatic. In most cases of multiple cancers with the same morphological types, the earlier should be registered as primary tumor. In most of the synchronous multiple cancers, familial cancer syndromes should be considered and rules out. In case of two tumors diagnosed at the same time in colon and rectum, primary site should be detected by T stage or tumor sizes. In case of multiple tumors in Recto-sigmoid, Colon , and Rectum the earlier history of tumor should be considered as primary site. This rule was applied for Female Genital tumors, as earlier site is always the Primary cancer and other tumors should be registered as metastatic sites. Conclusion: Given the complexity of coding MPCs, we suggested some additional rules for identifying, recording, coding, and registering multiple primary cancers in the context of the EA-PBCR program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hossein Somi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Roya Dolatkhah
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Iraj Asvadi Kermani
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Sepideh Sepahi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Narges Youzbashi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Marzieh Nezamdoust
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuba MG, Brogi E. Update on lobular lesions of the breast. Histopathology 2023; 82:36-52. [PMID: 36482279 PMCID: PMC9752180 DOI: 10.1111/his.14829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The current histological classification of in-situ and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) includes different morphological variants, some of which have been recently described. In this review, we will focus upon: (i) the diagnostic criteria of non-invasive lobular neoplasia and treatment implications across different countries; (ii) utility and limitations of immunohistochemistry; (iii) recently described variants of ILC; and (iv) the significance of lobular differentiation in invasive carcinoma for clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gabriela Kuba
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Macdonald ER, Clifford BK, Simar D, Ward RE. Ballet after breast cancer: investigating the feasibility and acceptability of a novel 16-week classical ballet intervention for breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9909-9919. [PMID: 36301400 PMCID: PMC9607692 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07420-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The “Ballet after breast cancer” study sought to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a 16-week classical ballet intervention for breast cancer survivors, delivered face-to-face and/or online. Methods Breast cancer survivors were recruited to take part in 2 × 1-h ballet classes per week for 16 weeks. Primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability were assessed according to rates of enrolment and attendance and participant feedback via questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QOL), upper-body disability, shoulder range of motion (ROM), muscular strength, aerobic capacity, and physical activity levels. Associations between rate of attendance and changes in secondary measures were explored. Results Thirty-one participants (62% of eligible individuals) enrolled in the program. Twenty-nine women commenced the intervention [53.3 ± 10.8 years (Mean ± SD)], attending 77.6% [67.6, 87.5] (Mean [95% CI]) of sessions. Based on these rates of enrolment and attendance, and participant feedback, the program was deemed feasible and acceptable to participants. Significant improvements in shoulder ROM and reductions in sedentary behaviour were achieved. Participants also reported improvements in physical capacity and psychological, social, and cognitive wellbeing. Conclusions The “Ballet after breast cancer” program, delivered face-to-face and/or online, was feasible and acceptable to breast cancer survivors. Improvements in shoulder ROM achieved doing ballet were pertinent given the adverse effects of upper-body morbidity on breast cancer survivor QOL. Improvements in physical activity behaviour and perceived benefits to wellbeing also support the use of ballet to mitigate QOL impairment after treatment. Implications for cancer survivors The physical demands and the fun, creative, and social characteristics of ballet promote improvement across multiple domains of health and wellbeing. Ballet shows promise as an activity to improve QOL and increase long-term engagement in health-promoting physical activity after breast cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07420-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza R Macdonald
- Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Health Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Briana K Clifford
- Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Health Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland (UQ), Brisbane, Australia
| | - David Simar
- Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Health Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachel E Ward
- Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Health Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Swain SM, Macharia H, Cortes J, Dang C, Gianni L, Hurvitz SA, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Slamon D, Valagussa P, du Toit Y, Heinzmann D, Knott A, Song C, Cortazar P. Event-Free Survival in Patients with Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with a Pathological Complete Response after HER2-Targeted Therapy: A Pooled Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205051. [PMID: 36291835 PMCID: PMC9599862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The current standard of care for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who have a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is continuation of HER2-targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. However, it is not clear how long-term outcomes differ by the HER2-targeted regimen received in each setting. To investigate this question, we pooled patient-level data (n = 1763) from neoadjuvant studies of trastuzumab and pertuzumab to evaluate outcomes with respect to single versus dual HER2 targeting in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Patients treated with dual HER2-targeted therapy in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings had the highest 4-year event-free survival rates, suggesting that this treatment approach may provide the most benefit for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Abstract The standard-of-care for patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is continuation of HER2-targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. Our objective was to evaluate risk of recurrence or death in these patients and determine if outcomes differed by the HER2-targeted regimen received in each setting. We analyzed patient-level data from five randomized trials evaluating trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or both as part of systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer, and assessed event-free survival (EFS) in 1763 patients. Patients with pCR had decreased risk of an EFS event versus those with residual disease (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27–0.46). Regardless of pCR status, after adjusting for baseline factors, reduction in EFS event risk was greater in patients administered pertuzumab/trastuzumab in both settings versus those administered only trastuzumab in both settings (HR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.26–0.49), or pertuzumab/trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting and only trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47–0.96). Patients with pCR had longer EFS than those with residual disease. Patients treated with pertuzumab/trastuzumab in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings had the lowest risk of breast cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra M. Swain
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20057, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-202-687-8487
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- Quirónsalud Group, IOB Institute of Oncology, Madrid and Barcelona, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08023 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chau Dang
- Department of Medicine, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10013, USA
| | - Luca Gianni
- Fondazione Michelangelo, 20121 Milano, Italy
| | - Sara A. Hurvitz
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | | - Dennis Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adam Knott
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chunyan Song
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hartmann S, Kühn T, Hauptmann M, Stickeler E, Thill M, Lux MP, Fröhlich S, Ruf F, Loibl S, Blohmer JU, Kolberg HC, Thiemann E, Weigel M, Solbach C, Kaltenecker G, Paluchowski P, Schrauder MG, Paepke S, Watermann D, Hahn M, Hufnagel M, Lefarth J, Untch M, Banys-Paluchowski M. Axillary Staging after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Initially Node-Positive Breast Carcinoma in Germany: Initial Data from the AXSANA study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:932-940. [PMID: 36110892 PMCID: PMC9470287 DOI: 10.1055/a-1889-7883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To date, the optimal axillary staging procedure for initially node-positive breast carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been unclear. The aim of the AXSANA study is to prospectively compare different surgical staging techniques with respect to the oncological outcome and quality of life for the patients. Little is known about current clinical practice in Germany. Material and Methods In this paper we analyzed data from patients enrolled in the AXSANA study at German study sites from June 2020 to March 2022. Results During the period under investigation, 1135 patients were recruited at 143 study sites. More than three suspicious lymph nodes were initially found in 22% of patients. The target lymph node (TLN) was marked in 64% of cases. This was done with clips/coils in 83% of patients, with magnetic seeds or carbon suspension in 8% each, and with a radar marker in 1% of patients. After NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were each planned in 48% of patients, and sentinel lymph node biopsy alone (SLNB) in 2%. Clinically, the nodal status after NACT was found to be unremarkable in 65% of cases. Histological lymph node status was correctly assessed by palpation in 65% of patients and by sonography in 69% of patients. Conclusion At the German AXSANA study sites, TAD and ALND are currently used as the most common surgical staging procedures after NACT in initially node-positive breast cancer patients. The TLN is marked with various markers prior to NACT. Given the inadequate accuracy of clinical assessment of axillary lymph node status after NACT, it should be questioned whether axillary dissection after NACT should be performed based on clinical assessment of nodal status alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Hartmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Prof. Dr. med. Thorsten Kühn Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und GeburtshilfeKlinikum
EsslingenHirschlandstraße 9773730 Esslingen
a. N.Germany
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGAPLESION MARKUS KRANKENHAUS, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Sarah Fröhlich
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany,Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Weigel
- Brustzentrum Schweinfurt-Mainfranken, Leopoldina-Krankenhaus, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universität Frankfurt, Brustzentrum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Stefan Paepke
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Dirk Watermann
- Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus, Brustzentrum Südbaden, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Jutta Lefarth
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Welslau M, Müller V, Lüftner D, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Fehm TN, Belleville E, Bader S, Seitz K, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Schneeweiss A, Harbeck N, Würstlein R, Hartkopf AD, Wöckel A, Seliger B, Massa C, Kolberg HC. Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 1 - Early Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:580-589. [PMID: 35903719 PMCID: PMC9315400 DOI: 10.1055/a-1811-6106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence relating to the treatment of breast cancer patients with early-stage disease has increased significantly in the past year. Abemaciclib, olaparib, and pembrolizumab are new drugs with good efficacy in the relevant patient groups. However, some questions remain unanswered. In particular, it remains unclear which premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should be spared unnecessary treatment. The question of the degree to which chemotherapy exerts a direct cytotoxic effect on the tumor or reduces ovarian function through chemotherapy could be of key importance. This group of patients could potentially be spared chemotherapy. New, previously experimental biomarker analysis methods, such as spatial analysis of gene expression (spatial transcriptomics) are gradually finding their way into large randomized phase III trials, such as the NeoTRIP trial. This in turn leads to a better understanding of the predictive factors of new therapies, for example immunotherapy. This review summarizes the scientific innovations from recent congresses such as the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2021 but also from recent publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Simon Bader
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Katharina Seitz
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Seliger
- Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Chiara Massa
- Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanaat Z, Vaez Gharamaleki J, Vaez Gharamaleki Y, Dolatkhah R. The analysis of breast cancer survival in East Azerbaijan province of Iran; prognostic impact of chemotherapy and hormone therapy protocols. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 32:100578. [PMID: 35609449 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global cancer pattern indicated that there were about 2.3 million newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in 2020 worldwide, and was the most common cancer incident in the world. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic impact of various treatment modalities and cancer-specific overall and disease-free survival rates. METHODS One, 5-, 10-, and 15 -years survival rates were calculated; furthermore, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates were obtained using Kaplan Meier method. To assess the effects of different treatment methods and all clinico-pathological variables with OS and DFS, cox-regression method was used to achieve adjusted hazard ratios of mortality and recurrence rates. RESULTS During the study period, 504 primary breast cancer cases were evaluated, with mean age of 49.69(± 10.68) years. The one, 5-, 10-, and 15- year survival rates were 98.21%, 87.39%, 68.17% and, 60.60%, respectively. Tamoxifen + GnRh Agonist and Tamoxifen protocols decreased the hazard of relapse 46% and 84%, respectively. The best one-year OS was obtained for patients treated with Tamoxifen with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for about 100% overall survival rate. The breast cancer mortality rate was lower than relapse rate in the first and 5thyears of disease, but 10- and 15- year mortality were higher than 10- and 15 -year relapse rates. CONCLUSION Our results revealed better overall survival and disease- free survival among primary breast cancer patients in East Azerbaijan; consequently, this underscores establishing and using better chemotherapy and hormone therapy protocols and sufficient follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohreh Sanaat
- Medical Hematologist and Oncologist, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Jalil Vaez Gharamaleki
- Medical Hematology and Oncology, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Yosra Vaez Gharamaleki
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Roya Dolatkhah
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lux MP, Lewis K, Rider A, Niyazov A. Real-world multi-country study of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among adult women with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1089-1101. [PMID: 35098723 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We assessed real-world patient demographics and BRCA1/2 mutation testing rates among adult women with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: Oncologists across the USA and in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK provided medical chart data in 2015 and 2017. Results: Overall, 28% of patients received BRCA1/2 mutation testing. Untested patients were more likely to be aged ≥45 years, have hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative ABC and have no known family history of breast/ovarian cancer. BRCA1/2 mutation testing rates were significantly lower in the European countries, women aged ≥45 years, women without a known family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative ABC versus advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Conclusion: BRCA1/2 mutation testing rates were low, and disparities were observed in patient characteristics among BRCA1/2 mutation-tested versus untested patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Frauen- und Kinderklinik St. Louise, St. Vincenz-Kliniken, Husener Strasse 81, Paderborn 33098, Germany
| | - Katie Lewis
- Oncology Franchise, Adelphi Real World, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK
| | - Alex Rider
- Oncology Franchise, Adelphi Real World, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Djahansouzi S, Hanstein B, Rein D, Clees M, Rath W. The rate of estrogen receptor-conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant Tamoxifen administration. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 5:e1431. [PMID: 34086424 PMCID: PMC8789621 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone Receptor (HR)-discordance between primary breast cancer and metastasis is a known biological phenomenon. Discordance studies usually comprise a heterogeneous group of HR-positive and negative patients and allow for the comparison of changes in HR-status from the primary to the recurrent disease. However, in a clinical setting, the rate of estrogen receptor-conversion following endocrine therapy with agents such as Tamoxifen (TAM) in estrogen receptor-positive cancers is of primary interest as opposed to total receptor discordance. AIM To investigate the rate of estrogen receptor-conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant TAM administration and to compare the results with the meta-analysis data of HR-discordance studies. METHODS AND RESULTS A retrospective double-center review of biomarkers in 67 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients who underwent TAM treatment in the adjuvant setting. The estrogen and progesterone receptor-status were compared at the time of diagnosis and following relapse and the Disease-free Survival, mean duration of TAM treatment as well as the operative, radiation, and cytotoxic therapies registered before TAM treatment, were recorded. Initially, all patients were estrogen receptor-positive. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 52.8 ± 12.4 years. After recurrence, only 47 patients (70.1%) were still estrogen receptor-positive with a highly significant loss of estrogen receptor-expression in 29.9% of cases. The mean duration of TAM treatment was 40.7 ± 19.9 months. 45 patients (i.e., 67.2%) progressed during the TAM treatment and the remaining 22 patients (32.8%) developed relapse after the TAM treatment had finished. Initially, there were 82.1% progesterone receptor-positive and 17.9% progesterone receptor-negative, but after relapse the progesterone receptor-positive cases diminished significantly to 53.7%, showing a progesterone receptor-loss of 28.4%. CONCLUSION The rate of estrogen receptor-loss associated with tumor progression following TAM treatment is approximately 30%, which is of clinical relevance in order to evaluate further endocrine efficacy in these patients. This rate of receptor conversion is roughly 6-13% higher compared to the recently published meta-analysis data of discordance studies. This discrepancy could possibly be due to anti-hormonal therapy with TAM accentuating receptor conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirus Djahansouzi
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyRue Emile MayrischEsch‐sur‐AlzetteLuxembourg
| | - Bettina Hanstein
- Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversity Hospital CologneKölnGermany
| | - Daniel Rein
- Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversity Hospital DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Michel Clees
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyRue Emile MayrischEsch‐sur‐AlzetteLuxembourg
| | - Werner Rath
- Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyUniversity Hospital AachenAachenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11121379. [PMID: 34945851 PMCID: PMC8704519 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11121379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of US in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients with and without pathogenic mutations. Methods: The retrospective study included consecutive high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a multigene testing panel for hereditary cancers, pre-operative axillary US and breast/axillary surgery. The group was divided into patients with pathogenic mutations (PM group) and patients without PM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism by applying Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a reference p-value < 0.05 and a CI of 95%. Results: Out of 190 patients with BC, 96 (51%) were negative and 94 (49%) were positive for PM as follows: 28 (25.5%) BRCA1, 16 (17%) BRCA2, 15 (16%) CHECK2, 14 (14%) RAD Group, 7 (7%) PALB, 6 (6%) NBN, 3 (3%) TP53 and ATM and 2 (2%) BARD1. US was positive in 88 of the patients, 36 with PM and 52 without PM. US and surgery (≥N1 stage) were both positive in 31 (62%) of PM patients and 44 (88%) of patients without genetic changes. There were 19 (61%) false negative US examinations in the PM group and 6 (13%) in the group without genetic changes, respectively. If the US is positive, there is a 2.6 times greater risk of positive nodes in PM patients (p-value < 0.000, 95% CI = 4.2–37.9), and a 6.2 times greater risk of positive nodes in patients without genetic changes (p-value < 0.000, 95%CI = 8.4–37.4). In the PM group, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 62, with PPV = 86 and NPV = 67. In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, there is 2.5 greater times risk of nodal disease if the US is positive (p-value = 0.001, 95%CI = 2.6–76). In patients without PM, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 88, PPV = 84 and NPV = 86. Conclusion: US is more sensitive in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients without PM compared to PM patients. Furthermore, there are more false negative US examinations in PM patients, compared to surgery patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lepomäki M, Karhunen-Enckell U, Tuominen J, Kronqvist P, Oksala N, Murtola T, Roine A. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:577-588. [PMID: 34779520 PMCID: PMC9298886 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age. Methods A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin. Results The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50–64), 68% (65–79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (≤1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1–2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001). Conclusions Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiju Lepomäki
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ulla Karhunen-Enckell
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jalmari Tuominen
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Niku Oksala
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Vascular surgery, Vascular Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Teemu Murtola
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Urology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Antti Roine
- Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Steinhof-Radwańska K, Grażyńska A, Lorek A, Gisterek I, Barczyk-Gutowska A, Bobola A, Okas K, Lelek Z, Morawska I, Potoczny J, Niemiec P, Szyluk K. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Assessment of Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3448-3462. [PMID: 34590596 PMCID: PMC8482113 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Evaluating the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is key to planning further therapy of breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-energy and subtraction contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images in the detection of complete response (CR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 63 female patients were qualified for our retrospective analysis. Low-energy and subtraction CESM images just before the beginning of NAC and as a follow-up examination 2 weeks before the end of chemotherapy were compared with one another and assessed for compliance with the postoperative histopathological examination (HP). The response to preoperative chemotherapy was evaluated based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Results: Low-energy images tend to overestimate residual lesions (6.28 mm) and subtraction images tend to underestimate them (2.75 mm). The sensitivity of low-energy images in forecasting CR amounted to 33.33%, while the specificity was 92.86%. In the case of subtraction CESM, the sensitivity amounted to 85.71% and the specificity to 71.42%. Conclusions: CESM is characterized by high sensitivity in the assessment of CR after NAC. The use of only morphological assessment is insufficient. CESM correlates well with the size of residual lesions on histopathological examination but tends to underestimate the dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-32-358-1350
| | - Anna Grażyńska
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Andrzej Lorek
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Iwona Gisterek
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (I.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Anna Barczyk-Gutowska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Agnieszka Bobola
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (I.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Karolina Okas
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Zuzanna Lelek
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Irmina Morawska
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Jakub Potoczny
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Paweł Niemiec
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Karol Szyluk
- 1st Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Bytomska 62, 41-940 Piekary Śląskie, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ng JY, Sahak H, Lau SKC. A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines Providing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Recommendations. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:112. [PMID: 34342715 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Up to 80% of patients with breast cancer are reported to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Despite this high prevalence, many healthcare providers have little knowledge and education surrounding this topic and may be inadequately prepared to discuss such therapies with their patients. Given this knowledge gap, the purpose of this study was to systematically identify the quantity and assess the quality of CAM recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Thirty-four CPGs were deemed eligible, 5 of which mentioned CAM, and 4 of which made CAM recommendations. Eligible CPGs containing CAM recommendations were assessed with the AGREE II instrument. Scaled domain percentages from highest to lowest were (% overall, % CAM) as follows: scope and purpose (100.0%, 100.0%), editorial independence (100.0%, 100.0%), clarity of presentation (97.2%, 80.6%), rigour of development (80.2%, 80.2%), stakeholder involvement (88.9%, 77.8%), and applicability (58.3%, 58.3%). CPGs with favourable scores may provide practitioners with guidance on safe and effective use of CAM therapies. A need exists to improve the quality of CAM recommendations in CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Y Ng
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Hosna Sahak
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Stephanie Ka Ching Lau
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Learning and Discovery, McMaster University, Room 2112, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lyseng-Williamson KA. Trastuzumab Emtansine: A Review of Its Adjuvant Use in Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer. Drugs 2021; 80:1723-1730. [PMID: 32996066 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01408-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla®), an antibody-drug conjugate of trastuzumab (Herceptin®) connected by a thioether linker to the microtubule inhibitor DM1 (a cytotoxic derivative of maytansine), provides direct intracellular delivery of the potent cytotoxin DM1 to HER2-overexpressing cells, while retaining trastuzumab activity. Its approval in metastatic/advanced breast cancer (BC) has been extended to include single-agent adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early BC in patients with residual invasive disease in the breast and/or lymph nodes after neoadjuvant taxane-based and HER2-targeted treatment. In the pivotal KATHERINE trial in this population, significantly more trastuzumab emtansine than trastuzumab recipients were estimated to be free of invasive disease recurrence at 3 years, with a 50% reduction in the risk of invasive disease recurrence or death. The tolerability of trastuzumab emtansine in early BC was consistent with its known safety profile; as expected, adverse events were more common with trastuzumab emtansine than with trastuzumab. Recently updated international and national treatment guidelines recommend trastuzumab emtansine as a preferred option in this high-risk BC population.
Collapse
|
21
|
Breast and axillary surgery in malignant breast disease: a review focused on literature of 2018 and 2019. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 32:91-99. [PMID: 31833973 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There have been fundamental changes in the surgical approach to breast cancer management over the last decades. The primary objective of achieving locoregional control, however, remains unchanged. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to strategies optimizing systemic treatment and radiotherapy, current discussions focus on improving the surgical approach to breast cancer. Especially in view of the increasingly pivotal role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy NAT/NAC (NACT), gauging the extent of tissue removal in the breast and the width of resection margins in breast-conserving surgery is highly important, as is the extent of axillary surgery. Although sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients always underwent axillary lymph node dissection in the past, this paradigm has been challenged in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has emerged as a new staging option in biopsy-proven node-positive patients who convert to clinical node negativity (cN0) after NACT. TAD combines the removal of the SLN and of the target lymph node marked prior to NACT. The accuracy of axillary staging both before and after NACT plays an important role for prognostication and multidisciplinary treatment plans, while its extent has significant effects on patients' arm morbidity and quality of life. SUMMARY The current review focuses on recent evidence regarding surgical management of the breast and axilla in patients with primary breast cancer based on a PubMed and EMBASE literature search for publication years 2018 and 2019.
Collapse
|
22
|
Teerenhovi H, Tuominen S, Nurmi-Rantala S, Hemmilä P, Ellonen A. Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Biological Subgroups of Breast Cancer in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1372-e1380. [PMID: 33955109 PMCID: PMC8342560 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparing breast cancer survival trends globally, Finland is among the top three countries in Europe. However, outcome data on breast cancer subgroups in the Finnish population are limited. This retrospective, registry-based study aimed to assess patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of different breast cancer subgroups in early (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a real-life clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study consisted of 6,977 adult, female patients with breast cancer diagnosed in Southwest Finland during 2005-2018. Patients were divided into four mutually exclusive groups: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), triple negative, HER2-/hormone receptor positive (HR+), and HER2 and/or HR status unknown, and further into patients with EBC and MBC. Overall survival (OS) was assessed as a clinical outcome, as well as the following real-world (rw) clinical outcomes: disease-free survival (rwDFS), progression-free survival (rwPFS), and distant recurrence-free interval (rwDRFI). RESULTS Within EBC, 5-year survival was the highest (88%) in HER2-/HR+, followed by 85% in HER2+, and 75% in triple negative. The rwDFS varied significantly in EBC (5-year rwDFS HER2 -/HR+, HER2+, triple negative: 87%, 80%, 71% respectively). In MBC, median survival was 2 years for both HER2-/HR+ and HER2+ and markedly shorter for triple negative (0.8 years). Independent predictors of mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1), other subgroups than HER2-/HR+ (HR, 1.2-1.9), metastatic disease (HR, 9.8), and other malignancies (HR, 2.7). CONCLUSION This registry-based study demonstrates significant differences in breast cancer outcomes on the subgroup level, as well as poorer outcomes compared with clinical trials, giving complementary insight on clinical characteristics in an unselected patient population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This retrospective, registry-based study assessed the clinical outcomes of different breast cancer subgroups in 6,977 adult, female patients with breast cancer diagnosed in Southwest Finland during 2005-2018. Results demonstrated significant variation in the survival between subgroups in both early breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer, as well as differences between unselected patients representing the standard of care and randomized clinical trials. Although, according to the global comparison of survival trends, the net survival of patients with breast cancer in Finland is generally high, there is great variation between subgroups. These real-life breast cancer data provide tools to further evaluate medical need in different breast cancer subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Antti Ellonen
- Turku University and Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Catanzariti F, Avendano D, Cicero G, Garza-Montemayor M, Sofia C, Venanzi Rullo E, Ascenti G, Pinker-Domenig K, Marino MA. High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:63. [PMID: 34037876 PMCID: PMC8155169 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01005-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast lesions with uncertain malignant behavior, also known as high-risk or B3 lesions, are composed of a variety of pathologies with differing risks of associated malignancy. While open excision was previously preferred to manage all high-risk lesions, tailored management has been increasingly favored to reduce overtreatment and spare patients from unnecessary anxiety or high healthcare costs associated with surgical excision. The purpose of this work is to provide the reader with an accurate overview focused on the main high-risk lesions of the breast: atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (atypical ductal hyperplasia), lobular neoplasia (including the subcategories lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia), flat epithelial atypia, radial scar and papillary lesions, and phyllodes tumor. Beyond merely presenting the radiological aspects of these lesions and the recent literature, information about their potential upgrade rates is discussed in order to provide a useful guide for appropriate clinical management while avoiding the risks of unnecessary surgical intervention (overtreatment).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Catanzariti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Daly Avendano
- Department of Breast Imaging, Breast Cancer Center TecSalud, ITESM Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Giuseppe Cicero
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Carmelo Sofia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ascenti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Katja Pinker-Domenig
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zheng C, Yu ZG. Clinical practice guidelines for pre-operative evaluation of breast cancer: Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) practice guidelines 2021. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 134:2147-2149. [PMID: 34039864 PMCID: PMC8478365 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Zheng
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stickeler E, Aktas B, Behrens A, Belleville E, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Hartkopf AD, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Müller V, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Schulmeyer CE, Tesch H, Thomssen C, Uleer C, Untch M, Welslau M, Wöckel A, Wurmthaler LA, Würstlein R, Thill M. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 1 - Prevention and Early Stages. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:526-538. [PMID: 34035547 PMCID: PMC8137274 DOI: 10.1055/a-1464-0953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarises not only the latest evidence on prevention, but also the current research on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. Recent years have seen a growing body of evidence on the risk of high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. A large international consortium has now been able to further refine the answer to the question of the significance of the so-called panel genes. Moreover, the data on treatment selection regarding endocrine efficacy and the decision for or against chemotherapy have also been advanced markedly. There is also new data on adjuvant CDK4/6 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6) inhibitors, which are standard in first-line treatment in patients with metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. For other therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have successfully improved the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant treatment settings for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there is a growing understanding of the quality of life and side effects. This is especially important in situations where patients could possibly be cured without such a regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annika Behrens
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Christoph Uleer
- Praxisgemeinschaft Frauenärzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lena A. Wurmthaler
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ditsch N, Stickeler E, Behrens A, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Hartkopf AD, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Müller V, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Schulmeyer CE, Tesch H, Thomssen C, Uleer C, Untch M, Welslau M, Wöckel A, Wurmthaler LA, Würstlein R, Thill M, Aktas B. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 2 - Advanced Stages, Long-Term Consequences and Biomarkers. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:539-548. [PMID: 34035548 PMCID: PMC8137275 DOI: 10.1055/a-1464-1221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarises and discusses significant aspects of recently published studies on patient treatment in advanced breast cancer and on biomarkers in breast cancer. In recent years, a large number of drugs for all molecular subtypes have been developed up to phase III trials. With regard to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastasised breast cancer, the recent discussion has centred on the best candidate for combined chemotherapy. The oral taxanes could become a new type of oral chemotherapies. There is a growing body of data on biomarkers for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, which could also signify further development for other molecular subtypes. New substances have been developed for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer that still result in good remission even after massive prior treatment and/or cerebral metastasis. Similarly, knowledge is growing about targeted therapies with antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) against Trop-2, which could bolster our therapeutic armoury in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In addition, the clinical focus is on understanding how to maintain fertility after breast cancer treatment. Here, pooled analyses provide new insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Annika Behrens
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Christoph Uleer
- Praxisgemeinschaft Frauenärzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lena A. Wurmthaler
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich Ludwig Maximilians University, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Do hospital type or caseload make a difference in chemotherapy treatment patterns for early breast cancer? Results from 104 German institutions, 2008-2017. Breast 2021; 58:63-71. [PMID: 33933924 PMCID: PMC8102997 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past decade, chemotherapy has been used more selectively in early breast cancer (EBC) due to better risk stratification. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has evolved to the primary treatment option. The type and size of hospitals is known to have a substantial influence on the kinds of treatment they provide, and therefore on patient outcomes (e.g. rates for pathological complete response, pCR), but it is not yet known how this has affected delivery of chemotherapy for EBC in Germany. METHODS This study analyzed chemotherapy use and pCR rates after NACT for EBC patients treated at 104 German institutions 2008-2017. Institutions were separated into associated hospital type (university hospital; teaching hospital; community hospital) and annual caseload (≤100; 101-250; >250 cases/year). RESULTS Overall, 124,084 patients were included, of whom 11.6% were treated at university hospitals, 63.1% at teaching hospitals, and 25.3% at community hospitals. In total, 46,274 (37.3%) received chemotherapy, of whom 44,765 had information available about systemic treatment and surgery. From 2008 to 2017, chemotherapy use declined from 48.3% to 36.4% for university hospitals, from 40.7% to 30.3% for teaching hospitals, and from 42.4% to 33.7% for community hospitals. Furthermore, the proportion of NACT increased the most in university hospitals (from 32.0% to 68.1%); whereas, the rate of pCR (defined as ypT0 ypN0) increased irrespective of institutional type. Analyses regarding annual caseload did not show any differences. CONCLUSIONS The results from this large, nationwide cohort reflect a more selective use of chemotherapy in Germany, irrespective of institutional type or case load.
Collapse
|
28
|
Myllys M. Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer. EXCLI JOURNAL 2021; 20:625-627. [PMID: 33883987 PMCID: PMC8056062 DOI: 10.17179/excli2021-3607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maiju Myllys
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bešlija S, Gojković Z, Cerić T, Abazović AM, Marijanović I, Vranić S, Mustedanagić–Mujanović J, Skenderi F, Rakita I, Guzijan A, Koprić D, Humačkić A, Trokić D, Alidžanović J, Efendić A, Šišić I, Drljević H, Bešlagić V, Babić B, Pašić A, Ramić A, Mikić D, Guzin Z, Karan D, Buhovac T, Miletić D, Šečić S, Šahmić AĐ, Mujbegović L, Kubura A, Burina M, Lalović N, Dukić N, Mašić JV, Ćuk M, Stanušić R. 2020 consensus guideline for optimal approach to the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2021; 21:120-135. [PMID: 32415816 PMCID: PMC7982071 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2020.4846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The HERe2Cure project, which involved a group of breast cancer experts, members of multidisciplinary tumor boards from healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina, was initiated with the aim of defining an optimal approach to the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer. After individual multidisciplinary consensus meetings were held in all oncology centers in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a final consensus meeting was held in order to reconcile the final conclusions discussed in individual meetings. Guidelines were adopted by consensus, based on the presentations and suggestions of experts, which were first discussed in a panel discussion and then agreed electronically between all the authors mentioned. The conclusions of the panel discussion represent the consensus of experts in the field of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The objectives of the guidelines include the standardization, harmonization and optimization of the procedures for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, all of which should lead to an improvement in the quality of health care of mentioned patients. The initial treatment plan for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer must be made by a multidisciplinary tumor board comprised of at least: a medical oncologist, a pathologist, a radiologist, a surgeon, and a radiation oncologist/radiotherapist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semir Bešlija
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zdenka Gojković
- University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Timur Cerić
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | - Inga Marijanović
- University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Semir Vranić
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | - Faruk Skenderi
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ivanka Rakita
- University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Aleksandar Guzijan
- University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dijana Koprić
- University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Alen Humačkić
- Cantonal Hospital “Dr. Safet Mujić”, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Danijela Trokić
- Radiotherapy Center, International Medical Centers, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | - Alma Efendić
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ibrahim Šišić
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Harun Drljević
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Vanesa Bešlagić
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Božana Babić
- University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Azra Pašić
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Anela Ramić
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dijana Mikić
- University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zlatko Guzin
- Cantonal Hospital “Dr. Safet Mujić”, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dragana Karan
- University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Teo Buhovac
- University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Dragana Miletić
- University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Senad Šečić
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Azra Đozić Šahmić
- Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | - Alisa Kubura
- Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Mensura Burina
- University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Nenad Lalović
- University Hospital Foča, Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | | | - Mirjana Ćuk
- University Hospital Foča, Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reinisch M, Seiler S, Hauzenberger T, Kamischke A, Schmatloch S, Strittmatter HJ, Zahm DM, Thode C, Furlanetto J, Strik D, Möbus V, Reimer T, Sinn BV, Stickeler E, Marmé F, Janni W, Schmidt M, Rudlowski C, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer in Men: Results from the MALE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:565-572. [PMID: 33538790 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance The extent of changes in estradiol levels in male patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving standard endocrine therapies is unknown. The sexual function and quality of life related to those changes have not been adequately evaluated. Objective To assess the changes in estradiol levels in male patients with breast cancer after 3 months of therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial assessed 56 male patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Patients were recruited from 24 breast units across Germany between October 2012 and May 2017. The last patient completed 6 months of treatment in December 2017. The analysis data set was locked on August 24, 2018, and analysis was completed on December 19, 2018. Interventions Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus GnRHa for 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the change in estradiol levels from baseline to 3 months. Secondary end points were changes of estradiol levels after 6 months, changes of additional hormonal parameters, adverse effects, sexual function, and quality of life after 3 and 6 months. Results In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial, a total of 52 of 56 male patients with a median (range) age of 61.5 (37-83) years started treatment. A total of 3 patients discontinued study treatment prematurely, 1 in each arm. A total of 50 patients were evaluable for the primary end point. After 3 months the patients' median estradiol levels increased by 67% (a change of +17.0 ng/L) with tamoxifen, decreased by 85% (-23.0 ng/L) with tamoxifen plus GnRHa, and decreased by 72% (-18.5 ng/L) with AI plus GnRHa (P < .001). After 6 months, median estradiol levels increased by 41% (a change of +12 ng/L) with tamoxifen, decreased by 61% (-19.5 ng/L) with tamoxifen plus GnRHa, and decreased by 64% (-17.0 ng/L) with AI plus GnRHa (P < .001). Sexual function and quality of life decreased when GnRHa was added but were unchanged with tamoxifen alone. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial found that AI or tamoxifen plus GnRHa vs tamoxifen alone led to a sustained decrease of estradiol levels. The decreased hormonal parameters were associated with impaired sexual function and quality of life. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01638247.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sabine Seiler
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Christian Thode
- Amedes MVZ Wagnerstibbe für Laboratoriumsmedizin, medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Möbus
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH Neu-Isenburg, Germany.,Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Prognostic Cancer Gene Expression Signatures: Current Status and Challenges. Cells 2021; 10:cells10030648. [PMID: 33804045 PMCID: PMC8000474 DOI: 10.3390/cells10030648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Current staging systems of cancer are mainly based on the anatomical extent of disease. They need refinement by biological parameters to improve stratification of patients for tumor therapy or surveillance strategies. Thanks to developments in genomic, transcriptomic, and big-data technologies, we are now able to explore molecular characteristics of tumors in detail and determine their clinical relevance. This has led to numerous prognostic and predictive gene expression signatures that have the potential to establish a classification of tumor subgroups by biological determinants. However, only a few gene signatures have reached the stage of clinical implementation so far. In this review article, we summarize the current status, and present and future challenges of prognostic gene signatures in three relevant cancer entities: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
|
32
|
Noske A, Ammann JU, Wagner DC, Denkert C, Lebeau A, Sinn P, Kreipe HH, Sommer U, Baretton G, Steiger K, Kiechle M, Hieke-Schulz S, Flores M, Roth W, Weichert W. A multicentre analytical comparison study of inter-reader and inter-assay agreement of four programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays for scoring in triple-negative breast cancer. Histopathology 2021; 78:567-577. [PMID: 32936950 DOI: 10.1111/his.14254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Studies in various cancer types have demonstrated discordance between results from different programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays. Here, we compare the reproducibility and analytical concordance of four clinically developed assays for assessing PD-L1-positivity in tumour-infiltrating immune cells in the tumour area (PD-L1-IC-positivity) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS AND RESULTS Primary TNBC resection specimens (n = 30) were selected based on their PD-L1-IC-positivity per VENTANA SP142 (<1%: 15 cases; 1-5%: seven cases; >5%: eight cases). Serial histological sections were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263, DAKO 22C3 and DAKO 28-8. PD-L1-IC-positivity and tumour cell expression (≥1 versus <1%) were scored by trained readers from seven sites using online virtual microscopy. The adjusted mean of PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP263 (7.8%) was significantly higher than those for the other three assays (3.7-4.9%). Differences in adjusted means were statistically significant between SP263 and the other three assays (P < 0.0001) but not between the three remaining assays when excluding SP263 (P = 0.0961-0.6522). Intra-class correlation coefficients revealed moderate-to-strong inter-reader agreement for each assay (0.460-0.805) and poor-to-strong inter-assay agreement for each reader (0.298-0.678) on PD-L1-IC-positivity. CONCLUSIONS In this first multicentre study of different PD-L1 assays in TNBC, we show that PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP142, 22C3 and 28-8 was reproducible and analytically concordant, indicating that these three assays may be analytically interchangeable. The relevance of the higher PD-L1-IC-positivity for SP263 should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelia Noske
- Technical University of Munich, Institute of Pathology, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Daniel-Christoph Wagner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Private Group Practice for Pathology Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Sinn
- Division of Gynecopathology, University Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Sommer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo Baretton
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Technical University of Munich, Institute of Pathology, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mike Flores
- Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Wilfried Roth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Technical University of Munich, Institute of Pathology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harbeck N, Schneeweiss A, Thuss-Patience P, Miller K, Garbe C, Griesinger F, Eberhardt WEE, Klussmann JP, Wollenberg B, Grimm MO, Zander T, Lüftner D. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant end-points in health technology assessment in oncology. Eur J Cancer 2021; 147:40-50. [PMID: 33611103 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) of clinical and economic value of a new intervention is an integral step in providing the access of patients to innovative cancer care and treatment. Overall survival (OS) is the preferred criterion for demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy in HTA given its direct clinical and patient relevance. However, with often long life expectancy of patients with early cancer, analysis of OS becomes less practical. Partially due to this reason, pathological complete response (pCR) and time-to-event end-points like disease-free survival are frequently incorporated into the pivotal clinical trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. However, there exists a discrepancy between different national HTA bodies regarding the acknowledgement of patient relevance of these end-points. In this article, we analysed the perspectives of patients on different aspects of end-points used in clinical trials in early cancer. Gathered evidence strongly suggests that complete tumour eradication and reduced risk of recurrence provide important psychological benefits thus signifying that pCR and time-to-event end-points are directly relevant to patients. Additionally, we reviewed opinions on patient relevance of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy end-points adopted by HTA bodies during the recent evaluations. We found that improvements in end-points used in the adjuvant setting were commonly considered as valuable to patients. In contrast, opinions on patient relevance of neoadjuvant therapy end-points varied between the national HTA bodies. Universal acknowledgement of patient relevance of therapeutic end-points for early cancer by HTA bodies is necessary to balance the inequality in uptake of innovative therapies into national healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Pius-Hospital, University Department Internal Medicine-Oncology, University of Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Wilfried E E Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jens P Klussmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wollenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital MRI, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, University Medicine Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Edlund K, Madjar K, Lebrecht A, Aktas B, Pilch H, Hoffmann G, Hofmann M, Kolberg HC, Boehm D, Battista M, Seehase M, Stewen K, Gebhard S, Cadenas C, Marchan R, Brenner W, Hasenburg A, Koelbl H, Solbach C, Gehrmann M, Tanner B, Weber KE, Loibl S, Sachinidis A, Rahnenführer J, Schmidt M, Hengstler JG. Gene Expression-Based Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Early Breast Cancer: Results of the Prospective Multicenter EXPRESSION Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2148-2158. [PMID: 33542080 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Expression-based classifiers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are not routinely used in the clinic. We aimed to build and validate a classifier for pCR after NACT. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a prospective multicenter study (EXPRESSION) including 114 patients treated with anthracycline/taxane-based NACT. Pretreatment core needle biopsies from 91 patients were used for gene expression analysis and classifier construction, followed by validation in five external cohorts (n = 619). RESULTS A 20-gene classifier established in the EXPRESSION cohort using a Youden index-based cut-off point predicted pCR in the validation cohorts with an accuracy, AUC, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.811, 0.768, 0.829, 0.587, 0.216, and 0.962, respectively. Alternatively, aiming for a high NPV by defining the cut-off point for classification based on the complete responder with the lowest predicted probability of pCR in the EXPRESSION cohort led to an NPV of 0.960 upon external validation. With this extreme-low cut-off point, a recommendation to not treat with anthracycline/taxane-based NACT would be possible for 121 of 619 unselected patients (19.5%) and 112 of 322 patients with luminal breast cancer (34.8%). The analysis of the molecular subtypes showed that the identification of patients who do not achieve a pCR by the 20-gene classifier was particularly relevant in luminal breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS The novel 20-gene classifier reliably identifies patients who do not achieve a pCR in about one third of luminal breast cancers in both the EXPRESSION and combined validation cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Edlund
- Leibniz-Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Katrin Madjar
- Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Antje Lebrecht
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Henryk Pilch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Gerald Hoffmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Manfred Hofmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vinzenz von Paul Kliniken gGmbH Marienhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Boehm
- Center of Minimal Invasive Surgery, Senology and Oncology, mic.ma.mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marco Battista
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Martina Seehase
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kathrin Stewen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Susanne Gebhard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Cristina Cadenas
- Leibniz-Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Rosemarie Marchan
- Leibniz-Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Koelbl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Berno Tanner
- Practice for Gynecological Oncology, Hoen Neuendorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Agapios Sachinidis
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Neurophysiology and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jan G Hengstler
- Leibniz-Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the TU Dortmund (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dicuonzo S, Leonardi MC, Raimondi S, Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Gerardi MA, Morra A, Zerella MA, Zaffaroni M, Pansini F, Cattani F, Luraschi R, Fodor C, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Rojas DP, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Acute and intermediate toxicity of 3-week radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost using TomoDirect: prospective series of 287 early breast cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1415-1428. [PMID: 33537865 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02538-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To report toxicity of a hypofractionated scheme of whole-breast (WB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed (TB) using Tomotherapy® with Direct modality. METHODS Patients with early breast cancer, undergoing radiotherapy (RT) in 15 daily fractions to WB (prescription dose 40.05 Gy) and SIB to the TB (48 Gy), between 2013 and 2017, was analyzed. Primary endpoint was acute and intermediate toxicity assessed at the end and within 6 months from RT, according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Secondary endpoints included early chronic toxicity at 12-months follow-up, using the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale, and cosmesis using Harvard criteria. RESULTS The study population was of 287 patients. Acute and intermediate toxicity was collected among 183 patients with data available at the end of RT and within 6 months, 85 (46%) experienced G2 toxicity and 84 (46%) G1 toxicity, while 14 (8%) did not report toxicity at any time. A significant reduction of any grade toxicity was observed between the two time points, with the majority of patients reporting no clinically relevant toxicity at 6 months. At univariate analysis, age < 40 years, breast volume > 1000 cm3 and Dmax ≤ 115% of prescription dose were predictive factors of clinically relevant acute toxicity (G ≥ 2) at any time. At multivariable analysis, only age and breast volume were confirmed as predictive factors, with Relative Risks (95% Confidence Intervals): 2.02 (1.13-3.63) and 1.84 (1.26-2.67), respectively. At 12-month follow-up, 113 patients had complete information on any toxicity with 53% of toxicity G < 2, while cosmetic evaluation, available for 102 patients, reported a good-excellent result for 86% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated WB IMRT with a SIB to the TB, delivered with TomoDirect modality, is safe and well-tolerated. Most patients reported no toxicity after 6 months and good-excellent cosmesis. Predictive factors of clinically relevant toxicity might be considered during treatment planning in order to further reduce side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - S Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - V Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - A Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - M Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - F Pansini
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - F Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - C Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - P Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - D P Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moderate hypofractionation remains the standard of care for whole-breast radiotherapy in breast cancer: Considerations regarding FAST and FAST-Forward. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:269-280. [PMID: 33507331 PMCID: PMC7841378 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01744-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Moderate hypofractionation is the standard of care for adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Recently, 10-year results from the FAST and 5‑year results from the FAST-Forward trial evaluating adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 weeks or 1 week have been published. This article summarizes recent data for moderate hypofractionation and results from the FAST and FAST-Forward trial on ultra-hypofractionation. While the FAST trial was not powered for comparison of local recurrence rates, FAST-Forward demonstrated non-inferiority for two ultra-hypofractionated regimens in terms of local control. In both trials, the higher-dose experimental arms resulted in elevated rates of late toxicity. For the lower dose experimental arms of 28.5 Gy over 5 weeks and 26 Gy over 1 week, moderate or marked late effects were similar in the majority of documented items compared to the respective standard arms, but significantly worse in some subdomains. The difference between the standard arm and the 26 Gy of the FAST-Forward trial concerning moderate or marked late effects increased with longer follow-up in disadvantage of the experimental arm for most items. For now, moderate hypofractionation with 40–42.5 Gy over 15–16 fractions remains the standard of care for the majority of patients with breast cancer who undergo whole-breast radiotherapy without regional nodal irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Al-Masri M, Aljalabneh B, Al-Najjar H, Al-Shamaileh T. Effect of time to breast cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:7-13. [PMID: 33475879 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06090-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a cornerstone in managing breast cancer. There is no defined consensus on the optimal time between NACT and surgery. We analyze the effect of time between the end of NACT and surgery on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients who received NACT followed by surgery. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 468 patients with breast cancer (stage I-III) who received and completed the same regimen of NACT (Anthracyclines and Taxanes B27 protocol) at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) (2006-2014). Patients have been divided into three groups according to the duration between the end of NACT and surgery, <4 weeks, 4-8 weeks and >8 weeks. RESULTS Most patients were stages II-III breast cancer with only four patients with stage I. Almost all patients (99%) had either invasive ductal or invasive lobular carcinomas. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 96% of patients. Most patients were alive at the time of analysis (84%). Complete pathological response was achieved in 20% of patients. Local recurrence rate was 6.6% with a median follow up of 3.8 years (interquartile range 0.6-10.9). Analysis showed that the groups had equivalent DFS. However, OS was adversely affected if patients had their surgery after 8 weeks of NACT compared to those who had their surgery between 4 and 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer surgery post NACT within the first 8 weeks had no impact on survival. However, surgery after 8 weeks of NACT showed negative impact on OS. Therefore, delaying surgery after 8 weeks is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Al-Masri
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center-KHCC, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Basim Aljalabneh
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center-KHCC, Amman, Jordan
| | - Hani Al-Najjar
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center-KHCC, Amman, Jordan
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chong ZX, Yeap SK, Ho WY. Role of miRNAs in regulating responses to radiotherapy in human breast cancer. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:289-301. [PMID: 33356761 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1864048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer that affects females globally. Radiotherapy is a standard treatment option for breast cancer, where one of its most significant limitations is radioresistance development. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-protein-coding RNAs that have been widely studied for their roles as disease biomarkers. To date, several in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies have reported the roles of miRNAs in regulating radiosensitivity and radioresistance in breast cancer cells. This article reviews the roles of miRNAs in regulating treatment response toward radiotherapy and the associating cellular pathways. We identified 36 miRNAs that play a role in mediating radio-responses; 22 were radiosensitizing, 12 were radioresistance-promoting, and two miRNAs were reported to promote both effects. A brief overview of breast cancer therapy options, mechanism of action of radiation, and molecular mechanism of radioresistance was provided in this article. A summary of the latest clinical researches involving miRNAs in breast cancer radiotherapy was also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Xiong Chong
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Swee Keong Yeap
- China-ASEAN College of Marine Sciences, Xiamen University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Wan Yong Ho
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Krug D, Vonthein R, Schreiber A, Boicev AD, Zimmer J, Laubach R, Weidner N, Dinges S, Hipp M, Schneider R, Weinstrauch E, Martin T, Hörner-Rieber J, Olbrich D, Illen A, Heßler N, König IR, Dellas K, Dunst J. Impact of guideline changes on adoption of hypofractionation and breast cancer patient characteristics in the randomized controlled HYPOSIB trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:802-811. [PMID: 33320286 PMCID: PMC8397631 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01730-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated radiotherapy is the standard of care for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (RT). However, adoption has been slow. The indication for regional nodal irradiation has been expanded to include patients with 0–3 involved lymph nodes. We investigated the impact of the publication of the updated German S3 guidelines in 2017 on adoption of hypofractionation and enrollment of patients with lymph node involvement within a randomized controlled phase III trial. Methods In the experimental arm of the HYPOSIB trial (NCT02474641), hypofractionated RT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) was used. In the standard arm, RT could be given as hypofractionated RT with sequential boost (HFseq), normofractionated RT with sequential boost (NFseq), or normofractionated RT with SIB (NFSIB). The cutoff date for the updated German S3 guidelines was December 17, 2017. Temporal trends were analyzed by generalized linear regression models. Multiple logistic regression models were used to investigate the influence of time (prior to/after guideline) and setting (university hospital/other institutions) on the fractionation patterns. Results Enrollment of patients with involved lymph nodes was low throughout the trial. Adoption of HFseq increased over time and when using the guideline publication date as cutoff. Results of the multiple logistic regressions showed an interaction between time and setting. Furthermore, the use of HFseq was significantly more common in university hospitals. Conclusion The use of HFseq in the standard arm increased over the course of the HYPOSIB trial and after publication of the S3 guideline update. This was primarily driven by patients treated in university hospitals. Enrolment of patients with lymph node involvement was low throughout the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander D Boicev
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
| | - Jörg Zimmer
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Reinhold Laubach
- Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Dinges
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie & Radioonkologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Hipp
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Schneider
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Helios-Kliniken Schwerin, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Evelyn Weinstrauch
- Praxis für Radioonkologie, Johanniter-Zentren für Medizinische Versorgung Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Thomas Martin
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Fachbereich RadioOnkologie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Olbrich
- ZKS Lübeck (Zentrum für klinische Studien Lübeck), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alicia Illen
- ZKS Lübeck (Zentrum für klinische Studien Lübeck), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Nicole Heßler
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Inke R König
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Kathrin Dellas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Riedel F, Schaefgen B, Sinn HP, Feisst M, Hennigs A, Hug S, Binnig A, Gomez C, Harcos A, Stieber A, Kauczor HU, Sohn C, Golatta M, Glaeser A, Heil J. Diagnostic accuracy of axillary staging by ultrasound in early breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol 2020; 135:109468. [PMID: 33338758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axillary ultrasound (AUS) is a standard procedure in the preoperative clinical identification of axillary metastatic lymph node (LN) involvement. It guides decisions about local and systemic therapy for patients with early breast cancer (EBC). But there is only weak evidence on the diagnostic criteria and standard interpretation. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of AUS in the detection and exclusion of LN metastases. METHODS In a retrospective single-center study, 611 consecutive EBC patients with 622 axillae underwent AUS +/- core needle biopsy (CNB) plus axillary surgery, i.e. sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection. For all patients, AUS image documentation of at least the most suspicious LN was saved during the initial diagnostic work-up. The diagnostic outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden-index (YI), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) on the basis of the daily routine interpretation and on the basis of previously recommended diagnostic criteria by two blinded examiners. RESULTS On the basis of the daily routine interpretation, AUS had a sensitivity (95 % CI) of 53.3 % (46.4-60.1), a specificity (95 % CI) of 93.6 % (90.8-95.8), an accuracy (95 % CI) of 79.7 % (76.4-82.8), a YI (95 % CI) of 0.47 (0.40 - 0.54), and a DOR (95 % CI) of 16.75 (10.37-27.05). Systematic application of previously recommended diagnostic criteria did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of routinely interpreted AUS. CONCLUSION AUS performance alone is not sufficient to accurately identify or exclude axillary metastatic disease in unselected patients with EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Riedel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaefgen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André Hennigs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Hug
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Binnig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Gomez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aba Harcos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Stieber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antonia Glaeser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kolberg HC, Kühn T, Krajewska M, Bauerfeind I, Fehm TN, Fleige B, Helms G, Lebeau A, Stäbler A, Schmatloch S, Hausschild M, Schwentner L, Schrenk P, Loibl S, Untch M, Kolberg-Liedtke C. Residual Axillary Burden After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Early Breast Cancer in Patients with a priori Clinically Occult Nodal Metastases - a transSENTINA Analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:1229-1236. [PMID: 33293731 PMCID: PMC7714621 DOI: 10.1055/a-1298-3453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Among patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the association between pathological complete remission (pCR) in the breast and clinical/pathological parameters is well established, whereas the association between these parameters and residual axillary involvement after NACT remains unclear.
Methods
Patients with clinically occult nodal metastases (i.e. negative by clinical assessment but positive by SLNB prior to NACT, i.e. Arm B of the SENTINA trial) were included in the presented analysis. All patients received a second sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection after NACT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the association between clinical/pathological parameters and axillary involvement after NACT.
Results
Arm B of the SENTINA study contained 360 patients, 318 of which were evaluable for this analysis. After NACT, 71/318 (22.3%) patients had involved SLNs or non-SLNs after NACT. Overall, 71/318 (22.3%) patients achieved a pCR in the breast. Associations of extranodal spread, lack of multifocality and pCR in the breast with residual axillary burden were statistically significant. In a descriptive analysis including all patients with clinically negative axilla before NACT in the SENTINA trial 1.2% of triple negative (TN) patients and 0.5% of HER/2 positive patients had residual axillary disease in case of a breast pCR.
Conclusions
Patients in the SENTINA trial with clinically negative axilla and involved SLNs still carried a significant risk of nodal metastases after NACT. However, the risk of residual axillary burden was particularly low in TN and HER/2 positive tumors in case of a breast pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Centre, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Maja Krajewska
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Barbara Fleige
- Department of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gisela Helms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annette Stäbler
- Department of Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Maik Hausschild
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Health Center Fricktal, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
| | | | - Peter Schrenk
- Breast Competence Centre, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Huober J, Schneeweiss A, Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Lux MP, Janni W, Ettl J, Belleville E, Thill M, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Schulmeyer CE, Welslau M, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Fehm TN, Lüftner D, Schütz F, Wöckel A. Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 3 - Early Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:1105-1114. [PMID: 33173238 PMCID: PMC7647721 DOI: 10.1055/a-1270-7208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of patients with early breast cancer has always been characterised by escalation by new therapies and de-escalation through identification of better treatment regimens or introduction of better tools to estimate prognosis. Efforts in some of these areas in the last few years have led to solid data. The results of the large studies of de-escalation through use of multi-gene tests are available, as are the results of some studies that investigated the new anti-HER2 substances T-DM1 and pertuzumab in the early treatment situation. Several large-scale studies examining the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors will soon be concluded so innovations can be anticipated in this area also. This review article will summarise and classify the results of the latest publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Carla E Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Krug D, Baumann R, Krockenberger K, Vonthein R, Schreiber A, Boicev A, Würschmidt F, Weinstrauch E, Eilf K, Andreas P, Höller U, Dinges S, Piefel K, Zimmer J, Dellas K, Dunst J. Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after breast-conserving surgery: results of a prospective trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:48-55. [PMID: 33001241 PMCID: PMC7801347 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01689-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report results of a multicenter prospective single-arm phase II trial (ARO-2013-04, NCT01948726) of moderately accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. METHODS The eligibility criteria included unifocal breast cancer with an indication for adjuvant radiotherapy to the whole breast and boost radiotherapy to the tumor bed. The whole breast received a dose of 40 Gy and the tumor bed a total dose of 48 Gy in 16 fractions of 2.5 and 3 Gy, respectively. Radiotherapy could be given either as 3D conformal RT (3D-CRT) or as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The study was designed as a prospective single-arm trial to evaluate the acute toxicity of the treatment regimen. The study hypothesis was that the frequency of acute skin reaction grade ≥2 would be 20% or less. RESULTS From November 2013 through July 2014, 149 patients were recruited from 12 participating centers. Six patients were excluded, leaving 143 patients for analysis. Eighty-four patients (58.7%) were treated with 3D-CRT and 59 (41.3%) with IMRT. Adherence to the treatment protocol was high. The rate of grade ≥2 skin toxicity was 14.7% (95% confidence interval 9.8-21.4%). The most frequent grade 3 toxicity (11%) was hot flashes. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated low toxicity of and high treatment adherence to hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB in a multicenter prospective trial, although the primary hypothesis was not met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - René Baumann
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.,Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - Katja Krockenberger
- ZKS Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,AMEDOM GmbH, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Boicev
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
| | | | - Evelyn Weinstrauch
- Praxis für Radioonkologie, Johanniter-Zentren für Medizinische Versorgung Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | | | - Peter Andreas
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie, Krankenhaus Buchholz, Buchholz in der Nordheide, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Dinges
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie & Radioonkologie, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Karen Piefel
- Strahlenzentrum Hamburg MVZ, Hamburg, Germany.,Fachbereich Strahlentherapie, Ambulanzzentrum des UKE, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Zimmer
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kathrin Dellas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Maes‐Carballo M, Muñoz‐Núñez I, Martín‐Díaz M, Mignini L, Bueno‐Cavanillas A, Khan KS. Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review. Health Expect 2020; 23:1045-1064. [PMID: 32748514 PMCID: PMC7696137 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not clear whether clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) are adequately promoting shared decision making (SDM). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the recommendations about SDM in CPGs and CSs concerning breast cancer (BC) treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY Following protocol registration (Prospero no.: CRD42018106643), CPGs and CSs on BC treatment were identified, without language restrictions, through systematic search of bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CDSR) and online sources (12 guideline databases and 51 professional society websites) from January 2010 to December 2019. INCLUSION CRITERIA CPGs and CSs on BC treatment were selected whether published in a journal or in an online document. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS A 31-item SDM quality assessment tool was developed and used to extract data in duplicate. MAIN RESULTS There were 167 relevant CPGs (139) and CSs (28); SDM was reported in only 40% of the studies. SDM was reported more often in recent publications after 2015 (42/101 (41.6 %) vs 46/66 (69.7 %), P = .0003) but less often in medical journal publications (44/101 (43.5 %) vs 17/66 (25.7 %), P = .009). In CPGs and CSs with SDM, only 8/66 (12%) met one-fifth (6 of 31) of the quality items; only 14/66 (8%) provided clear and precise SDM recommendations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS SDM descriptions and recommendations in CPGs and CSs concerning BC treatment need improvement. SDM was more frequently reported in CPGs and CSs in recent years, but surprisingly it was less often covered in medical journals, a feature that needs attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Maes‐Carballo
- Department of General SurgeryComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
| | | | | | | | - Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBSGranadaSpain
| | - Khalid Saeed Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
McMahon MA, Haigh I, Chen Y, Millican-Slater RA, Sharma N. Role of vacuum assisted excision in minimising overtreatment of ductal atypias. Eur J Radiol 2020; 131:109258. [PMID: 32919262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE B3 lesions are indeterminate lesions of uncertain malignant potential. They include lesions with and without epithelial atypia. Those with atypia include atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP)/atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). They are traditionally managed with surgery. Vacuum assisted excision (VAE) allows larger samples to be obtained using a vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB) device, which equates to a surgical biopsy. We propose that VAE and mammographic surveillance is a safe alternative to surgery in managing the ductal atypias; (AIDEP/ADH and FEA). METHOD Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on B3 lesions (April 2009 - March 2016) from consecutive breast screening patients diagnosed with AIDEP/ADH or FEA on initial diagnostic core biopsy. Mammographic abnormality, breast density, size, management pathway and upgrade to cancer and types of cancer were also collected during the treatment pathway and 5 year surveillance period (April 2009 - April 2019). RESULTS 273 cases of ductal atypia were identified. 187/273 (68.5 %) cases were managed with VAE only as no upgrade to malignancy and then 5 year mammographic surveillance. 34/273 (12.5 %) cases had a VAE diagnosing malignancy. 24/273 (8.8 %) cases had a VAE and then a surgical biopsy due to radiological or pathological concern, 8/24 upgraded to malignancy. 22/273 (8%) cases had a surgical diagnostic biopsy, 9/22 (41 %) cases were upgraded to malignancy. In total 51/273 (19 %) cases were diagnosed with cancer on the new pathway (13 invasive (all ER positive and Her2 negative) and 38 non-invasive, (34 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 4 cases of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)). While 17/273 (6.2 %) cases developed malignancy (12 invasive (all HER2 negative) and 4 DCIS and 1 LCIS) during the 5 year surveillance period. CONCLUSIONS VAE is a safe alternative to surgery in managing ductal atypias. 187/273 (68.5 %) women avoided surgery. While 34/51 cancers (66.7 %) were diagnosed preoperatively using VAE, allowing the women to have a single therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A McMahon
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - I Haigh
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Y Chen
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, School of Medicine at University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - N Sharma
- Department of Breast Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dippmann AK, Damrau C, Hengelbrock J, Albert US, Lebeau A, Lux MP, Veit C. [Are men and women with breast cancer treated equally in Germany?]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2020; 155:1-10. [PMID: 32861615 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Within the statutory health insurance system of the Federal Republic of Germany, a system of quality assurance has been implemented and operationalised through the measurement of quality indicators. For breast surgery, these quality indicators are mainly based on recommendations of the German clinical guideline for screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of breast cancer. The 2018 update of this guideline includes a new chapter on breast cancer in men. The aim of this analysis is to examine whether male and female patients with breast cancer are treated equally where appropriate and recommended by the clinical guideline, as measured by the quality indicators. METHOD Data of ten quality assurance indicators were analysed, for each indicator separately, stratified by sex and pooled over a 5-year period to gain statistical power. This dataset constitutes the largest data pool of men with surgical interventions for breast neoplasm in Germany. Indicator results were then compared between male and female cases. Additional subgroup analyses were carried out for two quality indicators with substantial outcome difference between male and female cases in order to detect possible differences in the treatment of breast cancer between different medical departments. RESULTS The database of the ten quality assurance indicators comprised 551,221 patients (546,324 females and 4,897 males) between 2014 and 2018. Pooled data of nine quality indicators (QIs) showed statistically significant outcome differences between male and female cases. In spite of pooling, the male sample size of four QIs was too small to allow for statistically reliable comparisons between male and female patients. Outcome differences in the remaining five QIs may, on the one hand, be explained by anatomical differences and different extent of the surgery, and on the other hand they confirm international data for lower HER2-positivity rates in male breast cancer patients. However, two process indicators, aiming at pretherapeutic biopsy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in invasive breast cancer recommended by the clinical guideline, show substantial differences of more than 6 percentage points between the sexes: although recommended by the clinical guideline, both procedures are carried out less often in male cases. Further analysis regarding the medical departments that recorded the treatment revealed that risk for non-adherence to guideline recommendation was high if treatment took place in non-gynaecological departments. Compared to gynaecological departments, procedures such as pretherapeutic biopsy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were carried out less frequently if cases were documented to be handled by surgery or plastic surgery departments. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Analysis of breast surgery quality indicators reveals a lower level of adherence to guideline recommendations for men with breast cancer compared to women in some aspects of the guideline, as measured by statutory quality indicators in breast surgery. Male breast cancer might be a rare disease, but nevertheless, awareness-rising is needed in diagnostics, treatment and interdisciplinarity in order to avoid inequality between the sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Katharina Dippmann
- IQTIG - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Claudia Damrau
- IQTIG - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Johannes Hengelbrock
- IQTIG - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf und Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Kinder- und Frauenklinik St. Louise, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Paderborn, Paderborn, Deutschland
| | - Christof Veit
- IQTIG - Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Riedel F, Heil J, Feisst M, Moderow M, von Au A, Domschke C, Michel L, Schaefgen B, Golatta M, Hennigs A. Analyzing non-sentinel axillary metastases in patients with T3-T4 cN0 early breast cancer and tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes undergoing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:627-636. [PMID: 32816190 PMCID: PMC7599150 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05876-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, completing axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) did not benefit patients with T1–T2 cN0 early breast cancer and 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCT). This paper reports cALND rates in the clinical routine for patients who had higher (T3–T4) tumor stages and/or underwent mastectomy but otherwise met the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Aim of this study is to determine cALND time trends and non-sentinel axillary metastases (NSAM) rates to estimate occult axillary tumor burden. Methods Data were included from patients treated in 179 German breast cancer centers between 2008 and 2015. Time-trend rates were analyzed for cALND of patients with T3–T4 tumors separated for BCT and mastectomy and regarding presence of axillary macrometastases or micrometastases. Results Data were available for 188,909 patients, of whom 19,009 were identified with 1–2 positive SLN. Those 19,009 patients were separated into 4 cohorts: (1) Patients with T1–T2 tumors receiving BCT (ACOSOG Z0011 eligible; n = 13,741), (2) T1–T2 with mastectomy (n = 4093), (3) T3–T4 with BCT (n = 269), (4) T3–T4 with mastectomy (n = 906). Among patients with T3–T4 tumors, cALND rates declined from 2008 to 2015: from 88.2 to 62.6% for patients receiving mastectomy and from 96.6 to 58.1% in patients receiving BCT. Overall rates for any NSAM after cALND for cohorts 1–4 were 33.4%, 42.3%, 46.9%, 58.8%, respectively. Conclusions The cALND rates have decreased substantially in routine care in patients with ‘extended’ ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Axillary tumor burden is higher in these patients than in the ACOSOG Z0011 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Riedel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mareike Moderow
- West German Breast Center GmbH, Bahlenstr. 180, 40589, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexandra von Au
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Domschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Michel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schaefgen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lucioni M, Rossi C, Lomoro P, Ballati F, Fanizza M, Ferrari A, Garcia-Etienne CA, Boveri E, Meloni G, Sommaruga MG, Ferraris E, Lasagna A, Bonzano E, Paulli M, Sgarella A, Di Giulio G. Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended? Eur Radiol 2020; 31:920-927. [PMID: 32816199 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07161-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast lesions classified as of "uncertain malignant potential" represent a heterogeneous group of abnormalities with an increased risk of associated malignancy. Clinical management of B3 lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) is still challenging: surgical excision is no longer the only available treatment and VABB may be sufficient for therapeutic excision. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy in B3 lesions that underwent surgical excision, identifying possible upgrading predictive factors and characterizing the malignant lesions eventually diagnosed. These results are compared with a subset of patients with B3 lesions who underwent follow-up. METHODS A total of 1250 VABBs were performed between January 2006 and December 2017 at our center. In total, 150 B3 cases were diagnosed and 68 of them underwent surgical excision. VABB findings were correlated with excision histology. A PPV for malignancy for each B3 subtype was derived. RESULTS The overall PPV rate was 28%, with the highest upgrade rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia (41%), followed by classical lobular neoplasia (29%) and flat epithelial atypia (11%). Only two cases of carcinoma were detected in the follow-up cohort, both associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia at VABB. CONCLUSION Open surgery is recommended in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia while, for other B3 lesions, excision with VABB only may be an acceptable alternative if radio-pathological correlation is assessed, if all microcalcifications have been removed by VABB, and if the lesion lacks high-risk cytological features. KEY POINTS • Surgical treatment is strongly recommended in case of ADH, while the upgrade rate in case of pure FEA, especially following complete microcalcification removal by VABB, may be sufficiently low to advice surveillance as a management strategy. • The use of 11-G- or 8-G-needle VABB, resulting in possible complete diagnostic excision of the lesion, can be an acceptable alternative in case of RS, considering open surgery only for selected high-risk patients. • LN management is more controversial: surgical excision may be recommended following classical LN diagnosis on breast biopsy if an additional B3 lesion is concurrently detected while in the presence of isolated LN with adequate radiological-pathological correlation follow-up alone could be an acceptable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Lucioni
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Rossi
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Pascal Lomoro
- Breast Imaging Department, Valduce Hospital, Via Dante Alighieri 11, 22100, Como, Italy.
| | - Francesco Ballati
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marianna Fanizza
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlos A Garcia-Etienne
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Boveri
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Meloni
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Sommaruga
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Elisa Ferraris
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and, Università degli Studi, Pavia, Italy
| | - Angioletta Lasagna
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and, Università degli Studi, Pavia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- University of Pavia and Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Paulli
- Anatomic Pathology Section, Department of Human Pathology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Adele Sgarella
- Breast Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Giulio
- Breast Imaging Department, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Robertson S, Acs B, Lippert M, Hartman J. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:161-175. [PMID: 32572716 PMCID: PMC7376512 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05752-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The proliferation-associated biomarker Ki67 has potential utility in breast cancer, including aiding decisions based on prognosis, but has unacceptable inter- and intralaboratory variability. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic potential for Ki67 hot spot scoring and global scoring using different digital image analysis (DIA) platforms. METHODS An ER+/HER2- breast cancer cohort (n = 139) with whole slide images of sequential sections stained for hematoxylin-eosin, pancytokeratin and Ki67, was analyzed using two DIA platforms. For hot spot analysis virtual dual staining was applied, aligning pancytokeratin and Ki67 images and 22 hot spot algorithms with different features were designed. For global Ki67 scoring an automated QuPath algorithm was applied on Ki67-stained whole slide images. Clinicopathological data included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) along with PAM50 molecular subtypes. RESULTS We show significant variations in Ki67 hot spot scoring depending on number of included tumor cells, hot spot size, shape and location. The higher the number of scored tumor cells, the higher the reproducibility of Ki67 proliferation values. Hot spot scoring had greater prognostic potential for RFS in high versus low Ki67 subgroups (hazard ratio (HR) 6.88, CI 2.07-22.87, p = 0.002), compared to global scoring (HR 3.13, CI 1.41-6.96, p = 0.005). Regarding OS, global scoring (HR 7.46, CI 2.46-22.58, p < 0.001) was slightly better than hot spot scoring (HR 6.93, CI 1.61-29.91, p = 0.009). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only global scoring was an independent prognostic marker for both RFS and OS. In addition, global Ki67-based surrogate subtypes reached higher concordance with PAM50 molecular subtype for luminal A and B tumors (66.3% concordance rate, κ = 0.345), than using hot spot scoring (55.8% concordance rate, κ = 0.250). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the automated global Ki67 scoring is feasible and shows clinical validity, which, however, needs to be confirmed in a larger cohort before clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Robertson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, CCK, Karolinska Institutet, R8:04, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, CCK, Karolinska Institutet, R8:04, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, CCK, Karolinska Institutet, R8:04, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bando H, Kataoka A, Tamaki K, Kobayashi M, Tamura N, Ozawa M, Kawano J, Fukatsu Y, Kitano A, Shiota K, Yamauchi H. Physician's knowledge, attitudes and practice pattern for breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: a survey among breast care specialists in Japan. Breast Cancer 2020; 27:796-802. [PMID: 32592140 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01118-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP) is uncommon, and thus there is limited evidence on its treatment. However, the incidence of BCP is increasing probably due to women having children at an older age. We aimed to clarify the practice patterns and limitations in treatment for BCP in Japan. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was developed for board-certified Japanese breast cancer specialists (n = 1583) to evaluate their knowledge, attitude, experience, and practice patterns regarding BCP. Survey items also included questions regarding potential barriers of practice toward patients diagnosed during pregnancy and respondents' background. RESULTS In March 2018, 492 (31.1%) breast oncologists responded to the survey. Among them, 234 (48%) respondents had the experience of treating at least one case of BCP. The accuracy of knowledge about BCP was evaluated by three items regarding BCP treatment from the latest Japanese Breast Cancer Society treatment guideline, and 265 (54%) were categorized to have "appropriate knowledge". Majority of the physicians (89%) have responded that patients should be treated in a center where both a cancer-treating team and obstetrician exist, and 48% responded that treating patients by the collaboration of cancer-treating team and obstetric team in different institutes is an alternative reasonable option. CONCLUSIONS Interest, knowledge, and awareness of the guidelines appear to influence physician attitude, and thus it is urgently important to lay out educational materials and learning opportunities regarding BCP for breast specialists. A regional network of oncologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians to support the BCP patients should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Bando
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Akemi Kataoka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Nobuko Tamura
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miwa Ozawa
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Kawano
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Hakuaikai Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Yumi Fukatsu
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Atsuko Kitano
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kyoko Shiota
- Integrated Woman's Health, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideko Yamauchi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|