Oxidized Phospholipids and Risk of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: The Copenhagen General Population Study

Lipoprotein(a) is a highly atherogenic lipoprotein: pathophysiological basis and clinical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) has been identified as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis. However, as reviewed here, there is ongoing debate as to the key pathogenic features of Lp(a) particles and the degree of Lp(a) atherogenicity relative to low-density lipoprotein (LDL).

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic analyses have revealed that Lp(a) on a per-particle basis is markedly (about six-fold) more atherogenic than LDL. Oxidized phospholipids carried on Lp(a) have been found to have substantial pro-inflammatory properties triggering pathways that may contribute to atherogenesis. Whether the strength of association of Lp(a) with ASCVD risk is dependent on inflammatory status is a matter of current debate and is critical to implementing intervention strategies. Contradictory reports continue to appear, but most recent studies in large cohorts indicate that the relationship of Lp(a) to risk is independent of C-reactive protein level.

SUMMARY

Lp(a) is a highly atherogenic lipoprotein and a viable target for intervention in a significant proportion of the general population. Better understanding the basis of its enhanced atherogenicity is important for risk assessment and interpreting intervention trials.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Lifestyle on Association Between Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Events

Background

In European cohorts, healthier lifestyle either attenuated or associated with lower cardiovascular risk despite elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)].

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to test if social determinants of health (SDOH) and Life's Simple 7 (LS7) scores impact the association of Lp(a) with cardiovascular events in U.S. cohorts.

Methods

We performed a sequential multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis using the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) and MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) cohorts. We first adjusted for age, gender, non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, race, and ethnicity, then sequentially added SDOH and LS7 scores. The primary outcomes were time until first myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke.

Results

ARIC (n = 15,072; median Lp(a) = 17.3 mg/dL) had 16.2 years and MESA (n = 6,822; median Lp(a) = 18.3 mg/dL) had 12.3 years of average follow-up. In age, gender, race, and ethnicity, and non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol adjusted analyses, Lp(a) was associated with MI in ARIC (HR: 1.10, P < 0.001) and MESA (HR: 1.11, P = 0.001), and stroke in ARIC (HR: 1.07, P < 0.001) but not MESA (HR: 0.97, P = 0.53). In models with SDOH and LS7, associations of Lp(a) remained similar with MI (ARIC, HR: 1.08, P < 0.001; MESA, HR: 1.10, P = 0.001) and stroke (ARIC, HR: 1.06, P = 0.002; MESA, HR: 0.96, P = 0.37). Each additional SDOH correlated positively with MI (ARIC, HR: 1.04, P = 0.01; MESA, HR: 1.08, P = 0.003) and stroke in ARIC (HR: 1.08, P = 0.00) but not MESA (HR: 1.03, P = 0.41). Each additional LS7 point correlated negatively with MI (ARIC, HR: 0.88, P < 0.001; MESA, HR: 0.85, P < 0.001) and stroke (ARIC, HR: 0.91, P < 0.001; MESA, HR: 0.86, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SDOH and lifestyle factors associated with risk for MI and stroke but did not largely impact the association between Lp(a) and cardiovascular events.

Genetics and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Cardiovascular Risk

Elevated lipoprotein(a) is a genetically transmitted codominant trait that is an independent risk driver for cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein(a) concentration is heavily influenced by genetic factors, including LPA kringle IV-2 domain size, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and interleukin-1 genotypes. Apolipoprotein(a) is encoded by the LPA gene and contains 10 subtypes with a variable number of copies of kringle -2, resulting in >40 different apolipoprotein(a) isoform sizes. Genetic loci beyond LPA, such as APOE and APOH, have been shown to impact lipoprotein(a) levels. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations are generally 5% to 10% higher in women than men, and there is up to a 3-fold difference in median lipoprotein(a) concentrations between racial and ethnic populations. Nongenetic factors, including menopause, diet, and renal function, may also impact lipoprotein(a) concentration. Lipoprotein(a) levels are also influenced by inflammation since the LPA promoter contains an interleukin-6 response element; interleukin-6 released during the inflammatory response results in transient increases in plasma lipoprotein(a) levels. Screening can identify elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and facilitate intensive risk factor management. Several investigational, RNA-targeted agents have shown promising lipoprotein(a)-lowering effects in clinical studies, and large-scale lipoprotein(a) testing will be fundamental to identifying eligible patients should these agents become available. Lipoprotein(a) testing requires routine, nonfasting blood draws, making it convenient for patients. Herein, we discuss the genetic determinants of lipoprotein(a) levels, explore the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association between lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease, and provide practical guidance for lipoprotein(a) testing.

A study protocol to characterise pathophysiological and molecular markers of rheumatic heart disease and degenerative aortic stenosis using multiparametric cardiovascular imaging and multiomics techniques

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), and congenital valve diseases are prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. Many knowledge gaps remain in understanding disease mechanisms, stratifying phenotypes, and prognostication. Therefore, we aimed to characterise patients through clinical profiling, imaging, histology, and molecular biomarkers to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of RHD and AS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, case-controlled study, we plan to recruit RHD and AS patients and compare them to matched controls. Living participants will undergo clinical assessment, echocardiography, CMR and blood sampling for circulatory biomarker analyses. Tissue samples will be obtained from patients undergoing valve replacement, while healthy tissues will be obtained from cadavers. Immunohistology, proteomics, metabolomics, and transcriptome analyses will be used to analyse circulatory- and tissue-specific biomarkers. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be used for hypothesis testing and identification of important biomarkers. In summary, this study aims to delineate the pathophysiology of RHD and degenerative AS using multiparametric CMR imaging. In addition to discover novel biomarkers and explore the pathomechanisms associated with RHD and AS through high-throughput profiling of the tissue and blood proteome and metabolome and provide a proof of concept of the suitability of using cadaveric tissues as controls for cardiovascular disease studies.

Oxidized phospholipids in cardiovascular disease

Prolonged or excessive exposure to oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) generates chronic inflammation. OxPLs are present in atherosclerotic lesions and can be detected in plasma on apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins. When initially conceptualized, OxPL-apoB measurement in plasma was expected to reflect the concentration of minimally oxidized LDL, but, surprisingly, it correlated more strongly with plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels. Indeed, experimental and clinical studies show that Lp(a) particles carry the largest fraction of OxPLs among apoB-containing lipoproteins. Plasma OxPL-apoB levels provide diagnostic information on the presence and extent of atherosclerosis and improve the prognostication of peripheral artery disease and first and recurrent myocardial infarction and stroke. The addition of OxPL-apoB measurements to traditional cardiovascular risk factors improves risk reclassification, particularly in patients in intermediate risk categories, for whom improving decision-making is most impactful. Moreover, plasma OxPL-apoB levels predict cardiovascular events with similar or greater accuracy than plasma Lp(a) levels, probably because this measurement reflects both the genetics of elevated Lp(a) levels and the generalized or localized oxidation that modifies apoB-containing lipoproteins and leads to inflammation. Plasma OxPL-apoB levels are reduced by Lp(a)-lowering therapy with antisense oligonucleotides and by lipoprotein apheresis, niacin therapy and bariatric surgery. In this Review, we discuss the role of role OxPLs in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and Lp(a) atherogenicity, and the use of OxPL-apoB measurement for improving prognosis, risk reclassification and therapeutic interventions.

Macrophage polarization and metabolism in atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the accumulation of fatty deposits in the inner walls of vessels. These plaques restrict blood flow and lead to complications such as heart attack or stroke. The development of atherosclerosis is influenced by a variety of factors, including age, genetics, lifestyle, and underlying health conditions such as high blood pressure or diabetes. Atherosclerotic plaques in stable form are characterized by slow growth, which leads to luminal stenosis, with low embolic potential or in unstable form, which contributes to high risk for thrombotic and embolic complications with rapid clinical onset. In this complex scenario of atherosclerosis, macrophages participate in the whole process, including the initiation, growth and eventually rupture and wound healing stages of artery plaque formation. Macrophages in plaques exhibit high heterogeneity and plasticity, which affect the evolving plaque microenvironment, e.g., leading to excessive lipid accumulation, cytokine hyperactivation, hypoxia, apoptosis and necroptosis. The metabolic and functional transitions of plaque macrophages in response to plaque microenvironmental factors not only influence ongoing and imminent inflammatory responses within the lesions but also directly dictate atherosclerotic progression or regression. In this review, we discuss the origin of macrophages within plaques, their phenotypic diversity, metabolic shifts, and fate and the roles they play in the dynamic progression of atherosclerosis. It also describes how macrophages interact with other plaque cells, particularly T cells. Ultimately, targeting pathways involved in macrophage polarization may lead to innovative and promising approaches for precision medicine. Further insights into the landscape and biological features of macrophages within atherosclerotic plaques may offer valuable information for optimizing future clinical treatment for atherosclerosis by targeting macrophages.

Oxidized phospholipids facilitate calcific aortic valve disease by elevating ATF4 through the PERK/eIF2α axis

In this study we sought to analyze the critical role of oxidized phospholipid (OxPL) in the progression of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) with the involvement of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). Differentially expressed genes related to CAVD were identified using bioinformatics analysis. Expression of ATF4 was examined in mouse models of aortic valve calcification (AVC) induced by the high cholesterol (HC) diet. Valvular interstitial cells (VICs) were then isolated from mouse non-calcified valve tissues, induced by osteogenic induction medium (OIM) and co-cultured with OxPAPC-stimulated macrophages. The effect of OxPLs regulating ATF4 on the macrophage polarization and osteogenic differentiation of VICs was examined with gain- and loss-of-function experiments in VICs and in vivo. In aortic valve tissues and OIM-induced VICs, ATF4 was highly expressed. ATF4 knockdown alleviated the osteogenic differentiation of VICs, as evidenced by reduced expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2), osteopontin (OPN), and osteocalcin. In addition, knockdown of ATF4 arrested the AVC in vivo. Meanwhile, OxPL promoted M1 polarization of macrophages and mediated osteogenic differentiation of VICs. Furthermore, OxPL up-regulated ATF4 expression through protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit alpha (eIF2α) pathway. In conclusion, OxPL can potentially up-regulate the expression of ATF4, inducing macrophages polarized to M1 phenotype, osteogenic differentiation of VICs and AVC, thus accelerating the progression of CAVD.

Lipoprotein(a) and calcific aortic valve disease initiation and progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although evidence indicates the association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with atherosclerosis, the link with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the connection between Lp(a) and aortic valve calcification and stenosis (AVS). We included all relevant studies, indexed in eight databases, up to February 2023. A total of 44 studies (163 139 subjects) were included, with 16 of them being further meta-analysed. Despite considerable heterogeneity, most studies support the relationship between Lp(a) and CAVD, especially in younger populations, with evidence of early aortic valve micro-calcification in elevated-Lp(a) populations. The quantitative synthesis showed higher Lp(a) levels, by 22.63 nmol/L (95% CI: 9.98-35.27), for patients with AVS, while meta-regressing the data revealed smaller Lp(a) differences for older populations with a higher proportion of females. The meta-analysis of eight studies providing genetic data, revealed that the minor alleles of both rs10455872 and rs3798220 LPA gene loci were associated with higher risk for AVS (pooled odds ratio 1.42; 95% CI: 1.34-1.50 and 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09-1.48, respectively). Importantly, high-Lp(a) individuals displayed not only faster AVS progression, by a mean difference of 0.09 m/s/year (95% CI: 0.09-0.09), but also a higher risk of serious adverse outcomes, including death (pooled hazard ratio 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01-1.90). These summary findings highlight the effect of Lp(a) on CAVD initiation, progression and outcomes, and support the early onset of Lp(a)-related subclinical lesions before clinical evidence.

The contribution of amyloid deposition in the aortic valve to calcification and aortic stenosis

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) and stenosis have a complex pathogenesis, and no therapies are available that can halt or slow their progression. Several studies have shown the presence of apolipoprotein-related amyloid deposits in close proximity to calcified areas in diseased aortic valves. In this Perspective, we explore a possible relationship between amyloid deposits, calcification and the development of aortic valve stenosis. These amyloid deposits might contribute to the amplification of the inflammatory cycle in the aortic valve, including extracellular matrix remodelling and myofibroblast and osteoblast-like cell proliferation. Further investigation in this area is needed to characterize the amyloid deposits associated with CAVD, which could allow the use of antisense oligonucleotides and/or isotype gene therapies for the prevention and/or treatment of CAVD.

Lipoprotein(a): Evidence for Role as a Causal Risk Factor in Cardiovascular Disease and Emerging Therapies

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an established risk factor for multiple cardiovascular diseases. Several lines of evidence including mechanistic, epidemiologic, and genetic studies support the role of Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis/calcific aortic valve disease (AS/CAVD). Limited therapies currently exist for the management of risk associated with elevated Lp(a), but several targeted therapies are currently in various stages of clinical development. In this review, we detail evidence supporting Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for ASCVD and AS/CAVD, and discuss approaches to managing Lp(a)-associated risk.

Use of Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A biomarker whose time has come. A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with elevated levels estimated to be prevalent in 20% of the population. Observational and genetic evidence strongly support a causal relationship between high plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-related events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, and valvular aortic stenosis. In this scientific statement, we review an array of evidence-based considerations for testing of Lp(a) in clinical practice and the utilization of Lp(a) levels to inform treatment strategies in primary and secondary prevention.

Serum lipoprotein(a) and 3-year outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed at addressing the association between serum lipoprotein (a) levels and clinical outcomes of consecutive patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We used consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the Heart Center University of Freiburg, Bad Krozingen in Germany between January 2005 and November 2013. A total of 6679 patients [men (n = 5391) and women (n = 1288)] mean aged 67.5 (± 11.1) years were assessed at baseline and prospectively followed for 3 years. Lp(a) measurement were performed at hospital admission as a routine laboratory parameter.

RESULTS

Approximately 30% of PCI patients show an elevated Lp(a) value of more than 50mg/dL. In total, 736 Patients died during the follow-up, thereof 189 (11.3%) in the first quartile, 186 (10.7%) in the second quartile, 183 (11.5%) in the third quartile and 178 (10.7%) in the last quartile (p value 0.843 from LogRank test). The MACE rate showed consistent results with 409 (24.4%), 385 (22.1%), 395 (24.7%) and 419 (25.3%) in the different respective quartiles (p value 0.125 from LogRank test).

CONCLUSION

In this large non-selected cohort of patients undergoing PCI followed by moderate intensity statin therapy, higher Lp(a) levels were not associated with worse clinical outcomes during a follow-up of 3 years.

Targeting oxidized phospholipids by AAV-based gene therapy in mice with established hepatic steatosis prevents progression to fibrosis

Oxidized phosphatidylcholines (OxPCs) are implicated in chronic tissue damage. Hyperlipidemic LDL-R--deficient mice transgenic for an OxPC-recognizing IgM fragment (scFv-E06) are protected against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To examine the effect of OxPC elimination at different stages of NAFLD progression, we used cre-dependent, adeno-associated virus serotype 8-mediated expression of the single-chain variable fragment of E06 (AAV8-scFv-E06) in hepatocytes of albumin-cre mice. AAV8-induced expression of scFv-E06 at the start of FPC diet protected mice from developing hepatic steatosis. Independently, expression of scFv-E06 in mice with established steatosis prevented the progression to hepatic fibrosis. Mass spectrometry-based oxophospho-lipidomics identified individual OxPC species that were reduced by scFv-E06 expression. In vitro, identified OxPC species dysregulated mitochondrial metabolism and gene expression in hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells. We demonstrate that individual OxPC species independently affect disease initiation and progression from hepatic steatosis to steatohepatitis, and that AAV-mediated expression of scFv-E06 is an effective therapeutic intervention.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) as a predictor for coronary events in older men

Elevated circulating lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is associated with an increased risk of first and recurrent cardiovascular events; however, the effect of baseline Lp(a) levels on long-term outcomes in an elderly population is not well understood. The current single-center prospective study evaluated the association of Lp(a) levels with incident acute coronary syndrome to identify populations at risk of future events. Lp(a) concentration was assessed in 755 individuals (mean age of 71.9 years) within the community and followed for up to 8 years (median time to event, 4.5 years; interquartile range, 2.5–6.5 years). Participants with clinically relevant high levels of Lp(a) (>50 mg/dl) had an increased absolute incidence rate of ASC of 2.00 (95% CI, 1.0041) over 8 years (P = 0.04). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier cumulative event analyses demonstrated the risk of ASC increased when compared with patients with low (<30 mg/dl) and elevated (30–50 mg/dl) levels of Lp(a) over 8 years (Gray’s test; P = 0.16). Within analyses adjusted for age and BMI, the hazard ratio was 2.04 (95% CI, 1.0–4.2; P = 0.05) in the high versus low Lp(a) groups. Overall, this study adds support for recent guidelines recommending a one-time measurement of Lp(a) levels in cardiovascular risk assessment to identify subpopulations at risk and underscores the potential utility of this marker even among older individuals at a time when potent Lp(a)-lowering agents are undergoing evaluation for clinical use.

Implication of Lipids in Calcified Aortic Valve Pathogenesis: Why Did Statins Fail?

Calcific Aortic Valve Disease (CAVD) is a fibrocalcific disease. Lipoproteins and oxidized phospholipids play a substantial role in CAVD; the level of Lp(a) has been shown to accelerate the progression of valve calcification. Indeed, oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a) into the aortic valve stimulate endothelial dysfunction and promote inflammation. Inflammation and growth factors actively promote the synthesis of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and trigger an osteogenic program. The accumulation of ECM proteins promotes lipid adhesion to valve tissue, which could initiate the osteogenic program in interstitial valve cells. Statin treatment has been shown to have the ability to diminish the death rate in subjects with atherosclerotic impediments by decreasing the serum LDL cholesterol levels. However, the use of HMG-CoA inhibitors (statins) as cholesterol-lowering therapy did not significantly reduce the progression or the severity of aortic valve calcification. However, new clinical trials targeting Lp(a) or PCSK9 are showing promising results in reducing the severity of aortic stenosis. In this review, we discuss the implication of lipids in aortic valve calcification and the current findings on the effect of lipid-lowering therapy in aortic stenosis.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Elevated Lipoprotein(a): Cascade Testing and Other Implications for Contextual Models of Care

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a predominantly genetic disorder, is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valvular disease, particularly in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a Tier I genomic condition. The combination from birth of the cumulative exposure to elevated plasma concentrations of both Lp(a) and low-density lipoprotein is particularly detrimental and explains the enhanced morbidity and mortality risk observed in patients with both conditions. An excellent opportunity to identify at-risk patients with hyper-Lp(a) at increased risk of ASCVD is to test for hyper-Lp(a) during cascade testing for FH. With probands having FH and hyper-Lp(a), the yield of detection of hyper-Lp(a) is 1 individual for every 2.1-2.4 relatives tested, whereas the yield of detection of both conditions is 1 individual for every 3-3.4 relatives tested. In this article, we discuss the incorporation of assessment of Lp(a) in the cascade testing in FH as a feasible and crucial part of models of care for FH. We also propose a simple management tool to help physicians identify and manage elevated Lp(a) in FH, with implications for the care of Lp(a) beyond FH, noting that the clinical use of RNA therapeutics for specifically targeting the overproduction of Lp(a) in at risk patients is still under investigation.

Association Between Lipoprotein(a) and Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Preliminary studies indicated that enhanced plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [lp(a)] might link with the risk of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), but the clinical association between them remained inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to determine this association.

Methods

We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies reporting the incidence of CAVD and their plasma lp(a) concentrations. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate the effect of lp(a) on CAVD using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses by study types, countries, and the level of adjustment were also conducted. Funnel plots, Egger's test and Begg's test were conducted to evaluate the publication bias.

Results

Eight eligible studies with 52,931 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Of these, four were cohort studies and four were case-control studies. Five studies were rated as high quality, three as moderate quality. The pooled results showed that plasma lp(a) levels ≥50 mg/dL were associated with a 1.76-fold increased risk of CAVD (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.47–2.11), but lp(a) levels ≥30 mg/dL were not observed to be significantly related with CAVD (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.98–1.68). We performed subgroup analyses by study type, the RRs of cohort studies revealed lp(a) levels ≥50 mg/dL and lp(a) levels ≥30 mg/dL have positive association with CAVD (RR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.39–2.07; RR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.19–1.61).

Conclusion

High plasma lp(a) levels (≥50 mg/dL) are significantly associated with increased risk of CAVD.

Oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein(a): An update

Over the past few years, there has been an undiminished interest in lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs), mainly carried on this lipoprotein. Elevated Lp(a) has been established as an independent causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. OxPLs play an important role in atherosclerosis. The main questions that remain to be answered, however, is to what extent OxPLs contribute to the atherogenicity of Lp(a), what effect hypolipidaemic medications may have on their levels and the potential clinical benefit of their reduction. This narrative review aimed to summarize currently available data on OxPLs and cardiovascular risk, as well as the effect of established and emerging hypolipidaemic medications on Lp(a)-OxPLs.

Metabolism of tissue macrophages in homeostasis and pathology

Cellular metabolism orchestrates the intricate use of tissue fuels for catabolism and anabolism to generate cellular energy and structural components. The emerging field of immunometabolism highlights the importance of cellular metabolism for the maintenance and activities of immune cells. Macrophages are embryo- or adult bone marrow-derived leukocytes that are key for healthy tissue homeostasis but can also contribute to pathologies such as metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, fibrosis or cancer. Macrophage metabolism has largely been studied in vitro. However, different organs contain diverse macrophage populations that specialize in distinct and often tissue-specific functions. This context specificity creates diverging metabolic challenges for tissue macrophage populations to fulfill their homeostatic roles in their particular microenvironment and conditions their response in pathological conditions. Here, we outline current knowledge on the metabolic requirements and adaptations of macrophages located in tissues during homeostasis and selected diseases.

MicroRNA-22 promoted osteogenic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells by inhibiting CAB39 expression during aortic valve calcification

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a common valve disease characterized by the fibro-calcific remodeling of the aortic valves, which is an actively regulated process involving osteogenic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells (VICs). MicroRNA (miRNA) is an essential regulator in diverse biological processes in cells. The present study aimed to explore the role and mechanism of miR-22 in the osteogenic differentiation of VICs. The expression profile of osteogenesis-related miRNAs was first detected in aortic valve tissue from CAVD patients (n = 33) and healthy controls (n = 12). miR-22 was highly expressed in calcified valve tissues (P < 0.01), and the expression was positively correlated with the expression of OPN (rs = 0.820, P < 0.01) and Runx2 (rs = 0.563, P < 0.01) in VICs isolated from mild or moderately calcified valves. The sustained high expression of miR-22 was also validated in an in-vitro VICs osteogenic model. Adenovirus-mediated gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments were then performed. Overexpression of miR-22 significantly accelerated the calcification process of VICs, manifested by significant increases in calcium deposition, alkaline phosphate activity, and expression of osteoblastic differentiation markers. Conversely, inhibition of miR-22 significantly negated the calcification process. Subsequently, calcium-binding protein 39 (CAB39) was identified as a target of miR-22. Overexpression of miR-22 significantly reduced the expression of CAB39 in VICs, leading to decreased catalytic activity of the CAB39-LKB1-STRAD complex, which, in turn, exacerbated changes in the AMPK-mTOR signaling pathway, and ultimately accelerated the calcification process. In addition, ROS generation and autophagic activity during VIC calcification were also regulated by miR-22/CAB39 pathway. These results indicate that miR-22 is an important accelerator of the osteogenic differentiation of VICs, and a potential therapeutic target in CAVD.

Lipoprotein(a) and Body Mass Compound the Risk of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

BACKGROUND

High plasma lipoprotein(a) and high body mass index are both causal risk factors for calcific aortic valve disease.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to test the hypothesis that risk of calcific aortic valve disease is the highest when both plasma lipoprotein(a) and body mass index are extremely high.

METHODS

From the Copenhagen General Population Study, we used information on 69,988 randomly selected individuals recruited from 2003 to 2015 (median follow-up 7.4 years) to evaluate the association between high lipoprotein(a) and high body mass index with risk of calcific aortic valve disease.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals in the 1st to 49th percentiles for both lipoprotein(a) and body mass index, the multivariable adjusted HRs for calcific aortic valve disease were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-1.9) for the 50th to 89th percentiles of both (16% of all individuals) and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.5-5.1) for the 90th to 100th percentiles of both (1.1%) (P for interaction = 0.92). The 10-year absolute risk of calcific aortic valve disease increased with higher lipoprotein(a), body mass index, and age, and was higher in men than in women. For women and men 70-79 years of age with body mass index ≥30.0 kg/m², 10-year absolute risks were 5% and 8% for lipoprotein(a) ≤42 mg/dL (88 nmol/L), 7% and 11% for 42-79 mg/dL (89-169 nmol/L), and 9% and 14% for lipoprotein(a) ≥80 mg/dL (170 nmol/L), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely high lipoprotein(a) levels and extremely high body mass index together conferred a 3.5-fold risk of calcific aortic valve disease. Ten-year absolute risk of calcific aortic valve disease by categories of lipoprotein(a) levels, body mass index, age, and sex ranged from 0.4% to 14%.

Trends in testing and prevalence of elevated Lp(a) among patients with aortic valve stenosis

Background and aims:

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is causally associated with aortic valve stenosis (AS) but Lp(a) testing among AS patients is not broadly incorporated into clinical practice. We evaluated trends in Lp(a) testing in an academic medical center.

Methods:

Educational efforts and adding Lp(a) to the lipid panel on the electronic medical record (EMR) and preprocedure order sets were used to increase awareness of Lp(a) as a risk factor in AS. Medical records at University of California San Diego Health (UCSDH) were analyzed from 2010 to 2020 to define the yearly frequency of first time Lp(a) testing in patients with diagnosis codes for AS or undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Results:

Lp(a) testing for any indication increased over 5-fold from 2010 to 2020. A total of 3808 patients had a diagnosis of AS and 417 patients had TAVR. Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dL were present in 37% of AS and 35% of TAVR patients. The rates of Lp(a) testing in AS and TAVR were 14.0% and 65.7%, respectively. In AS, Lp(a) testing increased over time from 8.5% in 2010, peaking at 24.2% in 2017, and declining to 13.9% in 2020 (p < 0.001 for trend). Following implementation of EMR order-sets in 2016, Lp(a) testing in TAVR cases increased to a peak of 88.5% in 2018.

Conclusions:

Elevated Lp(a) is prevalent in AS and TAVR patients. Implementation of educational efforts and practice pathways resulted in increased Lp(a) testing in patients with AS. This study represents a paradigm that may allow increased global awareness of Lp(a) as a risk factor for AS.

Oxidative Modification of Proteins: From Damage to Catalysis, Signaling, and Beyond

Significance: The systematic investigation of oxidative modification of proteins by reactive oxygen species started in 1980. Later, it was shown that reactive nitrogen species could also modify proteins. Some protein oxidative modifications promote loss of protein function, cleavage or aggregation, and some result in proteo-toxicity and cellular homeostasis disruption. Recent Advances: Previously, protein oxidation was associated exclusively to damage. However, not all oxidative modifications are necessarily associated with damage, as with Met and Cys protein residue oxidation. In these cases, redox state changes can alter protein structure, catalytic function, and signaling processes in response to metabolic and/or environmental alterations. This review aims to integrate the present knowledge on redox modifications of proteins with their fate and role in redox signaling and human pathological conditions. Critical Issues: It is hypothesized that protein oxidation participates in the development and progression of many pathological conditions. However, no quantitative data have been correlated with specific oxidized proteins or the progression or severity of pathological conditions. Hence, the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying these modifications, their importance in human pathologies, and the fate of the modified proteins is of clinical relevance. Future Directions: We discuss new tools to cope with protein oxidation and suggest new approaches for integrating knowledge about protein oxidation and redox processes with human pathophysiological conditions. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 35, 1016-1080.

Persistence of Lipoproteins and Cholesterol Alterations after Sepsis: Implication for Atherosclerosis Progression

(1) Background: Sepsis is one of the most common critical care illnesses with increasing survivorship. The quality of life in sepsis survivors is adversely affected by several co-morbidities, including increased incidence of dementia, stroke, cardiac disease and at least temporary deterioration in cognitive dysfunction. One of the potential explanations for their progression is the persistence of lipid profile abnormalities induced during acute sepsis into recovery, resulting in acceleration of atherosclerosis. (2) Methods: This is a targeted review of the abnormalities in the long-term lipid profile abnormalities after sepsis; (3) Results: There is a well-established body of evidence demonstrating acute alteration in lipid profile (HDL-c ↓↓, LDL-C -c ↓↓). In contrast, a limited number of studies demonstrated depression of HDL-c levels with a concomitant increase in LDL-C -c in the wake of sepsis. VLDL-C -c and Lp(a) remained unaltered in few studies as well. Apolipoprotein A1 was altered in survivors suggesting abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism concomitant to overall lipoprotein abnormalities. However, most of the studies were limited to a four-month follow-up and patient groups were relatively small. Only one study looked at the atherosclerosis progression in sepsis survivors using clinical correlates, demonstrating an acceleration of plaque formation in the aorta, and a large metanalysis suggested an increase in the risk of stroke or acute coronary event between 3% to 9% in sepsis survivors. (4) Conclusions: The limited evidence suggests an emergence and persistence of the proatherogenic lipid profile in sepsis survivors that potentially contributes, along with other factors, to the clinical sequel of atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a): Knowns, unknowns and uncertainties

Over the last 10 years, there have been advances on several aspects of lipoprotein(a) which are reviewed in the present article. Since the standard immunoassays for measuring lipoprotein(a) are not fully apo(a) isoform-insensitive, the application of an LC-MS/MS method for assaying molar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) has been advocated. Genome wide association, epidemiological, and clinical studies have established high lipoprotein(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the relative importance of molar concentration, apo(a) isoform size or variants within the LPA gene is still controversial. Lipoprotein(a)-raising single nucleotide polymorphisms has not been shown to add on value in predicting ASCVD beyond lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Although hyperlipoproteinemia(a) represents an important confounder in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), it enhances the risk of ASCVD in these patients. Thus, identification of new cases of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) during cascade testing can increase the identification of high-risk individuals. However, it remains unclear whether FH itself increases lipoprotein(a). The ASCVD risk associated with lipoprotein(a) seems to follow a linear gradient across the distribution, regardless of racial subgroups and other risk factors. The inverse association with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes needs consideration as effective lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies are progressing towards the market. Considering that Mendelian randomization analyses have identified the degree of lipoprotein(a)-lowering that is required to achieve ASCVD benefit, the findings of the ongoing outcome trial with pelacarsen will clarify whether dramatically lowering lipoprotein(a) levels can reduce the risk of ASCVD.

Lipoprotein (a) as a treatment target for cardiovascular disease prevention and related therapeutic strategies: a critical overview

Advances in several fields of cardiovascular (CV) medicine have produced new treatments (e.g. to treat dyslipidaemia) that have proven efficacy in terms of reducing deaths and providing a better quality of life. However, the burden of CV disease (CVD) remains high. Thus, there is a need to search for new treatment targets. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has emerged as a potential novel target since there is evidence that it contributes to CVD events. In this narrative review, we present the current evidence of the potential causal relationship between Lp(a) and CVD and discuss the likely magnitude of Lp(a) lowering required to produce a clinical benefit. We also consider current and investigational treatments targeting Lp(a), along with the potential cost of these interventions.

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

High lipoprotein(a) concentrations present in 10%-20% of the population have long been linked to increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular disease. It is unclear whether high concentrations represent an unmet medical need. Lipoprotein(a) is currently not a target for treatment to prevent cardiovascular disease.

CONTENT

The present review summarizes evidence of causality for high lipoprotein(a) concentrations gained from large genetic epidemiologic studies and discusses measurements of lipoprotein(a) and future treatment options for high values found in an estimated >1 billion individuals worldwide.

SUMMARY

Evidence from mechanistic, observational, and genetic studies support a causal role of lipoprotein(a) in the development of cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease and peripheral arterial disease, as well as aortic valve stenosis, and likely also ischemic stroke. Effect sizes are most pronounced for myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, and aortic valve stenosis where high lipoprotein(a) concentrations predict 2- to 3-fold increases in risk. Lipoprotein(a) measurements should be performed using well-validated assays with traceability to a recognized calibrator to ensure common cut-offs for high concentrations and risk assessment. Randomized cardiovascular outcome trials are needed to provide final evidence of causality and to assess the potential clinical benefit of novel, potent lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies.

Genetics of Lipoprotein(a): Cardiovascular Disease and Future Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) levels are determined 80-90% by genetics and differ by up to 1000-fold between individuals. This review discusses the most recent literature on lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, as well as future lipoprotein(a)lowering therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few decades, numerous studies have observed that high lipoprotein(a) levels are associated observationally and causally through human genetics with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Also, the development of safe and effective therapies to lower lipoprotein(a) is ongoing, most importantly using antisense oligonucleotides to prevent production of lipoprotein(a). Finally, both observational and genetic studies have estimated the extent to which lowering of lipoprotein(a) is needed to obtain a clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein(a) is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, currently no approved safe and effective therapy is available to lower lipoprotein(a) levels. That said, promising randomized studies using antisense oligonucleotides show up to 80% reductions in lipoprotein(a), reductions that hopefully will result in lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease as presently tested in the ongoing HORIZON phase 3 trial.

Metabolomics in Severe Aortic Stenosis Reveals Intermediates of Nitric Oxide Synthesis as Most Distinctive Markers

BACKGROUND

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a rapidly growing global health problem with an estimated 12.6 million cases globally in 2017 and a 112% increase of deaths since 1990 due to aging and population growth. CAVD may develop into aortic stenosis (AS) by progressive narrowing of the aortic valve. AS is underdiagnosed, and if treatment by aortic valve replacement (AVR) is delayed, this leads to poor recovery of cardiac function, absence of symptomatic improvement and marked increase of mortality. Considering the current limitations to define the stage of AS-induced cardiac remodeling, there is need for a novel method to aid in the diagnosis of AS and timing of intervention, which may be found in metabolomics profiling of patients.

METHODS

Serum samples of nine healthy controls and 10 AS patients before and after AVR were analyzed by untargeted mass spectrometry. Multivariate modeling was performed to determine a metabolic profile of 30 serum metabolites which distinguishes AS patients from controls. Human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) were incubated with serum of the AS patients and then stained for ICAM-1 with Western Blot to analyze the effect of AS patient serum on endothelial cell activation.

RESULTS

The top 30 metabolic profile strongly distinguishes AS patients from healthy controls and includes 17 metabolites related to nitric oxide metabolism and 12 metabolites related to inflammation, in line with the known pathomechanism for calcific aortic valve disease. Nine metabolites correlate strongly with left ventricular mass, of which three show reversal back to control values after AVR. Western blot analysis of CMECs incubated with AS patient sera shows a significant reduction (14%) in ICAM-1 in AS samples taken after AVR compared to AS patient sera before AVR.

CONCLUSION

Our study defined a top 30 metabolic profile with biological and clinical relevance, which may be used as blood biomarker to identify AS patients in need of cardiac surgery. Future studies are warranted in patients with mild-to-moderate AS to determine if these metabolites reflect disease severity and can be used to identify AS patients in need of cardiac surgery.

Effect of bariatric surgery on plasma levels of oxidised phospholipids, biomarkers of oxidised LDL and lipoprotein(a)

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and this is improved following bariatric surgery. Oxidised phospholipids (OxPL) are thought to reflect the pro-inflammatory effects of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and both are independent predictors of cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE

Our study sought to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on OxPL, biomarkers of oxidised LDL (OxLDL) and Lp(a).

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study of 59 patients with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery. Blood samples were obtained prior to surgery and at 6 and 12 months after. Sixteen patients attending the tertiary medical weight management clinic at the same centre were also recruited for comparison. Lipid and metabolic blood parameters, OxLDL, OxPL on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB), IgG and IgM autoantibodies to MDA-LDL, IgG and IgM apoB-immune complexes and Lp(a) were measured.

RESULTS

Reduction in body mass index (BMI) was significant following bariatric surgery, from median 48 kg/m2 at baseline to 37 kg/m2 at 6 months and 33 kg/m2 at 12 months. OxPL-apoB levels decreased significantly at 12 months following surgery [5.0 (3.2-7.4) to 3.8 (3.0-5.5) nM, p = 0.001], while contrastingly, Lp(a) increased significantly [10.2 (3.8-31.9) to 16.9 (4.9-38.6) mg/dl, p = 0.002]. There were significant post-surgical decreases in IgG and IgM biomarkers, particularly at 12 months, while OxLDL remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery results in a significant increase in Lp(a) but reductions in OxPL-apoB and other biomarkers of oxidised lipoproteins, suggesting increased synthetic capacity and reduced oxidative stress. These biomarkers might be clinically useful to monitor physiological effects of weight loss interventions.

The role of Lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular disease: Current concepts and future perspectives

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are associated with the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and with calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) both observationally and causally from human genetic studies. The mechanisms are not well characterized but likely involve its role as a carrier of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs), which are known to be increased in pro-inflammatory states, to induce pro-inflammatory changes in monocytes leading to plaque instability, and to impair vascular endothelial cell function, a driver of acute and recurrent ischemic events. In addition, Lp(a) itself has prothrombotic activity. Current lipid-lowering strategies do not sufficiently lower Lp(a) serum levels. Lp(a)-specific-lowering drugs, targeting apolipoprotein(a) synthesis, lower Lp(a) by up to 90% and are being evaluated in ongoing clinical outcome trials. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the associations of Lp(a) with ASCVD and CAVS, the current role of Lp(a) assessment in the clinical setting, and emerging Lp(a)-specific-lowering therapies.

Lipoprotein(a) and Oxidized Phospholipids Promote Valve Calcification in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

Background

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a major carrier of oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), is associated with an increased incidence of aortic stenosis (AS). However, it remains unclear whether elevated Lp(a) and OxPL drive disease progression and are therefore targets for therapeutic intervention.

Objectives

This study investigated whether Lp(a) and OxPL on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) levels are associated with disease activity, disease progression, and clinical events in AS patients, along with the mechanisms underlying any associations.

Methods

This study combined 2 prospective cohorts and measured Lp(a) and OxPL-apoB levels in patients with AS (V_max >2.0 m/s), who underwent baseline ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET), repeat computed tomography calcium scoring, and repeat echocardiography. In vitro studies investigated the effects of Lp(a) and OxPL on valvular interstitial cells.

Results

Overall, 145 patients were studied (68% men; age 70.3 ± 9.9 years). On baseline positron emission tomography, patients in the top Lp(a) tertile had increased valve calcification activity compared with those in lower tertiles (n = 79; ¹⁸F-NaF tissue-to-background ratio of the most diseased segment: 2.16 vs. 1.97; p = 0.043). During follow-up, patients in the top Lp(a) tertile had increased progression of valvular computed tomography calcium score (n = 51; 309 AU/year [interquartile range: 142 to 483 AU/year] vs. 93 AU/year [interquartile range: 56 to 296 AU/year; p = 0.015), faster hemodynamic progression on echocardiography (n = 129; 0.23 ± 0.20 m/s/year vs. 0.14 ± 0.20 m/s/year] p = 0.019), and increased risk for aortic valve replacement and death (n = 145; hazard ratio: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.13 to 3.08; p = 0.014), compared with lower tertiles. Similar results were noted with OxPL-apoB. In vitro, Lp(a) induced osteogenic differentiation of valvular interstitial cells, mediated by OxPL and inhibited with the E06 monoclonal antibody against OxPL.

Conclusions

In patients with AS, Lp(a) and OxPL drive valve calcification and disease progression. These findings suggest lowering Lp(a) or inactivating OxPL may slow AS progression and provide a rationale for clinical trials to test this hypothesis.

Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A translational review

Until recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation was restricted to high-risk and inoperable patients. The updated 2017 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines has widened the indication to include intermediate-risk patients, based on two recently published trials (PARTNER 2 and SURTAVI). Moreover, two other recent trials (PARTNER 3 and EVOLUT LOW RISK) have demonstrated similar results with transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low-risk patients. Thus, extension of transcatheter aortic valve implantation to younger patients, who are currently treated by surgical aortic valve replacement, raises the crucial question of bioprosthesis durability. In this translational review, we propose to produce a state-of-the-art overview of the durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation by integrating knowledge of the basic science of bioprosthesis degeneration (pathophysiology and biomarkers). After summarising the new definition of structural valve deterioration, we will present what is known about the pathophysiology of aortic stenosis and bioprosthesis degeneration. Next, we will consider how to identify a population at risk of early degeneration, and how basic science with the help of biomarkers could identify and predict structural valve deterioration. Finally, we will present data on the differences in durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement.

Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis and Atherosclerotic Calcification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the pathophysiology of calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) and surveys relevant clinical data and basic research that explain how CAVS arises.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), autotaxin, and genetic driving forces such as mutations in LPA gene and NOTCH gene seem to play a major role in the development of CAVS. These factors might well become targets of medical therapy in the coming years. CVAS seems to be a multifactorial disease that has much in common with coronary artery disease, mainly regarding lipidic accumulation and calcium deposition. No clinical trials conducted to date have managed to answer the key question of whether Lp(a) lowering and anti-calcific therapies confer a benefit in terms of reducing incidence or progression of CAVS, although additional outcome trials are ongoing.

An update on lipid oxidation and inflammation in cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including ischemic heart diseases and cerebrovascular diseases, are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Atherosclerosis is the major underlying factor for most CVD. It is well-established that oxidative stress and inflammation are two major mechanisms leading to atherosclerosis. Under oxidative stress, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)-containing phospholipids and cholesterol esters in cellular membrane and lipoproteins can be readily oxidized through a free radical-induced lipid peroxidation (LPO) process to form a complex mixture of oxidation products. Overwhelming evidence demonstrates that these oxidized lipids are actively involved in the inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis by interacting with immune cells (such as macrophages) and endothelial cells. In addition to lipid lowering in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic CVD, targeting chronic inflammation has been entering the medical realm. Clinical trials are under way to lower the lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and its associated oxidized phospholipids, which will provide clinical evidence that targeting inflammation caused by oxidized lipids is a viable approach for CVD. In this review, we aim to give an update on our understanding of the free radical oxidation of LPO, analytical technique to analyze the oxidation products, especially the oxidized phospholipids and cholesterol esters in low density lipoproteins (LDL), and focusing on the experimental and clinical evidence on the role of lipid oxidation in the inflammatory responses associated with CVD, including myocardial infarction and calcific aortic valve stenosis. The challenges and future directions in understanding the role of LPO in CVD will also be discussed.

Potential Causality and Emerging Medical Therapies for Lipoprotein(a) and Its Associated Oxidized Phospholipids in Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

The prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease is increasing with aging of the population. Current treatment options for advanced or symptomatic aortic stenosis are limited to traditional surgical or percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Medical therapies that impact the progression of calcific aortic valve disease do not currently exist. New pathophysiological insights suggest that the processes leading to calcific aortic valve disease are metabolically active for many years before and during the clinical expression of disease. The identification of genetic and potentially causal mediators of calcific aortic valve disease allows opportunities for therapies that may slow progression to the point where aortic valve replacement can be avoided. Recent studies suggest that approximately one-third of aortic stenosis cases are associated with highly elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and pathways related to the metabolism of procalcifying oxidized phospholipids. Oxidized phospholipids can be carried by Lp(a) into valve leaflets but can also be formed in situ from cell membranes, lipoproteins, and apoptotic cells. This review will summarize the clinical data implicating the potential causality of Lp(a)/oxidized phospholipids, describe emerging therapeutic agents, and propose clinical trial designs to test the hypothesis that lowering Lp(a) will reduce progression aortic stenosis and the need for aortic valve replacement.

Association of Mild to Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis Progression With Higher Lipoprotein(a) and Oxidized Phospholipid Levels: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Several studies have reported an association of levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and the content of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB) and apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo[a]) with faster calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) progression. However, whether this association is threshold or linear remains unclear.

Objective

To determine whether the plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) have a linear association with a faster rate of CAVS progression.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial tested the association of baseline plasma levels of Lp(a), OxPL-apoB, and OxPL-apo(a) with the rate of CAVS progression. Participants were included from the ASTRONOMER (Effects of Rosuvastatin on Aortic Stenosis Progression) trial, a multicenter study conducted in 23 Canadian sites designed to test the effect of statin therapy (median follow-up, 3.5 years [interquartile range, 2.9-4.5 years]). Patients with mild to moderate CAVS defined by peak aortic jet velocity ranging from 2.5 to 4.0 m/s were recruited; those with peak aortic jet velocity of less than 2.5 m/s or with an indication for statin therapy were excluded. Data were collected from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005, and underwent ad hoc analysis from April 1 through September 1, 2018.

Interventions

After the randomization process, patients were followed up by means of echocardiography for 3 to 5 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression rate of CAVS as assessed by annualized progression of peak aortic jet velocity.

Results

In this cohort of 220 patients (60.0% male; mean [SD] age, 58 [13] years), a linear association was found between plasma levels of Lp(a) (odds ratio [OR] per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .006), OxPL-apoB (OR per 1-nM increase, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .02), and OxPL-apo(a) (OR per 10-nM increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .002) and faster CAVS progression, which is marked in younger patients (OR for Lp[a] level per 10-mg/dL increase, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.07-1.33; P = .002]; OR for OxPL-apoB level per 1-nM increase, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = .01]; and OR for OxPL-apo[a] level per 10-nM increase, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .001]) and remained statistically significant after comprehensive multivariable adjustment (β coefficient, ≥ 0.25; SE, ≤ 0.004 [P ≤ .005]; OR, ≥1.10 [P ≤ .007]).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study demonstrates that the association of Lp(a) levels and its content in OxPL with faster CAVS progression is linear, reinforcing the concept that Lp(a) levels should be measured in patients with mild to moderate CAVS to enhance management and risk stratification.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800800.

NHLBI Working Group Recommendations to Reduce Lipoprotein(a)-Mediated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis

Pathophysiological, epidemiological, and genetic studies provide strong evidence that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal mediator of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Specific therapies to address Lp(a)-mediated CVD and CAVD are in clinical development. Due to knowledge gaps, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute organized a working group that identified challenges in fully understanding the role of Lp(a) in CVD/CAVD. These included the lack of research funding, inadequate experimental models, lack of globally standardized Lp(a) assays, and inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying current drug therapies on Lp(a) levels. Specific recommendations were provided to facilitate basic, mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical research on Lp(a); foster collaborative research and resource sharing; leverage expertise of different groups and centers with complementary skills; and use existing National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute resources. Concerted efforts to understand Lp(a) pathophysiology, together with diagnostic and therapeutic advances, are required to reduce Lp(a)-mediated risk of CVD and CAVD.

Lipoprotein(a), Oxidized Phospholipids, and Aortic Valve Microcalcification Assessed by 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography

Background

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) and a well-established genetic risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Whether Lp(a) predicts aortic valve microcalcification in individuals without CAVS is unknown. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) and OxPL levels in patients with CAVS and to determine if individuals with elevated Lp(a) but without CAVS have higher aortic valve microcalcification.

Methods

We recruited 214 patients with CAVS from Montreal and 174 patients with CAVS and 108 controls from Québec City, Canada. In a second group of individuals with high (≥75 nmol/L, n = 27) or low (<75 nmol/L, n = 28) Lp(a) levels, 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed to determine the difference in mean tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) of the aortic valve.

Results

Patients with CAVS had 62.0% higher Lp(a) (median = 28.7, interquartile range [8.2-116.6] vs 10.9 [3.6-28.8] nmol/L, P < 0.0001), 50% higher OxPL-apolipoprotein-B (2.2 [1.3-6.0] vs 1.1 [0.7-2.6] nmol/L, P < 0.0001), and 69.9% higher OxPL-apolipoprotein(a) (7.3 [1.8-28.4] vs 2.2 [0.8-8.4] nmol/L, P < 0.0001) levels compared with individuals without CAVS (all P < 0.0001). Individuals without CAVS but elevated Lp(a) had 40% higher mean TBR compared with individuals with low Lp(a) levels (mean TBR = 1.25 ± 0.23 vs 1.15 ± 0.11, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Elevated Lp(a) and OxPL levels are associated with prevalent CAVS in patients studied in an echocardiography laboratory setting. In individuals with elevated Lp(a), evidence of aortic valve microcalcification by 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography is present before the development of clinically manifested CAVS.

Autotaxin and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a complex trait disorder characterized by calcific remodeling of leaflets. Genome-wide association (GWA) study and Mendelian randomization (MR) have highlighted that LPA, which encodes for apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], is causally associated with CAVD. Apo(a) is the protein component of Lp(a), a LDL-like particle, which transports oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs). Autotaxin (ATX), which is encoded by ENPP2, is a member of the ecto-nucleotidase family of enzymes, which is, however, a lysophospholipase. As such, ATX converts phospholipids into lysophosphatidic acid (LysoPA), a metabolite with potent and diverse biological properties. Studies have recently underlined that ATX is enriched in the Lp(a) lipid fraction. Functional experiments and data obtained in mouse models suggest that ATX mediates inflammation and mineralization of the aortic valve. Recent findings also indicate that epigenetically-driven processes lower the expression of phospholipid phosphatase 3 (PLPP3) and increased LysoPA signaling and inflammation in the aortic valve during CAVD. These recent data thus provide novel insights about how lipoproteins mediate the development of CAVD. Herein, we review the implication of lipoproteins in CAVD and examine the role of ATX in promoting the osteogenic transition of valve interstitial cells (VICs).

Lipoprotein(a) in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) for which transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly utilized as treatment. We evaluated the effect of a program to increase testing of and define the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) among patients undergoing TAVR. Educational efforts and incorporation of a “check-box” Lp(a) order to the preoperative TAVR order set were instituted. Retrospective chart review was performed in 229 patients requiring TAVR between May 2013 and September 2018. Of these patients, 57% had an Lp(a) level measured; testing rates increased from 0% in 2013 to 96% in 2018. Lipoprotein(a) testing occurred in 11% of patients before and in 80% of patients after the “check-box” order set ( P < .001). The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dL) was 35%; these patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease requiring revascularization compared with patients with normal Lp(a) (65% vs 47%; P = .047). Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL also had higher incidence of paravalvular leak compared with those with normal Lp(a) (13% vs 4%; P = .04). This study defines the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in advanced stages of CAVS and provides a practice pathway to assess procedural complications and long-term outcomes of TAVR in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.

Role of lipoprotein (a) and LPA KIV2 repeat polymorphism in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and calcification: a proof of concept study

Hemodynamic valvular impairment is a frequent determinant of the natural history of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). The role of elevated Lp(a) levels and LPA Kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) size polymorphism in influencing aortic valve calcification and stenosis development in patients with tricuspid aortic valve was recognized. In this study, we investigate the association between Lp(a) and LPA KIV-2 repeat number, and the presence of calcification and stenosis in BAV patients. Sixty-nine patients [79.7% males; median age 45(30-53) yrs], consecutively referred to Center for Cardiovascular Diagnosis or Referral Center for Marfan syndrome or related disorders, AOU Careggi, from June to November 2014, were investigated. For each patient, clinical (ECG and echocardiography) and laboratory [Lp(a) (Immunoturbidimetric assay) and LPA KIV-2 repeat number (real-time PCR)] evaluation were performed. Patients were compared with 69 control subjects. No significant association between Lp(a) circulating levels and LPA KIV-2 repeat number and BAV was evidenced. Among BAV patients, significantly higher Lp(a) levels according to calcification degree were found [no calcifications:78(42-159) mg/L, mild/moderate: 134(69-189) mg/L; severe: 560(286-1511) mg/L, p = 0.008]. Conversely, lower LPA KIV-2 repeat numbers in subjects with more severe calcification degree were observed. Furthermore, higher Lp(a) levels in patients with aortic stenosis [214(67-501) mg/L vs 104(56-169) mg/L, p = 0.043] were also found. In conclusion, present data suggest the potential role for Lp(a) as a possible risk marker useful to stratify, among BAV patients, those with a higher chance to develop valvular calcifications and aortic stenosis.

Lipoproteins as targets and markers of lipoxidation

Lipoproteins are essential systemic lipid transport particles, composed of apolipoproteins embedded in a phospholipid and cholesterol monolayer surrounding a cargo of diverse lipid species. Many of the lipids present are susceptible to oxidative damage by lipid peroxidation, giving rise to the formation of reactive lipid peroxidation products (rLPPs). In view of the close proximity of the protein and lipid moieties within lipoproteins, the probability of adduct formation between rLPPs and amino acid residues of the proteins, a process called lipoxidation, is high. There has been interest for many years in the biological effects of such modifications, but the field has been limited to some extent by the availability of methods to determine the sites and exact nature of such modification. More recently, the availability of a wide range of antibodies to lipoxidation products, as well as advances in analytical techniques such as liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS), have increased our knowledge substantially. While most work has focused on LDL, oxidation of which has long been associated with pro-inflammatory responses and atherosclerosis, some studies on HDL, VLDL and Lipoprotein(a) have also been reported. As the broader topic of LDL oxidation has been reviewed previously, this review focuses on lipoxidative modifications of lipoproteins, from the historical background through to recent advances in the field. We consider the main methods of analysis for detecting rLPP adducts on apolipoproteins, including their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the biological effects of lipoxidized lipoproteins and their potential roles in diseases.

•

Lipoproteins can be modified by reactive Lipid Peroxidation Products (rLPPs).

•

Lipoprotein lipoxidation is known to occur in several inflammatory diseases.

•

Biochemical, immunochemical and mass spectrometry methods can detect rLPP adducts.

•

Due to higher information output, MS can facilitate localization of modifications.

•

Antibodies against some rLPPs have been used to identify lipoxidation in vivo.