Effect of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibition on arterial blood pressure is context dependent

Zucker Diabetic Sprague Dawley rat (ZDSD): type 2 diabetes translational research model

New Findings

What is the topic of this review?

The Zucker Diabetic‐Sprague Dawley (ZDSD) rat is in the early adoption phase of use by researchers in the fields of diabetes, including prediabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome. It is essential that physiology researchers choose preclinical models that model human type 2 diabetes appropriately and are aware of the limitations on experimental design.

What advances does it highlight?

Our review of the scientific literature finds that although sex, age and diets contribute to variability, the ZDSD phenotype and disease progression model the characteristics of humans who have prediabetes and diabetes, including co‐morbidities.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a prevalent disease and a significant concern for global population health. For persons with T2D, clinical treatments target not only the characteristics of hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance, but also co‐morbidities, such as obesity, cardiovascular and renal disease, neuropathies and skeletal bone conditions. The Zucker Diabetic‐Sprague Dawley (ZDSD) rat is a rodent model developed for experimental studies of T2D. We reviewed the scientific literature to highlight the characteristics of T2D development and the associated phenotypes, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular complications and bone and skeletal pathologies in ZDSD rats. We found that ZDSD phenotype characteristics are independent of leptin receptor signalling. The ZDSD rat develops prediabetes, then progresses to overt diabetes that is accelerated by introduction of a timed high‐fat diet. In male ZDSD rats, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increases at a constant rate from 7 to >30 weeks of age. Diabetic ZDSD rats are moderately hypertensive compared with other rat strains. Diabetes in ZDSD rats leads to endothelial dysfunction in specific vasculatures, impaired wound healing, decreased systolic and diastolic cardiac function, neuropathy and nephropathy. Changes to bone composition and the skeleton increase the risk of bone fractures. Zucker Diabetic‐Sprague Dawley rats have not yet achieved widespread use by researchers. We highlight sex‐related differences in the ZDSD phenotype and gaps in knowledge for future studies. Overall, scientific data support the premise that the phenotype and disease progression in ZDSD rats models the characteristics in humans. We conclude that ZDSD rats are an advantageous model to advance understanding and discovery of treatments for T2D through preclinical research.

Hypertension in diabetes care: emerging roles of recent hypoglycemic agents

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) frequently have multiple cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal comorbidities, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Accordingly, this patient population often requires polypharmacy, which is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions, poor adherence, and even adverse outcomes. Accumulating evidence on newer hypoglycemic agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, has highlighted the marked improvements in cardiovascular and renal outcomes associated with the off-target benefits for relevant comorbidities, including hypertension. These classes of hypoglycemic agents are unique, as they achieve consistently modest but significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), an effect that has not been targeted and observed with conventional hypoglycemic agents. In addition to this BP-lowering effect, these agents also have multifaceted beneficial impacts on other cardiometabolic and renal parameters, which appear to be helpful for providing an important comprehensive therapeutic approach to improve the prognosis in patients with T2D. The clinical advantages of these agents may reduce the dose and number of concomitant medications used to treat T2D and related comorbidities. These positive spillover effects may also enhance the clinical use of agents to achieve better diabetes care. As a consequence, the clinical significance of these hypoglycemic agents now extends beyond their hypoglycemic effects, thereby providing a new-normal strategy to use in an evidence-based, patient-centric approach to diabetes care.

Is Sitagliptin Effective for Modulating Metabolic Disturbances Associated With Olanzapine in Schizophrenia Patients? A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of patients with schizophrenia due to metabolic disturbances is high. Our aim is to survey the effects of sitagliptin on metabolic disturbances associated with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

In this 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, 71 patients taking olanzapine (10 to 30 mg) for at least 1 month were randomly allocated to enter 1 of the 2 treatment groups (olanzapine plus placebo or olanzapine plus sitagliptin). Sitagliptin was added to patients 'current medications with the dose of 100 mg/d. Physical examinations and measurement of anthropometric (body mass index and waist circumference) and laboratory parameters (fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride) were measured at baseline, week 4, and week 12. The patients were assessed for any side effects of the medications in each visit.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (30 in the sitagliptin and 31 in the placebo group) completed the trial. The anthropometric measurements at the end of the study did not differ between the 2 groups. glycated hemoglobin and total cholesterol were significantly lower in the sitagliptin group after 12 weeks. Other metabolic profile revealed either no change or minimal magnitude changes. No major side effect was reported.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic disturbances associated with olanzapine treatment in patients with schizophrenia can be modulated by sitagliptin.

Long-Term Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition Worsens Hypertension and Renal and Cardiac Abnormalities in Obese Spontaneously Hypertensive Heart Failure Rats

Background The long-term effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on blood pressure and cardiovascular and renal health remain controversial. Herein, we investigated the extended (>182 days) effects of DPP4 inhibition in a model of spontaneous hypertension, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, obesity and hyperlipidemia. Methods and Results Adult obese spontaneously hypertensive heart failure rats (SHHF) were implanted with radio transmitters for measurement of arterial blood pressures. Two weeks later, SHHF were randomized to receive either a DPP4 inhibitor (sitagliptin, 80 mg/kg per day in drinking water) or placebo. At the end of the radiotelemetry measurements, renal and cardiac function and histology, as well as other relevant biochemical parameters, were assessed. For the first 25 days, mean arterial blood pressures were similar in sitagliptin-treated versus control SHHF; afterwards, mean arterial blood pressures increased more in sitagliptin-treated SHHF (P<0.000001). The time-averaged mean arterial blood pressures from day 26 through 182 were 7.2 mm Hg higher in sitagliptin-treated SHHF. Similar changes were observed for systolic (8.6 mm Hg) and diastolic (6.1 mm Hg) blood pressures, and sitagliptin augmented hypertension throughout the light-dark cycle. Long-term sitagliptin treatment also increased kidney weights, renal vascular resistances, the excretion of kidney injury molecule-1 (indicates injury to proximal tubules), renal interstitial fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, renal vascular hypertrophy, left ventricular dysfunction, right ventricular degeneration, and the ratios of collagen IV/collagen III and collagen IV/laminin in the right ventricle. Conclusions These findings indicate that, in some genetic backgrounds, long-term DPP4 inhibitor treatment is harmful and identify an animal model to study mechanisms of, and test ways to prevent, DPP4 inhibitor-induced pathological conditions.

Hemodynamic effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria

Objective:

Concomitant treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors is increasingly common. Pharmacological studies have suggested a potential adverse drug interaction between ACE inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors resulting in unfavorable hemodynamic changes; very few studies have examined such an interaction between angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and DPP-4 inhibitors. We investigated blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) during treatment with the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin in individuals receiving either ACE inhibitors or ARBs in the MARLINA-T2D trial.

Methods:

In this study, 360 individuals with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria receiving unchanged doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs were randomized to linagliptin or placebo. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, an exploratory endpoint, was conducted at baseline and after 24 weeks.

Results:

Ambulatory BP monitoring data were available for 208 individuals (linagliptin: n = 111; placebo: n = 97). Baseline mean ± SD 24-h SBP and DBP were 132.5 ± 12.4 mmHg and 75.9 ± 9.4 mmHg, respectively; mean 24-h HR was 76.3 ± 10.1 bpm. At week 24, no overall effect of the DPP-4 inhibitor versus placebo was seen on mean 24-h SBP, DBP, or HR. Furthermore, in the subgroups receiving either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB, no effect on these hemodynamic parameters was seen as a result of concomitant DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.

Conclusion:

Adding linagliptin to treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs was not associated with any hemodynamic changes, supporting their concomitant use in individuals with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria.

Incretin-based therapies and renin-angiotensin system: Looking for new therapeutic potentials in the diabetic milieu

Incretin-based therapies include pharmacologic agents such as glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors which exert potent anti-hyperglycemic effects in the diabetic milieu. They are also shown to have extra-pancreatic effects. Renin-angiotensin system is part of the endocrine system which is widely distributed in the body and is closely involved in water and electrolyte homeostasis as well as renal and cardiovascular functions. Hence the renin-angiotensin system is the main target for treating patients with various renal and cardiovascular disorders. There is growing evidence that incretins have modulatory effects on renin-angiotensin system activity; thereby, can be promising therapeutic agents for the management of renal and cardiovascular disorders. But the exact molecular interactions between incretins and renin-angiotensin system are not clearly understood. In this current study, we have reviewed the possible molecular mechanisms by which incretins modulate renin-angiotensin system activity.

DPP4 Inhibition, NPY1-36, PYY1-36, SDF-1α, and a Hypertensive Genetic Background Conspire to Augment Cell Proliferation and Collagen Production: Effects That Are Abolished by Low Concentrations of 2-Methoxyestradiol

By reducing their metabolism, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibition (DPP4I) enhances the effects of numerous peptides including neuropeptide Y_1–36 (NPY_1–36), peptide YY_1–36 (PYY_1–36), and SDF-1α. Studies show that separately NPY_1–36, PYY_1–36 and SDF-1α stimulate proliferation of, and collagen production by, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs), and glomerular mesangial cells (GMCs), particularly in cells isolated from genetically hypertensive rats. Whether certain combinations of these factors, in the absence or presence of DPP4I, are more profibrotic than others is unknown. Here we contrasted 24 different combinations of conditions (DPP4I, hypertensive genotype and physiologic levels [3 nM] of NPY_1–36, PYY_1–36, or SDF-1α) on proliferation of, and [³H]-proline incorporation by, CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs. In all three cell types, the various treatment conditions differentially increased proliferation and [³H]-proline incorporation, with a hypertensive genotype + DPP4I + NPY_1–36 + SDF-1α being the most efficacious combination. Although the effects of this four-way combination were similar in male versus female CFs, physiologic (1 nM) concentrations of 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME; nonestrogenic metabolite of 17β-estradiol), abolished the effects of this combination in both male and female CFs. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs are differentially activated by various combinations of NPY_1–36, PYY_1–36, SDF-1α, a hypertensive genetic background and DPP4I. We hypothesize that as these progrowth conditions accumulate, a tipping point would be reached that manifests in the long term as organ fibrosis and that 2ME would obviate any profibrotic effects of DPP4I, even under the most profibrotic conditions (i.e., hypertensive genotype with high NPY_1–36 + SDF-1α levels and low 2ME levels).

The Effects of DPP4 Inhibitors on Lipid Status and Blood Pressure in Rats with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

The aim of the present study was to examine, evaluate and compare the effects of administered dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin on lipid status parameters and blood pressure in rats with streptozotocine induced diabetes mellitus type 2. Forty-eight Wistar albino rats were divided randomly into 4 groups: 1. group I: control healthy group; 2. group II: rats with diabetes mellitus type 2; 3. group III: rats with diabetes mellitus type 2+ treated with 0.6 mg/kg of sitagliptin; 4. group IV: rats with diabetes mellitus type 2 treated with 0.45 mg/kg of saxagliptin. The rats from experimental groups were fed with a high-fat diet for 4 weeks and after 6–8 h of starvation received one dose of streptozotocin (STZ) intraperitoneally (25 mg/kg body weight) to induce type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Animals with fasting glucose above 7 mmol/L and insulin over 6 mmol/L were included in the study as rats with T2DM. Upon completion of the experiments, the blood was collected from the anesthetized animals and serum triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TCH), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and low density lipoprotein (LDL) were measured using spectrophotometry and commercial kits. At the beginning of the study and the day before sacrificing animals, the blood pressure and heart rate were measured by a tail-cuff noninvasive method. DPP4 inhibitors, as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, were associated with modest reductions in DBP, LDL-C, TCH, and TGL and significant improvement in HDL, SBP and HR.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition Increases Postprandial Norepinephrine via Substance P (NK1 Receptor) During RAAS Inhibition

CONTEXT

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors may increase the risk of heart failure. Decreased degradation of vasoactive peptides like substance P [also degraded by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)] and Y1 agonists peptide YY (PYY 1-36) and neuropeptide Y (NPY 1-36) could contribute.

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the hypothesis that there is an interactive effect of DPP4 inhibition and ACE inhibition (vs antihypertensive control subjects) on vasoactive peptides after a mixed meal.

PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN

Fifty-three patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension were randomized to double-blind treatment with ramipril, valsartan, or amlodipine for 15 weeks in parallel groups. During the 5th, 10th, and 15th weeks, participants also received placebo + placebo, sitagliptin 100 mg/d + placebo, and sitagliptin + aprepitant 80 mg/d in random order. On the last day of each crossover treatment, participants underwent a mixed-meal study.

RESULTS

Sitagliptin increased postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 and decreased glucose in all antihypertensive groups. Sitagliptin increased NPY 1-36 and decreased Y2 agonists NPY 3-36 and PYY 3-36 in all groups. During ramipril or valsartan, but not amlodipine, sitagliptin increased postprandial norepinephrine; substance P receptor blockade with aprepitant prevented this effect. Despite increased norepinephrine, sitagliptin decreased postprandial blood pressure during ACE inhibition.

CONCLUSION

DPP4 inhibition increases postprandial concentrations of the Y1 agonist NPY 1-36. During treatment with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, DPP4 inhibition increased postprandial norepinephrine through a substance P receptor-dependent mechanism. Increased NPY 1-36 and norepinephrine could increase risk of heart failure but did not result in higher postprandial blood pressure.

Sitagliptin vs. pioglitazone as add-on treatments in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes on the maximal dose of metformin plus sulfonylurea

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of sitagliptin versus pioglitazone as add-on drugs in patients with poorly controlled diabetes with metformin and sulfonylureas.

METHODS

This is a randomized, open-label, parallel assignment clinical trial. Patients who had inadequate glycemic control [7% (53 mmol/mol) ≤ A1C < 11% (97 mmol/mol)] despite a minimum 6-month period of active treatment with metformin 2000 mg/day plus gliclazide 240 mg/day were enrolled in the study. HbA1C, fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting plasma lipid parameters [total cholesterol (TC0, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)], systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), weight, waist circumference, and body mass index were measured at baseline and after 17, 34, and 52 weeks of treatment. Generalized estimating equation analysis was done to compare treatment groups for continuous efficacy parameters.

RESULTS

No significant difference in HbA1C reduction was observed between the treatment groups during the study course. (P = 0.149, adjusted P = 0.434; coefficient - 0.11 ± 0.08). The FBG (P = 0.032; coefficient 7.44 ± 3.48), HDL-C (P = 0.001; coefficient - 2.69 ± 0.83), TG (P = 0.027; coefficient 12.63 ± 5.71) and SBP (P < 0.001; coefficient 5.43 ± 1.26) changes from baseline, and weight gain were greater in the pioglitazone group. The mean changes in LDL-C and TC from baseline to week 52 were greater in the sitagliptin group (P = 0.034; coefficient - 7.40 ± 3.50, P = 0.013; coefficient - 7.16 ± 2.88, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Sitagliptin and pioglitazone were equally effective in improvement of HbA1C. There were some differences in terms of lipid indices, weight gain, and SBP. The current study confirmed that both sitagliptin and pioglitazone are effective treatment options and the decision should be made for each individual based on the baseline characteristics.

Effects of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Alogliptin on Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are controversial. There is no information on the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with DM. We evaluated the effects of alogliptin on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Blood pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were measured before and after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment with alogliptin in 22 hypertensive patients with T2DM.

RESULTS

After 3, 6, and 12 months, alogliptin treatment decreased hemoglobin A1c from 7.0 ± 0.97% to 6.4 ± 0.61%, 6.3 ± 0.58%, and 6.3 ± 0.75% (P < 0.01, respectively), glucose from 8.6 ± 4.39 mmol/l to 7.05 ± 2.16, 7.05 ± 2.28, and 6.44 ± 1.50 mmol/l (P < 0.01, respectively), systolic blood pressure from 137 ± 18 mm Hg to 127 ± 13, 125 ± 15, and 120 ± 17 mm Hg (P < 0.01, respectively), diastolic blood pressure from 79 ± 13 mm Hg to 74 ± 8, 74 ± 10, and 70 ± 8 mm Hg (P < 0.01, respectively) and baPWV from 1,947 ± 349 cm/second to 1,774 ± 259, 1,856 ± 361, and 1,756 ± 286 cm/second (P < 0.01, respectively). A baseline baPWV value of 1,643 cm/second was the optimal cut-off value for patients who had reduced blood pressure after treatment with alogliptin (sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 75.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Alogliptin was associated with improvements not only in glucose metabolism but also in blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with T2DM. The cut-off value of baPWV may enable identification of responders of decrease in blood pressure by alogliptin in hypertensive patients with T2DM.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Registration Number for Clinical Trial: UMIN000007722.

DPP-4 Inhibitors as Potential Candidates for Antihypertensive Therapy: Improving Vascular Inflammation and Assisting the Action of Traditional Antihypertensive Drugs

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is an important protease that is widely expressed on the surface of human cells and plays a key role in immune-regulation, inflammation, oxidative stress, cell adhesion, and apoptosis by targeting different substrates. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are commonly used as hypoglycemic agents. However, in addition to their hypoglycemic effect, DPP-4i have also shown potent activities in the cardiovascular system, particularly in the regulation of blood pressure (BP). Previous studies have shown that the regulatory actions of DPP-4i in controlling BP are complex and that the mechanisms involved include the functional activities of the nerves, kidneys, hormones, blood vessels, and insulin. Recent work has also shown that inflammation is closely associated with the elevation of BP, and that the inhibition of DPP-4 can reduce BP by regulating the function of the immune system, by reducing inflammatory reactions and by improving oxidative stress. In this review, we describe the potential anti-hypertensive effects of DPP-4i and discuss potential new anti-hypertensive therapies. Our analysis indicated that DPP-4i treatment has a mild anti-hypertensive effect as a monotherapy and causes a significant reduction in BP when used in combined treatments. However, the combination of DPP-4i with high-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can lead to increased BP. We suggest that DPP-4i improves vascular endothelial function in hypertensive patients by suppressing inflammatory responses and by alleviating oxidative stress. In addition, DPP-4i can also regulate BP by activating the sympathetic nervous system, interfering with the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), regulating Na/H₂O metabolism, and attenuating insulin resistance (IR).

Extracellular Ubiquitin(1-76) and Ubiquitin(1-74) Regulate Cardiac Fibroblast Proliferation

SDF-1α (stromal cell-derived factor-1α) is a CXCR4-receptor agonist and DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4) substrate. SDF-1α, particularly when combined with sitagliptin to block the metabolism of SDF-1α by DPP4, stimulates proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts via the CXCR4 receptor; this effect is greater in cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats versus Wistar-Kyoto normotensive rats. Emerging evidence indicates that ubiquitin(1-76) exists in plasma and is a potent CXCR4-receptor agonist. Therefore, we hypothesized that ubiquitin(1-76), similar to SDF-1α, should increase proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts. Contrary to our working hypothesis, ubiquitin(1-76) did not stimulate cardiac fibroblast proliferation, yet unexpectedly antagonized the proproliferative effects of SDF-1α combined with sitagliptin. In this regard, ubiquitin(1-76) was more potent in spontaneously hypertensive versus Wistar-Kyoto cells. In the presence of 6bk (selective inhibitor of insulin-degrading enzyme [IDE]; an enzyme known to convert ubiquitin(1-76) to ubiquitin(1-74)), ubiquitin(1-76) no longer antagonized the proproliferative effects of SDF-1α/sitagliptin. Ubiquitin(1-74) also antagonized the proproliferative effects of SDF-1α/sitagliptin, and this effect of ubiquitin(1-74) was not blocked by 6bk and was >10-fold more potent compared with ubiquitin(1-76). Neither ubiquitin(1-76) nor ubiquitin(1-74) inhibited the proproliferative effects of the non-CXCR4 receptor agonist neuropeptide Y (activates Y₁ receptors). Cardiac fibroblasts expressed IDE mRNA, protein, and activity and converted ubiquitin(1-76) to ubiquitin(1-74). Spontaneously hypertensive fibroblasts expressed greater IDE activity. Extracellular ubiquitin(1-76) blocks the proproliferative effects of SDF-1α/sitagliptin via its conversion by IDE to ubiquitin(1-74), a potent CXCR4 antagonist. Thus, IDE inhibitors, particularly when combined with DPP4 inhibitors or hypertension, could increase the risk of cardiac fibrosis.

Alogliptin prevents diastolic dysfunction and preserves left ventricular mitochondrial function in diabetic rabbits

Background

There are increasing evidence that left ventricle diastolic dysfunction is the initial functional alteration in the diabetic myocardium. In this study, we hypothesized that alogliptin prevents diastolic dysfunction and preserves left ventricular mitochondrial function and structure in diabetic rabbits.

Methods

A total of 30 rabbits were randomized into control group (CON, n = 10), alloxan-induced diabetic group (DM, n = 10) and alogliptin-treated (12.5 mg/kd/day for 12 weeks) diabetic group (DM-A, n = 10). Echocardiographic and hemodynamic studies were performed in vivo. Mitochondrial morphology, respiratory function, membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation rate of left ventricular tissue were assessed. The serum concentrations of glucagon-like peptide-1, insulin, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers were measured. Protein expression of TGF-β1, NF-κB p65 and mitochondrial biogenesis related proteins were determined by Western blotting.

Results

DM rabbits exhibited left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial dilation, increased E/e′ ratio and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure combined with decreased maximal decreasing rate of left intraventricular pressure (− dp/dtmax) were observed. Alogliptin alleviated ventricular hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in diabetic rabbits. These changes were associated with decreased mitochondrial ROS production rate, prevented mitochondrial membrane depolarization and improved mitochondrial swelling. It also improved mitochondrial biogenesis by PGC-1α/NRF1/Tfam signaling pathway.

Conclusions

The DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin prevents cardiac diastolic dysfunction by inhibiting ventricular remodeling, explicable by improved mitochondrial function and increased mitochondrial biogenesis.

Effect of vildagliptin versus glibenclamide on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Several trials have reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM), improve endothelial function. The current study investigated the effects of vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, compared to glibenclamide on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure in patients with T2DM and hypertension.

METHODS

Patients aged over 35 years with T2DM and hypertension, but without cardiovascular disease, were randomly allocated to treatment with vildagliptin (n = 25) or glibenclamide (n = 25). Both groups took metformin. Endothelial function was evaluated by peripheral artery tonometry (Endo-PAT 2000) to calculate the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and arterial stiffness. Primary outcome was change in the RHI after 12 weeks of treatment. Twenty-four-hour non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed using a Mobil-O-Graph^® 24-h PWA monitor. Arterial stiffness was assessed using the augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm (AIx75), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP).

RESULTS

There were no changes in the RHI in the vildagliptin group (before 2.35 ± 0.59; after 2.24 ± 0.60; p value = NS) or in the glibenclamide group (before 2.36 ± 0.52; after 2.34 ± 0.50; p value = NS), with no differences between groups (p value = NS). There was also no difference between vildagliptin and glibenclamide treatment in respect to AIx75 (p value = NS), cSBP (p value = NS) or PWV (p value = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin and glibenclamide similarly do not change the endothelial function and arterial stiffness after 12 weeks of treatment in diabetic and hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease. Thus, vildagliptin has a neutral effect on vascular function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02145611, registered on 11 Jun 2013.

DPP (Dipeptidyl Peptidase)-4 Inhibition Potentiates the Vasoconstrictor Response to NPY (Neuropeptide Y) in Humans During Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibition

DPP (dipeptidyl peptidase)-4 inhibitors are antidiabetic drugs that may increase heart failure in high-risk patients. NPY (neuropeptide Y) is coreleased with norepinephrine, causes vasoconstriction via the Y1 receptor, and is degraded by DPP4 to NPY (3-36) in vitro. NPY (3-36) decreases release of norepinephrine via the Y2 receptor. We tested the hypothesis that DPP4 inhibition would potentiate the vasoconstrictor effect of NPY. Eighteen nonsmokers (12 healthy controls and 6 with type 2 diabetes mellitus) participated in 1 of 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover studies. First, subjects were randomized to order of treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg/d versus placebo for 7 days separated by 4-week washout. On the last day of treatment, NPY was infused by brachial artery and forearm blood flow was measured using plethysmography. Blood samples were collected after each dose. NPY infusions were repeated after 90-minute washout and intra-arterial enalaprilat. Second, 5 healthy subjects were randomized to crossover treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg/d plus valsartan 160 mg/d versus placebo plus valsartan. NPY infusions were performed on the seventh day of treatment. NPY caused dose-dependent vasoconstriction. During enalaprilat, sitagliptin significantly potentiated NPY-induced vasoconstriction in controls and diabetics ( P≤0.02 for forearm blood flow in either group). Baseline norepinephrine release was increased during sitagliptin and enalaprilat, but not further by NPY. Sitagliptin increased the ratio of NPY to NPY (3-36). During valsartan, sitagliptin also significantly potentiated NPY-induced vasoconstriction ( P=0.009 for forearm blood flow). Potentiation of endogenous NPY could contribute to cardiovascular effects of DPP4 inhibitors in patients taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 acutely affects renal blood flow and urinary flow rate in spontaneously hypertensive rats despite significantly reduced renal expression of GLP-1 receptors

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) is an incretin hormone increasing postprandial insulin release. GLP‐1 also induces diuresis and natriuresis in humans and rodents. The GLP‐1 receptor is extensively expressed in the renal vascular tree in normotensive rats where acute GLP‐1 treatment leads to increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and increased renal blood flow (RBF). In hypertensive animal models, GLP‐1 has been reported both to increase and decrease MAP. The aim of this study was to examine expression of renal GLP‐1 receptors in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and to assess the effect of acute intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1. We hypothesized that GLP‐1 would increase diuresis and natriuresis and reduce MAP in SHR. Immunohistochemical staining and in situ hybridization for the GLP‐1 receptor were used to localize GLP‐1 receptors in the kidney. Sevoflurane‐anesthetized normotensive Sprague–Dawley rats and SHR received a 20 min intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1 and changes in MAP, RBF, heart rate, dieresis, and natriuresis were measured. The vasodilatory effect of GLP‐1 was assessed in isolated interlobar arteries from normo‐ and hypertensive rats. We found no expression of GLP‐1 receptors in the kidney from SHR. However, acute intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1 increased MAP, RBF, dieresis, and natriuresis without affecting heart rate in both rat strains. These results suggest that the acute renal effects of GLP‐1 in SHR are caused either by extrarenal GLP‐1 receptors activating other mechanisms (e.g., insulin) to induce the renal changes observed or possibly by an alternative renal GLP‐1 receptor.

The pleiotropic cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Patients with Type 2 diabetes have an excess risk for cardiovascular disease. One of the several approaches, included in the guidelines for the management of Type 2 diabetes, is based on dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4; also termed CD26) inhibitors, also called gliptins. Gliptins inhibit the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1): this effect is associated with increased circulating insulin-to-glucagon ratio, and a consequent reduction of HbA1c. In addition to incretin hormones, there are several proteins that may be affected by DPP-4 and its inhibition: among these some are relevant for the cardiovascular system homeostasis such as SDF-1α and its receptor CXCR4, brain natriuretic peptides, neuropeptide Y and peptide YY. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiological relevance of gliptin pleiotropism and its translational potential.

Sitagliptin reduces inflammation, fibrosis and preserves diastolic function in a rat model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a systemic syndrome driven by co-morbidities, and its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Several studies suggesting that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) might be involved in the pathophysiology of heart failure have prompted experimental and clinical investigations of DPP4 inhibitors in the cardiovascular system. Here we have investigated whether the DPP4 inhibitor sitagliptin affected the progression of HFpEF independently of its effects on glycaemia.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Seven-week-old Dahl salt-sensitive rats were fed a high-salt diet for 5 weeks to induce hypertension. Then the rats continued with the high-salt diet and were treated with either sitagliptin (10 mg·kg-1 ) or vehicle for the following 8 weeks. Blood pressure and cardiac function were measured in vivo. Histochemical and molecular biology analyses of myocardium were used to assay cytokines, fibrotic markers, DPP4 and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)/GLP-1 receptor.

KEY RESULTS

Treatment with sitagliptin attenuated diastolic dysfunction, reduced mortality and reduced cardiac DPP4 activity, along with increased circulating GLP-1 and myocardial expression of GLP-1 receptors. Myocardial levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and CCL2) were reduced. Sitagliptin treatment decreased the levels of endothelial NOS monomer, responsible for generation of ROS, while the amount of NO-producing dimeric form increased. Markers of oxidative and nitrosative stress were decreased. Moreover, increased collagen deposition and activation of pro-fibrotic signalling, inducing elevated myocardial stiffness, were attenuated by sitagliptin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Sitagliptin positively modulated active relaxation and passive diastolic compliance by decreasing inflammation-related endothelial dysfunction and fibrosis, associated with HFpEF.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Targeting Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.22/issuetoc and http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.v82.4/issuetoc.

The ZDSD rat: a novel model of diabetic nephropathy

The ZDSD rat is a new obese-diabetic rat model that expresses type 2 diabetes in the presence of an intact leptin pathway. During a long pre-diabetic state, the animals exhibit most of the features of metabolic syndrome including obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, insulin resistance and decreased glucose disposal. The animals used in these studies were either allowed to become spontaneously diabetic at 16-30 weeks of age, or diabetes was induced with a diabetogenic diet. In the presence of either spontaneous or diet-induced diabetes, they develop progressive albuminuria as well as increases in other urinary markers of impaired renal function (kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), β2-microglobulin, clusterin and cystatin C). Typical morphological changes of nephropathy, such as glomerular capillary basement membrane thickening and podocyte effacement, accompany these marker increases. Lisinopril (ACEi) treatment (30 mg/kg/day via the diet) dramatically reduced diabetes-induced albuminuria by 85%, independent of the duration of diabetes or the initial albumin excretion. These results position the ZDSD rat as a relevant model of diabetic nephropathy that can be treated with clinically effective compounds.

8-Aminoguanosine and 8-Aminoguanine Exert Diuretic, Natriuretic, Glucosuric, and Antihypertensive Activity

In vivo, guanine moieties in DNA, RNA, guanine nucleotides, or guanosine or guanine per se can undergo nitration (for example, by peroxynitrite) or hydroxylation (for example, by superoxide anion) on position 8 of the purine ring. Subsequent catabolism of these modified biomolecules leads to the production of a diverse group of 8-nitro, 8-amino, and 8-hydroxy guanosine and guanine compounds. Indeed, studies suggest the in vivo existence of 8-nitroguanosine, 8-nitroguanine, 8-aminoguanosine, 8-aminoguanine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, and 8-hydroxyguanine. Since a multitude of these compounds exist in vivo, and since the renal effects of 8-substituted guanosine and guanine compounds are entirely unknown, we examined the effects of guanosine, guanine, 8-nitroguanosine, 8-nitroguanine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, 8-hydroxyguanine, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, 8-aminoguanosine, and 8-aminoguanine (33.5 µmol/kg/min; intravenous infusion for 115 minutes) on excretion of sodium, potassium, and glucose in rats. Guanosine, 8-nitroguanosine, and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine had minimal natriuretic activity. Guanine, 8-nitroguanine, 8-hydroxyguanosine, and 8-hydroxyguanine had moderate natriuretic activity (increased sodium excretion by 9.4-, 7.8-, 7.1-, and 8.6-fold, respectively). In comparison with all other compounds, 8-aminoguanosine and 8-aminoguanine were highly efficacious and increased sodium excretion by 26.6- and 17.2-fold, respectively, exceeding that of a matched dose of amiloride (13.6-fold increase). 8-Aminoguanosine and 8-aminoguanine also increased glucose excretion by 12.1- and 12.2-fold, respectively, and decreased potassium excretion by 69.1 and 71.0%, respectively. Long-term radiotelemetry studies demonstrated that oral 8-aminoguanosine and 8-aminoguanine (5 mg/kg/day) suppressed deoxycorticosterone/salt-induced hypertension. These experiments demonstrate that some naturally occurring 8-substitued guanosine and guanine compounds, particularly 8-aminoguanosine and 8-aminoguanine, are potent and efficacious potassium-sparing diuretics/natriuretics that may represent a novel class of antihypertensive diuretics.

Acute Ischemic Stroke Severity, Progression, and Outcome Relate to Changes in Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV and Fibroblast Activation Protein Activity

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for acute stroke treatment, given its potential to prolong the biological half-life of neuroprotective substrates. A related protease, fibroblast activation protein (FAP), was recently shown to inactivate the same substrates. Therefore, it should also be investigated as a potential target in stroke. The study aimed to investigate whether stroke severity and outcome correlate with DPPIV and FAP activities and their kinetics shortly after acute ischemic stroke. DPPIV and FAP activities were analyzed in the serum of 50 hyperacute stroke patients at admission, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after stroke onset and in 50 age-matched healthy controls. This was done as part of the Middelheim's Interdisciplinary Stroke Study. DPPIV activity tended to increase shortly after stroke compared to the control population. DPPIV and FAP activities steadily decreased in the first week after stroke onset. Higher infarct volumes (≥5 ml) and a more severe stroke (NIHSS >7) at admission were correlated with a stronger decrease in the activities of both enzymes. Moreover, these patients more often developed a progressive stroke, were more often institutionalized. Patients with a stronger increase in DPPIV activity at admission and decrease in the activity of both DPPIV and FAP during the first week after stroke onset had a more severe stroke and worse short-term outcomes.

Cardiovascular efficacy of sitagliptin in patients with diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a 12-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Gliptins should have beneficial effects beyond glycemic control, potentially on the pathophysiology of cardiovascular (CV) diseases, with some basic studies demonstrating this possibility. However, we are yet to answer whether there are any direct CV effects in the clinical setting. We aimed to examine the beneficial effects of sitagliptin in Japanese patients with diabetes and high CV risk for 12 months.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of 205 patients with type 2 diabetes. All participants had more than one major CV risk factor and were treated with sitagliptin for 12 months. At 3 or 12 months, we examined the effects of treatment on glycemic control, CV function (by electrocardiography, echocardiography, and reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry), and CV biomarkers.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly elderly (68.8 ± 9.9 years) and male (71.5 %) and typically had more than three CV risk factors (79.2 %). Treatment with sitagliptin significantly reduced the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level from 7.09 % ± 0.81 % at baseline to 6.67 % ± 0.69 % at 3 months and 6.68 % ± 0.73 % at 12 months (both P < 0.001). The reduction in HbA1c was also in tandem with the decrease in the level of high-sensitive C-reactive protein throughout the study. Independent of the change in HbA1c, sitagliptin reduced systolic (-7.0 ± 18.9 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (-5.1 ± 11.7 mmHg) at 12 months, and this was associated with a decrease in urinary albumin. In contrast, there were no beneficial effects on cardiac and endothelial function or on the levels of serum B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitive troponin T, and urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese patients with diabetes and multiple CV risk factors, sitagliptin showed a decrease in blood pressure associated with an improvement in albuminuria in addition to glycemic control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000005663.

Sitagliptin and other 'gliptins'--why prescribe them?

INTRODUCTION

In 2008, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) required all new glucose-lowering therapies to show cardiovascular safety, and this applies to the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors ('gliptins'). At present, there is contradictory evidence on whether the gliptins increase hospitalizations for heart failure.

AREAS COVERED

This is an evaluation of the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) in high risk cardiovascular subjects with type 2 diabetes [1]. TECOS demonstrated non-inferiority for sitagliptin over placebo for the primary outcome, which was cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. There was no difference in the rate of hospitalization for heart failure between sitagliptin and placebo.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the results of TECOS, debate over the effects of sitagliptin on the rates of hospitalizations for heart failure continues with some recent studies suggesting increased rates. Recently, empagliflozin (an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) has been shown to reduce cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes, including the rates of hospitalization for heart failure. In our opinion, these positive findings with empagliflozin suggest that it should be prescribed in preference to the gliptins, including sitagliptin, unless any positive cardiovascular outcomes are reported for the gliptins.

Increased susceptibility of spontaneously hypertensive rats to ventricular tachyarrhythmias in early hypertension

Hypertension is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death caused by ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF). We hypothesized that, in early hypertension, the susceptibility to stress-induced VT/VF increases. We compared the susceptibility of 5- to 6-month-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and age/sex-matched normotensive rats (NR) to VT/VF during challenge with oxidative stress (H2 O2 ; 0.15 mmol l(-1) ). We found that only SHR hearts exhibited left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy. H2 O2 promoted VT in all 30 SHR but none of the NR hearts. In 33% of SHR cases, focal VT degenerated to VF within 3 s. Simultaneous voltage-calcium optical mapping of Langendorff-perfused SHR hearts revealed that H2 O2 -induced VT/VF arose spontaneously from focal activations at the base and mid left ventricular epicardium. Microelectrode recording of SHR hearts showed that VT was initiated by early afterdepolarization (EAD)-mediated triggered activity. However, despite the increased susceptibility of SHR hearts to VT/VF, patch clamped isolated SHR ventricular myocytes developed EADs and triggered activity to the same extent as NR ventricular myocytes, except with larger EAD amplitude. During the early stages of hypertension, when challenged with oxidative stress, SHR hearts showed an increased ventricular arrhythmogenicity that stems primarily from tissue remodelling (hypertrophy, fibrosis) rather than cellular electrophysiological changes. Our findings highlight the need for early hypertension treatment to minimize myocardial fibrosis, ventricular hypertrophy, and arrhythmias.

Cardiovascular Effects of Incretin-Based Therapies

The incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, are important new classes of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These agents prolong the action of the incretin hormones, GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), by inhibiting their breakdown. The incretin hormones improve glycemic control in T2DM by increasing insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon levels. The cardiovascular (CV) effects of the incretin-based therapies have been of substantial interest since 2008, when the US Food and Drug Administration began to require that all new therapies for diabetes undergo rigorous assessment of CV safety through large-scale CV outcome trials. This article reviews the most recent CV outcome trials of the DPP-4 inhibitors (SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, and TECOS) as evidence that the incretin-based therapies have acceptable CV safety profiles for patients with T2DM. The studies differ with regard to patient population, trial duration, and heart failure outcomes but show similar findings for CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke, as well as hospitalization for unstable angina.

NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 activate cardiac fibroblasts: an effect enhanced by genetic hypertension and inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase 4

Cardiac sympathetic nerves release neuropeptide Y (NPY)1-36, and peptide YY (PYY)1-36 is a circulating peptide; therefore, these PP-fold peptides could affect cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). We examined the effects of NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 on the proliferation of and collagen production ([(3)H]proline incorporation) by CFs isolated from Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) normotensive rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Experiments were performed with and without sitagliptin, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP4; an ectoenzyme that metabolizes NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 (Y1 receptor agonists) to NPY3-36 and PYY3-36 (inactive at Y1 receptors), respectively]. NPY1-36 and PYY1-36, but not NPY3-36 or PYY3-36, stimulated proliferation of CFs, and these effects were more potent than ANG II, enhanced by sitagliptin, blocked by BIBP3226 (Y1 receptor antagonist), and greater in SHR CFs. SHR CF membranes expressed more receptor for activated C kinase (RACK)1 [which scaffolds the Gi/phospholipase C (PLC)/PKC pathway] compared with WKY CF membranes. RACK1 knockdown (short hairpin RNA) and inhibition of Gi (pertussis toxin), PLC (U73122), and PKC (GF109203X) blocked the proliferative effects of NPY1-36. NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 stimulated collagen production more potently than did ANG II, and this was enhanced by sitagliptin and greater in SHR CFs. In conclusion, 1) NPY1-36 and PYY1-36, via the Y1 receptor/Gi/PLC/PKC pathway, activate CFs, and this pathway is enhanced in SHR CFs due to increased localization of RACK1 in membranes; and 2) DPP4 inhibition enhances the effects of NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 on CFs, likely by inhibiting the metabolism of NPY1-36 and PYY1-36. The implications are that endogenous NPY1-36 and PYY1-36 could adversely affect cardiac structure/function by activating CFs, and this may be exacerbated in genetic hypertension and by DPP4 inhibitors.