Systematic inspection of insulin injection sites for local complications related to incorrect injection technique

Skin Involvement in Paediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

Skin involvement is an overlooked aspect in the management of paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. A comprehensive search of published literature using the PubMed database was carried out using the following key terms: "children," "pediatric/paediatric patients," "skin," "skin disorders," "type 1 diabetes." Dermatological side effects are frequently observed among diabetic children and adolescents. Insulin-induced lipodystrophies and allergic contact dermatitis caused by insulin pumps or glycaemic sensors are the most common skin reactions in these patients. Furthermore, several diabetes-associated skin diseases such as necrobiosis lipoidica, granuloma annulare, vitiligo, and bullosis diabeticorum may already be present in paediatric patients. Paediatric diabetes specialists should pay attention to their patients' skin to recognize these disorders, identify the potential causes, and choose the most suitable treatment. Finally, the evaluation of skin concentrations of advanced glycation end-products using non-invasive diagnostic techniques may be used to assess the risk of chronic complications of diabetes as early as adolescence.

Characteristics and morphology of lipohypertrophic lesions in adults with type 1 diabetes with ultrasound screening: an exploratory observational study

INTRODUCTION

Lipohypertrophy is a common complication of exposure to insulin therapy. Despite the prevalence of lipohypertrophy and its potentially hazardous effects on glucose regulation, it remains a relatively understudied problem in diabetes. The objective of this study was to characterize lipohypertrophic tissue using ultrasound in adults with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational study of 74 people with type 1 diabetes from a diabetes center in South East London. Participants' insulin exposed areas were scanned with ultrasound, with a high-frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz). The observed tissue changes were described, measured and graded according to nodule size and thickness of the dermal layer.

RESULTS

Participants mean age and diabetes duration were 40.6 (±14.2) and 18.3 (±10.9) years, respectively, and 60% (n=44) were male. A total of 740 lipohypertrophic nodules were observed, ranging from 1.8 mm to 40 mm in width. The mean (SD/range) number of nodules per participants was 10.4 (±6.2/1-29). Delineation between the dermal layers was disrupted in all current injection sites. In 52 participants (70%), there was a 30% increase in dermal thickness compared with local none injected tissue, and in 36 participants (48%) the increase was 50%. The level of thickness was >3 mm in the abdominal areas of 22 (40%) of these participants and in thighs of eight participants (17.8%). Hypoechogenic areas suggestive of necrotic tissue were observed within the lipohypertrophic nodules of 22 (30%) participants. Needle length and nodule depth were correlated (r=0.69, p<0.001). A conceptual model of the insulin exposed tissue changes observed was constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that insulin-exposed tissue changes are heterogenous and has provided conceptual and grading frameworks for classifying these changes. Further studies are required to establish the clinical implications of these classifications, in relation to glucose regulation and other clinical parameters.

Early detection of cutaneous complications of insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous insulin therapy is associated with important injection site complications, which can influence insulin pharmacokinetics resulting in glycemic fluctuations above and below target levels for blood glucose.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the prevalence and risk factors of cutaneous complications including insulin derived amyloidosis in insulin-injecting diabetes patients and to study the role of ultrasonography (in comparison to gel-assisted palpation) in early diagnosis of lipohypertrophy (LH).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in India, wherein 500 patients injecting insulin for ≥2 years were randomly enrolled and evaluated for the presence of cutaneous complications of insulin therapy through clinical examination, ultrasonography and punch biopsy of skin.

RESULTS

Clinical examination detected LH in 44.6% of patients. Ultrasonography diagnosed additional 13.4% of patients with LH which were missed on clinical examination. Incorrect rotation of sites (P < 0.001) and insulin syringe reusage for more than five times (P < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of LH. Skin biopsy was performed in 100 cases, out of which two patients showed apple green birefringence and its association with insulin was confirmed by positive staining with anti insulin antibody in these two patients.

CONCLUSION

Improper rotation of sites and reuse of needles were the leading causes of LH in Indian diabetic patients. Ultrasonography is more objective and reliable method of detecting LH. Insulin-derived amyloidosis may be a more common complication of insulin therapy than previously thought.

A meta-analysis and meta-regression on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients on insulin therapy

AIMS OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of lipohypertrophy (LH) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients on insulin therapy and identify factors influencing the prevalence rates through a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened from inception to 20th Aug 2020. Data on prevalence was transformed using the logit transformation for pooling the proportions using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. Random-effects meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of the following moderators on the pooled prevalence: male gender, mean age, type of DM, DM duration, duration of insulin therapy, needle re-users, rotation of injection site, HbA_1c, insulin dose, ≥8mm needle users and mean number of injections/day.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included. LH was diagnosed by observation and palpation by all studies. On meta-analysis of data from 26,865 participants, the overall prevalence of LH was found to be 41.8% (95% CI: 35.9% to 47.6%). On region-wise analysis, pooled prevalence of LH in Europe was 44.6% (95% CI: 37.5% to 51.8%) in Africa was 34.8% (95% CI: 16.9% to 52.8%) and in Asia was 41.3% (95% CI: 27.2% to 55.3%). The pooled prevalence of LH in studies only on type 1 and type 2 DM patients was 39.9% (95% CI: 28.3% to 51.6%) and 45.9% (95% CI: 29.5% to 62.4%) respectively. Only insulin duration was found to significantly influence the prevalence of LH on meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the prevalence of LH in DM patients on insulin therapy is estimated to be 41.8%. The longer the duration of insulin therapy, the higher is the prevalence of LH.

Impact of Insulin Injection and Infusion Routines on Lipohypertrophy and Glycemic Control in Children and Adults with Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Proper insulin injection/infusion is essential to optimize insulin absorption and action. Guidelines on insulin injection techniques are available. Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a local complication of insulin therapy, which results in erratic absorption and impaired glycemic control.

METHODS

Children and adults with type 1 diabetes on insulin injection or infusion were enrolled in the study. Subjects were interviewed and filled in a questionnaire on injection/infusion routines. Sites of injection/infusion were examined by trained diabetes educators, and capillary HbA1c was obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine subjects (104 children) with type 1 diabetes were enrolled; 119 were on multiple daily injection (MDI) and 50 on insulin pump therapy. Seventy-two percent and 82% of children and adults, respectively, rotate site at every injection; 78% of pump users change infusion set and 74% rotate site at 2-3 days. Thirty-nine percent and 32% of children and adults had LH. HbA1c was lower in children and adults with no LH (P < 0.001). An association was seen between LH and rotation frequency in children (P = 0.026). LH was the most common skin complication in the MDI group, while nodules, allergy marks and hyperpigmentation were seen in pump users.

CONCLUSION

Proper injection/infusion routines impact glycemic control and skin health. Education and examination of injection sites remain a crucial part of diabetes management.

Why are so huge differences reported in the occurrence rate of skin lipohypertrophy? Does it depend on method defects or on lack of interest?

Lipohypertophy (LH) is the most common skin complication of incorrect injection technique which does not only represent an aesthetic defect but also severely disrupts insulin pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. As a consequence of that, hormone release is delayed and unexplained/unpredictable hypoglycemia occurs, both deteriorating metabolic control while negatively affecting adherence to treatment and quality of life. The economic burden due to unwanted intra-LH injections is accounted for by inappropriately high insulin requirements, increased emergency-related hospitalizations, and loss of work days. Greater attention has to be paid by diabetes care teams to education programs with periodic refreshers to achieve better metabolic control and reduce the economic burden of diabetes.

A Systematic Review of Ultrasound-Detected Lipohypertrophy in Insulin-Exposed People with Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a common complication occurring in diabetes individuals. The most common methods used include palpation, visual examination and/or ultrasound (US). To date, there is limited information on the detection sensitivity among the different techniques used to identify LH. This systematic review aimed to identify studies that examined insulin-related LH using US detection to identify the prevalence, characteristics and morphology of LH, and to compare US and clinical palpation methods for detecting LH.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were systematically searched for studies detecting LH using US in insulin users. Articles were screened for eligibility and included studies were appraised using quality assessment tools. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, and the extracted data was synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were included in the review providing data on 1722 patients. The prevalence of LH prevalence varied from 14.5% to 88% (median 56.6%). Identified risk factors for the development of included insulin injection behaviour such as a lack of injection site rotation and social factors such as low education level. Four studies compared LH detection by US to palpation, providing inconsistent results. One study showed that palpation detected 64% more LH, whilst two studies demonstrated that US identified 50% more sites and extended areas of LH (additional ~ 5 cm²). Another study provided comparable estimates between palpation and US in clinicians trained to detect LH (97%).

CONCLUSION

The evidence highlights a lack of congruence in results pertaining to the detection sensitivity of US and palpation for LH sites. More research with robust study design is needed to verify whether clinically palpation is sufficient to detect LH, or whether US would increase the precision of LH assessment to help address this common clinically significant problem.

Insulin-Related Lipohypertrophy: Lipogenic Action or Tissue Trauma?

Lipohypertrophy has been suggested as an outcome of lipogenic action of insulin and/or injection-related tissue trauma. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the predictors of lipohypertrophy in 372 type 1 diabetes patients (mean age 17.1 years) receiving subcutaneous insulin with pen and/or syringes for ≥3 months. On examining injection sites with inspection and palpation technique, 62.1% patients demonstrated lipohypertrophy. Univariate analysis showed that gender, BMI, HbA1c, injection device, rotation, injection area, needle length, insulin regimen, and total daily dose of insulin were associated with lipohypertrophy (p < 0.05). Notably, the mean needle reuse was comparable in patients with or without lipohypertrophy (8.1 vs. 7.2, p = 0.534). In multivariate logistic regression, gender, HbA1c, TDD, injection devices, and needle length lost its significance. Further, injections over smaller area (≤8.5 × 5.5 cm) and non-rotation of sites were found to be strongest independent predictor of lipohypertrophy (p < 0.0005 for both) with increased odds of 23.2 (95% CI 9.1-59.2) and 6.3 (95% CI 3.4-11.9) times, respectively. Being underweight was also a significant independent predictor (odds ratio [OR] 13.0 [95% CI 2.2-75.2], p = 0.004). Compared to rapid plus long-acting analogs, regular insulin plus long-acting analogs and conventional premixed insulin users had 3.2 (95% CI 1.5-6.8, p = 0.003) and 4.6 (95% CI 1.4-15.7, p = 0.014) fold higher risk of lipohypertrophy (mean injection frequency 4.01 vs. 4.01 vs. 2.09, respectively). Sub-group analysis showed that lipohypertrophy was 79% less likely in patients with multiple daily injections (≥4) than twice-daily regimen (OR 0.21, p < 0.0005). Moreover, lipohypertrophy was reduced to half with bolus doses of rapid-acting insulin analogs than regular insulin (p = 0.003), even though mean injection frequency was comparable (4.01 vs. 3.93, p = 0.229). This difference was statistically insignificant for basal doses with NPH or long-acting analogs (p = 0.069). Therefore, injection area, rotation, BMI, and insulin regimen are the best predictors of lipohypertrophy and together could correctly identify lipohypertrophy status in 84.4% patients with excellent discrimination capability (AUC = 0.906, p < 0.0005). In conclusion, findings of our study suggest that delivering rapidly absorbed insulin analogs over large injection area along with greater split of total daily doses reduce insulin-induced lipogenesis and outplay tissue trauma added through frequent injections and needle reuse.

An Effective Intervention for Diabetic Lipohypertrophy: Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Multicenter Study in France

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is highly prevalent and is potentially harmful to insulin-injecting patients.

METHODS

In this study, we assessed the impact of injection technique (IT) education, including use of a 4-mm pen needle on insulin-treated patients with clinically observed LH in a randomized, controlled, prospective multicenter study in France with follow-up of 6 months. Intensive education and between-visit reinforcement were given to the intervention group. Control patients received similar messages at study outset.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were recruited (age 52.1 ± 15.7 years; men 70.7%; body mass index >30 kg/m²: 34.2%; type 1: 53.7%; years with diabetes mellitus: 18.1 ± 10.5), of which 109 patients were included in the final analysis. The intervention group (n = 53) showed a significant decrease of total daily dose of insulin (average at baseline: 54.1 IU) at 3 months (T-3) and 6 months (T-6), reaching just over 5 IU versus baseline (P = 0.035). Corresponding, although not significant, decreases occurred in controls (n = 56); between-group differences were not significant. There were significant decreases in HbA1c (up to 0.5%) at T-3 and T-6 in both groups, with no significant differences between groups. A significant number of intervention patients improved their IT habits; about half achieved ideal IT habits by T-3 versus a quarter of control patients. By T-6, 2/3 of intervention patients achieved either ideal or acceptable IT habits, while only 1/3 of control patients did.

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention was effective in both study arms, however, to a greater degree and more rapidly in the intervention group. Widespread application of this intervention could be highly cost-effective.

Insulin (Technique) Induced Hypoglycaemia

The most common side effect of insulin therapy is hypoglycaemia apart from weight gain. It occurs commonly due to insulin overdose, faulty injection site, technique and meal-insulin mismatch. In lean individuals even the needle size can be a contributing factor to hypoglycaemia. Here we report a case who presented with recurrent episodes of hypoglycaemia due to a combination of wrong insulin site, technique as well as needle size. On examination, he was found to have spotted dermopathy on his forearms (insulin injection site) which was consistent with intradermal insulin administration. Recently, insulin infusion through intradermal route has been found to reach the systemic circulation faster than even the conventional subcutaneous injection. This case emphasizes that hypoglycaemias can occur due to less common causes. It warrants a good clinical examination and patient education.

Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017

Health-care professionals in India frequently manage injection or infusion therapies in persons with diabetes (PWD). Patients taking insulin should know the importance of proper needle size, correct injection process, complication avoidance, and all other aspects of injection technique from the first visit onward. To assist health-care practitioners in their clinical practice, Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India, has updated the practical advice and made it more comprehensive evidence-based best practice information. Adherence to these updated recommendations, learning, and translating them into clinical practice should lead to effective therapies, improved outcomes, and lower costs for PWD.

Indian Injection Technique Study: Injecting Complications, Education, and the Health Care Professional

INTRODUCTION

Using the Indian and rest of world (ROW) injection technique questionnaire (ITQ) data, we address key insulin injection complications.

METHODS

In 2015 we conducted an ITQ survey throughout India involving 1011 patients. Indian values were compared with those from 41 other countries participating in the ITQ, known here as ROW.

RESULTS

More than a quarter of Indian insulin users described lesions consistent with lipohypertrophy (LH) at their injection sites and approximately 1 in 5 were found to have LH by the examining nurse (using visual inspection and palpation). Just over half of Indian injectors report having pain on injection. Of these, 4 out of 5 report having painful injections only several times a month or year (i.e., not with every injection). Doctors and diabetes educators in India (as opposed to nurses) have a larger role in teaching patients how to inject than they do in ROW. Despite this specialized approach, a very high percentage of patients report that they have not been trained (at least cannot remember being trained) in a wide range of essential injection topics. Only about 30% of Indian injectors get their sites checked at least annually, with nearly a third only having sites checked when they specifically complained and nearly 4 out of 10 never having had their sites checked.

CONCLUSION

Indian HCPs can clearly do a better job covering all the vital topics essential to proper injection habits.

New Insulin Delivery Recommendations

Many primary care professionals manage injection or infusion therapies in patients with diabetes. Few published guidelines have been available to help such professionals and their patients manage these therapies. Herein, we present new, practical, and comprehensive recommendations for diabetes injections and infusions. These recommendations were informed by a large international survey of current practice and were written and vetted by 183 diabetes experts from 54 countries at the Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy: Expert Recommendations (FITTER) workshop held in Rome, Italy, in 2015. Recommendations are organized around the themes of anatomy, physiology, pathology, psychology, and technology. Key among the recommendations are that the shortest needles (currently the 4-mm pen and 6-mm syringe needles) are safe, effective, and less painful and should be the first-line choice in all patient categories; intramuscular injections should be avoided, especially with long-acting insulins, because severe hypoglycemia may result; lipohypertrophy is a frequent complication of therapy that distorts insulin absorption, and, therefore, injections and infusions should not be given into these lesions and correct site rotation will help prevent them; effective long-term therapy with insulin is critically dependent on addressing psychological hurdles upstream, even before insulin has been started; inappropriate disposal of used sharps poses a risk of infection with blood-borne pathogens; and mitigation is possible with proper training, effective disposal strategies, and the use of safety devices. Adherence to these new recommendations should lead to more effective therapies, improved outcomes, and lower costs for patients with diabetes.

Insulin Injection Into Lipohypertrophic Tissue: Blunted and More Variable Insulin Absorption and Action and Impaired Postprandial Glucose Control

OBJECTIVE

Lipohypertrophy (LHT) is common in insulin-treated patients but its exact impact on insulin absorption and action is unclear.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this crossover study, 13 patients with type 1 diabetes received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.15 units/kg insulin lispro into LHT (confirmed by examination and ultrasound) and normal adipose tissue (NAT). On one day, a euglycemic clamp was performed with two injections each into LHT and NAT, and on another day one injection per region was given before a standardized mixed meal (75 g carbohydrates), all in randomized order.

RESULTS

Compared with NAT, LHT reduced insulin absorption (mean area under the insulin concentration curve [AUCINS0-4h] 131 vs. 165 h * mU/L [LHT vs. NAT]; Cmax 61 vs. 79 mU/L, P < 0.02, respectively) and effect (areas under glucose infusion rate [GIR] curves [AUCGIR0-4h 625 vs. 775 mg/kg, P < 0.05]) but increased intrasubject variability ([coefficient of variation] AUCINS0-4h 52 vs. 11%, Cmax 55 vs. 15%, AUCGIR0-4h 57 vs. 23%, all P < 0.01). Postprandial blood glucose (BG) concentrations were ≥26% higher with LHT (AUCBG0-5h 731 vs. 513 mg * h/dL, BGmax 199 vs. 157 mg/dL, 2-h BG 150 vs. 104 mg/dL, 5-h BG 145 vs. 81 mg/dL, all P < 0.05) and maximum concentrations occurred later. Hypoglycemia (BG ≤50 mg/dL) occurred numerically less frequently with LHT injection (two vs. six patients), whereas profound hyperglycemia (BG ≥300 mg/dL) only occurred with LHT injection (two patients). Tmax-INS did not differ between LHT and NAT in either study.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin absorption and action are blunted and considerably more variable with LHT injection, leading to profound deterioration in postprandial glucose control.

Lipodystrophy in Insulin-Treated Subjects and Other Injection-Site Skin Reactions: Are We Sure Everything is Clear?

Physicians and patients have long been aware of skin lesions at the sites of insulin injections, referred to as lipodystrophy that can present as lipoatrophy (LA) or lipohypertrophy (LH). However, the reported prevalence of these different skin lesions varies widely, emphasizing the need for a correct identification method. In this short review we discuss LA and LH and also take into account other skin lesions, such as bruising, as well as different needle injuries, including those associated with the subcutaneous injection of pegvisomant (a drug aimed at counteracting the high levels of growth hormone associated with acromegaly), long-acting exenatide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist), and anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha biologic agents (used against Crohn's disease). In these latter cases specific studies are warranted to understand the pathophysiological background and possible prevention. However, the most common lesion is still insulin injection site-related LD, so a strong effort has to be made to avoid the confusion generated by previously misleading classifications which were barely able to reliably distinguish between LA and LH.

Improvement of Insulin Injection Technique: Examination of Current Issues and Recommendations

PURPOSE

Correct insulin injection technique is a crucial aspect of diabetes management. The purpose of this article is (1) to outline the medical literature, including patient-based studies and surveys, surrounding the type of issues and problems that patients encounter with injectable insulin therapy and the degree to which correct insulin technique is being applied and (2) to review the latest recommendations for insulin injection technique and discuss the key aspects that diabetes educators and other health care professionals should be communicating to their patients to ensure that injection technique is optimized.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of the literature and multiple patient surveys demonstrates that patients continue to have many issues with insulin injection technique, highlighting the pressing need for effective patient education. In addition, many patients are not using insulin pen devices correctly. Widespread lack of injection site rotation and reuse of needles have resulted in high rates of lipohypertrophy. Lipohypertrophy has in turn been associated with significantly increased levels of unexplained hypoglycemia and glycemic variability and significantly increased insulin costs. By providing clear, evidence-based consensus recommendations, initiatives such as the Forum for Injection Technique are helping to address these issues but will be successful only if concerted efforts in patient education and reeducation are made to ensure that these recommendations are implemented consistently. This should involve all stakeholders in insulin therapy-particularly diabetes educators, who are at the forefront of patient education.

A suitable palpation technique allows to identify skin lipohypertrophic lesions in insulin-treated people with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a major complication of subcutaneous insulin treatment brought about by multiple overlapping injections and/or needle reuse. It is responsible for unacceptable glucose oscillations due to a high rate of hypoglycaemic episodes and rebound glucose spikes. Skin ultrasound scans (USS), the gold standard for its detection, is too expensive for screening purposes.

AIMS

To define a structured method allowing health professionals (HPs) to identify LH lesions as inexpensively and correctly as possible.

METHODS

Out of 129 insulin-treated people with diabetes identified by USS as having LH lesions, only 40 agreed to participate in the study (24 females, age 54 ± 15 years, daily insulin dosage 57 ± 12 IU). Each was blindly examined by four well trained and four non-trained HPs according to a standard method involving repeated well codified maneuvers.

RESULTS

A specific training allowed inexperienced HPs to acquire high diagnostic accuracy in identifying LH lesions independent of site, size, shape, and even BMI. This kind of training also allowed to reach a 97 % consistency rate among HPs as compared to USS, while the lack of training was associated with a wide variability and inconsistency of identification results.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes teams should follow systematically the simple procedure reported in this paper for the diagnosis of LH and try to get it further implemented and progressively refined in large scale studies. This would have a major impact on patient education in terms of (1) correct injection technique and (2) ability to identify lesions early enough to prevent poor metabolic outcome.

Prevalence of lipohypertrophy and associated risk factors in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Secondary failure of oral hypoglycemic agents is common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); thus, patients often need insulin therapy. The most common complication of insulin treatment is lipohypertrophy (LH).

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of LH among insulin-treated patients with Patients with T2DM, to identify the risk factors for the development of LH, and to examine the association between LH and glycemic control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1090 patients with T2DM aged 20 to 89 years, who attended the diabetes clinics at the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Genetics (NCDEG, Amman, Jordan) between October 2011 and January 2012, were enrolled. The presence of LH was examined by inspection and palpation of insulin injection sites at the time of the visit as relevant clinical and laboratory data were obtained. The LH was defined as a local tumor-like swelling of subcutaneous fatty tissue at the site of repeated insulin injections.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LH was 37.3% (27.4% grade 1, 9.7% grade 2, and 0.2% grade 3). The LH was significantly associated with the duration of diabetes, needle length, duration of insulin therapy, lack of systematic rotation of insulin injection sites, and poor glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

The LH is a common problem in insulin-treated Jordanian patients with T2DM. More efforts are needed to educate patients and health workers on simple interventions such as using shorter needles and frequent rotation of the insulin injection sites to avoid LH and improve glycemic control.

Epidemiology, complications and management of diabetes in Ethiopia: a systematic review

Non-communicable diseases are becoming major problems of public health importance in most developing countries as a result of the effects of globalization and epidemiologic transition; however, there is little evidence regarding diabetes and other non-communicable diseases in these countries. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the magnitude of diabetes, the relationship between malnutrition and diabetes, diabetic complications, and the management of diabetes in Ethiopia. Relevant studies and other evidence were identified by searches in the Embase from 1970 to December 2011 and by reviewing the reference lists from retrieved articles. Relevant articles from non-indexed local journals were also included. Data were extracted and summarized using the major themes of the systematic review. Although the prevalence of diabetes in Ethiopia is estimated to be 2% nationally, evidence suggests that it prevalence could be >5% in those older than 40 years of age in some settings. Studies in the 1980s and 1990s have reported conflicting evidence regarding malnutrition-related diabetes; however, more recent studies are reconfirming a strong association between malnutrition and diabetes. There is remarkable prevalence of both acute and chronic complications in diabetic cases in Ethiopia. In addition to this, more than one-third, but only less than half, of diabetic patients in Ethiopia receive standard diabetes care. The results of this study indicate that, in response to the emergence of diabetes and other non-communicable diseases, effective and efficient prevention and control strategies should be designed and implemented in Ethiopia.

Insulin administration: selecting the appropriate needle and individualizing the injection technique

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes who receive insulin therapy often fail to meet their targets for metabolic control with insulin injections. Their inadequate glycemic control may be related to incorrect injection procedure.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the latest data related to insulin injection and needle characteristics, which play an integral role in patient satisfaction. Searches of Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were conducted. Results show that optimal insulin injection can facilitate glycemic control in pediatric and adult patients. In general, needles shorter than 8 mm are appropriate for normal weight, obese pediatric and adult patients. However, body mass index, gender, race, age and injection site can influence the depth of subcutaneous tissue and thus, the desired needle size and injection technique. Although the abdomen, thighs and buttocks are all recommended injection sites, abdominal injections disperse insulin slightly more rapidly than thigh injections.

EXPERT OPINION

Wider acceptance of needles shorter than 6 mm will occur with more evidence of their safety and efficacy, particularly in children. Development of shorter and thinner needles to make injections even easier and less burdensome may be expected in the future.

New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes

AIM

Injections administered by patients are one of the mainstays of diabetes management. Proper injection technique is vital to avoiding intramuscular injections, ensuring appropriate delivery to the subcutaneous tissues and avoiding common complications such as lipohypertrophy. Yet few formal guidelines have been published summarizing all that is known about best practice. We propose new injection guidelines which are thoroughly evidence-based, written and vetted by a large group of international injection experts.

METHODS

A systematic literature study was conducted for all peer-reviewed studies and publications which bear on injections in diabetes. An international group of experts met regularly over a two-year period to review this literature and draft the recommendations. These were then presented for review and revision to 127 experts from 27 countries at the TITAN workshop in September, 2009.

RESULTS

Of 292 articles reviewed, 157 were found to meet the criteria of relevance to the recommendations. Each recommendation was graded by the weight it should have in daily practice and by its degree of support in the medical literature. The topics covered include The Role of the Professional, Psychological Challenges, Education, Site Care, Storage, Suspension and Priming, Injecting Process, Proper Use of Pens and Syringes, Insulin analogues, Human and Pre-mixed Insulins, GLP-1 analogs, Needle Length, Skin Folds, Lipohypertrophy, Rotation, Bleeding and Bruising, Pregnancy, Safety and Disposal.

CONCLUSION

These injecting recommendations provide practical guidance and fill an important gap in diabetes management. If followed, they should help ensure comfortable, effective and largely complication-free injections.

Results and analysis of the 2008-2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of injection therapy in diabetes depends on correct injection technique and, to provide patients with guidance in this area, we must understand how they currently inject.

METHODS

From September 2008 to June 2009, 4352 insulin-injecting Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients from 171 centers in 16 countries were surveyed regarding their injection practices.

RESULTS

Overall, 3.6% of patients use the 12.7-mm needle, 1.8% use the 12-mm needle, 1.6% use the 10-mm needle, 48.6% use the 8-mm needle, 15.8% use the 6-mm needle, and 21.6% use the 5-mm needle; 7% of patients do not know what length of needle they use. Twenty-one percent of patients admitted injecting into the same site for an entire day, or even a few days, a practice associated with lipohypertrophy. Approximately 50% of patients have or have had symptoms suggestive of lipohypertrophy. Abdominal lipohypertrophy seems to be more frequent in those using the two smaller injection size areas, and less frequent in those using larger areas. Nearly 3% of patients reported always injecting into lipohypertrophic lesions and 26% inject into them sometimes. Of the 65% of patients using cloudy insulins (e.g. NPH), 35% do not remix it before use.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear from the latest survey that we have improved in certain areas, but that, in others, we have either not moved at all or our efforts have not yielded the results we expected. The results of the present survey are available online on a country-by-country and question-by-question basis at http://www.titan-workshop.org.

Performing Subcutaneous Injections: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Persons using daily subcutaneous injections to administer medicine perform them in different ways and thereby increase the risk of skin complications related to the injection. It is often part of nurses' role to administer medicine and educate the patient in injection technique. Course literature in nursing education, commercial patient education pamphlets, and instructional leaflets do not give consistent advice regarding subcutaneous injection technique.

AIM

The aim of this review was to identify the scientific foundation for the technical performance of subcutaneous injections. The question to be answered was: How should a subcutaneous injection be administered to achieve the right dose in the right place with minimum complications?

METHOD

The review included a search in three databases, a screening process at abstract level, followed by a quality assessment of included articles. The quality assessment was done independently by two people and followed specific protocols.

RESULT

A total of 38 articles were assessed for quality and covered information on dose, location, and complications of subcutaneous injection. The assessed studies are heterogeneous in design and describe different aspects of the subcutaneous injection technique. Therefore, the scientific foundation for technical performance is weak. However, several studies indicate that the amount of subcutaneous fat and appropriate needle length are of high importance for the drug to reach the target tissue.

CONCLUSION

More research regarding effective subcutaneous injection technique needs to be done.

Efficacy and safety performance of the Innovo insulin doser

Innovo (Novo Nordisk A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) is a new insulin injection system that offers built-in memory and a large, clear display to provide patients with more control during insulin injections. The aim of this trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of Innovo and NovoPen 3 (Novo Nordisk A/S) in patients experienced in using insulin injection devices. Participants included 217 adults who had used NovoPen 3 or other durable pen systems for at least 6 months. This multinational, multicenter, open, randomized crossover trial comprised two treatment periods of equal duration (6 or 12 weeks). Efficacy was determined using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose concentrations, and safety parameters were the frequency and severity of hypoglycemic events. Daily insulin dose was also recorded. The effect of device type on change in HbA1c was not significant. The adjusted treatment differences between Innovo and NovoPen 3 were 0.088% [confidence interval (CI), -0.031 to 0.208%] and 0.005% (CI, -0.086 to 0.096%) for the German and Dutch/Austrian sites, respectively. Blood glucose profiles were not affected significantly by device type. Treatment differences were 0.04 mmol/L (CI, -0.57 to 0.48 mmol/L) and 0.21 mmol/L (CI, -0.13 to 0.55 mmol/L) for the German and Dutch/Austrian sites, respectively. Innovo and NovoPen 3 did not differ with regard to safety: There were no differences in numbers of various types of adverse events, or in percentage of patients experiencing one or more hypoglycemic event. This study demonstrates that the Innovo insulin doser is as safe and efficacious as NovoPen 3.

Breakage of insulin syringe needle in subcutaneous tissue

We report the case of a young girl with diabetes mellitus whose insulin syringe needle broke and became embedded in subcutaneous tissue.

Impaired absorption and omission of insulin: a novel method of detection using the diabetes advisory system computer model

The Diabetes Advisory System (DIAS) is a decision-support program developed to assist insulin dose adjustment in type 1 diabetes. In this paper, we show how it might be used to identify impaired absorption or omission of insulin in patients with poorly controlled blood glucose. An evaluation of glucose results from four outpatients with persistent hyperglycemia is presented (age 19-48 years with type 1 diabetes for 13-18 years of duration, HbA1c 9.4-13.6%). Each had completed a 4-day record of blood glucose (BG, pre-meal and bedtime), dietary (carbohydrate) intake, and insulin doses (with injection sites). From these data, DIAS modeled a glucose profile (simulated glucose, SG) for the same period. Qualitative assessments were made of differences between BG and SG, and selective reduction or complete removal of insulin doses where BG >> SG. Large improvements in modeling were attributed to either impaired absorption or omission of insulin. Confirmation of these problems was sought from the patients by detailed consultation and physical examination. Impaired insulin absorption was suspected in two patients, both having significant injection site abnormalities. Insulin omission was suspected in the other two subjects. Both had normal injection sites, and one admitted to missing doses. Following retraining, data from three patients showed noticeable improvements in overall modeling as well as glucose control. Using DIAS in the evaluation of patients with type 1 diabetes may highlight previously unrecognized injection site abnormalities or insulin dose omission. This could assist rational optimization of insulin therapy in cases of persistently poor glucose control.

Role Of Injection Technique In Use Of Insulin Pens: Prospective Evaluation Of A 31-Gauge, 8-Mm Insulin Pen Needle

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness, comfort, and ease of use of insulin pen injections with a 31-gauge, 8-mm needle.

METHODS

In 50 study subjects (24 patients with type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes and 26 insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes), we assessed the delivery of insulin, residual insulin leakage, glycemic control, plunger depression pressure, and perceived pain associated with the B-D 31-gauge, 8-mm pen needles in comparison with the B-D conventional 30-gauge, 8-mm pen needles, while the patient used their own insulin pens (Novo or B-D). The study subjects injected their usual dose of regular and NPH insulin using the 30-gauge, 8-mm needle during the first 3 weeks of the study. This period was followed by two 3-week crossover segments of the study with either needle assigned in random sequence.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were noted in glycemic control or perceived pain of injection between the two needles. The interaction between the two needles and the two insulin pen brands on glycemic control was not statistically significant. Plunger depression pressure increased with the increase in the gauge of the needle and with increases in size of dose of injected insulin (P<0.01). B-D pen users reported lower plunger pressure ratings in comparison with Novo pen users (P<0.01), regardless of the needle type and dose range. Both the insulin pen type and the needle type individually had statistically significant (P<0.01) effects on the residual insulin leakage from the needle tip after injection; however, their interaction was not statistically significant. Insulin doses greater than 30 units were associated with increased leakage (P<0.01). As needle retention time decreased, residual insulin leakage from the needle tip after injection increased (P<0.01), regardless of the needle used.

CONCLUSION

The 31-gauge insulin pen needles are safe and effective for the delivery of insulin. With both 30-gauge and 31-gauge needles, attention to injection technique is essential to ensure complete delivery of insulin, particularly with administration of large doses.