Transcatheter electrical ablation of right bundle branch. A method of treating macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia attributed to bundle branch reentry

Progressive outcomes of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease

BACKGROUND

Ablation strategies to treat bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBRT) are well described. However, reports of long-term follow-up outcomes in BBRT patients without structural heart disease (SHD) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term follow-up prognosis of BBRT patients without SHD.

METHODS

Changes in electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were used to evaluate progression during follow-up. Potential pathogenic candidate variants were screened using a specific gene panel.

RESULTS

Eleven consecutive BBRT patients without obvious SHD based on echocardiographic and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging results were enrolled. Median age was 20 (11-48) years, and median follow-up time was 72 months. During follow-up, PR interval [206 (158-360) ms vs 188 (158-300) ms; P = .018] and QRS duration [187 (155-240) ms vs 164 (130-178) ms; P = .008] each increased significantly compared with postablation. Right- and left-sided chamber dilation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) also were observed. Clinical deterioration or events occurred in 8 patients: 1 sudden death; 3 both complete heart block and reduced LVEF; 2 significantly reduced LVEF; and 2 prolonged PR interval. Genetic testing results showed that 6 of 10 patients (excluding the patient with sudden death) had ≥1 potential pathogenic candidate variants.

CONCLUSION

Further deterioration of His-Purkinje system conduction was observed in young BBRT patients without SHD after ablation. The His-Purkinje system may be the first target of genetic predisposition.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Involving the His-Purkinje System: Fascicular and Bundle Branch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia

The Purkinje system has been found to mediate several monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs). These include fascicular VTs and bundle branch reentrant (BBR) VTs. Previous studies have revealed that VTs involving the His-Purkinje system are composed of multiple discrete subtypes that are best differentiated by their mechanism, drug effect, VT morphology, and successful ablation site. Recognition of the heterogeneity of these VTs and their unique characteristics should facilitate the appropriate diagnosis and therapy and help guide catheter ablation therapy. In this article, we focus on the latest updates of the mechanisms underlying left ventricle fascicular VTs and BBR-VTs as well as the latest catheter ablation techniques.

Arrhythmias Utilizing Concealed Nodoventricular or His-Ventricular Pathways: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis and Management

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe the electrophysiologic characteristics, diagnostic maneuvers, and treatment of a series of arrhythmias using concealed nodoventricular (cNV) or His-ventricular (cHV) pathways.

BACKGROUND

Confirming the presence and participation of cNV or cHV pathways in tachyarrhythmias is challenging.

METHODS

We present 4 cases of tachycardias with a participatory cNV or cHV pathway.

RESULTS

The first patient had a narrow complex tachycardia with ventriculoatrial dissociation. Findings of an entrainment pacing from the right ventricle and fused premature ventricular complexes suggested cNV pathway involvement. The second patient had nonsustained narrow complex tachycardia with more ventricular than atrial complexes. The tachycardia exhibited an anterograde His-right bundle (RB) activation sequence and normal His-ventricular (HV) interval and consistently terminated with fused ventricular extra stimuli, suggesting cNV pathway participation. The third patient had a wide complex tachycardia (WCT) with either a right or left bundle branch block pattern. The WCT showed an eccentric His-RB activation sequence and short HV interval and terminated with fused premature ventricular complexes, suggesting a cHV (or concealed fasciculoventricular) pathway involvement. The fourth patient had a WCT with alternating bundle branch block morphologies with a short HV interval. Entrainment from the basal right ventricle demonstrated fusion and a short postpacing interval, suggesting cHV (or fasciculoventricular) pathway involvement. Ablation at the proximal RB rendered the tachycardia noninducible.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured approach can help diagnose and treat cNV or cHV pathways. We emphasize the importance of evaluating both the His-RB activation pattern and HV interval during sinus rhythm and tachycardia as well as the ventricular pacing study.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Reflections on the early invasive clinical cardiac electrophysiology era through fifty manuscripts: 1967-1992

In 1967, researchers in The Netherlands and France independently reported a new technique, later called programmed electrical stimulation. The ability to reproducibly initiate and terminate arrhythmias heralded the beginning of invasive clinical cardiac electrophysiology as a medical discipline. Over the next fifty years, insights into the pathophysiologic basis of arrhythmias would transform the field into an interventional specialty with a tremendous armamentarium of procedures. In 2015, the variety and complexity of these procedures were major reasons that led to the recommendation for an increase in the training period from one year to two years. The purpose of this manuscript is to present fifty manuscripts from the early invasive clinical cardiac electrophysiology era, between 1967 and 1992, to serve as an educational resource for current and future electrophysiologists. It is our hope that reflection on the transition from a predominantly noninvasive discipline to one where procedures are commonly utilized will lead to more thoughtful patient care today and to inspiration for innovation tomorrow. In the words of the late Dr. Mark E. Josephson, "It is only by getting back to the basics that the field of electrophysiology will continue to grow instead of stagnate."

Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia: review and case presentation

Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBRVT) is characterized by a unique, fast (200-300 beats/min), monomorphic wide complex tachycardia (WCT) associated with syncope, hemodynamic compromise, and cardiac arrest. It is challenging to diagnose, requiring a His bundle recording and specific pacing maneuvers. The overall incidence has been reported to be up to 20% among patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) undergoing electrophysiologic studies. We report a case of BBRVT in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) presenting as a WCT with recurrent implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. We describe all the characteristic features of BBRVT and discuss its differential. We also discuss the role of ablation for this condition.

Human His-Purkinje System: Abnormalities of Conduction, Rhythm Disorders and Case Studies

This review covers many of the arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities related to His-Purkinje System. These include junctional premature complexes, junctional and fascicular tachycardias, bundle branch reentry (BBR), and the role of apparent conduction in various forms of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) with or without involvement of accessory pathways (AP).

Prevention of sudden cardiac death beyond the ICD: have we reached the boundary or are we just burning the surface?

Preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major unsolved problem in contemporary medical practice. As the most common cause of SCD, treatment for ventricular arrhythmias is the target area of interest in research field. While implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) effectively decreases death from ventricular arrhythmias in highly selected patients, risk of inappropriate shocks, mortality from frequent therapy, chance of failing in abortion of arrhythmias despite having a defibrillator, and our inability to recognize which of several hundreds of thousands of patients at risk for sudden death but do not meet current criteria for defibrillator, limit ICD effectiveness. In this article, a brief review of mechanism leading to SCD, the existing evidence for a defibrillator and the lacunae in present guidelines for patients clearly at risk for sudden death but without proven benefit from a defibrillator are presented in Section I. Following this, interventional approaches, both catheter-based and general measures that may serve as adjuncts to a defibrillator in preventing this all too common catastrophic end event, are summarized in Section II.

Mechanisms of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults

Aging is associated with an increased prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias, which contribute to higher morbidity and mortality in the elderly. The frequency of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachyarrhythmia, is projected to increase as the population ages, greatly impacting health care resource utilization. Several clinical factors associated with the risk of arrhythmias have been identified in the population, yet the molecular bases for the increased predisposition to arrhythmogenesis in the elderly are not fully understood. This review highlights the epidemiology of cardiac dysrhythmias, changes in cardiac structure and function associated with aging, and the basis for arrhythmogenesis in the elderly.

VT ablation in heart failure

Ventricular tachycardias (VT), shocks, and clusters of shock are ominous signs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and herald an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality. VT clusters have been associated with aggravation of heart failure (19%), acute coronary events (14%), and electrolyte imbalance (10%). Yet, any association of potential causative factors and aggravation of VT is vague. Maybe, in patients with any substrate for re-entry, progressive aggravation of ventricular dysrhythmias is to be expected. The high recurrence rate of electrical storm despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy supports this view. The optimal timing of VT ablation is unknown, but current convention is to perform VT ablation after shock clusters or incessant VT has occurred. Preemptive VT ablation before VT has occurred is rarely performed (only in 15% of active centers) and the majority of centers never perform VT ablation even after the first shock. Such practice is within guidelines that recommend VT ablation only in ICD patients with recurrent or incessant VT. However, there is strong data in support of preemptive VT ablation.

Monomorphic and polymorphic ventricular tachycardias arising from the His–Purkinje system: what do we know?

Monomorphic and polymorphic Purkinje-related ventricular tachycardias (VTs) may occur in patients with and without underlying structural heart disease. Monomorphic Purkinje-related VTs can be divided into different entities: verapamil-sensitive left fascicular VTs; bundle branch reentry tachycardias (BBRT); interfascicular VTs and focal Purkinje VTs. The most frequent fascicular VT is left posterior fascicular VT, characterized by macro-reentry within the posterior Purkinje network. However, the reentry may also be located in the anterior Purkinje network (left anterior fascicular VT). BBRT is also a macro-reentry-tachycardia, utilizing both the right and the left bundle branch as the antegrade and the retrograde limb and is often associated with pre-existing conduction disturbances in the specific conduction system. Interfascicular VT is rare and characterized by a macro-reentry within the left fascicles. BBRT and interfascicular VT may also occur in the same patient. In contrast to the mentioned macro-reentry mechanisms there are focal Purkinje-related VTs arising from the anterior or posterior Purkinje system. Focal Purkinje triggered premature ventricular contractions originating from the distal Purkinje arborization in patients without a structural heart disease, as well as in patients with known ischemic heart disease or an underlying channelopathy such as Brugada syndrome may induce polymorphic VTs. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for both monomorphic as well as polymorphic Purkinje-related VTs, often resulting in noninducibility and freedom from VT recurrence. A systematic analysis of the surface ECG and the intracardiac electrograms is essential for successful ablation of these heterogeneous and potentially curable VTs.

Incessant interfascicular reentrant ventricular tachycardia as a result of catheter ablation of the right bundle branch: case report and review of the literature

A 72-year-old woman developed incessant interfascicular (IF) ventricular tachycardia immediately after successful right bundle branch (RBB) catheter ablation for the treatment of sustained bundle branch reentrant tachycardia. Catheter ablation of the left bundle branch and the left anterior fascicle was successful in eliminating the tachycardia (in 2 different sessions). This report discusses the direct link between the creation of an RBB block and the development of IF tachycardia, in our case, and in prior cases of IF reentry reported in the literature.

Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), which most commonly occurs in patients with structural heart disease, can be associated with an increased risk of sudden death. The most common cause of ventricular fibrillation is acute coronary ischemia, whereas a myocardial scar from prior infarct is the most common cause of sustained monomorphic VT in patients with structural heart disease. More benign forms of idiopathic VT can also occur in the absence of structural heart disease. Treatment of VT involves both emergent management and prevention of recurrence with medical and device therapy. Appropriately selected patients who have experienced VT or those who are at risk of VT may be candidates for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The left ventricular ejection fraction is most frequently used to stratify patients with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy who are at risk of sudden death and may be candidates for a prophylactic defibrillator. Catheter ablation may also be an option for appropriately selected patients with many forms of VT. This article discusses the etiologies and management of VT and its association with sudden death.

Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), which most commonly occurs in patients with structural heart disease, can be associated with an increased risk of sudden death. The most common cause of ventricular fibrillation is acute coronary ischemia, whereas a myocardial scar from prior infarct is the most common cause of sustained monomorphic VT in patients with structural heart disease. More benign forms of idiopathic VT can also occur in the absence of structural heart disease. Treatment of VT involves both emergent management and prevention of recurrence with medical and device therapy. Appropriately selected patients who have experienced VT or those who are at risk of VT may be candidates for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The left ventricular ejection fraction is most frequently used to stratify patients with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy who are at risk of sudden death and may be candidates for a prophylactic defibrillator. Catheter ablation may also be an option for appropriately selected patients with many forms of VT. This article discusses the etiologies and management of VT and its association with sudden death.

Bundle Brunch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia with Two Distinct Conduction Patterns in a Patient with Complete Right Bundle Branch Block

We report a rare case of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia [BBRVT]. A 67-year-old female was admitted for management of wide QRS tachycardia (right bundle branch block [RBBB] and a southwest axis). The mapping procedure revealed the tachycardia circuit consisted of the left anterior fascicle (LAF) as an antegrade, and the right bundle as a retrograde pathway. She presented RBBB during sinus rhythm. LAF ablation changed the tachycardia configuration to a northwest axis and prolonged the cycle length. Left posterior fascicle ablation terminated the tachycardia, and complete atrioventricular block occurred, which showed the unidirectional conduction over the right bundle.

Bundle branch re-entry ventricular tachycardia in a patient with complete heart block

A 58-year-old male patient presented episodes of palpitations in the context of atrioventricular block treated by a dual-chamber pacemaker. Clinical and electrophysiological studies identified the tachyarrhythmia to be bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardia, which was successfully treated by radiofrequency ablation of the proximal right bundle branch.

Bundle branch reentrant tachycardia in a patient with a calcified bicuspid aortic valve and normal ventricular function

We report the case of a bundle branch reentrant tachycardia (BBRT) in a 40-yearold patient with a calcified bicuspid aortic valve and normal left ventricular function. The ventricular tachycardia was eliminated by successful radiofrequency ablation of the right bundle branch. As the aortic valve annulus is in close proximity to the specialized conduction system, premature degeneration of a bicuspid aortic valve may involve the bundle of His and the proximal bundle branches by invading calcifications. We speculate that calcifications invading the proximal bundle branches from the bicuspid aortic valve may have created the substrate for the BBRT in this patient.

Mechanisms underlying ventricular arrhythmias in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: implications for management

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) have been associated with mortality in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). All 3 main mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis - reentry, trigger activity, and automatism - have been implicated. Arrhythmogenic substrates in IDCM favor these mechanisms and are often potentiated by electrolyte imbalance secondary to diuretic treatment, by antiarrhythmic drugs, or by bradycardia, leading to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Myocardial macroreentry is the mechanism most frequently responsible for monomorphic VT in IDCM; however, focal activation and His-Purkinje macroreentry are often responsible and, especially in the latter case, are frequently unrecognized. Clinical suspicion and final recognition by electrophysiologic testing have important therapeutic consequences, because both focal activation and His-Purkinje macroreentry can be treated effectively by catheter ablation. On the other hand, the frequent recurrences of myocardial macroreentrant VT after ablation require this therapy to be used in combination with drugs or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have a beneficial effect for primary prevention of VA in IDCM. Type III antiarrhythmics have a neutral effect on mortality and type I antiarrhythmics should be avoided. Treatment of nonsustained VT in IDCM is controversial because it often presents without symptoms and is linked more to overall mortality than to arrhythmic mortality. Empiric treatment with amiodarone or electrophysiologically guided sotalol are preferred to the use of other drugs for secondary prevention of sustained VA. ICDs should be implanted in patients who have been resuscitated from cardiac arrest due to VA, or in those with poorly tolerated VT and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Empiric treatment with amiodarone or electrophysiologically guided class III antiarrhythmics may also be alternatives for patients with IDCM and no severe left ventricular dysfunction, especially if VT is well tolerated.

Are electrophysiological studies needed prior to defibrillator implantation?

At present, patients with documented sustained VT or resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA) are treated with ICDs. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate if a routine electrophysiological study should be recommended prior to ICD implantation. In 462 patients referred for ICD implantation because of supposedly documented VT (n = 223) or CA (n = 239), electrophysiological study was routinely performed. In 48% of the patients with CA, sustained VT or VF was inducible. Electrophysiological study suggested conduction abnormalities (n = 11) or supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 3) in conjunction with severely impaired left ventricular function to have been the most likely cause of CA in 14 (5.9%) of 239 patients. Likewise, sustained VT was only inducible in 48% of patients with supposedly documented VT. Of these inducible VTs, nine were diagnosed as right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia or as bundle branch reentry tachycardia. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias judged to represent the clinical event were the only inducible arrhythmia in 35 (16%) patients (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia [n = 7], AV reentry tachycardia [n = 4], atrial flutter [n = 19], and atrial tachycardia [n = 5]). Based on findings from the electrophysiological study, ICD implantation was withheld in 14 (5.9%) of 239 patients with CA and in 44 (19.7%) of 223 patients with supposedly documented VT. During electrophysiological study, VT or VF was only reproducible in about 50% of patients with supposedly documented VT or CA. Electrophysiological study revealed other, potentially curable causes for CA or supposedly documented VT in 12.6% (58/462) of all patients, indicating that ICD implantation can potentially be avoided or at least postponed in some of these patients. Based on these retrospective data, routine electrophysiological study prior to ICD implantation seems to be advisable.

Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardia in the absence of myocardial or valvar dysfunction without detecting bundle branch potentials

A case is reported of a patient with only isolated conduction abnormalities of the His-Purkinje system with no identifiable myocardial or valvar dysfunction, leading to "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardias (BBRVTs). The electrophysiological study showed infra-Hisian conduction system disease and two different inducible wide QRS complex tachycardias. Neither right bundle branch nor left bundle branch potentials were recorded despite extensive catheter manipulation. However, these tachycardias were diagnosed as BBRVTs by using entrainment manoeuvres and comparing the HV intervals during both sinus rhythm and the tachycardias. These tachycardias were eliminated by catheter ablation of the right bundle branch, using the morphology of the local electrograms and anatomical findings.

Therapeutic options in patients with reduced ejection fraction and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

The patient with a reduced ejection fraction and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia represents a common management problem for the physician. This article reviews the supporting evidence for the therapeutic options available for these patients according to the etiology of the reduced ejection fraction. In postinfarction patients, electrophysiology-guided implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy improves survival more than antiarrhythmic therapy. In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, the best therapy is yet undetermined. Ongoing clinical trials will hopefully direct future therapy.

Ventricular tachycardia syndromes

Better understanding of the underlying mechanism and substrate of different VTs has made it possible to tailor treatment strategies properly. The advent of sophisticated device-based therapy and of more precise and effective catheter ablation approaches will expand clinicians' ability to gain control of this multifaceted arrhythmia syndrome.

Wide QRS complex tachycardias

Wide QRS complex tachycardia is a common clinical occurrence and presents a diagnostic challenge for the physician. History, physical examination, chest radiographs, and electrocardiographic analysis are important in making the correct diagnosis. Diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia is supported by history of prior myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, physical examination showing cannon A-waves in the jugular venous pulsation or variable heart sounds, chest radiograph showing cardiomegaly or evidence of prior cardiac surgery, and characteristic ECG features: AV dissociation, fusion/capture beats, QRS concordance or typical morphologic features in leads V1 and V6. In this article, a clinical approach to wide QRS complex tachycardias is presented.