Pharmacokinetics of an Oral Drug (Acetaminophen) Administered at Various Times in Relation to Subcutaneous Injection of Exenatide (Exendin-4) in Healthy Subjects

Drug-Drug Interactions Between Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Oral Medications: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) are used in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. Their slowing effect of gastric emptying might change oral drug absorption, potentially affecting pharmacokinetics, particularly in the case of medications with a narrow therapeutic index.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize data on drug-drug interactions between GLP1RAs and oral drugs.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to November, 1st 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected pharmacokinetic studies of any injectable GLP1RA given with an oral medication, and product prescribing sheets reporting data without access to the original study.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted the data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-two reports and six prescribing sheets were included. Treatment with GLP1RAs resulted in unaffected or reduced Cmax and delayed tmax of drugs with high solubility and permeability (warfarin, contraceptive pills, acetaminophen), drugs with high solubility and low permeability (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors), drugs with low solubility and high permeability (statins) and drugs with low solubility and permeability (digoxin). However, the use of GLP1RAs did not exert clinically significant changes in the AUC or differences in clinically relevant endpoints.

LIMITATIONS

The major limitations of the studies that are included in this systematic review are the enrollment of healthy subjects and insufficient data in conditions that might affect pharmacokinetics (e.g., kidney dysfunction).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, reduced Cmax and delayed tmax of drugs co-administered with GLP1RAs are consistent with the known delayed gastric output by the latter. Nevertheless, the overall drug exposure was not considered clinically significant. Dose adjustments are probably not required for simultaneous use of GLP1RAs with oral medications. Still, results should be carefully generalized to cases of background kidney dysfunction or when using drugs with narrow therapeutic index. The study is registered in PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022332339 .

Effect of Stabilizers on Encapsulation Efficiency and Release Behavior of Exenatide-Loaded PLGA Microsphere Prepared by the W/O/W Solvent Evaporation Method

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of various stabilizers on the encapsulation efficiency and release of exenatide-loaded PLGA (poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)) microspheres prepared by the water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) solvent evaporation (SE) method. It was shown that the stabilizers affected exenatide stability in aqueous solutions, at water/dichloromethane interfaces, on PLGA surfaces, or during freeze-thawing and freeze-drying procedures. Sucrose predominantly reduces instability generated during freeze-thawing and freeze-drying. Phenylalanine prevents the destabilization at the water-dichloromethane (DCM) interface through decreased adsorption. Poloxamer 188 enhances stability in aqueous solutions and prevents adsorption to PLGA. Proline and lysine decrease adsorption on PLGA surfaces. Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR) was used to find the molecular interaction of additives with exenatide or PLGA. Additives used in stability assessments were then added stepwise into the inner or outer water phase of the W/O/W double emulsion, and exenatide-loaded microspheres were prepared using the solvent evaporation method. The effect of each stabilizer on the encapsulation efficiency and release behavior of microspheres correlated well with the stability assessment results, except for the negative effect of poloxamer 188. Particle size analysis using laser diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), water vapor sorption analysis, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy were also employed to characterize the prepared exenatide-loaded PLGA microsphere. This study demonstrated that an adequate formulation can be obtained by the study about the effect of stabilizers on peptide stability at the preformulation step. In addition, it can help to overcome various problems that can cause the destabilization of a peptide during the microsphere-manufacturing process and sustained drug release.

Suppression Failure of Cortisol Secretion by Dexamethasone May Occur in Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist-treated Patients with Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy

Two diabetic women (case 1, 75 years old; case 2, 49 years old) being treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) showed no suppression of cortisol secretion on a dexamethasone suppression test (DST). However, its secretion was suppressed after switching from GLP-1 RAs to insulin. We also checked the cortisol secretion by a DST in five consecutive inpatients (case 3-7) being treated with GLP-1 RAs. The coefficients of R-R interval variation at rest and during deep breathing were lower in the two false-positive cases (case 1 and 2) than in the five true-negative cases (case 3-6). GLP-1 RAs can be switched to insulin in order to eliminate the slow absorption effect of dexamethasone by GLP-1 RAs if a DST is planned in diabetic patients receiving GLP-1 RAs.

A Model of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and its Effect on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Measurements

Some of commercial continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, i.e., minimally-invasive sensors able to measure almost continuously glucose concentration in the subcutaneous tissue, recently received the regulatory approval to be used for making therapeutic decisions in diabetes management. A fundamental requirement for its safe and effective use is represented by the accuracy of CGM measurements. However, despite recent advances in sensors accuracy and reliability, CGM still suffers from inaccuracy problems in presence of pharmacologic interferences, e.g., the common orally administered acetaminophen (APAP), which artificially raises CGM glucose readings for several hours. A model of the artifact induced by APAP on CGM measurements would be useful to design algorithms to compensate such a distortion. The aim of this work is to exploit the data published by previous literature studies to design a model of oral APAP pharmacokinetics and its effect on glucose concentration measured by CGM sensors. Specifically, the developed model was identified on average data of both plasma APAP concentration and the APAP effect on CGM profiles after an oral administration of 1000 mg of APAP. The APAP effect on CGM readings was estimated from the difference observed, in the same study, between the glucose profile measured by a Dexcom G4 Platinum sensor and the plasma glucose concentration. The model was validated by comparing the simulated effect of mealtime APAP administration in CGM measurements of 100 virtual subjects generated by the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes (TID) Simulator vs. the effect observed in a clinical study by Maahs et al. (Diabetes Care, 2015) in 40 TID subjects taking APAP at breakfast. Results suggest that the proposed model is able to reliably describe the mean APAP effect on CGM measurements.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of exenatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor analogs are a group of therapeutic agents which mimic endogenous GLP-1, exerting their effect by the stimulation of the GLP-1 receptor with a wide distribution. Its activation increases insulin releasing dependent on blood glucose levels, suppression of glucagon secretion and a reduction of hepatic glucose output. It delays gastric emptying and increases satiety. Exenatide is the synthetic version of exendin-4, a natural peptide with similar properties to human GLP-1. There are two pharmaceutical forms, for subcutaneous injection: twice daily and once weekly. Clinical practice guidelines recommend them because of a high efficacy reducing hyperglycemia, low risk of hypoglycemia and a significative weight loss effect. Gastrointestinal adverse events are the most common beside injection site-related. Their cost is the main limitation to use. Areas covered: We review the recent literature investigating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and efficacy-safety studies of exenatide twice daily and once weekly in type 2 diabetes Expert opinion: GLP-1 receptor analogs are now positioned as an effective and safe drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Exenatide significally reduces HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose. Additionally, it produces moderate weight loss and decreases blood pressure. One weekly formulation may improve compliance while cost is still a limitation. EXSCEL trial has shown that, despite cardiovascular safety, exenatide do not exhibits cardiovascular benefits.

Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Liraglutide is an acylated glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue with 97 % amino acid homology with native glucagon-like peptide-1 and greatly protracted action. It is widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and administered by subcutaneous injection once daily. The pharmacokinetic properties of liraglutide enable 24-h exposure coverage, a requirement for 24-h glycaemic control with once-daily dosing. The mechanism of protraction relates to slowed release from the injection site, and a reduced elimination rate owing to metabolic stabilisation and reduced renal filtration. Drug exposure is largely independent of injection site, as well as age, race and ethnicity. Increasing body weight and male sex are associated with reduced concentrations, but there is substantial overlap between subgroups; therefore, dose escalation should be based on individual treatment outcome. Exposure is reduced with mild, moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment. There are no clinically relevant changes in overall concentrations of various drugs (e.g. paracetamol, atorvastatin, griseofulvin, digoxin, lisinopril and oral combination contraceptives) when co-administered with liraglutide. Pharmacodynamic studies show multiple beneficial actions with liraglutide, including improved fasting and postprandial glycaemic control (mediated by increased insulin and reduced glucagon levels and minor delays in gastric emptying), reduced appetite and energy intake, and effects on postprandial lipid profiles. The counter-regulatory hormone response to hypoglycaemia is largely unaltered. The effects of liraglutide on insulin and glucagon secretion are glucose dependent, and hence the risk of hypoglycaemia is low. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of liraglutide make it an important treatment option for many patients with type 2 diabetes.

Update in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

There are now more than 20 million people in America with diabetes mellitus (DM), and the prevalence of this illness continues to increase especially in those with type 2 DM. Over the past decade, research in the area of DM treatment has focused on pharmacologic approaches to modifying glucose metabolism as well as on lifestyle interventions to prevent and manage DM. Pharmacologic research has been guided by an improved understanding of the human physiology of glucose metabolism, allowing for development of new hormonal drug therapies and improved insulin formulations. As a result, there are several new pharmacologic treatments now available or on the horizon for DM. In this article, the authors review the first of the new hormonal therapies for DM, with a focus on information that will be useful for diabetes educators including the medication actions, side effects, patient counseling points, monitoring, and place in therapy in comparison to existing DM treatments. This series on new therapies has been divided into 3 parts, with this first part devoted to an update on the new incretin mimetic and amylin analog agents recently approved for use in DM. Subsequent parts in this series will focus on the new insulin products and oral therapies available or soon to be available. Cases will be used to assist with understanding the type of patient who will benefit from each of these new therapies.

Formulary Forum: Exenatide: A New Option for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Objective:

To evaluate available literature characterizing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, efficacy, and safety of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Data Sources:

A PubMed database search (1966–May 2006) was conducted, using exenatide as the search term. The manufacturer's prescribing information was also used.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

English-language articles were selected and data were extracted with a focus on clinical outcomes associated with the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Data Synthesis:

Exenatide exerts a glucoregulatory effect by various mechanisms including secretion of glucose-dependent insulin, suppression of inappropriately high glucagon levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, delayed gastric emptying, and reduction of food intake. In placebo-controlled clinical studies, plasma exenatide concentrations appeared to exhibit dose-proportional kinetics, reaching peak plasma levels between 2 and 3 hours after a single subcutaneous injection. Exenatide's elimination half-life ranged from 3.3 to 4.0 hours, and the time to reach maximum concentration was about 2 hours. Interactions between exenatide and agents such as digoxin and lisinopril were not considered significant. In Phase III trials, exenatide demonstrated significant reduction of hemoglobin A1c levels from baseline and compared with placebo after 30 weeks of treatment in patients unable to achieve optimal glycemic control with metformin, a sulfonylurea, or oral combination therapy (0.4–0.9%). Patients' weight decreased with exenatide (0.9–2.8 kg), but adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events were common. Exenatide combined with thiazolidonediones, D-phenylalanine derivatives, meglitinides, or alpha glucosidase inhibitors has not been studied.

Conclusions:

Clinical trials have demonstrated that exenatide improves glycemic control when added to sulfonylureas and metformin, and it may be an alternative to insulin glargine in patients requiring additional therapy. Hypoglycemia has been encountered in clinical trials of exenatide, especially upon initiation of therapy with sulfonylureas (not with metformin); close patient monitoring is therefore recommended. Further studies should assess the impact of exenatide on clinical outcomes such as micro- and macrovascular disease.

Non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs: An update on pharmacological interactions

Nowadays, the goal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains personalized control of glucose. Since less than 50% of patients with T2DM achieve glycemic treatment goal and most of them take medications for comorbidities associated to T2DM, drug interactions, namely pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, may enhance or reduce the effect of compounds involved in hyperglycemia. Hence, clinicians should be aware of the severe complications in T2DM patients in case of a concomitant use of these medications. It is within this context that this review aims to evaluate the effect of a second drug on the pharmacokinetic of these compounds which may lead, along with several pharmacodynamic interactions, to severe clinical complications, i.e., hypoglycemia. Available drugs already approved in Europe, USA and Japan have been included.

Incretin-like effects of small molecule trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonists

Objective

Type 2 diabetes and obesity are emerging pandemics in the 21st century creating worldwide urgency for the development of novel and safe therapies. We investigated trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel target contributing to the control of glucose homeostasis and body weight.

Methods

We investigated the peripheral human tissue distribution of TAAR1 by immunohistochemistry and tested the effect of a small molecule TAAR1 agonist on insulin secretion in vitro using INS1E cells and human islets and on glucose tolerance in C57Bl6, and db/db mice. Body weight effects were investigated in obese DIO mice.

Results

TAAR1 activation by a selective small molecule agonist increased glucose-dependent insulin secretion in INS1E cells and human islets and elevated plasma PYY and GLP-1 levels in mice. In diabetic db/db mice, the TAAR1 agonist normalized glucose excursion during an oral glucose tolerance test. Sub-chronic treatment of diet-induced obese (DIO) mice with the TAAR1 agonist resulted in reduced food intake and body weight. Furthermore insulin sensitivity was improved and plasma triglyceride levels and liver triglyceride content were lower than in controls.

Conclusions

We have identified TAAR1 as a novel integrator of metabolic control, which acts on gastrointestinal and pancreatic islet hormone secretion. Thus TAAR1 qualifies as a novel and promising target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity.

•

TAAR1 is a novel key player in metabolic control.

•

TAAR1 is expressed in β-cells and intestinal enteroendocrine cells in mice and humans.

•

TAAR1 agonist improved glucose tolerance and reduced body weight in mouse disease models.

Lixisenatide reduces postprandial hyperglycaemia via gastrostatic and insulinotropic effects

BACKGROUND

Lixisenatide is a once-daily, prandial, short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Its main antidiabetic effect is to delay gastric emptying to control postprandial plasma glucose excursions. The dose-response relationship of the integrated insulinotropic and gastrostatic response to lixisenatide in healthy volunteers after a standardized liquid meal was investigated.

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects received acetaminophen 1000 mg with a standardized liquid meal 60 min after a single subcutaneous injection of placebo or lixisenatide 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 µg in randomized order separated by a 2- to 7-day washout. Acetaminophen pharmacokinetics served as a surrogate to assess rate of gastric emptying. Postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and glucagon were assessed for 5 h after the meal test, and lixisenatide pharmacokinetics were determined for 6 h.

RESULTS

After lixisenatide administration and prior to the standardized meal, insulin and C-peptide transiently increased, while fasting plasma glucose decreased in a dose-dependent manner. After the meal, postprandial plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide were dose proportionally reduced with lixisenatide versus placebo for up to 6 h. Compared with placebo, glucagon levels were transiently lower after any lixisenatide dose, with more sustained reductions after the meal and no apparent dose-related trends. Acetaminophen absorption was significantly reduced and delayed compared with placebo for lixisenatide doses ≥5 µg and demonstrated dose-dependent slowing of gastric emptying. Lixisenatide displayed near dose-proportional exposure, with gastrointestinal events increasing with dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Lixisenatide reduced fasting plasma glucose via stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin release and controlled postprandial plasma glucose by delaying gastric emptying, demonstrating it to be a valuable option for overall glycaemic control.

Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an update on drug-drug interactions

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing rapidly, as are the associated co-morbidities. Consequently, it has become necessary for a diabetic patient to take multiple medications at the same time to delay progression of the disease. This can put patients at an increased risk of moderate to severe drug interactions, which may threaten patients' life or may deteriorate the quality of their life. Hence, managing drug-drug interactions is the cornerstone of anti-diabetic therapy. Most of the clinically important drug-drug interactions of anti-diabetic agents are related to their metabolic pathways, but drugs that compete for renal excretion or impair renal status can also play an important role. In this review, we have examined the clinical implications and underlying mechanisms of drugs that are likely to alter the pharmacologic response of or cause adverse events with antidiabetic drugs, and we have outlined safe and efficacious treatment modalities.

Exenatide twice daily: a review of its use in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Exenatide, administered subcutaneously twice daily (Byetta(®)), is a synthetic version of the natural peptide exendin-4, which is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (incretin mimetic). Exenatide binds to the GLP-1 receptor with the same affinity as GLP-1, but has a much longer half-life, since it is not degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4. Exenatide twice daily enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppresses inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion, slows gastric emptying and reduces caloric intake. In well-designed clinical trials, adjunctive subcutaneous exenatide 5 or 10 μg twice daily for 16-52 weeks significantly and dose-dependently improved glycaemic control and reduced mean body weight compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) and/or basal insulin. The improvements in glycaemic control and reductions in body weight were stably maintained during long-term therapy (up to 3.5 years). The efficacy of adjunctive exenatide twice daily was generally similar to that of basal, prandial or biphasic insulin, sulfonylureas, rosiglitazone and lixisenatide, and less than that of liraglutide, taspoglutide or exenatide once weekly with respect to reductions in glycated haemoglobin. Exenatide twice daily was generally well tolerated; mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, which decreased with time on therapy, were the most common adverse events. In patients not receiving concomitant sulfonylureas or insulin, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was low; when it did occur, it was generally mild in severity. Thus, adjunctive exenatide twice daily is a valuable option in the treatment of type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with OADs and/or basal insulin.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between pradigastat and acetaminophen in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen, a gastric emptying marker.

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy subjects were enrolled and received 1000 mg acetaminophen with meal in period 1, pradigastat (100 mg × 3 days followed by 40 mg × 7 days, 1 h before meal) in period 2, and 1000 mg acetaminophen at -2, -1, 0, +1, and +3 h with respect to meal timing in presence of steady-state pradigastat (40-mg maintenance dose) during periods 3-7.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval of Cmax and AUC of acetaminophen were within 80-125% suggesting that the rate ad extent of acetaminophen were not affected when given at various time points with respect to pradigastat/meal timing. The acetaminophen Tmax was also not impacted under all treatment conditions but increased from 0.75 to 2.00 h when administered 1 h after food.

CONCLUSION

In the presence of steady-state pradigastat, the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen is unchanged, when given before, with, or 3 h after a meal. However, when given 1 h after a meal, the Tmax of acetaminophen was delayed by ∼1.25 h without affecting Cmax or AUC.

GSK2374697, a novel albumin-binding domain antibody (AlbudAb), extends systemic exposure of exendin-4: first study in humans--PK/PD and safety

GSK2374697 is a genetically engineered fusion protein of a human domain antibody to exendin-4. This molecule binds with a high affinity to human serum albumin, creating a long-duration glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. This study is the first evaluation of the albumin-binding domain antibody (AlbudAb) drug delivery platform in humans. The aim of this randomized clinical study was to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of GSK2374697. The pharmacokinetic profile was prolonged, with estimated half-lives ranging from 6 to 10 days. Postprandial glucose and insulin were reduced, and gastric emptying was delayed in healthy subjects, confirming anticipated GLP-1 receptor agonist pharmacology. The safety and tolerability were as expected for a potent GLP-1 agonist. Gradual titration of doses greatly improved tolerability. Rapid tolerance to nausea was observed. Study results support further investigation in type 2 diabetes and for weight loss.

Glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2 in health and disease: a review

The gut derived peptides, glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2 (GLP-1 and GLP-2), are secreted following nutrient ingestion. GLP-1 and another gut peptide, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are collectively referred to as 'incretin' hormones, and play an important role in glucose homeostasis. Incretin secretion shares a complex interdependent relationship with both postprandial glycemia and the rate of gastric emptying. GLP-1 based therapies are now well established in the management of type 2 diabetes, while recent literature has suggested potential applications to treat obesity and protect against cardiovascular and neurological disease. The mechanism of action of GLP-2 is not well understood, but it shows promise as an intestinotropic agent.

Activation of enteroendocrine membrane progesterone receptors promotes incretin secretion and improves glucose tolerance in mice

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion is classically regulated by ingested nutrients. To identify novel molecular targets controlling incretin secretion, we analyzed enteroendocrine cell pathways important for hormone biosynthesis and secretion. We demonstrate that progesterone increases GLP-1 secretion and extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation in enteroendocrine GLUTag cells via mechanisms sensitive to the mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor U0126. The stimulatory effects of progesterone (P4) or the synthetic progestin R5020 on ERK1/2 phosphorylation were independent of the classical progesterone receptor antagonist RU486. Furthermore, a cell-impermeable BSA-progesterone conjugate rapidly increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation and GLP-1 secretion. Knockdown of the membrane progesterone receptors Paqr5 or Paqr7 in GLUTag cells eliminated the stimulatory effect of R5020 and progesterone on GLP-1 secretion. Enteral progesterone administration increased plasma levels of GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and insulin, and improved oral glucose tolerance in an RU486-insensitve manner in mice: however, systemic progesterone exposure did not improve glucose homeostasis. Unexpectedly, the glucoregulatory actions of enteral progesterone did not require classical incretin receptor signaling and were preserved in Glp1r(-/-) and Glp1r(-/-):Gipr(-/-) mice. Intestine-restricted activation of membrane progesterone receptors may represent a novel approach for stimulation of incretin hormone secretion and control of glucose homeostasis.

GLP-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations

INTRODUCTION

Within recent years, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RA) have emerged as a new treatment option for type 2 diabetes. The GLP-1-RA are administered subcutaneously and differ substantially in pharmacokinetic profiles.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the pharmacokinetics and safety aspects of the currently available GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide (based on the structure of native GLP-1), exenatide twice daily and exenatide once weekly (based on exendin-4) in relation to the kinetics and toxicology of native GLP-1. The review is based on electronic literature searches and legal documents in the form of assessment reports from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration.

EXPERT OPINION

GLP-1-based therapy combines several unique mechanisms of action and have the potential to gain widespread use in the fight against diabetes and obesity. The difference in chemical structure have strong implications for key pharmacokinetic parameters such as absorption and clearance, and eventually the safety and efficacy of the individual GLP-1-RA. The main safety concerns are pancreatitis and neoplasms, for which there are no identifiable differences in risk between the available agents. Antibody formation and injection site reactions are more frequent with the exendin-4-based compounds. The efficacy with regard to Hb(A1c) reduction is superior with the longer-acting agonists, whereas the shorter-acting GLP-1-RA seems to provide greater postprandial glucose control and lower tolerability as a possible consequence of less induction of tachyphylaxis. The future place of these agents will depend on the added safety and efficacy data in the several ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials.

An update in incretin-based therapy: a focus on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, exenatide and liraglutide, offer a unique mechanism in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as part of the incretin system. Their mechanism of action is to increase insulin secretion, decrease glucagon release, reduce food intake, and slow gastric emptying. They target postprandial blood glucose values and have some effect on fasting levels as well. In addition, they promote weight loss and may help to preserve β-cell function, both major problems in T2DM patients. Changes in hemoglobin A1c are similar to those produced by other T2DM agents, including thiazolidinediones, low-dose metformin, and sulfonylureas, and better than those caused by α-reductase inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. These agents have been safely studied in combination with metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, and insulin therapy. Overall, data are limited for head-to-head comparisons, but it appears that liraglutide may have better efficacy and tolerability compared with exenatide; however, more studies are needed. They are overall well tolerated, with the main adverse events being similar to those with metformin (gastrointestinal intolerances that are transient and dose dependent). However, patients must be monitored for pancreatitis as a rare but possible side effect. For T2DM patients willing to use an injectable agent, exenatide and liraglutide offer another therapeutic option to control hyperglycemia with the potential for weight loss and may be combined with other agents safely.

Drug-drug interactions with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

OBJECTIVE

To review drug interaction studies of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and concurrent oral medications.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched (to December 5, 2011) using the terms exenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, and lixisenatide. The search was limited to studies published in English and conducted in adults. Abstracts from the American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions from 2004 through 2011 were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All abstracts were screened for eligibility, which consisted of studies reporting the effects of GLP-1RA administration on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concurrent oral medications. Data extracted from eligible trials included study and population characteristics; pharmacokinetic parameters including maximum concentration (C(max)), time to maximum concentration (t(max)), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC); and pharmacodynamic properties.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Our search identified 254 potentially relevant articles; of those, 11 articles evaluating 15 drug interactions were reviewed. Only 1 study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes. Equivalence in AUC was demonstrated in the majority of drug interactions studied (11 of 15). The AUCs of acetaminophen and lovastatin were decreased after exenatide administration and those of lisinopril and digoxin were decreased after liraglutide administration. In 10 studies, GLP-1RAs decreased the C(max) and, in 14 studies, prolonged the t(max) of study drug. Pharmacokinetic properties of drugs and differences in study design can explain differences in interaction potential.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs may produce clinically significant interactions with drugs that require achievement of target peak concentrations or a rapid onset of action. Studies in patients with type 2 diabetes are needed to further assess and allow comparison of several GLP-1RA agents' impact on steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concomitant oral medications.

Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Consistent with its effect on gastric emptying, exenatide, an injectable treatment for type 2 diabetes, may slow the absorption rate of concomitantly administered oral drugs resulting in a decrease in maximum concentration (Cmax). This study evaluated the drug interaction potential of exenatide when administered adjunctively with oral contraceptives, given their potential concomitant use.

METHODS

This trial evaluated the effect of exenatide co-administration on single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 30 μg, levonorgestrel [LV] 150 μg [Microgynon 30®]). Thirty-two healthy female subjects participated in an open-label, randomised, crossover trial with 3 treatment periods (oral contraceptive alone, 1 hour before exenatide, 30 minutes after exenatide). Subjects received a single dose of oral contraceptive on Day 8 of each period and QD doses on Days 10 through 28. During treatment periods of concomitant usage, exenatide was administered subcutaneously prior to morning and evening meals at 5 μg BID from Days 1 through 4 and at 10 μg BID from Days 5 through 22. Single- (Day 8) and multiple-dose (Day 22) pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed for each treatment period.

RESULTS

Exenatide did not alter the bioavailability nor decrease daily trough concentrations for either oral contraceptive component. No substantive changes in oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics occurred when oral contraceptive was administered 1 hour before exenatide. Single-dose oral contraceptive administration 30 minutes after exenatide resulted in mean (90% CI) Cmax reductions of 46% (42-51%) and 41% (35-47%) for EE and LV, respectively. Repeated daily oral contraceptive administration 30 minutes after exenatide resulted in Cmax reductions of 45% (40-50%) and 27% (21-33%) for EE and LV, respectively. Peak oral contraceptive concentrations were delayed approximately 3 to 4 hours. Mild-to-moderate nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events observed during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed reduction in Cmax is likely of limited importance given the unaltered oral contraceptive bioavailability and trough concentrations; however, for oral medications that are dependent on threshold concentrations for efficacy, such as contraceptives and antibiotics, patients should be advised to take those drugs at least 1 hour before exenatide injection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00254800.

Clinical pharmacology of incretin therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Increased understanding of the role of incretin hormones in maintaining glucose homeostasis has enabled the development of pharmacotherapies that target deficient incretin activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Incretin therapies are premised on 1 of 2 approaches: (1) augmenting the activity of the hormone glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 (GLP-1 receptor agonists) and (2) inhibiting the degradation of GLP-1 by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 (DPP-4 inhibitors).

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the pharmacokinetic properties and clinical profiles of the GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide twice daily, liraglutide once daily, exenatide once weekly, taspoglutide, and albiglutide) and the DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin) available for use or in late-stage development.

METHODS

A search of PubMed for literature published between 2000 and mid-2010 was conducted using the names of each agent as key words. Phase III and IV studies were included in the review of efficacy and tolerability. Supplemental searches of abstracts from major diabetes conferences provided additional information on pharmacokinetic properties. Searches of all reference lists were performed to identify additional references of interest.

RESULTS

The PubMed search identified multiple randomized, controlled clinical studies of the GLP-1 receptor agonists and the DPP-4 inhibitors administered as monotherapy or in combination regimens. Reductions from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin ranged from 0.4% to 1.5% with exenatide 5 to 10 μg/d (7 studies), 0.6% to 1.5% with liraglutide 0.6 to 1.8 mg/d (6 studies), 0.3% to 1.0% with sitagliptin 25 to 200 mg/d (9 studies), 0.5% to 0.9% with saxagliptin 2.5 to 10 mg/d (3 studies), 0.4% to 1.0% with vildagliptin 50 to 100 mg/d (6 studies), and 0.4% to 0.8% with alogliptin 12.5 to 25 mg/d (4 studies). Dosage adjustments and caution in prescribing incretin therapies are recommended in patients with renal disease, with those recommendations varying based on the agent and the degree of dysfunction. Incretin therapies have been associated with few interactions with commonly used antihyperglycemic and cardiovascular therapies.

CONCLUSION

Based on the pharmacokinetic and therapeutic characteristics described in previously published Phase III and IV studies of incretin therapies, these agents may provide an option for the management of T2DM.

The effect of the once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analog liraglutide on the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen

INTRODUCTION

Acetaminophen is a commonly used analgesic and antipyretic drug, and is frequently used to study gastric emptying. Due to its high permeability and high solubility, acetaminophen can be used as a pharmacologic model for medications with similar characteristics. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of liraglutide on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of acetaminophen in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial in which subjects with type 2 diabetes received placebo or liraglutide. After steady state PK of liraglutide 1.8 mg/ placebo were established, a single dose of acetaminophen 1 g was administered at the time of liraglutide C(max) (maximum concentration). The PK profile of acetaminophen was assessed at 18 time points during the 8-hour post-dosing period. Placebo and liraglutide were considered equivalent with respect to area under the curve (AUC)(0-∞) and AUC(0-480) min of acetaminophen if the 90% CI for the ratio was fully contained within the limits of 0.80 to 1.25.

RESULTS

All subjects (n=18; mean [SD] age 59 [7] years, body mass index [BMI] 29.7 [4.2] kg/m(2), and glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] 7.8% [0.6%]) completed the study. Equivalence was demonstrated between liraglutide 1.8 mg at steady state and placebo, with respect to acetaminophen AUC(0-∞) (estimated ratio 1.04; 90% CI: 0.97, 1.10) and acetaminophen AUC(0-480) min (estimated ratio 0.95; 90% CI: 0.89, 1.01). During liraglutide, a lower C(max) was observed (estimated ratio 0.69; 90% CI: 0.56, 0.85) and the median acetaminophen t(max) occurred 15 minutes later compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

The overall exposure of acetaminophen following a 1 g dose was comparable for subjects taking liraglutide or placebo, and the clinical impact of the lower C(max) and delay in absorption of acetaminophen was considered to be transient and small, and without clinical relevance. No adjustment for acetaminophen is recommended when used concomitantly with liraglutide.

Postprandial hyperlipidemia, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk: focus on incretins

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is only partially reduced by intensive glycemic control. Diabetic dyslipidemia is suggested to be an additional important contributor to CVD risk in T2DM. Multiple lipid lowering medications effectively reduce fasting LDL cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations and several of them routinely reduce CVD risk. However, in contemporary Western societies the vasculature is commonly exposed to prolonged postprandial hyperlipidemia. Metabolism of these postprandial carbohydrates and lipids yields multiple proatherogenic products. Even a transient increase in these factors may worsen vascular function and induces impaired endothelial dependent vasodilatation, a predictor of atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular events. There is a recent increased appreciation for the role of gut-derived incretin hormones in controlling the postprandial metabolic milieu. Incretin-based medications have been developed and are now used to control postprandial hyperglycemia in T2DM. Recent data indicate that these medications may also have profound effects on postprandial lipid metabolism and may favorably influence several cardiovascular functions. This review discusses (1) the postprandial state with special emphasis on postprandial lipid metabolism and its role in endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk, (2) the ability of incretins to modulate postprandial hyperlipidemia and (3) the potential of incretin-based therapeutic strategies to improve vascular function and reduce CVD risk.

Effect of exenatide on splanchnic and peripheral glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic subjects

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the mechanisms via which exenatide attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

STUDY DESIGN

Seventeen T2DM patients (44 yr; seven females, 10 males; body mass index = 33.6 kg/m(2); glycosylated hemoglobin = 7.9%) received a mixed meal followed for 6 h with double-tracer technique ([1-(14)C]glucose orally; [3-(3)H]glucose i.v.) before and after 2 wk of exenatide. In protocol II (n = 5), but not in protocol I (n = 12), exenatide was given in the morning of the repeat meal. Total and oral glucose appearance rates (RaT and RaO, respectively), endogenous glucose production (EGP), splanchnic glucose uptake (75 g - RaO), and hepatic insulin resistance (basal EGP × fasting plasma insulin) were determined.

RESULTS

After 2 wk of exenatide (protocol I), fasting plasma glucose decreased (from 10.2 to 7.6 mm) and mean postmeal plasma glucose decreased (from 13.2 to 11.3 mm) (P < 0.05); fasting and meal-stimulated plasma insulin and glucagon did not change significantly. After exenatide, basal EGP decreased (from 13.9 to 10.8 μmol/kg · min, P < 0.05), and hepatic insulin resistance declined (both P < 0.05). RaO, gastric emptying (acetaminophen area under the curve), and splanchnic glucose uptake did not change. In protocol II (exenatide given before repeat meal), fasting plasma glucose decreased (from 11.1 to 8.9 mm) and mean postmeal plasma glucose decreased (from 14.2 to 10.1 mm) (P < 0.05); fasting and meal-stimulated plasma insulin and glucagon did not change significantly. After exenatide, basal EGP decreased (from 13.4 to 10.7 μmol/kg · min, P = 0.05). RaT and RaO decreased markedly from 0-180 min after meal ingestion, consistent with exenatide's action to delay gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Exenatide improves 1) fasting hyperglycemia by reducing basal EGP and 2) postmeal hyperglycemia by reducing the appearance of oral glucose in the systemic circulation.

Pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes: the potential of incretin-based therapies

Management guidelines recommend metformin as the first-line therapy for most patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet and exercise. Efficacy with metformin therapy is usually of limited duration, which necessitates the early introduction of one or two additional oral agents or the initiation of injections, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists or insulin. Although safe and effective, metformin monotherapy has been associated with gastrointestinal side effects (≈20% of treated patients in randomized studies) and is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or severe liver disease. Patients treated with a sulphonylurea are at increased risk for hypoglycaemia and moderate weight gain, whereas those receiving a thiazolidinedione are subject to an increased risk of weight gain, oedema, heart failure or fracture. Weight gain and hypoglycaemia are associated with insulin use. Thus, there is an unmet need for a safe and efficacious add-on agent after initial-therapy failure. Evidence suggests that incretin-based agents, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, can successfully achieve glycaemic targets and potentially provide cardiovascular and β-cell-function benefits. This review will examine current approaches for treating type 2 diabetes and discuss the place of incretin therapies, mainly GLP-1 agonists, in the type 2 diabetes treatment spectrum.

GPR119 regulates murine glucose homeostasis through incretin receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms

G protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) was originally identified as a β-cell receptor. However, GPR119 activation also promotes incretin secretion and enhances peptide YY action. We examined whether GPR119-dependent control of glucose homeostasis requires preservation of peptidergic pathways in vivo. Insulin secretion was assessed directly in islets, and glucoregulation was examined in wild-type (WT), single incretin receptor (IR) and dual IR knockout (DIRKO) mice. Experimental endpoints included plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), and peptide YY. Gastric emptying was assessed in WT, Glp1r-/-, DIRKO, Glp2r-/-, and GPR119-/- mice treated with the GPR119 agonist AR231453. AR231453 stimulated insulin secretion from WT and DIRKO islets in a glucose-dependent manner, improved glucose homeostasis, and augmented plasma levels of GLP-1, GIP, and insulin in WT and Gipr-/- mice. In contrast, although AR231453 increased levels of GLP-1, GIP, and insulin, it failed to lower glucose in Glp1r-/- and DIRKO mice. Furthermore, AR231453 did not improve ip glucose tolerance and had no effect on insulin action in WT and DIRKO mice. Acute GPR119 activation with AR231453 inhibited gastric emptying in Glp1r-/-, DIRKO, Glp2r-/-, and in WT mice independent of the Y2 receptor (Y2R); however, AR231453 did not control gastric emptying in GPR119-/- mice. Our findings demonstrate that GPR119 activation directly stimulates insulin secretion from islets in vitro, yet requires intact IR signaling and enteral glucose exposure for optimal control of glucose tolerance in vivo. In contrast, AR231453 inhibits gastric emptying independent of incretin, Y2R, or Glp2 receptors through GPR119-dependent pathways. Hence, GPR119 engages multiple complementary pathways for control of glucose homeostasis.

Effects of GLP-1 and incretin-based therapies on gastrointestinal motor function

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a hormone secreted predominantly by the distal small intestine and colon and released in response to enteral nutrient exposure. GLP-1-based therapies are now used widely in the management of type 2 diabetes and have the potential to be effective antiobesity agents. Although widely known as an incretin hormone, there is a growing body of evidence that GLP-1 also acts as an enterogastrone, with profound effects on the gastrointestinal motor system. Moreover, the effects of GLP-1 on gastrointestinal motility appear to be pivotal to its effect of reducing postprandial glycaemic excursions and may, potentially, represent the dominant mechanism. This review summarizes current knowledge of the enterogastrone properties of GLP-1, focusing on its effects on gut motility at physiological and pharmacological concentrations, and the motor actions of incretin-based therapies. While of potential importance, the inhibitory action of GLP-1 on gastric acid secretion is beyond the scope of this paper.

The safety and tolerability of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type-2 diabetes

Established therapies for type-2 diabetes effectively reduce blood glucose, but are often associated with adverse effects that pose risks to patient's health or diminish adherence to treatment. Weight gain, hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal symptoms are commonly reported and some agents may not be safe for use in patients with renal impairment or elevated cardiovascular risk. New treatments based on the action of the endogenous human hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), including exenatide and liraglutide, are available. These therapies provide a novel pharmacological approach to glycaemic control via multiple mechanisms of action, and accordingly exhibit different safety and tolerability profiles than conventional treatments. GLP-1 receptor agonists stimulate insulin release only in the presence of elevated blood glucose and are therefore associated with a fairly low risk of hypoglycaemia. Gastrointestinal symptoms are common but transient, and there appears to be little potential for interaction with other drugs. GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with weight loss rather than weight gain. As protein-based therapies, these agents have the potential to induce antibody formation, but the impact on efficacy and safety is minor. GLP-1 receptor agonists thus offer a new and potentially useful option for clinicians concerned about some of the common adverse effects of type-2 diabetes therapies.

Long-term metabolic and hormonal effects of exenatide on islet transplant recipients with allograft dysfunction

The initial success of islet transplantation (ITx) is followed by graft dysfunction (GDF) and insulin reintroduction. Exenatide, a GLP-1 agonist, increases insulin and decreases glucagon secretion and has potential for beta-cell regeneration. To improve functional islet mass, exenatide treatment was given to ITx recipients with GDF. The objective of this study was to assess metabolic and hormonal effects of exenatide in GDF. In this prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized study, 11 type 1 diabetes recipients of ITx with GDF had HbA1c, weight, insulin requirements, and 5-h mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT; with/without exenatide given before test) at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiating exenatide treatment. Baseline MMTT showed postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperglucagonemia. Daily exenatide treatment resulted in improved glucose, increased amylin/insulin ratio, and decreased proinsulin/insulin ratio as assessed by MMTT. Glucagon responses remained unchanged. Exenatide administration 1 h before MMTT showed decreased glucagon and glucose at 0 min and attenuation in their postprandial rise. Time-to-peak glucose was delayed, followed by insulin, proinsulin, amylin, and C-peptide, indicating glucose-driven insulin secretion. Five subjects completed 12-month follow-up. Glucose and glucagon suppression responses after MMTT with exenatide were no longer observed. Retrospective 3-month analysis of these subjects revealed higher and sustained glucagon levels that did not suppress as profoundly with exenatide administration, associated with higher glucose levels and increased C-peptide responses. In conclusion, Exenatide suppresses the abnormal postprandial hyperglucagonemia and hyperglycemia observed in GDF. Changes in amylin and proinsulin secretion may reflect more efficient insulin processing. Different degrees of responsiveness to exenatide were identified. These may help guide the clinical management of ITx recipients.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 gastrointestinal regulatory role in metabolism and motility

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility, primarily gastric emptying, balances the hormonal output that takes place after food intake in order to maintain stable blood sugar. The incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), work together to reduce postprandial hyperglycemia by glucose-dependent insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon release, as well as inhibition of GI motility and gastric emptying. GLP-1 is considered the more effective of the two incretins due to its additional inhibitory effects on GI motility. It is observed that patients on treatment with GLP-1 analogues or exenatide achieve a considerable weight loss during treatment. This is of benefit to improve insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, weight loss per se is of considerable benefit in an even longer health perspective. The weight loss is considered to be due to the inhibition of GI motility. This effect has been studied in animal experimentation, and from there taken to involve studies on GI motility in healthy volunteers and patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Evolving to a phase II study in IBS, the GLP-1 analogue (ROSE-010) was recently shown to be effective for treatment of acute pain attacks in IBS. Taken together, data speak in favor of GI motility as a central component not only in metabolic disorders but also in IBS, be it due to a direct relaxing effect on GI smooth muscle or a slow emptying of gastric contents resulting in a less outspoken nutritional demand on hormonal regulatory functions in the GI tract.

Incretin-based therapies: review of the outpatient literature with implications for use in the hospital and after discharge

A large percentage of critically ill adult inpatients have type 2 diabetes, which may be undiagnosed or uncontrolled during hospitalization. Hyperglycemia complicates the therapeutic management of inpatients and leads to adverse outcomes, and intensive glycemic control with insulin reduces morbidity and mortality. Insulin therapy, however, is labor-intensive and time-consuming. More important, long-standing protocols such as the sliding scale do not provide adequate glucose control. Although more research is needed to determine the best methods for treating hyperglycemia in-hospital, the importance of achieving better glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia has been demonstrated. Post-discharge diabetes care is equally important, as it is essential in improving long-term outcomes after a hospital stay. Hospital care providers can play an important role in effective antihyperglycemic regimens in patients with diabetes prior to discharge. Post-discharge management is a formidable challenge because of the availability of an array of oral antidiabetes agents, including metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones, each with distinct therapeutic and adverse event profiles. Incretin-based therapies offer a potentially useful option for post-discharge therapy, and possibly for inpatient diabetes treatment. Incretins are effective, safe, and well-tolerated; they are easier for patients to use compared with insulin injections (eg, continual glucose monitoring is not required); and they may provide long-term improvement of cardiovascular parameters and beta-cell function. This review examines the challenges to achieving glycemic control in the hospital setting and summarizes clinical data on the efficacy and safety of incretin-based therapies in their use in the hospital and after discharge.

Glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: targets and new therapies

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide public health challenge. Despite the availability of many antidiabetes agents and pharmacotherapies targeting cardiovascular risk factors, the morbidity, mortality and economic consequences of T2DM are still a great burden to patients, society, health care systems and the economy. The need for new therapies for glycaemic control is compounded by the fact that existing treatments have limitations either because of their side effects (particularly weight gain and hypoglycaemia) or contraindications that limit their use. Furthermore, none of the current therapies have a significant impact on disease progression. Incretin-based therapies offer a new therapeutic approach to the management of T2DM, and there are also several even newer therapies in development. There are two groups of incretin-based therapies currently available; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues/mimetics. The former are given orally while the latter subcutaneously. These drugs result in glucose-dependent insulin secretion and glucose-dependent glucagon suppression, with consequent low risk of hypoglycaemia when used as mono- or combination therapy (except when used with sulphonylureas). In addition, they are either weight neutral in the case of DPP-4 inhibitors or cause weight loss in the case of incretin mimetics/analogues. Furthermore, animal studies have shown that these agents prolong beta cell survival which offers the theoretical possibility of slowing the progression to T2DM. In this article we will review the currently available antidiabetes agents with particular emphasis on incretin-based and future therapies. In addition, we will review and discuss the evidence relating to glycaemic control and cardiovascular disease.

A review of exenatide as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

Incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone released from cells in the gastrointestinal tract (GI), leading to glucose-dependent insulin release from the pancreas. It also suppresses postprandial hyperglycemia, glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying. Exenatide (EXE), a functional analog of human GLP-1, was approved by the US FDA in April 2005.

Objective

This article reviews current primary literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of EXE in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and describes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing and administration of EXE.

Methods

English-language articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966 to March 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to present), and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews (1995 to March 2009). Search terms included EXE, diabetes mellitus, postprandial hyperglycemia, gastric emptying, glucagon, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Articles were selected for review if their designs were randomized, blinded and of controlled design that focused on clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 DM.

Results

EXE is administered subcutaneously in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm within the 60-minute period before the morning and evening meals. Its C_max is reached within 2.1 hours, and its T_1/2 in 2.4 hours. EXE’s metabolism is primarily through the kidneys. For the patients who received EXE 10 μg SC BID in three, 30-week, placebo-controlled studies with background sulfonylureas (SUs), metformin (MET), or SU + MET, there were significant reductions in HbA_1c (0.77 to 0.86%), fasting plasma glucose (0.6 mmol/L) and body weight (1.6 to 2.8 kg) (P ≤ 0.05 vs PCB) that were sustained in patients who completed two open-label phase trials with an additional 52 weeks of therapy. The use of thiazolidinediones was associated with a slight advantage over EXE in improving HbA_1c along with increased weight gain; those who received EXE lost weight, but experienced more GI adverse effects. Patients who received EXE lost significant body weight while patients who received insulin gained weight. Patients receiving insulin had lower fasting, prelunch and predinner glucose excursions while patients in the EXE groups had lower postprandial glucose levels. Nausea was most frequently (>20%) reported in patients receiving the highest dose of EXE (10 μg SC BID vs 5 μg SC BID).

Conclusions

EXE at the dose of 10 μg SC BID has been proven to decrease HbA_lc by 1.3% ± 0.1% and decrease body weight by up to 5.3 ± 0.8 kg at week 82. Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse event (>20%) especially in patients being treated with EXE 10 μg SC BID. EXE can be safely added to MET therapy, SU therapy or MET + SU combination to effectively target glycemic goals in patients with type 2 DM. Long-term, head-to-head studies assessing the effect of the EXE ± oral agents/insulins in patients with HbA_lc ≥ 10% are still needed to fully clarify the role of EXE in poorly controlled patients with type 2 DM.

Effect of exenatide on gastric emptying and relationship to postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of exenatide on gastric emptying (GE) in type 2 diabetes using scintigraphy.

METHODS

Seventeen subjects with type 2 diabetes participated in a randomized, single-blind, 3-period, crossover study. In each 5-day period, 5 or 10 microg exenatide or placebo was administered subcutaneously BID. Oral antidiabetic treatments were continued. The presence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy was assessed during screening. On day 5, after the morning dose, subjects consumed a 450-kcal breakfast containing (99m)Tc-labeled eggs and (111)In-labeled water, and GE was measured by scintigraphy. Plasma glucose and insulin, perceptions of appetite, and plasma exenatide were also quantified.

RESULTS

Exenatide slowed GE of both solid and liquid meal components [solid (T(50)(90% confidence interval [CI]); placebo, 60(50-70) min; 5 microg exenatide, 111(94-132) min; 10 microg exenatide, 169(143-201) min; both P<0.01); liquid (T(50)(90% CI), placebo, 34(25-46) min; 5 microg exenatide, 87(65-117) min; 10 microg exenatide, 114(85-154) min; both P<0.01)]. GE was not different between subjects with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (n=7), compared with those without (n=10) (P>/=0.68). Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose (area under the curve [AUC((0-6 h))]) by 69-76% and peak insulin (C(max)) by 84-86% compared with placebo. There was an inverse relationship between the postprandial rise in glucose (AUC((0-3 h))) and GE (solid T(50), r=-0.49, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Exenatide slows GE substantially in type 2 diabetes, which could be an important mechanism contributing to the beneficial effect of exenatide on postprandial glycemia.

Exenatide: incretin therapy for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Exenatide is the first in a novel class of drugs that mimics naturally occurring glucagon-like peptide 1. In patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), control of both glycemia and bodyweight are important to minimize the risk of diabetes complications. Exenatide improves glycemic control through glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppression of glucagon secretion, delaying gastric emptying and suppressing appetite. Exenatide therapy significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (Hb_A1c) and fasting and postprandial plasma glucose when added to metformin and/or sulfonylureas, with an average weight loss of 2 kg. Furthermore, exenatide-treated patients sustained the reductions achieved in Hb_A1c at 12 weeks with a progressive reduction in bodyweight during 3-year follow-up. Exenatide is generally well tolerated; nausea is the most common side effect but significantly reduces over time and with gradual dose titration. Hypoglycemia at a rate greater than placebo only occurred in combination with sulfonylureas. Exenatide may enable patients with T2DM to improve glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia and provoking weight loss.

Effect of exenatide on 24-hour blood glucose profile compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 2-week study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the glucose-lowering effect of exenatide over 24 hours in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using metformin, with or without a thiazolidinedione (TZD).

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 2-week study was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control, despite metformin with or without a TZD. Patients underwent a baseline and a week-2 (study end) 24-hour admission during which serial serum glucose measurements were taken. Preprandial and postprandial concentrations of triglycerides and free fatty acids were also measured. Meals provided for each patient were identical at the baseline and week-2 assessments. Following the baseline admission, patients were randomized to receive SC injections of either exenatide (5 microg BID for 1 week, then 10 microg BID for the next week) or placebo (volume equivalent) for 14 days.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (19 women [63%], 11 men [37%]; mean [SD] age, 52.6 [11.2] years; weight, 94.3 [23.0] kg; body mass index, 34.2 [6.1] kg/m(2); glycosylated hemoglobin value, 8.0% [0.9%]; diabetes duration, 8.7 [5.6] years; race, Hispanic 18 [60%], white 10 [33%], black 2 [7%]) were eligible. Seventeen patients (57%) were randomized to treatment with exenatide and 13 patients (43%) received placebo. Concurrent antidiabetic medications were metformin only (n = 19 [63%]) and metformin plus a TZD (n = 11 [37%]). All postbaseline values were least squares mean (SE). After 2 weeks (study end), the 24-hour time-average glucose values were 7.0 (0.2) and 8.8 (0.3) mmol/L for exenatide-treated and placebo-administered patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The glucose values for patients treated with exenatide were lower compared with those in patients who received placebo 2 hours after the morning meal (6.6 [0.4] vs 12.0 [0.5] mmol/L; P < 0.001), the midday meal (8.8 [0.5] vs 11.8 [0.6] mmol/L; P = 0.001), and the evening meal (6.8 [0.4] vs 11.3 [0.4] mmol/L; P < 0.001). The mean durations of patient exposure to glucose concentrations >7.8 and >11.1 mmol/L were significantly shorter for the exenatide group compared with the placebo group (>7.8 mmol/L: 6.8 [0.9] vs 14.1 [1.1] hours; >11.1 mmol/L: 1.0 [0.7] vs 4.7 [0.8] hours; both, P < 0.001). After 2 weeks, the postprandial triglyceride excursions after the morning and evening meals for patients treated with exenatide were significantly lower compared with those treated with placebo. There was no apparent effect on free fatty acid concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide was associated with significantly reduced glucose concentrations at multiple time points during 24 hours, with the greatest effect seen on postprandial glucose concentrations. In addition, exenatide was associated with decreased overall hyperglycemic exposure and significantly decreased postprandial triglyceride excursions. These results are consistent with those seen in other studies that reported the effectiveness of exenatide in controlling hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Mechanism of action of exenatide to reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes

We examined the contributions of insulin secretion, glucagon suppression, splanchnic and peripheral glucose metabolism, and delayed gastric emptying to the attenuation of postprandial hyperglycemia during intravenous exenatide administration. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G). Acetaminophen was given with the mixed meal (75 g glucose, 25 g fat, 20 g protein) to monitor gastric emptying. Plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, acetaminophen concentrations and glucose specific activities were measured for 6 h post meal. Post-meal hyperglycemia was markedly reduced (P < 0.01) in EXE (138 +/- 16 mg/dl) and in E+G (165 +/- 12) compared with CON (206 +/- 15). Baseline plasma glucagon ( approximately 90 pg/ml) decreased by approximately 20% to 73 +/- 4 pg/ml in EXE (P < 0.01) and was not different from CON in E+G (81 +/- 2). EGP was suppressed by exenatide [231 +/- 9 to 108 +/- 8 mg/min (54%) vs. 254 +/- 29 to189 +/- 27 mg/min (26%, P < 0.001, EXE vs. CON] and partially reversed by glucagon replacement [247 +/- 15 to 173 +/- 18 mg/min (31%)]. Oral glucose appearance was 39 +/- 4 g in CON vs. 23 +/- 6 g in EXE (P < 0.001) and 15 +/- 5 g in E+G, (P < 0.01 vs. CON). The glucose retained within the splanchnic bed increased from approximately 36g in CON to approximately 52g in EXE and to approximately 60g in E+G (P < 0.001 vs. CON). Acetaminophen((AUC)) was reduced by approximately 80% in EXE vs. CON (P < 0.01). We conclude that exenatide infusion attenuates postprandial hyperglycemia by decreasing EGP (by approximately 50%) and by slowing gastric emptying.

Exenatide

Exenatide is the first in a new class of compounds, which possess similar activity to the naturally-occurring hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). It mirrors many of the effects of GLP-1, improving glycaemic control through a combination of mechanisms, which include glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion, suppression of glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying and reduced appetite. Phase III clinical trials showed exenatide therapy for 30 weeks significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin, and fasting and postprandial plasma glucose compared with baseline when added to metformin and sulfonylureas or a combination of the two, with an average weight loss of approximately 2 kg. Exenatide can also be used in combination with thiazolidinediones and may be an alternative to insulin in patients requiring additional therapy. In patients with established Type 2 diabetes, control of both glycaemia and body weight are important to minimise the risk of future diabetes complications. Open-label extensions from these pivotal trials demonstrate that patients treated with exenatide for < or = 3 years sustained the reductions in glycaemic control achieved at 30 weeks and had a progressive reduction in body weight. Exenatide is generally well tolerated; nausea is the most commonly reported side effect, but can be significantly reduced when a target dose of exenatide is achieved in patients with gradual dose titration. Hypoglycaemia has been encountered in clinical trials of exenatide, especially on initiation of therapy with sulfonylureas (not with metformin). Exenatide may enable patients with Type 2 diabetes to improve glycaemic control and reduce or eliminate the risk of hypoglycaemia and weight gain.

Investigational treatments for Type 2 diabetes mellitus: exenatide and liraglutide

Although a number of compounds are currently used to treat Type 2 diabetes mellitus, achieving a sustained glycaemic control over time is often not possible using oral antidiabetics. Endogenous incretins exhibit beneficial effects that could be useful for Type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment, such as stimulating insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia, improving beta-cell mass and function, reducing glucagon secretion, delaying gastric emptying, reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia and diminishing body weight; however, their short half-life makes them unsuitable for treatment. Incretin mimetics such as liraglutide and exenatide were developed to overcome this limitation. This review discusses the effects of these compounds and their potential as a new class of antidiabetic agents.

Safety and adverse effects associated with GLP-1 analogues

The incretin mimetics are an emerging class of agents for the treatment of diabetes. So far, exenatide is licensed for use in the US and also became available in the UK in May 2007. Within development and Phase III trials, liraglutide may also be made available within the next 2 years. These agents enhance glucose-dependent insulin secretion and exhibit other antihyperglycaemic actions, which are of particular benefit to overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the profile of adverse effects for these agents in relation to their current (exenatide) and anticipated (liraglutide) role in the management of Type 2 diabetes.

[Incretins as new therapeutic targets of type 2 diabetes]

The epidemic characteristics of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) pose a formidable challenge in terms of healthcare, given the tremendous impact it has on the healthcare resources needed not only to treat it, but also to prevent and treat the associated cardiovascular complications. This makes up the number 1 cause of DM-associated morbidity-mortality in addition to its social and personal impact. We currently have a growing number of available treatment tools that make it possible to achieve the target glycemic control in most of our patients, albeit unfortunately, only temporarily in a good many of them, because of the progressive nature of the disease. Furthermore, current therapy often entails undesirable effects, such as weight gain or the emergence of hypoglycemias that limit their optimization. Recently, a new class of drugs has been incorporated into the treatment of DM - incretin mimetics. These new drugs act in very much the same way as the intestinal hormones that are naturally secreted following the intake of nutrients, called incretins (e.g., glucagon like peptide-1 [GLP-1]), with the added advantage that these molecules are resistant to enzymatic degradation by the DPP-IV enzyme. This provides them with a half-life that makes ambulatory treatment possible, unlike natural incretins whose half-life is too short to make them viable as treatment. The incretin mimetics bind to GLP-1 receptors, increasing glucose-dependent secretion of insulin and decreasing glucose-dependent posprandial secretion of glucagon, slowing gastric emptying, and reducing food intake. All these mechanisms have a significant impact on glucose homeostasis and a beneficial effect on body weight. Moreover, studies in experimental models suggest that these new molecules might have a promising effect on pancreatic beta cell function and mass. Exenatide is the first incretin mimetic available to date. Efficacy and safety data of this drug show it as a therapeutic option for the treatment of type 2 DM.