Typical and atypical antipsychotics in adolescent schizophrenia: efficacy, tolerability, and differential sensitivity to extrapyramidal symptoms

HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, HTR2C and HTR6 Gene Polymorphisms and Extrapyramidal Side Effects in Haloperidol-Treated Patients with Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a serious, chronic psychiatric disorder requiring lifelong treatment. Extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) are common adverse reactions to antipsychotic medications. In addition to the dopaminergic system, serotonergic mechanisms, including serotonin (5-HT) receptors, might be involved in EPS development. This study aimed to examine molecular associations of HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, HTR2C and HTR6 gene polymorphisms with acute EPS in 229 male schizophrenia patients, following two weeks of haloperidol monotherapy. The Simpson-Angus Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) were used to evaluate EPS severity. Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR, following extraction of blood DNA. Significant acute EPS appeared in 48.03% of schizophrenia patients. For the rs13212041 HTR1B gene polymorphism, affecting microRNA regulation of HTR1B gene expression, a higher frequency of TT carriers was found among haloperidol-treated patients with akathisia when compared to the group without akathisia symptoms. In comparison to C-allele carriers, patients carrying the TT genotype had higher akathisia severity, as determined by the SAS, BARS and ESRS scales. These molecular findings suggest potential involvement of 5-HT_1B receptors in akathisia development following haloperidol treatment, as well as possible epigenetic mechanisms of serotonergic modulation associated with antipsychotic-induced EPS.

Neuromotor Adverse Effects in 342 Youth During 12 Weeks of Naturalistic Treatment With 5 Second-Generation Antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) effects in youth were monitored to quantify extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and to identify risk profiles for treatment-emergent EPS.

METHOD

Data were analyzed for the nonrandomized, prospective Second-generation Antipsychotic Treatment Indications, Effectiveness and Tolerability in Youth (SATIETY) inception cohort study. EPS were assessed at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after naturalistic SGA initiation for schizophrenia, mood, disruptive behavior, and autism spectrum disorders using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and Treatment Emergent Side Effect Scale. Drug-induced parkinsonism was defined by incident mean SAS score >0.33, anticholinergic initiation, or increasing total SAS score ≥2 in patients with baseline EPS.

RESULTS

In 342 youth aged 13.6 ± 3.5 years (male = 58.2%, antipsychotic-naive = 65.8%), 15.2% developed drug-induced parkinsonism. Raw SGA-grouped drug-induced parkinsonism rates were as follows: quetiapine = 1.5%, olanzapine = 13.8%, risperidone = 16.1%, ziprasidone = 20.0%, and aripiprazole = 27.3%. SGA type, dose, higher age, and lower baseline functioning were jointly associated with drug-induced parkinsonism (R(2) = 0.18; p < .0001). Controlling for these factors, drug-induced parkinsonism rates were significantly lower only for quetiapine and olanzapine. Subjectively reported EPS (5%), EPS-related treatment discontinuation (3.3%), and anticholinergic initiation (3%) were infrequent. Anticholinergic initiation was most frequent with risperidone (10.2%; p = .0004). Treatment-emergent dyskinesia ranged from 4.5% (aripiprazole) to 15.5% (olanzapine). SGA type, younger age, white race/ethnicity, and baseline AIMS were jointly associated with treatment-emergent dyskinesia (R(2) = 0.31; p < .0001). Controlling for these factors, treatment-emergent dyskinesia rates differed among SGA subgroups, with higher rates with olanzapine and ziprasidone. At baseline, psychostimulant use was associated with dyskinesia, and number of psychotropic comedications was associated with subjective EPS.

CONCLUSION

In youth, SGA-related EPS rates did not generally exceed those reported in adults, with particularly low rates with quetiapine and olanzapine.

"First do no harm." A systematic review of the prevalence and management of antipsychotic adverse effects

AIMS

We aim to identify the prevalence and management strategies of nine clinically important categories of antipsychotic adverse effects, namely: extrapyramidal symptoms; sedation; weight gain; type II diabetes; hyperprolactinaemia; metabolic syndrome, dyslipidaemia; sexual dysfunction; and cardiovascular effects.

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for schizophrenia and other mental disorders. The adverse effects of antipsychotics are common, with a potential negative impact on adherence and engagement. Despite this, the scientific study of the prevalence or management of adverse antipsychotic effects is a neglected area.

METHOD

A systematic review was undertaken using pre-defined search criteria and three databases, with hand searching of citations and references. Inclusion was agreed on by two independent researchers after review of abstracts or full text. Quality analysis of included studies was conducted using pre-agreed criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 53 studies met inclusion criteria, revealing the following: (1) antipsychotic polypharmacy was associated with increased frequency of adverse effects, and (2) a longer duration of treatment is associated with greater severity (e.g. higher BMI); (3) clozapine was more strongly associated with metabolic disturbance than other antipsychotics in three studies and olanzapine was associated with the most weight gain in three studies; (4) hyperprolactinaemia was more common in women than men, but 50% men noted sexual dysfunction versus 25-50% in women; (5) despite clinical guideline recommendations there is a low rate of baseline testing for lipids and glucose; and (6) seven studies described adverse effect management strategies, but only two examined their efficacy - one found a significant reduction in weight with non-pharmacological group therapy and the other found a significant reduction in dyslipidaemia with statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic adverse effects are diverse and frequently experienced, but are not often systematically assessed. There is a need for further scientific study concerning the management of these side effects.

Quetiapine versus aripiprazole in children and adolescents with psychosis--protocol for the randomised, blinded clinical Tolerability and Efficacy of Antipsychotics (TEA) trial

BACKGROUND

The evidence for choices between antipsychotics for children and adolescents with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders is limited. The main objective of the Tolerability and Efficacy of Antipsychotics (TEA) trial is to compare the benefits and harms of quetiapine versus aripiprazole in children and adolescents with psychosis in order to inform rational, effective and safe treatment selections.

METHODS/DESIGN

The TEA trial is a Danish investigator-initiated, independently funded, multi-centre, randomised, blinded clinical trial. Based on sample size estimation, 112 patients aged 12-17 years with psychosis, antipsychotic-naïve or treated for a limited period are, 1:1 randomised to a 12- week, double-blind intervention with quetiapine versus aripiprazole. Effects on psychopathology, cognition, health-related quality of life, and adverse events are assessed 2, 4, and 12 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome is change in the positive symptom score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The recruitment period is 2010-2014.

DISCUSSION

Antipsychotics are currently the only available pharmacologic treatments for psychotic disorders. However, information about head-to-head differences in efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotics are scarce in children and adolescents. The TEA trial aims at expanding the evidence base for the use of antipsychotics in early onset psychosis in order to inform more rational treatment decisions in this vulnerable population. Here, we account for the trial design, address methodological challenges, and discuss the estimation of sample size.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119014.

Trifluoperazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Trifluoperazine is a long-established high potency typical antipsychotic drug used in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses.

OBJECTIVES

To determine absolute effects of trifluoperazine for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses compared with placebo.To critically appraise and summarise current evidence on the resource use, cost and economic evaluation of trifluoperazine compared with placebo for schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

Searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials (July 2012), supplemented with handsearching, reference searching, personal communication and contact with industry. Two review authors undertook a search for economic studies using the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Health Economic Database (CSzGHED) on the 9th April 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All available clinical randomised trials involving people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses that compare trifluoperazine with placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies for the effects of interventions were reliably selected by a review team and data were doubly independently extracted to reduce bias. We only used dichotomous data, using intention-to-treat analysis when possible. Data were estimated using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A 'Summary of findings' table was produced, where possible, for each primary outcome using GRADE. Economic studies were searched and reliably selected by review authors (VF and SS) to provide an economic summary of available data. Where no relevant economic studies were eligible for inclusion, the economic review team valued the already-included effectiveness outcome data to provide a rudimentary economic summary.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 10 studies with a total number of 686 participants featuring in 20 different outcomes of interest. Overall, there was significant clinical improvement in clinical global state at medium term amongst people receiving trifluoperazine (3 RCTs, n = 417, RR 4.61, CI 1.54 to 13.84, low quality evidence) and significantly fewer people receiving trifluoperazine left the studies early due to relapse or worsening at medium term (2 RCTs, n = 381, RR 0.34, CI 0.23 to 0.49, low quality evidence). However, results were equivocal for leaving the study early at medium term for any reason (2 RCTs, n = 391, RR 0.80, CI 0.17 to 3.81, very low quality evidence) and due to severe adverse effects (2 RCTs, n = 391, RR 1.54, CI 0.56 to 4.24, very low quality evidence). Equivocal data were also found for intensified symptoms at medium term (2 RCTs, n = 80, RR 1.05, CI 0.54 to 2.05, very low quality evidence) and rates of agitation or distress again at medium term (1 RCT, n = 52, RR 2.00, CI 0.19 to 20.72, very low quality evidence). Comparison between low and high-dose trifluoperazine with placebo from a single study provided equivocal evidence of effects. For economic outcomes, we valued outcomes in GBP terms and presented them in additional tables; there was an estimated saving of £3488.3 in favour of trifluoperazine. However, numerous assumptions were made and these savings need to be interpreted in light of those assumptions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our results agree with existing evidence that compared to placebo, trifluoperazine is an effective antipsychotic for people with schizophrenia. Furthermore, our review provides supportive evidence that trifluoperazine increases the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Although the effect sizes against placebo are similar to those observed with other agents, they are based on data from many small, pre-CONSORT trials with generally either a low or very low GRADE evidence that has limited implication for clinical practice. Large, independent trials are needed that adhere to the CONSORT statement to compare trifluoperazine with placebo used in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses.

The association study of polymorphisms in DAT, DRD2, and COMT genes and acute extrapyramidal adverse effects in male schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol

Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) are common adverse effects of antipsychotics. The development of acute EPSs could depend on the activity of dopaminergic system and its gene variants. The aim of this study was to determine the association between dopaminergic type 2 receptor (DRD2) dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene polymorphisms and acute EPSs in 240 male schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol (15-mg/d) over a period of 2 weeks. Acute EPSs were assessed with Simpson-Angus Scale. Three dopaminergic gene polymorphisms, the DRD2 Taq1A, the SLC6A3 VNTR, and the COMT Val158Met, were determined. Extrapyramidal symptoms occurred in 116 (48.3%) of patients. Statistically significant associations were found for SLC6A3 VNTR and COMT Val158Met polymorphisms and EPS susceptibility. Patients with SLC6A3 9/10 genotype had almost twice the odds to develop EPSs compared with those with all other SLC6A3 genotypes (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.30), and patients with COMT Val/Met genotype had 1.7 times greater odds to develop EPSs than those with all other COMT genotypes (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.88). There was no statistically significant association between genotype and allele frequencies of DRD2, SLC6A3, or COMT polymorphisms and the development of particular EPSs.In conclusion, the results of the present study showed for the first time the association between acute haloperidol-induced EPSs and SLC6A3 VNTR and COMT Val158Met polymorphisms. Although the precise biological mechanisms underlying these findings are not yet understood, the results suggest that the dopaminergic gene variations could predict the vulnerability to the development of the acute EPSs in haloperidol-treated schizophrenic patients.

Second generation antipsychotics & nocturnal enuresis in children

Nocturnal enuresis, or involuntary wetting during sleep, is an adverse drug reaction that may occur with numerous second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and currently is underreported. This article reviews SGA-induced enuresis and its management.

Identification of clinically meaningful relationships among cognition, functionality, and symptoms in subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder is a major determinant of disability. This study explored the relationships among cognitive functioning, clinical symptoms, overall functionality, and demographic characteristics.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a 52-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind study (N=323) comparing 2 doses of risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) in stable subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cognitive evaluations were performed and standardized using a healthy age- and sex-matched comparison group. Simple and multiple regression models were used to identify relationships among neurocognitive composite scores (NCS), clinical symptom end points (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total and factor scores), overall functionality (Personal and Social Performance [PSP] score), and demographics.

RESULTS

A simple regression model identified significant relationships between the NCS at end point and PANSS total score, PANSS disorganized thoughts factor score, functioning (PSP) and age. A 1-point decrease on PANSS total score and PANSS disorganized thoughts factor score corresponded to an increase in NCS of 0.126-point, and 0.81-point increases, respectively. A 1-point increase on the PSP corresponded to a 0.186-point increase in the NCS T-score. Among the demographic variables, only age correlated significantly with cognition (10-year increase in age corresponded to 1.1-point decrease in NCS T-score) in a multiple regression model.

CONCLUSION

Improved cognition was associated with beneficial changes in functional status and clinical symptoms (particularly disorganization symptoms) in subjects with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Older subjects showed less overall cognitive improvement. Improved cognitive and functional outcome is correlated with symptom improvements in RLAI-treated patients with schizophrenia.

Poor response to treatment: beyond medication

In psychiatry, one of the main factors contributing to poor response to pharmacological treatment is adherence. Noncompliance with maintenance treatments for chronic illnesses such as schizophrenia and affective disorders can exceed 50%, Poor adherence can be due to drug-related factors (tolerance, complexity of prescription, side effects, or cost), patient-related variables (illness symptoms, comorbidity, insight capacity, belief system, or sociocultural environment), and physician-related factors (communication or psychoeducational style). Psychosocial treatments must be used in conjunction with medication during the maintenance phase to improve adherence to treatment and to achieve - through the management of psychological variables - better social, work, and family functioning. This article reviews the concepts of adherence and noncompliance, and their impact on maintenance treatments, as well as the effect of dealing with psychosocial factors in psychiatric treatment.

Neurotoxic/neuroprotective activity of haloperidol, risperidone and paliperidone in neuroblastoma cells

The neurotoxicity of antipsychotic (AP) drugs seems to be linked with neurological side effects like extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). On the other hand, neuroprotective effects can mitigate or slow the progressive degenerative structural changes in the brain leading to improved outcome of schizophrenia. First and second-generation antipsychotics may differ in their neurotoxic and neuroprotective properties. The aim of this study was to compare the neurotoxic/neuroprotective activity of haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, and risperidone, a second-generation one, with paliperidone, a relatively new second-generation antipsychotic, in SK-N-SH cells. Haloperidol, risperidone and paliperidone (10, 50, 100 μM) were administered, either alone or in combination with dopamine (100 μM), to human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH. We examined the effects of the drugs on cell viability (measured by alamarBlue®), caspase-3 activity (measured by fluorimetric assay) and cell death (by measuring the externalization of phosphatidylserine). Haloperidol significantly decreased cell viability and increased caspase-3 activity and cell death. Risperidone and paliperidone did not affect cell viability or cell death. Both second-generation APs decreased caspase-3 activity, especially paliperidone. In cells treated with dopamine in combination with antipsychotics, only paliperidone (10 μM) induced a slight improvement in cell viability. While haloperidol potentiated the dopamine-induced increase in caspase-3 activity, risperidone and paliperidone reduced this effect. The results indicate that haloperidol induces apoptosis, whereas risperidone and paliperidone may afford protection against it. Of the APs tested, paliperidone always showed the strongest neuroprotective effect. The different antipsychotic effects on survival and cell death might be related to differences in their capacity to induce EPS.

Ten years of antipsychotic prescribing to children: a Canadian population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To report the prescribing of antipsychotics to the youth population of the Canadian province of Manitoba during the course of a decade.

METHODS

Use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents (aged 18 years or younger) was described using data collected from the administrative health databases of Manitoba Health and the Statistics Canada census between the fiscal years of 1999 and 2008.

RESULTS

The prevalence of antipsychotic use in this segment of the population increased with the introduction of the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) from 1.9 per 1000 in 1999 to 7.4 per 1000 in 2008. The male-to-female antipsychotic usage ratio increased from 1.9 to 2.7 as the male youth population represented the fastest-growing subgroup of antipsychotic users in the entire population of Manitoba. The total number of prescriptions also increased significantly despite the lack of approved indications in this population. Proportion of use remained equally split between high- and low-income users. More than 70% of antipsychotic prescriptions to children and adolescents were written by general practitioners. The most common diagnoses linked to antipsychotic use were attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorders. Use of antipsychotics in combination with methylphenidate increased from 13% to 43%.

CONCLUSION

Extensive off-label use of SGAs has been observed in the youth population of Manitoba for treatment of aggressive behaviours across a range of diagnoses. It is important to monitor antipsychotic prescribing to children as more reports of significant adverse events associated with antipsychotics become available.

Anticholinergic use in children and adolescents after initiation of antipsychotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are thought to have a lower likelihood of inducing extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than are first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs). Clinical observations suggest that younger patients may be more sensitive to SGA-associated EPS than are adults and require therapy with anticholinergic agents.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of patients 5-18 years of age who received anticholinergic therapy during the initial stages of antipsychotic treatment, as well as to compare anticholinergic utilization across patients receiving aripiprazole, risperidone, and quetiapine, SGAs previously identified as the most commonly prescribed at the academic institution studied.

METHODS

Patients 5-18 years of age who were initiating a course of an antipsychotic between January 1, 2005, and September 1, 2008, were identified in a retrospective review of prescription and medical records. Data on demographic characteristics, antipsychotic and anticholinergic utilization, indications, diagnoses, and concomitant medications were collected from the medical record. Only the first therapeutic course of an antipsychotic identified was analyzed. Anticholinergic utilization at antipsychotic initiation and after 30 days was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 235 antipsychotic treatment courses were identified. Of these, 152 patients met our inclusion criteria. Anticholinergic utilization at any time during the first 30 days of treatment was identified in 32 patients (21%), while EPS was documented for 12 patients (8%). FGA or polypharmacy (simultaneous use of >or=2 scheduled antipsychotic) use versus SGA use (OR 18.98; 95% CI 4.74 to 75.95) was the primary characteristic significantly associated with anticholinergic utilization within 30 days after initiation. Of the most commonly used SGAs, risperidone was the drug with which anticholinergics were most frequently prescribed (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticholinergic prescribing exceeded the incidence of EPS, as documented in the medical record (21% vs 8%), and differed across individual medications and antipsychotic class. Utilization of FGAs or polypharmacy was a key predictor of anticholinergic use.

Paliperidone extended-release tablets in patients with recently diagnosed schizophrenia

AIM

Effective early and persistent antipsychotic treatment in recently diagnosed schizophrenia may positively impact long-term outcomes. Paliperidone extended-release (ER) was assessed in this population.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of pooled data from three 6-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, and three 1-year open-label (OL) studies of paliperidone ER in schizophrenia patients. Data stratified by time since diagnosis (< or =3 vs. >3 years).

RESULTS

At DB (n = 1193) and OL baselines (n = 744), 259 (21.9%) and 188 (25.3%) patients were diagnosed < or =3 years. At DB end point, both populations improved with paliperidone ER versus placebo on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale scores (all P < 0.05). At OL end point, there were significant improvements from DB baseline in both populations on these scales (P < 0.0001), with greater improvement in the < or =3-year population on PANSS total (P < 0.001) and PSP (P < 0.001) scores. During DB treatment, only the < or =3-year population reported adverse events (AEs) in > or =5% (placebo-adjusted rate) of subjects receiving paliperidone ER: akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder not otherwise specified and somnolence. During OL treatment, akathisia and somnolence occurred more frequently (> or =5%) in the < or =3- versus >3-year population. OL study completion rates were 51.1% in < or =3-year, and 48.2% in >3-year subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Paliperidone ER significantly improved symptoms and functioning in schizophrenia patients, regardless of time since diagnosis. Recently diagnosed patients who continued treatment exhibited greater symptom reduction and functional benefit over the long term. Results also suggest that these patients may be more susceptible to certain AEs.

A common variant in DRD3 gene is associated with risperidone-induced extrapyramidal symptoms

We present a pharmacogenetic study of acute antipsychotic (AP)-induced extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) using an extensive linkage disequilibrium mapping approach in seven-candidate genes with a well-established link to dopamine (DRD2, DRD3, ACE, COMT, DAT, MAO-A, MAO-B). From a cohort of 321 psychiatric inpatients, 81 cases presenting with EPS (Simpson-Angus > 3) and 189 controls presenting without EPS (Simpson-Angus < or = 3) took part. Eighty-four-tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes were genotyped. After extensive data cleaning, 70 SNPs were analyzed for association of single markers and haplotypes. AP dosage, AP-DRD2 blockade potency and age were identified as susceptibility factors for AP-induced EPS. One SNP of the DRD3 gene, rs167771, achieved significant association with EPS risk after Bonferroni correction (nominal P-value 1.3 x 10(-4)) in the patients treated with risperidone (132 patients). AP-induced EPS remains a serious public health problem. Our finding of a common SNP (rs167771) in the DRD3 gene provides a strong new candidate gene for risperidone-induced EPS.

Effects of risperidone on glutamate receptor subtypes in developing rat brain

Levels of ionotropic glutamate (Glu) N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA), 2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazol-4-yl)propionic acid (AMPA), and kainic acid (KA) receptors in forebrain regions of juvenile rats (age 42 days) were quantified after 3 weeks of treatment with three different doses of risperidone (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) and compared findings to those in adult rats treated with risperidone (3.0 mg/kg/day) previously. Risperidone (at 0.3 mg/kg/day) did not alter levels of three ionotropic Glu receptors in all brain regions examined. Risperidone (at 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg/day) significantly decreased NMDA binding in caudate-putamen of juvenile and adult animals. In contrast, the same two doses of risperidone decreased NMDA receptors in nucleus accumbens of juveniles and not adults. Risperidone (at 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg/day) increased AMPA receptors in medial prefrontal cortex and caudate-putamen of juvenile animals, whereas risperidone (at 3.0 mg/kg) increased AMPA receptors in caudate-putamen and hippocampus of adults. Kainate receptors were not altered by any dose of risperidone in any brain region examined in developing and mature animals. The findings indicate that risperidone exerts dose-dependent effects on Glu receptor subtypes in developing animals, and that Glu receptor responses to repeated administration of risperidone are different in juvenile animals than adults.

Polymorphism of dopamine D2 receptor (TaqIA, TaqIB, and-141C Ins/Del) and dopamine degradation enzyme (COMT G158A, A-278G) genes and extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders

The relationship is examined of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) polymorphism (TaqIA, TaqIB, -141 C Ins/Del) and the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphism (A-278G, G158A) to the risk of antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Participants comprised 80 cases presenting with EPS (Simpson-Angus Scale score >3) and 188 controls presenting without EPS (Simpson-Angus Scale score <or=3) participated in this study. The COMT(L) allele conferred a reduction of EPS risk of 60% to heterozygotes, but the finding did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. In the bipolar subgroup, with a COMT(L) allele protection of 70%, the reduction remained significant after Bonferroni correction. The analysis of the COMT haplotypes revealed an association of the A-G haplotype with EPS risk in the overall group and the bipolar disorder subgroup, and an association of the A-A haplotype with EPS protection in the bipolar subgroup. No significant associations were found for DRD2 or COMT A-278G polymorphisms. This is the first report of an association between the COMT polymorphism and EPS susceptibility. These results are of interest in view of the increased use of antipsychotic drugs in bipolar patients in both the acute manic and the depressive phase.

Child and adolescent schizophrenia: pharmacological approaches

BACKGROUND

Childhood-onset schizophrenia is a serious, chronic and disabling illness that can significantly affect the quality of life of the affected individuals and their families. The affected children commonly show significant premorbid developmental impairment and social abnormalities that may provide an early clinical clue to pursue treatment. Until recent times, treatment approaches for childhood schizophrenia were derived from the adult population. However, given the unique developmental challenges in the pediatric population, this extrapolation may not hold true.

OBJECTIVE

This review encompasses and elaborates on the efficacy, safety and tolerability data available at present for both typical and atypical antipsychotics for treatment of childhood schizophrenia.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted on PUBMED with special emphasis on double-blind placebo-controlled studies in childhood schizophrenia. Data from similar studies presented in recent meetings were also added to the review.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent research in pediatric psychopharmacology has led to the Food and Drug Administration's approval of two atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. Although data in this age group are still sparse, research in this unique population has grown over the years.

Clozapine use in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Although the role of clozapine is well established for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, it is rarely used in pediatric populations, mainly due to its potentially serious adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize practical aspects of use of clozapine in treating children with schizophrenia and management of associated adverse effects.

METHODS

Available studies in the literature using clozapine in the pediatric population are summarized and the NIMH experience in treating refractory childhood-onset schizophrenia cases with clozapine is discussed.

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher incidence of adverse effects in children, clozapine appears to be a uniquely beneficial second-line agent for treating children with refractory schizophrenia.

Observed clinical and health services outcomes in pediatric inpatients treated with atypical antipsychotics: 1999-2003

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and health services outcomes in pediatric inpatients prescribed an atypical antipsychotic (AA) to those not prescribed an AA at discharge.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and, where necessary, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to compare differences between and within an inpatient group prescribed risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine (n=1,131) with an inpatient group not prescribed an antipsychotic at discharge (n=1,741).

RESULTS

The AA treatment group showed greater psychiatric symptom difficulty at admission as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children (Mean BPRS-C) than the group not prescribed AAs (40.3 [n=433] vs. 35.2 [n=452], respectively, p<0.001). AA-treated inpatients also had a higher number of mental health outpatient visits during the 6 months prior to admission. Patients receiving AAs (n=1,050) had significantly longer adjusted length of stay (LOS) than those not receiving antipsychotics (n=1,664): 26.4 days versus 22.4 days, respectively (p<0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested pediatric inpatients presenting with greater psychiatric symptom difficulty at hospital admission were more likely to be prescribed an AA. Choice of AA may influence certain clinical and health services outcomes. Additional prospective controlled studies evaluating AA efficacy and safety, including head-to-head comparisons, in pediatric inpatients are warranted.

Effects of risperidone on dopamine receptor subtypes in developing rat brain

The atypical antipsychotic risperidone is often prescribed to pediatric patients with neuropsychiatric disorders, though its effects on the developing brain remain unclear. Accordingly, we studied the effects of repeated treatment of risperidone on dopamine receptors in brain regions of juvenile rat. Levels of dopamine receptors (D(1), D(2), D(3), D(4)) in forebrain regions of juvenile rats were quantified after 3 weeks of treatment with three different doses of risperidone (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) and compared findings to those in adult rats treated with risperidone (3.0 mg/kg/day) previously. Risperidone (at 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg/day) increased levels of D(1) receptors in nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen of juvenile, but not adult rats. Conversely, all three doses of risperidone dose-dependently increased D(2) labeling in medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, and D(4) receptor in nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen and hippocampus of juvenile animals as well as in adults. Only the high dose of risperidone (3.0 mg/kg) increased D(2) receptors in caudate-putamen in both juvenile and adult brain. D(3) receptors were not altered by risperidone in any brain region at any dose or age. The findings indicate dose-dependent effects of risperidone on dopamine receptors in developing animals, and that juvenile animals are more sensitive than adults to the cerebral effects of risperidone.

Management of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with atypical antipsychotics: a systematic review of published clinical trials

We aimed to provide a descriptive review of treatment studies of atypical antipsychotics in paediatric psychiatric disorders. A systematic review of the literature used Medline and EMBASE databases to identify clinical trials of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents between 1994 and 2006. Trials were limited to double-blind studies and open-label studies of > or = 8 weeks duration that included > or = 20 patients. Nineteen double-blind and 22 open-label studies were identified. Studies included use of clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in the treatment of disruptive behavioural disorders (DBDs), pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs), tic disorder, psychotic disorders, and mania. These medications generally reduced the severity of a variety of psychiatric symptoms in children and adolescents. Less frequent adverse events included extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperglycaemia and diabetes, and endocrine effects. The review of published scientific data suggests that most of the atypical antipsychotics, excluding clozapine, have a favourable risk/benefit profile and effectively reduce disabling behaviours in paediatric psychiatric patients. While there is a body of evidence published of treatment of DBDs and PDDs, there is a lack of controlled data to guide clinical practice for the use of atypical antipsychotics for paediatric psychotic disorders and bipolar disorder. While there have been studies with duration up to 2 years, no definitive data are available that suggest long-term safety; additional studies are warranted.

Prevalence of movement disorders in adolescent patients with schizophrenia and in relationship to predominantly atypical antipsychotic treatment

OBJECTIVE

To examine prevalence of movement disorders (MDs) such as tardive dyskinesia (TD), parkinsonism or akathisia in an adolescent population with schizophrenia and in relationship to predominantly atypical antipsychotic treatment.

METHOD

Ninety-three patients (aged 19.6+/-2.2 years) were ascertained in this cross-sectional/retrospective study. 76 patients (81.7%) received atypical, 10 (10.8%) typical antipsychotics and 7 (7.5%) combinations of atypical/typical antipsychotics. MD symptoms were assessed using Tardive Dyskinesia Rating Scale (TDRS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Extrapyramidal Symptom Scale (EPS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS).

RESULTS

Movement disorder symptoms were found in 37 patients (39.8%) fulfilling strict/subthreshold criteria for TD (5.4/11.8%), parkinsonism (2.2/25.8%) or akathisia (1.1/11.8%), respectively. Patients treated with typical antipsychotics displayed a significantly higher EPS-score (P=0.036) and a tendency towards a higher BAS-score (P=0.061) compared to patients with atypical antipsychotics. Treatment durations with typical/atypical antipsychotics showed trends towards advantages of atypical antipsychotics with regard to parkinsonism/akathisia symptoms (P=0.061; P=0.054), but not with regard to TD symptoms (P=0.003), possibly due to confounding effects.

CONCLUSION

Under treatment with atypical antipsychotics MD symptoms are less prevalent and less pronounced than under typical antipsychotics. We speculate that the finding of relatively high prevalence rates of subthreshold MD symptoms may be, at least partially, explained by previous or combined therapy with typical antipsychotics.

Neuropsychological performance in first-episode adolescents with schizophrenia: a comparison with first-episode adults and adolescent control subjects

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to compare the extent of cognitive deficits between adolescents and adults early in the course of schizophrenia.

METHODS

A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was performed on 49 adolescents with childhood- or adolescent-onset schizophrenia, 139 adults with adult-onset schizophrenia, 32 healthy adolescent volunteers, and 240 healthy adult volunteers. Both patient groups were assessed early in the course of their illness and were matched to their respective control groups on age and parental education.

RESULTS

The adolescent patients performed significantly worse than the adult patients on tasks of working memory, language, and motor function. The healthy adolescents also performed significantly worse than the healthy adults in working memory and language tasks but were significantly better than the adults in motor function. When accounting for developmental differences in the control group, only motor performance was worse in the adolescent patients compared with the adult patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings, when coupled with published retrospective studies reporting greater cognitive deficits in earlier onset schizophrenia, implicate a cessation in development in specific cognitive domains following the onset of schizophrenia in adolescent patients.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of ziprasidone in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide single-dose pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability data for ziprasidone in youths with tic disorder, for comparison to adult studies to discern whether ziprasidone pediatric dosing could be modeled from adult data.

METHOD

A single-dose, open-label study of ziprasidone was conducted in youths (ages 7-16 years) with Tourette's disorder or chronic tic disorder. Dosing of ziprasidone oral suspension (40 mg/mL) was weight adjusted: >60 kg, 20 mg (group 1, n = 8); 31 to 60 kg, 10 mg (group 2, n = 8); and 16 to 30 kg, 5 mg (group 3, n = 8). Patients were assessed for serum ziprasidone concentration, safety, tolerability, and electrocardiogram pre- and postdose.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were evaluated for safety and tolerability, and 23 were evaluated for pharmacokinetics. Regression analysis of AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values versus weight-normalized dose showed linear, dose-related changes in ziprasidone exposure. Ziprasidone was well tolerated with frequent, although transient, somnolence. No clinically significant change from baseline was observed in Bazett's or Fridericia's corrected QT(c) interval, and change in QT(c) interval was not related to serum ziprasidone concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral ziprasidone exhibited linear pharmacokinetics and dose-related exposure in youths with Tourette's disorder or chronic tic disorder, which are comparable to adult data. A single dose of ziprasidone was well tolerated without clinically significant effects on electrocardiograms collected around the time of maximum serum concentration.

Long-term safety and efficacy of risperidone in children with disruptive behaviour disorders. Results of a 2-year extension study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the longterm efficacy, safety, and tolerability of risperidone, over a cumulative period of 3 years, in treating children with disruptive behaviour disorders and below average intelligence (IQ 35-84).

METHOD

This trial included 35 children (aged 6-16 years), diagnosed with disruptive behaviour disorder. All subjects had previously completed a 1-year, open-label risperidone study, and this extension study followed them for an additional 2 years of treatment. Safety was assessed using the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and the recording of adverse events, vital signs, Tanner score, and changes in body mass index (BMI). Efficacy was measured using the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale.

RESULTS

The beneficial effects observed in the original trial were maintained during the extension. Few extrapyramidal side-effects occurred, as assessed by the ESRS, and there were no cases of tardive dyskinesia. The children showed a modest increase in BMI, part of which may be attributed to normal growth over the 2-year period. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and none of them were considered probably or very likely related to risperidone.

CONCLUSION

Continuing low-dose risperidone for up to 3 years appears to be safe and effective in children with disruptive behaviour disorders.

Recognizing and monitoring adverse events of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents

Although second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are used increasingly in children and adolescents, data on the effectiveness and safety in pediatric populations are still sparse. Much of the safety information is derived from studies conducted in adults. This derivation is problematic because children and adolescents are exposed to SGAs during a phase of unparalleled physical and psychologic development that can affect pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug actions, efficacy, and side-effect patterns. This article presents an overview of SGA-related side effects in children and adolescents and strategies to monitor health outcomes effectively in youngsters receiving SGAs.

Treatment-refractory schizophrenia in children and adolescents: an update on clozapine and other pharmacologic interventions

Treatment-refractory early-onset schizophrenia is a rare but severe form of the disorder associated with poor premorbid function and long-term disability. The currently available evidence suggests that clozapine remains the most efficacious treatment for the amelioration of both positive and negative symptoms of the disorder and problematic aggressive behaviors. Clozapine use in children and adolescents, however, is limited by its association with hematologic adverse events and an increased frequency of seizure activity. Further studies are needed to examine the usefulness of antipsychotic combinations and of augmentation therapies to antipsychotic medications in order to treat persistent residual psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents who have schizophrenia and who have not responded to several sequential trials of antipsychotic monotherapy.

Metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics in children: a literature review

The objective of this review is to summarize the data about metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics in children. Original research articles about side effects of atypical antipsychotics used in children were reviewed. The data was obtained mainly through Medline searches, identifying articles focusing on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children. Forty studies that addressed the issue of metabolic side effects were selected. The use of atypical antipsychotics in children has been consistently associated with weight gain and moderate prolactin elevation, while only a few case reports address the issue of glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia. The risk of weight gain and hyperprolactinaemia might be higher in younger children. Other risk factors have also been associated with antipsychotic-induced metabolic disturbances. These changes seem to be reversible, at least in some cases. Metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics could lead to serious complications in children who are prescribed these medications. Serious considerations should be given before initiating treatment and consistent clinical monitoring is essential. More research is needed, especially regarding glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia.

Prevention of schizophrenia: can it be achieved?

Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder with a profound impact on patients, their caregivers and society. It is also an expensive disorder to treat, despite being relatively rare. In this paper, prevention of schizophrenia is described in terms of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. Schizophrenia is regarded as a neurodevelopmental disorder with different phases. Primary prevention essentially involves education programmes about the association of obstetric complications and the increased risk of schizophrenia. Secondary prevention involves intervention at the prodromal phase. We review the literature and discuss the evidence relating to intervention in this phase of the illness. Early intervention could result in reduction in morbidity and better quality of life for the patients and their families. The prodromal phase can now be identified, based on current symptoms, with reliability and predictive validity for the risk of development of schizophrenia in the following year. We also discuss possible risks faced by prodromal patients, such as unnecessary stigmatisation, and the role of drug treatment during intervention at this stage. Any recommendation that anti-psychotic medications be routinely prescribed in this phase should be supported by more research work. Drug and psychosocial intervention is indicated as part of tertiary prevention to prevent further disability in the illness.

Second-generation antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed available pediatric literature on second-generation antipsychotic medications to assess current evidence of efficacy and safety.

METHOD

An English language MEDLINE search (1974-2003) was conducted using key words-atypical antipsychotics, children and adolescents, toxicity, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Additional efficacy and safety data were obtained from drug manufacturers.

RESULTS

We identified 176 reports, including 15 double-blind, controlled trials, 58 openlabel studies, 18 retrospective chart reviews, and 85 case series/reports. The majority of these studies (43%) were of risperidone. Evidence suggests that second-generation antipsychotics are efficacious in the treatment of psychosis, bipolar disorders, pervasive developmental disorders, and Tourette's Disorder, and are potentially useful in mental retardation, conduct disorder, and severe attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The most frequently reported side effects included cardiovascular effects, weight gain, sedation, sialorrhea, extrapyramidal signs, and hyperprolactinemia, although the relative frequencies of these untoward effects vary among medications.

CONCLUSION

Although the evidence base for pediatric use of second-generation antipsychotics is expanding, the majority of available studies are anecdotal, or short-term, openlabel trials. Reports suggest that these compounds are effective for a variety of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, but additional double-blind, controlled studies are required to establish definitive efficacy. Although these medications appear to be well tolerated in short-term studies, long-term follow-up investigations and ongoing clinical monitoring are necessary to confirm their safety in this age group.

Clinical effectiveness of new generation antipsychotics in adolescent patients

In addition to management of symptoms of disease, pharmacological interventions in adolescents with psychotic disorders must be clinically effective to provide the best possible outcome in terms of well-being, functioning, and disease burden. Six outcome domains should be considered: symptoms of disease, tolerability, everyday functioning, subjective well-being, family/career burden, and treatment adherence. To date, few studies have compared the clinical effectiveness of the different new generation antipsychotics in adolescents. However, clear differences exist between available agents, particularly in terms of tolerability profile. This review will focus on the particular issues that clinicians need to consider in order to maximise the clinical effectiveness of the new generation antipsychotics in adolescent patients with psychosis. For example, adolescents are not only more susceptible to the side effects of antipsychotic medication than adults, but they are also more likely to be sensitive to the negative impact of side effects on appearance, body image, and self-esteem. Data available in children and adolescents will be reviewed, and the practical implications for patient management will be highlighted. The importance of dosing the new generation antipsychotics appropriately will also be discussed.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of quetiapine in adolescents: an open-label extension trial

Quetiapine is a novel, atypical antipsychotic agent that has been shown to provide long-term efficacy without serious adverse effects in adults. This is the first study of the extended use of quetiapine in adolescents. Five boys and 5 girls, ages 12.3 to 15.9 years, with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (n = 7) or bipolar disorder with psychotic features (n = 3) were eligible for entry into this single-site, 88-week, open-label trial. Subjects had completed a pharmacokinetic study over 23 days, during which the dosage of quetiapine was increased sequentially from 25 mg bid to a maximum of 400 mg bid (800 mg/day) (McConville et al. 2000). In the open-label extension of this trial, which followed directly after this trial, a physician's choice design allowed for flexible dose titration of quetiapine by the study physician to an optimal dose for each patient, with ending doses ranging from 300 mg/day to 800 mg/day. Concomitant medications, especially for anxiety and/or manic symptoms, were allowed as deemed necessary. Tolerability and safety were assessed using clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, measurements of vital signs, interviews for selective symptomatology, and electrocardiograms. Psychiatric measurements included the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and the modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Neurologic symptom ratings included the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. Mean BPRS, CGI, and SANS scores improved significantly during the trial (p < 0.05). No extrapyramidal symptoms or evidence of tardive dyskinesia was seen. Clinically, there was a nonsignificant increase in mean weight and body mass index at week 64. This long-term study suggests that quetiapine is a well-tolerated antipsychotic agent that is efficacious for the treatment of symptoms of selected psychotic disorders in adolescents.

Comparative analysis of acute and chronic administration of haloperidol and clozapine using [3H] 2-deoxyglucose metabolic mapping

In an effort to compare and contrast the mechanisms of action of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, [3H] 2-deoxyglucose metabolic mapping was employed following acute and chronic administration of haloperidol (1 mg/kg i.p. acute and 0.5 mg/kg i.p. chronic) and clozapine (20 mg/kg i.p., both acute and chronic). Optical density ratios (ODR) were measured in 62 brain structures. An overall decrease in ODR was observed in many of the regions analyzed. Acute haloperidol elicited significant decreases, particularly in the thalamus and hippocampus. Acute clozapine decreased glucose uptake in the caudate putamen, hippocampus, central gray, locus coreleus, and the thalamus. In both chronically treated haloperidol and clozapine animals, significant decreases in ODR were seen in the thalamus and hippocampal areas most dramatically, with other changes in the superior colliculus, retrospenial cortex, and the cerebellum. Clozapine caused significant effects in 32 nuclei acutely and only 19 nuclei chronically. Haloperidol caused significant effects in 23 nuclei acutely and 15 nuclei chronically. The pattern of change induced by haloperidol and clozapine were remarkably similar when considering their pharmacology is somewhat different. Both antipsychotics elicited fewer significant changes upon chronic administration.

Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part II

OBJECTIVE

To develop treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotic medications for children and adolescents with serious psychiatric disorders and externalizing behavior problems.

METHOD

Using a combination of evidence- and consensus-based methodologies, recommendations were developed in six phases as informed by three primary sources of information: (1) current scientific evidence (published and unpublished), (2) the expressed needs for treatment-relevant information and guidance specified by clinicians in a series of focus groups, and (3) consensus of clinical and research experts derived from a formal survey and a consensus workshop.

RESULTS

Fourteen treatment recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for aggression in youth with comorbid psychiatric conditions were developed. Each recommendation corresponds to one of the phases of care (evaluation, treatment, stabilization, and maintenance) and includes a brief clinical rationale that draws upon the available scientific evidence and consensus expert opinion derived from survey data and a consensus workshop.

CONCLUSION

Until additional research from controlled trials becomes available, these evidence- and consensus-based treatment recommendations may be a useful approach to guide the use of antipsychotics in youth with aggression.

The New York high risk project to the Hillside recognition and prevention (RAP) program

The sudden interest in initiating treatment before the onset of psychosis (i.e., during the prodromal stage of schizophrenia) has failed to integrate the earlier work on prediction generated by more traditional high-risk studies. Genetic high-risk research has most typically focused on the long-term, prospective study of children of parents with schizophrenia. In this paper, it will be argued that high-risk research can make at least two major contributions to prevention programs. First, previous findings can guide identification of risk factors and provide clues about causality, thus highlighting which pre-morbid deficits should be treatment targets. For example, as discussed here, data from the New York High Risk Project points to impaired attention as a highly promising candidate risk factor, with a possible causal association with later-emerging social deficits. Second, the high-risk approach can provide a framework for establishing the predictive validity of prodromal clinical indicators and for understanding the nature of the schizophrenia prodrome. Preliminary findings from the Hillside Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program, integrating high-risk methodology with an early intervention strategy, indicate that the prodrome is a developmentally complex phase of schizophrenia. In particular, a cluster of early features-including cognitive, academic, and social impairments, along with odd/disorganized behaviors-appear to anticipate positive symptoms and may constitute a core risk profile. Preliminary RAP treatment findings also suggest that medications other than anti-psychotics may be effective for treating early prodromal symptoms, challenging the widely held hypothesis that anti-psychotics should always be the first line preventive treatment.

The schizophrenia prodrome: treatment and high-risk perspectives

Interest in the prodromal stage of schizophrenia-the stage directly preceding the onset of psychosis-has recently undergone a dramatic increase. To a great extent, this has resulted from the convergence of two very different research traditions. Many treatment researchers have moved from a concern with symptom control to an interest in prevention and view the prodrome as the optimal stage to begin intervention with anti-psychotics. High-risk researchers, who view the identification of accurate risk factors as necessarily preceding preventive programs, have begun to move from the premorbid to the prodromal phase as the most effective starting point. Thus, researchers in both traditions have targeted the schizophrenia prodrome as the most likely gateway to prevention. However, clashes between the two traditions in approaches, methodology and research goals have also led to considerable controversy. Such issues as how best to define the prodrome, what the actual risk for schizophrenia is among prodromal individuals, and what type of medication should be used remain largely unresolved. The Hillside Recognition and Prevention (RAP) Program has been designed to address many of these and related questions. Within a naturalistic treatment framework, the RAP program combines both high-risk and treatment research strategies. Preliminary findings from a 3-year RAP pilot study, for example, suggest that the prodrome is a developmentally complex phase of schizophrenia, that it consists of distinctly different subgroups and that novel anti-psychotics are clearly beneficial for some but not all individuals. Depending upon clinical characteristics and phase of the prodrome, anti-depressants also appear highly effective.

Update and recommendations for the use of antipsychotics in early-onset psychoses

A review was undertaken of studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic medications for the management of psychosis in children and adolescents. All identified published and unpublished studies from 1996 onward were included for review. The search located one randomized control trial, seven open-label trials, six retrospective chart reviews, and nine case reports. The studies assessed the use of haloperidol, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine in the management of psychosis in children and adolescents. Most studies reported reasonable treatment response; however, extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, and weight gain are concerning. This points to the need for appropriate baseline assessments prior to initiating treatment with these agents. Particular attention should be given to assessment of the extrapyramidal system as well as to baseline weight, lipid profile, and blood glucose. Further study is needed to refine the use of antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents in order to minimize adverse effects while conferring an optimum therapeutic response. The importance of instituting effective early treatment in youth with psychoses is an important goal that may serve to lessen the long-term morbidity of the illness.

The schizophrenia prodrome: promise for prevention

Converging theoretical, psychopharmacological, neurodevelopmental advances have led to increasing interest in preventive intervention in schizophrenia. In particular, evidence suggests that early treatment is associated with a better prognosis. Furthermore, based on the reported reduction in severe side effects, the new novel antipsychotics potentially provide the tools for early intervention. Nevertheless, initiation of intervention during the prodrome has become controversial because of such unresolved issues as: (i) how to accurately identify susceptible individuals who are in true need of preventive intervention; (ii) at what developmental point in the prodrome medication should be initiated; (iii) how long medication should be continued; and (iv) what medication is optimal for each phase of the prodrome. By adopting a naturalistic, prospective research strategy, the Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program now underway in New York has been designed to address these and other important questions involved in prodromal research and treatment.

Treatment of childhood-onset schizophrenia with olanzapine

This paper reports on a clinical observation of 15 hospitalized youths ages 6-13 years diagnosed with childhood-onset schizophrenia and acutely treated with olanzapine. Initial sedation was the most common side effect observed. Youngsters who had not had a previous trial on any psychotropic did better than those that had failed a previous medication trial. Age was inversely correlated with positive response to olanzapine. Patients who experienced initial sedation did best once the initial sedation wore off. The majority of patients in the study improved on olanzapine.

Update on childhood-onset schizophrenia

Updated findings from the ongoing National Institute of Mental Health Child Psychiatry Branch longitudinal study of childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) are presented, along with replications from collaborators at other sites. Clinical and neurobiologic continuities of COS with poor-outcome adult-onset schizophrenia suggests that their underlying pathophysiology is the same. However, these early-onset cases appear to have more striking genetic contributions to their etiology. Updated findings involve risk factors (birth complications, cytogenic abnormalities, early language and motor problems, and familial psychopathology), treatment trials, and brain magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Inpatient treatment of severe disruptive behaviour disorders with risperidone and milieu therapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic impact of adding risperidone to milieu therapy of latency-aged inpatients with severe disruptive disorders.

METHODS

The charts of 90 latency-aged patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatry ward were reviewed retrospectively. Fifteen of these patients received risperidone treatment, were nonpsychotic, and did not suffer from pervasive developmental disorder (12 male, 3 female; mean age 9.99 years, SD 1.76). Their scores on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were compared at admission, before risperidone treatment, and at discharge.

RESULTS

All subjects were diagnosed with a disruptive behavioural disorder. Ten (66.67%) had additional learning difficulties, and 13 (86.7%) had pathological personality traits. The characteristics of the sample suggested borderline pathology or multiple complex developmental disorder. Following a mean of 38 days after admission (SD 22.3), the patients received risperidone for a mean of 46 days (SD 28.2) before being discharged. The mean maintenance dose of risperidone was 1.27 mg daily (SD 0.36). Mean CGAS scores increased from admission (21.9, SD 7.0) to before risperidone treatment (26.8, SD 7.6, P < 0.0001) and to discharge (50.3, SD 5.3, P < 0.0001). Only 2 patients had documented side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose risperidone used adjunctively to milieu therapy led to statistically and clinically significant additional improvement in the functioning of hospitalized latency-aged children with severe behavioural disorders. Low-dose risperidone is a safe and effective adjunct to milieu therapy for treating this population in inpatient settings. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.