Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus by Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical relevance of left atrial structural remodeling and non-pulmonary vein foci in atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The mechanistic role of left atrial (LA) structural remodeling as a non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger in the initiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. This study is aimed at prospectively evaluating the association between non-PV triggers and LA structural remodeling.

METHODS

A total of 517 patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF were included. After PV isolation, a standardized protocol was implemented to reveal non-PV triggers, which included burst pacing into AF followed by cardioversion during isoproterenol infusion. If pacing-induced atrial tachycardia (AT) was observed, mapping and catheter ablation were performed.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of LA low-voltage area (LVA) < 0.5 mV incrementally increased during right atrial pacing among the no induction (n = 470), AF (n = 21), and AT (n = 26) groups (2.6 ± 5.7%, 5.5 ± 6.4%, and 18.0 ± 21.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). In the AF induction group, non-PV foci originated from the left atrium in 13 of 25 foci (52%), and 8 of 13 LA non-PV foci (62%) were located in the septal region. All except 1 focus originated from the non-LVA < 0.5 mV (8%), but 8 of the 13 LA foci originated from the LVA < 1.0 mV (62%). There were no differences in AF recurrence among the groups (log-rank, P = 0.160).

CONCLUSION

The majority of non-PV foci in the LA originated outside regions with advanced structural remodeling, thus suggesting the limited effectiveness of adjunctive ablation guided by the LVA < 0.5 mV during sinus rhythm in eliminating non-PV triggers.

The value of computed tomography angiography for evaluation of left atrial enlargement in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The post-processing technology of CTA offers significant advantages in evaluating left atrial enlargement (LAE) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF). This study aims to identify parameters for rapidly and accurately diagnosing LAE in patients with PAF using CT cross-sections.

METHODS

Left atrial pulmonary venous (PV) CT was performed to 300 PAF patients with dual-source CT, and left atrial volume (LAV), left atrial anteroposterior diameter (LAD1), left atrial transverse diameter (LAD2), and left atrial area (LAA) were measured in the ventricular end systolic (ES) and middle diastolic (MD). LA index (LAI) = LA parameter/body surface area (BSA). Left atrial volume index (LAVIES) > 77.7 ml/m2 was used as the reference standard for the LAE diagnosis.

RESULTS

227 patients were enrolled in the group, 101 (44.5%) of whom had LAE. LAVES and LAVMD (r = 0.983), LAVIES and LAVIMD (r = 0.984), LAAES and LAVIES (r = 0.817), LAAMD and LAVIES (r = 0.814) had strong positive correlations. The area under curve (AUC) showed that all measured parameters were suitable for diagnosing LAE, and the diagnostic efficacy was compared as follows: LAA/LAAI> LAD> the relative value index of LAD, LAD2> LAD1. LAA and LAAI demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy, with LAA being more readily available than LAAI.

CONCLUSIONS

The axial LAA measured by CTA can be served as a parameter for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of LAE in patients with PAF.

Left Atrial Appendage Opacification on Cardiac Computed Tomography in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Clinical Implications of Slow-Flow

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) slow-flow may increase the risk of ischemic stroke. We studied LAA attenuation on cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used data from a prospective cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing cardiac computed tomography during the acute stroke imaging protocol. We compared characteristics, functional outcome (modified Rankin scale: higher scores indicating worse outcome), stroke recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events after 2-year follow-up between patients with LAA thrombus (filling defect<100 Hounsfield Unit (HU)), slow-flow (filling defect ≥100 HU) and normal filling. Of 421 patients, 31 (7%) had LAA thrombus, 69 (16%) slow-flow, and 321 (76%) normal filling. Patients with thrombus or slow-flow more often had known atrial fibrillation compared with normal filling (45%, 39%, and 9%, P<0.001). Patients with thrombus had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-scores compared with slow-flow and normal filling (18 [interquartile range, 9-22], 6 [interquartile range, 3-17], and 5 [interquartile range, 2-11], P<0.001). Compared with normal filling, there was no difference with slow-flow in functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 3 versus 2; acOR 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4]), stroke recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.3-1.9]) or major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.7-2.1]), while patients with thrombus had worse functional outcome (median modified Rankin scale, 6, acOR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.5-7.4]). In cryptogenic stroke patients (n=156) slow-flow was associated with stroke recurrence (27% versus 6%, aHR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.1-15.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with slow-flow had similar characteristics to patients with thrombus, but had less severe strokes. Slow-flow was not significantly associated with functional outcome or major adverse cardiovascular events, but was associated with recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Crosslink between atrial fibrillation and cancer: a therapeutic conundrum

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with malignancies than in general population. The pathophysiological processes include the pro-inflammatory condition and the exaggerated inflammatory reaction to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery interventions. Thus, it is pivotal to decrease morbidity and mortality in this group by providing appropriate care and prevention. In this subset, the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events is high and the common risk score such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED employed in non-oncologic patients have limited evidence in cancer patients. A paucity of evidence in the setting in individuals having both malignancies and atrial fibrillation entangle the clinician when it comes to therapeutic management. Tailored management is recommended of anticoagulation treatment could be difficult, and there is. In this review, we try to explain the mechanism of AF in cancer patients as well as its management in this setting.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Therapy Overview and Future Perspective

The left atrial appendage (LAA) has gained increasing attention in the field of cardiology as a potential site for intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, especially in individuals who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LAAO, encompassing its anatomic considerations, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice timely and fully, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2‑VASc‑60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of the Asian AF population. The guidelines also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Left Atrial Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation

This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of preprocedural imaging in three clinical scenarios in patients needing endovascular treatment or cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. These clinical scenarios include preprocedural imaging prior to radiofrequency ablation; prior to left atrial appendage occlusion; and prior to cardioversion. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice in a timely and comprehensive manner, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of the Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of the Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering have jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines have comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of AF in the Asian population. The guidelines have also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Computed Tomography to Exclude Cardiac Thrombus in Atrial Fibrillation-An 11-Year Experience from an Academic Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) could be a suitable method for acute exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) prior to cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) at the emergency department. Our aim was to present our experiences with this modality in recent years.

METHODS

This registry-based observational study was performed at the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. We studied all consecutive patients with AF and AFL who underwent CT between January 2012 and January 2023 to rule out LAAT before cardioversion to sinus rhythm was attempted. Follow-ups were conducted by telephone and electronic medical records. The main variables of interest were the rate of LAAT and ischemic stroke at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients (143 [61%] men; median age 68 years [IQR 57-76], median CHA2DS2-VASc 2 [IQR 1-4]) were analyzed. Follow-up was completed in 216 (92%) patients after a median of 506 (IQR 159-1391) days. LAAT was detected in eight patients (3%). A total of 163 patients (72%) in whom LAAT was excluded by CT were eventually successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm. No adverse events occurred during their ED stay. All patients received anticoagulation according to the CHA2DS2-VASc risk stratification, and no patient had suffered an ischemic stroke at follow-up, resulting in an incidence risk of ischemic strokes of 0% (95% CI 0.0-1.2%).

CONCLUSION

LAAT was rare in patients admitted to the ED with AF and AFL who underwent cardiac CT prior to attempted cardioversion. At follow-up, no patient had suffered an ischemic stroke. Prospective studies need to show whether this strategy is suitable for the acute treatment of symptomatic AF in the emergency setting.

Extensive myocardial calcifications in a dialysis patient: A porcelain heart manifesting with abdominal pain

This case report describes a 41-year-old male patient with chronic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis presenting with upper abdominal pain and mild thigh numbness. CT chest demonstrated extensive myocardial calcifications and left atrial thrombus. This case emphasizes the clinical relevance of myocardial calcifications, especially in patients with end-stage renal disease. It also highlights the potential association between these calcifications and complications such as atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events. The findings emphasize the need for diagnostic vigilance and an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of myocardial calcifications in the context of renal disease.

One-Day Interruption of NOAC Is Associated with Low Risk of Periprocedural Adverse Events during Pulmonary Vein Isolation If Combined with Left Atrial Thrombus Exclusion with Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Safety, efficacy, and patient comfort are the expectations during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to validate the combined advantages of pre- and periprocedural anticoagulation with non-vitamin K anticoagulants (NOACs) and rigorous left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) exclusion with computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

This study included a population of consecutive patients, between March 2018 and June 2020, who underwent cardiac CT within 24 h before PVI to guide the ablation and rule out LAAT. NOAC was omitted 24 h before the ablation.

RESULTS

A total of 187 patients (63% male) underwent CT before PVI. None of the patients experienced stroke during or after the procedure. The complication rate was low, with no thromboembolic events and 2.1% of patients experiencing a major bleeding event.

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting NOAC 24 h before the ablation might be safe if combined with left atrial thrombus exclusion with computed tomography.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Transesophageal echocardiography and computerized tomography angiography mismatch in left atrial appendage thrombus evaluation

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Nonetheless, computerized tomography angiography (CTA) is readily used to exclude LAA thrombus before pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and LAA closure procedures. We aimed to assess the comparability of LAA thrombus diagnosis using chest CTA scans in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE.

METHODS

Retrospective collection of consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE and chest CTA within 30 days and had evidence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) or LAA thrombus on TEE. Clinical, demographic, and echo data were collected. Prospective analysis of the CTA for evidence of LAA thrombus in the same group of patients was performed. We compared the findings of the two modalities.

RESULTS

Out of 1550 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE examinations in the study period, 63 patients underwent TEE within 30 days of a chest CTA scan. Twenty-three patients had LAA thrombus and 40 had some degree of SEC according to TEE. On CTA, 11 were interpreted as positive with a high level of suspicion for the presence of an LAA thrombus. Six patients (26.1%) had LAA thrombus according to both CT and TEE. Therefore, low concordance was found between test results (chi-squared continuity correction = 5.5, df  = 1, and P -value = 0.01902).

CONCLUSION

The discrepancy between CTA and TEE results suggests these examinations might be more suitable as complementary examinations to exclude LAA thrombus.

Role of cardiac computed tomography in hyperacute stroke assessment

BACKGROUND

Incorporating cardiac CT with hyperacute stroke imaging may increase the yield for cardioembolic sources. It is not clarified whether stroke severity influences on rates of intracardiac thrombus. We aimed to investigate a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) threshold below which acute cardiac CT was unnecessary.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected stroke who underwent multimodal brain imaging and concurrent non-gated cardiac CT with delayed timing were prospectively recruited from 1st December 2020 to 30th November 2021. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis of the NIHSS and intracardiac thrombus on hyperacute cardiac CT.

RESULTS

A total of 314 patients were assessed (median age 69 years, 61% male). Final diagnoses were ischemic stroke (n=205; 132 etiology-confirmed stroke, independent of cardiac CT and 73 cryptogenic), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=21) and stroke-mimic syndromes (n=88). The total yield of cardiac CT was 8 intracardiac thrombus and 1 dissection. Cardiac CT identified an intracardiac thrombus in 6 (4.5%) with etiology-confirmed stroke, 2 (2.7%) with cryptogenic stroke, and none in patients with TIA or stroke-mimic. All of those with intracardiac thrombus had NIHSS ≥4 and this was the threshold below which hyperacute cardiac CT was not justified (sensitivity 100%, specificity 38%, positive predictive value 4.0%, negative predictive value 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A cutoff NIHSS ≥4 may be useful to stratify patients for cardiac CT in the hyperacute stroke setting to optimize its diagnostic yield and reduce additional radiation exposure.

Use of Computed Tomography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedure Planning and Post-Procedure Assessment

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to systemic anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with increased risk for thromboembolic events. Pre- and post-procedural imaging is essential for technical success, allowing practitioners to identify contraindications, select appropriate devices, and recognize procedural complications. Although transesophageal echocardiography has traditionally served as the preeminent imaging modality in LAAO, cardiac computed tomography imaging has emerged as a noninvasive surrogate given its excellent isotropic spatial resolution, multiplanar reconstruction capability, rapid temporal resolution, and large field of view.

A preliminary study of minimal left atrial appendage occlusion using Watchman under the guidance of fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has been considered an alternative treatment to prevent embolic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, it carries a risk of general anesthesia or esophageal injury if guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of minimal LAAO (MLAAO) using Watchman under fluoroscopy guidance alone in patients with NVAF.

METHODS

A total of 249 consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAAO using the WATCHMAN device were divided into two groups: the Standard LAAO (SLAAO) group and the MLAAO group. Procedural characteristics and follow-up results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of successful device implantation (p > 0.05). Fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure dose, and contrast medium usage in the MLAAO group were higher than those in the SLAAO group (p < 0.001). The procedure time and hospitalization duration were significantly lower in the MLAAO group than those in the SLAAO group (p < 0.001). The occluder compression ratio, measured with fluoroscopy, was lower than that measured with TEE (17.63 ± 3.75% vs. 21.69 ± 4.26%, p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed between the SLAAO group and the MLAAO group (p < 0.05) in terms of oropharyngeal/esophageal injury, hypotension, and dysphagia. At 3 months after LAAO, the MLAAO group had a higher incidence of residual flow within 1-5 mm compared to the SLAAO group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

MLAAO guided by fluoroscopy, instead of TEE, without general anesthesia simplifies the operational process and may be considered safe, effective, and feasible, especially for individuals who are unable to tolerate or unwilling to undergo TEE or general anesthesia.

Cardiac Masses and Pseudomasses: An Overview about Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background

A cardiac lesion detected at ultrasonography might turn out to be a normal structure, a benign tumor or rarely a malignancy, and lesion characterization is very important to appropriately manage the lesion itself. The exact relationship of the mass with coronary arteries and the knowledge of possible concomitant coronary artery disease are necessary preoperative information. Moreover, the increasingly performed coronary CT angiography to evaluate non-invasively coronary artery disease leads to a rising number of incidental findings. Therefore, CT and MRI are frequently performed imaging modalities when echocardiography is deemed insufficient to evaluate a lesion. A brief comprehensive overview about diagnostic radiological imaging and the clinical background of cardiac masses and pseudomasses is reported.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the venous rather than the arterial phase is essential for the evaluation of the right phrenic nerve

BACKGROUND

Preprocedural detection of the running course of the right pericardiophrenic bundles (PBs) is considered to be useful in preventing phrenic nerve (PN) injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, previous studies using the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) reported a relatively low right PBs detection rate.

METHODS

This study included 63 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation and preoperative contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the venous and arterial phases (66.7 ± 10.2 years; 44 male). The venous phase of contrast-enhanced CT significantly improved the detection rate of PBs compared to the arterial phase (96.8% vs. 60.3%, p < .001), and PBs were detected in the venous phase only in 23 (36.7%) patients. No significant differences were observed between the right PBs detection rate using non-contrast CT versus the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced CT (p = .37). Patients without visualization of the right PBs during the arterial phase had a higher frequency of chronic heart failure (p = .0083), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = .021), and a higher CHADS2 score (p = .048) than those with visualization. In five patients whose right PBs could only be detected during the venous phase of contrast-enhanced CT, the reconstructed running course of the right PBs corresponded with the PN generated by electrical high-output pacing.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced CT images of the venous phase, rather than the arterial phase, are useful in detecting the right PBs, especially in patients with heart failure or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

Intracardiac echocardiography is a promising strategy for guiding closure of the left atrial appendage

Background and Aims

Percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is an effective approach for preventing ischemic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), a new imaging modality, is a promising strategy for guiding LAAC. This review highlights the various strategies for ICE-guided-LAAC as an option for clinical policy.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovid Web of Science, SpringerLink, and other notable databases to identify recent peer-reviewed clinical trials, reviews, and research articles related to ICE and its application in the guidance of LAAC.

Results

Various methods are used to evaluate the spatial structure and dimensions of the LAA. The main techniques for guiding LAAC are transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography (CTA), and ICE. Among these techniques, the advantages of ICE typically include (1) multiangle and real-time assessment of intracardiac structure, (2) a reduction in procedural fluoroscopy, (3) reduced operation time and improved workflow in the catheterization laboratory, and (4) the avoidance of general anesthesia and the early detection of complications.

Conclusion

ICE is a promising strategy for the guidance of LAAC. Among the most advanced and recent technological innovations in cardiovascular imaging in general and volume imaging in particular, ICE offers greater efficacy and safety.

Twenty-five years of research in cardiac imaging in electrophysiology procedures for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

Catheter ablation is nowadays considered the treatment of choice for numerous cardiac arrhythmias in different clinical scenarios. Fluoroscopy has traditionally been the primary imaging modality for catheter ablation, providing real-time visualization of catheter navigation. However, its limitations, such as inadequate soft tissue visualization and exposure to ionizing radiation, have prompted the integration of alternative imaging modalities. Over the years, advancements in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in enhancing the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of catheter ablation procedures. This manuscript aims to explore the utility of imaging, including electroanatomical mapping, cardiac computed tomography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and nuclear cardiology exams, in helping electrophysiology procedures. These techniques enable accurate anatomical guidance, identification of critical structures and substrates, and real-time monitoring of complications, ultimately enhancing procedural safety and success rates. Incorporating advanced imaging technologies into routine clinical practice has the potential to further improve clinical outcomes of catheter ablation procedures and pave the way for more personalized and precise ablation therapies in the future.

Prominent para-cardiac fat mimicking left atrial appendage thrombus on echocardiography: Utility of cardiac computed tomography

Transesophageal echocardiography is the most frequently used imaging modality for exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus prior to cardioversion. Echocardiographers should be aware of rare conditions that may mimic left atrial appendage thrombus. Here, we describe a rare case of prominent para-cardiac fat mimicking left atrial appendage thrombus on transesophageal echocardiographic imaging. Multimodality imaging with cardiac computed tomography was instrumental in providing further anatomical delineation and characterization of the echodensity as prominent para-cardiac fat in this case.

Radiomics Based on Single-Phase CTA for Distinguishing Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus from Circulatory Stasis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation before Ablation

Differentiation of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) and left atrial appendage (LAA) circulatory stasis is difficult when based only on single-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) in routine clinical practice. Radiomics provides a promising tool for their identification. We retrospectively enrolled 204 (training set: 144; test set: 60) atrial fibrillation patients before ablation, including 102 LAAT and 102 circulatory stasis patients. Radiomics software was used to segment whole LAA on single-phase CTA images and extract features. Models were built and compared via a multivariable logistic regression algorithm and area under of the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), respectively. For the radiomics model, radiomics clinical model, radiomics radiological model, and combined model, the AUCs were 0.82, 0.86, 0.90, 0.93 and 0.82, 0.82, 0.84, 0.85 in the training set and the test set, respectively (p < 0.05). One clinical feature (rheumatic heart disease) and four radiological features (transverse diameter of left atrium, volume of left atrium, location of LAA, shape of LAA) were added to the combined model. The combined model exhibited excellent differential diagnostic performances between LAAT and circulatory stasis without increasing extra radiation exposure. The single-phase, CTA-based radiomics analysis shows potential as an effective tool for accurately detecting LAAT in patients with atrial fibrillation before ablation.

Left lateral decubitus computed tomography before catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aim    The study aimed to determine the efficacy of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for diagnosing left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus before catheter ablation with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position and, also, to evaluate the risk factors for thrombus formation.Material and methods    This retrospective, cohort study included 101 patients with atrial fibrillation. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and left lateral decubitus CCTA. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed to confirm or exclude LAA thrombus. Patients with allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media, increased serum creatinine, hyperthyroidism, pregnancy, and age&lt;18 years were excluded. The CHA2‑DS2‑VASc and HAS-BLED scores were calculated for each patient.Results    All LAA thrombi detected on CCTA were confirmed by TEE. Higher CHA2‑DS2‑VASc, HAS-BLED scores, enlarged LA, and the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium were significantly associated with the presence of LAA thrombus. A LAA cauliflower shape was a predictor of thrombus. An increase of LAA volume by 1 ml increased the chances of LAA thrombus and cerebral ischemic infarct by 2 %. The growth of the LAA anteroposterior diameter by 1 cm increased the risk of LAA thrombus by 190 % and of cerebral infarct by 78 %. An increase in the CHA2DS2‑VASc score by 1 point increased the risk of thromboembolism and cerebral infarction by 12 %.Conclusions    CCTA performed in the left lateral decubitus position of the patient is an optimal screening tool to detect or exclude LAA thrombus before catheter ablation because of atrial fibrillation. CCTA has predictive value for risk of thrombosis formation in LAA.

Use of a new non-contrast-enhanced BOOST cardiac MR sequence before electrical cardioversion or ablation of atrial fibrillation-a pilot study

Introduction

Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is the most common source of embolization in atrial fibrillation (AF). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard method for LAA thrombus exclusion. Our pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy of a new non-contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence (BOOST) with TEE for the detection of LAA thrombus and to evaluate the usefulness of BOOST images for planning radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) compared with left atrial (LA) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). We also attempted to assess the patients' subjective experiences with TEE and CMR.

Methods

Patients with AF undergoing either electrical cardioversion or RFCA were enrolled. Participants underwent pre-procedural TEE and CMR scans to evaluate LAA thrombus status and pulmonary vein anatomy. Patient experiences with TEE and CMR were assessed using a questionnaire developed by our team. Some patients scheduled for RFCA also had pre-procedural LA contrast-enhanced CT. In such cases, the operating physician was asked to subjectively define the quality of the CT and CMR scan on a scale of 1-10 (1 = worst, 10 = best) and comment on CMR's usefulness in RFCA planning.

Results

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. In 94.4%, both TEE and CMR excluded, and in 1 patient, both modalities reported the presence of LAA thrombus. In 1 patient, TEE was inconclusive, but CMR excluded LAA thrombus. In 2 patients, CMR could not exclude the presence of thrombus, but in 1 of those cases, TEE was also indecisive. During TEE, 67%, during CMR, only 1.9% of patients reported pain (p < 0.0001), and 89% would prefer CMR in case of a repeat examination. The quality of the left atrial contrast-enhanced CT scans was better compared with the image quality of the CMR BOOST sequence [8 (7-9) vs. 6 (5-7), p < 0.0001]. Still, the CMR images were useful for procedural planning in 91% of cases.

Conclusion

The new CMR BOOST sequence provides appropriate image quality for ablation planning. The sequence might be useful for excluding larger LAA thrombi; however, its accuracy in detecting smaller thrombi is limited. Most patients preferred CMR over TEE in this indication.

Follow Up imaging After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion-Something or Nothing and for How Long?

Routine postprocedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography angiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for follow-up surveillance usually performed 1 to 6 months after the procedure. Imaging enables recognition of well-suited and sealed devices in the left atrial appendage as well as of potential harmful complications such as peri-device leaks, device-related thrombus, and device embolization, which may lead to further surveillance observation with recurrent imaging, reinitiation of oral anticoagulants, or additional interventional procedures.

Left Atrial Thrombus-Are All Atria and Appendages Equal?

Although the left atrial appendage (LAA) seems useless, it has several critical functions that are not fully known yet, such as the causes for being the main origin of cardioembolic stroke. Difficulties arise due to the extreme range of LAA morphologic variability, making the definition of normality challenging and hampering the stratification of thrombotic risk. Furthermore, obtaining quantitative metrics of its anatomy and function from patient data is not straightforward. A multimodality imaging approach, using advanced computational tools for their analysis, allows a complete characterization of the LAA to individualize medical decisions related to left atrial thrombosis patients.

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID

Infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, is associated with numerous potential secondary complications. Global efforts have been dedicated to understanding the myriad potential cardiovascular sequelae which may occur during acute infection, convalescence, or recovery. Because patients often present with nonspecific symptoms and laboratory findings, cardiac imaging has emerged as an important tool for the discrimination of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications of this disease. The clinician investigating a potential COVID-related complication must account not only for the relative utility of various cardiac imaging modalities but also for the risk of infectious exposure to staff and other patients. Extraordinary clinical and scholarly efforts have brought the international medical community closer to a consensus on the appropriate indications for diagnostic cardiac imaging during this protracted pandemic. In this review, we summarize the existing literature and reference major societal guidelines to provide an overview of the indications and utility of echocardiography, nuclear imaging, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of cardiovascular complications of COVID.

Risk factors associated with left atrial appendage thrombosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation by transesophageal echocardiography

PURPOSE

This study investigated possible mechanism of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis and constructed a model to evaluate the future risk of LAA thrombosis and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 2591 patients diagnosed with NVAF. Patients were divided based on the presence of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) into a thrombus group, SEC group, and control group. General, biochemical, and echocardiography data of the three groups were analyzed. The variables independently associated with LAA thrombosis and SEC were determined by the logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was constituted based on the regression analysis and the discriminatory ability was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

LAA thrombosis and SEC were present in 110 (4.2%) patients and 103 (3.9%) patients, respectively. AF type (OR = 1.857), previous stroke (OR = 1.924), fibrinogen (OR = 1.636), diameters of the left atria (OR = 1.094), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 0.938), and LAA maximum caliber (OR = 1.238) resulted as independent risk factors for LAA thrombosis and SEC. The area under curve of the nomogram established by multivariate logistic regression was 0.824. Conclusions; Through the study, 6 independent risk factors related to the LAA thrombosis and SEC were found, and an effective nomogram was constructed to predict the LAA thrombosis and SEC in NVAF patients.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Workup of Noncerebral Systemic Arterial Embolic Source

Noncerebral systemic arterial embolism, which can originate from cardiac and noncardiac sources, is an important cause of patient morbidity and mortality. When an embolic source dislodges, the resulting embolus can occlude a variety of peripheral and visceral arteries causing ischemia. Characteristic locations for noncerebral arterial occlusion include the upper extremities, abdominal viscera, and lower extremities. Ischemia in these regions can progress to tissue infarction resulting in limb amputation, bowel resection, or nephrectomy. Determining the source of arterial embolism is essential in order to direct treatment decisions. This document reviews the appropriateness category of various imaging procedures available to determine the source of the arterial embolism. The variants included in this document are known arterial occlusion in the upper extremity, lower extremity, mesentery, kidneys, and multiorgan distribution that are suspected to be of embolic etiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Evaluation of causal heart diseases in cardioembolic stroke by cardiac computed tomography

Cardioembolic stroke is a potentially devastating condition and tends to have a poor prognosis compared with other ischemic stroke subtypes. Therefore, it is important for proper therapeutic management to identify a cardiac source of embolism in stroke patients. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can detect the detailed visualization of various cardiac pathologies in the cardiac chambers, interatrial and interventricular septum, valves, and myocardium with few motion artifacts and few dead angles. Multiphase reconstruction images of the entire cardiac cycle make it possible to demonstrate cardiac structures in a dynamic manner. Consequently, CCT has the ability to provide high-quality information about causal heart disease in cardioembolic stroke. In addition, CCT can simultaneously evaluate obstructive coronary artery disease, which may be helpful in surgical planning in patients who need urgent surgery, such as cardiac tumors or infective endocarditis. This review will introduce the potential clinical applications of CCT in an ischemic stroke population, with a focus on diagnosing cardioembolic sources using CCT.

Spectral cardiac CT in acute stroke patients

Cardiac CT obtained in acute ischemic stroke patients can facilitate timely detection of cardiac sources of embolism and guide secondary prevention strategies. Spectral CT exploiting the simultaneous acquisition of separate higher-energy and lower-energy photon spectrum datasets has the potential to improve contrast between thrombi and cardiac structures. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of spectral cardiac CT compared to conventional CT for the detection of cardiac thrombi in acute stroke patients. Patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing spectral cardiac CT were retrospectively included. Conventional CT images, virtual 55 keV monoenergetic (monoE55), z-effective (zeff), and iodine density images were evaluated for the presence of thrombi. Diagnostic certainty was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Contrast ratios were calculated for all reconstructions. 63 patients with 20 thrombi were included. Four thrombi were missed on conventional images but detected on spectral reconstructions. MonoE55 achieved the highest scores for diagnostic certainty. Contrast ratios were highest on iodine density images, followed by monoE55, conventional and zeff (p < 0.005). Spectral cardiac CT adds diagnostic benefit for the detection of intra-cardiac thrombi in acute ischemic stroke patients compared to conventional CT.

Atrial Fibrillation Occurring During Acute Hospitalization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Acute atrial fibrillation is defined as atrial fibrillation detected in the setting of acute care or acute illness; atrial fibrillation may be detected or managed for the first time during acute hospitalization for another condition. Atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery is a distinct type of acute atrial fibrillation. Acute atrial fibrillation is associated with high risk of long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence, warranting clinical attention during acute hospitalization and over long-term follow-up. A framework of substrates and triggers can be useful for evaluating and managing acute atrial fibrillation. Acute management requires a multipronged approach with interdisciplinary care collaboration, tailoring treatments to the patient's underlying substrate and acute condition. Key components of acute management include identification and treatment of triggers, selection and implementation of rate/rhythm control, and management of anticoagulation. Acute rate or rhythm control strategy should be individualized with consideration of the patient's capacity to tolerate rapid rates or atrioventricular dyssynchrony, and the patient's ability to tolerate the risk of the therapeutic strategy. Given the high risks of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with acute atrial fibrillation, clinical follow-up and heart rhythm monitoring are warranted. Long-term management is guided by patient substrate, with implications for intensity of heart rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, and considerations for rhythm management strategies. Overall management of acute atrial fibrillation addresses substrates and triggers. The 3As of acute management are acute triggers, atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management, and anticoagulation. The 2As and 2Ms of long-term management include monitoring of heart rhythm and modification of lifestyle and risk factors, in addition to considerations for atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management and anticoagulation. Several gaps in knowledge related to acute atrial fibrillation exist and warrant future research.

Utility and limitations of coherent mapping algorithm utilizing vectors and global propagation patterns in atrial tachycardia

Background

A novel mapping algorithm utilizing vectors and global patterns of propagation (Coherent™, Biosense Webster) has been developed to help identify the mechanism of atrial tachycardia (AT). We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of coherent mapping compared with that of ripple mapping.

Methods and results

This study included 41 consecutive patients with 84 ATs (47 reentrant and 37 focal ATs). Two independent electrophysiologists confirmed the diagnoses using coherent mapping before the ripple map-guided ablation. AT termination was achieved in 75 of 84 ATs (89%) at first ablation lesion set. Four of the remaining nine ATs, which were terminated before an index radiofrequency (RF) application, were non-inducible after RF delivery at the first lesion set, whereas the other five ATs were terminated at the second lesion set. Diagnostic agreement between coherent and ripple maps was achieved in 51 of 84 ATs (61%): 28 of the 47 macroreentrant ATs (60%) and 23 of the 37 focal ATs (62%; P = 0.826). In typical macroreentrant ATs, including left atrial roof, perimitral, and cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent ATs, coherent maps achieved diagnostic agreement in 23 of 29 ATs (79%), which was higher than that in other ATs (51%, P = 0.018): 13 of 26 macroreentrant ATs (50%) and 15 of 29 focal ATs (52%, P = 1.000).

Conclusion

Ripple map-guided AT ablation achieved a high termination rate in the first lesion set. Coherent mapping yielded a favorable diagnostic accuracy for typical macroreentrant ATs, though its value for diagnosing other ATs was limited.

Frequency and Clinical Significance of Atrial Cavities in situ Thrombosis: A Large-Scale Study and Literature Review

Background

Atrial tachyarrhythmias are the main cause of atrial thrombosis, and are usually in the left appendage. The prevalence and causes of endocavitarian thrombosis have not been investigated in recent large-scale studies. Aim of our work was to describe the epidemiology, the clinical characteristics and predisposing factors of "extra-appendicular" atrial thrombosis and to report a systematic review of recent literature.

Methods and Results

5,862 consecutive adult patients referred to a transesophageal echocardiographic exam, were enrolled. A total of 175 subjects with Atrial Thrombosis were found with a prevalence of 2.98%; among those 22 was found in left (0.38%) and 2 in the right (0.03%) atrium. Among the 22 patients with left atrial thrombosis, 8 were associated with prosthetic valves, 4 with mitral stenosis and the remaining with hypercoagulative conditions (cancer, septic shock, eosinophilic pneumonia, cardiogenic shock and warfarin under-dosage in permanent atrial fibrillation and decompensated heart failure). Cancer was associated in one of the two patients with a right atrial clot. The review of the literature from 2000 to December 2019 revealed conflicting results of 48 case reports of atrial cavity thrombosis; pooling this data proved the rarity of extra-appendage thrombosis and confirmed its association with a valvular heart disease or a systemic hypercoagulable state.

Conclusions

Atrial "extra-appendage" thrombosis is a rare condition usually associated to "valvular" atrial fibrillation (such as prosthetic valves and mitral stenosis). A minority, but significant, cases are secondary to a thrombophilic conditions. In absence of valvular heart disease an underlying condition should be sought.

Atrial cardiomyopathy: Current and future imaging methods for assessment of atrial structure and function

Changes in atrial size and function have historically been considered a surrogate marker of ventricular dysfunction. However, it is now recognized that atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) may also occur as a primary myocardial disorder. Emerging evidence that ACM is a major risk factor for atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and thromboembolic stroke, has highlighted the significance of this disorder and the need for better assessment of atrial metrics in clinical practice. Key barriers in this regard include a lack of standardized criteria or hierarchy for the diagnosis of ACM and lack of consensus for the most accurate phenotyping methods. In this article we review existing literature on ACM, with a focus on current and future non-invasive imaging methods for detecting abnormalities of atrial structure and function. We discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessing a range of parameters, including atrial size and contractile function, strain, tissue characteristics, and epicardial adipose tissue. We will also present the potential application of novel imaging methods such as sphericity index and four- or five-dimensional flow.

Prevalence and risk factors of cardiac thrombus prior to ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation in structural heart disease

AIMS

Assess prevalence, risk factors, and management of patients with intra-cardiac thrombus referred for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive VT ablation referrals between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed (n = 618). Patients referred for de novo, scar-related VT ablation who underwent pre-procedure cardiac computed tomography (cCT) were included. We included 401 patients [61 ± 14 years; 364 male; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 ± 13%]; 45 patients (11%) had cardiac thrombi on cCT at 49 sites [29 LV; eight left atrial appendage (LAA); eight right ventricle (RV); four right atrial appendage]. Nine patients had pulmonary emboli. Overall predictors of cardiac thrombus included LV aneurysm [odds ratio (OR): 6.6, 95%, confidence interval (CI): 3.1-14.3], LVEF < 40% (OR: 3.3, CI: 1.5-7.3), altered RV ejection fraction (OR: 2.3, CI: 1.1-4.6), and electrical storm (OR: 2.9, CI: 1.4-6.1). Thrombus location-specific analysis identified LV aneurysm (OR: 10.9, CI: 4.3-27.7) and LVEF < 40% (OR: 9.6, CI: 2.6-35.8) as predictors of LV thrombus and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (OR: 10.6, CI: 1.2-98.4) as a predictor for RV thrombus. Left atrial appendage thrombi exclusively occurred in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was finally performed in 363 including 7 (16%) patients with thrombus but refractory electrical storm. These seven patients had tailored ablation with no embolic complications. Only one (0.3%) ablation-related embolic event occurred in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac thrombus can be identified in 11% of patients referred for scar-related VT ablation. These findings underscore the importance of systematic thrombus screening to minimize embolic risk.

Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis, Investigations, and Management

In 2014, Hart et al. introduced the concept of "embolic stroke of undetermined source" (ESUS) to the clinical-research stroke community. The hypothesis underlying the development of the ESUS construct was that this potentially heterogenous group of stroke mechanisms were largely thromboembolic, and would thus benefit from anticoagulation over antiplatelet for secondary prevention. Since then, 2 large clinical trials have shown that, to date, there is not a clear uniform antithrombotic strategy for secondary prevention after ESUS as it was originally broadly defined. However, this work has yielded valuable information about the patient phenotypes that experience ESUS strokes, as well as hypothesis-generating substudies that have given rise to the next generation of secondary prevention trials aimed at more personalized approaches for different suspected mechanisms of embolic stroke. In parallel with the evolution of ESUS, several studies aimed at screening for atrial fibrillation in the secondary stroke prevention population have generated additional questions about the mechanistic relevance of atrial fibrillation detected after stroke, and how this should inform poststroke workup, and secondary prevention strategies. Herein, we provide a synthesis of the current understanding surrounding the patient phenotypes that experience ESUS strokes, and previous, ongoing, and anticipated clinical trials that will guide earlier and later secondary prevention strategies and poststroke cardiac investigations.

Left atrial appendage thrombus in acute stroke: diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography compared to transesophageal echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of an extended emergency computed tomography angiography (CTA) including cardiac imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke for the detection of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as a reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients with presumed acute ischemic stroke who had undergone non-ECG-gated CTA for the craniocervical vessels with an extended coverage including the heart in the context of emergency stroke evaluation and for whom TEE was available as part of the routine stroke diagnostic. We selected cases with evidence of LAA thrombus in TEE and controls without LAA thrombus in TEE in a 1:3 ratio. Two independent observers analyzed CTA images for presence of LAA thrombus and were blinded to the presence of thrombus in TEE.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with LAA thrombus in TEE, and 66 patients without LAA thrombus in TEE were included. The detection of LAA thrombus using CTA showed a sensitivity of 63.6%, a specificity of 81.8%, a positive predictive value of 53.9% and a negative predicted value of 87.1%. Interobserver agreement was only moderate (Cohen´s κ = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

An extended emergency CTA including cardiac imaging can be helpful in early risk stratification in patients with stroke of cardioembolic origin. However, our data show that a standard CTA of craniocervical vessels with extended coverage of the heart is of limited value when compared to TEE, the standard method of detecting LAA thrombi.

Intracardiac echocardiography is a safe and effective alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage thrombus evaluation at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation: The ICE-TEE study

BACKGROUND

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) technology has been increasingly accepted as an integral part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. It is still unknown whether ICE can routinely replace transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for routine thrombus screening in non-selective AF patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether ICE can routinely replace TEE in screening for left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in general patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF.

METHODS

A total of 2003 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were included. 1155 patients (ICE group) received intra-procedural ICE examination for LA/LAA thrombus screening, while 848 patients (TEE group) received pre-procedure TEE examination. The incidence of thrombus, peri-procedure complications, and hospital efficiency were assessed.

RESULTS

The LA and LAA were adequately visualized in all patients. Five patients in the ICE group and 15 patients in the TEE group were found to have LAA thrombus. The incidence of major periprocedural thrombo-embolic events was comparable between two groups (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = .76), none were due to undetected LA/LAA thrombus. Other major periprocedural complications occurred at similar rates in both groups, while post-procedure fever was less common in the ICE group (12.7% vs. 17.4%, p < .001). Procedure times and hospital length of stay were both shorter in the ICE group (142 min [87-197 min] vs. 150 min [95-205 min], and 3[2-4] day vs. 4[3-5] day, respectively, both p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE can replace TEE for atrial thrombus screening in AF patients undergoing ablation without increased complications. An "ICE replacing TEE" workflow can also reduce the incidence of postoperative fever and improve hospital efficiency.

Study on the correlation between false-positive filling defect in LAA CT and LAA structure in patients with atrial fibrillation based on TEE

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the actual meaning of "false positive filling defect" in left atrial appendage (LAA) computed tomography (CT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the gold standard.

METHODS

Patients with AF undergoing cardiac CT angiography and TEE examinations for proposed radiofrequency catheter ablation between October 2020 and October 2021 were selected as the study subjects. Transesophageal echocardiography was taken as the "gold standard," and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) and thrombus events were defined as positive events. The CT manifestations were classified into three groups (true positive, false positive, and true negative) to evaluate the differences in left atrium (LA) anterior-posterior diameter (LAAP), LA anterior wall thickness, and LAA orifice long diameter and short diameter, area, and depth between the three groups.

RESULTS

(1) There was no statistical difference in LA anterior wall thickness between the three groups (p > .05); there was a statistical difference in LAAP (only) between the true-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). (2) There was a statistical difference in LAA orifice long diameter, short diameter, and area between the true-positive group and the true-negative group as well as between the false-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). (3) There was a statistical difference in LAA depth between the true-positive group and the false-positive group as well as between the true-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). (4) The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of LAA depth affecting the LAA thrombus and SEC was 0.863 (confidence interval = 0.718-1.000), the sensitivity was 77.8%, and the specificity was 90.6% for predicting the occurrence of LAA thrombus and SEC in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) and an LAA depth of ≥50.84 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a difference in LAA diameter between the TEE-based CT false-positive group and the other groups. A "CT false positive" is an objectively existing state, and CT might be able to identify the LAA hemodynamic disorder earlier than TEE. Furthermore, a CT + TEE combined application could more accurately evaluate LAA hemodynamics in patients with AF.

Atrial thrombosis: Not only left, think also about right!

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the general population. Systemic thromboembolism from left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis is a well-known complication of AF, whereas thromboembolic complications from a right atrial (RA) thrombus are infrequent. Nevertheless, the prevalence of RA thrombosis is debated; despite having a low prevalence in echocardiographic studies, the higher prevalence found in autoptic studies rises the hypothesis of an under detection of RA clots, possibly related to the limited evaluation of right atrial appendage (RAA) with non-invasive imaging. Here we present a review of the current literature about RA thrombosis, regarding its diagnosis, differentials, and best treatment options.

Preprocedural Multimodality Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. In current medical practice, multimodality imaging is routinely used in the management of AF. Twenty-one years ago, the ACUTE trial (Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography) results were published, and the management of AF changed forever by incorporating transesophageal echocardiography guided cardioversion of patients in AF for the first time. Current applications of multimodality imaging in AF in 2022 include the use of transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography before cardioversion to exclude left atrial thrombus and in left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. Transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance are clinically used for AF ablation planning. The decision to use a particular imaging modality in AF is based on patient's characteristics, guideline recommendation, institutional preferences, expertise, and cost. In this first of 2-part review series, we discuss the preprocedural role of echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in the AF, with regard to their clinical applications, relevant outcomes data and unmet needs, and highlights future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Cardiac CT for intra-cardiac thrombus detection in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS)

Introduction

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is a common medical challenge regarding secondary prevention strategy. Cardiac imaging is the cornerstone of embolic stroke workup, in an effort to diagnose high risk cardio-embolic sources. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is an emerging imaging modality with high diagnostic performance for intra-cardiac thrombus detection. The yield of CCTA implementation in addition to standard care in ESUS workup is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the utility of CCTA in detecting intra-cardiac thrombi in the routine ESUS workup.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective observational analysis of ESUS cases managed in vascular neurology unit between 2019 and 2021. Within this ESUS registry, consecutive patients undergoing CCTA were included and carefully analyzed.

Results

During the study period 1066 Ischemic stroke (IS) cases were treated and evaluated. 266/1066 (25%) met ESUS criteria and 129/266 (48%) underwent CCTA. Intra-cardiac thrombus was detected by CCTA in 22/129 (17%; 95% CI, 11.5%-23.5%) patients: left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in 13 (10.1%) patients, left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in 8 (6.2%) patients, and left atrial (LA) thrombus in 1 (0.8%) patient. Only 5/22 (23%) of these thrombi were suspected, but could not be confirmed, in trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Among CCTA-undergoing patients, 27/129 (21%; 95% CI, 14%-28%) were found to have an indication (including pulmonary embolism) for commencing anticoagulation (AC) treatment, rather than anti-platelets. In favor of CCTA implementation, 22/266 (8.2%; 95% CI, 4.9%-11.5%) patients within the entire ESUS cohort were diagnosed with intra-cardiac thrombus, otherwise missed.

Conclusion

CCTA improves the detection of intra-cardiac thrombi in addition to standard care in ESUS patients. The implementation of CCTA in routine ESUS workup can change secondary prevention strategy in a considerable proportion of patients.

Stroke risk evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from left atrial appendage

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is believed to be a common site of thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the commonly-applied stroke risk stratification model (such as. CHA2DS2-VASc score) does not include any structural or hemodynamic features of LAA. Recent studies have suggested that it is important to incorporate LAA geometrical and hemodynamic features to evaluate the risk of thrombus formation in LAA, which may better delineate the AF patients for anticoagulant administration and prevent strokes. This review focuses on the LAA-related factors that may be associated with thrombus formation and cardioembolic events.

Small Study Effects in Diagnostic Imaging Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Small study effects are the phenomena that studies with smaller sample sizes tend to report larger and more favorable effect estimates than studies with larger sample sizes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the presence and extent of small study effects in diagnostic imaging accuracy meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in the PubMed database for diagnostic imaging accuracy meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Meta-analyses with 10 or more studies of medical imaging diagnostic accuracy, assessing a single imaging modality, and providing 2 × 2 contingency data were included. Studies that did not assess diagnostic accuracy of medical imaging techniques, compared 2 or more imaging modalities or different methods of 1 imaging modality, were cost analyses, used predictive or prognostic tests, did not provide individual patient data, or were network meta-analyses were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was calculated for each primary study using 2 × 2 contingency data. Regression analysis was used to examine the association between effect size estimate and precision across meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 31 meta-analyses involving 668 primary studies and 80 206 patients were included. Fixed effects analysis produced a regression coefficient for the natural log of DOR against the SE of the natural log of DOR of 2.19 (95% CI, 1.49-2.90; P < .001), with computed tomography as the reference modality. Interaction test for modality and SE of the natural log of DOR did not depend on modality (Wald statistic P = .50). Taken together, this analysis found an inverse association between effect size estimate and precision that was independent of imaging modality. Of 26 meta-analyses that formally assessed for publication bias using funnel plots and statistical tests for funnel plot asymmetry, 21 found no evidence for such bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found evidence of widespread prevalence of small study effects in the diagnostic imaging accuracy literature. One likely contributor to the observed effects is publication bias, which can undermine the results of many meta-analyses. Conventional methods for detecting funnel plot asymmetry conducted by included studies appeared to underestimate the presence of small study effects. Further studies are required to elucidate the various factors that contribute to small study effects.