1
|
Erdoğan EG, Örsal Ö. The effect of web-designed education on medication adherence, asthma control and fatigue in patients with asthma: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract 2024:e13288. [PMID: 39031297 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to determine the effect of web-designed education developed for asthma patients on drug adherence, asthma control and fatigue. METHODS This randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 2021 and January 2022 with 200 individuals suffering from poor asthma control who participated in web-designed education. After the intervention, the asthma patients were followed up for 6 weeks to measure Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Fatigue Scale (CAFS), Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Inhalation Devices Usage Techniques Knowledge Test (IDUSTKT). Data were analysed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program using the Chi-square test, Independent t-test, Man-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Paired t-test, Greenhouse-Geisser (F) test and Linear regression. RESULTS The web-designed education had a statistically significant effect on the total scores of CAFS, ACT and IDUSTKT for individuals with asthma (p < 0.001). This intervention decreased fatigue levels, improved asthma control and enhanced knowledge of inhalation device usage techniques. Although there was an improvement in medication adherence, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION These results suggest that web-based educational programs can be an effective tool in asthma management and may improve patients' quality of life. Future research should examine the long-term effects of such educational programs and their effectiveness across different demographic groups in more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eylül Gülnur Erdoğan
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Turkey
| | - Özlem Örsal
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luu B, Chinnadurai A, Choudhary O, Breede N, Fidler LM, Ryan CM, Khan MH, Lau AK, Blazer AJ, Wentlandt K, Rozenberg D. A comprehensive evaluation of online inhaler use techniques for obstructive airway disease. Respir Med 2024; 226:107607. [PMID: 38548142 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary inhaler therapy is a core treatment modality for >600 million individuals affected by obstructive airways disease globally. Poor inhaler technique is associated with reduced disease control and increased health care utilization; however, many patients rely on the internet as a technical resource. This study assesses the content and quality of online resources describing inhaler techniques. METHODS A Google search was conducted in April 2023 capturing the top 5 search results for 12 common inhaler devices. Websites were compared to product monographs for preparation/first use, inhalational technique, and post-usage/device care. They were also assessed using accepted quality metrics (GQS, DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark scores) and clinically relevant aspects based on the literature and consensus statements. RESULTS Websites regularly excluded critical steps important for proper inhaler technique. They performed best on information related directly to inhalation technique (average median score 78%), whereas steps related to preparation/first use (58%) or post-usage/device care (50%) were less frequently addressed. Median GQS, DISCERN, and JAMA Benchmark scores were 3 [IQR 3-4], 3 [IQR 2-4], and 1 [IQR 1-3], respectively. Clinically relevant factors were only addressed in about one-fifth of websites with no websites addressing smoking cessation, environmental considerations, or risk factors for poor technique. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights gaps in online resources describing inhaler technique, particularly related to preparation/first use and post-usage/device care steps. Clinically relevant factors were rarely addressed across websites. Improvements in these areas could lead to enhanced inhaler technique and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Luu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anu Chinnadurai
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Omer Choudhary
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nikki Breede
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lee M Fidler
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clodagh M Ryan
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad Hashim Khan
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ambrose K Lau
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alina J Blazer
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirsten Wentlandt
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dmitry Rozenberg
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koyuncu A, Ari A. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of mobile health technologies in respiratory medicine. Expert Rev Respir Med 2024; 18:159-174. [PMID: 38795074 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2361048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mobile health (mHealth) technology in respiratory medicine is a fast-growing and promising digital technology that is popular among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). They provide reminders and step-by-step instructions for the correct inhalation technique, monitor patients' adherence to treatment, and facilitate communication between patients and HCPs. AREAS COVERED While numerous mHealth apps have been developed over the years, most applications do not have supporting evidence. Selecting the best mHealth app in respiratory medicine is challenging due to limited studies carrying out mHealth app selection. Although mHealth technologies play an important part in the future of respiratory medicine, there is no single guide on the evaluation and selection of mHealth technologies for patients with pulmonary diseases. This paper aims to provide an overview of mHealth technologies, particularly emphasizing digital inhalers and standalone applications used in asthma. Additionally, it offers insights into the evaluation, selection, and pertinent considerations surrounding mHealth applications in respiratory medicine. EXPERT OPINION Evaluating mHealth apps will take time, resources, and collaboration between stakeholders such as governmental regulatory bodies, subject-matter experts, and industry representatives. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of the mHealth app will improve clinical decision-making, personalized treatments, self-management and disease monitoring in respiratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayfer Koyuncu
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Bioengineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Ari
- College of Health Professions Department of Respiratory Care, Regent's Professor and Associate Dean for Research, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Czira A, Banks V, Requena G, Wood R, Tritton T, Wild R, Compton C, Ismaila A. Treatment pathways, economic burden and clinical outcomes in new users of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting B 2-agonist dual therapy with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a primary care setting in England: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e072361. [PMID: 38326272 PMCID: PMC10860111 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) improves lung function and health status and reduces COPD exacerbation risk versus monotherapy. This study described treatment use, healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), healthcare costs and outcomes following initiation of single-device ICS/LABA as initial maintenance therapy (IMT). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Primary care, England. DATA SOURCES Linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. PARTICIPANTS Patients with COPD and ≥1 single-device ICS/LABA prescription between July 2015 and December 2018 were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Treatment pathways, COPD-related HCRU and healthcare costs, COPD exacerbations, time to triple therapy, medication adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and indexed treatment time to discontinuation. Data for patients without prior maintenance therapy history (IMT users) and non-triple users were assessed over a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS Of 13 451 new ICS/LABA users, 5162 were IMT users (budesonide/formoterol, n=1056; beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol, n=2427; other ICS/LABA, n=1679), for whom at 3 and 12 months post-index, 45.6% and 39.4% were still receiving any ICS/LABA. At >6 to ≤12 months, the proportion of IMT users with ≥1 outpatient visit (10.1%) and proportion with ≥1 inpatient stay (12.6%) had increased from those at 3 months (9.0% and 7.4%, respectively). Inpatient stays contributed most to total COPD-related healthcare costs. For non-triple IMT users, at 3 and 12 months post-index, 4.5% and 13.7% had ≥1 moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation. Time to triple therapy initiation and time to discontinuation of index medication ranged from 45.9 to 50.2 months and 2.3 to 2.8 months between treatments. Adherence was low across all time points (21.5-27.6%). Results were similar across indexed therapies. CONCLUSIONS In the year following treatment initiation, ICS/LABA adherence was poor and many patients discontinued or switched therapies, suggesting that more consideration and optimisation of treatment is required in England for patients initiating single-device ICS/LABA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandrosz Czira
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, GSK, R&D Global Medical, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Victoria Banks
- Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Gema Requena
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, GSK, R&D Global Medical, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Robert Wood
- Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Theo Tritton
- Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Rosie Wild
- Real-world Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Chris Compton
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, GSK, R&D Global Medical, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Afisi Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mahler DA, Halpin DMG. Consideration and Assessment of Patient Factors When Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD. Chest 2024; 165:323-332. [PMID: 37977266 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Because guidelines and strategies for pharmacologic treatment of COPD focus on specific classes of inhaled medications, there is an unmet need for information to guide health care professionals for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system that matches the unique characteristics of individual patients. This article provides guidance for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system based on three "key" patient factors: cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and peak inspiratory flow. In addition, information is provided about specific tests to assess these patient factors. Cognitive impairment with an estimated prevalence of 25% among patients with COPD adversely affects patients' ability to correctly use a handheld device. To our knowledge, the prevalence of impaired manual dexterity/strength has not been reported in those with COPD. However, 79% of patients with COPD have reported one or more physical impediments that could influence their ability to manipulate an inhaler device. The measurement of peak inspiratory flow against the simulated resistance (PIFr) of a dry powder inhaler establishes whether the patient has the inhalation ability for creating optimal turbulent energy within the device. A suboptimal PIFr for low to medium-high resistance dry powder inhalers has been reported in 19% to 84% of stable outpatients with COPD. Health care professionals should consider cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and PIFr in their patients with COPD when prescribing inhaled pharmacotherapy. Impairments in these patient factors are common among those with COPD and can affect the individual's competency and effectiveness of using inhaled medications delivered by handheld devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A Mahler
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Respiratory Services, Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, NH.
| | - David M G Halpin
- Respiratory Medicine, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu J, Meng W, Ma Y, Zhao Z, Xiong R, Wang J, Zhao R, Zeng H, Chen Y. Errors and Adherence to Inhaled Medications in Chinese Adults with COPD. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:69-76. [PMID: 37620726 PMCID: PMC10817877 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08378-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to inhaled medications is key to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) control and management. OBJECTIVE To assess errors and adherence to inhalation therapy in COPD patients, and identify potential factors associated with poor adherence. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1, 2022, to November 30, 2022, in 24 hospital outpatient departments in different cities of Hunan Province, China. Adherence to inhaled medications was measured using the 10-item Test of Adherence Inventory, and the results were expressed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS A total of 2218 clinically confirmed adult COPD patients completed the questionnaires, and 1423 patients with more than a 3-month history of inhalation therapy were analyzed. This study found that 61.3% of patients made one or more use errors. Not holding the breath after inhalation or holding the breath for less than 3 s had the highest reporting rate (30.7%). A considerable proportion of patients (66.6%) demonstrated suboptimal adherence to inhaled medications. Patients who resided in rural areas (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.88), used dual therapy (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.05-2.05), and exhibited common use errors (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.39-3.82) were more likely to present suboptimal adherence. Patients with CAT (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test) score < 10 (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.94), a junior high school education and above (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94), and duration of inhaled medication use > 3 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.83) were associated with better adherence. CONCLUSION Suboptimal adherence to inhaled medications and many inhalation therapy errors were identified among COPD patients. Common use errors in inhaled medications, CAT score, and education background were predictive of and influenced adherence to inhaled medications. It is necessary to strengthen training in Chinese patients about inhaler use and follow-up intensively with patients throughout treatment, especially for patients with risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiankang Wu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Weiwei Meng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yiming Ma
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiqi Zhao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ruoyan Xiong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rui Zhao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huihui Zeng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China.
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China.
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Firlik KS, Anupindi VR, Hayes V, DeKoven M, Shaikh A, Franchino-Elder J. Improved medication adherence in COPD patients using tiotropium or tiotropium olodaterol with the HealthPrize digital behavior change program. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023:1-15. [PMID: 38116664 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2296561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of the HealthPrize RespiPoints™ program on treatment adherence and persistence in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, program participants and nonparticipants receiving tiotropium bromide (TIO) or TIO and olodaterol between 1 January 2015-31 March 2020 were propensity score matched (PSM), from the linked database of the HealthPrize patient list and IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Treatment adherence, persistence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the odds of adherence (≥80% proportion of days covered [PDC]), adjusted risk of discontinuation, and adjusted total healthcare costs. RESULTS Program participants (n = 262) demonstrated a 44% greater adherence during followup than nonparticipants (n = 262) (mean [standard deviation] PDC: 0.72 [0.27] vs 0.50 [0.36], p < 0.0001). Participants had higher odds of adherence vs nonparticipants (adjusted odds ratio: 2.51; 95% confidence interval: 1.72-3.66, p < 0.0001) and a lower percentage of participants discontinued their index medication (19.85% vs 33.59%, p = 0.0004). Fewer participants were hospitalized during follow-up (13.74% vs 17.56%, p = 0.23); adjusted total medical costs were 24% lower (p = 0.08). Higher pharmacy costs partially offset lower healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS Program participants showed improved COPD medication adherence and persistence compared to nonparticipants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mitchell DeKoven
- IQVIA, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Asif Shaikh
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Turégano-Yedro M, Trillo-Calvo E, Navarro i Ros F, Maya-Viejo JD, González Villaescusa C, Echave Sustaeta JM, Doña E, Alcázar Navarrete B. Inhaler Adherence in COPD: A Crucial Step Towards the Correct Treatment. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2887-2893. [PMID: 38059011 PMCID: PMC10697822 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s431829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
COPD is a typical example of chronic disease. As such, treatment adherence tends to be as low as between 30% and 50%, with specific issues in COPD due to the use of inhaled therapies. Decreased adherence in COPD is associated with worse outcomes, with increased risk for exacerbations and long-term mortality. Factors that impact adherence are multiple, some related to patient, some related to clinicians and finally some related to healthcare system. Among clinician factors, prescription of simplified treatment regimens delivered by an inhaler adapted to the patient's characteristics is crucial. Although it has been observed a huge improvement in the design and usability of inhaler devices for COPD in the last two centuries, there is still a clear gap in this field. Smart inhalers as well as simplified treatment regimens could improve adherence and therefore improve long-term outcomes in COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fernando Navarro i Ros
- Centro de Salud Ingeniero J Benlloch, Valencia, Spain
- Red Investigadores SEMERGEN, Madrid, Spain
| | - José David Maya-Viejo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Camas, Distrito Sanitario Aljarafe-Sevilla Norte, Camas, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Cruz González Villaescusa
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Maria Echave Sustaeta
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esperanza Doña
- Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs- Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gagné M, Karanikas A, Green S, Gupta S. Reductions in inhaler greenhouse gas emissions by addressing care gaps in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:e001716. [PMID: 37730281 PMCID: PMC10510936 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Climate change from greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represents one of the greatest public health threats of our time. Inhalers (and particularly metred-dose inhalers (MDIs)) used for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), constitute an important source of GHGs. In this analysis, we aimed to estimate the carbon footprint impact of improving three distinct aspects of respiratory care that drive avoidable inhaler use in Canada. METHODS We used published data to estimate the prevalence of misdiagnosed disease, existing inhaler use patterns, medication class distributions, inhaler type distributions and GHGs associated with inhaler actuations, to quantify annual GHG emissions in Canada: (1) attributable to asthma and COPD misdiagnosis; (2) attributable to overuse of rescue inhalers due to suboptimally controlled symptoms; and (3) avoidable by switching 25% of patients with existing asthma and COPD to an otherwise comparable therapeutic option with a lower GHG footprint. RESULTS We identified the following avoidable annual GHG emissions: (1) ~49 100 GHG metric tons (MTs) due to misdiagnosed disease; (2) ~143 000 GHG MTs due to suboptimal symptom control; and (3) ~262 100 GHG MTs due to preferential prescription of strategies featuring MDIs over lower-GHG-emitting options (when 25% of patients are switched to lower GHG alternatives). Combined, the GHG emission reductions from bridging these gaps would be the equivalent to taking ~101 100 vehicles off the roads each year. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis shows that the carbon savings from addressing misdiagnosis and suboptimal disease control are comparable to those achievable by switching one in four patients to lower GHG-emitting therapeutic strategies. Behaviour change strategies required to achieve and sustain delivery of evidence-based real-world care are complex, but the added identified incentive of carbon footprint reduction may in itself prove to be a powerful motivator for change among providers and patients. This additional benefit can be leveraged in future behaviour change interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Gagné
- Division of Respirology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aliki Karanikas
- Division of Respirology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Green
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Respirology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Terry PD, Dhand R. The 2023 GOLD Report: Updated Guidelines for Inhaled Pharmacological Therapy in Patients with Stable COPD. Pulm Ther 2023; 9:345-357. [PMID: 37470971 PMCID: PMC10447769 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-023-00233-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 22 years, annual GOLD Reports have documented important changes in guidance and recommendations for uniformly treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with the goal of improving outcomes in patients suffering from this condition. The most recent GOLD Report, released in 2023, shows continued refinement in several areas, including more precise definitions of COPD and exacerbations of COPD, a new set of parameters to assess exacerbation severity, an updated COPD assessment tool, updated guidelines for initial and follow-up treatment, new information regarding the association between pharmacological triple therapy and reduction in mortality, and new discussions of inhaler device choice and adherence to COPD medications. Whereas we do not address all of the new or updated material in GOLD's 2023 Report, we summarize key changes in GOLD's recommendations regarding inhalation therapy for stable COPD and frame these changes in the context of previous GOLD recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Terry
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box U-114, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA
| | - Rajiv Dhand
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box U-114, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mahler DA, Watz H, Emerson-Stadler R, Ritz J, Gardev A, Shaikh A, Drummond MB. Clinical Implications of Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD: Post Hoc Analyses of the TRONARTO Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:1729-1740. [PMID: 37599896 PMCID: PMC10432827 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s404243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with COPD, inhalation ability should be assessed when considering inhaler choice. To evaluate whether the soft mist inhaler (SMI) is suitable for COPD patients irrespective of inhalation ability, the TRONARTO study investigated the efficacy of dual long-acting bronchodilator therapy delivered via the Respimat® SMI on lung function in patients with COPD stratified by inhalation ability. Tiotropium/olodaterol delivered via the SMI was effective both in patients with peak inspiratory flow (PIF) <60 L/min and PIF ≥60 L/min, measured against medium-low resistance. Methods This congress compilation summarizes post hoc analyses from the TRONARTO study presented at the annual American Thoracic Society 2022 and European Respiratory Society 2022 meetings. These analyses evaluated PIF in over 200 patients, with PIF measurements taken daily at home for 4 weeks, and in the clinic at baseline, Weeks 2 and 4. Results Overall, 57.9% of patients had a PIF range (difference between lowest and highest PIF measurements) <20 L/min (12.4% of patients had PIF range <10 L/min). At-home PIF range decreased over the study period, suggesting that inhaler training/repeated PIF measurements may help to make patients' inspiratory effort more consistent. Some patient characteristics correlated with lower PIF (female gender, shorter stature, more severe disease, worse airflow obstruction) and lower PIF range (more severe disease). PIF measurements differed between medium-low and high-resistance settings, highlighting the importance of measuring PIF at the resistance of a patient's inhaler. PIF correlated poorly with spirometry measurements. Conclusion As indicated in COPD management guidelines, choice of inhaler is essential to optimize pharmacologic therapies for COPD. Poor inspiratory ability should be viewed as a treatable trait that can help to inform inhaler choice. Inhaler training and consideration of PIF (if patients use a dry powder inhaler) can reduce patient-to-inhaler mismatch, with potential consequences for health status and exacerbation risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A Mahler
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
- Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, NH, USA
| | - Henrik Watz
- Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Asif Shaikh
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - M Bradley Drummond
- Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Celli B, Vestbo J. Simplifying pharmacotherapy for patients with COPD: a viewpoint. Eur Respir J 2023; 62:2300115. [PMID: 37591551 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00115-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bartolome Celli
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jørgen Vestbo
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, and the North West Lung Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Case MA, Eakin MN. Up-to-date guidance towards improving medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med 2023; 17:539-546. [PMID: 37494126 PMCID: PMC10529685 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2239708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite efficacious treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), medication adherence remains quite poor, with most estimates based on electronic monitoring devices ranging from 20-30%. This degree of nonadherence represents a significant missed opportunity to realize the benefits of treatment of this disease. AREAS COVERED In this article, we review research on the prevalence of nonadherence among patients with COPD, the association of nonadherence with health outcomes, barriers to adherence in this patient population, and potential interventions. EXPERT OPINION Integrating research into practice involves assessing patients' adherence, identifying modifiable barriers to adherence, open discussion of these barriers with patients, and tailored interventions to address them. These interventions may include treatment of previously unrecognized comorbid disease, providing educational or behavioral interventions, optimizing prescribing strategies, use of adherence aids, or addressing cost and other access barriers. Electronic inhaler monitors are promising interventions for both monitoring and improving adherence. However, remaining concerns about integration into patient care, data management, cost, acceptability, and ethical and privacy issues must be overcome prior to their implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith A. Case
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
| | - Michelle N. Eakin
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hale EM, Greene G, Mulvey C, Mokoka MC, van Boven JFM, Cushen B, Sulaiman I, Brennan V, Lombard L, Walsh J, Plunkett S, McCartan TA, Kerr PJ, Reilly RB, Hughes C, Kent BD, Jackson DJ, Butler M, Counihan I, Hayes J, Faul J, Kelly M, Convery R, Nanzer AM, Fitzgerald JM, Murphy DM, Heaney LG, Costello RW. Use of digital measurement of medication adherence and lung function to guide the management of uncontrolled asthma (INCA Sun): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2023; 11:591-601. [PMID: 36963417 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00534-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical value of using digital tools to assess adherence and lung function in uncontrolled asthma is not known. We aimed to compare treatment decisions guided by digitally acquired data on adherence, inhaler technique, and peak flow with existing methods. METHODS A 32-week prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, parallel, randomly controlled trial was done in ten severe asthma clinics across Ireland, Northern Ireland, and England. Participants were 18 years or older, had uncontrolled asthma, asthma control test (ACT) score of 19 or less, despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, and had at least one severe exacerbation in the past year despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the active group or the control group, by means of a computer-generated randomisation sequence of permuted blocks of varying sizes (2, 4, and 6) stratified by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration and recruitment site. In the control group, participants were masked to their adherence and errors in inhaler technique data. A statistician masked to study allocation did the statistical analysis. After a 1-week run-in period, both groups attended three nurse-led education visits over 8 weeks (day 7, week 4, and week 8) and three physician-led treatment adjustment visits at weeks 8, 20, and 32. In the active group, treatment adjustments during the physician visits were informed by digital data on inhaler adherence, twice daily digital peak expiratory flow (ePEF), patient-reported asthma control, and exacerbation history. Treatment was adjusted in the control group on the basis of pharmacy refill rates (a measure of adherence), asthma control by ACT questionnaire, and history of exacerbations and visual management of inhaler technique. Both groups used a digitally enabled Inhaler Compliance Assessment (INCA) and PEF. The primary outcomes were asthma medication burden measured as proportion of patients who required a net increase in treatment at the end of 32 weeks and adherence rate measured in the last 12 weeks by area under the curve in the intention-to-treat population. The safety analyses included all patients who consented for the trial. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02307669 and is complete. FINDINGS Between Oct 25, 2015, and Jan 26, 2020, of 425 patients assessed for eligibility, 220 consented to participate in the study, 213 were randomly assigned (n=108 in the active group; n=105 in the control group) and 200 completed the study (n=102 in the active group; n=98 in the control group). In the intention-to-treat analysis at week 32, 14 (14%) active and 31 (32%) control patients had a net increase in treatment compared with baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0·31 [95% CI 0·15-0·64], p=0·0015) and 11 (11%) active and 21 (21%) controls required add-on biological therapy (0·42 [0·19-0·95], p=0·038) adjusted for study site, age, sex, and baseline FeNO. Three (16%) of 19 active and 11 (44%) of 25 control patients increased their medication from fluticasone propionate 500 μg daily to 1000 μg daily (500 μg twice a day; adjusted OR 0·23 [0·06-0·87], p=0·026). 26 (31%) of 83 active and 13 (18%) of 73 controls reduced their medication from fluticasone propionate 1000 μg once daily to 500 μg once daily (adjusted OR 2·43 [1·13-5·20], p=0·022. Week 20-32 actual mean adherence was 64·9% (SD 23·5) in the active group and 55·5% (26·8) in the control group (between-group difference 11·1% [95% CI 4·4-17·9], p=0·0012). A total of 29 serious adverse events were recorded (16 [55%] in the active group, and 13 [45%] in the control group), 11 of which were confirmed as respiratory. None of the adverse events reported were causally linked to the study intervention, to the use of salmeterol-fluticasone inhalers, or the use of the digital PEF or INCA. INTERPRETATION Evidence-based care informed by digital data led to a modest improvement in medication adherence and a significantly lower treatment burden. FUNDING Health Research Board of Ireland, Medical Research Council, INTEREG Europe, and an investigator-initiated project grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Mac Hale
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Garrett Greene
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Statistics, University College Dublin, Dublin
| | - Christopher Mulvey
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matshediso C Mokoka
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Breda Cushen
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Imran Sulaiman
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vincent Brennan
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lorna Lombard
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joanne Walsh
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead Plunkett
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Thomas A McCartan
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patrick J Kerr
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Richard B Reilly
- Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cian Hughes
- Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian D Kent
- Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's Hospital, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David J Jackson
- Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's Hospital, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marcus Butler
- Respiratory Medicine Division, St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian Counihan
- Respiratory Medicine Division, OLUH, Drogheda, Ireland
| | - James Hayes
- Respiratory Medicine Division, Cavan Hospital, Cavan, Ireland
| | - John Faul
- Respiratory Medicine, James Connolly Hospital, Dublin
| | - Martin Kelly
- Respiratory Medcine, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Rory Convery
- Consultant Respiratory Physician at Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Alexandra M Nanzer
- Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's Hospital, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Mark Fitzgerald
- Respiratory Medicine Division, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Desmond M Murphy
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Cork and Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University, Belfast, UK
| | - Richard W Costello
- INCA Research Team, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Clinical Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beaumont Hospital and RCSI University of Medicine and Health Science, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu DL, Luo CL, Du X, Li PP, Jiang M, Liu T, Sun Y. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Readiness for Discharge of Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:1323-1333. [PMID: 37255947 PMCID: PMC10226539 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s410725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Readiness for hospital discharge is an important indicator of patients' transition from illness to health and can predict rehabilitation and prognosis. Identifying factors that influence readiness for discharge is crucial for developing effective nursing interventions. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the current status of discharge readiness and its influencing factors in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods A total of 311 elderly inpatients diagnosed with COPD were enrolled in this investigation at a tertiary hospital in Chengdu between December 2021 and June 2022. Questionnaires were designed to collect general information, disease-related information, and responses to the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and the Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were employed to further analyze factors related to discharge readiness and the correlation between discharge readiness and the quality of discharge guidance. Results The total score of discharge readiness of elderly COPD patients was 77.72 ± 11.86 with a mean score of 6.48 ± 0.19 for each item. The quality of discharge instructions was 110.54 ± 15.66, with a mean score of 6.12 ± 0.15 for each item. Discharge preparation was positively correlated with the quality of discharge guidance. Multivariate analysis showed that marital status, admission mode, length of stay in hospital, Classification of Severity of Airflow Limitation, mMRC classification, number of medications taken with discharge, presence of inhalers in medication orders, mode of home oxygen therapy, and quality of discharge guidance were independent factors of discharge readiness in elderly COPD patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both discharge readiness and the quality of discharge guidance for elderly COPD patients in China are currently suboptimal and need further improvement. The survey findings provide valuable insights that can guide future management practices and interventions aimed at improving discharge readiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dao-Lin Wu
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Medical College and the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chun-Li Luo
- School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Du
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pei-Pei Li
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Jiang
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Liu
- Clinical Medical College and the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Medical College and the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Key Clinical Specialty of Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yun Sun
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- Clinical Medical College and the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin TY, Yan DC, Wang YJ, Liang YT, Chen TL, Wan GH. An aerosol inhalation monitor would improve the accuracy of checklist assessment in drug inhalation techniques. Respir Med 2023; 206:107068. [PMID: 36495788 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.107068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Checklists are usually employed to assess the inhalation techniques in patients, but partial techniques are difficult to evaluate visually. This study aimed to assess the checklist validity and an agreement between checklists and an aerosol inhalation monitor (AIM) assessments. METHODS This study used a checklist and an AIM to evaluate the participants' inhalation techniques with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and two dry powder inhalers (DPIs). The kappa (κ) coefficient, prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ (PABAK), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were all calculated to determine the agreement between the checklist and AIM in an MDI and DPIs with different inhalation technique steps. RESULTS The checklist and AIM exhibited poor agreement in the MDI for actuation and inhalation time, and a moderate agreement for inspiratory flow. The fair agreement was observed in DPIs for inspiratory flow between the checklist and AIM. The steps of holding breath in MDI and DPIs were highly correlated between both assessments. The lowest accuracy evaluated with an AIM was found in the step of actuation and inhalation time in the MDI and in the inspiratory flow step in DPIs. CONCLUSION The checklist tended to overestimate the accuracy of critical techniques including the actuation and inhalation time in MDIs and the inspiratory flow in DPIs. Thus, the AIM device can be used as an objective auxiliary tool to assess and quantify the specific steps of inhalation technique for the users with MDI and DPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Yu Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dah-Chin Yan
- Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Therapy, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jung Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ting Liang
- Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tun-Liang Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Gwo-Hwa Wan
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Respiratory Care, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan; Center for Environmental Sustainability and Human Health, Ming Chi University of Technology, Taishan, New Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bosnic-Anticevich S, Bakerly ND, Chrystyn H, Hew M, van der Palen J. Advancing Digital Solutions to Overcome Longstanding Barriers in Asthma and COPD Management. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:259-272. [PMID: 36741814 PMCID: PMC9891071 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s385857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Maintenance therapy delivered via inhaler is central to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. Poor adherence to inhaled medication and errors in inhalation technique have long represented major barriers to the optimal management of these chronic conditions. Technological innovations may provide a means of overcoming these barriers. This narrative review examines ongoing advances in digital technologies relevant to asthma and COPD with the potential to inform clinical decision-making and improve patient care. Digital inhaler devices linked to mobile apps can help bring about changes in patients' behaviors and attitudes towards disease management, particularly when they build in elements of interactivity and gamification. They can also support ongoing technique education, empowering patients and helping providers maximize the value of consultations and develop effective action plans informed by insights into the patient's inhaler use patterns and their respiratory health. When combined with innovative techniques such as machine learning, digital devices have the potential to predict exacerbations and prompt pre-emptive intervention. Finally, digital devices may support an advanced precision medicine approach to respiratory disease management and help support shared decision-making. Further work is needed to increase uptake of digital devices and integrate their use into care pathways before their full potential in personalized asthma and COPD management can be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Correspondence: Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, 2037, NSW, Australia, Tel +61 414 015 614, Email
| | - Nawar Diar Bakerly
- Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Job van der Palen
- Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, and Section Cognition, Data and Education, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Busse WW, Castro M, Casale TB. Asthma Management in Adults. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:21-33. [PMID: 36283607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Management of asthma in adults has advanced in the past 10 years. Central to these advances has been further clarification of type (T) 2 mechanisms of airway inflammation and utilization of T2 biomarkers, that is, eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. In addition, epithelial cells are emerging as significant contributors to inflammation through generation of alarmins to initiate local injury as well as downstream pathways. Five new biologics, mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab, were approved to join omalizumab and revolutionize severe asthma treatment. These biologics significantly prevent exacerbations to spare systemic corticosteroids use and their side effects. Guidelines attest to the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (formoterol) for both maintenance and rescue therapy. Focused updates to the Expert Panel Report addressed limited but specific questions relevant to asthma control. Future guidelines should include phenotype/endotype-directed therapeutics to gain more precision-directed treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W Busse
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis.
| | - Mario Castro
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leving MT, Bosnic-Anticevich S, van Cooten J, de Sousa JC, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, Pardo MG, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van der Ham I, Janse Y, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price D, Roman-Rodriguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Emerson-Stadler R, Kocks JWH. Clinical recommendations for dry powder inhaler use in the management of COPD in primary care. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:59. [PMID: 36575175 PMCID: PMC9794707 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00318-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely - measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in' and 'breathing out calmly after inhalation'. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika T. Leving
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ,grid.410692.80000 0001 2105 7653Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- grid.10328.380000 0001 2159 175XLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Dekhuijzen
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lars Dijk
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Garcia Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- grid.420061.10000 0001 2171 7500Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- grid.411728.90000 0001 2198 0923Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Iris van der Ham
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ymke Janse
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- grid.24704.350000 0004 1759 9494Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- grid.500407.6Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.7107.10000 0004 1936 7291Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodriguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- grid.8127.c0000 0004 0576 3437Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Emerson-Stadler
- grid.420061.10000 0001 2171 7500Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Janwillem W. H. Kocks
- grid.512383.e0000 0004 9171 3451General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands ,grid.500407.6Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Dept. of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pleasants RA, Chan AH, Mosnaim G, Costello RW, Dhand R, Schworer SA, Merchant R, Tilley SL. Integrating digital inhalers into clinical care of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2022; 205:107038. [PMID: 36446239 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.107038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Modernizing inhaled medications through digital technology can help address persistent problems of non-adherence and poor inhaler technique in patients with obstructive lung diseases. With a growing body of supportive clinical studies, advances in digital inhaler sensors and platforms, greater support from payers and healthcare organizations, significant growth with these technologies is expected. While all digital (smart) inhalers record adherence, these are distinguished by their compatibility with commercial inhalers, capabilities to guide inhaler technique, use of patient-reported outcomes, and user-friendliness for both the healthcare professional (HCP) and patient. Due to the complexity and novelty of employing digital inhalers, collaboration with multiple entities within health systems is necessary and a well-planned integration is needed. For HCPs and patients, cybersecurity and privacy are critical, it will require review by each healthcare organization. In the US, some payers reimburse for remote monitoring using digital inhalers, but reimbursement is currently unavailable in other countries. There are several models for remote patient care, as employing an active, ongoing digital interface between the HCP and patient or they may choose to only review data at clinical encounters. Personalization of therapies and feedback are key to success. While digital inhaler malfunction uncommonly occurs, patient attrition over a year is significant. Some patients will be challenged to use digital platforms or have the necessary technology. Additional research is needed to address cost-effectiveness, in vivo accuracy of inspiratory measurement capable devices, ability to teach inhaler technique, their application for monitoring lung function, and lastly real-world adoption and implementation in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy A Pleasants
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Amy Hy Chan
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, USA.
| | - Giselle Mosnaim
- NorthShore University Health System, Clinical Associate Professor at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, USA.
| | - Richard W Costello
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77, Ireland.
| | - Rajiv Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
| | - Stephen A Schworer
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Rajan Merchant
- Woodland Clinic Medical Group, Dignity Health Medical Foundation, CommonSpirit Health Research Institute, CommonSpirit Health Dignity Health, Woodland Clinic, 632 W Gibson Rd, Woodland, CA, USA.
| | - Stephen L Tilley
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fieutelot G, Valentin S, Ribeiro Baptista B, Chaouat A, Chabot F, Guillaumot A. L’infirmier en pratique avancée, un acteur-clé dans le développement de la réadaptation respiratoire chez le patient atteint de BPCO. Rev Mal Respir 2022; 39:822-831. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
22
|
Hsiao YH, Tseng CM, Sheu CC, Wang HY, Ko HK, Su KC, Tao CW, Tsai MJ, Chen YF. Shared Decision-Making Facilitates Inhaler Choice in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2067-2078. [PMID: 36081765 PMCID: PMC9448347 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s376547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Inadequate inhaler technique and nonadherence to therapy are associated with poorer clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Shared decision-making (SDM), based on clinical evidence, patient goals and preferences, improves quality of care. This study aims to investigate the initial patients’ choices of inhaler devices in patients with newly-diagnosed COPD after an SDM process. Patients and Methods We conducted a prospective, observational, multi-center study in four hospitals in Taiwan from December 2019 to July 2021. All treatment-naïve patients with newly-diagnosed COPD who were able to use three different inhalers of dual bronchodilators (Respimat®, Ellipta®, and Breezhaler®) in the outpatient setting were enrolled. After an SDM process, every patient was prescribed with one inhaler chosen by him- or herself. Errors of using inhalers were recorded after prescription of the inhaler, and at the follow-up visit a month later. The patients’ adherence, satisfaction score, and willingness to keep the initially chosen inhaler were investigated. Results In 109 enrolled patients, 43, 45, and 21 patients chose Respimat®, Ellipta®, and Breezhaler®, respectively. Patients chose different inhalers had similar rates of critical error on both visits, while the rates greatly decrease on the follow-up visit, no matter which inhaler devices they chose initially. The majority of patients had good adherence (use as the prescription daily, n = 79, 82%), satisfaction (satisfaction score ≥4, n = 70, 73%), and strong willingness to keep the initial inhaler (n = 89, 93%) on the follow-up visit regardless of disease severity and their comorbidities. Conclusion SDM might facilitate inhaler choosing, reduce inhaler errors (versus baseline) with good adherence, satisfaction and strong willingness to keep the initial inhaler in patients with newly-diagnosed COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Han Hsiao
- Division of General Chest Medicine, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department and Institute of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Min Tseng
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chau-Chyun Sheu
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yi Wang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Kuo Ko
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Cheng Su
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Clinical Respiratory Physiology, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wei Tao
- Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Ju Tsai
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Ming-Ju Tsai, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, Tz-You 1st Road, 807, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Tel +886 7 3121101, Ext. 5651, Fax +886 7 3161210, Email
| | - Yen-Fu Chen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Yen-Fu Chen, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan, Tel +886 5 5323911, Ext. 2501, Email
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Leving MT, van Boven JFM, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, van Cooten J, Correia de Sousa J, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, García Pardo M, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van der Ham I, Hartgers-Gubbels ES, Janse Y, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price DB, Roman-Rodríguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani OS, Kocks JH. Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow and Critical Inhalation Errors are Associated with Higher COPD-Related Healthcare Costs. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2401-2415. [PMID: 36185173 PMCID: PMC9521797 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s380736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the relationship between suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (sPIF), inhalation technique errors, and non-adherence, with Healthcare Resource Utilisation (HCRU) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients receiving maintenance therapy via a Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI). Patients and methods The cross-sectional, multi-country PIFotal study included 1434 COPD patients (≥40 years) using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured with the In-Check DIAL G16, and sPIF was defined as a typical PIF lower than required for the device. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings and grouped into 10 steps. Patients completed the “Test of Adherence to Inhalers” questionnaire. HCRU was operationalised as COPD-related costs for primary healthcare, secondary healthcare, medication, and total COPD-related costs in a 1-year period. Results Participants with sPIF had higher medication costs compared with those with optimal PIF (cost ratio [CR]: 1.07, 95% CI [1.01, 1.14]). Multiple inhalation technique errors were associated with increased HCRU. Specifically, “insufficient inspiratory effort” with higher secondary healthcare costs (CR: 2.20, 95% CI [1.37, 3.54]) and higher total COPD-related costs (CR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.31). “no breath-hold following the inhalation manoeuvre (<6 s)” with higher medication costs (CR: 1.08, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15]) and total COPD-related costs (CR 1.17, 95% CI [1.07, 1.28]), and “not breathing out calmly after inhalation” with higher medication costs (CR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.04, 1.37]). Non-adherence was not significantly associated with HCRU. Conclusion sPIF and inhalation technique errors were associated with higher COPD-related healthcare utilisation and costs in COPD patients on DPI maintenance therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika T Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Medication Adherence Expertise Centre of the Northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Z Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marina García Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Iris van der Ham
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ymke Janse
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David B Price
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodríguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar S Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janwillem H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Janwillem H Kocks, General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, Groningen, 9713 GH, the Netherlands, Tel +31 50 211 3898, Email
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chrystyn H, Saralaya D, Shenoy A, Toor S, Kastango K, Calderon E, Li T, Safioti G. Investigating the Accuracy of the Digihaler, a New Electronic Multidose Dry-Powder Inhaler, in Measuring Inhalation Parameters. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2022; 35:166-177. [PMID: 34964657 PMCID: PMC9242715 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2021.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The Digihaler® is a Food and Drug Administration-approved, digital multidose dry powder inhaler with an integrated electronic module that provides patients and health care professionals with feedback on inhalation parameters, including usage, adherence, and technique. This study compared inhalation parameters measured using the Digihaler with readings made simultaneously using an inhalation profile recorder (IPR). Methods: This single-visit, open-label study enrolled children (4-17 years) and adults (18-55 years) with asthma, and adults (≥55 years) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Participants made three separate inhalations using an empty Digihaler device, each measured simultaneously by the Digihaler and IPR. Inhalation profiles were downloaded from the devices at the end of the study. Inhalation parameters measured included peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and inhaled volume (inhV). The profile with the highest PIF and corresponding IPR profile were analyzed. Results: Overall, 150 participants were enrolled; inhalation data were available for 148 (50 children and 49 adults with asthma, and 49 with COPD). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 39.1 (24.5) years; 51% of participants were male. Overall mean (SD) PIFs as measured by the Digihaler and IPR were 70.62 (17.73) L/min and 72.55 (19.42) L/min, respectively, with a mean percentage difference of -1.75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.64 to 0.15). Mean percentage differences between the Digihaler and IPR measurements of PIF ranged from -2.97% among adults with COPD to 0.16% among children with asthma. Overall mean (SD) inhV for the Digihaler and IPR were 1.57 (0.69) L and 1.67 (0.73) L, respectively, with a mean percentage difference of -6.11 (95% CI: -8.08 to -4.13). There was a strong correlation between PIF and inhV measurements taken by the Digihaler and those taken by the IPR (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.96). Conclusions: Our findings confirm the ability of the Digihaler to provide accurate measurement of inhalation parameters when used by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Chrystyn
- Inhalation Consultancy Ltd., Leeds, United Kingdom.,Address correspondence to: Henry Chrystyn, MPharm, PhD, Inhalation Consultancy Ltd., 77 High Street, Yeadon, Leeds LS19 7SP, United Kingdom
| | - Dinesh Saralaya
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Anil Shenoy
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Toor
- Respiratory Matters, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
| | - Kari Kastango
- Department of Statistical Operations, Everest Clinical Research, Little Falls, New Jersey, USA
| | - Enric Calderon
- Department of Combination Products and Devices R&D, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Thomas Li
- Department of Statistics, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Guilherme Safioti
- Department of Connected Respiratory, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
W H Kocks J, Wouters H, Bosnic-Anticevich S, van Cooten J, Correia de Sousa J, Cvetkovski B, Dekhuijzen R, Dijk L, Dvortsin E, Garcia Pardo M, Gardev A, Gawlik R, van Geer-Postmus I, van der Ham I, Harbers M, de la Hoz A, Janse Y, Kerkhof M, Lavorini F, Maricoto T, Meijer J, Metz B, Price D, Roman-Rodriguez M, Schuttel K, Stoker N, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Leving MT. Factors associated with health status and exacerbations in COPD maintenance therapy with dry powder inhalers. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:18. [PMID: 35618739 PMCID: PMC9135702 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-022-00282-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the associations of Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF), inhalation technique and adherence with health status and exacerbations in participants with COPD using DPI maintenance therapy. This cross-sectional multi-country observational real-world study included COPD participants aged ≥40 years using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured three times with the In-Check DIAL G16: (1) typical PIF at resistance of participant’s inhaler, (2) maximal PIF at resistance of participant’s inhaler, (3) maximal PIF at low resistance. Suboptimal PIF (sPIF) was defined as PIF lower than required for the device. Participants completed questionnaires on health status (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)), adherence (Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI)) and exacerbations. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings. Complete data were available from 1434 participants (50.1% female, mean age 69.2 years). GOLD stage was available for 801 participants: GOLD stage I (23.6%), II (54.9%), III (17.4%) and IV (4.1%)). Of all participants, 29% had a sPIF, and 16% were shown able to generate an optimal PIF but failed to do so. sPIF was significantly associated with worse health status (0.226 (95% CI 0.107–0.346), worse units on CCQ; p = 0.001). The errors ‘teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece’, ‘breathe in’, and ‘breathe out calmly after inhalation’ were related to health status. Adherence was not associated with health status. After correcting for multiple testing, no significant association was found with moderate or severe exacerbations in the last 12 months. To conclude, sPIF is associated with poorer health status. This study demonstrates the importance of PIF assessment in DPI inhalation therapy. Healthcare professionals should consider selecting appropriate inhalers in cases of sPIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore. .,Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Wouters
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joyce van Cooten
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaime Correia de Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), PT Government Associate Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Biljana Cvetkovski
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Evgeni Dvortsin
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marina Garcia Pardo
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Radosław Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Iris van der Ham
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marten Harbers
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto de la Hoz
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Ymke Janse
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Kerkhof
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boyd Metz
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miguel Roman-Rodriguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto De Investigación Sanitaria De Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Kirsten Schuttel
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nilouq Stoker
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marika T Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Randerath W, de Lange J, Hedner J, Ho JPT, Marklund M, Schiza S, Steier J, Verbraecken J. Current and Novel Treatment Options for OSA. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00126-2022. [PMID: 35769417 PMCID: PMC9234427 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00126-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnoea is a challenging medical problem due to its prevalence, its impact on quality of life and performance in school and professionally, the implications for risk of accidents, and comorbidities and mortality. Current research has carved out a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes and defined major pathophysiological components. These findings point to the concept of personalised therapy, oriented on both the distinct clinical presentation and the most relevant pathophysiology in the individual patient. This leads to questions of whether sufficient therapeutic options other than positive airway pressure (PAP) alone are available, for which patients they may be useful, if there are specific indications for single or combined treatment, and whether there is solid scientific evidence for recommendations. This review describes our knowledge on PAP and non-PAP therapies to address upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousability and respiratory drive. The spectrum is broad and heterogeneous, including technical and pharmaceutical options already in clinical use or at an advanced experimental stage. Although there is an obvious need for more research on single or combined therapies, the available data demonstrate the variety of effective options, which should replace the unidirectional focus on PAP therapy. The analysis of individual pathophysiological composition opens new directions towards personalised treatment of OSA, focusing not only on pharyngeal dilation, but also on technical or pharmaceutical interventions on muscle function or breathing regulationhttps://bit.ly/3sayhkd
Collapse
|
27
|
Tay TR, van Boven JFM, Chan A, Hew M. Electronic Inhaler Monitoring for Chronic Airway Disease: Development and Application of a Multidimensional Efficacy Framework. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2022; 10:1189-1201.e1. [PMID: 34915225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Inhaled therapy is the cornerstone of chronic airway disease therapy, but poor adherence to controller inhalers worsens clinical outcomes and increases cost. Monitoring of controller use is needed to improve adherence, and monitoring of reliever use can predict impending exacerbations. Both can be accurately achieved by electronic inhaler monitoring (EIM). However, evidence for EIM use in clinical practice is limited and varied, and knowledge gaps remain across different outcomes and health settings. We aimed to develop a framework to assess EIM systematically across all aspects of efficacy, apply this framework to the current literature, and identify gaps in efficacy to inform future development in the field. We adapted an existing framework for diagnostic tests, consisting of six levels of efficacy with ascending clinical relevance: technical, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, therapeutic, patient outcome, and societal efficacy. Tailoring this framework to EIM, we incorporated expert feedback and applied it to the EIM efficacy literature. We found that EIM has good diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic thinking, and therapeutic efficacies, but evidence is lacking for specific aspects of technical, patient outcome, and societal efficacies. Further development of EIM requires improved reliability, usability, and data security for patients, and optimal integration with electronic medical records and overall patient care. Defining appropriate target patient groups and pairing EIM data with effective interventions, in conjunction with reducing costs through technological innovation and economies of scale, will enhance patient and societal outcome efficacies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tunn Ren Tay
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the Northern Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Amy Chan
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shlomi D, Cohen J, Alon A, Oberman B, Katz I. Duplicate Prescription Rates of Long-Acting Bronchodilator Inhalers. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2022; 35:252-258. [PMID: 35384737 DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2021.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Long-acting bronchodilator inhalers are widely used with or without inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) by patients with lung diseases. In Israel alone, there are 21 inhalers containing long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs) and/or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs). Some patients are treated incorrectly with several inhalers of the same pharmacologic group. Methods: Electronic data of LABA and/or LAMA inhalers purchased during a period of 1 year were extracted in one district of Clalit Health Services in Israel. Patients who were treated with two or more inhalers from the same pharmacologic group were compared with patients without duplicate treatment. Inhaler purchases during the 12 months before and after the first duplicate purchase were compared with the purchases by patients without duplication of treatment. New diagnoses were compared to identify possible side effects. Results: Of the 13,528 patients who were treated with LABA and/or LAMA inhalers, 244 (1.8%) purchased at least two different inhalers from the same pharmacologic group. Inhaler purchases were 3.8 times higher in the duplication group during the 12 months before the first duplication. Inhaler purchase increased by 28% in the duplication group compared with a 4.5% increase in the nonduplication group (p < 0.001) during the following year. The risk for duplicated consumption was significantly higher in patients with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis, males, and persons aged between 61 and 80 years. Conclusions: Nearly 2% of the patients treated with long-acting bronchodilators consumed different medications of the same pharmacologic group even when adherence was satisfactory. COPD patients are at higher risk for inhaler duplication. Clinical Trial Registration Number: 0151-20-COM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dekel Shlomi
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.,Clalit Health Services, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
| | | | - Adi Alon
- Clalit Health Services, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
| | - Bernice Oberman
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel HaShomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Irit Katz
- Clalit Health Services, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koopman M, Franssen FME, Gaffron S, Watz H, Troosters T, Garcia-Aymerich J, Paggiaro P, Molins E, Moya M, van Burk L, Maier D, Garcia Gil E, Wouters EFM, Vanfleteren LEGW, Spruit MA. Differential Outcomes Following 4 Weeks of Aclidinium/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: A Reanalysis of the ACTIVATE Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:517-533. [PMID: 35342289 PMCID: PMC8943652 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s308600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale It is difficult to predict the effects of long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) on lung function, exercise capacity and physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, the multidimensional response to LABD was profiled in COPD patients participating in the ACTIVATE study and randomized to LABD. Methods In the ACTIVATE study, patients were randomized to aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate (AB/FF) or placebo for four weeks. The primary outcomes included (1) lung function as measured by functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), and spirometric outcomes; (2) exercise performance as measured by a constant work rate cycle ergometry test (CWRT); and (3) physical activity (PA) using an activity monitor. Self-organizing maps (SOMs) were used to create an ordered representation of the patients who were randomly assigned to four weeks of AB/FF and cluster them into different outcome groups. Results A total of 250 patients were randomized to AB/FF (n = 126) or placebo (n = 124). Patients in the AB/FF group (39.6% women) had moderate-to-severe COPD, static hyperinflation (FRC: 151.4 (27.7)% predicted) and preserved exercise capacity. Six clusters with differential outcomes were identified. Patients in clusters 1 and 2 had significant improvements in lung function compared to the remaining AB/FF-treated patients. Patients in clusters 1 and 3 had significant improvements in CWRT time, and patients in clusters 2, 3 and 6 had significant improvements in PA compared to the remaining AB/FF-treated patients. Conclusion Individual responses to 4 weeks of AB/FF-treatment in COPD are differential and the degree of change differs across domains of lung function, exercise capacity and PA. These results indicate that clinical response to LABD therapy is difficult to predict and is non-linear, and show doctors that it is important to look at multiple outcomes simultaneously when evaluating the clinical response to LABD therapy. Clinical Trial Registration The original ACTIVATE study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT02424344.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Koopman
- Department of Research and Development, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Maud Koopman, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Hornerheide 1, Horn, 6085 NM, the Netherlands, Email
| | - Frits M E Franssen
- Department of Research and Development, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henrik Watz
- Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Thierry Troosters
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pierluigi Paggiaro
- Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emiel F M Wouters
- Department of Research and Development, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, the Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lowie E G W Vanfleteren
- COPD Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martijn A Spruit
- Department of Research and Development, CIRO+, Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
How to Choose the Right Inhaler Using a Patient-Centric Approach? Adv Ther 2022; 39:1149-1163. [PMID: 35080761 PMCID: PMC8790222 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-02034-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
There are many different inhaler devices and medications on the market for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with over 230 drug-delivery system combinations available. However, despite the abundance of effective treatment options, the achieved disease control in clinical practice often remains unsatisfactory. In this context, a key determining factor is the match or mismatch of an inhalation device with the characteristics or needs of an individual patient. Indeed, to date, no ideal device exists that fits all patients, and a personalized approach needs to be considered. Several useful choice-guiding algorithms have been developed in the recent years to improve inhaler–patient matching, but a comprehensive tool that translates the multifactorial complexity of inhalation therapy into a user-friendly algorithm is still lacking. To address this, a multidisciplinary expert panel has developed an evidence-based practical treatment tool that allows a straightforward way of choosing the right inhaler for each patient.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zabczyk C, Blakey JD. The Effect of Connected "Smart" Inhalers on Medication Adherence. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2022; 3:657321. [PMID: 35047916 PMCID: PMC8757760 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.657321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent worldwide, and major sources of morbidity. Key barriers to reduce the harm from these conditions are the widespread and related issues of low use of prescribed inhaled therapy, use of medicines differently from that prescribed, suboptimal inhaler technique, and lack of adherence are the action plans. Connected smart inhalers show great potential to improve these issues, and thus outcomes from airways disease. In this mini-review, we considered the published evidence that the use of smart inhalers leads to more doses of preventative treatment being taken on time and with appropriate techniques. We found multiple trials across a variety of settings and age groups where smart inhalers were used with audio-visual reminders and healthcare professional feedback, which substantially improved the number of doses of preventative treatment taken. Trial evidence also supports the use of feedback from smart inhalers in improving true concordance (doses taken correctly and on time), though only for a single type of smart device. The relative lack of study is in contrast with the potential impact of smart inhalers. Major research questions remain unresolved, as who might fund future large-scale studies, how guideline committees may consider them, and how to implement effective solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Zabczyk
- Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - John D Blakey
- Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sánchez-Nieto JM, Bernabeu-Mora R, Fernández-Muñoz I, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Alcántara-Fructuoso J, Fernández-Alvarez J, Vera-Olmos JC, Martínez-Ferre MJ, Olea MGV, Valenciano MJC, Martínez DS. Effectiveness of individualized inhaler technique training on low adherence (LowAd) in ambulatory patients with COPD and asthma. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2022; 32:1. [PMID: 35013343 PMCID: PMC8748930 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-021-00262-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
To analyze whether there is improvement in adherence to inhaled treatment in patients with COPD and asthma after an educational intervention based on the teach-to-goal method. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-group study, with intervention and before-after evaluation. The study population included 120 patients (67 females and 53 males) diagnosed with asthma (70.8%) and COPD (29.1%). The level of adherence (low and optimal) and the noncompliance behavior pattern (erratic, deliberate and unwitting) were determined by the Test of the adherence to Inhalers (TAI). This questionnaire allows you to determine the level of adherence and the types of noncompliance. Low Adherence (LowAd) was defined as a score less than 49 points. All patients received individualized educational inhaler technique intervention (IEITI). Before the IEITI, 67.5% of the patients had LowAd. Following IEITI, on week 24, LowAd was 55% (p = 0.024). Each patient can present one or more types of noncompliance. The most frequent type was forgetting to use the inhaler (erratic), 65.8%. The other types were deliberate: 43.3%, and unwitting: 57.5%. All of them had decreased on the final visit: 51.7% (p = 0.009), 25.8% (p = 0.002), 39.2% (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in adherence between asthma and COPD patients at the start of the study. The only predicting factor of LowAd was the female gender. An individualized educational intervention, in ambulatory patients with COPD and asthma, in real-world clinical practice conditions, improves adherence to the inhaled treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Miguel Sánchez-Nieto
- Division of Pneumology, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, 30008, Murcia, Spain.,Institute for Bio-health Research of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Murcia, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roberto Bernabeu-Mora
- Division of Pneumology, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, 30008, Murcia, Spain. .,Institute for Bio-health Research of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain. .,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Murcia, El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Irene Fernández-Muñoz
- Division of Pneumology, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, 30008, Murcia, Spain
| | - Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz
- Division of Intensive Care Unit, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, 30008, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan Carlos Vera-Olmos
- Division of Pneumology, Morales Meseguer General University Hospital, 30008, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Diego Salmerón Martínez
- Institute for Bio-health Research of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, 30120, Murcia, Spain.,Department of Health and Social Sciences, Murcia University, Murcia, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Watson A, Wilkinson TMA. Digital healthcare in COPD management: a narrative review on the advantages, pitfalls, and need for further research. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2022; 16:17534666221075493. [PMID: 35234090 PMCID: PMC8894614 DOI: 10.1177/17534666221075493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite current treatment strategies which focus on smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation, and symptomatic relief. A focus of COPD care is to encourage self-management, particularly during COVID-19, where much face-to-face care has been reduced or ceased. Digital health solutions may offer affordable and scalable solutions to support COPD patient education and self-management, such solutions could improve clinical outcomes and expand service reach for limited additional cost. However, optimal ways to deliver digital medicine are still in development, and there are a number of important considerations for clinicians, commissioners, and patients to ensure successful implementation of digitally augmented care. In this narrative review, we discuss advantages, pitfalls, and future prospects of digital healthcare, which offer a variety of tools including self-management plans, education videos, inhaler training videos, feedback to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), exacerbation monitoring, and pulmonary rehabilitation. We discuss the key issues with sustaining patient and HCP engagement and limiting attrition of use, interoperability with devices, integration into healthcare systems, and ensuring inclusivity and accessibility. We explore the essential areas of research beyond determining safety and efficacy to understand the acceptability of digital healthcare solutions to patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems, and hence ways to improve this and sustain engagement. Finally, we explore the regulatory challenges to ensure quality and engagement and effective integration into current healthcare systems and care pathways, while maintaining patients’ autonomy and privacy. Understanding and addressing these issues and successful incorporation of an acceptable, simple, scalable, affordable, and future-proof digital solution into healthcare systems could help remodel global chronic disease management and fractured healthcare systems to provide best patient care and optimisation of healthcare resources to meet the global burden and unmet clinical need of COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair Watson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UKCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tom M A Wilkinson
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Novel Methods of Measuring Adherence Patterns Reveal Adherence Phenotypes with Distinct Asthma Outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 19:933-942. [PMID: 34936847 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202106-653oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Poor adherence with asthma controller medication contributes to worse symptom control and increased exacerbation risk. Adherence is often expressed as the mean proportion of prescribed doses taken over a period of 6-12 months. New metrics may capture individual day-to-day variability patterns linked with distinct clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES To test the hypotheses that novel time- and dose-based adherence variability metrics offer independent value to mean adherence in identifying distinct adherence patterns, that are associated with symptom control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] score) and exacerbation risk, using electronically-recorded medication data from a 6-month cluster randomized trial examining the effect of inhaler reminders on adherence. METHODS Adherence metrics were calculated from the first two months (months 0-2) of the study period. In addition to mean adherence (%prescribed puffs/day taken, PTmean), we examined novel metrics including: time adherence area-under-curve (T-AUC), reflecting cumulative gaps in adherence over time, entropy (H), reflecting disorder in the ways in which a patient changed their medication dose adherence from day to day, and standard deviation of the %prescribed puffs/day taken (PTSD). Dominant metrics identified from factor analysis were included in hierarchical clustering analysis. We compared the resultant clusters in terms of outcomes over months 2-6, and exacerbation risk over the entire study period. RESULTS Two factors explained >65% of the total variance in adherence, primarily driven by T-AUC and H. Two main patient clusters based on their adherence metrics were identified: Cluster 1 ("high time adherence", n=75) had better T-AUC, i.e. fewer gaps between medication-taking days, than Cluster 2 ("low time adherence", n=23). Though both clusters had similar symptom control at 2 months, Cluster 1 showed less subsequent decline in ACT over months 2-6 (median(IQR) change in ACT score: 1(-1, 4) vs -2(-3.75,0.75); p=0.012), and had better symptom control at 6 months (ACT score: 20(17, 23) vs 17 (15, 20); p=0.034). There were no significant differences between the clusters in terms of proportion of exacerbators or time to exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS Novel metrics showed that low time adherence was associated with greater risk of decline in asthma symptom control. Adherence patterns may exhibit 'memory' relevant to future clinical status, warranting validation in a larger dataset.
Collapse
|
35
|
Monteiro C, Maricoto T, Prazeres F, Augusto Simões P, Augusto Simões J. Determining factors associated with inhaled therapy adherence on asthma and COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global literature. Respir Med 2021; 191:106724. [PMID: 34954637 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to therapy has been reported worldwide as a major problem, and that is particularly relevant on inhaled therapy for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), considering its barriers and features. We reviewed the global literature reporting the main determinants for adherence on these patients. METHODS Searches were made using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science databases. Analytical, observational and epidemiological studies (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies) were included, reporting association between any type of determinant and the adherence for inhaler therapy on Asthma or COPD. Random-effects meta-analysis were used to summarise the numerical effect estimates. RESULTS 47 studies were included, including a total of 54.765 participants. In meta-analyses, the significant determinants of adherence to inhaled therapy were: older age [RR = 1.07 (1.03-1.10); I2 = 94; p < 0.0001] good disease knowledge/literacy [RR = 1.37 (1.28-1.47); I2 = 14; p = 0.33]; obesity [RR = 1.30 (1.12-1.50); I2 = 0; p = 0.37]; good cognitive performance [RR = 1.28 (1.17-1.40); I2 = 0; p = 0.62]; higher income [RR = 1.63 (1.05-2.56); I2 = 0; p = 0.52]; being employed [RR = 0.87 (0.83-0.90); I2 = 0; p = 0.76] and using multiple drugs/inhalers [RR = 0.81 (0.79-0.84); I2 = 0; p = 0.80]. Overall, the strength of the underlying evidence was only low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS Many determinants may be associated to patient's adherence, and personalised interventions should be taken in clinical practice to address it by gaining an understanding of their individual features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constança Monteiro
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Tiago Maricoto
- Aveiro Healthcare Centre, Aradas Health Unit, Aveiro, Portugal; Faculty of Health Sciences, GRUBI - Systematic Reviews Group, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Filipe Prazeres
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal; Family Health Unit Beira Ria, 3830-596, Gafanha da Nazaré, Portugal; Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal; Pulsar Family Health Unit, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - José Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal; Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450, Porto, Portugal; USF Caminhos do Certoma, do ACeS Baixo Mondego, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leving M, Wouters H, de la Hoz A, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Dekhuijzen R, Gardev A, Lavorini F, Meijer J, Price D, Rodríguez MR, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Wijnsma B, Kocks J. Impact of PIF, Inhalation Technique and Medication Adherence on Health Status and Exacerbations in COPD: Protocol of a Real-World Observational Study (PIFotal COPD Study). Pulm Ther 2021; 7:591-606. [PMID: 34533772 PMCID: PMC8445793 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-021-00172-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dry powder inhalers (DPIs), a commonly prescribed inhaler type for respiratory diseases, require patients to generate sufficient peak inspiratory flow (PIF) to ensure optimal drug delivery to the airways. Effectiveness of therapy also requires a good inhalation technique and adequate medication adherence. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), recent studies conducted in tertiary care suggest that DPI users with suboptimal PIF have poorer COPD-related health status and increased exacerbation risk versus those with optimal PIF. The PIFotal study will investigate the impact of PIF, inhalation technique and medication adherence on patient-reported outcomes in patients with COPD in primary care using a DPI for their maintenance therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This cross-sectional observational study will assess 1200 patients (aged ≥ 40 years, diagnosed with COPD and using a DPI for COPD maintenance therapy for ≥ 3 months) from the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Greece and Australia. Assessments will consist of (1) PIF measurements (usual patient inhalation manoeuvre, maximal PIF against resistance of own inhaler, and maximal PIF against low resistance); (2) Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test and Test of Adherence to Inhalers scores; and (3) video recordings of patient inhalation technique. Dependent variables include health status (CCQ score), number of self-reported exacerbations in previous 12 months, and healthcare resource utilisation in previous 6 months. Independent variables include PIF values, inhalation technique errors, medication adherence, and demographic and clinical characteristics. In the primary analysis, the mean difference in CCQ score between patients (1) with optimal/suboptimal PIF, (2) exhibiting/not exhibiting inhalation technique errors, and (3) adhering/not adhering to medication will be examined in a multivariable linear mixed model. ETHICS The study protocol was approved by ethics committees/institutional review boards of all participating sites prior to enrolment; written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04532853.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Wouters
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto de la Hoz
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Asparuh Gardev
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Jiska Meijer
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Miguel Román Rodríguez
- Primary Care Respiratory Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Baleares (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Health Planning Unit, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK
- Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Birgit Wijnsma
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Professor Enno Dirk Wiersmastraat 5, 9713 GH, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Comparative educational outcomes of an active versus passive learning continuing professional development activity on self-management support for respiratory educators: A non-randomized controlled mixed-methods study. Nurse Educ Pract 2021; 57:103256. [PMID: 34814074 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM We compared educational outcomes associated with an active vs. passive continuing professional development activity on self-management support for respiratory educators. BACKGROUND There is a need to identify learning activities associated with the most successful continuing professional development programs for respiratory educators. DESIGN This was a non-randomized controlled mixed-methods study recruiting respiratory educators attending a continuing professional development activity on self-management support. METHODS In the experimental group, active learning methods (role-play simulations) were employed, whereas passive learning methods (lecture) were used in the comparison group. Educators were allocated to the comparison group (first 15 months of the study), then to the experimental group (last 17 months). Educators filled questionnaires measuring pre-/post-activity knowledge about self-management support (score 0-25) and self-reported competence (score 1-10). Scores were compared using mixed-effect models. Interviews with educators were conducted and content analysis was performed. RESULTS We recruited 94/94 educators (active: n = 51; passive: n = 43). Knowledge scores increased to a greater extent in the active vs. passive learning group (adjusted difference-in-difference [aDID]=2.01; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.14-3.88), although competence scores increased to a greater extent in the passive learning group (aDID=-0.38; 95%CI: -1.56 to -0.04). Reflecting on their competence, educators of the active learning group identified the need to further improve their self-management support skills, whereas educators of the passive learning group did not. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that an active learning continuing professional development activity on self-management support could help educators to better apply knowledge and appears to engage them in a process of reflection on action.
Collapse
|
38
|
Schiza S, Lévy P, Martinez-Garcia MA, Pepin JL, Simonds A, Randerath W. The search for realistic evidence on the outcomes of obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 2021; 58:58/4/2101963. [PMID: 34620678 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01963-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Schiza
- Sleep Disorders Center, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Patrick Lévy
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble University Hospital, Sleep Laboratory, EFCR, Grenoble, France
| | - Miguel Angel Martinez-Garcia
- Pneumology Dept, University and Politechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.,CIBERES de enfermedades respiratorias, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jean-Louis Pepin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, HP2 Laboratory, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble University Hospital, Sleep Laboratory, EFCR, Grenoble, France
| | - Anita Simonds
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Winfried Randerath
- Bethanien Hospital, Clinic of Pneumology and Allergology, Center for Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Solingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mahler DA, Ludwig-Sengpiel A, Ferguson GT, de la Hoz A, Ritz J, Shaikh A, Watz H. TRONARTO: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Delivered via Soft Mist Inhaler in COPD Patients Stratified by Peak Inspiratory Flow. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:2455-2465. [PMID: 34511891 PMCID: PMC8414074 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s324467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inhaled bronchodilator therapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Some inhalers require patients to achieve certain inhalation efforts either to activate the device or to deliver medication to the site of action. For dry powder inhalers, low peak inspiratory flow (PIF) can result in poor medication delivery but the clinical significance of this is not well understood. Methods TRONARTO was a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study which stratified patients with moderate-to-severe COPD according to their PIF against medium-low resistance at screening. Patients were randomized to receive tiotropium/olodaterol (5 μg/5 μg) or matched placebo delivered via the Respimat® Soft Mist™ inhaler (SMI). After 4 weeks of treatment, we assessed change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve 0–3 hours (FEV1 AUC0–3h) and trough FEV1. Results Overall, 213 patients were randomized, of whom 106 received tiotropium/olodaterol (PIF <60 L/min, 55; PIF ≥60 L/min, 51) and 107 received placebo (PIF <60 L/min, 55; PIF ≥60 L/min, 52). For FEV1 AUC0–3h, the adjusted mean change from baseline versus placebo was 336 mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 246–425 mL; P<0.0001) in the PIF <60 L/min group and 321 mL (95% CI 233–409 mL; P<0.0001) in the PIF ≥60 L/min group. For trough FEV1, the adjusted mean change from baseline versus placebo was 201 mL (95% CI 117–286 mL; P<0.0001) in the PIF <60 L/min group and 217 mL (95% CI 135–299 mL; P<0.0001) in the PIF ≥60 L/min group. Conclusion In the TRONARTO study, which included patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and varying inspiratory flow abilities, treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol resulted in significant lung function improvements versus placebo. This SMI can be used irrespective of the PIF that a patient can generate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A Mahler
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.,Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, NH, USA
| | | | - Gary T Ferguson
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA
| | - Alberto de la Hoz
- Cardio-Metabolism and Respiratory, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - John Ritz
- Biostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Asif Shaikh
- Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Henrik Watz
- Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Xiroudaki S, Schoubben A, Giovagnoli S, Rekkas DM. Dry Powder Inhalers in the Digitalization Era: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13091455. [PMID: 34575530 PMCID: PMC8467565 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
During the last decades, the term "drug delivery systems" (DDSs) has almost fully replaced previously used terms, such as "dosage forms", in an attempt to emphasize the importance of the drug carrier in ensuring the claimed safety and effectiveness of the product. However, particularly in the case of delivery devices, the term "system", which by definition implies a profound knowledge of each single part and their interactions, is not always fully justified when using the DDS term. Within this context, dry powder inhalers (DPIs), as systems to deliver drugs via inhalation to the lungs, require a deep understanding of the complex formulation-device-patient interplay. As of now and despite the progress made in particle engineering and devices design, DPIs' clinical performance is limited by variable patients' breathing patterns. To circumvent this pitfall, next-generation DPIs should ideally adapt to the different respiratory capacity of individuals across age, health conditions, and other related factors. In this context, the recent wave of digitalization in the health care and industrial sectors may drive DPI technology towards addressing a personalized device-formulation-patient liaison. In this review, evolving technologies are explored and analyzed to outline the progress made as well as the gaps to fill to align novel DPIs technologies with the systems theory approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Styliani Xiroudaki
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy; (S.X.); (A.S.)
| | - Aurélie Schoubben
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy; (S.X.); (A.S.)
| | - Stefano Giovagnoli
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy; (S.X.); (A.S.)
- Correspondence: (S.G.); (D.M.R.); Tel.: +39-075-5855162 (S.G.); +30-210-7274023 (D.M.R.)
| | - Dimitrios M. Rekkas
- Section of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmacy, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: (S.G.); (D.M.R.); Tel.: +39-075-5855162 (S.G.); +30-210-7274023 (D.M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Janjua S, Pike KC, Carr R, Coles A, Fortescue R, Batavia M. Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013381. [PMID: 34496032 PMCID: PMC8425588 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013381.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung condition characterised by persistent respiratory symptoms and limited lung airflow, dyspnoea and recurrent exacerbations. Suboptimal therapy or non-adherence may result in limited effectiveness of pharmacological treatments and subsequently poor health outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of interventions intended to improve adherence to single or combined pharmacological treatments compared with usual care or interventions that are not intended to improve adherence in people with COPD. SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (search date 1 May 2020). We also searched web-based clinical trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs included adults with COPD diagnosed by established criteria (e.g. Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease). Interventions included change to pharmacological treatment regimens, adherence aids, education, behavioural or psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), communication or follow-up by a health professional (e.g. telephone, text message or face-to-face), multi-component interventions, and interventions to improve inhaler technique. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Working in pairs, four review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We assessed confidence in the evidence for each primary outcome using GRADE. Primary outcomes were adherence, quality of life and hospital service utilisation. Adherence measures included the Adherence among Patients with Chronic Disease questionnaire (APCD). Quality of life measures included the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). MAIN RESULTS We included 14 trials (2191 participants) in the analysis with follow-up ranging from six to 52 weeks. Age ranged from 54 to 75 years, and COPD severity ranged from mild to very severe. Trials were conducted in the USA, Spain, Germany, Japan, Jordan, Northern Ireland, Iran, South Korea, China and Belgium. Risk of bias was high due to lack of blinding. Evidence certainty was downgraded due to imprecision and small participant numbers. Single component interventions Six studies (55 to 212 participants) reported single component interventions including changes to pharmacological treatment (different roflumilast doses or different inhaler types), adherence aids (Bluetooth inhaler reminder device), educational (comprehensive verbal instruction), behavioural or psychological (motivational interview). Change in dose of roflumilast may result in little to no difference in adherence (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 1.99; studies = 1, participants = 55; low certainty). A Bluetooth inhaler reminder device did not improve adherence, but comprehensive verbal instruction from a health professional did improve mean adherence (prescription refills) (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.54). Motivational interview improved mean adherence scores on the APCD scale (MD 22.22, 95% CI 8.42 to 36.02). Use of a single inhaler compared to two separate inhalers may have little to no impact on quality of life (SGRQ; MD 0.80, 95% CI -3.12 to 4.72; very low certainty). A Bluetooth inhaler monitoring device may provide a small improvement in quality of life on the CCQ (MD 0.40, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.73; very low certainty). Single inhaler use may have little to no impact on the number of people admitted to hospital compared to two separate inhalers (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.90; very low certainty). Single component interventions may have little to no impact on the number of people expereincing adverse events (very low certainty evidence from studies of a change in pharmacotherapy or use of adherence aids). A change in pharmacotherapy may have little to no impact on exacerbations or deaths (very low certainty). Multi-component interventions Eight studies (30 to 734 participants) reported multi-component interventions including tailored care package that included adherence support as a key component or included inhaler technique as a component. A multi-component intervention may result in more people adhering to pharmacotherapy compared to control at 40.5 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.59; studies = 4, participants = 446; I2 = 0%; low certainty). There may be little to no impact on quality of life (SGRQ, Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire, CAT) (studies = 3; low to very low certainty). Multi-component interventions may help to reduce the number of people admitted to hospital for any cause (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.63; studies = 2, participants = 877; low certainty), or COPD-related hospitalisations (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; studies = 2, participants = 220; moderate certainty). There may be a small benefit on people experiencing severe exacerbations. There may be little to no effect on adverse events, serious adverse events or deaths, but events were infrequently reported and were rare (low to very certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Single component interventions (e.g. education or motivational interviewing provided by a health professional) can help to improve adherence to pharmacotherapy (low to very low certainty). There were slight improvements in quality of life with a Bluetooth inhaler device, but evidence is from one study and very low certainty. Change to pharmacotherapy (e.g. single inhaler instead of two, or different doses of roflumilast) has little impact on hospitalisations or exacerbations (very low certainty). There is no difference in people experiencing adverse events (all-cause or COPD-related), or deaths (very low certainty). Multi-component interventions may improve adherence with education, motivational or behavioural components delivered by health professionals (low certainty). There is little to no impact on quality of life (low to very low certainty). They may help reduce the number of people admitted to hospital overall (specifically pharmacist-led approaches) (low certainty), and fewer people may have COPD-related hospital admissions (moderately certainty). There may be a small reduction in people experiencing severe exacerbations, but evidence is from one study (low certainty). Limited evidence found no difference in people experiencing adverse events, serious adverse events or deaths (low to very low certainty). The evidence presented should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies with more intervention types, especially single interventions, are needed. It is unclear which specific COPD subgroups would benefit, therefore discussions between health professionals and patients may help to determine whether they will help to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Janjua
- Cochrane Airways, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Robin Carr
- 28 Beaumont Street Medical Practice, Oxford, UK
| | - Andy Coles
- COPD Patient Advisory Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Fortescue
- Cochrane Airways, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mitchell Batavia
- Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, Department of Physical Therapy, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Melani AS. Inhaler technique in asthma and COPD: challenges and unmet knowledge that can contribute to suboptimal use in real life. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021; 14:991-1003. [PMID: 33983092 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1929922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Inhalers are the most commonly used devices for lung drug delivery in asthma and COPD. Inhaler use offers several advantages but requires the user's proper mastery. The issue of inhaler technique is very important as inhaler misuse remains common in real life regardless of the inhaler used and is associated with poor disease control.Areas covered:This narrative review analyses the key-steps of inhaler mastery and the significance of the errors of use for the main devices. There are uncertainties on many tasks of inhaler use and on those variations from recommended steps that are considered as critical errors.Expert opinion: Despite technological advancements, an easy-to-use device is not yet available. Whatever the chosen inhaler, health care givers' proper practical education with the opportunity of feedback learning has a key-role for improving inhaler technique, but is time-consuming, and remains limited to few successful experiences. Newer digital technologies will be applied to the field of inhaler education, but the lack of knowledge on many practical aspects of inhaler technique might be a limit for its extensive implementation. Possibly digital innovation might substantially contribute to reduce inhaler misuse only if clinicians, manufacturers, and subjects will cooperate together on this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Melani
- Dipartimento Scienze Mediche, Policlinico Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chan AHY, Pleasants RA, Dhand R, Tilley SL, Schworer SA, Costello RW, Merchant R. Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective. Pulm Ther 2021; 7:345-376. [PMID: 34379316 PMCID: PMC8589868 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-021-00167-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Impressive advances in inhalation therapy for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have occurred in recent years. However, important gaps in care remain, particularly relating to poor adherence to inhaled therapies. Digital inhaler health platforms which incorporate digital inhalers to monitor time and date of dosing are an effective disease and medication management tool, promoting collaborative care between clinicians and patients, and providing more in-depth understanding of actual inhaler use. With advances in technology, nearly all inhalers can be digitalized with add-on or embedded sensors to record and transmit data quantitating inhaler actuations, and some have additional capabilities to evaluate inhaler technique. In addition to providing an objective and readily available measure of adherence, they allow patients to interact with the device directly or through their self-management smartphone application such as via alerts and recording of health status. Clinicians can access these data remotely and during patient encounters, to better inform them about disease status and medication adherence and inhaler technique. The ability for remote patient monitoring is accelerating interest in and the use of these devices in clinical practice and research settings. More than 20 clinical studies of digital inhalers in asthma or COPD collectively show improvement in medication adherence, exacerbation risk, and patient outcomes with digital inhalers. These studies support previous findings about patient inhaler use and behaviors, but with greater granularity, and reveal some new findings about patient medication-taking behaviors. Digital devices that record inspiratory flows with inhaler use can guide proper inhaler technique and may prove to be a clinically useful lung function measure. Adoption of digital inhalers into practice is still early, and additional research is needed to determine patient and clinician acceptability, the appropriate place of these devices in the therapeutic regimen, and their cost effectiveness. Video: Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective (MP4 74535 kb)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H. Y. Chan
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Roy A. Pleasants
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Rajiv Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN USA
| | - Stephen L. Tilley
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Stephen A. Schworer
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Richard W. Costello
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77 Ireland
| | - Rajan Merchant
- Dignity Health Woodland Clinic, 632 W Gibson Rd, Woodland, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Spencer S, Hamer O, Berger E, Booth A, Irving GJ, Owen M, Relph N, Usmani O, Kelly C. Interventions to improve inhaler technique for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Spencer
- Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Oliver Hamer
- Respiratory Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | | | | | - Greg J Irving
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Michael Owen
- Faculty of Health and Social Care; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Nicola Relph
- Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| | - Omar Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital; London UK
| | - Carol Kelly
- Respiratory Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine; Edge Hill University; Ormskirk UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
d'Ancona G, Weinman J. Improving adherence in chronic airways disease: are we doing it wrongly? Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17:210022. [PMID: 34295423 PMCID: PMC8291927 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0022-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-adherence to medicines is a significant clinical and financial burden, but successful strategies to improve it, and thus bring about significant improvements in clinical outcome, remain elusive. Many barriers exist, including a lack of awareness amongst some healthcare professionals as to the extent and impact of non-adherence and a dearth of skills to address it successfully. Patients may not appreciate that they are non-adherent, feel they cannot disclose it or underestimate its impact on their health in the short and longer term. In describing the evidence-based frameworks that identify the causal factors behind medicines taking (or not taking) behaviours, we can start to personalise interventions to enable individuals to make informed decisions about their treatments and thus overcome real and perceived barriers to adherence. Medicines non-adherence is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. @GrainnedAn and colleagues outline causal factors behind this behaviour and the appropriate individualised interventions available to support optimal medicines use.https://bit.ly/3ejJNTV
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gráinne d'Ancona
- Pharmacy Dept/Thoracic Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Weinman
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Holmes J, Heaney LG. Measuring adherence to therapy in airways disease. Breathe (Sheff) 2021; 17:210037. [PMID: 34295430 PMCID: PMC8291934 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0037-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-adherence to medication is one of the most significant issues in all airways disease and can have a major impact on disease control as well as on unscheduled healthcare utilisation. It is vital that clinicians can accurately determine a patient's level of adherence in order to ensure they are gaining the maximal benefit from their therapy and also to avoid any potential for unnecessary increases in therapy. It is essential that measurements of adherence are interpreted alongside biomarkers of mechanistic pathways to identify if improvements in medication adherence can influence disease control. In this review, the most common methods of measuring adherence are discussed. These include patient self-report, prescription record checks, canister weighing, dose counting, monitoring drug levels and electronic monitoring. We describe the uses and benefits of each method as well as potential shortcomings. The practical use of adherence measures with measurable markers of disease control is also discussed. Educational aims To understand the various methods available to measure adherence in airways disease.To learn how to apply these adherence measures in conjunction with clinical biomarkers in routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Holmes
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Alahmadi FH, Keevil B, Elsey L, George K, Niven R, Fowler SJ. Serum Inhaled Corticosteroid Detection for Monitoring Adherence in Severe Asthma. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4279-4287.e6. [PMID: 34153519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are fundamental to asthma management, but adherence is low. OBJECTIVES To investigate (1) whether LC-MS/MS could be used to detect ICSs in serum and (2) whether serum levels related to markers of disease severity. METHODS We collected blood samples over an 8-hour period from patients with severe asthma prescribed at least 1000 μg daily of beclomethasone dipropionate equivalent. Following baseline sampling, patients were observed taking their usual morning dose. Subsequent blood samples were obtained 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours postinhalation and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Correlations between serum ICS levels and severity markers were investigated. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were recruited (41 females; 39 prescribed maintenance prednisolone; mean age, 49 ± 12 years; FEV1, 63 ± 20 %predicted). Eight hours postinhalation, all patients using budesonide (n = 10) and beclomethasone dipropionate (15), and all but 1 using fluticasone propionate (28), had detectable serum drug levels. Fluticasone furorate was detected in 2 patients (of 4), ciclesonide in none (of 7). Low adherence by repeat prescription records (<80%) was identified in 43%. Blood ICS levels correlated negatively with exacerbation rate, and (for fluticasone propionate only) positively with FEV1 %predicted. CONCLUSIONS Commonly used ICSs can be reliably detected in the blood at least 8 hours after dosing, and could therefore be used as a measure of adherence in severe asthma. Higher exacerbation rates and poorer lung function (for fluticasone propionate) were associated with lower blood levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad H Alahmadi
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Brian Keevil
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lynn Elsey
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kate George
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Niven
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J Fowler
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jansen EM, van de Hei SJ, Dierick BJH, Kerstjens HAM, Kocks JWH, van Boven JFM. Global burden of medication non-adherence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma: a narrative review of the clinical and economic case for smart inhalers. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3846-3864. [PMID: 34277075 PMCID: PMC8264677 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Medication non-adherence to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy poses a significant burden for patients and societies. Non-adherence encompasses poor initiation, implementation (including poor inhalation technique) and non-persistence. Globally, non-adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes, reduced quality of life and high healthcare and societal costs. Costs are mainly caused by excess hospitalizations and impaired work productivity. Multiple intervention programs to increase adherence in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been conducted. However, these intervention programs are generally not as effective as intended. Additionally, adherence outcomes are mostly examined with non-objective or non-granular measures (e.g., self-report, dose count, pharmacy records). Recently developed smart inhalers could be the key to objectively diagnose and manage non-adherence effectively in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Smart inhalers register usage of the inhaler, record time and date, send reminders, give feedback about adherence and some are able to assess inhaler technique and predict exacerbations. Still, some limitations need to be overcome before smart inhalers can be incorporated in usual care. For example, their cost-effectiveness and budget impact need to be examined. It is likely that smart inhalers are particularly cost-effective in specific asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subgroups, including patients with asthma eligible for additional GINA-5 therapy (oral corticosteroids or biologics), patients with severe asthma in GINA-5, patients with asthma with short-acting beta2 agonists overuse, patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with frequent exacerbations and patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease of working-age. While there is high potential and evidence is accumulating, a final push seems needed to cost-effectively integrate smart inhalers in the daily management of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evalyne M Jansen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne J van de Hei
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn J H Dierick
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands.,General Practitioners Research Institute (GPRI), Groningen, The Netherlands.,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI), Singapore
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands.,Medication Adherence Expertise Center of the northern Netherlands (MAECON), Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nash D. Poor Inhaler Adherence and Techniques – How Can We Improve It? CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s13670-021-00355-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
50
|
Lampela P, Tolppanen AM, Koponen M, Tanskanen A, Tiihonen J, Hartikainen S, Taipale H. Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a Comorbidity and Association with the Choice of Antidementia Medication Among Persons with Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 73:1243-1251. [PMID: 31929157 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common comorbidities in persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, pharmacotherapy of these diseases may have opposite mechanisms of action; anticholinergics in asthma/COPD and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) in AD. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether existing asthma/COPD affects the choice of AD medication, and the survival of the patients with AD. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, data from the MEDALZ-study, which includes all community-dwelling persons with AD during 2005-2011 in Finland (n = 70718) was utilized. Persons with asthma/COPD (N = 7211) were defined as having a special reimbursement for asthma/COPD, or long-term use (≥250 days) of inhaled anticholinergics, inhaled corticosteroids, or leukotriene antagonists during the year before AD diagnosis. We compared persons with and without asthma/COPD regarding the choice of the initial antidementia medication (AChEI versus memantine) with logistic regression and mortality with Cox regression model during the follow-up (up to end of 2015). RESULTS Memantine was favored over AChEIs as first-line treatment to AD in persons with asthma/COPD compared to those without asthma/COPD (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.31). Memantine was also more commonly used among those who used multiple asthma/COPD medications (7.9% of memantine initiators used ≥3 asthma/COPD medications compared with 5.5% of those who initiated with AChEI). Mortality was higher in persons with asthma/COPD compared to those without asthma/COPD (adjusted hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13). CONCLUSION More frequent use of memantine instead of AChEI may result from an attempt to prevent possible worsening of asthma/COPD by AChEIs. Vulnerable persons with both AD and asthma/COPD need individually assessed pharmacotherapy for their medical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasi Lampela
- Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Marjaana Koponen
- Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Antti Tanskanen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari Tiihonen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sirpa Hartikainen
- Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heidi Taipale
- Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|