Hormonal regulation of serum lipoprotein(a) levels. Contrasting effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I

Administration of insulin like growth factor I (IGFI) lowers serum lipoprotein(a)-impact on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Insulin like growth factor I (IGFI) secreted by the liver upon stimulation by pituitary growth hormone (GH) acts as the most important growth stimulating hormone in children. The present review presents evidence that among its additional metabolic effects, IGF-I suppresses the synthesis of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In view of this property, it is suggested that the addition of IGF-I to the armamentarium of hyperlipoproteinemia treatment should be considered.

Increase of serum lipoprotein (a), an adverse effect of growth hormone treatment

A number of reports show that high endogenous, or therapeutic administration of human growth hormone (hGH) cause an increase of serum lipoprotein a, Lp(a). Being thrombogenic Lp(a) is an independent risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Hence, it is hypothesized that the recently reported association between childhood hGH treatment and cardiovascular morbidity is probably due to the GH effect on Lp(a) synthesis. It is therefore suggested to determine serum Lp(a) levels before and during hGH treatment in children and adults.

The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1/insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 administration on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in recreational athletes

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies suggested that recombinant human IGF-1 (rhIGF-1) administration affects carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in healthy people and in people with diabetes. This study aimed to determine the effects of rhIGF-1/rhIGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) administration on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism in healthy recreational athletes.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 administration study at Southampton General Hospital, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

56 recreational athletes (30 men, 26 women).

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo, low-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (30 mg/day) or high-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (60 mg/day) for 28 days. The following variables were measured before and immediately after the treatment period: fasting lipids, glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glycated haemoglobin. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to estimate insulin sensitivity and indirect calorimetry to assess substrate oxidation rates. The general linear model approach was used to compare treatment group changes with the placebo group.

RESULTS

Compared with the placebo group, there was a significant reduction in fasting triglycerides in participants treated with high-dose rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 (p = .030), but not in the low-dose group (p = .390). In women, but not in men, there were significant increases in total cholesterol (p = .003), HDL cholesterol (p = .001) and LDL cholesterol (p = .008). These lipid changes were associated with reduced fasting insulin (p = .010), C-peptide (p = .001) and HOMA-IR (p = .018) in women and reduced C-peptide (p = .046) in men.

CONCLUSIONS

rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 administration for 28 days reduced insulin concentration, improved insulin sensitivity and had significant effects on lipid profile including decreased fasting triglycerides.

Fasting levels of growth hormone are associated with carotid intima media thickness but are not affected by fluvastatin treatment

Background

Growth hormone (GH) has been linked to cardiovascular disease but the exact mechanism of this association is still unclear. We here test if the fasting levels of GH are cross-sectionally associated with carotid intima media thickness (IMT) and whether treatment with fluvastatin affects the fasting level of GH.

Methods

We examined the association between GH and IMT in 4425 individuals (aged 46–68 years) included in the baseline examination (1991–1994) of the Malmö Diet and Cancer cardiovascular cohort (MDC-CC). From that cohort we then studied 472 individuals (aged 50-70 years) who also participated (1994–1999) in the β-Blocker Cholesterol-Lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS), a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical trial. Using multivariate linear regression models we related the change in GH-levels at 12 months compared with baseline to treatment with 40 mg fluvastatin once daily.

Results

In MDC-CC fasting values of GH exhibited a positive cross-sectional relation to the IMT at the carotid bulb independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (p = 0.002). In a gender-stratified analysis the correlation were significant for males (p = 0.005), but not for females (p = 0.09). Treatment with fluvastatin was associated with a minor reduction in the fasting levels of hs-GH in males (p = 0.05) and a minor rise in the same levels among females (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

We here demonstrate that higher fasting levels of GH are associated with thicker IMT in the carotid bulb in males. Treatment with fluvastatin for 12 months only had a minor, and probably not clinically relevant, effect on the fasting levels of hs-GH.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0563-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations are inversely associated with T2D, prediabetes, and insulin resistance in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], an LDL-like particle, has been proposed as a causal risk factor for CVD among general populations. Meanwhile, both serum Lp(a) and diabetes increase the risk of CVD. However, the relationship between serum Lp(a) and T2D is poorly characterized, especially in the Asian population. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional study in 10,122 participants aged 40 years or older in Jiading District, Shanghai, China. Our study found that the prevalence of T2D was decreased from 20.9% to 15.0% from the lowest quartile to the highest quartile of serum Lp(a) concentrations (P for trend <0.0001). Logistic regression analyses showed that the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of prevalent T2D for quartiles 2-4 versus quartile 1 were 0.86 (0.73-1.01), 0.88 (0.75-1.04), and 0.76 (0.64-0.90) (P for trend = 0.0002), after adjustment for traditional confounding factors. Moreover, the risks for prevalent prediabetes, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinemia were also decreased from the lowest to the top quartile. This inverse association between serum Lp(a) and T2D was not appreciably changed after we adjusted hypoglycemic medications or excluded the subjects with hypoglycemic and/or lipid-lowering agents and/or a history of self-reported CVD.

Lipoprotein(a) and risk of type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that cardiovascular risk is higher with increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Whether Lp(a) concentration is related to type 2 diabetes is unclear.

METHODS

In 26 746 healthy US women (mean age 54.6 years), we prospectively examined baseline Lp(a) concentrations and incident type 2 diabetes (n = 1670) for a follow-up period of 13 years. We confirmed our findings in 9652 Danish men and women with prevalent diabetes (n = 419). Analyses were adjusted for risk factors that included age, race, smoking, hormone use, family history, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A(1c) (Hb A(1c)), C-reactive protein, and lipids.

RESULTS

Lp(a) was inversely associated with incident diabetes, with fully adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for quintiles 2-5 vs quintile 1 of 0.87 (0.75-1.01), 0.80 (0.68-0.93), 0.88 (0.76-1.02), and 0.78 (0.67-0.91); P for trend 0.002. The association was stronger in nonfasting women, for whom respective HRs were 0.79 (0.58-1.09), 0.78 (0.57-1.08), 0.66 (0.46-0.93), and 0.56 (0.40-0.80); P for trend 0.001; P for interaction with fasting status 0.002. When we used Lp(a) > or =10 mg/L and Hb A(1c) <5% as reference values, the adjusted HRs were 1.62 (0.91-2.89) for Lp(a) <10 mg/L and Hb A(1c) <5%, 3.50 (3.06-4.01) for Lp(a) > or =10 mg/L and Hb A(1c) 5%-<6.5%, and 5.36 (4.00-7.19) for Lp(a) <10 mg/L and Hb A(1c) 5%-<6.5%. Results were similar in nonfasting Danish men and women, for whom adjusted odds ratios were 0.75 (0.55-1.03), 0.64 (0.46-0.88), 0.74 (0.54-1.01), and 0.58 (0.42-0.79) for Lp(a) quintiles 2-5 vs quintile 1; P for trend 0.002.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that Lp(a) was associated inversely with risk of type 2 diabetes independently of risk factors, in contrast to prior findings of positive associations of Lp(a) with cardiovascular risk.

The effect of atorvastatin on serum lipoproteins in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with long-term adverse effects on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Reducing growth hormone secretion improves well-being and symptoms, but may not significantly improve the lipoprotein profile. An additional approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in acromegaly may therefore be to target lipoprotein metabolism directly. In this study we investigated the effect of statin treatment.

DESIGN

Double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effects on circulating lipoproteins of atorvastatin 10 mg daily vs. placebo. Each treatment was given for 3 months in random order.

SUBJECTS

Eleven patients with acromegaly.

MEASUREMENTS

Lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, enzyme activity and calculated cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin treatment compared to placebo resulted in a significant decrease in serum cholesterol (5.85 +/- 1.04 mmol/l vs. 4.22 +/- 0.69 mmol/l; mean +/- SD; P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (2.95 +/- 1.07 mmol/l vs. 1.82 +/- 0.92 mmol/l; P < 0.001), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (0.31 (0.21-0.47) mmol vs. 0.23 (0.13-0.30) mmol/l median (interquartile range); P < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (111 +/- 28 mg/dl vs. 80 +/- 18 mg/dl; P < 0.001), and calculated coronary heart disease risk (6.8 (3.3-17.9) vs. 2.8 (1.5-5.7)% over next 10 years; P < 0.01). Serum triglyceride was 1.34 (1.06-1.71) mmol/l on placebo and 1.14 (0.88-1.48) mmol/l on atorvastatin (ns). HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1 and Lp(a) concentrations and cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin: cholesterol acyl transferase activities were also not significantly altered.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin treatment was safe, well tolerated and effective in improving the atherogenic lipoprotein profile in acromegaly.

Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management

This review focuses on the systemic complications of acromegaly. Mortality in this disease is increased mostly because of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, although currently neoplastic complications have been questioned as a relevant cause of increased risk of death. Biventricular hypertrophy, occurring independently of hypertension and metabolic complications, is the most frequent cardiac complication. Diastolic and systolic dysfunction develops along with disease duration; and other cardiac disorders, such as arrhythmias, valve disease, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and endothelial dysfunction, are also common in acromegaly. Control of acromegaly by surgery or pharmacotherapy, especially somatostatin analogs, improves cardiovascular morbidity. Respiratory disorders, sleep apnea, and ventilatory dysfunction are also important contributors in increasing mortality and are advantageously benefitted by controlling GH and IGF-I hypersecretion. An increased risk of colonic polyps, which more frequently recur in patients not controlled after treatment, has been reported by several independent investigations, although malignancies in other organs have also been described, but less convincingly than at the gastrointestinal level. Finally, the most important cause of morbidity and functional disability of the disease is arthropathy, which can be reversed at an initial stage, but not if the disease is left untreated for several years.

Cardiovascular risk factors in acromegaly before and after normalization of serum IGF-I levels with the GH antagonist pegvisomant

Acromegaly is associated with premature cardiovascular mortality. GH replacement therapy decreases inflammatory markers of cardiovascular risk, but little is known about these markers in patients with acromegaly. The GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, reduces IGF-I levels in 98% of patients treated. We investigated the effects of GH receptor blockade on inflammatory and other cardiovascular risk markers in active acromegaly. Forty-eight patients with acromegaly and 47 age- and body mass index-matched controls were included. The study consisted of 3 parts: a cross-sectional study, a prospective randomized 12-wk placebo-controlled study, and a longitudinal open-label study of up to 18 months of pegvisomant treatment. After baseline evaluation, patients with acromegaly were randomized to placebo (n = 14), 10 mg (n = 12), 15 mg (n = 10), or 20 mg (n = 12) daily pegvisomant for 12 wk. Subsequently, all patients received at least 10 mg pegvisomant daily for up to 18 months, with dose adjustments to achieve a normal IGF-I level. Anthropometry, GH, IGF-I, and pegvisomant levels were measured monthly. C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), glucose, insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were determined at baseline, 4 and 12 wk in the placebo-controlled study and at 3-month intervals (during which IGF-I levels were normal) in the longitudinal study. In the cross-sectional study, patients had lower CRP than did controls [median, 0.3 (range, 0.2-0.8) vs. 2.0 (0.6-3.7) mg/liter; P < 0.0001] and had higher insulin [78.6 (55.8-130.2) vs. 54.5 (36.6-77.5) pM, P = 0.0051]. IL-6, homocysteine, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were not different between groups. In the placebo-controlled study, CRP increased in patients treated with 20 mg pegvisomant, compared with placebo (mean +/- SEM, 13.7 +/- 3.6 vs. 0.5 +/- 3.3 mg/liter; P = 0.010). There were no significant differences in IL-6, homocysteine, glucose, insulin, triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels. In the longitudinal open-label study (median duration, 15.6 months), CRP increased by 2.0 +/- 0.5 mg/liter (P = 0.0002). Total cholesterol and triglycerides increased (0.22 +/- 0.11 mM, P = 0.050; and 0.25 +/- 0.09 mM, P = 0.007, respectively), whereas lipoprotein(a) decreased (-70 +/- 33 mg/liter, P = 0.039). Glucose, insulin, homocysteine, HDL cholesterol, and IL-6 did not change. We conclude that patients with active acromegaly have lower CRP and higher insulin levels than healthy controls. Administration of pegvisomant increases CRP levels. We propose that GH secretory status is an important determinant of serum CRP levels, although additional studies are needed to determine the mechanism and significance of this finding.

Serum lipoprotein changes following IGF-I normalization using a growth hormone receptor antagonist in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Active acromegaly is associated with altered lipid metabolism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of serum IGF-I normalization on serum lipoproteins and insulin, in patients with acromegaly receiving the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients (9 male, mean age 58.7 years, range 28-79) with active acromegaly (baseline serum IGF-I > 130% the age-related upper limit of normal) received pegvisomant and achieved a normal serum IGF-I [585.2 +/- 54.3 (mean +/- SEM) to 169.2 +/- 13.9 ng/ml, P < 0.0001].

MEASUREMENTS

Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein B (apo B), apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1), lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] and insulin were measured in a single batch analysis on samples obtained at baseline and the first occasion of serum IGF-I normalization. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Paired analysis was performed using Student's paired t-test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Normalization of serum IGF-I resulted in an increase in TC (5.0 +/- 0.3 to 5.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.0068), an increase in LDL (3.0 +/- 0.25 to 3.7 +/- 0.31 mmol/l, P = 0.0093) and an increase in apo B (110.6 +/- 7.76 to 127.1 +/- 8.86 mg/l, P = 0.014). TC and LDL increased in all but four patients. Despite a significant fall in fasting insulin levels (9.9 to 8.3 mU/l, range 8.85-19.8 to 6.33-11.6, P < 0.001) and insulin resistance (2.7 to 1.9, range 1.2-10.4 to 1-6.2, P < 0.001), mean serum TG and HDL levels were unaffected by IGF-I normalization. The protein component of HDL, apo A1, increased (153 +/- 4 to 166.4 +/- 5.43 mg/l, P = 0.026) and Lp(a) declined (median 342 to 235 mg/l, range 60-1013 to 74-671), P = 0.0035). Baseline serum TC and LDL were below the age- and sex-matched mean population value but after normalization of serum IGF-I the distribution of serum TC and LDL values was similar to that of the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Active acromegaly is associated with lowered mean serum TC and LDL. Successful management using pegvisomant increases lowered baseline serum TC and LDL levels, restoring the distribution of values to that of the general population, and improves insulin resistance. These findings are consistent with the reported lipoprotein changes following GH administration to normal and GH-deficient individuals.

Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lipoprotein levels during treatment of growth hormone-deficient adult humans

The incidence of atherosclerosis is increased in growth hormone (GH) deficient-individuals. Nonetheless, the antiatherogenic benefits of GH replacement therapy remain uncertain. In this study the effect of human recombinant growth hormone (hrGH) replacement therapy administered to GH-deficient adults on the plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) concentration and activity was analyzed. These findings were related to changes in the concentrations of the plasma lipoproteins. The hrGH was administered for 12 mon to human GH-deficient patients (n = 13; 8 men, 5 women). During the study plasma lipoproteins were separated by ultracentrifugation, and plasma cholesterol esterification rate (CER), endogenous CETP activity, and CETP concentration were measured. GH replacement therapy transiently (at 3 mon) lowered plasma concentration of CETP and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and raised total triglycerides. Furthermore, hrGH permanently increased both the plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration, which is known as atherogenic, and the proportion of cholesteryl ester in the high density lipoprotein2 (HDL2) particles, which is potentially atheroprotective. The simultaneous decrease of the plasma CETP and LDL-C concentrations elicited by hrGH indicated a close relationship between LDL metabolism and the regulation of the CETP gene expression. Endogenous CETP activity and the CER were not modified because these parameters are regulated in opposite ways by plasma levels of triglycerides; that is, CER increased and CETP decreased.

Effects of normalization of GH hypersecretion on lipoprotein(a) and other lipoprotein serum levels in acromegaly

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) has been recognized as an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein(a) has been found to be elevated in sera of acromegalic patients, possibly contributing to the increased incidence of coronary heart disease found in these patients. In the present study we sought to determine the effects of GH hormonal status on lipoprotein(a) and other lipid parameters, including lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PATIENTS

Twenty acromegalic patients, with either active (n = 12) or controlled (n = 8) acromegaly, were studied. Twenty-nine healthy subjects served as control group for serum lipid measurements.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum GH, IGF-1, IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and insulin levels were measured in patients. Insulin resistance was measured by the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA). Plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-lipids, apolipoproteins A-I and B, lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein lipase activity were also measured.

RESULTS

The highest lipoprotein(a) levels were observed in patients with active acromegaly, followed by patients with controlled acromegaly, whose lipoprotein(a) concentrations were still significantly higher than those of the control group (means +/- SEM: active acromegaly, 0.67+/-0.13 g/l; controlled acromegaly, 0.41+/-0.12 g/l; controls 0.17+/-0.02 g/l; P<0.05). There were no differences in other lipid and lipoprotein values among the groups. In patients, significant correlations were observed between lipoprotein(a) and basal GH levels (r = 0.56, P<0.02), mean GH levels (r = 0.48, P<0.05) and with insulin resistance estimated by HOMA (r = 0.62, P<0.01). No correlations were found between lipoprotein(a) and IGF-1 or IGFBP-3 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present results demonstrate that both active acromegalic patients and those with controlled disease have elevated serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations. The findings might suggest that the present biochemical criteria for cure of acromegaly are not strict enough to result in the normalization of all the undesirable metabolic changes found in this disease, and also that significant cardiovascular risk may persist despite successful treatment of acromegaly.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and IGF-I during oral and transdermal estrogen replacement therapy: relation to lipoprotein(a) levels

Low levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) have recently been associated with several risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on plasma IGFBP-1 levels are, however, unclear. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study for 6 months was conducted in 73 hysterectomized postmenopausal women randomized into two groups: oral estradiol (E2) valerate, 2 mg/day (n = 35) and transdermal E2 gel, 1 mg/day (n=38). Plasma IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) were determined at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The groups were similar for age and BMI. The baseline levels of estrone (E1), E2, IGFBP-1, IGF-I and Lp(a) did not differ between the groups. During treatment, serum estradiol concentrations increased in both groups. During oral ERT, IGFBP-1 levels increased by 104% (P<0.001), whereas IGF-I levels decreased by 13% (mean, P<0.05). IGF-I and IGFBP-1 levels remained unchanged in the transdermal group. Lp(a) levels decreased by 23% (median, P<0.001) in the oral group, but were unaffected by transdermal therapy. The change in IGFBP-1 concentrations during oral ERT showed an inverse correlation to that in Lp(a) (r = -0.40, P<0.05, Spearman correlation). In conclusion, oral ERT seems to enhance plasma levels of IGFBP-1, which may be one reason for the reduced Lp(a) levels.

Growth hormone (GH) status is an independent determinant of serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE

Both severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency in hypopituitary adults and physiological ageing are associated with an increase in fat mass, dyslipidaemia, and an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. Ageing is also associated with a physiological decrease in spontaneous as well as stimulated GH secretion. We wished to evaluate the effects of endogenous GH status on circulating lipoproteins.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Forty-two healthy nonobese adults of both sexes (20 M + 22 F) aged 27-59 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Twenty-four hour GH secretion, arginine-stimulated GH secretion, and fasting values of lipoproteins and triglycerides. Body composition was measured by CT-scan and whole body DXA-scan. VO2-max was measured on an ergometer bicycle.

RESULTS

GH secretion decreased with age and was lower in males. Older subjects had more total body fat, subcutaneous abdominal fat, and intra-abdominal fat than younger ones, and their VO2-max was decreased. Men had more intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat but less total body fat than women. There was no sex difference in VO2-max. Total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C (mmol/l) were higher in older than in the younger subjects (TC: 5.32 (95% CI = 0.49) vs. 4. 17 (95% CI = 0.28), P < 0.001; LDL-C: 3.66 (95% CI = 0.52) vs. 2.54 (95% CI = 0.37), P = 0.001) without sex differences. HDL-C did not show any difference with age or between sexes. Triglycerides (mmol/l) were higher in older subjects and in males (older: 1.36 (95% CI = 0.19) vs. younger: 1.02 (95% CI = 0.20), P = 0.015; M: 1. 34 (95% CI = 0.24) vs. F: 1.03 (95% CI = 0.16), P = 0.03). There was no age-difference in lipoprotein (a), but concentrations were higher in women (M: 4.35 (2.95-8.30) vs. F: 19.40 (4.10-32.80), P = 0.03). TC, LDL-C, and triglycerides correlated positively with age and indices of adiposity, and inversely with VO2-max. TC, LDL-C, and triglycerides also correlated significantly and negatively with arginine-stimulated GH secretion (peak GH) (TC vs. peak GH (r = - 0. 395, P = 0.01); LDL-C vs. peak GH (r = - 0.365, P = 0.017); triglycerides vs. peak GH (r = - 0.386, P = 0.01)). Multiple linear regression analysis showed GH status to be an independent predictor of both TC, LDL-C, and triglycerides.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that GH may exert direct effects on lipid metabolism.

Effect of tamoxifen on lipoprotein(a) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in healthy women

Studies in breast cancer patients have shown that tamoxifen decreases circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), an independent risk factor for premature coronary heart disease, and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), a promising surrogate biomarker for breast cancer. Since a common hormone regulatory pathway has been suggested for both biomarkers, we measured Lp(a) levels for 6 months in 68 healthy women participating in a chemoprevention trial of tamoxifen and correlated its changes with IGF-I. After 1 month, mean Lp(a) levels decreased by 23% with tamoxifen and increased by 6% with placebo (P = 0.033). No further change was observed after 2 and 6 months. Women with abnormal values at baseline (i.e. > 30 mg/dl) showed the highest reduction. The mean levels of IGF-I decreased by 23.5% with tamoxifen and remained stable with placebo, but the changes induced by tamoxifen in Lp(a) and IGF-I levels were uncorrelated. Our results support the observation that tamoxifen may be a suitable preventive option for women with multiple disease risk factors.

Relationship of lipoprotein(a) levels to physical activity and family history of coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the association of physical activity with serum lipoprotein(a) [La(a)] levels in individuals according to whether they had a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

Lp(a) levels in 332 healthy Spanish men aged 20 to 60 years were measured. Physical activity and family history of CHD were assessed.

RESULTS

For men with a family history of CHD, the odds ratio for Lp(a) levels above the median value was 0.13 (95% confidence interval = 0.03, 0.50) in very active men (energy expended in physical activity > 300 kcal/day) compared with active men (energy expended in physical activity < 300 kcal/day).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular daily physical activity in individuals with a family history of CHD could be useful for controlling Lp(a) levels.

Atherothrombogenicity of lipoprotein(a): the debate

Although lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) has been recognized as an atherothrombogenic factor, the underlying mechanisms for this pathogenicity have not been clearly defined. Plasma levels have received most of the attention in this regard; however, discrepancies among population studies have surfaced. Particularly limited is the information on the fate of Lp(a) that enters the arterial wall, in terms of mechanisms of endothelial transport and interactions with cells and macromolecules of the extracellular matrix. A typical Lp(a) represents a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle having as a protein moiety apo B-100 linked by a single interchain disulfide bond to a unique multikringle glycoprotein, called apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]). In vitro studies have shown that Lp(a) can be dissected into its constituents, LDL and apo(a). In turn, the latter can be cleaved by enzymes of the elastase and metalloproteinase families into fragments that exhibit a differential behavior in terms of binding to macromolecules of the extracellular matrix: fibrinogen, fibronectin, and proteoglycans. By immunochemical criteria, apo(a) predominantly localizes in areas of human arteries affected by the atherosclerotic process, where elastase and metalloproteinase enzymes operate and where apo(a) fragments are potentially generated. The accumulation of these fragments in the vessel wall is likely to depend on their affinity for the constituents of the extracellular matrix. Thus, factors that modulate inflammation and inflammation-mediated fragmentation of Lp(a)/apo(a) may play an important role in the cardiovascular pathogenicity of Lp(a). This pathogenicity may be attenuated by measures directed at preventing the activation of those vascular cells that secrete enzymes with a proteolytic potential for Lp(a)/apo(a), namely, leukocytes, macrophages, and T cells.

Tracking of serum lipoprotein (a) concentration and its contribution to serum cholesterol values in children from 7 to 36 months of age in the STRIP Baby Study. Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Babies

We investigated the tracking phenomenon of serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations and assessed the impact of serum concentration of lipoprotein (a) cholesterol on total cholesterol concentrations in children from 7 to 36 months of age. Serum samples for lipoprotein (a) and cholesterol determinations at 7, 13, 24 and 36 months were prospectively obtained from 430 children. Serum lipoprotein (a) was determined using immunoradiometric assay. A strong correlation was observed between lipoprotein (a) concentrations at 7 and 36 months of age (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). Seventy-eight per cent to 86% of the children in the lowest and highest lipoprotein (a) quintiles at 13 months remained in the respective quintiles at 36 months. The average contribution of lipoprotein (a) cholesterol to total cholesterol varied from 0.5% to 3.2% (individual variation 0.13-32.39%) depending on the type of milk received and the age of the children. At 7 months the contribution was 0.44% in breast-fed and 0.93% in formula-fed infants (P < 0.0001). The tracking phenomenon of serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations is strong already in early childhood. The contribution of lipoprotein (a) cholesterol to serum total cholesterol concentration should be taken into account when the changes in serum cholesterol levels are interpreted in the first year of life.

The effect of growth hormone replacement therapy for up to 12 months on lipoprotein composition and lipoprotein(a) in growth hormone-deficient adults

The effect of growth hormone replacement therapy in near physiological doses on lipoprotein composition and serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations was investigated in growth hormone-deficient subjects. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant growth hormone was undertaken for 6 months followed by an open extension for a further 6 months (0.125 IU/kg per week for the first 4 weeks of each 6 month period and thereafter 0.25 IU/kg per week). A total of 18 patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency or hypopituitarism were studied. Lipid concentrations were estimated in lipoprotein fractions and protein concentrations were measured in low density lipoprotein (LDL). Glucose and glycated haemoglobin in blood and insulin, cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoproteins A-I and B and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were measured in serum. In the placebo-controlled phase fasting blood glucose concentrations increased with growth hormone treatment from 5.0 +/- 0.2 to 5.8 +/- 0.2 mmol/l (P = 0.02) (mean +/- S.E.M.), although no significant changes were seen in lipids or lipoproteins. In the group receiving active treatment total serum cholesterol decreased from 6.0 +/- 0.4 to 5.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (P = 0.002) after 6 months, due to reduced LDL cholesterol concentrations. Low density lipoprotein protein concentrations fell (0.8 +/- 0.1 versus 0.7 +/- 0.1 g/l) (P = 0.005), and LDL phospholipid levels decreased from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 0.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l (P = 0.007). Serum cholesterol and LDL composition reverted to pre-treatment values by 12 months. Fasting blood glucose remained above pre-treatment values (P = 0.036) and fasting insulin was significantly increased (P = 0.044). There was no effect of growth hormone therapy on serum triglyceride, apolipoprotein or lipoprotein(a) concentrations. In conclusion, growth hormone therapy with near physiological doses has no long term effects on serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations or lipoprotein composition.

The effect of growth hormone on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) levels in familial hypercholesterolemia

Severe elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol are not always normalized with conventional drugs. Growth hormone decreases LDL cholesterol levels, in part by augmenting liver LDL receptor activity. This increase may be on the order of magnitude of the increase induced by statins. We investigated the effect of growth hormone in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-one men with FH aged 20 to 48 years, of whom 81% had a known LDL receptor gene mutation, discontinued all lipid-lowering drugs 6 weeks before the study. Dietary stabilization continued for 5 more weeks, followed by single-blind placebo injections for 1 week. Thereafter, 16 subjects were allocated to recombinant growth hormone 0.05 IU/kg/d and 15 to placebo injected subcutaneously for 12 weeks. Baseline lipid levels were similar in both groups. One subject in the growth hormone group withdrew after 8 weeks due to shoulder pain. Mean compliance among the rest of the subjects was 98%. The mean change in LDL cholesterol was -0.46 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.00 to 0.09 mmol/L) in the growth hormone group versus 0.08 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.55 to 0.71 mmol/L) in the placebo group (difference not significant). No changes occurred in the levels of other lipids, lipoprotein particles, or apolipoproteins, with the exception of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. The median changes in Lp(a) were 33% (interquartile range, 2% to 53%) and -15% (interquartile range, -22% to 18%) in the growth hormone and placebo groups, respectively (P = .02). We conclude that the effect of growth hormone on LDL cholesterol levels in FH is less than expected, based on its LDL-catabolic effects, and is counteracted by profound increases in Lp(a) levels, resulting in unchanged levels of apolipoprotein B. Thus, growth hormone is probably not useful as adjunctive therapy in FH.

Growth hormone treatment increases circulating lipoprotein(a) in children with chronic renal failure

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients managed by dialysis or kidney transplantation. Whilst the use of human growth hormone (hGH) is of established benefit in CRF children particularly in those with short stature, in the present study we assessed in CRF children the effect of hGH treatment on circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a genetically determined cardiovascular risk factor. We studied 15 CRF children treated by dialysis or conventional therapy and after kidney transplantation. Overnight fasting blood samples were collected immediately before and after 6 months hGH treatment. In all but one of the children there was a significant increase in serum Lp(a) over the 6 month treatment period -(+)66.7% over the basal levels (range 14 to 180%). After the hGH treatment, in six children Lp(a) levels were elevated to above 300 mg/l, the cut-off level for increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Concomitantly/children also had an increase in serum levels of IGF-I (+96.4%) and insulin (+85.8%). All children had an accelerated growth velocity during the treatment; there was no effect on serum creatinine. Our study shows that hGH treatment in CRF children, though beneficial in its growth promoting effects, increases the already characteristically high levels of serum Lp(a), a risk factor for CAD, and that serum Lp(a) monitoring during treatment with hGH may be useful in evaluating future cardiovascular risk.

Current and potential therapeutic uses of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I

The accepted and potential uses of GH and IGF-I are summarized in Table 1. In general, the research on the therapeutic uses of IGF-I is at a much earlier state of development compared with GH The use of GH in the treatment of children with GH deficiency is well accepted, and its use in the treatment of short stature of renal failure also is widely accepted. The FDA has approved the use of GH in children with short stature caused by GH insufficiency and renal failure. The use of GH in patients with Turner syndrome has not been approved by the FDA, although it has been approved in several other countries. The use of GH for the treatment of adults with GH deficiency is approved in several countries but it is not approved in the Unites States. With the exception of the cases with GHIS, the use of IGF-I as a therapeutic agent cannot yet be regarded as of proven usefulness. The potential uses of GH and IGF-I are an area of active investigation and will continue to enlighten our understanding of human disease and disorders of growth.

Metabolic effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I in humans: comparison with recombinant human growth hormone

Many of the metabolic actions of growth hormone (GH) are mediated through insulin-like growth factors or somatomedins. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) has a dichotomous insulin-like and GH-like action when used in different clinical situations in humans. Its effects on carbohydrate metabolism show a prominent increase in total insulin sensitivity, causing hypoglycemia in higher doses and maintaining normal glucose homeostasis in lower doses. This polypeptide selectively stimulates whole body protein synthesis with no effect on proteolysis when given in doses of 100 micrograms/ kg subcutaneously twice daily for at least 5-7 days, effects which are indistinguishable from those of GH. This contrasts with the marked suppression of proteolysis observed when higher doses are given, similar to the effects observed with insulin. When used in combination with rhGH, rhIGF-I has a synergistic effect, improving total nitrogen retention in calorically deprived subjects, yet it does not cause any greater enhancement of whole body protein anabolism in normally fed volunteers than giving rhGH and rhIGF-I individually. This suggests a common pathway for IGF-I and GH enhancing protein anabolism in the normally fed state. rhIGF-I also stimulates linear growth in children with defects in the GH receptor. Recent data show that this potent growth factor has a potential advantage over GH in the treatment of severe protein catabolic states, particularly the glucocorticosteroid-dependent model, as it ameliorates the marked increase in protein catabolism caused by the steroids, but without a diabetogenic effect. Here, a brief overview is provided of available human data on the actions of this peptide on carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism, linear growth, and its anabolic effects. rhIGF-I offers promise in the treatment of selective growth disorders and in protein catabolic and insulin-resistant states.

Regulation of rat hepatic low density lipoprotein receptors. In vivo stimulation by growth hormone is not mediated by insulin-like growth factor I

Growth hormone (GH) has an important role in the regulation of hepatic LDL receptor expression and plasma lipoprotein levels. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate if these effects of GH on hepatic LDL receptors are direct or mediated by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Two models were studied in which substitution with GH is important for the regulation of hepatic LDL receptors: hypophysectomized rats receiving high-dose ethynylestradiol or challenge with dietary cholesterol. The hypophysectomized rats were hormonally substituted by infusion with dexamethasone and L-thyroxine, and either GH or IGF-I. In both models, GH was essential for maintaining normal expression of LDL receptors. In contrast, despite fully normalized plasma levels, IGF-I did not support the expression of hepatic LDL receptors. Analysis of plasma lipoproteins revealed that substitution with GH, but not with IGF-I, reduced LDL and intermediate density lipoproteins. In addition, determination of hepatic mRNA levels for apo B-100 and apo B-48 indicated that GH may be more effective than IGF-I in the promotion of apo B mRNA editing. In conclusion, GH has specific effects on hepatic LDL receptor expression and plasma lipoprotein levels that are not mediated by IGF-I.