Integration and Impact of Telemedicine in Underserved Pediatric Primary Care

Social Determinants of Pediatric Primary Care Telehealth and In-Office Visits During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of primary care telehealth following the rapid reduction of in-person pediatric primary care availability during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and how this varied by community-level social determinants and individual-level social needs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 0 to 17 years across 16 sites within Nationwide Children's Hospital Primary Care Network from March 22 to July 31, 2020, and a preceding comparator period (2019). The study population includes 107,629 patient encounters. We compared visit type (in-person vs telehealth), demographics, presence of individual social needs, and community social determinants using the Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI). To assess telehealth utilization, we compared the ratio of 2019 to 2020 primary care visits across levels of COI. We trained a linear regression model predicting the number of telehealth encounters in 2020 using individual patient characteristics and COI.

RESULTS

Patients in census tracts with high and very high levels of opportunity maintained the highest relative encounter volume (2020:2019) at the beginning of the pandemic (0.78 and 0.73, respectively, compared to 65% for children living in very low opportunity neighborhoods; P < 0.001). Patients with caregiver-reported social needs (housing, transportation, utilities, food) had relatively greater telehealth use following the start of the public health emergency.

CONCLUSIONS

Volume of primary care visits decreased least for high and very high-opportunity neighborhoods yet individual social needs were associated with higher relative use of telemedicine. Findings suggest that telehealth was an important modality to deliver care to children with social needs but does not overcome community-level barriers.

Access to Primary Care Telemedicine and Visit Characterization in a Pediatric, Low-Income, Primarily Latino Population: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been widely integrated into primary care pediatrics. While initial studies showed some concern for disparities in telemedicine use, telemedicine uptake for pediatric patients in a low-income, primarily Latino community over a sustained period has yet to be described.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the relationship between demographics, patient portal activation, and telemedicine visits, as well as characterize diagnoses addressed in telemedicine, in a low-income, primarily Latino population over time.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team conducted outreach for telemedicine and patient portal activation with the adoption of a new electronic health record. Data were collected on all in-person and telemedicine visits from February 2020 through April 2021 for 4 community-based pediatric practices. The outcomes included patient portal activation, telemedicine use, and reason for telemedicine visits. Bivariate tests and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess the independent effects of demographics on the likelihood of portal activation and having a telemedicine visit. Telemedicine diagnoses were categorized, and subanalyses were conducted to explore variations by age and month.

RESULTS

There were 12,377 unique patients and 7127 telemedicine visits. Latino patients made up 83.4% (n=8959) of the population. Nearly all patients (n=10,830, 87.5%) had an activated portal, and 33.8% (n=4169) had at least 1 telemedicine visit. Portal activation decreased with age >2 years (2-4 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.76; 5-11 years: aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.23-0.32; 12-14 years: aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.23-0.35; and 15-17 years: aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.58). Spanish-speaking (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.45-0.59) and non-Latino patients (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.76) had decreased odds of activation and having a telemedicine visit (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89 and aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81, respectively). The top 5 diagnostic categories for telemedicine were infectious disease (n=1749, 26.1%), dermatology (n=1287, 19.5%), gastrointestinal (n=771, 11.7%), well and follow-up care (n=459, 7%), and other specialty-related care (n=415, 6.3%). Infectious disease showed the most variation over time. Age-based patterns included a decrease in the proportion of infectious disease diagnoses by increasing age group and a higher proportion of well and follow-up care in older ages. Additional telemedicine diagnoses included common infant concerns for patients younger than 2 years of age; pulmonary, asthma, and allergy concerns for toddler or school-age children; behavioral health concerns for younger adolescents; and genitourinary and gynecologic concerns for older adolescents.

CONCLUSIONS

The high engagement across demographics suggests feasibility and interest in telemedicine in this low-income, primarily Latino population, which may be attributable to the strength of outreach. Language-based disparities were still present. Telemedicine was used for a wide range of diagnoses. As telemedicine remains a vital component of pediatric health care, targeted interventions may enhance engagement to serve diverse pediatric patient populations.

Community Health Worker Videoconferencing Interventions for Disease Management and Health Promotion: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Public health interventions delivered by community health workers (CHWs) have been proven effective in improving health outcomes across multiple fields, particularly in populations that are underserved by traditional health care systems. To date, little research is available about how CHW-led interventions could be successfully delivered virtually, despite many other health care services being offered via telehealth.

OBJECTIVE

This paper details a scoping review protocol that aims to assess the existing literature on CHW-led interventions using videoconferencing technology.

METHODS

The scoping review protocol was developed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines on conduct of scoping reviews. Included papers will describe a direct intervention to manage disease or improve health, delivered by CHWs via videoconferencing. Multiple literature databases and gray literature will be searched. Abstracts and then full texts will be reviewed to determine inclusion by 2 independent reviewers; conflicts at each stage will be resolved by a third reviewer. A data extraction tool will be used by reviewers to independently chart data from included studies; results will be reviewed for accuracy by a second reviewer. Included papers will be analyzed to identify the breadth of the available evidence, including barriers, facilitators, effectiveness, and best practices described in the literature. Data will be summarized in a narrative review.

RESULTS

This study commenced in April 2022, and the study protocol was finalized in November 2022. A preliminary search of the published literature (excluding gray literature) in July 2024 revealed 276 reports after removal of duplicates. The formal literature search will commence in August 2024, with results available by December 2024. We intend to publish results in the academic literature as well as creating a report accessible to nonacademic and community audiences.

CONCLUSIONS

This review will illuminate the breadth of the evidence available on CHW videoconferencing interventions, with specific focus on strategies for implementation success and equity of access. and will be of great value to organizations that offer CHW services.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/55160.

Neighborhood vulnerability and associations with poor health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the relationship between neighborhood vulnerability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the childhood cancer population. This study evaluated the impact of neighborhood vulnerability on HRQOL among adult survivors of childhood cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 4393 adult survivors of childhood cancer from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. At the baseline (2007-2020), HRQOL was assessed using the SF36v2's physical and mental components summaries (PCS and MCS). Neighborhood vulnerability was assessed using the overall, domain, and indicator-specific scores of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and Minority Health SVI (MHSVI). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations of neighborhood vulnerability (quartiles: Q1-Q4) with impaired HRQOL (1SD below the norm), adjusting for diagnosis, demographics, personal socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle, and chronic health condition burden. Interactions of SVI and MHSVI with personal SES on impaired HRQOL were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among survivors, 51.9% were male, averaging 30.3 years of age at evaluation and 21.5 years since diagnosis. Comparing neighborhoods with higher vs lower vulnerability (Q4 vs Q1), overall (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 2.16) and domain-specific vulnerability (socioeconomic: OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.15; household composition: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.16 to 2.06; housing and transportation: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.76; medical vulnerability: OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.09) were significantly associated with impaired PCS, but not MCS. Residing in neighborhoods lacking urgent care clinics was significantly associated with impaired PCS (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.78). Having lower vs higher personal education and living in higher vulnerability neighborhoods were associated with more impaired PCS (Pinteraction = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

Specific aspects of neighborhood vulnerability increase the risk for impaired physical HRQOL. Addressing these neighborhood factors is essential to enhance the HRQOL of survivors.

Comparison of Telemedicine Usage at Two Distinct Medicaid-Focused Pediatric Clinics

Objective: To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Methods: Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021 at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Site A and Site B care for different populations (Site B care for mostly immigrant families with preferred language Spanish). Outcomes included the percent of visits conducted through telemedicine and reason for visit. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable mixed multilevel logistic regression, were used to assess relationship between patient demographics and telemedicine use. Results: Out of 17,142 total visits, 13% of encounters at Site A (n = 987) and 25% of encounters at Site B (n = 2,421) were conducted using telemedicine. Around 13.8% of well-child care (n = 1,515/10,997), 36.2% of mental health care (n = 572/1,581), and 25.0% of acute care/follow-up (n = 1,893/7,562) were telemedicine visits. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in odds of a patient having any telemedicine use by preferred language, sex, or payor. Patients 1-4 years of age had the lowest odds of telemedicine use. At Site A, patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.45), Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66), or other race/ethnicity (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23-0.55) had lower odds of telemedicine use in comparison to Non-Hispanic White. Conclusions: Telemedicine was successfully accessed by Medicaid enrollees for different types of pediatric primary care. There was no difference in telemedicine use by preferred language and payor. However, differences existed by age at both sites and by race/ethnicity at one site. Future research should explore operational factors that improve telemedicine access for marginalized groups.

Effects of Maternal SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Neonatal Discharge Planning and Care: Exacerbation of Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities

OBJECTIVES

To determine if SARS-CoV-2 disproportionately impacted infants born to racial and ethnic minorities and if virus exposure led to decreased access to care.

METHODS

This study was an observational case-control study, between March 2020 and March 2022 in Portland, Maine. Forty-seven cases and 47 controls were enrolled. Cases were infants born to mothers diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 at delivery, and controls were infants matched by date of birth, born to SARS-CoV-2 negative women. Demographic data, maternal clinical data, infant outcomes, and infant discharge plans were compared using Chi squared or Fisher Exact tests. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of race on neonatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure.

RESULTS

Infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were more likely Black or Hispanic than White and Non-Hispanic early in the pandemic, with reversal during the second year. SARS-CoV-2-exposed infants experienced delays in routine newborn outpatient care, although delay improved over the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were initially more likely to be infants of color. During this time, infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were also experiencing significant delays in newborn care.

Has telemedicine come to fruition? Parents' and pediatricians' perceptions and preferences regarding telemedicine

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine has increasingly become a viable option for patient care and may increase access to care. The aim of our study was to evaluate both parent and pediatrician perceptions, preferences, and acceptability regarding the use of different telemedicine modalities.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of both parents and pediatricians in Geneva, Switzerland in 2021. The questionnaire focused on digital literacy, preferences, acceptability, advantages, and disadvantages regarding telemedicine (phone, email, video, and instant message). Descriptive statistics and comparisons of preferences and perceptions (Pearson Chi2 and logistic regression) were performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-two parents and 45 pediatricians participated. After face-to-face consultations, parents and pediatricians preferred the phone for simple medical advice, discussion of parameters, acute or chronic problems, and psychological support. Email was preferred for communication of results and prescription renewal. Main reasons for using telemedicine were avoiding travel and saving time. Disadvantages were lack of physical examination, technical problems, and unsuitability of the reason for consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the factors that influence acceptance and satisfaction with telemedicine is vital for its successful implementation. Convenience, quality of care, trust, strong pediatrician-parent relationships, technical reliability, user-friendliness, and privacy considerations play significant roles in shaping parent and pediatrician attitudes toward telemedicine.

IMPACT

The COVID-19 pandemic spurred the expansion of the use of telemedicine in pediatric care. Few studies have addressed parent and pediatrician perceptions and preferences regarding telemedicine. Both parents and pediatricians consider certain telemedicine modalities (phone, email, video, and instant message) pertinent in only specific clinical situations. Advantages of telemedicine outweigh disadvantages with parents and pediatricians appreciating the increased access to care, time savings, and avoiding transport. However, the lack of a physical examination remains a significant disadvantage. Convenience, quality of care, trust, strong pediatrician-parent relationship, technical reliability, user-friendliness, and privacy considerations play significant roles in shaping attitudes towards telemedicine.

Telehealth Use in a National Pediatric Weight Management Sample During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: This study aimed to assess the implementation and access to telehealth-delivered pediatric weight management (PWM) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic at six US PWM programs (PWMP) using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Methods: The COVID-19 period (COVID) was defined in this retrospective, multisite study as the time when each site closed in-person care during 2020. The Pre-COVID period (Pre-COVID) was an equivalent time frame in 2019. Patients were stratified by visit completion status. Patient characteristics for COVID and Pre-COVID were compared to examine potential changes/disparities in access to care. Results: There were 3297 unique patients included across the six sites. On average, telehealth was initiated 4 days after in-person clinic closure. Compared with Pre-COVID, COVID (mean duration: 9 weeks) yielded fewer total completed visits (1300 vs. 2157) and decreased revenue (mean proportion of nonreimbursed visits 33.30% vs. 16.67%). Among the completed visits, COVID included a lower proportion of new visits and fewer patients who were male, non-English speaking, Hispanic, or Asian and more patients who were Black or lived ≥20 miles from the program site (p < 0.05 for all). Among no-show/canceled visits, COVID included more patients who had private insurance, older age, or a longer time since the last follow-up. Conclusion: Rapid implementation of telehealth during COVID facilitated continuity of PWM care. Clinic volume and reimbursement were lower during COVID and differences in the patient population reached by telehealth emerged. Further characterization of barriers to telehealth for PWM is needed.

Utilization and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine During the First 6 Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Largest Pediatric Ambulatory Network in New York State

Objective: We aimed to (1) describe telemedicine utilization and usability during the first 6 weeks of the pandemic and (2) determine if usability varied by individual- or visit-level characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ambulatory pediatric telemedicine visits occurring between March 10, 2020, and April 18, 2020, across a large academic health system. We performed manual chart review to assess individual- and visit-level characteristics and invited caregivers to respond to an adapted Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). We used multiple logistic regression to determine predictors of high usability. Results: There were 3,197 ambulatory pediatric telemedicine visits, representing 2,967 unique patients. Patients were racially/ethnically diverse (42.5% non-Hispanic White) and primarily English-speaking (89.2%). Surveys were completed by 441 (17%) of those invited. Every item of the TUQ had agreement or strong agreement from the majority of respondents. Compared with non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian identity was associated with lower usability in three domains and overall, and non-Hispanic Black identity was associated with higher satisfaction and future use. As compared with caregivers of infants younger than 1 year, caregivers of older patients reported lower usability in the three domains. Conclusions: Telemedicine was successfully implemented across 18 ambulatory pediatric specialties in the largest health system in New York State at the onset of COVID-19, and caregivers found it usable and acceptable. Usability scores did not vary by visit-level characteristics but did vary by race/ethnicity and age. Further research is necessary to identify modifiable drivers of the patient experience, particularly in non-Hispanic Asian communities and older adolescents.

Racial Differences in Expanded Telemedicine Use During COVID-19: A Literature Review

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted the widespread adoption of telemedicine to deliver health care services while minimizing in-person contact. However, concerns persist regarding equitable access to telemedicine, especially for vulnerable populations. This study examines the utilization patterns of telemedicine by race in the United States, considering different modalities, medical specialties, and geographic regions. Methods: A comprehensive review of 26 articles published between January 2020 and August 2022 was conducted to analyze racial disparities in telemedicine use during the pandemic. Data from electronic health records and self-reported race were compiled for analysis. Variations based on geography, clinical care types, telemedicine modalities (audio or video), and study design were explored. Results: The findings indicate the presence of racial disparities in telemedicine utilization, with minority groups exhibiting lower usage rates compared with Whites. The location of outpatient clinics and clinical care types did not significantly influence telemedicine use by race. Among studies comparing telemedicine modalities, African Americans were more likely to choose audio/phone visits over video visits. Studies employing a pre-post design were less likely to identify disparities in telemedicine use by race. Conclusions: This study consistently demonstrates increasing racial disparities in telemedicine use. Future research should focus on identifying contributing factors and developing strategies to address these disparities. Policymakers should consider implementing initiatives promoting equitable access to telemedicine, including financial assistance, improved broadband infrastructure, and digital literacy programs. By addressing these barriers, telemedicine can play a crucial role in reducing health care disparities and improving access to care for all Americans.

The Management of Pediatric Asthma Using Telehealth: An Integrative Review

Introduction: Asthma is one of the most chronic noncommunicable diseases of childhood, affecting 1 in 12 children in the United States. The use of telemedicine for the management of pediatric asthma has shown improved health outcomes; however, it is important to understand what can impact its acceptance. The purpose of this review was to identify the facilitators and barriers to pediatric asthma management, as viewed by stakeholders. Methods: An electronic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete. Articles included in the review contained perceptions of the use of telemedicine for the management of pediatric asthma, as viewed by stakeholders. The socioecological model was used as the theoretical framework to extract data based on its five levels. Results: After reviewing full texts of 143 articles, 118 were excluded, leaving 25 articles included in this review. A majority of included articles focused on mobile health (m-Health) studies for the management of pediatric asthma, with the remaining articles studying synchronous telemedicine or a combination of modalities. Common themes were identified; however, most were focused on the use of m-Health and few studies contained the viewpoints of the caregiver, children, or providers regarding synchronous telemedicine. Discussion: This integrative review identified a number of facilitators and barriers for the management of asthma using telemedicine. However, more qualitative studies are needed to evaluate the perceptions of caregivers, patients, and primary providers regarding synchronous telehealth. It was also recognized that telemedicine may increase instead of reduce health care disparities.

Evaluating the Impact of Telemedicine Expansion on Visit Frequency for Children with Type 1 Diabetes at a Single Academic Center in Oregon

Objective: The telemedicine expansion (TE) that accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic presents a novel opportunity to increase access to care for rural-residing children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who may live a great distance from their provider. The study objective was to compare trends in visit frequency among the pediatric T1D population at a single academic center in Oregon before and after TE by those living <100 miles versus ≥100 miles from clinic (MFC) and those residing in urban versus rural areas. Research Design and Methods: We evaluated electronic health record data from 790 children receiving care between July 2018 and December 2021. We estimated differences in likelihood of adequately timed monitoring care (ATMC) over time by patient residence using Generalized Estimating Equations. Results: Just before TE, 37.3% of children were receiving ATMC and those living ≥100 MFC were 20.6% less likely to receive ATMC compared with those living <100 MFC (relative risk [RR] 0.79; confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.57-1.11). Following TE, decreases in ATMC for those living ≥100 MFC were less than for those living <100 MFC (RR of interaction: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-2.00). Just before TE, those living in rural areas were as likely to receive ATMC compared with those living in urban areas (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.61-1.63). Following TE, decreases in ATMC were greater for those living in rural areas versus urban areas (RR of interaction: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.31-2.01). Conclusions: Between July 2020 and December 2021, the likelihood of ATMC decreased across the entire pediatric T1D population. Decreases in ATMC during this period were more substantial for those living <100 MFC and/or in rural areas, however, these discrepancies were not statistically significant.

Clinicodemographic Profile and Clinical Outcome of Children Presenting to Telemedicine Center at Institute of National Importance of India: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

There is a global shortage of healthcare professionals, especially in developing countries, leading to disparities in access to healthcare, worsened by the pandemic. Telemedicine is emerging as a solution, with growing adoption worldwide due to advancements in technology and increased awareness. Research Problem. The establishment of telemedicine depends on resources, infrastructure, and knowledge about healthcare needs. Further studies are needed to monitor and address evolving issues in telemedicine. The Overall Purpose of the Study. Rural health disparities stem from multiple factors, like limited healthcare access, workforce shortages, lifestyle choices, and lower socioeconomic status, leading to higher mortality and chronic diseases. Addressing these challenges is vital for rural community well-being. Telemedicine centers present a promising solution, bridging gaps, and improving healthcare outcomes for underserved remote populations. Methodology. Objective: This study assessed the clinicodemographic profile and clinical outcome of children presenting to the telemedicine center at the Institute of National Importance in India. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: A single-center tertiary care level. Participants: This study included 79 children aged up to 18 years. Major Findings and Summary of Interpretations. In our study, 79 children using telemedicine found a near-equal gender distribution. 8.9% needed emergency care, with common complaints being respiratory issues, fever, abdominal pain, and vomiting. After two weeks, 83.5% showed improvement, emphasizing telemedicine's effectiveness in pediatric care.

Conclusion

Our study underscores telemedicine's positive impact on pediatric healthcare, emphasizing its potential to enhance access, outcomes, and cost-efficiency. Wider telemedicine adoption can reduce morbidity and mortality, support preventive care, and streamline posttreatment services, alleviating pressure on specialized facilities. While our focus was pediatrics, the telemedicine model is adaptable to various age groups and conditions, but it should be seen as a valuable supplement to, not a total substitute for, in-person healthcare visits.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Ambulatory Pediatric Telemedicine Utilization During COVID-19

Objective: Few studies have examined sociodemographic disparities in ambulatory pediatric telemedicine utilization during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We aimed to (1) assess disparities in telemedicine visit completion during the first 6 weeks of the pandemic in 2020 and (2) determine if these disparities were significantly different from those present in 2019, when all visits occurred in person. Methods: We compared sociodemographic characteristics of patients with successful versus unsuccessful telemedicine visits from March 10, 2020 to April 18, 2020, using generalized linear mixed models. We performed the same analysis for in-person visits from the same period in 2019. We tested for differences across years using interaction terms in a combined 2019-2020 model. Results: Of 3,639 telemedicine visits scheduled, 3,033 (83.3%) were successful. In 2020, Black/African American race was significantly associated with lower odds of telemedicine visit success (odds ratio 0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.87]) compared with White race, after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, insurance type, visit timing, visit specialty, social vulnerability index, and internet access. In 2019, racial identity other than White was significantly associated with lower odds of in-person visit success than White, as was public insurance compared with private. In the full 2019-2020 model, in-person visits (2019) had lower odds of success than telemedicine visits (2020), and neither race, insurance type, nor any other sociodemographic characteristic had significant interactions with year. Conclusions: Racial disparities were evident in telemedicine utilization early in the pandemic; however, these disparities were not significantly different from those seen in 2019, when all visits were in person. Furthermore, telemedicine may improve access to care overall, despite having no significant impact on inequity. Efforts to eliminate racial disparities in ambulatory pediatric health care utilization are necessary across visit modalities.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Medical Home for Children Born Premature in the National Survey of Children's Health

OBJECTIVE

Children born premature are more likely to be from minoritized racial and ethnic groups and face chronic health and developmental problems. The medical home aims to comprehensively address health and social needs of all families. This study evaluates racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of a medical home among children born premature compared to children born full-term.

METHODS

A 2017-18 National Survey of Children's Health data set was used to calculate the medical home performance measure and subcomponents for children aged 0 to 17 born premature (n = 5633) or full-term (n = 45,819). Chi square and logistic regression assessed magnitude and significance of variations by race and ethnicity and prematurity status.

RESULTS

Prematurity prevalence differed by race and ethnicity (12.0% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], 12.8% Hispanic, 11.1% Multiracial/Other, 11.0% non-Hispanic White [NHW]). Minoritized children born premature had lower adjusted odds of receiving care in a medical home compared to NHW peers (eg, NHB adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.38-0.76] and Hispanic aOR 0.56 [95% CI: 0.40-0.79]). Differences were greater in magnitude among children born premature compared to full-term peers (eg, NHB premature aOR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.38-0.76] vs NHB full-term aOR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.58-0.78]), with similar results for "personal doctor/nurse" and "usual sick care."

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the medical home among children born premature, some more pronounced than full-term peers. To deliver equitable care for all children, efforts are needed to expand access to and improve the medical home, including reliable routine and sick care and stronger family-provider relationships.

The role of primary care during the pandemic: shared experiences from providers in five European countries

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated wide-ranging adaptations to the organisation of health systems, and primary care is no exception. This article aims to collate insights on the role of primary care during the pandemic. The gained knowledge helps to increase pandemic preparedness and resilience.

METHODS

The role of primary care during the pandemic in five European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy) was investigated using a qualitative approach, namely case study, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. In total, 31 interviews were conducted with primary care providers between June and August 2022. The five country case studies were subjected to an overarching analysis focusing on successful strategies as well as gaps and failures regarding pandemic management in primary care.

RESULTS

Primary care providers identified disruptions to service delivery as a major challenge emerging from the pandemic which led to a widespread adoption of telehealth. Despite the rapid increase in telehealth usage and efforts of primary care providers to organise face-to-face care delivery in a safe way, some patient groups were particularly affected by disruptions in service delivery. Moreover, primary care providers perceived a substantial propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines among the population, which also threatened patient-physician relationships. At the same time, primary care providers faced an increased workload, had to work with insufficient personal protective equipment and were provided incongruous guidelines from public authorities. There was a consensus among primary care providers that they were mostly sidelined by public health policy in the context of pandemic management. Primary care providers tackled these problems through a diverse set of measures including home visits, implementing infection control measures, refurbishing used masks, holding internal meetings and relying on their own experiences as well as information shared by colleagues.

CONCLUSION

Primary care providers were neither well prepared nor the focus of initial policy making. However, they implemented creative solutions to the problems they faced and applying the learnings from the pandemic could help in increasing the resilience of primary care. Attributes of an integrated health system with a strong primary care component proved beneficial in addressing immediate effects of the pandemic.

Fulfilling 6 Domains of Health Care Quality: A Qualitative Parental Caregiver Study of Pediatric Telehealth During a Pandemic

Using qualitative methods, we examine telehealth care quality from the perspective of parents of pediatric patients during a pandemic. We fill a gap in the literature essential for measuring effectiveness of pediatric telehealth. A total of 22 participants (n = 21 female; n = 1 male) enrolled in 1 of 9 interviews and focus groups conducted in 2021. Transcribed data were thematically analyzed and organized based on the 6 domains of quality health care by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). Analyzed data revealed 7 themes and 52 codes. Pediatric telehealth visits were perceived as efficient, timely, safe, and generally effective by parents for their child's health care. Participants experienced equal or greater time with their child's care provider via telehealth than through in-person visits. Qualitative results directly align with IOM domains of quality health care and contribute to the growing literature and evidence that may lead to improved telehealth outcomes and better preparedness for emergent public health events.

Teleoncology: Novel Approaches for Improving Cancer Care in North America

Due to widespread healthcare workforce shortages, many patients living in remote and rural North America currently have reduced access to various medical specialists. These shortages, coupled with the aging North American population, highlight the need to transform contemporary healthcare delivery systems. The exchange of medical information via telecommunication technology, known as telemedicine, offers promising solutions to address the medical needs of an aging population and the increased demand for specialty medical services. This progressive movement has also improved access to quality health care by mitigating the current shortage of trained subspecialists. Minimizing the effects of these shortages is particularly urgent in the care of cancer patients, many of whom require regular follow-up and close monitoring. Cancer patients living in remote areas of North America have reduced access to specialized care and, thus, have unacceptably high mortality and morbidity rates. Teleoncology, or the use of telemedicine to provide oncology services remotely, has the ability to improve access to high-quality care and assist in alleviating the burden of some of the severe adverse events associated with cancer. In this review, the authors describe how recent advances in teleoncology can reduce healthcare disparities and improve future cancer care in North America.

The Evolution of Primary Care Telehealth Disparities During COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Telehealth has become widely used as a novel way to provide outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but data about telehealth use in primary care remain limited. Studies in other specialties raise concerns that telehealth may be widening existing health care disparities, requiring further scrutiny of trends in telehealth use.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to further characterize sociodemographic differences in primary care via telehealth compared to in-person office visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if these disparities changed throughout 2020.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a large US academic center with 46 primary care practices from April-December 2019 to April-December 2020. Data were subdivided into calendar quarters and compared to determine evolving disparities throughout the year. We queried and compared billed outpatient encounters in General Internal Medicine and Family Medicine via binary logic mixed effects regression model and estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. We used sex, race, and ethnicity of the patient attending each encounter as fixed effects. We analyzed socioeconomic status of patients in the institution's primary county based on the patient's residence zip code.

RESULTS

A total of 81,822 encounters in the pre-COVID-19 time frame and 47,994 encounters in the intra-COVID-19 time frame were analyzed; in the intra-COVID-19 time frame, a total of 5322 (11.1%) of encounters were telehealth encounters. Patients living in zip code areas with high utilization rate of supplemental nutrition assistance were less likely to use primary care in the intra-COVID-19 time frame (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P=.006). Encounters with the following patients were less likely to be via telehealth compared to in-person office visits: patients who self-identified as Asian (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and Nepali (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.72), patients insured by Medicare (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88), and patients living in zip code areas with high utilization rate of supplemental nutrition assistance (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). Many of these disparities persisted throughout the year. Although there was no statistically significant difference in telehealth use for patients insured by Medicaid throughout the whole year, subanalysis of quarter 4 found encounters with patients insured by Medicaid were less likely to be via telehealth (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth was not used equally by all patients within primary care throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically by patients who self-identified as Asian and Nepali, insured by Medicare, and living in zip code areas with low socioeconomic status. As the COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth infrastructure change, it is critical we continue to reassess the use of telehealth. Institutions should continue to monitor disparities in telehealth access and advocate for policy changes that may improve equity.

Widening Racial Disparities During COVID-19 Telemedicine Transition: A Study of Child Mental Health Services at Two Large Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether racial disparities in access to pediatric mental health care were affected during the COVID-19 telemedicine transition at both The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Boston Children's Hospital (BCH).

METHOD

Electronic health records were queried for all unique outpatient visits from a pre-pandemic period in 2019 and a within-pandemic period in 2020. Changes in the proportion of patients were compared based on insurance status, clinic location, and racial identification. Hypotheses were tested via logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

At CHOP, from 2019 to 2020, the proportion of racially minoritized patients significantly declined within a 1-month period from 62% to 51%, whereas the proportion of White-identifying patients increased from 38% to 49% (β = 0.47; z = 3.60; p =.0003), after controlling for insurance status and clinic location. At BCH, the proportion of racially minoritized patients significantly declined within a longer 6-month period between 2019 and 2020, from 62% to 59%, whereas the proportion of White-identifying patients increased from 38% to 41% (β = 0.13; z = 2.8; p = .006), after controlling for insurance status.

CONCLUSION

At CHOP and BCH, the COVID-19 telemedicine transition exacerbated pre-existing racial disparities in pediatric mental health services. Our findings suggest that racially minoritized patients receiving services in urban areas may be particularly at risk for losing access when telemedicine is implemented. Although there are limitations to this racial dichotomization, examining differences between White and racially minoritized patients can highlight ways in which White-identifying individuals have disproportionately received enhanced access to healthcare resources.

An Assessment of a Socioeconomic Risk Screening Tool for Telemedicine Encounters in Pediatric Primary Care: A Pilot Study

Socioeconomic adversity negatively affects child health. Telemedicine use in pediatrics is rapidly expanding. We piloted a socioeconomic risk screening tool within telemedicine visits. Using chart review, our primary aim was to assess the rates of screen completion, risk identification, and referral generation during telemedicine visits. Our secondary aim was to assess family satisfaction and barriers to connecting with referrals/interventions through follow-up telephone interviews. This study included 179 telemedicine encounters. The screening tool was completed in 63% of encounters and was positive in 5% of encounters. Of those who identified socioeconomic risks, 90% received a referral/intervention (social work consultation, food pantry, etc.). During follow-up calls, families expressed satisfaction with telemedicine, though 31% described difficulty connecting with the recommended services. High rates of socioeconomic risk screening resulting in interventions are achievable during telemedicine visits. Further work is needed to identify optimal socioeconomic risk screening questions and opportunities, and to ensure successful interventions.

Caring for adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care: seizing opportunities to address youth mental health needs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide primary care providers (PCPs) with updated practical guidance around the assessment and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents and young adults (AYA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Of the three different presentations of ADHD delineated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), the Predominantly Inattentive presentation is the most common among AYA. Multiple rating scales exist to assist clinicians in identifying ADHD symptoms and monitoring treatment effects. Importantly, ADHD frequently persists into adulthood with negative impacts in many life domains if left untreated. It is important for PCPs to provide support for AYA as they transition to adulthood, as treatment adherence often drops sharply at that time, and, once treatment is discontinued, it is rarely restarted. Further, clinicians should be aware of the negative psychological, behavioral, and social impacts that COVID-19 has had on AYA with ADHD.

SUMMARY

AYA with ADHD often seek care first from PCPs. However, diagnosis and management of ADHD among AYA are challenging, and many clinicians feel ill-equipped, creating concern that many youth may go undiagnosed and untreated. Despite these long-standing challenges, recent advances have opened up critical opportunities for PCPs to proactively address ADHD in primary care settings and make a profound impact on youth as they seek to realize their full potential.

A COVID-19 primer for primary care clinicians

COVID-19 has challenged primary care clinicians to rapidly learn new information and adapt clinical practice in response to the continuous evolution of prevention, diagnosis, and management measures. The introduction of COVID-19 vaccination for age-eligible children has afforded increased opportunities for disease prevention, and the pandemic has highlighted the need for primary care clinicians to serve as advocates for their young patients and their communities.

Telehealth: A Useful Tool for the Management of Nutrition and Exercise Programs in Pediatric Obesity in the COVID-19 Era

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the implementation of policies that mandate various restrictions on daily life, including social distancing, the closure of public services and schools, and movement limitations. Even though these restrictive measures decreased the COVID-19 spread, they may have detrimental effects on various lifestyle components such as physical inactivity, sedentary behavior, and dietary habits, influencing the maintenance of weight and contributing to obesity among children and adolescents. The coexistence of childhood obesity and COVID-19 and changes in the bioecological environment have put children and adolescents at increased risk for developing obesity and exacerbating the severity of this disorder. The use of telehealth technology is a modern approach useful for the delivery of health care services by health care professionals, where distance is a critical factor. Telehealth is effective in promoting increased self-monitoring and behavioral change, and provides the opportunity to perform online nutritional support and exercise training programs to promote a healthy lifestyle and reduce sedentary behaviors in children and adolescents. Telehealth, including tele-exercise and tele-nutrition, has the potential to address many of the key challenges in providing health services, including in patients with obesity during the COVID-19 outbreak. This narrative review aims to describe the role of telehealth as an opportunity in the management of pediatric obesity in the COVID-19 era, and to deliver nutrition and exercise programs for the maintenance of health.