Clinical implications of pathophysiological and demographic covariates on the population pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab emtansine, a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer: Advantages and Advancements of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, a Type of Chemo-Biologic Hybrid Drugs

Cancer is a significant health challenge globally, with millions of people affected every year, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Although other treatment options are available with limitations, chemotherapy, either standalone or combined with other therapeutic procedures, is the most commonly used practice of treating cancer. In chemotherapy, cancer cells/malignant tumors are targeted; however, due to less target specificity, along with malignant cells, normal cells are also affected, which leads to various off-target effects (side effects) that impact the patient quality of life. Out of all the different types of cancers, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in humans worldwide. Current anticancer drug discovery research aims to develop therapeutics with higher potency and lower toxicity, which is only possible through target-specific therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are explicitly designed to target malignant tumors and minimize off-target effects by reducing systemic cytotoxicity. Several ADCs have been approved for clinical use and have shown moderate to good efficacy so far. Considering various aspects, chemotherapy and ADCs are useful in treating cancer. However, ADCs provide a more focused and less toxic approach, which is especially helpful in cases where resistance to chemotherapy (drug resistance) occurs and in the type of malignancies in which specific antigens are overexpressed. Ongoing ADC research aims to develop more target-specific cancer treatments. In short, this study presents a concise overview of ADCs specific to breast cancer treatment. This study provides insight into the classifications, mechanisms of action, structural aspects, and clinical trial phases (current status) of these chemo-biologic drugs (ADCs).

Application of Pharmacometrics in Advancing the Clinical Research of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Principles and Modeling Strategies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a pivotal area in the research and development of antitumor drugs. They provide innovative possibilities for tumor therapy by integrating the tumor-targeting capabilities of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxic effect of small molecule drugs. Pharmacometrics, an important discipline, facilitates comprehensive understanding of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ADCs by integrating clinical trial data through modeling and simulation. However, due to the complex structure of ADCs, their modeling approaches are still unclear. In this review, we analyzed published population pharmacokinetic models for ADCs and classified them into single-analyte, two-analyte, and three-analyte models. We also described the benefits, limitations, and recommendations for each model. Furthermore, we suggested that the development of population pharmacokinetic models for ADCs should be rigorously considered and established based on four key aspects: (1) research objectives; (2) available in vitro and animal data; (3) accessible clinical information; and (4) the capability of bioanalytical methods. This review offered insights to guide the application of pharmacometrics in the clinical research of ADCs, thereby contributing to more effective therapeutic development.

Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anticancer Agents

An objective of the Precision Medicine Initiative, launched in 2015 by the US Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health, is to optimize and individualize dosing of drugs, especially anticancer agents, with high pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recently reported that 40% of obese patients receive insufficient chemotherapy doses and exposures, which may lead to reduced efficacy, and recommended pharmacokinetic studies to guide appropriate dosing in these patients. These issues will only increase in importance as the incidence of obesity in the population increases. This publication reviews the effects of obesity on (1) tumor biology, development of cancer, and antitumor response; (2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of small-molecule anticancer drugs; and (3) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of complex anticancer drugs, such as carrier-mediated agents and biologics. These topics are not only important from a scientific research perspective but also from a drug development and regulator perspective. Thus, it is important to evaluate the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents in all categories of body habitus and especially in patients who are obese and morbidly obese. As the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents may be highly variable across drug types, the optimal dosing metric and algorithm for difference classes of drugs may be widely different. Thus, studies are needed to evaluate current and novel metrics and methods for measuring body habitus as related to optimizing the dose and reducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of anticancer agents in patients who are obese and morbidly obese.

Covariate analysis of tusamitamab ravtansine, a DM4 anti‐CEACAM5 antibody‐drug conjugate, based on first‐in‐human study

Tusamitamab ravtansine is an anti‐CEACAM5 antibody‐drug conjugate indicated in patients with solid tumors. Based on a previous developed semimechanistic model describing simultaneously pharmacokinetic (PK) of SAR408701, two of its active metabolites: DM4 and methyl‐DM4 and naked antibody, with integration of drug‐to‐antibody data, the main objective of the present analysis was to evaluate covariate’s impact in patients from phase I/II study (n = 254). Demographic and pathophysiologic baseline covariates were explored to explain interindividual variability on each entity PK parameter. Model parameters were estimated with good precision. Five covariates were included in the final PK model: body surface area (BSA), tumor burden, albumin, circulating target, and gender. Comparison of BSA‐adjusted dosing and flat dosing supported the current BSA‐based dosing regimen, to limit under and over exposure in patients with extreme BSA. Overall, this model characterized accurately the PKs of all entities and highlighted sources of PK variability. By integrating mechanistic considerations, this model aimed to improve understanding of the SAR408701 complex disposition while supporting key steps of clinical development.

Clinical Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are biopharmaceutical products where a monoclonal antibody is linked to a biologically active drug (a small molecule) forming a conjugate. Since the approval of first ADC (Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (trade name: Mylotarg)) for the treatment of CD33-positive acute myelogenous leukemia, several ADCs have been developed for the treatment of cancer. The goal of an ADC as a cancer agent is to release the cytotoxic drug to kill the tumor cells without harming the normal or healthy cells. With time, it is being realized that ADCS can also be used to manage or cure other diseases such as inflammatory diseases, atherosclerosis, and bacteremia and some research in this direction is ongoing. The focus of this review is on the clinical pharmacology aspects of ADC development. From the selection of an appropriate antibody to the finished product, the entire process of the development of an ADC is a difficult and challenging task. Clinical pharmacology is one of the most important tools of drug development since this tool helps in finding the optimum dose of a product, thus preserving the safety and efficacy of the product in a patient population. Unlike other small or large molecules where only one moiety and/or metabolite(s) is generally measured for the pharmacokinetic profiling, there are several moieties that need to be measured for characterizing the PK profiles of an ADC. Therefore, knowledge and understanding of clinical pharmacology of ADCs is vital for the selection of a safe and efficacious dose in a patient population.

Capturing the Magic Bullet: Pharmacokinetic Principles and Modeling of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Over the past two decades, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a promising class of drugs for cancer therapy and have expanded to nononcology fields such as inflammatory diseases, atherosclerosis, and bacteremia. Eight ADCs are currently approved by FDA for clinical applications, with more novel ADCs under clinical development. Compared with traditional chemotherapy, ADCs combine the target specificity of antibodies with chemotherapeutic capabilities of cytotoxic drugs. The benefits include reduced systemic toxicity and enhanced therapeutic index for patients. However, the heterogeneous structures of ADCs and their dynamic changes following administration create challenges in their development. The understanding of ADC pharmacokinetics (PK) is crucial for the optimization of clinical dosing regimens when translating from animal to human. In addition, it contributes to the optimization of dose selection and clinical monitoring with regard to safety and efficacy. This manuscript reviews the PK characteristics of ADCs and summarizes the diverse approaches for PK modeling that can be used to evaluate an ADC at the preclinical and clinical stages to support their successful development. Despite the numerous available options, fit-for-purpose modeling approaches for the PK and PD of ADCs should be critically planned and well-thought-out to adequately support the development of an ADC.

Limitations of Systemic Oncological Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy, affecting middle-age and older women frequently suffering from other chronic diseases, including chronic kidney disease. The risk of breast cancer development in women on renal replacement therapy (peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis) is higher than in the general population. Chronic kidney disease does not limit surgical treatment or radiotherapy; however, it affects the pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the systematic treatment to a different extent, increasing their toxicity and the risk of adverse drug reactions. This article summarizes the current knowledge (published studies accessed through PUBMED) on drugs used in chemotherapy, hormone therapy, anti-HER2 drugs, CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, and immune therapy in breast cancer patients undergoing dialysis. We discuss the data, the optimal choice of the chemotherapeutic protocol, and the administration of drugs in a specific time relation to the haemodialysis session to ensure the most effective and safe treatment to breast cancer patients.

Influence of Antigen Mass on the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Antibodies in Humans

Therapeutic antibodies are increasingly used to treat various diseases, including neoplasms and chronic inflammatory diseases. Antibodies exhibit complex pharmacokinetic properties, notably owing to the influence of antigen mass, i.e. the amount of antigenic targets to which the monoclonal antibody binds specifically. This review focuses on the influence of antigen mass on the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies quantified by pharmacokinetic modelling in humans. Out of 159 pharmacokinetic studies, 85 reported an influence of antigen mass. This influence led to non-linear elimination decay in 50 publications, which was described using target-mediated drug disposition or derived models, as quasi-steady-state, irreversible binding and Michaelis-Menten models. In 35 publications, the pharmacokinetics was apparently linear and the influence of antigen mass was described as a covariate of pharmacokinetic parameters. If some reported covariates, such as the circulating antigen level or tumour size, are likely to be correlated to antigen mass, others, such as disease activity or disease type, may contain little information on the amount of antigenic targets. In some cases, antigen targets exist in different forms, notably in the circulation and expressed at the cell surface. The influence of antigen mass should be soundly described during the early clinical phases of drug development. To maximise therapeutic efficacy, sufficient antibody doses should be administered to ensure the saturation of antigen targets by therapeutic antibodies in all patients. If necessary, antigen mass should be taken into account in routine clinical practice.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Assessment for the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin in Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the Phase III ECHELON-1 Study

The efficacy of the CD30‐directed antibody‐drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin was established in combination with chemotherapy as frontline treatment for advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in the randomized phase III ECHELON‐1 study. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure–response models were developed to quantify sources of PK variability and relationships between exposure and safety/efficacy end points in ECHELON‐1. The influence of patient‐specific factors on the PK of the ADC and the microtubule‐disrupting payload monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) was investigated; none of the significant covariates had a clinically relevant impact. Exposure–response analyses evaluated relationships between time‐averaged area under the curve (AUC; ADC, MMAE) and efficacy end points (ADC) or safety parameters (ADC, MMAE). Exposure–efficacy analyses supported consistent treatment benefit with brentuximab vedotin across observed exposure ranges. Exposure‐safety analyses supported the recommended brentuximab vedotin starting dose (1.2 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and effective management of peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia with dose modification/reduction and febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor primary prophylaxis.

Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients

The rapid advancement in the development of therapeutic proteins, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), has created a novel mechanism to selectively deliver highly potent cytotoxic agents in the treatment of cancer. These agents provide numerous benefits compared to traditional small molecule drugs, though their clinical use still requires optimization. The pharmacology of mAbs/ADCs is complex and because ADCs are comprised of multiple components, individual agent characteristics and patient variables can affect their disposition. To further improve the clinical use and rational development of these agents, it is imperative to comprehend the complex mechanisms employed by antibody-based agents in traversing numerous biological barriers and how agent/patient factors affect tumor delivery, toxicities, efficacy, and ultimately, biodistribution. This review provides an updated summary of factors known to affect the disposition of mAbs/ADCs in development and in clinical use, as well as how these factors should be considered in the selection and design of preclinical studies of ADC agents in development.

Population pharmacokinetic and covariate analyses of intravenous trastuzumab (Herceptin®), a HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody, in patients with a variety of solid tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of the intravenous formulation of trastuzumab, assess the impact of patient and pathological covariates on trastuzumab PK, and perform simulations to support dosing recommendations in special situations.

METHODS

Serum trastuzumab concentrations were obtained from 1582 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), early breast cancer (EBC), advanced gastric cancer (AGC), or other tumor types/healthy volunteers in 18 phase I, II, and III trials and analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the data. During treatment, linear clearance (CL) dominated, resulting in a total CL of 0.173-0.337 L/day, which is similar to other IgG1 monoclonal antibodies. Covariates influencing CL were baseline body weight, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, gastric cancer, and the presence of liver metastases. MBC and EBC had similar PK parameters, while CL was higher in AGC. Simulations indicated that at least 95% of patients with BC reach concentrations < 1 µg/mL (~ 97% washout) by 7 months. A dose delay in BC or AGC patients of > 1 week would take approximately 6 weeks to get back within steady-state exposure range.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab PK for the intravenous formulation was well-described across cancer types, disease status, and regimens. No dose adjustment is required for any of the identified patient covariates. A 7-month serum washout period for trastuzumab is recommended. A reloading dose is required if a maintenance dose is missed by > 1 week.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Cancer Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach that provides novel treatment options and hope for patients with cancer. By coupling monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to cytotoxic small-molecule payloads with a plasma-stable linker, ADCs offer the potential for increased drug specificity and fewer off-target effects than systemic chemotherapy. As evidence for the potential of these therapies, many new ADCs are in various stages of clinical development. Because their structure poses unique challenges to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization, it is critical to recognize the differences between ADCs and conventional chemotherapy in the design of ADC clinical development strategies. Although some properties may be determined mainly by either the mAb or the small-molecule portion, the behavior of these agents is not always predictable. Furthermore, because the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of ADCs are influenced by all 3 of its components (mAb, linker, and payload), it is important to characterize the intact molecule, any target-mediated catabolic clearance of the mAb, and the ADME properties of the small-molecule payload. Here we describe key issues in the clinical development of ADCs, including considerations for designing first-in-human studies for ADCs. We discuss some difficulties of ADC pharmacokinetic characterization and current approaches to overcoming these challenges. Finally, we consider all aspects of clinical pharmacology assessment required during drug development, using examples from the literature to illustrate the discussion.

Population PK and Exposure-Response Relationships for the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Brentuximab Vedotin in CTCL Patients in the Phase III ALCANZA Study

The antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin consists of the CD30‐directed antibody attached to the microtubule‐disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). In pharmacokinetic models, including data from six studies (380 patients with classical Hodgkin's, systemic anaplastic large‐cell, and cutaneous T‐cell (CTCL) lymphomas), lower clearance of ADC and modestly higher ADC exposure in CTCL patients did not translate into higher MMAE exposure. In CTCL patients from the phase III ALCANZA study (n = 66), improved progression‐free survival with brentuximab vedotin vs. controls was not related to ADC exposure. ADC exposure was a predictor of grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results support the consistent benefit observed with brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks across the range of exposures in ALCANZA and support dose reductions in patients experiencing TEAEs at the starting dose.

Factors Affecting the Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Major advances in therapeutic proteins, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), have created revolutionary drug delivery systems in cancer over the past decade. While these immunoconjugate agents provide several advantages compared to their small-molecule counterparts, their clinical use is still in its infancy. The considerations in their development and clinical use are complex, and consist of multiple components and variables that can affect the pharmacologic characteristics. It is critical to understand the mechanisms employed by ADCs in navigating biological barriers and how these factors affect their biodistribution, delivery to tumors, efficacy, and toxicity. Thus, future studies are warranted to better understand the complex pharmacology and interaction between ADC carriers and biological systems, such as the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) and tumor microenvironment. This review provides an overview of factors that affect the pharmacologic profiles of ADC therapies that are currently in clinical use and development.

Trastuzumab emtansine: determining its role in management of HER2+ breast cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab linked to DM1 (emtansine), a potent cytotoxic maytansinoid derivative, by a stable linker. This structure results in improved tumor-directed cytotoxicity in HER2+ breast cancer with reduced systemic toxicities, particularly the cardiac toxicities associated with single agent trastuzumab. Phase III trials have demonstrated improved progression-free and overall survival in heavily pretreated patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, its role in first-line treatment is less clear. Ongoing studies continue to evaluate its role in neoadjuvant and adjuvant management of HER2+ breast cancer.

Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Antibody-Drug Conjugates against Cancer

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are ushering in the next era of targeted therapy against cancer. An ADC for cancer therapy consists of a potent cytotoxic payload that is attached to a tumour-targeted antibody by a chemical linker, usually with an average drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 3.5-4. The theory is to deliver potent cytotoxic payloads directly to tumour cells while sparing healthy cells. However, practical application has proven to be more difficult. At present there are only two ADCs approved for clinical use. Nevertheless, in the last decade there has been an explosion of options for ADC engineering to optimize target selection, Fc receptor interactions, linker, payload and more. Evaluation of these strategies requires an understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of ADC pharmacokinetics. Development of ADCs for use in cancer further requires an understanding of tumour properties and kinetics within the tumour environment, and how the presence of cancer as a disease will impact distribution and elimination. Key pharmacokinetic considerations for the successful design and clinical application of ADCs in oncology are explored in this review, with a focus on the mechanistic determinants of distribution and elimination.

Brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with CD30-positive haematologic malignancies and hepatic or renal impairment

Aims

Brentuximab vedotin, an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), selectively delivers the microtubule‐disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) into CD30‐expressing cells. The pharmacokinetics of brentuximab vedotin have been characterized in patients with CD30‐positive haematologic malignancies. The primary objective of this phase 1 open label evaluation was to assess the pharmacokinetics of brentuximab vedotin in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Methods

Systemic exposures were evaluated following intravenous administration of 1.2 mg kg^–1 brentuximab vedotin in patients with CD30‐positive haematologic malignancies and hepatic (n = 7) or renal (n = 10) impairment and compared with those of unimpaired patients (n = 8) who received 1.2 mg kg^–1 brentuximab vedotin in another arm of the study.

Results

For any hepatic impairment, the ratios of geometric means (90% confidence interval) for AUC(0,∞) were 0.67 (0.48, 0.93) for ADC and 2.29 (1.27, 4.12) for MMAE. Mild or moderate renal impairment caused no apparent change in ADC or MMAE exposures. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 ml min^–1; n = 3) decreased ADC exposures (0.71 [0.54, 0.94]) and increased MMAE exposures (1.90 [0.85, 4.21]). No consistent pattern of specific adverse events was evident, but analysis of the safety data was confounded by the patients' poor baseline conditions. Five patients died due to adverse events considered unrelated to brentuximab vedotin. All had substantial comorbidities and most had poor baseline performance status.

Conclusions

Hepatic impairment and severe renal impairment may cause decreases in brentuximab vedotin ADC exposures and increases in MMAE exposures.

Pharmacokinetics of Selected Anticancer Drugs in Elderly Cancer Patients: Focus on Breast Cancer

Background: Elderly patients receiving anticancer drugs may have an increased risk to develop treatment-related toxicities compared to their younger peers. However, a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) basis for this increased risk has not consistently been established yet. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically review the influence of age on the PK of anticancer agents frequently administered to elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed electronic database, Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and available drug approval reviews, as published by EMA and FDA. Publications that describe age-related PK profiles of selected anticancer drugs against breast cancer, excluding endocrine compounds, were selected and included. Results: This review presents an overview of the available data that describe the influence of increasing age on the PK of selected anticancer drugs used for the treatment of breast cancer. Conclusions: Selected published data revealed differences in the effect and magnitude of increasing age on the PK of several anticancer drugs. There may be clinically-relevant, age-related PK differences for anthracyclines and platina agents. In the majority of cases, age is not a good surrogate marker for anticancer drug PK, and the physiological state of the individual patient may better be approached by looking at organ function, Charlson Comorbidity Score or geriatric functional assessment.

Weight-based dosing in medication use: what should we know?

BACKGROUND

Weight-based dosing strategy is still challenging due to poor awareness and adherence. It is necessary to let clinicians know of the latest developments in this respect and the correct circumstances in which weight-based dosing is of clinical relevance.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed.

RESULTS

Clinical indications, physiological factors, and types of medication may determine the applicability of weight-based dosing. In some cases, the weight effect may be minimal or the proper dosage can only be determined when weight is combined with other factors. Medications within similar therapeutic or structural class (eg, anticoagulants, antitumor necrosis factor medications, P2Y12-receptor antagonists, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies) may exhibit differences in requirements on weight-based dosing. In some cases, weight-based dosing is superior to currently recommended fixed-dose regimen in adult patients (eg, hydrocortisone, vancomycin, linezolid, and aprotinin). On the contrary, fixed dosing is noninferior to or even better than currently recommended weight-based regimen in adult patients in some cases (eg, cyclosporine microemulsion, recombinant activated Factor VII, and epoetin α). Ideal body-weight-based dosing may be superior to the currently recommended total body-weight-based regimen (eg, atracurium and rocuronium). For dosing in pediatrics, whether weight-based dosing is better than body surface-area-based dosing is dependent on the particular medication (eg, methotrexate, prednisone, prednisolone, zidovudine, didanosine, growth hormone, and 13-cis-retinoic acid). Age-based dosing strategy is better than weight-based dosing in some cases (eg, intravenous busulfan and dalteparin). Dosing guided by pharmacogenetic testing did not show pharmacoeconomic advantage over weight-adjusted dosing of 6-mercaptopurine. The common viewpoint (ie, pediatric patients should be dosed on the basis of body weight) is not always correct. Effective weight-based dosing interventions include standardization of weight estimation, documentation and dosing determination, dosing chart, dosing protocol, order set, pharmacist participation, technological information, and educational measures.

CONCLUSION

Although dosing methods are specified in prescribing information for each drug and there are no principal pros and cons to be elaborated, this review of weight-based dosing strategy will enrich the knowledge of medication administration from the perspectives of safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics, and will also provide research opportunities in clinical practice. Clinicians should be familiar with dosage and administration of the medication to be prescribed as well as the latest developments.

Trastuzumab emtansine in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ado- trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate composed of trastuzumab, a stable linker (MCC), and the cytotoxic agent DM1 (derivative of maytansine; mertansine). T-DM1 retains the mechanisms of action of trastuzumab, but also acts as a, selectively delivered, tubulin inhibitor. Following antigen-mediated binding to the tumor cell, T-DM1 is endocytosed and intracellularly catabolized resulting in the release of its cytotoxic moiety.

AREAS COVERED

T-DM1 has completed Phase III development and compared favorably with the lapatinib/capecitabine combination with a superior response rate (objective response rate [ORR]) and duration of response, longer duration of disease control (progression-free survival [PFS]), prolonged overall survival and improved tolerability and quality of life in patients with prior treatment with trastuzumab and a taxane. In a separate Phase III, T-DM1 was compared with any other chosen regimen in patients who had at least received two prior HER2-directed therapies. T-DM1 nearly doubled PFS.

EXPERT OPINION

T-DM1 (Kadcyla) has become the treatment of choice in second-line and beyond for patients with advanced HER2-expressing breast cancer.

Phase I trial of EpCAM-targeting immunotoxin MOC31PE, alone and in combination with cyclosporin

Background:

A phase I trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of the anti-EpCAM immunotoxin (IT) MOC31PE in cancer patients. An important part of the study was to investigate whether the addition of Sandimmune (cyclosporin, CsA) suppressed the development of anti-IT antibodies.

Methods:

Patients with EpCAM-positive metastatic disease were eligible for treatment with intravenous MOC31PE using a modified Fibonacci dose escalation sequence. Maximum tolerated dose was first established without, then with intravenously administered CsA.

Results:

Sixty-three patients were treated with MOC31PE in doses ranging from 0.5 to 8 μg kg⁻¹. Maximum tolerated dose was 8 μg kg⁻¹ for MOC31PE alone, and 6.5 μg kg⁻¹ when combined with CsA. The dose-limiting adverse event was reversible liver toxicity. No radiological complete or partial responses were observed, whereas stable disease was seen in 36% of the patients receiving MOC31PE only. The pharmacokinetic profile of MOC31PE was characterised by linear kinetics and with a half-life of ∼3 h. The addition of CsA delayed the generation of anti-IT antibodies.

Conclusions:

Intravenous infusion of MOC31PE can safely be administered to cancer patients. Immune suppression with CsA delays the development of anti-MOC31PE antibodies. The antitumour effect of MOC31PE warrants further evaluation in EpCAM-positive metastatic disease.

A Humanized Anti-CD22-Onconase Antibody-Drug Conjugate Mediates Highly Potent Destruction of Targeted Tumor Cells

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have evolved as a new class of potent cancer therapeutics. We here report on the development of ADCs with specificity for the B-cell lineage specific (surface) antigen CD22 being expressed in the majority of hematological malignancies. As targeting moiety a previously generated humanized anti-CD22 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derivative from the monoclonal antibody RFB4 was reengineered into a humanized IgG1 antibody format (huRFB4). Onconase (ranpirnase), a clinically active pancreatic-type ribonuclease, was employed as cytotoxic payload moiety. Chemical conjugation via thiol-cleavable disulfide linkage retained full enzymatic activity and full binding affinity of the ADC. Development of sophisticated purification procedures using size exclusion and ion exchange chromatography allowed the separation of immunoconjugate species with stoichiometrically defined number of Onconase cargos. A minimum of two Onconase molecules per IgG was required for achieving significant in vitro cytotoxicity towards lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. Antibody-drug conjugates with an Onconase to antibody ratio of 3 : 1 exhibited an IC₅₀ of 0.08 nM, corresponding to more than 18,400-fold increased cytotoxicity of the ADC when compared with unconjugated Onconase. These results justify further development of this ADC as a promising first-in-class compound for the treatment of CD22-positive malignancies.

Trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of trastuzumab, a stable linker (MCC), and the cytotoxic agent DM1 (derivative of maytansine). Administration of T-DM1 leads to limited systemic exposure of free DM1, with no evidence of DM1 accumulation after repeated dosing.

AREAS COVERED

Phase I and Phase II clinical trials with T-DM1 as a single agent and in combination with paclitaxel, docetaxel, and pertuzumab have shown substantial clinical activity and a favorable safety profile. A randomized, open-label, first-line trial comparing trastuzumab and docetaxel with single agent T-DM1 showed a significant improved progression-free survival for T-DM1.

EXPERT OPINION

T-DM1 has successfully completed second-line Phase III development for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. The Phase III EMILIA study demonstrated an overall survival benefit for T-DM1 compared to the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in taxane-trastuzumab pretreated patients. T-DM1 may offer delivery on a personalized basis of very potent cytotoxic agents in a cellular selective manner.

Trastuzumab emtansine: a review of its use in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab-based therapy

Trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla™) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of the humanized anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 antibody trastuzumab covalently linked to the highly potent microtubule inhibitory drug DM1 (a cytotoxic derivative of maytansine) via a stable thioether linker. Intravenous trastuzumab emtansine was recently approved for use in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable, locally advanced (in the EU) or metastatic (in the USA and EU) breast cancer who had previously received trastuzumab and a taxane (separately or in combination), making it the first antibody-drug conjugate approved in this indication. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of trastuzumab emtansine in these patients and summarizes its pharmacology. In the well-designed EMILIA study, trastuzumab emtansine significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival, relative to treatment with lapatinib plus capecitabine, in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. Trastuzumab emtansine was generally well tolerated in this study, with <6% of patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. Based on its efficacy and favourable tolerability, the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend trastuzumab emtansine as the preferred option in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have received previous trastuzumab-based therapy.

Application of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation for Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development

Characterization and prediction of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) is challenging, since it requires simultaneous quantitative understanding about the PK-PD properties of three different molecular species i.e., the monoclonal antibody, the drug, and the conjugate. Mathematical modeling and simulation provides an excellent tool to overcome these challenges, as it can simultaneously integrate the PK-PD of ADCs and their components in a quantitative manner. Additionally, the computational PK-PD models can also serve as a cornerstone for the model-based drug development and preclinical-to-clinical translation of ADCs. To provide an overview of this subject matter, this manuscript reviews the PK-PD models applicable to ADCs. Additionally, the usage of these models during different drug development stages (i.e., discovery, preclinical development, and clinical development) is also emphasized. The importance of PK-PD modeling and simulation in making rationale go/no-go decisions throughout the drug development process is also highlighted. There is an array of PK-PD models available, ranging from the systems models specifically developed for ADCs to the empirical models applicable to all chemotherapeutic agents, which one can employ for ADCs. The decision about which model to choose depends on the questions to be answered, time at hand, and resources available.

T-DM1, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective against uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas overexpressing HER2

Ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma (CS) are characterized by their aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis. We evaluated the efficacy of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), against primary HER2 positive and HER2 negative CS cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Eight primary CS cell lines were evaluated for HER2 amplification and protein expression by fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Sensitivity to T-DM1-induced antibody-dependent-cell-mediated-cytotoxicity (ADCC) was evaluated in 4-h-chromium-release-assays. T-DM1 cytostatic and apoptotic activities were evaluated using flow cytometry based proliferation assays. In vivo activity of T-DM1 was also evaluated. HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification were detected in 25 % (2/8) of the primary CS cell lines. T-DM1 and T were similarly effective in inducing strong ADCC against CS overexpressing HER2 at 3+ levels. In contrast, T-DM1 was dramatically more effective than T in inhibiting cell proliferation (P < 0.0001) and in inducing G2/M phase cell cycle arrest in the HER2 expressing cell lines (shift of G2/M: mean ± SEM from 14.87 ± 1.23 to 66.57 ± 4.56 %, P < 0.0001). Importantly, T-DM1 was highly active at reducing tumor formation in vivo in CS xenografts overexpressing HER2 (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001 compared to T and vehicle respectively) with a significantly longer survival when compared to T and vehicle mice (P = 0.008 and P = 0.0001 respectively). T-DM1 may represent a novel treatment option for the subset of HER2 positive CS patients with disease refractory to chemotherapy.

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer: latest evidence and clinical potential

In February 2013, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, Kadcyla®) received regulatory approval in the United States for treatment-refractory human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer based on results from EMILIA, a large phase III trial that compared standard of care lapatinib plus capecitabine to T-DM1. Several other studies have been reported in the metastatic setting and multiple trials are ongoing or planned in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Here we provide an updated and comprehensive review of clinical trials evaluating T-DM1, discuss management of toxicity associated with this drug, propose potential mechanisms of resistance and offer practical considerations for the treating oncologist.

A phase IIa dose-finding and safety study of first-line pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab, capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab provides a more comprehensive blockade of HER2 signalling than trastuzumab alone. Therefore, we conducted a phase IIa study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (aGC).

METHODS

Patients received pertuzumab 840 mg for cycle 1 and 420 mg q3w for cycles 2-6 (Arm A) or pertuzumab 840 mg q3w for six cycles (Arm B). Trastuzumab, cisplatin and capecitabine were also given for six cycles, then trastuzumab q3w until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. The co-primary endpoints were day 43 pertuzumab serum trough concentration (Cmin) and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomised. Mean pertuzumab Cmin at day 43 was 40.0 μg ml(-1) (s.d.: 17.3) in Arm A and 62.7 μg ml(-1) (29.1) in Arm B. Mean day 43 Cmin in Arm A was ~37% lower than that seen in metastatic breast cancer. The safety profiles were similar between arms and treatment was well tolerated. Partial responses were achieved by 86% and 55% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the pharmacokinetic and safety data, the 840 mg q3w pertuzumab dose has been selected for a phase III study of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive aGC.

Trastuzumab emtansine: first global approval

Genentech and ImmunoGen are collaborating on the development of trastuzumab emtansine, a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate that comprises Genentech's trastuzumab antibody linked to ImmunoGen's anti-mitotic agent, mertansine (a maytansine derivative; also known as DM1). The conjugate combines two strategies: the anti-HER2 activity of trastuzumab, and the targeted intracellular delivery of mertansine, a tubulin polymerisation inhibitor which interferes with mitosis and promotes apoptosis. The linker in trastuzumab emtansine is a non-reducible thioether linker, N-succinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC, designated MCC after conjugation). Trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla™) has been launched in the USA as second-line monotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, and has been filed for approval in the EU and Japan in this indication. Trastuzumab emtansine is in phase III development as first-line combination therapy or monotherapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, and as third-line monotherapy for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Phase II development is underway for early-stage breast cancer and phase II/III development is underway in patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of trastuzumab emtansine leading to this first approval for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer who previously received trastuzumab and a taxane, separately or in combination.

Population pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: clinical implications of the effect of covariates

Purpose

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab linked to DM1, a highly potent cytotoxic agent. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed to estimate typical values and interindividual variability of T-DM1 PK parameters and the effects of clinically relevant covariates.

Methods

Serum samples were collected from 671 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who received single-agent T-DM1 in five phase I to phase III studies. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with the first-order conditional estimation method was used.

Results

A linear two-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment described T-DM1 PKs in the clinical dose range. T-DM1 elimination clearance was 0.676 L/day, volume of distribution in the central compartment (V_c) was 3.127 L, and terminal elimination half-life was 3.94 days. Age, race, region, and renal function did not influence T-DM1 PK. Given the low-to-moderate effect of all statistically significant covariates on T-DM1 exposure, none of these covariates is expected to result in a clinically meaningful change in T-DM1 exposure.

Conclusions

T-DM1 PK properties are consistent and predictable in patients. A further refinement of dose based on baseline covariates other than body weight for the current 3.6 mg/kg regimen would not yield clinically meaningful reductions in interindividual PK variability in patients with MBC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-014-2500-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model elucidating the disposition of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) for treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapeutic for treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers. The T-DM1 dose product contains a mixture of drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) moieties whereby the small molecule DM1 is chemically conjugated to trastuzumab antibody. The pharmacokinetics (PK) underlying this system and other ADCs are complex and have not been elucidated. Accordingly, we have developed two PK modeling approaches from preclinical data to conceptualize and understand T-DM1 PK, to quantify rates of DM1 deconjugation, and to elucidate the link between trastuzumab, T-DM1, and DAR measurements. Preclinical data included PK studies in rats (n = 34) and cynomolgus monkeys (n = 18) at doses ranging from 0.3 to 30 mg/kg and in vitro plasma stability. T-DM1 and total trastuzumab (TT) plasma concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Individual DAR moieties were measured by affinity capture liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometry. Two PK modeling approaches were developed for T-DM1 using NONMEM 7.2 software: a mechanistic model fit simultaneously to TT and DAR concentrations and a reduced model fit simultaneously to TT and T-DM1 concentrations. DAR moieties were well described with a three-compartmental model and DM1 deconjugation in the central compartment. DM1 deconjugated fastest from the more highly loaded trastuzumab molecules (i.e., DAR moieties that are ≥3 DM1 per trastuzumab). T-DM1 clearance (CL) was 2-fold faster than TT CL due to deconjugation. The two modeling approaches provide flexibility based on available analytical measurements for T-DM1 and a framework for designing ADC studies and PK-pharmacodynamic modeling of ADC efficacy- and toxicity-related endpoints.

T-DM1, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective against primary HER2 overexpressing uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo

Amplification of c-erbB2 has been reported in over 30% of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and found to confer poor survival because of high proliferation and increased resistance to therapy. In this study, we evaluated for the first time Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), a novel antibody–drug conjugate, against multiple epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive USC cells in vitro followed by developing a supportive in vivo model. Fifteen primary USC cell lines were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry for HER2 protein expression. C-erbB2 gene amplification was evaluated using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Sensitivity to T-DM1 and trastuzumab (T)-induced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity was evaluated in 5-h chromium release assays. T-DM1 and T cytostatic and apoptotic activities were evaluated using flow-cytometry-based proliferation assays. In vivo activity of T-DM1 versus T in USC xenografts in SCID mice was also evaluated. High levels of HER2 protein overexpression and HER2 gene amplification were detected in 33% of USC cell lines. T-DM1 was considerably more effective than trastuzumab in inhibiting cell proliferation and in causing apoptosis (P = 0.004) of USC showing HER2 overexpression. Importantly, T-DM1 was highly active at reducing tumor formation in vivo in USC xenografts overexpressing HER2 (P = 0.04) and mice treated with TDM-1 had significantly longer survival when compared to T-treated mice and control mice (P ≤ 0.0001). T-DM1 shows promising antitumor effect in HER2-positive USC cell lines and USC xenografts and its activity is significantly higher when compared to T. T-DM1 may represent a novel treatment option for HER2-positive USC patients with disease refractory to trastuzumab and traditional chemotherapy.

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): a novel antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with poorer prognosis and shortened survival. Primary and acquired resistance to existing HER2-targeted therapies presents a challenge for the management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine, a drug-antibody conjugate, has shown promising results for patients failing prior treatment with trastuzumab. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine consists of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab linked to a potent microtubule inhibitor (emtansine), allowing a targeted delivery of chemotherapy to cells that overexpress HER2. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine has been approved for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have failed prior therapy with trastuzumab and a taxane. Although well-tolerated in clinical trials, thrombocytopenia has been reported and platelet values should be monitored closely. Increased liver enzymes and bilirubin, as well as cardiotoxicity, have also been documented, and recommendations for dose reduction or discontinuation due to these toxicities are available. Clinical trials are currently ongoing to further define the role of ado-trastuzumab emtansine in both the metastatic and early breast cancer settings.

Exposure-response relationship of T-DM1: insight into dose optimization for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Exposure-response (E-R) analyses for ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, Kadcyla) were performed using data from a randomized, active control (lapatinib plus capecitabine) trial in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses stratified by T-DM1 trough concentration on day 21 of cycle 1 (Cmin,C1D21) were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). E-R analyses indicated that after adjusting for baseline risk factors, higher T-DM1 exposure is associated with improved efficacy. T-DM1-treated patients with Cmin,C1D21 lower than the median value had values of OS and PFS comparable to those of the active control arm. The percentage of patients who received T-DM1 dose adjustments was similar across the exposure range and was lower than that of the active control arm. Our findings suggest that there may be an opportunity to optimize Kadcyla dose in the patient subgroup with low T-DM1 exposure for improved efficacy with acceptable tolerability.

Strategies to address drug interaction potential for antibody-drug conjugates in clinical development

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a unique class of therapeutic proteins with both small and large molecular components. In vivo, ADCs are processed to multiple clinically relevant analytes, each with distinct PK properties. This increases the complexity for ADC drug interaction (DI) assessment. Furthermore, given the usually narrow therapeutic range for ADCs, a thorough risk assessment is essential to establish benefit/risk for patients. Therefore, an early understanding of the ADC catabolism and elimination pathways and cytochrome P450 reaction phenotyping, cytochrome P450 inhibition and induction potential, transporter interaction and inhibition potential for the cytotoxic drug catabolites assessed by in vitro and preclinical studies is essential. This information would be integrated with the clinical PK and PD properties of the ADC-related analytes for a theoretical risk assessment of ADC DI in combination therapy. ADC DI assessment in clinical studies will further support the theoretical risk assessment and the conclusions for the labeling statement.

Trends in cancer-targeted antibody-drug conjugates

Better knowledge of engineered antibodies and tumour biology has led to the development of novel targeted therapies, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs combine a monoclonal antibody, directed toward specific antigen highly expressed on the cancer cell, to potent cytotoxic drug through a stable linker. ADCs are designed to bind selectively to cancer cells and to deliver cytotoxic drugs into the cancer cell, which may preserve normal cells. ADCs should be stable and non-toxic in circulation. Upon binding to antigen, ADCs are internalized by different processes, followed by the intracellular release of an active form of the cytotoxic drug, which in turn kills the cancer cell. This technology has the potential to further improve the anticancer activity while limiting toxicity. First results from ongoing clinical trials are encouraging. Favourable pharmacokinetic profile was observed showing good stability in circulation. Clinical studies demonstrated that ADCs provide clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. Objective responses and clinical benefits were demonstrated with the investigated ADCs. Major toxicities frequently associated to chemotherapy were barely or not reported with ADCs. Taken together, ADCs may become the new wave of anticancer drugs in the future.

The success story of trastuzumab emtansine, a targeted therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine is a unique antibody-drug conjugate targeting selectively human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer cells, thus conferring high efficacy with minimal systemic toxicities. Trastuzumab emtansine consists of a monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and potent cytotoxic agent DM1, combined together through a stable thioether bond. First-in-man phase I study set the maximum tolerated dose at 3.6 mg/kg given intravenously on a 3-weekly regimen. In phase II studies, trastuzumab emtansine at 3.6 mg/kg provided objective tumour responses and clinical benefit with an encouraging safety profile. Over these studies, trastuzumab emtansine had favourable pharmacokinetics. No accumulation of trastuzumab emtansine or catabolites was observed even after repeated dosing and free DM1 was very low in circulation. The stability of trastuzumab emtansine in circulation justifies the minimal systemic toxicity observed. Recently, a randomised international open-label phase III study confirmed the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Overall survival was significantly improved in the trastuzumab emtansine arm. Safety outcomes were also favourable. The adverse events traditionally related to chemotherapy were markedly lower or absent with trastuzumab emtansine. Cardiotoxicity, frequently observed in HER2-directed therapy, was not reported. Although thrombocytopenia and elevations in hepatic enzymes were reported with trastuzumab emtansine, these events were reversible and manageable. Ongoing trials investigating trastuzumab emtansine as a single-agent or in combination with other agents, will determine the place of trastuzumab emtansine in the current therapeutic strategies deployed for HER2-metastatic breast cancer.

Hormone-related pharmacokinetic variations associated with anti-breast cancer drugs

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer, with more than one million new patients diagnosed annually worldwide. Generally speaking, there are three types of drugs used in management of breast cancer namely: hormonal treatment, chemotherapeutic agents and target-based agents. There is increasing evidence that hormones play an important role in development of both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent breast cancers.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics of various types of drugs used to treat breast cancer. Furthermore, the authors discuss hormone-related variations including: the menstrual status, gender and exogenous hormones influencing drug absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion (ADME). The authors also describe the physiological factors such as body weight and age that affect the pharmacokinetics of several drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of anti-breast cancer drugs are multifaceted. Hormones appear to be a key factor determining the pharmacokinetics (and efficacy) of hormonal therapy due to their role in cancer progression. In chemotherapy, the effects of hormones on the drug pharmacokinetics are possibly mediated through P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux and/or cytochrome P450 metabolism. In many cases, dosing regimen should be adjusted for drugs used in treatment of breast cancers based on the hormone levels in the body.

Trastuzumab emtansine: the first targeted chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate, comprised of a potent cytotoxic drug connected via a stable linker to the anti-HER2 antibody, trastuzumab, thereby primarily targeting chemotherapy delivery to cells overexpressing the HER2 receptor. A Phase II randomized trial of T-DM1 in the front-line metastatic breast cancer setting revealed promising activity and improved safety compared with standard chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Subsequently, a Phase III trial in patients with trastuzumab-pretreated metastatic breast cancer showed T-DM1 to be associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. T-DM1 represents a major shift in the treatment of patients with breast cancer as it replaces traditional nontargeted chemotherapy with a 'smart' medication that directs the cytotoxic therapy to cancer cells by using a known biomarker.

Effects of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) on QT Interval and Safety of Pertuzumab Plus T-DM1 in Patients With Previously Treated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate in development for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancer. Drugs in development are generally tested for their effects on QT interval, prolongation of which is associated with the potentially fatal arrhythmia torsades de pointes. In addition, an association between left ventricular dysfunction and other HER2-directed agents has been documented. This multicenter, phase 2 study, TDM4688g, assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics of T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, and the safety of pertuzumab plus T-DM1, an anti-HER2 extracellular domain antibody, in patients with early disease progression on T-DM1 alone. The primary end point was the change in QTc interval from baseline to each postbaseline time point, adjusted for heart rate using Fridericia's correction. T-DM1 had no clinically relevant effect on QTc interval. The observed upper limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval was below the 10-millisecond threshold of safety concern. The safety and efficacy of single-agent T-DM1 was consistent with that observed in previous studies. Pertuzumab plus T-DM1 was generally well tolerated with no new safety signals. These results support further investigation of T-DM1 as a single agent and with pertuzumab.

Treating breast cancer in the 21st century: emerging biological therapies

For many years, the medical treatment of breast cancer was reliant solely on cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, over the past twenty years, treatment has evolved to a more target-directed approach. We now employ tailored therapy based on the presence or absence of receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). We expect this trend to continue, as agents that use novel approaches to target HER2, as well as targeting different portions of the HER signaling pathway, are in various stages of development. Notably, pertuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to a different domain of the extracellular portion of the HER2 receptor than trastuzumab, was recently approved for use, as was lapatinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients with triple negative breast cancer, particularly those with the BRCA mutation, have more limited treatment options and carry a worse prognosis than those who are hormone receptor positive. However, recent data has shown that PARP inhibitors may have significant anti-tumor effect in those with this subtype of breast cancer. Novel agents that inhibit mTOR, PI3K, the insulin-like growth factor, heat shock protein 90, and histone deacetylase have shown promise in phase I-III trials and offer exciting new possibilities for the treatment of this often fatal disease. As we are presented with an ever increasing number of treatment options, the timing and combinations of therapeutic agents used becomes ever more complex in the age of personalized care, but we are hopeful that ultimately this will lead to improved patient outcomes.

Update on clinical trials: genetic targets in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in United States. From data of American Cancer Society from 2007 reported total of 178,480 women diagnosed with breast cancer. The death rate from breast cancer has decreased in North America over time, but still accounts for second highest cancer death, following lung cancer. Breast cancer is staged based on tumor size, nodal involvement, and distant metastasis like any other solid tumors. However clinical staging is not the only important factor in management of breast cancer. Various molecular features divides breast cancer into many subgroups - that act differently, and respond differently from therapy. Thus the focus of breast cancer treatment has evolved focusing on specific targets. The most important biologic markers in subtyping of breast cancer so far are hormone receptor positivity and HER2/neu protein expression. Five molecular subtypes using intrinsic gene set include Basal mRNA, HER2 + mRNA, Luminal AmRNA, Luminal B mRNA, and Normal-like mRNA. In addition, better understanding of genetic target of breast cancer has given us arsenal of personalized, and more effective treatment approach.This review will focus on examples that highlight several mechanism of tumorigenesis, giving us not just understanding of gene pathways and the molecular biology, that could lead us to therapeutic target. Several important molecular targets have been investigated in preclinical and clinical trials, others are yet to be explored. We will also describe genetic mechanisms discovery related to overcoming resistance to current targeted therapies in breast cancer, including hormone receptor expression and HER 2- neu amplification. We will also review other exciting developments in understanding of breast cancer, the tumor microenvironment and cancer stem cells, and targeting agents in that area.

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) clinical pipeline: a review

Biological therapies play an increasing role in cancer treatment, although the number of naked antibodies showing clinical efficacy as single agent remains limited. One way to enhance therapeutic potential of antibodies is to conjugate them to small molecule drugs. This combination is expected to bring together the benefits of highly potent drugs on the one hand and selective binders of specific tumor antigens on the other hand. However, designing an ADC is more complex than a simple meccano game, requiring thoughtful combination of antibody, linker, and drugs in the context of a target and a defined cancer indication. Lessons learned from the first-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and improvement of the technology guided the design of improved compounds which are now in clinical trials. Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris(®)), an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated to a potent microtubule inhibitor for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphomas, is the only marketed ADC today. A total of 27 ADC are currently undergoing clinical trials in both hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications. Among them, T-DM1 (trastuzumab emtansine), an ADC comprised of trastuzumab conjugated to DM1, via a non-cleavable linker, is showing very promising results in phase III for the treatment of HER2-positive refractory/relapsed metastatic breast cancer. Other compounds, such as CMC-544, SAR3419, CDX-011, PSMA-ADC, BT-062, and IMGN901 currently in clinical trials, targeting varied antigens and bearing different linker and drugs, contribute to the learning curve of ADC, as do the discontinued ADC. Current challenges include improvement of the therapeutic index, linked to a careful selection of the targets, a better understanding of ADC mechanism of action, the management and understanding of ADC off-target toxicities, as well as the selection of appropriate clinical settings (patient selection, dosing regimen) where these molecules can bring highest clinical benefit.

A guide to rational dosing of monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Dosing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is often based on body size, with the perception that body size-based dosing would reduce inter-subject variability in drug exposure. However, most mAbs are target specific with a relatively large therapeutic window and generally a small contribution of body size to pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, the dosing paradigm for mAbs should be assessed in the context of these unique characteristics. The objective of this study was to review the current dosing strategy and to provide a scientific rationale for dosing of mAbs using a modelling and simulation approach.

METHODS

In this analysis, the body weight-based or body weight-independent (fixed) dosing regimens for mAbs were systematically evaluated. A generic two-compartment first-order elimination model was developed. Individual or population pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated as a function of the body weight effects on clearance (θ(BW_CL)) and on the central volume of distribution (θ(BW_V1)). The variability in exposure (the area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC], trough serum concentration [C(min)] and peak serum concentration [C(max)]) was compared between body weight-based dosing and fixed dosing in the entire population. The deviation of exposure for light and heavy subjects from median body weight subjects was also measured. The simulation results were then evaluated with clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of various mAbs that were given either by body weight-based dosing or by fixed dosing in the case study.

RESULTS

Results from this analysis demonstrated that exposure variability was dependent on the magnitude of the body weight effect on pharmacokinetics. In contrast to the conventional assumption, body weight-based dosing does not always offer advantages over fixed dosing in reducing exposure variability. In general, when the exponential functions of θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) in the population pharmacokinetic model are <0.5, fixed dosing results in less variability and less deviation than body weight-based dosing; when both θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) are >0.5, body weight-based dosing results in less variability and less deviation than fixed dosing. In the scenarios when either θ(BW_CL) or θ(BW_V1) is >0.5, the impact on exposure variability is different for each exposure measure. The case study demonstrated that most mAbs had little effect or a moderate body weight effect (θ(BW_CL) and θ(BW_V1) <0.5 or ∼0.5). The difference of variability in exposure between body weight-based and fixed dosing is generally less than 20% and the percentages of deviation for light and heavy subpopulations are less than 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis provided insights into the conditions under which either fixed or body weight-based dosing would be superior in reducing pharmacokinetic variability and exposure differences between light and heavy subjects across the population. The pharmacokinetic variability introduced by either dosing regimen is moderate relative to the variability generally observed in pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety. Therefore, mAb dosing can be flexible. Given many practical advantages, fixed dosing is recommended to be the first option in first-in-human studies with mAbs. The dosing strategy in later stages of clinical development could then be determined based on combined knowledge of the body weight effect on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy from the early clinical trials.