1
|
O'Hagan E, McIntyre D, Nguyen T, Tan KM, Hanlon P, Siddiqui M, Anastase D, Lim TW, Uzendu A, Van Nguyen T, Wong WJ, Khor HM, Kumar P, Usherwood T, Chow CK. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights. Glob Heart 2024; 19:73. [PMID: 39281000 PMCID: PMC11396169 DOI: 10.5334/gh.1353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use. Findings Data from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36-45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors' confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%). Interpretation Cost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel O'Hagan
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Daniel McIntyre
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Tu Nguyen
- The George Institute for Global Health, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Rd Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Kit Mun Tan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Peter Hanlon
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears building, Byres Road, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maha Siddiqui
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Dzudie Anastase
- Clinical Research Education, Networking and Consultancy and Department of Medicine, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon
| | - Toon Wei Lim
- National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, 119074, Singapore
| | - Anezi Uzendu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, United States
| | - Tan Van Nguyen
- University of Medicine & Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Min City, Vietnam
| | - Wei Jin Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Rd Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Hui Min Khor
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Pramod Kumar
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo Marg, Ansari Nagar, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India
| | - Timothy Usherwood
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Clara K Chow
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvagno M, Cassai AD, Zorzi S, Zaccarelli M, Pasetto M, Sterchele ED, Chumachenko D, Gerli AG, Azamfirei R, Taccone FS. The state of artificial intelligence in medical research: A survey of corresponding authors from top medical journals. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0309208. [PMID: 39178224 PMCID: PMC11343420 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a subset of artificial intelligence that enables machines to understand and respond to human language through Large Language Models (LLMs)‥ These models have diverse applications in fields such as medical research, scientific writing, and publishing, but concerns such as hallucination, ethical issues, bias, and cybersecurity need to be addressed. To understand the scientific community's understanding and perspective on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research and authorship, a survey was designed for corresponding authors in top medical journals. An online survey was conducted from July 13th, 2023, to September 1st, 2023, using the SurveyMonkey web instrument, and the population of interest were corresponding authors who published in 2022 in the 15 highest-impact medical journals, as ranked by the Journal Citation Report. The survey link has been sent to all the identified corresponding authors by mail. A total of 266 authors answered, and 236 entered the final analysis. Most of the researchers (40.6%) reported having moderate familiarity with artificial intelligence, while a minority (4.4%) had no associated knowledge. Furthermore, the vast majority (79.0%) believe that artificial intelligence will play a major role in the future of research. Of note, no correlation between academic metrics and artificial intelligence knowledge or confidence was found. The results indicate that although researchers have varying degrees of familiarity with artificial intelligence, its use in scientific research is still in its early phases. Despite lacking formal AI training, many scholars publishing in high-impact journals have started integrating such technologies into their projects, including rephrasing, translation, and proofreading tasks. Efforts should focus on providing training for their effective use, establishing guidelines by journal editors, and creating software applications that bundle multiple integrated tools into a single platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Salvagno
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alessandro De Cassai
- Sant’Antonio Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Zorzi
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mario Zaccarelli
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marco Pasetto
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elda Diletta Sterchele
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dmytro Chumachenko
- Department of Mathematical Modelling and Artificial Intelligence, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
- Ubiquitous Health Technologies Lab, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Alberto Giovanni Gerli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Razvan Azamfirei
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Fabio Silvio Taccone
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young A, Findlay S, Cole M, Cranford JA, Daniel M, Alter H, Chisolm-Straker M, Macias-Konstantopoulos WL, Wendt WJ, Stoklosa H. A Teach-the-Teacher Module for Human Trafficking Bedside Instruction. MEDEDPORTAL : THE JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES 2024; 20:11422. [PMID: 39044803 PMCID: PMC11263469 DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Human trafficking (HT) is a public health issue that adversely affects patients' well-being. Despite the prevalence of trafficked persons in health care settings, a lack of educational modules exists for use in clinical contexts. We developed a 50-minute train-the-trainer module on HT. Methods After piloting the workshop for faculty, fellows, and residents (n = 19) at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) national conference, we implemented it in medical students' curricula during their emergency medicine clerkship at the University of Iowa (n = 162). We evaluated the worskhop by (a) a retrospective pre-post survey of self-reported ability to (1) define HT, (2) recognize high-risk signs, (3) manage situations with trafficked persons, and (4) teach others about HT, and (b) a 3-month follow-up survey to assess longitudinal behavior change. Results In both contexts, results demonstrated improvement across all learning outcomes (pre-post differences of 1.5, 1.3, 1.9, and 1.7 on a 4-point Likert-type scale for each learning objective above, respectively, at the SAEM conference and 1.2, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.3 at the University of Iowa; p < .001 for all). In the 3-month follow-up, we observed statistically significant changes in self-reported consideration of and teaching about HT during clinical encounters among learners who had previously never done either (p < .001 and p = .006, respectively). Discussion This train-the-trainer module is a brief and effective clinical tool for bedside teaching about HT, especially among people who have never previously considered HT in a clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Young
- Fourth-Year Medical Student, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
- Co-primary authors
| | - Shannon Findlay
- Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
- Co-primary authors
| | - Michael Cole
- Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - James A. Cranford
- Associate Research Scientist, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan
| | - Michelle Daniel
- Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, and Vice Dean for Medical Education, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine
| | - Harrison Alter
- Founding Director and Director of Research, Andrew Levitt Center for Social Emergency Medicine, Berkeley
| | - Makini Chisolm-Straker
- Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - Wendy L. Macias-Konstantopoulos
- Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director, Center for Social Justice and Health Equity, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Wendi-Jo Wendt
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - Hanni Stoklosa
- Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Chief Medical Officer, HEAL Trafficking
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Noureldin M, Melton B. Pharmacists' awareness and confidence in performing Pharmacists' Patient Care Process-related activities. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024; 64:102129. [PMID: 38796159 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP) is a 5-step approach for patient-centered evidence-based pharmaceutical care. The PPCP was developed by the Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners in 2014; however, little is known about PPCP terminology and process uptake across the profession. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore practicing pharmacists' awareness of and confidence in performing PPCP-related activities in various practice settings. METHODS This is a cross-sectional observational study of practicing pharmacists using a multiphase quantitative survey research design. A previously validated instrument, the PPCP Self-Efficacy Scale, was revised and distributed. The 28-item instrument addressed activities mapped to each of the 5 PPCP components (Collect, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Follow-Up). The survey was distributed via Qualtrics to an IQVIA pharmacist e-mail listserv in 2021 and to pharmacist state license rosters containing e-mail addresses in 2022. RESULTS A total 853 practicing pharmacists completed the survey. Most participants identified as female (62.5%) and white (74.6%). Almost 60% of participants reported practicing for 16 or more years. Forty-four percent practiced in a community pharmacy setting, whereas 23.6% and 15.4% practiced in a health-system setting and ambulatory care setting, respectively. Sixty-two percent indicated they had no previous knowledge of the PPCP, and 12.5% were unsure. Overall participants had relatively high self-efficacy mean scores for each of the PPCP components. Participants working in an ambulatory care setting had the highest mean self-efficacy scores across all PPCP components (P < 0.05). Participants who were affiliated with a college or school of pharmacy (e.g., faculty, preceptor) had higher mean self-efficacy scores than participants who were not affiliated (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Most of practicing pharmacists are unaware of PPCP terminology. Their confidence in performing tasks associated with PPCP components is relatively high and varies based on PPCP component and practice setting.
Collapse
|
5
|
Elsallab M, Bourgeois F, Maus MV. National Survey of FACT-Accredited Cell Processing Facilities: Assessing Preparedness for Local Manufacturing of Immune Effector Cells. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:626.e1-626.e11. [PMID: 38494077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
The utilization of the human immune system as a therapeutic modality has materialized in the form of novel biologics known as immune effector cells (IECs). However, currently approved IECs rely on autologous cells for manufacturing that are funneled through costly centralized supply chains leading to long wait times and potentially increased mortality. Alternative models for manufacturing at or near the point-of-care in a distributed and local approach are being proposed to overcome such a bottleneck. Cell processing facilities for minimally manipulated products, as well as academic good manufacturing practice facilities, are being considered for such manufacturing tasks. However, the infrastructure and the practices of these facilities remains unstudied. Here, we surveyed the cell processing facilities accredited by the Foundation for Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) in the United States to better understand their preparedness for local manufacturing of IECs. A structured survey consisting of 40 items was distributed to the directors of 157 facilities. The survey evaluated 6 domains, including facility characteristics, quality practices, personnel, use of automation, experience with IECs, and the perception of the point-of-care model. Thirty-eight facilities completed the survey (24.2%). Most facilities were involved in handling IEC products (35/38, 92.1%), and the majority had infrastructure to support basic operations and quality control such as viability (36/36, 100%), identity (33/36, 91.7%), and sterility (33/36, 91.7%). The quality practices varied among the facilities depending on the types of products processed. A slight majority implemented automation in their workflows (22/38, 57.9%). Facilities expressed a general interest in adopting point-of-care models (23/38, 61%), with financial and human resources identified as the most significant constraints. In conclusion, FACT-accredited cell processing facilities may provide the infrastructure required for local manufacturing. However, there is a need for standardization and minimum quality requirements to effectively implement such models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdi Elsallab
- Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Florence Bourgeois
- Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marcela V Maus
- Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murillo A, Su S, Zyczynski H, Bradley M. Management of Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms in Older Women: A Survey of Practitioners. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024; 30:452-456. [PMID: 37882057 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection for which empiric antibiotics are prescribed despite limited progression to urosepsis. More than half of antibiotics prescribed to older adults for a suspected UTI are considered unnecessary. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding management of older women (>65 years) with symptoms attributed to UTIs among family and internal medicine providers. STUDY DESIGN This cross-sectional study surveyed 330 primary care providers in November 2021 regarding management of UTI symptoms. The primary outcome was the proportion of primary care providers who felt safe waiting for urine culture results before prescribing antibiotics in older women. RESULTS The response rate was 43.0% (n = 142) with the majority of primary care providers practicing medicine more than 15 years (56.3%). For the primary outcome, 26.1% (n = 37) of primary care providers felt safe waiting for a urine culture result before prescribing antibiotics, while 62.0% (n = 88) felt delaying antibiotics depended on multiple factors, and 9.2% (n = 13) felt it was never safe to delay antibiotics. Primary care providers that either never felt it was safe to delay antibiotics or felt that "it depends" on a variety of factors, attributed their antibiotics administration to concern for progression to sepsis (n = 50, 49.5%) or progression of symptoms (n = 28, 27.7%). A higher proportion of primary care providers practicing more than 15 years felt safe delaying antibiotics compared with primary care providers with less experience (33.8% vs 18.3%, P = 0.04), and 70.3% of those who felt safe delaying antibiotics had more than 15 years of experience. CONCLUSION Primary care providers with more clinical experience have more comfort delaying antibiotics in older women with UTI symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Murillo
- From the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marelić M, Klasnić K, Vukušić Rukavina T. Measuring e-Professional Behavior of Doctors of Medicine and Dental Medicine on Social Networking Sites: Indexes Construction With Formative Indicators. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 10:e50156. [PMID: 38412021 PMCID: PMC10933720 DOI: 10.2196/50156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have predominantly measured e-professionalism through perceptions or attitudes, yet there exists no validated measure specifically targeting the actual behaviors of health care professionals (HCPs) in this realm. This study addresses this gap by constructing a normative framework, drawing from 3 primary sources to define e-professional behavior across 6 domains. Four domains pertain to the dangers of social networking sites (SNSs), encompassing confidentiality, privacy, patient interaction, and equitable resource allocation. Meanwhile, 2 domains focus on the opportunities of SNSs, namely, the proactive dissemination of public health information and maintaining scientific integrity. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop and validate 2 new measures assessing the e-professional behavior of doctors of medicine (MDs) and doctors of dental medicine (DMDs), focusing on both the dangers and opportunities associated with SNSs. METHODS The study used a purposive sample of MDs and DMDs in Croatia who were users of at least one SNS. Data collection took place in 2021 through an online survey. Validation of both indexes used a formative approach, which involved a 5-step methodology: content specification, indicators definition with instructions for item coding and index construction, indicators collinearity check using the variance inflation factor (VIF), external validity test using multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) model, and external validity test by checking the relationships of the indexes with the scale of attitude toward SNSs using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS A total of 753 responses were included in the analysis. The first e-professionalism index, assessing the dangers associated with SNSs, comprises 14 items. During the indicators collinearity check, all indicators displayed acceptable VIF values below 2.5. The MIMIC model showed good fit (χ213=9.4, P=.742; χ2/df=0.723; root-mean-square error of approximation<.001; goodness-of-fit index=0.998; comparative fit index=1.000). The external validity of the index is supported by a statistically significant negative correlation with the scale measuring attitudes toward SNSs (r=-0.225, P<.001). Following the removal of 1 item, the second e-professionalism index, focusing on the opportunities associated with SNSs, comprises 5 items. During the indicators collinearity check, all indicators exhibited acceptable VIF values below 2.5. Additionally, the MIMIC model demonstrated a good fit (χ24=2.5, P=.718; χ2/df=0.637; root-mean-square error of approximation<0.001; goodness-of-fit index=0.999; comparative fit index=1.000). The external validity of the index is supported by a statistically significant positive correlation with the scale of attitude toward SNSs (r=0.338; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Following the validation process, the instrument designed for gauging the e-professional behavior of MDs and DMDs consists of 19 items, which contribute to the formation of 2 distinct indexes: the e-professionalism index, focusing on the dangers associated with SNSs, comprising 14 items, and the e-professionalism index, highlighting the opportunities offered by SNSs, consisting of 5 items. These indexes serve as valid measures of the e-professional behavior of MDs and DMDs, with the potential for further refinement to encompass emerging forms of unprofessional behavior that may arise over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Marelić
- Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ksenija Klasnić
- Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tea Vukušić Rukavina
- Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Biomedical Research Center Šalata, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schlaepfer CH, Packiam VT, Tracy CR, Takacs EB, Steinberg RL. Current Utilization and Perceptions of Formal Education of Point-of-care Ultrasound in Urology. Urology 2024; 184:8-14. [PMID: 38065312 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the extent of formal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training, current utilization of POCUS, and contemporary perceptions of POCUS amongst urologists. METHODS A survey including questions regarding demographics, prior ultrasound education, current ultrasound utilization in practice/training, perceived optimal POCUS utilization, and the perception of formal ultrasound training was developed. The survey was disseminated to residency program directors (PDs) via the SAU and members of AUA subsection organizations. Data were collected via Redcap. RESULTS A total of 40 PDs and 159 other respondents completed the survey with approximately half (51%) in an academic practice and two-thirds (68%) with more than 10years in practice. PD response rate was 28%, and general response rate was 2%. Among all respondents, 95% (186/196) and 82% (160/194) agreed/strongly agreed formal POCUS training would be worthwhile during and after residency. Among urology residency PDs, 93% (37/40) agreed/strongly agreed that formal POCUS training is worthwhile in residency. The majority of respondents used some form of ultrasound in practice (77%, 154/199). However, only 37% (72/199) of all respondents had prior formal POCUS training, and 19% (5/26) of PDs reported formal training in their programs. Of respondents without formal training, 63% (80/127) reported interest in pursuing formal training. CONCLUSION POCUS is widely utilized in many practices. Yet, most urologists have not participated in formal POCUS training and most programs do not have curricula. Urologists have favorable opinions of the utility, safety, and efficacy of POCUS and desire training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vignesh T Packiam
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA
| | - Chad R Tracy
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA
| | - Elizabeth B Takacs
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA
| | - Ryan L Steinberg
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Venn RA, Khurshid S, Grayson M, Ashburner JM, Al‐Alusi MA, Chang Y, Foulkes A, Ellinor PT, McManus DD, Singer DE, Atlas SJ, Lubitz SA. Characteristics and Attitudes of Wearable Device Users and Nonusers in a Large Health Care System. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032126. [PMID: 38156452 PMCID: PMC10863832 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumer wearable devices with health and wellness features are increasingly common and may enhance disease detection and management. Yet studies informing relationships between wearable device use, attitudes toward device data, and comprehensive clinical profiles are lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS WATCH-IT (Wearable Activity Tracking for Comprehensive Healthcare-Integrated Technology) studied adults receiving longitudinal primary or ambulatory cardiovascular care in the Mass General Brigham health care system from January 2010 to July 2021. Participants completed a 20-question electronic survey about perceptions and use of consumer wearable devices, with responses linked to electronic health records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with device use. Among 214 992 individuals receiving longitudinal primary or cardiovascular care with an active electronic portal, 11 121 responded (5.2%). Most respondents (55.8%) currently used a wearable device, and most nonusers (95.3%) would use a wearable if provided at no cost. Although most users (70.2%) had not shared device data with their doctor previously, most believed it would be very (20.4%) or moderately (34.4%) important to share device-related health information with providers. In multivariable models, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.80 per 10-year increase [95% CI, 0.77-0.82]), male sex (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.95]), and heart failure (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63-0.89]) were associated with lower odds of wearable device use, whereas higher median income (OR, 1.08 per 1-quartile increase [95% CI, 1.04-1.12]) and care in a cardiovascular medicine clinic (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.05-1.30]) were associated with greater odds of device use. CONCLUSIONS Among patients in primary and cardiovascular medicine clinics, consumer wearable device use is common, and most users perceive value in wearable health data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael A. Venn
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac ArrhythmiasCardiology Division, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Shaan Khurshid
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac ArrhythmiasCardiology Division, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Mia Grayson
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Jeffrey M. Ashburner
- Division of General Internal MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Mostafa A. Al‐Alusi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Andrea Foulkes
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Patrick T. Ellinor
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac ArrhythmiasCardiology Division, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - David D. McManus
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Massachusetts T.H. Chan Medical SchoolWorcesterMAUSA
| | - Daniel E. Singer
- Division of General Internal MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Steven J. Atlas
- Division of General Internal MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Steven A. Lubitz
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac ArrhythmiasCardiology Division, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tolleson-Rinehart S, Rosenthal SL, de Roche AM, Laughon M, Sewell TB, Rivera CM, Gozal D, Hirsch R, Orange JS, Davis SD. Supporting Career Transitions of Senior Faculty: Perspectives of Chairs and Full Professors. J Pediatr 2024; 264:113518. [PMID: 37244584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Tolleson-Rinehart
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Susan L Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | - Ariel M de Roche
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Laughon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Taylor B Sewell
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Christina M Rivera
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - David Gozal
- Department of Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
| | - Raphael Hirsch
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jordan S Orange
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tennankore K, Jones J, Miller A, Adib A, Mathew S, Rasic D, Cookey J. Transforming healthcare delivery: a descriptive study of a novel provider-to-provider virtual care platform. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1284566. [PMID: 38155888 PMCID: PMC10753175 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Addressing challenges in access to specialty care, particularly long wait times and geographic disparities, is a pressing issue in the Canadian healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the impact and feasibility of provider-to-provider phone consultations between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists using a novel virtual care platform in Nova Scotia (Virtual Hallway). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey over 5 months, involving 211 PCPs and 34 specialists across Nova Scotia. The survey assessed the need for formal in-person referrals as well as clinician satisfaction. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics and the one-sample t-test. Results We found that 84% of provider-to-provider phone consultations negated the need for an in-person specialist referral. It was also reported that 90% of patients that did require in-person consultation had enhanced care while they awaited an in-person appointment with a specialist. Very high levels of satisfaction were reported among both PCPs and specialists, and there was a noticeable increase in billing volumes related to these consultations as measured by provincial billing codes. Conclusion The findings indicate that provider-to-provider phone consultations are feasible, well-accepted and also effective in reducing the need for in-person specialist visits. This approach offers a promising avenue for alleviating waitlist burdens, enhancing the quality of care, and improving the overall efficiency of healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Division of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, QEII - Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Ashley Miller
- Division of General Internal Medicine, QEII - Bethune Building, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Ashfaq Adib
- Virtual Hallway Consults Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shan Mathew
- Pleasant Street Medical Group, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
| | - Daniel Rasic
- Virtual Hallway Consults Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jacob Cookey
- Virtual Hallway Consults Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bohnhoff JC, Guyon-Harris K, Schweiberger K, Ray KN. General and subspecialist pediatrician perspectives on barriers and strategies for referral: a latent profile analysis. BMC Pediatr 2023; 23:576. [PMID: 37980515 PMCID: PMC10656818 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04400-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children in need of pediatric subspecialty care may encounter multiple barriers, and multiple strategies have been suggested to improve access. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of general and subspecialty pediatric physicians regarding barriers to subspecialty care and the value of strategies to improve subspecialty access. METHODS We surveyed a national sample of 1680 general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020 regarding 11 barriers to subspecialty care and 9 strategies to improve access to subspecialty care, selected from recent literature. Using latent profile analysis, respondents were grouped according to the degree to which they believed each of the barriers impacted access to subspecialty care. Using chi-squared tests, we compared the profiles based on respondent characteristics and perspectives on strategies to improve access. RESULTS The response rate was 17%. In 263 responses completed and eligible for inclusion, the barriers most frequently described as "major problems" were wait times (57%), lack of subspecialists (45%) and difficulty scheduling (41%). Respondents were classified into 4 profiles: "Broad concerns," "Subspecialist availability concerns," "Clinician communication concerns," and "Few concerns." These profiles varied significantly by respondent specialty (p < .001, with medical subspecialists overrepresented in the "Clinician communication" profile, psychiatrists in the "subspecialist availability" profile, and surgeons in the "few concerns" profile); and by respondents' typical wait time for appointments (p < .001, with physicians with the longest wait times overrepresented in the "subspecialist availability" profile). CONCLUSIONS We found specific profiles in clinician views regarding barriers to subspecialty care which were associated with perspectives on strategies aimed at overcoming these barriers. These results suggest that health systems aiming to improve subspecialty access should first identify the barriers and preferences specific to local clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Bohnhoff
- Department of Pediatrics, Maine Health, 1577 Congress St Fl 1, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, Maine Health Institute of Research, Scarborough, ME, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Katherine Guyon-Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kelsey Schweiberger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kristin N Ray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sakelaris V, Sullivan EE, Harris D. The impact of physician leadership development on behaviour and work-related changes. Healthc Manage Forum 2023; 36:373-377. [PMID: 37387618 DOI: 10.1177/08404704231185550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we present findings from a retrospective survey of 117 physician leadership development program graduates at the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. The survey was designed to assess how the program contributed to graduates' leadership development, specifically in terms of behaviour change and work-related changes. The themes resulting from the analysis of the open-ended questions reflected that the program led to changes in graduates' leadership behaviour and their ability to lead change in their respective organizations. The study highlighted the benefits of investment in training for physician leaders to advance transformation and improvement initiatives in a changing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Devin Harris
- British Columbia Patient Safety and Quality Council, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lüchinger R, Audétat MC, Bajwa NM, Bréchet-Bachmann AC, Guessous I, Richard-Lepouriel H, Dominicé Dao M, Perron J. French-speaking Swiss physician's perceptions and perspectives regarding their competencies and training need in leadership and management: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1095. [PMID: 37828553 PMCID: PMC10571431 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10081-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective leadership and management (L&M) are essential to the success of health care organizations. Young medical leaders often find themselves ill-prepared to take on these new responsibilities, but rarely attend training in L&M skills. The aims of this study were to evaluate physician's self-perceived competencies and training needs for L&M, to identify available regional L&M training, and to highlight opportunities, challenges and threats regarding physicians' training in medical L&M in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods study in three steps: (1) a survey on perceived L&M competencies and training needs (5 dimensions) to all physicians of a Swiss University Hospital (N = 2247); (2) a mapping of the Swiss French speaking L&M training programs through analysis of hospital websites and interviews; and (3) semi-structured interviews with L&M program coordinators about the programs' strengths and weaknesses as well as the opportunities and challenges to include physicians in such training. We used analysis of variance to compare differences in perceived competences between physicians of different hierarchical status and used Cramer's V to measure the association's degree between physicians' training needs and prior training in L&M and hierarchical status. We analysed semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis. RESULTS Five-hundred thirty-two physicians responded (24%). Physicians perceived themselves as rather competent in most leadership dimensions. More experienced physicians reported a higher sense of competence in all dimensions of leadership (e.g. Working with others: F = 15.55, p < .001; Managing services: F = 46.89, p < .001). Three competencies did not vary according to the hierarchical status: emotional intelligence (F = 1.56, p = .20), time management (F = 0.47, p = .70) and communicating (F = 1.97, p = .12). There was a weak to moderate association between the responders' self-perceived needs for training and their hierarchal status for all competencies (Cramer's V ∈ [0.16;0.35]). Physicians expressed a strong desire to seek out training for all competencies, especially for knowing one's leadership style (82%), managing teams (83%), and managing conflict (85%). Although existing local L&M training programs covered most relevant topics, only a forth of responders had attended any type of training. L&M program coordinators identified several facilitators and barriers to physician attendance on institutional (matching reality and training), relational (managing collective intelligence), and individual levels (beliefs and self-perceived identity). CONCLUSIONS French-speaking Swiss hospital physicians clearly express training needs for L&M skills although they only rarely attend such training programs. Reasons for non-attendance to such programs should be explored in order to understand physicians' low participation rates in these trainings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lüchinger
- Unit of Research and Development in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - M-C Audétat
- Unit of Research and Development in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- University Institute of Family and Child Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N M Bajwa
- Unit of Research and Development in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Women, Children and Adolescents, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A-C Bréchet-Bachmann
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - I Guessous
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - H Richard-Lepouriel
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Dominicé Dao
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Junod Perron
- Unit of Research and Development in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Medical Directorate, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iwai Y, Yu AYL, Thomas SM, Fayanju OA, Sudan R, Bynum DL, Fayanju OM. Leadership and Impostor Syndrome in Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:585-595. [PMID: 37350479 PMCID: PMC10846669 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impostor syndrome is an internalized sense of incompetence and not belonging. We examined associations between impostor syndrome and holding leadership positions in medicine. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional survey was distributed to US physicians from June 2021 to December 2021 through medical schools and professional organizations. Differences were tested with the chi-square test and t -test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with holding leadership positions and experiencing impostor syndrome. RESULTS A total of 2,183 attending and retired physicians were included in the analytic cohort; 1,471 (67.4%) were in leadership roles and 712 (32.6%) were not. After adjustment, male physicians were more likely than women to hold leadership positions (odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.69; p < 0.001). Non-US citizens (permanent resident or visa holder) were less likely to hold leadership positions than US citizens (odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.55; p < 0.001). Having a leadership position was associated with lower odds of impostor syndrome (odds ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68; p < 0.001). Female surgeons were more likely to report impostor syndrome compared to male surgeons (90.0% vs 67.7%; p < 0.001), an association that persisted even when female surgeons held leadership roles. Similar trends were appreciated for female and male nonsurgeons. Impostor syndrome rates did not differ by race and ethnicity, including among those underrepresented in medicine, even after adjustment for gender and leadership role. CONCLUSIONS Female physicians were more likely to experience impostor syndrome than men, regardless of specialty or leadership role. Although several identity-based gaps persist in leadership, impostor syndrome among racially minoritized groups may not be a significant contributor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Iwai
- From the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC (Iwai)
| | - Alice Yunzi L Yu
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (Yu)
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute (Thomas), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (Thomas), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Oluseyi A Fayanju
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (QA Fayanju)
| | - Ranjan Sudan
- Surgery (Sudan), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Debra L Bynum
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC (Bynum)
| | - Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine (OM Fayanju), The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation (PC3I) (OM Fayanju), The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (LDI) (OM Fayanju), The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Rena Rowan Breast Center, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA (OM Fayanju)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dugani SB, Fischer KM, Schroeder DR, Geyer HL, Maniaci MJ, Paulson M, Croghan IT, Burton MC. Global well-being, anxiety, social isolation, and emotional support among hospitalists during COVID-19 and Mpox outbreaks. Hosp Pract (1995) 2023; 51:211-218. [PMID: 37491767 PMCID: PMC10775116 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2023.2241342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a decline in hospitalist wellness. The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved, and new outbreaks (i.e. Mpox) have challenged healthcare systems. The objective of the study was to assess changes in hospitalist wellness and guide interventions. METHODS We surveyed hospitalists (physicians and advanced practice providers [APPs]), in May 2021 and September 2022, at a healthcare system's 16 hospitals in four US states using PROMIS® measures for global well-being, anxiety, social isolation, and emotional support. We compared wellness score between survey periods; in the September 2022 survey, we compared wellness scores between APPs and physicians and evaluated the associations of demographic and hospital characteristics with wellness using logistic (global well-being) and linear (anxiety, social isolation, emotional support) regression models. RESULTS In May 2021 vs. September 2022, respondents showed no statistical difference in top global well-being for mental health (68.4% vs. 57.4%) and social activities and relationships (43.8% vs. 44.3%), anxiety (mean difference: +0.8), social isolation (mean difference: +0.5), and emotional support (mean difference: -1.0) (all, p ≥ 0.05). In September 2022, in logistic regression models, APPs, compared with physicians, had lower odds for top (excellent or very good) global well-being mental health (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.31 [0.13-0.76]; p < 0.05). In linear regression models, age <40 vs. ≥40 years was associated with higher anxiety (estimate ± standard error, 2.43 ± 1.05; p < 0.05), and concern about contracting COVID-19 at work was associated with higher anxiety (3.74 ± 1.10; p < 0.01) and social isolation (3.82 ± 1.21; p < 0.01). None of the characteristics showed association with change in emotional support. In September 2022, there was low concern for contracting Mpox in the community (4.6%) or at work (10.0%). CONCLUSION In hospitalists, concern about contracting COVID-19 at work was associated with higher anxiety and social isolation. The unchanged wellness scores between survey periods identified opportunities for intervention. Mpox had apparently minor impact on wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar B. Dugani
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karen M. Fischer
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Holly L. Geyer
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Michael J. Maniaci
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Margaret Paulson
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ivana T. Croghan
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Research Hub, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Neill S, Hoe E, Fortin J, Goldberg AB, Janiak E. Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use. Contraception 2023; 126:110108. [PMID: 37394110 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To measure the prevalence of early pregnancy loss management types among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts, and delineate barriers, facilitators, demographic and practice-related factors associated with mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN We surveyed a census of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts. Descriptive statistics measured the prevalence of offering expectant, misoprostol-alone, mifepristone and misoprostol, dilation and curettage in the office and operating room, and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated barriers and facilitators to mifepristone use. Data were weighted to account for nonresponders. RESULTS 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate=29%). Participants most commonly offered expectant management (98%), dilation and curettage in the operating room (94%), and misoprostol-only medication management (80%). Fewer offered mifepristone-misoprostol (51%) or dilation and curettage in an office setting (45%). Those in private practice or other practice types had lower odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol than those in academic practice (private practice: aOR 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.19, 0.61]). Female physicians had higher odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol (aOR 1.97, 95% CI [1.11, 3.49]). Obstetrician-gynecologists who included medication abortion in their practice had much higher odds of using mifepristone for early pregnancy loss (aOR 25.06, 95% CI [14.52, 43.24]). The Food and Drug Administration Risk and Evaluation Management Strategies Program was a primary barrier among those not using mifepristone (54%). CONCLUSIONS Many obstetrician-gynecologists do not offer mifepristone-based regimens for early pregnancy loss, which are more efficacious than misoprostol-only regimens. The Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program is a major barrier to mifepristone use. IMPLICATIONS Half of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts do not use mifepristone for early pregnancy loss management. Major barriers include lack of experience with mifepristone and the Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program regulations. Removing medically unnecessary regulations and increasing education on mifepristone via access to abortion care experts may increase uptake of this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Neill
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Emily Hoe
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Fortin
- ASPIRE Center for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alisa B Goldberg
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; ASPIRE Center for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Janiak
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; ASPIRE Center for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hallquist MLG, Borensztein MJ, Coughlin CR, Buchanan AH, Andrew Faucett W, Peay HL, Smith ME, Tricou EP, Uhlmann WR, Wain KE, Ormond KE. Defining critical educational components of informed consent for genetic testing: views of US-based genetic counselors and medical geneticists. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1165-1174. [PMID: 37308598 PMCID: PMC10545703 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Consent and Disclosure Recommendation (CADRe) framework proposes that key components of informed consent for genetic testing can be covered with a targeted discussion for many conditions rather than a time-intensive traditional genetic counseling approach. We surveyed US genetics professionals (medical geneticists and genetic counselors) on their response to scenarios that proposed core informed consent concepts for clinical genetic testing developed in a prior expert consensus process. The anonymous online survey included responses to 3 (of 6 possible) different clinical scenarios that summarized the application of the core concepts. There was a binary (yes/no) question asking respondents whether they agreed the scenarios included the minimum necessary and critical educational concepts to allow an informed decision. Respondents then provided open-ended feedback on what concepts were missing or could be removed. At least one scenario was completed by 238 respondents. For all but one scenario, over 65% of respondents agreed that the identified concepts portrayed were sufficient for an informed decision; the exome scenario had the lowest agreement (58%). Qualitative analysis of the open-ended comments showed no consistently mentioned concepts to add or remove. The level of agreement with the example scenarios suggests that the minimum critical educational components for pre-test informed consent proposed in our prior work is a reasonable starting place for targeted pre-test discussions. This may be helpful in providing consistency to the clinical practice of both genetics and non-genetics providers, meeting patients' informational needs, tailoring consent for psychosocial support, and in future guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maia J Borensztein
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Curtis R Coughlin
- Department of Pediatrics and Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Holly L Peay
- RTI International, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Eric P Tricou
- Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wendy R Uhlmann
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Human Genetics; Center for Bioethics & Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Milani SA, Ahmed A, Rajagopal S, Raji M. The Landscape of Geriatric Fellow Scholarly Activity Participation: Findings From a National Survey of Program Directors. Cureus 2023; 15:e47989. [PMID: 38034147 PMCID: PMC10686579 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction As the US population continues to age, there is a critical need for geriatricians to be trained and engaged in research to inform high-quality care for older adults. Our objective was to understand the extent, type, barriers, and facilitators of research training and the attitudes toward research training and scholarly activity among Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited US geriatric fellowship programs. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of geriatric fellowship program directors from September to November 2022. Surveys assessing program characteristics, requirements for scholarly activity, director demographics, and director attitudes toward scholarly activity were distributed via email. We used descriptive statistics to assess fellowship scholarly activity requirements, facilitators, and perceived barriers. Results The survey response rate was 35.3% (41/116 programs). Most programs (82.9%) required participation in scholarly activity and provided protected time (73.2%). Definitions of scholarly activities greatly differed among programs. The most common scholarly activity requirements included participation in a scholarly project (70.7%) or local presentation (46.3%). The short duration of fellowship was the most common major barrier, reported by 70.7% of directors. Lastly, 34.1% of directors indicated satisfaction with the quality of research training provided, while 65.9% of directors reported satisfaction with the opportunities provided to participate in scholarly activities. Conclusions Overall, program requirements, facilitators, and perceived barriers to scholarly activity were heterogeneous among US geriatric program directors. Additionally, only about one-third of directors were satisfied with the research training provided. Our future work will compare the attitudes and reported barriers/facilitators of program director and fellow participants toward participation in scholarly activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaf A Milani
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| | - Adeeb Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| | - Shilpa Rajagopal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| | - Mukaila Raji
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Venn RA, Khurshid S, Grayson M, Ashburner JM, Al-Alusi MA, Chang Y, Foulkes A, Ellinor PT, McManus DD, Singer DE, Atlas SJ, Lubitz SA. Characteristics and Attitudes of Wearable Device Users and Non-Users in a Large Healthcare System. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.10.23293960. [PMID: 37609134 PMCID: PMC10441501 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.10.23293960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Consumer wearable devices with health and wellness features are increasingly common and may enhance prevention and management of cardiovascular disease. However, the characteristics and attitudes of wearable device users versus non-users are poorly understood. Methods Wearable Activity Tracking for Comprehensive Healthcare-Integrated Technology (WATCH-IT) was a prospective study of adults aged ≥18 years receiving longitudinal primary or ambulatory cardiovascular care at one of eleven hospitals within the Mass General Brigham multi-institutional healthcare system between January 2010-July 2021. We invited patients, including wearable users and non-users, to participate via an electronic patient portal. Participants were asked to complete a 20-question survey regarding perceptions and use of consumer wearable devices. Responses were linked to electronic health record data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with device use. Results Among 280,834 individuals receiving longitudinal primary or cardiovascular care, 65,842 did not have an active electronic portal or opted out of research contact. Of the 214,992 individuals sent a survey link, 11,121 responded (5.2%), comprising the WATCH-IT patient sample. Most respondents (55.8%) reported current use of a wearable device, and most non-users (95.3%) reported they would use a wearable device if provided at no cost. Although most users (70.2%) had not shared device data with their doctor previously, the majority believed it would be very (20.4%) or moderately (34.4%) important to share device-related health information with providers. In multivariable models, older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.80 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 0.77-0.82), male sex (0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95), and heart failure (0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89) were associated with lower odds of wearable device use, whereas higher median zip code income (1.08 per 1-quartile increase, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) and care in a cardiovascular medicine clinic (1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30) were associated with greater odds of device use. Nearly all respondents (98%) stated they would share device data with researchers studying health outcomes. Conclusions Within an electronically assembled cohort of patients in primary and cardiovascular medicine clinics with linkage to detailed health records, wearable device use is common. Most users perceive value in wearable data. Our platform may enable future study of the relationships between wearable technology and resource utilization, clinical outcomes, and health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael A. Venn
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shaan Khurshid
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mia Grayson
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Ashburner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mostafa A. Al-Alusi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea Foulkes
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Patrick T. Ellinor
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David D. McManus
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts T.H. Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel E. Singer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven J. Atlas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven A. Lubitz
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Baltas I, Gilchrist M, Koutoumanou E, Gibani MM, Meiring JE, Otu A, Hettle D, Thompson A, Price JR, Crepet A, Atomode A, Crocker-Buque T, Spinos D, Guyver H, Tausan M, Somasunderam D, Thoburn M, Chan C, Umpleby H, Sharp B, Chivers C, Vaghela DS, Shah RJ, Foster J, Hume A, Smith C, Asif A, Mermerelis D, Reza MA, Haigh DA, Lamb T, Karatzia L, Bramley A, Kadam N, Kavallieros K, Garcia-Arias V, Democratis J, Waddington CS, Moore LSP, Aiken AM. Exploring the views of infection consultants in England on a novel delinked funding model for antimicrobials: the SMASH study. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2023; 5:dlad091. [PMID: 37533762 PMCID: PMC10391702 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives A novel 'subscription-type' funding model was launched in England in July 2022 for ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. We explored the views of infection consultants on important aspects of the delinked antimicrobial funding model. Methods An online survey was sent to all infection consultants in NHS acute hospitals in England. Results The response rate was 31.2% (235/753). Most consultants agreed the model is a welcome development (69.8%, 164/235), will improve treatment of drug-resistant infections (68.5%, 161/235) and will stimulate research and development of new antimicrobials (57.9%, 136/235). Consultants disagreed that the model would lead to reduced carbapenem use and reported increased use of cefiderocol post-implementation. The presence of an antimicrobial pharmacy team, requirement for preauthorization by infection specialists, antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds and education of infection specialists were considered the most effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Under the new model, 42.1% (99/235) of consultants would use these antimicrobials empirically, if risk factors for antimicrobial resistance were present (previous infection, colonization, treatment failure with carbapenems, ward outbreak, recent admission to a high-prevalence setting).Significantly higher insurance and diversity values were given to model antimicrobials compared with established treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections, while meropenem recorded the highest enablement value. Use of both 'subscription-type' model drugs for a wide range of infection sites was reported. Respondents prioritized ceftazidime/avibactam for infections by bacteria producing OXA-48 and KPC and cefiderocol for those producing MBLs and infections with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter spp. and Burkholderia cepacia. Conclusions The 'subscription-type' model was viewed favourably by infection consultants in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Gilchrist
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eirini Koutoumanou
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Malick M Gibani
- Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James E Meiring
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Akaninyene Otu
- Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - David Hettle
- Department of Infection Sciences, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ameeka Thompson
- Department of Infection Sciences, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - James R Price
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Anna Crepet
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Spinos
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - Hudson Guyver
- James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk, UK
| | - Matija Tausan
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Maxwell Thoburn
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Cathleen Chan
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Umpleby
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK
| | - Bethany Sharp
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Callum Chivers
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Ronak J Shah
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Foster
- Directorate of Pharmacy, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Amy Hume
- Directorate of Pharmacy, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Christopher Smith
- Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ammara Asif
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic
| | | | | | - Nikhil Kadam
- Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Democratis
- Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | | | - Luke S P Moore
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, London, UK
| | - Alexander M Aiken
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Warrick AE, Hassid B, Coleman B, Cansino C, Faustin M. Multidisciplinary physician survey assessing knowledge of the female athlete triad and relative energy deficiency in sport. J Eat Disord 2023; 11:70. [PMID: 37161433 PMCID: PMC10169360 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-023-00800-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short and long-term health consequences surrounding Low Energy Availability can be mitigated by recognizing the risk factors and making early diagnosis of the Female Athlete Triad (Triad) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). While awareness of the Triad among physicians and allied health professionals has been studied, there are very few studies that assess physician awareness of both the Triad and RED-S. METHODS Our study assesses Low Energy Availability, the Triad, and RED-S knowledge with an electronic survey, educational handout, and follow up survey among physicians across multiple specialties at a single academic institution. RESULTS Among 161 respondents, respective Triad and RED-S awareness among surveyed specialties was highest in Orthopedic surgeons (100%, 100%), followed by Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (70%, 53%), Family Medicine (67%, 48%), Internal Medicine (54%, 36%), Obstetrics and Gynecology (46%, 32%), Pediatrics (45%, 29%), Endocrinology (33%, 33%), and Other (33%, 33%). Comparing the initial survey results to the follow-up survey results, there was an increase from 37 to 72% of physicians who correctly identified that the presence of low BMI or recent weight loss is not a required component of the Triad or RED-S. Both the initial and follow-up survey revealed a continued misperception surrounding the use of hormonal contraception to resume menstrual cycles, with 33% of physicians on initial survey and 44% of physicians on follow-up survey incorrectly answering that question. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary physicians have various levels of knowledge surrounding the Triad and RED-S, and there is a need for improved physician awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of the Triad and RED-S. Misperceptions exist surrounding the role of hormonal contraception in female athletes with the Triad and RED-S to regain and regulate menses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra E Warrick
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3850, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Brandon Hassid
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3850, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Brandon Coleman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3850, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Catherine Cansino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 2521 Stockton Blvd, 4th floor, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Marcia Faustin
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, 4860 Y street Suite 3850, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barnhart BJ, Reddy SG, Vandergrift JL. Which Outreach Modes Improve Response Rates to Physician Surveys? Lessons from an Experiment at the American Board of Internal Medicine. Eval Health Prof 2023; 46:48-53. [PMID: 36445930 DOI: 10.1177/01632787221143151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Physicians are a notoriously difficult group to survey due to a low propensity to respond. We investigate the relative effectiveness of reminder phone calls, pre-notification postcards, mailed paper surveys, and $1 upfront incentives for boosting survey response rate by embedding a randomized experiment into a mixed-mode operational survey at the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2019. Expected response rates and average marginal effects for each follow-up method were computed from a logistic regression model. The control group which only received email reminders achieved a response rate of 18.2%, 95% CI: (15.0%, 21.9%). The intervention group which included reminder emails, pre-notification postcards, and mailed paper surveys with $1 incentives achieved a response rate of 43.1%, 95% CI: (38.8%, 47.5%). Mailed paper surveys yielded the largest percentage point increase in response rate of 11.2%, 95% CI: (7.3%, 15.2%), while $1 upfront monetary incentives and phone call reminders increased survey response rate by 5.9%, 95% CI: (1.6%, 10.2%) and 5.5%, 95% CI: (2.6%, 8.3%) respectively. Pre-notification postcards are associated with a 2.0%, 95% CI: (-1.7%, 5.6%) increase in survey response rate. Cost-effectiveness for each method is discussed. This research supports optimal decision making for researchers when planning a physician survey study.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kalyoussef S, Hakim A, Kumar A, Fanella S, Mohandas S, Gaviria-Agudelo C. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Infectious Disease Telehealth Practices in North America. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023; 12:21-28. [PMID: 36317225 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piac111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has driven a significant increase in the use of telehealth (TH) but little is published about changes in TH usage by pediatric infectious disease (PID) providers. We assessed their pre- and intra-pandemic TH usage and experience. METHODS The Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Telehealth Work Group surveyed PID specialists in the United States and Canada from 6 December 2020 until 26 February 2021. Data collected included TH modalities, barriers, and satisfaction. RESULTS The survey response rate was 11.3% (288 of 2,550 PID clinicians) with 243 (96% of 253 analysis-eligible responses) managing children only. Women accounted for 62.1% (n = 157), 51.4% (130) of respondents devoted 50-99% of their time to direct patient care, and 93.3% (236) were located in the United States. The greatest increase in TH usage during the pandemic was in synchronous provider-patient communications (3.9-fold increase). During the pandemic, provider-provider TH increased by less than 10%, comfort with TH usage doubled from 42% to 91%, and satisfaction grew from 74% to 93.3% with different aspects of TH. The top challenge was incomplete or no physical examination (182, 71.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-pandemic TH usage and lack of barriers, but not reimbursement, were significantly associated with higher intra-pandemic usage. EMR-integrated TH was associated with significantly higher usage and satisfaction. Over 70% of respondents anticipate continuing TH usage after the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS There was high intra-pandemic usage of, and increased comfort and satisfaction with telehealth by PID specialists. Our data help inform post-pandemic TH expectations and strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabah Kalyoussef
- The Children's Hospital at Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Ambuj Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sergio Fanella
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sindhu Mohandas
- Department of Pediatrics, Children Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Claudia Gaviria-Agudelo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vaughan-Malloy AM, Yuen JC, Sandora TJ. Using a Human Factors Framework to Assess Clinician Perceptions of and Barriers to High Reliability in Hand Hygiene. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51:514-519. [PMID: 36933570 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand hygiene (HH) is critical to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Clinician perspectives on maintaining high reliability are poorly defined. METHODS We surveyed physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to understand perceptions of and barriers to high reliability in HH. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 model was used to develop an electronic survey exploring six human factors engineering (HFE) domains. RESULTS . Among 61 respondents, 70% perceived HH as "essential" to patient safety. While 87% reported alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability as very effective in improving HH reliability, 77% reported dispensers to be "sometimes" or "often" empty. Clinicians in surgery/anesthesia were more likely than those in medical specialties to note skin irritation from ABHR (OR 4.94; 95% CI 1.37-17.81) and less likely to believe feedback was effective in improving HH (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.88). One quarter of respondents indicated the layout of patient care areas was not conducive to performing HH. Staffing shortages and the pace and demands of work precluded HH for 15% and 11% of respondents, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Aspects of organizational culture, environment, tasks, and tools were identified as barriers to high reliability in HH. HFE principles can be applied to more effectively promote HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Vaughan-Malloy
- Infection Prevention and Control, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115.
| | - Jenny Chan Yuen
- Infection Prevention and Control, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Thomas J Sandora
- Infection Prevention and Control, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Halliday JA, Russell-Green S, Hagger V, O E, Morris A, Sturt J, Speight J, Hendrieckx C. Feasibility and acceptability of e-learning to upskill diabetes educators in supporting people experiencing diabetes distress: a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:768. [PMID: 36352377 PMCID: PMC9644574 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03821-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes distress is a commonly experienced negative emotional response to the ongoing burden of diabetes. Holistic diabetes care, including attention to diabetes distress, is recommended in clinical guidelines, yet not routinely implemented. Diabetes health professionals have highlighted lack of training as a barrier to implementation of psychological care. Therefore, we developed an e-learning: 'Diabetes distress e-learning: A course for diabetes educators' to address this need. This pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of evaluating the e-learning in a randomised controlled trial study, the acceptability of the e-learning to credentialled diabetes educators (CDEs); and preliminary evidence of its effect upon CDEs' diabetes distress-related knowledge, motivation, confidence, behavioural skills, and barriers to implementation. METHODS A pilot, unblinded, 2-armed, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited during a 4-month timeframe. Eligible participants were CDEs for ≥ 1 year providing care to ≥ 10 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes per week. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1 computer automated) to 1 of 2 learning activities: diabetes distress e-learning (intervention) or diabetes distress chapter (active control). They had 4 weeks to access the activity. They completed online surveys at baseline, 2-week and 12-week follow-up. RESULTS Seventy-four eligible CDEs (36 intervention, 38 active control) participated. At baseline, recognition of the clinical importance of diabetes distress was high but knowledge and confidence to provide support were low-to-moderate. Engagement with learning activities was high (intervention: 83%; active control: 92%). Fifty-five percent returned at least 1 follow-up survey. All 30 intervention participants who returned the 2-week follow-up survey deemed the e-learning high quality and relevant. Systemic barriers (e.g., financial limitations and access to mental health professionals) to supporting people with diabetes distress were common at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The e-learning was acceptable to CDEs. The study design was feasible but needs modification to improve follow-up survey return. The e-learning showed potential for improving diabetes distress-related knowledge, confidence and asking behaviours, but systemic barriers to implementation remained. Systemic barriers need to be addressed to facilitate implementation of support for diabetes distress in clinical practice. Future larger-scale evaluation of the e-learning is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Halliday
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Sienna Russell-Green
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Virginia Hagger
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Eric O
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Ann Morris
- AMCON Diabetes Management Service, Warrnambool, Australia
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nguyen AM, Schaler-Haynes M, Chou J, Wetzel M, Koller M, Yedidia MJ, Cantor JC. Impact Of The New Jersey COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Reciprocity Licensure Program On Health Care Workforce Supply. HEALTH AFFAIRS (PROJECT HOPE) 2022; 41:1125-1132. [PMID: 35914197 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
New Jersey's COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Reciprocity Licensure program provided temporary licenses to more than 31,000 out-of-state health care practitioners. As one of the first COVID-19 hot spots in the US, New Jersey is uniquely positioned to provide insights on enabling an out-of-state health care workforce through temporary licensure to address critical, ongoing concerns about health care workforce supply. In January 2021 we surveyed New Jersey temporary licensees. We analyzed more than 10,000 survey responses and found that practitioners who used the temporary license originated from every state in the US, provided both COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-related care, served a combination of new and existing patients, conversed with patients in at least thirty-six languages, and primarily used telehealth. Findings suggest that temporary licensure of out-of-state practitioners, along with telehealth waivers, may be a valuable, short-term solution to mitigating health care workforce shortages during public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Nguyen
- Ann M. Nguyen , Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Magda Schaler-Haynes
- Magda Schaler-Haynes, Office of the New Jersey Attorney General, Newark, New Jersey
| | | | - Matthew Wetzel
- Matthew Wetzel, Office of the New Jersey Attorney General
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pradhan N, Dyas AR, Bronsert MR, Lambert-Kerzner A, Henderson WG, Qiu H, Colborn KL, Mason NJ, Meguid RA. Attitudes about use of preoperative risk assessment tools: a survey of surgeons and surgical residents in an academic health system. Patient Saf Surg 2022; 16:13. [PMID: 35300719 PMCID: PMC8932286 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-022-00320-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Formal surgical risk assessment tools have been developed to predict risk of adverse postoperative patient outcomes. Such tools accurately predict common postoperative complications, inform patients and providers of likely perioperative outcomes, guide decision making, and improve patient care. However, these are underutilized. We studied the attitudes towards and techniques of how surgeons preoperatively assess risk. Methods Surgeons at a large academic tertiary referral hospital and affiliate community hospitals were emailed a 16-question survey via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) between 8/2019-6/2020. Reminder emails were sent once weekly for three weeks. All completed surveys by surgical residents and attendings were included; incomplete surveys were excluded. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency distributions and percentages for categorical variables, means, and standard deviations for continuous variables), and Fisher’s exact test and unpaired t-tests comparing responses by surgical attendings vs. residents. Results A total of 108 surgical faculty, 95 surgical residents, and 58 affiliate surgeons were emailed the survey. Overall response rates were 50.0% for faculty surgeons, 47.4% for residents, and 36.2% for affiliate surgeons. Only 20.8% of surgeons used risk calculators most or all of the time. Attending surgeons were more likely to use prior experience and current literature while residents used risk calculators more frequently. Risk assessment tools were more likely to be used when predicting major complications and death in older patients with significant risk factors. Greatest barriers for use of risk assessment tools included time, inaccessibility, and trust in accuracy. Conclusions A small percentage of surgeons use surgical risk calculators as part of their routine practice. Time, inaccessibility, and trust in accuracy were the most significant barriers to use. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-022-00320-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha Pradhan
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam R Dyas
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-310, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Michael R Bronsert
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anne Lambert-Kerzner
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - William G Henderson
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Howe Qiu
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn L Colborn
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.,Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-310, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Nicholas J Mason
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. .,Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, C-310, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. .,Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|