1
|
Lechien JR, Vaezi MF, Chan WW, Allen JE, Karkos PD, Saussez S, Altman KW, Amin MR, Ayad T, Barillari MR, Belafsky PC, Blumin JH, Johnston N, Bobin F, Broadhurst M, Ceccon FP, Calvo-Henriquez C, Eun YG, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Crevier-Buchman L, Clarke JO, Dapri G, Eckley CA, Finck C, Fisichella PM, Hamdan AL, Hans S, Huet K, Imamura R, Jobe BA, Hoppo T, Maron LP, Muls V, O'Rourke AK, Perazzo PS, Postma G, Prasad VMN, Remacle M, Sant'Anna GD, Sataloff RT, Savarino EV, Schindler A, Siupsinskiene N, Tseng PH, Zalvan CH, Zelenik K, Fraysse B, Bock JM, Akst LM, Carroll TL. The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1614-1624. [PMID: 37929860 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work was to gather an international consensus group to propose a global definition and diagnostic approach of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to guide primary care and specialist physicians in the management of LPR. METHODS Forty-eight international experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and physiologists) were included in a modified Delphi process to revise 48 statements about definition, clinical presentation, and diagnostic approaches to LPR. Three voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 8/10. Votes were anonymous and the analyses of voting rounds were performed by an independent statistician. RESULTS After the third round, 79.2% of statements (N = 38/48) were approved. LPR was defined as a disease of the upper aerodigestive tract resulting from the direct and/or indirect effects of gastroduodenal content reflux, inducing morphological and/or neurological changes in the upper aerodigestive tract. LPR is associated with recognized non-specific laryngeal and extra-laryngeal symptoms and signs that can be evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires and clinical instruments. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing can suggest the diagnosis of LPR when there is >1 acid, weakly acid or nonacid hypopharyngeal reflux event in 24 h. CONCLUSION A global consensus definition for LPR is presented to improve detection and diagnosis of the disease for otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care practitioners. The approved statements are offered to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated diagnostic approaches to LPR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Laryngoscope, 134:1614-1624, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology (Anatomy Department), EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Walter W Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacqueline E Allen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Petros D Karkos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sven Saussez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology (Anatomy Department), EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Kenneth W Altman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Milan R Amin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tareck Ayad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Montreal Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Maria R Barillari
- Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, L. Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy
| | - Peter C Belafsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Joel H Blumin
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nikki Johnston
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Francois Bobin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Fabio P Ceccon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christian Calvo-Henriquez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Young-Gyu Eun
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science and Technology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
| | - John O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Giovanni Dapri
- International School Reduced Scar Laparoscopy, Minimally Invasive General and Oncologic Surgery Center, Humanitas Gavazzeni University Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia A Eckley
- Divisão de Otorrinolaringologia, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Laboratórios de Diagnóstico, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camille Finck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Abdul-Latif Hamdan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Stephane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
| | - Kathy Huet
- Department of Metrology and Langage Science, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
| | - Rui Imamura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Toshitaka Hoppo
- Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lance P Maron
- Netcare Park Lane Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Vinciane Muls
- Department of gastroenterology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels
| | - Ashli K O'Rourke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Paulo S Perazzo
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gregory Postma
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vyas M N Prasad
- ENT Centre and Singapore Medical Specialist Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marc Remacle
- Department of Otolaryngology, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Geraldo D Sant'Anna
- Disciplina de Otorrinolaringologia, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Robert T Sataloff
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nora Siupsinskiene
- Department of Otolaryngology, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Klaipeda university, Klaipeda, Lithuania
| | - Ping-Huei Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Craig H Zalvan
- Department of Otolaryngology-New York Medical College, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY; Institute for Voice and Swallowing Disorders, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA
| | - Karol Zelenik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - Jonathan M Bock
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lee M Akst
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas L Carroll
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng X, Chen Z, Chen T, Zhou L, Liu C, Zheng J, Hu R. Assessing the role of dryness and burning sensation in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4542. [PMID: 38402357 PMCID: PMC10894288 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55420-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a condition characterized by the regurgitation of stomach and duodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, with variable and non-specific symptoms. Therefore, developing an accurate symptom scale for different regions is essential. Notably, the symptoms of "dryness and burning sensation in the laryngopharynx or mouth" are prevalent among the Chinese population but are often omitted from conventional symptom assessment scales, such as the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) scales. To address this gap, our study incorporated the symptoms into the RSI and RSS-12 scales, developing the RSI-10/RSS-13 scales. Afterward, we assessed the role of the new scale's reliability (Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), and diagnostic efficiency. Our study encompassed 479 participants (average = 39.5 ± 13.4 years, 242 female) and 91 (average = 34.01 ± 13.50 years, 44 female) completed 24 h MII-pH monitoring. The Cronbach's α values of 0.80 and 0.82 for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 scales, respectively. RSI-10 and RSS-13 exhibited strong test-retest reliability (ICCs = 0.82-0.96) and diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.84-0.85). Furthermore, the factor analysis identified the RSS-13 and its three sub-scales (ear-nose-throat, digestive tract, respiratory tract) exhibited good to excellent structural validity (χ2/df = 1.95, P < 0.01; CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05). The AUC optimal thresholds for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 in the Chinese population were 13 and 36, respectively. Besides, the inclusion of the new item significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency of the RSI scale (P = 0.04), suggesting that RSI-10 holds promise as a more effective screening tool for LPRD, and global validation is needed to demonstrate the impact of this new symptom on the diagnosis of LPRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaowei Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhiwei Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ting Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chaofeng Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jingyi Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Renyou Hu
- Chongqing Jinshan Science and Technology (Group) Co Ltd, Chongqing, 401120, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lechien JR, Bobin F. Diagnostic Value of Fasting and Bedtime Saliva Pepsin Measurements in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. Biomedicines 2024; 12:398. [PMID: 38398000 PMCID: PMC10886472 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pepsin test is an emerging non-invasive diagnostic approach for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of multiple salivary pepsin tests for detecting LPR. METHODS Patients with suspected LPR and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to November 2022. Patients benefited from hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) and fasting and bedtime saliva collections to measure oral pepsin. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated considering fasting, bedtime, and the highest values of the pepsin tests at ≥16, ≥36, ≥45, and ≥100 ng/mL cutoffs. RESULTS The pepsin test was adequately performed in 147 LPR patients and 32 controls. The pepsin tests were 81.6%, 74.8%, and 61.5% sensitive at cutoffs of ≥16, ≥45, and ≥100 ng/mL, respectively. The PPVs were 93.0%, 94.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. The highest specificity (81.8%) was found for the fasting pepsin test at a cutoff of 100 ng/mL. The highest sensitivity (81.6%) was found by considering the highest measured pepsin test at the ≥16 ng/mL threshold. The measurement of fasting saliva pepsin was associated with the highest sensitivity and specificity value. At ≥16 ng/mL, 27 patients had negative findings, indicating that 18.4% (27/147) of the true positive cases were missed by considering the highest pepsin test. The receiver operating characteristic curve reported that a cutoff of 21.5 was 76.9% sensitive and 62.5% specific, while the PPV and NPV were 91.1% and 38.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The consideration of the highest concentration of the fasting and bedtime saliva pepsin collections at a cutoff of 21.5 was associated with the best detection rate and sensitivity of the pepsin tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R. Lechien
- Division of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, EpiCURA Hospital, B7000 Baudour, Belgium
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Avenue du Champ de Mars, 6, B7000 Mons, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), 92150 Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, F64000 Brussels, Belgium
- Polyclinique Elsan de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France;
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lukaschyk J, Abel J, Brockmann-Bauser M, Clausen JF, Reiter R, Wessel J, Rohlfs AK. The Relation Between Endoscopic and Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Signs, Vocal Tract Discomfort, Voice Handicap, and Voice Disorder Type: Same Yet Different? J Voice 2024:S0892-1997(23)00381-8. [PMID: 38182496 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the relation between subjective voice-related symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with different etiology of voice disorder and vocally healthy subjects with and without laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS The study involved 149 participants (106 female, 43 male) including 125 with various voice disorders (functional, structural, and neurogenic) and 24 vocally healthy individuals. For self-rating the German versions of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Vocal Tract Discomfort (VTD) Scale, and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were applied, while endoscopic evaluations utilized the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). Statistical analyses incorporated ANOVA with Bonferroni posthoc tests to identify group variations. Correlations between VTD Scale, VHI, RSI, RFS, and RSA were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. To examine test sensitivity and specificity for the VTD Scale and RSA, we performed a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Youden's-Index was applied to determine the cut-off-value with best discriminatory abilities. The diagnosis of LPR was assumed when the criteria of RFS > 7 AND RSI > 13 was met. RESULTS Significant differences for all voice diagnosis groups and vocally healthy individuals for RFS and all three self-rating questionnaires were found. Moreover, there was significant correlation between VTD Scale and VHI and RSI as well as RSI and RFS, which was moderate, negative in the group of persons with LPR. However, there was no significant difference for RSA results between the vocally healthy or any diagnosis group. CONCLUSION Thus, the RFS may be more suitable to predict reflux and voice-related symptoms. The VTD Scale is a useful instrument in screening voice disorders but also LPR and can therefore be used as a tool for decision-making when transferring to a specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lukaschyk
- ENT, Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology - Klosterstern, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Jakob Abel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meike Brockmann-Bauser
- Department of Phoniatrics and Speech Pathology, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jacob Friedrich Clausen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Reiter
- Division of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Julian Wessel
- ENT, Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology - Klosterstern, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna-Katharina Rohlfs
- ENT, Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology - Klosterstern, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lechien JR, Geneid A, Bohlender JE, Cantarella G, Avellaneda JC, Desuter G, Sjogren EV, Finck C, Hans S, Hess M, Oguz H, Remacle MJ, Schneider-Stickler B, Tedla M, Schindler A, Vilaseca I, Zabrodsky M, Dikkers FG, Crevier-Buchman L. Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:5459-5473. [PMID: 37707614 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice. METHODS Nineteen laryngologists-phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected. RESULTS Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included: baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases. CONCLUSION The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, EpiCURA Hospital, Anatomy Department of University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France.
| | - Ahmed Geneid
- Department of Otolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jörg E Bohlender
- Department of Phoniatrics and Speech Pathology, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanna Cantarella
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Fondazione, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan C Avellaneda
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology Service. Hospital Universitario Mayor Mederi, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Gauthier Desuter
- ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth V Sjogren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Camille Finck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liege, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Stephane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France
| | - Markus Hess
- Medical Voice Center (MEVOC), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Haldun Oguz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Fonomer, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Marc J Remacle
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Eich, Luxembourg
| | | | - Miroslav Tedla
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comenius University, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabel Vilaseca
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michal Zabrodsky
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Motol, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Frederik G Dikkers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bobin F, Lechien JR. Association between oropharyngeal ph-monitoring, pepsin saliva concentration and degree of apnea-hypopnea index of obstructive sleep apnea. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 52:68. [PMID: 37838710 PMCID: PMC10576889 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-023-00675-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin saliva measurements. DESIGN Prospective uncontrolled study. METHODS Patients with sleep disturbances and reflux symptoms underwent polysomnography, 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and saliva pepsin collections. The prevalence of LPR was investigated in OSA patients according to oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin measurements. A correlation analysis was performed between pH-monitoring findings, pepsin saliva levels, reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12), reflux sign assessment (RSA), Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pichot and arousal findings. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients completed the evaluations. LPR was detected in 34/37 (92%) and 29/34 (85%) patients at the oropharyngeal-pH monitoring and pepsin test, respectively. OSA was detected in 30 patients (81%). Among them, LPR was detected in 28/30 (93%) cases. Pharyngeal reflux events mainly occurred nighttime/supine in OSA patients. Both Ryan score and supine reflux time at pH < 6.5 were significantly associated with BMI and the RSA sub- and total scores (p < 0.02). Tongue-base hypertrophy score was positively associated with the number of micro-arousals (p = 0.027); the supine percent of pH < 6.5 (p = 0.030); morning (p = 0.030) and bedtime pepsin saliva measurements (p = 0.037). The bedtime pepsin saliva level was significantly associated with Ryan Score (p = 0.047); AHI (p = 0.017) and the sleep saturation < 90% time (p = 0.040). The saliva level of the morning pepsin was associated with a shortest paradoxical sleep phase (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION OSA patients may have high prevalence of pharyngeal reflux events at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and high pepsin saliva measurements. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring should be useful for the correlation between reflux and sleep findings in OSA patients. Future large cohort controlled studies are needed to determine the prevalence of LPR in OSA and healthy individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Bobin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Elsan Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Jérôme R Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Elsan Hospital, Poitiers, France.
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Laryngoloy and Bronchoesophagology Division, EpiCURA Hospital, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Suresnes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lechien JR, Bobin F. Variability and accuracy of multiple saliva pepsin measurements in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 52:66. [PMID: 37794462 PMCID: PMC10548621 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-023-00670-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the variability and diagnostic value of multiple salivary pepsin measurements in the detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS Patients with LPR symptoms were consecutively recruited from December 2019 to Augustus 2022. Twenty-one asymptomatic individuals completed the study. The diagnostic was confirmed with hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). Patients collected three saliva samples during the 24-h testing period. Symptoms and findings were studied with reflux symptom score-12 and reflux sign assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of pepsin measurements were calculated considering morning, post-lunch and post-dinner samples. The consistency and relationship between HEMII-pH, pepsin measurements, and clinical features were investigated. RESULTS Morning, post-lunch and post-dinner saliva pepsin concentrations were measured in 42 patients. Pepsin measurements were 64.9%, 59.5%, and 59.0% sensitive for morning, post-lunch and post-dinner collections at cutoff ≥ 16 ng/mL. Considering the highest concentration of the three pepsin saliva collections, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 70.5%, 73.0%; 66.7% and 78.9%, respectively. Morning pepsin measurements reported higher consistency, sensitivity, and specificity than post-dinner and post-lunch pepsin measurements. CONCLUSION The collection of several saliva pepsin samples improves the detection rate of LPR. In case of high clinical LPR suspicion and negative pepsin test, a HEMII-pH study could provide further diagnostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Division of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium.
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Avenue du Champ de Mars, 6, 7000, Mons, Belgium.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Polyclinique Elsan de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
- Research Committee of Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-Rhinolaryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.
| | - Francois Bobin
- Polyclinique Elsan de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- Research Committee of Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-Rhinolaryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Han H, Zhao Y, Lv Q, Liu J, Liang Y. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Reflux Symptom Score. J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00268-0. [PMID: 37743110 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reliability, validity and clinical value of the Chinese version of reflux symptom score (RSS) (RSS in Chinese). METHODS This was a prospective study that contained 42 healthy volunteers and 135 possible laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) patients. Reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, oropharyngeal pH monitoring (Dx-pH monitoring), and RSS of each patient were performed. RSS was performed again after 1 week. Confirmed LPRD patients were treated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 8 weeks. And RSS was performed again after treatment. The reliability and validity of RSS was evaluated. RESULTS The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of RSS was 0.772, which indicated good internal reliability. The results of test-retest found all P values were less than 0.05, which supported good external reliability. The comparison of the results of RSS with oropharyngeal pH monitoring discovered a diagnostic coincidence rate of 83.70% and a positive predictive value of 84.96%, which showed good criterion validity. After 8 weeks treatment of PPI, RSS decreased significantly (pretreatment 84.79 ± 42.50,post-treatment 20.11 ± 22.82, P < 0.001), indicating good responsiveness to change of RSS. The score of quality of life impact of suspected LPRD patients was obviously higher than that of healthy volunteers (t = 7.153, P < 0.001). All patients and volunteers agreed that RSS in Chinese can evaluate their symptoms well. CONCLUSION RSS in Chinese had good internal and external reliability, good criterion validity and good responsiveness to change. The content and method of evaluation of RSS in Chinese was better and more comprehensive. RSS in Chinese could be a new instrument to evaluate LPRD in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honglei Han
- Otolarygology Head and Neck Surgey Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing city, Beijing, China.
| | - Yu Zhao
- Otolarygology Head and Neck Surgey Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing city, Beijing, China
| | - Qiuping Lv
- Otolarygology Head and Neck Surgey Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing city, Beijing, China
| | - Jianfeng Liu
- Otolarygology Head and Neck Surgey Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing city, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liang
- Gastroesophageal Surgery Department, Chinese PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing city, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodriguez A, Steffens Y, Calvo-Henriquez C, Mayo-Yáñez M, Horoi M, Lechien JR. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Changes during the COVID-19 Quarantine. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1475. [PMID: 37629765 PMCID: PMC10456535 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective: To examine the effects of the lockdown on diet adherence and stress levels in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Materials and Methods: Patients with a positive LPR diagnosis at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring were treated from a pre- to lockdown period with a 3-month high-protein, low-fat, alkaline, plant-based diet, with behavioral changes, and an association of pantoprazole (20 MG/d) and alginate (Gaviscon 3/d). The following patient-reported outcomes questionnaire and findings instrument were used: Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). At the posttreatment time, patients were invited to evaluate the impact of lockdown on diet adherence and stress management with a predefined grid of foods and beverages and the perceived stress scale (PSS), respectively. Results: Thirty-two patients completed the evaluations. RSS-12 and RSA significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment. Most patients experienced mild-to-severe stress levels at the end of the lockdown. The level of stress substantially increased in 11 patients (34%) due to the lockdown, while it did not change in 11 patients (44%). In 11 cases (34%), patients reported that the adherence to the anti-reflux diet was better than initially presumed thanks to the lockdown period, while 44% (N = 14) reported that the lockdown did not impact the adherence to a diet. PSS and RSS-12 were significantly correlated at the end of the pandemic (rs = 0.681; p < 0.001). The increase in stress level was positively associated with the lack of adherence to diet (rs = 0.367; p = 0.039). Conclusions: During the lockdown, the diet habits of LPR patients were improved in one-third and unchanged in 44% of cases. The stress level was increased in one-third of patients, which was associated with an increase in symptom scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Rodriguez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (A.R.); (Y.S.); (M.H.)
| | - Younes Steffens
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (A.R.); (Y.S.); (M.H.)
| | - Christian Calvo-Henriquez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Miguel Mayo-Yáñez
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), 15006 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - Mihaela Horoi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (A.R.); (Y.S.); (M.H.)
| | - Jerome R. Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (A.R.); (Y.S.); (M.H.)
- Department of Otolaryngology, Elsan Hospital, 86000 Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, 75000 Paris, France
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), 7000 Mons, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guimarães I, Batista AP, Quintal A, Bom R, Romeiro C, Saraiva M, Cunha M, Ferreira DB, Correia P, Almeida L, Torrejano G. The Reflux Symptom Score-12: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation for European Portuguese Speakers With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00190-X. [PMID: 37524579 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To translate and cross-culturally adapt the 12-item reflux symptom score (RSS-12) to European Portuguese (EP) and determine its clinimetric properties for symptomatic individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN Multinational cross-sectional cohort study. METHODS The English RSS-12 was cross-culturally adapted according to the recommendations of the international guidelines. The validation study included the completion of the RSS-12, reflux symptom index, and voice handicap index by symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with LPR. The RSS-12 was completed a second time by symptomatic subjects. Nine clinimetric properties were analyzed according to the international guidelines for validation of patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS The EP RSS-12 is equivalent to the English version (content, depth, and scoring). A total of 155 adults (84 with LPR symptoms) aged 21-78 years participated in the validation study. Statistical analyses revealed high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha >0.90), high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.70, P < 0.001), low measurement error (Standard measure error of 5.21 for RSS and 1.59 for quality of life), good content validity (omission data <1% and item-total correlations > 0.652), good construct validity (61.9% of the total item variance with moderate item loadings), strong concurrent validity with reflux symptom index (rp = 0.772, P < 0.001) and moderate validity with voice handicap index (rp = 0.531, P < 0.001), and significantly known-groups validity (P < 0.001). The EP RSS-12 showed cross-cultural validity with French and Persian versions and high predictive validity with a cut-off value >8 for a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 91.5%. CONCLUSIONS The EP RSS-12 retained the features of the English version and is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure for EP individuals with LPR in the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Guimarães
- Speech and Language Pathologist (SLP), Speech Therapy Department, Alcoitão Health School of Sciences; Clinical and Therapeutics Pharmacological Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana P Batista
- PMR Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Algarve, Portimão, Portugal.
| | - Aldora Quintal
- ENT Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Rita Bom
- ENT Department, Hospital do Espírito Santo de Évora, EPE, Évora, Portugal
| | - Cláudia Romeiro
- ENT Department, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, EPE, Portugal
| | - Madalena Saraiva
- ENT Department, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, EPE, Portugal
| | - Maura Cunha
- PMR Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Daniela B Ferreira
- ENT Department Centro Hospitalar de Entre Douro e Vouga, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
| | - Paula Correia
- ENT Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Lina Almeida
- ENT Department, Hospital dos Lusíadas, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Gabriela Torrejano
- ENT Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, EPE, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Almothahbi AS, Alasqah MI, Mesallem T, Bukhari M, Almohizea M, Almalki K. Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Reflux Symptom Score, Short Version 12 (RSS-12). J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00164-9. [PMID: 37433707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) is a patient-related outcomes measure (PROM) that was developed to diagnose Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), by assessing the severity and frequency of specific symptoms and their respective impact on quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE To develop the Arabic version of RSS-12 (Ar-RSS-12), and to assess its validity and reliability. METHOD The RSS-12 was translated from French into Arabic using the forward-backward translation method, and the translated version underwent transcultural validation. A case-control study was conducted at the otolaryngology clinics of a referral hospital, during the period November to December 2022. It included 61 patients with LPR-related symptoms and a Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) score >13, and 61 control without LPR-related symptoms and negative RSI scores ≤13. The internal consistency, internal and external validity, and Test-Retest reliability of Ar-RSS-12 were analyzed. RESULT Patients had significantly higher scores than controls in all 12 items and total Ar-RSS and QoL impact scores, with high Z score values. Item scores showed variable correlation levels with total Ar-RSS score, with ear-nose-throat items showing the strongest correlation (Spearman's rho 0.592-0.866). The QoL scores were more strongly correlated to the symptoms' severity than frequency. The internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.878. Regarding external validity, correlations with RSI score showed high Spearman's rho values for total Ar-RSS (0.905) and QoL total score (0.903). No statistically significant difference was observed between Test and Retest results in any of the 12 items' score or the total score and QoL, indicating the reproducibility of the test. CONCLUSION The Ar-RSS is a valid and reproducible tool for the screening, assessment, and monitoring of LPR in Arabic speaking patients. The inclusion of symptoms severity and frequency, as well as their individual effects on patient's QoL, support the superior clinical applications of RSS compared to other existing PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Saeed Almothahbi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | - Tamer Mesallem
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Bukhari
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Khalid Almalki
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lechien JR, Bobin F. Saliva pepsin measurements in the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023:10.1007/s00405-023-08000-1. [PMID: 37140740 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08000-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the diagnostic value of salivary pepsin measurement (Peptest) for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients. METHODS Patients with reflux symptoms were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to November 2022. Patients benefited from hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH), fasting and bedtime saliva collections to measure pepsin. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were evaluated for GERD and LPR patients considering the highest values of pepsin tests at ≥ 16, ≥ 75, and ≥ 216 ng/mL cutoffs. The relationship between HEMII-pH, endoscopic and clinical findings, and pepsin measurements was studied. RESULTS Saliva was collected in 109 LPR patients and 30 individuals with both LPR and GERD. The total number of pharyngeal reflux events was significantly higher in GERD-LPR patients compared with LPR patients (p = 0.008). The mean fasting and bedtime pepsin saliva concentrations were similar between groups. The sensitivity of Peptest in LPR patients was 30.5%, 70.2%, and 84.0% at cutoffs ≥ 16, ≥ 75 and ≥ 216 ng/mL. In GERD-LPR group, Peptest was 80.0%, 70.0%, and 30.0% sensitive. At cutoff 16 ng/mL, Peptest reported PPV of 20.7% and 94.8% in LPR-GERD and LPR groups, respectively. NPV were 73.9% and 8.7% in GERD-LPR and LPR groups, respectively. The consistency analysis between Peptest and HEMII-pH was not significant. Peptest was significantly associated with the number of acid pharyngeal reflux events (rs = 0.182; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION Pepsin saliva measurements appear to be not a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of GERD in LPR patients. Future studies are needed to determine the place of Peptest in laryngopharyngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Division of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Polyclinique Elsan de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Korsunsky SRA, Camejo L, Nguyen D, Mhaskar R, Chharath K, Gaziano J, Richter J, Velanovich V. Voice Hoarseness with Reflux as a Suspected Etiology: Incidence, Evaluation, Treatment, and Symptom Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:658-665. [PMID: 36652177 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05574-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the clinical evaluation course, treatments, and outcomes of patients with a primary complaint of hoarseness due to suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with a primary complaint of hoarseness with acid reflux as the suspected cause at a single institution between October 2011 and March 2020 who underwent clinical evaluation, treatment, and follow-up. Data collected included diagnostic procedures and treatments received, subjective symptom outcomes, and final diagnosis as determined by the treating physician. RESULTS A total of 134 patients met the inclusion criteria. Videostroboscopy was the most performed procedure (n = 59, 44%) followed by endoscopy (n = 38, 28%) and pH monitoring (n = 28, 21%). Three patients were removed for statistical analysis of treatment differences and outcomes due to variant treatment plans. Most patients received sole medical management (n = 86, 66%), 7 patients received only voice therapy (5%), and 10 patients underwent surgical management (8%). Several patients received combined medical management and voice therapy (n = 21, 16%). Final diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (25%), followed by multifactorial causes (17%) and dysphonia with unclear etiology (13%). Among all patients, 82 (61%) reported symptom improvement. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with LPR or LPR with GERD (21%), and 22 reported symptom improvement (79%). There was a statistically significant relationship between a final diagnosis with a reflux component and symptom improvement (p = .038). There was no statistically significant difference between treatment types and symptom outcomes both within the total patient population (p = .051) and patients diagnosed with a reflux condition (p = .572). CONCLUSION LPR remains a difficult diagnosis to establish and represents a minority of patients with voice complaints. Despite varying evaluation and treatment modalities, most patients with LPR improved during their treatment and evaluation period without a clear association with any specific type of treatment. Further studies should explore diagnostic criteria for LPR, the necessary and efficient clinical evaluation to establish a diagnosis, and possible beneficial treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Diep Nguyen
- USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rahul Mhaskar
- USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Joy Gaziano
- USF Health Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joel Richter
- USF Health Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang R, Liang F, Tian R, Yao Y, Zhang M, Li X. There is a Good Consistency Between Reflux Symptom Score-12 and Reflux Symptom Index in Chinese Population. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00373-3. [PMID: 36460539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the consistency between the Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Chinese people. METHODS Patients with symptoms of LPR from the outpatient otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinic were included. All included patients completed the RSS-12 and RSI. The patient with RSS-12>11 or RSI>13 suggested possible LPR. For the patients with RSI >13 or RSS-12>11, they were treated using diet recommendations and were prescribed a twice-daily pantoprazole for 12 weeks. The consistency between the RSS-12 and RSI was compared with the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS A total of 258 patients were included. The mean scores for RSS-12 and RSI were 13.21±17.31 and 12.86±6.15, respectively. The positive rate of LPR was 17.44% based on the RSI, and 24.42% based on the RSS-12. The kappa value between the RSS-12 and RSI was 0.736 (P < 0.001). Following 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction in both RSI and RSS-12. Based on the RSI, 73% of patients had a good treatment response, whereas according to the RSS-12, 85% of patients had a good treatment response. CONCLUSION There is a good consistency between RSS-12 and RSI, meaning that the RSS-12 is a feasible LPR initial screening tool. The RSS-12 provides a more comprehensive evaluation of reflux symptoms and treatment effect than RSI in patients with LPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruimin Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hebei Langfang people's Hospital, Hebei, China.
| | - Fangfang Liang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hebei Langfang people's Hospital, Hebei, China
| | - Ru Tian
- Department of Otolaryngology, Langfang Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine, Hebei, China
| | - Yang Yao
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hebei Langfang people's Hospital, Hebei, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hebei Langfang people's Hospital, Hebei, China
| | - Xiaowen Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hebei Langfang people's Hospital, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang X, Zhang J, Liu Z, Zhang C, Zou S, Li J. Investigation of Reflux Characteristics in Outpatients of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery by Age and Gender in the Chinese Population. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00226-0. [PMID: 35985897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the characteristics of patients with reflux diseases in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics through the Reflux Symptom Scale-12 (RSS-12) and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q). METHODS All included patients completed the RSS-12 and GERD-Q scales and were considered to have LPR with an RSS-12 score >11 and GERD with a GERD-Q score >7. Data were analyzed according to genders (male and female) and age (18-40, 41-60, and >60 years). RESULTS A total of 977 patients were included. the mean RSS-12 and GERD-Q score were 11.32±21.34 and 6.31±1.21, and the positive rate of LPR and GERD were 28.76% and 8.90%, respectively. Males had a higher positive rate of LPR and GERD than females, and there were more males with LPR who also had GERD. Among those with both LPR and GERD, males had significantly higher ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptom scores such as hoarseness and excess throat mucus than females. However, females had significantly higher scores of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mainly indigestion and abdominal pain, and elder patients (>60 years) had higher scores of ENT, GI, respiratory symptoms, as well as the impact of symptoms on quality of life than the young patients (18-40, and 41-60 years). CONCLUSION Patients in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics have different reflux characteristics by gender and age in the Chinese population. Males had more severe ENT-related symptoms of distress, while females had more complaints of GI symptoms. Older patients had higher scores for ENT, GI and respiratory symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Wang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Navy Clinical College, the Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui Province, China
| | - Jinhong Zhang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Zhi Liu
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Chun Zhang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Shizhen Zou
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Jinrang Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Beijing 100048, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Short Version of the Reflux Symptom Score: Reflux Symptom Score-12 into Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 89:264-270. [PMID: 35760754 PMCID: PMC10071531 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the process of translation into Brazilian Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation of the French Reflux Symptom Score-12 questionnaire used for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. METHODS This was a cross-cultural translation and adaptation study of a health instrument, with a cross-sectional design. It was carried out in eight stages: translation from French into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, application of the first version (pilot test 1), adaptation by a panel of experts, application of the second version (pilot test 2), back translation, reviewing by a committee in conjunction with the author of the original instrument and, application of the final version. The Brazilian Portuguese versions of the questionnaire were applied to individuals with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux who underwent pHmetry and esophageal manometry at the study site. RESULTS In pilot test 1, the first version of the RSS-12 in Brazilian Portuguese was applied to 30 patients. The patients had no difficulty to understand any of the 12 symptom items, but 15 patients (50%) had difficulty interpreting the symptom frequency score. After adapting the format of the frequency score, a version 2 of the RSS-12 in Brazilian Portuguese was applied to another 23 patients, who completed the questionnaire in full without any difficulty. Along with the review committee, the author of the original RSS-12 considered the version 2 to be adequate and did not propose any changes, so it was approved as the final version of the Brazilian Portuguese RSS-12. CONCLUSION The Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument, called Reflux Symptom Score-12 PT-BR, shows good understanding and linguistic, conceptual and content equivalence, in relation to the original Reflux Symptom Score-12.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rao SJ, Nickel JC, Kiell EP, Madden LL. Readability of Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Laryngology. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:1069-1074. [PMID: 34498753 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to evaluate patients' symptoms and clinical improvement after an intervention. Advocacy efforts and increased provider awareness regarding health literacy have helped to improve the readability of PROMs. Recent studies in otolaryngology in rhinology, pediatric otolaryngology, and head and neck reported PROM readability scores above the sixth-grade level. However, there is limited data regarding the readability of laryngology PROMs. Thus, this study aims to report the readability levels of PROMs in laryngology by assessing different readability indices and describing the relationship of readability levels to equitable healthcare. METHODS This is a bibliometric study that received approval from institutional review board (IRB) review as a nonhuman subject research study. Recent and widely utilized laryngology PROMs were selected from a publicly available literature search by reviewing laryngology systematic reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Laryngology PROMs were selected from voice, dysphagia, airway, and other PROMs including voice questionnaires administered to patients seeking gender affirming voice care from systematic reviews and expert opinion. There were 37 PROMs included in this study. PROMs were analyzed via Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease Score. RESULTS All laryngology PROMs had readabilities above the recommended sixth-grade level. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of Gunning Fog was 7.30 (2.59), SMOG was 8.70 (1.51), FORCAST was 10.05 (1.51), and Flesch Reading Ease Score was 8.08 (2.76). CONCLUSION Laryngology PROMs are above the recommended middle school reading level. To further promote health equity, readability should be considered when developing future PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shambavi J Rao
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Joseph C Nickel
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Eleanor P Kiell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Lyndsay L Madden
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Saussez S, Hans S. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease is More Severe in Obese Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2742-E2748. [PMID: 34086292 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To investigate whether there is an impact of obesity and overweight on the clinical findings and therapeutic responses of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN Prospective uncontrolled. METHODS Patients with LPR-related symptoms and positive LPR diagnosis at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH) were recruited from December 2017 to December 2020. Patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors, and alginate for 3 to 6 months. The following outcomes were studied according to the weight of patients: HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy features, symptoms, findings, and therapeutic response. RESULTS A total of 262 patients completed the study, accounting for 134, 85, and 43 patients with normal weight (body mass index [BMI] <25), overweight (BMI = 25-29.99), and obesity (BMI >30). Obese patients reported significant higher prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), acid LPR, and a more severe LPR disease regarding the number of pharyngeal reflux events, reflux symptom score (RSS), and reflux sign assessment (RSA). RSS and RSA scores significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment irrespective of the patient weight group. Symptoms and signs continued to improve from 3 to 6-month posttreatment only in patients with a normal weight. CONCLUSION Obesity is associated with a more severe LPR disease and a higher proportion of GERD and acid LPR. Obese LPR patients may require more frequently PPI-therapy regarding the higher prevalence of GERD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Research Committee, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | | | - Vinciane Muls
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sven Saussez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lechien JR, Hans S, De Marrez LG, Dequanter D, Rodriguez A, Muls V, Ben Abdelouahed F, Evrard L, Maniaci A, Saussez S, Bobin F. Prevalence and Features of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Primary Burning Mouth Syndrome. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2627-E2633. [PMID: 34009647 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To investigate the prevalence and features of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS). STUDY DESIGN Prospective uncontrolled study. METHODS Patients who visited our Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial surgery with BMS were prospectively recruited from September 2018 to September 2020. Patients benefited from dental, maxillofacial, otolaryngological examinations, and hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH). Oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal findings and symptoms were rated with Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12). Patients were treated with a combination of diet, pantoprazole, and alginate. RESULTS From the 81 included patients, 76 reported >1 pharyngeal reflux events (93.8%), accounting for 35 (46.1%), 24 (31.6%), and 17 (22.3%) acid, mixed, and nonacid LPR, respectively. Thirty-two patients had both LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Thirty-eight patients benefited from pepsin saliva measurement, which was positive in 86.8% of cases. The mean scores of mouth/tongue burning, RSS-12, and RSA significantly improved from pre- to post-treatment (P < .004). At 3-month post-treatment, 62.5% of patients reported an improvement of mouth/tongue burning score. Patients with both GERD and LPR reported higher baseline RSS-12 and RSA scores. CONCLUSION Acid, weakly acid, and nonacid LPR may be involved in the development of BMS. The use of an appropriate treatment considering the reflux features is associated with an improvement of symptoms and findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Reflux Study Group, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Lisa G De Marrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, University Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Didier Dequanter
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Rodriguez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vinciane Muls
- Reflux Study Group, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fairouz Ben Abdelouahed
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasme Hospital, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Evrard
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasme Hospital, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonino Maniaci
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", ENT Section, ENT Department of University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Sven Saussez
- Reflux Study Group, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Francois Bobin
- Reflux Study Group, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Polyclinique Elsan de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V, Saussez S, Remacle M, Hans S. Reflux clinic: proof-of-concept of a Multidisciplinary European Clinic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:1713-1716. [PMID: 33620580 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06705-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France. .,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France. .,Laboratory of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
| | - Francois Bobin
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.,Elsan Polyclinic of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Vinciane Muls
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sven Saussez
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Marc Remacle
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Stephane Hans
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lechien JR, Saussez S, Muls V, Barillari MR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Hans S, Karkos PD. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A State-of-the-Art Algorithm Management for Primary Care Physicians. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3618. [PMID: 33182684 PMCID: PMC7697179 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disease in the general population with acute or chronic symptoms. LPR is often misdiagnosed in primary care because of the lack of typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and findings on endoscopy. Depending on the physician's specialty and experience, LPR may be over- or under-diagnosed. Management of LPR is potentially entirely feasible in primary care as long as General Practitioners (GPs) are aware of certain "red flags" that will prompt referral to a Gastroenterologist or an Otolaryngologist. The use of patient-reported outcome questionnaires and the consideration of some easy ways to diagnose LPR without special instrumentation oropharyngeal findings may help the GP to diagnose and often manage LPR. In this review, we provide a practical algorithm for LPR management for GPs and other specialists that cannot perform fiberoptic examination. In this algorithm, physicians have to exclude some confounding conditions such as allergy or other causes of pharyngolaryngitis and "red flags". They may prescribe an empirical treatment based on diet and behavioral changes with or without medication, depending on the symptom severity. Proton pump inhibitors and alginates remain a popular choice in order to protect the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa from acid, weakly acid and alkaline pharyngeal reflux events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R. Lechien
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), B7000 Mons, Belgium;
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), 92150 Paris, France;
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 92150 Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, University Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Ambroise Paré, 92150 Paris, France
| | - Sven Saussez
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), B7000 Mons, Belgium;
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, University Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Ambroise Paré, 92150 Paris, France
| | - Vinciane Muls
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, University Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Maria R. Barillari
- Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Naples SUN, 34103 Naples, Italy;
| | - Carlos M. Chiesa-Estomba
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 00685 San Sebastian, Spain;
| | - Stéphane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), 92150 Paris, France;
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 92150 Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU Ambroise Paré, 92150 Paris, France
| | - Petros D. Karkos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki Medical School, 54621 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|