Optimal Asthma Control: Time for a New Target

Asthma patients' and physicians' perspectives on the burden and management of asthma: Post-hoc analysis of APPaRENT 1 and 2 to assess predictors of treatment adherence

INTRODUCTION

Patient adherence to maintenance medication is critical for improving clinical outcomes in asthma and is a recommended guiding factor for treatment strategy. Previously, the APPaRENT studies assessed patient and physician perspectives on asthma care; here, a post-hoc analysis aimed to identify patient factors associated with good adherence and treatment prescription patterns.

METHODS

APPaRENT 1 and 2 were cross-sectional online surveys of 2866 adults with asthma and 1883 physicians across Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Italy, Mexico, and the Philippines in 2020-2021. Combined data assessed adherence to maintenance medication, treatment goals, use of asthma action plans, and physician treatment patterns and preferences. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between patient characteristics and both treatment prescription (by physicians) and patient treatment adherence.

RESULTS

Patient and physician assessments of treatment goals and adherence differed, as did reporting of short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions alongside maintenance and reliever therapy (MART). Older age and greater patient-reported severity and reliever use were associated with better adherence. Patient-reported prescription of SABA with MART was associated with household smoking, severe or poorly controlled asthma, and living in China or the Philippines.

CONCLUSIONS

Results revealed an important disconnect between patient and physician treatment goals and treatment adherence, suggesting that strategies for improving patient adherence to maintenance medication are needed, focusing on younger patients with milder disease. High reliever use despite good adherence may indicate poor disease control. Personalised care considering patient characteristics alongside physician training in motivational communication and shared decision-making could improve patient management and outcomes.

Household Use of Green Cleaning Products, Disinfecting Wipes, and Asthma Control Among Adults

BACKGROUND

The use of household disinfectants and cleaning products (HDCPs) may negatively impact asthma control, but studies remain scarce. Moreover, no study considered green products or wipes, increasingly used during home cleaning.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the associations between the use of HDCPs, including disinfecting wipes and green products, and asthma control based on data from the French Web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort.

METHODS

Using a standardized questionnaire (2018), we assessed asthma control (never asthma: reference; controlled: Asthma Control Test ≥ 20; uncontrolled: Asthma Control Test < 20) and the use of HDCPs, including 2 types of products (irritants and green products) and 2 application modes (sprays and disinfecting wipes). Cross-sectional associations of the frequency of weekly use of HDCPs at home with asthma control, adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, and educational level were assessed by multinomial logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Analyses were performed on 37,043 adults (mean age 47 y; 75% women; 62% with a weekly use of at least 1 HDCP). Strong associations were observed between weekly use of HDCPs and uncontrolled asthma. In particular, an almost daily use (4-7 d/wk) of irritants (odds ratio [OR] 2.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.97-4.00) and green products (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.70-3.39) as well as sprays (OR 2.69; 95% CI 1.97-3.68) and disinfecting wipes (OR 3.51; 95% CI 2.31-5.33) was associated with uncontrolled asthma. When not co-used with irritants and sprays, associations remained statistically significant for both disinfecting wipes and green products.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly use of HDCPs, including green products or wipes, was associated with uncontrolled asthma and should be considered by health practitioners in order to improve asthma control.

Effect of Individual Patient Characteristics and Treatment Choices on Reliever Medication Use in Moderate-Severe Asthma: A Poisson Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Even though increased use of reliever medication, including short-acting beta agonists (SABA), provides an indirect measure of symptom worsening, there have been limited efforts to assess how different patterns of reliever use correlate with symptom control and future risk of exacerbations. Here, we evaluate the effect of individual baseline characteristics on reliever use in patients with moderate-severe asthma on regular maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) or combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR).

METHODS

A drug-disease model describing the number of 24-h puffs and overnight occasions was developed with data from five clinical studies (N = 6212). The model was implemented using a nonlinear mixed effects approach and a Poisson function, considering clinical and demographic baseline characteristics. Goodness of fit and model predictive performance were assessed. Heatmaps were created to summarise the effect of concurrent baseline factors on reliever utilisation.

RESULTS

The final model accurately described individual patterns of reliever use, which is significantly increased with time since diagnosis, smoking, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score and higher body mass index (BMI) at baseline. Whilst the number of puffs decreases slowly after an initial drop relative to the start of treatment, exacerbating patients utilise significantly more reliever than those who do not exacerbate. The mean effect of FP/SAL (median dose: 250/50 μg BID) on reliever use was slightly higher than that of BUD/FOR (median dose: 160/4.5 μg BID), i.e. a 75.3% vs 69.3% reduction in reliever use, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of individual-level patient data in conjunction with a parametric approach enabled the characterisation of interindividual differences in the patterns of reliever use in patients with moderate-severe asthma. Taken together, individual demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as exacerbation history, can be considered an indicator of the degree of asthma control. High SABA reliever use suggests suboptimal clinical management of patients on maintenance therapy.

Decreased TLR7 expression was associated with airway eosinophilic inflammation and lung function in asthma: evidence from machine learning approaches and experimental validation

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a global public health concern. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of asthma were poorly understood. This study aims to explore potential biomarkers associated with asthma and analyze the pathological role of immune cell infiltration in the disease.

METHODS

The gene expression profiles of induced sputum were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE76262 and GSE137268) and were combined for analysis. Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) was identified as the core gene by the intersection of two different machine learning algorithms, namely, least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) regression and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and the top 10 core networks based on Cytohubba. CIBERSORT algorithm was used to analyze the difference of immune cell infiltration between asthma and healthy control groups. Finally, the expression level of TLR7 was validated in induced sputum samples of patients with asthma.

RESULTS

A total of 320 differential expression genes between the asthma and healthy control groups were screened, including 184 upregulated genes and 136 downregulated genes. TLR7 was identified as the core gene after combining the results of LASSO regression, SVM-RFE algorithm, and top 10 hub genes. Significant differences were observed in the distribution of 13 out of 22 infiltrating immune cells in asthma. TLR7 was found to be closely related to the level of several infiltrating immune cells. TLR7 mRNA levels were downregulated in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls (p = 0.0049). The area under the curve of TLR7 for the diagnosis of asthma was 0.7674 (95% CI 0.631-0.904, p = 0.006). Moreover, TLR7 mRNA levels were negatively correlated with exhaled nitric oxide fraction (r = - 0.3268, p = 0.0347) and the percentage of peripheral blood eosinophils (%) (r = - 0.3472, p = 0.041), and positively correlated with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (% predicted) (r = 0.3960, p = 0.0071) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (r = 0.3213, p = 0.0314) in asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased TLR7 in the induced sputum of eosinophilic asthmatic patients was involved in immune cell infiltration and airway inflammation, which may serve as a new biomarker for the diagnosis of eosinophilic asthma.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on PICU admissions for severe asthma exacerbations: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The incidence of severe asthma exacerbations (SAE) requiring a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (and its association with public restrictions) is largely unknown. We examined the trend of SAE requiring PICU admission before, during, and after COVID-19 restrictions in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its relationship with features such as environmental triggers and changes in COVID-19 restriction measures.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, all PICU admissions of children aged ≥2 years for severe asthma at the Amsterdam UMC between 2018 and 2022 were included. The concentrations of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) and pollen were obtained from official monitoring stations.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2022, 228 children were admitted to the PICU of the Amsterdam UMC for SAE. While we observed a decrease in admissions during periods of more stringent restriction, there was an increase in the PICU admission rate for SAE in some periods following the lifting of restrictions. In particular, following the COVID-19 restrictions in 2021, we observed a peak incidence of admissions from August to November, which was higher than any other peak during the indicated years. No association with air pollution or pollen was observed.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that an increase in clinically diagnosed viral infections after lockdown periods was the reason for the altered incidence of SAE at the PICU in late 2021, rather than air pollution and pollen concentrations.

The treatable traits approach to adults with obstructive airways disease in primary and secondary care

The treatable traits approach is based on the recognition that the different clinical phenotypes of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD) are a heterogeneous group of conditions with different underlying mechanisms and clinical manifestations, and that the identification and treatment of the specific clinical features or traits facilitates a personalised approach to management. Fundamentally, it recognises two important concepts. Firstly, that treatment for obstructive lung disease can achieve better outcomes if guided by specific clinical characteristics. Secondly, that in patients with a diagnosis of asthma, and/or COPD, poor respiratory health may also be due to numerous overlapping disorders that can present with symptoms that may be indistinguishable from asthma and/or COPD, comorbidities that might require treatment in their own right, and lifestyle or environmental factors that, if addressed, might lead to better control rather than simply increasing airways directed treatment. While these concepts are well accepted, how best to implement this personalised medicine approach in primary and secondary care within existing resource constraints remains uncertain. In this review, we consider the evidence base for this management approach and propose that the priority now is to assess different prototype templates for the identification and management of treatable traits in both asthma and COPD, in primary, secondary and tertiary care, to provide the evidence that will guide their use in clinical practice in different health care systems.

The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire enhances the assessment of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Asthma control is often overestimated in routine practice, and despite advances in the understanding of immunopathology and the availability of new precision therapies, the burden of disease remains unacceptably high.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) with patient and physician assessments and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in identifying asthma control.

METHODS

Baseline data from a longitudinal study of the AIRQ were analyzed. Patients with asthma in the United States aged 12 years and older followed in 24 specialty practices and 1 specialty-affiliated primary care clinic were enrolled between May and November 2019. At entry, participants completed AIRQ and ACT, and participants and physicians completed 5-point Likert scale assessments of control.

RESULTS

A total of 1112 participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age = 43.9 [19.3] years, 70% of the female sex, 78% White). Overall, 62% of participants rated themselves as well- or completely controlled, and 54% were rated comparably by physicians. The ACT classified 49% of participants as well-controlled, with 35% similarly categorized by AIRQ. Previous-year exacerbations were experienced by 32% of participants who self-rated as well- or completely controlled, 30% who were rated as well- or completely controlled by physicians, and 29% assessed as well-controlled by ACT, but only 15% of those classified as well-controlled by AIRQ.

CONCLUSION

The burden of asthma is substantial in patients cared for by asthma specialists, and asthma control is overestimated by patients, physicians, and the symptom-based ACT. The AIRQ assesses risk in addition to symptom control and may serve to improve asthma control determination by assessing previous exacerbations.

Impact of asthma control on quality of life in an outpatient setting in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

The goal of asthma therapy is asthma control. As a chronic disease, asthma may cause considerable physical, emotional and social restrictions impacting quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyze control of asthma symptoms in an outpatient setting in Brazil and its impact on quality of life.

METHODS

A pilot cross-sectional study was performed in two public centers in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, Brazil. Control of asthma symptoms was assessed according to GINA guidelines, and quality of life was analyzed by the Mini Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ).

RESULTS

A total of 47 adult patients with asthma were analyzed. Asthma was controlled in 8 patients (17.0%), partially controlled in 26 patients (55.3%) and uncontrolled in 13 patients (27.7%). Patients with controlled asthma showed better mini-AQLQ scores (4.99 ± 1.10) as compared to those with partly controlled (3.66 ± 1.10) and uncontrolled asthma (2.59 ± 0.64; p < 0.001 for both). Most patients (85.1%) were taking inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting bronchodilators (LABA) as controller treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Better asthma control had a positive impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) contributing to a better disease management. Few patients reached full asthma control in our specialty ambulatory center, suggesting further initiatives are required to improve the quality of asthma care in Brazil.

Diagnosis and Assessment of the Asthmas

Optimizing asthma diagnosis is an essential part of global strategies to reduce the excessive illness burden from asthma. New understanding about how to address the complexity and heterogeneity of the different forms of asthma means that asthma diagnosis now requires a compound diagnostic approach and label. Eliciting the typical symptoms and abnormal physiology of variable airflow limitation permits the recognition of asthma, and the identification of further features, such as eosinophilic or type 2 inflammation, allows a compound diagnostic label of eosinophilic asthma. This conveys key information about future exacerbation risk and likely treatment responsiveness. Treatable traits are a useful way to implement this new approach to diagnosis. Targeted assessment is used to inform a specific treatment plan in a pragmatic and iterative process.

Overview of recent advancements in asthma management

Asthma is a common but complex heterogenous inflammatory airway disorder. Despite significant developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of asthma, it remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Optimal management involves addressing modifiable risk factors, titration of inhaled pharmacotherapy in a stepwise approach and, in severe disease, consideration of biologic agents. Appreciation of the clinical characteristics of asthma and recognition of the immune pathways involved has allowed the development of phenotypic and endotypic subtypes of asthma to be better defined. This has revolutionised asthma management, allowing risk stratification of patients, targeted use of biologic agents to modify cytokine responses that drive asthma and improved patient outcomes. Patient education and engagement are critical to the management of this disease in an era of personalised medicine and a rapidly changing global environment.

Smoking: a leading factor for the death of chronic respiratory diseases derived from Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Background

Smoking is believed as one of the major risk factors resulting in a variety of non-communicable diseases, such as lung cancer and chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). However, the global burden of CRDs attributed to smoking has not been systematically studied, particularly across different temporal and spatial scales.

Methods

We conducted a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of CRDs and related risk factors using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Incidence, death, risk factors, and other parameters such as estimated annual percentage change have been analyzed. We also compared various risk factors across regions, countries, and genders.

Results

Globally, the incidence of CRDs and deaths cases have increased in the last 30 years, while the corresponding age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and death rate (ASDR) have declined. Smoking was the leading risk factor for the death of CRDs all over the world. However, in low and low-middle Socio-demographic Index (SDI) areas, particulate matter pollution was the main risk factor leading to death from CRDs, while smoking was ranked first among the major risk factors in areas with middle, middle-high, or high SDI. Globally, gender differences in morbidity and mortality from CRDs were observed. Males had slightly more cases and ASIR of chronic respiratory diseases than females over the last 30 years. However, the mortality cases and ASDR in males were significantly higher than that of females. Furthermore, the ASDR of all major risk factors, specially smoking, was higher in men than in women.

Conclusions

CRDs were still major threats human health. The current study highlights the dominating roles of smoking for death risks resulting from CRDs, followed by PM pollution. Therefore, tobacco control and improving air quality are key to reducing deaths from CRDs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01944-w.

Pharmacogenetics of Bronchodilator Response: Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of bronchodilator response (BDR) to albuterol have been published over the past decade. This review describes current knowledge gaps, including pharmacogenetic studies of albuterol response in minority populations, effect modification of pharmacogenetic associations by age, and relevance of BDR phenotype characterization to pharmacogenetic findings. New approaches, such as leveraging additional "omics" data to focus pharmacogenetic interrogation, as well as developing polygenic risk scores in asthma treatment responses, are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent pharmacogenetic studies of albuterol response in minority populations have identified genetic polymorphisms in loci (DNAH5, NFKB1, PLCB1, ADAMTS3, COX18, and PRKG1), that are associated with BDR. Additional studies are needed to replicate these findings. Modification of the pharmacogenetic associations for SPATS2L and ASB3 polymorphisms by age has also been published. Evidence from metabolomic and epigenomic studies of BDR may point to new pharmacogenetic targets. Lastly, a polygenic risk score for response to albuterol has been developed but requires validation in additional cohorts. In order to expand our knowledge of pharmacogenetics of BDR, additional studies in minority populations are needed. Consideration of effect modification by age and leverage of other "omics" data beyond genomics may also help uncover novel pharmacogenetic loci for use in precision medicine for asthma treatment.

Use of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide to Guide the Treatment of Asthma: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO) test is a point-of-care test that is used in the assessment of asthma.

Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on whether FE_NO testing is indicated to optimize asthma treatment in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered.

Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to form a consensus document regarding a single question relevant to the use of FE_NO. The question was selected from three potential questions based on the greatest perceived impact on clinical practice and the unmet need for evidence-based answers related to this question. The panel performed systematic reviews of published randomized controlled trials between 2004 and 2019 and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members evaluated and approved the recommendations.

Main Results: After considering the overall low quality of the evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation for FE_NO-based care. In patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered, we suggest that FE_NO is beneficial and should be used in addition to usual care. This judgment is based on a balance of effects that probably favors the intervention; the moderate costs and availability of resources, which probably favors the intervention; and the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in daily practice.

Conclusions: Clinicians should consider this recommendation to measure FE_NO in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered based on current best available evidence.

Moving towards a Treatable Traits model of care for the management of obstructive airways diseases

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two prevalent chronic airways diseases. Both are complex and heterogeneous. Traditionally, clinical guidelines have advocated a stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy of asthma and COPD, but there is increasing realization that both require a more personalized and precise management approach. To this end, a management strategy based on the so-called Treatable Traits has been proposed. Emerging evidence suggests that this model improves relevant outcomes in patients with chronic airway diseases but further research is needed to guide implementation. This review discusses the challenges, opportunities, and hurdles that its implementation will have to face.

Comparing the Asthma Control and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Different Fixed Combinations of Inhaled Corticosteroids Plus Long-acting Beta 2 Agonist; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Asthma is the most common chronic inflammatory disease of the pulmonary system. The prevalence of asthma is growing enormously worldwide posing a significant health and economic burden. Asthma treatment guidelines recommend a combination of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta 2 agonist (LABA). However, there is little guidance for clinicians on selecting a specific ICS/LABA combination. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of three fixed dose ICS/LABA combination therapies i.e., fluticasone/salmeterol, fluticasone/formoterol and budesonide/formoterol for the management of moderate to severe asthma. Design: This was a prospective interventional, three-armed, parallel group, open label, and randomized clinical trial Methods: Adult asthmatic patients of both genders (n=135) were randomly allocated to the three ICS/LABA treatment groups: fluticasone/salmeterol-treated group (n=45) , fluticasone/formoterol-treated group (n=45) and budesonide/formoterol-treated group (n=45). All groups were treated for three months. The main outcome parameters included lung function (FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC), inflammatory state (hs-CRP, ECP) and asthma control (ACT). Results: After 3 months of treatment, fluticasone/formoterol significantly increased FEV1 compared to fluticasone/salmeterol (p<0.01) and FEV1% compared to budesonide/formoterol (p<0.01). Both fluticasone-containing combinations significantly increased FEV1/FVC (p<0.001, p<0.001), decreased serum hs-CRP (p<0.01, p<0.001), and serum ECP (p<0.05, p<0.001) and improved ACT (p<0.05, p<0.01) compared to budesonide. Fluticasone/formoterol significantly reduced ECP in comparison to fluticasone/salmeterol (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed a superiority for fluticasone-containing combinations over budesonide for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma. Within the former combinations, fluticasone/formoterol was better than fluticasone/salmeterol.

Step-up and step-down approaches in the treatment of asthma

Introduction: Significant intraindividual and temporal variability in symptom control is a feature of asthma that requires careful monitoring and the need to periodically review and adjust therapy. Both NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA offer helpful algorithms for a stepping approach to asthma.Areas covered: The problems arisen in applying the stepwise approach to the treatment of asthma proposed by NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA algorithms and their possible alternatives.Expert opinion: The current therapeutic stepping approach to asthma, which takes into account lung function, symptoms and quality of life, is certainly useful, but it does not consider the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, patient's overestimation or underestimation of the severity of the disease and differences in the opinions on the level of asthma control required between patients and physicians and also between physicians in both primary care and specialist settings are common and may negatively affect asthma control and future risks. A reassessment of the conventional stepping approach to management of asthma is now needed. A pragmatic approach that sets therapeutic goals for each individual and associates them with the treatable traits of asthma which, when therapeutically targeted, will in many cases help to achieve the goals, seems more reasonable than the present stepping approach.

Proteome profiling reveals the efficacy and targets of sophocarpine against asthma

Sophocarpine (SPC) as a quinolizidine alkaloid displays powerful effects on inflammatory diseases through regulating multiple targets. Asthma is a complex heterogeneous and inflammatory disease with an increasing incidence worldwide. Here we established a mice asthma model and investigated the effect of SPC. Mice induced by ovalbumin (OVA) exhibits exacerbated Th1/Th2 immune imbalance and allergic lung inflammation. SPC treatment regulated Th1/Th2 cytokines production (IL-4, IL-5 and INF-γ) in BALF, reduced IgE level in serum, inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration, and improved the lung tissue pathology. Proteomic results showed that 5064 proteins in lung tissue were detected and among them 223 preliminary therapeutic targets of SPC were selected. Subsequently, excluding non-human genes, 109 targets with established crystal structures were harvested. Meanwhile, the molecular docking results showed that the binding energy of 87 targets with SPC was varied from -9.72 kcal/mol to 227.16 kcal/mol. Further, SPC suppressed arrb2, anxa1, myd88 and sphk1 expression and activated p-stat1. All of the five targets based on the screened results of proteomics and molecular docking are critical in allergic asthma. Thus, our data revealed that SPC alleviated bronchial asthma via targeting multi-targets.

Balancing the needs of the many and the few: where next for adult asthma guidelines?

Asthma differs from many other chronic conditions in that most key management decisions are made in non-specialist settings, such as general practitioner surgeries and accident and emergency departments. Diagnosis in primary care relies on recognition of a characteristic pattern of symptoms and the occurrence of asthma attacks, sometimes supplemented by basic lung function tests. Ongoing management is guided by the assessment of symptoms and simple lung function measures of airflow obstruction, with little attempt made to personalise management. This approach is flawed because the inadequate specificity of symptoms, as well as the low sensitivity of variable airflow obstruction, means that a diagnosis of asthma is often difficult to exclude with confidence. Moreover, even if diagnosed correctly, dissociation between inflammation, airflow obstruction, and symptoms means that a generalised stepwise approach to managing asthma on the basis of symptoms is unlikely to be successful in a substantial proportion of patients. As a result, effective treatments are used inefficiently, and outcomes are often worse than they could be. Rather than use of either a population-based or personalised approach for the diagnosis and management of asthma, we recommend a new combined approach, in which treatment decisions are driven by objective assessment of key treatable mechanistic traits.

Household Cleaning and Poor Asthma Control Among Elderly Women

BACKGROUND

Asthma control is suboptimal in nearly half of adults with asthma. Household exposure to disinfectants and cleaning products (DCP) has been associated with adverse respiratory effects, but data on their association with asthma control are scant.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between household use of DCP and asthma control in a large cohort of French elderly women.

METHODS

We used data from a case-control study on asthma (2011-2013) nested in the E3N cohort. Among 3023 women with current asthma, asthma control was defined by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). We used a standardized questionnaire to assess the frequency of cleaning tasks and DCP use. We also identified household cleaning patterns using a clustering approach. Associations between DCP and ACT were adjusted for age, smoking status, body mass index, and education.

RESULTS

Data on ACT and DCP use were available for 2223 women (70 ± 6 years old). Asthma was controlled (ACT = 25), partly controlled (ACT = 20-24), and poorly controlled (ACT ≤ 19) in 29%, 46%, and 25% of the participants, respectively. Weekly use of sprays and chemicals was associated with poorly controlled asthma (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1 spray: 1.31 [0.94-1.84], ≥2 sprays: 1.65 [1.07-2.53], P trend: .01; 1 chemical: 1.24 [0.94-1.64], ≥2 chemicals: 1.47 [1.03-2.09], P trend: .02). Risk for poor asthma control increased with the patterns "very frequent use of products" (1.74 [1.13-2.70]) and "infrequent cleaning tasks and intermediate use of products" (1.62 [1.05-2.51]).

CONCLUSION

Regular use of DCP may contribute to poor asthma control in elderly women. Limiting their use may help improve asthma management.

The management of severe asthma in 2020

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways affecting more than 300 million patients worldwide. The disease can be of various severity ranging from very mild to severe. The severe form of the disease only affects about 5% of patients but is responsible for a large component of the overall disease burden and results in about half of direct asthma-related costs. This led to important investments in research, which allowed better understanding of its pathophysiology and the development of new therapeutic strategies. Despite those breakthroughs, recent guidelines still emphasize the need to distinguish uncontrolled or difficult-to-control asthma from severe asthma. Indeed, a significant number of patients referred to severe asthma clinics are non-severe uncontrolled patients. However, the basics of asthma management such as ensuring that the patient has the right diagnosis, recognition of contributing comorbidities, avoidance of exposure to sensitizing agents in allergic individuals, regular assessment of control, and patient education should not be forgotten. The major improvements in pathophysiology arose from the evidences that asthma is of heterogeneous nature. Such heterogeneity has been particularly studied in severe asthma, leading to the recognition of more homogeneous groups referred to as phenotypes. Appropriate phenotyping of individual patients allows enforcing more specific treatment plans for patients, which is a step toward precision medicine. The high morbidity and socioeconomic burden of severe asthma has led to the development of optimized therapeutic strategies in addition to the commercialization of new drugs. Many of these have targeted the eosinophilic component of inflammatory asthma phenotypes while there is still a need to develop new therapies for non-eosinophilic asthma. When asthma is not controlled by optimal therapy, including a high-dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA), a long acting anticholinergic agent can be added and if insufficient, a variety of biologic agents is now available in many countries. When biologics are not an option, thermoplasty and macrolides have also become available. Despite many recent breakthroughs in severe asthma, much research needs to be done. Improvement in availability of targeted asthma medications and asthma prevention should be top priorities.

Real-Life effects of benralizumab on exacerbation number and lung hyperinflation in atopic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

BACKGROUND

The humanized monoclonal antibody benralizumab targets the α subunit of the interleukin-5 (IL-5) receptor and the FcγRIIIa receptor expressed by natural killer cells. Through this dual mechanism of action, benralizumab neutralizes the pro-eosinophil functions of IL-5 and promotes eosinophil apoptosis.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

The present real-life study aimed to evaluate, in 22 allergic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, the effects of benralizumab on asthma exacerbations and lung hyperinflation.

RESULTS

In this regard here we show that, after 24 weeks of add-on treatment, benralizumab completely depleted peripheral blood eosinophils (from 810 to 0 cells/μL; p < 0.0001), and significantly decreased both asthma exacerbation number (from 4 to 0; p < 0.0001) and residual volume (from 2720 to 2300 mL; p < 0.01). Moreover, at the same time point (24 weeks) benralizumab also increased pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ (from 1295 to 1985 mL; p < 0.0001), FVC (from 2390 to 2974 mL; p < 0.0001), FEF_25-75 (from 0.6 to 1.42 L/sec; p < 0.0001), IC (from 1940 to 2460 mL; not significant), and ACT score (from 14.73 to 22.95; p < 0.0001), as well as reduced prednisone intake (from 25 to 0 mg; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our results suggest that via its anti-eosinophil actions benralizumab improved airflow limitation, lung hyperinflation, and respiratory symptoms, as well as lowered asthma exacerbation rate and abrogated OCS consumption in most patients.

Beyond type 2 cytokines in asthma - new insights from old clinical trials

Introduction: Human asthma is a heterogeneous disorder on molecular, pathological, and clinical levels. The paradigm of asthma as an allergic process driven by type 2 cytokines and mediators has led to targeted biologic therapies resulting in some clinical benefit in patient subsets. However, some patient subsets and clinical manifestations do not benefit from these interventions, thus redefining unmet needs. Clinical studies of type 2 directed therapies have identified new targets under investigation in clinical development; these include epithelial alarmins, non-type 2 cytokines, cytokine receptor signaling, mast cells and neuroinflammation.Areas covered: We consider lessons learned concerning asthma pathogenesis from observational studies and clinical trials of biologic agents that target type 2 mediators. We also provide a perspective on emerging therapeutic hypotheses to target processes independent of or orthogonal to type 2 inflammation in asthma.Expert opinion: Type 2 inflammation is continuous, not discrete, and is likely a modifier of underlying dysregulated airway physiology. Non-type 2 inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL17, IL6, IFNs), microbiome, alarmins (e.g., TSLP, IL33), mast cells and sensory neurons may represent orthogonal targets to type 2 mediators. There is a need to better match targets and outcome measures in biologically defined patient populations to appropriately test hypotheses in the clinic.